Recovery of Gut Microbiota of Healthy Adults Following Antibiotic Exposure
Recovery of Gut Microbiota of Healthy Adults Following Antibiotic Exposure
Recovery of Gut Microbiota of Healthy Adults Following Antibiotic Exposure
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0257-9
To minimize the impact of antibiotics, gut microorganisms harbour and exchange antibiotics resistance genes, collectively
called their resistome. Using shotgun sequencing-based metagenomics, we analysed the partial eradication and subsequent
regrowth of the gut microbiota in 12 healthy men over a 6-month period following a 4-day intervention with a cocktail of 3 last-
resort antibiotics: meropenem, gentamicin and vancomycin. Initial changes included blooms of enterobacteria and other patho-
bionts, such as Enterococcus faecalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum, and the depletion of Bifidobacterium species and butyrate
producers. The gut microbiota of the subjects recovered to near-baseline composition within 1.5 months, although 9 common
species, which were present in all subjects before the treatment, remained undetectable in most of the subjects after 180 days.
Species that harbour β-lactam resistance genes were positively selected for during and after the intervention. Harbouring gly-
copeptide or aminoglycoside resistance genes increased the odds of de novo colonization, however, the former also decreased
the odds of survival. Compositional changes under antibiotic intervention in vivo matched results from in vitro susceptibility
tests. Despite a mild yet long-lasting imprint following antibiotics exposure, the gut microbiota of healthy young adults are
resilient to a short-term broad-spectrum antibiotics intervention and their antibiotics resistance gene carriage modulates their
recovery processes.
H
uman gut microbiota form complex, balanced ecosystems1. optimizing and disseminating antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs),
Perturbations of these biota may drive infections2, obesity3,4, collectively forming resistomes23. The human gut microbiota is con-
diabetes5–7 and inflammatory8 and neurological disorders9. sidered a reservoir for ARGs where members exchange these genes,
Rodent and human studies have shown that fecal transplants10, pre- thereby propagating resistance24. The development and spread of
biotics11, probiotics12 and antibiotics13, for example, can alter the gut microbial antibiotic resistance is a serious health concern given that
microbiota and improve host health. An estimated increase in life previously reliable antibiotics now fail. The intestinal microbiota
expectancy of 2–10 years is attributable to antibiotics14. However, from subjects in different countries harbour different ARG reper-
early-life exposure to antibiotics (especially macrolides) has also toires, reflecting the local usage patterns of antibiotics in healthcare
been associated with metabolic, inflammatory and neurologi- and food production25. However, only a few studies have character-
cal impairments both in animal models15–17 and in observational ized the effects of particular antibiotic regimens on the gut ecosys-
human studies18–22. tems of individuals with respect to the associated resistomes. In a
When exposed to antibiotics, microbial communities respond longitudinal 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplification and shotgun
not only by changing their composition, but also by evolving, metagenomics study of children receiving macrolides or penicillins
1
Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen,
Denmark. 2Clinical-Microbiomics A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3Center for Diabetes Research, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup,
Denmark. 4Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin,
Germany. 5Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany. 6Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin ,
Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany. 7Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
8
Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany. 9Danish Diabetes Academy, Odense,
Denmark. 10Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 11BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
12
China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China. 13James D. Watson Institute of Genome Sciences, Hangzhou, China. 14Genome Biology Unit,
European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany. 15Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit, University of Heidelberg and European Molecular
Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany. 16Department of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. 17iCarbonX, Shenzhen,
China. 18Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural
University, Beijing, China. 19Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 20State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in
Chinese Medicine/Macau Institute for Applied Research in Medicine and Health, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long,
Taipa Macau, China. 21Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. 22Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health
and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 23These authors contributed equally: Albert Palleja, Kristian H. Mikkelsen,
Sofia K. Forslund. *e-mail: filipknop@dadlnet.dk; arumugam@sund.ku.dk; oluf@sund.ku.dk
(β-lactams), we found decreased diversity and enriched ARG car- In line with the alpha diversity measures, principal coordinate
riage from the exposure, more so in the former than the latter18. Two analysis based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities demonstrated that gut
previous 16S rRNA gene amplification-based studies performed in microbial compositions immediately after treatment (D4 and D8)
one cohort demonstrated how treating healthy individuals with a had profound differences from D0, but gradually returned towards
single common antibiotic (for example, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, their initial composition (Fig. 2a). To analyse the full composi-
amoxicillin or minocycline) led to an enrichment of ARGs (imputed tional changes after antibiotic perturbation beyond the first two
based on taxonomic composition) and long-lasting compositional principal coordinates, we compared the perturbed samples to their
effects on the microbiota, including depletion of butyrate-produc- corresponding samples at D0 using Bray–Curtis dissimilarities.
ing species26,27. Another 16S rRNA gene study reported that a seven- To verify whether these observed changes were more severe than
day treatment with vancomycin caused profound changes in the expected over time in the absence of antibiotics, we also compared
microbiota, whereas a seven-day amoxicillin treatment did not28. In the Bray–Curtis dissimilarities between same-donor samples in our
contrast, a recent single-antibiotic study reported reduced micro- cohort to Bray–Curtis dissimilarities between same-donor samples
bial diversity after a three-day amoxicillin treatment29. Finally, a with comparable sampling intervals in two control populations35,36.
study using shotgun metagenomic data suggested that the effects of Compared to D0 samples, D4 and D8 showed very high composi-
cefprozil (a β-lactam) on the gut microbiota depended on its initial tional differences (median values 0.98 and 0.95, respectively), indi-
state30, reconciling previously divergent results. Antibiotic resistance cating drastic changes in the microbiome composition immediately
genes undetected at baseline were found after a seven-day treatment post-treatment (Fig. 2b). These differences were significantly larger
with the antibiotic30. However, the effects of a combinatorial multi- than same-donor differences in the control populations (two-sided
ple-antibiotic treatment on the microbiota and the role of ARGs in Wilcoxon rank-sum test, q < 0.001). By D42 and D180, the com-
gut microbial persistence have not been studied so far. munities still exhibited compositional differences from D0, but
Recently, we conducted an intervention in 12 healthy men who at a significantly lower magnitude (median values 0.70 and 0.64,
underwent prospective eradication of the gut microbiota through a respectively). These differences were still significantly larger than
combination of three broad-spectrum bactericidal antibiotics (van- same-donor differences at even larger time separations in control
comycin, gentamicin and meropenem) during a single four-day populations (Fig. 2b; two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, q < 0.05).
course and investigated the effects on host metabolism31. This mul- However, the compositional differences between D42 and D180
tidrug cocktail is a modified version of prophylactic antibiotic pro- samples were not significantly different from the variation seen over
tocols from intensive care units32 and includes antibiotics given to comparable durations in control populations (Fig. 2b, rightmost
patients with infections by multidrug-resistant bacteria. In the pres- panel; two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test; US Human Microbiome
ent study, using shotgun metagenomics on stool samples collected Project (HMP) dataset, time interval >100 d, P = 0.10; Voigt dataset,
before and at four different time points over a period of six months time interval >300 d, P = 0.57) suggesting that the gut microbiota
after treatment, we tracked the process of eradication, partial sur- had reached a stable composition by D42.
vival, gradual regrowth and re-establishment of these gut microbial
communities. Using a metagenomic species approach33, we link Specific microbial taxonomic changes during recovery and recol-
individual ARGs of the resistome to their carrier taxa, assessing how onization. We investigated which microorganisms became extinct
the ARG repertoire of intestinal microorganisms helps or hinders or survived after the treatment, which microorganisms colonized
them during survival and recolonization. the gut de novo and which microorganisms were lost permanently
by following the changes in the relative abundance of individual
Results microbial species over time. By D8, 4 days post-intervention, the
Overall composition of gut microbiota of young healthy adults relative abundances of 50 species had significantly changed (two-
recovers from a broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure. We charac- sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test adjusted for compositionality,
terized the gut microbial composition of the 12 study subjects using q < 0.05). There was an enrichment of low-abundance commensals
species-level metagenomic operational taxonomic units (mOTUs)34. like Escherichia coli, Veillonella spp., Klebsiella spp., E. faecalis and
Using samples collected at baseline (D0), immediately after antibi- F. nucleatum (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1),
otic treatment (4 d after baseline; D4) and at three further time points indicating a major ecological change. We also observed a deple-
(8, 42 and 180 d after baseline; D8, D42 and D180, respectively), we tion of other commensals, particularly butyrate producers, such
traced the eradication and recovery of gut microbial species by ecologi- as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Roseburia hominis, Anaerostipes
cal alpha and beta diversity measures. The gut microbial alpha diversity hadrus, Coprococcus spp. and Eubacterium spp. This replicates
of our subjects recovered within six months of the intervention (Fig. 1). reported decreases of short-chain fatty acid producers under anti-
By D4, immediately after intervention, both the species richness biotic treatment27,28.
and Shannon diversity were dramatically reduced compared to D0 By D42, none of the species whose relative abundance differed
(two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test; false discovery rate (FDR)- significantly between D0 and D8 exhibited significant differences,
adjusted P values (q) = 0.0098 and q = 0.0065, respectively). However, suggesting that most of the dominant microorganisms of the human
despite the broad-spectrum nature of the intensive antibiotic treat- gut had regrown. Some of the previously blooming species, includ-
ment, full eradication was not achieved and numerous species were ing Klebsiella spp., Megasphaera micronuciformis, E. faecalis and
detectable by D4 (Fig. 1a). By D8, the gut microbiota still exhibited F. nucleatum, were no longer detectable. Others, such as E. coli and
reduced richness, but Shannon diversity had significantly increased Veillonella spp., remained but returned to D0 levels, so that by the
(Fig. 1b; two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test; q = 0.0065), suggest- end of the observational period they were not particularly elevated.
ing that the surviving microorganisms started recovery by regrowing Clostridium spp. were generally undetectable pre-intervention
more evenly. Thereafter, both richness and Shannon diversity were but significantly increased in their relative abundance by D42
gradually regained during the six-month follow-up (as measured at (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test after adjusting for composi-
D42 and D180). Interestingly, although we observed no significant tionality, q < 0.05) (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1).
differences in Shannon diversity between D0 and D180, the species These species are known to form endospores under unfavourable
richness remained significantly lower by D180 (two-sided Wilcoxon conditions, reviving when environmental conditions are once again
signed-rank test; q = 0.011), suggesting that some microorganisms that favourable37. This may have provided them with an advantage in
were originally present may have been permanently lost or severely our clinical setup, with spores reviving on sensing an emptier gut
depleted due to the treatment. and effectively colonizing the gut after intervention. Specifically,
175 4
150
Shannon diversity
3
125
Richness
100
2
75
50
1
25
0
0
D0 D4 D8 D42 D180 D0 D4 D8 D42 D180
Time point Time point
Fig. 1 | Gut microbial diversity recovers after a broad-spectrum antibiotic intervention. a,b, Microbial richness (a) and Shannon diversity (b) based on
mOTU relative abundances. The boxplots represent the diversity measures for the 12 volunteers (centre line, median; box limits, first and third quartiles;
whiskers, 1.5 × interquartile range), which are also represented as points connected across time by grey lines. Samples are coloured according to time point
(n = 57). The FDR-adjusted P values are shown between consecutive time points (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test).
Clostridium bolteae abundance was significantly increased by the species level (Supplementary Fig. 1) as well as differences
D42 (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test after compositionality between conspecific strains (Supplementary Fig. 3). For this, we
test, q = 0.026) and remained elevated in all 12 subjects on D180 updated the ARG annotation of IGC genes40 to ARG families in the
(two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests after compositionality test, Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD)41 and the
q = 0.052; Supplementary Figs. 1,2). Finally, some species detected ResFams42 database. By mapping metagenomic reads to IGC, we esti-
at D0 were not detected again within the study time frame. These mated the abundance of known ARGs against β-lactams (parent class
included: (1) members of genus Bifidobacterium that are considered of meropenem; note that several β -lactamases cannot cleave
pathogen-protective and immunostimulatory; (2) butyrate pro- carbapenems43), aminoglycosides (parent class of gentamicin),
ducers such as Coprococcus eutactus and Eubacterium ventriosum glycopeptides (parent class of vancomycin) and all other antibiotic
and (3) methane-producing Methanobrevibacter smithii associ- classes, which were grouped for comparison. We conducted the
ated with the efficient digestion of polysaccharides. These results analysis at the antibiotic class level as existing ARG annotation is
with regards to compositional changes broadly match expecta- frequently incomplete, whereas cross-resistance between structur-
tions from the relative susceptibility to antibiotics of human gut ally similar antibiotics is common and likewise incompletely anno-
microorganisms from a recent in vitro microbial growth inhibition tated. We further quantified multidrug efflux pumps (MEPs), which
screen38 (see Supplementary Analysis, Supplementary Table 4 and could potentially confer unspecific multidrug resistance. Antibiotic
Supplementary Fig. 12). resistance genes against β-lactams and aminoglycosides were not
We then investigated taxonomic changes at an increased reso- significantly altered from D0 abundances (Fig. 3). Our results were
lution using metagenomic species33 (MGSs) derived from the inte- robust to the choice of ARG database (see Methods). The larger
grated gene catalog (IGC) of 9.9 million gut microbial genes39. MGSs contribution to the ARG abundance changes that we observed
include cultured as well as uncultured gut microbial species and are driven by genes more likely to be chromosomal than located
provide sub-species-level resolution in some taxonomic groups, as on mobile genetic elements (see Methods). Antibiotic resistance
each MGS is probably derived from an independent chromosome33. genes against glycopeptides were significantly depleted by D4 and
MGS-based analysis confirmed many of the microbial changes remained so until D8 (Fig. 3; two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test,
observed using mOTUs (Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary q < 0.05). We observed no significant differences when comparing
Table 1) and highlighted additional changes. It corroborated the either D42 or D180 to D0. Abundances of MEPs were significantly
post-intervention significant increase of species usually only found elevated by D8 (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test, q < 0.01) and
at low abundance. Furthermore, it confirmed the depletion of butyr- these were maintained until D42 (two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank
ate producers (Supplementary Fig. 3) post-treatment and provided test, q < 0.05). By D180, no category showed significant differences
increased sub-species resolution, highlighting eight different MGSs when compared to D0 (Fig. 3). Thus, the overall ARG abundance
belonging to F. prausnitzii, one to R. hominis, three to Eubacterium spp. analysis did not show clear temporal patterns that could explain the
and two to Coprococcus spp. as significantly depleted (two-sided differences between species and conspecific strains.
Wilcoxon signed-rank test after adjusting for compositionality, Unlike previous gut resistome analyses, our use of the MGS
q < 0.05). Remarkably, only two F. prausnitzii strains were able to approach33 enabled us to link ARGs to the MGSs that they belong
recover by D180, another six could not recover through the study to. First, we observed that both the MGSs that survived the treat-
period (Supplementary Fig. 3), reflecting the different recovery ment and the first colonizers often harbour ARGs against multiple
capacities between conspecific strains. antibiotics (Supplementary Figs. 4,5). Second, by using the abun-
dances of MGSs and the abundance of individual ARGs within
Resistance gene carriage impacts survival and colonization poten- them, we noted each MGS as either detected or undetected in
tial of gut microorganisms. We hypothesized that differences in each study sample and, when detected, we marked those as either
antibiotic resistance potential among microorganisms could explain resistant or non-resistant to each of the three antibiotics. We then
the differences in their recovery patterns, which involve trends at assessed how possession of ARGs affected the chance of survival
Bray−Curtis dissimilarity
S6 0.8
0.8 0.8 0.8
0.7 0.7
PCo2 (13%)
S6 0.7 0.7
0 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
S6
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
0
us 42
60
d
us 8
us 4
2
d
7
rs 18
18
rs D
rs D
D
M 300
00
rs D
D
D
ve us
D
ve s
PCo1 (17%)
>1
ve s
0 su
>
us
0 su
us
0 s
D ver
D ver
t,
P,
D ers
D ver
ig
ve
Vo
0
0
H
0
D
D
0
42
D
D
Fig. 2 | Gut microbial composition dramatically changes after broad-spectrum antibiotic intervention but recovers progressively. a, Principal coordinate
analysis based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity between samples, calculated using mOTU relative abundances. Samples are coloured according to time
point (n = 57) and ellipses represent the 95% confidence interval for each time point assuming a multivariate normal distribution. The grey lines connect
samples from the same individual (S6) to denote a representative trajectory followed by the individuals after antibiotic intervention. The variance
explained by each axis is stated as a percentage in parentheses. b, The boxplots show the Bray–Curtis dissimilarities (as a measure of beta diversity)
between same-donor samples from two different time points (centre line, median; box limits, first and third quartiles; whiskers, 1.5 × interquartile range).
The four boxplots in the rightmost panel show that the extent of compositional changes between paired samples during the study time (D0 to D180) were
significantly different compared to the degree of variation over time observed for paired samples in the Voigt and HMP controls (separated by time spans
>300 d and >100 d, respectively) but the compositional changes between D42 and D180 did not differ from the controls. Grey was used to represent
the study distances between paired study samples (n = 57). Orange and brown was used to represent the distances between paired samples for the
Voigt (n = 35) and HMP (n = 82) datasets, respectively. Two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to test for significant differences between sample
distances and FDR-adjusted P values are shown. ABX, antibiotics-treated cohort.
of an MGS (detection at D0 and at a later time point) using Fisher’s selected for, whereas species carrying aminoglycoside ARGs here
exact test (see Methods for details). Metagenomic species with could be negatively selected for. The latter could reflect that amino-
β-lactam ARGs had significantly higher odds of survival (odds ratio glycosides are inactive under anaerobic conditions (as those found
(OR) = 1.64 (1.24–2.17)) by D8, but this effect decreased at later time in the gut) and are usually administered for local or systemic infec-
points (Fig. 4). In contrast, MGSs with glycopeptide ARGs had sig- tions. The trend observed for species carrying glycopeptide ARGs
nificantly decreased chances of survival from D0 to D8 (OR = 0.32 could indicate that, under the present multidrug treatment, carry-
(0.23–0.44)) and D42 (OR = 0.71 (0.60–0.84)), again with the effect ing vancomycin ARGs may not be beneficial for the survival of a
weakening over time. This change may be due to the increase of microorganism. This may indicate that these ARGs are not func-
Gram-negative species in the initial time points after treatment, tional and/or are expensive to make (most known vancomycin
which are naturally resistant to vancomycin without the need for resistance systems are operons of up to nine genes encoding pro-
specific ARGs. Strikingly, MGSs with aminoglycoside ARGs exhib- teins that build an alternative cell-wall precursor less susceptible to
ited a gradual decrease of survival odds from D0 to D180 (OR = 0.67 glycopeptide binding44), or it could reflect that most of the vanco-
(0.48–0.93)). Although we observed a significant enrichment of mycin resistance in the gut microbial population is not encoded by
MEPs by D8 (Fig. 3), MGSs carrying MEPs did not show higher ARGs but is due to the overall cell envelope composition. The same
chances of survival. Interestingly, MGSs that were undetected at trends were observed for carrying glycopeptide ARGs in the control
D0 had significantly higher odds of de novo colonization of the population (HMP; >100 d) but with lower odds (Fig. 4; OR = 0.57
gut ecosystem at a later time point if they carried ARGs against any (0.49–0.65) and OR = 1.36 (1.18–1.56) for survival and de novo
of the three classes used: aminoglycoside ARGs (OR = 4.32 (2.29– colonization, respectively). Thus, glycopeptide resistance capacity
8.57); OR = 1.91 (1.24–2.94); OR = 2.01 (1.39–2.92); for D8, D42 may be found more frequently in taxa with a generally higher gut
and D180, respectively), β-lactam ARGs (OR = 1.64 (1.12–2.40); turnover. Carrying MEPs significantly increased the chance of MGS
OR = 1.40 (1.12–1.77); OR = 1.12 (0.91–1.37), respectively), or gly- survival in the control population (Fig. 4; OR = 1.78 (1.36–2.32)),
copeptide ARGs (OR = 2.45 (1.61–3.74); OR = 2.33 (1.86–2.94); but we did not observe this pattern in our intensive treatment, sug-
OR = 1.33 (1.09–1.62), respectively), although this effect also weak- gesting that MEPs were altogether insufficient to provide resistance
ened over time (Fig. 4). We observed the opposite pattern in the to our antibiotic cocktail.
long term for MGSs carrying MEPs, suggesting that the possession We next tested whether ARG families that changed significantly
of more MEPs does not increase the chances of colonizing the gut in abundance post-intervention were also enriched within the
environment post-treatment (OR = 0.51 (0.35–0.76) and OR = 0.54 genomes of species that were enriched post-intervention. Indeed,
(0.38–0.76) for D42 and D180, respectively). The survival and taxonomic compositional changes predicted the gene-level changes
colonization likelihood trends for MGSs harbouring β-lactam and for 65 of 82 families (Supplementary Analysis and Supplementary
aminoglycoside ARGs were not observed in the control population Table 6). The remaining ARG families may represent cases of genes
(HMP same-donor sample pairs with an interval >100 d; Fig. 4), that are more variably found across conspecific gut strains, or genes
suggesting that MGSs carrying β-lactam ARGs could be positively that have been carried on mobile elements in the recent evolutionary
9 × 10–5
1 × 10–3
4 × 10–3
4 × 10–2
ARG abundance
2 × 10–3
0 0 0 0 7 × 10–2 1 × 10–3
9 × 10–5
0
4
8
D 2
0
0
4
8
D 2
0
0
4
8
D 2
0
0
4
8
D 2
0
0
4
8
D 2
0
D
D
D
4
18
D
D
D
4
18
D
D
D
4
18
D
D
D
4
18
D
D
D
4
18
D
D
Time point Time point Time point Time point Time point
Fig. 3 | Microbial antibiotic resistance potential changes after broad-spectrum antibiotic intervention. Boxplots show the changes in ARG relative
abundance (centre line, median; box limits, first and third quartiles; whiskers, 1.5 × interquartile range) throughout the intervention (n = 57). These
enrichments/depletions are shown for the three drug classes used in the intervention (aminoglycosides, β-lactams and glycopeptides), MEPs and a general
category where we pooled ARGs that protect against all other antibiotic classes (other). FDR-adjusted P values are shown for the statistically significant
enrichments (two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test). The grey horizontal lines represent the median and the 25th and 75th percentile values at D0.
Aminoglycoside
resistance
. *** ** ***
log2[OR]
.
3
β-Lactam
resistance *** * ** 2
1
0
Glycopeptide
resistance *** *** *** *** ** *** *** –1
–2
–3
Fig. 4 | Resistance gene carriage impacts the odds of microbial survival and colonization. The left heatmap shows the odds ratio (log2) of survival and
colonization after the intervention of MGSs carrying ARGs to the antibiotics used in the treatment as well as MEPs (for D8, D42 and D180; n = 48).
The right heatmap shows the same for a control population (HMP; n = 82). Asterisks represent statistically significant odds ratios. ***q < 0.001;
**0.001 ≤ q < 0.01; *0.01 ≤ q < 0.05; ▪0.05 ≤ q < 0.1; Fisher’s exact test. Exact FDR P values and other details about the statistical test can be found in
Supplementary Fig. 4.
past. We note among others that the carpapenem-resistance asso- Increase of antibiotic resistance functional potential and enrich-
ciated resistance-nodulation-cell division pump AdeJ, character- ment of virulence factors following antibiotic exposure. We next
istic of Acinetobacter baumannii45,46, is detected and elevated after investigated whether there were microbial functions that increased
intervention in these samples in the absence of its typical host, sug- in abundance alongside the otherwise usually low-abundance spe-
gesting that its genomic carriage in the gut may be wider than previ- cies by D8 and later post-treatment time points. We used previously
ously thought. published annotation of IGC genes40 to the Kyoto Encyclopedia
Author contributions Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
O.P., T.H. and F.K.K. devised the study protocol. M.F.N. participated in the protocol published maps and institutional affiliations.
design and application and in the participant recruitment and selection. K.H.M. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2018
Please do not complete any field with "not applicable" or n/a. Refer to the help text for what text to use if an item is not relevant to your study.
For final submission: please carefully check your responses for accuracy; you will not be able to make changes later.
` Experimental design
1. Sample size
Describe how sample size was determined. This is the first metagenomic study characterizing the effects of a prospective eradication of
the gut microbiota of young healthy adults using a multiantibiotic treatment. No formal
sample size calculations were employed for this prospective analysis, but the cohort size was
based on what has been sufficient to test host phenotype effects in previous clinical studies
as well as in other metagenomic studies of comprehensive intervention effects.
2. Data exclusions
Describe any data exclusions. Three samples from day 4 repeatedly failed during library construction and were therefore
discarded.
3. Replication
Describe the measures taken to verify the reproducibility For the experimental findings, these are the first of its kind, analyzing the effects of
of the experimental findings. multiantibiotic treatment on the gut microbial communities of healthy young adults. No
additional replication cohort were recruited for this study and we suggest such replication be
undertaken in discussing the results. However we validated observations of previous single
antibiotic treatments in humans.
4. Randomization
Describe how samples/organisms/participants were We followed only one group (as per a longitudinal study of a single condition, multiantibiotic
allocated into experimental groups. treatment) of 12 healthy young Danish men with specific inclusion criteria described in
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142352, therefore there was no need to randomize the study
subjects. Public data previously generated using equivalent protocols were used for non-
intervention controls, compared in cross-section and over time intervals.
5. Blinding
Describe whether the investigators were blinded to Under longitudinal analysis of a single condition, no blinding was either possible or necessary.
group allocation during data collection and/or analysis. All sample processing and statistical analysis was done in an automated computational
framework which does not make use of the time point or intervention status information
except when tested for, making effective blinding occur by default.
Note: all in vivo studies must report how sample size was determined and whether blinding and randomization were used.
November 2017
1
6. Statistical parameters
n/a Confirmed
The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as a discrete number and unit of measurement (animals, litters, cultures, etc.)
A description of how samples were collected, noting whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or whether the same
sample was measured repeatedly
A statement indicating how many times each experiment was replicated
The statistical test(s) used and whether they are one- or two-sided
Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.
A clear description of statistics including central tendency (e.g. median, mean) and variation (e.g. standard deviation, interquartile range)
Clearly defined error bars in all relevant figure captions (with explicit mention of central tendency and variation)
See the web collection on statistics for biologists for further resources and guidance.
` Software
Policy information about availability of computer code
7. Software
Describe the software used to analyze the data in this We used the MOCAT and MOCAT2 software to process and annotate the sequenced reads
study. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047656; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw183). For the differential
abundance testing we used a compositionality test available at: https://github.com/apalleja/
compositionality_test. Otherwise standard R packages were used, which are cited and
publicly available.
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the paper but not yet described in the published literature, software must be made
available to editors and reviewers upon request. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). Nature Methods guidance for
providing algorithms and software for publication provides further information on this topic.
9. Antibodies
Describe the antibodies used and how they were validated n/a
for use in the system under study (i.e. assay and species).
10. Eukaryotic cell lines
a. State the source of each eukaryotic cell line used. n/a
2
` Animals and human research participants
November 2017