Lecture 5 PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16

Estimation of gas deliverability

Engr Usama Ahmed Khand


Gas Reservoir Engineering
Petroleum & Natural Gas Engineering
Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering, and Management
Sciences, Quetta
CONTENT
Introduction
Reservoir deliverability
 Analytical methods
 Emprical methods

Well deliverability
 Nodal analysis
INTRODUCTION
Gas reservoir deliverability is evaluated using well inflow performance relationship (IPR).
Gas well IPR determines gas production rate as a non-linear function of pressure drawdown (reservoir
pressure minus bottom hole pressure)
Gas well IPR also depends on flow conditions, that is, transient, steady –state, or pseudosteady state flow
which are determined by reservoir boundary conditions.
There are 2 methods for establishing well IPR under different flow conditions: Analytical and Empirical
Analytical Methods
General solution to pseudosteady state flow in a radial-flow gas reservoir is expressed: (Pres=2000-3000 Psi)

Note: μ and z may vary considerably as a function of pressure. Therefore, the pseudo-pressure function
𝑷 𝑷
was developed: m(p)=𝟐 dP
𝑷 𝒘 𝒇 μ𝒛
q - is the gas production rate in Mscf/d
k - the effective permeability to gas in md
m(p) - the real gas pseudopressure in psi2/cp at the reservoir pressure p in psi
m(pwf) - the real gas pseudopressure in psi2/cp at the flowing bottom hole pressure pwf
D - the non-Darcy coefficient in d/Mscf
T - the reservoir temperature in R
.
PSEUDOPRESSURE OR REAL GAS POTENTIAL
ANALYTICAL METHODS
As the real gas pseudopressure is difficult to evaluate without a computer program, approximations to
Equation are usually used in the natural gas industry.
 At pressures lower than 2000 psia:

Equation using a pressure-squared approach


pb is the base pressure,
μ – the average gas viscosity
Z – the average gas compressibility factor.

 At pressures higher than 3,000 psia, highly compressed gases (behave like liquids)
Approximated using pressure approach
Bg -the average formation volume factor of gas
in rb/scf

Disadvantage: it is difficult and costly to obtain values of all the parameters in above equations
EMPIRICAL METHODS
Empirical models are more attractive and widely employed in field applications:
Forchheimer model Backpressure model

A, B, C, and n are empirical constants that can be determined based on test points.
The value of n is usually between 0.5 and 1.
It is obvious that a multirate test is required to estimate values of these constants.
If two test points are (q1, pwf1) and (q2, pwf2), expressions of these constants are:
EMPIRICAL METHODS (SIMPLIFICATION )
Forchheimer model Backpressure model

Simplification:
Pressure-squared approach

The constants can be determined with test points:


WELL DELIVERABILITY
Determination: combination of well inflow performance and wellbore flow performance
Well inflow performance – reservoir deliverability
Wellbore flow performance-resistance to flow of tubing

Flowhead
BOP Stack

Casing

VLP
Tubing

Test tool
Packer
IPR IPR
Focuses: prediction of achievable gas production rates from gas reservoirs
Technique of analysis: Nodal analysis (SLB Patent)
NODAL ANALYSIS
Fluid properties (z and μ) change with location-dependent pressure and temperature in the gas
production system
To simulate the fluid flow in the system, it is necessary to break the system into discrete nodes that
separate system elements (equipment section)
The system analysis for determination of fluid production rate and pressure at a specified node is
called Nodal analysis.
Principle: pressure continuity, that is only one unique pressure value at a given node ( no matter
upstream or downstream equipments)
Operating point
(operating Q and P)

Intersection of the two performance curves

Upstream equipment Downstream equipment


Inflow performance curve Outflow performance curve
NODAL ANALYSIS
Use: Bottom hole or wellhead as the solution node

Analysis with the Bottom Hole Node (tubing shoe is set to the top of the pay zone)

The inflow performance is the well Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR)


&
the outflow performance is the Tubing Performance Relationship (TPR),

The IPR is defined:

The TPR is defined:

Operating flow rate qsc and pressure pwf at the bottom hole node can be determined graphically by
plotting above equations
OR can be solved numerically by combining above equations
NODAL ANALYS
NODAL ANALYSIS
Analysis with Wellhead node
The inflow performance curve is the Wellhead Performance Relationship (WPR) that is obtained
transforming the IPR to wellhead through TPR
The outflow performance curve is the wellhead Choke Performance Relationship (CPR)

Solution: plotting the WPR and CPR and finding solution at the intersection point
IPR DATA
IPR DATA (FROCHEIMER)
The Forcheimer equation expresses the inflow performance in terms of turbulent and non turbulent pressure
drop coefficients expressed as
IPR DATA (BACK PRESSURE)
In this form of the back pressure equation C is determined from the reservoir pressure and reservoir properties.
NEXT SESSION
Gas well performance

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy