Verbattle Time Rip
Verbattle Time Rip
Verbattle Time Rip
Against -
Science seeks to model the way the universe works. The way the universe works
is the truth science seeks. Since science can at best only model this, and the
model is not reality, the model must always remain inferior to the truth.
Against -
This really depends on the person. The person in question could be quite a
huge bigot or not much of a bigot. Corrupt people too could have just made
a few mistakes which didn’t affect the rest of us that much. And who says
we’re talking about politicians? Even normal people at their work could be
bigots, or they could’ve taken bribes and changed something. With the
huge number of different situations, we really can’t tell if being a bigot or
being corrupt is worse than the other, so we’d like to conclude by saying
the statement is inaccurate, which leads us to disagree with it and stand
against it.
For - acting is the art or occupation of performing fictional roles in plays, films, or television.
It quite literally, by definition, is an art. And to act well, you need talent, acting isn’t literally a
talent. You might be born with the talent to act, but that does not make acting itself a talent ok
help wtf
Against - acting is the talent that the people is the born with
Donald trump is a great world leader-
For-
Against-
Against-
Against-
Science is superior to truth - for. I’ve got against covered
For-
Intelligence is quite literally the ability to acquire knowledge and skills.
That’s all well and good, let’s say you do this pretty well, but how are you
gonna use this knowledge without understanding logic? Without a basic
level of reasoning being used, you won’t really be able to get any further -
all you can do is quite literally become a walking talking encyclopedia and
be unable to apply your knowledge or skills with some level of logic to help
you out in life. I’ll give you the simplest example I can think of - the Indian
education system. It’s built around the concept of rote memorization, as I’m
sure you all can tell, and helps make our toppers a bunch of people who
memorize and don’t apply - how in the world does this system help us? It’s
rooted in acquiring knowledge, ie intelligence, and gives no importance at
all to logic. If a visitor walks in the house with wet hair, it is logical for one to
assume that it is raining outside, but all intelligence can tell you in this
situation based on our definitions is that the visitor’s hair is wet.
Against -
The Webster dictionary defines intelligence as the skilled use of reason, and
logic as reasoning used with strict principles of validity. With such similar
definitions, there’s no way to say that logic is superior to intelligence. There
are even cases where intelligence can be called superior to logic - take the
example of a sidewalk being built. Designer A says it’s logical to build a path
to the sidewalk directly from the house, while Designer B says it’s logical to
build one at an angle facing the north while heading to the sidewalk, as
everyone works in the north. Both plans are logical, yes, but it’s pretty clear
that the second one is the intelligent one as it uses human experience and
intellect to save some time.
Against-
Might could dominate, but is it right? Not exactly. You could exact your will on
someone with your supposed might, but that, in no way, makes it right. What
you’re doing might be right, too, but it’s not related to your might in any way at
all. Might isn’t right. So if the team here against us can’t establish a definite
relation between might and being right, I’m sure we all can end on the
assumption that this statement is incorrect.
Secularism is a fallacy-
For-
Against-