USDA Database For The Proanthocyanidin Content of Selected Foods
USDA Database For The Proanthocyanidin Content of Selected Foods
USDA Database For The Proanthocyanidin Content of Selected Foods
Prepared by
in collaboration with
August 2004
Table of Contents
Documentation...........................................................................................................................1
Data Sources ..............................................................................................................................1
Data Management ......................................................................................................................2
Data Quality Evaluation.............................................................................................................3
Data Aggregation and Format....................................................................................................4
Format of Table 1 USDA Database for the Proanthocyanidin Content of Selected Foods....4
References Cited in the Documentation ....................................................................................5
Table 1. USDA Database for the Proanthocyanidin Content of Selected Foods .....................7
Table 2. Foods Containing Undetectable Amounts of Proanthocyanidins .............................24
Table 3. Foods that Contain Other Proanthocyanidins (Prodelphinidins and
Propelargonidins) along with Procyanidins and A-Type Linkages ..........................25
Sources of Data ........................................................................................................................26
1
Documentation
Data Sources
The database contains analytical data generated by the ARS scientists at Arkansas Childrens
Nutrition Center (Ref. 13, Sources of Data) as well as other published analytical data. Food
samples analyzed by the Arkansas Center were procured under the National Food and Nutrient
Analysis Program (NFNAP) of the Nutrient Data Laboratory (NDL) of the USDA. Fresh
produce samples were obtained from retail supermarkets in four regions of the United States
during two different seasons. Similar foods were composited by season and region, frozen,
homogenized and freeze-dried to stabilize the proanthocyanidin content. Samples were
shipped frozen on dry ice and kept at 700C until analysis. Processed and prepared products as
well as nuts, cereals/beans, and snacks were ground without freeze-drying. Beverages were
analyzed in their original liquid form. The normal-phase High Performance Liquid
Chromatography (HPLC) method developed by Hammerstone, et al (1999) and optimized by
Adamson, et al (1999) and Gu, et al (2002, 2003) was applied for the analysis and quantitation
of PAs. This method separates and quantifies all compounds from mono- to decamers
individually and polymers with degrees of polymerization (DPs) greater than ten as a single
peak. Gu, et al validated this method to demonstrate the efficiency of extraction and specificity
of separation and quantification. The risk of contamination of polymers with non-
proanthocyanidin (non-PA) compounds is minimal due to the limited occurrence of these
compounds in most foods. Non-PA compounds may occur in wines and strawberries.
In addition, previously published data were collected through searches of scientific literature
databases. Data from analytical studies that used only acceptable analytical methods (HPLC
methods, both normal and reverse phase) were considered for inclusion. The reverse phase
HPLC method is not suitable for separating the compounds with DPs higher than three
(Adamson, et al 1999). Since a number of studies, using the reverse phase HPLC method, are
included in the database, compounds with DPs >3 may not be reported for all foods.
Analytical methods, (i.e. Folin-Ciocalteu and Vanillin assay) which are not specific for PAs
only and quantify only total PAs but not individual compounds were not considered
acceptable.
2
Data Management
The PAs are polymers of flavan-3-ols or flavanols. Procyanidins (polymers of [epi] catechin)
are the most common proanthocyanidins in foods, however prodelphinidins (derived form [epi]
gallocatechin) and propelargonidins (derived from afzelechin) also have been identified
(Santos-Buelga and Scalbert 2000; Gu, et al 2004). See Figure 1.
The most common flavanol-flavanol linkages are C-C bonds (B-type, 46 or 48), but occasionally
mixed double linkages occur (A type, 48, 27). See Figure 2.
Unfortunately analytical technology has not advanced to the stage where each of these
proanthocyanidins as well as A-type linkages can be quantified separately. Nonetheless, mass
spectrometric detection systems, which have been employed for much of the current
proanthocyanidin data, can qualitatively distinguish among the oligomers of varying
polymerization degree and the various intermonomeric linkages. Therefore the data in this
table are a summation of all forms of proanthocyanidins for a given oligomeric fraction. The
monomers, dimers and trimers are reported individually, while tetramers, pentamers and
hexamers are grouped together as 4-6mers; and heptamers, octamers, nonamers and decamers
are grouped together as 7-10mers. Polymers (DP>10) are reported as a separate group. All the
values are reported as mg/100g of fresh weight of edible portion, except for grape seeds and
skins. Although grape seeds and skins are not consumed as such, their contents of PAs are of
great importance to wine makers. Therefore their values are included in the database. If a
value was reported as Trace an estimate was calculated by multiplying the Limit of
Quantitation (LOQ) by a factor of 0.71 (Mangels, et al 1993) to reflect the area under the curve
below the LOQ, if the LOQ was available. A zero value reported in the database should be
3
considered as a true zero (below the limit of detection, LOD), indicating that authors attempted
to measure the compound in that food and did not find it. The lack of a value for a particular
compound(s) does not imply a zero value, but only that data were unavailable. The table of
analytical values contains values for only those compounds and foods that were available at the
time of this survey; it does not mean that other compounds were not present in that particular
food or foods not included in the database do not contain PAs. Most of the data, except for the
data generated by the Arkansas Nutrition Center, reported values for monomers, dimers and
trimers only because most of the analysts used the reverse phase HPLC method for separating
the compounds.
QI CC
75-100 A
74-50 B
49-25 C
<25 D
Format of Table 1 USDA Database for the Proanthocyanidin Content of Selected Foods
This table contains proanthocyanidin values for 205 foods. The fields are as follows:
Table 2 provides a list of foods where PAs were not detected. Similarly Table 3 provides a list
of foods that contain proanthocyanidins other than procyanidins (prodelphinidins and
propelargonidins) and double linkages (A-type). All three tables along with the references for
sources of data are available on the NDL website: www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp.
A review of these data for proanthocyanidins indicates variability in levels of specific PAs. A
plants genetic predisposition dictates the biosynthesis of the primary (sugars, amino acids,
etc.) and secondary metabolites (i.e. proanthocyanidins, saponins, alkaloids, etc.). Variability
with respect to secondary metabolites can exist between varieties (or cultivars) of the same
species. This is quite apparent with data presented herein for apple and grape. However,
various environmental factors determine the extent to which genetic potentialities are achieved.
Ecology, drought, soil type/structure, disease, herbivore damage, and farming practices (i.e.
pruning, application of pesticides, etc.) do have an influence on secondary plant metabolism.
The post-harvest handling (storage time, temperature, modified atmospheres, etc.) of fruits and
vegetables can also impact metabolite levels. Processing effects such as heating, fermentation,
shearing, etc. can influence the final levels of these compounds. Finally, variability in food
component values may be attributable to the differences in analytical methods used to
determine the values.
When food composition data are being reviewed and evaluated it is important to distinguish
variability due to factors intrinsic to the food or food processing from factors inherent to the
measurement process. It is not possible at this stage to separate the sources and magnitude of
effects to biological or analytical variability. In this database values came from limited sources
and were based on a limited number of samples. This may also account for the apparent higher
variability in the PA contents. Comparisons for raw and processed foods are not valid unless
paired samples are used for both the raw and processed foods. But the preliminary
observations did show considerable loss of PAs after cooking, e.g. raw and cooked pinto beans
(796 vs 21 mg/100g respectively). Therefore it is important to study the effects of processing
on PA contents in the future studies.
1
Table contains data for those compounds where analytical data were available; lack of data does not mean the compound is not present in a particular food.
Table 1. USDA Database for the Proanthocyanidin Content of Selected Foods 2004
(for mean, standard deviation, min and max, units = mg/100 g, edible portion) 8
1
NDB Description Proanthocyanidin Mean SD N Min Max CC Sources of
No. Data
97069 Apples, Golden Monomers 3.71 1.02 7 2.34 5.00 A 8, 13
Delicious, with peel,
raw Dimers 7.59 2.24 7 4.58 10.34 A 8, 13
Sources of Data:
1. Adamson, G.E., Lazarus, S.A., Mitchell, A.E., Prior, R.L., Cao, G., Jacobs, P.H.,
Kremers, B.G., Hammerstone, J.F., Rucker, R.B., Ritter, K.A., and Schmitz, H.H.
HPLC method for the quantification of procyanidins in cocoa and chocolate samples and
correlation to total antioxidant capacity.
J. Agric. Food Chem., 1999, 47, 4184-4188.
*Cocoa beans and chocolates (milk, dark, and noir-type).
*Procyanidins (monomers, dimers, trimers, etc.).
2. Awika, J.M., Dykes, L., Gu, L., Rooney, L.W., and Prior, R.L.
Processing sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and sorghum products alters procyanidin
oligomer and polymer distribution and content.
J. Agric. Food Chem., 2003, 51(18), 5516-5521.
*Sorghum grain (high tannin, sumac), Sorghum bran (sumac), Cocoa, Blueberry.
*Procyanidins (monomers-decamers, polymers, total procyanidins).
12. Gu, L., Kelm, M., Hammerstone, J.F., Beecher, G., Cunningham, D., Vannozzi,
S., and Prior, R.L.
Fractionation of polymeric procyanidins from lowbush blueberry and quantification of
procyanidins in selected foods with an optimized normal-phase HPLC-MS fluorescent
detection method.
J. Agric. Food Chem., 2002, 50, 4852-4860.
*Blueberries (lowbush), Brown sorghum bran, Cocoa, Cranberries.
*Procyanidins (monomers through polymers), Total procyanidins.
13. Gu, L., Kelm, M.A., Hammerstone, J.F., Beecher, G., Holden, J., Haytowitz, D.,
Gebhardt, S., and Prior, R.L.
Concentrations of proanthocyanidins in common foods and estimations of normal
consumption.
J. Nutr., 2004, 134(3), 613-617.
14. Jerumanis, J.
Quantitative analysis of flavanoids in barley, hops, and beer by high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC).
J. Inst. Brew., July-August 1985, 91, 250-252.
*Barley, Hops.
*Procyanidins B3 & C2, Prodelphinidin B3 & trimers (B, D, & E), (+)-Catechin.
17. Mangas, J.J., Suarez, B., Picinelli, A., Moreno, J., and Blanco, D.
Differentiation by phenolic profile of apple juices prepared according to two membrane
techniques.
J. Agric. Food Chem., 1997, 45(12), 4777-4784.
*Apple juice (from cider apples).
*Procyanidins B1 & B2, (-)-Epicatechin, Chlorogenic acid, Phloretin glucoside
(phloridzin), Phloretin xyloglucoside, Unknown polyphenol.
21. Quettier-Deleu, C., Gressier, B., Vasseur, J., Dine, T., Brunet, C., Luyckx, M.,
Cazin, M., Cazin, J.-C., Bailleul, F., and Trotin, F.
Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum
Moench) hulls and flour.
Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2000, 72, 35-42.
*Flour, Hulls (var. La Harpe)
*Procyanidin B2 & B2-3-O-gallate, (-)-Epicatechin, (-)-Epicatechin gallate, Rutin,
Quercetin, Hyperoside.
22. Ricardo da Silva, J.M., Rosec, J-Ph., Bourziex, M., Mourgues, J., & Moutounet,
M.
Dimer and trimer procyanidins in Carignan and Mourvedre grapes and red wines.
Vitis, 1992, 31, 55-63.
*Grapes & Wine-red (Carignan and Mourvedre).
*Procyanidins B1-B4, C1, T2, B1-3-O-gallate, B2-3-O-gallate, B2-3-O-gallate.
30
23. Ricardo da Silva, J.M., Cheynier, V., Samsom, A., and Bourziex, M.
Effect of pomace contact, carbonic maceration, and hyperoxidation on the procyanidin
composition of Grenache blanc wines.
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 1993, 44(2), 168-172.
*Wine (from Grenache blanc grapes).
*Procyanidins B1-B4, C1, T2, B1-3-O-gallate, B2-3-O-gallate, B2-3-O-gallate.
28. Suarez-Valles, B., Sanatamaria-Victorero, J., Mangas Alonso, J.J., and Blanco-
Gomis, D.
High-performance liquid chromatography of the neutral phenolic compounds of low
molecular weight in apple juice.
J. Agric. Food Chem., 1994, 42, 2732-2736.
*Apple juice (N Senora, San Pedro, & San Juan varieties).
*Procyanidins B1, B2, C1 + tetramer, Unknown procyanidin, Catechin, Epicatechin,
Phloretin xyloglucoside, Rutin, Isoquercetin + Hyperin, Unknown flavonol, Avicularin,
Phloridzin, Quercetrin.
30. Tomas-Barberan, F.A., Gil, M.I., Cremin, P., Waterhouse, A.L., Hess-Pierce, B.,
and Kader, A.A.
HPLC-DAD-ESIMS analysis of phenolic compounds in nectarines, peaches, and plums.
J. Agric. Food Chem., 2001, 49, 4748-4760.
*Nectarines (white & yellow flesh), Peaches (white & yellow flesh), Plums (red &
yellow).
* Procyanidins (B1 & others for nectarines and peaches; B1, B2, B4, A-type dimers, &
others for plums), Catechin, Epicatechin, Quercetin glycosides, Cyanidin glycosides,
Hydrocinnamic acid derivatives, Totals.