Scribd
Upload
229 views6 pages

APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University CET Campus, Thiruvananthapuram Kerala - 695016 India Academic Audit Report 2015 - 2016

1. The document is an academic audit report from 2015-2016 for St. Thomas College of Engineering and Technology conducted by auditor K M PEETHAMBARAN. 2. Several aspects of the college's academic programs and facilities were rated including compliance to the academic calendar, functioning of student committees, student feedback, and faculty to student ratios. 3. Areas in need of improvement included conducting tutorial classes, use of ICT in teaching, and holding remedial classes, while student attendance, syllabus coverage, and infrastructure received higher ratings. The principal outlined responses to address issues raised.

Uploaded by

Joseph John
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
229 views6 pages

APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University CET Campus, Thiruvananthapuram Kerala - 695016 India Academic Audit Report 2015 - 2016

1. The document is an academic audit report from 2015-2016 for St. Thomas College of Engineering and Technology conducted by auditor K M PEETHAMBARAN. 2. Several aspects of the college's academic programs and facilities were rated including compliance to the academic calendar, functioning of student committees, student feedback, and faculty to student ratios. 3. Areas in need of improvement included conducting tutorial classes, use of ICT in teaching, and holding remedial classes, while student attendance, syllabus coverage, and infrastructure received higher ratings. The principal outlined responses to address issues raised.

Uploaded by

Joseph John
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University

CET Campus, Thiruvananthapuram


Kerala -695016
India
Academic Audit Report
2015 - 2016

Basic Details
Institution

St.Thomas College of Engineering and Technology

Auditor Name

K M PEETHAMBARAN

Visit

First

Semester Type

Odd

Assessment

Key Aspects

Rating

Auditor Remarks

Compliance to the
Good(4)
Academic Calendar of KTU

Principal's Response
Will continue with
complying to KTU
Calender.

Functioning of students
grievances and appeal
committee

Good(4)

Will take a very serious


approach in terms of
gathering students
grievances and solving
them on a need to need
basis through this
committee.

Functioning of Academic
Discipline & Welfare
committee

Good(4)

Will continue to put in place


a very disciplined
atmosphere.

Student feedback on cocurricular and


extracurricular activities

Fair(3)

No co-curricular activities

Will implement extra


curricular activities.

1.39

Will maintain the same ratio


henceforth.

Average student to faculty Excellent(5)


ratio index

B.Tech
No of B.TechStudents

153

Page No: 1

CIVIL ENGINEERING

Key Aspects

Rating

Auditor Remarks

Principal's Response

No tutorial logbook

Class duration of 1 hour


each has been shortened to
50 minutes each thereby
creating an hour of Tutorial
every working day in the
process. Tutorial log book
and attendance has been
implemented across all
subjects.

All classes are to be made


smart

Will implement the


recommendation.

Lab series exam not


conducted

Has already put in place a


timetable to conduct the
same.

Functioning of class/course Good(4)


committees
Schedule of Time Table

Good(4)

Attendance of students

Excellent(5)

Quantity & Quality of


Good(4)
Assignments/Mini Projects
Conduct of Tutorial Classes Poor(2)

Syllabus coverage as per


course plan

Good(4)

Use of ICT enabled


Fair(3)
teaching & Digital courses
Conduct of Practical
classes

Good(4)

Syllabus coverage of
practical courses

Good(4)

Evaluation of students
performance in practical
classes

Fair(3)

Conduct of
remedial/bridge classes

Very Poor(1)

Maintenance of course
diary

Good(4)

Student feedback on
curriculum coverage

Good(4)

Student feedback on
infrastructural facilities

Good(4)

Not started. No register.


Remedial classes in
(Bridge course conducted) progress after analysing the
performance of weak
students.

Page No: 2

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

Key Aspects

Rating

Auditor Remarks

Principal's Response

No tutorial logbook

Class duration of 1 hour


each has been shortened to
50 minutes each thereby
creating an hour of Tutorial
every working day in the
process. Tutorial log book
and attendance has been
implemented across all
subjects.

All classes are to be made


smart

Will implement the


recommendation.

lab series exam not


conducted

Has already put in place a


timetable to conduct the
same.

Functioning of class/course Good(4)


committees
Schedule of Time Table

Good(4)

Attendance of students

Excellent(5)

Quantity & Quality of


Good(4)
Assignments/Mini Projects
Conduct of Tutorial Classes Poor(2)

Syllabus coverage as per


course plan

Good(4)

Use of ICT enabled


Fair(3)
teaching & Digital courses
Conduct of Practical
classes

Good(4)

Syllabus coverage of
practical courses

Good(4)

Evaluation of students
performance in practical
classes

Fair(3)

Conduct of
remedial/bridge classes

Very Poor(1)

Maintenance of course
diary

Good(4)

Student feedback on
curriculum coverage

Good(4)

Student feedback on
infrastructural facilities

Good(4)

Not started. No Register.


Remedial classes in
(Bridge course conducted) progress after analysing the
performance of weak
students.

Page No: 3

ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGG

Key Aspects

Rating

Auditor Remarks

Principal's Response

No tutorial logbook

Class duration of 1 hour


each has been shortened to
50 minutes each thereby
creating an hour of Tutorial
every working day in the
process. Tutorial log book
and attendance has been
implemented across all
subjects.

All classes are to be made


smart

Will implement the


recommendation.

lab series exam not


conducted

Has already put in place a


timetable to conduct the
same.

Functioning of class/course Good(4)


committees
Schedule of Time Table

Good(4)

Attendance of students

Excellent(5)

Quantity & Quality of


Good(4)
Assignments/Mini Projects
Conduct of Tutorial Classes Poor(2)

Syllabus coverage as per


course plan

Good(4)

Use of ICT enabled


Fair(3)
teaching & Digital courses
Conduct of Practical
classes

Good(4)

Syllabus coverage of
practical courses

Good(4)

Evaluation of students
performance in practical
classes

Fair(3)

Conduct of
remedial/bridge classes

Very Poor(1)

Maintenance of course
diary

Good(4)

Student feedback on
curriculum coverage

Good(4)

Student feedback on
infrastructural facilities

Good(4)

Not started. No Register.


Remedial classes in
(Bridge course conducted) progress after analysing the
performance of weak
students.

Page No: 4

COMPUTER SCIENCE &


ENGINEERING

Key Aspects

Rating

Auditor Remarks

Principal's Response

No tutorial logbook

Class duration of 1 hour


each has been shortened to
50 minutes each thereby
creating an hour of Tutorial
every working day in the
process. Tutorial log book
and attendance has been
implemented across all
subjects.

All classes are to be made


smart

Will implement the


recommendation.

Lab series exam not


conducted

Has already put in place a


timetable to conduct the
same.

Functioning of class/course Good(4)


committees
Schedule of Time Table

Good(4)

Attendance of students

Excellent(5)

Quantity & Quality of


Good(4)
Assignments/Mini Projects
Conduct of Tutorial Classes Poor(2)

Syllabus coverage as per


course plan

Good(4)

Use of ICT enabled


Fair(3)
teaching & Digital courses
Conduct of Practical
classes

Good(4)

Syllabus coverage of
practical courses

Good(4)

Evaluation of students
performance in practical
classes

Fair(3)

Conduct of
remedial/bridge classes

Very Poor(1)

Maintenance of course
diary

Good(4)

Student feedback on
curriculum coverage

Good(4)

Not started. No Register.


Remedial classes in
(Bridge course conducted) progress after analysing the
performance of weak
students.

Page No: 5

Student feedback on
infrastructural facilities

Good(4)

Page No: 6

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy