WD Gann's Methods

Understanding WD Gann's vast creation of the very detailed and unmistakable prophecy of
9/11 requires understanding methods of conveying meaning and methods of
encryption. Why didn't Mr. Gann simply state his prophecy in plain words? Because words
lie; intentionally and unintentionally. Language is ambiguous. The person speaking or
writing, despite his/her best efforts, is seldom, if ever, perfectly clear. Even if clear, the
person receiving the meaning may misinterpret the words. The great philosopher Gurdjiffe,
as recalled by P.D. Outspensky, called it "subjective language" as opposed to "objective
language." Gann said that the only language which people and nations can agree upon is that
of math and science. Concepts that cannot be proven in math is subject to error by the sender
and receiver.

But that's only one of the reasons the prophecy was buried in TTTTA as opposed to being
issued in an article such as "Prophecy of 9/11" on a full page of the Wall Street Journal in
1927 with "WD Gann" listed as the author at the bottom of the page. Obviously, he would
have become a pariah overnight; end of his business and associations. "This man is crazy,
thinks he's a Nostradamus." But there's a greater reason; as Hermetics say, and St Clement of
Alexandria and countless others would reprise, why would a knowledgable person throw
"...pearls before swine?" Why should people, unwilling to work for knowledge, be entitled to
that knowledge? And finally, displaying knowledge, over the ages, has been dangerous. Ask
Galileo how it worked out for him.

Allusion to the 9/11 prophecy is provided at the surface level with the word "Mammouth."
One must work to confirm the prophecy was made. The concepts of 'veiling' are at least
centuries old and most are ancient. Here is a list off the top of my head of people (among
others) I've studied to understanding their usages:

 Misspelling- Various, simplistic

 Numbers and mathematics as confirmation of meaning- Ancient, St Clement
 Acrostic and telestic encoding - Lord Francis Bacon/John Dee and many before
 Opposites- Hermetic from The Kybalion, timeless ancient knowledge
 Allegory- Philo of Alexandria

The Target; "The 110-story" Building, "The Mammouth Building"

Obviously, misspelling alerts a reader to a disharmony. How can anyone see the word "The
Mammouth Building," and, having recognized the true spelling is "Mammoth" without the 'u,'
not pause? Was Mr. Gann that dumb and/or careless? I think not. Perhaps an enquiring
mind might run a search on that misspelled word to see if there is a common historical
usage? Failing to find a distant common usage, what do you do with the word? File it in
'curious.'

Now what do you do when you see "110-story Mammouth Building?" A number confirming
the misspelling disharmony. An enquiring mind, having lived in the age of 9/11, will want to
know more. At least, if he makes the connection with the 110-story World Trade
Center. Most people will make that connection and, of them, not a person has gone
appreciably farther. Any farther at all that I can find. Until I wrote about it several months
ago. And until now.
So, the "110-story,""The Mammouth Building" are discordant surface level notations,
anything else? How about "The Cedar." Perhaps on page 369, where Gann refers to the 110-
story building as "the cedar," is connecting the Mammouth Building with Ezekiel
17:3. Jonathan Cahn; the Isaiah 9:10 prophecy. This is putting the cart before the horse, but
"the Cedar" will be the connection to Gann's ongoing prophecy envisioned to be presented in
a fourth post. It is the real reason I am writing this series. But let's get back to the methods
of veiling.

Okay, we have a surface meaning of The Mammouth Building; how do we confirm there is
something meaningful in the initial disharmony? How about rudimentary
gematria. Actually, not even rising to the level of gematria, but mathematic,
nonetheless. How many letters are there in "The Mammouth Building?" There are 19
letters…the same as "The World Trade Center." 19 is a very meaningful number, by the
way. The gematria system of the Pythagorean system for the two phrases are 89 and 92,
respectively, that reduce to 17 and 11. Interesting, the WTC reduces once to 11 (9+2). There
isn't any confirmation in the more detailed gematria, but we do have the same number of
letters; 19. Did Gann style the name of the building to be intentionally 19 letters as was the
WTC….and the same number of stories? The 110-story building? Numbers, 19 and 110
confirming the surface meaning.

More circumstance, numbers of occurrence. How many times do we find the words
"Mammouth,""110", and "cedar" in TTTTA? We find "Mammouth" six times in TTTTA,
once as "The Mammouth" and five times as "the Mammouth Building." 1 and 5. The first
instance occurs on the 432nd line of Chapter 34 (the mis-numbered Chapter XXXIX). I've
counted the lines in that chapter. It is on line 432 in chapter 39, err 34, allowing a line
between page heading and the first line and a line between pages. That number, 432, is also
the number of pages in TTTTA when counting the cover and blank pages. 432 is a
cosmically important number found in the mysteries of the Great Pyramid of Giza and in
astronomic measurements of the solar system. It is the number encoded in Luke passages
1:24, 27, 36, 56 and 59 (5X6X6X3X8=4320). 4320 divided by 2 is the diameter of the moon,
432,000 multiplied by 2 is the diameter of the sun, 432 squared is the speed of light…. The
next five occurrences of "Mammouth" are all worded as "The Mammouth Building." One
instance and five instances. Concatenate those two numbers, 1 and 5, and remember the
number; 15. The same number already mentioned; 15, File it in 'don't forget' and... don't
forget.

Now, the "110-story" building. A quick scan and we find it once on line 433 of Chapter 34
(XXXIX). Only once. We find the number "110" appearing another 188 times in TTTTA
making a total of 189.

Now, "cedar." Similar to "the Mammouth" and "110-story" we find "the cedar" only once
referring to the alternate name of the 110-story Mammouth Building. There are another 5
instances of the use of the word "cedar" but they all relate to a type of word; branch of the
cedar, cedar boards, etc. Interestingly, we find the former one reference as "the cedar" on
page 369, Chapter 31 (XXXI) and it is the 431st line of that chapter. Did I miscount and miss
a line in this chapter? If I did this might be line 432 just as was "The Mammouth" on line
432 of Chapter 34. Another day. The takeaway to "The cedar" is again 1 instance of one
usage (referring to the Mammouth Building) and 5 usages as a type of wood or tree; 1 and
5. Again, 15. The "don't forget" file is getting bigger.

One more permutation. If you take the 6 total occurrences of "Mammouth" and add the one
occurrence of "110-story building" which was substituted for "The Mammouth Building",
you get 7 total occurrences. The same is true of the 6 total occurrences of "cedar" when you
add one occurrence of "110-story;" you get 7. Now you take 6 of "Mammouth," 6 of "cedar"
and 1 of "110-story" and you get 13. Both 7 and 13 having numerological and other
significance. File them in respectively named folders.

Nope, yet one more "coincidence." Cedar appears on line 431 of Chapter 31, "the
Mammouth" appears on line 432 of Chapter 34 (aka XXXIX), and "110-story" appears on
line 433 of chapter 34 (aka XXXIX). Say that quickly…..431, 432 and 433. Cute Mr. Gann,
cute. That is not random coincidence, now is it? I envision readers with hands over their
eyes, hands over their ears, hands over their mouths. Courage you random walkers; we, yet,
have such a long way to go down this road.

The Perpetrators

So far, we have only a very discomforting and, increasingly so, feeling of the similarity
between "The Mammouth Building" and the WTC. How can Mr. Gann prove to us, people
who are working to understand his true meaning, that he is talking about the events that
involved the two buildings; one allegorical and fictional, the other real and doomed. He will
give us more contrived, designed circumstances. Acrostics and telestics, devices that are
centuries old but prominently used by Lord Francis Bacon and John Dee, aka, the first
"007." Lord Bacon was only once noted in TTTTA but John Dee is mentioned exactly 46
times…. in the telestic encoding. I'll reserve the unmistakeable telestic references to John
Dee for now as the subject is off point.

Bacon and Dee were contemporaries living in the time of Queen Elizabeth I
(1500s/1600s). Bacon, a lawyer, philosopher and writer (many believe him to have been the
author of many of the works of Shakespeare), wrote a book on then modern methods of
encryption. Dee was the scientist, mathematician, magician of Queen Elizabeth I's and
Maximillian's courts and friend of Bacon. In his time, Dee was known to have 4000
'volumes' in his library when Cambridge had only 400. Both were reputed for their veiled
writings, Dee being known to the Queen in personal correspondence as "007." Both were
thought to have been Rosicrucian/Hermetic, at least in philosophy, if not in fact.

Acrostic and telestic, the same method with a different object. An acrostic is the use of the
first letter of consecutive lines of text to spell a hidden word. A telestic is the same but using
the last letter of a line. Consider the very first paragraph of TTTTA where we find the "six
e's:"
The last letter of six consecutive lines i "e." This "word" is created by Mr. Gann with a
meaning; that the entirety of TTTTA will be littered with meaningful acrostic and telestic
words that confirm meaning at the surface or plain word level OR convey new meaning. If
you believe 6 e's is not designed by Gann but, rather, is just a coincidence, then you needn't
read any further. It is statistically prohibitive to think this design was not intended… I've
presented the math and statistics in other posts. If the probability of six consecutive coin
tosses of a fair count is 1 divided by 2 to the 6th power (1/2^6, a joint probability) then the
probability of 6 consecutive e's is 1 divided by 26 to the 6th power if all letters had an equal
likelihood of occurrence (as a head or tail has an equal probability on a single coin
toss). Since 'e' is a popular level, I will conceded the improbability of 6 consecutive e's is a
mere 1 divided by, oh, 13 to the 6th power. 1 / 13^6. Pretty small. AND in the very first
paragraph. "Be alerted to the acrostic/telestic method" is what 6 e's screams to the thoughtful
reader.

Alerted to the existence of acrostic/telestic encoding, what might have been buried to support
a prophecy of 9/11? How about the perpetrator, Muhammad Ata? Yes, there are exactly 15
acrostic spellings of "ata" in TTTTA (blue highlighted):
That's 15. There isn't a 16th, or 17th….. Exactly 15. Where is that file, "don't forget," I've
been keeping?

Provided above, you will find the exact page number of 15 instances, the only 15 instances,
of the word "ata" spelled in the acrostics/telestics of TTTTA. Make that "only in acrostics."
Not a single telestic. Of those 15, arguably 7 provide meaning or emphasis to the surface
narrative from which they are derived (see the arrows). For those 7 that I sensed a narrative
connection to the 9/11 tragedy I provide, at the right, the exact narrative comprising the
acrostic word. That way you can see those 7 meanings AND you can construct the acrostic
word for those 7 as well. Needless to say, the other 8 instances of 'ata" can be traced to the
page number I provide. You can prove all 15 to yourself if you will do the work.
Numbers generated in the previous paragraph; 7 and 15. Obviously 7, is a universally and
Biblically important number. And 15. On 9/11/2001 there were 4 flights highjacked BUT
only three of the flights attacked the US. The fourth was scuttled in a farm field in
Pennsylvania and did not inflict damage on the US…save for the tragic loss of the lives of
those on board. Of the three flights that successfully assaulted the US, there were five
terrorists on each of the three flights. 3X5=15. A number confirming the meaning of "ata."
Look it up in Wikipedia; 5 terrorists on each of the three flights; 15.

Since we are considering the terrorists, what about the means of their terror; the three
planes. American Airlines flight 11 was first to attack the North Tower of WTC with Ata on
board, United Air flight 175 followed hitting the South Tower, and American Airlines flight
77 attacked the Pentagon. [Interesting, 11 and 77, but deferred for now.] It nagged me for
such a long time that I could not find any trace of those flights in the acrostics/telestics. I
kept seeing "TWA" but not a hint of American or United. In fact, 15 prominent citations of
the word "TWA" in the acrostics encoding. This time I'll provide just the page numbers
where you may find them.

Those 15 citations of "TWA" and the absence of any reference to American Air or United Air
finally jogged my memory. TWA was formed in 1925, prior to and existing at the
publication of TTTTA. Amid financial turmoil its assets were liquidated in early 2001 with
the principal assets being ultimately acquired by American Airlines shortly thereafter. For all
we know, the three planes assaulting the US on September 11, 2001 may have been first
owned by TWA. For certain, we know, TWA was the name of the company that was
substantially and ultimately acquired by American Airlines in 2001. Flights 11 and 77 were
"TWA" flights in that sense of history; the time in which TTTTA was written.

15 citations of "Ata" and 15 citations of "TWA", the exact number of terrorists and means of
their terror. All 30 total citations were acrostics. None were telestics. If you believe in
randomness, do you believe there could not have been a single "ata" or "TWA" that was a
telestic? If you can't wrap your mind around this improbability, again, you should not be
reading further; you've already ruled the earth is the center of the universe just as the Church
so rudely informed Galileo.

15 citations of "Ata" and 15 of "TWA." There was 1 occurrence of "the Mammouth" and 5 of
"the Mammouth Building". There was 1 occurrence of "the cedar" referring to the building
and 5 referring to the type of wood or tree. Concatenate 1 and 5 and you have 15. The "don't
forget" file is brimming.

There are so many details of the 9/11 attack that Mr. Gann provides. I find new
"coincidences" each time I search. Once complete, the allusion of the simple discordant
"Mammouth" will have become a fully articulated prediction that leads to the 9/11
tragedy. The "don't forget" file will have become the size of a healthy chapter in a Dickens'
novel. Gann's meaning will become as undeniable as the math of 2+2=4. Errrrr, that's an
opinion and a not so humble one at that. But I have "worked out" the evidence, so reserve the
condemnation.

Next up, I will compare details of the "Gigantic Attack on New York City" (page 362) and
those of the events of September 11, 2001. A new concept will be used; the ancient concept
of the opposite; the positive and negative, the male and female, the ying and yang, the odd
and the even…. And in the third post of the series, I will provide the exact timing, to within
one minute, of onset of the 9/11 attack as encoded in TTTTA in 1927. And at that point, this
grand, hidden allegory and prediction will be complete. That encoding has been buried in
TTTTA for 88 years, until I found it in 2015. I know, the "I'"s become narcissistic. But
the "I" is important, as well, as may demonstrated in posts beyond this series and in a
separate manifest prophecy.

You can perform a word search on the first edition copy of TTTTA at archive.org to find
"Mammouth,""110-story,""the cedar." If or when you do visit archive.org, pull the page bar
at the bottom all the way to the right, to the final page…its page 432, the back cover. I've
given you the page numbers of acrostic/telestic words to support the "conflagration of
circumstance" concerning "ata" and "TWA." Its up to you to prove it to yourself, prove me
wrong or, otherwise, just consider in silence:

Qui non intelligit, aut taceat, aut discat (John Dee, "Monas Hieroglyphica")

Jim Ross
(of Tottenham)

WD Gann presents seven prophecies in "The Tunnel Thru the Air" according to the way I
have counted them.

 The first is a prophecy of numerous inventions (twelve in my count of inventions I've

identified ranging from encrypted cellular phones to the Saeto torpedo to modern
drone warfare). Most people have sensed the many inventions Gann predicted, some
predictable in 1927, many not. The laundry list is very impressive when taken
together.
 The second is the 1929 stock market crash and botom and the attendant depression in
far greater detail than the bad times of "1930-33" found on page 82 and 83.
 The third is World War II in far greater detail than "another bad bad period for the
United States will be 1940-44" found also on page 83.
 The fourth is the Vietnam War alluded to by the last name of Edna Quinton…the
acronym of Quinton is Tonkin; the Gulf of Tonkin incident and the Gulf of Tonkin
Resolution that permitted President Johnson to wage war in all significant respects.
 The fifth has been partially developed in "The Great Battle(s) of Detroit" published in
the blog.
 The sixth is in the process of being developed on this blog; it is the prophecy of 9/11.
 The seventh is me.
Yes, this seems narcissistic, it sounds delusional. No, I am just the matter of the proof, not
the architect; first proven to me, and now, if you will consider, proven to you - that Gann
envisioned and published these things. You are in charge. You can prove what I will say to
yourself and you haven't any excuse for not doing so. I give you the page and line number of
the evidence. The only tools you will need are a first edition copy of TTTTA found at
archive.org and the understanding of the definition of the very simple acrostic and telestic
encoding method. An acrostic is a word spelled by the first letter of consecutive lines of a
narrative and a telstic is its counterpart spelled with the last letter of consecutive lines. That's
all you need; unless you have decided before the provision of the proof. Many people are
like that,….no, most people are like that.

I've alluded to having found my name in TTTTA. It occurred over a period of several weeks
but was proven to me in great detail which I will provide in 3 issues of this series. And it
emerged in exactly the sequential order I recount. I hope the reader will consider how I felt
as I moved from mild unease, to extreme unease, to complete awe and finally to a sense of
duty; this duty. Now, that could be getting a bit delusional, but that's my feeling. Can a
delusional person recognize and contemplate his state? By definition, I don't think so.

As best I recall, in about December 2014 I was trudging through TTTTA having seen the six
e telestic in the first paragraph of the Foreword ("six e's" are explained in the previous and
many other posts). I was looking at the last letter of every line (telestic) to see if I could
identify words that might have meaning. Literally, I was looking at a seemingly endless set
of vertically aligned letters in the book and considering the permutations in my mind. Talk
about drudgery. Until I found this on page 14:

My last name, "ross." At first I was "weirded out." But then I regained composure. After all,
how much of a coincidence would it be to find any four-letter word in a large population of
random letters? The population of letters, given that TTTTA is 15304 lines long, would be
15304 first letters of lines plus 15304 last letters of lines. Of course, we're talking about a
joint probability and conditioned further that the letters must be in a sequence (r-o-s-s). I
judged it very improbable but hardly prohibitively so.

So I chilled. I remember transitioning into a state of "Well, that's really cute." I recall posting
the substance of the above on Thetas Pendulum that day or a day or two later. It may have
been the Pentagonal_time board on Yahoo. I haven't gone back to check.

In the weeks thereafter, I created an Excel spreadsheet of every line in TTTTA, the largest
component of which was a group of Word files of the book that a generous Internet personna
and brilliant researcher, Superrome, has made available at his website,
Gannstudygroup. Loading those files, after a couple edits, into Excel I was able to construct
an acrostic/telestic search device where I could find acrostically/telestically created words
easily. Perhaps we are in early January 2015.
Inevitably, it struck me to look for Jim, James, Jimi, Jimmy, Chip, all names which were
given me by myself or my childhood 'chums.' Still in early January. And I found it on page
75:

And there it was; "Jimi." Even the "J" in "Jimi" was capitalized. My high school
name…more often spelled "Jimmy" but a couple of my closest buddies did spell it that way
just to imply a gentler gender than I would chose as a self description; they'd try to piss me
off. And succeeded.

The improbability has now become far greater….two four letter words, each very improbable
individually. But now its a joint improbability involving the 8 letters of the only person who
has identified the acrostic/telestic encoding of TTTTA in 88 years since TTTTA was
published.

And now I have an acrostic, "Jimi" and a telestic, "ross." Shame on you Mr. Gann for not
providing me a capital "R." Here I'm talking to a dead man…or so we suppose in this
world. I was really 'weirded out" now. It was a bit of a panic actually. Someone was
"looking" at me. I know how that sounds. But that's how I felt. How would you feel?

No, your name is not in the acrostics/telestics of TTTTA. I have found very few names
greater than 3 letters; a limited number of 3 letter names, very few four letter names. I can't
recall any personal four letter names other than the above but I'm sure there are some. How
strange.
On the 7th line of Chapter 7, beginning on the same line as January 28, 1927, we find the
"J." Figure the meanings of those numbers. 7th of Chapter 7 or 77. 77 being the age of Mr.
Gann when he died (77 years and 12 days), 77 being the flight number of the jet that struck
the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 (see my previous post). Muhammad Ata's flight 11
multiplied by 7. So many general numerological meanings of 77 beyond the Gann and 9/11
prophecy specific meanings.

Before we leave this thought, parse the date, January 28, 1927, more particularly,
1927. Theosophic reduction gives us 1+9+2+7=19. And 19 squared is the number of earth
axis degrees in one solar day. Many mathematic and numerologic meanings of 19, too many
to recite. And further Theosophic reduction of 1+9=10 or 1. The monad. Further, January is
the first month of the year or 1. And the 28th day Theosophically reduced; 2+8=10 which
reduces to….1. If you don't know that number, the monad, you should; both its
numerological and philosophical meaning. One.

If I gave the task to 100 supposed "Gann Gurus" (none of whom have identified the use of
acrostics or telestics in TTTTA, by the way) of identifying the 10 most important pages in
TTTTA, I expect that 100 would name page 75 as the beginning of the most important
chapter of the book; 'Future Cycles." Gann asserts the future is mathematic and the math is
found in the Bible. In pages 82 and 83 of this chapter, Gann vaguely predicts the stock
market decline, the first years of the Great Depression and the years of World War II.

Continuing on pages 75 and 76, Mr. Gann goes further to define the repetition of history and
his Biblical basis:

Those last two lines of the above, the word "Then" is spelled. Two of the letters are acrostic
(Th) and two are telestic (en). I do not recall finding any other word spelled in the 30608
acrostic/telestic letters formed that way. As best I can determine, that is the only one.
At this point, I know the case that "I" was intended to receive a message is not proven to
anyone else's satisfaction. If its not your name and you do not have to ponder the
implications, then you won't ponder something that is happening to me. I did not have
dispositive proof that would convince another person that a message had been intended for
me. I do not recall making that assertion then public.

But I knew the proof was somewhere in TTTTA. Undeniable proof to me and anyone who
would be willing to 'consider,' that I was a part of something. Most people won't ponder the
thought, much less, honestly consider it. But a very few will.

I did not know where to look in TTTTA for confirmation. I did not know what I'd be looking
for…. But I knew I would find it.

And then I did. On January 28th, I did find it. January 28th, the same day of the year that we
find on the line of the first letter of my first name I found the "dispositive proof."

Prove the above to yourself, disprove me if you can or dismiss it with "I doubt it." Only the
latter of three alternatives is the sign of what St Clement referred to as "the swine" before
which he would not cast pearls. Have the courage to do the work and make a decision. St
Clement also said "Faith" is a matter of choice; and choice infers a reasoned decision based
on consideration of the facts.

The "capstone" of proof will follow in due course as will installments of the sixth prophecy,
that being 9/11.
There are so many ways to illustrate the ancient concept of opposites; many eloquent,
philosophic, mathematic, all very introspective if you chose to dwell on it. Start from the
ultimate beginning, the first breath of God, the initial thought that created all things. You
find it in Genesis as the contrasts in day and night, darkness and light, heaven and earth….
you find Gurdjiffe explaining the diatonic cosmology with it, you find Gann explaining it as
the positive and negative; it is the fourth Hermetic principle of "The Kybalion:"

Both Gurdjiffe and Gann elaborate the principle to add to the positive and negative to add a
neutral. Gurdjieffe gets to the "Law of three" and its part in the creation of the
enneagram. Gann, through Robert Gordon, states it as a free standing principle, but again,
with the neutral (page 78):

Gann, seemingly, goes a bit further. Perhaps he infers that, within cycles there are opposites
or between cycles of differing levels or greater and smaller overlapping wheels we get
opposites. Perhaps the "Gigantic Battle of New York" has finer insights on how his
conceptualization works.
The first opposite; June 9, 1932, most prominently, the day of the "Gigantic" attack on New
York City and, contemporaneously, Robert Gordon's birthday. Take this date apart and you
might have 6-9 and 1932. The first part is 69 (which is also 6+9=15) and the second part is
1+9+3+2=15. A perfect transition from the dominant number 15 in the first post to a newly
introduced number, 69. Did I say the number 15 wouldn't be as important in this second
post?

The number 69; one might perceive it to be a perfect symbol of opposites. Is there any other
2 digit number that, comprised of different digits, will allow you to completely invert
either number (invert meaning turn upside down AND right to left) and you have the other
digit? Take just the 6, turn it upside down and then rotate it left to right and you have 9. Do
the same with the 9 and it becomes a 6. A mirror reverse, but not just east west; north south
as well. The resulting 2 digits are the same. You have either 66 or 99 depending on which
digit you double flip.

Now manipulate the numbers a different way. Take the complete number, 69, and turn it
upside down and rotate the whole number right to left. You end up with…69, the same
number with which you started.

Finally, manipulate the numbers a third way. Move the 9 one place to the left or the six one
place right and you have 96, the transposition of the 69. The difference in the numbers are 27
(96-69) and the cube of 3.

How important is the number 69 to Mr. Gann? Of course, Robert established his office in
New York at 69 Wall Street. Or perhaps reviewing page number 69 might help.
Very important page but we will focus on the "Jonus triangle." On page 69 we find the "Jonas
triangle" constructed of four observations of the letter "J" in Jonas. Unquestionably, it is a
right triangle further bisected to produce two apparent equilateral triangles. But that's not the
important part. I believe its pretty easy to find triangles in text. But this one has an
interesting property. If you count the letters from the vertically aligned "J"s on the left and
the vertical line spacing you get sides of 12 and 40 and you can compute an interest
hypotenuse of 41.761. Recalling a previous essay found here on the only cycle that Mr. Gann
calls "great," the one twenty fourth division of that cycle would be 41.666 years. Recalling
yet another essay found here regarding cycles derived from the philosopher stone numbers of
Mr. Gann and John Dee (432 and 252, respectively), we find the derivative 41.666 year cycle
might have further substance. [I did not discover the Jonas triangle but did apply the math to
it, compared it to the "Great" 1000 year cycle and to the philosopher stone numbers.]

And we must mention the specific scripture as well and the number 3. 3+3=6 and
3*3=9. We have the fixings of 69. And cube 3 to derive 27 and you have the difference
between 96 and 69 described two paragraphs above. So much more in this scripture but off
point for now.

Suffice to say, 69 is important and Mr. Gann went to great lengths to emphasize its
importance.
The outcome is the most important opposite. In 1932, Robert Gordon defends the 110-story
Mammouth Building, the cedar. He utterly destroys two fleets of allied enemy airplanes. [As
a note, there is a third fleet of planes, but RG drops them safely into the Tunnel using
sleeping gas.] In 2001, the twin towers are utterly destroyed in two waves of attacks.

**In 1932, the U.S. is victorious, in 2001, the U.S. is defeated. Opposite outcomes.**

The destruction of "two's" are opposite. In 1932, Robert Gordon entirely destroys two
fleets of allied enemy airplanes. In 2001, the enemy entirely destroys two towers.

**In 1932, the enemy lost 2 fleets of planes, in 2001 the U.S lost two 110-story towers.**

The flight paths of the attacks. This promises to be confusing and arguable. Consider it as
you wish but in context of the previous indisputable opposites. There are two New York
attacks in which total destruction of two enemy fleets occurred in 1932 and two New York
attacks in 2001 in which total destruction of two great towers occurred.

The flight paths of the first wave of the allied enemy fleet originated from "40 or 50 miles up
the Hudson River" (page 362). Since the Mammouth was located at 42nd and Broadway
(Time Square) and within only a few miles of the mouth of the Hudson, the only possible
conclusion that the planes were over the Hudson would be if they were attacking from the
north. Further confirmation, Robert Gordon waited until they were over Yonkers; again,
attack from the north. In 2001, Muhammad Ata's Flight 11 departed Logan at 7:59am
traveling east, turned due south shortly after entering New York airspace and attacked the
WTC from the north. Visually, one might consider the 1932 and 2001 attack routes the
same. The 1932 and 2001 first wave attacks were the same.

The flight paths of the second wave of the allied enemy and the second attacking United
Flight 175 did not have the same flight paths. They, themselves, were opposites and their
mere being opposites placed them as opposites the the first attacks which were the same. The
second wave of enemy planes approached the Mammouth were sighted over Long Island
Sound but Robert Gordon waited until they approached from the Atlantic Ocean and were
over Fire Island. The fleet of planes emanated from the north, turned westward at Fire Island
and began their attack at about Fire Island. Relative to the Mammouth, the incoming planes
were coming from the north east. Except that the Flight 175 emanated from the north, it
passed New York City widely on its west side, and turned sharply northward shortly before it
would have reached Philadelphia. Its final flight path to the WTC was from the south
west. The 1932 and 2001 second wave attacks were opposites.

Could Mr. Gann have contrived the 1932 flight plans to demonstrate opposites? I am very
hesitant to dismiss the possibility. Regardless, the authenticity of the 9/11prophecy hardly
rests on this point.

The point of this essay and second component of the three, is to explain the outcomes of the
respective battles according to the Hermetic principle of opposites, and to explain the
importance of the number, 69, in Mr. Gann's prophecy of 9/11. Without this explanation, the
perfect timing that will be demonstrated in the final essay would be lost in the vacant thought
"But in 1932 we won and in 2001 we lost. He didn't predict anything. He has it bass
ackwards."

Quite the contrary. He was right to within one minute, given the concept of opposites.
Having found my first and last name, I'm more than uneasy. Consider the improbability that
'the' person in 88 years (an interesting number) that discovered the hidden acrostic and
telestic codes in WD Gann's 1927 "The Tunnel Thru the Air" AND found his name in that
coding. Was it predicted? How improbable is that occurrence?

First, notice that I have not found any other person's four letter names in TTTTA. I'm sure
they are there, but in days of looking, I haven't found them. There are many, many three
letter names and I can correlate most of them, varyingly, with real persons that I "know"
influenced Mr. Gann. For example, I find John Dee's 46 times in TTTTA. No, not John, but
"Dee" and "007." I've recounted this in the companion series regarding what I style the 6th
prophecy but I'll include it here. I find "dee" 45 times in TTTTA. But I said 46 only 2 lines
above. John Dee was a philosopher, scientist, mathematician, astrologer, and magician in
Queen Elizabeth I's court. His was incredibly learned for the early 1500s having a personal
library that dwarfed that of Cambridge. A contemporary of the now alleged writer of some or
all of Shakespeare's works and also alleged Rosicrucian, Lord Francis Bacon, John Dee was
identified to the Queen in personal correspondence as "007." I found "Dee" in telestics 45
times and only as a telestic word. Never an acrostic word. Non random? Yes. But not proof
to me. How would it be proven to me? I "knew" I would find the proof; that Mr. Gann had
foreseen the need for proof and it would be there.

And I woke up one morning, after having read Dee's "Monas Hieroglyphica" and pondered
his philosophers stone number for hours, and I knew how Gann would confirm the 45
instances referred to John Dee. I searched and I found on page 198 of the first edition
TTTTA:

Find it yourself, first edition TTTTA is on archive.org. But that was not all. There were 22
"dee"s before the "007" and there were 23 after. The "007" is exactly the middle of book in
reference to the number of "dee"s. 22 intervals before and 22 intervals after. The same
number of stops, 22, in Robert Gordon's 7 days (see my many, many struggling essays on the
math and geometry of RG's 7 days). Still, it doesn't stop there. I've numbered every line in
TTTTA and revised my numbering twice for the inevitable "Ross-ups" (my code for how
often I "screw-up). I'm on version 3 of the numbering. Ignoring the forward, the title and
blank pages and the back flap and blank pages, there are 15158 lines on the numbered pages
of TTTTA. And the midpoint or "keystone" of "007" is 7579 as you can see in the extreme
left column of the above insert. Two times 7579 is 15158. Perfect.

Sorry about the digression, but I thought it necessary to show how I believe I verify
things. How the evidence of non randomness has built up on my thinking such that I have
little doubt about the "design."

Back to the improbability of "Jimi" and "ross," the first person to, likely, have discovered
acrostics/telestics, and, certainly, to have written about them and disclosed them. Each of the
two words is a joint probability and within them ordering is important to create an intelligible
word. Further, there is a joint probability that the two words will appear without ordering. I
will address only the joint probability of one four-letter word as I am hardly qualified to do
that.

A fair coin tossed four times has what probability of four consecutive heads? 1/2 X 1/2 X 1/2
X 1/2 or 1 divided by 2 to the fourth power. The probability of a head on a single toss to the
power of number of ordered outcomes jointly required. Alternately, 50% X 50% X 50% X
50% = .0625. If you said you were going to flip a fair coin 4 times, the chance you'd get 4
straight heads would be 6.25%. Don't make book on it.

The joint probability of ONE four letter name is similar to the coin toss. Assuming every
letter in the alphabet has an equal likelihood, the formula is 1/26 X 1/26 X 1/26 X1/26 =
.00000219. Actually, this is incorrect but substantially correct….regardless of the admitted
incorrectness of this formulation, the answer will be the same. It is vastly improbable that the
person that 'outs' the acrostic/telestic coding of TTTTA will find his four-letter last name in
the 30,316 letters (15158 above lines X the first letter of each line and the last letter of each
line). I'll let the statisticians wrestle with how improbable….but only matters if you to know
how many zeros you put to the right of the decimal, 12, 50, 100.

Still, I "knew" there would be simple confirmation a non statistician could recognize. And
then I knew how Gann would prove it to me. I'd previously seen "The Imitation Game" over
the holidays and was stunned when, in a bar scene, Hugh Alexander told Alan Turing he'd
discover the keyword to the Enigma cipher…it was Mathew 7:7 "Ask…seek….find." A
recurrent scripture quoted once and paraphrased twice more in TTTTA. Did Mr. Gann
predict the keyword to device that many say would tip the balance of World War II? I think
so but haven't proven it to myself? That thought brought me to see that movie again on
January 27, 2015. I put that date in my calendar.

I've never paid to see the same movie twice. I've seen some movies I'd be embarrassed to
admit to learned people dozens of times, but never paid twice. I saw "The Imitation Game"
with my wife and neighbors (as my excuse) a second time. Sitting there, thinking of ciphers,
I "knew" how I'd have my name confirmed. I thought, can I leave the theatre, drive home,
look it up and get back in time to pick up the wife and neighbors. No. I had to sit there and
stew.

I'd previously seen dozens (in my best guess) of the word "tot" and hadn't a clue why it was
being spelled so often. I live on "Tottenham" Lane. I also remembered there were exactly 19
instances of the word "ten" because I'd studied that word, specifically, in the acrostics and
telestics. But I did not recall a "ham." Still, I "knew" he'd find a way to spell Tot-ten-ham.

And it took only seconds, with the Excel "finder" I'd developed to find acrostic and telestic
words in the first edition copy of TTTTA. At least I found 2 words on pages 350 and
351. I'd gotten lucky; while there multitudes of "tot"s and 19 "ten"s there was one and only
one "ham." That is where those 3 words, "Tot-ten-ham" HAD to be spelled. And there was
"tot" on page 350 and "ham" on page 351. There had to be a "ten" in between. And there
wasn't. I stared and started at the screen but there wasn't a "ten." With a double dose of Z-
quill that night, I slept well.

And when I woke up I knew how he'd spell "ten." I've collapsed the two pages and present
it HERE.

He spelled "toT-10-ham." This is where I live; Tottenham Lane.

The above was enough for me. But he wasn't finished with the proof; not even close. Hence,
look for a part 3 of 3.
As I disclosed in the Mea Culpa post of a couple days ago, I made an error in line counting
and the corrected number of lines is 15304 from cover of "The Tunnel Thru the Air" to last
line of the back flap using the rules I established (one line between paragraphs and one line
between pages). When I revised the lines, I had to re index all the acrostics and telestics for
my Excel device that finds acrostic and telestic words. This led to another error in the
counting of the word "TWA" which I discussed in the 9/11 prophecy. There is also an error
in logic concerning the number of instances of "ata" which refers to Mohammad Ata
(misspelled).

First, there are 20 instances of the word "TWA" not 15. 15 was the recurrent number of
terrorists on the 3 planes that struck the USA, the fourth plane scuttled in Pennsylvania and
not allowed to attack. Still, 20 represents the total number of terrorists on all four
planes. You may say none of the planes were TWA and you might recall, the assets of TWA
were sold/distributed in early 2001, most, but not all, of which became property of American
Airlines. There were 2 American Air flights (11 and 175) and 2 United Air (77 and 93).

Second, the real name of Muhammad Ata is Mohamed Mohamed el-Amir Awad el-Sayed
Atta.
I came to realize, duh, this when, in light of the 'finder device' error with TWA, I recounted
the number of 'ata's and found 15. But with one of the 15 was extremely elaborated:

This citation was very meaningful in several respects:

 There are 4 's's preceding the 'ata' signaling to me "this is meaningful,"

 The narrative says "putting error to flight" referring to Ata who boarded a plane to
kill,
 Of course, the acrostic 'ata,'
 The five asterisks of referring back to Luo Clement.

When I say the asterisks refer to Luo Clement, read my series regarding WD Gann being Luo
Clement. I assert and, by a preponderance of evidence, show that WD Gann is Luo Clement
and that it was Mr. Gann who wrote "The Ancient Science of Numbers." The five asterisks
appears only once in TTTTA and once in "The Ancient Science of Numbers." It is a
component of the preponderance of evidence.

So what is this saying. Its saying compute the Pythagorean value of Mohmmad Ata's
name. And I did. And just to make sure I had the spelling of the name correct I looked it
up….and I was wrong again. It is Mohamed Mohamed el-Amir Awad el-Sayed Atta. I see it
most frequently (defending my stupidity) spelled 'Mohammad Ata,' not 'Mohamed Atta.'

So I went back and searched for 'Atta' and found 3 instances. All three are incredibly
meaningful. Two of them were derived from narratives that dealt with forgiving ones self for
errors and doing the best he can. So I felt better about myself. But one had BOTH 'ata' and
'atta' contiguously presented and was packed with 9/11 meaning:

Both 'ata' and 'atta' contiguous; 15 of the former representing 15 successful attackers and 3 of
the latter representing 3 successful planes carrying 15 successful attackers.

In meaning I try to find; a beginning, an end and a beginning. The Japanese first attack in the
fictional war, a beginning. Robert Gordon's punishment of the attackers during his 7 days, an
end. Mohammed Atta, a new beginning. A new beginning; 9/11 the "first warning"
according to Jonathan Cahn's thesis of "The Harbinger." The thesis that I will assert WD
Gann published in the 'veiled' language of TTTTA in 1927. But that is several posts from
this point. It is the ongoing nature of Gann's 6th prophecy; that 9/11 was a beginning, not an
end. Recall the 700 year rise and domination of Islam ended with the first crusade in 1096-99
and found its peak approximately 1000 years ago. A thousand year cycle ago. There's a post
on "The Great 1000-year Cycle."
Why the movie Pi? I discover incredible frustration when I see my incredible errors. And
yet, when I do the work to make corrections, I find, what I consider, greater meaning and
insights. Take a step, back up two, advance three. But I also find some redemption that in
the errors, new understanding is gained. And I find forgiveness in doing the best I can.

I guess it all works out well in the end. But the confusion and personal indictment along the
way really works on one. Pi.

I'm still contemplating the final post of the series on the 9/11 sixth prophecy and final post 3
of 3 of the seventh prophecy.

Just as a note subject to being corrected, here is my first calculation of the value of (the) (a)
common usage of the name of the 9/11 attacker and his formal name found on Wikipedia:

As calculated above (according to Luo Clement's values of numbering), the common usage
name has a value of 36 reduced to 9 and the formal name has a value of 138 reduced to 3. Of
course, 3 and 9 fall in the same triad and, thus, imply a similarity of vibration. The all
important first name, Mohammad has the same value as Mohamed, 32, and both reduce to 5
of the second triad.

Perhaps this will prove valuable at some point or of interest to others.

In making corrections in line numbering and the 'finder device' I've created to find acrostic
and telestic words in "The Tunnel Thru the Air," I noticed the first instance of the acrostic
word, "Ata," was in proximity to the acrostic, "TWA." [It is the first instance of 'ata' but the
second instance of 'TWA'.] Not only that, there was also a proximate instance of John Dee's
last name "Dee" spelled as a telestic with an additional 'e.'

Was I surprised to find the apparent isosceles triangle created by those words? Not at all.
At the "A" point on lines 1, 2 and 3, the first letter of each line is T, W, and A. Similarly, at
point C you have on line 18, 19 and 20 you have the letters a, t and a. Those two words are
acrostics because they use the first letter of each of the respective lines. At point B you have
a telstic that uses the last letter of each sentence on lines 9, 10, 11 and 12 or D, e, e, e.

If you bisect the triangle to create two right triangles you can find the lengths of the sides AB
and BC:

The triangle pictured is a bit distorted. The space that is taken for a vertical line is much
bigger than that of a horizontal character. If you gave the horizontal the same space as the
vertical, you'd get a far more elongated triangle, horizontally, than is pictured above.
I think Mr. Gann wants us to know that TTTTA will include hidden acrostic and telestic
messages involving TWA (which was dissolved in early 2001 and became American Airlines
and assets of other airlines), John Dee (of whom I've written many times) and Mohammad
Ata or, more formally, Mohamed Mohamed el-Amir Awad el-Sayed Atta.

I have found that, when Mr. Gann wants you to take particular notice of a concept or event,
he often defines an isosceles or right triangle involving the notable concepts. Page 69, the
"Jonas triangle," is a similar example.

One number, 69, and the understanding of opposites will connect the events of 1932 to the
tragedy of 9/11. When you boil all these three lengthy posts, it becomes that simple. And
WD Gann designed all of this in "The Tunnel Thru the Air" with the intent that it be
found. As I claim in a separate but contemporary series concerning the 7th prophecy, Mr.
Gann intended this information be discovered as it is now; in the time of the 266th Pope.

We are brought to this point that Mr. Gann has predicted the name of the chief terrorist
attacker, the building to be attacked, the airline of two of the three planes (perhaps all three)
used in the attack, the flight paths of the attack, the number of effective waves of attack. All
the details are at the surface level or encoded in the acrostic/telestic or numerological levels
of "The Tunnel Thru the Air." All that remains is the beginning point in time, the time
interval and the application of opposites.

There is but one additional concept needed; discern the correct beginning. We find Ezekiel
21:30 appearing in, not surpassingly, three places in TTTTA; pages 55, 73 and 176, this
excerpt taken from the second citation:

Astrologers know this principle well but us non astrologer pencil pushing CPAs need the
lesson; it's not on the CPA exam. The theme that will emerge is, not only is it that New York
City being assaulted in 1932 and 2001, but it is the United States. That's an end of a war and
the beginning of a post war period. While the focus is on the Mammouth Building and the
World Trade Center, the 110-story buildings; the former known in TTTTA as "the cedar" and
the latter having become associated with the sycamore (Isaiah 9:10 sycamore/cedar imagery)
that saved St Paul's Chapel on September 11, 2001. More on that in a post on the ongoing
prophecy.

The last battle of the fictional 1932 war was Washington DC on July 4, 1932, not that of New
York City, nor Robert Gordon's 7 days. I'll offer that as a proposition as I'm sure there are
those who will take issue. Here's the theory. Luo Clement, who I have asserted is WD Gann,
asserted a person willing him/herself a new name, becomes of that vibration…of that
destiny. Where the nativity of the United States might exist, historically, "depends" and the
confusion cannot be better expressed than in the History channel video
found HERE. Ultimately, and by the will and conscious design of the nation, the place of
nativity has become Washington DC just as the will of a person can change his or her name.
The event in the life of the nation that will be repeated is a beginning, but a beginning
involving opposites. The last battle of the fictional war takes place on the birthday of the
nation in it's adopted place of nativity and from that date, July 4, 1932, Mr. Gann's interval of
69 will be applied to produce, yet again, opposites:

Elegance and simplicity, but still two paradoxes must be reconciled. Above are the days
from the Battle of Washington to the WTC tragedy. Two paradoxes, the 12 hours related to
the Mammouth attack and the date of the Battle of Washington. All paradoxes must be
reconciled.

First, let's deal with the 12 hours. In his description of the attack on the Mammouth, Mr.
Gann meticulously avoids using the format "8pm." Instead, time and again, the time is given
as "o'clock." Not "8pm" but "8 o'clock," not "10pm" by "10 o'clock." Why this change in
wording when throughout TTTTA we find the "am" and "pm?" It's the use of the opposite;
the opposite of night (when the Mammouth attack commenced) is day (when the WTC attack
commenced with Flight 11 departing Logan). It is a difference of 12 hours and, accordingly,
a half day is added above.

The second paradox; how can we use the timing of the Mammouth attack and the the date of
the Battle of Washington? It may be as simple as this rumination that Mr. Gann gives us on
page 386:

The attack on the Mammouth was merely the beginning of the final battle and the Battle of
Washington on July 4, 1932 was its completion. Just as were the two planes that attacked the
WTC, the completion of the tragedy of September 11, 2001 was Flight 77 impacting the
Pentagon. The portion of the attack that related to the Mammouth, the beginning at "8
o'clock" and the ending near "10 minutes after 10 o'clock" would be the same timing for the
WTC tragedy recounted in the next paragraph.

Set aside the paradox and consider some exact timing and duration of the attack….to the
minute timing.

 In 1932, Robert Gordon overhears the enemy's having departed to begin their attack
on the Mammouth at "8 o'clock" in the evening on page 361 (19 squared or the earth
degrees in a solar day) on the Tel-talk.' Similarly in 2001, at the opposite time of day,
the morning, AA Flight 11 departs Logan to begin its attack on WTC. One minute
difference after accounting for the opposite of night and day.

 In 1932, Robert Gordon sights and destroys two fleets of enemy airplanes, in
seemingly minutes, to end the destruction that occurred in 1932 (a third fleet of planes
were dropped harmlessly into the Tunnel). And in 2001, the second tower, the North
Tower, fell at 10:28am. Perhaps, RG spent 18 minutes in completing his destruction
of the two fleets of planes….in that case the timing would be exact after accounting
for the opposite of night and day.

I can go on and on explaining similarities and resolving paradoxes presented. Having

wrestled with Mr. Gann's concepts so long, hardly leaving the thoughts for now the better
part of a year, I've realized two items of relevance among many.

First, owing to the nature of my fallibility I'll get a lot of stuff wrong….I'll make clerical
mistakes and I'll make mistakes of logic. But that's for me to forgive myself and not to
apologize for the efforts and progress I believe I have made.

Second and far more important, paradoxes are a matter of understanding. We get knowledge
by studying a teacher who knows; Mr. Gann. We put our mental construct of the knowledge
into motion and productivity through our effort. But we create "understanding" by wrestling
with the concepts derived from the first two steps. By resolving the paradox on our own and
thereby making the 'understanding' our personal understanding.

To my satisfaction, I've resolved the paradoxes involved in the sixth prophecy as provided
here and pending further consideration. Accordingly, I accept that Mr. Gann foresaw, to the
day and within 1 minute, the attack on the World Trade Center. For others, the timing, just
according to the numbers, will be attractive but they won't believe my resolution of the
paradoxes which I identified. They might find further dispute of the logic; perhaps additional
paradoxes. They might disagree with my resolutions. They wrestle with the paradox as did
I. Or, tragically, they might simply dismiss all as being personally or theologically
impermissible. Of those alternatives, only the last is an affront to thought. It would seem
similar thinking forced Socrates to drink hemlock and Galileo to spend his last years in
confinement and isolation.

So, forgive my errors, prove that which is factual, resolve what is paradoxical to your
satisfaction, and keep whatever is good.
This ends the WD Gann's prophecy of the World Trade Center tragedy, but its a continuing
prophecy in that it was only a beginning of an opposite. Where Mr. Gann styled the victory
in 1932 as the end of war and beginning of an era of peace, the opposite occurred in 2001; a
defeat. And as the beginning of the opposite period, 2001 is not a good prognosis for
America. In a separate post in the ongoing prophecy, I'll provide evidence of WD Gann's
warning to the our age, the age of the 266th Pope. It is similar to Rabbi Jonathan Cahn's
thesis recounted in "The Harbinger," but included in "The Tunnel Thru the Air"; about 73
years before the first warning symbolized in the WTC tragedy and 83 years before its
recognition by Rabbi Cahn.

More to remind myself. I am searching all of the acrostics and telestic words of the 15304
lines (latest count) of "The Tunnel Thru the Air" for four letter or greater proper nouns;
names of people. I'm doing this to judge the uniqueness of my findings of certain things and
it is turning out that there are precious few such proper nouns.

Recalling the prophecy of 9/11 is the beginning of a greater prophecy, I come upon the
following acrostic, 'ata,' telestic, 'feo' and Biblical verse on page 67:

Daniel 4:26, many meanings packed into just the verse. But I pick out joint meaning of the
verse, the contrived acrostic and telestic and the location in Chapter 6.

I find the stump of the tree reminiscent of the stump/roots of the sycamore at ground zero that
saved destruction of St Paul's Chapel from the steel beam thrown from the falling WTC.

I find one of the 15 instances of the acrostic word "Ata" found in TTTTA. There are 15
instances of 'ata' representing the 15 terrorists, including Mohamed Atta, on board the 3
planes that were successful in attacking the US (there are also 3 instances of "Atta"
repressing the 3 planes that were successful tools of destruction).

I find "feo" which, translated from Spanish to English, gives you "bad" or "badly."

And I find this located on line 266 connoting the 266th Pope. That this message is destined
for the time of the 266th Pope who is Pope Francis recently elected in 2013.

Its Rabbi Cahn's thesis of "The Harbinger" wrapped up in 8 lines or, arguably, a possible
meaningful 7 lines. And its predicted 73 years before the event in 1927 and 83 years before
the Rabbi recognizes the Biblical correlation.