BAB 10

COST AND BUDGET

1.1. Construction Cost

The costs for the construction of the Kota Bima flood include the work of
Normalization, construction of embankments, and the construction of
reinforcement cliffs. Recapitulation of development cost of each river of
Malay and Padolo River.

1.2. RAP Cost

The cost of compensation for land, housing and infrastructure borne by the
Bima City government from the Post-Disaster Rehabilitation and
Reconstruction Grant 2016 amounts to Rp.166.997.000.000, - (Source:
BPBD)
Tabel 10.1. RAP Cost

No Item Unit Volume Unit Price Total

1 Land Acquisition 5200 m length m2 104,000 Rp 120,000 Rp 12,480,000,000

2 Houses compensation
- semi-permanent unit 77 Rp 50,000,000 Rp 3,850,000,000
- permanent unit 357 Rp 100,000,000 Rp 35,700,000,000

TOTAL Rp 52,030,000,000

Tabel 10.2. List of Land Prices (Market) With NJOP Considerations

No Owner / Authorization Owner MARKET PRICE INFORMATION

1 KECAMATAN RASANAE BARAT 175,000 ZONA 1

2 KECAMATAN MUMPADA 115,000 ZONA 1
3 KECAMATAN ASAKOTA 675,500 ZONA 1
175,000
Source: - Land Procurement Document for Development for Public Interest
- (Padolo River Arrangement) in Kelurahan Dara Kec. West Rasanae City of Bima
- Bima City Housing and Settlement Office 2017
 BAB 11
MONITORING AND EVALUATION

11.1. Main Purpose of RAP Monitoring

The main purpose of monitoring the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) is to
ensure that resettlement is done under the RAP. It is also to see the progress
made in the implementation of a comprehensive and timely RAP and to
identify problems as early as possible to facilitate required resettlement and
mitigation. Included in the monitoring of land acquisition, compensation
payments for lost assets, resettlement of project affected persons and
expenditures.
Monitoring and evaluation are important activities in the implementation of
each plan. This activity becomes important if planning is related to land
acquisition and resettlement & rehabilitation. Monitoring involves periodic
review of the implementation of the plan to ascertain whether the activity is
performing as expected and provide feedback on planning time and work
plan with maintaining quality. Conversely, evaluation is the impact of the work
plan in the context of achieving project objectives.
Monitoring and Reporting Activities shall be conducted with the aim of
overseeing the implementation of the land acquisition program to be carried
out in accordance with the intended plans, objectives and outputs.
Funding requirements for the implementation of monitoring and evaluation
activities are sourced from the Regional Budget (APBD) of Kota Bima.

11.2. Internal factors

These inputs are related to internal factors that can be controlled by those
who need land (Local Government) but may become an obstacle in the land
acquisition process with the following details:
Internal Factors of Land Procurement Flood Control in Bima City as in the
table below:

Tabel 11.1. Internal Factors of Flood Control Procurement in Kota Bima

Indicator Risk Recommendation
1. Budget 1.1 Capacity Funding (not enough APBD / APBN)
1.2 Absence of Additional Fund Allocation (either due
to bank rate / interest / rise in land prices
1.3 Frequent Fixed Payment Delay (UGK)
1.4 UGK disbursement process does not go smoothly
1,5 lack of sufficient cash flow
2. Land Data 2.1 Land Documentation is incomplete
physical data
2.2 incomplete ground
2.3 Land ownership data is incomplete
2.4 Long-term land and building invetarization
2,5 long running list of nominative making & listing
2,6 preparation of payment lists & readiness to issue
letters of rights by intansi that require long-standing
land
2,7 verification of the completeness of the land
acquisition file before the payment of UGK
Data 2,8 archiving system of land acquisition is not
clear
2,9 administrative data requirements before long-
term paid
2.10 the existence of land ownership of Data
3. Human 3.1 P2T is less experienced in land acquisition cases
Resources 3.2 P2T Kurang pemahaman tentang aturan
(HR) prosedural acquisition

3.3 P2T land is less precise in examining members

3.4 ownership status P2T consisting of structural

officials do not have sufficient time for land acquisition
activities

3.5 ownership of falsification dikumen by irresponsible

person

3.6 P2T have no land acquisition

 Indicator Risk Recommendation

3.7 land acquisition file (receipt & SPH) has not

signed by party

3. level P2T related presence in the field at the time of

payment of compensation is the officer is quite
minimal

3.9 which is not firm in the field

4. 4.1 P2T Coordination is less supportive

Kcoordination 4.2 lack of extension / socialization of land
acquisition

4.3 implementation of community consultation did not

go smoothly

4.4 Land rights disposal witnessed by P2T goes lack

of way

4.5 long clearance of land from land

4.6 Duration of decision-making process due to rise in

land prices above time allocation SK Committee

4.7 for land acquisition difficult to predict

4.8 settlement payment process

4.9 the deceased SPJ is the cost of liberation of tanh

5. 5.1 Lack of community cooperation (to release land

landowners rights)
5.2 Lack of concern for citizens
5.3 Landowners demand a higher rate of UGK niali
than that determined by the Bupati / Walikota
5.4 Value Compensation for buildings is often
considered by landowners too small, so the
landowner is difficult to build his house
5,5 Landowners often demand land acquisition even if
the land is still feasible to build / utilize
5.6 There is still buying and selling land by
speculators resulting in an increase in land prices
5.7 punishment of land ownership
5,8 landowners are difficult to contact and not clea
5,9 lack of understanding of landowners regarding
UGK payment procedures
 Indicator Risk Recommendation

5.10 claims for land records

5.11 low process of signing letter of land acquisition
5.12 Surcharges for land acquisition through the
second tax
5.13 reluctance of landowners to be acquitted

11.3. External factors

These inputs are related to external factors that can not be controlled by
those in need of land (local government) so that they have a role / effect on
time performance in the process of land acquisition process with details
(table 11.2):

Tabel 11.2. External Factors of Land Procurement Flood Control in Bima City

Indicator Risk Recommendation

1. Rule 1.1 The appeal process of the establishment of the
development site (SP2LP) from the land-needing agency
does not proceed smoothly
1.2 The appraisal appraisal mechanism does not work well
1.3 The Consignment Mechanism does not proceed
smoothly / according to the procedure
1.4 The duration of the SK issuance on the form & amount
of the price of the indemnity
1,5 Length of approval decision (location of governor)
1,6 duration list SK ownership
1.7 There is a new government policy that affects the land
acquisition process
1,8 he existence of social-political policy changes from the
government
2. Finance 2.1 The existence of fluctuations in the rupiah exchange
rate that affect the land
2.2 The existence of currency value inflation that affects
the price of land
2.3 Project Operational Cost (BOP) P2T in accordance
with the Ministerial Decree is considered too smalll
2.4 The process of giving money Loss (UGK) is not going
well
3. Price 3.1 The existence of price increases
3.2 there is a problem in the price agreement between
citizens and P2T
3.3 complete documentation BA Price agreement
 Indicator Risk Recommendation
agreement
3.4 The difficulty level predicts the value of land
acquisition
4. Land Status 4.1 The presence of the masalh in the determination of
waste land
4.2 Length of land certification process
4.3 Status of land ownership is incomplete

5.1 The occurrence of floods that hinder the land

5. Environment acquisition process
5.2 Earthquakes affect the process of land acquisition
5.3 There is a landslide due to the mobilization of heavy
equipment in the surrounding area that impedes the land
acquisition process
6 Geographical 6.1 Land prices that have ease of access to transportation
factors lines have a higher value
6.2 The price of land close to the central business area
has a higher value

11.4. Reporting
The types of internal monitoring reports consist of monthly and final activity
reports:
a. Monthly report
This report will contain information about:
 Details of the socialization data that has been done including the
location, from the preparation and when the land acquisition is
carried out
 Type and timing of compensation and rehabilitation as specified in
land acquisition documents
 Complaints and complaints from the LAP on all aspects of land
acquisition and resettlement implementation
 The socio-economic conditions of the LAP include listing the
names of PAPs and their registered assets
 This monthly report is made by the monitoring team leader and
submitted to the PMU, the Bupati and the Project.
b. Final Activity Report
This report contains information on the achievement of physical targets /
activity targets, realization of absorption and budget allocations,
development of socio-economic conditions of PAPs, problems /
constraints faced and action / action plan of completion, and
implementation of subsequent activities. External monitoring reports will
be made at the beginning and end construction by the team to be formed
by the Project.