Actively Clamped Bidirectional Flyback Converter PDF
Actively Clamped Bidirectional Flyback Converter PDF
Actively Clamped Bidirectional Flyback Converter PDF
4, AUGUST 2000
Abstract—An actively clamped bidirectional flyback converter Transformer of the proposed converter.
is proposed. The converter’s operation is examined in detail. All Switching period.
switches in the converter have zero-voltage-switching character- Average voltage across capacitor .
istics. A low-frequency behavior model and small-signal transfer
functions are derived. It is found that the flow of current is directly Instantaneous voltage across capacitor .
under the control of the duty cycle, and that the transformer’s Average voltage across capacitor .
leakage inductance has a significant effect on the control charac- Instantaneous voltage across capacitor .
teristic of the converter. It is expected that such bidirectional con- Drain to source voltage of MOSFET
verters will find wide applications in the interconnection of mul- .
tiple sources of dc power to a common bus (e.g., in a dc uninter-
ruptible power supply). Simulation and experiment results are also Gate to source voltage of MOSFET
presented. .
Average voltage across .
Index Terms—Active clamping, bidirectional converter, flyback
converter. Instantaneous voltage across .
Average voltage across the magnetizing inductance of
transformer.
NOMENCLATURE Instantaneous voltage across the magnetizing induc-
Duty cycle of pulsewidth modulation (PWM) controller tance of transformer.
output.
Duty cycle of actively clamp switch . I. INTRODUCTION
Average input current of capacitor .
Instantaneous input current of capacitor
Average input current of capacitor .
.
B IDIRECTIONAL dc–dc converters allow the transfer of
power between two dc sources in either direction. They
are increasingly used in applications such as dc uninterruptible
Instantaneous input current of capacitor . power supplies [1] [2], battery chargers [3], multiplexed-battery
Average current of . systems [4], computer systems, aerospace systems [5] [6], and
Instantaneous current of . dc motor drives circuits [7] [8].
Average magnetizing current of transformer. Many bidirectional converter topologies have been reported
Instantaneous magnetizing current of transformer. [1]–[9]. In low-power applications, the flyback topology is
Current from drain to source of MOSFET more attractive due to its simplicity and easy control of bidi-
. rectional power transfer [1]. However, conventional flyback
Current from knife to joint of switch bidirectional converters suffer from high voltage and current
. stresses. To solve this problem, some circuits use resonant
Average output current of dc source . techniques [5] [6]. However, the voltage or current stresses in
Instantaneous output current of dc source . these circuits are still high because of the resonant operation.
Average output current of dc source . Some other circuits operate the converter at variable frequency
Instantaneous output current of dc source . [10], which is, however, undesirable for many applications.
Magnetizing inductance of transformer. In this paper, an actively clamped bidirectional flyback
Total effective inductance in series with the primary converter is proposed. This converter has a fixed switching
winding of transformer. frequency and is always operated in continuous conduction
Turns ratio of transformer ( ). mode. All switching transistors have zero-voltage-switching
Number of turns of primary winding. (ZVS) characteristics. The energy trapped in the transformer
Number of turns of secondary winding. leakage inductance is recycled and the stresses of the switches
are minimized. The operation and modeling of the proposed
Manuscript received May 16, 1999; revised January 20, 2000. Abstract pub- converter are verified by simulation and experimental results.
lished on the Internet April 21, 2000. This work was supported by the University
Grants Committee of Hong Kong and The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
G. Chen and Y.-S. Lee are with the Department of Electronic and Information II. PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION
Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
S. Y. R. Hui is with the Department of Electronic and Information Engi- Fig. 1 shows the circuit topology of the proposed actively
neering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong. clamped bidirectional flyback converter. In this topology, ac-
D. Xu and Y. Wang are with the Department of Electrical Engineering, Zhe-
jiang University, 310027 Hangzhou, China. tively clamped circuits are employed at both ends of the con-
Publisher Item Identifier S 0278-0046(00)06826-X. verter. In the design, the inductance , which consists of the
0278–0046/00$10.00 © 2000 IEEE
CHEN et al.: ACTIVELY CLAMPED BIDIRECTIONAL FLYBACK CONVERTER 771
(a) (b)
(c)
Fig. 4. Idealized switching stages of the proposed converter. (a) t 0t . (b) t 0t . (c) t 0t .
driving signals and and, at the same time, increase ative direction. At the same time, current increases linearly
the pulsewidths of and . in the reverse direction. Power is delivered to .
It is expected that the proposed converter will find wide ap- The last stage is shown in Fig. 4(c) ( ). In this stage,
plications in the interconnection of multiple dc power sources and are on, and and are off. The current in de-
to a common dc bus. creases to zero rapidly. At the same time, the current in
increases rapidly until it is equal to the current in .
Based on the three stages mentioned above, a low-frequency
behavior model of the converter will be derived.
III. MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF
LOW-FREQUENCY BEHAVIOR
A. Low-Frequency Behavior Modeling and DC Analysis
In the modeling of the low-frequency behavior of the bidirec- From the waveforms shown in Fig. 5, it can be found that the
tional flyback converter, the following assumptions (referring to current in S2 ( ) reduces to zero at (and ). At this time,
Fig. 4) are made. the current in is equal to the current in , i.e.,
• is the magnetizing inductance of the power trans-
former.
• is an ideal transformer. (1)
• All transistors (including their body diodes) are ideal
(2)
switching elements.
• Switch and switch are always in complementary
states. From (2) and the current waveforms of and shown in
• Switch and switch are also always in complemen- Fig. 5, the following equations can be obtained:
tary states.
• and are turned on immediately after and are
turned off [as shown in Fig. 4(b)].
• is turned on (and is turned off) only when the cur-
rent in is reduced to zero [transition from Fig. 4(c)
to(a)].
As a result of the assumptions made above, the operation can (3)
be simplified to three stages, as shown in Fig. 4.
The first stage is shown in Fig. 4(a) ( ). In this stage, and
and are on, and are off. It is the main stage when
delivers output power into the converter. The voltage across
the secondary winding of the transformer is clamped to .
and are charged linearly. (4)
The second stage is shown in Fig. 4(b) ( ). In this stage, Therefore, we know the time when is turned off (and is
and are on, and and are off. The voltage across turned on).
and is clamped to . The current in ( ) first The low-frequency behavior model of the proposed converter
decreases linearly to zero and then increases linearly in the neg- is shown in Fig. 6. (The detailed analyses of the average currents
774 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 47, NO. 4, AUGUST 2000
(5)
(6)
(10)
(7)
(11)
(8)
CHEN et al.: ACTIVELY CLAMPED BIDIRECTIONAL FLYBACK CONVERTER 775
B. Small-Signal AC Analysis
The small-signal characteristics of the converter can be ob-
tained by adding perturbations as follows:
(12) (22)
Substituting (22) into (4)–(12), and using the dc solutions
The converter’s dc solutions can be obtained by letting (13)–(19), the following Laplace transformed equations are
the differential components ( , , and obtained (the second- and higher terms are omitted):
) in the above equations be zero and combining
(4)–(12). This gives
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(23)
(17)
(18) (24)
(19)
(20) (25)
776 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 47, NO. 4, AUGUST 2000
(26)
0
Fig. 7. Simulated and calculated ( [ I (s)]= D (s)) characteristics for D =
0:6 [- -4 - -: simulated results (using PSpice); —: calculated results (using
MATLAB)],
(28) (32)
(29)
The dotted lines in Fig. 7 are the result of PSpice simulation
In order to determine the small-signal transfer func- based on the low-frequency behavior model shown in Fig. 6.
tion between the output current and the duty cycle The solid lines are the result of calculation (using MATLAB)
( ), we first assume that based on (32). It can be found that they agree with each other
very well.
(30)
Substituting (30) into (23)–(29), the small-signal transfer func- IV. SIMULATED AND EXPERIMENT RESULTS
tion is found as In order to verify the properties of the proposed converter,
experiments are also performed under the following condi-
(31) tions:
power (into
where ) W, and are MOSFET SMP40N10, and
and are MOSFET IRF540.
Fig. 8 shows the experimental waveforms. The waveforms
for a power flow from to are shown in Fig. 8(a). These
waveforms resemble closely those shown in Fig. 3. Symmet-
rical waveforms are observed when power flows from to
. Fig. 8(b) shows the waveforms when there is no net flow of
power. It is found that the converter maintains ZVS performance
even under no-load (or light load) condition. The efficiency of
the proposed converter is plotted in Fig. 9.
Fig. 10 shows the measured small-signal transfer characteris-
tics ( ) for a duty cycle of 0.6. In the low-fre-
quency range, the measured characteristics agree well with the
calculated characteristics. In the high-frequency range, there
is some difference between them. The reason is that the av-
To cross check the low-frequency behavior model shown in erage-value modeling method is not very accurate at high fre-
Fig. 6 with the results of the ac analysis given above, an ex- quencies near the switching frequency. In addition, the effects
CHEN et al.: ACTIVELY CLAMPED BIDIRECTIONAL FLYBACK CONVERTER 777
(a)
(b)
Fig. 8. Experimental waveforms (top trace: v (20 V/div; middle trace: v (50 V/div; bottom trace: i 5 A/div). (a) Power flows from V 1 to V 2. (b) No power
flow.
of the parasitical parameters in the circuit are more significant in this converter. A low-frequency model of the proposed con-
at high frequency. verter was built and analyzed. It was found that the output cur-
rent of the converter can be controlled directly by varying the
duty cycle. All theoretical analyses have been verified by both
V. CONCLUSION
simulations and experiments. The proposed converter is particu-
The principle of operation of an actively clamped bidirec- larly suitable for applications like low-power dc uninterruptible
tional flyback converter has been described. ZVS is achieved power supplies.
778 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 47, NO. 4, AUGUST 2000
(A3)
(A4)
Fig. 9. Efficiency of the proposed converter. (Power transferred from V 1 to From Fig. 4, it can be also found that, in the interval ,
V 2 is positive. Power transferred from V 2 to V 1 is negative.)
the current flowing into is times the difference between
the current in and the current in
(A5)
(A6)
(A7)
(A8)
(A9)
APPENDIX
The expressions of the average currents in , , and From the current waveform of , the average current in can
( , , and ) in the low-frequency behavior model be calculated as follows:
of the proposed converter shown in Fig. 6, are derived in this
Appendix.
Referring to Figs. 4 and 5, it can be found that, in the interval
, the current flowing into is equal to the current (A10)
in . Therefore, the average current of can be given as
follows:
(A11)
We also know
(A2) (A12)
CHEN et al.: ACTIVELY CLAMPED BIDIRECTIONAL FLYBACK CONVERTER 779