Jharkand Mud House Report Lokesh
Jharkand Mud House Report Lokesh
Jharkand Mud House Report Lokesh
REPORT
JHARKHAND MUD HOUSE
TEAM DETAILS
NAME1 U.Lokesh
UNIVERSITY/COLLEGE Mahindra École Centrale
NAME2 Namratha Reddy
UNIVERSITY/COLLEGE Mahindra École Centrale
1. Housing Typology
while, at the same time, stand-in as a visual barrier for the private spaces. The small windows
also help to keep the hot summer sun and cold winter winds out.
Technology: Building mud houses is more art than science. Learning the accurate mixtures to
use based on the soil you have available is more a matter of trial and error than calculation,
and thus requires a certain amount of experimentation.
The hutments were originally built of mud, grass, sticks, and pebbles. These houses were
mostly self-built by family members, sometimes supported by neighbours. Customary
architecture developed its individuality by tapping nearby resources and exploiting them to
confront problems posed by the local environment [Cooper & Dawson, 1998]. The huts were
made of local materials. Timber, bamboo, clay, straw, cow dung, and a special variety of
grass were used to build houses. The walls were made of an unusual type of mud obtained by
souring earth by adding vegetable waste and leaving it to mature. The decaying waste forms
tannic acid and other organic colloids, greatly improving the mud’s plasticity [Cooper &
Dawson, 1998]. This mud was then mixed with cow dung, chopped straw, and gravel or
stones to make the raw material for the walls. In the Middle East fibrous ingredients like
straw are used to improve the tensile strength of mud bricks. Mud houses are extremely
strong if constructed correctly, and proponents of earth houses claim they are resistant to
earthquakes.
The walls were formed by applying a thick coat of the mixture on both sides of bamboo mesh
that wrapped around the posts. Sometimes the mesh was made of wooden logs obtained from
sal trees that grow in abundance in this region. The walls are approximately 450 mm (18
inches) thick. The roof rested on nine wooden posts erected in three rows, with three posts
per row, as shown and purlins that supported the roof structure. The huts usually had a gabled
thatch roof. Bamboo sticks formed the mullions to support the thatch. The thick thatch used
as roofing material prevented rain from entering the house and at the same time provided
insulation to the building. While providing some benefits to the house, thatch had its own
drawbacks. It tended to house parasites, rodents, and birds. Over time, as an effect of
industrial hybridization, the thatch in the huts was replaced by sun-dried or burnt clay
Mangalore tiles that are today more commonly used as roofing material for the huts as has
been done in the house studied. [Gautam Avinash (2008).]
4. References:
1. Cooper Ilay and Dawson Barry (1998), Traditional Buildings of India-Published by
Thames & Hudson.
2.Gupta,J. and Chakraborty,M. (2012), Sustainability of Rural Mud Houses in Jharkhand:
Analysis related to Thermal Comfort, ABACUS, Spring 2012, Volume 7, No. 1 , pp. 56-63.
(ISSN 0973-8339).
3. Picture, http://www.indiapersonaltours.fr/tour-inde-rurale.php
4. Gautam Avinash (2008), Climate Responsive Vernacular Architecture: Jharkhand, India,
Masters of Science Thesis, Department of Architecture, Kansas State University, Manhattan,
Kansas.