Calendar Conversion
Calendar Conversion
Calendars
5IJTJOGPSNBUJPOJTSFQSJOUFEGSPNUIF&YQMBOBUPSZ4VQQMFNFOUUPUIF
"TUSPOPNJDBM"MNBOBD
4&6SCBOBOE1,4FJEFMNBO
&ET
E. G. RICHARDS
XJUIQFSNJTTJPOGSPN6OJWFSTJUZ4DJFODF#PPLT
.JMM7BMMFZ
$""MM
SJHIUTSFTFSWFE5PQVSDIBTFUIFDPNQMFUFCPPL
TFF
IUUQXXXVTDJCPPLTDPNVSCBOIUN
15.1 Introduction
15.1.1 Overview
A calendar is a system for assigning a unique name, its date, to every day so that the order of
the dates is apparent and the interval in days between two dates can be readily calculated. A
date is generally specified by three numbers: a day of the month, D, a month, M and a year,
Y; in most calendars, the months also have names.
Most calendars are based on astronomical cycles so that the days of the month cycle in
approximate synchrony with the lunations (the cycle of the phases of the Moon) and the
months cycle in approximate synchrony with the seasons of the year.
Since the number of lunations in a year and the number of days in a lunation are not integral
(and also slowly change with time), extra intercalary days or months may be inserted into
occasional years to maintain a long-term average synchrony with the astronomical cycles.
Years in which a day or month is intercalated are sometime called leap years. The Romans
called years with an extra day bissextile years.
Solar calendars, such as the current Gregorian calendar, maintain accurate synchrony
with the astronomical year while abandoning any attempt to keep the months in synchrony
with the lunations of the Moon. Lunar calendars, such as the Islamic calendar, maintain
synchrony of the months and abandon synchrony with the Sun. Luni-solar calendars, such
as the Jewish, Chinese and Christian Ecclesiastic calendars, attempt to maintain synchrony
with both.
According to a recent estimate (Fraser 1987), there are about forty calendars in use in the
world today and more that have been abandoned. This chapter is concerned with only a few
of these. We discuss here nine. The first of these is the Gregorian calendar, which is now used
throughout the world for secular purposes. It is the official calendar of the United Kingdom
(since 1752), but not of the United States (which has no official calendar). We discuss a
further six (the Julian, Jewish, Islamic, Indian, Chinese and Bahá’i calendars), which are in
current use to determine the proper dates of religious or cultural activities. We discuss two
more (The Ancient Egyptian and the French Republican calendars), which are of historical
interest. Brief historical summaries and the details of the operation are given for each of
these nine calendars, but we do not discuss their usage. Algorithms are given for arithmetic
calendars (see § 15.1.4) for converting dates in one to those in others.
Despite a vast literature on calendars, truly authoritative references, particularly in En-
glish, are difficult to find. One such is Reingold and Dershowitz (1997, 2001). Richards (1998)
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 585 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
586 15. Calendars
surveys a broad variety of calendars and Aveni (1990) stresses their cultural contexts rather
than their operational details. Fotheringham (1935), Doggett (1992) and the Encyclopaedia
of Religion and Ethics (Hastings 1910), in its section on “Calendars,” offer basic informa-
tion on historical calendars. Blackburn and Holford-Stevens (1999) give detailed information
about customs appertaining to each day of the year and on a variety of calendars. The sections
on “Calendars” and “Chronology” in all editions of the Encyclopaedia Britannica provide
useful historical surveys. Ginzel (1906,1911) remains an authoritative, if dated, standard of
calendrical scholarship. References on individual calendars are given in the relevant sections.
See also URL[1], URL[2], URL[3], URL[4], and URL[5].
365.d 242 189 6698 − 0.000 006 153 59 T − 7.29 × 10−10 T 2 + 2.64 × 10−10 T 3. (15.1)
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 586 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.1 Introduction 587
increase, expressed as parts per billion (109) per century, are given for the year 2000
The synodic month, or lunation, the mean interval between conjunctions of the Moon
and Sun, corresponds to the cycle of lunar phases. The following expression for the synodic
month is based on the lunar theory of Chapront-Touzé and Chapront (1988):
29.d 530 588 8531 + 0.000 000 216 21 T − 3.64 × 10−10 T 2 (15.2)
but any particular cycle may vary from the mean by up to seven hours.
In these expressions, T is the number of Julian centuries (of 36525 days) measured from
2000 January 1 in Terrestrial Time (TT). It is given by T = (J − 245 1545.0)/36525 where
J is the Julian date (see § 15.1.10).
The lengths of the tropical year and synodic month are given by these formulae in days of
86400 seconds (SI) of International Atomic Time (TAI). See Chapter 3 for further information
on timescales.
Historians (Stephenson 1997) have also found that the length of the mean solar day
expressed in TAI is not constant. It appears to be increasing by about 0.0017 seconds per
century because of tidal and other effects. It also suffers from both periodic and small random
changes.
The lengths of the cycles change slowly with time and expressions 15.1 and 15.2 only
represent approximations and are included in this chapter only for illustrative reasons. The
lengths of these cycles calculated from them for representative years are shown in. Table 15.1.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 587 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
588 15. Calendars
to error on account of the weather and such calendars cannot be constructed in advance.
Examples are the ancient Jewish calendar and the Islamic calendar as it is generally used to
determine important religious dates (such as the start of Ramadan); both of these depend on
sightings of the crescent of the new moon. The heliacal rising of Sopdet (Sirius) may, at one
time, have signalled the start of the ancient Egyptian year. It is likely that many calendars
now lost were observational. Note that the local time at which an observation is made may
fall in different days according to the locality of the observer.
Astronomical calendars depend on a model to predict the times of such events. These
models have changed over the centuries as astronomical knowledge improved. Examples
of astronomical calendars include the Chinese and Indian luni-solar calendars, the original
form of the French Republican calendar and one form of the Bahá’i calendar. Astronomical
calendars usually specify that the events be observed or calculated for a particular meridian.
Thus events used in the Chinese calendar are observed at a meridian at 120◦ East (but before
1929 at the meridian of Beijing). The French Republican calendar specified the meridian of
Paris.
Arithmetic calendars abandon any explicit references to astronomical events and are
regulated by fixed rules, though they may have been designed in an attempt to keep their
years or months in step with the astronomical periods. Examples include the current Gregorian
calendar and its predecessor, the Julian calendar, as well as the ancient Egyptian calendar, the
modern Jewish calendar and the civil Islamic calendar (used by historians of Islamic culture).
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 588 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.1 Introduction 589
calendar and the French Republican calendar used a 10-day cycle, and the Bolsheviks in
Russia experimented with a four-day “week.” Most of the world today recognises the seven-
day week which has religious significance for Christians, Jews and Muslims.
The seven-day week probably originated in Babylon as a useful, if inexact, division of the
lunar month and was probably adopted by the Jewish people at the time of the Babylonian
exile in the sixth century b.c.. It is likely that it has run continuously and without interruption
since these times to the present day (but see Zerubavel E. (1989). The seven-day cycle was
widely used in the Roman Empire from the first century b.c.. According to Cassius Deo each
of the seven “wandering stars,” the Sun, the Moon and the five naked-eye planets known
to the ancients, was assigned cyclically to each of the 24 hours of each day in the order of
their apparent speed in the heavens. The star assigned to the first hour was the regent of
the day. The names of the regents gave each day its name and the order of the days in this
astrological week. These names, or their equivalents in other languages and pantheons, are
still used today. Saturn’s day coincided with the Jewish Sabbath, though the Jews never used
the Roman names.
Colson (1926) and Zerubavel (1989) are standard references on the week. Richards (1998)
gives a comprehensive list of the names of the days of the week. Zerubavel (1989) also
considers other week-like numerical cycles used by past and present cultures.
Cycles of years have also had significance for various cultures. The Romans used a 15-
year cycle of indiction for taxation purposes. The Chinese have a cycle of 60 years comprised
of two simultaneous cycles of 10 and 12 years (60 is the lowest common multiple of 10 and
12). The years in both of these Chinese cycles carried names. The cultures of Central America
and of India used several cycles of years; some are exceedingly long.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 589 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
590 15. Calendars
era and an existing system associated with historical records. However, Dionysius did not
use an accurate date for the birth of Christ and scholars generally believe that Christ was
born some years before a.d. 1, but the historical evidence is not adequate to allow a definitive
dating.
Years after the epoch of the Christian calendar are traditionally labeled: a.d. (Anno
Domini) but the label c.e. (Common Era) is preferred by some. Likewise the traditional
label of years before a.d. 1 has been b.c. (Before Christ) but some prefer b.c.e. (Before
Common Era).
It is often possible to assign a date in a calendar to days preceding the epoch or the
date on which it was first used. Such dates are termed proleptic dates. Bede, the eighth-
century English historian, began the practice of counting years backward from a.d. 1 (see
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 590 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.1 Introduction 591
Colgrave and Mynors 1969). In this system, the year a.d. 1 is preceded by the year 1 b.c.,
with no intervening year 0. Because of this numerical discontinuity, this “historical” system is
cumbersome for comparing ancient and modern dates. I have used +1(etc.) to designate a.d. 1
(etc.). The year +1is naturally preceded by year 0, which is preceded by year −1. Since the use
of negative numbers developed slowly in Europe, this system of dating was delayed until the
eighteenth century, when it was introduced by the astronomer Jacques Cassini (Cassini 1740).
15.1.9 Dates
The date of any day is specified by giving the year and the month in which it falls and its
day of the month and maybe the day of the week. There are many conventions concerning
the order in which these are presented. We shall specify here dates by giving the day of the
week, the year number, the name of the month and the day of the month in that order.
Note that in nearly all calendars, the first day of a month is day 1—rather than day 0;
likewise, the first month of a year is month 1—rather than month 0. This is in contradistinction
to other systems for specifying time; thus the first hour of a day is hour 0—rather than hour 1.
We shall use, following the practice of historians, the Julian calendar (see § 15.3.4) for
dates before 1582 and the Gregorian for dates after, but it is usual to specify the calendar used
for dates between 1582 and 1800. We shall not always label the years with either a.d./b.c.
or c.e./b.c.e. Instead a positive year number should be read to imply a year in the Common
Era (a.d.), whilst a negative year implies a year before that (b.c.). Thus, a year 2000 means
a.d. 2000 whilst −1000 implies 1001 b.c.. In general negative year, −Y is equivalent to
1 − Y b.c.. We will, however, use the terms a.d. or b.c. when referring to centuries.
The time of day of the start of a day varies in different Calendars. Thus, the Gregorian
day runs from midnight to midnight, but the Islamic and Jewish days start some six hours
earlier and run from dusk (at a nominal 6 p.m.) to dusk. This raises the point as to which,
for example, Gregorian day or date corresponds to a given Islamic or Jewish date. The usual
convention, which we follow here and in The Astronomical Almanac, is that dates in different
calendars correspond when they contain the same noon. Thus the Islamic and Jewish days
start some six hours before the corresponding Gregorian day. In some Indian calendars the
day starts at dawn, some six hours later.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 591 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
592 15. Calendars
golden numbers (the period after which the Moon’s phases approximately repeat on the same
calendar dates), and the fifteen-year indiction cycle (the Roman tax cycle).
Scaliger could, therefore, characterise a year by a triplet of numbers (S, G, I); S, the
number of the year in the solar cycle, runs from 1 to 28; G, the golden number of the year,
runs from 1 to 19; I, the number of the year in the Indiction cycle runs from 1 to 15. He noted
that a given combination would recur after 7980 (= 28 × 19 × 15) years. This he called a
Julian Period, because it was based on the Julian calendar year. For his initial epoch, Scaliger
chose the year in which S, G and I were all equal to 1. He knew that the year 1 (a.d. 1) had
S = 10, G = 2 and I = 4 and worked out that the combination (1,1,1) occurred in the year
−4712 (4713 b.c.) which was year 1 of Scaliger’s Julian period.
Although Scaliger’s original idea was to introduce a count of years, nineteenth-century
astronomers adapted this system to create a count of days elapsed since the beginning of the
Julian period. John Herschel (1849) gave a thorough explanation of the system and provided
a table of “Intervals in Days between the Commencement of the Julian Period, and that of
some other remarkable chronological and astronomical Eras.”
Astronomers have extended this idea by appending to the day number, the time of day
expressed as a decimal fraction of a day. The resulting numbers called Julian dates define
any instant of time. Thus 2 451 545.0 corresponds to noon on 2000 January 1 as observed at
a meridian of 0◦ (Greenwich) in the Gregorian calendar. At a meridian of 0◦, the day 2000
January 1 began 12 hours earlier at 2 451 544.5. Further east, the day begins earlier and further
west, later.
It is important to note these Julian dates specify an instant in Universal Time (UT), not
local time. A day in the Gregorian calendar begins at midnight, the world over, at an instant
that varies with longitude, and hence is specified by different Julian dates. This is inconvenient
when considering calendars. It is, therefore, useful to define a Julian Day Number, J, (to be
distinguished from a Julian date) which is a whole number, and which may be used to label
each of the days. The Julian Day Number of Saturday 2000 January 1 is then 2 451 545 and
of Monday −4712 January 1 it is 0. URL[7] provides a useful program for interconverting
dates and Julian dates.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 592 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.2 The Ancient Egyptian Calendar 593
moon) and are thus synchronised with the lunations, but these calendars also make use of
solar months. These are defined by dividing the ecliptic into twelve sections, analogous to
the sign of the Zodiac, and separated by 30◦ of solar longitude. The temporal lengths of both
the lunar months and of the solar months vary throughout the year. Thus, although the starting
dates of the solar and lunar months generally alternate, so that each lunar month contains the
start of just one solar month, there are years in which a lunar month contains the start of
two solar months (i.e., the solar month is entirely contained in a lunar month) or of no solar
month (i.e., the lunar month is entirely contained in a solar month). The points at which extra
months are intercalated are determined by such months. This results in the intercalation of
about 7 extra months in 19 years and achieves a result similar to that of the Metonic calendar.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 593 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
594 15. Calendars
5 epagomenal days belonging to no month. The names of the months are shown in Table 15.3.
The year began on Thoth 1. Since 365 is a poor approximation to the number of days in the
year, the start of the year cycled slowly through the seasons with a period of about 1500
years. There was no Egyptian Era, instead the years were counted from the accession of each
Pharaoh in regnal fashion, but Ptolemy used the era of Nabonassar (E.N.) (see § 15.1.7).
The Roman writer Censorinus noted that the Julian calendar date 139 July 20 (Julian Day
Number 1 772 028)) was Thoth 1 in the Egyptian calendar. This day started year 887 E.N.
The Egyptian calendar was reformed by the Roman Emperor Augustus in 23 b.c.. He
decreed that a sixth epagomenal day should be inserted once every four years to keep
it in synchrony with the Julian calendar. This modified calendar is sometimes called the
Alexandrian calendar.
This Alexandrian calendar is not extinct even today. Calendars closely similar to it are
used by the Coptic Church in modern Egypt and in Ethiopia. It was also used by a variety
of cultures and religions including The Zoroastrian Parsees, the Armenian Church and the
French Republicans after their revolution.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 594 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.3 The Roman and Julian Calendars 595
mostly with names similar to those in the current Gregorian calendar, though the numbers of
days in several were different. The year started on Januarius 1.
At one time the years were indicated by a regnal system that mentioned the names of the
current Consuls. Later, in the first century b.c., the years were numbered from the presumed
date of the foundation of Rome, −752; these are termed ab urbe condita (A.U.C). Later still
the Emperor Diocletian instituted an era which started with his accession in 283.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 595 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
596 15. Calendars
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 596 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.3 The Roman and Julian Calendars 597
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 597 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
598 15. Calendars
A Julian calendar year thus contains 365 days or 366 in a leap year. Years are, today,
counted from the initial epoch defined by Dionysius Exiguus (see § 15.1.8). A leap day,
February 29, is intercalated after February 28 in leap years. Leap years are divisible by 4,
e.g., +2000 was a leap year but +2001was not. For this purpose, year 0 (or 1 b.c., see § 15.1.9)
is considered to be divisible by 4.
The epoch of the calendar (Saturday, 1 January 1) had a Julian Day Number 1 721 424
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 598 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.4 The Gregorian Calendar 599
Detailed information about the Gregorian reform may be found in the collection of papers
resulting from a conference sponsored by the Vatican to commemorate its four-hundredth
anniversary (Coyne, Hoskin and Pedersen 1983).
Every year that is exactly divisible by 4 is a leap year, except for years that are exactly divisible
by 100, but these centurial years are leap years if they are exactly divisible by 400.
As a result, the year 2000 was a leap year, whereas 1900 and 2100 are not.
The epoch of the Gregorian calendar, (1 January 1) was Monday, 1 January 3 in the Julian
calendar or Julian Day Number 1 721 426.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 599 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
600 15. Calendars
The date of Easter as calculated in the Gregorian calendar is used by the Catholic and
most Protestant churches. However, the Eastern Orthodox churches still calculate the date of
Easter in the Julian calendar, though some such churches have, in this century, modified the
original method of calculation.
or
The second, the Golden number, is the position (1 to 19) of a year in the 19 year Metonic
cycle. If Y is the year in either the Julian or Gregorian calendar, the golden number, G, is
given by:
The third is the Epact of a year. It is the age in days (0 to 29) of the ecclesiastical moon
on the first day of the year (January 1).
For the Dionysian canon (tied to the Julian calendar), the epact, E, of a year with a Golden
number G is given by:
In the Gregorian canon, the calculation of the epact is more complicated. First the basic
formula for the epact is changed to:
But this must be modified by the addition of the so called solar (SOL) and lunar (LUN)
equations.
The solar equation firstly makes an adjustment needed to return the date of the vernal
equinox to its traditional date close to March 21. Secondly it makes an adjustment of the
decreased length of the Gregorian year. It is given by:
The lunar equation likewise gives an adjustment to correct the average length of a lunation
to value more close to that of the real Moon. It is given by:
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 600 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.5 The Jewish Calendar 601
The day of Easter Sunday is then given as a Day of March, S, (i.e., counting from March 1
as day 1) in terms of this modified epact E by:
S = R + mod(7 + N − C, 7) (15.12)
where
C = 1 + mod(R + 2, 7) (15.13)
and
R = 45 − E if E < 24 (15.14)
or R = 75 − E if E ≥ 24 (15.15)
See § 15.11.1 for a full explanation of the mathematical notation used here. Details of the
calculation are discussed at length by Butcher (1877), Oudin (1940) and Richards (1998).
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 601 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
602 15. Calendars
After the Diaspora, this arrangement became unworkable; by the time news of sightings
at Jerusalem reach outlying Jewish communities, the start of the months was well past. The
patriarch Hillel II is credited with reforming this state of affairs by disseminating codified
rules, which anybody, anywhere, could follow.
The exact details of Hillel’s calendar have not survived, but it is generally considered
to include rules for intercalation over nineteen-year cycles. Up to the tenth century a.d.,
however, there was disagreement about the proper years for intercalation and the initial epoch
for reckoning years.
The modern Jewish calendar is the official calendar of Israel and is the liturgical calendar
of the Jewish faith.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 602 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.5 The Jewish Calendar 603
with 29 days.
deemed to have taken place on the Monday, October 7, −3760 at 11:20 P.M. or Tishri 1,
A.M. 1 at 5 hr, 204 hk; it is a simple matter to calculate the molad of Tishri of any succeeding
year by adding an appropriate multiple of the interval between successive moladot to the time
of this first molad.
Successive moladot occur at fixed intervals of 29 days 12 hr and 793 hk (= 29.530 594
days). They do not coincide with the phases of the real astronomical Moon, but they should
remain in average synchrony for a very long time. Calendrical dates are worked out, inde-
pendent of longitude using local times.
The rules of postponement and the insertion of leap month imply that the number of days
in a year varies. There are six types of calendar year, according to the number of days in
them. Firstly, a year may be common or leap; common years contain 12 months and leap
years contain 13. Furthermore any year may be deficient, regular or abundant. The numbers
of days in the six types of year are shown in Table 15.6. The names of the months and the
number of days therein are shown in Table 15.7 Generally the number of days in the month
alternate between 30 and 29.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 603 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
604 15. Calendars
Before the introduction of the new calendar, the Molad of Tishri was determined by the
first sighting of the new moon; this would always be close to the Sun. If the molad occurred
before dusk (nominally 6:00 P.M.), it might not be visible and would be taken to fall on the
next day. Rule (1) preserves this traditional feature.
2. If the Molad of Tishri of a common year (i.e., of twelve months) falls on a Tuesday
(day 3) at or after 9 hr, 204 hk, then Tishri 1 is postponed one day to the Wednesday
(day 4). Rule (4) would then require a further postponement to the Thursday.
Should this rule apply to year Y, it may be calculated that the Molad of the succeeding
year, Y+1, would fall twelve months later on a Saturday on or after 18 hr, 0 hk. Year Y+1
would then be postponed one day by Rule (1) and a further day by Rule (4). This would then
mean that year Y would have an unacceptable 356 days. This is avoided by postponing the
start of year Y by one day so that it would have 355 days.
3. If the Molad of Tishri of a common year following a leap year falls on a Monday
(day 2) at or after 15 hr, 589 hk, then Tishri 1 is postponed one day to the Tuesday
(day 3).
Should this rule apply to the common year Y, it may be calculated that the Molad of the
previous leap year, Y−1, would occur (thirteen months earlier) on a Tuesday on or after 18 hr,
0 hk. Year Y−1 would thus have been postponed by one day by Rule (1) and then a further
day by Rule (4). This would then mean that year Y−1 had an unacceptable 382 days. This is
avoided by postponing the start of year Y by one day so that year Y−1 would have 383 days.
4. If the Molad of Tishri falls on a Sunday, Wednesday or Friday (days 1, 4 or 6), then
Tishri 1 is postponed by one day.
This (political) rule prevents Hoshanna Rabba (Tishri 21) from occurring on the Sabbath
and Yom Kippur (Tishri 10) from occurring on the day before or after the Sabbath. Work
(including the preparation of food and the burial of the dead,) is forbidden on Yom Kippur and
the Sabbath; this rule prevents there being two consecutive days on which work is forbidden.
Work is necessary on Hoshanna Rabba and Rule (4) eliminates any conflict.
A thorough discussion of both the functional and religious aspects of the dehiyyot is
provided by Cohen (1981).
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 604 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.5 The Jewish Calendar 605
The day and time of the Molad of Tishri of any given year can be found by adding the
time of the first epochal molad to the times of all the lunations that precede it. The number
of weeks in these calculations may be ignored, and if the number of days exceeds 7, it may
be reduced by 7.
Example 1. Find the weekday and time of the Molad of Tishri of Anno Mundi (A.M.) 2.
A.M. 1 is a common year with 12 lunations. Thus the time of the Molad of 2 A.M is found
by adding the time for these 12 lunations to the time of the first epochal Molad.
Days-Hours-Halakim
epochal molad 2-05-0204
+12 lunations 4-08-0876
Molad of Tishri, A.M. 2 6-14-0000
The molad of A.M. 2 fell on day 6 at 14 hr 0 hk; this corresponds to Friday at A.M. 8
Days-Hours-Halakim
Epochal molad 2-05-0204
19-year cycles 303 × 2-16-0595 2-22-1005
Ordinary years 2 × 4-08-0876 1-17-0672
Leap years 0 × 5-21-0589 0-00-0000
Molad of Tishri A.M. 5760 6-21-0801
Since the molad occurs on day 6, dehiyyah (4) causes Tishri 1 to be postponed to day 7.
Tishri 1 of A.M. 5760 fell on day 7 (Saturday).
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 605 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
606 15. Calendars
days in Y may be calculated. This should fall within the limits given in Table 15.6. It is then
a simple matter to ascertain the date of the start of each month given the data in Table 15.7
or Table 15.15.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 606 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.6 The Islamic Calendar 607
be based on poor models. It may be noted that the instant of observation of a new moon may
fall in different days in different parts of the world. See URL[10] for details of the ongoing
Moon watch project.
The years are reckoned from the Era of the Hijra, commemorating the migration of the
Prophet and his followers from Mecca to Medina.
The history and construction of the Islamic calendar are discussed by Burnaby (1901),
Mayr and Spuler (1961), and by Freeman-Grenville (1963).
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 607 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
608 15. Calendars
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 608 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.7 The Indian Calendars 609
number is omitted from the day count. In the latter, a day number is repeated. The logic of
Days and tithis is analogous to that of lunar and solar months (see § 15.7.3).
The seven-day week has been used in India since at least 484 and the names of the days
are derived from planetary Gods as in the Roman astrological week.
Different modes of counting the years have been used. Some initialise the count at the
start of a dynasty of rulers. One such is the Saka era commencing in the year 78. Other counts
are astronomically based such as the Kali-yoga whose epoch in −3101 is the date of the most
recent mean conjunction of the seven planets or wandering stars (which includes the Sun and
the Moon) known to the ancients.
Pingree (1978) provides a survey of the development of mathematical astronomy in India.
Although he does not deal explicitly with calendars, this material is necessary for a full
understanding of the history of India’s calendars. Sewell (1912, 1989) and Sewell and Dikshit
(1911) provide a comprehensive account of the traditional calendars. They are also discussed
by Chatterjee (1987).
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 609 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
610 15. Calendars
in the same solar month, the two bear the same name but the first is described with the
prefix adhika, or intercalary. Years containing such a year have thirteen lunar months. This
is equivalent to the intercalation of a month.
More rarely, a short solar month will occur without containing the start of a lunation.
In that case, the name of the lunar month is omitted; this is equivalent to an extracalation.
Such a (ksaya) month can occur only in the months near the Earth’s perihelion passage. In
compensation, a month in the first half of the year will have had two new moons, so the year
will still have twelve lunar months. Ksaya months are separated by as few as nineteen years
and as many as 141 years.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 610 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.8 The Chinese Calendar 611
not only served practical needs, but also confirmed the consonance between Heaven and the
imperial court.
Like the luni-solar Indian calendar (see § 15.7.2), the months of the Chinese calendar start
on the day of a new moon. Solar months, analogous to the signs of the Zodiac and the Indian
sankrântis, are used to define intercalary months, which occur every two or three years.
Analysis of surviving astronomical records inscribed on oracle bones reveals a Chinese
luni-solar calendar, with intercalation of lunar months, dating back to the Shang dynasty of
the fourteenth century b.c. Since then, there have been more than 50 changes in the details.
From the earliest records, the beginning of the year occurred at a new moon near the
winter solstice but the choice of the month to begin the civil year varied with time and
place. In the late second century b.c., a reform established the practice, which continues
today, of requiring the winter solstice to occur in month 11. This reform also introduced the
intercalation system in which dates of new moons are compared with the 24 solar terms (see
§ 15.8.3). However, calculations were based on the mean motions resulting from the cyclic
relationships. Inequalities in the Moon’s motions were incorporated as early as the seventh
century a.d. (Sivin 1969), but the Sun’s mean longitude was used for calculating the solar
terms until 1644. Since 1645, the calendar is based on the true positions of the Sun and Moon
and its accuracy depends on the accuracy of the astronomical theories and calculations. Before
1929, the calculation referred to observations at Beijing (116◦ 25′ East), but since then to the
120◦ East meridian.
Years were counted from a succession of eras established by reigning emperors (but see
§ 15.8.2). Although the accession of an emperor would mark a new era, an emperor might
also declare a new era at various times within his reign in an attempt to re-establish a broken
connection between Heaven and Earth (as personified by the emperor). The break might be
revealed by the death of an emperor, the occurrence of a natural disaster, or the failure of
astronomers to predict a celestial event such as an eclipse. In the latter case, a new era might
mark the introduction of new astronomical or calendrical models.
Western (pre-Copernican) astronomical theories were introduced to China by Jesuit mis-
sionaries in the seventeenth century and more modern Western concepts gradually became
known. Following the revolution of 1911, the traditional practice of counting years from the
accession of an emperor was abolished.
Published calendrical tables are often in disagreement about the Chinese calendar. Some
of the tables are based on mean, or at least simplified, motions of the Sun and Moon. Some
are calculated for other meridians than 120◦ East. Some incorporate a rule that the eleventh,
twelfth, and first months are never followed by an intercalary month. This is sometimes not
stated as a rule, but as a consequence of the rapid change in the Sun’s longitude when the
Earth is near perihelion. However, it is incorrect when the motions of the Sun and Moon are
accurately calculated.
Reference works give a variety of rules for establishing New Year’s Day and for interca-
lation in the luni-solar calendar. Since the calendar was originally based on the assumption
that the Sun’s motion was uniform through the seasons, the published rules are frequently
inadequate to handle special cases.
Although the Gregorian calendar is used in the Peoples’ Republic of China for adminis-
trative purposes, the traditional Chinese calendar is used for setting traditional festivals and
for timing agricultural activities in the countryside. The Chinese calendar is also used by
Chinese communities around the world.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 611 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
612 15. Calendars
mod(A,B) denotes the remainder when A is divided by B. It follows that the year starting in
2000 is geng-chen, a year of the Dragon.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 612 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.8 The Chinese Calendar 613
shown in Table 15.13. These terms are numbered and assigned names that are seasonal or
meteorological in meaning. For convenience the minor and major terms are denoted by J and
Z, respectively, followed by the number. The major terms define the starts of solar months.
Because of the ellipticity of the Earth’s orbit, the lengths of the solar months vary with the
season as with the Indian Sankrântis (see § 15.7.2).
1. The instants of conjunctions and major solar terms are calculated for meridians of
120◦ East.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 613 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
614 15. Calendars
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 614 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.8 The Chinese Calendar 615
month if it is empty. In either case, the Chinese New Year starts on Mc , but if neither
Ma nor Mb are empty, the year starts on Mb .
Example 1. Find the first day of the Chinese year starting in Gregorian year 2000.
From Eq. 15.16, we find that 2000 is geng-chen, a year of the Dragon.
Thus, L = 11, there is no leap month in the sui and the year begins on Mb , 2000 Feb 5.
Example 2.. Find the first day of the Chinese year in 2033 and the first day of its leap
month. 2033 is an anomalous year whose details are sometimes in error in published Chinese
almanacs.
We find that 2033 is gui-chou, a year of the Ox.
Thus, L = 12 and there is a leap month in the sui, but we find that neither Ma nor Mb are
empty, so that the year begins on Mb , 2033 Jan 31.
1. Determine the dates, NY and NY +1 of the starts of the years Y and Y + 1 as described
in § 15.8.5.
2. Also note from the calculation of NY +1 which of the last two lunations of year Y that
started on Ma or Mb , are empty, if either are.
3. Calculate the number of lunations, K, in the period NY and NY +1; this is given by the
integer nearest to (NY +1 and NY )/29.53.
If K = 12, the year starting on NY has no leap months and its months are numbered
1 to 12.
If K = 13, one of these 13 months is a leap month. This is the month starting on Ma
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 615 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
616 15. Calendars
Example 1. Find the months in the Chinese year starting in Gregorian year 2000.
Thus K = 12; there is no leap month and the months are numbered consecutively 1 to 12.
Example 2. Find the months in the Chinese year starting in Gregorian year 2033.
Thus K = 13; there is a leap month. We find that the month starting on Ma is empty so that
the month starting on 2033 Dec 22 is a leap month. This leap month comes after month 11
(which contains the winter solstice) so that it is also assigned the number 11. The leap month
is followed by month 12 and preceded by month 1 to 11.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 616 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.11 Calendar Conversion Algorithms 617
The calendar is an astronomical calendar whose year begins on the day of the vernal equinox,
but commonly an arithmetic variation is used in which the year begins on March 21 in the
Gregorian calendar. There are 19 months, each having 19 days, in the year followed by four
epagomenal days with a fifth in leap years; these are inserted at the end of the 18th month.
Each of the days of the year is given a name. The years, in the Bahá’i Era (E.B.) are counted
from the epoch on Thursday, 1844 March 21 in the Gregorian calendar or Julian Day Number
2 394 647.
calendar.
b Although the French Republican calendar was originally an astronomical calendar, it was abolished in 1806
before the intercalations differed from that of the Gregorian calendar. Discussions were held to amend it with
a different rule of intercalation, but the proposals were never put into effect.
c Although the Bahá’i calendar was defined as an astronomical calendar, it is generally operated as an
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 617 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
618 15. Calendars
Table 15.15 Number of days, A(K,M),in the Jewish calendar that precede the first day of the month
M for a year characterised by K
K M=1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0 30 59 88 117 147 176 206 235 265 294 324 —
2 0 30 59 89 118 148 177 207 236 266 295 325 —
3 0 30 60 90 119 149 178 208 237 267 296 326 —
4 0 30 59 88 117 147 177 206 236 265 295 324 354
5 0 30 59 89 118 148 178 207 237 266 296 325 355
6 0 30 60 90 119 149 179 208 238 267 297 326 356
We also use the notation “A ≥ B” to mean “A is greater than or equal to B”; “A > B” to
mean “A is greater than B”; and “A < B” to mean “A is less than B.”
In several of the algorithms we use Table 15.15. The entry in this table in row K and in
the column headed by M gives the number of days in a Jewish year which precede month M,
in a year of character K. We refer to this as A(K,M).
A date is represented by the year, Y, in the appropriate era; a month number, M (epagom-
enal days are presumed to fall in an extra, short month), and the day of the month, D. Julian
Day Numbers are represented by J. A number W is used to represent the day of the week
with W = 1 for Sunday, . . . , W = 7 for Saturday.
W = 1 + mod(J + 1, 7)
Algorithm 2. The day of the week number, W, of the date D/M/Y in the Gregorian calendar
is given by:
1. a = mod(9 + M, 12)
2. b = Y − a/10
3. W = 1 + mod(2 + D + (13 ∗ a + 2)/5 + b + b/4 − b/100 + b/400, 7)
1. h=M−m
2. g = Y + y − (n − h)/n
3. f = mod(h − 1 + n, n)
4. e = (p ∗ g + q)/r + D − 1 − j
5. J = e + (s ∗ f + t)/u
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 618 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.11 Calendar Conversion Algorithms 619
5a. Z = f/6
5b. Je + ((31 − Z) ∗ f + 5 ∗ Z)/u
6. J = J − (3 ∗ ((g + A)/100))/4 − C
Algorithm 4. To convert a Julian Day Number, J, to a date in one of the calendars listed in
Table 15.14:
1. f =J+j
2. e=r ∗f +v
3. g = mod(e, p)/r
4. h=u∗g+w
5. D = (mod(h, s))/u + 1
6. M = mod(h/s + m, n) + 1
7. Y = e/p − y + (n + m − M)/n
For Gregorian type calendars (4, 6, 8, and 9) insert between steps 1 and 2:
a. X = g/365
b. Z = g/185 − X
c. s = 31 − Z
d. w = −5 ∗ Z
4a. h = u ∗ g + w
5a. D = (6 ∗ X + mod(h, s))/u + 1
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 619 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
620 15. Calendars
7. If e ≥ 19440
or e ≥ 9924 and f = 3 and g = 0
or e ≥ 16 788 and f = 2 and g = 0 and h = 1
then d = d + 1
8. J = d + mod(mod(d + 5, 7), 2) + 347 997
N.B. If integers requiring more than 15 bits are not acceptable, steps 1 to 3 may be replaced by:
1a. a = (235 ∗ Y − 234)/19
1b. b = 204 + 793 ∗ a
1c. c = 5 + 12 ∗ a + b/1080
2a. d = 1 + 29 ∗ a + c/24
3a. e = mod(b, 1080) + 1080 ∗ mod(c, 24)
Algorithm 6. To calculate the Jewish year, Y, in which Julian Day Number J falls:
1. M = (25 920 ∗ (J − 347 996))/765 433
N.B. The ratio 25 820/765 433 = 0.033 863 18;
M may be set to the integral part of 0.033 863 18 ∗ (J − 347 996).
2. Y = 19 ∗ (M/235) + (19 ∗ mod(M, 235) − 2)/235 + 1
3. Calculate, using algorithm 5, the Julian Day Number, K, of 1 Tishri
for the year Y A.M.
4. If K > J : Y = Y − 1
Algorithm 7. To calculate the date in the Jewish calendar, D/M/Y which corresponds to
Julian Day Number J.
1. Calculate the Jewish year, Y A.M., in which J falls using algorithm 6.
2. Calculate, using algorithm 5, the Julian Day Number,
a, of 1 Tishri 1 in the year Y A.M.
3. Calculate, using algorithm 5, the Julian Day Number,
b, of 1 Tishri 1 in the year Y+1 A.M.
4. K = b − a − 352 − 27 ∗ (mod(7 ∗ Y + 13, 19)/12)
N.B. K characterizes the year Y
5. c=J−a+1
6. From Table 15.15, find the highest M such that A(K,M) < c
7. D = c − A(M, K)
Algorithm 8. To calculate the Julian Day Number, J, which corresponds to a Jewish date
D/M/Y:
1. Calculate, using algorithm 5, the Julian Day Number,
a, of 1 Tishri 1 in the year Y A.M.
2. Calculate, using algorithm 5, the Julian Day Number, b, of 1
Tishri 1 in the year Y+1 A.M.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 620 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
15.12 Calendar Conversion Programs 621
Algorithm 9. To calculate the month M and day of the month D of Easter Sunday in the
year Y in the Julian calendar:
Algorithm 10. To calculate the month M and day of the month D of Easter Sunday for the
year Y in the Gregorian calendar:
1. a = Y/100
2. b = a − a/4
3. c = mod(Y, 19)
4. e = mod(15 + 19 ∗ c + b − (a − (a − 17)/25)/3, 30)
5. f = e − (c + 11 ∗ e)/319
6. g = 22 + f + mod(140004 − Y − Y /4 + b − f, 7)
7. M = 3 + g/32
8. D = 1 + mod(g − 1, 31)
1. CALENDRICA
This interconverts between dates in 25 calendars. It is supplied
with Calendrical Calculations Millennium Edition: (Reingold and
Dershowitz 2001)
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 621 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
622 15. Calendars
2. CALENDAR
This interconverts between dates in 15 calendars; it may be downloaded from URL[6]:
http://www.ricswal.plus.com
3. CALISTO
This interconverts dates, particularly English regnal and
ecclesiastical dates. It may be downloaded from URL[9].
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments are due to LeRoy Doggett as some of the material in this chapter is taken
from Chapter 12 of the previous edition (Doggett 1992).
REFERENCES
1. Calendopaedia, an encyclopaedia of calendrical information, by Michael Astbury:
http://calendopedia.com/.
2. The home page of Dr. J.R. Stockton. It provides information with a mathematical emphasis on
various aspects of calendars and astronomy:
http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk.
3. A commercial site sponsoring Project Pluto, providing information on calendars:
http://www.projectpluto.com.
4. The home page of Professor H. Aslaksen providing information concerning several calendars
including the mathematics of the Chinese calendar:
http://www.math.nus.edu.sg/aslaksen/calendar/chinese.shtml.
5. The Web Exhibits Project, an educational site sponsored by various educational organisations
providing information on a variety of calendar:
http://webexhibits.org.
6. The home page of E.G. Richards containing a detailed mathematical treatment of D.A. Hatcher’s
method of interconverting dates. It also contains algorithms for interconverting calendars and a
calendar conversion program which may be downloaded:
http://www.ricswal.plus.com.
7. The website of the Astronomical Applications Department of the U.S. Naval Observatory containing
information on various calendars and a converter to get the Julian date to calendar date and vice
versa:
http://aa.usno.navy.mil/.
8. A commercial site which provides links and information a variety of calendrical topics:
http://calendarzone.com.
9. A useful glossary of special days and calendrical terms. You can also download a calendar conversion
program:
http://homepages.tesco.net/∼jk.calisto/calisto/.
10. An invitation to participate in the Moon Watch project and report your sightings:
http://astro.ukho.gov.uk/moonwatch/.
Aveni, A. F. (1990). Empires of Time. London: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.
Bickerman, E. J. (1980). Chronology of the Ancient World. London: Thames and Hudson.
Blackburn, B. and L. Holford-Stevens (1999). The Oxford Companion to the Year. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 622 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
References 623
Bruin, F. (1981). The First Visibility of the Lunar Crescent. Vistas in Astronomy 21, 331–358.
Burnaby, S. B. (1901). The Elements of the Jewish and Muhammadan Calendars. London: George
Bell & Sons.
Butcher, S. (1877). The Ecclesiastical Calendar: Its Theory and Construction. London: Macmillan.
Calendar Reform Committee (1955). Report of the Calendar Reform Committee. Technical report,
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi.
Cappelli, A. (1930). Cronologia Cronografia e Calendario perpetuo. Milan.
Cassini, J. (1740). Tables astronomiques du Soleil et de la Lune. Paris.
Chapront-Touzé, M. and J. Chapront (1988). ELP 2000–85: a Semi-Analytical Lunar Ephemeris
Adequate for Historical Times. Astronomy and Astrophysics 190, 342–352.
Chatterjee, S. K. (1987). Indian Calendars. In G. Swarup et al. (Eds.), History of Oriental Astronomy,
Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Cheney, C. R. (1981). A Handbook of Dates for Students of English History. London: Royal Historical
Society.
Colgrave, B. and R. A. B. Mynors (1969). Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People. Oxford.
Colson, F. (1926). The Week. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coyne, G. V., M. A. Hoskin, and O. Pedersen (Eds.) (1983). Gregorian Reform of the Calendar, Vatican
City. Pontifica Academia Scientiarum.
Danjon, A. (1959). Astronomie Génerale. Paris.
Delambre, J. B. J. (1821). Histoire de l’astronomie Moderne. Paris.
Doggett, L. E. (1992). Calendars. In Explanatory Supplement to The Astronomical Almanac, Chapter 12.
Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books.
Doggett, L. E. and B. E. Schaefer (1989). Results of the July Moonwatch. Sky & Telescope 77, 373–375.
Doggett, L. E., P. K. Seidelmann, and B. E. Schaefer (1988). Moonwatch—July 14, 1988. Sky &
Telescope 76, 34–35.
Fotheringham, J. K. (1935). The Calendar. In The Nautical Almanac, pp. 755–771. London.
Fraser, J. T. (1987). Time; the Familiar Stranger. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Freeman-Grenville, G. S. P. (1963). The Muslim and Christian Calendars. London.
Ginzel, F. K. (1906, 1911). Handbuch der Mathematischen und Technischen Chronologie. Leipzig.
Grotefend, H. and O. Grotefend (1941). Taschenbuch der Zeitrechnung des deutschen Mittelalters und
der Neuzeit. Hannover.
Hastings, J. (Ed.) (1910). Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, Edinburgh. Clark.
Hatcher, D. A. (1985). Generalised Equations for Julian Day Numbers and Calendar Dates. Journal of
the Royal Astronomical Society 26, 151–155.
Herschel, J. F. W. (1849). Outlines of Astronomy. London.
Ilyas, M. (1984). A Modern Guide to Astronomical Calculations of Islamic Calendar Times and Qibla.
Kuala Lumpur.
King, D. A. (1987). Some Early Islamic Tables for Determining Lunar Crescent Visibility. In D. King
and G. Saliba (Eds.), From Deferent to Equant: A Volume of Studies in the History of Science in the
Ancient and Medieval Near East in Honour of E. S. Kennedy, Volume 500 of Annals of the New
York Academy of Sciences. New York.
Laskar, J. (1986). Secular Terms of Classical Planetary Theories Using the Results of General Relativity.
Astronomy and Astrophysics 157, 59–70.
Mayr, J. and B. Spuler (1961). Wüstenfeld-Maler’sche Vergleichungs-Tabellen. Wiesbaden.
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 623 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4
624 15. Calendars
Meeus, J. and D. Savoie (1992). The History of the Tropical Year. Journal of the British Astronomical
Association 102, 40–42.
Michels, A. K. (1978). The Calendar of the Roman Republic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Needham, J. (1959). Science and Civilisation in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neugebauer, O. (1975). A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy, Part III. New York.
Oudin, J. M. (1940). Étude sur la Date de Pâques. Bull. Astronomique (2) 12, 391–410.
Parise, F. (1982). The Book of Calendars. New York.
Parisot, J. P. (1986). Additif to the Paper of D.A. Hatcher: ’Generalised Equations for Julian Day
Numbers and Calendar Dates’. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 27, 506–507.
Pingree, D. (1978). History of Mathematical Astronomy in India. In Dictionary of Scientific Biography,
Volume XV, pp. 533–633. New York.
Poole, R. (1998). Time’s alteration: Calendar Reform in Early Modern England. London: University
College London Press.
Purple Mountain Observatory (1984). The Newly Compiled Perpetual Chinese Calendar (1840–2050).
Beijing: Popular Science Publishing House.
Reingold, E. M. and N. Dershowitz (1997). Calendrical Calculations. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Reingold, E. M. and N. Dershowitz (2001). Calendrical Calculations Millennium Edition. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Reingold, E. M. and N. Dershowitz (2002). Calendrical Tabulations. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Resnikoff, L. A. (1943). Jewish Calendar Calculations. Scripta Mathematica 9, 274–277.
Richards, E. G. (1998). Mapping Time: The Calendar and its History. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Scalinger, J. J. (1583). De emendatione temporum. Paris.
Schaefer, B. E. (1988). Visibility of the Lunar Crescent. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical
Society 29, 511–523.
Sewell, R. (1912). Indian Chronology. London: George Allen.
Sewell, R. (1989). The Siddhantas and the Indian Calendar. New Delhi: Asian Educational Services.
reprinted.
Sewell, R. and S. B. Dikshit (1911). The Indian Calendar. London: George Allen.
Simon, J. L., P. Bretagnon, J. Chapront, M. Chapront-Touzé, G. Francou, and J. Laskar (1994).
Numerical expressions for precession formulae and mean elements for the Moon and the planets.
Astronomy and Astrophysics 282, 663–683.
Sivin, N. (1969). Cosmos and Computation in Early Chinese Mathematical Astronomy. Leiden.
Spier, A. (1952). The Comprehensive Hebrew Calendar. New York.
Steel, D. (2000). Marking Time. New York: Wiley.
Stephenson, F. R. (1997). Historical Eclipses and Earth’s Rotation. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Tung Tso-Pin (1960). Chronological Tables of Chinese History. Hong Kong.
Zerubavel, E. (1989). The Seven Day Circle. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
5IJTJOGPSNBUJPOJTSFQSJOUFEGSPNUIF&YQMBOBUPSZ4VQQMFNFOUUPUIF
"TUSPOPNJDBM"MNBOBD
4&6SCBOBOE1,4FJEFMNBO
&ET
XJUI
QFSNJTTJPOGSPN6OJWFSTJUZ4DJFODF#PPLT
.JMM7BMMFZ
$""MMSJHIUTSFTFSWFE
5PQVSDIBTFUIFDPNQMFUFCPPL
TFFIUUQXXXVTDJCPPLTDPNVSCBOIUN
Urban & Seidelmann first pages 2012/5/22 12:39 p. 624 (chap15) Windfall Software, PCA ZzTEX 14.4