Formation Damage Caused Cement Filtrates in Sandstone Cores
Formation Damage Caused Cement Filtrates in Sandstone Cores
Formation Damage Caused Cement Filtrates in Sandstone Cores
Summa". A series of core damage experiments was conducted with filtrates containing various cement additives, such as dispersants and fluid-loss additives. Results clearly show that the extent and location of the permeability impairment varies, depending on'
the relative rate of particle precipitation and the residence time in the core. Results of the core-flow experiments are interpreted in
conjunction with particle-size distribution and concentration results obtained in batch experiments. Variations in the average particle
size and the number concentration of particles with time in various compositions of cement filtrates are reported. These prove to be
useful indicators of the extent and location of the damage observed in the cores.
Introduction
Several factors motivate the study of the possible damage that cement filtrates can cause in the near-wellbore region. The cement
filtrate has a very high pH (> 12) and a high concentration of divalent ions. The high pH tends to cause clay and fines to be released
and to migrate into pore throats, where they cause damage. On the
other hand, the high concentration of divalent cations (mainly
Ca2+ and Mg2+) prevents fines movement and actually "cements" the fines in place. Which effect will predominate is not
evident.
In addition to the physicochemical effects, chemical reactions between the high~pH filtrate and the silica grains may result in the
precipitation of calcium silicate hydrate. This probably will not be
a major cause of damage because the reaction and precipitation processes are slow.
A potential source of damage that is probably the greatest cause
for concern is the precipitation of insoluble salts (e.g., CaC0 3 and
CaS04) in the formation. Salts can cause damage in a region beyond the perforation depths that may be very significant, depending on the quantity of precipitate. The work reported here
investigates this possibility in depth. Most research on cement fIltration has focused on hole stability, flow properties of the cement
slurry, "flash setting," and cement quality in the annular space
between casing and wellbore. Few papers have been published on
the possible effects of cement filtrate coming into contact with the
reservoir rock and fluids. The extent and mechanisms of the damage
are not very clear. Even the basic conclusions from past publications have been somewhat contradictory. 1-3
Cunningham and Smith 1 investigated the components of cement
filtrates (Table I) and their influence on formation permeability.
Their results indicated little permeability damage resulting from
clay swelling and migration and lime/silicate reaction caused by
cement filtrate. They concluded that the low lime content of the
cement filtrate and the limited ability of filtrate to pass from the
slurry to the formation restrict damage from the lime/silicate reaction. Krueger 2 also found no appreciable permeability changes in
Berea sandstone cores exposed to cement fIltrate. However, growth
oflarge 'calcium carbonate or calcium sulfate crystals in pore openings and other fines on the pore wall were shown by a scanningelectron-microscope (SEM) photomicrograph of a core invaded by
cement filtrate. Smith et al., 3 however, found serious brine permeability reduction from 60 to 90% in cores from various formations after the cores had been invaded by cement filtrate. They
postulated two mechanisms that could cause damage due to cement
filtrates: fine solids removed from the rock matrix and lime/silicate reaction.
The cement filirate, which penetrates into permeability formations under the high differential pressure between the annular space
and the formation, has ionic components related to the chemical
components of the cement and the hydration reactions. The major
constituents in the aqueous phase in contact with hydrating cement
are calcium silicates (Ca 2 + , OH-), calcium aluminates [Ca2+ ,
Al(OH) 4'1, calcium sulfates (Ca2+, SOf-), calcium carCopyright t 991 Society of Petroleum Engineers
Experimental
Particle-Size-Distribution Measurements. Class H cement is used
in the tests and mixed separately with one or two additives in a
water/cement ratio of 0.5 to form nine different cement slurries
(Table 2).
An instrument that has a laser-based sensor, particle counter, and
tank sampler for particle-size measurements in liquids is used in
the tests. The instrument can acquire particle number data in a 25mL test sample in six particle-size ranges from 0.5 to 25 I'm. In
our tests, the size ranges are set to be 1.1, 2.02, 5.1, 10, 20, and
25.7 I'm. The concentration of particles in the sample must be well
above 3,000 counts/mL to obtain data with low coincidence error.
The cement filtrate gathered frQm an API fIlter press has a particle concentration much higher than 3,000 counts/mL, and particles continuously precipitate from it. The instrument cannot directly
measure the particle-size distribution in the cement filtrate because
of the high concentration of particles. Before the te,st is started, a
saturated CaC0 3 solution is made up to dilute the cement filtrate
and to suspend the CaC0 3 particles crystallized from the filtrate
without any dissolution during particle-size measurement. Before
use, the saturated CaC0 3 solution is filtered several times to remove undissolved CaC0 3 and other particles.
After the cement slurry is blended for 5 minutes in a 0.5 water/cement ratio, the filtrate is gathered from the API filter press under
lOO-psi pressure. Immediately, 0.25 mL of the filtrate is put into
125 mL of CaC03 solution (0.2 % concentration) and the particle399
Salt
(%)
Specific
Gravity
pH
0
5
10
18
Saturated
1.008
1.048
1.080
1.121
1.206
12.6
12.1
12.0
11.8
11.6
168
180
168
180
174
860
1,685
2,060
1,675
650
0
0
0
0
105
SO~
CI-
4,950
7,000
9,600
8,400
7,400
20
31,250
59,750
105,500
185,000
Composition
Cement + fresh water
Cement + cellulose-based filtrate
Cement + synthetic polymer filtrate-control additive
Cement + synthetic polymer dispersant additive
Cement + lignin retarder Additive 1
Cement + lignin retarder Additive 2
Cement + organic acid Dispersant 1
Cement + organic acid Dispersant 2
Cement + cellulose + lignin Retarder 1
to confining pressure
Fig. 1-Schematlc of equipment used: 1-API filter press; 2metering pump; 3-pressure transducers; 4-core holder.
size distribution is measured. At the same time, the rest of the fIltrate
is continuously stirred to simulate continuous flow. Particle-size
distributions of the filtrate particles suspended in CaC0 3 solution
at some known ratio are measured at different stirring times (10,
20, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes).
From the tests, the number of particles in six particle-size ranges
and the cumulative number of all particles in the cement filtrate
can be obtained as a function of time. All tests were d~ne at room
temperature.
Permeability-Reduction Measurements. Test Device. The test
device (Fig. 1) consists of an API filter press, a core holder, and
a set of pressure transducers and demodulators to monitor the permeability across different sections of the core. If cement fIltrate
is injected into the core by a pump, the fluid filtrate sits in an accumulator for a long time while nucleation, precipitation, and other
reactions are taking place. This will almost certainly affect the results of permeability measurements. In our device, the filter press
is connected to the core holder so that the cement filtrate can directly
enter the core under a constant pressure with minimal delay. This
closely simulates the process of filtration in a wellbore. Three pressure transducers are placed along the length of the core holder to
monitor the pressure changes in three sections of the core. As a
result, we can observe the particle formation in the core and the
resulting permeability damage during the entire test.
400
Concentration
(%)
Viscosity at 74F
(cp)
1
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.09
3.33
6.87
1.12
1.18
1.12
1.12
1.10
2.99
!C
a:
...
oJ
10 7
10 7
oJ
:IE
~
:i
::;)
10
lOS
il:
10
I!!I
oJ
NO STIRRING
10MIN.
20 MIN.
30 MIN.
SO MIN.
120 MIN.
180MIN.
105
10 4
.5
10 3
E
~
18
10 2
NO STIRRING
10 MIN.
20 MIN.
30 MIN .
60 MIN
120 MIN.
lS0MIN.
10 1
~
a:
10 0
...
C
1.1
5.1
2.02
(0)
1.1
25.S
20.0
10.0
(a)
.,...
3.5
3.0
2.5
1.5
..
2.4
I!
2.2
,..'"
m~
200
100
(b)
1 00
Time min.
(b)
4~----------~--------~
150
200
Tim. min.
...------------r---------~..,
3+-----------t-------~_1
2+-----------t------r--_1
8c:
2.0
1.S
...:
",---
1.0
25.6
I! 2.0
20
I'm
""
4.0
""
10
E 2.S
4.5
5.1
Partlcl. Siz.
2.S
5.0
2.02
100
(c)
...:
200
100 +------+----~-_l
50+--------4-~~----_l
Time min.
Time min.
20,--..,------,---
Kl change
..
200
100
(c)
K2 change
K3 change
'"
c:
c:
~
z:
-20
I)
:;;
:;;
....
-st---j~~~~ft-~r---~~~~f-~~------l
-80+---j-----4-~~~-4-------}.~~------_4
...
E
Sackflush
300
200
100
(d)
Time
400
min.
40 +---I-I---''''l--\
200
400
(d) Time
sao
soo
min.
401
10 7
10 6
E
.E
105
10 4
10 3
z"
w
....
10 6
105
<
II:
NO STIRRING
10MIN.
20 MIN.
30 MIN.
80 MIN.
120 MIN.
180 MIN.
iL
....
:2
10 4
10 3
:Ii
~
10 2
10 1
w
....
(,)
10 1
10 0
>=
II:
10 2
1.1
2.02
(0)
5.1
10
20
Partlcl. Size
3.0
"-
2.S
r.. m//
<
NO STIRRING
10 MIN.
20 MIN .
30MIN.
80 MIN.
120 MIN.
180 MIN.
10 0
<
Do.
25.6
5.1
2.02
1.1
(0)
I'm
10.0
20.0
25.6
4.0
./
E
Q
~ 3.5
..
~
~ 2.0
>
2.4
3.0
:: 2.5
2.6
.-/
1.5
1.0
2.2
0
(b)
200
100
100
(b)
Time min.
200
Time min.
15
200
.c
10
100
(,)
0
0
100
(c)
200
(c)
200
Tim. min.
20
~
....
...c
Oi
z:
Brln.
0
-20
-40
co
-60
Do.
-so
z:
(,)
(,)
...
100
Time min.
100
~
:::;;
:;;
..
E
Do.
Kl change
K2change
K3change
-100
-100
0
100
200
300
(d)
400
Time min.
500
600
100
300
200
(d)
400
Time min.
to 5 x 10 5 . The increase in Cp indicates that a large number of particles still precipitate from the filtrate. On the other hand, the particles that adsorb polymeric molecules are easily coagulated by
collision between themselves during stirring to form aggregates.
In the permeability test, all the filtrate effective permeabilities
in each section are lower than the original brine permeabilities during
cellulose filtrate penetration and continuously decline. No obvious
indication can be found for the section in which the particles prefer to precipitate and deposit because all three permeabilities are
reduced in the same manner. A 0.68- to 0.3-mLlrnin filtrate flow
rate is used in the test so that the filtrate can pass through the whole
core in about 20 to 40 minutes. A longer residence time may have
caused addition damage judging from the particle-size and concentration results.
After 4 PV of brine injection at 0.25 mL/rnin, Section 3 has the
most serious damage (-96 %) while k 1 and k2 have the same
degree of damage (-63 to -69%). Therefore, it is clear that more
serious particle damage does occur in the downstream sections of
the core. This situation remains the same after the flow rate is increased to 0.5 mL/min. kl and k2 recover slightly as more filtrate
is removed from the core. After 4 PV of reverse brine injection,
Section 3 still has the most serious damage and Section 1 is only
slightly damaged.
section are substantially reduced, especially in the input and output sections. After 3.5 PV of reverse brine injection, the change
in k 1 turns to a positive value, which indicates that damage had
been caused by the formation of an external filter cake of particles. However, the change in k3 is -62%. This clearly demonstrates the ability of precipitated solids to cause irreversible damage
deep in the formation. It is difficult to conjecture what would occur
beyond the 5-in. core length used here. It would certainly be a complex function of the flow and precipitation rates.
Filtrates With Fluid-Loss Additives. Two kinds of fluid-loss additives are used in our tests: a cellulose derivative and a synthetic
polymer. Each has a different effect on the precipitation process.
Figs. 3 and 4 show the results from these two filtrates.
Particle precipitation is very high for the cellulose filtrate. nc remains in the 10 6 range. Cp increases from 10 to 50 mg/L and d
remains between 2 and 3 /lm. The number of particles in each size
range rapidly increases so that nc increases to more than 10 6 . The
addition of this cellulose additive results in precipitated particle concentrations at least 10 times higher than those for the pure cement.
The synthetic polymer behaves similarly, although far fewer particles are precipitated. As the fIltrate is stirred, nc rapidly increases
402
10 6
105
10 4
10min.
20 min.
30
min.
~
E
~
=
E
:>
10 3
10 2
l-
f--
t---
10 1
l-
f--
t---
;:
0..
..
105
No Stirring
10 4
GO min
.5
10 3
120 min
E
:>
10 2
180 min.
NO STIRRING
10MIN.
20 MIN.
~ 30 MIN.
EI
60MIN.
120 MIN.
180 MIN
10 1
10 0
10 0
1.12.025.1
(a)
!!
>
Particle Size
2.02
(a)
I'm
~ 5
....
.
c
1.1
2025.6
5.1
10
20
Particle Size
25.6
I'm
5.0
10
4.5
..............
-.........
3.5
!! 2.5
4.0
~ 3.0
"
~ 2.0
~.--
1.5
1.0
100
(b)
10
.. 8
E
6
200
(b)
...
'"
.2
100
(c)
200
200
.f
o
100
Time min.
Time min.
~
0
Time min.
(c)
laO
Time mig.
200
20
40~--~---r--------
--r----~---r---r------_,
Brine
11-
'"~
.c
u
20
Backflu.h
t----t~IiI~~-;::::j;;pr----r_---I-
Kl change
K2change
K3 change
O~--~~~-+----~~d.----r----I
11-
'"
0:
m -40
"~
i-~+---~--~----~~~~--~~".r--;-------~
0..
100
300
200
(d)
Time
20
~
:g
~-2O+----t---t--~---i--;-~-it---~~~~----~
:;
li
.c
400
SOD
min.
60
Brine
80
0
100
(d)
200
Time min.
300
400
The synthetic polymer f1l.trate causes less damage to core permeability than the cellulose filtrate. However, the damage is more
severe than with pure cement. The cellulose f1l.trate causes serious
permeability damage deep in the formation. In the synthetic polymer f1l.trate test, the most serious permeability damage takes place
in the inlet section. We can conclude that the f1l.trate can form aggregates in the early stages of f1l.tration, thus forming an internal
f1l.ter cake in the first section of the core to block most of the flowing area.
After 5 PV of brine injection, kl drops 98%, k3 71 %, and k2
35%. k3 remains unchanged when the flow rate rises from 0.5 to
1 mL/min. But k2 and k3 have some degree of recovery, perhaps
as a result of particle dissolution of the precipitate and of the removal
of any excess adsorbed polymer. After 6 PV of reverse brine injection at 1 mL/min, the internal f1l.ter cake is partially removed
so that kl changes to -60%, while k2 drops to -42%.
the concentration of particles increasing to 12 mg/L. This is significantly smaller than the quantity of precipitate obtained with the
f1l.trate-Ioss-control additives. As such, the permeability reduction
is also less severe.
After 5 PV of brine injection, the permeability for each section
after the f1l.trate treatment is not significantly reduced, although the
fIltrate permeabilities for the first ana third sections show some smaIl
reduction. Also, increasing the flow rate and changing the flow
direction have no apparent effect on the brine permeabilities.
Figs. 6 and 7 show the results of the lignin derivatives and
f1l.trates. Both dispersant additives can increase the setting time of
a cement slurry. The lignin derivative causes a small number of
large precipitate particles to form quickly (d=5 ILm). This causes
the permeability in the most upstream section to be reduced most
significantly. Subsequent flow with brine causes some of these particles to dissolve partially and plug up flow channels farther downstream. Backflushing restores the permeability of each section to
~20% reduction.
The other lignin derivative used behaves similarly. The average
particle size here, however, is substantially smaller (d=2.5 ILm).
The permeability of Section 1 is reduced the most but is completely restored after flowing brine and backflushing (Fig. 7).
Figs. 8 and 9 show the results of two organic acid filtrates. It
can be seen that these additives somewhat restrained particle precipitation. As a result, the brine permeabilities of each section after
403
10 6
W
0-
lOS
10 4
.:
10 3
10 2
'0
I---
fH
'
II
10
'"
!:i
a:
NO STIRRING
10MIN.
20 MIN.
30 MIN.
60MIN.
120 MIN.
180 MIN
lOS
G:
::I
10
!:
10 3
:i
:)
z
10 2
....
(,)
t---
....
10 1
j:
a:
10 0
1.1
2.02
(a)
5.1
10
Particle Size
20
10 0
'"...
25.6
1.1
'" 4.0
2.5
'" 2.0
1.5
f 3.5
3.0
=2.5
.."....-
..
./
'" 2.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
100
Time min.
(b)
200
100
(b)
200
Time min.
12
15
'ij,
U.
E 10
:
c
10
6
4
0
0
(c)
100
Time min.
200
"'"
./
-----
100
(c)
200
Time min.
200;-----~---r------~_r--------_,--------~
20
Brlna
#
0
cco
20
(,)
.c:
.c:
25.6
e 3.0
f!
...
.,m
5.0
'" 4.0
3.5
:ii
20.0
E 4.5
(,)
10.0
PARTICLE SIZE
(a)
5.0
cco
5.1
2.02
.,m
E 4.5
NOSTR'IING
10MIN.
20 MIN.
30 MIN.
60 MIN.
120 MIN.
180 MIN.
100
Cement
Filtrate
Brine
Backfluah
40
Kl change
K2change
60
K3 change
Brine
-80
0
100
200
300
400
500
:ii
...
-100 +---~-'---+----~-'--+----~----1----~----t
o
100
200
400
300
(d)
Time min.
with brine postflushes. But because CaC03 has a very small solubility even at neutral pH values, it will require a very large number of PV's before it can be completely redissolved.
The effect of temperature can be estimated by noting that the solubility of CaC0 3 decreases from 0.85 giL at 77F (the temperature at which our experiments were conducted) to 0.4 giL at
122P.5 Therefore, precipitate formation may be a more severe
problem at higher temperatures.
The extent and location of the permeability impairment depend
on the quantity of precipitate and on the ratio of the precipitation
rate to the convection rate. The most likely mechanism of precipitate formation is heterogeneous nucleation on colloidal mineral
nuclei that have a low energy barrier to surface diffusion and strongly adsorbing active sites. Unfortunately, the process of heterogeneous nucleation and precipitation is very complex and only
qualitative statements can be made about the kinetics of precipitation. The precipitation rate is in general proportional to the number of nucleation sites and to the square of the degree of
supersaturation (for calcium carbonate, calcium hydroxide, and calcium sulfate) and is strongly affected by the rate of fluid convection and the presence of small quantities of adsorbing impurities. 6
At this time, it is not feasible to make any predictions about the
precipitation rates for the different cement filtrates considered.
404
j;:
10 6
10 4
.E
10 3
Ii
z"
Authors
10 5
EI
10 2
NO STIRRING
10MIN.
20 MIN
30 MIN .
60 MIN .
120 MIN .
180 MIN
10 1
100
2 . 02
11
5.1
25
20
10
Particle Size
(0)
~m
5.0
r--'
4.5
4.0
::1..
3 .5
Conclusions
3.0
c.
2.5
.:
2.0
:~
1.5
1.0
200
100
(b)
Time min.
14
;{
0. 12
,/
E 10
C
e
o
o
8
6
--6
.",
/'"
- - ----
r-
100
(e)
.'"
20 0
Time min.
20~--'--r------r--
t:
~ 20 +-----t'l:u:~_.::_-t__
:;;
.40
+-__+-+..:::o..___
--"~
60+---~-+---~~~~d+---+-+~-~---~
4--+______~--~4J~~_+~~~~~--~
G 1___
Q. 80 +
10 0
20 0
(d)
400
300
Time min .
5 00
600
Results have been reported for two groups of experiments: particlesize-distribution measurements in different cement fIltrates as a function of stirring time and permeability-damage measurements on
Berea sandstone cores penetrated by these filtrates. From the results presented here, it is evident that the ratio of the precipitation
rate to the fluid convection rate is an important factor that controls
the extent of permeability damage. Some correlation can be seen
between the precipitation rates measured in the particle-count experiments and the permeability-reduction experiments. For example, fIltrates with fast precipitation rates tend to damage the upstream
end ofthe core, whereas filtrates with slow precipitation rates tend
either not to plug the core at all or to reduce the permeability of
the downstream cores first. Additives also influence the quantity
of the precipitate and, therefore, the permeability reduction. For
example, the addition of a lignin derivative or a synthetic polymer
reduces the quantity of precipitate and causes less damage in the
core. Addition of a cellulose derivative, however, increases the
quantity of precipitate by an order of magnitude . It is probably erroneous to make conclusions about formation damage caused by
cement filtrates when short cores (1 in. long) are used. Indeed, further research is required into experimentally and theoretically accounting for the characteristic time for precipitation and the
residence time in the core.
Acknowledgment
We express our appreciation to Jiao Di at the U. of Texas for help
with the experiments and with the preparation of the manuscript.
Reference.
I. Cunningham, W.C. and Smith, D.K.: " Effect of Salt Cement Filtrate
on Subsurface Formations," JPT (March 1968) 259-64.
2. Krueger, R. F.: "An Overview of Formation Damage and Well Productivity in Oilfield Operations," JPT (Feb. 1986) 132-52.
3. Smith, C.S., Ross, W.M. , and Hendrickson, A.R.: "Hydrofluoric Acid
Stimulation-Development for Field Applications," paper SPE 1284
presented at the 1965 SPE Annual Meeting, Denver, Oct. 3-6.
4 . Adams , N.J. and Charrier, T. : Drilling Engineering (1985) .
5. Ellis, A.J.: "The Solubility of Calcite in Sodium Chloride Solutions at
High Temperatures," Am. J. Sci. (1963) 261, 259.
6. Walton, A.G.: The Formation and Properties of Precipitates (1967).
'Sexact.
C
m3
cm
kg
SPEPE
Original SPE manuscript received lor review AprM 26, 1989. Paper (SPE 19305) accepted
lor publication March 13, 1991 . Revised manuscript received Feb. 15, 1991.
405