Effect of The Silica Sources On The Crystallinity of Nanosized ZSM-5 Zeolite
Effect of The Silica Sources On The Crystallinity of Nanosized ZSM-5 Zeolite
Effect of The Silica Sources On The Crystallinity of Nanosized ZSM-5 Zeolite
www.elsevier.com/locate/micromeso
a
Central Metallurgical R&D Institute, Department of Nanostructured Material, CMRDI, P.O. Box 87, Helwan, Cairo 11421, Egypt
b
Faculty of Science, Benha Branch, Zagazig University, Benha 13518, Egypt
c
Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Abbasia 11566, Egypt
Received 31 August 2004; received in revised form 20 October 2004; accepted 20 October 2004
Available online 8 December 2004
Abstract
Silica sources can inuence dierent aspects of ZSM-5 crystallization and it leads to change in the properties of the nal product.
The crystallinity of nanosized ZSM-5 zeolite from precursors mixtures containing dierent silica sources, e.g. tetraethylorthosilicate
(TEOS), colloidal silica (Ludox LS 30), sodium metasilicate and fumed silica have been studied. The produced samples are inves-
tigated using XRD, SEM, and carbon % in the samples after calcination in air and BET surface area. The product obtained by
TEOS, fumed silica and colloidal silica is ZSM-5 phase, but the product obtained by sodium metasilicate is the quartz phase.
The crystallinity, and % of the nanosized ZSM-5 zeolite increased in the following order: sodium metasilicate < colloidal sil-
ica < TEOS < fumed silica. The average crystal size increased in the following order: fumed silica < TEOS < colloidal sil-
ica < sodium metasilicate. The surface area increased in the following order: sodium metasilicate < colloidal
silica < TEOS < fumed silica. The template was almost completely removed from the ZSM-5 by calcination at 550 C for 8 h in air.
2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1387-1811/$ - see front matter 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.10.031
8 R.M. Mohamed et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 79 (2005) 712
of alkaline cations is very limited. All these factors to- a rate of 100 cm3/min; 5.039 mg from the synthesized
gether with careful choice of the reactants allow the sta- zeolite was put in platinum cell. Surface areas were re-
bilization of clear starting mixtures where only corded using Nova 2000 series, Chromatech. The FT-
discrete gel particles are present [1922]. Most of the IR spectra were recorded using Jasco FT-IR-460 plus,
investigations were devoted to the synthesis of nano- Japan; % of carbon content in the sample after removal
sized zeolites with tetraethylorthosilicate as a silica of the template was recorded by using Strohlein. The
source. A limited number of articles discuss the forma- zeolite samples were also characterized by scanning elec-
tion of nanosized zeolites by using other silica sources tron microscopy using a Jeol scanning microscope mod-
[2329]. The aim of the present study was to investigate el JSM5410. The amount of silica and alumina in the
the eect of silica sources on the crystallinity of nano- crystalline samples were obtained by EDAX technique.
sized ZSM-5.
3.2. FT-IR
Table 1
Eect of silica sources on structural parameters of as-synthesized
samples
Silica sources Structural parameters (A) Unit cell
V (A)3
a b c
Standard ZSM-5 20.02 19.89 13.38 5332.0249
Fumed silica 19.92 19.92 13.36 5301.3330
TEOS 19.92 19.92 13.36 5301.3330
Colloidal silica 20.16 19.90 13.44 5391.9120
Sodium metasilicate 4.24 3.01 5.43 69.2990
Table 2
Eect of silica sources on crystallinity, surfaces area and average
crystal size of as-synthesized ZSM-5
Silica Crystallinity Surface Average Phase
sources of ZSM-5, % area, crystal formed
m2/g size, nm
Fumed silica 97.3 358.21 55.8 ZSM-5
TEOS 77.1 351.16 90.3 ZSM-5
Colloidal silica 46.7 285.00 113.6 ZSM-5 Fig. 2. IR spectra of as-synthesized ZSM-5 zeolite samples obtained
Sodium metasilicate 9.17 135.7 Quartz by using dierent silica sources where a = colloidal silica, b = TEOS,
silica c = fumed silica and d = sodium metasilicate.
10 R.M. Mohamed et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 79 (2005) 712
Fig. 3. SEM images of sample prepared by using dierent silica sources, where in a = fumed silica, b = colloidal silica, c = sodium metasilicate and
d = TEOS.
R.M. Mohamed et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 79 (2005) 712 11
Table 4
Si/Al atomic % ratio of the produced samples measured by EDX
Technique at three areas
Silica sources Si/Al atomic % Average Si/Al
atomic %
A1 A2 A3
Fumed silica 27.8 28.78 27.9 28.16
TEOS 23.46 22.33 23.70 23.16
Colloidal silica 21.31 20.08 19.98 20.46
Sodium metasilicate 46.27a 48.93a 37.77a 44.32a
a
Only Si is present and no Al present.
6
0
-2
4
-4
DTA ( uV)
TG ( Wt. loss
-6
2
-8
-10
0 TG
-12
DTA
-14
-2 -16
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Fig. 5. FT-IR spectra of optimum ZSM-5 in its dierent forms: (a) as-
synthesized (ZUC), (b) calcined zeolite (ZC), (c) ion-exchange zeolite
Temperature, C
(ZCI) and (d) calcined after ion-exchanging (ZCIC).
Fig. 4. DTA/TG curves for as-synthesized fully crystalline ZSM-5
zeolite. eect of removal of template on structural parameters.
The results show that the unit cell parameters of the
ZSM-5 sample are greater than that of ZSM-5-tetrapro-
Table 5 pyl sample. This is attributed to removal of template
The eect of calcination time on the % of carbon remaining from ZSM-5 pores; this is conrmed by increasing sur-
Calcination time, h % of carbon remaining face area of ZSM-5 sample from 358.21 to 381 m2/g.
0 3.02 Fig. 5 shows the XRD patterns of ZSM-5-tetrapropyl
2 1.25 sample and ZSM-5. The results demonstrate that the
4 0.8 crystallinity of ZSM-5-tetrapropyl sample is almost sim-
6 0.75 ilar to that of ZSM-5, so that the removal of template
8 0.26
has no signicant eect on the crystallinity.
remaining in the sample was decreased from 3.02% to 3.6. The formation of H-ZSM-5 form
0.26% by increasing calcination time from 2 to 8 h,
respectively, as shown in Table 5. Hence, the template The optimum ZSM-5 sample (ZUC) was calcined at
was almost completely removed from the ZSM-5 by cal- 550 C in air for 8 h. After the rst calcination, the zeo-
cination of the sample, which was prepared by using lite sample was noted as calcined (ZC). This sample was
fumed silica at 550 C for 8 h in air. Table 6 shows the ion-exchanged to replace sodium ion for hydrogen ion
present on the active sites. A 1.0 M aqueous solution
of ammonium nitrate was used at 80 C for carrying
Table 6 out ion-exchange, the zeolite to solution ratio was 1 g
Eect of removal of template on structural parameters to 150 cm3 and the stirring was carried out for 1 h. After
ZSM-5 Structural parameters Unit cell ion-exchange, the zeolite was ltered, washed and dried
(A) V (A)3 at 120 C overnight. After ion-exchange, the zeolite was
a b c noted as (ZCI). The ZCI was calcined at 550 C for 3 h in
Standard ZSM-5-tetrapropyl 20.022 19.899 13.383 5332.0249 airow to decompose the ammonium ion to produce
ZSM-5-tetrapropyl sample 19.920 19.920 13.360 5301.3330 hydrogen form (ZCIC). Fig. 6 shows the infrared spec-
Standard ZSM-5 19.870 20.107 13.369 5343.6836 tra of zeolites (ZUC, ZC, ZCI and ZCIC). These spectra
ZSM-5 sample 19.910 20.030 13.400 5343.8800
show the appearance and disappearance of dierent
12 R.M. Mohamed et al. / Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 79 (2005) 712
References
[1] C. Naccache, Y.B. Tarrit, in: F.R. Ribeiro, A.E. Rodrigues, L.D.
Rollman, C. Naccache (Eds.), Zeolite Science and Technology,
ZSM-5 tetrapropyl The Hague, 1984, p. 373.
[2] T. Inui, G. Takeuchi, Y. Takegnami, Appl. Catal. 4 (1982) 201.
[3] E.G. Derouane, J.P. Gilson, Z. Gabelica, Appl. Catal. 1 (1981)
201.
Intensity