The Veterinarian's Role in Food Safety

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16

Volume No. 1 Issue No.

6 June 2011

The Veterinarian’s Role in


Food Safety
Veterinary Bulletin - Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department

Authors: Dr. Barry BOUSFIELD and Dr. Richard BROWN

I. Introduction
Veterinarians (Vets) and Food Safety: A Word Association
It is common in the English language to
The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE)
come across word associations. For example,
“Most reported outbreaks of foodborne disease are due
the word cat is often associated with the word to contamination of foods with zoonotic agents, often
mouse or the word dog. The word soldier during primary production. Veterinary services play a
is associated with the word army. When key role in the investigation of such outbreaks, all the way
back to the farm and in formulating and implementing
you read the word vet, you will very likely remedial measures once the source of the outbreak
associate that name with cats or dogs. This is has been identified. This work should be carried out
because the word vet conjures up the image in close collaboration with human and environmental
health professionals, analysts, epidemiologists(流行
of a person who treats sick animals such as
病學家), food producers, processors and traders and
dogs or cats. others involved.”

Associations indicate the way we think


about the world we live in. For example, what person would you think of if you were asked to consider
cooked meat ready to eat? It is most likely you would think of a cook, or a waiter, or the farmer who
produced the food. It is very unlikely that you would associate a vet with meat that is on a plate of
food that you are about to eat. It is a simple fact that most people do not associate meat on a plate
with vets. This way of thinking would be correct about hundred years ago, but the world has changed
since then. Vets now have many links with much of the meat you have eaten and will continue to eat.
This is because vets in the world are closely involved with food of animal origin. They are also closely
involved in many products of animal origin.

Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science


“In the fight against foodborne zoonoses (由食物引致的人畜共通傳染病), efficient surveillance systems,
and risk assessment and management systems should be established. Moreover, constructive dialogue
and collaboration between public health workers, veterinarians and food-safety experts is essential to
develop effective prevention and control strategies.
“A Brief Review of Foodborne Zoonoses in China (Epidemiol. Infect., Page 1 of 8. Cambridge University Press 2011)”
World Veterinary Association
“Veterinarians are present at every link in the
chain and have the knowledge and expertise
to audit the standards of animal health, The World Organization for Animal Health (OIE)
animal welfare and public health from “stable “The OIE will continue to publicise and promote
to table”. Safe food can only be produced the fundamental role of the Veterinary services in
if healthy, clean, residue and stress free the area of food safety, both on-farm and at the
animals are delivered to the slaughterhouse abattoir level, notably by constantly collaborating
where a dedicated inspectorate, headed by a with the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC)(國
veterinarian, can ensure that high standards of 際食品法典委員會) in order to develop standards,
animal welfare and food safety are maintained. guidelines and recommendations that are in
This assurance should apply to all products of harmony.”
animal origin throughout the processing and
marketing stages.”

II. The ‘From Farm to Fork’ Concept


This article describes the process of following the food of animal origin from the farm where the
animal is born through to the dinner plate and on to your fork. By the time you finish reading this
article you may be surprised to note that nowadays the vet is integral to this process.

One of the ways to understand this ‘new’ idea is to follow the ‘from farm to fork’ process shown in
the following photographs.

(1) Pig farm

(3) Food processing factory


(2) Slaughterhouse
(Photography by Chong Fat)

(5) Restaurant
(Photography by Wing) (4) Transport of product after inspection

From farm to fork through slaughterhouse, processing and transport.

2
One of the main aims and advantages of developing such a ‘new’ and ‘holistic’ concept is that in
the event of a problem developing, such as a food ‘poisoning’ incident, the food, its processing and
its source can more easily be traced, investigated and effectively corrected.

II. (a) Food Safety at the Farm Level


Animal Welfare
It is often said that good animal welfare equates to good food safety.
As stated by Federation of Veterinarians of Europe (FVE) “Public health, animal health and animal
welfare are indeed interrelated and require a holistic approach. As an example of this, stressed
animals are more likely to develop diseases, which will require veterinary treatment. However, this
may increase the presence of residues in the animal produce, which in turn may affect public health.
This example highlights the link between animal welfare, animal health and public health.” (1)

The FVE go on to say “the farmer’s responsibility to ensure that his product is uncontaminated by
herbicides, pesticides, and veterinary medicinal products, and to ensure that risks associated with
animal health, animal welfare or zoonotic disease are controlled, can only be effectively achieved
through a specifically designed animal health plan. These plans must be drawn up in conjunction with
the producer’s veterinarian who can provide reassurance to customers.” (2)

Medicine Use
On every livestock farm there will be a farmer trying to raise animals or
birds. Vets who visit the farms will be guiding the farmer in his use of medicines
for any animals that get sick. They will want to make sure that he uses the right
medicine for the right species and the correct dose. For example, in Hong
Kong, farmers are advised to use foot and mouth disease (FMD) vaccine,
which contains and matches the specific strains of virus that are present in the
territory at the time.
Foot and Mouth Disease vaccine
used in Hong Kong

Furthermore, they will be advising the farmer to ensure that he


has records of what drugs he uses on the farm and which individual
animals receive these drugs. One of the most important reasons for
this is to ensure that any animal, which is sent to slaughter, has drug
residues below the permitted limit before it is slaughtered. This period
is known as the “withdrawal period(停藥期)”. Withdrawal periods
are typically around two to three weeks. However, for some drugs the
withdrawal period can be as short as 12 hours and for others as long
as many months.

Vets will also want to assist and advise the farmer in the use of
Antibiotic Permit issued to farmers antibiotics because of the risk this has in developing resistance to

3
antibiotics. Bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics represent a risk to future generations of animals,
which may get sick. If the bacteria are very resistant to antibiotics, there may be no medicines
available to the farmer for him to treat a sick animal. It is also possible, in certain circumstances that
these resistant bacteria could reach a slaughterhouse or a market, causing meat or milk to become
contaminated, which in turn may cause antibiotic resistance to be transferred to the consumers of such
products.

In view of the above, the uses of antibiotics on farm animals in Hong Kong is controlled. Farmers are
allowed to buy only specified injectable antibiotics and the permit on page 3 is a photocopy of such.

Animal Feed
Vets will also have interest in the food the animals consume. This
is because, if the animal feed is incorrect or toxic, it will affect the
health of the animals, and in some cases, the toxin in the animal
feed can be absorbed by the animal and then passed on to the
consumer in the milk, meat or eggs produced.

Dioxins, heavy metals such as lead and mercury, polychlorinated


biphenyls (PCBs), dichlorodiphenyltrichoroethane (DDT)(滴滴涕)
radionuclides (radioactivity), salmonella, and the prion (朊毒體)
causing bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) are well known
Officials entering animal feed store for inspection
examples of contamination in animal feed.

In these cases, if there is a problem, the vet


will try to find and remove the source of the
toxin. Checks will be made for a period on the
animals, their milk, meat, eggs etc., to make
sure that the level of the toxin present is below
international safety standards.

Examples of similar control processes are


those that are stated in the European Union (EU)
Feed Hygiene Regulation (183/2005) 1.(3) The
Regulation came into force on 1 January 2008
and applies to livestock farms and arable farms
Animal feeds for chicken available for inspection that grow, use or sell crops for use as animal
feed. Such farms have to follow basic hygiene
procedures in relation to the feed they use or grow and have to ensure that hazards are properly
controlled. They must also provide a statement of compliance to their local authority. (4)

4
For instance, in Demark, farmers are advised to buy certified
salmonella-free feed and similar requirements are known, for
laying hens, to avoid salmonella (沙門氏菌) or say dioxin (二
噁英) entering the food chain in eggs.(5)

Public demonstration in Germany highlighting the dangers of dioxin in food


(Photo: Andreas Praefcke)

Animal and Zoonotic Disease


Vets are trained to recognize disease. Diseases of great interest to them are zoonoses, which are
diseases that can affect both animals and man (See the Veterinary Bulletin Volume 1 Issue No.1).

If a vet suspects zoonoses, such as tuberculosis (TB), is on a farm, he will want to take certain steps.
The first two steps will be to confirm the diagnosis and control the disease outbreak. The third will be
to make sure that the disease does not enter the food chain, in this case, through the milk or through
the meat. In the picture below, a vet is checking through a tuberculin skin test, whether the animal is
suffering from TB or not.

Testing of a dairy cow


for Tuberculosis

In the picture below, local chickens about to be marketed are being bled to check for the absence
of the zoonotic avian influenza H5N1 infection; this is very much a vet directed process.

Furthermore, once the birds are found to be free of any


evidence of the H5N1 virus, they are permitted to be marketed
under the following movement permit; this is to ensure that only
H5N1 negative birds are sent and housed in the market.

Bleeding a chicken for H5N1 testing in Hong Kong

5
II. (b) Food Safety at the Market Level
Food animal markets, world wide, are well known for spreading disease from farm back to farm
or further down the “farm to fork” food chain. Therefore this is an area where additional measures
are sometimes required such as “rest days” during which markets are kept empty while they are
thoroughly cleansed.

In Singapore, the USA and Europe specific ‘public health’ vets


routinely inspect live food animal markets for signs of ill health,
contamination and poor welfare.

Veterinary signed H5N1 Movement Control Permit


of chickens in Hong Kong

Poultry market closure and cull after the discovery of


H5N1 in Hong Kong

Poultry market in Hong Kong

Rest Day and Cleansing of a Hong Kong


Wholesale Poultry Market

A related example is the European practice found in the UK, where government vets routinely
inspect livestock auction markets and where animal health officers (AHO), under their direction, are
stationed at the auction usually for the whole day of the market. If an AHO detects a problem that
requires professional attention; he will call a government vet or private vet to attend to the case.

6
For example, if a cow has an accident and breaks a leg he may call out a private vet to carry out
immediate euthanasia (人道毀滅) on welfare grounds.

II. (c) Food Safety at the Slaughterhouse Level

The World Organization for Animal Health (OIE)


“Control and/or reduction of biological hazards of animal and public health
importance by ante- and post-mortem meat inspection are a core responsibility of
Veterinary Services.”

As defined by the Encyclopedia Britannica; “ante-mortem inspection (宰前檢驗) identifies animals


not fit for human consumption. Here animals that are down, disabled, diseased, or dead are removed
from the food chain and labeled “condemned.” Other animals showing signs of being sick are labeled
“suspect” and are segregated from healthy animals for more thorough inspection during processing
procedures. Post-mortem inspection (宰後檢驗) of the head,
viscera, and carcasses helps to identify whole carcasses,
individual parts, or organs that are not wholesome or safe
for human consumption.”

Animals or birds are often transported directly from the


farm to slaughterhouse. In this process, vets have many
different roles.

Initially vets may be involved in checking the health and


Cattle available for inspection during transport
welfare of the animals at some of the stages of transport to
the slaughterhouse and once there, in the ante-mortem inspection prior to slaughter.

In most developed countries ante- and post-


mortem meat inspection at the slaughterhouse
is carried out (or audited) by vets; as they are
regarded as the most, if not only, competent
and qualified persons to do such inspections (or
audits). In these countries, specific veterinary
postgraduate meat and poultry inspection
courses and qualifications are offered.

For example, the United States Department


of Agriculture (USDA) requires that a vet be
on site at a slaughterhouse at all working
times and that personnel handling, herding, A government vet performing ante-mortem inspection on live pigs being
unloaded at the Sheung Shui Slaughterhouse in Hong Kong
stunning, moving, transporting, or otherwise

7
working with live animals be patient, considerate, competent, and familiar with USDA guidelines.
Requirements similar to this occur in Macau, Mainland China and Singapore.

A high general level of hygiene in a slaughterhouse is


vital. It is, for example, important to make sure that there is
no contamination (particularly of bacterial origin) between
‘unclean’ parts of a carcass such as stomach contents and
the meat, which people will actually eat.

The box below outlines an additional example of


seperating ‘clean’ and ‘unclean’ parts. In BSE endemic
counturies there are additional hygiene requirements, i.e.
the separation of Specified Risk Materials (SRM) from the
rest of the carcass in the prevention of the spread of BSE.
The Department of Agriculture and Food of Eire (Ireland)
states that “Veterinary Inspection staff carries out continuous
detailed inspections to ensure that no SRM gets in to the
food chain.” (6)

Meat inspection of pig carcasses by USDA official


(Source from http://www.usda.gov/oc/photo/99cs0694.htm)

Department of Agriculture and Food of Eire (Ireland)


The following portions of animals are designated as SRM and are excluded from the human food
and animal feed chains:
• the skull, brain, eyes, tonsils and spinal cord of cattle over 12 months and the intestine from the
duodenum to the rectum of bovine animals of all ages;
• the skull, brain, eyes, tonsils and spinal cord of sheep and goats that are over twelve months
of age or that have one permanent incisor erupted through the gum and the spleen of sheep and
goats of all ages.
These materials are isolated on slaughter of the animals, permanently stained and removed directly
to a specially dedicated rendering plant, where they are rendered and the resultant meat and
bonemeal and tallow are stored pending destruction by incineration.

Drug and Chemical Residue Checks


Traditional meat inspection procedures have now had modern additional checks added in order to
safeguard the public. These checks are to look for substances such as growth promoters, hormones,
antibiotics or chemicals used legally or illegally in the production of the meat; with the aim of significantly
reducing the risk of the public consuming meat with harmful chemicals.

8
The picture on the right shows an inspector
collecting the urine of a pig that may contain traces
of an illegal substance, such as Clenbuterol (鹽酸克
倫特羅) or Salbutamol (沙丁胺醇).

Clenbuterol is called a “beta-2-agonist” and when


fed to livestock it assists growth and increases the
proportion of lean meat produced. People may suffer
nervousness, fast heart rate, muscle tremors (肌肉
不自主顫動) and other symptoms after eating meat
containing the illegal use of this chemical.

Clenbuterol residue checking in a Hong Kong slaughterhouse


Checking for residues is not a static matter. There
are constant changes; evolving problems and new
matters have to be addressed. No matter what the source of food is. In the last few years, there have
been many different problems with residues in food. Melamine (三聚氰胺) in milk, malachite green
(孔雀石綠) in fish, caponizing hormones in birds, growth hormone in feed lot cattle are examples.

In theory the list of chemicals or drugs that animals could be tested is unending. This list could
include any of the drugs produce by the pharmaceutical industry. However, one has to be practical
about this. An example of a list of the most relevant, from the point of view of risk to the public, is
shown in the table below.

Drug Types Tested in Pigs Slaughtered in Hong Kong in 2010


Amoxycillin Ampicillin Bacitracin Benzylpenicillin
Carabadox Ceftiofur Chloramphenicol Chlortetracycline
Clenbuterol Cloxacillin Colistin Danofloxacin
Dicloxacillin Dienoestrol Diethylstilboestrol Dihydrostreptomycin
Dimetridazole Doxycycline Enrofloxacin Erythromycin
Flumequine Furaltadone Furazolidone Gentamicin
Hexoestrol Kitasamycin Ivermectin Lincomycin
Neomycin Oxolinic acid Oxytetracycline Salbutamol
Spectinomycin Streptomycin Sulfonamides Tetracycline
Tiamulin Trimethoprim Tylosin Virginiamycin

9
Different countries have different ways of addressing these evolving challenges. In the USA the
majority of government vets involved with food matters are employed by the Food Safety and Inspection
Service (FSIS) of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). However, many vets are also employed
by the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Centre of Veterinary Medicine (CVM).

The logo of Center for Veterinary Medicine


The US FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) regulates the manufacture and distribution of
food additives and drugs that will be given to animals. These include animals from which human
foods are derived, as well as food additives and drugs for pet (or companion) animals. CVM is
responsible for regulating drugs, devices, and food additives given to, or used on, over one hundred
million companion animals, plus millions of poultry, cattle, swine, and minor animal species.
This is the official CVM Logo. This logo appears on various published items and other printed
material authorized by the Center for Veterinary Medicine.

II. (d) Food Safety in Food Processing


Veterinary involvement in food processing is seen mainly in the inspection of food factories,
particularly in Europe, Australia and New Zealand, which export large quantities of meat, milk,
cheese and yoghurt abroad.

Vets in Hong Kong originally had little involvement in food processing; however, recently they have
had a greater involvement. This was because countries importing food products from Hong Kong were
worried about serious animal and bird diseases being allowed to pass through the production process
and then into their country. One example of this was the importing country’s requirement for veterinary
inspection to ensure that meat was deboned and cooked to avoid foot and mouth disease virus from
surviving the manufacturing process and being imported (the virus survives for a long time in bone
marrow). Another example was the requirement for veterinary inspection to ensure moon cakes were
cooked to a certain temperature and specified time in order to reduce the risk of Newcastle disease
virus, Salmonella, and other serious pathogens passing through the manufacturing process.

In addition, vets in Hong Kong have also inspected food-processing facilities in countries which
export food of animal origin to Hong Kong. One example of this was the inspection of a Canadian
facility, to ensure that the spinal cord and other relevant body parts were removed from a carcass
prior to its meat being export in order to reduce the risk of BSE. Another example was the inspection
of an Australian facility, to investigate the source of bacterial contamination of imported ice cream
into Hong Kong.

10
II. (e) Food Safety in the Storage and Transport of Food
Traditionally, food inspectors are involved in the inspection of the retail side of the food process.
However, vets do have a great interest in how food of animal origin is stored prior to going to
retailers. This is an area where, if one is not careful, mistakes can occur. In this respect, it is important
that batches of food are kept separate from each other and are clearly marked and identified with
their movements recorded.

Certain countries do use veterinary supervised inspections of the storage and transport of food. In
Singapore, for example, the Agri-Food & Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA) has established
certain requirements for the handling and processing of meat and fish, through their Wholesome Meat
and Fish Act and Sale of Food Acts.(7)

In addition, if food is to move across international borders, it often requires some form of veterinary
health certification. This can only be completed by a vet (see the section IV on page 14). Part of the
certification will be to ensure not only that the food is correctly handled at the correct temperature, but
that it is also of good hygienic quality and safe to eat.

II. (f) Food Safety in the Sale of Food for the Plate and onto Your Fork
Traditionally food retail and the correct handling and cooking of food in the kitchen at restaurants
and at home was, in many countries, the responsibility of food inspectors and/or food hygienist and
their related bodies. However, in Europe, particularly in France and Germany, vets in the nineteenth
and twentieth centuries were integral to the development of food hygiene laws, initially to curb large
outbreaks of trichinosis (旋毛蟲病). (8)

The importance of food handling is also highlighted by the fact that the USDA estimates that 85% of
food poisoning cases could be avoided if people just handled food properly. (9) As a result of this, the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (美國疾病控制與預防中心) in the USA, employs
veterinary epidemiologists as part of the team to track down and investigate food poisoning cases,
and such investigations reach right into the fridges, storerooms and kitchens of restaurants and homes.

The start of this particular veterinary public health involvement can be traced to the aftermath of
World War II, where the U.S. Public Health Service’s Communicable Disease Center, later named
CDC established a veterinary public health unit. James Steele, the first chief public health vet in the
CDC, was also active in promoting the veterinary public health unit in the World Health Organization
(WHO). Martin Kaplan, another American vet, became the first director of this WHO unit. Both men
expanded into the USA and worldwide the traditional European emphasis on veterinary-directed food-
safety programs to include investigations into the epidemiology and control of zoonoses. (10)

11
II. (g) Food Safety through “Traceback”
If a food poisoning problem does occur in the retail or domestic cooking area, vets will want to be
informed by their public health colleagues about the identity of the suspect food. This is because world
wide the opinion is that it is important to check the whole food producing system, as the problem may
not be just in the restaurant or at home. (See the first box on page 1)

In particular, they will want to know the batch number, name of the food manufacturer, name of the
food and other details to help with identification and traceback. They will then start the “traceback”
exercise.

“Traceback” processes and


systems were originally developed
in the USA and Europe, particularly
Scandinavian countries (北歐國
家) such Denmark in the 1970’s.

The aim of the traceback exercise


is to find out where in the chain
the problem has occurred. Did
the problem occur at the point of sale in for example a
restaurant? If not then did the problem occur at a food
storage point? If so, which one and what other foods were
stored at the time and at that place? Alternatively, did the
problem occur at a processing plant and if so, which one?
This is highly relevant for example with ground beef and An animal traceback exercise in Hong Kong
E. Coli O157 food poisoning. If not these ones, did the
problem occur at a food factory? Which one and on what
day? What other batches of food from that factory may
be affected? If not the food factory, how about the abattoir? If not the abattoir, the livestock transport
lorries to the abattoir or finally the farm itself or the feed going into the farm. In this whole traceback
process, many professions will be involved not only vets (See the first box on page 1), but if the source
looks increasingly likely to be from the farm itself, there is a much greater veterinary involvement
compared to other professions.

III. Overall Strategy and Advice in Matters Concerning Food Safety


Nowadays most governments in the world have vets advising them on strategic matters concerning
food of animal origin as well as other veterinary matters. One of the leading countries being France
simply because of the serious food hygiene problems they encountered over 100 years ago. (8)

12
An example of this early veterinary role is that meat safety was the main item on the agenda of the
Vienna International Conference organized by Austria and Hungary in March 1872. This conference
set up the outline of border controls to be used to increase food safety.

China soon followed suit in 1896 when the Ching Dynasty Government approved the building
of the Central–Eastern Railway by Russia. Meat was imported from Russia to feed the builders of
the railway line. As a consequence in 1903, the Chinese Railway Bureau established a veterinary
inspection department whose main task was to inspect this Russian meat. (11)

Nowadays the veterinary strategists will use many intellectual tools. Risk assessments, risk analysis,
risk communication, risk management, assessment of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points
(HACCP) (危害分析重要管制點), their own field experience, incident data resources, research data
resources and food safety simulations are few examples of these tools.

In Hong Kong this work is now mainly carried out by the Centre for Food Safety (CFS) of the Food
and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD).

They have access and contribute to many national and international early warning and surveillance
systems. For example, the USA’s PulseNet and FoodNet system, the EU’s Rapid Alert System for Food
and Feed (RASFF), WHO International Food Safety Authority’s Network (INFOSAN) and the Food
and Agriculture Organisation’s (FAO) Emergency Prevention
System for Food Safety (EMPRESS Food Safety). All of these
systems are freely available online.

In view of the recent incident at Fukushima in Japan,


radiation monitoring of food and animal food has become an
important and relevant matter regionally.

Lessons are being learnt from radioactive contamination Welsh sheep on uplands: currently some sheep grazing
monitoring which still occurs in the United Kingdom, 25 years uplands are under restriction while measurements are
taken, this has been continuing for over 25 years.
after the world’s worst nuclear accident at Chernobyl (切爾諾 (Photography by Marion Phillips)

貝爾). Wind and rain carried radioactive material thousands


of miles away to the hills of north Wales and Cumbria after
the explosion at the plant in 1986.

Sheep from affected areas are still scanned before entering the food chain. In the weeks and months
following the accident, more than 5,000 farms were placed under restrictions. Over the years, this
number has come down to the current 330 in Wales and 8 in Cumbria, England.

13
The restrictions mean any sheep and lambs which graze on higher ground there have to be brought
down to lower lying areas to allow radiation measurements to decrease, before they can be sold.

According to a farmer in the area, “no-one could have predicted how things have turned out”. He
said, “Anyone still under restriction would have found it hard to believe that it would still be in place
after 25 years”.(12)

IV. The Health Certification of Food Animals and Food of Animal Origin
The verb ‘to vet’ used in the English language is a very distinctive word. It means to check something
thoroughly and in detail. Traditionally once a vet has “vetted” an animal or animal product, he can
issue a certificate describing what he has found. This certificate is regarded, within the veterinary
profession, as an extremely important document, which as far as it is humanly possible reflects the
whole truth. Veterinary certificates, since they have to be completed to the highest possible standards,
are very useful in facilitating international trade. The importer expects that what is written on the
veterinary heath certificate is true and believable. It is on these ethical principles that the OIE uses
veterinary health certificates to ensure that food that is safe to eat can cross borders (See box below
and Veterinary Bulletin Volume No. 1 Issue No.5).

The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE)


“Certification in relation to animal diseases, including zoonoses, and meat hygiene should be the
responsibility of the Veterinary Authority.”
“International veterinary health certificates underpin international trade and provide assurances
to the importing country regarding the health status of the animals and products imported.”

V. Conclusion
According to one of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization’s recent publications,
there still are worldwide significant challenges concerned with food safety. There are many reasons
for these new challenges. To give two simple examples, the world trade in agricultural products has
increased fivefold since 1950,(13) and the number of agents causing food borne diseases is likewise
increasing.(14)

In these new situations, both government and private companies require new mixes of professions
and technologists to help them overcome these challenges. It now appears that the veterinarian will
be one of those professions to be intimately involved in facing these challenges.

Every profession has its golden age when its work is recognized to be vital to society and how
people view the world. Hundreds of years ago, astrologers were one of the most important professions.
Government used them to guide them on serious issues of the day. Private people used them to assist
them in personal matters. A little later, priests became one of the most powerful professions, again
acting at both a government and a private level. Nowadays both astrologers and priests are still
present but have not such a great impact on society. In the last century, the impact of engineers,

14
doctors and technologists has been very great. Most recently, computer professionals have become
extremely relevant.

Now with globalization, more processed food, more and more food imports and exports worldwide,
greater movement of animal and humans, it appears that it is the turn of the veterinary profession to be
one of the most crucial to society. Their work with food of animal origin is an indicator of the influence
they now have and will probably have in the future. Vets are not only trained to deal with all mammal
species except man but also with birds, fish and exotic animals. They are trained in an extremely wide
set of disciplines up to a degree level: examples would be risk assessment, bacteriology, virology,
toxicology, immunology and public health to mention a few.(15)

At the beginning of this issue, you were asked to consider what word you would associate with
vet. It was likely you associated it with dogs, cats, and their health. Now you may perhaps consider
associating many foods with the word vet. For hopefully in one sense much of the food you will eat
in the future will have been “vetted”. That is it to say it will have been thoroughly checked by a vet.

Veterinary inspection of moon cake factory

15
References
(1) Federation of Veterinarians of Europe. Meat Inspection and the Development of Community Risk Based Food Legislation
FVE Response.
http://www.fve.org/news/position_papers/public_health/fve_00_044_amendments_food_hygiene.pdf.
Retrieved 15th April 2011.

(2) Federation of Veterinarians of Europe. Role of the Private Veterinary Practitioner in Food Hygiene Controls on Farm.
http://www.fve.org/news/position_papers/public_health/fve_07_066_role_private_vet_in_food_hygiene.pdf.
Retrieved 15th April 2011.

(3) Hartlepool Borough Council. Feed Hygiene.


http://www.hartlepool.gov.uk/info/788/animal_health_and_welfare/1056/feed_hygiene/1.
Retrieved 15th April 2011.

(4) The Official Journal of the European Union Online. Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of the European Parliament and of
the Council.2005-laying down requirements for feed hygiene.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2005/l_035/l_03520050208en00010022.pdf.
Retrieved 15th April 2011.

(5) Monique A. van der Gaag and Ruud B.M. Huirne. Elicitation of expert knowledge on controlling Salmonella in the pork
chain.
http://library.wur.nl/artik/jcns/1782799.pdf. Retrieved 15th April 2011.

(6) Teagasc Food Assurance Online (Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority). Veterinary Checks and Controls in
Meat Plants.
http://www.foodassurance.teagasc.ie/FAOL/foodChainControls/foodChainControls/Controls_meatplants.htm.
Retrieved 15th April 2011.

(7) The University of Nottingham. Logistics and Cold Supply Chain Management in Singapore and Asia Pacific
http://edissertations.nottingham.ac.uk/819/1/Singapore_Food_Logistic_Indusrty_-_Dissertation_(11.12.06).pdf.
Retrieved 15th April 2011.

(8) Zylberman P. Making Food Safety an Issue: Internationalized Food Politics and French Public Health from the 1870s to
the Present. The UCL Centre for the History of Medicine.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC546293/pdf/medhis4801-001.pdf. Retrieved 15th April 2011.

(9) Schafer W. and Driessen S. A Quick Consumer Guide to Safe Food Handling. The University of Minnesota.
http://www.extension.umn.edu/distribution/nutrition/dj5711.html. Retrieved 15th April 2011.

(10) eNotes.com. Encyclopedia of Public Health-Veterinary Public Health.


http://www.enotes.com/public-health-encyclopedia/veterinary-public-health. Retrieved 15th April 2011.

(11) 夏紅民。1998。中國的進出境動植物檢疫。中國農業出版社。中華人民共和國。第21頁。

(12) BBC News. Chernobyl Radiation Checks on Welsh Farms 25 years.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/mobile/uk-wales-north-west-wales-13196041. Retrieved 1st May 2011.

(13) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food Quality and Safety.
http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsummit/english/fsheets/fsafety.pdf. Retrieved 15th April 2011.

(14) eNotes.com. Encyclopedia of Public Health- Food-Borne Diseases.


http://www.enotes.com/public-health-encyclopedia/food-borne-diseases. Retrieved 15th April 2011.

(15) Buncic S. Integrated Food Safety and Veterinary Public Health.


http://bookshop.cabi.org/Uploads/Books/PDF/9780851999081/9780851999081.pdf. Retrieved 15th April 2011.

Editorial Board:
Editor: Dr. Barry BOUSFIELD, Dr. Richard BROWN, Dr. Mary CHOW and Dr. NG Lip Tet
Proofreader: Dr. Christopher John BRACKMAN and Dr. Veronica LEONG
Chinese editor of specific terms: Dr. Kenny HO and Dr. Michelle YEUNG
Coordinator: Mr. Dominic LEUNG

Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department


Room 708, 7/F Cheung Sha Wan Government Offices, 303 Cheung Sha Wan Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Website: www.afcd.gov.hk Email: tsdiq@afcd.gov.hk

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy