IMC - Mediated and Non Mediated Communication
IMC - Mediated and Non Mediated Communication
The process of generating meaning by sending and receiving verbal and nonverbal
symbols and signs that are influenced by multiple contexts.
- Initially we had oral societies, for communication and transacting business
- Also use of objects began (pebbles, stones)
- Aristotle – rhetoric – the art of being articulate and speaking persuasively
Defining Communication
Well, communication has been defined as the act of giving, receiving or exchanging
information, ideas and opinions so that the message is completely understood by both
parties.
The sender sends a message with a certain intention in mind. The receiver of the
message tries to understand and interpret the message sent. He then gives feedback to
the original sender, who in turn interprets the feedback. This process, repeated
continuously, constitutes communication.
Clearly, there are several major elements in the communication process a sender,
message, channel, receiver, feedback, context. There is both a speakers intention to
convey a message and a listeners reception of what has been said.
Thus, listening skills are just as important as speaking skills in order for communication
to be effective. This means that if you want to get your message across accurately, you
need to consider these three things:
• The message;
Elements of Communication
a) Sender
b) Message
c) Channel
d) Receiver
e) Noise
f) Feedback
g) Context
h) Effect
Below are some possible problem areas that may turn out to to be barriers to effective
communication:
(a) Status/Role
The sender and receiver of a message may be of equal status within a hierarchy (e.g.
managers in an organisation) or they may be at different levels (e.g. manager/employee,
lecturer/student, business owner/clients).
Cultural differences, both within or outside the organisation (for example, inter-
departmental dealings and communication with outside organisations or ethnic
minorities) may impede the communication process.
Before you choose your communication channel, you should ask yourself whether the
channel is appropriate for a particular purpose and the person/receiver you have in
mind. Sending messages via inappropriate channels can send out wrong signals and end
up creating confusion.
The length of the message also affects the communication process. You need to be sure
that it serves the purpose and is appropriate for the receiver. Is the message too long or
too brief?
Poor choice of words or weak sentence structure also hampers communication. The
same goes for inappropriate punctuation. The two sentences below illustrate clearly
how different placement of punctuation can change the entire meaning of a sentence:
(f) Disabilities
Disabilities such as impaired sight, dyslexia and poor mental health can also be barriers
to good communication, and should be taken into consideration when evaluating the
effectiveness of the communication process. You may need to use hearing aids, sign
language, magnifying systems, and symbols to alleviate problems caused by disabilities.
Whether the receiver is known or unknown to you also plays a major role in
determining the effectiveness of your communication. A known receiver may be better
able to understand your message despite having insufficient information as both of you
probably have common experiences and a shared schemata. An unknown receiver, on
the other hand, may require more information and time to decode the message.
A noisy place (a party, for instance) usually puts a strain on oral communication as both
the sender and the receiver need to put extra effort to get the message across and
ensure that it is understood clearly and correctly.
2) Mass-mediated communication
Mass-mediated communication, they are usually referring to newspapers,
radio and television stations, and so on. Thus, they focus on the channels, or
media, typically associated with this type of communication. Although each of
these channels would fall into a working definition of mass-mediated
communication, we borrow from Chaffee and Metzger (2001), who offer
three characteristics of “mass” mediated communication: mass production, a
lack of individual (audience) control, and it is finite in its available channels.
3) Limited bandwidth to carry information
Mass communication works with limited bandwidth. Bandwidth is the
amount of capacity a channel has to carry a signal/information. Be it the
plywood surface of a highway billboard, a particular television or radio
frequency, or the amount of space on a newspaper page, each channel is
physically limited in the amount of content it has, and (usually) having more
content is more expensive. Therefore, only a limited amount of content can
be produced and broadcasted through mass-mediated channels. More recent
thinking on media has, however, challenged the importance of these defining
characteristics.