Verbattle Time Rip

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Science is superior to truth -

For- Science- Reorganization of knowledge based on things that can be verified


and tested using a certain procedure. Truth remains subjective, and our
understanding of truth changes, the more science teaches us. Our universal
truths have constantly undergone change, while science provides rational
explanations.

Against -
Science seeks to model the way the universe works. The way the universe works
is the truth science seeks. Since science can at best only model this, and the
model is not reality, the model must always remain inferior to the truth.

Bigotry is worse than corruption:


For-
You are, in the end, going to end up doing at least something if you’re
corrupt. You can’t sit back, relax with a martini and wait for your reelection
campaign. Even if you relatively end up doing less than people who work
hard and are truthful while using their post, you will end up doing
something. What if you’re a bigot too? By not giving a damn about what the
people think, if you choose to stick to your ideas and disregard whatever
the people say, you’ll end up doing nothing that anyone approves of, and
you’ll probably end up doing no good for the country, district, city, or
whatever. Even if you’re not corrupt, you’ll end up focusing on your ideas
without even considering what other people think, and you will do quite
literally NOTHING for the good of us.

Against -
This really depends on the person. The person in question could be quite a
huge bigot or not much of a bigot. Corrupt people too could have just made
a few mistakes which didn’t affect the rest of us that much. And who says
we’re talking about politicians? Even normal people at their work could be
bigots, or they could’ve taken bribes and changed something. With the
huge number of different situations, we really can’t tell if being a bigot or
being corrupt is worse than the other, so we’d like to conclude by saying
the statement is inaccurate, which leads us to disagree with it and stand
against it.

Acting is not a talent

For - acting is ​the art or occupation of performing fictional roles in plays, films, or television.
It quite literally, by definition, is an art. And to act well, you need talent, acting isn’t literally a
talent. You might be born with the talent to act, but that does not make acting itself a talent ok
help wtf

Against - acting is the talent that the people is the born with
Donald trump is a great world leader-
For-
Against-

Silence is golden - eliminated

You can gain respect with good English -


For-
Technically, even if most the people you know won’t care about your
English accent or anything else, there are going to be people who end up
judging you on first impressions when you speak really good English and
you’re gonna get some respect from them because you know how to speak
well.

Against-

The press has been unfair to Indian politicians - eliminated i don’t


remember anything

There is no need for a purpose in life -


For-
I’ve got this

Against-
Science is superior to truth - for. I’ve got against covered

Logic is more important than intelligence

Logic - ​Reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity.


Intelligence - The ability to acquire knowledge and skills

For-
Intelligence is quite literally the ability to acquire knowledge and skills.
That’s all well and good, let’s say you do this pretty well, but how are you
gonna use this knowledge without understanding logic? Without a basic
level of reasoning being used, you won’t really be able to get any further -
all you can do is quite literally become a walking talking encyclopedia and
be unable to apply your knowledge or skills with some level of logic to help
you out in life. I’ll give you the simplest example I can think of - the Indian
education system. It’s built around the concept of rote memorization, as I’m
sure you all can tell, and helps make our toppers a bunch of people who
memorize and don’t apply - how in the world does this system help us? It’s
rooted in acquiring knowledge, ie intelligence, and gives no importance at
all to logic. ​If a visitor walks in the house with wet hair, it is logical for one to
assume that it is raining outside, but all intelligence can tell you in this
situation based on our definitions is that the visitor’s hair is wet.

Against -
The Webster dictionary defines intelligence as ​the skilled use of reason, and
logic as reasoning used with strict principles of validity. With such similar
definitions, there’s no way to say that logic is superior to intelligence. There
are even cases where intelligence can be called superior to logic - take the
example of a sidewalk being built. Designer A says it’s logical to build a path
to the sidewalk directly from the house, while Designer B says it’s logical to
build one at an angle facing the north while heading to the sidewalk, as
everyone works in the north. Both plans are logical, yes, but it’s pretty clear
that the second one is the intelligent one as it uses human experience and
intellect to save some time.

Practically, might is right


For-
Might Is Right​, or ​The Survival of the Fittest​, is a book by pseudonymous author Ragnar
Redbeard. First published in 1890, it heavily advocates ​egoist anarchism​, ​amorality​,
consequentialism​ and ​psychological hedonism​. In ​Might Is Right​, Redbeard rejects conventional
ideas of ​human​ and ​natural rights​ and argues that only strength or physical might can establish
moral right (à la ​Callicles​ or ​Thrasymachus​). The book also attacks ​Christianity​and ​Democracy​.
Friedrich Nietzsche​'s theories of ​master–slave morality​ and ​herd mentality​ serve as a clear
inspiration for Redbeard's book written contemporaneously. Practically, having the fittest survive in a
bigger proportion does increase the amount of people in our population with favourable genes
promoting stronger, fitter, smarter people, which would in the end help us, however morally
ambiguous this is. So, might in the end is the winner, or the one that’s right, as the book tries to say.

Against-
Might could dominate, but is it right? Not exactly. You could exact your will on
someone with your supposed might, but that, in no way, makes it right. What
you’re doing might be right, too, but it’s not related to your might in any way at
all. Might isn’t right. So if the team here against us can’t establish a definite
relation between might and being right, I’m sure we all can end on the
assumption that this statement is incorrect.

Men should wear makeup


For-
Against-

Secularism is a fallacy-
For-
Against-

India should always be a welfare state-


For-
Against-

Lying is not a sin-


For-
it's completely relative, even religious leaders have lied countless times
after preaching about the truth. White lies too hold our society and
social structures together and being truthful in many situations could
hurt our entire society, which could be considered a huge sin. But lying
in these situations holds our delicate social structure together which is
a boon to all of us - that's not a sin, that's just necessary.
Against-
a sin is an immoral act considered to be a transgression against divine
law.
It doesn't matter if lying helps us or doesn't help us, according to the
scriptures, in most cases, lying is in fact a sin. So, lying is in fact a sin
by the very definition of a sin itself.
You need to have reservations in the entertainment industry too-

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy