Simulation of Nitrogen Liquefaction Cycle
Simulation of Nitrogen Liquefaction Cycle
Simulation of Nitrogen Liquefaction Cycle
10HMTC055
T p T4 g 1 (2)
[h3 (1 ) (1 y )(h8 h7 )]
h4 (13)
(1 )
h5 h4 (14)
vii. Phase Separator: The dryness fraction, x5 of the
stream entering the phase separator is estimated as
Figure 3. PINCH POINT OF HX2
(h5 h f 5 )
y (1 ) (for initial guess) (3) x5 (15)
h9 1h2 ' (for initial guess) (hg 5 h f 5 )
(4)
[h9 (1 y )(1 ) h2 (1 ) h4 g (1 ) h p (1 y )]
h8 (5) viii. Yield: The liquid yield obtained per kg of gas passing
[( )(1 y )] through the throttling valve, is (1-x5). Hence for (1-) kg of
[h4 g (1 ) (1 y )(h8 h p )] gas passing through the throttling valve, the yield is
h3 (6)
(1 )
y (1 )(1 x5 ) (16)
h9 1h2 '(1 1)h8 (7)
To obtain the process parameters the iteration process is
repeated starting from equations (5) to (16) till the tolerance in
The iterations continued until the two subsequent iterative y is less than 10-5.
values of h9 are within a specified limit (10-4 kJ/kg).
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
iii. Turbo-expander: In the turboexpander, the process The effect of parametric variation on the liquefaction
3-6s is the isentropic expansion and the process 3-6 is the system gives the optimum performance. This analysis also
actual expansion. The entropy at node point 3 (s3) for specified depicts the off-design performance analysis.
values of h3 and p3 is taken from property chart (Alprops). The
high pressure stream after the expansion through the turbine is a. Effect of Mass Flow Rate through Turbo-expander
always to be dry which ensures that s6 is always greater than
s6g. The enthalpy at the end of expansion is estimated as,
Figure 8. VARIATION OF YIELD WITH EFFICIENCY OF
TURBOEXPANDER
CONCLUSIONS
The thermodynamic simulation of the liquefier is done
Figure 6. VARIATION OF YIELD WITH EFFECTIVENESS OF
HEAT EXCHANGER-1 using both excels programming and Aspen (the process design
software). The simulation can be adopted to bring about any
c. Effect of Variation of Pinch Point over the changes in the configuration of the liquefaction cycle and can
Performance of the Plant be extended for the liquefaction of helium. For the pressure
range considered (1-8 bar), only two heat exchangers would
be sufficient. Parametric study is carried out to access the role
of different component efficiencies in predicting overall
system efficiency. The optimum mass fraction to be diverted
through turboexpander for the maximum yield is estimated to
be 0.94. The heat exchangers and turboexpander have been
designed in our laboratory. After fabrication of all the
components, the system is to be integrated for commissioning
and performance analysis.
REFERENCES
[1] Barron, R.F., 1985. Cryogenic systems, Oxford
University Press.
[2] Flynn, T.M., 1996.Cryogenic Engineering, Marcel-
Dekker Inc.
[3] Timmerhaus, K.D. and Flynn T.M, 1989.Cryogenic
Process Engineering, Plenum Press.
[4] M.D.Atrey, 1998.Thermodynamic analysis of
Collins helium liquefaction cycle, Cryogenics
Figure 7. VARIATION OF YIELD WITH PINCH 38,1199-1206
TEMPERATURE OF HEAT EXCHANGER -2