UNG Vs UDG
UNG Vs UDG
UNG Vs UDG
Perhaps you've wondered why some master mixes contain UNG and other master
mixes contain UDG and thought to yourself, what is the difference?
To answer this question, we first need to establish that for qPCR practical purposes
there is no difference. But, it is a little more complicated than just stating there is no
difference. Uracil-DNA glycosylases (UDGs) are evolutionary, well-preserved DNA-
repair enzymes. The term UDG refers to a superfamily of enzymes comprising six
sub-families. Family I UDG enzymes are called UNG, after the uracil-N-glycosylase
gene [6]. The terms UDG and UNG are commonly used interchangeably because they
perform the same function in qPCR—namely to prevent carryover contamination.
UNG can specifically degrade products that have already been through the PCR
process. UNG allows previous PCR amplifications or mis-primed, nonspecific
products to degrade, leaving native nucleic acid templates intended for amplification
intact. UNG activation occurs as the first step of PCR at a 50°C incubation for 2
minutes.
The dU-containing PCR product behaves like native dT-containing DNA in blotting,
cloning and sequencing, and the presence of UNG will not affect most post-PCR
analyses. In addition, UNG does not affect the electrophoretic mobility or ethidium–
bromide-staining efficiency of DNA, and will not affect your experimental results.
Page 1 of 3
What is UNG/UDG?
To prevent carryover contamination in your qPCR, use a master mix that contains
either UNG or UDG.
E. coli UNG is also not recommended for 1-step RT-PCR application as the reverse
transcription step to create cDNA would incorporate dU-nucleotides thus degraded
by UNG in the reaction. The remedy is to convert RNA to cDNA in separate reactions.
Alternatively, there are 1-step RT-PCR master mix that uses dU-nucleotides but uses
a heat-labile UNG (cloned from Atlantic cod species). The heat labile UNG can be in-
activated during the 50-55°C reverse transcription step thus the first strand cDNA
that contains dU bases will not be degraded.
The sequence being amplified should contain dA and dT nucleotides. Only DNA
sequences with these nucleotides will lead to dU-containing PCR products that can
be degraded by UNG.
Primers should contain dA-nucleotides near their 3' ends, so that the primer-dimers
generated are degraded by UNG at least as efficiently as dU-containing PCR
products. The further a dA-nucleotide is from the 3' end, the more likely the partially
degraded primer-dimers may serve as templates for a subsequent PCR amplification.
Producing such primer-dimers could compromise the amplification of the desired
target region. If primers with dA-nucleotides near the end cannot be used, consider
primers with 3' terminal dU-nucleotides. Terminal dU-nucleotides are not substrates
for UNG; these primers will not be degraded [1].
UNG is also not suitable for use in amplifying dU-containing PCR products, as in
nested-PCR protocols, as the enzyme will degrade the dU-containing PCR product,
preventing further amplification [5]. Furthermore, UNG is not suitable for amplifying
bisulfite converted DNA template. This is because bisulfite converts unmethylated
cytosine bases into uracil residues.
In general, any time you want to work with the amplicon after the run is over, but
perhaps not immediately, it would be best to use a master mix without UNG.
Page 2 of 3
What is UNG/UDG?
As UNG has activity below 55°C, this should be the minimum annealing temperature
for PCR amplification, to avoid degradation of newly synthesized dU-containing PCR
products by residual UNG activity, even after a long initial denaturation step [8].
Page 3 of 3