Plasma Physics
Plasma Physics
Plasma Physics
Vasco Guerra
February 2017
Foreword
• Constants:
• Conversion factors:
• Mathematical relations:
~ × (∇
∇ ~ × A)
~ = ∇(
~ ∇~ · A)
~ − ∇2 A
~; ~a × (~b × ~c) = (~a · ~c)~b − (~a · ~b)~c
~ × (ψ A)
∇ ~ = ψ(∇
~ × A)
~ + (∇ψ)
~ ×A ~; ~ × (∇
∇ ~ A)
~ =0
ˆ ∞
r
2 π
exp(−Ax )dx =
−∞ A
ˆ +∞ √
2 2 π
x exp(−Ax )dx =
0 4A3/2
1 d2
21 d 2 dφ
In spherical coordinates and simmetry, ∇ φ = 2 r = (rφ)
r dr dr r dr2
d2 φ 1 dφ
In cylindrical coordinates and symmetry, ∇2 φ = 2 +
dr r dr
6
• Drifts
~ ×B
E ~
ExB drift ~vd = 2
B
2 ~ ~
mv⊥ B × ∇B
Grad B drift ~vd =
2qB B2
2 ~
mvk ~ur × B
Curvature drift ~vd = 2
qB Rc
1 2
~
1 ~ur × B
2
Fields in vacuum ~vd = mvk + v⊥ 2
2 qB Rc
m d ~
Polarization drift ~vd = E⊥
qB 2 dt
1 ∇P~ ×B ~
Diamagnetic drift ~vd = −
qn B 2
1
mv 2
Magnetic moment µ= 2 ⊥
B
• Waves
– Electrostatic electron waves
∗ B~ 0 = 0 ou ~k k B
~ 0:
ω 2 = ωpe2
+ 3k 2 vt2 ; vt2 = kT /m (Langmuir waves)
∗ ~k ⊥ B~ 0 : ω 2 = ωpe 2 2
+ ωce = ωh2 ; (upper hybrid waves)
– Ion electrostatic waves
∗ B~ 0 = 0 ou ~k k B
~ 0:
ω 2 = k 2 c2s ; c2s = γe kB Tem+γi
i kB Ti
(ion acoustic waves)
2 2 γi kB Ti γe k B T e 1
ω =k mi + mi 1+γe k2 λ2 (ion plasma waves)
De
∗ ~k ⊥ B~ 0:
ω 2 = k 2 c2s + ωl2 ; ωl2 = ωce ωci (lower hybrid oscillations)
ω 2 = k 2 c2s + ωci
2
(ion cyclotronic waves)
7
ν = N hσvi ~Γ = n~v
~Γ = nµE
~ − D∇n
~ ~ + ~v × B
E ~ = η J~
∂~v
ρm = J~ × B
~ − ∇P
~ P = Pe + Pi
∂t
• Maxwell’s equations
~
~ ·B
∇ ~ =0; ~ = µ0 J~ + 1 ∂ E
~ ×B
∇ 2
c ∂t
~
∇ ~ = ρ ;
~ ·E ~ ×E
∇ ~ =− ∂ B
ε0 ∂t
• Kinetic theory
ˆ ˆ
n(~r, t) = f (~r, ~v , t)d3 v ; ~ = h~v i = 1
V ~v f (~r, ~v , t)d3 v
n
∂f ~ r f + q (E
~ + ~v × B)
~ ·∇
~ v f = 0 (Vlasov eq.)
+ ~v · ∇
∂t m
8
CHAPTER 1
field and calculate the typical shielding length. Calculate the intensity of the
electric field at x = 0.5 cm, assuming that eφ(x)/kB T 1.
5. (F. F. Chen) A spherical conductor of radius R is immersed in a plasma and
charged to a potential φ0 . The electrons remain Maxwellian and move to
form a Debye shield, but the ions are stationary during the time frame of the
experiment. Assuming eφ0 kB Te :
(a) derive an expression for the potential as a function of r;
(b) calculate the charge in the sphere;
(c) calculate the sphere capacity for R = 10 cm, Te = 1 keV and n0 = 1014
and 106 cm−3 , and show that for high electron densities the plasma
behaves as a dielectric.
6. In the deduction of the electron plasma frequency, suppose the ions are not
infinitely massive, but have a mass mi and can move. Modify the discussion
to show that the coupled oscillation of the electron and ion “slabs” is made
with the total plasma frequency (ωp2 = ωpe
2 2
+ ωpi ).
7. (∗) In this problem we want to calculate the plasma oscillation frequency for
a spherical plasma, proceeding in a similar way as it was done for the slab
configuration in the previous exercise.
Consider a spherical plasma of radius R, represented by a uniform positive
ion background of density n0 inside the sphere. Assume the ions are infinitely
massive. Initially, the electron density has the same volume distribution as
that of the ions. The “electron sphere” is then stretched to a radius R+δr and
then released. Assume at all instants that the electron density is distributed
uniformly on the spherical volume it occupies.
8. An infinite conducting plane is placed inside an homogeneous plasma and
charged to a potential φ0 . The electrons move and keep a Boltzmann distri-
bution, with eφ/kB Te 1, while the ions can be considered stationary for
the time-scale of the experiment. Consider the xx direction perpendicular to
the plane and x = 0 coinciding with the plane.
9. (?) Consider an infinite line, uniformly charged with a linear charge density λ,
immersed in a homogeneous plasma. The electrons and ions follow Maxwellian
distributions, respectively with temperature Te and Ti .
(a) Show that the electrostatic potential can be written, in cylindrical co-
λ r
ordinates, in the form φ(r) = 2πε0 K0 λD , where K0 is the modified
Bessel function of second kind of order zero, and determine λD . Derive
the expression for the electric field as a function of r.
(b) Calculate the total charge around the line, per unit length.
11
ne0 e2
2 ni0 Te
∇ φ= 1+ φ,
0 kB Te ne0 Ti
where ne0 and ni0 are the non-perturbed densities of electrons and ions,
i.e., their densities at a large distance from the test charge.
(c) Determine the Debye length and tell if it is larger, smaller or equal to
the case where there are no dust particles.
(d) Obtain the expression for the electrostatic potential φ(r).
Historical note: this problem was studied by Lakhsmi, Bharuthram and
Shukla in Astrophys. Space Sci. 209 (1993) 213. Dust particles have
been observed in asteroid regions, planetary atmospheres (Earth and
Titan), comet tails and several laboratory plasmas.
density is
n0 , if s < x < l − s
ne (x) = .
0, for 0 < x < s and l − s < x < l
The regions 0 < x < s and l − s < x < l are called the “sheath” regions.
(a) Determine the potential φ(x) and the electric field E(x) for 0 < x < l.
Find φ0 = φ(x = l/2) and plot the potential and the electric field as a
function of x.
[Hint: consider the symmetry of the problem and recall that the electric
field must be continuous]
(b) Does the electric field at the sheaths act to confine the electrons within
the bulk plasma or does it tend to destroy the confinement?
(c) Chose eφ0 = 5kB Te and find an expression for s. Discuss the plausibility
of the value given for φ0 .
CHAPTER 2
2
1. For particles with the same kinetic energy W = mv⊥ /2, compute the ratio
between the Larmor radius of a proton and an electron (mp /me = 1836).
3. (F. F. Chen) An electron beam with density ne = 1014 m−3 and radius R = 1
cm crosses a region with a uniform magnetic field B ~ = B0 ~uz , where B0 = 2
T and the zz axis is aligned with the direction of propagation of the beam.
Determine the direction and magnitude of the E ~ ×B ~ drift at r = R (note
~
that E is the electrostatic field created by the charge of the beam).
~ ×B
that the finite Larmor radius effects are important if the E ~ drift
velocity is of the order of the thermal speed).1
5. (F. F. Chen) Suppose the earth’s magnetic field is 3 × 10−5 T at the equator
and falls off as 1/r3 as in a perfect dipole. Let there be an isotropic population
of 1 eV protons and 30 keV electrons, each with density n = 107 m−3 at r = 5
earth radii in the equator plane.
~ drift velocities.
(a) Compute the ion and electron ∇B
(b) Does an electron drift eastward or westward?
(c) How long does an electron take to encircle the earth?
(d) Compute the current ring density in A/m2 .
Note: the curvature drift is non-neglible... but neglect it anyway.
6. (?) Hall thrusters are widely used in space propulsion. A stationary plasma
thruster (SPT) is schematically represented in the figure.2
The thruster has a cylindrical
shape, with an open chamber de-
fined by inner (Ri ) and outer
(Re ) radii and height L, where
the anode is placed. In the cham-
ber there is a magnetic field,
pointing from Ri to Re . An ax-
ial electric field points outwards
from the anode. The thruster ex-
periences a propelling force if it is
able to eject positive ions along
the direction of the electric field.
Xenon is injected into the cham-
ber, and electrons coming from
the cathode ionize the Xe atoms,
creating new electron/ion pairs.
Our purpose is to study the motion of electrons and ions created by ionisation
of Xe in the thruster. Consider Re = 5 cm, Ri = 3 cm and L = 30 cm. The
fields in the chamber are approximately E = 5kV /m and B = 5 mT, and the
mass of Xe is 131.3 u (1u = 1.66 × 10−24 g).
(a) Assuming that the electrons are created with a speed perpendicular to
~ ~v⊥ , describe qualitatively their motion and draw schematically their
B,
trajectory (neglect any possible curvature, ∇B~ and centrifugal force
drifts).
(b) A simple image of the thrust operation can be obtained by calculating
the electron and ion Larmor radii, rLe and rLi . Assuming the velocity of
ions and electrons to be, respectively, v⊥,i = 100 m/s (ions are formed
from ionisation of the injected neutral Xe atoms) and v⊥,e = 1 × 104
m/s (electrons coming from the cathode are accelerated from the E
1 Notice
√
the definition of the thermal speed from Chen’s book, a factor of 2 larger than
defined in this text.
2 M. Keidar and I. I. Beilis, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 34 (2006) 804
15
field), calculate rLe and rLi and compare it with the relevant thruster
dimensions. Does the thruster experience a propelling force in these
conditions?
(c) Solve the equations of motion for the electrons created in an ionising
collision, assuming they are created with zero speed. Consider a plane
geometry (i.e., solve the equations in cartesian axes), with the xx-axis
along E.~ Determine the amplitude of oscillation in the xx direction.
(d) In the conditions of c., what would be the amplitude of oscillation of the
positive ions in the xx direction, if they were created withe zero speed?
Comment the results of c. and d..
Note: a tutorial on the physics and modelling of Hall thrusters is pre-
sented by J. P. Boeuf, J. Appl. Phys. 121 (2017) 011101.
E0 cos(ωt)~ux .
(a) Using the invariance of µ, find the energy to which the proton is accel-
erated before it escapes.
(b) How long does it take to reach that energy?
[Suggestions: i) suppose that the B field is approximately uniform in the
space between the mirrors and changes abruptly near the mirrors, i.e.,
treat each mirror as a flat piston and show that the velocity gained at
each bounce is 2vm ; ii) compute the number of bounces necessary; iii)
assume that the distance between the mirrors does not change appre-
ciably during the acceleration process.]
3. (F. F. Chen) The magnetic field along the axis of a magnetic mirror is B( z) =
B0 (1 + α2 z 2 ), where α is a constant. Suppose that at z = 0 an electron has
velocity v 2 = 3vk2 = 32 v⊥
2
.
Fluid drifts
(a) Show that the E~ ×B ~ (~vE ) and electron diamagnetic drifts (~vDe ) ãare
equal in magnitude and have opposite directions.
(b) Show that the plasma rotates as a rigid body.
(c) In the reference frame that rotates with velocity ~vE there are drift waves
that propagate with speed vϕ = 0.5vDe . What is vϕ in the labora-
tory frame? Represent on a r − θ diagram the directions and relative
magnitudes of ~vE , ~vDe and ~vϕ in the lab frame.
(d) Obtain the diamagnetic current, J~D , as a function of r.
(e) Calculate JD for B = 0.4 T, n0 = 1016 m−3 , kTe = kTi = 0.25 eV and
r = r0 = 1 cm.
3. A cylindrical plasma column of an isothermal plasma of radius R = 8 mm
and equal ion and electron temperatures, kB T = 5 eV, is immersed on on
a magnetic field B = 0, 6 T, aligned with the cylinder axis (coincident with
the zz axis). The density has a profile n(r) = n0 J0 2, 4 Rr , where J0 is
20 Chapter 4. Fluid drifts
12 −3
the Bessel function of first kind of order zero and
n0 = 10 0 cm . Assume
eϕ
you can consider ni = ne = n = n0 exp kT . Note: J0 (x) = −J1 (x),
J0 (1, 2) ' 0, 67; J1 (1, 2) ' 0, 49.
(a) Obtain the expressions for the ion and electron diamagnetic drift as a
function of r. Justify qualitatively the direction of the drifts.
(b) Calculate the diamagnetic current density at r = R/2 (value and direc-
tion).
CHAPTER 5
1. (F. F. Chen 4.6) Compute the effect of collisional damping on the propagation
of Langmuir waves, by adding a term −mnν~v to the electron equation of
motion and rederiving the dispersion relation for Te = 0 (plasma oscillations).
Show that the wave is damped in time.
(a) What is the plasma density if a phase shift of 1/10 fringe is observed?
Assume a uniform density and note that one fringe corresponds to a
360o phase shift.
(b) Show that if the phase shift is small, then it is proportional to the density.
Note: Anyone can communicate by radio with the ISS astronauts. The de-
tails and the frequencies actually used can be found in NASA’s webpage
(http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/station/reference/radio/)
22 Chapter 5. Waves in non-magnetized plasmas
4. (F. F. Chen 4.10) Hannes Alfvén (Nobel Prize in Physics in 1970) has sug-
gested that perhaps the primordial universe was symmetrical between matter
and antimatter. Suppose that the universe was at one time a uniform mixture
of protons, antiprotons, electrons and positrons, each species having a density
n0 .
(a) Show that the dispersion relation can be written in the form
ω2
ω 2 = ωpi
2 2
+ ωpe
ω 2 − γe vt2 k 2
(a) Use the two-fluid equations and the Poisson’s equation to show that the
dielectric constant of the plasma can be written in the form
2 2
ωpi ωpe
(k, ω) = 1 − − .
ω2 (ω − kv0 )2
(b) Verify that the dispersion relation is a polynomial function of fourth
order (so that for each real value of k there are four solutions for ω).
ω2 ω2
Sketch approximately the function f (ω) = ωpi2 + (ω−kv pe
0)
2 for a fixed k
and mark on the graph where the four roots are ω [you do not need to
give the exact values, we are only interested in understanding the form
of the function].
(c) In some situations the dispersion relation has only two real roots, which
happens for small enough kv0 (convince yourself this is the case, by
looking at the graph you have just drawn). In that case, one of the
imaginary roots corresponds to an unstable wave, growing exponentially
in time. Show that, if kv0 = ωpe ω, the instability growth rate is
√ 1/3
me
given by 23 21/3
1
mi ωpe s−1 [Suggestion: start by expanding the
last term of (k, ω) to the first order in ω/ωpe ].
(d) From the general relations in a) e b), derive the dispersion relation in the
limit mi → ∞. Then obtain the limit v0 → 0 (while keeping mi → ∞).
Comment the results.
7. (Exam 2015/2016) Consider a plasma formed by electrons and two species of
positive ions, a light species (a) and a heavy species (b). We want to study
the propagation of low-frequency electrostatic waves in this plasma. As the
plasma is quasi-neutral, the non-perturbed electron and ion densities verify
the relation ne0 = na0 + nb0 .
(a) Justify why you can use the plasma approximation, neglect the electron
inertia and consider isothermal electrons.
(b) Write the relevant fluid equations and linearize them, keeping only the
terms up to first order.
(c) Show that the first order perturbations of the electron and ion-a densities
are related by
r
na1 = ω2 ma n ,
Ta e1
k2 kB Te − γa Te
where r = na0 /ne0 .
(d) What is the relation between the first order perturbation on the electron
and ion-b densities?
(e) Show that the dispersion relation can be written as
r (1 − r) m
mb
a
1= ω2 ma Ta
+ ω2 ma a Tb
k2 kB Te − γa Te k2 kB Te − γb m
mb Te
If both ion species have similar densities, which one determines the
plasma behaviour? Comment the result.
[Historical note: These waves were experimentally observed by Naka-
mura and Saitou, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion (2003) 45 759; the
case Ta , Tb 6= 0 gives two solutions, a fast acoustic wave and a slow
acoustic wave and it is much more complex to analyse.]
8. (Exam 2016/2017) Consider an electromagnetic wave in a cold, non-magnetised
plasma. Neglect the ion motion but consider the effect of collisions between
electrons and neutrals, assuming a constant collision frequency ν.
(a) Write the relevant system of equations to study this system.
(b) Linearize the system of equations in the usual form and keep only the
first order terms.
(c) Show that the dispersion relation can be written in the form
2
c2 k 2 ωpe
= 1 − .
ω2 ω(ω + iν)
(d) Assuming ν/ω 1, show that the skin depth (attenuation distance) is
given by
!1/2
2
2c ω 2 ωpe
2
1− 2 .
ν ωpe ω
[Suggestion: use the dispersion relation and take a real frequency ω and
an imaginary wavenumber k = iα + β.]
9. (Exam 2017/2018) In this problem we study classical and quantum ion acous-
tic waves.
(a) Consider first classical ion acoustic waves, i.e., those studied in class.
i. The dispersion relation for ion acoustic waves was derived under
the plasma approximation. Explain what does this approximation
mean in the study of linear waves in plasmas and why the dispersion
relations obtained in this way should be valid for small values of k.
ii. Show that the dispersion relation of ion plasma waves does reduce
to that of ion acoustic waves in the limit k → 0. Explain which of
the two terms on the r.h.s. of the dispersion relation must dominate
for the expression to be valid.
(b) We turn now our attention to the quantum case. Quantum hydrody-
namic models (QHM) generalize the fluid equations for plasmas with
the inclusion of a quantum correction term to the force balance equa-
tion. It is possible to show that, in the limit me /mi → 0 and for
TF i < Ti < Te TF e , where TF s denotes the Fermi temperature of
species s and the remaining quantities have their usual meaning, this
equation leads to the following relationship between the potential φ and
the electron density:
2 2
n2
eφ 1 1 cs ∂ √
= − + e2 − √ H 2 ne , (5.1)
2kB TF e 2 2n0 2 ne ωpi ∂x2
25
and
~ωpe
H=
2kB TF e
is a dimensionless parameter characterizing the importance of quantum
diffraction effects (it is the ratio between the plasmon energy and the
Fermi energy).
The relevant fluid equations are the ion continuity and momentum con-
servation equations, Poisson’s equation and equation (5.1). Neglect the
ion thermal agitation.
i. Write the four fluid equations in terms of the four unknowns ni , vi ,
ne and φ.
ii. Show that the linearizarion of equation (5.1) leads to
" 2 #
eφ1 1 2 cs k ne1
= 1+ H ,
2kB TF e 4 ωpi n0
ni1 k 2 eφ1
= 2 .
n0 ω mi
iv. Obtain the dispersion relation for the quantum ion-acoustic waves,
2 c2 k 2
2
ωpi 1 + H4 ωs 2
ω 2 = ω2 pi
k2 .
pi 2 H 2 c2s k2
c2 + k
s
1 + 4 ω2
pi
1. (F. F. Chen 4.7) For the upper hybrid oscillations, show that the elliptical
orbits are always elongated in the direction of ~k (hint: derive an expression
for vx /vy ).
3. (F. F. Chen 4.21) Show that in a positronium plasma, i.e., a neutral plasma
of electrons and positron, there is no Faraday rotation [suggestion: write the
system of linearized equation in matrix form, Ax = 0, and ask Mathematica
..
for help to calculate det(A) ^].
(a) Write an expression for the cutoff density for the X wave.
(b) On a vφ2 /c2 vs. ω diagram, show the branch of the X-wave dispersion
relation on which such interferometer would work.
(b) Linearize the equations for the electrons, keeping only the first order
terms. Show that
ωce
vey = i vex ,
ω
where (obviously) the speeds vex and vey are the components of the first
order correction to the electron velocity.
(c) Still using only the electron equations from c), show that
k(1 − ε)n0
ne1 = −i eE1 ,
me Ω2e
kB Te
where Ω2e = ω 2 − ωce
2
− γe k 2 c2se and c2se = me .
(d) Defining Ω+ e Ω− similarly toá Ωe , what are the expressions for n+1 e
n−1 ?
(e) Show that, in the plasma approximation, the dispersion relation can be
written in the form
me 2 2 m− me m− 2 2
ε Ω Ω + (1 − ε)Ω2+ Ω2− + Ω− Ωe = 0 .
m+ + e m+ m2+
(a) Write the system of linearised (vectorial) equations that leads to the
dispersion relation for these waves, neglecting ion motion (mi → ∞),
electron thermal motion (Te → 0) and collisions.
(b) It can be shown that the system you just wrote leads to
Ex (ω 2 − c2 k 2 − α) + Ey iαωce /ω =0
2 2 2
Ey (ω − c k − α) − Ex iαωce /ω =0
where
ωp2
α= 2 ω2
.
1 − ωce
Continue from here to obtain the dispersion relation for this wave (in
the form given in the formulae for the exam).
(c) Show (briefly) that the modes are right and left hand circularly polarized,
and identify which is which.
(d) Define and obtain the cutoff frequencies. Comment the results.
e iωEy − ωce Ex
vy = −
m ω 2 − ωce
2
e iEz
vz = −
m ω
ii. Show that the conductivity tensor is given by
σ⊥ σ× 0
−σ× σ⊥ 0 ,
0 0 σk
where
ne2 i ne2 iω ne2 ωce
σk = ; σ⊥ = ; σ× = .
me ω me ω 2 − ωce
2 me ω 2 − ωce
2
(c) The above formalism provides the dispersion relation for any cold, mag-
netized plasma (!!!) (inclusion of ion motion is straightforward). It is
possible to show that when ~k ⊥ B~ the dispersion matrix takes the form
S −iD 0
2 2
D = iD − kωc2 + S 0 ,
k2 c2
0 0 − ω2 + P
2
ωpe
where S = S(ω, ωpe , ωce ), D = D(ω, ωpe , ωce ) and P = 1 − ω2 .
30 Chapter 6. Waves in magnetized plasmas
4.50E+01
4.00E+01
3.50E+01
3.00E+01
2.50E+01
2.00E+01
1.50E+01
1.00E+01
5.00E+00
0.00E+00
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Real Linear Approxima8on
2. (F. F. Chen, 5.1) The electron-neutral collision cross section for 2 eV electrons
in He is about 6πa20 , where a0 = 0.53 × 10−8 cm is the radius of the first
32 Chapter 7. Diffusion and transport in weakly ionized plasmas
Bohr orbit of the hydrogen atom. A positive column with no magnetic field
has p = 1 Torr of He (at room temperature), and kTe = 2 eV.
(a) Compute the electron diffusion coefficient in m2 /s, assuming that hσvi
is equal to the product σv for 2 eV electrons.
(b) If the current density along the column is 2 kA/m2 and the plasma
density is 1016 m−3 , what is the electric field along the column?
with j = 1, 2, α1 + α2 = 1 e v = |~v |.
´´´
(a) Verify that the distribution function is correctly normalized, i.e., f (~v )d3 v =
n.
(b) Show that the average value q
of the absolute value of the velocity of each
B j 8k T
of the maxwellians is hvj i = πm and calculate the average value of
the absolute value of the velocity of the distribution.
(c) The cross section for electron-neutral momentum transfer can be approx-
imated by σm (u) = βm u, where βm is constant and u is the electron
energy. Show that the mean collision frequency for momentum transfer
associated to each Maxwellian is νm = 2N βm kB Tj hvj i and calculate
the average value of the momentum collision frequency of the distribu-
tion.
(d) The ionization cross section of the same gas can be approximated by
σi (u) = 0, if u < ui , and σi (u) = βi , if u ≥ ui , where ui is the
ionization threshold. Show that the
ionization
frequency
associated with
ui ui
each Maxwellian is νi = N βi hvj i kTj + 1 exp − kTj and calculate
the mean ionization frequency of the distribution.
(e) Calculate the values in items c. and d. for kB T1 = 1 eV, kB T2 = 16 eV,
α1 = 0.99, α2 = 0.01, βm = 10−20 m2 /eV, βi = 10−20 m2 , ui = 15
eV and N = 1023 m−3 . Comment the results.
(f) (to answer in the las problem sheet) Suppose that an electronic wave is
excited on a plasma with an initial distribution with a shape similar to
the one used in this problem. Is there a region of wavelengths where,
at least in principle, these waves are unstable. If yes, can you define an
interval of phase speeds where to search for these waves?
Useful integrals:
ˆ ∞ √ ˆ ∞
2
2
π 3
2
1
x exp −Ax dx = x exp −Ax dx =
0 4A3/2 0 2A2
ˆ ∞ 2 ˆ ∞ (Ax2 2
2 3 2 i + 1) exp(−Axi )
x exp (−Ax) dx = x exp −Ax dx =
0 A3 xi 2A2
33
(a) Write the expressions for the r and θ components of the two fluid force
equations.
(b) Solve the previous equations for vr and vθ and verify that:
i. for the r component,
1 ∂n
ver = −µer E − Der
n ∂r
where
µe De
µer = 2
ωce
, Der = 2
ωce
1+ νe2 1+ νe2
and
e kB Te
µe = , De = ;
me νe me νe
ii. for the θ component
vE + vD
veθ = νe2
1+ 2
ωce
where
E kB Te 1 ∂n
vE = − , vD = − .
B eB n ∂r
(c) Find the expression of E that ensures ambipolarity along the radial di-
rection.
(d) Obtain the expression of Der for very intense B-fields (ωce νe ) and
verify which is the length scale of the associated “random walk” motion.
Comment the result.
(a) Show that the equation for the perpendicular velocity of the electrons is
given by
µe ~ 1
~ve⊥ = − 2 E⊥ +
ωce
~v ,
ν2 E
1 + ν2 1 + ω2e
e ce
where ~vE ~ ×B
is the E ~ drift velocity and µe = e
is the electron
m e νe
mobility.
35
1. (F. F. Chen 5.9) Suppose the plasma in a fusion reactor is in the shape of
a cylinder 1.2 m in diameter and 100 m long. The 5 T magnetic field is
uniform, except for short mirror regions at the ends, which we may neglect.
Other parameters are kTi = 20 keV, kTe = 10 keV and n(r = 0) = 1021 m−3 .
The density profile is found experimentally to be approximately as sketched
in the figure.
3. (F. F. Chen 5.18) If a cylindrical plasma column diffuses at the Bohm rate,
calculate the steady-state radial density profile, n(r), ignoring the fact that it
38 Chapter 8. Diffusion and transport in fully ionized plasmas
may unstable. Assume the density is zero at r = ∞ and has the value n0 at
r = r0 .
4. (F. F. Chen 5.15) Consider an axisymmetric cylindrical plasma with E ~ =
~ = B~uz and ∇P
Ee ~ur , B ~ i = ∇P~ e = ∂P/∂r~ur . Neglect the convective term
and consider the stationary case.
(a) Write the two-fluid equations.
(b) From the θ components of these equations, show that vir = ver .
(c) From the r components, show that vsθ = vE + vDs (s = i, e).
(d) Find an expression for vir and show it does not depend on Er .
5. (Exam 2014/2015)
(a) Use the MHD equations to derive the expression
∂~v ~ × B)
~ + σ0 (~v × B)
~ ×B
~ − ∇P
~ ,
ρm = σ0 ( E
∂t
where σ0 is the plasma conductivity (σ0 = 1/η).
~ in
(b) Solve the equation for the velocity components perpendicular to B
~
the case E = 0 and P = const., to show that the characteristic time
for diffusion across the magnetic field is
ρm
τ= ,
σ0 B 2
i.e., ~v⊥ (t) = ~v⊥ (0) exp (−t/τ ).
6. (Exam 2015/2016) Consider a fully ionised plasma where the density varies
~ = B0 (x)~uz .
slowly along ~ux and where the magnetic field is given by B
∂P
(a) Use the MHD equations to show that, in stationary regime, ∂x = Jy B0 .
(b) The MHD equations provide a macroscopic image of the plasma. Explain
the physical meaning of the expression obtained.
(c) On a more microscopic image, since the positive ions are typically heavier
and colder than the electrons, the electric current density calculated in
a) is carried essentially by the electrons. Calculate the electron velocity
associated with that current. Comment the result.
7. (Exam 2016/2017) As seen in class, the generalised Ohm’s law can take the
form
~
~ = η J~ + 1 J~ × B
~ + ~v × B
E ~ + 1 ∇P~ e + me ∂ J .
en ne 2
en ∂t
During a substorm in the nightside magnetotail (disturbance in the mag-
netosphere) the following values have been measured: E ' 0.1 mV/m;
v ' 100 km/s; B ' 1 nT; J ' 1 nA/m2 ; n ' 1 cm−3 ; Pe ' 0.1 nPa.
In these circumstances, the characteristic length scale is L ' 104 km, the
characteristic time scale is τ ' 10 s and the effective resistivity is less than
1 mS−1 .
Compare the magnitudes of the various terms in Ohm’s law in this case.
Comment the results.
39
(c) Imagine a situation with Bθ = 0 and where the plasma density decreases
radially. Interpret and discuss the meaning of the previous equation in
this case.
[Suggestion: start by drawing a typical profile of n(r), then draw Bz (r)
and mark all forces acting on the plasma.]
CHAPTER 9
Kinetic theory I
1. Derive the continuity equation from the Vlasov’s equation (integrate in d3 v).
2. Derive the force equation from Vlasov’s equation (multiply by ~v and inte-
grate in d3 v). The most laborious term is the one involving the gradient in
configuration space, which makes appear the average value of the tensor ~v~v .
Calculate the explicitly this term when:
(a) the thermal agitation is negligible;
(b) the average velocity is zero (i.e., the fluid is at rest and there is only
thermal agitation);
(c) in the general case where the velocoty can be decomposed as ~v = ~u + w,
~
where ~u is the average velocity of the fluid and w
~ corresponds to the
thermal agitation.
3. (Exam 2015/2016) Consider a stationary plasma, without magnetic field, un-
der the effect of an electrostatic field E ~ = −∇φ. ~ We want to obtain the
electrostatic potential due to a test charge placed in the plasma. We shall
look for a stationary solution of Vlasov’s equation on the separable form
fs (~r, ~v , t) ≡ fs (v, ~r) = f0s (v)ψs (~r), where f0 is the Maxwellian distribution,
3/2
mv 2
m
f0 (~r, ~v , t) ≡ f0 (v) = n0 exp − ,
2πkB Te 2kB Te
(a) Show that for a homogeneous plasma in the absence of external fields
the difference between f and f0 decays exponentially with time.
(b) Consider now electrons in an unmagnetized, homogeneous, time-independent
plasma in a weak constant electric field, E~1 . Linearise the distribution
function, f (~r, ~v , t) ≡ f (~v ) = f0 (~v ) + f1 (~v ) , where f0 is the (uniform
and stationary) unperturbed distribution, assumed to be a Maxwellian,
and f1 is a first order perturbation.
i. Show that ˆ
e2
J~ = − ~ ·∇
E ~ v f0 ~v d3 v .
νc m
ii. Show that the electrical conductivity is given by
ne e2
σc = .
mνc
[Note: This is one of many examples of deriving familiar macroscopic
results from underlying kinetic equations.]
CHAPTER 10
Kinetic theory II
2 ˆ +∞ ∂g
ωpe γ ∂u
i (k, ω) = − 2 =0
k k ωr 2 γ 2
−∞ u− k + k
ii. Show that
2 ˆ +∞ ∂g
∂u (v0 − u)
ωpe
1+ 2 2 2 =0,
k −∞ u − ωkr + γk
where v0 is the value of u corresponding to the hump in the distri-
bution function (see figure).
[Suggestion: consider the linear combination r − i (kv0 − ωr )/γ]
iii. Show that the expression from the previous question can never be
satisfied and conclude about the stability of single-humped distri-
butions.
~ r, t)
(a) Write the expressions that allow the calculation of ρ(~r, t) and J(~
from the distribution functions and show they are first order quantities.
(b) Looking for plane waves, show that the first order distributions are given
by
qs /ms ~ ~
f1s = E1 · ∇v f0s (v) .
i(ω − ~k · ~v )
~ 0 = 0 and B~0 = 0, but that in principle E
Note: recall that E ~1 =
6 0 and
~
B1 6= 0.
(c) Use Maxwell’s equations to show that for transverse waves
2
~ 1 = iωµ0 J~1 + ω E
k2 E ~1 .
c2
(e) Assume E ~ 1 = E1 ~uy and ~k = k~ux and neglect the ion motion (mi → ∞).
Simplify the expression above to derive the dispersion relation
ˆ +∞
2 2 2 2 g(vx )
ω − k c = ω ωpe dvx ,
−∞ ω − kvx
where ˆ ˆ
+∞ +∞
1
g(vx ) = f0e (v)dvy dvz .
n0 −∞ −∞
Substituting,
(a) n ' 2.69 × 1025 m−3 = 2.69 × 1019 cm−3 (Loschmidth number);
(b) n ' 3.22 × 1022 m−3 = 3.22 × 1016 cm−3 .
The different values obtained are summarized in the table below and repre-
sented in figure 1.1
λD (m) Λ
a) 7.4 × 10−5 4.1 × 106
b) 7.4 4.1 × 109
c) 2.4 × 10−3 1.3 × 104
d) 2.4 × 10−8 1.3 × 103
e) 7.4 × 10−5 4.1 × 103
f) 24 1.3 × 109
g) 2.4 × 10−4 1.3 × 103
48 Solutions to chapter 1. Debye shielding and fundamental effects
ne [cm-3]
20
10
Laser fusion
16
10
12
10 Tokamak
Gaseous electronics
8 Flame
10
Ionosphere
4
10
Solar wind
0 Interstellar medium
10
1 d2
qT r
∇2 φ = exp −
r dr2 4π0 λD
1
= 2 φ(r) .
λD
ρ = e(ni − ne )
eφ eφ
= n0 e exp − − exp +
kB Ti kB Ti
eφ eφ
' n0 e 1 − −1−
kB Ti kB Te
n0 e2 1
1 1
= + ≡ 2 φ0 ,
kB Ti Te λD
Substituting values,
This example shows that the Debye length is a characteristic length and
not the distance for a perfect shielding.
Alternative solution:1
1 Thanks due to my former student to Ricardo Barrué
50 Solutions to chapter 1. Debye shielding and fundamental effects
where rij is the distance between charges i and j. We may then consider
that the interaction energy between charge i and all the other charges is
1 1 X qj
Wi = qi ,
2 4π0 rij
j6=i
P
so that the total interaction energy is W = i Wi (think on a system
of only two point charges).
Note: in this view the interaction energy of a system of two equal point
charges is distributed equally among both charges [see, e.g., B. Jayaram
and A. Das, J. Mol. Struct. 543 P (2001) 123]. Different definitions
can be used, such as W = 12 i Wi , and the interaction energy of
charge i with all others is twice that defined above; this difference in the
definitions makes a difference of a factor of two in the resolution of the
exercise and is completely irrelevant for the point being made.
With the definition above, the interaction energy between the test charge
qT and the remaining charges is
˚
1 1 ρ(r)
Wq = qT dV
2 4π0 r
ˆ +∞
1 2 1 qT r 1
= qT 4πr − 2 exp − dr
8π0 0 λ D 4πr λD r
qT2
=− .
8π0 λD
The mean kinetic energy of the test charge is 23 kT , so that its total
energy is
3 qT2
Etot = kT − .
2 8π0 λD
51
n0 λ3D 1
kT 0
n0 λD 1
n0 e2
e2
kT
0 λD
3 qT2
kT .
2 8π0 λD
plasma
E
x=0
d2 φ(x) e
− 2
= [ni (x) − ne (x)] .
dx 0
Since Te = Ti = T , the ion and electron densities can be written as
eφ(x) eφ(x)
ni (x) = n0 exp − ' n0 1 −
kB T kB T
eφ(x) eφ(x)
ne (x) = n0 exp + ' n0 1 + ,
kB T kB T
52 Solutions to chapter 1. Debye shielding and fundamental effects
and
d2 φ(x) 1
2
= 2 φ(x) ,
dx λD
1/2
with the Debye length defined as λD = 2n
0 kB T
0 e 2 .
The solution is
x x
φ(x) = φ0 exp − + φ1 exp + ,
λD λD
where φ0 and φ1 are constants. The condition
lim φ(x) = 0
x→+∞
i.e., E(x = 0) = λφD0 ≡ E0 . Moreover, the expression above shows that the
plasma shields the external electric field, within a characteristic distance λD .
whose solution is
r r
ϕ(r) = C1 exp − + C2 exp + ,
λD λD
lim ϕ(r) = 0 ⇒ C2 = 0 ,
r→+∞
ϕ(R) R
φ(r = R) = = φ0 ⇒ C1 = Rφ0 exp .
R λD
Substituting,
1 1
E(r = R+ ) = φ0 +
R λD
1 1
σ = 0 φ0 +
R λD
R
Q = 4π0 φ0 R 1 + .
λD
54 Solutions to chapter 1. Debye shielding and fundamental effects
For Te = 1 keV the Debye length is λD ' 2.35 m and 2.35 × 10−5 m,
respectively for n0 = 106 cm−3 and n0 = 101 4 cm−3 . The Debye length
is to be compared with R = 10 cm, showing the two values of the density
correspond to the two limiting cases discussed above. For completeness,
the capacity of the sphere is C0 ' 1.1 × 10−11 F in vacuum, C '
1.6 × 10−11 F∼ C0 for n0 = 106 cm−3 , and C ' 4.7 × 10−8 F C0 for
n0 = 1014 cm−3 .
6. Consider two slabs of length L and cross sectional area ∆S, one “holding”
singly charged positive ions with mass mi and number density n0 and the other
“holding” electrons of mass me and the same number density n0 (to ensure
quasi-neutrality). The slabs can move along the x-axis, perpendicular to their
cross section. The deviation of the ion and electron slabs in relation to their
equilibrium position is defined by the displacements xi and xe , respectively
(see figure 1.6).
The region of width |xi − xe | where the net charge density is different from
zero has a total charge ∆Q = n0 e(xe −xi )∆S. The configuration corresponds
to a parallel plate capacitor, for which the electric field is uniform and along
the x-axis,
~ = ∆Q/∆S ~ux = n0 e (xe − xi )~ux .
E
0 0
The total charge in the electron slab is Qe = −(n0 e∆SL), so that the force
on it is
2
~ = − (n0 e) (xe − xi )∆SL~ux .
F~e = Qe E
0
Similarly, the force on the ion slab is
2
~ = + (n0 e) (xe − xi )∆SL~ux .
F~i = Qi E
0
The equations of motion for each slab are (note that the total mass of the
electron slab is Me = me n0 ∆SL; similarly for the ion slab)
F~e = Me~ae = me n0 ∆SLẍe ~ux ,
55
χ̈ = ẍe − ẍi
2 2
χ̈ = −ωpe (xe − xi ) − ωpi (xe − xi )
2 2
χ̈ = −(ωpe + ωpi )χ
χ̈ = −ωp2 χ
The electron field inside the plasma can be obtained from Gauss’s law, applied
to a spherical surface of radius r < (R + δr ),
‹
E~ · ~n dS = Qint ,
0
where
4
Qint =e(n0 − ne ) πr3
3
R3
4 3
=en0 1 − πr .
(R + δr )3 3
Hence,
2 en0 1 4 3
4πr E(r) = 1− 3
πr ,
0 (1 + δr /R) 3
en0 1 1
E(r) = r 1− .
0 3 (1 + δr /R)3
1
Expanding in Taylor series f (x) = (1+x)3 for small x, f (x) ' 1 − 3x,
en0 1 δr en0 r
E(r) ' r 1−1+3 = δr .
0 3 R 0 R
The equation of motion for an electron placed at the surface of the plasma
sphere reads
d2
me 2 (R + δr ) = −eE(r=R+δr ) ,
dr
leading to
d2 δ r e2 n0
R + δr
me 2 = − δr
dr 0 R
2
e n0
'− δr
0
Finally,
d2 δr 2
= −ωpe δr ,
dr2
q
e 2 n0
where ωpe = me 0 is the usual plasma frequency. The latter equation
corresponds to an harmonic oscillator of angular frequency ωpe , proving the
result.
The regions x > 0 and x < 0 have to be solved separately. For x > 0,
the first boundary condition is
lim φ(x) = 0 ,
x→+∞
lim φ(x) = φ0
x→0+
ϕ/ϕ0
0,5
-5 -2,5 0 2,5 5
x/λD
E
σ/2ε0
-5 -2,5 0 2,5 5
x/λD
-σ/2ε0
The total charge in the plasma, facing a section of area A of the plane
and in the positive-x region, is given by
˚ ˆ +∞
Q+ = ρ(x) dV = A ρ(x) dx
0
ˆ +∞
σ x
=−A exp − dx
0 2λD λD
x=+∞
σ x σ
=−A −λD exp − = −A .
2λD λD x=0 2
Q+ σ
=− .
A 2
Q−
Similarly, the charge in the plasma in the negative-x region is A = − σ2 .
Therefore,
Q+ + Q−
= −σ .
A
Multiplying by r2 ,
d2 φ dφ r2
r2 + r − φ=0.
dr2 dr λ2D
d2 φ 1 dφ
ξ 2 λD 2
+ξ − ξ2φ = 0 ,
dξ λD dξ
d2 φ dφ
ξ2 2 + ξ − ξ2φ = 0 ,
dξ dξ
which is the modified Bessel equation of order zero.
The solution is
where
λ
Evac. (r) =
2π0 r
is the electrostatic field created by an infinite wire with linear charge
density λ in vacuum.
The electric field is
dφ d r dK0 (ξ) dξ
E(r) = − = −B K0 = −B
dr dr λD dξ dr
1 r 1
= − B[−K1 (ξ)] = BK1 .
λD λD λD
Since for small ξ, K1 (ξ) ' 1ξ , i.e., K1 λrD ' λrD , for small r
B
E(r) ' .
r
λ
The boundary condition as r → 0 leads to B = 2π0
, so that
λ r λ r
E(r) = K1 ; φ(r) = K0 .
2π0 λD λD 2π0 λD
61
As
Q
= −λ ,
l
the plasma perfectly shields the charge in the wire.
Since the Bessel functions K0 (ξ) and Ki (ξ) decay with a characteristic
decay length of the order of 1 (see the figures in the formulation of the
problem), the potential and the electric field are shielded efficiently for
distances r λD , as expected. The shielding is complete only when
r → ∞, but is already nearly perfect for distances of a few Debye lengths.
Like in the previous exercise, it is possible to verify the importance and
efficiency of the Debye shielding of the plasma and the meaning of quasi-
neutrality in the very definition of plasma. As an example, when the
problem is solved in vacuum the potential decreases very slowly and it
is not even possible to impose the condition φ(r → ∞) = 0, contrary
to what happens in the present case.
10. (a) As the electrons are lighter and more mobile than the ions, they tend
to arrive first at the dust particles, which get negatively charged. The
mechanism is somewhat analogous to the negative charging of the walls
of a reactor, at the origin of the phenomenon of ambipolar diffusion (cf.
chapter 7). Typically, Zd ∼ 100.
(b) The electron, ion and dust particle densities are given, respectively, by
eφ eφ
ne =ne0 exp ' ne0 1 +
kB Te kB Te
eφ eφ
ni =ni0 exp − ' ni0 1 −
kB Ti kB Ti
nd =nd0 .
62 Solutions to chapter 1. Debye shielding and fundamental effects
ne0 e2
e eφ eφ ni0 Te
∇2 φ = ni0 + ne0 = 1+ φ.
0 kB Ti kB Te 0 kB Te ne0 Ti
1
(c) The usual expression ∇2 φ = λ2D
φ, where λD has dimensions of length,
is obtained defining
1/2
0 kB Te 1 1
λD = 1/2 = λDe 1/2 ,
ne0 e2
ni0 Te ni0 Te
1+ ne0 Ti 1+ ne0 Ti
where λDe is the electron Debye length in the absence of dust particles.
Without dust particles, ni0 /ne0 = 1; on the other hand, in the presence
of dust particles, ni0 /ne0 > 1, leading to a smaller Debye length.
(d) The electrostatic potential can be obtained as in the standard derivation
of the Debye length. It follows problem 5, with the exception of the
second boundary condition, which should be replaced by
1 qT
lim φ(r) = ,
r→0 4π0 r
corresponding to recovering the potential created by a point charge in
vacuum when we are very close to the charge (no shielding). With the
qT
notation of problem 5, this means setting C1 = 4π 0
and, accordingly,
qT r
φ(r) = exp − ,
4π0 r λD
1. From rLs = v⊥s /ωcs and ωcs = eB/ms , where s = {e, i} denotes electrons
and protons, respectively,
rLi v⊥i mi
= .
rLe v⊥e me
√
Furthermore, the condition on the kinetic energy corresponds to mi v⊥i =
√
me v⊥e . Hence,
√
r
rLi mi
= ' 1837 ' 43 .
rLe me
2. (a) The particle is initially accelerated by the electric field on the positive
y-direction. Its orbit is turned by the magnetic field, so that the resulting
motion is a combination of cyclotron motion with an E ~ ×B ~ drift in the
~ ~
positive x-direction. The E × B drift is the outcome of the increase
of the Larmor radius with v⊥ (the velocity in the plane perpendicular
~ in this case v⊥ is the velocity in the x − y plane), which takes
to B;
place while vy > 0. From energy conservation it is clear that when the
particle returns to y=0 it has zero velocity. Moreover, since ~v (t=0)=0,
vk = vz is always zero, as there are no forces in the z-direction. The
orbit is schematically sketched in figure 2.1.
(b) In cartesian coordinates, with B ~ = B0 ~uz and E ~ = E0 ~uy , the compo-
nents of the Lorentz force F~ = q(E ~ + ~v × B)
~ are
max = qvy B0
may = −qvx B0 + qE0 .
maz = 0
The last equation implies vz = cte. Using the initial condition vz (t=0)=0,
it comes vz (t) = 0.
64 Solutions to chapter 2. Single particle motion I
y
Larger rL
vy=0
Smaller rL
x
t=0; vy=0
vd
ωc−2 ζ̈ = − ζ
| {z }
v̈x
ζ̈ = −ωc2 ζ .
65
where
E0 E0
~vc = − cos(ωc t) ~ux + sin(ωc t) ~uy
B0 B0
E0
~vd = ~ux
B0
~ ×B
to a constant drift (E ~ drift).
Taking the time average over several gyroperiods, h~v i = ~vd = cte.,
since the time average of the sinusoidal functions is zero (hcos(· · · )i =
hsin(· · · )i = 0). Therefore, h~ai = 0 and there is no average acceleration.
The average force q~vd × B ~ cancels the electric force q E.
~
(d) The drift velocity ~vd is independent of the charge and the mass. Hence,
all the particles drift with the same velocity and there is no net current
in a neutral plasma. The particle’s trajectory for q < 0 is depicted in
figure 2.2
vd
(e) In this case the drift velocity could be obtained simply by replacing
E = F/q in the previous result for ~vd , and would be
F mg
~vd = ~ux = ~ux ,
qB qB
which does depend on the charge. Accordingly, the drift velocity would
be different for particles of different mass and would have opposite direc-
tions for particles of different charge, resulting in a net electrical current.
3. The electrostatic field created by the electron beam is readily obtained from
Gauss’ law. Considering a cylinder of radius r > R and length l, as shown in
67
figure 2.3,
‹
~ · ~n dS = Qint
E
0
ene πR2 l
E(r)2πrl = −
0
~ en e R2
E(r) = − ~ur
2r0
~ = R) = − ene R ~ur
E(r
20
R
Bz uθ v
~ ×B
The E ~ drift velocity is
~ ×B
E ~ E(R)B0 ene R
~vd = = ~uθ = ~uθ .
B2 B02 20 B0
∂ne n0 e ∂φ eφ
= exp
∂r kB Te ∂r kTe
ne n0 eφ
'− = − exp ;
λ λ kTe
e ∂φ 1
=−
kB Te ∂r λ
∂φ kB Te
=− .
∂r eλ
Hence,
~ = − ∂φ ~ur = kB Te ~ur .
~ = −∇φ
E
∂r eλ
68 Solutions to chapter 2. Single particle motion I
2 2kB Te
hv⊥ i= ≡ vt2 .
m
Hence, the average Larmor radius is
mhv⊥ i mvt
hrL i = = ,
eB eB
or, equivalently,
eBhrL i
vt = .
m
On the other hand,
E kB Te
vE = =
B eλB
2kB Te m m
= = vt2
m 2eλB 2eλB
hrL ieB m vt
= vt = hrL i .
m } 2eλB
| {z 2λ
vt
uz
Earth N B
uθ
~ ⊥= ∂B B0 3
(∇B) ~ur = −3 4 RT3 ~ur = − B(r)~ur .
∂r r r
~ × ∇B/B
Accordingly, |B ~ 2
| = 3/r and
2
1 mv⊥ 3
vd = .
|q| 2B r
K 2 K 50
vd = = ,
e B(r = 5RT )5RT e B0 RT
1
it comes, vde ' 7.85 × 103 m/s for the electrons and vdi = ved 30×10 3 '
ExB drift
Cyclotron motion
L
B
E
Re E B
2Ri Ri
Re
E
B Re
Cyclotron motion
ExB drift
ExB drift
(b) The electron and ion Larmor radii are given by, respectively,
v⊥e me
RLe = ' 1.14 × 10−5 m
eB
v⊥i mi
RLi = ' 2.72 × 10−2 m
eB
B≃0
B≠0
E
2rL
(c) This exercise is very similar to problem 2, so that just an outline is given
here. Taking the x−axis along E ~ and defining the y−axis along B ~ (cf.
figure 2.6), the Lorentz force equation reads
evz B
mv̇x = −eE + evz B v̇x = − eE m + m
mv̇y = 0 −→ v̇y = 0 .
mv̇z = −evx B v̈z = − eB v̇
m x
~
estimated in that simple analysis, due to the ion acceleration on the E
field.
qE0
dvx
mẍ = qE0 cos(ωt) dt = m cos(ωt)
ÿ = 0 ; vy (t) = vy (t = 0) = 0 .
z̈ = 0 vz (t) = vz (t = 0) = 0
Hence
ˆ t
qE0 qE0
vx (t) = cos(ωτ ) dτ = sin(ωt) ,
0 m mω
ˆ t
qE0 −qE0 qE0 qE0
x(t) = xi + sin(ωτ ) dτ = 2
− 2
cos(ωt) + 2
,
0 mω mω
| {z } mω mω
xi
qE0
x(t) = − cos(ωt) .
mω 2
qE0/mω2
-qE0/mω2
x = x0 + x1
dE0
E0 (x) ' E0 (x0 ) + x1 (x0 )
dx
dE0
E(x, t) ' E0 (x0 ) + x1 (x0 ) cos(ωt) .
dx
qE0
x1 (t) = − cos(ωt) .
mω 2
74 Solutions to chapter 2. Single particle motion I
q2 d
E02 ,
Fp = mẍ0 = − 2
4mω dx
which acts in the direction of decreasing E-field, as described
qualitatively in the beginning of the exercise.
SOLUTIONS TO CHAPTER 3
1. (a) Let the indexes 0 and R denote the mid-plane of the mirrors and the
reflection points, respectively. Since
1 2
2 mv⊥
µ= ,
B
the conservation of µ reads
1 2 1 2
2 mv⊥0 2 mv⊥R
= ,
B0 BR
where the magnetic field takes the minimum value at the center, B0 =
bmin .
The conservation of energy implies
1 2 1 2 1 2
mv⊥0 + mvk0 = mv⊥R ,
m m m
where the condition of zero parallel velocity at the reflection point was
used (vkR = 0).
The limit when the proton escapes corresponds to BR = Bmax .
(b) How long does it take to reach that energy? Suggestions: i) suppose that
the B field is approximately uniform in the space between the mirrors
and changes abruptly near the mirrors, i.e., treat each mirror as a flat
piston and show that the velocity gained at each bounce is 2vm ; ii)
compute the number of bounces necessary; iii) assume that the distance
between the mirrors does not change appreciably during the acceleration
process.
2. (F. F. Chen) A plasma with an isotropic distribution of speeds is placed inside
a magnetic mirror with mirror ratio Rm = 4. There are no collisions, so
that the particles in the loss cone escape, while the others remain trapped.
Calculate the fraction of particles that remains trapped.
76 Solutions to chapter 3. Single particle motion II
3. (F. F. Chen) The magnetic field along the axis of a magnetic mirror is B( z) =
B0 (1 + α2 z 2 ), where α is a constant. Suppose that at z = 0 an electron has
velocity v 2 = 3vk2 = 32 v⊥
2
.
(a) Calculate the drifts existing on the particle motion and describe qualita-
tively the motion.
(b) Try now to confirm the results you have already obtained, starting
directly from the equations of motion. In particular, show that you
can indeed recover the results from a) for low frequencies of the field,
i.e., ω ωce [Suggestion: i) search for solutions of the form ~v =
~vk + ~vL + ~vD exp(iωt), where ~vL is the velocity of the cyclotron motion
and ~vD is constant and perpendicular to B; ~ ii) verify you can obtain an
equation for ~vD in the form iωm~vD = −eE ~ 0 − ev~D × B;
~ iii) make the
cross product with B~ and eliminate ~vD × B].~