12.VIJAY Research Article
12.VIJAY Research Article
12.VIJAY Research Article
V.Vijay Kumar et al
ISSN 2349-7750
ISSN: 2349-7750
PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Available online at: http://www.iajps.com
Research Article
Corresponding Author:
V. Vijay Kumar,
Department of Pharmacology,
Nalanda Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Kantepudi, Sattenapalli, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-Mail: vijay127@gmail.com
QR code
Please cite this article in press as V.Vijay Kumar et al, Evaluation of Hypo Lipidemic and Antioxident
Properties of Methanolic Extract of Leaves of Ruelliatuberosa Linn on Mithionine and Triton Induced
Models in Wister Albino Rats, Indo Am. J. Pharm. Sci, 2016; 3(5).
www.iajps.com
Page 462
V.Vijay Kumar et al
ISSN 2349-7750
Fig 1: Schematic diagram of cholesterol transport in the tissues, with sites of action of the main drugs
affecting lipoprotein metabolism
www.iajps.com
Page 463
V.Vijay Kumar et al
ISSN 2349-7750
Synonyms
Problems
Labs
description
Treatment
Burger-gruetz syndrome,
Primary Hyperlipoproteinemia, or
Familial
Hyperchylomicronemia
Decreased
lipoprotein lipase
(LPL) or altered
Apo
Elevated
chylomicrons
Diet control
Type II a
Polygenic hypercholesterolemia or
Familial hypercholesterolemia
LDL receptor
deficiency
Elevated LDL
only
Bile Acid,
sequestrants,
statins, niacin
Type II b
Combined hyperlipidemia
Decreased LDL
receptor and
Increased Apo-B
Defect in Apo-E
synthesis
Increased VLDL
production and
Decreased
elimination
Increased VLDL
production and
decreased LPL
Elevated LDL,
VLDL and
Triglycerides
Statins, Niacin
Gemfibrozil
increased IDL
Drug of choice
Gemfebrozil
Increased VLDL
Drug of choice
Niacin
Increased LDL
and
chylomicrons
Niacin
Gemfebrozil
Type I
Familial Dysbetalipoproteinemia
Type III
Type IV
Endogenous Hyperlipidemia
Type V
Familial hypertriglyceridemia
Coriandrum sativum
Umbelliferae
Leaves, Seeds
Trichila connaroids
Curcuma longa
Nardostachys jatamansi
Meliaceae
Zingiberaceae
Valerianaceae
Leaves
Tuber
Whole Plant
Achyranthus aspera
Fabaceae
Aerial Parts
Cassia tora
Caesalpiniaceae
Seeds
Phaseolus aconitifolius
Fabaceae
Seeds
Pterocarpus marsupium
Adenocalymma alliaceum
Fabaceae
Bignoniaceae
Heart wood
Flower
Phyllanthus niruri
Euphorbiaceae
Whole plant
Terminalia arjuna
Arinica montana
Inula racemosa
Averrhoa bilimbi
Acacia polyantha
Combretaceae
Compositae
Arteraceae
Oxalidaceae.
Mimosaceae
Zingiberaceae
Bark
Flower
Root
Fruit
Heartwood
Synonyms
Coriander plant,
Chinese parsley,
Gagnep.
Haldi, turmeric
Indianspikenard, Jataamaansii
Burweed
Chaff-flower
Sickle pod
moth bean,
Vigna aconitifolia
Malabar Kino, Benga
Wild garlic,
Stonebreaker
Nela Nelli
Arjuna, vellamatta
Mountain flower
Pushkara, Pushkaramola
Cucumber tree
White cutch tree
Rhizomes
Convolvulacaae
Caesalpiniaceae
Ranunculaceae
Root
Leaves ,seeds
Root
Elephant creeper
Caksu bankullthi
Nirbisi
Alpinia galangal
Argyreia nervosa
Cassia absuslinn
Delphinium denudatum
www.iajps.com
Family
Part
Page 464
V.Vijay Kumar et al
ISSN 2349-7750
Phytochemical constituents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Carbohydrates
Alkaloids
Steroids & sterols
Glycosides
Saponins
Flavanoids
Tannins
Proteins & amino acids
Phenols
Terpenoids
+ve
+ve
+ve
+ve
+ve
+ve
+ve
+ve
+ve
-ve
www.iajps.com
Page 465
V.Vijay Kumar et al
ISSN 2349-7750
Head
Response
Body
Tail
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Alertness
Grooming
Touch response
Torch response
Pain response
Tremors
Convulsion
Righting reflux
Gripping strength
Pinna reflux
Corneal reflux
Writhing
Pupils
Before
Normal
Absent
Absent
Normal
Normal
Absent
Absent
Normal
Normal
Present
Present
Absent
Normal
After
Normal
Absent
Absent
Normal
Normal
Absent
Absent
Normal
Normal
Present
Present
Absent
Normal
Before
Normal
Absent
Absent
Normal
Normal
Absent
Absent
Normal
Normal
Present
Present
Absent
Normal
After
Normal
Absent
Absent
Normal
Normal
Absent
Absent
Normal
Normal
Present
Present
Absent
Normal
Before
Normal
Absent
Absent
Normal
Normal
Absent
Absent
Normal
Normal
Present
Present
Absent
Normal
After
Normal
Absent
Absent
Normal
Normal
Absent
Absent
Normal
Normal
Present
Present
Absent
Normal
14
15
Urination
Salivation
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
6
17
Skin colour
Lacrimation
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Table 4: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa lipid profiles in Methionine induced
hyperlipidemic animals.
Group
Dose
(mg/k
g)
Normal control
Saline
(5ml/k
g))
Hyperlipidemic
control
Saline
(5ml/k
g)
TC
(mg/dl)
TG
(mg/dl)
HDL
(mg/dl)
LDL
(mg/dl)
VLDL
(mg/dl)
Atherogenic
index
15 D
59.60
0.99
30 D
82.51
0.34
15 D
30.75
2.52
30 D
119.9
1
0.85
15 D
41.17
0.47
30 D
37.01
0.57
15 D
13.6 1
0.67
30 D
6.33
1.76
15 D
6.27
0.98
30 D
23.87
0.17
15 D
0.20
0.03
30 D
0.50
0.01
96.6
3.80a
113.5
1
0.59a
62.27
1.21a
173.9
0
1.22
36.33
1.48
26.07
0.61
45.79
4.54
a
0.21
0.0
9a
0.84
0.01
12.9
1
0.17a
34.67
0.2a
52.6
0
0.88a
145.0
0
1.52b
53.21
0.68
43.00
1.15
14.12
0.02
b
0.05
0.0
9b
0.52
0.08
9.67
0.08b
29.00
0.3b
131.3
0
0.91
54.67
0.88
41.27
0.73
6.43
1.24
b
0.02
0.0
1b
0.48
0.12
11.6
7
0.0
8ns
26.27
0.17
14.0
0
0.5
7b,g
15.6
7
0.8
8b.h
55.00
0.9
42.63
0.56
24.36
0.15
b
-0.17
0.0
2b
0.50
0.08
7.23
0.3
1b
26.87
0.2a
25.3
3
1.85b
METHANOLIC
EXTRACT OF
TECTONA
GRANDIS
METHANOLIC
EXTRACT OF
TECTONA
GRANDIS
100
Atrovastatin
10
200
56.38
0.88b
84.22
0.52b
,e
,e
47.46
0.5b,f,
82.79
0.91b
,j
47.46
0.59c
54.38
0.90c
b,h
www.iajps.com
74.07
1.71b
94.61
2.56b
34.08
1.6b
134.8
1.08b
Page 466
V.Vijay Kumar et al
150
Normal control
hyperlpidemic control
a
a
mg/dl
100
b
50
ISSN 2349-7750
15
y
da
30
y
da
Days
Fig 2: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa ON TC level in Methonine induced animals.
200
Normal control
a
b
mg/dl
150
Hyperlipidemic control
METG (100 mg/kg)
METG (200 mg/kg)
100
50
15
y
da
30
y
da
Days
Fig 3: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa ON TG level in Methonine induced animals.
60
b
Normal control
b
40
Hyperlipidemic control
METG (100 mg/kg)
mg/dl
20
15
y
da
30
y
da
Days
Fig 4: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa HDL level in Methonine induced animals.
60
Normal control
Hyperlipidemic control
METG (100 mg/kg)
40
mg/dl
b
b
20
b
b
da
y
30
15
da
y
Days
www.iajps.com
Page 467
V.Vijay Kumar et al
ISSN 2349-7750
Fig 5: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa LDL levels in Methonine induced animals.
40
Normal control
a
b
b
mg/dl
30
Hyperlipidemic control
METG(100 mg/kg)
METG(200 mg/kg)
20
10
ns
15
y
da
30
y
da
Days
Fig 6: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa VLDL level in Methonine induced animals
Table 5: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa SGOT level in Methonine induced animals
GROUPS
Control
Hyperlipidic
control
76.33
133.7
Methonalic extract
of
Ruellia tuberosa
100mg/kg
113.0
7.965
5.667
24.00 ns
(n=6)
SGOT(U/L)
Methonalic extract
of
Ruellia tuberosa
200mg/kg
98.67
Atrovastatin
14.67 ns
11.33 ns
10mg/kg
182.7
SGOT
250
U/L
200
150
100
50
va
st
at
in
\k
g
()
g
T
G
at
ro
00
m
g
(1
T
G
(2
00
m
ic
er
lip
id
R
O
yp
O
N
T
C
\k
g
)
GROUPS
Fig 6: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa SGOT level in Methonine induced animals
Table 6: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa in Methonine induced animals SGPT level
GROUPS
Control
HYPERLIPIDIC
MODEL
(n=6)
SGPT(U/L)
Methonalic
extract of
Methonalic extract
of Ruellia
tuberosa
100 mg/kg
Methonalic extract
of Methonalic
extract of Ruellia
tuberosa
74.00
83.33
45.33
200mg/kg
44.00
2.082
6.173a
2.028b
1.155b
Atrovastati
n
10mg/kg
87.33
6.642 ns
Fig 7: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa SGPT level in Methonine induced animals
www.iajps.com
Page 468
V.Vijay Kumar et al
ISSN 2349-7750
SGPT
100
U/L
80
60
40
20
0
)
)
L
el
in
kg
kg
at
od
RO
g/
g\
st
m
NT
c
va
0m
0m
i
O
0
o
0
d
r
1
C
(2
pi
at
G(
G
rli
ET
ET
pe
M
M
hy
GROUPS
Table 7:.Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa Methonine induced animals Creatinine level
GROUPS
Control
HYPERLIPIDIC
MODEL
(n=6)
SGPT(U/L)
Methonalic extract
of Methonalic
extract of Ruellia
tuberosa
100mg/kg
Methonalic extract
of Methonalic
extract of Ruellia
tuberosa
200mg/kg
Atrovastati
n
10mg/kg
0.5333
0.5333
0.6000
0.5333
0.4667
0.03333
0.03333a
0.0 ns
0.03333 ns
0.03333 ns
Fig 8: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberose Creatinine level in Methonine induced animals
CREATININE
0.8
U/L
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
OL
TR
N
O
pe
Hy
el
od
ic
dm
pi
rli
)
kg
g\
0m
10
G(
ET
M
)
kg
g\
m
00
(2
G
ET
ro
At
in
at
st
a
v
GROUPS
Table 8: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa in Methonine induced animals ALP level
GROUPS
(n=6)
ALP(U/L)
www.iajps.com
Control
16.7
3.480
HYPERLIPIDIC
MODEL
176.0
27.50a
Methonalic extract
of Methonalic
extract of Ruellia
tuberosa
Methonalic extract
of Methonalic
extract of Ruellia
tuberosa
100mg/kg
200mg/kg
89.00
8.737b
88.33
8.570b
Atrvostati
n
10mg/kg
99.33
8.950c
Page 469
V.Vijay Kumar et al
ISSN 2349-7750
U/L
200
150
100
50
0
L
g)
g)
tn
ic
\k
\k
ta
RO
im
g
g
T
d
os
i
m
m
N
v
p
0
0
rl
ro
CO
10
20
at
pe
G(
G(
T
T
hy
E
E
M
M
GROUPS
Fig 9: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa ALP level in Methonine induced animals
LIVER
units/min/mg protein
150
100
50
L
ic
0)
0)
in
at
im
20
10
RO
t
(
(
d
s
(
T
G
a
N
G
pi
ET
ov
rli
ET
r
CO
e
t
M
M
p
a
hy
GROUPS
KIDNEY
600
400
200
O
N
TR
O
hy
L
pe
rl
ip
id
m
ic
M
E
TG
(1
00
)
M
E
TG
(2
00
)
at
ro
va
st
at
in
Fig 10: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa SOD level in Methonine induced animals
GROUPS
Fig 11: Effect of Methonalic extract of Ruellia tuberosa GPX level in Methonine induced animals
www.iajps.com
Page 470
V.Vijay Kumar et al
ISSN 2349-7750
98.722.28a
Atorvastatin
391.09b
39.61.08b
36.71.4b
43.561.0a
Atorvastatin
29.31.13b
34.581.29b
30.311.17b
36.121.0
Hyperlipidemic
97.211.52a
Atorvastatin
52.711.18b
67.912.0b
53.521.19b
CONCLUSION:
The Methanolic herbal extract at two different
doses was evaluated for antihyperlipidemic
activity, in the present study. The Methanolic
extract of Ruellia tuberosa whole leaves was
subjected to phytochemical screening to find the
chemical constituents present. The extract revealed
the presence of carbohydrates, alkaloids,
phytosterols, proteins & aminoacids, tannin,
saponins and flavonoids. The extract was also
studied for anti-hyperlipidemic activity with
Methionine induced hyperlipidimic model and
Triton X 100 induced hyperlipidemic model which
mimics hyperlipidemia in experimental animals.
The effect of the Methanolic extract of the Ruellia
tuberosa on total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL,
HDL and VLDL levels were studied. Both the dose
levels of Methanolic extract of Ruellia tuberosa
showed significant anti hyperlipidemic activity as
compared to the control group. The herbal extracts
at dose level of 100 mg/kg b.w and 200 mg/kg b.w
reduced the blood lipids level significantly. The
200 mg/kg was found to be more potent than lower
dose in reducing lipid levels. The Methanol extract
reduced the total Cholesterol, Triglycerides, LDL,
and increased Body weight level in hyperlipidemia
induced rats which are less significant compared to
the standard and more significant compared to
positive control.
The Methanolic extract of Ruellia tuberosa Linn
possess phytochemicals with reported antioxidant
www.iajps.com
activity, the formulation was screened for antioxidant activity by catalase assay and has
significant free radical scavenging activity. Studies
lead to the conclusion that herbal extract of the
whole plant Ruellia tuberosa Linn could be used
for the treatment of hyperlipidemia, as they are
found to be potent and safe in pre-clinical study.
However elucidation of exact mechanism of action
of beneficial effects of these formulations needs
further investigation. More randomized controlled
trials in large patient populations have to be carried
out before determining the status of these drugs in
the therapy of hyperlipidemia.
REFERENCES:
1.Pooja
C
Ochani
and
Priscilla
DMello.Antioxidant and anti hyperlipidemic
activity of Hibiscus sabdariffa Linn. Leaves and
calyces extracts in rats.Indian Journal Of
Experimental Biology,Vol. 47,April 2009,pp.276282
2.Rang and Dale Pharmacology 6th edition pg
no:324
3.A.V.Badarinath, K. Mallikarjuna RAo, C.Madhu
Sudhana Chetty, S. Ramkanth. A Review on InvitroAntioxidant
Methods:
Comparisions,
Correlations and Considerations.
International
Journal of PharmTech Research (IJPRIF ) Vol.2,
No.2, pp 1276-1285, April-June 2010.
4.Sangameswaran
B,
Balakrishnan
B.R,
Chumbhale Deshraj and Jayakar B. In
Page 471
www.iajps.com
V.Vijay Kumar et al
ISSN 2349-7750
Page 472