Primary Care Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 528
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses the primary care management of abnormal uterine bleeding and reviews comparative effectiveness of different treatment options.

The document was prepared for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to assist in healthcare decision making regarding the treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding.

It provides information on the definition and causes of abnormal uterine bleeding as well as treatments discussed in published literature and their effectiveness based on clinical studies.

Comparative Effectiveness Review

Number 96

Primary Care
Management of
Abnormal Uterine
Bleeding
Comparative Effectiveness Review
Number 96

Primary Care Management of Abnormal Uterine


Bleeding

Prepared for:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
540 Gaither Road
Rockville, MD 20850
www.ahrq.gov

Contract No. 290-2007-10065-I

Prepared by:
Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center
Nashville, TN

Investigators:
Katherine E. Hartmann, M.D., Ph.D.
Rebecca N. Jerome, M.L.I.S., M.P.H.
Mary Louise Lindegren, M.D.
Shannon A. Potter, M.L.I.S.
Tracy C. Shields, M.S.I.S.
Tanya S. Surawicz, M.P.H.
Jeffrey C. Andrews, M.D.

AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC025-EF


March 2013
This report is based on research conducted by the Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center
under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD
(Contract No. 290-2007-10065 I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the
authors, who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of
AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

The information in this report is intended to help health care decisionmakers—patients and
clinicians, health system leaders, and policymakers, among others—make well informed
decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. This report is not intended to
be a substitute for the application of clinical judgment. Anyone who makes decisions concerning
the provision of clinical care should consider this report in the same way as any medical
reference and in conjunction with all other pertinent information, i.e., in the context of available
resources and circumstances presented by individual patients.

This report may be used, in whole or in part, to inform the development of clinical practice
guidelines, other quality enhancement tools, methodologic guidance for systematic review, or to
inform reimbursement and coverage policies. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services endorsement of such derivative products may not be stated or implied.

This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission except
those copyrighted materials that are clearly noted in the document. Further reproduction of those
copyrighted materials is prohibited without the specific permission of copyright holders.

Persons using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in this report. For
assistance contact EffectiveHealthCare@ahrq.hhs.gov.

None of the investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement that conflicts with
the material presented in this report.
Suggested citation: Hartmann KE, Jerome RN, Lindegren ML, Potter SA, Shields TC, Surawicz
TS, Andrews JC. Primary Care Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. Comparative
Effectiveness Review No. 96. (Prepared by the Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center under
Contract No. 290-2007-10065 I.) AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC025-EF. Rockville, MD:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. March 2013.
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm.

ii
Preface
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), through its Evidence-based
Practice Centers (EPCs), sponsors the development of systematic reviews to assist public- and
private-sector organizations in their efforts to improve the quality of health care in the United
States. These reviews provide comprehensive, science-based information on common, costly
medical conditions, and new health care technologies and strategies.
Systematic reviews are the building blocks underlying evidence-based practice; they focus
attention on the strength and limits of evidence from research studies about the effectiveness and
safety of a clinical intervention. In the context of developing recommendations for practice,
systematic reviews can help clarify whether assertions about the value of the intervention are
based on strong evidence from clinical studies. For more information about AHRQ EPC
systematic reviews, see www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reference/purpose.cfm.
AHRQ expects that these systematic reviews will be helpful to health plans, providers,
purchasers, government programs, and the health care system as a whole. Transparency and
stakeholder input are essential to the Effective Health Care Program. Please visit the Web site
(www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov) to see draft research questions and reports or to join an e-
mail list to learn about new program products and opportunities for input.
We welcome comments on this systematic review. They may be sent by mail to the Task
Order Officer named below at: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road,
Rockville, MD 20850, or by email to epc@ahrq.hhs.gov.

Carolyn M. Clancy, M.D. Jean Slutsky, P.A., M.S.P.H.


Director Director, Center for Outcomes and Evidence
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Stephanie Chang, M.D., M.P.H. Shilpa Amin, M.D., M.Bsc., FAAFP


Director Task Order Officer
Evidence-based Practice Program Center for Outcomes and Evidence
Center for Outcomes and Evidence Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

iii
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to an exceptional group of colleagues who made this report possible. Each
step of a systematic review draws on the skills and attention of an entire team. The authors
gratefully acknowledge the following individuals for their contributions to this project:
Dr. Mamata Raj was instrumental in extracting data and completing tables. Dedicated staff
members Ms. Kathy Lee, Ms. Sanura Latham, and Mr. Ross Brown assisted with formatting,
data entry, and article retrieval. Ms. J. Nikki McKoy and Ms. Nila Sathe provided guidance on
logistics of the review process and organization of the report. Dr. Melissa McPheeters offered
key input and feedback on the protocol, conceptual framework for the report, and
methodological issues.

Key Informants
Janet R. Albers, M.D. Kristen A. Matteson, M.D., M.P.H.
SIU Center for Family Medicine Women and Infants’ Hospital
Springfield, IL Providence, RI

Barbara S. Apgar, M.D. Malcolm G. Munro, M.D.


University of Michigan University of California, Los Angeles
Ann Arbor, MI Los Angeles, CA

Marc A. Fritz, M.D.


UNC Fertility Preservation Program
Chapel Hill, NC

Technical Expert Panel


In designing the study questions and methodology at the outset of this report, the EPC
consulted several technical and content experts. Broad expertise and perspectives are
sought. Divergent and conflicted opinions are common and perceived as health scientific
discourse that results in a thoughtful, relevant systematic review. Therefore, in the end, study
questions, design and/or methodologic approaches do not necessarily represent the views of
individual technical and content experts.

Andrea S. Lukes, M.D. Malcolm G. Munro, M.D.


Duke University University of California, Los Angeles
Durham, NC Los Angeles, CA

Kristen A. Matteson, M.D., M.P.H. Anita L. Nelson, M.D.


Women and Infants’ Hospital University of California, Los Angeles
Providence, RI Los Angeles, CA

iv
Peer Reviewers
Peer reviewer comments on a preliminary draft of this report were considered by the EPC in
preparation of this final report. Synthesis of the scientific literature presented here does not
necessarily represent the views of individual reviewers.

Jeffrey Jensen, M.D., M.P.H. Anita Nelson, M.D.


Oregon Health & Science University University of California, Los Angeles
Portland, OR Los Angeles, CA

Annekathryn Goodman, M.D. Lee A. Learman, M.D., Ph.D.


Gillette Center for Women’s Cancer Indiana University
Boston, MA Indianapolis, IN

Jonathan Klein, M.D., M.P.H. Malcolm Munro, M.D.


University of Rochester University of California, Los Angeles
Rochester, NY Los Angeles, CA

Patricia Langenberg, M.A., Ph.D.


University of Maryland, Baltimore
Baltimore, MD

v
Primary Care Management of Abnormal Uterine
Bleeding
Structured Abstract
Objective. The Vanderbilt Evidence-based practice Center systematically reviewed evidence
about interventions for symptomatic abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), both irregular and cyclic.
We focused on interventions that are suitable for use in primary care practice including medical,
behavioral, and complementary and alternative medicine approaches.

Data sources. We searched MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, and Embase for randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) published in English from January 1980 to June 2012 in women with symptomatic
AUB. We also searched regulatory data and scientific publications for data about harms.

Review methods. Using dual review with a priori criteria, we excluded 1,734 publications
because they did not address a Key Question, were not an eligible study design, or did not apply
to the primary care treatment of AUB.

Results. Thirty-nine RCTs (6 good quality, 10 fair quality, and 23 poor quality) evaluated 12
distinct interventions. These included 7 studies of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
system (LNG-IUS), 13 of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 6 of tranexamic acid
(TXA), and 5 of combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs). The majority of studies made direct
comparisons to other drugs. Ten studies enrolled women with irregular uterine bleeding; the
remainder focused on women with heavy cyclic bleeding. Among women with irregular menses,
metformin, metformin with exenatide, and a tricyclic oral contraceptive improved menstrual
regularity. Among women with heavy, cyclic menstrual bleeding all seven studies of LNG-IUS
favored the intrauterine system in comparisons that included NSAIDs, COCs, progestogens and
usual care. Reduction in menstrual blood loss ranged from 70 to 87 percent less bleeding than
baseline. NSAIDs reduced bleeding in six of six studies when compared with placebo or
progestogens. The degree of improvement was highly variable for individual women. TXA was
more effective than progestogens and NSAIDs in three of four studies, and COCs provided
benefit compared with placebo in two studies. Harms were rare and trials underpowered to assess
harms for all interventions. For most interventions, surveillance studies of longer-term risks were
not done in comparable populations.

Conclusions. Two interventions for irregular bleeding (metformin, COCs) and four for heavy
cyclic bleeding (LNG-IUS, NSAIDs, TXA) have low or moderate strength of evidence for
effectiveness, while COCs have high strength of evidence. Several common interventions
(including diet and exercise and acupuncture) lack sufficient evidence. Across interventions, data
are sparse to evaluate long-term improvements and risk of harms.
Limitations include a predominance of small, short trials lacking standard terminology and
diagnostic criteria for identifying and including women with AUB. Tools for collecting outcome
data are crude (e.g., collection of sanitary products to measure blood loss) and may contribute to
a high rate of attrition. Emphasis on biologic outcomes may neglect the importance of patient-
reported outcomes that assess whether symptoms are considered resolved by women themselves.

vi
Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ ES-1
Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1
Background ....................................................................................................................... 1
Condition..................................................................................................................... 1
Terminology................................................................................................................ 1
Therapies ........................................................................................................................... 2
Primary Care Treatment Options ................................................................................ 3
Scope and Key Questions ................................................................................................. 5
Scope of the Review ................................................................................................... 5
Key Questions ............................................................................................................. 6
Analytic Framework ......................................................................................................... 6
Organization of This Report ............................................................................................. 7
Methods .................................................................................................................................. 9
Topic Refinement and Review Protocol ........................................................................... 9
Literature Search Strategy................................................................................................. 9
Search Strategy ........................................................................................................... 9
Supplementary Information for KQ2 ........................................................................ 10
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria..................................................................................... 10
Study Selection ............................................................................................................... 11
Quality (Risk of Bias) Assessment of Individual Studies ............................................... 11
Data Extraction ............................................................................................................... 12
Data Synthesis ................................................................................................................. 12
Strength of the Body of Evidence ................................................................................... 12
Applicability ................................................................................................................... 13
Peer Review and Public Commentary ............................................................................ 14
Results .................................................................................................................................. 15
Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 15
Results of Literature Searches ........................................................................................ 15
Description of Included Studies ...................................................................................... 18
KQ1A. Management of Irregular Uterine Bleeding ....................................................... 19
Description of Included Studies ................................................................................ 19
Key Points ................................................................................................................. 20
Detailed Synthesis ..................................................................................................... 21
KQ1B. Management of Abnormal Cyclic Bleeding ....................................................... 26
Description of Included Studies ................................................................................ 26
Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (Mirena®)........................................ 26
Contraceptive Vaginal Ring...................................................................................... 33
Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs .................................................................... 34
Tranexamic Acid ....................................................................................................... 45
Combined Oral Contraceptives ................................................................................. 51
Use of Decision Aids in Treatment of Menorrhagia ................................................. 54
KQ2. Harms of Interventions for Management of Abnormal Bleeding ......................... 56
Description of Included Studies and Sources of Information ................................... 56
Key Points for Harms of Reviewed Treatments ....................................................... 57

vii
Detailed Synthesis ..................................................................................................... 58
Summary ................................................................................................................... 75
Discussion............................................................................................................................. 76
Key Findings ................................................................................................................... 76
State of the Literature................................................................................................ 76
Effectiveness of Interventions for Abnormal Bleeding ............................................ 76
Applicability ............................................................................................................. 79
Summary of Strength of Evidence and Findings ............................................................ 85
Implications for Clinical and Policy Decisionmaking .................................................... 88
Limitations of This CER ................................................................................................. 89
Limitations of the Evidence Base ................................................................................... 89
Methodologic Limitations......................................................................................... 90
Ongoing Research ........................................................................................................... 90
Future Research Needs ................................................................................................... 91
Irregular Uterine Bleeding ........................................................................................ 91
Abnormal Cyclic Uterine Bleeding .......................................................................... 91
Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 92
References ............................................................................................................................ 94
Abbreviations and Acronyms .......................................................................................... 104

Tables
Table A. PICOTS .............................................................................................................. ES-3
Table B. Strength of evidence for improving menstrual regularity (KQ1A) .................. ES-13
Table C. Strength of evidence for improving heavy menstrual bleeding (KQ1B) ......... ES-15
Table 1. PICOTS ..................................................................................................................... 5
Table 2. Definitions of eligible patient populations.............................................................. 11
Table 3. Strength of evidence grades and definitions ........................................................... 13
Table 4. Medications from studies included in the CER ...................................................... 19
Table 5. Primary outcomes of medical interventions for irregular uterine bleeding ............ 21
Table 6. Primary outcomes of medical interventions for irregular uterine bleeding
in women with PCOS...................................................................................................... 23
Table 7. Primary outcomes of behavioral interventions for irregular uterine bleeding
in women with PCOS...................................................................................................... 24
Table 8. Primary outcomes of acupuncture for irregular uterine bleeding ........................... 25
Table 9. Primary outcomes of LNG-IUS for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding ................... 28
Table 10. Percent change in blood loss from baseline in studies of LNG-IUS .................... 30
Table 11. Change in blood loss volume from baseline in studies of LNG-IUS ................... 30
Table 12. Primary outcomes of contraceptive vaginal ring for abnormal cyclic
uterine bleeding............................................................................................................... 34
Table 13. Primary Outcomes of NSAIDs for Abnormal Cyclic Uterine Bleeding .............. 36
Table 14. Percent change in blood loss from baseline in studies of NSAIDs ...................... 40
Table 15. Change in blood loss volume from baseline in studies of NSAIDs...................... 42
Table 16. Primary outcomes of TXA for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding ........................ 47
Table 17. Percent change in blood loss from baseline in studies of TXA ............................ 48
Table 18. Change in blood loss volume from baseline in studies of TXA ........................... 49
Table 19. Primary outcomes of COCs for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding ....................... 52

viii
Table 20. Primary outcomes of decision aids for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding ............ 56
Table 21. Side effects reported in Cabergoline trials ............................................................ 67
Table 22. Strength of evidence for improving menstrual regularity (KQ1A) ...................... 86
Table 23. Strength of evidence for improving heavy menstrual bleeding (KQ1B) .............. 87

Figures
Figure 1. Analytic Framework ................................................................................................ 7
Figure 2. Flow diagram of literature search and screening (KQ1) ....................................... 16
Figure 3. Flow diagram of literature search and screening (KQ2) ....................................... 17

Appendixes
Appendix A. Literature Search Strategies
Appendix B. Abstract Review Form (KQ1)
Appendix C. Abstract Review Form (KQ2)
Appendix D. Full-Text Review Form (KQ1)
Appendix E. Full-Text Review Form (KQ2)
Appendix F. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool
Appendix G. Cochrane Risk of Bias Criteria
Appendix H. Thresholds for Quality Assessment
Appendix I. Risk of Bias and Quality Score for Individual Studies
Appendix J. Evidence Table
Appendix K. Reasons for Exclusion (KQ1)
Appendix L. Reasons for Exclusion (KQ2)
Appendix M. Labeled Indications for Drugs Included in Review
Appendix N. Harms from Package Inserts for Drugs Included in Review
Appendix O. Systematic Reviews
Appendix P. Ongoing Studies

ix
Executive Summary
Background
Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is among the most common gynecologic complaints of
reproductive-age women in ambulatory care settings. It is estimated to affect 11 to 13 percent of
reproductive-age women at any given time. Prevalence increases with age, reaching 24 percent
in women aged 36 to 40.1,2 Women generally present for care because the amount, timing, or
other characteristics of the bleeding have changed from their individual norm. Population norms
for menstrual bleeding, as established by 5th and 95th percentiles, are:3-7
• Frequency of menses within a 24- to 38-day window
• Regularity (i.e., cycle-to-cycle variation) within 2 to 20 days
• Duration of flow from 4 to 8 days
• Blood loss volume from 5 to 80 ml
Symptoms outside this normal range, or different from normal for the individual, can become
problematic and deserve evaluation because they can warn of underlying conditions. Common
problems include worry about the cause, embarrassment if the bleeding includes flooding-type
bleeding with saturation of clothing, missed work and responsibilities, limitations of social
activities and exercise, decreases or changes in sexual activity, and frustration with costs of
sanitary protection. Collectively, the effects of troublesome bleeding reduce quality of life and
drive desire for information about causes and treatment options.1,8
There is not a clear consensus on the clinical evaluation of a patient presenting with
abnormal bleeding. Recommendations suggest that initial evaluation confirm the source and
timing of bleeding, and exclude certain architectural etiologies (e.g., fibroids, polyps), cancer and
precancerous changes in the cervix or uterus, coagulation defects, and systemic disease. The
2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification recommends a
structured history followed by uterine evaluation.9 In the research setting, the alkaline hematin
method is the preferred technique for direct measurement of total menstrual blood loss (MBL).
The pictorial blood loss assessment chart is a semi-quantitative tool for uniform reporting of
bleeding as represented by the degree of saturation of sanitary pads and tampons. Diagnostic
tools and evaluation strategies are not within the scope of this review;10,11 however, the review
captures the operational definitions used by researchers and addresses applicability of the
findings to contemporary practice.

Terminology
Nomenclature to classify AUB has evolved steadily over the past several decades.12 Early
classifications relied primarily on bleeding characteristics, using terms like menorrhagia (i.e.,
abnormally long or heavy menses) and metrorrhagia (i.e., bleeding at irregular intervals). These
terms were often linked with timing and amount to infer whether or not regular and predictable
ovulation was occurring. These terms are generally applied without formal documentation of
ovulatory status. Furthermore, previously applied terms like “dysfunctional uterine bleeding”
also carried a variable element of recognition that the label was a diagnosis of exclusion.12 The
resulting challenge was that practitioners and researchers applied different exclusions before
selecting interventions or enrolling patients. Over time, these differences in terminology and use
of operational definitions resulted in inconsistent application of diagnostic terms.4,12-14

ES-1
Recent international consensus recommendations, formally adopted by FIGO in 2010 and
published in 2011, more consistently align terminology by creating two major groupings (i.e.,
discrete structural vs. nonstructural) for causes of bleeding.9,15,16 The FIGO classification
includes nine categories of abnormal bleeding arranged according to the acronym PALM-
COEIN:9,15 four have objective visual criteria detected by imaging, biopsy, or pathology (i.e.,
PALM: polyps; adenomyosis; leiomyomata; and malignancy and hyperplasia) while another five
are not directly related to structural abnormalities (i.e., COEIN: coagulopathy; ovulatory
dysfunction; endometrial; iatrogenic; and not yet classified).
If we map the intended focus of this comparative effectiveness review to the FIGO
classification, we are addressing the COEIN groups that are characterized as “ovulatory
dysfunction” (AUB-O), “endometrial hemostatic dysfunction” (AUB-E), and “not yet classified”
(AUB-N) abnormal bleeding. However it is crucial to note that direct measures of ovulation are
not employed in most available literature and endometrial samples for classification are even
rarer, except when used to rule out malignancy. Indeed much remains to be explained about the
pathophysiology of the very common and problematic complaint of unpredictable and/or heavy
bleeding. In summary, the relevant population for this review includes nonpregnant women from
menarche to menopause who have had abnormal bleeding (scant or heavy) for 3 months or
longer that is not attributed to structural abnormalities, coagulation defects, systemic illnesses, or
medications.
While some reviews further subdivide women experiencing AUB into age groups,17 such as
those near menarche and in the perimenopausal timeframe, we plan to retain an emphasis on
categorization. Women across the reproductive lifespan can have abnormal bleeding that arises
from ovulatory dysfunction or endometrial processes.18 While the underlying causes may vary,
for instance from lack of consistent regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis in teens
near the onset of menses, and from lack of ovarian reserve in perimenopausal women, the
treatment options overlap.19 We will report when research was done with an age-restricted
population but will otherwise cover all the relevant literature regardless of reproductive age or
reproductive history of participants.

Therapies
In a recently published research article examining the practice patterns for medical treatment
of AUB, authors reported that practicing obstetrician-gynecologists most frequently selected oral
contraceptives for the treatment of both irregular and abnormal cyclic menstrual bleeding and
lacked an overall awareness of current evidence on effectiveness of treatment options for AUB.20
Current recommendations for medical management of irregular and abnormal cyclic uterine
bleeding include levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antifibrinolytics, combined oral contraceptives (COCs), and
progestogens.21-26 Surgical intervention is usually reserved for women with persistent bleeding
that does not respond to medical therapy or for women who have finished childbearing and do
not wish to indefinitely continue medical therapy.2,21

Scope and Key Questions


The relevant population for this review includes nonpregnant women from menarche to
menopause who have had AUB for 3 months or longer, that is not attributed to structural
abnormalities, coagulation defects, systemic illnesses, or medications. This review evaluates the
interventions and direct comparisons among treatments that are often used and promoted as first-

ES-2
line choices, with the goal of clearly describing their effectiveness and potential harms for use in
primary care settings. We explicitly defined eligibility criteria using a PICOTS (population,
intervention, comparator[s], outcome, timing, and setting) structure (Table A).

Table A. PICOTS
PICOTS Element Description
Nonpregnant women from menarche to menopause who have had abnormal bleeding for 3
months or longer whose bleeding is not caused by structural abnormalities, coagulation defects
systemic disease, cancer, or medication.

Two specific subtypes of abnormal bleeding will be the focus:


• Irregular uterine bleeding: problem bleeding (frequent or infrequent) of 3 months or greater
Population:
duration, excluding regular cyclic/menstrual patterns of bleeding, fibroids, polyps,
adenomyosis, cancers, medication side effects, coagulation defects, and related systemic
disease.
• Abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding: problem bleeding of 3 months or greater duration, excluding
irregular and unpredictable patterns of bleeding, fibroids, polyps, adenomyosis, cancers,
medication side effects, coagulation defects, and related systemic disease.
• Medical therapies
o Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
o Antifibrinolytics
a o Oral hormone treatments (e.g., oral contraceptives, progestogens)
Interventions:
o Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system
o Vaginal ring contraceptive device
• Behavioral strategies (e.g., stress reduction, weight reduction, exercise)
• Complementary and alternative medicine therapies (e.g., acupuncture, herbal medicine)
Comparator: Direct comparison among interventions listed above or comparison to placebo.
• Bleeding profile (e.g., amount, frequency, duration, pattern, symptom bother, hematocrit)
• Quality of life including both general and bleeding specific measures
• Pain related to bleeding
• Sexual function as reported by sexual function measures, general measures of sexual
activity, frequency and satisfaction
• Patient satisfaction with outcomes and acceptability of treatment
Outcomes:
• Fertility
• Time to conception
• Additional interventions including concurrent and consecutive surgical and nonsurgical
treatments

b
Harms (e.g., thromboembolic events, emotional side effects, weight gain, short- and long-
term harms)
Timing: Interventions initiated after symptoms present most months for 3 months or longer.
Setting: Any clinical care setting.
PICOTS = population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing, and setting
a
Excluding surgical interventions and procedures such as endometrial ablation.
b
Includes treatment-related adverse events (e.g., drug side effects); does not include consequences related to the failure to
adequately treat the symptom.

Key Questions
Key Question 1A
What is the evidence for the effectiveness of medical, behavioral, and complementary and
alternative medicine interventions (e.g., hormonal treatment, weight loss, or acupuncture) for
improving short and long-term outcomes in women with irregular uterine bleeding?

ES-3
Key Question 1B
What is the evidence for the effectiveness of medical, behavioral, and complementary and
alternative medicine interventions (e.g., hormonal treatment, weight loss, or acupuncture) for
improving short and long-term outcomes in women with abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding?

Key Question 2
What are the harms, including adverse events, associated with medical, behavioral, and
complementary and alternative medicine interventions (e.g., hormonal treatment, weight loss, or
acupuncture) in women with irregular uterine bleeding or abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding?

Analytic Framework
We developed the analytic framework (Figure 1 of full report) based on clinical expertise of
Key Informants and refined it with input from a Technical Expert Panel. The analytic framework
illustrates the population, interventions, outcomes, and adverse effects that guided the literature
search, study eligibility, screening, and synthesis.

Methods
Literature Search
For Key Question (KQ) 1, we searched MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, and Embase. Search results
were limited to papers published in English, and published in or after 1980. Search strategies
used a combination of subject headings (i.e., controlled vocabulary) and keywords (Appendix A
of full report). We also searched the reference lists of included publications and recent
systematic reviews related to management of AUB. For KQ2, we expanded our search of
primary literature to include standard drug package inserts, and structured a separate literature
search to identify publications that conducted surveillance for harms in large datasets (Appendix
A of full report).

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria


We predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria related to the study population, intervention,
comparators, outcomes, timing, and setting in order to assess the eligibility of the search results.
Eligible studies had to explicitly define and describe the study population, interventions, and
outcomes. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions for women with
irregular or abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding. We excluded studies of women with AUB caused
by coagulation defects, systemic disease, structural abnormalities, cancer, or medication side-
effects. For KQ1A we included studies of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) if
the patient baseline and outcome data included information on cycle regularity. We excluded
studies of women with infertility if the primary treatment goal was conception. Harms data to
address KQ2 was captured from the included RCTs for KQ1, reports based on
pharmacoepidemiological databases, large observational studies, large case-controlled studies,
and postmarketing surveillance data.

ES-4
Study Selection
We developed screening forms to assess eligibility for inclusion in the review for KQ1 and
KQ2. We revised the forms following testing by the team. We conducted screening in two
phases: abstract and full-text screening. Publications were promoted to full-text review when one
reviewer indicated that the publication met all inclusion criteria or when the title and abstract did
not provide adequate information to make a determination. Two reviewers independently
reviewed each publication at the full-text screening phase. Discordant classifications were
resolved in team meetings including senior investigators.

Data Extraction
Two reviewers independently extracted relevant data from all included publications using a
predefined evidence table shell. A senior investigator reviewed the evidence tables for accuracy
and completeness. The final evidence tables are provided in Appendix J of the full report.

Quality (Risk of Bias) Assessment


We assessed quality of RCTs using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool,27 which
evaluates domains including sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, outcome
data reporting, and reporting bias. Two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias as low, high,
or unclear for each domain. We used a preestablished threshold of criteria to rate the quality of
each study based on the risk of bias assessment as good, fair, or poor. Discordant assessments
were resolved in team meetings including senior investigators. A summary of all component
items and overall risk of bias/quality score for each included study is provided in Appendix I of
the full report.

Data Synthesis
We provide a systematic narrative synthesis of the available data from original research
studies of acceptable quality for nonsurgical treatment of AUB. We present individual study data
grouped by KQ and then intervention. Detailed study information is provided in evidence tables
included in Appendix J of the full report.
A meta-analysis was not feasible for this review. Few studies had comparable treatment
doses, interval, or duration of followup. Among those that did, the ability to aggregate data is
limited by differences in outcomes measures which included measures of blood loss from
sanitary product collection, and self-report using scoring systems including standardized pictorial
systems. For regularity of bleeding no two measures of outcome were the same.

Strength of the Body of Evidence


For KQ1, we used explicit criteria to grade the overall strength of the evidence (e.g., low,
moderate, high, and insufficient) on each intervention. We used established concepts of the
quantity of evidence (e.g., numbers of studies, aggregate ending-sample sizes), the quality of
evidence (i.e., from the quality ratings of individual articles), directness of the outcomes for
informing the KQs, and the coherence or consistency of findings across similar and dissimilar
studies and in comparison to known or theoretically sound principles of clinical or behavioral
research and practice. For KQ2, we did not rate of strength of evidence because a fully inclusive

ES-5
assessment of harms could not be completed for each of the 12 interventions that have been
widely studied in populations that lack direct applicability to this report.

Applicability
We assessed applicability of the results from the literature to the population of women with
abnormal cyclic and irregular uterine bleeding. Using the PICOTS framework, we identified
factors that may limit the applicability of individual research studies. We summarized the
applicability of the body of evidence and described key elements from the PICOTS framework
that characterize the applicability of the identified studies.

Results
For KQ1, we identified 1,775 titles and abstracts for screening; 219 publications were
identified as potentially eligible for inclusion and were promoted for full-text review. We
identified 41 publications from 39 unique studies that met criteria for inclusion. Ten studies
included in the review addressed KQ1A; 31 publications representing 29 studies addressed
KQ1B. We conducted a separate search and screening process for KQ2. We identified 2,730
titles and abstracts for screening. Of these, 788 references were promoted for full text review.
Using predefined criteria, we found 25 publications about harms that were eligible for inclusion.
We obtained package inserts for each KQ1 included drug intervention.

Description of Included Studies (KQ1)


Thirty-nine included studies evaluated NSAIDs (13 studies),28-40 the LNG-IUS (7
studies),28,41-46 tranexamic acid (TXA; 7 studies),29,34,40,47-50 COCs (6 studies),31,41,43,51-53
contraceptive vaginal ring (1 study),54 metformin (4 studies),55-58 progestogens (1 study),59
cabergoline (1 study),60 lifestyle/behavioral changes (2 studies),61,62 acupuncture (2 studies),61,63
and patient decision aids (3 studies)64-66 using at least one comparator or placebo arm. The total
number of interventions addressed is greater than the number of studies because of direct
comparisons between one or more interventions within single studies. Study duration was
typically 6 months or less. Four of the studies addressing KQ1B included a followup of 1 to 2
years.

KQ1A. Management of Irregular Uterine Bleeding


Ten RCTs addressed restoring menstrual regularity in those with irregular uterine bleeding.
Three were conducted in the United States,51,57,62 two in Italy,56,60 two in Turkey,58,59 and one
each in China,63 Sweden,61 and the United Kingdom.55 The studies ranged in size from 23 to 201
participants and examined the efficacy of metformin (4 studies),55-58 progestogen (1 study),59
triphasic birth control pills (1 study),51 cabergoline (1 study),60 diet and exercise (1 study),62 and
acupuncture (2 studies).61,63 The majority compared treatment to placebo or sham intervention;
three included comparisons of effectiveness of two interventions. Two studies were classified as
good quality,51,60 two studies as fair quality,55,63 and six studies as poor quality.56-59,61,62

Metformin and Exenatide


Metformin was an active treatment arm in four RCTs conducted among women with PCOS.
Two RCTs compared metformin outcomes to a placebo group,55,56 one compared metformin to
N-acetyl-cysteine,58 and one three-armed study compared metformin only, exenatide only, and

ES-6
both.57 In each case, compared with baseline or placebo, metformin was effective for improving
the regularity of bleeding over a number of months.55,56,58 Combination therapy improved cycle
frequency better than metformin or exenatide alone in 60 women with PCOS.57

Progestogens
Vaginal micronized progesterone and oral dydrogesterone were studied in a single trial
among women clinically classified as having dysfunctional uterine bleeding.59 Both routes of
administration improved cycle regularity with 92 percent and 85 percent of participants,
respectively, achieving cycle length of less than 35 days and no intermenstrual bleeding by the
third cycle of use. Effects were statistically comparable, but the trial was not powered to show
equivalence or noninferiority.

COCs
A triphasic oral contraceptive was also studied in a single RCT among women with irregular
uterine bleeding.51 This trial included women with both short and long intervals between
bleeding episodes and with both heavy and normal amounts of bleeding. The outcomes are
provided by the authors in aggregate and not presented by initial bleeding characteristics.
Overall, 68 percent of women taking the COC achieved excellent or good cycle control as
assessed by the study investigators compared with 26 percent of those receiving a placebo.

Cabergoline
In a very preliminary investigation of cabergoline,60 a drug indicated for the treatment of
prolactinoma, treatment over 6 months was associated with return of regular menses in three of
eight women compared with none of six receiving placebo. Women in the study had PCOS and
normal prolactin levels.

Behavioral and Lifestyle Interventions


Among adolescents with PCOS, both a low-fat, calorie-restricted diet and a carbohydrate-
restricted diet in conjunction with 30 minutes of aerobic activity 3 days a week resulted in more
regular menses among those who lost weight.62 This single small study did not present outcomes
by the diet group to which participants were randomized. Presumably there was not a clear
difference, meaning there is no evidence for which dietary approach to choose. A single trial of
acupuncture in 84 women61 also included an exercise control group at the same intensity as the
diet and exercise trial. This group experienced a meaningful improvement in their menstrual
frequency (42% increase from baseline calculated by study investigators) that was comparable to
acupuncture at 32 weeks. We did not find evidence comparing diet to exercise directly.

Complementary and Alternative Medicine


Two studies of acupuncture with different underlying hypotheses and different methods
(conventional acupuncture and low-frequency electroacupuncture) found benefit for a specific
style of acupuncture when compared with no intervention or alternate placement of acupuncture
needles.61,63 By 32 weeks in the trial of electroacupuncture for PCOS,61 women who received 14
acupuncture treatments over 16 weeks had a 121 percent improvement in cycle regularity while
those who exercised only had a 42 percent improvement. Both were statistically comparable in
this small trial. Both acupuncture and exercise were superior to no treatment. In the trial of two
differing placements of needles every other day for 3 cycles,63 women who received treatment

ES-7
for “mind tranquilizing and menstruation promotion” had greater improvements (no treatment
failures among 21 women) compared with those receiving traditional placement (n=16) for
“delayed menses” among whom 19 percent did not have improvements.

KQ1B. Management of Abnormal Cyclic Bleeding


We identified 31 publications representing 29 studies addressing nonsurgical interventions
for the management of abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding. The interventions evaluated in the
studies included the LNG-IUS (7 studies),28,41-46 NSAIDs (13 studies),28-40 TXA (7
studies),29,34,40,47-50 COCs (5 studies),31,41,43,52,53 and contraceptive vaginal ring (1 study).54 We
also identified three studies that evaluated decision aids for the management of AUB.65-67
Included studies described nonsurgical interventions and compared these interventions to another
intervention (17 studies),28,29,31,33,34,37,38,40-45,48,49,54,58,67 placebo (9 studies),30,32,35,36,39,47,50,52,53 or
usual care (4 studies)46,64-66 Studies were conducted in 16 countries (United States, Canada, the
United Kingdom, Australia, Finland, the Netherlands, Sweden, Czech Republic, Germany,
Hungary, Poland, Ukraine, Turkey, India, Egypt, and Brazil). Of the 29 included studies, 4
studies were assessed as good quality,35,47,52,53 8 as fair quality,30,38,39,42,45,49,50,54 and 17 as poor
quality.28,29,31-34,36,37,40,41,43,44,46,48,64-66

LNG-IUS
LNG-IUS was an effective intervention for reduction of abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding in
all seven of the identified studies.28,41-46 Five studies that measured menstrual blood loss (MBL)
directly from collected sanitary materials documented 70 to 87 percent reductions in bleeding
when comparing treated women with their baseline.28,41-43,45 When measured, 80 percent or more
of women who were enrolled because they met criteria for heavy menses achieved normal total
blood loss. These improvements were significantly greater than changes in comparison groups
treated with NSAIDs, COCs, progestogens, and usual care. Evidence suggests the LNG-IUS
effectively reduces self-reported symptom severity and duration of bleeding. A single study
among women scheduled for hysterectomy found that LNG-IUS users were more likely to cancel
their surgery compared with women in the usual care group.46

NSAIDs
In 13 studies, NSAIDs including mefenamic acid, naproxen, meclofenamate, and
flurbiprofen given at the onset of menses for up to 5 days reduced MBL when compared with
baseline.28-40 NSAIDs are effective when compared with placebo.35,39,68 Overall, 6 of 13 studies
provided statistical comparisons to baseline only. Evidence is equivocal, one trial each, showing
NSAIDs are similar in effectiveness or superior to oral norethisterone.33,37 When measured,
specific NSAIDs have been shown to reduce blood loss by 20 to 59 percent.28-31,33-35,38-40,68 While
NSAIDs can significantly reduce MBL, they did not consistently reduce bleeding to levels
considered clinically normal (i.e., less than 80 ml) in all patients. There was considerable
variability in response, with some patients experiencing an increase in blood loss during
treatment. Studies evaluated treatment durations from one to six menstrual cycles. There were no
differences in MBL reductions between NSAIDs and oral norethisterone or COCs. There were
also no differences seen between individual types of NSAIDs, specifically mefenamic acid and
naproxen. The most recent study found similar reductions in patient-reported assessments of
bleeding severity when NSAIDs plus TXA was compared with TXA alone.40

ES-8
TXA
All seven RCTs including TXA treatment demonstrated effectiveness for improving heavy
bleeding.29,34,40,47-50 TXA at a dose of 1.95 to 4.5 grams per day for 4 to 5 days from the onset of
bleeding led to a clinically significant reduction in MBL, ranging from a 26 to 54 percent
decrease in studies lasting up to a year. Both biologic and self-reported symptoms of bleeding
severity were improved. In comparison to progestogens (norethisterone and
medroxyprogesterone acetate), COCs, and NSAIDs, TXA provided greater reduction in MBL,
however not all trials presented statistical analysis for head-to-head comparisons. No head-to-
head comparisons of TXA versus LNG-IUS were identified.

COCs
Five RCTs included groups treated with COCs.31,41,43,52,53 Measured reduction in bleeding
was from 43 to 69 percent with complete normalization of total volume of bleeding achieved in
30 to 44 percent of women. One crossover comparison to mefenamic acid in 24 participants
found both to be effective but lacked power to determine if either treatment was superior.31 Two
placebo-controlled studies found COCs effective for reducing menstrual bleeding and days of
bleeding.52,53 In the two head-to-head comparisons between COCs and LNG-IUS,41,43 reductions
in heavy menstrual bleeding were documented in both treatment groups. Women with a LNG-
IUS had greater benefit.

Contraceptive Vaginal Ring


A single RCT compared the efficacy of the contraceptive vaginal ring with norethisterone in
95 women with abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding. The treatments were equally effective,
reducing the patient-reported bleeding score by 67 percent in the contraceptive vaginal ring
group and by 70 percent in the norethisterone group.54

Decision Aids
Three studies investigated decisions aids to assist women seeking treatment for heavy cyclic
bleeding in making informed decisions about care.64-66 Their findings suggest these tools do
increase patient knowledge and enhance satisfaction with care. Overall, decision aids did not
result in choices that influence disease symptoms in directly measurable ways. One study found
fewer women who received the decision aid ultimately choose surgical referral and
hysterectomy.65 However this treatment choice cannot necessarily be linked to improvement in
bleeding symptoms.

KQ 2. Harms of Interventions for Management of Abnormal


Bleeding
Capturing useful information about potential harms of treatment for reproductive-age women
that is specifically applicable to interventions for abnormal bleeding is a challenge because many
agents have multiple indications and harms are often not well-studied in reproductive-age
women. A wide range of interventions are used to treat abnormal bleeding. Twelve interventions
relevant to the primary care setting were identified for this report. In this section we have
restricted brief summaries to medications only (behavioral and lifestyle interventions,
acupuncture, and decision support tools, each with little potential for serious harm, are discussed
in the full report). We summarized harms and present findings in this order:

ES-9
• Addressing the clinical trials included in this review.
• Compiling the key content of package inserts.
• Searching for surveillance studies that aimed to examine risk of harm in large populations
of individuals (i.e., 1,600 or more) for specific interventions.
• Providing information from existing contemporary reviews and guidance on harms for
common medications with broad indications.
We have grouped the interventions together, presenting those for abnormal irregular uterine
bleeding first, followed by those for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding. In instances in which the
agent was used for both conditions the information is presented only once.

Metformin and Exenatide


In the included trials, metformin is associated with increased gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms
including abdominal pain, nausea, and diarrhea.55-57 This is compatible with the package insert.69
Severe harms of metformin detected in larger studies, typically among older adults with type 2
diabetes, include lactic acidosis, serious hypoglycemia (most often in combination with other
agents) and liver failure. Incidence of such serious harms is below 1 in 10,000 and may be as low
as 1 per 100,000 person-years of exposure.70
Exenatide is typically used as a second agent when adequate glycemic control is not achieved
with a single diabetes treatment. Its harm profile is uninformed by the literature in this review
which included only one study with 40 women treated.57 The package insert suggests
hypoglycemia is the most serious side effect,71 and large scale surveillance studies have not
confirmed initial concerns that pancreatitis was more common among those treated.72,73 Reviews
including data about harms identify metformin as a first-line agent of choice for diabetes
management, and concur that both agents are associated with excess GI complaints.74-76

Progesterone
Route of progestogen administration was compared in one comparative effectiveness trial for
women with irregular menses.59 In the remaining studies, progestogens were included as the
comparator arms (in each case hypothesizing and documenting the superiority of the agent under
study) or within COCs.33,37,42,44,45,48,49 The progesterone-releasing intrauterine system is
separately reviewed below.
Progestogens, like depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), and vaginal micronized
progesterone gel are associated with increased complaints of weight gain, fluid retention,
abdominal pain, nausea, change of mood, and change in appetite. Many of these were
documented in the included studies which were typically under-powered or made comparisons to
other active agents, making comparisons of risk of side effects less informative. Among the most
common complaints associated with progestogens is irregular bleeding. Package inserts also note
potential dangers of exposure to high doses in pregnancy.77
A surveillance study has linked DMPA to increased future rate of fractures (though analyses
were not controlled for key confounders like smoking and body mass index),78 while another
large study showed recovery of normal bone density within 2 to 3 years of ceasing use.79 Some
data suggest use of progestogens is associated with increased risk of deep venous thrombosis,
though other research restricted to those using particular drugs for the indication of heavy
menses demonstrates that women with heavy menses have higher risk of deep vein thrombosis
regardless of the intervention they use suggesting some degree of confounding by the indication

ES-10
for which the drug is given.80 Reviews and meta-analyses confirm common side effects,
including progestogens being a cause of irregular bleeding.81

COCs
Primary care providers and many women are aware of the most serious risks of COCs and
the more common side-effects including edema, nausea, breast tenderness, skin changes, and GI
symptoms. The studies in this review reported harms profiles for common symptoms similar to
package insert documents.82-85 Certain risks like that for venous thromboembolism, myocardial
infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, hypertension, gallbladder disease, and benign liver tumors are
also well documented. Patients and clinicians should be alerted to factors that increase risk of
complications such as cigarette smoking, advancing age (with 35 often used as a threshold), and
predisposition to thrombotic events. Two recent systematic reviews have reiterated increased risk
for deep venous thrombosis with a suggestion that risk is lowest in those COCs containing
levonorgestrel or norgestimate as the progestogens.6,86

Cabergoline
The sole study of cabergoline in this review was exploratory with 14 women with PCOS and
15 normal controls.60 When used for treatment of prolactinoma, this drug is associated with
nausea, headache, dizziness, lack of energy, and constipation. Cochrane reviews on three
different conditions found no difference in overall risk of harms for cabergoline compared with
placebo,87,88 however a review of use for Parkinson’s patients revealed increased valvular heart
disease on echocardiogram with few symptomatic individuals.89,90 The applicability of this data
to young women with irregular menses is very limited.

LNG-IUS
Participants in the included trial of use of the LNG-IUS for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding
had few serious complications. Common side effects include changes in bleeding pattern
including spotting and complete absence of menses. Abdominal pain/bloating, headache,
depressed or altered mood, heavy bleeding, breast tenderness, and intrauterine device expulsion
are expected to occur in approximately 5 percent or more of women using this treatment, as
reflected in package inserts.91,92 Surveillance studies provide good estimates from large registries
of users. Difficult insertions occur in 3 to 4 percent of women, with painful insertion occurring in
about 1 percent.93,94 Risk of uterine perforation is between 0.9 and 2.6 per 1,000 users and the
majority are not recognized at the time of insertion.94-97 Nulliparous status and noncontraceptive
indications do not appear to influence risk of perforation. Hair loss, that is known to be reversible
in many but not all patients, occurs in about 1.8 per 1,000 users.95 The LNG-IUS is not
associated with increased risk of deep vein thrombosis in more than 8 million person-years of
observation.98-100 Systematic reviews match package insert and surveillance data also noting that
expulsion occurs in 5 to 16 percent of women.81,84,101,102

Contraceptive Vaginal Ring


In the single trial of the contraceptive vaginal ring included in this review, the incidence of
nausea, headache, and breast tenderness was comparable in both treatment groups during three
cycles of treatment. The contraceptive vaginal ring users were less likely to report breakthrough
bleeding than women taking norethisterone. Local events, including vaginal discomfort,
vaginitis, foreign body sensation and coital problems were reported more frequently in ring-

ES-11
users, but no one discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Product materials note that the
contraceptive vaginal ring is contraindicated in cigarette smokers over age 35 due to increased
risk of venous thromboembolism. A 15-year cohort study that included over 38,000 person-years
of contraceptive vaginal ring use reported an elevated adjusted relative risk of 2.5 (95% CI, 1.4
to 4.4) for thrombotic stroke and 2.1 (95% CI, 0.7 to 6.5) for myocardial infarction compared
with women (over 9 million person-years) who had not used hormonal contraception.98
Systematic reviews have noted that the risk of venous thromboembolism for the contraceptive
vaginal ring was elevated and similar to COCs.103

NSAIDs
NSAIDs are generally dosed intermittently in young women with problem bleeding. This
makes detection of harms challenging. Complaints commonly reported in trials included:
abdominal pain, nausea, gastritis, and light headedness or dizziness. Less common events
included rashes and itching. These agents include a boxed warning on the product labels about
cardiovascular and GI risks.104-106 Upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurs in approximately 1
percent of patients treated for 3 to 6 months and at higher rates with longer use.105-107 However,
the majority of use assessed in this way is chronic, daily use. Product materials note that short
term use is not without risk but do not provide risk estimates. Other common side effects include
edema, abdominal pain, constipation, nausea, vomiting, heart burn, headache, nervousness, and
conflicting central nervous system complaints like anxiety and tremor as well as malaise and
somnolence. A pooled analysis of trials found mild neurologic and GI adverse events were more
common in those treated than among placebo users.108 The available reviews note additional
investigation is required to clarify potential cardiovascular risks.109,110

TXA
Within studies in our review similar numbers of participants withdrew from TXA treatment
arms as from placebo and comparison groups.47,48 Side effect profiles were similar across those
treated and untreated with the agent who remained in trials. The Food and Drug Administration
has examined concerns about changes in QT-interval changes on electrocardiograms, but overall
the number of subjects included in trials was considered to be low for evaluating harms and drug
safety.111 The updated prescription label now includes headache, nasal and sinus symptoms, back
pain, and abdominal pain as occurring in more than 10 percent of those taking the drug.112 Joint
pain, muscle cramps and spasms, migraine, anemia, and fatigue occur in more than 5 percent of
users. Post-marketing reports have identified thrombosis, allergic reactions including
anaphylaxis, and visual disturbances.112 This led to contraindications similar to those for COCs
recommending that women with any history of thrombotic disease, risk for thrombotic disease,
who smoke, are over age 35, or who concomitantly use tissue plasminogen activator, avoid the
drug. Several reviews have examined harms and concluded that GI effects are most common and
no thrombotic events were identified in 10 study populations.113-116 It is important to note that
overall these trials are small and large-scale surveillance data over time will likely be required
for definitive answers.

ES-12
Discussion
Summary of Strength of Evidence and Findings
The strength of evidence tables (Table B and Table C) summarize the total number of studies
and within those studies the number of women who received the specific intervention. The tables
also provide the assessment of the risk of bias, consistency of findings across trials, directness of
the evidence that treatment improves the symptom, and precision of the estimates provided by
the literature.
Overall the evidence to answer KQs about the management of AUB did not reach standards
for high strength of evidence for any intervention from the literature relevant to treatment of
women with irregular uterine bleeding (Table B). COCs, as represented in a single good quality
placebo controlled trial with 201 participants, documented effectiveness.51 The treatment effect
was large with improvement in bleeding patterns reported for more than 80 percent of women
taking COC compared with 45 percent for the placebo group. Combined, these factors provided
moderate evidence of benefit. Use of metformin is supported by low strength of evidence
predominantly related to small trials of somewhat limited quality. For the remainder of the
interventions investigated for management of irregular uterine bleeding, there is insufficient
evidence that follows from single and/or lower quality studies.
Table B. Strength of evidence for improving menstrual regularity (KQ1A)
Intervention
Quality: Studies Overall Findings
Risk of
(Subjects Consistency Directness Precision Strength of
Bias a
Assigned to Evidence Comparisons
Intervention)
b
Progestogen
High NA Direct Imprecise Insufficient Not analyzed by arm
Poor: 1(69)59
d
c Cycle control improved: 87%
COC
Low NA Direct Precise Moderate
Good: 1(101)51
COC vs. PBO, p<0.00151
f
e Delay to first ovulation: 24
Metformin
days
Poor: 3(81)56-58 Medium NA Direct Imprecise Low
Fair: 1(45)55
MET vs. PBO, p=0.0255
g
Exenatide
High NA Direct Imprecise Insufficient Small, poor quality trial
Poor: 1(20)57
i
Cycle control improved:
h
Cabergoline 100%
Low NA Direct Imprecise Insufficient
Good: 1(8)60
CBG vs. PBO, p=NR60
j
Diet
High NA Direct Imprecise Insufficient Not analyzed by arm
Poor: 1(24)62

ES-13
Table B. Strength of evidence for improving menstrual regularity (KQ1A) (continued)
Intervention
Quality: Studies Overall Findings
Risk of
(Subjects Consistency Directness Precision Strength of
Bias a
Assigned to Evidence Comparisons
Intervention)
k
Exercise
High NA Direct Imprecise Insufficient Not analyzed by arm
Poor: 1(34)61
l m
Acupuncture Menstrual regulation: 86%
61
Poor: 1(33) High NA Direct Imprecise Insufficient
Fair: 1(23)63 MP-ACU > R-ACU, p<0.0563
CBG = cabergoline; COC = combined oral contraceptive; MET = metformin; MR-ACU = menstruation-promoting acupuncture;
NR = not reported; PBO = placebo; R-ACU = routine acupuncture
a
Overall strength of evidence assessment based on good and fair quality studies only.
b
Oral dydrogesterone (n=35) vs. 8% vaginal micronized progesterone (n=34).
c
Triphasic norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol vs. placebo (n=100).
d
Subject assessment.
e
Poor quality studies: metformin vs. N-acetyl cysteine (n=50), exenatide (n=20), or placebo (n=12); Fair quality study: metformin
vs. placebo (n=47).
f
Mean days to ovulation.
g
Compared with metformin (n=20) or metformin plus exenatide (n=20).
h
Compared with placebo (n=6).
i
Menstrual cyclicity restoration in oligomenorrhea or spontaneous menses in amenorrhea.
j
Low-fat diet (n=12) vs. low-carbohydrate diet (n=12).
k
Compared with acupuncture (n=33) or no intervention (n=17).
l
Poor quality study: acupuncture vs. exercise (n=34) or no intervention (n=17); Fair quality study: mind tranquilizing acupuncture
vs. routine acupuncture (n=17).
m
Patients cured or markedly relieved.

For management of heavy cyclic bleeding, the literature was more robust (Table C). COCs
are supported by high strength of evidence for the purpose of decreasing MBL. The LNG-IUS,
various NSAIDs, and TXA are also effective for reducing the amount of measured menstrual
bleeding and are each supported by moderate strength of evidence. In head-to-head comparisons
with statistically significant differences, the LNG-IUS has one trial showing superiority to
NSAIDs,28 two showing superiority to COCs,41,43 and two showing superiority to
progestogens.42,44,45 COCs were equivalent in one trial compared with an NSAID.31 TXA was
also superior to NSAIDs,29,34 and when combined with an NSAID was superior to TXA alone.40
Most of these interventions have been shown to have additional positive effects, typically
including shorter duration of bleeding and improvement in symptoms when participants used
standardized scoring systems to report treatment response.

ES-14
Table C. Strength of evidence for improving heavy menstrual bleeding (KQ1B)
Intervention
b
Quality: Studies Overall Findings
Risk of
(Subjects Consistency Directness Precision Strength of
Bias a
Assigned to Evidence Comparisons
Intervention)
71% and 94% reduction in
LNG-IUS MBL in 2 head-to-head
Poor: studies
Medium Consistent Direct Precise Moderate
5(173)28,41,43,44,46
42
Fair: 2(104)42,45 LNG-IUS > MPA, p<0.001
45
LNG-IUS vs. NOR, p=NS
28% to 49% reduction in
MBL in 3 placebo controlled
NSAID
trials; 46% and 47%
Poor:
reduction in MBL in 1 head-
9(192)28,29,31-
34,36,37,40 to-head study (2 NSAID
Medium Consistent Direct Imprecise Moderate
arms)
Fair:
3(129)30,38,39,68 30
MFA vs. PBO, p=NR
Good: 1(32)35 39,35
p<0.001
38
MFA vs. NPX, p=NS
26% and 40% reduction in
TXA MBL in 2 placebo controlled
Poor: trials; 45% reduction in MBL
4(202)29,34,40,48 Medium Consistent Direct Precise Moderate in 1 head-to-head study
Fair: 2(260)49,50
50,47
Good: 1(123)47 TXA vs. PBO, p<0.001
49
TXA > NOR, p<0.001
64% and 69% reduction in
c
COC MBL in 2 placebo controlled
Poor: 3(90)31,41,43 Low Consistent Direct Precise High trials
Good: 2(269)52,53
52,53
COC vs. PBO, p<0.001
20% increase to 87%
reduction in MBL in 4 head-
d
Progestogen to-head studies
Poor: 1(50)48
Medium Inconsistent Direct Imprecise Insufficient 42
Fair: MPA < LNG-IUS, p<0.001
45
4(173)42,45,49,54 NOR < LNG-IUS, p=NS
49
NOR < TXA, p<0.0001
54e
NOR vs. CVR, p=NS
e
67% reduction in MBL in 1
CVR head-to-head study
Medium NA Direct Imprecise Insufficient
Fair: 1(48)54
54
CVR vs. NOR, p=NS
COC = combined oral contraceptive; CVR = contraceptive vaginal ring; LNG-IUS = levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
system; MBL = menstrual blood loss; MCF = meclofenamate; MFA = mefenamic acid; MPA = medroxyprogesterone; NA = not
applicable; NOR = norethisterone; NPX = naproxen; NR = not reported; NS = not significant; NSAID = nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory drug; PBO = placebo; TXA = tranexamic acid
a
Overall strength of evidence assessment based on good and fair quality studies only.
b
Change in menstrual blood loss from baseline measured by the alkaline hematin method (unless otherwise noted) from good and
fair quality studies.
c
Ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel (n=71) or norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol (n=19) or estradiol valerate and dienogest
(n=269).
d
Medroxyprogesterone (n=177) or oral norethisterone (n=113) or depot medroxyprogesterone (n=44).
e
Percent change in menstrual blood loss measured by the pictorial blood loss assessment chart.

ES-15
Applicability
Applicability describes the extent to which results observed in published studies from this
review are likely to reflect the expected outcomes when an intervention is applied to broader
populations in real-world conditions. Studies for this review were intended to provide
information to inform primary care management of irregular or cyclic AUB. In shaping the
methods for this review, we engineered the report so that the included research is applicable to
primary care of women with these complaints in the United States. Because we narrowed our
focus to symptomatic women of reproductive age with chronic complaints of abnormal bleeding,
this comes at the cost of fewer studies being addressed. However, it assures that studies included
were explicitly designed to examine the effectiveness of the treatments for improving the
outcomes of interest in the populations of interest. Applicability of the findings is therefore high.
For each intervention, it is important to note the following provisions. The results of this
review apply for women:
• Who are reproductive age and state they have an irregular pattern of menstrual bleeding
or heavy cyclic menstrual bleeding;
• Without abnormal findings on pelvic exam or on ultrasound report (fibroids, polyps);
• Without an intrauterine device in place, and who are not pregnant or lactating;
• Who are healthy, and without renal impairment, hepatic impairment, intestinal disease,
thyroid disease, abnormal cervical cytology, noncyclic bleeding, history or presence of
significant medical problems (e.g., thromboembolic disease, coagulopathy, subarachnoid
hemorrhage, endocrine disorders, or eye disease);
• For whom any additional clinically determined diagnostic and screening tests have been
completed to rule out other causes of abnormal bleeding;
• Does not have any of the contraindications found in the Food and Drug Administration
sources discussed in the main document and do not have risks of drug-drug interactions if
they take multiple prescription medications.
This review was not designed to guide evaluation of women with abnormal bleeding, rather
to address what treatments have evidence of effectiveness once the diagnosis is established and
primary care management is to be initiated.
Overall applicability was high. However, often women who are in trials do not reflect the full
range of those with abnormal bleeding seen in primary care. Study participants were more likely
to be normal weight, nonsmokers, with few, if any concomitant conditions. The interventions
(except in the case of specific comparators as noted) are available in the same doses and
formulation in the United States. Outcomes such as measured blood loss, self-reported symptom
severity and days of bleeding are of direct relevance to women with abnormal bleeding. Our
findings are sparse for outcomes which can be considered essential for a condition like AUB that
is defined by symptoms. Important outcomes include satisfaction with response to treatment,
definitive assessments of whether or not the women considered their complaint resolved, and
whether they wished to continue the same treatment or add additional treatments. Followup in
general was brief, so the findings may not apply well to management of a chronic condition like
abnormal bleeding. This makes assessments of harms challenging since use of interventions over
extended periods may have different risk profiles from short timeframes like one to six cycles.

ES-16
Research Gaps
Recent improvements in unifying nomenclature and formalizing consensus definitions for the
clinical groupings of bleeding abnormalities9 will likely continue to have a positive influence on
the ability to properly interpret the findings of individual studies, to identify groups of studies
with comparable methods, and to aggregate results. An array of methodologic recommendations
and specific research needs are detailed in the full report. Common themes included the need for
larger, better controlled RCTs, with combinations of biological and patient-reported outcomes
and that evaluate outcomes over longer periods of time, at least past 1 year. Populations need to
become more representative of those seeking care (teens, heavier women, those with common
comorbidities like diabetes) and need to directly address common clinical interventions like
COCs and progestogens that are represented in the literature by a surprisingly small number of
older studies, given how ubiquitous their application is in clinical care. No studies examine
trajectories through care, mapping sequential treatment options or costs of care based on the
initial treatment strategy assigned. No studies examined combining effective treatments,
especially in women who had improvements but did not reach satisfactory control of bleeding or
cycle regularity. Overall trial designs should begin to shift towards effectiveness from efficacy,
moving beyond the level of proof of concept that is required for drug and device approval to a
deeper level that can better inform care, cost considerations and policy.

Conclusions
Women who have problematic irregular or heavy cyclic menstrual bleeding have a number of
treatment options available that are supported by systematic review of the research literature.
These include high strength of evidence that COCs can improve menstrual regularity for women
with irregular bleeding patterns. Metformin is supported by moderate strength of evidence for
improving cycle regularity especially among women with PCOS. This provides both a
contraceptive and a noncontraceptive option for irregular menses. Other interventions like
progestogens are associated with statistically and clinically meaningful improvements from
baseline patterns, however the overall evidence is insufficient from well-designed, larger studies
with ability to directly compare treatment arms rather than only pre-post measures within groups.
Multiple interventions for heavy cyclic bleeding are supported by evidence that they reduce
MBL. These include strong evidence that COCs are effective and moderate strength of evidence
that the LNG-IUS, NSAIDs, and TXA reduce bleeding relative to baseline, decrease total
volume of bleeding when comparisons are made across treatment groups, and when measured,
decrease days of bleeding per cycle. In direct comparisons, LNG-IUS is superior to NSAIDs.
TXA is superior to NSAIDs and TXA combined with an NSAID was superior to TXA alone.
Results from COC and NSAID comparisons suggest comparable effectiveness. Not all women
will benefit from these interventions. Across agents data are sparse to evaluate long-term
improvements and risk of harms.
Limitations include a predominance of small, short trials lacking standard terminology and
diagnostic criteria for identifying and including women with AUB. Tools for collecting outcome
data are crude (collection of sanitary products) and may contribute to a high rate of attrition.
Biologic outcomes, like measured blood loss and hemoglobin or hematocrit levels, may neglect
the importance of patient-reported outcomes that assess whether symptoms are considered
resolved by women themselves. Nevertheless, the variety of effective options suggests many
women can achieve symptom relief and have available choices that address both symptoms and

ES-17
contraceptive or fertility desires, as well as potentially improving other symptoms like menstrual
cramping.

References
1. Liu Z, Doan QV, Blumenthal P, et al. A 9. Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, et
systematic review evaluating health-related al.; FIGO Working Group on Menstrual
quality of life, work impairment, and health- Disorders. FIGO classification system
care costs and utilization in abnormal uterine (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal
bleeding. Value Health 2007 May- uterine bleeding in nongravid women of
Jun;10(3):183-94. PMID: 17532811. reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet
2011 Apr;113(1):3-13. PMID: 21345435.
2. Marret H, Fauconnier A, Chabbert-Buffet N,
et al. Clinical practice guidelines on 10. Doubilet PM. Diagnosis of abnormal uterine
menorrhagia: management of abnormal bleeding with imaging. Menopause 2011
uterine bleeding before menopause. Eur J Apr;18(4):421-4. PMID: 21701427.
Obstet Gynecol Reprod Bio 2010
11. Bradley LD. Diagnosis of abnormal uterine
Oct;152(2):133-7. PMID: 20688424.
bleeding with biopsy or hysteroscopy.
3. Belsey EM, Pinol AP. Menstrual bleeding Menopause 2011 Apr;18(4):425-33.
patterns in untreated women. Task Force on PMID: 21701428.
Long-Acting Systemic Agents for Fertility
12. Woolcock JG, Critchley HO, Munro MG, et
Regulation. Contraception 1997
al. Review of the confusion in current and
Feb;55(2):57-65. PMID: 9071513.
historical terminology and definitions for
4. Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical gynecologic disturbances of menstrual bleeding. Fertil
endocrinology and infertility. 8th ed. Steril 2008;90(6):2269-80.
Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer PMID: 18258230.
Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;
13. Fraser IS, Critchley HO, Munro MG, et al.
2011.
A process designed to lead to international
5. Hallberg L, Hogdahl AM, Nilsson L, et al. agreement on terminologies and definitions
Menstrual blood loss—a population study. used to describe abnormalities of menstrual
Variation at different ages and attempts to bleeding. Fertil Steril 2007 Mar;87(3):466-
define normality. Acta Obstet Gynecol 76. PMID: 17362717.
Scand 1966;45(3):320-51. PMID: 5922481.
14. Rahn DD, Abed H, Sung VW, et al.; Society
6. Manzoli L, De Vito C, Marzuillo C, et al. of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic
Oral contraceptives and venous Review Group. Systematic review highlights
thromboembolism: a systematic review and difficulty interpreting diverse clinical
meta-analysis. Drug Saf 2012 Mar outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding
1;35(3):191-205. PMID: 22283630. trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2011 Mar;64(3):293-
300. PMID: 20705427.
7. Treloar AE, Boynton RE, Behn BG, et al.
Variation of the human menstrual cycle 15. Munro MG, Critchley HO, Fraser IS; FIGO
through reproductive life. Int J Fertil 1967 Working Group on Menstrual Disorders.
Jan-Mar;12(1 Pt 2):77-126. PMID: 5419031. The FIGO classification of causes of
abnormal uterine bleeding. Int J Gynaecol
8. Matteson KA, Clark MA. Questioning our
Obstet 2011 Apr;113(1):1-2.
questions: do frequently asked questions
PMID: 21316671.
adequately cover the aspects of women's
lives most affected by abnormal uterine 16. Fraser IS, Critchley HO, Munro MG, et al.
bleeding? Opinions of women with Can we achieve international agreement on
abnormal uterine bleeding participating in terminologies and definitions used to
focus group discussions. Women Health describe abnormalities of menstrual
2010 Mar;50(2):195-211. PMID: 20437305. bleeding? Hum Reprod 2007
Mar;22(3):635-43. PMID: 17204526.

ES-18
17. Hale GE, Zhao X, Hughes CL, et al. 26. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—
Endocrine features of menstrual cycles in Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.
middle and late reproductive age and the 121: long-acting reversible contraception:
menopausal transition classified according implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet
to the staging of reproductive aging Gynecol 2011 Jul;118(1):184-96.
workshop (STRAW) staging system. J Clin PMID: 21691183.
Endocrinol Metab 2007 August 1,
27. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne JA. Chapter
2007;92(8):3060-7. PMID: 17550960.
8: Assessing the risk of bias in included
18. Heller DS. Pathologic basis for abnormal studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, eds.
uterine bleeding with organic uterine Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews
pathologies. Menopause 2011 of interventions. The Cochrane
Apr;18(4):412-5. PMID: 21701425. Collaboration; 2011.
19. Albers JR, Hull SK, Wesley RM. Abnormal 28. Reid PC, Virtanen-Kari S. Randomised
uterine bleeding. Am Fam Physician 2004 comparative trial of the levonorgestrel
Apr 15;69(8):1915-26. PMID: 15117012. intrauterine system and mefenamic acid for
the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia: a
20. Matteson KA, Anderson BL, Pinto SB, et al.
multiple analysis using total menstrual fluid
Practice patterns and attitudes about treating
loss, menstrual blood loss and pictorial
abnormal uterine bleeding: a national survey
blood loss assessment charts. BJOG 2005
of obstetricians and gynecologists. Am J
Aug;112(8):1121-5. PMID: 16045528.
Obstet Gynecol 2011 May 14.
PMID: 21737060. 29. Bonnar J, Sheppard BL. Treatment of
menorrhagia during menstruation:
21. Ely JW, Kennedy CM, Clark EC, et al.
randomised controlled trial of ethamsylate,
Abnormal uterine bleeding: a management
mefenamic acid, and tranexamic acid. BMJ
algorithm. J Am Board Fam Med 2006 Nov-
1996 Sep 7;313(7057):579-82.
Dec;19(6):590-602. PMID: 17090792.
PMID: 8806245.
22. National Collaborating Centre for Women's
30. van Eijkeren MA, Christiaens GC, Geuze
and Children's Health. Heavy Menstrual
HJ, et al. Effects of mefenamic acid on
Bleeding. NICE Clinical Guideline CG44.
menstrual hemostasis in essential
London: Institute for Health and Clinical
menorrhagia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992
Excellence; 2007.
May;166(5):1419-28. PMID: 1595797.
23. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—
31. Fraser IS, McCarron G. Randomized trial of
Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.
2 hormonal and 2 prostaglandin-inhibiting
14: management of anovulatory bleeding.
agents in women with a complaint of
Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001 Mar;72(3):263-
menorrhagia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
71. PMID: 11296797.
1991 Feb;31(1):66-70. PMID: 1872778.
24. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—
32. Grover V, Usha R, Gupta U, et al.
Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.
Management of cyclical menorrhagia with
59: clinical management guidelines for
prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor. Asia
obstetricians-gynecologists: intrauterine
Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 1990
device. Obstet Gynecol 2005
Sep;16(3):255-9. PMID: 2088249.
Jan;105(1):223-32. PMID: 15625179.
33. Cameron IT, Haining R, Lumsden MA, et
25. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—
al. The effects of mefenamic acid and
Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.
norethisterone on measured menstrual blood
110: noncontraceptive uses of hormonal
loss. Obstet Gynecol 1990 Jul;76(1):85-8.
contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol 2010
PMID: 2359570.
Jan;115(1):206-18. PMID: 20027071.
34. Andersch B, Milsom I, Rybo G. An
objective evaluation of flurbiprofen and
tranexamic acid in the treatment of
idiopathic menorrhagia. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand 1988;67(7):645-8.
PMID: 3073625.

ES-19
35. Vargyas JM, Campeau JD, Mishell DR, Jr. 43. Endrikat J, Shapiro H, Lukkari-Lax E, et al.
Treatment of menorrhagia with A Canadian, multicentre study comparing
meclofenamate sodium. Am J Obstet the efficacy of a levonorgestrel-releasing
Gynecol 1987 Oct;157(4 Pt 1):944-50. intrauterine system to an oral contraceptive
PMID: 3314521. in women with idiopathic menorrhagia. J
Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009 Apr;31(4):340-7.
36. Tsang BK, Domingo MT, Spence JE, et al.
PMID: 19497153.
Endometrial prostaglandins and
menorrhagia: influence of a prostaglandin 44. Kucuk T, Ertan K. Continuous oral or
synthetase inhibitor in vivo. Can J Physiol intramuscular medroxyprogesterone acetate
Pharmacol 1987 Oct;65(10):2081-4. versus the levonorgestrel releasing
PMID: 3123043. intrauterine system in the treatment of
perimenopausal menorrhagia: a randomized,
37. Cameron IT, Leask R, Kelly RW, et al. The
prospective, controlled clinical trial in
effects of danazol, mefenamic acid,
female smokers. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol
norethisterone and a progesterone-
2008;35(1):57-60. PMID: 18390083.
impregnated coil on endometrial
prostaglandin concentrations in women with 45. Irvine GA, Campbell-Brown MB, Lumsden
menorrhagia. Prostaglandins 1987 MA, et al. Randomised comparative trial of
Jul;34(1):99-110. PMID: 3685399. the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and
norethisterone for treatment of idiopathic
38. Hall P, Maclachlan N, Thorn N, et al.
menorrhagia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998
Control of menorrhagia by the cyclo-
Jun;105(6):592-8. PMID: 9647148.
oxygenase inhibitors naproxen sodium and
mefenamic acid. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987 46. Lahteenmaki P, Haukkamaa M, Puolakka J,
Jun;94(6):554-8. PMID: 3304401. et al. Open randomised study of use of
levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system
39. Fraser IS, Pearse C, Shearman RP, et al.
as alternative to hysterectomy. BMJ 1998
Efficacy of mefenamic acid in patients with
Apr 11;316(7138):1122-6. PMID: 9552948.
a complaint of menorrhagia. Obstet Gynecol
1981 Nov;58(5):543-51. PMID: 7029369. 47. Lukes AS, Moore KA, Muse KN, et al.
Tranexamic acid treatment for heavy
40. Najam R, Agarwal D, Tyagi R, et al.
menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled
Comparison of traneximic acid with a
trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010 Oct;116(4):865-
combination of traneximic acid and
75. PMID: 20859150.
mefenamic acid in reducing menstrual blood
loss in ovulatory dysfunctional uterine 48. Kriplani A, Kulshrestha V, Agarwal N, et al.
bleeding (DUB). Journal of Clinical and Role of tranexamic acid in management of
Diagnostic Research 2010;4(5):3020-5. dysfunctional uterine bleeding in
comparison with medroxyprogesterone
41. Shaaban MM, Zakherah MS, El-Nashar SA,
acetate. J Obstet Gynaecol 2006
et al. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
Oct;26(7):673-8. PMID: 17071438.
system compared to low dose combined oral
contraceptive pills for idiopathic 49. Preston JT, Cameron IT, Adams EJ, et al.
menorrhagia: a randomized clinical trial. Comparative study of tranexamic acid and
Contraception 2011 Jan;83(1):48-54. norethisterone in the treatment of ovulatory
PMID: 21134503. menorrhagia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995
May;102(5):401-6. PMID: 7612535.
42. Kaunitz AM, Bissonnette F, Monteiro I, et
al. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine 50. Freeman EW, Lukes A, VanDrie D, et al. A
system or medroxyprogesterone for heavy dose-response study of a novel, oral
menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled tranexamic formulation for heavy menstrual
trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010 Sep;116(3):625- bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011
32. PMID: 20733445. Oct;205(4):319 e1-7. PMID: 21777897.
51. Davis A, Godwin A, Lippman J, et al.
Triphasic norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol for
treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding.
Obstet Gynecol 2000 Dec;96(6):913-20.
PMID: 11084177.

ES-20
52. Fraser IS, Romer T, Parke S, et al. Effective 59. Karakus S, Kiran G, Ciralik H. Efficacy of
treatment of heavy and/or prolonged micronised vaginal progesterone versus oral
menstrual bleeding with an oral dydrogestrone in the treatment of irregular
contraceptive containing estradiol valerate dysfunctional uterine bleeding: a pilot
and dienogest: A randomized, double-blind randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J
Phase III trial. Hum Reprod Obstet Gynaecol 2009 Dec;49(6):685-8.
2011;26(10):2698-708. PMID: 21784734. PMID: 20070724.
53. Jensen JT, Parke S, Mellinger U, et al. 60. Paoletti AM, Cagnacci A, Depan GF, et al.
Effective treatment of heavy menstrual The chronic administration of cabergoline
bleeding with estradiol valerate and normalizes androgen secretion and improves
dienogest: A randomized controlled trial. menstrual cyclicity in women with
Obstet Gynecol 2011;117(4):777-87. polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril
PMID: 21422847. 1996;66(4):527-32. PMID: 8816612.
54. Abu Hashim H, Alsherbini W, Bazeed M. 61. Jedel E, Labrie F, Oden A, et al. Impact of
Contraceptive vaginal ring treatment of electro-acupuncture and physical exercise on
heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized hyperandrogenism and oligo/amenorrhea in
controlled trial with norethisterone. women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a
Contraception 2012 Mar;85(3):246-52. randomized controlled trial. Am J Physiol
PMID: 22067765. Endocrinol Metab 2011 Jan;300(1):E37-45.
PMID: 20943753.
55. Fleming R, Hopkinson ZE, Wallace AM, et
al. Ovarian function and metabolic factors in 62. Ornstein RM, Copperman NM, Jacobson
women with oligomenorrhea treated with MS. Effect of weight loss on menstrual
metformin in a randomized double blind function in adolescents with polycystic
placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol ovary syndrome. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol
Metab 2002 Feb;87(2):569-74. 2011;24(3):161-5. PMID: 21419674.
PMID: 11836287.
63. Cai XM, Wu J. The mind-tranquilizing and
56. Moghetti P, Castello R, Negri C, et al. menstruation-regulating method for
Metformin effects on clinical features, acupuncture treatment of delayed menstrual
endocrine and metabolic profiles, and cycle—a clinical controlled study. J Tradit
insulin sensitivity in polycystic ovary Chin Med 2009 Mar;29(1):35-8.
syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, PMID: 19514186.
placebo-controlled 6-month trial, followed
64. Vuorma S, Rissanen P, Aalto AM, et al.
by open, long-term clinical evaluation. J
Impact of patient information booklet on
Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000 Jan;85(1):139-
treatment decision—a randomized trial
46. PMID: 10634377.
among women with heavy menstruation.
57. Elkind-Hirsch K, Marrioneaux O, Bhushan Health Expect 2003 Dec;6(4):290-7.
M, et al. Comparison of single and PMID: 15040791.
combined treatment with exenatide and
65. Kennedy AD, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A, et al.
metformin on menstrual cyclicity in
Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on
overweight women with polycystic ovary
treatment choices, health outcomes, and
syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
costs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA
2008;93(7):2670-8. PMID: 18460557.
2002 Dec 4;288(21):2701-8.
58. Oner G, Muderris, II. Clinical, endocrine PMID: 12460093.
and metabolic effects of metformin vs N-
66. Protheroe J, Bower P, Chew-Graham C, et
acetyl-cysteine in women with polycystic
al. Effectiveness of a computerized decision
ovary syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
aid in primary care on decision making and
Reprod Biol 2011 Nov;159(1):127-31.
quality of life in menorrhagia: Results of the
PMID: 21831508.
MENTIP randomized controlled trial.
Medical Decision Making 2007;27(5):575-
84. PMID: 17898242.

ES-21
67. Vuorma S, Teperi J, Aalto AM, et al. A 77. Aktun H, Moroy P, Cakmak P, et al. Depo-
randomized trial among women with heavy Provera: use of a long-acting progestin
menstruation— impact of a decision aid on injectable contraceptive in Turkish women.
treatment outcomes and costs. Health Expect Contraception 2005 Jul;72(1):24-7.
2004 Dec;7(4):327-37. PMID: 15544685. PMID: 15964288.
68. Fraser IS, McCarron G, Markham R. A 78. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L.
preliminary study of factors influencing The effects of depot medroxyprogesterone
perception of menstrual blood loss volume. acetate and intrauterine device use on
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984 Aug fracture risk in Danish women.
1;149(7):788-93. PMID: 6380294. Contraception 2008 Dec;78(6):459-64.
PMID: 19014791.
69. Glucophage [package insert]. Princeton, NJ:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2009. 79. Rosenberg L, Zhang Y, Constant D, et al.
Bone status after cessation of use of
70. Chan KA, Truman A, Gurwitz JH, et al. A
injectable progestin contraceptives.
cohort study of the incidence of serious
Contraception 2007 Dec;76(6):425-31.
acute liver injury in diabetic patients treated
PMID: 18061699.
with hypoglycemic agents. Arch Intern Med
2003 Mar 24;163(6):728-34. 80. Sundstrom A, Seaman H, Kieler H, et al.
PMID: 12639207. The risk of venous thromboembolism
associated with the use of tranexamic acid
71. Byetta [package insert]. San Diego, CA:
and other drugs used to treat menorrhagia: a
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2011.
case-control study using the General
72. Dore DD, Bloomgren GL, Wenten M, et al. Practice Research Database. BJOG 2009
A cohort study of acute pancreatitis in Jan;116(1):91-7. PMID: 19016686.
relation to exenatide use. Diabetes Obes
81. Lethaby AE, Cooke I, Rees M. Progesterone
Metab 2011 Jun;13(6):559-66.
or progestogen-releasing intrauterine
PMID: 21320263.
systems for heavy menstrual bleeding.
73. Dore DD, Seeger JD, Arnold Chan K. Use Cochrane Database Syst Rev
of a claims-based active drug safety 2005(4):CD002126. PMID: 16235297.
surveillance system to assess the risk of
82. Loestrin 1/20 [package insert]. Pomona,
acute pancreatitis with exenatide or
NY: Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2009.
sitagliptin compared to metformin or
glyburide. Curr Med Res Opin 2009 83. Nordette [package insert]. Sellersville, PA:
Apr;25(4):1019-27. PMID: 19278373. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; 2010.
74. LeBlanc E, O'Connor E, Whitlock EP, et al. 84. Ortho Tri-Cyclen [package insert]. Raritan,
Screening for and Management of Obesity NJ: Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals,
and Overweight in Adults. Evidence Report Inc.; 2010.
No. 89. AHRQ Publication No. 11-05159-
85. Natazia [package insert]. Wayne, NJ: Bayer
EF-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for
HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2012.
Healthcare Research and Quality; Oct 2011.
86. Martinez F, Ramirez I, Perez-Campos E, et
75. Shyangdan DS, Royle P, Clar C, et al.
al. Venous and pulmonary
Glucagon-like peptide analogues for type 2
thromboembolism and combined hormonal
diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst
contraceptives. Systematic review and meta-
Rev 2011(10):CD006423. PMID: 21975753.
analysis. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health
76. Waugh N, Cummins E, Royle P, et al. Care 2012 Feb;17(1):7-29.
Newer Agents for Blood Glucose Control in PMID: 22239262.
Type 2 Diabetes (Supplement). London:
87. Tang H, Hunter T, Hu Y, et al. Cabergoline
National Institute for Health and Clinical
for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation
Excellence; 2009.
syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2012(2):CD008605. PMID: 22336848.

ES-22
88. Scholz H, Trenkwalder C, Kohnen R, et al. 97. Van Houdenhoven K, van Kaam KJ, van
Dopamine agonists for restless legs Grootheest AC, et al. Uterine perforation in
syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev women using a levonorgestrel-releasing
2011(3):CD006009. PMID: 21412893. intrauterine system. Contraception 2006
Mar;73(3):257-60. PMID: 16472566.
89. Bogazzi F, Manetti L, Raffaelli V, et al.
Cabergoline therapy and the risk of cardiac 98. Lidegaard O, Lokkegaard E, Jensen A, et al.
valve regurgitation in patients with Thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction
hyperprolactinemia: a meta-analysis from with hormonal contraception. N Engl J Med
clinical studies. J Endocrinol Invest 2008 2012 Jun 14;366(24):2257-66.
Dec;31(12):1119-23. PMID: 19246980. PMID: 22693997.
90. Rasmussen VG, Ostergaard K, Dupont E, et 99. Lidegaard O, Nielsen LH, Skovlund CW, et
al. The risk of valvular regurgitation in al. Risk of venous thromboembolism from
patients with Parkinson's disease treated use of oral contraceptives containing
with dopamine receptor agonists. Mov different progestogens and oestrogen doses:
Disord 2011 Apr;26(5):801-6. Danish cohort study, 2001-9. BMJ
PMID: 21671508. 2011;343:d6423. PMID: 22027398.
91. Mirena [package insert]. Wayne, NJ: Bayer 100. van Hylckama Vlieg A, Helmerhorst FM,
HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2009. Rosendaal FR. The risk of deep venous
thrombosis associated with injectable depot-
92. FDA. Statistics filing memorandum for a
medroxyprogesterone acetate contraceptives
supplemental NDA (Mirena).FDA; 2009.
or a levonorgestrel intrauterine device.
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Devel
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010
opmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResou
Nov;30(11):2297-300. PMID: 20798377.
rces/UCM245687.pdf. Accessed April 13,
2012. 101. French R, Van Vliet H, Cowan F, et al.
Hormonally impregnated intrauterine
93. Harrison-Woolrych M, Zhou L, Coulter D.
systems (IUSs) versus other forms of
Insertion of intrauterine devices: a
reversible contraceptives as effective
comparison of experience with Mirena and
methods of preventing pregnancy. Cochrane
Multiload Cu 375 during post-marketing
Database Syst Rev 2004(3):CD001776.
monitoring in New Zealand. N Z Med J
PMID: 15266453.
2003 Aug 8;116(1179):U538.
PMID: 14513085. 102. Marjoribanks J, Lethaby A, Farquhar C.
Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy
94. Zhou L, Harrison-Woolrych M, Coulter
menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst
DM. Use of the New Zealand Intensive
Rev 2006(2):CD003855. PMID: 16625593.
Medicines Monitoring Programme to study
the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine 103. Rott H. Thrombotic risks of oral
device (Mirena). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug contraceptives. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol
Saf 2003 Jul-Aug;12(5):371-7. 2012 Aug;24(4):235-40. PMID: 22729096.
PMID: 12899110.
104. Lucas PJ, Baird J, Arai L, et al. Worked
95. Paterson H, Clifton J, Miller D, et al. Hair examples of alternative methods for the
loss with use of the levonorgestrel synthesis of qualitative and quantitative
intrauterine device. Contraception 2007 research in systematic reviews. BMC Med
Oct;76(4):306-9. PMID: 17900442. Res Methodol 2007;7:4. PMID: 17224044.
96. van Grootheest K, Sachs B, Harrison- 105. Meclofenamate sodium [package insert].
Woolrych M, et al. Uterine perforation with Morgantown, WV: Mylan Pharmaceuticals,
the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine Inc.; 2006.
device: analysis of reports from four
106. Naprosyn [package insert]. South San
national pharmacovigilance centres. Drug
Francisco, CA: Genentech USA, Inc.; 2010.
Saf 2011 Jan 1;34(1):83-8.
PMID: 21142273. 107. Flurbiprofen tablet [package insert]. Detroit,
MI: Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories,
Inc.; 2007.

ES-23
108. Marjoribanks J, Proctor M, Farquhar C, et 113. Alshryda S, Sarda P, Sukeik M, et al.
al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for Tranexamic acid in total knee replacement: a
dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone
Rev 2010(1):CD001751. PMID: 20091521. Joint Surg Br 2011 Dec;93(12):1577-85.
PMID: 22161917.
109. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Gonzalez-Perez A,
Bueno H, et al. NSAID use selectively 114. Lethaby A, Farquhar C, Cooke I.
increases the risk of non-fatal myocardial Antifibrinolytics for heavy menstrual
infarction: a systematic review of bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
randomised trials and observational studies. 2000(4):CD000249. PMID: 11034679.
PLoS One 2011;6(2):e16780.
115. Naoulou B, Tsai MC. Efficacy of
PMID: 21347435.
tranexamic acid in the treatment of
110. Salvo F, Fourrier-Reglat A, Bazin F, et al. idiopathic and non-functional heavy
Cardiovascular and gastrointestinal safety of menstrual bleeding: A systematic review.
NSAIDs: a systematic review of meta- Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012
analyses of randomized clinical trials. Clin May;91(5):529-37. PMID: 22229782.
Pharmacol Ther 2011 Jun;89(6):855-66.
116. Sukeik M, Alshryda S, Haddad FS, et al.
PMID: 21471964.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the
111. FDA. New Drug Application: 22-430 use of tranexamic acid in total hip
(Tranexamic Acid) Summary Review.Center replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011
for Drug Evaluation and Research; 2009. Jan;93(1):39-46. PMID: 21196541.
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_d
ocs/nda/2009/022430s000sumr.pdf.
Accessed April 13, 2012.
112. Lysteda [package insert]. Parsippany, NJ:
Ferring Pharmaceutical; 2011.

ES-24
Introduction
Background
Condition
Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is among the most common of gynecologic complaints
from reproductive-age women in ambulatory care settings—of similar frequency to the number
seeking care for urinary tract infections and vaginitis. In the general population, AUB is
estimated to affect 11 to 13 percent of reproductive-age women. The prevalence of AUB
increases with age, reaching 24 percent in women aged 36 to 40.1,2 In addition to gynecologists,
all primary care practitioners including pediatricians, family physicians, advanced practice
nurses, and internists, will encounter the need to evaluate, treat, or refer women with bleeding-
related symptoms.3 Women generally present because the amount, timing, or other
characteristics of the bleeding have changed from their individual norm.
Population norms for menstrual bleeding, as established by 5th and 95th percentiles, are:4-7
• Frequency of menses within a 24 to 38 day window
• Regularity (cycle-to-cycle variation) within 2 to 20 days
• Duration of flow from 4 to 8 days
• Volume of blood loss from 5 to 80 ml
Symptoms outside this range or different from normal for the individual can become
problematic and deserve evaluation because they can warn of underlying conditions. Common
problems include worry about the cause, embarrassment if the bleeding includes flooding-type
bleeding with saturation of clothing, missed work and responsibilities, limitations of social
activities and exercise, decreases or changes in sexual activity, and frustration with costs of
sanitary protection.1,8 Collectively, the effects of troublesome bleeding reduce quality of life and
drive desire for information about causes and treatment options.1,8
There is not a clear consensus on the clinical evaluation of a patient presenting with
abnormal bleeding. Recommendations suggest that initial evaluation confirm the source and
timing of bleeding, and exclude certain architectural etiologies, cancer, coagulation defects, and
systemic disease. The 2011 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)
classification recommends a structured history followed by uterine evaluation.9 In the research
setting, the alkaline hematin method is the preferred technique for direct measurement of total
menstrual blood loss (MBL). The pictorial blood loss assessment chart is a semi-quantitative tool
for uniform reporting of bleeding as represented by the degree of saturation of sanitary pads and
tampons. Diagnostic tools and evaluation strategies are not within the scope of this review;10,11
however, the review captures the operational definitions used by researchers and addresses
applicability of the findings to contemporary practice.

Terminology
Nomenclature to classify symptomatic problem bleeding has evolved steadily over the past
several decades.12 Early classifications primarily used characteristics of the bleeding to group
women. Terms like menorrhagia (abnormally long or heavy menses) and metrorrhagia (bleeding
at irregular intervals) were often linked with timing (short or long intervals) and amount (heavy
or light) to infer whether or not regular and predictable ovulation was occurring and further
assign likely ovulatory or anovulatory status. These terms are generally applied without formal

1
documentation of ovulatory status. Furthermore, previously applied terms like “dysfunctional
uterine bleeding” also carried a variable element of recognition that the label was a diagnosis of
exclusion.12 The resulting challenge was that practitioners and researchers applied different
exclusions before selecting interventions or enrolling patients. Over time, differences in
terminology choice and in operational definitions have resulted in wide inconsistencies in
application of diagnostic terms.4,12-14
Recent international consensus recommendations, formally adopted by FIGO in 2010 and
published in 2011, more consistently align terminology by creating two major groupings (i.e.,
discrete structural vs. nonstructural) for causes of bleeding.9,15,16 The FIGO classification
includes nine categories of abnormal bleeding arranged according to the acronym PALM-
COEIN:9,16 four have objective visual criteria detected by imaging, biopsy, or pathology (i.e.,
PALM: polyps; adenomyosis; leiomyomata; and malignancy and hyperplasia) while another five
are not directly related to structural abnormalities (i.e., COEIN: coagulopathy; ovulatory
dysfunction; endometrial; iatrogenic; and not yet classified).
If we map the intended focus of this comparative effectiveness review (CER) to the FIGO
classification, we are addressing the COEIN groups that are characterized as “ovulatory
dysfunction” (AUB-O), “endometrial hemostatic dysfunction” (AUB-E), and “not yet classified”
(AUB-N) abnormal bleeding. However it is crucial to note that direct measures of ovulation are
not employed in most available literature and endometrial samples for classification are even
more rare, except when used to rule out malignancy. Indeed much remains to be explained about
the pathophysiology of the very common and problematic complaint of unpredictable and/or
heavy bleeding. In summary, the relevant population for this review includes nonpregnant
women from menarche to menopause who have had abnormal bleeding (scant or heavy) for 3
months or longer that is not attributed to structural abnormalities, coagulation defects, systemic
illnesses, or medications.
While some reviews further subdivide women experiencing AUB into age groups,17 such as
those near menarche and in the perimenopausal timeframe, we plan to retain an emphasis on
categorization. Women across the reproductive lifespan can have abnormal bleeding that arises
from ovulatory dysfunction or endometrial processes.18 While the underlying causes may vary,
for instance from lack of consistent regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis in teens
near the onset of menses, and from lack of ovarian reserve in perimenopausal women, the
treatment options overlap.3 We will report when research was done with an age-restricted
population but will otherwise cover all the relevant literature regardless of reproductive age or
reproductive history of participants.

Therapies
Current guidelines from professional societies including the American Congress of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists,19-22 the American Academy of Family Physicians,23 and the
National Institute for Clinical Excellence24 recommend medical therapy, including the
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
(NSAIDs), antifibrinolytics, combined oral contraceptives (COCs), and progestogens, as the
first-line treatment for irregular uterine bleeding and abnormal cyclic bleeding.
In a recently published research article,25 Matteson and colleagues examined the practice
patterns and attitudes from a U.S. sample of obstetricians and gynecologists regarding the
medical treatment of women with AUB. The authors reported that practicing obstetrician-
gynecologists most frequently selected COCs for the treatment of both irregular and abnormal

2
cyclic menstrual bleeding and that participants lacked an overall awareness of current evidence
on effectiveness of common treatment options for AUB.25 However, another recent publication26
reported that, that in conflict with recommendations, uterine-preserving surgical procedures were
the most common first-line treatment for women with heavy menstrual bleeding within a large
cohort from a national claims database of large employers.

Primary Care Treatment Options


Pharmacologic therapies to treat AUB in the ambulatory setting include estrogens,
progestogens, combination (estrogen and progestogen) hormonal formulations, NSAIDs,
antifibrinolytics, and progesterone-releasing intrauterine devices (IUDs). Medical interventions
are generally considered first-line treatment.27,28 Surgical intervention is usually reserved for
women with persistent bleeding that does not respond to medical therapy or for women who
have finished childbearing and do not wish to continue medical therapy indefinitely.2,23

LNG-IUS
A pooled analysis of data from five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported that the
LNG-IUS provided clinically and statistically significant sustained reductions in MBL.29 Locally
released progesterone from the IUD reduces growth of the uterine lining, minimizing the tissue
available to be shed during menstruation. IUDs are used as contraception by approximately 5
percent of women in the United States.30 Based on large-scale claims data, use of the LNG-IUS
increased 19-fold between 2002 and 2008 to 7.7 per 1000 women, becoming the most commonly
used IUD in the United States.31

NSAIDs
NSAIDs are commonly used to treat AUB (more recently termed AUB-E) because of the role
of prostaglandins in the pathogenesis of heavy menstrual bleeding. Higher levels of
prostaglandin E2 have been observed in the endometria of women with heavy menstrual
bleeding.32 Additional evidence points to an abnormal ratio of specific prostaglandins as a
contributing factor to problems with hemostasis.32 NSAIDs act to reduce prostaglandin synthesis
by inhibiting the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase and therefore reducing endometrial prostaglandin
levels leading to decreased potential for vasodilation and angiogenesis.33 Based on a limited
number of small studies, a 2007 Cochrane Review34 found that NSAIDs were superior to placebo
but less effective than tranexamic acid and LNG-IUS at reducing MBL.

TXA
TXA is an antifibrinolytic that slows the breakdown of fibrin in blood clots. By decreasing
the degradation of physiologic blood clots, blood flow from uterine vessels sealed by the clot is
decreased. Since it is not a hormonal agent and does not have contraceptive effects it may be
useful for women who desire a pregnancy or for whom hormonal treatment is contraindicated.
TXA appears to be well-tolerated and cost-effective, reducing blood loss considerably and
improving health related quality of life for women with menorrhagia.35

COCs
COCs are commonly used to manage abnormal bleeding associated with ovulation since they
work in part by superimposing an organized cycle and discourage thick growth of the uterine
lining. The American Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecologists 2010 Practice Bulletin for

3
noncontraceptive uses of hormonal contraceptives recommends COCs as a reasonable choice to
regulate and reduce menstrual bleeding, based on good and consistent scientific evidence.21
However, according to a 2009 Cochrane systematic review,36 there is insufficient evidence to
establish the effectiveness of the oral contraceptive pill compared with other medical therapies,
placebo, or no therapy for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.36 In a clinical review for
diagnosis and management of AUB,37 authors assert that COCs are likely beneficial for treatment
of anovulatory (i.e., acyclic) AUB but there is lack of good quality data to support their use in
abnormal cyclic bleeding.37 The COC is also known to cause abnormal bleeding patterns, with
breakthrough bleeding reported as one of the most common reasons for discontinuation of COC
use.38 Additional data are needed on the number needed to treat and the number needed to harm
for adverse effects.

Progestogens
During a normal cycle, the natural rise and fall of progesterone, which is produced by the
ovary after ovulation, has multiple biological effects on the endometrium. These include
“organization” that results in the coordinated withdrawal bleeding observed as the menses after
progesterone levels fall. Cyclic administration of progestogens in women with AUB is intended
to mimic natural production of progesterone in the luteal phase and then withdrawal, by
providing the agent for a number of days, typically 10 to 14, after which bleeding occurs. Other
methods of administration of progestogen, such as by long acting injection or oral contraceptive
pills that contain only a progestogen, exploit a different biologic property of progestogens. When
continuously administered, progestogens encourage endometrial quiescence and reduce growth
of the endometrium. In women with AUB, these effects can modulate problematic symptoms by
fostering endometrial stability and a relatively thin endometrium resulting in less bleeding. The
American Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecologists practice bulletins on management of
anovulatory bleeding and noncontraceptive uses of hormonal contraceptives note that
progestogens are an appropriate first-line choice for medical management of irregular bleeding
that results from lack of regular, predictable ovulation.19,21

Behavioral and Lifestyle Interventions


Diet and physical activity interventions have been proposed for irregular menstrual bleeding
because irregular menses often indicate irregular or absent ovulation. Obesity and metabolic
syndrome, including polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), are associated with increased risk of
anovulatory cycles. Trials that have achieved modest weight loss in infertile patients have
restored regular ovulatory function in a majority of women with obesity-related subfertility.39
Both aerobic and strength training as well as weight loss may improve blood sugar profiles and
reduce relative or frank insulin resistance, which are intermediates to restoring regular menses in
some women.

Complementary and Alternative Medicine


Initial literature scans suggested that there is an extremely limited body of literature on trials
of complementary and alternative medicine for AUB. Complementary and alternative medicine
based therapies are included as interventions of interest due to their increasing popularity among
patients and growing interest to clinicians.40

4
Scope and Key Questions
Scope of the Review
The relevant population for this review includes nonpregnant women from menarche to
menopause who have had AUB for 3 months or longer, that is not attributed to structural
abnormalities, coagulation defects, systemic illnesses, or medications.
The literature reflects various management options for women with AUB with conflicting
recommendations/summaries. Interventions of interest for this review include medical,
complementary and alternative medicine, and behavioral/lifestyle interventions. This review
does not consider surgical interventions for AUB, as surgical management is adequately covered
by other groups conducting systematic reviews.
This review is focused on the evidence available to inform selection of nonsurgical options to
treat AUB with an emphasis on interventions that are accessible to and within the scope of usual
practice for primary care practitioners in a clinical care setting. This means that while we did not
restrict literature review to studies conducted only in primary care settings, we did restrict the
review to include only those interventions that could be deployed in primary care. We address
abnormal bleeding that is chronic in nature, meaning the symptom has persisted for the majority
of the prior 3 months, and is of two primary and common types: (1) irregular in timing (i.e.,
acyclic); and (2) abnormal though cyclic. We explicitly defined eligibility criteria using a
PICOTS (population, intervention, comparator(s), outcome, timing, and setting) structure (Table
1).

Table 1. PICOTS
PICOTS Element Description
Nonpregnant women from menarche to menopause who have had abnormal bleeding for 3
months or longer whose bleeding is not caused by structural abnormalities, coagulation defects,
systemic disease, cancer, or medication.

Two specific subtypes of abnormal bleeding will be the focus:


• Irregular uterine bleeding: problem bleeding (frequent or infrequent) of 3 months or greater
Population:
duration, excluding regular cyclic/menstrual patterns of bleeding, fibroids, polyps,
adenomyosis, cancers, medication side effects, coagulation defects, and related systemic
disease.
• Abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding: problem bleeding of 3 months or greater duration, excluding
irregular and unpredictable patterns of bleeding, fibroids, polyps, adenomyosis, cancers,
medication side effects, coagulation defects, and related systemic disease.
• Medical therapies
o Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
o Antifibrinolytics
a o Oral hormone treatments (e.g., oral contraceptives, progestogens)
Interventions:
o Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system
o Vaginal ring contraceptive device
• Behavioral strategies (e.g., stress reduction, weight reduction, exercise)
• Complementary and alternative medicine therapies (e.g., acupuncture, herbal medicine)
Comparator: Direct comparison among interventions listed above or comparison to placebo.

5
Table 1. PICOTS (continued)
PICOTS Element Description
• Bleeding profile (e.g., amount, frequency, duration, pattern, symptom bother, hematocrit)
• Quality of life including both general and bleeding specific measures
• Pain related to bleeding
• Sexual function as reported by sexual function measures, general measures of sexual
activity, frequency and satisfaction
• Patient satisfaction with outcomes and acceptability of treatment
Outcomes:
• Fertility
• Time to conception
• Additional interventions including concurrent and consecutive surgical and nonsurgical
treatments

b
Harms (e.g., thromboembolic events, emotional side effects, weight gain, short- and long-
term harms)
Timing: Interventions initiated after symptoms present most months for 3 months or longer.
Setting: Any clinical care setting.
PICOTS = population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing, and setting
a
Excluding surgical interventions and procedures such as endometrial ablation.
b
Includes treatment-related adverse events (e.g., drug side effects); does not include consequences related to the failure to
adequately treat the symptom.

Key Questions
Key Question 1A (KQ1A)
What is the evidence for the effectiveness of medical, behavioral, and complementary and
alternative medicine interventions (e.g., hormonal treatment, weight loss, or acupuncture) for
improving short and long-term outcomes in women with irregular uterine bleeding?

Key Question 1B (KQ1B)


What is the evidence for the effectiveness of medical, behavioral, and complementary and
alternative medicine interventions (e.g., hormonal treatment, weight loss, or acupuncture) for
improving short and long-term outcomes in women with abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding?

Key Question 2 (KQ2)


What are the harms, including adverse events, associated with medical, behavioral, and
complementary and alternative medicine interventions (e.g., hormonal treatment, weight loss, or
acupuncture) in women with irregular uterine bleeding or abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding?

Analytic Framework
We developed the analytic framework (Figure 1) drawn from clinical expertise of Key
Informants and refined it with input from a Technical Expert Panel (TEP). The analytic
framework illustrates the population, interventions, outcomes, and adverse effects that guided the
literature search, study eligibility, screening, and synthesis.

6
Figure 1. Analytic framework

CAM = complementary and alternative medicine


Note: Numbers in circles represent Key Questions.

Organization of This Report


The Methods chapter describes our processes including our search strategies, inclusion and
exclusion criteria, approach to review of abstract and full publications, methods for extraction of
data into evidence tables, and compiling evidence. We also describe our approach to grading the
quality of the literature and assessing the strength of the evidence.
The Results Chapter presents the findings of the literature search and review of the evidence
by Key Question (KQ). When there are distinct populations in which the interventions have been
studied such as enrollment based on differing criteria, we discuss related data together. Within
KQs we present summary information in the order: devices, medications, lifestyle and behavior
interventions, and complementary and alternative medicine. Within a category such as
medication, we organize the results from greater number of studies to fewer, and presented the
results of placebo controlled trials before direct comparisons.
The final section discusses the results and enlarges on the methodologic considerations
relevant to each KQ. We also outline the current state of the literature and needs for future
research on management of AUB. We include a list of abbreviations and acronyms at the end of
the report followed by appendixes to provide further detail on our methods and the studies
assessed. The appendices are as follows:
• Appendix A Literature Search Strategies
• Appendix B Abstract Review Form (KQ1)
• Appendix C Abstract Review Form (KQ2)
• Appendix D Full-Text Review Form (KQ1)
• Appendix E Full-Text Review Form (KQ2)
• Appendix F Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool
• Appendix G Cochrane Risk of Bias Criteria
• Appendix H Thresholds for Quality Assessment
• Appendix I Risk of Bias and Quality Score for Individual Studies
• Appendix J Evidence Table
• Appendix K Reasons for Exclusion (KQ1)

7
• Appendix L Reasons for Exclusion (KQ2)
• Appendix M Labeled Indications for Drugs Included in Review
• Appendix N Harms from Package Inserts for Drugs Included in Review
• Appendix O Systematic Reviews
• Appendix P Ongoing Studies

8
Methods
The methods for this comparative effectiveness review (CER) follow those suggested in the
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Methods Guide for Effectiveness and
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews.41 The main sections in this chapter reflect the elements of
the protocol established for the CER; certain methods map to the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist.42

Topic Refinement and Review Protocol


The topic for this report was nominated by a health care professional using the Effective
Health Care Web site (http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/). Working from the nomination, we
drafted the initial Key Questions (KQs) and analytic framework and sought input from Key
Informants representing family medicine, generalist and subspecialty obstetrics and gynecology,
and midwifery. Key Informants uniformly stressed the importance of terminology and of
establishing clear and distinct categories of women for whom the review is intended to apply and
suggested framing the review from the vantage point of a primary care provider or specialist who
is at the earliest stage of management of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), which is typically
nonsurgical management. KQs were refined to reflect the feedback from Key Informants and
address gaps in existing evidence reviews and knowledge base about management of AUB.
After review from AHRQ, the KQs and analytic framework were posted online for public
comment. We received no comments during the public posting phase. We prepared final KQs
and resubmitted them to AHRQ for review. We identified Technical Experts on the topic to
provide assistance during the project. The Technical Expert Panel (TEP) included individuals
with expertise in bleeding abnormalities, nomenclature and classification of AUB, and lead
authors of ongoing reviews of surgical interventions. The TEP included five members serving as
technical or clinical experts. To ensure robust, scientifically relevant work, we called on the TEP
to review and provide comments as our work progressed. TEP members participated in
conference calls and discussions through e-mail to:
• Refine the analytic framework and KQs;
• Discuss the preliminary assessment of the literature, including inclusion/exclusion
criteria;
• Provide input on the information and domains included in evidence tables;

Literature Search Strategy


Search Strategy
Databases
We searched the following databases: MEDLINE® (PubMed interface), the Cumulative
Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL®), and Embase. All search results were
limited to English language. Searches were further restricted from 1980 forward in order to
ensure literature was relevant to current secular trends in practice as well as available treatment
strategies. We carried out hand searches of the reference lists of recent systematic reviews
related to management of AUB and the reference lists of included publications. Searches were
executed between September 2011 and June 2012.

9
Search Terms
Each search strategy used a combination of subject headings (i.e., controlled vocabulary) and
keywords appropriate for each database (Appendix A). The search strategies included terms
related to AUB, along with drug and therapy terms relevant to the topic and focus of Key
Question 1A (KQ1A) and Key Question 1B (KQ1B). For Key Question 2 (KQ2), we conducted
a second, separate search in MEDLINE (PubMed interface), using controlled vocabulary and
keywords focusing on adverse effects and harms associated with those drugs and treatments from
our KQ1A and KQ1B included studies. We also employed a combination of subject headings
and keywords to narrow retrieval to desired study types; for KQ1A and KQ1B, this included
terms related to randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and for KQ2, terms geared toward also
retrieving cohort and postmarketing surveillance studies.

Supplementary Information for KQ2


To further assess KQ2, we searched Internet resources to identify current research and
regulatory information related to adverse effects and harms specific to those drugs and therapies
from KQ1A and KQ1B included publications, with the term harm referring to any negative
psychological, physical, or health system consequence associated with the intervention being
studied. These searches were executed between January and March 2012. The Scientific
Resource Center invited manufacturers of drugs from our included studies to provide Scientific
Information Packets.
For each included intervention, we conducted searches of the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) database of approved drugs (Drugs@FDA) and DailyMed to locate the most recent label
information, determine the approval date, ascertain therapeutically equivalent drugs, and find
other relevant information related to harms. For those drugs no longer marketed or unavailable in
the United States, label information (including indications and usage, and harms) was also
retrieved from the regulatory agencies of other countries where the drug is approved (e.g.,
HealthCanada's Drug Product Database), drug information databases (e.g., Micromedex® and
LexiComp®), and manufacturer or pharmaceutical company Web sites. Additionally, we
searched the FDA's safety information and adverse reporting Web site (MedWatch) to verify the
most recent changes to label information were included in our harms data.
To supplement the harms data extracted from package inserts and relevant studies, we
adapted our primary PubMed search strategy to identify systematic reviews and meta analyses
examining the therapeutic agents identified in our analysis of the literature for KQ1, limiting to
items published since 2005.
To ascertain current and ongoing research, we searched clinicaltrials.gov with topic
keywords (e.g., “abnormal uterine bleeding”, “menorrhagia”, “heavy menstrual bleeding”),
looked at both recruiting and completed studies, and again focused on those drugs and therapies
from KQ1A and KQ1B included publications.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria


To be considered for inclusion, studies had to explicitly define and describe the study
population, the interventions, and outcomes.
For this CER, the population of interest included women with symptomatic cyclic or
irregular uterine bleeding (Table 2). We excluded studies of women with AUB caused by
coagulation defects, systemic disease (e.g., thyroid disease), structural abnormalities (e.g.,

10
fibroids, polyps), cancer, or medication side effects. Studies that included patients with AUB of
mixed or ill-defined etiologies were reviewed for evaluable data from patients meeting the
description of the population of interest. For KQ1A we included studies of women with
polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) if the patient baseline and outcome data included
information on cycle regularity. We excluded studies of women with infertility if the primary
treatment goal was conception.

Table 2. Definitions of eligible patient populations


Patient group Description
Problem bleeding (frequent or infrequent) of 3 months or greater duration, excluding
Irregular uterine bleeding regular cyclic/menstrual patterns of bleeding, fibroids, polyps, adenomyosis, cancers,
medication side effects, coagulation defects, and related systemic disease.
Problem bleeding of 3 months or greater duration, excluding irregular and
Abnormal cyclic uterine
unpredictable patterns of bleeding, fibroids, polyps, adenomyosis, cancers, medication
bleeding
side effects, coagulation defects, and related systemic disease.

To be considered for inclusion, clinical research studies had to evaluate a nonsurgical


intervention. For KQ1 and KQ2 we included data from controlled clinical trials (e.g., RCTs)
designed to evaluate an intervention or treatment strategy for individuals from the population of
interest. For KQ2, we also included data from uncontrolled observational studies, namely high-
quality, large cohort studies, postmarketing surveillance studies, and registries/databases, with a
population of 1,600 or more patients or records to capture information on adverse events or other
harms.43 We determined that a minimum sample size of 1,600 was needed in order to reliably
detect harms with an estimated prevalence of 1 percent. We did not specify a minimal population
size for KQ1. Several factors, including varying prevalence of cyclic and irregular patterns of
bleeding and the large number of interventions under consideration for this review, make it
difficult to reliably establish a minimum sample size for evaluating treatment effectiveness.
To balance resources and focus on literature of most immediate relevance to primary care
practice in the United States, we excluded papers that were not published in English.44

Study Selection
We developed individual abstract and full-text screening forms for KQ1 and KQ2
(Appendixes B, C, D and E). We revised the forms following testing by the team. The forms
were adapted for use in the Web-based systematic review product, DistillerSR (Evidence
Partners, Ottawa, Canada).
We conducted screening in two phases: abstract and full-text screening. Publications were
promoted to full-text review when one reviewer indicated that the publication met all inclusion
criteria or when the title and abstract did not provide adequate information to make a
determination. Two reviewers independently reviewed each publication at the full-text screening
phase. Discordant classifications were resolved in team meetings including senior investigators.

Quality (Risk of Bias) Assessment of Individual Studies


Two senior team members independently assessed quality of the included studies;
disagreements were resolved through discussion or third party adjudication as needed. We
recorded quality assessments in tables, summarizing each study.
We used the Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews41 and
the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool45 (Appendix F), an existing tool with established validity and

11
reliability, to assess methodological quality of included studies. This tool includes criteria for
judging risk of bias for specific elements from five fundamental domains: sequence generation,
allocation concealment, blinding, outcome data, and selective reporting (Appendix G) in RCTs.
From these domains an overall assessment of risk of bias was calculated based on prespecified
thresholds for modified quality assessment criteria from the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) Tool
(Appendix H). The overall risk of bias assessment was then expressed as one of three final study
quality ratings: studies assessed as having a high risk of bias were categorized as “poor” quality
studies; studies having a medium risk of bias were categorized as “fair” quality studies; and
studies assessed as low risk of bias were categorized as “good” quality studies.
We assessed quality for the included studies that addressed KQ1 only. For KQ2, we sought
evidence from varied sources; it was not possible to systematically assess the quality of the
evidence related to harms. A summary of all component items and overall risk of bias/quality
score for each included study is provided in Appendix I.

Data Extraction
We created uniform evidence tables to extract data and facilitate data synthesis. We collected
those data related to population characteristics, type of abnormal bleeding, intervention
characteristics, and outcomes including harms.
We evaluated the ability to capture data across publications about candidate effect modifiers
and confounders of treatment response and uniformly extracted information about candidates
including age, body mass index, parity, and smoking status. When available we also collected
current and prior contraception, perimenopausal status, fibroid status, and comorbidities
including diabetes and PCOS. The final evidence tables are provided in Appendix J.

Data Synthesis
A meta-analysis was not feasible for this review. Few studies had comparable treatment
doses, interval, length of treatment, or duration of followup. Among those that did, the ability to
aggregate data was limited by differences in outcomes measures which included measures of
blood loss from sanitary product collection, and self-report using scoring systems including
standardized pictorial systems.
For regularity of bleeding no two measures of outcome were the same. We provide a
narrative synthesis of the available data from original research studies of acceptable quality for
nonsurgical treatment of AUB.46 We group findings and summary tables by KQ, intervention,
and outcomes.

Strength of the Body of Evidence


The strength of evidence evaluation is stipulated in the Methods Guide for Effectiveness and
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews.41,47 The guide emphasizes the following four major
domains: risk of bias (low, medium, high); consistency (inconsistency not present, inconsistency
present, unknown or not applicable); directness (direct, indirect); and precision (precise,
imprecise) of the evidence. Risk of bias was derived from the quality assessment of the
individual studies that addressed the KQ and specific outcomes under consideration.
We used explicit criteria for rating the overall strength of the evidence on each intervention
into qualitative categories (e.g., low, moderate, high, and insufficient). We used established
concepts of the quantity of evidence (e.g., numbers of studies, aggregate ending-sample sizes),

12
the quality of evidence (i.e., from the quality ratings on individual articles), directness of the
outcomes for informing the KQs, and the coherence or consistency of findings across similar and
dissimilar studies and in comparison to known or theoretically sound ideas of clinical or
behavioral knowledge. For this CER, overall strength of evidence for each intervention was
made based upon a qualitative consideration of the assessment for each domain.
We assessed the overall strength of evidence rating based on the assessments for the
individual domains for cycle regularity (KQ1A) and menstrual blood loss (MBL) reduction
KQ1B. Data from studies that were considered to be fair or good quality were included in the
assessments. Poor quality studies were identified but not included in the assessment of strength
of evidence. For KQ2, we did not rate of strength of evidence because a fully inclusive
assessment of harms could not be completed for each of the 12 interventions that have been
widely studied in populations that lack direct applicability to this report.
The overall strength of evidence was graded as “high”, “moderate”, “low”, or “insufficient”
(Table 3).47 When no studies were available for an outcome or comparison of interest, or if the
available evidence was weak (i.e. from studies with high risk of bias) we graded the evidence as
insufficient.
Two senior investigators independently graded the body of evidence and final assignment
was reviewed with the project team. We achieved alignment through group discussion with
careful attention to application of consistent standards across each area item being graded.

Table 3. Strength of evidence grades and definitions


Grade Definition
We are very confident that the estimate of effect lies close to the true effect for this outcome.
High
The body of evidence has few or no deficiencies. We believe that the findings are stable.
We are moderately confident that the estimate of effect lies close to the true effect for this
Moderate outcome. The body of evidence has some deficiencies. We believe that the findings are likely
to be stable, but some doubt remains.
We have limited confidence that the estimate of effect lies close to the true effect for this
outcome. The body of evidence has major or numerous deficiencies (or both). We believe that
Low
additional evidence is needed before concluding either that the findings are stable or that the
estimate of effect is close to the true effect.
We have no evidence, we are unable to estimate an effect, or we have no confidence in the
Insufficient estimate of effect for this outcome. No evidence is available or the body of evidence has
unacceptable deficiencies, precluding judgment.

Applicability
We assessed applicability of the results gathered from the literature to the population of
women with abnormal cyclic and irregular uterine bleeding according to EPC methods
guidance.48 Assessments of applicability were done to account for any factors limiting the ability
to apply interventions to other populations or other settings, such as inadequate description of the
intervention or failure to report followup data.
Using the patient, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing, and setting (PICOTS)
framework, we identified factors that may limit the applicability of individual research studies.
We summarized the applicability of the body of evidence and described key elements from the
PICOTS framework that characterize the applicability of a body of studies.

13
Peer Review and Public Commentary
Experts in reproductive endocrinology and primary care treatment of women were invited to
provide external peer review. The draft report was posted for 4 weeks to elicit public comment.
We addressed all reviewer comments by revising the text as appropriate. Responses to peer and
public review comments will be listed in the disposition of comments report. This report will be
available on the AHRQ Web site 3 months after the posting of this final CER.

14
Results
Introduction
This chapter presents the results of the systematic review of the literature on primary care
management of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). We present findings for Key Question 1
(KQ1) beginning with an overview of the content of the literature as a whole, followed by results
and detailed analysis organized first by studies addressing irregular uterine bleeding (KQ1A) and
then by studies addressing abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding (KQ1B). When there are distinct
populations in which the interventions have been studied such as enrollment based on differing
criteria, we discuss related data together. Within KQs we present summary information in the
order: devices, medications, lifestyle and behavioral interventions, and complementary and
alternative medicine. Within a category such as medication, we organize the results from greater
number of studies to fewer, and presented the results of placebo controlled trials before direct
comparisons. These analyses are followed by review of the studies and supplemental information
addressing KQ2, which pertains to harms associated with the interventions identified for KQ1.
Studies also are described in summary tables, generally organized to present particular
common outcomes, like change in volume of bleeding, in a single summary in the relevant
section of text. Details on quality assessment and individual components of the quality scoring
for individual studies can be found in Appendix I. Information about the overall strength of
evidence supporting the effectiveness of specific interventions (or lack of utility) is summarized
by related outcomes in the Discussion.

Results of Literature Searches


Searches identified 1,775 titles and abstracts for screening for KQ1. From this broad
screening, we reviewed the publication abstracts and identified 219 publications as potentially
eligible for inclusion. Following a review of the full text, we identified 39 studies described in 41
publications that met the predetermined criteria for inclusion. Publications from 10 studies
addressed KQ1A. Thirty-one publications from 29 studies addressed KQ1B. Overall 6 of these
studies were rated as good quality, 10 as fair, and 23 as poor with regard to risk of bias in the
findings. Details of the scoring of individual publications are included in Appendix I.
We conducted a separate search and screening process for KQ2. We identified 2,730 titles
and abstracts for screening. Of these, 788 references were promoted for full-text review. Using
predefined criteria, we found 25 publications that were eligible for inclusion. We received 4 of
17 requested industry packets and obtained package inserts for each KQ1 included drug
intervention. See Figures 2 (KQ1) and 3 (KQ2) for a diagram of literature search and screening.
The complete list of excluded papers and exclusion reasons is provided in Appendix K for
KQ1 and in Appendix L for KQ2.

15
Figure 2. Flow diagram of literature search and screening (KQ1)

KQ = Key Question; RCT = randomized controlled trial


a
After duplicates removed.
b
Total does not equal number excluded as publications could be excluded for multiple reasons.

16
Figure 3. Flow diagram of literature search and screening (KQ2)

KQ1 = Key Question 1; LNG-IUS = levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system; TXA = tranexamic acid; CVR = contraceptive
vaginal ring
a
Total does not equal number excluded as publications could be excluded for multiple reasons.
b
Numbers do not tally as papers could include data on harms for more than one intervention.

17
Description of Included Studies
Included studies evaluated 12 different interventions including: levonorgestrel-releasing
intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), combined oral
contraceptives (COCs), tranexamic acid (TXA), contraceptive vaginal ring, metformin,
exenatide, progestogens, cabergoline, lifestyle/behavioral changes, acupuncture, and decision
aids using at least one comparator or placebo arm. Table 4 includes a complete list of the
medications from the included studies. Twenty-one studies were head-to-head comparisons and
14 of the included studies established intervention efficacy by comparison to placebo. Four
studies compared the intervention to usual or existing care. The majority of studies (29 studies
reported in 31 publications) included in this review recruited women with complaints of
abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding (KQ1B). Ten of the included studies targeted women with
irregular uterine bleeding (KQ1A). Fourteen studies (36 percent) included some measure of
patient reported outcome. Sixteen studies (41 percent) included some measure of symptom
resolution or normalization.
The duration of the studies included in this review was generally short. Studies addressing
KQ1A had a duration of 6 months or less with most (7/10) lasting 3 to 4 months. For KQ1B,
study duration ranged from 2 cycles to 2 years. The majority of the studies (22/29) evaluating an
intervention for abnormal cyclic bleeding lasted 6 months or less. Two studies that compared the
effectiveness of LNG-IUS with COC lasted for 1 year. Of the two studies on the use of decision
aids, one included a 1-year followup and the other included a 2-year followup.
We did not identify publications that explicitly focused on reducing heavy menstrual blood
loss (MBL) in the context of irregular menses, especially menses with extended intervals
between episodes of bleeding. The publications included for KQ1A are focused exclusively on
irregular bleeding patterns, most often oligomenorrhea (fewer cycles than normal across
months). Studies that met the criteria for inclusion for KQ1A evaluated progestogens (1 study),49
COCs (1 study),50 metformin (4 studies),51-53,54 exenatide (1 study),53 cabergoline (1 study),55 diet
(1 study),56 and exercise (1 study),57 and acupuncture (2 studies).57,58 These total to more than 10
since several were direct comparisons. Two studies were good quality,50,55 2 were fair
quality,51,58 and 6 were poor quality.49,52-54,56,57
For KQ1B, most of the included studies evaluated LNG-IUS (7 studies),59-65 NSAIDs (13
studies)63,66-77 or TXA (7 studies).66,71,77-81 We identified 5 studies59,61,68,82,83 that evaluated the
use of COCs for the management of AUB and 1 study of the contraceptive vaginal ring.84 We
found 3 studies85-87 that evaluated decision aids for the management of AUB. Included studies
evaluated the effect of these interventions on MBL, quality of life, menstrual cycle patterns, and
other clinical and functional outcomes. Among the most common outcome metrics was change
in MBL expressed as a percent. This was typically reported as a comparison of post-treatment
blood loss to baseline. The alkaline hematin method and the pictorial blood loss assessment chart
score were used to measure MBL. The alkaline hematin method, the current gold standard for
estimating MBL, requires women to collect their used feminine hygiene products; consequently,
it is rarely used outside of a research setting.88,89 The pictorial blood loss assessment chart score
is a practical, semi quantitative method of estimating MBL, in which women indicate the type of
product used and the degree of saturation using a chart for guiding classification.90-92
For KQ2, we identified 23 publications reporting on harms of the included interventions. We
also reviewed and summarized harms reported in the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from
KQ1 and from the package inserts for all products and prescription interventions included in
KQ1.

18
Table 4. Medications from studies included in the CER
Medication Brand Name
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
Mirena®
system
Contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing®
Antifibrinolytic Agents
Tranexamic acid, oral Lysteda®
Combined Oral Contraceptives, Oral
Estradiol valerate and dienogest, oral Natazia®
Ethinyl estradiol (0.03 mg) and
Nordette®, Altavera®, Levora®, Marlissa®, Portia® 28
levonorgestrel (0.15 mg), oral
Ethinyl estradiol (0.20 mg) and
Loestrin® 21 1/20, Junel® 1/20, Microgestin® 1/20, Minestrin® 1/20
norethindrone acetate (1.0 mg), oral
Norgestimate ethinyl estradiol Ortho Tri-Cyclen®, Tri-Sprintec®, Tri-Previfem®, MonoNessa®, Ortho Tri-
(triphasic), oral Cyclen® Lo, Ortho-Cyclen®, Sprintec®, TriNessa®
Progestogens
Gynorest®
Dydrogesterone, oral
International brand names: Dabroston, Dufaston, Duphaston®, Terolut
Medroxyprogesterone acetate,
Depo-Provera® CI, Depo-subQ Provera 104
injectable suspension
Medroxyprogesterone acetate, oral Provera®
Norethisterone/norethindrone, oral Aygestin®
Progesterone, vaginal gel Crinone®
Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
Flurbiprofen, oral Ansaid®
Meclofenamate Meclomen®
Mefenamic acid, oral Ponstel®
Naprosyn®, Anaprox® DS, Anaprox®, Naprosyn® Suspension, EC-
Naproxen sodium, oral
Naprosyn®, Various OTC brands
Other
Cabergoline, oral Dostinex®
Exenatide, injection Byetta®
International brand names: Altodor, Dicinone, Dicynene, Dicynone, Eselin®,
Ethamsylate, etamsylate
Ethamsyl, Hemo 141, Hemoced, Impedil
Metformin hydrochloride, oral Glucophage®, Glucophage XR®, Fortamet®, Glumetza®

KQ1A. Management of Irregular Uterine Bleeding


Description of Included Studies
As noted in the description of the overall literature yield for this review, we did not identify
publications that explicitly focused on mitigating the heaviness of irregular uterine bleeding.
Symptoms like gushing or soaking type bleeding commonly occur in the context of irregular
menses, especially menses with extended intervals between episodes of bleeding. The
publications available to be included for this KQ focused on improving the regularity of bleeding
and enrolled participants with bleeding categorized by the research teams as “dysfunctional
uterine bleeding” or irregular bleeding with oligomenorrhea (i.e., fewer cycles than normal).
Studies were included whether or not participants reported menorrhagia (heavy bleeding) as
long as the authors reported on the use of the intervention to improve cycle regularity. We did

19
not review the literature on infertility or subfertility resulting from absent or infrequent
ovulation, even when it included cycle regularity data. Interventions for fertility treatment in this
group, like clomiphene, are distinct from those for symptom management used in primary care
settings. Likewise research populations of infertile women likely lack comparability to the
broader population of women whose primary complaint is irregular cycles and may include
women with subfertility who are seeking treatment for problem bleeding.
Overall 10 studies addressed restoring menstrual regularity in those with irregular uterine
bleeding. Three were conducted in the United States,50,53,56 two in Italy,52,55 two in Turkey,49,54
and one each in China,58 Sweden,57 and the United Kingdom.51 The studies ranged in size from
23 to 201 participants and examined the efficacy of metformin (4 studies),51-54 acupuncture (2
studies),57,58 diet and exercise (1 study),56 cabergoline (1 study),55 progestogen (1 study),49 and
triphasic birth control pills (1 study).50 Two studies were classified as good quality,50,55 two as
fair quality,51,58 and six as poor quality49,52-54,56,57 with respect to risk of bias in the assessment of
effectiveness of the intervention of improving cycle regularity. Details of quality scoring for
individual publications are included in Appendix I.
Overall these 10 studies, that included women with irregular uterine bleeding, offer
incomplete evidence that medications, possibly diet and exercise, and potentially acupuncture
may offer some benefit for establishing more predictable menstrual bleeding patterns. They
provide no direct evidence about the ability to reduce the heaviness of bleeding or the symptoms
and bother associated with intermittent heavy bleeding because quantity of bleeding and patient-
reported outcomes other than timing of bleeding were not among the outcomes for these trials.

Key Points
• Metformin improves regularity of menstrual bleeding in women with polycystic ovarian
syndrome (PCOS) when evaluated over months. When combined with exenatide, a newer
injectable drug typically used for type 2 diabetes, the effect is greater than either
metformin or exenatide alone over 6 months of followup in a single study of 60 women.
• In a very preliminary investigation of cabergoline, a drug typically used for elevated
prolactin, three of eight women with PCOS and normal prolactin levels resumed regular
cycles while none did in the six-person placebo group.
• Both oral dydrogesterone and vaginal micronized progesterone gel administered on a
cyclic schedule had comparable influence on normalizing timing of menses.
• Triphasic norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol birth control pills provided excellent or good
control of bleeding abnormalities in 68 percent of those taking active pills compared with
26 percent of those receiving placebo.
• In adolescents both a low-fat, calorie-restricted diet or a carbohydrate-restricted diet
along with 30 minutes of anaerobic exercise 3 days a week resulted in more regular
menses if the individual lost weight.
• Acupuncture improved cycle regularity in two trials, one in which both acupuncture and
exercise (30 minutes 3 days each week) resulted in improvements by 32 weeks compared
with placebo. In this study acupuncture provided more rapid relief by 16 weeks than
exercise. Another poorly-described study found more individuals “cured” using needle
placement specific for mind tranquilizing and menstruation promotion compared with
those for delayed menses.
• In summary a number of available interventions appropriate for use in primary care
settings have preliminary evidence of effectiveness for increasing the regularity of

20
menses. Only metformin consistently demonstrated benefit across studies and each of
these studies enrolled women with oligomenorrhea and PCOS.
• Overall, literature is absent to inform choice of any of these modalities over another.

Detailed Synthesis
Medical Therapies
Seven studies, two conducted in the United States, two in Italy, two in Turkey, and one in the
United Kingdom examined medical therapies to improve menstrual interval.49-55 Five included
women who met detailed criteria for PCOS51-55 and two included women classified as having
dysfunctional uterine bleeding by clinical criteria that are not tightly operationalized but include
extended intervals between cycles.49,50 We first present the findings for the RCTs that enrolled
women with irregular uterine bleeding and then the data from PCOS trials.

Medical Therapies for Irregular Uterine Bleeding


Two studies, one comparing a triphasic oral contraceptive with placebo and one comparing
vaginal micronized progesterone (8% gel) with oral dydrogesterone, evaluated medical therapy
in women with irregular uterine bleeding (Table 5).

Table 5. Primary outcomes of medical interventions for irregular uterine bleeding


Author, Year
Country Comparison Groups (n) Key Cycle Control Outcomes
Quality
• Study population included women with oligomenorrhea,
menorrhagia, menometrorrhagia, and polymenorrhea.
G1: Triphasic norgestimate- • Investigators classified resolution of bleeding abnormalities
Davis et al., 200050 from diaries as excellent or good in 41.2% and 26.8% of
ethinyl estradiol oral
United States those receiving intervention and 10.5% and 15.8% of those
contraceptive (101)
Good on placebo (p<0.001).
G2: Placebo (100)
• Women’s self-assessments were similar to the
investigators’ and indicated better outcomes in those
receiving the oral contraceptive (p<0.001).
• Both groups achieved comparable regularity of bleeding
G1: Vaginal micronized
49 patterns in the 3 treated cycles observed: 92.6%, 88.9%,
Karakus et al., 2009 progesterone, 90 mg every
and 92.6% in the vaginal group, and 81.5%, 88.9%, and
Turkey other night for 10 days (34)
85.2% in oral group (p>0.5).
Poor G2: Oral dydrogesterone, 10
mg daily for 10 days (35) • Satisfaction with intervention was comparable between
groups (p=0.5).

Triphasic Oral Contraceptives


Oral contraceptives over-ride the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis coordination of ovarian
sex steroid production. By providing exogenous estrogen and progestogen, oral contraceptives
are intended to regulate cycle control pharmacologically. A single RCT50 evaluated a triphasic
norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol preparation compared with placebo among women classified as
having dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Triphasic oral contraceptives have three distinct levels of
progestogen (norgestimate in this study) and estrogen (ethinyl estradiol) over the course of the 21
days of active pills in a typical 28 day oral contraceptive pill pack, compared with monophasic
pills which have the same hormone level provided across all 21 days of active pills.
The researchers randomized 201 women at a 1:1 ratio to receive either the study drug or
placebo for three 28-day cycles. Data from 192 patients were included in the outcome analyses.

21
The study enrolled participants with a variety of menstrual concerns including heavy periods,
frequent periods, irregular and heavy periods, and rare episodes of bleeding. Investigators did not
systematically evaluate for the presence of disorders of hemostasis. The data are provided in
aggregate for all participants regardless of their bleeding pattern or primary symptom. The study
drug regimen included 0.18 mg norgestimate and 0.035 mg ethinyl estradiol for days 1 to 7,
0.215 mg norgestimate and 0.035 mg ethinyl estradiol for days 8 to 14, 0.25 mg norgestimate
and 0.035 mg ethinyl estradiol for days 15 to 21, and inactive tablets for days 22 to 28. The
primary efficacy outcomes included the investigator and the subject’s overall assessment of
improvement in AUB symptoms.
Both the investigator assessments and subject assessments of symptom improvement
indicated significant (p<0.001) improvement in cycle control in the study drug group compared
with the placebo group. The investigator assessed some level of subject improvement (fair, good,
or excellent) in 81.4 percent of triphasic norgestimate ethinyl estradiol-treated patients as
compared with 35.8 percent of placebo-treated patients; the proportions of subject-rated
improvement were similar to investigator ratings. Among several quality of life measures
assessed, improvement over baseline was only observed in physical functioning in the triphasic
norgestimate ethinyl estradiol-treated patients compared with their placebo-treated counterparts.
This good quality, multicenter, industry-sponsored trial was conducted in the United States
and appears to have been conducted to expand the indication for a particular brand name to
include cycle control for women with dysfunctional uterine bleeding. The trial was published in
2000 and was the only study identified that included women with problem bleeding from
irregular and closely spaced or rare menses.

Progestogens
Prior to menses without ovulation the sequence of biologic events that includes a rise in
progesterone and then a precipitous drop does not occur. This is because the literal site of
ovulation, the corpus luteum, is responsible for production of progesterone. In the absence of
conception, the corpus luteum involutes and ceases production. This rise and fall in progesterone
has multiple biological effects on the endometrium which include “organization” that results in a
coordinated withdrawal bleed, the menses, after progesterone levels fall. Administration of a
progestogen is intended therapeutically to mimic natural production of progesterone and then
withdrawal.
A single RCT sought to compare the efficacy of oral dydrogesterone, 10 mg twice daily for
10 days starting on cycle day 15, compared with vaginal micronized progesterone (8 percent gel)
applied every other evening from cycle days 17 to 27. Both groups had improvements in cycle
regularity compared with their baseline (p value not provided).49 Regular bleeding patterns were
observed in more than 89 percent of the three treated cycles in the vaginal administration group,
and more than 82 percent of the oral group. Improvement in bleeding patterns was comparable
for both groups (p>0.5). Satisfaction with the intervention was also comparable across groups.

Medical Therapies for PCOS


Three medical therapies (metformin, exenatide, and cabergoline) were evaluated in five trials
that enrolled women with PCOS (Table 6). We present the findings from the study of
cabergoline followed by findings from four studies that evaluated metformin or exenatide. In
summary, each of the studies of medical therapies reported findings that favor the medical
intervention for establishing more predictable cycles in women with PCOS. No medication was
effective for all participants though several exceeded 80 percent of those on active therapy

22
achieving improvements in cycle regularity. The number and size of studies is small and overall
the quality is fair to poor with one small pilot study of good quality design and implementation
but limited by lack of statistical power.

Table 6. Primary outcomes of medical interventions for irregular uterine bleeding in women with
PCOS
Author, Year
Country Comparison Groups (n) Key Cycle Control Outcomes
Quality
3 of 8 women receiving cabergoline resumed regular cycles.
55 5 of 8 had onset of menses within 32 to 37 days of treatment
Paoletti et al., 1995 G1: Cabergoline, 0.5 mg
initiation.
Italy each week (8)
Among women receiving placebo 3 had no menses and 3 had
Good G2: Placebo (6)
menstrual cycles that were widely separated in time. (No
statistical comparisons are provided.)
Mean time to first ovulation was shorter with metformin (23.6
51 days) than placebo (41.8 days) (p=0.02).
Fleming et al., 2002 G1: Metformin, 850 mg twice
Total ovulation events where higher among women receiving
United Kingdom a day (45)
metformin over 16 weeks (p=0.59).
Fair G2: Placebo (47)
Pregnancy rate not different among those who desired to
conceive (4 of 23 in G1 and 1 of 19 in G2).
Oner and Muderriss G1: Metformin, 500 mg 3 Menstrual regularity improved significantly (p≤0.05) from
201154 times a day (50) baseline in G1 (from 17% to 47%) and G2 (from 29% to 53%).
Turkey G2: N-acetyl-cysteine, 600 There was no significant difference in improvement from
Poor mg 3 times a day (50) baseline between G1 and G2.
G1: Exenatide, 10 mcg twice
Elkind-Hirsch et al., The combination of exenatide and metformin was superior to
a day (20)
200853 either medication alone for improving menstrual frequency.
G2: Metformin, 500 mg twice
United States Women taking both had 80% of menses predicted for a
a day (20)
Poor normal pattern, compared with 57% (G1) and 49% (G2).
G3: Both (20)
Moghetti et al., Study enrolled women with fewer than 6 menses per year and
G1: Metformin, 500 mg twice
200052 a followed for 26 weeks.
a day (11)
Italy a “Menstrual frequency” improved with metformin compared
G2: Placebo (12)
Poor with placebo (p=0.002).
a
total n=23; exact group size not specified.

Cabergoline
Cabergoline is a dopamine agonist used in treatment of pituitary adenomas, which are benign
hormone producing growths in the pituitary often producing elevated prolactin levels.
Mechanism of effectiveness for restoring cycles in PCOS may include amplifying dopamine
neurotransmitter actions in the central nervous system resulting in hypoprolactinemia and lower
levels of hormone signals that increase androgen production by the ovary.55
One good quality RCT55 conducted in Italy evaluated cabergoline for improving menstrual
cyclicity. In this preliminary study of 14 women, authors compared time to onset of menses and
regularity of cycle in women treated with cabergoline (0.5 mg per week) with women receiving
placebo. No statistical comparisons are reported, only the summary that five of the eight women
receiving cabergoline had menses with three of them resuming regular cycles over 4 months. All
women taking placebo had either no cycles (n=3) or widely spaced cycles (n=3).

Metformin and Exenatide


Metformin, the most common choice for initial type 2 diabetes management, reduces liver
glucose production and increases uptake and use of glucose in other tissues throughout the body.
Because relative insulin resistance is one of the manifestations of PCOS, metformin is believed

23
to disrupt this part of the syndrome by improving insulin response. Exenatide, a newer agent for
treatment of type 2 diabetes introduced in 2005, is administered by subcutaneous injection. This
drug promotes increased insulin release in response to blood glucose and it dampens glucagon
activity. Glucagon is the natural hormone which promotes glucose release from storage in the
liver. It is often administered as a second agent to improve glycemic control in those with type 2
diabetes. As metformin, it may improve the relative insulin resistance seen in PCOS.
One British51 and one Italian52 RCT evaluated metformin compared with placebo for
improving menstrual cycle regularity among women with PCOS defined by rare or absent
menstrual cycles, and hyperandrogenic chronic anovulation. The larger trial in the United
Kingdom enrolled 82 women and randomly assigned them to an 850 mg dose twice a day. As
with typical administration the dose was initiated at a lower level and increased over a week to
reduce risk of gastrointestinal distress. Over the course of 16 weeks those on metformin ovulated
sooner, an average of 18.2 days earlier (p=0.02), than those receiving placebo. Those on
metformin also had a higher total number of ovulatory events (p=0.059). The Italian study
(n=23), used a metformin dose of 500 mg 3 times a day (also after a ramp up) and reported
“menstrual frequency” improved (p=0.002), without additional definitions of the outcome.
A poor quality trial (n=100)54 in Turkey compared metformin (500 mg 3 times a day) to N-
acetyl-cysteine (600 mg 3 times a day) for improving menstrual regularity in women with PCOS.
Menstrual regularity improved significantly (p≤0.05) from baseline in both groups with no
significant difference in improvement between groups.
A third trial in the United States compared three arms with 20 participants in each:
metformin (500 mg twice each day), exenatide (10 mcg twice a day), and both.53 Participants
were followed for 6 months. The primary outcome for this trial was the proportion of menses
achieved over time compared with what would be a predicted normal pattern. For instance a
woman predicted to have six menses over 6.5 months would have a menstrual index of 50
percent if she in fact had only three menses over that time. Women taking metformin had 57
percent of expected menstrual bleeds and those on placebo had 49 percent. Those taking both
metformin and exenatide had 80 percent of the predicted normal number of menses which was a
significant advantage in effectiveness.

Behavioral Interventions
A single, poor quality study in teens with PCOS in the United States (n=24), attempted to
examine the influence of diet and exercise on restoration of normal menses (Table 7).56

Table 7. Primary outcomes of behavioral interventions for irregular uterine bleeding in women
with PCOS
Author, Year
Country Comparison Groups (n) Key Cycle Control Outcomes
Quality
G1: Hypocaloric low-fat Both groups were asked to complete 30 minutes of aerobic
Ornstein et al., 201156 diet (12) exercise 3 times per week.
United States G2: Carbohydrate Both lost similar amounts of weight over 12 weeks.
Poor restriction without caloric Menstrual patterns are not reported by group.
or fat targets (12) Amount of weight loss correlated with menstrual regularity.

Diet and Exercise


The rationale for examining the effects of diet and exercise is based on similar effects to the
diabetes medications studied. Exercise improves glucose utilization and insulin sensitivity.

24
Likewise diet, with even modest weight loss, can improve insulin response. The study advised
girls in both intervention groups to spend 30 minutes in aerobic activity 3 times each week. One
arm was instructed in how to keep a hypocaloric diet, consisting of less than 40 grams per day of
fat. The other group was instructed in how to follow a low-carbohydrate (i.e., no more than 20
grams per day) diet without specific calorie targets or fat restriction. Among the 16 who
completed the study, both groups lost comparable amounts of weight over 12 weeks, an average
of 6.5 percent of bodyweight. The authors did not report menstrual patterns by diet treatment
group; they report only that degree of weight loss correlated with menstrual regularity (r= −0.2,
p=0.001).56

Complementary and Alternative Medicine


Two trials, one of fair quality58 and another of poor quality,57 report on use of acupuncture
for menstrual regularity among women with oligomenorrhea from PCOS and dysfunctional
uterine bleeding, respectively (Table 8).

Table 8. Primary outcomes of acupuncture for irregular uterine bleeding


Author, Year
Country
Comparison Groups (n) Key Cycle Control Outcomes
Population
Quality
G1: Acupuncture at points
Cai and Wu, 200958 for mind tranquilizing and Based on self-reported scores, 67% of G1 were classified as
China menstruation promotion cured compared with 19% of G2 over 3 cycles.
Dysfunctional uterine (23) 25% of G1 classified as markedly relieved compared with 19%
bleeding G2: Routine acupuncture of G2.
Fair points for delayed menses There were no failures in G1 and 19% in G2 (p<0.05).
(17)
G1: Low-frequency
Electroacupuncture achieved greater improvement in regularity
57 electroacupuncture (33)
Jedel et al., 2011 (+146% from baseline) compared with G2 (58% improvement)
G2: Brisk exercise at least
Sweden and G3 (17% worsening). All comparisons p<0.05 at 16 weeks.
30 minutes 3 days per
PCOS By 32 weeks, electroacupuncture (+121% increase in cycle
week (34)
Poor regularity) and exercise (+42%) were comparable and both
G3: No active intervention
superior to no intervention (−17%).
(17)
PCOS = polycystic ovarian syndrome

Acupuncture
The smaller study (n=40)58 inadequately describes inclusion criteria specifying only that
women were clinically diagnosed with dysfunctional uterine bleeding, and likewise
operationalizes outcomes loosely by classifying participants as “cured” or not without providing
a definition of what characteristics of the menstrual pattern or bleeding constituted a cure. The
intervention of interest to the investigators was acupuncture for mind tranquilizing and
menstruation promotion compared with a more conventional selection of needle sites used for
delayed menses. Over three cycles more women were classified as cured using the mind-
tranquilizing and menstruation promoting method (67% vs.19%); more women classified
symptoms as markedly relieved, and there were no failures in the intervention compared with the
usual approach arm (19%,, p<0.05).
The larger, poor quality study done in Sweden (n=84)57 randomized participants to low-
frequency electroacupuncture for a total of 14 treatments, brisk exercise 30 minutes 3 times each
week, or no active intervention. At 16 weeks electroacupuncture achieved greater improvement
in menstrual regularity, defined as a ratio of the number of observed versus expected cycles.

25
Women began the study with a ratio of 0.28 menses per expected cycle and improved in the
electroacupuncture group to 0.69 menses per expected cycle a 146-percent increase in cycle
regularity when compared with either exercise (58% improvement) or no active intervention
(17% worsening) at 16 weeks. By 32 weeks, electroacupuncture (121% increase in cycle
regularity) and exercise (42% increase in cycle regularity) were comparable and both superior to
no intervention (17% decrease in cycle regularity).

KQ1B. Management of Abnormal Cyclic Bleeding


Description of Included Studies
We identified 31 publications representing 29 studies addressing primary care interventions
for the management of abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding. Most of the studies that qualified for
inclusion evaluated the LNG-IUS (7 studies),59-65 NSAIDs (13 studies),63,66-77 or TXA (7
studies).66,71,77-81 We identified five studies59,61,68,82,83 that evaluated use of COCs for the
management of AUB and one study of the contraceptive vaginal ring.84 We found three studies85-
87
that evaluated decision aids for the management of AUB. The total number of interventions
addressed is greater than the number of studies because of direct comparisons between one or
more interventions within single studies. Included studies described interventions appropriate for
primary care and compared these interventions to another intervention (16 studies), placebo (9
studies), or usual care (4 studies). The results are summarized below and details for each study
are presented in the Evidence Table (Appendix J).

Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (Mirena®)


Key Points
• LNG-IUS is associated with a clinically significant reduction in MBL ranging from 70 to
87 percent in studies lasting up to 1 year. However, there are no controlled longer-term
followup studies.
• In comparison to progestogens, combined hormonal pills, and NSAIDs, LNG-IUS
provided greater reduction in MBL.
• No head-to-head comparisons of LNG-IUS versus TXA were assessed. An indirect
comparison of the percentage reduction and volume reduction in MBL suggests that
LNG-IUS has a greater effect than TXA.

Detailed Synthesis
The LNG-IUS is an intrauterine, long-term, progestogen-only method of contraception
licensed for 5 years of use. The system must be inserted and removed by a qualified practitioner,
including primary care providers. The LNG-IUS has a T-shaped plastic frame with a rate-
limiting membrane on the vertical stem that releases a daily dose of 20 micrograms of
levonorgestrel into the endometrial space. The effects of the LNG-IUS are local and hormonal,
including prevention of endometrial proliferation. The LNG-IUS is also licensed for the
management of idiopathic menorrhagia or heavy menstrual bleeding.
Seven RCTs of LNG-IUS were included (Table 9).59-65 The number of study participants
ranged from 39 to 165. The total number of women assigned to LNG-IUS was 275; study
endpoint outcome measures were reported for 255.

26
Criteria for participation varied among the studies. Three trials assessed MBL using the
alkaline hematin method for study entry and required that women have a mean MBL of 80 ml or
more for at least one63,64 or two 60 cycles prior to randomization. One study required that study
participants report a pictorial blood loss assessment chart score greater than 100 for two
consecutive cycles. For one trial, the inclusion criterion was self-defined as “heavy menstrual
bleeding", although mean MBL and pictorial blood loss assessment scores were reported at
baseline.59 For one trial the inclusion criterion was intention to undergo hysterectomy for AUB
not due to a fibroid greater than 3 cm.65 In one trial, the authors did not adequately describe the
inclusion criteria, although organic causes were excluded.62 Baseline median and mean MBL
values differed among the studies.
The target intervention was the same for all seven trials: LNG-IUS (52 mg levonorgestrel,
initial release rate 20 mcg per 24 hours). The comparator differed among the 7 trials. Two trials
compared LNG-IUS to a COC, including continuous daily ethinyl estradiol (30
mcg)/levonorgestrel (150 mcg)59 and cyclic monthly norethindrone acetate (1 mg)/ethinyl
estradiol (20 mcg) for days 1 to 21.61 Three trials compared LNG-IUS with a progestogen: single
intramuscular injection of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on the first day of the
cycle,62 oral tablet of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA; 5 mg) daily starting on the first day of
the cycle,62 oral MPA (10 mg) daily for 10 days each cycle starting on cycle day 16,60 and
norethisterone (5 mg) 3 times daily from cycle day 5 to 26 for three cycles.64 One trial compared
LNG-IUS with oral mefenamic acid (500 mg) 3 times daily for first 4 days of each cycle.63 One
trial assigned the patients in the control group to continue their preexisting medical treatment for
excessive uterine bleeding or symptoms of dysmenorrhea, or both.65
The primary outcome of six of the LNG-IUS studies was change in blood loss. The alkaline
hematin method was used to measure MBL in four trials.59,60,63,64 One of these four reported both
mean and median MBL.60 Two studies only reported median MBL63,64 and one study only
reported mean MBL.59 Two trials used the pictorial blood loss assessment score for the primary
outcome measure.61,62 Two trials used the pictorial blood loss assessment chart as a secondary
outcome measure.59,63 One study reported the proportion of women who cancelled their prior
decision to undergo hysterectomy as the primary outcome measure.65
The timing of the summative outcome measure reporting varied among the trials. One trial
reported after one menstrual cycle.64 Three trials reported after three menstrual cycles.60,63,64 Four
trials reported after six menstrual cycles.60,62,63,65 Two trials reported after 12 months.59,61
The setting varied: one trial was conducted in three countries (Brazil, Canada, and the United
States);60 two trials were conducted in the United Kingdom;63,64 the remainder of studies were
conducted in Egypt,59 Canada,61 Turkey,62 and Finland.65 Two studies were assessed as fair
quality,60,64 and five were of poor quality related to inadequate allocation concealment, lack of
blinding of participants and assessors, and selective outcome reporting.59,61-63,65 Details of quality
scoring for individual publications are included in Appendix I.

27
Table 9. Primary outcomes of LNG-IUS for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding
Author, Year
Country Comparison Groups (n) Key Outcomes
Quality
• Median reduction in MBL (alkaline hematin) was
60 −128.7 ml in G1 compared with −17.8 ml in G2 after 6
Kaunitz et al., 2010
G1: LNG-IUS (82) cycles (p<0.001).
United States, Canada,
G2: MPA,10 mg daily for • Higher proportion of women with successful treatment
Brazil
10 days of each cycle (83) (defined as MBL<80 ml and 50% or greater reduction
Fair
in MBL from baseline) in G1 (84.8%) compared with
G2 (22.2%) (p<0.001).
• MBL decreased significantly in both groups after 3
G1: LNG-IUS (22)
Irvine et al., 199864 cycles (94% reduction for G1 and 87% reduction for
G2: Norethisterone, 5 mg
United Kingdom G2).
3 times daily on cycle day
Fair • More women in G1 (76%) wished to continue treatment
5 to 26 (22)
after 3 months as compared with G2 (22%).
• MBL assessed by alkaline hematin method significantly
(p<0.001) decreased in both groups from baseline.
• Greater reduction in MBL measured by alkaline
hematin method at 12 months in G1 (87.4 ± 11.3%)
G1: LNG-IUS (56)
compared with G2 (34.9 ± 76.9%) (p=0.01).
Shaaban et al., 201159 G2: Low-dose COC, 30
• PBLAC scores decreased more in G1 (86.6 ± 17.0%)
Egypt mcg ethinyl estradiol and
compared with G2 (2.5 ± 93.2%) at 12 months
Poor 150 mcg levonorgestrel
(p<0.001).
(56)
• Women in G1 had significant improvements in ferritin
and hemoglobin at 12 months.
• Fewer bleeding days per year in G1 (34.5 ± 12.0)
compared with G2 (65.1 ± 15.3) (p<0.001).
• PBLAC score decreased significantly (p<0.001) in both
groups at 12 months.
• The MBL median score decreased more in G1 (from
G1: LNG-IUS (20)
61 228 to 13, −83% mean change) compared with G2
Endrikat et al., 2009 G2: COC, 1 mg
(from 290 to 72, mean change −68%) (p=0.002).
Canada norethindrone acetate and
• Proportion of women with successful treatment
Poor 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol
(defined as MBL score<100 at 12 months) higher in G1
(19)
(80%) compared with G2 (37%) (p<0.009).
• Mean hemoglobin levels increased in both groups from
baseline (p<0.001).
• More women in G1 (86%) with successful treatment
62 G1: LNG-IUS (44) compared with G2 (75%) or G3 (68%).
Kucuk and Ertan, 2008
G2: DMPA, single shot • PBLAC scores, days of menstrual bleeding, and
Turkey
(44) hemoglobin improved in all 3 groups from baseline.
Poor
G3: MPA, 5 mg daily (44) • Mean MBL scores at 6 months were lower in G1 (77)
compared with G2 (146) and G3 (154) (p<0.01).

28
Table 9. Primary outcomes of LNG-IUS for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding (continued)
Author, Year
Country Comparison Groups (n) Key Outcomes
Quality
Reid and Virtanen-Kari, G1: LNG-IUS (25) • MBL significantly reduced in both groups from
200563 G2: Mefenamic acid, 500 baseline.
United Kingdom mg 3 times per day for first • After 6 months median MBL was 5 ml in G1 compared
Poor 4 days of cycle (26) with 100 ml in G2 (p<0.001).
Lahteenmaki et al., 199865
G1: LNG-IUS (28) • Proportion of women cancelling hysterectomy was
Finland
G2: Usual care (28) 64% in G1 vs. 14.3% in G2 (p<0.001).
Poor
COC = combined oral contraceptive; DMPA = depot medroxyprogesterone; LNG-IUS = levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
system; MBL = menstrual blood loss; MPA = medroxyprogesterone; PBLAC = pictorial blood loss assessment chart

Description of Results
Outcome Measures
All but one of the LNG-IUS studies reported MBL using the alkaline hematin method or
pictorial blood loss assessment score as the primary outcome. Four trials59,60,63,64 used the
alkaline hematin method to measure MBL and four trials used the pictorial blood loss assessment
chart to estimate blood loss.59,61-63 Two studies also reported treatment success as an outcome,
defined as MBL less than 80 ml60 or pictorial blood assessment score less than 100.61 One trial
reported the proportion of women who cancelled their prior decision to undergo hysterectomy as
the primary outcome measure.65 Other outcome measures reported in the studies of LNG-IUS
included total bleeding and spotting days, hemoglobin, ferritin, treatment failure, and
menorrhagia severity score.

Menstrual Blood Loss


Reduction Expressed as a Percent
Three studies reported the percent reduction in MBL from baseline (Table 10). A fair quality
multicenter trial with 165 participants compared LNG-IUS with oral MPA administered during
the luteal phase of the cycle and reported a mean reduction in MBL of 71 percent (SD ± 88%) in
the LNG-IUS group compared with 22 percent (SD ± 36%) in the MPA group at the 6-month
interval (p<0.001).60 In a small fair quality RCT conducted in the United Kingdom,64 the change
in MBL was comparable between groups after 3 months of treatment with a 94-percent reduction
in MBL for LNG-IUS users and an 87-percent reduction in MBL among women taking
norethisterone.
A trial conducted in Egypt with 112 participants compared LNG-IUS with continuous
combined ethinyl estradiol (30 mcg) and levonorgestrel (150 mcg; continuous COC) and
reported an 87-percent (SD ± 12%) reduction in mean MBL in the LNG-IUS group compared
with a 35-percent (SD ± 77%) reduction in the COC group at the 12-month interval (p=0.013).59

29
Table 10. Percent change in blood loss from baseline in studies of LNG-IUS
LNG-IUS vs.
Author, Year Comparator LNG-IUS Group Comparator Group
Comparator
−70.8 −21.5
a
Kaunitz et al., 201060 MPA p<0.001
−94.0 −87.0
64 b
Irvine et al., 1998 Norethisterone p=NS
COC,
Shaaban et al., 201159 c −87.4 −34.9 p=0.013
continuous
COC = combined oral contraceptive; MPA = medroxyprogesterone
a
Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (10 mg) once daily for 10 consecutive days starting on day 16 in each cycle.
b
5 mg 3 times daily from day 5 to 26 of the cycle over three cycles.
c
Ethinyl estradiol (30 mcg) and levonorgestrel (150 mcg).

Reduction Expressed as a Volume


Four studies reported the absolute reduction in MBL from baseline (Table 11). The
multicenter trial with 165 participants reported a statistically significant (p<0.001) reduction in
median MBL after six menstrual cycles with LNG-IUS (128.8 ml) compared with those
receiving MPA (17.8 ml).60
The United Kingdom trial with 44 participants and 3 months duration reported similar
reductions (p=NS) in median MBL for the LNG-IUS group (104 ml) and the norethisterone
group (94 ml).64
The trial conducted in Egypt with 112 participants that compared LNG-IUS with continuous
COC reported a statistically significant (p<0.001) reduction in mean MBL after 12 menstrual
cycles with LNG-IUS (255.6 ml) compared with those receiving COC (156.1 ml).59 A trial
conducted in the United Kingdom with 51 participants that compared continuous LNG-IUS with
mefenamic acid for the first 4 days of each cycle reported a statistically significant (p<0.001)
difference in reduction in median MBL after six menstrual cycles with LNG-IUS (117 ml)
compared with those receiving mefenamic acid (21 ml ).63 The same study reported a statistically
significant reduction in median pictorial blood loss assessment chart score: a 215 point reduction
after six cycles with LNG-IUS compared with a 74-point reduction with mefenamic acid
(p<0.001).63

Table 11. Change in blood loss volume from baseline in studies of LNG-IUS
Comparator LNG-IUS vs.
Author, Year Comparator LNG-IUS Group
Group Comparator
Kaunitz et al., 201060 MPA −128.8 ml −17.8 ml p<0.001
Irvine et al., 1998 64
Norethisterone −104.0 ml −94.0 ml p=NS
Shaaban et al.,
COC, continuous −255.6 ml −156.1 ml p<0.001
201159
Reid and
Mefenamic acid −117.0 ml −21.0 ml p<0.001
Virtanen−Kari, 200563
COC = combined oral contraceptive; MPA = medroxyprogesterone
a
Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (10 mg) once daily for 10 consecutive days starting on day 16 in each cycle.
b
5 mg 3 times daily from day 5 to 26 of the cycle over three cycles.
c
Ethinyl estradiol (30 mcg) and levonorgestrel (150 mcg).

Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart Score


Four studies reported change in pictorial blood loss assessment chart score from baseline. A
poor quality Canadian trial with 39 participants compared LNG-IUS with 20 mcg ethinyl
estradiol and 1 mg norethindrone acetate (cyclic COC) and reported an 83-percent reduction in
the mean pictorial blood loss assessment chart score in the LNG-IUS group (median scores

30
declined from 228 to 12) compared with a 68-percent reduction in the cyclic COC group (median
scores declined from 290 to 72) at 12 months.61
Another poor quality Turkish study of 132 women compared LNG-IUS use with either a
single intramuscular injection of DMPA or with daily oral MPA. After 6 menstrual cycles, the
LNG-IUS users had a mean score reduction of 210 compared with a reduction of 138 in the
DMPA group (p<0.01), and a 76-point reduction in the MPA group (p<0.01). No significant
difference was reported in the reductions in the pictorial blood loss assessment chart score
between DMPA and MPA.62
The pictorial blood loss assessment was used in two trials that also measured MBL using the
alkaline hematin method. One study reported a reduction in the mean pictorial blood loss
assessment chart score of 90 percent (SD ± 12%) in the LNG-IUS group at the 6-month interval
compared with a reduction of 42 percent (SD ± 54%) in the COC group.59 At 12 months, the
mean scores declined by 275 (87%) for LNG-IUS users compared with only 51 (3%) for the
women taking COCs.59 In another study, the change in median pictorial blood assessment scores
from baseline was significantly greater (p<0.001) in the LNG-IUS group from 240 (range, 91 to
545) to 25 (range, 0 to 401) compared with the mefenamic acid group from 233 (range, 77 to
469) to 159 (range, 50 to 307) after six cycles of treatment. 63

Treatment Success
Three studies reported the percent of women with successful treatment; however the
definition of success differed among the trials. The fair quality multicenter trial with 165
participants that compared LNG-IUS with oral MPA reported a 85 percent (67/79) success rate
in the LNG-IUS group at the 6-month interval, compared with a 22 percent (18/81) success rate
in the MPA group (p<0.001).60 Treatment success was defined as MBL less than 80 ml at the end
of study and 50 percent or greater reduction in MBL from baseline.60
The poor quality Canadian trial with 39 participants that compared LNG-IUS with cyclic
COC reported a treatment success of 80 percent (16/20) in the LNG-IUS group at the 12-month
interval compared with 37 percent (7/19) in the cyclic COC group (p<0.009).61 Treatment
success was defined as a pictorial blood loss assessment chart score less than 100 at 12 months.61
The poor quality Turkish study that compared LNG-IUS with DMPA injection or oral MPA
use reported treatment success rates of 86 percent, 75 percent, and 68 percent, respectively.62 The
criterion for determining treatment response was a pictorial assessment bleeding score less than
185 and stabilization or increase in hemoglobin levels.62

Total Bleeding Days and Total Spotting Days


The trial conducted in Egypt with 112 participants that compared LNG-IUS with continuous
COC did not report baseline days of bleeding or spotting. The study did report that the endpoint
number of bleeding days, adjusted for 1-year duration was 34.5 ± 12.0 for the LNG-IUS group
and 65.1 ± 15.3 for the continuous COC group (p<0.001). The study also reported that the
endpoint number of spotting days, adjusted for 1-year duration, was not different between the
two groups.59
The trial conducted in Turkey with 132 participants that compared LNG-IUS with either a
single intramuscular injection of DMPA or with daily oral MPA reported a statistically
significant decrease in mean bleeding days after six menstrual cycles with all three interventions.
No significant difference was reported in the decrease in bleeding days between LNG-IUS and
DMPA and MPA.62

31
Hemoglobin
The trial conducted in Turkey with 132 participants that compared LNG-IUS with either a
single intramuscular injection of DMPA or with daily oral MPA reported a statistically
significant increase in hemoglobin after six menstrual cycles with all three interventions. The
mean hemoglobin score was increased by 0.8 g/dl in the LNG-IUS group compared with 0.5 g/dl
with DMPA (p<0.05) and compared with 0.6 g/dL with MPA (p<0.05). No significant difference
was reported in the increase in hemoglobin between DMPA and MPA.62
The trial conducted in Egypt with 112 participants that compared LNG-IUS with continuous
COC reported a statistically significant (p<0.001) increase in hemoglobin for the LNG-IUS
group (1.2 g/dl) compared with the continuous COC group (−0.4 g/dl).59 The United Kingdom
trial with 44 participants reported no significant differences in hemoglobin changes over 3
months.64 The Canadian trial with 39 participants that compared LNG-IUS with cyclic COC
reported no significant differences in hemoglobin changes.61

Ferritin
The trial conducted in Egypt with 112 participants that compared LNG-IUS with continuous
COC reported a statistically significant (p<0.001) increase in ferritin for the LNG-IUS group
(56.7 mcg/dl) compared with the continuous COC group (−34.3 mcg/dl).59 The United Kingdom
trial with 44 participants and 3 months duration reported no significant differences in ferritin
changes.64

Treatment Failure
The trial conducted in Egypt with 112 participants that compared LNG-IUS with continuous
COC defined treatment failure as initiation of an alternative medical treatment or need for
surgery or expulsion of the LNG-IUS. The trial reported a statistically significant (p=0.007)
lower failure rate for the LNG-IUS group compared with the continuous COC group (hazard
ratio= 0.30; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.73).59

Proportion of Women Who Cancelled Hysterectomy


An open randomized multicenter study conducted in Finland with 56 women aged 33 to 49
scheduled to undergo hysterectomy for treatment of excessive uterine bleeding reported that 64
percent (95% CI, 44 to 81%) of women in the LNG-IUS group compared with 14 percent (95%
CI, 4 to 33%) of women in the control group (continued current medical treatment) had cancelled
their decision to undergo hysterectomy after 6 months (p<0.001).65

Head-to-Head Comparisons

LNG-IUS Versus COC


Both the trial that compared LNG-IUS to continuous COC (daily 30 mcg of ethinyl estradiol
and 150 mcg levonorgestrel)59 and the trial that compared LNG-IUS to cyclic COC ( 1 mg
norethindrone acetate and 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol for days 1 to 21)61 found that LNG-IUS was
superior to COC for blood loss reduction expressed as a percent (83 to 90% reduction in mean
pictorial blood loss assessment chart score for LNG-IUS compared with 42 to 68% for COC).
One trial reported superiority of LNG-IUS for blood loss expressed as volume, total bleeding
days, treatment failure, hemoglobin, and ferritin level.59 One of the trials reported superiority of
LNG-IUS for achieving blood loss below the definition of heavy menstrual bleeding.61

32
LNG-IUS Versus Progestogens
The only outcome measure used by all three trials that compared progestogens to LNG-IUS
was MBL reduction by volume.60,62,64 Two trials reported that LNG-IUS significantly reduced
MBL compared with progestogens, including oral MPA (10 mg daily for 10 days starting on
cycle day 1660 or 5 mg daily starting on cycle day 162) and DMPA (single injection of on cycle
day 1).62 A third trial reported no significant difference between LNG-IUS and norethisterone (5
mg 3 times daily from cycle day 5 to cycle day 26 for three cycles) for reducing MBL.64 The
trials used different progestogen formulations and different measures of blood loss.60,62,64 One of
the trials comparing LNG-IUS to oral MPA reported significantly greater treatment success,
reduction in blood loss as a percentage, and women achieving blood loss less than the definition
of heavy menstrual bleeding in the LNG-IUS group.60

LNG-IUS Versus Mefenamic Acid


A single trial reported significantly greater reduction in MBL for LNG-IUS (117 ml)
compared with mefenamic acid (500 mg 3 times daily for first 4 days of cycle; 21 ml).63

Prevention of Hysterectomy
A single poor quality trial reported significantly more (p<0.001) women cancelled their
decision to undergo hysterectomy in the LNG-IUS group (64%; 95% CI, 44 to 81%) compared
with women who continued current medical treatment (14%; 95% CI, 4 to 33%).65

Contraceptive Vaginal Ring


Key Points
• A single RCT reported that the contraceptive vaginal ring was as effective as
norethisterone for improving bleeding.
• More women who were randomized to the vaginal ring were satisfied with treatment
compared with women randomized to norethisterone.
• More women in the vaginal ring group elected to continue treatment than in the oral
medication group.

Detailed Synthesis
We identified a single RCT of fair quality that compared the efficacy of the contraceptive
vaginal ring to norethisterone in 95 women with abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding (Table 12).
The study was conducted in Egypt among women with a pictorial blood loss assessment chart
score over 185. The primary outcome measure was MBL after three cycles of treatment assessed
using the pictorial blood loss assessment chart score. Other outcome measures included duration
of menses, hemoglobin, ferritin, and quality of life.
The treatments were equally effective, reducing the patient-reported bleeding score by 67
percent in the contraceptive vaginal ring group and by 70 percent in the norethisterone group.84

33
Table 12. Primary outcomes of contraceptive vaginal ring for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding
Author, Year
Country Comparison Groups (n) Key Outcomes
Quality
• Mean PBLAC score declined significantly (p<0.001) from
G1: Contraceptive vaginal baseline after 3 cycles for G1 (from 288 to 90) and G2
ring, 15 mcg of ethinyl (from 302 to 92).
estradiol and 120 mcg
• Mean hemoglobin levels increased from baseline for both
Abu Hashim et al., etonogestrel inserted
G1 (p=0.02) and G2 (p=0.03).
201284 between day 1 and 5 of
• Duration of menses was significantly shorter (p<0.001) for
Egypt cycle and used for 3
both G1 and G2.
Fair weeks/cycle (48)
G2: Norethisterone acetate • More women in G1 (71%) than in G2 (42.5%) were
tablets,5 mg 3 times daily on satisfied with treatment.
days 5 to 26 (47) • More women in G1 (77%) than in G2 (25.5%) elected to
continue treatment.
PBLAC = pictorial blood loss assessment chart; MBL = menstrual blood loss

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs


Key Points
• The most commonly studied NSAID was mefenamic acid; other NSAIDs included
naproxen, meclofenamate, and flurbiprofen.
• Overall, NSAIDs demonstrated significant reductions in MBL (20 to 49 percent)
compared with baseline and were significantly more effective than placebo, but many
women still have objective menorrhagia after treatment. Variability in treatment response
with NSAIDs is considerable, including some individuals with increases in MBL with
treatment.
• Comparing individual NSAIDs, there were no significant differences found in reductions
of MBL between mefenamic acid and naproxen.
• In one RCT, LNG-IUS was significantly more effective at reducing MBL compared with
mefenamic acid.
• In two trials, TXA had significantly greater reductions in MBL compared with either
flurbiprofen or mefenamic acid.
• There were no significant differences between NSAIDs and either norethisterone, low-
dose COC, ethamsylate, or an older progesterone-impregnated intrauterine coil in 5 trials.
• Studies were mostly of short duration with most lasting from 2 to 3 cycles.
• No studies examined quality of life, sexual function, fertility, or time to conception as an
outcome. Quality of life needs further attention since most women will be offered
treatment based on complaints/perception rather than objective measurement.
• NSAIDs are also effective against menstrual-related abdominal pain and cramping.

Detailed Synthesis
We identified 13 unique studies from 14 publications that examined the use of NSAIDs for
abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding (Table 13). Seven were parallel group RCTs63,66,67,69,70,74,77 and
six were randomized, crossover trials.68,71-73,75,76 Trials were conducted in seven different
countries: Australia,68,76 Canada,73 India,69,77 the Netherlands,67 Sweden,71 United
Kingdom,63,66,70,74,75 and the United States.72 The number of participants in each trial ranged from
19 to 110 with crossover trials ranging from 14 to 69. One study was assessed as good quality,72

34
three were assessed as fair quality,67,75,76 and nine were assessed as poor quality.63,66,68-71,73,74,77
Details of quality scoring for individual publications are included in Appendix I.
Studies used different inclusion criteria for defining menorrhagia. Six trials used the
objective alkaline hematin method with MBL more than 80 ml as criteria for
inclusion.63,66,67,70,71,75 Two trials used the alkaline hematin method with MBL more than 50 to
60 ml,72,74 one study used a combination of subjective and objective assessments of MBL more
than 80 ml,73 and four trials used either subjective criteria or did not define heavy menstrual
bleeding for inclusion into the trial.68,69,76,77 Some studies required women to have regular
cycles.63,67,68,72,73,77 Most studies excluded populations who had underlying disease or
intrauterine device (IUD) use. One study76 included patients with IUD (n=6), fibroids (n=2), Von
Willebrand disease (n=1) and reported changes in MBL separately for women with ovulatory
menorrhagia from those with underlying disease. Another study also included patients with IUDs
(n=7) in the eligible patient population.72 Patients ranged in age from 14 to 51 years of age.
The target intervention differed among the 13 studies. For each NSAID, dose and duration
did not vary greatly. The most commonly studied NSAID, mefenamic acid, was used in 11
trials.63,66-70,73-77 The usual dose of mefenamic acid was 500 mg 3 times a day starting at the onset
of menses for duration of 5 days or until cessation of menses. One study initiated mefenamic
acid 5 days prior to onset of menses through cessation.67 Another trial used a slightly different
regimen with 500 mg at onset of menses followed by 250 mg every 6 hours for 3 to 5 days.73
One study included mefenamic acid at 250 mg 3 times a day from onset menses for 5 days in
conjunction with TXA 500 mg 3 times a day for the same 5-day period.77 One trial studied
meclofenamate at a dose of 100 mg 3 times a day from onset of menses for duration of 6 days or
until cessation of menses.72 Naproxen was studied in two trials with initial loading doses of 500
to 550 mg then 250 to 275 mg every 6 hours for 5 days or until 24 hours after cessation of heavy
bleeding.68,75 Flurbiprofen was studied in one trial at a dose of 100 mg twice a day from onset of
menses for duration of 5 days.71
The comparator differed among the 13 studies. Mefenamic acid was compared with placebo
in four studies, two RCTs67,69 and two crossover trials.73,76 One crossover trial compared
meclofenamate to placebo.72 Two crossover trials compared mefenamic acid to naproxen68,75 for
two cycles. One of these crossover trials also used low-dose COC with 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol
and 150 mcg levonorgestrel given daily for 21 days for two cycles.68 Two RCTs used
norethisterone 5 mg twice daily from day 19 to 26 of the cycle70 or days 15 to 25 of the cycle74
for two cycles. Two RCTs used progesterone-releasing intrauterine systems, including the LNG-
IUS that releases 20 mcg of levonorgestrel per day for six cycles63 and an older progesterone-
impregnated intrauterine coil that releases 65 mcg of progesterone daily for two cycles.74 One
RCT compared mefenamic acid (500 mg every 8 hours) with TXA (1 gram every 6 hours) and
ethamsylate (500 mg every 6 hours) for the first 5 days of menses for three cycles.66 One
crossover trial compared flurbiprofen (100 mg twice a day for 5 days) with 1.5 grams of TXA (3
times a day for the first 3 days of menses and 1 gram on days 4 to 5) for two cycles.71 One RCT
compared a combination of mefenamic acid (250 mg per day) and TXA (500 mg 3 times a day)
to TXA alone from day 1 to 5 of menses for three cycles.77
Duration of treatment ranged from one67 to six63 menstrual cycles, with the majority
consisting of two68,70-76 to three66,69,77 cycles.
The primary outcome for most studies (11/13) was MBL measured with the alkaline hematin
method.63,66-68,70-76 Seven studies reported mean MBL66-68,71-73,76 and four studies reported
median MBL.63,70,74,75 One small, placebo-controlled crossover trial73 measured MBL but only

35
reported the proportion of women who experienced reductions in MBL during the treatment
cycles. One trial used the pictorial blood loss assessment chart score77 as the primary outcome
measure for blood loss and a second trial of NSAIDS used the pictorial blood loss assessment
chart as a secondary outcome measure.63 One trial reported the percentage of patients relieved of
menorrhagia,69 however the method of measurement was not provided. Other outcomes studied
included duration of bleeding,66,69,70,72,75,76 number of pads/tampons used,66,69,72,75 and total
menstrual fluid loss.63 One trial examined patient satisfaction.66 No studies examined quality of
life, sexual function, fertility, or time to conception as an outcome.

Table 13. Primary outcomes of NSAIDs for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding
Author, Year
Country Comparison Groups (n) Key Outcomes
Quality
a • Mean MBL during meclofenamate cycles (69.0 ± 6.3 ml)
G1 : Meclofenamate, 100
was significantly less than baseline (141.6 ± 15.9 ml) and
mg 3 times daily for 2 cycles
during placebo cycles (135.6 ± 11.3 ml) (p<0.0001).
Vargyas et al., 198772 followed by placebo for 2
• Mean number of bleeding days was shorter during
United States cycles (15)
meclofenamate cycles (4.8 ± 0.2) than during placebo
Good G2: Placebo for 2 cycles,
cycles (5.4 ± 0.18) (p<0.0003).
followed by meclofenamate
for 2 cycles (17) • Median hemoglobin, hematocrit, and serum ferritin levels
did not change during the study.
Van Elijkeren et al., • Mean MBL decreased 40% in G1 from baseline mean 108
G1: Mefenamic acid, 500 mg
199267 ml to 65 ml (p=0.01) compared with increase in G2 from
3 times daily (6)
Netherlands 151 ml to 189 ml (p=0.46).
G2: Placebo (5)
Fair • Patients were scheduled for hysterectomy.
G1: Mefenamic acid 500 mg
every 8 hrs. in phase 1 and
a
naproxen in phase 2 (19)
Hall et al., 198775 • Treatment with mefenamic acid and naproxen reduced
G2: Naproxen 550 mg
United Kingdom bleeding by average of 47 and 46% respectively.
loading dose followed by 275
Fair
mg every 6 hrs. in phase 1
followed by mefenamic acid
a
in phase 2 (19)
G1: Mefenamic acid, 500 mg
• Mefenamic acid significantly reduced mean MBL (28%)
3 times daily for 2 cycles
Fraser et al., 1981, compared with placebo (p<0.001).
followed by placebo for 2
198476 ,93 a • Reductions were greater (30%) among women with MBL
cycles (38)
Australia >80 ml at baseline (p<0.001).
G2: Placebo for 2 cycles
Fair
followed by mefenamic acid • Only 30 out of 69 women had measured blood loss >80 ml
(31)
a during placebo cycles.

G1: TXA, 500 mg and • The mean PBLAC score in G1 declined from 246 to 100 at
Najam et al., 201077 mefenamic acid, 250 mg 3 6 months (p<0.01) and in G2 from 250 to 125 (p=NS).
India times daily (55) • Hemoglobin levels significantly increased in both groups,
Poor G2: TXA, 500 mg 3 times from 8.6 to 12.3 in G1 (p=0.016) and from 9.5 to 12.0 in G2
daily (55) (p=0.04).
Reid and Virtanen- G1: LNG-IUS (25)
• MBL significantly reduced in both groups from baseline but
Kari, 200563 G2: Mefenamic acid 500 mg
after 6 months median MBL was 5 ml in G1 compared with
United Kingdom 3 times daily for first 4 days
100 ml in G2 (p<0.001).
Poor of cycle (26)

36
Table 13. Primary outcomes of NSAIDs for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding (continued)
Author, Year
Country Comparison Groups (n) Key Outcomes
Quality
• TXA reduced MBL by 54% (mean decreased from 164 ml
G1: Mefenamic acid, 500 mg to 75 ml) and mefenamic acid reduced MBL by 20% (from
Bonnar and (25) 186 ml to 148 ml). Ethamsylate did not reduce MBL.
Sheppard, 199666 G2: TXA, 1 g (27) • Mean MBL for women in G1 remained >80 ml after 3
Ireland G3: Ethamsylate, 500 mg treatment cycles (148 ml; range, 138 to 168 ml).
Poor (29) • 77% in G2 and 74% in G1 wished to continue treatment.
• Improvement in dysmenorrheal was reported by 19% in G1,
13% in G2 and 4% in G3.
G1: Mefenamic acid, 500 mg
every 6 to 8 hrs. for 2 cycles;
naproxen, 500 mg at onset
followed by 250 mg every 6 • Mefenamic acid reduced MBL by 38% in G2 (p=0.002) and
Fraser and a
to 8 hrs. for 2 cycles (15) by 20% in G1 (p=0.198).
McCarron, 199168
G2: Mefenamic acid, 500 mg • Women treated with low-dose COC had 43% reduction in
Australia
every 6 to 8 hrs. for 2 cycles; MBL (p<0.001).
Poor
low-dose COC (ethinyl • Naproxen resulted in a 12% reduction in MBL (p=0.079).
estradiol 30 mcg and
levonorgestrel 150 mcg) for
a
2 cycles (15)
• 86% of women in G1 reported relief of menorrhagia
Grover et al., 199069 G1: Mefenamic acid, 500
a compared with 20% in G2 (p<0.001).
India mg, every 8 hours (40)
G2: Placebo (40)
a • Mean bleeding days in G1 reduced from 9.7 ± 3.1 to 4.1 ±
Poor
0.6.
• Median blood loss was significantly reduced in both groups
from 123 ml to 81 ml in G1 (p<0.001) and from 109 ml to 92
Cameron et al., G1: Mefenamic acid, 500 mg
in G2 (p<0.002).
199070 3 times daily (17)
• Median percentage reduction in blood loss was 24% for G1
Scotland G2: Norethisterone, 5 mg
and 20% for G2 (p>0.1).
Poor twice daily (15)
• 52% of women in G1 and 67% in G2 still had menorrhagia
after 2 months of treatment.
G1: Flurbiprofen, 100 mg
twice daily for 2 cycles
• Both treatments significantly reduced MBL (p<0.01).
followed by TXA for 2 cycles
Andersch et al., a • Reduction in MBL was 53% with TXA compared with 24%
(15)
198871 for flurbiprofen (p<0.01).
G2: TXA, 1.5 g 3 times daily
Sweden • Mean MBL reduced to 155 ± 33 ml with TXA and 223 ± 44
on days 1 to 3 and 1 g twice
Poor ml for flurbiprofen (baseline MBL was 295 ± 52 ml).
daily on days 4 to 5 for 2
cycles followed by • Hemoglobin did not change with either treatment.
a
flurbiprofen for 2 cycles (15)

37
Table 13. Primary outcomes of NSAIDs for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding (continued)
Author, Year
Country Comparison Groups (n) Key Outcomes
Quality
G1: Mefenamic acid, 500 mg
at onset followed by 250 mg
every 6 hrs. for 3 to 5 days
Tsang et al., 198773
for 2 cycles followed by • 8/10 women experienced reduction in MBL while taking
Canada a
placebo (14) mefenamic acid compared with placebo (p<0.05).
Poor
G2: Placebo for 2 cycles
followed by mefenamic acid
a
for 2 cycles (14)
G1: Mefenamic acid, 500 mg
3 times daily (8)
Cameron et al.,
74 G2: Norethisterone, 5 mg • Median MBL reduced in G1 from 68 to 47 ml (p=0.05) and
1987
twice daily (8) in G3 from 71 to 45 ml (p<0.05).
United Kingdom
G3: Progesterone- • Median MBL was unchanged in G2 (94 to 110 ml).
Poor
impregnated intrauterine coil
releasing 65 mcg daily (8)
COC = combined oral contraceptive; LNG-IUS = levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system; MBL = menstrual blood loss;
NS = not significant; PBLAC = pictorial blood assessment chart; TXA = tranexamic acid
a
Crossover study.

Description of Results

Outcome Measures
All studies of NSAIDs examined bleeding outcomes. Eleven studies used the alkaline
hematin method for an objective measure of MBL. Two trials used the pictorial blood loss
assessment chart to assess blood loss.63,77 One study69 reported relief of menorrhagia for which
methods were not provided.
Although we aimed to collect data on measures of quality of life, sexual function, fertility
and time to conception, none of the 13 clinical trials reported on these outcomes. One study
reported patient satisfaction based on participants’ wish to continue treatment at the end of the
study.66

MBL
Reduction Expressed as a Percent
Four trials of fair to good quality reported statistically significant reductions in MBL
compared with baseline, ranging from 40 to 49 percent among those who received one to two
treatment cycles of NSAIDs, including mefenamic acid, naproxen, or meclofenamate (Table
14).67,72,75,76
A good quality crossover trial conducted in the United States,72 randomized 32 women with
MBL more than 60 ml to meclofenamate or placebo for 2 treatment cycles. Seven (21%)
participants were using an IUD. Significantly (p<0.0001) greater reductions in MBL were
reported among those receiving meclofenamate (48.9 ± 3.7%) compared with those receiving
placebo (9.2 ± 5.3%). During treatment, the change in MBL associated with meclofenamate
ranged from −42 ± 3 percent in cycle 1 to −56 ± 8 percent in cycle 3.
A small, fair quality, RCT conducted in the Netherlands,67 randomized women scheduled for
a hysterectomy due to subjective menorrhagia to either mefenamic acid 500 mg (n=6) or placebo

38
(n=5) 3 times daily starting 5 days before expected menses to cessation of bleeding for 1
treatment cycle. Eligible participants had regular cycles, no IUD, and MBL more than 80 ml.
Those receiving mefenamic acid had greater reductions (40%, p=0.01) in mean MBL from
baseline compared with placebo where a nonsignificant increase (25%) in MBL was reported,
A randomized, double-blind crossover fair quality trial conducted in the United Kingdom75
compared naproxen (550 mg at onset of menses then 275 mg every 6 to 8 hours for 5 days) to
mefenamic acid among 38 women with MBL more than 80 ml for 2 treatment cycles. Patients
with pelvic inflammation, fibroids, or other local disease were excluded. There were no
significant differences in mean MBL reduction between the two groups receiving mefenamic
acid (46% and 47%) and the two groups receiving naproxen (44% and 48%). Reductions in MBL
compared with baseline were statistically significant (p<0.001) in both the groups receiving
mefenamic acid and naproxen.
One crossover RCT of fair quality conducted in Australia and published in two papers76,93
randomized 85 women with menorrhagia to mefenamic acid or placebo for two cycles. Overall
there was a 28-percent reduction in mean MBL among those who received mefenamic acid
compared with those who received placebo (p<0.001). There was a 30-percent reduction
(p<0.001) in blood loss among those with MBL more than 80 ml at baseline (n=30) but a 28-
percent increase in blood loss among those with MBL more than 35 ml at baseline (n=14).
Six poor quality trials also reported significantly reduced MBL compared with baseline
levels (Table 14). One poor quality RCT conducted in the United Kingdom63 compared 51
participants randomized to either mefenamic acid or to LNG-IUS. Both LNG-IUS and
mefenamic acid significantly (p<0.005) reduced MBL compared with baseline; however, the
study reported a greater reduction in median MBL among those treated with LNG-IUS (95%)
compared with those receiving mefenamic acid (23%) after six cycles of treatment.
One RCT66 conducted in Ireland randomized women to either TXA (n=27), mefenamic acid
(n=25), or ethamsylate (n=29) for three cycles. The study reported a 54-percent reduction in
mean MBL from baseline for those receiving TXA (p<0.001), a 20-percent reduction for those
receiving mefenamic acid (p<0.001), and no reduction for those receiving ethamsylate.
A small crossover trial71 conducted in Sweden compared TXA to flurbiprofen for two
treatment cycles. A greater reduction in mean MBL from baseline was reported among those
receiving TXA (53%) compared with those receiving flurbiprofen (24%).
One RCT conducted in the United Kingdom70 examined the efficacy of mefenamic acid
compared with norethisterone among 32 participants with MBL more than 80 ml for 2 cycles.
Median percent change in blood loss volume was not significantly different between mefenamic
acid (−24%; range, 5 to −83%) and norethisterone (−20%; range, 2 to −53%). Median MBL with
treatment was 81 ml (range, 22 to 193 ml) for those receiving mefenamic acid and 92 ml (range,
43 to 189 ml) for those receiving norethisterone. One patient treated with mefenamic acid had an
increase in blood loss.
One crossover trial68 conducted in Australia examined the efficacy of mefenamic acid
compared with low-dose COC (30 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 150 mcg levonorgestrel given daily
for 21 days) in one group and mefenamic acid compared with naproxen in another group, each
for two cycles among women with a clinical history of menorrhagia. There was no significant
difference in reduction of mean MBL between those receiving mefenamic acid (38%) and those
receiving low-dose COC (43%) or between those receiving mefenamic acid (20%) and those
receiving naproxen (12%).

39
Table 14. Percent change in blood loss from baseline in studies of NSAIDs
Comparator NSAID vs.
Author, Year NSAID Comparator NSAID Group
Group Comparator Group
Vargyas et al.,
Meclofenamate Placebo −48.9 −9.2 p<0.0001
198772
Van Elijkeren et Mefenamic
Placebo −40.0 NR NR
al., 199267 acid
Mefenamic
Hall et al., 198775 Naproxen −47.0 −46.0 NS
acid
Fraser et al., Mefenamic
Placebo NR NR p<0.001
1981, 198476 ,93 acid
Reid and
Mefenamic
Virtanen- LNG-IUS −23.0 −95.0 p<0.001
acid
Kari,200563
Bonnar and Mefenamic
TXA −20.0 −54.0 p<0.05
Sheppard,199666 acid
Bonnar and Mefenamic
Ethamsylate −20.0 0 p<0.001
Sheppard,199666 acid
Fraser and
Mefenamic
McCarron, Naproxen −20.0 −12.0 NS
acid
199168
Fraser and
Mefenamic
−38.0 −43.0
a
McCarron, COC NS
acid
199168
Cameron et al., Mefenamic
Norethisterone −24.0 −20.0 NS
199070 acid
Andersch et al.,
Flurbiprofen TXA −24.0 −53.0 p<0.01
198871
COC = combined oral contraceptive; LNG-IUS = levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system; TXA = tranexamic acid;
NS = nonsignificant
a
30 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 150 mcg levonorgestrel.

Reduction Expressed as a Volume


In four trials of fair to good quality,67,72,75,76 treatment with meclofenamate, mefenamic acid
or naproxen reduced MBL compared with baseline (Table 15). Mean or median MBL after
treatment ranged from 65 to 77 ml. Mefenamic acid and naproxen were comparable in
effectiveness.75
A good quality crossover trial conducted in the United States randomized 32 women to
meclofenamate or placebo for 2 cycles. There was a significantly greater reduction in mean MBL
from baseline with meclofenamate (72.6 ml) compared with placebo (6.0 ml).72
A small fair quality RCT conducted in the Netherlands randomized women scheduled for a
hysterectomy due to subjective menorrhagia to mefenamic acid (n=6) or placebo (n=5). There
was a significant reduction in mean MBL from baseline in the treatment group (43 ml, p=0.01)
compared with a 38-ml increase in MBL in the placebo group.67
A fair quality crossover trial conducted in the United Kingdom compared naproxen to
mefenamic acid among 38 women with MBL more than 80 ml for 2 treatment cycles. Median
reductions in blood volume from baseline for mefenamic acid ranged from 54 ml to 61 ml
(p<0.001) and the reduction for naproxen ranged from 52 to 62 ml (p<0.001) over 2 treatment
cycles. There were no significant differences in reductions in MBL between mefenamic acid and
naproxen.75

40
A fair quality crossover RCT conducted in Australia reported greater reductions in mean
MBL among those receiving mefenamic acid (18.8 ml) for 2 treatment cycles compared with
those receiving placebo. Among the women with MBL more than 80 ml at baseline (n=30), there
was a significant (p<0.001) reduction in mean MBL (33.6 ml) among those receiving mefenamic
acid compared with those receiving placebo.76
Six poor quality studies reported similar findings; NSAIDS significantly reduced MBL
compared with baseline (Table 15). In a poor quality RCT conducted in the United Kingdom
with 51 women,63 MBL was reduced by 21 ml in those receiving mefenamic acid compared with
baseline; however, the women in the LNG-IUS group reported significantly greater reductions in
blood loss volume (117 ml, p<0.001) from baseline.
In an RCT conducted in Ireland,66 81 women were randomized to either TXA (n=27),
mefenamic acid (n=25), or ethamsylate (n=29) for three cycles. Compared with baseline, those
receiving TXA had an 89 ml reduction in MBL, those receiving mefenamic acid reported a 43 ml
reduction, and those receiving ethamsylate reported an increase in MBL of 8 ml. Those receiving
TXA had a 46 ml greater reduction in MBL compared with those receiving mefenamic acid
(p<0.05) and those receiving mefenamic acid had a 51 ml greater reduction in MBL compared
with those receiving ethamsylate; however, mean MBL (148 ml; range, 138 to 168 ml) after 3
cycles of treatment with mefenamic acid remained more than 80 ml.
In a crossover trial conducted in Australia, 68 there were no differences in absolute reductions
in MBL volume between mefenamic acid and low-dose COC (30 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 150
mcg levonorgestrel given daily for 21 days) or between mefenamic acid compared with
naproxen. Reductions in blood loss volume compared with baseline were reported for both those
receiving mefenamic acid (38.1 ml, p=0.002) and those receiving COC (43.2 ml, p<0.001). In
the other group, there were nonsignificant reductions in MBL from baseline for mefenamic acid
(26 ml) and naproxen (15.5 ml).
In one RCT conducted in the United Kingdom,70 median MBL was reduced after 2 cycles of
mefenamic acid from 123 ml (range, 86 to 237 ml) to 81 ml (range, 22 to 193 ml), a reduction of
42 ml (p<0.001) and was significantly reduced with norethisterone from 109 ml (range, 81 to
236 ml) to 92 ml (range, 43 to 189 ml), a reduction of 17 ml (p<0.002), but there was no
significant difference in reductions between mefenamic acid and norethisterone.
A small crossover trial71 conducted in Sweden that compared TXA with flurbiprofen for two
treatment cycles, reported significantly (p<0.01) greater reductions in mean MBL from baseline
for TXA (140 ml, p<0.01) compared with the change in MBL from baseline for flurbiprofen (72
ml, p<0.01).
In another small RCT conducted in the United Kingdom,74 median MBL was significantly
reduced after two cycles of treatment with mefenamic acid (n=6), 38 ml reduction (median 47
ml; range, 39 to 210 ml) from baseline (85 ml; range, 68 to 169 ml), p=0.05, and was
significantly reduced with a progesterone-impregnated intrauterine coil (n=7), 19 ml reduction
(median 45 ml; range, 31 to 77 ml) from baseline (median 64 ml; range, 56 to 164 ml, p<0.05).
However, there was no significant reduction in median MBL after two cycles of norethisterone
(21 ml; median 110 ml; range, 18 to 187 ml).

41
Table 15. Change in blood loss volume from baseline in studies of NSAIDs
Comparator NSAID vs.
Author, Year NSAID Comparator NSAID Group
Group Comparator Group
Vargyas et al.,
Meclofenamate Placebo -72.6 -6.0 p<0.0001
198772
Van Elijkeren et
Mefenamic acid Placebo -43.0 +38.0 NR
al., 199267
75
Hall et al., 1987 Mefenamic acid Naproxen -57.5 -57.0 p=NS
Fraser et al.,
Mefenamic acid Placebo NR NR p<0.001
1981, 198476
Reid and
Virtanen- Mefenamic acid LNG-IUS -21.0 -117.0 p<0.001
Kari,200563
Bonnar and
Mefenamic acid TXA -43.0 -89.0 p<0.05
Sheppard,199666
Bonnar and
Mefenamic acid Ethamsylate -43.0 +8.0 p<0.05
Sheppard,199666
Fraser and
McCarron, Mefenamic acid Naproxen -26.0 -15.5 p=NS
199168
Fraser and
a
McCarron, Mefenamic acid COC -38.1 -43.2 p=NS
199168
Cameron et al.,
Mefenamic acid Norethisterone -42.0 -17.0 p=NS
199070
Andersch et al.,
Flurbiprofen TXA -72.0 -140.0 p<0.01
198871
Cameron et al.,
Mefenamic acid Norethisterone -38.0 -21.0 NR
198774
Progesterone-
Cameron et al.,
Mefenamic acid impregnated -38.0 -19.0 NR
198774
intrauterine coil
COC = combined oral contraceptive; LNG-IUS = levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system; NSAID = nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drug; NR = not reported; NS = nonsignificant
a
Ethinyl estradiol (30 mcg)/levonorgestrel (150 mcg).

Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart Score


One poor quality RCT conducted in India77 randomized 110 women with menorrhagia to a
combination of TXA and mefenamic acid or TXA alone for three treatment cycles. The pictorial
blood loss assessment chart score was lowered by 146 points (59%, p<0.01) from baseline in
those receiving mefenamic acid plus TXA and by 125 points (50%, p=NS) from baseline in those
receiving TXA alone. In a poor quality RCT conducted in the United Kingdom,63 women
receiving mefenamic acid reported a 74-point reduction (p<0.001) in the median pictorial blood
loss assessment chart score from baseline.

Relief of Menorrhagia
Improvement in the subjective relief of menorrhagia with NSAIDs was reported in two
trials.66,69 One RCT conducted in India69 randomized 80 women with subjectively defined,
cyclic, heavy bleeding to either mefenamic acid or placebo for three cycles. Relief of
menorrhagia was significantly greater among those receiving mefenamic acid (86%) compared
with those receiving placebo (20%). Another trial66 reported that most women (57%) who

42
received mefenamic acid thought their blood loss was less after three treatment cycles compared
with baseline. A small, placebo-controlled crossover trial conducted in Canada73 randomized
women to 2 cycles each of mefenamic acid and placebo and reported that 8 of the 10 women
who competed the study experienced reductions in MBL during the mefenamic acid cycles
compared with their placebo cycles (p<0.05).

Duration of Bleeding and Total Menstrual Fluid Loss


Duration of bleeding (in days) was reported in six trials of NSAIDs.66,69,70,72,75,76 In two trials,
one fair and one good quality, the duration of menstrual blood flow was shorter among those
receiving either meclofenamate72 or mefenamic acid76 compared with placebo. Another fair
quality study reported that both mefenamic acid and naproxen reduced the mean number of
bleeding days.75
Two poor quality RCTs reported a significantly shorter duration of bleeding during
mefenamic treatment cycles compared with pretreatment cycles,69,70 but there was no change
with norethisterone.70 In one poor quality, three-arm trial66 of mefenamic acid, TXA, and
ethamsylate, there was no difference in duration of menstrual bleeding between treatment arms.
In one poor quality study,63 total menstrual fluid loss was significantly less at cycle 3 and cycle 6
compared with baseline among women receiving mefenamic acid.

Hemoglobin
In two trials,71,72 hemoglobin concentrations did not increase during treatment with NSAIDs.
In a good quality, crossover trial conducted in the United States, the median hemoglobin,
hematocrit, and ferritin levels were unchanged compared with baseline.72 In a crossover trial
conducted in Sweden,71 hemoglobin concentration during control cycles was no different from
hemoglobin concentration during treatment. In the RCT in India,77 mean hemoglobin increased
significantly in the group receiving combined mefenamic acid and TXA (12.3 g/dl) and in the
group receiving TXA alone (12.0 g/dl).

Head-to-Head Comparisons
Mefenamic Acid Versus Naproxen
Two crossover trials compared mefenamic acid to naproxen.68,75 There were no differences in
reduction of MBL between mefenamic acid and naproxen.
One fair quality crossover trial75 conducted in the United Kingdom compared naproxen to
mefenamic acid among 38 women with MBL more than 80 ml for 2 treatment cycles. Primary
outcomes were mean MBL using the alkaline hematin method. Both mefenamic acid and
naproxen reduced median MBL by 46 to 47 percent and 44 to 48 percent, respectively, compared
with baseline. The median reductions in MBL volume from baseline for mefenamic acid ranged
from 54 ml to 61 ml (p<0.001); the reduction for naproxen ranged from 52 to 62 ml (p<0.001)
over two treatment cycles. There were no differences in reductions in MBL between mefenamic
acid and naproxen.
One poor quality crossover trial68 conducted in Australia randomized 30 women with a
clinical history of menorrhagia to either mefenamic acid or naproxen for 2 cycles. The same dose
of mefenamic acid was compared with oral contraceptives in a second group (see section below).
The primary outcome was MBL measured by the alkaline hematin method. Mefenamic acid
reduced mean MBL by 20 percent compared with baseline (p=NS). Naproxen reduced mean

43
MBL by 12 percent compared with baseline (p=NS) with no significant differences in reductions
between mefenamic acid and naproxen. Despite these reductions, the majority of women
receiving NSAIDs still had objective menorrhagia after treatment. There was considerable
variability in response to both NSAIDs, with some women experiencing increases in MBL
during treatment with NSAIDs.

Mefenamic Acid Versus Progesterone-Releasing Intrauterine Systems


Two poor quality RCTs conducted in the United Kingdom examined the efficacy of
mefenamic acid compared with progesterone-releasing intrauterine systems. One studied the
continuous LNG-IUS,63 and the other studied an older progesterone-impregnated intrauterine
coil that releases 65 mcg of progesterone daily.74 Both trials used objective measures of MBL
(alkaline hematin method) for inclusion criteria, but with slightly different volumes (more than
80 ml63 and more than 50 ml74) to assess MBL outcomes.
One RCT with 51 participants63 reported a statistically significant greater reduction in
median MBL from baseline in the women with LNG-IUS (117 ml) compared with the women
receiving mefenamic acid (21 ml) after six cycles of treatment. Significantly greater (p<0.001)
reductions in the median pictorial blood loss assessment chart score and total menstrual fluid loss
were also reported with LNG-IUS compared with mefenamic acid. Despite significant reductions
with mefenamic acid, most patients still had objective MBL more than 80 ml.
One small RCT74 reported reductions in median MBL after two cycles of treatment with both
mefenamic acid (n=6), with a reduction of 21 ml (median 47 ml; range, 39 to 210 ml) from
baseline (85 ml; range, 68 to 169 ml; p=0.05), and with the progesterone-impregnated
intrauterine coil (n=7) with a reduction of 19 ml (median 45 ml; range, 31 to 77 ml) from
baseline (median 64 ml; range, 56 to 164 ml; p<0.05). No statistics for head-to-head comparisons
were reported.

NSAIDs Versus TXA


Two poor quality trials compared NSAIDs with TXA.66,71 Both trials reported that women
receiving TXA had significantly greater reductions in mean MBL compared with either
mefenamic acid or flurbiprofen over three cycles.
One RCT66 conducted in Ireland, randomized 81 women with MBL more than 80 ml to either
TXA (n=27), mefenamic acid (n=25), or ethamsylate (n=29) for three cycles. There was a
significant reduction in mean MBL from baseline over three treatment cycles for two of three
treatment arms: 54 percent (p<0.001) for TXA and 20 percent (p<0.001) for mefenamic acid.
The absolute change in MBL compared with baseline was −89 ml with TXA, −43 ml with
mefenamic acid, and +8 ml with ethamsylate.
One small randomized crossover trial71 conducted in Sweden compared TXA to flurbiprofen
in 15 women with MBL more than 80 ml. The trial reported a statistically significant reduction
in mean MBL (53%) in the group receiving TXA (53%) compared with the group receiving
flurbiprofen (24%). Absolute reductions in blood loss volume from baseline were greater for
TXA (140 ml) compared with flurbiprofen (72 ml).

TXA Plus Mefenamic Acid Versus TXA Alone


One poor quality RCT conducted in India77 randomized 110 women with menorrhagia (not
objectively defined) to a combination of TXA and mefenamic acid or to TXA alone. After three
treatment cycles, the pictorial blood loss assessment chart score was reduced in those receiving

44
mefenamic acid plus TXA (59%, p<0.01) and in those receiving TXA alone (50%, p=NS). No
statistics for head-to-head comparisons were reported.

Mefenamic Acid Versus Norethisterone


Two poor quality RCTs conducted in the United Kingdom examined the efficacy of
mefenamic acid compared with norethisterone. 70,74 Both trials examined the same dose and
duration of mefenamic acid (500 mg 3 times daily on cycle days 1 to 5) and the same dose of
norethisterone (5 mg twice per day) but given during slightly different cycle days, (days 19 to
2670 vs. days 15 to 2574). Both trials used the alkaline method for MBL measurement for
inclusion (50 to 80 ml) and outcome criteria.
One RCT70 reported no difference in reductions of median MBL among those receiving 2
treatment cycles of mefenamic acid (n=17) compared with those receiving norethisterone (n=15).
With either treatment, the majority of women still had MBL more than 80 ml. In the other small
RCT,74 no statistics for head-to-head comparisons were reported. Compared with baseline,
median MBL was reduced after treatment with mefenamic acid (n=6) by 38 ml and by 21 ml
(p=NS) among those receiving norethisterone (n=6). Median MBL with treatment was 47 ml
(range, 39 to 210 ml) with mefenamic acid and 110 ml (range, 24 to 222 ml) with norethisterone.
Mefenamic Acid Versus Low-Dose COC
One poor quality crossover trial68 conducted in Australia examined the efficacy of
mefenamic acid compared with low-dose COC with 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 150 mcg
levonorgestrel given daily for 21 days among 30 women with a clinical history of menorrhagia.
There were no differences between mefenamic acid and COC in reductions in mean MBL (38%
vs. 43%) or absolute reductions in MBL volume (38 ml vs. 43 ml).

Tranexamic Acid
Key Points
• Women taking TXA at a dose of 1.95 to 4.5 grams per day for 4 to 5 days from the onset
of bleeding experienced a clinically significant reduction in MBL, ranging from 26
percent to 54 percent in studies lasting up to 1 year. However, there are no long-term
followup studies.
• In comparison to progestogens, combined hormonal pills, and NSAIDs, TXA appeared to
provide greater reduction in MBL. No head-to-head comparisons of TXA versus LNG-
IUS were assessed.
• The number of reports of side-effects and adverse effects was generally not significantly
different between TXA and the comparator.
• Although no thromboembolic events were reported in any of the included TXA studies,
there are concerns about the possible increased risk of thromboembolic events in
particular women. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued precautions and
contra-indications.

Detailed Synthesis
TXA is a competitive inhibitor of plasminogen activation, thereby acting as an
antifibrinolytic agent. TXA does not appear to affect platelet numbers or aggregation but acts to
reduce the breakdown of fibrin in a preformed clot. Because menstrual bleeding involves

45
liquefaction of clotted blood from the spiral endometrial arterioles, a reduction in this process is
the putative mechanism of reduced menstrual bleeding.
Seven RCTs of TXA were identified (Table 16).66,71,77-81 One study compared TXA alone to
TXA plus mefenamic acid, and is discussed in the NSAIDs section above.77 For the six other
studies of TXA, study population ranged from 1571 to 304.81 The total number of women
randomized to TXA was 475. The total number of women assigned to TXA for whom study
endpoint outcome measures were collected, including intention to treat missing data protocols,
was 460.
For five of the trials, the bleeding criterion for study entry was a mean MBL (assessed using
the alkaline hematin method) of at least 80 ml for two or three cycles prior to
randomization.66,71,78,80,81 A sixth trial used the pictorial blood loss assessment chart score greater
than 100 to enroll participants.79 The mean MBL at baseline was similar for four of the trials
(range, 153 to 186 ml).66,78,80,81 The mean MBL at baseline was 295 ml for one trial.71
The intervention dosage differed among the six trials. The TXA administration protocols for
each menstrual cycle were: 1.95 grams per day or 3.9 grams per day for up to 5 days,81 2 grams
per day for 5 days,79 3.9 grams per day for up to 5 days,78 4 grams per day for 4 days,80 4 grams
per day for 5 days,66 4.5 grams per day for 3 days and then 2 grams per day for 2 days.71
Two of the studies were placebo-controlled.78,81The comparator differed across the other four
trials and included: oral MPA for 20 days,79 oral norethisterone for 7 days,80 mefenamic acid for
5 days,66 ethamsylate for 5 days,66 and flurbiprofen for 5 days.71
The primary outcome of the trials was change in blood loss (absolute volume or percent) or
change in pictorial blood loss assessment chart score. The alkaline hematin method was used to
assess MBL in five trials.66,71,78,80,81 The absolute change in mean blood loss from baseline and
percent change were reported in five studies.66,71,78,80,81 Three of these four reported mean
MBL,71,78,80 and three reported median MBL.66,78,80 One trial used the pictorial blood loss
assessment chart, which is a validated chart that helps participants more uniformly report
bleeding as represented by the degree of saturation of sanitary pads and tampons, for the
outcome measure.79
The timing of the summative outcome measure reporting varied among the trials. Two trials
reported after two menstrual cycles.71,80 Two trials reported after three menstrual cycles.66,81 Two
trials reported after six menstrual cycles.78,79
The setting varied: two trials were conducted in the United States,78,81 three in Europe,66,71,80
and one in India.79 Overall one study was assessed as good quality,78 two were fair quality,80,81
and three were poor quality.66,71,79 Details of quality scoring for individual publications are
included in Appendix I.

46
Table 16. Primary outcomes of TXA for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding
Author, Year
Country Comparison Groups (n) Key Outcomes
Quality
• Mean reduction in MBL measured by the alkaline hematin
method after 6 cycles was greater in G1 compared with G2
(p<0.001).
Lukes et al., 201078 G1: TXA 1.3 g 3 times daily
• Proportion of women with at least 50 ml reduction in MBL
United States up to 5 days per cycle (123)
was 56% in G1 and 19% in G2 (p<0.0001).
Good G2: Placebo (73)
• Women in G1 reported improvements in quality of life
(measured by the Menorrhagia Impact Score) compared
with G2 (p<0.01).
G1: TXA 3.9 g per day for
up to 5 days of menstrual
• Mean MBL was significantly reduced during treatment
Freeman et al., bleeding (118)
compared with baseline for G1 (26%) and for G2 (39%).
201181 G2: TXA 1.95 g per day for
• The reduction in mean MBL was significantly greater in the
Fair up to 5 days of menstrual
group receiving the higher TXA dose (G2).
bleeding (117)
G3: Placebo (69)
G1: TXA 1 g 4 times daily
• Mean reduction in MBL from baseline was 45% for G1
Preston et al., 199580 for 4 days (25)
(p<0.0001); mean MBL increased in G2 (p=NS).
United Kingdom G2: Norethisterone 5 mg
• Fourteen (56%) women in G1 and 2 (9.5%) women in G2
Fair twice a day on days 19 to 26
achieved MBL<80 ml.
(21)
• Both groups had significant (p<0.005) reductions in PBLAC
79 G1: TXA 500 mg 4 times scores after 3 months and mean reduction in blood loss
Kriplani et al., 2006
daily for 5 days (50) was 60.3% in G1 and 57.7% in G2.
India
G2: MPA 10 mg twice daily • Hemoglobin levels rose in both groups (p<0.05 for both).
Poor
days 5 to 25 (50) • Three women in G1 (6.1%) and 13 (28.9%) in G2 did not
respond to treatment (p=0.003).
G1: TXA 1 g every 6 hrs.
Bonnar and (27)
• Women in G1 had blood loss reduction of 54% compared
Shepard, 199666 G2: Ethamsylate 500 mg
with 20% for women in G3.
Ireland every 6 hrs. (29)
G3: Mefenamic acid 500 mg • No reduction in blood loss for G2.
Poor
every 8 hrs. (25)
G1: TXA for 2 cycles
Andersch et al., followed by flurbiprofen for 2 • MBL was significantly reduced during treatment with
a
198871 cycles (15) flurbiprofen and TXA.
Sweden G2: Flurbiprofen for 2 cycles • MBL was significantly (p<0.01) lower during treatment with
Poor followed by TXA for 2 cycles TXA compared with flurbiprofen.
a
(15)
MBL = menstrual blood loss; PBLAC = pictorial blood assessment chart
a
Crossover study.

Description of Results

Outcome Measures
The alkaline hematin method for MBL was used as an outcome measure in 5 of the TXA
trials.66,71,78,80,81 One poor quality trial used the pictorial blood loss assessment chart to assess
blood loss, with menorrhagia defined by a pictorial blood loss assessment chart score of 100 or
greater.79 Other outcome measures included hemoglobin level, treatment success, and quality of
life.

47
MBL
Reduction Expressed as a Percent
In five studies (one good quality, two fair quality, and two poor quality), TXA was associated
with significant reductions in MBL ranging from 26 to 54 percent (Table 17). A good quality
placebo-controlled trial reported a statistically significant (p<0.001) reduction in mean MBL
among women in the modified intent-to-treat population receiving TXA (40%) compared with
those receiving placebo (8%) for six menstrual cycles. The attributable reduction for TXA was
32 percent (p<0.001).78 The other placebo-controlled trial of fair quality reported significant
reductions in mean MBL for women receiving 3.9 or 1.95 grams per day of TXA (39% and 26%,
respectively) compared with a reduction in MBL of 2 percent for women taking placebo
(p<0.001).81
The trial that compared TXA with norethisterone reported a statistically significant reduction
in mean MBL among women receiving TXA for two treatment cycles compared with those
receiving norethisterone: 45-percent reduction (95% CI, 23% increase to 93% reduction;
p<0.0001 vs. baseline) compared with a 20-percent increase (95% CI, 114% increase to 62%
reduction; p=0.26 vs. baseline).80
A trial that compared TXA with ethamsylate and with mefenamic acid reported that over
three treatment cycles the mean reduction in MBL from baseline for the group receiving TXA
was 54 percent (p<0.001). For the mefenamic acid group the mean reduction in MBL from
baseline was 20 percent (p<0.001). There was no change in MBL for the ethamsylate group.66
A small, poor quality, crossover trial (n=15) that compared TXA with flurbiprofen reported
that over two treatment cycles the mean reduction in MBL from baseline for TXA was 53
percent (p<0.01) compared with 24 percent for flurbiprofen (p<0.01).71

Table 17. Percent change in blood loss from baseline in studies of TXA
Comparator TXA vs. Comparator
Author, Year Comparator TXA Group
Group Group
Lukes et al.,
Placebo -40.4 -8.2 p<0.001
201078
-38.6 (high dose)
Freeman et al.,
Placebo -26.1 (low dose) -1.9 p<0.0001
201181

Preston et al.,
Norethisterone -45.0 +20.0 p<0.0001
199580
Bonnar and
Mefenamic acid -54.0 -20.0 p<0.05
Shepard, 199666
Bonnar and
Ethamsylate -54.0 Increased p<0.0001
Shepard, 199666
Andersch et al.,
Flurbiprofen -53.0 -24.0 p<0.01
198871
MPA = medroxyprogesterone; NS = nonsignificant; NR = not reported

Reduction Expressed as a Volume


In five studies (one good quality, two fair quality, and two poor quality) TXA was associated
with significant reductions in MBL ranging from 47 to 140 ml (Table 18). Both placebo-
controlled trials reported a statistically significant reduction in mean MBL for women treated
with TXA.78,81 Among women in the modified intent-to-treat population receiving TXA for six
menstrual cycles, one study reported a reduction in MBL of 69.6 ml compared with a reduction

48
of 12.6 ml in the placebo group; the attributable reduction for TXA was 57 ml (p<0.001). The
calculated least-squares mean reduction in MBL in the modified intent-to-treat population
receiving TXA (66.3 ml) was greater compared with those receiving placebo (17.8 ml); the
attributable reduction for TXA was 48.5 ml (p<0.001).78 The effect size for TXA (standardized
observed effect) was 0.67 based upon the modified intention to treat analysis and the standard
deviation. The effect size was 0.49 based upon the least squares mean change analysis and the
standard deviation.78 The effect size for TXA compared with placebo is large.
In the larger fair quality study that compared high-dose (3.9 g/day) and low-dose (1.95 g/day)
TXA to placebo, the mean reduction from baseline for the intent-to-treat population was 65.3 ml
and 46.5 ml, respectively, while the placebo group had a small insignificant decline of 3.0 ml.
The low-dose group did not meet the authors predetermined threshold of at least 50 ml per cycle
reduction in MBL from baseline, but both groups treated with TXA did achieve a reduction in
MBL from baseline that exceeded the threshold determined by authors to be meaningful to
women (36 ml/cycle).81
A small fair quality trial that compared TXA with norethisterone reported a statistically
significant reduction in mean MBL occurred among women receiving TXA for two treatment
cycles compared with those receiving norethisterone: 79 ml reduction (95% CI, 62 to 108 ml
reduction) compared with 34 ml increase (95% CI, −2 to 64 ml reduction).80
A trial that compared TXA with ethamsylate and with mefenamic acid reported that the
pretreatment MBL in the TXA group ranged from 143 to 178 ml, and over three treatment cycles
the mean MBL was 72 to 77 ml, a mean reduction in MBL of 89 ml (range, 24 to 214 ml,
p<0.001). For the ethamsylate group, the pretreatment MBL ranged from 157 to 185 ml, and
over three treatment cycles the mean MBL was 161 to 185 ml, a mean increase of 8 ml (range,
280 to 103 ml). For the mefenamic acid group, the pretreatment MBL ranged from 159 to 199
ml, and over three treatment cycles the mean MBL was 138 to 168 ml, a mean reduction in MBL
of 43 ml (range, 82 to 179 ml; p<0.001).66 Head-to-head comparisons of the results of treatment
on absolute changes in blood loss showed that TXA reduced the mean loss by 97 ml more than
with ethamsylate (95% CI, 54 to 140 ml, p<0.001) and by 56 ml more than with mefenamic acid
(95% CI, 2 to 90 ml, p<0.05).66
A small crossover trial that compared TXA with flurbiprofen reported that over two
treatment cycles the mean reduction in MBL from baseline for TXA was 140 ml (SD ± 33 ml,
p<0.01), compared with 72 ml (SD ± 44 ml, p<0.01) for flurbiprofen.71

Table 18. Change in blood loss volume from baseline in studies of TXA
TXA vs.
Author, Year Comparator TXA Group Comparator Group
Comparator Group
Lukes et al.,
Placebo −69.6 ml −12.6 ml p<0.001
201078
Freeman et al., -65.3 ml (high-dose)
Placebo -3.0 ml p<0.0001
201181 -46.5 ml (low-dose)
Preston et al.,
Norethisterone −79.0 ml +34.0 ml p<0.0001
199580
Bonnar and
Mefenamic acid −89.0 ml −43.0 ml p<0.05
Shepard, 199666
Bonnar and
Ethamsylate −89.0 ml +8.0 ml p<0.001
Shepard, 199666
Andersch et al.,
Flurbiprofen −140.0 ml −72.0 ml p<0.01
198871
NR = not reported

49
Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart Score
One poor quality trial that used the pictorial blood loss assessment chart score as the blood
loss measure, compared TXA with oral MPA and reported a significant (p<0.005) reduction in
the pictorial blood loss assessment chart score over three treatment cycles from baseline for both
TXA (60.3%) and MPA (57.7%).79

Hemoglobin
Four studies71,78-80 reported changes in hemoglobin level. In the good quality study, mean
hemoglobin levels were unchanged from baseline for women taking TXA (0.02 ± 1.10 g/dL)
while the placebo group had a statistically significant increase (0.34 ± 0.66 g/dL) that was not
considered clinically significant.78 The post treatment hemoglobin levels were similar (estimated
difference 0.2 g/dl, 95% CI, −0.5 to 0.9) in the TXA (12.9 g/dl) and norethisterone groups (12.6
g/dl).80 Hemoglobin levels rose significantly from baseline for women taking TXA (p=0.0003)
and women taking MPA (p=0.02).79 The small crossover trial did not find differences in mean
hemoglobin during the control cycles (127.4 ± 3.7 g/l) compared with either TXA (126.2 ± 3.0
g/l) or flurbiprofen (127.2 ± 3.4 g/l) cycles.71

Treatment Success
One placebo-controlled trial reported a statistically significant difference (p<0.001) for
achieving a MBL below 80 ml (standard definition of heavy menstrual bleeding) in the modified
intent-to-treat population between women receiving TXA (43%) compared with those receiving
placebo (17%) for six menstrual cycles.78 This same study reported that 69 percent of cycles in
the TXA group achieved a predetermined MBL reduction of at least 36 ml, representing a blood
loss reduction considered meaningful to women.78 In the three-arm placebo controlled study,
women receiving the higher (3.9 g/day) and lower (1.95 g/d) dose of TXA achieved a reduction
in MBL from baseline that was perceived as meaningful to participants; however, only
participants receiving the higher dose of TXA (3.9 g/day) achieved a mean reduction in MBL
that exceeded 50 ml per cycle.81

Quality of Life
One placebo-controlled trial reported a statistically significant (p<0.001) difference in social
or leisure activities, and in physical activity, favoring TXA.78 Women taking TXA has
significant improvements in quality of life as assessed by the Menorrhagia Impact
Questionnaire.81

Head-to-Head Comparisons

TXA Versus Norethisterone and MPA


The trial that compared TXA with norethisterone reported a statistically significant
(p<0.0001) reduction in mean MBL for women receiving TXA for two treatment cycles
compared with no reduction for women receiving norethisterone.80 Expressed as percentage, the
change in MBL for TXA was a 45-percent reduction (95% CI, 23% increase to 93% reduction;
p<0.0001 vs. baseline) compared with an increase of 20 percent (95% CI, 114% increase to 62%
reduction; p=0.26 vs. baseline) for norethisterone; expressed as a measure of volume, there was a
reduction in MBL of 79 ml (95% CI, 62 to 108 ml reduction) for TXA compared with an
increase of 34 ml (95% CI, −2 to 64 ml reduction) for noresthisterone.80

50
In a trial that compared TXA with oral MPA, both groups experienced significant reductions
in MBL compared with baseline; the effect of these interventions was comparable (p=0.78). 79

TXA Versus Mefenamic Acid, Ethamsylate, and Flurbiprofen,


TXA reduced the mean blood loss by 97 ml more than with ethamsylate (95% CI, 140 to 54,
p<0.001) and by 46 ml more than with mefenamic acid (95% CI, 90 to 2 ml, p<0.05).66 The trial
that compared TXA with flurbiprofen reported that the reduction in MBL during treatment with
TXA was significantly (p<0.01) greater than the reduction reported during treatment with
flurbiprofen.71

Combined Oral Contraceptives


Key Points
• In two medium-sized RCTs, treatment of affected women with estradiol valerate and
dienogest led to improvement in a range of AUB symptoms, including both overall
complete response and effects on relevant laboratory values (e.g., hemoglobin, ferritin).
• In one small RCT and one small randomized crossover study of combination therapy
with ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel and one small RCT assessing therapy with
ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone acetate, COC treatment was associated with
significant reductions in MBL as compared with baseline.

Detailed Synthesis
We identified five RCTs that explored the effects of therapy with COCs on the incidence and
severity of abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding including two studies examining estradiol valerate
and dienogest,82,83 two studies examining ethinyl estradiol plus levonorgestrel,59,68 and one study
examining the combination of norethindrone acetate and ethinyl estradiol (Table 19).61 All five
studies were industry-sponsored.59,61,68,82,83 Three were multicenter RCTs, involving Australia
and Europe,82 the United States and Canada,83 and Canada,61 and two were academic single
center studies, one conducted in Egypt59 and one conducted in Australia.68 Two of the studies
included seven 28-day cycles of therapy with the primary response rate determined after 90 days
of therapy,82,83 while one examined outcomes after 6 months68 and two assessed outcomes after
12 months.59,61 Two studies employed a placebo comparison group,82,83 two compared COCs to
LNG-IUS,59,61 and one included a randomized crossover comparison of a COC to mefenamic
acid.68

51
Table 19. Primary outcomes of COCs for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding
Author, Year
Country Comparison Groups (n) Key Outcomes
Quality
• Full resolution of qualifying abnormal menstrual symptoms
during the first 90 days of treatment observed in 40.7% of
G1, as compared with 1.6% of G2 (p<0.0001).
Fraser et al., 201182 • Mean reduction in MBL was 69% in G1 vs. 5.8% in G2 and
G1: Estradiol valerate and
United States, there were significant reductions in days of bleeding
dienogest (149)
Canada (p=0.0186), and number of sanitary protection items used
G2: Placebo (82)
Good (p<0.0001) observed in G1 vs. G2.
• G1 participants had significant improvements vs. baseline in
hemoglobin, hematocrit, and ferritin values; no similar
change in G2.
• Full resolution of qualifying abnormal menstrual symptoms
during the first 90 days of treatment observed in 43.8% of
G1 vs. 4.2% of G2 (p<0.001).
Jensen et al., 201183 G1: Estradiol valerate and
• Mean reduction in MBL was 353 ml (64.2%) in G1 vs. 130 ml
Australia, Europe dienogest (120)
(18.7%) in G2 (p<0.001).
Good G2: Placebo (70)
• G1 participants had significant improvements vs. baseline in
hemoglobin, hematocrit, and ferritin values; no similar
change in G2.
• G2 associated with significant reduction in MBL at 12
months vs. baseline from 274.3 ± 142.6 ml to 118.2 ± 75.0
Shaaban et al.,
G1: LNG-IUS (56) ml (p<0.001).
201159
G2: Ethinyl estradiol and • Reduction in MBL at 12 months was significantly greater in
Egypt
levonorgestrel (56) the G1 vs. G2.
Poor
• Significant improvements in patient assessment of overall
health noted in G1 and G2.
• G1 and G2 experienced a significant decreased in MBL at
Endrikat et al., 200961 G1: LNG-IUS (20) 12 months compared with baseline. Mean decrease of 68%
Canada G2: Ethinyl estradiol and in MBL for G2 (p<0.001).
Poor norethindrone acetate (19) • Median MBL in G2 decreased from 290 ml at baseline to 72
ml at 12 months.
• Significant reduction in mean MBL observed during the COC
a treatment cycles (43%) as compared with baseline.
G1: Mefenamic acid (12)
Fraser et al., 199168 (p<0.001).
G2: Ethinyl estradiol and
Australia a • At least 20% reduction in MBL as compared with the
levonorgestrel (12)
Poor preceding baseline cycles was observed in 10/12 patients
during mefenamic acid treatment and 9/12 during COC
treatment.
LNG-IUS = levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system; MBL = menstrual blood loss; COC = combined oral contraceptive
a
Crossover study.

All studies assessed measures related to changes in MBL, including use of the alkaline
hematin method59,68,82,83 and the pictorial blood loss assessment chart.59,61 Other outcomes
included number of sanitary items used, a composite outcome of menstrual bleeding-related
factors,82,83 and related hematologic parameters (i.e., hematocrit, hemoglobin, and/or serum
ferritin).59,61,82,83 One study also assessed potential impact on health-related quality of life15 and
one described effects on a menorrhagia symptom severity score.61 None of the studies assessed
any potential effect modifiers.
Among the five studies of COC therapy, two were good quality82,83 and three were poor
quality.59,61,68 Details of quality scoring for individual publications are included in Appendix I.

52
Description of Results

Estradiol Valerate and Dienogest


Two multicenter RCTs with the same industry sponsor assessed the utility of estradiol
valerate and dienogest in treatment of women with AUB, defined as prolonged, frequent, and/or
heavy bleeding. The first RCT82 was conducted in Australia and Europe and comprised 231
women, randomized at a 2:1 ratio after a 90-day run-in period to receive estradiol valerate and
dienogest for seven 28-day cycles. The study drug regimen included estradiol valerate 3 mg on
days 1 to 2, estradiol valerate 2 mg and dienogest 2 mg on days 3 to 7, estradiol valerate 2 mg
and dienogest 3 mg on days 8 to 24, estradiol valerate 2 mg on days 25 to 26, and placebo on
days 27 to 28. Complete response, defined as full resolution of qualifying abnormal menstrual
symptoms during the first 90 days of treatment as compared with the 90-day run-in phase, was
observed in 29.5 percent of the estradiol valerate and dienogest group, as compared with 1.2
percent of the placebo-treated patients (p<0.0001). Treatment with estradiol valerate and
dienogest was also associated with significant reductions in volume of MBL (p<0.0001), days of
bleeding (p=0.02), and number of sanitary protection items used (p<0.0001) as compared with
the placebo group. The estradiol valerate and dienogest-treated patients also experienced
significant improvements versus baseline in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and ferritin values; similar
improvements were not observed in the placebo-treated group.
The second RCT83 was conducted at centers in the United States and Canada, employing the
same dose and randomization schema and including 190 women with AUB. Complete response,
defined as full resolution of qualifying abnormal menstrual symptoms during the first 90 days of
treatment as compared with the 90-day run-in phase, was observed in a significantly greater
proportion of the estradiol valerate and dienogest group (35/80, 44%) as compared with the
placebo group (2/48, 4%, p<0.001). The mean reduction in MBL was also greater in the estradiol
valerate and dienogest (−353 ml or −64% vs. loss during run-in phase) when compared with the
placebo group (−130 ml or −19% vs. observed run-in loss, p<0.001). Individuals in the estradiol
valerate and dienogest group also experienced significant improvements in hemoglobin,
hematocrit, and ferritin values as compared with the run-in phase, while similar improvements
were not observed in the placebo group.

Ethinyl Estradiol and Levonorgestrel


Two randomized controlled trials assessed the utility of an ethinyl estradiol (30 mcg) and
levonorgestrel (150 mcg) combination in women with menorrhagia.59,68 One of these trials was a
single center RCT involving 112 women with idiopathic menorrhagia randomized to LNG-IUS
(n=56) or ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel (n=56) for 12 months.59 Efficacy data from the LNG-
IUS arm of the study is discussed further in the LNG-IUS section of this report. In this trial, the
COC regimen was associated with a significant reduction in MBL as assessed by the alkaline
hematin method at 12 months as compared with baseline, from 274.3 ± 142.6 ml to 118.2 ± 75.0
ml (p<0.001); however, the overall reduction in MBL was significantly greater in the LNG-IUS
group as compared with the COC group. Significant improvements in patient assessment of
overall health and reduction in physically ill days were noted in both treatment groups.
The other trial assessing the use of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel was a crossover study
in women with menorrhagia, with one arm comparing outcomes of 12 women treated
sequentially with mefenamic acid (500 mg every 12 hours from first sign of menses until 24
hours after usual duration of heavy bleeding) and COCs for two cycles each in random order,

53
with a two-cycle washout period between treatment cycles.68 Additional efficacy details for
mefenamic acid and for another treatment arm in this study involving naproxen are further
discussed in the NSAIDs section of this report. A significant (p<0.001) reduction in mean MBL
as measured by the alkaline hematin method was observed during the COC treatment cycles as
compared with baseline (43%); the reduction in mean MBL during the mefenamic acid treatment
period was not significantly different than the COC treatment period. A response of at least 20
percent reduction in MBL as compared with the preceding baseline cycles was observed in 10 of
12 patients during mefenamic acid treatment and in 9 of 12 during COC treatment. One patient
responded to COCs but not to mefenamic acid, and two patients exhibited a response to
mefenamic acid but not to the COC regimen.

Ethinyl Estradiol and Norethindrone Acetate


One multicenter randomized controlled trial compared the combination of ethinyl estradiol
(20 mcg) and norethindrone acetate (1 mg) to use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
system (LNG-IUS) over 12 months in 39 women with idiopathic menorrhagia.61 Efficacy data
from the LNG-IUS arm of the study is also discussed further in the levonorgestrel-releasing
intrauterine system section of this report. The LNG-IUS arm included 17 women and the COC
arm included 12. Both arms experienced a significant (p<0.001) decrease in MBL at 12 months
as compared with baseline, with a decrease from a median MBL of 290 ml at baseline to a
median of 72 ml at 12 months observed in the COC group (mean decrease 68%). The decrease in
MBL, however, was significantly greater in the LNG-IUS group versus the COC group
(p=0.002). Treatment success, defined as MBL less than 100 at 12 months, was observed in a
significantly (p<0.009) greater proportion of the LNG-IUS participants (80%) as compared with
the COC group (37%). Menorrhagia symptom severity scores were also significantly lower in the
LNG-IUS group at 6 months as compared with the COC group (p=0.05). No significant changes
in hemoglobin concentration were observed in either group during the study.

Use of Decision Aids in Treatment of Menorrhagia


Key Points
• Three RCTs evaluated decision aids to assist patients with menorrhagia. All were of poor
quality due to lack of blinding of participants and care providers.
• Improvements in general health status, the primary outcome for 2 studies, were not
associated with decision aids. One study reported lower use of hysterectomy among
women who had an interview prior to their consultation while another study did not show
differences in hysterectomy rates after 1 year. Two studies did not report differences in
treatment outcomes after 6 months or 1 year.

Detailed Synthesis
Decision aids are interventions to inform patients of their treatment options when more than
one option exists. A recent Cochrane review of RCTs of decision aid94 found that decision aids
are beneficial in increasing patient knowledge of treatment options, help to clarify benefits and
harms associated with therapeutic choices, and increase patient participation in decision
selection. They have been shown to reduce elective surgery and have no apparent adverse effects
on patient outcomes or satisfaction.94

54
We identified three RCTs with four publications85-87,95 about medical decision aids in women
with menorrhagia (Table 20). All of the studies used a written decision aid booklet; one study
evaluated a computerized decision aid in conjunction with the pamphlet and one study also
mailed participants a videotape and conducted an interview prior to clinical appointment.
Diagnosis of menorrhagia was determined from medical records and not quantified in any of the
studies. Length of followup ranged from 6 months to 2 years. Two studies were conducted in the
United Kingdom86,87 and one was conducted in Finland.85 These studies were all of poor quality.
The largest study (n=894), conducted in England, randomized women to receive booklet and
videotape with interview, materials without interview, or standard practice groups.86 General
health status improved significantly and menorrhagia severity decreased in all three groups.
Treatment rates were similar in all groups after 2 years. Women in the interview group had a
lower rate of hysterectomy and reported greater satisfaction with treatment results. A medium
sized Finnish study evaluated the effectiveness of a mailed information booklet on treatment
outcomes and general health status after 1 year.85,95 More women who received the decision aid
were less likely to receive newer treatment methods including minor surgery or LNG-IUS (16%
vs. 26%, p=0.03). Most of the measured health outcome scores improved after 1 year for both
groups with no significant difference in patient satisfaction, knowledge, anxiety or sexual
satisfaction.
A small English study87 conducted from 2003 to 2005 evaluated a computerized decision aid
in conjunction with a patient leaflet. Women in the intervention group had significantly less
decisional conflict at 2 weeks and higher knowledge scores at 6 months. There were no
significant group differences in anxiety or treatments received after 6 months.
Although decision aids do help to increase patient knowledge, there are some methodological
limitations in these studies, including low participation rates, large number of drop outs, and lack
of blinding. The diagnosis of menorrhagia was not quantified and no effect modifiers were
examined in any of these studies. Information on harms was not reported in any of the decision
aid studies.

55
Table 20. Primary outcomes of decision aids for abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding
Author, Year
Country Comparison Groups (n) Outcomes Results
Quality
• Decisional conflict was
significantly reduced in G1 vs. G2
(adjusted difference 16.6 95% CI,
G1: Computerized decision Primary: total score on
Protheroe et al., 21.5 to 11.6, p<0.001).
aid and information leaflet Decisional Conflict Scale
200787 • Anxiety declined slightly for both
(74) Secondary: anxiety, quality
United Kingdom groups (p=NS).
G2: Information leaflet only of life, knowledge, treatment
Poor
(72) preferences • Quality of life and knowledge
scores improved in both groups
but more in G1 as compared with
G2.
• Fewer women in G1 received
newer treatments (minor surgery
or LNG-IUS) (p=0.03);
Primary: Planned treatment
hysterectomy rates were similar
at 3 months and actual
in both groups.
treatment at 1 year
• Most health status measures
Vuorma et al., General health status
G1: Information booklet improved for both groups.
200485,95 measured by RAND -36
(184)
Secondary: knowledge of • At 3 months 18% of women in G1
Finland
G2: Usual care (179) and 8% in G2 had received
Poor treatment methods,
prescription for oral medication
satisfaction with
(p=0.007).
communication anxiety and
sexuality • There were no differences
between groups in anxiety,
satisfaction, knowledge or sexual
satisfaction.
• Health status measures improved
for all 3 groups. Treatment rate
Primary: general health
(81%) during study was similar
G1: Interview and status measured using SF-
Kennedy et al., for all 3 groups (p=0.17) but
information booklet (300) 36
200286 women in G1 were less likely to
G2: Information booklet Secondary: treatments
United Kingdom have a hysterectomy (OR 0.60
only (296) received during followup,
Poor 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.96).
G3: No intervention (298) severity of menorrhagia,
• G1 were more satisfied in taking
patient satisfaction
part in treatment decision and
with results compared with G3.
CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; NS = nonsignificant

KQ2. Harms of Interventions for Management of Abnormal


Bleeding
Description of Included Studies and Sources of Information
Capturing useful information about potential harms of treatment for reproductive-age women
that is specifically applicable to interventions for abnormal bleeding is a challenge. A wide range
of interventions are used to treat abnormal bleeding. Twelve interventions relevant to the primary
care setting were identified for this report. They range from medications that are exceptionally
familiar to providers such as NSAIDs to potentially less familiar or newer medications like
exenatide (an injectable diabetes agent). Interventions also include those with widespread use
and many indications, like oral contraceptive pills or acupuncture, as well as those specifically
for the indication of abnormal bleeding like TXA.

56
To pare down the scope of the material, we took a four step approach to structuring this KQ
about harms.
• Summarizing harms detected within clinical trials included in this review. This has
limitations since many of the studies are small, with a range in size of 14 to 894 and a
median total study population of 80. Thus they are not well-suited to detecting events that
are rare but may be serious or affect a specific subgroup of women.
• Compiling the key content of FDA documents and package inserts for specific products
addressed in this review. This however lacks specificity as many of these products have
multiple indications and the concerns may not be as applicable to the population of
women with AUB or to the dose and duration of use for treating AUB. Furthermore
symptoms and harms are reported in these documents that may not be statistically,
meaningfully different between the active agent and the placebo.
• Searching for surveillance studies that aimed to examine risk of harm in large populations
of individuals (i.e., 1600 or more) using the specific intervention. This last step was done
using a separate search described in greater detail in methods. We restricted summarizing
results from harms surveillance studies to: metformin, exenatide, progestogens,
cabergoline, LNG-IUS, contraceptive vaginal ring, and TXA.
• Providing information about existing contemporary reviews and guidance on harms for
common medications with broad indications. Like the second approach it is important to
note that these extant literature reviews reflects varied indications and populations that
may not be directly applicable to use for AUB.
The organization of this chapter includes evidence about harms from these sources in the
following order:
• Harms identified in randomized trials included in this review.
• Harms flagged in FDA package inserts and regulatory proceedings.
• Harms investigated in large surveillance studies of metformin, exenatide, relevant
progestogens, cabergoline, LNG-IUS, contraceptive vaginal ring, and TXA.
• Contemporary reviews that include review of harms.
We present this summary of harms in the same order of KQs and intervention methods as the
results for our KQs. Interventions for irregular uterine bleeding are present before those for
abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding.

Key Points for Harms of Reviewed Treatments


• Metformin is associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal symptoms like diarrhea
and abdominal pain. Symptoms can be reduced by slowly increasing the dose. Severe
harms including lactic acidosis, serious hypoglycemia, and liver failure, studied among
populations of adult diabetics, occur at incidence rates below 1 in 10,000 and may be as
low as 1 in 100,000 person-years of exposure.
• Progestogens are associated with a number of common side effects of hormonal
preparations including weight gain, fluid retention, abdominal pain, nausea, change in
mood, and change in appetite. Abnormal uterine bleeding is itself a common side effect
of progestogen only interventions.
• COCs have commonly recognized side effects that include edema, breast tenderness,
nausea, headache, and skin changes. Known contraindications, including advancing age,
smoking, and high risk of thrombosis, apply when considering use of COCs for irregular

57
bleeding. Selected COC formulations may have lower risk of deep vein thrombosis than
others.
• Cabergoline has few known distinct harms; however, data is inadequate to assess risk in
young women without elevated prolactin.
• LNG-IUS has few serious harms after insertion. Irregular bleeding, especially early after
insertion is the most commonly reported side effect. Painful insertion occurs in roughly 1
of 100 procedures; 3.2 of 100 insertions are technically difficult, and uterine perforation
occurs in 0.9 to 2.6 cases per 1,000. The LNG-IUS is not associated with increased deep
vein thrombosis risk.
• NSAIDs have common harms that include abdominal pain, nausea, gastritis, and
lightheadedness/dizziness. Gastrointestinal bleeding is a serious side effect related to total
dose and duration of use; however, even short-term use can increase risk. The risk of
gastrointestinal bleeding from low-dose, intermittent NSAID use is poorly characterized.
• TXA use is associated with headache, nasal and sinus symptoms, back pain, and
abdominal pain in more than 10 percent of those taking the drug. Joint pain, muscle
cramps, migraine, anemia and fatigue occur in more than 5 percent. Rare events are less
well characterized and may include thrombosis, anaphylaxis, and visual disturbances.
TXA is contraindicated in those with higher risk of thrombosis.
• Contraceptive vaginal ring has similar side effects to COCs including breast tenderness,
nausea and headache. Ring users also experience local problems including leucorrhea,
vaginitis, and ring-related events including expulsion, foreign body sensation, and coital
problems. The contraceptive vaginal ring is not recommended for use in cigarette
smokers over age 35.
• Other than COCs, progestogens, and the LNG-IUS, the available data may not apply well
to populations of young women using these treatments.

Detailed Synthesis
Harms Related to Metformin
Information about Metformin from Included Trials
Metformin was investigated in two placebo controlled trials51,52 and in two arms of a three-
arm trial in which two arms included metformin:53 one metformin alone and another with
combined oral metformin and exenatide weekly injections. Doses used in these studies, after an
initial 1 week dose ramp up were 850 mg twice a day,51 500 mg 3 times daily,52 and 1,000 mg
twice daily.53 Combined, the three RCTs, with four total metformin arms, administered the drug
to only 77 women, 20 of whom were also receiving another agent.51-53 This provides insufficient
power to detect events that occur at the level of 1 to 5 percent or lower that are typically of
concern for harms. It also provides insufficient power to conclude that specific symptoms were
statistically more common among those treated than among the 33 women who received placebo
in two studies.51,52 Women receiving metformin did report gastrointestinal symptoms, including
diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea at higher absolute numbers than those in the placebo or
exenatide only groups,52,53 and the study reporting withdrawals51 documented 3 times as many
women on the active drug withdrew from the trial for side effects (15/45 vs. 5/47; p<0.05).

58
Information About Metformin From FDA Documents and Package Inserts
Increased gastrointestinal complaints are consistent with the documented side effects listed in
the package insert for metformin which include: diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, flatulence,
indigestion, and abdominal discomfort as events that are the most common and expected to occur
in more than 5 percent of those who initiate the drug.96 Of note, it is recommended that the dose
be increased gradually over 1 week or more precisely because these effects are common and can
be reduced by gradual introduction of the drug. The most serious known side effect of metformin
is lactic acidosis which occurs when lactate accumulates in the blood and decreases blood pH.
The package insert includes a boxed warning for this concerning effect.96 Little is known about
how common lactic acidosis might be among reproductive-age women, with PCOS and not type
2 diabetes, similar to those in the study or for whom the intervention might be considered as part
of primary care management of irregular uterine bleeding.

Information About Metformin From Large Datasets


Our literature search aimed at identifying publications designed to investigate harms,
required more than 1,600 exposed individuals, or for case-control analyses, case identification
consistent with a base population of more than 1,600. We identified four publications focused on
metformin harms.97-100
The Toxic Exposure Surveillance System database of the American Association for Poison
Control Centers provided data from 1996 through 2000 for accidental and intentional over
ingestion and unintentional misuse of metformin for 4,072 cases.97 Fifty-nine percent were
women and the majority was adults. Children under 12 had few serious side effects and no
deaths. Among adults, harms were evenly distributed across ages with a trend for more serious
outcomes in the elderly. In all groups lactic acidosis was rare (1.6%) and hypoglycemia at 2.8
percent was more common that previously reported. Given all individuals had unintended or
higher than therapeutic doses, they also observed elevated creatinine levels, an increased anion
gap, hypotension, and coma among those hospitalized.
The first publication focused on harms of intended use was published in 2003 to assess
incidence of serious acute liver injuries in patients on hypoglycemic agents.98 The population
comprised the 171,264 members of five health maintenance organizations receiving oral diabetes
medications. They identified 35 cases of acute liver failure, not known to be attributable to
another cause. Incidence per 1,000 person-years of use was not statistically meaningfully
different by medication used, after adjusting for other comorbidities and confounders. Overall
occurrence was roughly 1 case per 10,000 person-years in this population of all adult diabetics.98
In 2008, an analysis using the U.K. General Practice Research Database undertook an
analysis of the risk of lactic acidosis and hypoglycemia among 50,048 type 2 diabetics using oral
medications.99 The average age of patients included in the analysis was 60.7 ± 11.7 and 54.8
percent were women. They determined the incidence rate of lactic acidosis was 3.3 per 100,000
person-years among metformin users and 4.8 per 100,000 person-years among those on sulfonyl
ureas. The adjusted odds ratios for both lactic acidosis and severe hypoglycemic episodes were
significantly higher for those on sulfonyl ureas than metformin with a more than 2-fold elevation
in risk. However this analysis also did not include individuals taking metformin for indications
other than diabetes.
A retrospective cohort of more than 44,169 diabetic patients in a prepaid health plan
followed for an average of 4.2 years evaluated use of endoscopy.100 The exposure of interest was
defined by prescription of specific diabetes medications and the outcome of interest was lower

59
gastrointestinal tract endoscopy including flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. The analysis
was undertaken in part out of concern that therapy with metformin, with attendant risk of
gastrointestinal side effects, could increase use of lower tract endoscopy. Forty-seven percent of
participants were women with an average age of 66. The authors found that rates of endoscopy
were higher among all groups of diabetics on medications, including those using insulin. Taking
into account the precision of the estimates, there was no evidence that metformin led to excess
use compared with other medications either in the window immediately after initiation or with
chronic use. Overall, the higher use of endoscopy may simply reflect greater screening and
prevention vigilance among these patients with a chronic disease. No comparison is offered to
rates among diabetics controlled with diet and exercise alone.

Information About Metformin From Systematic Reviews


Estimates for withdrawals related to inability to tolerate the drug in included trials are
consistent with the meta-estimate in a recent systematic evidence review on management of
obesity. The AHRQ Screening and Management of Obesity in Adults101 evidence review
reported a risk ratio of 3.92 (95% CI, 1.23 to 12.57) for withdrawals in metformin-treated groups
compared with placebo in trials aimed at weight loss and not diabetes management.101 The report
likewise found excess complaints of gastrointestinal symptoms but was not able to quantify risk
and noted that evidence about harms is insufficient to inform care.101
Similar to the surveillance data, a Cochrane pooled analysis of comparative data from 347
trials found an upper limit of 4.3 cases of lactic acidosis per 100,000 patient-years among
metformin-treated diabetic patients.102 The analysis indicated no significant difference in mean
treatment levels or net change from baseline for lactate for metformin users as compared with
users of other therapies represented in the included trials.103 This review also notes that the only
evidence for lactic acidosis associated with metformin use is based on approximately 330 cases
reported in the literature.102 The 2011 AHRQ comparative effectiveness review (CER) Oral
Diabetes Medications for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: An Update104 included 140 trials with a
meta-analysis. Across all data sources in their review, the reviewers concluded there was high
grade evidence that metformin alone and in combination with other diabetes medications was
associated with greater occurrence of gastrointestinal side effects than with other agents alone or
in combinations that did not include metformin. Nonetheless the overall safety profile and
effectiveness of metformin led to the conclusion that metformin was the first-line agent for initial
management of type 2 diabetes. The authors take care to point out that even among trials for a
chronic condition like type 2 diabetes, longer term surveillance for harms does not exceed 2
years. As in diabetes, women with abnormal bleeding might wish to consider chronic treatment
and the literature to assess safety of continued use for any indication is scant.
Within a number of reviews of oral diabetes agents105,106 metformin is typically found to have
a favorable safety profile when compared with other medications and is often noted to be first-
line therapy in part for this reason. Relative safety in the context of other options for treating
diabetes is not directly applicable to use for improving menstrual cycle regularity, however there
are no physiologic reasons to expect that younger individuals without diabetes would experience
greater risk.

60
Harms Related to Exenatide

Information About Exenatide From the Included Trial


A single RCT in this review investigated exenatide, finding that alone it was less effective
than metformin, but that when combined the results were superior to either agent alone for
improving cycle regularity in women with PCOS.53 Exenatide is injected weekly and is generally
administered as a second agent among those with diabetes that is insufficiently controlled on a
single agent. The trial included in this review allocated women with PCOS to three groups: 1,000
mg of metformin twice daily, exenatide 10 mcg per day, or both.53 Nausea, diarrhea, and bloating
were more common in the arms taking metformin. No harm was more common in the exenatide
group except injection site pain or bruising which was de facto restricted to groups using
exenatide. Comparisons across groups of 20 are underpowered to detect differential harms across
groups or to detect more rare and potentially serious harms.

Information About Exenatide From FDA Documents and Package Insert


The package insert for exenatide notes that hypoglycemia is a common adverse effect but
does not specify what proportion of those prescribed the drug might experience low blood
sugar.107 Events that occurred in 2 percent or more of new users of exenatide when added to a
regimen with metformin or a sulfonyl urea include: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, feeling jittery,
dizziness, headache, dyspepsia, asthenia which is a lack of strength or energy, gastroesophageal
reflux, and increased sweating. Postmarketing experience includes reports of: injection-site
reactions; generalized pruritus and/or urticaria; macular or papular rash; angioedema;
anaphylactic reaction; increased international normalized ratio with concomitant warfarin use
sometimes associated with bleeding; nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea resulting in dehydration;
abdominal distension; abdominal pain; eructation; constipation; flatulence; acute pancreatitis;
hemorrhagic and necrotizing pancreatitis sometimes resulting in death; dysgeusia; somnolence;
altered renal function, including increased serum creatinine; renal impairment; worsened chronic
renal failure or acute renal failure (sometimes requiring hemodialysis); kidney transplant and
kidney transplant dysfunction; and alopecia (Byetta Package Insert, 2011).107

Information About Exenatide From Large Datasets


Surveillance studies have all focused on acute pancreatitis which is suspected of being a rare
but important side effect. Two analyses in large patient pools did not identify an
association,108,109 while a third publication with data from the FDA post marketing surveillance
database did see increased risk for both exenatide and another drug with similar but not identical
mechanism, sitagliptin.110
The two claims-based analyses relied on large databases of health plan enrollees: The
Ingenix Research Datamart108 and the Normative Health Information database.109 The first
examined 27,966 individuals who began exenatide and 16,276 who started sitagliptin.108 During
1 year of followup, acute pancreatitis occurred in 0.13 percent of those on exenatide and 0.12
percent of those on sitagliptin. In adjusted models, relative to comparison cohorts within the
health plan the relative risk of acute pancreatitis was 1.0 for both groups with confidence bounds
from 0.6 to 1.7 and 0.5 to 2.0 respectively. The second analysis included 25,719 new users of
exenatide compare to 234,536 new users of other diabetes medications.109 The groups differed in
important ways including more obesity and concomitant diabetes medications among those using
exenatide. In adjusted models to control for these and other factors, there was no increase in use

61
for current or recent use but an elevation in risk for past use. This was compared with a matched
case-control analysis that found no association for any category of current, recent, or past use.
This is compatible with those with past use having unknown additional comorbidity or
discontinuing use because of other serious health events. The authors conclude overall there was
not increased risk of pancreatitis among those taking exenatide.
The FDA surveillance data compared adverse events for exenatide to those for other drugs in
the database.110 They found the odds of being on exenatide were more than 10-fold higher than
the control drug for pancreatitis. Pancreatic cancer was almost 3-fold higher. The sole control for
confounding was the use of those on other drugs in the registry as a comparator. The authors note
that the FDA data is limited by incomplete data and reporting bias; notably they lack information
about obesity and individual behaviors such as alcohol use and the risk models are not adjusted
for these confounders.

Information About Exenatide From Systematic Reviews


Systematic reviews of diabetes medications (including the AHRQ report above on obesity
treatment101), a detailed CER conducted by the United Kingdom’s National Health Service, and a
Cochrane analysis including exenatide, reveal gastrointestinal issues, particularly nausea and
vomiting, and hypoglycemia as the most commonly observed side effects observed in those
initiating therapy with this agent.101,111,112

Harms Related to Progestogens


Information About Progestogens From Included Trials
A single RCT included in this review investigated progestogen use for improving cycle
regularity.49 The two agents used in this comparative effectiveness trial were 20 mg of oral
dydrogesterone, each day for 10 days, or 90 mg of micronized progesterone gel vaginally every
other day for 10 days. The authors’ intent was to demonstrate that both oral and vaginal
administration improved cycle control which was the case compared with baseline. However
power calculations did not indicate the equivalence band desired and the overall study was small
(n=69). They report the only adverse events experienced were in the micronized vaginal
progesterone gel group and included one episode each of groin pain, ovarian cyst, and 5-kg
weight gain. These events were too rare given the small study size to meaningfully assert
comparability or excess of harms between groups. Six patients in each treatment group withdrew
from the study (reasons not given), suggesting there was not a large discrepancy in willingness to
stay on study drug.
Eight studies of treatments for abnormal cyclic bleeding (KQ1B) included a progestogen as a
comparator. MPA was a comparator in three studies,60,62,79 one of which included DMPA as a
third comparison arm.62 Five studies compared LNG-IUS, TXA, an NSAID, or the contraceptive
vaginal ring to norethisterone64,70,74,80,84 and one of these studies also included a third arm using
the progesterone-impregnated intrauterine coil as a comparator.74 Harms reported with this class
of drug include: breakthrough bleeding; spotting; change in menstrual flow; amenorrhea;
headache; nervousness; dizziness; edema; increases or decreases in weight; change in cervical
secretions; cholestatic jaundice, breast tenderness and galactorrhea; skin sensitivity reactions
consisting of urticaria, pruritus, edema and generalized rash; acne, alopecia and hirsutism; rash
(allergic) with and without pruritus; anaphylactoid reactions and anaphylaxis; depression;
pyrexia; fatigue; insomnia; nausea; and somnolence.113-116 Most studies reviewed were small and

62
did not systematically compare adverse events across interventions groups. In all but one case,
progestogens were a comparator that was hypothesized and found to perform less well than the
intervention under study. The one exception was a direct comparison of two routes of delivery
discussed above.49 We consider COCs and the LNG-IUS in their own section.

Information About Progestogens From FDA Documents and Package Inserts


We have summarized information for progestogen only methods included in this review. The
label for Crinone, the progesterone vaginal gel, reports adverse events seen in the three clinical
studies for secondary amenorrhea in women taking either 4-percent or 8-percent strength
Crinone along with estrogen and occurring in 5 percent or more of women.114 These are given as:
abdominal pain (5% in patients taking 4% strength, 9% in patients taking 8% strength,
respectively); appetite increased (5%, 8%); bloating (13%, 12%); cramps not otherwise specified
(19%, 26%); fatigue (21%, 22%); headache (19%, 15%); nausea (8%, 6%); back pain (8%, 3%);
myalgia (8%, 0%); depression (19%, 15%); emotional lability (23%, 22%); sleep disorder (18%,
18%); vaginal discharge (11%, 3%); upper respiratory tract infection (5%, 8%); and pruritus in
genital area (2%, 6%).114 The package insert for vaginal progesterone gel includes a warning that
“physicians should be alert to the earliest manifestations of thrombotic disorders
(thrombophlebitis, cerebrovascular disorders, pulmonary embolism, and retinal thrombosis).”114
This profile of complaints is similar among smaller groups of women who receive the drug
as part of treatment for infertility care. One of the specific agents studied among women with
irregular menses, dydrogesterone, is not available in the United States. This compound has been
associated with risk of onset of acute porphyria. Porphyria is a genetic condition in which
individuals have a range of severities of defects in the enzyme pathways that produce heme. The
insert advises prescribing only for compelling reasons. Our review team does not find evidence
that other progestogens are associated with acute onset of porphyria symptoms.
The DMPA label115 includes a warning to women who may become pregnant while using the
drug or find themselves exposed to the drug during the first 4 months of pregnancy regarding the
risk of hypospadias; the risk of hypospadias, usually 5 to 8 per 1,000 male births in the general
population, may be approximately doubled with exposure to these drugs.115 Additionally, there
have been undesirable effects at the site of injection, such as residual lump, change in skin color,
or sterile abscess.115

Information about Progestogens from Large Datasets


The specific compounds used for irregular uterine bleeding or abnormal cycle bleeding were
not addressed in large surveillance studies or in systematic review that compiled information
about harms separate from their inclusion in COCs with the exception of DMPA and
norethindrone in progestin-only pills.
As noted, we did not attempt to review the surveillance literature related to harms of oral
contraceptives or specific progestogens in COCs. We did however seek large scale primary
studies related to harms of progestogen-only formulations such as DMPA. Four studies, one
conducted in Europe, one in Turkey, and two in Africa, described harms associated with
DMPA.117-120 A single cross-cutting study of contraceptive risks included norethindrone-alone
pills.121
A Danish case-control study that included 64,548 women with fractures indicated an
association with DMPA use (OR=1.44; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.06); this however was not adequately
controlled for factors that may confound the relationship, such as the potentially increased use of

63
DMPA among smokers or those with lower body mass index which are both also associated with
fracture risk.118 A study in South Africa evaluated bone density in 3,487 black, reproductive-age
women using injectable progestogens as contraception and reported decreased bone density by
measurement of heel bone density; this effect was reversible within 2 to 3 years of discontinuing
the injected progestogen across age categories of users.119 These findings are compatible with
data from smaller studies which they review well in their publication.
DMPA has been associated in observational studies with deep venous thrombosis.117
However, other work comparing those who use medications for menorrhagia has documented
increased risk among women who use TXA, mefenamic acid, and norethisterone, suggesting that
the increased risk of thrombosis may be an example of confounding by indication. Such
confounding suggests that the reason for which the medication is administered itself increases
risk of the adverse outcomes.122 In a comprehensive study of 9,262 DMPA users in Turkey
conducted between 1996 and 2004, deep vein thrombosis was not observed.120 The most
common adverse effects reported were menstrual disturbances (80%), weight gain (10%),
bloating, breast pain, headache, mood change, and sexual difficulties (each reported by more
than 1%). More than one-third of women discontinued the method with the most common
reasons for discontinuing other than desiring to conceive being irregular menses and side effects.
A 2012 publication about hormonal contraceptive methods and risk of thrombotic stroke and
myocardial infarction, estimated risk based on person-years of exposure to specific contraceptive
methods in a cohort of 15 years duration.121 In a total of 85,874 women-years of observation,
norethindrone progestin-only pills were not statistically significantly associated with increased
risk of either stroke or myocardial infarction.

Information About Progestogens From Systematic Reviews


A Cochrane review examining the use of progestogens for the treatment of heavy menstrual
bleeding found that progestogens had a generally better side effect profile than danazol, with
lower incidence of side effects such as headache, weight gain, and skin changes; however, breast
changes were relatively more common in the progestogens group.123 In the context of evaluating
progestogen-only pills for contraception, another Cochrane review found inter-cycle bleeding
and cycle irregularity to be some of the most common reasons for treatment discontinuation
represented in included trials.124

Harms Related to COCs


Information About COCs From Included Trials
Our review included six RCTs examining COC use in women with abnormal uterine
bleeding.50, 59, 61, 68, 82, 83 Due to the low power of these three medium sized RCTs and three small
RCTs for detecting adverse events, reports of potential harms in these publications are largely
limited to descriptive text rather than quantitative comparisons.
Among women with irregular menses only (KQ1A), one study treated patients with COCs.
Davis and colleagues50 assessed a triphasic pill in which the estrogen was ethinyl estradiol and
the progestogen was norgestimate. Their trial randomly assigned 201 women to the oral
contraceptive arm or a placebo. Authors do not provide detailed description of adverse events,
noting that the incidence was low and comparable between the two groups. Four women in the
COC group and three in the placebo group discontinued use after adverse events. Sixteen percent

64
of those on active drug and 19 percent of those receiving placebo withdrew prior to completion
of the trial.
Two trials assessing the use of estradiol valerate and dienogest in women with abnormal
cyclic uterine bleeding (KQ1B) each found that 9 to 10 percent of women discontinued therapy
with the COC regimen due to side effects.82,83 The type and incidence of adverse effects noted in
these two studies of estradiol valerate and dienogest are similar to those noted in the package
insert for this combination.125
The trial examining therapy with ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone acetate reported that
five women discontinued the study due to adverse events (approximately 25%), noting that the
most comment events included intermenstrual bleeding, menstrual disorder, and headache.61 The
two studies involving use of ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel did not describe potential harms
associated with treatment failure, other than noting the incidence of treatment failure.59,68

Information About COCs From FDA Documents and Package Inserts


The package inserts are similar for all combined estrogen and progestogen oral contraceptive
pills. The warning for combined pills notes:

Cigarette smoking increases risk of serious cardiovascular events from


combined oral contraceptive (COC) use. This risk increases with age
particularly in women over 35 years of age and with the number of cigarettes
smoked. For this reason, COC’s should not be used by women who are over
35 years of age and smoke.126-128

Other serious harms associated with COCs include thrombophlebitis and venous thrombosis
with and without embolism, arterial thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, myocardial
infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, cerebral thrombosis, hypertension, gallbladder disease and
benign liver tumors. A complete listing of package insert adverse events for this and other oral
contraceptives reviewed in this report is included in Appendix N. Package inserts do not
generally include information about the expected population incidence of these harms.
The majority of primary care providers and many women are aware of the most serious risks
of COCs and of more common side effects such as edema, nausea, vomiting, skin changes, and
gastrointestinal symptoms. Among more common side effects are also changes in cycle
characteristics themselves including spotting/breakthrough bleeding, lack of menses, and change
in characteristics of menstrual flow.
Adverse events for specific COCs studied for heavy menstrual bleeding in this review
include Nordette-28® (0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol and 0.15 mg levonorgestrel). The package insert
reports based on data from case control studies, the relative risk for superficial venous
thrombosis is three times higher in users of the COC compared with nonusers; the risk of deep
vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism is 4 to 11 times higher, and 1.5 to 6 times higher in
women predisposed to venous thromboembolic disease.127 The incidence of deep vein
thrombosis and pulmonary embolism for users of low-dose (i.e., less than 0.05 mg ethinyl
estradiol) COCs is up to 4 per 10,000 woman-years compared with 0.5 to 3 per 10,000 woman-
years for nonusers, although this risk is less than the risk associated with pregnancy (6 per
10,000 woman-years).127 A large postmarketing study noted that the Nordette label information
reports a relative risk of thrombotic strokes ranging from 3 for normotensive users to 14 in
women with severe hypertension. The relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke is reported to be 1.2 for

65
nonsmokers using oral contraceptives, 2.6 for smokers who did not use oral contraceptives, 7.6
for smokers who used oral contraceptives, 1.8 for normotensive users, and 25.7 for users with
severe hypertension.127
Label information on estradiol valerate and dienogest (Natazia®) reports two cases of
myocardial infarction and two cases of rupture ovarian cyst from clinical trials, along with
known serious risk of other cardiovascular events, vascular events, and liver disease (the
estimated attributable risk of liver adenomas is 3.3 cases per 100,000 COC users).125 In clinical
studies of the drug, 11.4 percent of women discontinued treatment due to an adverse reaction,
most commonly: menstrual disorder (metrorrhagia, menorrhagia, menstruation irregular, genital
hemorrhage, vaginal hemorrhage, dysfunctional uterine bleeding; 2.3%); mood changes
(depression, mood swings, mood altered, depressed mood, dysthymic disorder, crying; 1.2%);
acne (1.1%), headache (including migraines; 1.1%), and weight increased (0.7%).125
Postmarketing reports with Natazia include: venous and arterial thromboembolic events
(including pulmonary emboli, deep vein thrombosis, cerebral thrombosis, myocardial infarction
and stroke); hypertension; gallbladder disease; hepatitis; hypersensitivity; fluid retention;
hypertriglyceridemia; dizziness; chloasma; angioedema; erythema nodosum; erythema
multiforme; vulvovaginal candidiasis; and gastrointestinal symptoms.125

Information About COCs From Large Datasets


More than a hundred publications about harms (and preventive effects) of COCs are
available and full review was beyond the scope of this review. The systematic reviews featured
below include contemporary pills formulations and their harms.

Information About COCs From Systematic Reviews


Two recent systematic reviews have identified significant increased risk of deep venous
thrombosis among users of oral contraceptives, though the size of risk varied significantly among
different COC regimens and appeared lowest for agents containing levonorgestrel or
norgestimate.129,130 One Cochrane review has evaluated the potential association between COC
use and weight gain, finding insufficient evidence to make conclusions and noting the likelihood
that there is no large association between COCs and increased weight during therapy.131 Other
Cochrane reviews have assessed the relative efficacy and safety of various oral contraceptive
regimens; these reviews note variability in the type and incidence of adverse events among
included studies and comment that adverse event reporting among these studies was generally of
lower quality than expected, recommending better tracking of side effects in future studies as
well as systematic capture of patient reasons for treatment discontinuation.132-135 One of these
reviews found that the incidence of discontinuation due to side effects was lower in triphasic-
treated patients as compared with their monophasic-treated counterparts.134 The one Cochrane
review assessing the use of COCs in the setting of heavy menstrual bleeding identified only one
small crossover trial, which did not include description of adverse events.36

Harms Related to Cabergoline


Information About Cabergoline From Included Trials
A single exploratory study, with 29 participants among whom 14 had PCOS and 15 were
normal controls, randomly assigned 16 women to cabergoline and 13 to placebo for 4 months.55
The authors did not report adverse events and all women completed the trial.

66
Information About Cabergoline From Package Insert
The package insert for this drug intended to treat elevated prolactin levels provides data
about the risk of side effects in comparison to placebo in a 4-week study and compared with
bromocriptine which is another medication for prolactinoma treatment.136 In Table 21 we
summarize the incidence of cabergoline side effects that occurred in more than 5 percent of those
on the drug, as well as 4 week experience of side effects among individuals on placebo. We did
not identify large dataset analyses aimed at surveillance for harms.

Table 21. Side effects reported in cabergoline trials


Side Effect Placebo at Cabergoline at Cabergoline at
(% participants experiencing) 4 Weeks 4 Weeks 8 weeks
Nausea 20 27 29
Headache 25 26 26
Dizziness 5 15 17
Asthenia 10 9 6
Constipation 0 10 7
Abdominal pain 5 5 5
Somnolence 5 5 2
Fatigue 0 7 5
Depression 5 3 3
Hot flashes 5 1 3
Dyspepsia 0 2 5

Information About Cabergoline From Large Datasets


One harms surveillance study using the U.S. Adverse Event Reporting System Database
137
and two analyses done with data from the UK General Practice Research Database 138,139 have
linked drugs typically used to treat Parkinson’s disease, including cabergoline, to risk of harms.
Comparing cabergoline, an ergot derived drug, to nonergot derived drugs, or no medication,
these descriptive studies report new cardiac valve regurgitation occurred almost 5 times more
often among those receiving cabergoline in the UK case control study137 and more than 100-fold
more often in the United States adverse events registry.137 The latter publication followed the
former which may have raised awareness and amplified reporting. The research team using
United States data also reported increased odds of other forms of noncardiac fibrotic reaction in
the pleura, retroperitoneal spaces, and lungs. Most recently, cabergoline in the UK database was
link with doubling of heart failure risk.139 Notably these populations are substantially older and
highly likely to have a specific comorbidity (Parkinson’s) which may also modify risk and which
makes estimation of risk in other groups infeasible. No direct surveillance data is available to
inform estimation of risk in reproductive-age women.

Information About Cabergoline From Systematic Reviews


Several systematic reviews have explored the safety and efficacy of cabergoline for treatment
of a range of conditions. Two Cochrane reviews on ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and
restless leg syndrome, respectively, each assessed a small pool of available trials, finding no
significant difference in overall incidence of adverse events between cabergoline and
comparators.140,141 A meta-analysis of dopamine receptor agonist use among individuals with
Parkinson’s disease found a relative risk of 6.38 (95% CI, 3.17 to 12.81) for moderate to severe
valvular regurgitation142; a similar analysis of cabergoline use in hyperprolactinemia also found a
significant increase in risk of valve regurgitation, though this echocardiographic finding in this

67
patient population was clinically asymptomatic in all patients and participants were certain to be
older and more frail than women who would use the treatment for irregular uterine bleeding.143

Harms Related to Lifestyle and Behavioral Interventions

Information Across Sources for Diet and Exercise


The single RCT of diet and exercise intervention was conducted in teens with irregular
menses and did not identify adverse effects.56 One acupuncture trial included 34 women
randomized to a walking regimen who reported no adverse events or injuries.57 However it is
important not to assume that lifestyle and behavioral interventions such as diet and exercise are
without risks. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force report on Screening and Management of
Obesity in Adults101 provides a clear and succinct description of the potential harms stating:

Possible harms that could accrue from [these] interventions include bone loss
and increased fracture risk, injuries from increased physical activity, decreased
self-esteem from being labeled as obese or failure to lose weight, use of extreme
or unhealthy dietary approaches, and weight cycling.101

Harms Related to Acupuncture


Information Across Sources for Acupuncture
One study of acupuncture, that compared two strategies for selecting placemen of needles,
did not discuss harms or withdrawals.58 The other RCT reports only local redness or hematomas
occurring in 10 percent of those receiving acupuncture in 14 sessions over 16 weeks.57 Two of
33 women in the acupuncture group reported other side effects which were dizziness and nausea,
while the exercise and no intervention control group did not report any events.
A number of Cochrane reviews have explored the use of acupuncture for treatment of a
variety of women’s health issues, ranging from dysmenorrhea to endometriosis-related pain to
induction of labor; across the board, these reviews found that potential harms of acupuncture
have not been well studied and are often omitted from trial reports completely, noting that
investigation of possible adverse effects is an important consideration for future research
involving this therapeutic approach.144-147

Harms Related to LNG-IUS

Information About LNG-IUS From Included Trials


One trial did not provide any information about harms or adverse effects.59 Two trials stated
that there were no serious adverse effects related to either treatment.64,65 In one trial with 39
participants, one participant discontinued LNG-IUS therapy (5%) and five participants
discontinued cyclic COC (26%).61 One trial reported side effects in a table without comparative
statistics.63
One trial (n=165) reported that no deaths or drug-related serious adverse events occurred
during the study.60 Six participants in the LNG-IUS group (7%) and two in the oral MPA group
(2%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events.60 The LNG-IUS was expelled in four
participants (5%); two other participants had the LNG-IUS removed due to adverse effects.60 No
uterine perforations or pregnancies were observed during the study.60 Other treatment-emergent

68
adverse events reported during the study and occurring in at least 5 percent of women in any
treatment group were reported in a table without comparative statistics.
One trial reported 242 adverse events among 51 participants, with 158 in the LNG-IUS group
and 84 in the mefenamic acid group.63 The LNG-IUS was expelled in two participants (8%); one
of these had chlamydial endometritis.63

Information About LNG-IUS From FDA Documents and Package Insert


In October 2009, the prescription label for the LNG-IUS available in the United States was
updated though a process with the FDA.148 This revision was made for the new indication:
treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding for women who choose to use intrauterine contraception
as their method of contraception.149
According to the package insert, the most common (i.e., more than 10 percent) adverse
reactions reported in clinical trials of LNG-IUS are: uterine/vaginal bleeding alterations (51.9%),
amenorrhea (23.9%), intermenstrual bleeding and spotting (23.4%), abdominal /pelvic pain
(12.8%), and ovarian cysts (12%).148 The data provided reflect the experience with the use of
Mirena brand LNG-IUS in the adequate and well-controlled studies for contraception (n=2,339)
and heavy menstrual bleeding (n=80). For the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding indication
(n=80), the subjects included women aged 26 to 50 with confirmed heavy bleeding and exposed
for a median of 183 treatment days of Mirena (range, 7 to 295 days).
The adverse reactions seen across the two indications overlapped, and are reported using the
frequencies from the contraception studies. The less common (i.e., between 5% and 9% of users)
adverse reactions are: headache/migraine (7.7%), acne (7.2%), depressed/altered mood (6.4%),
menorrhagia (6.3%), breast tenderness/pain (4.9%), vaginal discharge (4.9%), and IUD
expulsion (4.9%). Other relevant adverse reactions occurring in fewer than 5 percent of subjects
include nausea, nervousness, vulvovaginitis, dysmenorrhea, back pain, weight increase,
decreased libido, cervicitis/Papanicolaou smear normal/class II, hypertension, dyspareunia,
anemia, alopecia, skin disorders including eczema, pruritus, rash and urticaria, abdominal
distention, hirsutism, and edema.148,150

Information About the LNG-IUS From Large Datasets


Large scale surveillance for harms provides important information to patients to assure
informed decisions about risks. This data includes information about complications with
insertion. In the New Zealand monitoring system which includes 3,519 insertions, difficult
insertions occurred in 3.6 percent of procedures and were not well predicted by nulliparous status
of noncontraceptive use of the IUD. Pain on insertion occurred for 1 percent of patients and 0.5
percent of attempts to insert could not be completed.151,152 Uterine perforation rates in three large
datasets ranged from 0.9 to 2.6 cases per 1,000.151,153,154 Authors of each of these studies, as well
as those of another report from four national pharmacovigilance centers in Europe confirm, that
perforations may not consistently be associated with painful insertions and that only a small
portion (less than 10%) are recognized at the time of the insertion.155
In surveillance data, the LNG-IUS in not associated with increased risk of deep vein
thrombosis,117 including in more than 8 million women-years of observation among Danish
women.156 The anecdotally reported complaint of hair loss is supported by a single study in New
Zealand by surveying women in the national registry. They found five cases of alopecia (two
recovered, one not, and two still unknown) and estimated incidence to be 1.8 per 1,000 users.153

69
A 2012 publication about hormonal contraceptive methods and risk of thrombotic stroke and
myocardial infarction, estimated risk based on person-years of exposure to specific contraceptive
methods in a cohort of 15 years duration.121 In a total of 184,875 women-years of observation,
the LNG-IUS was not statistically significantly associated with increased risk of myocardial
infarction, and appeared, relative to women not using hormonal methods, to offer protection
from stroke (RR=0.73; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.98).

Information About the LNG-IUS From Systematic Reviews


Systematic reviews report adverse events similar to those noted in the package insert,148 with
weight gain, bloating, acne, nausea and breast pain as the most commonly observed side effects.
These systematic reviews also comment on the risk of spontaneous device expulsion, reporting
an incidence of 5 to 16 percent.157-159

Harms Related to Contraceptive Vaginal Ring


Information About Contraceptive Vaginal Ring From Included Trials
The vaginal ring was used in a single study in this review as a treatment for heavy menstrual
bleeding and was found to be similar in effectiveness to oral norethisterone.84 The contraceptive
vaginal ring provides a steady release of 15 mcg of ethinyl estradiol and 120 mcg of etonogestrel
daily and is used vaginally for 3 weeks per cycle and then removed for 1 week. Following three
cycles of treatment, this study reported that the incidence of nausea, headache, and breast
tenderness was comparable in both treatment groups. The contraceptive vaginal ring users were
less likely to report breakthrough bleeding than the women taking norethisterone. No ring
expulsions were reported. Local events, including vaginal discomfort, vaginitis, foreign body
sensation and coital problems were reported more frequently in ring-users, but no one
discontinued treatment due to adverse events.

Information About Contraceptive Vaginal Ring From FDA Documents and


Package Insert
The package insert lists the most common harms reported by 5 to 14 percent of women in
clinical trials including vaginitis, headache, upper respiratory infection, vaginal secretion,
sinusitis, nausea, and weight gain.160 The adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment
in 1 to 2.5 percent of women include device-related events (e.g., foreign body sensation, coital
problems, and expulsion), vaginal symptoms, headache, emotional lability, and weight gain. The
package insert also warns against use of the vaginal contraceptive ring in cigarette-smokers over
age 35.

Information About Contraceptive Vaginal Ring From Large Data Sets


We identified three studies reporting data on harms from large studies of contraceptive
vaginal ring users.121,161,162 A 15-year Danish cohort study that included over 38,000 person-
years of vaginal ring use reported an elevated adjusted relative risk of 2.5 (95% CI, 1.4 to 4.4)
for thrombotic stroke and 2.1 (95% CI, 0.7 to 6.5) for myocardial infarction compared with
women (over 9 million person-years) who had not used hormonal contraception.121 In an
observational study of over 2,500 Swiss women, 20 percent (n=539) of contraceptive vaginal
ring users reported 753 adverse events. The most common harms were changes in menstrual
bleeding pattern (2.3%), vaginal discomfort (2.2%), leucorrhea (2.1%), mood disorders (2.0%)

70
and headache (1.9%).161 This profile is similar to data from a German open label study of the
acceptability of the contraceptive vaginal ring in which 431 of 5,823 (7.4%) of women
discontinued use for side effects over six cycles of use. In the full cohort, 9.9% of women
experienced symptoms classified as adverse events with the most common being bleeding
pattern, headache (including migraine),and acne.162 The research team reports 19 women
(<0.3%) has serious adverse events each of which was an isolated event, other than dizziness
which was reported by two women.

Information About Contraceptive Vaginal Ring From Systematic Reviews


A recently published review of the contraceptive vaginal ring summarized adverse events
from three large trials.163 The number of women using the contraceptive vaginal ring in these
three studies ranged from 499 to 2,322. Over one half of the women (58 to 66%) reported at least
one adverse event and 29 to 38 percent of these were possibly related to the contraceptive. The
most frequent complaints were headache (5.8 to 7.2%), ring-related (4.4 to 6.8%), vaginitis (3.9
to 5.6%), leucorrhea (3.2 to 4.8%), and nausea (0.8 to 3.2%). Between 11 and 14 percent of
women discontinued use of the contraceptive vaginal ring due to adverse events. Two women in
one study had deep vein thrombosis. Hypertension was reported in four women (0.8%) in a
single study. A study that investigated the effects of the device on lipid profiles reported
increases in triglycerides and sex hormone binding globulin levels but total cholesterol was
unchanged.
Another systematic review of COCs and bone health included one small cohort study of
contraceptive vaginal ring users, noting no change in bone mineral density from baseline for the
vaginal ring users compared with an increase in bone density among the control group of
nonhormone users.164 A recently published systematic review examining thrombotic risks of oral
contraceptives included data from studies of the contraceptive vaginal ring.165 The risk of venous
thromboembolism for the contraceptive vaginal ring was elevated and similar to COCs
containing ethinyl estradiol and gestodene (5.6-fold increase) or desogestrel (7.3-fold increase)
or ethinyl estradiol and drospirenone (6.3-fold increase).165

Harms Related to NSAIDs


Information About NSAIDs From Included Trials
Three trials did not provide any information about harms or adverse effects.68,73,74 Two trials
reported there were no serious side effects.75,77 Another trial reported treatment discontinuation
among one person receiving mefenamic acid and one person receiving norethisterone after the
third cycle.70 A table of adverse events was presented in this study with no comparative statistics,
though abdominal pain was reported in 18 percent and 20 percent of both mefenamic acid and
norethisterone groups.
In one trial,63 there were 242 adverse events noted with 158 in the LNG-IUS group and 84 in
the mefenamic acid group. There were two significant adverse events in this study, one with
hypertension in a patient with a history of hypertension, and one with chlamydia endometriosis
resulting in LNG-IUS expulsion. Of note, a smaller proportion of patients reported abdominal
pain with mefenamic acid (7.7%) compared with LNG-IUS (32.0%), though significance was
not reported in the table of adverse events.

71
In another trial,66 a total of 18 patients stopped treatment including three of 23 taking
mefenamic acid due to poor efficacy or an unwanted event such as nausea, headache, and
dizziness.
One trial77 reported nausea and gastrointestinal disturbances in nine (16.4%) and eight
(14.5%) and leg cramps in seven (12.7%) and 12 (21.8%) cases among those receiving TXA and
TXA with mefenamic acid, respectively.
One small crossover trial reported no treatment discontinuations,71 however, patients
receiving TXA reported nausea, dizziness, numbness, restless legs, and headache. Vomiting and
difficulty swallowing was reported by three women in the TXA group. Patients receiving
flurbiprofen reported tiredness, stomach pains, and nausea.
In one trial,67 one person discontinued mefenamic acid due to severe skin rash and itching
and in another trial,69 one person on mefenamic acid complained of gastritis. In another trial,72
one patient had epigastric distress and four patients had nausea and vomiting on meclofenamate.
However, the severity of dysmenorrhea (p<0.006), backache (p<0.02), and headache (p<0.002)
were significantly less for patients taking meclofenamate than placebo. There was no difference
in nausea or vomiting.
One trial75 reported any side effects in 18 patients taking naproxen and in 15 patients taking
mefenamic acid. Thirteen patients taking naproxen experienced gastrointestinal symptoms (i.e.,
nausea, diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, and anorexia) compared with six taking mefenamic
acid. Central nervous system symptoms (i.e., light headedness, dizziness, tiredness, and
headache) were reported by patients receiving mefenamic acid (n=6) and naproxen (n=5).
One trial76 reported no significant differences in nausea, depression, breast symptoms, and
other symptoms between mefenamic acid and placebo. However there was significant reductions
in abdominal pain (p<0.001), headache (p<0.001), and diarrhea (p<0.008) among those taking
mefenamic acid compared with placebo.

Information About NSAIDs From FDA Documents and Package Inserts


As a class, NSAIDs carry a risk of serious harms from cardiovascular thrombotic events,
myocardial infarction, stroke, renal effects, and hepatic effects, along with gastrointestinal
ulceration, bleeding and perforation. All drugs in this class have a boxed warning for
cardiovascular and gastrointestinal risk. Upper gastrointestinal ulcers, gross bleeding, or
perforation caused by NSAIDs occur in approximately 1 percent of patients treated for 3 to 6
months, and in about 2 to 4 percent of patients treated for 1 year, with trends continuing with
longer duration of continuous use.166-168 Labels note that even short-term therapy is not without
risk with this drug class.
In general, NSAIDs have been commonly associated with harms including edema, abdominal
pain, constipation, diarrhea, dyspepsia/heartburn, elevated liver enzymes, flatulence,
gastrointestinal bleeding, nausea, vomiting, body weight changes, headache, nervousness and
other manifestations of central nervous system stimulation (e.g., anxiety, insomnia, increased
reflexes, tremor), symptoms associated with central nervous system inhibition (e.g., amnesia,
asthenia, depression, malaise, somnolence), rash, changes in vision, dizziness/vertigo, tinnitus,
and signs and symptoms suggesting urinary tract infection.
More harms information on specific drugs is limited in the package inserts, for many of the
reasons given in the above discussion. In controlled studies of meclofenamate, approximately 4
percent of the patients had diarrhea severe enough to require discontinuation of the drug.167 See
Appendix M for more complete information from individual package inserts.

72
Information About NSAIDs From Systematic Reviews
A pooled analysis of trials in a systematic review of NSAIDs for the treatment of
dysmenorrhea found that mild neurological and gastrointestinal adverse events reported at
significantly greater frequency by those receiving NSAIDs as compared with those receiving
placebo.169 Another recent review underscores the risk of various gastrointestinal complaints and
notes that the cardiovascular effects of the traditional NSAIDs are poorly understood and warrant
further research;103 an increased risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction was also observed in a
recent systematic review and meta-analysis.170

Harms Related to TXA

Information About TXA From Included Trials


Within studies included in our review, similar numbers of participants withdrew from TXA
and placebo or other treatment groups.78,79 No thrombotic events were reported in the
participants treated with TXA and no deaths occurred during the study. Serious adverse events
reported in the TXA groups of trials included allergic reactions, headaches, and other symptoms
such as tachycardia, acute bronchitis, hypoglycemia, and posttraumatic stress disorder, the latter
judged to be unrelated to study treatment. There was no significant difference in the percentage
of side effects reported, comparing TXA to placebo. In particular, the frequency of
gastrointestinal-related adverse events was similar between groups. In another trial,66 a total of
18 patients stopped treatment including four of 26 taking TXA due to poor efficacy or an
unwanted event such as nausea, headache, and dizziness. One included trial had no withdrawals
or side effects reported,71 another reported no serious adverse effects.80

Information about TXA from FDA Documents and Package Insert


The companies, Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals and Ferring Pharmaceuticals, that manufacture
TXA (Lysteda®) received FDA approval after submitting research findings and other data in
2009. The manufacturer conducted two placebo-controlled randomized trials; the second of
which has been published.78 The first trial randomized 304 women and compared two doses of
TXA (1,950 mg and 3,900 mg daily for up to 5 days during each menstrual period) versus
placebo over three cycles.171 The data provided to the FDA for safety included these two
pragmatic cluster RCTs and two uncontrolled phase three trials, and a single QT-interval phase
two study. In total, these five studies described 12,169 treatment cycles, but among them only
234 women received the current recommended therapeutic dose of the medication.172 Overall,
the nature and number of adverse events did not raise any significant safety concerns. There were
no venous thromboembolic events in subjects taking TXA. There were no adverse effects on
vision or ocular safety concerns. There was no effect on the QT-interval. No drug-drug
interactions studies were conducted. The total number of subjects in clinical trials who received
TXA was considered low for evaluation of harms and drug safety.
The FDA also reviewed evidence from a database for a different formulation of TXA that
included 40 cases of possible venous thromboembolism over 5 years (none in the United States),
with 40 percent of these events occurring with intravenous use of the drug, and for indications
other than heavy menstrual bleeding.171 The review utilized by the FDA also documented
associated instances of retinal venous and arterial occlusion and ligneous conjunctivitis.171
In April 2011, the prescription label and package insert for the formulation of TXA available
in the United States was updated.171 According to the current label, the most common adverse

73
reactions reported in clinical trials of TXA were headache (50.4%), nasal and sinus symptoms
(25.4%), back pain (20.7%), abdominal pain (19.8%), musculoskeletal pain (11.2%), arthralgia
(6.9%), muscle cramps and spasms (6.5%), migraine (6%), anemia (5.6%), and fatigue (5.2%);
comparative statistics between active drug and placebo were not provided.171

Information About TXA From Large Data Sets


We identified a single large surveillance study using the General Practice Database from the
United Kingdom.122 The case-control analysis of deep vein thrombosis reported increased odds
of TXA use among cases (OR=3.20; 95% CI, 0.65 to 15.78) and note lack of precision of the
estimates based on sparse use of the medication. This report, examining drugs used for heavy
menstrual bleeding, found that all common treatments for menorrhagia were associated with
deep vein thrombosis risk and raised the question of confounding by indication, meaning that
characteristics of the women being treated (abnormal bleeding patterns) rather than the drugs
themselves might be the causal component.122
Based on United States and worldwide postmarketing reports, the following have been
reported in patients receiving TXA for various indications: nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea;
allergic skin reactions; anaphylactic shock and anaphylactoid reactions; impaired color vision
and other visual disturbances; dizziness; and thromboembolic events (e.g., deep vein thrombosis,
pulmonary embolism, cerebral thrombosis, acute renal cortical necrosis, and central retinal artery
and vein obstruction).171 There postmarketing reports of venous and arterial thrombotic events
included women who had used TXA concomitantly with combined hormonal contraceptives.
In consideration of the information reviewed, the FDA issued contra-indications and
precautions for TXA use, advising clinicians not to prescribe TXA to women known to have the
following conditions: active thromboembolic disease (e.g., deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary
embolism, or cerebral thrombosis); a history of thrombosis or thromboembolism, including
retinal vein or artery occlusion; an intrinsic risk of thrombosis or thromboembolism (e.g.,
thrombogenic valvular disease, thrombogenic cardiac rhythm disease, or hypercoagulopathy).
Four precautions are noted: (1) concomitant therapy with tissue plasminogen activators may
decrease the efficacy of both medications; (2) the risk of venous thromboembolism and arterial
thromboses may increase further when hormonal contraceptives are administered with TXA, of
particular concern in women who are obese or smoke cigarettes, especially smokers over 35
years of age; (3) TXA is not recommended for women taking either Factor IX complex
concentrates or anti-inhibitor coagulant concentrates because the risk of thrombosis may be
increased; (4) patients should be instructed to report visual and ocular symptoms promptly and
the medication should be stopped pending a complete ophthalmic evaluation, including dilated
retinal examination, to exclude the possibility of retinal venous or arterial occlusion.171

Information About TXA From Systematic Reviews


A 2012 review of the efficacy of TXA in treating heavy menstrual bleeding is compatible
with this review, finding mild to moderate adverse effects reported in included studies.173
Gastrointestinal effects were most common, and there were no reports of thromboembolic events
in the 10 studies evaluated.173 A Cochrane review conducted a combined analysis of the efficacy
and safety of TXA and ethamsylate as antifibrinolytics used to treat heavy menstrual bleeding;
emphasizing the short duration of the included studies, they comment that no increase in adverse
events was observed with use of these agents.174 Two systematic reviews of TXA use in
orthopedic surgery recently found no increased risk of thrombotic events in their pooled data

74
analyses.175,176 It is important to note that the trials included in these reviews are similar to those
in this review in that they are underpowered to detect rare but important harms.

Harms Related to Decision Aids


There are no harms associated with using decision aids other than time invested by patient
and clinician if the decision aid does not effectively inform patients about important care options.

Summary
Pharmaceutical agents, procedures and devices, and even diet and exercise have potential
complications. While contraceptive methods have typically been well-characterized in the
broadly applicable population of reproductive-age women, there may be characteristics
associated with abnormal bleeding that modify the risk profile of these interventions when
restricted to women with indications related to AUB. Women and their care providers will need
to weigh individual risk profiles, desire for contraception, and treatment strategies in order to
balance symptom management with minimization of risk, especially when choosing medications
that are less well-studied in this population, such as those used for diabetes management.

75
Discussion
Key Findings
State of the Literature
We identified 1,775 nonduplicate publications through the search process, with 219
proceeding to full-text review (Figure 2). We included 41 publications that reported on 39
separate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 12 types of interventions. These studies
evaluated the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS; 7 studies),59-65 the
contraceptive vaginal ring (1 study),84 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; 13
studies),67-70,72-76 tranexamic acid (TXA; 7 studies),66,71,77-81 combined oral contraceptives
(COCs; 6 studies),50,59,61,68,82,83 metformin (4 studies),51-54 exenatide (1 study),53progestogens (1
study),49 cabergoline (1 study),55 acupuncture (2 studies),57,58 lifestyle/behavioral changes (1
study),56 and patient decision aids (3 studies)86,87,177 using at least one comparator or placebo
arm.
A number of these studies compared the intervention of primary interest to a progestogen,
such as medroxyprogesterone (MPA).49,60,62,64,70,74,79,80 These studies were not considered
important contributions to evidence about the effectiveness of progestogens for treatment since
in each case the hypothesis was that the progestogen would be inferior or equivalent to the
intervention being studied. Though we report the outcomes for progestogen comparisons to other
interventions we have not separately summarized the effectiveness of progestogens. One trial
evaluated two routes of progestogen and was treated as a study evaluating progestogen for
symptom management.49
The quality of the included studies tended to be fair (10 studies)51,58,60,64,67,75,76,80,81,84 or poor
(23 studies).49,52-54,56,57,59,61-63,65,66,68-71,73,74,77,79,86,87,177 In part, this followed from the difficulty of
blinding participants to intervention status. For instance, no LNG-IUS studies included sham
insertion or a sham LNG-IUS string placement in the endocervical canal along with placebo
medication in both groups, though this would be required to achieve complete masking of
intervention groups. Likewise it can be challenging to mask outcome assessors to group status
when women and providers assess outcomes. An unmasked participant is counted in the scoring
as an unmasked assessor when the outcome is self-reported or self-collected. While this is
rigorous and appropriate in the evaluation of risk of bias in RCTs, it may be an inappropriately
strict criterion to apply for studies in which menstrual products are collected for measurement of
blood loss or in which biological markers such as hemoglobin or hematocrit levels are also
assessed. Understanding this context can inform interpretation of the literature.

Effectiveness of Interventions for Abnormal Bleeding


Key Question 1A (KQ1A). Management of Irregular Uterine Bleeding
A number of available interventions suitable for use in primary care have preliminary
evidence of effectiveness for improving the regularity of menses. Only metformin has
demonstrated effectiveness in more than one RCT with a total of 175 women with polycystic
ovaries participating in each of three studies. One study suggests adding exenatide to metformin
treatment can enhance effectiveness. No head-to-head comparison trials are available to inform
choices among medication types for management of irregular uterine bleeding.

76
Progestogens
Vaginal micronized progesterone (8% gel) and oral dydrogesterone were studied in a single
trial among women clinically classified as having dysfunctional uterine bleeding.49 In this RCT,
both vaginal and oral administration improved cycle regularity with 92 percent and 85 percent of
participants, respectively, achieving regular bleeding by the third cycle of use. Effects were
comparable, but the trial was not powered to show equivalence or noninferiority.

COCs
A triphasic oral contraceptive was also studied in a single RCT among women with irregular
uterine bleeding.50 This trial included women with both short and long intervals between
bleeding episodes and with both heavy and normal amounts of bleeding. The outcomes are
provided in aggregate and not presented by initial bleeding characteristics. Overall, 68 percent of
women taking the COC achieved excellent or good cycle control compared with 26 percent of
those receiving a placebo.

Metformin and Exenatide


Metformin was an active treatment arm in four RCTs conducted among women with
polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), two comparing outcomes to a placebo group,51,52 one
comparing metformin with N-acetyl-cysteine,54 and one comparing metformin only, exenatide
only, and both.53 In each case, metformin was effective for improving the regularity of bleeding
over a number of months compared with baseline or placebo. When combined with exenatide the
effect was greater than either alone in the study of 60 women with PCOS that compared all three
approaches.53

Cabergoline
In a very preliminary investigation of this drug indicated for treatment of prolactinomas,
cabergoline was associated with return of regular menses in three of eight women in the treated
group compared with none of the six receiving placebo.55 All women in the study had PCOS and
normal prolactin levels.

Behavioral and Lifestyle Interventions


Among adolescents with PCOS, both a low-fat, calorie-restricted diet and a carbohydrate-
restricted diet in conjunction with 30 minutes of aerobic activity 3 days a week resulted in more
regular menses among those who lost weight.56 This single small study did not present outcomes
by the diet group to which participants were randomized. Presumably, there was not a clear
difference, meaning there is no evidence to guide choice of dietary intervention. A single trial of
acupuncture also included an exercise control group at the same intensity as the diet and exercise
trial.57 This group experienced a 42-percent improvement in regularity of menses. We did not
find evidence comparing diet to exercise directly.

Complementary and Alternative Medicine


Two studies of acupuncture with different underlying hypotheses and different methods
(conventional acupuncture and low-frequency electroacupuncture) found benefit for a specific
style of acupuncture when compared with no intervention or alternate placement of acupuncture
needles.57,58 By 32 weeks in the trial of electroacupuncture for PCOS, women who received
acupuncture had a 121-percent improvement in cycle regularity while those who exercised only

77
had a 42-percent improvement which was statistically comparable in this small trial.57 Both
acupuncture and exercise were superior to placebo in this trial. In the trial of two differing
placements of needles, women who received treatment for “mind tranquilizing and menstruation
promotion” had greater improvements (no treatment failures among 21 women) compared with
those receiving traditional placement (n=16) for “delayed menses” among whom 19 percent did
not have improvements.58

KQ1B. Management of Abnormal Cyclic Bleeding


The LNG-IUS, various NSAIDs, TXA, and COCs are effective for reducing the amount of
menstrual bleeding and in some instances have been shown to have additional benefits. Each
category of intervention is described below.

LNG-IUS
All seven studies of the LNG-IUS demonstrated that the intervention effectively reduced
heavy menstrual bleeding.59-65 Evidence suggests the device reduces the volume and duration of
bleeding, improves iron status, and is an acceptable alternative to hysterectomy for some women.
In direct comparisons, the LNG-IUS was superior to COCs and NSAIDs at reducing menstrual
blood loss (MBL). We did not find any studies that compared the LNG-IUS to TXA.
Our analysis of LNG-IUS is consistent with prior systematic reviews. A 2001 systematic
review of five RCTs reported mean MBL reductions were between 71 and 96 percent.178 A 2005
systematic review identified 10 RCTs comparing LNG-IUS with surgery or pharmaceutical
treatments.157 The odds ratio for the proportion unwilling to continue with treatment was 0.27
(95% CI, 0.10 to 0.67) in favor of LNG-IUS. The odds ratio for proportion of women satisfied
with treatment was 2.13 (95% CI, 0.62 to 7.33).157

Contraceptive Vaginal Ring


One study investigated the contraceptive vaginal ring finding that it was similar in
effectiveness to norethisterone when taken orally three times a day for 21 days of each cycle.
Overall more women were satisfied with the contraceptive vaginal ring and chose to continue use
compared with women taking oral norethisterone.

NSAIDs
In a total of 13 studies, NSAIDs including mefenamic acid, naproxen, meclofenamate, and
flurbiprofen, given at the onset of menses for up to 5 days reduce MBL by 20 to 49 percent.63,66-
77
Studies have evaluated use over one to six menstrual cycles. Our analysis of NSAIDs is
consistent with a prior 2007 systematic review; NSAIDs were more effective than placebo at
reducing bleeding, but less effective than TXA or LNG-IUS.34 There were no differences in
reductions between NSAIDs and oral progestogens, COC, and an older progesterone-
impregnated intrauterine system (Progestasert®). There were no differences seen between
individual types of NSAIDs, specifically mefenamic acid and naproxen. The most recent study
found similar reductions in pictorial blood loss assessment chart scores when NSAIDs were
combined with TXA compared with TXA alone. NSAIDs reduce MBL, but do not consistently
reduce MBL to clinically meaningful levels (i.e., less than 80 ml) in all patients. There was
considerable variability in response. Some patients had an increase in blood loss during
treatment. NSAIDs do not regulate the pattern of menstruation nor provide contraception.
NSAIDs do provide relief of dysmenorrhea. Therefore, for patients who desire both reduced

78
MBL and relief from dysmenorrhea, but not contraception, and who do not have
contraindications, NSAIDs can be considered for up to five days during menses.

TXA
All seven RCTs of TXA demonstrate effectiveness of improving heavy bleeding.66,71,77-81
TXA at a dose of 1.95 to 4.5 grams per day for 4 to 5 days from onset of bleeding meaningfully
reduces MBL by 40 to 60 percent in studies lasting up to 1 year. Both biologic and self-reported
symptoms of bleeding severity are improved. Our analysis of TXA is consistent with prior
systematic reviews of another formulation of TXA. A 1995 systematic review pooled results
from seven trials and found a reduction in MBL of 46.7 percent (95% CI, 47.9% to 51.6%) with
TXA.179 A 2004 systematic review and meta-analysis of two RCTs of TXA versus placebo
reported a mean MBL difference of −93.96 ml (95% CI, −151.43 ml to −36.49 ml) in favor of
TXA treatment.174

COCs
Though the volume of RCT literature examining use of COCs in women with abnormal
uterine bleeding (AUB) is somewhat small relative to the frequency with which these agents are
used as a first-line therapy in women presenting with AUB symptoms, our analysis indicates
these agents are associated with decreases in AUB among treated women. All five RCTs of
COCs for the indication of heavy cyclic menstrual bleeding found benefit for reducing volume of
menstrual bleeding. 59,61,68,82,83 Two studies also identified improvements in related laboratory
values such as hematocrit and ferritin, 82,83 and one study also found significant improvement in
patient rating of overall health.59 These findings are consistent with the 2010 American Congress
of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommendations, which note that combined hormonal
contraceptives are a “reasonable option for initial management of menorrhagia.”21 In the two
head-to-head comparisons between COCs and LNG-IUS,59,61 reductions in heavy menstrual
bleeding were documented in both treatment groups, with a somewhat greater benefit for LNG-
IUS users.

Decision Aids
Three studies investigated decisions aids to assist women seeking treatment for heavy cyclic
bleeding in making informed decisions about care.86,87,177 The study results suggest that decision
aids increase patient knowledge and enhance satisfaction with care but do not affect disease
symptoms in directly measureable ways. One study found fewer women who received the
decision aid ultimately chose surgical referral and hysterectomy.86 However this decision cannot
be linked to improvement in bleeding symptoms. Since there are no known harms associated
with using decision aids, they may help patients evaluate treatment options and feel secure in
their choices.

Applicability
Applicability describes the extent to which results observed in published studies from this
this review are likely to reflect the expected outcomes when an intervention is applied to broader
populations in real-world conditions. Studies for this review were intended to provide
information to inform primary care management of AUB, whether irregular or cyclic. In shaping
the methods for this review, we have engineered the report so that the included research is
applicable to primary care of women in the United States. Our stricter criteria, narrowing

79
findings to only symptomatic populations of reproductive-age women with chronic complaints of
abnormal bleeding, comes at the cost of fewer studies being addressed. However, it assures that
those studies that are included were explicitly designed to examine the effectiveness of the
treatments for improving the outcomes of interest in the populations of interest. Applicability of
the findings is therefore high.
For each intervention, it is important to note the following provisions. The results of this
review apply for women:
• Who are reproductive age and state they have an irregular pattern of menstrual bleeding
or heavy cyclic menstrual bleeding.
• Without abnormal findings on pelvic exam or on ultrasound report (fibroids, polyps).
• Without an intrauterine device (IUD) in place, and who are not pregnant or lactating,
• Who are healthy, and without renal impairment, hepatic impairment, intestinal disease,
thyroid disease, abnormal cervical cytology, noncyclic bleeding, history or presence of
significant medical problems (e.g., thromboembolic disease, coagulopathy, subarachnoid
hemorrhage, endocrine disorders, or eye disease).
• For whom any additional clinically determined diagnostic and screening tests have be
completed to rule out these and other causes of abnormal bleeding.
• Does not have any of the contraindications found in the Food and Drug Administration
sources discussed in the main document and do not have risks of drug-drug interactions if
they take multiple prescription medications.
Our review was not designed to guide evaluation of women with abnormal bleeding, rather to
address what treatments have evidence of effectiveness once the diagnosis is established and
primary care management is to be initiated.

Applicability of Literature About Interventions for Irregular Uterine


Bleeding (KQ1A)
The literature about management of irregular uterine bleeding applies to women in primary
care settings in the United States. Ten RCTs, three conducted in the United States, two in Italy,
two in Turkey, and one each in China, Sweden, and the United Kingdom provide evidence about
seven types of intervention. Enrolled populations were narrowly defined and had either a clinical
diagnosis of irregular uterine bleeding, or met research criteria for PCOS. As a result the findings
are strictly applicable only to these groups of women. We describe the agents study within the
two populations in which the research was conducted.

Use for Irregular Uterine Bleeding (KQ1A)


Progestogens
The study comparing vaginal micronized progesterone (8% gel) with oral dydrogesterone for
a 10-day time period is applicable to primary care in the United States, as both routes are used in
standard care in the United States to provide progesterone in order to organize a withdrawal
bleed that will typically occur within days of completing the progestogen. The oral agent in this
trial, dydrogesterone, is not available in the United States. This study is therefore a surrogate for
oral versus vaginal administration of similar progestogen formulations such as MPA that are
widely used in the United States for this purpose; however it does not provide direct evidence to
support use of other agents. The outcome of interest for this review was regularity of bleeding
after treatment which was provided for three menstrual cycles. Both groups had improvement

80
however applicability for chronic use is unclear as no long-term followup of symptom control is
available. Progesterone is often used in management of specific causes of abnormal bleeding
such as PCOS however this study does not directly apply because the population was not
addressed in this study. Progesterone can be used by women who wish to conceive.

COCs
The single study, conducted in the United States, is directly applicable to primary care in the
United States. The study population of 201 women is representative of the spectrum of
complaints that may accompany chronic irregular uterine bleeding including menses that are
widely separated in time whether light, normal, or heavy with regard to heaviness of bleeding,
and includes women with closely space and unpredictable bleeding also without restriction on
heaviness of bleeding. The intervention is a common version of triphasic COC (Ortho Tri-
Cyclen®) that provides direct evidence for its effectiveness and indirect evidence for other
triphasic pills with similar dosing profiles. The evidence is less direct but likely applicable to
monophasic pills of similar estrogen and progestogen content. It does not apply to progestogen-
only formulations or to pills with estrogen doses lower than 0.035 mcg as used in this study.
Comparison to placebo provides definitive evidence of benefit but does not provide information
about how COCs compare to other strategies that might be used such as LNG-IUS or
progestogens. The outcomes included those that are a priority of women seeking treatment for
uterine bleeding and included cycle regularity, incidence of excessive bleeding, and overall
rating of symptom improvement.50 Harms and contraindications, as discussed in KQ2, are well-
known to care providers and often to women themselves, and COCs are not applicable as a long-
term strategy for women who wish to conceive.

Management of PCOS (KQ1A)


Metformin and Exenatide
The four trials that investigated use of metformin are applicable to care in the United States
and were conducted in the United States, Turkey, Italy, and the United Kingdom. The study in
the United States compared metformin, to exenatide or both. These studies enrolled women with
PCOS and fewer than expected normal menses. They investigated doses of metformin that are
available in the United States (500 mg and 850 mg, administered by mouth twice daily). None of
the studies used an extended-release form which is now available so evidence related to that
formulation is indirect. The outcome of interest for this review was menstrual frequency which
was improved compared with placebo in 2 trials. One head-to-head comparison was metformin
compared with exenatide or both. Both were superior to either alone for cycle control. Another
trial compared metformin to N-acetyl-cysteine. The most common side effect which is
gastrointestinal symptoms was identified in these studies and thus would be expected to apply to
this typically younger group of women who do not have diabetes. Metformin can be used by
women who wish to conceive and is safe for use in pregnancy. Based on other literature, it may
enhance fertility. Little is known about exenatide and fertility and safety in pregnancy, however
it does not have contraceptive effects.

Diet and Exercise


The applicability of the single trial of diet and exercise is limited. It enrolled 24 adolescents
with PCOS, 16 of whom completed the study and evaluated a low-fat, calorie-restricted diet or a
carbohydrate-restricted diet along with 30 minutes of anaerobic exercise 3 days a week. The trial

81
did not provide an intention to treat analysis, comparing arms but did report that weight loss in
either group improved cycle regularity. Behavioral changes can be applied in many populations
and would be expected to have benefits. Thus evidence is insufficient to advise which dietary
pattern is superior. Another arm of a single study found exercise 30 minutes each day, 3 days a
week, was more effective than no intervention and as effective as acupuncture in improving
cycle regularity.

Acupuncture
Two trials, one conducted in Sweden and one in China, assessed acupuncture. Depending on
the availability and the skill of acupuncturists available in communities, this intervention may
not be broadly applicable in the United States. Both tradition acupuncture and
electroacupuncture improved cycle regularity but this was assessed in essentially unblended
trials. The outcomes examined were relevant to patient symptoms however were very poorly-
described in one study in which the investigators applied categories like “cured” without clear
definitions. Overall, literature is absent to inform choice of any of these modalities over another.

Applicability of Literature to Management of Abnormal Cyclic


Bleeding (KQ1B)
Twenty-nine studies contributed evidence about interventions for management of abnormal
cyclic bleeding focused predominantly on effectiveness for reducing the amount of bleeding
among women with heavy menstrual bleeding. Overall these RCTs are applicable to primary
care in the United States. Five were conducted in the United States (including two multi-country
trials), eight studies were conducted in the United Kingdom, four studies were conducted in
Canada (including two multicenter studies), three studies were conducted in Australia (including
one multicenter trial), and two each were conducted in Finland, Egypt, and India. A single study
was conducted in each of the following countries: Netherlands, Sweden, and Turkey.

LNG-IUS
Overall, the study findings for LNG-IUS from this review apply to women in the primary
care settings in the United States. One trial was conducted in three countries (United States,
Canada, and Brazil), two trials were conducted in the United Kingdom, and the others were
conducted in Egypt, Canada, Turkey, and Finland. The settings are not substantially different
from a primary care setting in the United States. However, a limitation is that adolescent women
and women with obesity were not included in the RCTs populations, so direct applicability to
their care is lacking. Enrolled populations met our inclusion criteria and like others used direct
measures of volume of bleeding that would be replaced in clinical care with patient self-report.
The LNG-IUS is available in the United States. The intervention dosage was the same for all
seven trials and is that currently marketed (52 mg levonorgestrel, initial release rate 20 mcg per
24 hours). The LNG-IUS must be inserted by a provider. The details of the insertion procedure
must be understood and practiced to safely provide this treatment in a primary care setting. The
comparator differed among the seven trials; two trials compared LNG-IUS to a COC, three trials
compared LNG-IUS to a progestogen (oral or intramuscular route), one trial used an NSAID as a
comparator, and one trial assigned the patients in the control group to continue with their existing
medical treatment for excessive uterine bleeding or symptoms of dysmenorrhea, or both. None of
the trials compared LNG-IUS with TXA.

82
The primary outcome of the trials was change in blood loss which directly addresses the
primary symptom for which women typically seek treatment. One study used the proportion of
women who cancelled their prior decision to undergo hysterectomy as the primary outcome
measure. Timing of assessment of outcome varied among the trials: one trial reported after 1
menstrual cycle, three trials reported after 3 menstrual cycles, four trials reported after 6
menstrual cycles, and two trials reported after 12 months. The latter are more informative for a
device intended to be in place for 5 years.

Contraceptive Vaginal Ring


The contraceptive vaginal ring is available in the United States, and the group of women
enrolled in the only study available is comparable in symptom profile to those in other studies in
this CER. MBL reduction between the contraceptive vaginal ring users and the comparison
group receiving norethisterone 3 times daily was similar. Women in the contraceptive vaginal
ring group were more satisfied with treatment, however, it is important to note that comparison
of the ring to an agent dosed 3 times each day may not be applicable to typical practice patterns
in the United States when selecting a progestogen to prescribe for AUB.

NSAIDs
The 13 RCTs examining NSAIDs and included in this review are applicable to United States
populations. The studies were conducted in seven countries including Australia (2 studies),
Canada (1 study), India (2 studies), the Netherlands (1 study), Sweden (1 study), the United
Kingdom (5 studies), and the United States (1 study). In some trials, women were excluded who
were on hormonal medications, had menorrhagia related to an IUD, or who were taking NSAIDs
or steroids. Therefore, results of these studies are applicable to women with no contraindications
to NSAIDs including underlying hepatic, renal, or thyroid disease, stomach ulcers, or asthma,
and no drug sensitivity.
The specific NSAID administered to participants varied and included mefenamic acid (11
trials), naproxen (2 trials), flurbiprofen (1 trial), and meclofenamate (1 trial). One trial evaluated
mefenamic acid in conjunction with TXA. For each NSAID, dose and duration did not vary
greatly, with usually up to 5 days duration of use. The most commonly used dose of mefenamic
acid was 500 mg 3 times a day starting at the onset of menses. One trial initiated mefenamic acid
5 days prior to onset of menses through cessation of bleeding. Another trial used 500 mg at onset
of menses followed by 250 mg every 6 hours for 3 to 5 days. Mefenamic acid at a dose of 250
mg 3 times a day from onset menses for 5 days was used when combined with TXA in one trial.
Naproxen was evaluated with initial loading doses of 500 to 550 mg then 250 to 275 mg every 6
hours for 5 days or until 24 hours after cessation of heavy bleeding. Meclofenamate was studied
at a dose of 100 mg 3 times a day from onset of menses for duration of 6 days or until cessation.
Flurbiprofen was studied at a dose of 100 mg twice a day from onset of menses for duration of 5
days. Each of these doses is available for prescription in the United States. Notably, the literature
lacks RCTs about ibuprofen which is likely the most common prescription and over-the-counter
NSAID used for heavy bleeding and dysmenorrhea.
Outcomes for the trials in this review included documentation of objective blood loss. This is
not applicable in routine clinical care and subjective assessment of MBL is nearly always used as
the criteria for initiating and determining success with NSAIDs. NSAIDs are also effective in
reducing dysmenorrhea, and therefore patients with both heavy cyclic menstrual bleeding and
dysmenorrhea or headaches may desire NSAIDs.

83
TXA
The literature about TXA for management of abnormal cyclic bleeding applies well to
women in primary care settings in the United States. Two trials were conducted in the United
States, three were conducted in Europe, and one took place in India. Enrolled populations met
inclusion criteria and reviewed studies implemented exclusion of participants as described in the
methods for this review. Because women with comorbidities are systematically excluded from
these trials, we must note the studies apply to healthy women with heavy cyclic menstrual
bleeding. While studies quantified the amount of bleeding at baseline, this is typically not
feasible in clinical populations and the patient’s statement that menstrual bleeding is heavy
would be more likely to be used as a criterion for consideration of this therapy.
The formulation of TXA (Lysteda®) used in the included studies is the same that is currently
available in the United States. The intervention dosage differed among the five trials but was in
the range of 1.95 to 4.5 grams per day for 4 to 5 days. Treatments compared with TXA in these
trials did not include LNG-IUS or COC regimens. This modestly limits applicability since these
would be among the usual interventions considered in real-world clinical settings.
The primary outcome of the TXA trials was change in blood loss which is typically the most
pertinent symptom for women. The timing of assessments of outcomes varied among the trials
but was generally short: two trials reported after two menstrual cycles, four trials reported after
three menstrual cycles, one trial reported after six menstrual cycles. No trials reported outcomes
for use of TXA for 1 year or more of therapy. This limits understanding of applicability for long-
term use of this agent. Reporting of adverse events was not adequate for an assessment of harms
and in the context of short followup in trials, this prevents consideration of risks.

COCs
The findings of this review are applicable to women visiting a primary care setting for
management of heavy, cyclic uterine bleeding. The included RCTs were conducted in the United
States (1 study), Canada (2 studies), Australia (1 study), multiple sites in Europe (1 study), and
Egypt (1 study) in outpatient clinical care settings. Known contraindications to use of COCs and
abnormal findings during diagnostic work-up (e.g., fibroids or other endometrial pathology) were
commonly employed as exclusion criteria in the identified studies and these diagnostic
exclusions are applicable in the general primary care setting as well. Study participants were all
older than 18, and had normal range body weights so no evidence directly informs symptom
management or safety in younger adolescents or obese patients. COCs were compared with
placebo in three studies and with LNG-IUS in two studies. Both participants in the COC group
and LNG-IUS had improvements from baseline, but the LNG-IUS was superior to COC. In
comparison to mefenamic acid, COCs were superior. The outcomes assessed were those of high
relevance to patients and included MBL, blood counts and iron reserves, and participant and
clinician assessment of symptoms.

Decision Aids
Use of decision aids is increasingly common and promoted in U.S. health care settings
especially in clinical contexts in which patient preference plays a strong role in selection of the
treatment and prioritization of outcomes. Three studies of decision aids are included in this
review. Two were conducted in the United Kingdom and one in Finland. They are somewhat
applicable to care in the United States but may not directly apply given differences in payment
structures for care and prescriptions as well as potential differences in clinical care norms. All

84
three studies used information booklets mailed to patients prior to their appointments and one
added a computerized decision tool. The studies assessed outcomes like general health status,
quality of life, and decisional conflict, as well as secondary outcomes like anxiety. Study
populations included women older than 30 and 35 respectively in the two that reported, so
findings do not generalize to younger women. None found benefit which may or may not reflect
how similar approaches would be received in a U.S. health care context or across a broader age
span of women.

Final Comments on Applicability


Overall applicability of this literature to providing care was high. However, often women
who are in trials do not reflect the full range of those with abnormal bleeding seen in primary
care and, as we have noted, groupings of participants do not correspond directly to newer
classifications of sub-types of AUB.9 Study participants were more likely to be normal weight,
nonsmokers, with few, if any concomitant conditions. The interventions (except in the case of
specific comparators as noted) are available in the same doses and formulation in the United
States. Outcomes such as measured blood loss, self-reported symptom severity and days of
bleeding are of direct relevance to women with abnormal bleeding. Our findings are sparse for
outcomes which can be considered essential for a condition like AUB that are defined by
symptoms. Important outcomes include satisfaction with response to treatment, definitive
assessments of whether or not the women considered their complaint resolved, and whether they
wished to continue the same treatment or add additional treatments. Followup in general was
brief, so they findings may not apply well to management of a chronic condition like abnormal
bleedings. This makes findings about assessments of harms challenging since use of
interventions over extended periods may have different risk profiles from short timeframes like
one to six cycles.

Summary of Strength of Evidence and Findings


Overall the evidence to answer KQs about the management of AUB, did not reach standards
for high strength of evidence for any intervention. This was particularly true in the literature
relevant to treatment of women with irregular uterine bleeding. Combined oral contraceptives, as
represented in a single good quality placebo controlled trial with a total of 201 participants,
documented effectiveness. The treatment effect was large with improvement in bleeding patterns
reported for more than 80 percent of women taking COC compared with 45 percent for the
placebo group. Combined, these factors provided moderate evidence of benefit. Use of
metformin is supported by low strength of evidence predominantly related to small trials with
somewhat limited quality. For the remainder of the interventions investigated for management of
irregular uterine bleeding, there is insufficient evidence that follows from single or lower quality
studies, or both.
The strength of evidence tables (Table 22 and Table 23) that follow summarize the total
number of studies and within those studies the number of women who received the specific
intervention. The tables also provide the assessment of the risk of bias, consistency of findings
across trials, directness of the evidence that treatment improves the symptom, and precision of
the estimated provided by the literature. The complete scoring is found in the Appendix J. For
KQ1B, risk of bias associated with blinding of patients, personnel and outcome assessment was
most likely to compromise overall assessment of study quality. For KQ1A, risk of bias

85
associated with blinding of patients and personnel and incomplete outcome data was most likely
to compromise overall study quality.

Table 22. Strength of evidence for improving menstrual regularity (KQ1A)


Intervention
Quality: Studies Overall
Risk of Findings
(Subjects Consistency Directness Precision Strength of
Bias a Comparisons
Assigned to Evidence
Intervention)
b
Progestogen
High NA Direct Imprecise Insufficient Not analyzed by arm
Poor: 1(69)49
d
Cycle control improved:
c
COC 87%
Low NA Direct Precise Moderate
Good: 1(101)50
COC vs. PBO, p<0.00150
f
e Delay to first ovulation: 24
Metformin
days
Poor: 3(81)52,53,54 Medium NA Direct Imprecise Low
Fair: 1(45)51
MET vs. PBO, p=0.0251
g
Exenatide
High NA Direct Imprecise Insufficient Small, poor quality trial
Poor: 1(20)53
i
Cycle control improved:
h
Cabergoline 100%
Low NA Direct Imprecise Insufficient
Good: 1(8)55
CBG vs. PBO, p=NR55
j
Diet
High NA Direct Imprecise Insufficient Not analyzed by arm
Poor: 1(24)56
k
Exercise
High NA Direct Imprecise Insufficient Not analyzed by arm
Poor: 1(34)57
l m
Acupuncture Menstrual regulation: 86%
57
Poor: 1(33) High NA Direct Imprecise Insufficient
Fair: 1(23)58 MP-ACU > R-ACU, p<0.0558
CBG = cabergoline; COC = combined oral contraceptive; MET = metformin; MR-ACU = menstruation-promoting acupuncture;
NR = not reported; PBO = placebo; R-ACU = routine acupuncture
a
Overall strength of evidence assessment based on good and fair quality studies only.
b
Oral dydrogesterone (n=35) vs. 8% vaginal micronized progesterone (n=34).
c
Triphasic norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol vs. placebo (n=100).
d
Subject assessment.
e
Poor quality studies: metformin vs. N-acetyl cysteine (n=50), exenatide (n=20), or placebo (n=12); Fair quality study: metformin
vs. placebo (n=47).
f
Mean days to ovulation.
g
Compared with metformin (n=20) or metformin plus exenatide (n=20).
h
Compared with placebo (n=6).
i
Menstrual cyclicity restoration in oligomenorrhea or spontaneous menses in amenorrhea.
j
Low-fat diet (n=12) vs. low-carbohydrate diet (n=12).
k
Compared with acupuncture (n=33) or no intervention (n=17).
l
Poor quality study: acupuncture vs. exercise (n=34) or no intervention (n=17); Fair quality study: mind tranquilizing acupuncture
vs. routine acupuncture (n=17).
m
Patients cured or markedly relieved.

For management of heavy cyclic bleeding the literature was more robust. Combined oral
contraceptives are supported by high strength of evidence for the purpose of decreasing MBL.
The LNG-IUS, various NSAIDs, and TXA are also effective for reducing the amount of
measured menstrual bleeding and are each supported by moderate strength of evidence. Of note,
in head-to-head comparisons with statistically significant differences, the LNG-IUS has one trial
each showing superiority to NSAIDs, two showing superiority to COCs, and two showing

86
superiority to progestogens. COCs were superior in one trial compared with an NSAID. TXA
was also superior to an NSAID, and when combined with an NSAID was superior to TXA alone.
Most of these interventions have been shown to have additional positive effects, typically
including shorter duration of bleeding and improvement is symptoms when participants used
standardized scoring systems to report on treatment response.

Table 23. Strength of evidence for improving heavy menstrual bleeding (KQ1B)
Intervention
Quality: Studies Overall b
Risk of Findings
(Subjects Consistency Directness Precision Strength of
Bias a Comparisons
Assigned to Evidence
Intervention)
71% and 94% reduction in MBL
LNG-IUS
59,61- in 2 head-to-head studies
Poor: 5(173)
63,65 Medium Consistent Direct Precise Moderate
60
60,64 LNG-IUS > MPA, p<0.001
Fair: 2(104) 64
LNG-IUS vs. NOR, p=NS
28% to 49% reduction in MBL in
NSAID 3 placebo controlled trials; 46%
Poor: and 47% reduction in MBL in 1
63,66,68-
9(192) head-to-head study (2 NSAID
71,73,74,77
Medium Consistent Direct Imprecise Moderate arms)
Fair:
67,75,76,93 67
3(113) MFA vs. PBO, p=NR
72 76,72
Good: 1(32) p<0.001
75
MFA vs. NPX, p=NS
26% and 40% reduction in MBL
TXA in 2 placebo controlled trials;
Poor: 45% reduction in MBL in 1
66,71,77,79
4(202) Medium Consistent Direct Precise Moderate head-to-head study
80,81
Fair: 2(260)
78 81,78
Good: 1(123) TXA vs. PBO, p<0.001
80
TXA > NOR, p<0.001
c 64% and 69% reduction in MBL
COC
59,61,68 in 2 placebo controlled trials
Poor: 3(90) Low Consistent Direct Precise High
82,83
Good: 2(269) 83,82
COC vs. PBO, p<0.001

87
Table 23. Strength of evidence for improving heavy menstrual bleeding (KQ1B) (continued)
Intervention
Quality: Studies Overall b
Risk of Findings
(Subjects Consistency Directness Precision Strength of
Bias a Comparisons
Assigned to Evidence
Intervention)
20% increase to 87% reduction
d in MBL in 4 head-to-head
Progestogen
studies
Poor:
79,62,70,74
4(161) Medium Inconsistent Direct Imprecise Insufficient 60
MPA < LNG-IUS, p<0.001
Fair: 64
60,64,80,84 NOR < LNG-IUS, p=NS
4(173) 80
NOR < TXA, p<0.0001
84e
NOR vs. CVR, p=NS
e
67% reduction in MBL in 1
CVR head-to-head study
84 Medium NA Direct Imprecise Insufficient
Fair: 1(48)
84
CVR vs. NOR, p=NS
COC = combined oral contraceptive; CVR = contraceptive vaginal ring; LNG-IUS = levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
system; MBL = menstrual blood loss; MCF = meclofenamate; MFA = mefenamic acid; MPA = medroxyprogesterone; NA = not
applicable; NOR = norethisterone; NPX = naproxen; NR = not reported; NS = not significant; NSAID = nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory drug; PBO = placebo; TXA = tranexamic acid
a
Overall strength of evidence assessment based on good and fair quality studies only.
b
Change in menstrual blood loss from baseline measured by the alkaline hematin method (unless otherwise noted) from good and
fair quality studies.
c
thinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel (n=71) or norethindrone and ethinyl estradiol (n=19) or estradiol valerate and dienogest
(n=269).
d
Medroxyprogesterone (n=177) or oral norethisterone (n=113) or depot medroxyprogesterone (n=44).
e
Percent change in menstrual blood loss measured by the pictorial blood loss assessment chart.

Implications for Clinical and Policy Decisionmaking


This review highlights the variety of options that can be effective for management of
abnormal bleeding. We hope it serves to encourage care providers and women to consider the
full range of potentially helpful interventions. This review may help to underscore the fact that
contraceptive options like LNG-IUS and COCs are a proven option, while widening
consideration to include agents like metformin for women with PCOS and TXA for those with
heavy bleeding. Clinicians may be also be alerted to the some of the constraints of the literature
for these specific populations and proceed with more information to guide decisions and to
discuss likely side effects and potential harms.
Since these conditions are not typically life-threatening but are chronic, problematic, and can
be embarrassing and costly in terms of lost productivity, the primary health system and policy
challenge is to recognize that failure to address AUB is unnecessarily diminishing women’s
quality of life and function.1,8 Cost differences are unlikely to drive choices among many of these
interventions, though initial costs of long term treatments like the IUS can be disincentives if up-
front or maintenance costs to the patient are high.180-183 Likewise for newer drugs, like TXA,
decisions about eligibility and copays could influence uptake and continued utilization of an
effective medication. All the interventions described, with the exception of exenatide,
cabergoline, and acupuncture, are likely to be covered by most payors for these indications. For
the treatments noted that have not yet proven effectiveness in large well-conducted studies this
will need to be addressed with high quality research before policy decisions can be
recommended.

88
Limitations of This CER
In this review we focused tightly on primary care interventions for two specific patterns of
abnormal bleeding (irregular and cyclic). While this approach was identified by our team, Key
Informants, and the Technical Expert Panel (TEP) as an area of the literature that would benefit
from evidence synthesis, our focus does prevent comparison to second line therapies that may be
used by subspecialists for women who have failed primary care treatment and prevents
examination of how these medications fare when compared with surgical options. The latter
category of study is fairly small, and for broader perspective, there are a number of reviews
within the last 5 to 10 years that provide more sweeping information about these interventions.
For the reader’s convenience, Appendix M lists these reviews and related practice guidelines and
summarizes the conclusions that are relevant to the focus of this review.
Existing literature cannot uniformly be related to more recent updates in classification of
AUB that have potential to drive greater uniformity in research and greater thoroughness in
clinical evaluation. At present the inclusion and exclusion criteria of trials, the operational
definitions of the condition under study and the level of screening of participants to document
conformity with the FIGO 2011 classifications is lacking. As a result this literature synthesis is
constrained to groupings that are less specific. Nonetheless we have organized the findings into
groupings that are clinically recognized presentations and this evidence does apply for the
scenarios described.
We restricted this review to publications in English. Based on review of abstracts (generally
available in English) and on the expertise of our team and TEP, we do not feel that this biases the
review for assessment of the LNG-IUS and medications because few studies were omitted, and
larger, higher quality trials are typically published in the English language literature. The sole
domain that may be fundamentally under-represented because of this strategy is complementary
and alternative medicine which includes interventions such as herbal remedies, acupuncture, and
massage therapy. We also restricted interventions to those that had been studied in randomized
trials. This limits the degree of context that we can provide from observational studies about
factors such as predictors of treatment success or effect modifiers. However, it is uncommon for
observational studies to meet criteria sufficient to influence the assessment of strength of
evidence when there are trials available, so this restriction is unlikely to have influenced the
overall findings of this review.

Limitations of the Evidence Base


Throughout the report we endeavored to point out limitations specific to the included
populations, comparisons, and quality of the literature. Recent improvements in unifying
nomenclature and formalizing consensus definitions for the clinical groupings of bleeding
abnormalities9 will likely continue to have a positive influence on the ability to properly interpret
the findings of individual studies, to identify groups of studies with comparable methods and to
aggregate results. Though we did not systematically review literature about pathophysiology,
normative patterns for bleeding, natural history of AUB subtypes, or health systems influences,
we comment here beyond the need for specific trials in order to encompass other forms of
research that could enhance the design and conduct of effectiveness studies as well as filling
important gaps in knowledge that hinder research.

89
Methodologic Limitations
Recurring methodologic recommendations include a need for:
• Larger RCTs, appropriately powered for direct head-to-head comparisons of treatment
options in which loss of participants is minimized and intention-to-treat analyses are
uniformly conducted.
• Detailed attention to operational criteria for defining the bleeding pattern under study and
for methods used to define inclusion and exclusion. Conformity with FIGO PALM-
COIEN sub-types may be desirable.
• Study of the validity and reproducibility of classification of women presenting with
problem irregular and cyclic bleeding using the PALM-COIEN groupings or other
approaches is needed to understand the diagnostic properties of clinical classification
systems.
• Clear and definitive operational definitions of outcomes that include, indeed prioritize,
patient-reported, condition-specific quality of life and satisfaction measures over
durations of time compatible with treatment of a chronic condition. This should include
assessments of whether the woman herself considers her bleeding problem resolved.
• Study populations that match the characteristics of those who present with AUB in
primary care settings. This includes teens, perimenopausal women, heavier women, and
women with common comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension.
• More effective mechanisms of masking participants, researchers, and providers to
intervention status. This may include need to develop sham procedures to mimic IUD
insertion and to provide a sham “string” to confirm placement should a patient or
provider check status. (Of note the IUD is effective without a string and string-less
insertion is also an option for research where placement can be confirmed by ultrasound.)
• Studies designed to assess treatment trajectory and cost. Such studies could randomize
women to distinct treatment pathways and track the rate of conversion from one
treatment to another for inadequate symptom control or sequence addition of measures,
so that the effectiveness of combining multiple intervention methods can be assessed.
• An overall shift towards effectiveness from efficacy, moving beyond the level of proof of
concept that is required for drug and device approval to a deeper level that can better
inform care, cost considerations, and policy.

Ongoing Research
We identified four ongoing studies that may add to our understanding of the relative safety
and efficacy of different regimens for treatment of AUB (additional details provided in Appendix
P). Two currently funded trials are exploring the effect of a pretreatment regimen, one employing
misoprostol and one using norethindrone acetate, on short and long term bleeding outcomes
among women undergoing placement of an LNG-IUS for treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.
A large postmarketing surveillance study of the Mirena® LNG-IUS is also underway in
Kazakhstan, with a planned enrollment of 1,700 participants, potentially contributing additional
safety information to this body of literature. The utility and safety of new investigational agent, a
selective progesterone receptor modulator (CDB-2914) that has shown promise for reducing
bleeding in studies involving women with fibroids, is also currently being assessed in a study
involving women with AUB.

90
Future Research Needs
While the number of informative studies that could be designed is likely limitless, we list
examples, grouped by indication and intervention, of types of studies that could resolve current
and pressing gaps in knowledge.

Irregular Uterine Bleeding


• Development of a body of literature that examines benefits of exercise and weight loss
focused on improving bleeding patterns in women with irregular bleeding that results
from failed, mistimed, or poor-quality ovulation.
• Continued investigation of the role that insulin sensitizing and glycemic control agents
like metformin and exenatide have on improving irregular bleeding patterns.
• Carefully controlled trials of complementary and alternative medicine interventions like
acupuncture for improving menstrual regularity.
• RCTs specifically designed to assess both the heaviness and the interval of bleeding in
women with irregular bleeding, which could include approaches shown to have benefit
for heavy cyclic bleeding.

Abnormal Cyclic Uterine Bleeding


• Investigate the epidemiology and natural history of heavy menstrual bleeding in
representative primary care populations in order to better understand the boundaries of
what constitutes normal bleeding patterns and to document the trajectory of AUB. This
would for instance, contribute data about what factors predict severity and whether a
proportion of cases are self-limited.
• Determine whether harms reported to be associated with treatments for heavy bleeding
result because a causal contributor to the heavy bleeding is also related to the harm. For
instance abnormalities in coagulation may enhance risk of DVT and be associated with
heavy menses. Analyses for such confounding by indication may better assess risk of
harms and predictors of response.
• Across specific interventions, additional research and analysis is needed to determine
which individuals are most likely to respond to which interventions. This could develop
from personalized medicine approaches, from better understanding of the mechanisms
underpinning AUB, or from predictive modeling in large datasets.
• Assess the acceptability and cost-effectiveness of various treatments in the primary care
setting in the United States including LNG-IUS, NSAID, COCs and TXA.
• Determine the most valid and accurate indirect measures of MBL that can be used in
primary care settings and that correlate with objective direct measures.

Progesterone Containing IUDs Including the LNG-IUS


• Establish a registry of LNG-IUS users in the United States for extended followup of
potential harms and preventive effects (e.g., reduced risk of endometrial cancer, anemia).
• Extend postmarketing surveillance to assure safety when used in teens and nulliparous
patients.
• Examine costs in light of whether the treatment simultaneously resolves bleeding
complaints and provides contraception.

91
NSAIDs
• Directly compare classes of NSAIDs including commonly available over-the-counter
preparations.
• Conduct long-term effectiveness studies to determine if treatment effects are durable or
wane over time.
• Model the costs of treatment with varied NSAID dosing strategies.
• Determine if “pre-loading” in the days before onset of menses significantly reduces
menstrual bleeding alone and in combination with NSAIDs after onset of menstrual
bleeding.

COCs
• Conduct direct comparisons of COCs with other AUB management strategies to better
understand the relative merits of treatment options.
• Examine costs in light of whether the treatment simultaneously treats complaints and
provides contraception.

TXA
• Establish a registry of TXA users and exploit existing large payer datasets to examine
long-term followup for both effectiveness beyond 6 months and incidence of
rare/uncommon adverse effects.

Conclusions
Women who have problematic irregular or heavy cyclic menstrual bleeding have a number of
treatment options available that are supported by systematic review of the research literature.
These include high strength of evidence that COCs can improve menstrual regularity for women
with irregular bleeding patterns. Metformin is supported by moderate strength of evidence for
improving cycle regularity especially among women with PCOS. This provides both a
contraceptive and a noncontraceptive option for irregular menses. Other interventions like
progestogens are associated with statistically and clinically meaningful improvements from
baseline patterns, however the overall evidence is insufficient from well-designed, larger studies
with ability to directly compare treatment arms rather than only pre-post measures within groups.
Multiple interventions for heavy cyclic bleeding are supported by evidence that they reduce
MBL. These include strong evidence that COCs are effective and moderate strength of evidence
that LNG-IUS, NSAIDs, and TXA reduce bleeding relative to baseline, decrease total volume of
bleeding when comparisons are made across treatment groups, and when measured, decrease
days of bleeding. In direct comparisons, LNG-IUS is superior to NSAIDs. TXA is superior to
NSAIDs and TXA combined with an NSAID was superior to TXA alone. Results from COC and
NSAID comparisons suggest comparable effectiveness. Not all women who are treated with any
of these interventions that can be effective will improve. Across agents data are sparse to
evaluate long-term improvements and risk of harms.
Limitations include a predominance of small, short trials lacking standard terminology and
diagnostic criteria for identifying and including women with AUB. Tools for collecting outcome
data are crude (collection of sanitary products) and may contribute to a high rate of attrition.
Biologic outcomes, like measured blood loss and hemoglobin or hematocrit levels, may neglect
the importance of patient-reported outcomes that assess whether symptoms are considered

92
resolved by women themselves. Nevertheless, the variety of effective options suggests many
women can achieve symptom relief and will have available to them choices that address both
symptoms and contraceptive or fertility desires, as well as potentially improving other symptoms
like menstrual cramping.

93
References
1. Liu Z, Doan QV, Blumenthal P, et al. A 9. Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, et
systematic review evaluating health-related al.; FIGO Working Group on Menstrual
quality of life, work impairment, and health- Disorders. FIGO classification system
care costs and utilization in abnormal uterine (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal
bleeding. Value Health 2007 May- uterine bleeding in nongravid women of
Jun;10(3):183-94. PMID: 17532811. reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet
2011 Apr;113(1):3-13. PMID: 21345435.
2. Marret H, Fauconnier A, Chabbert-Buffet N,
et al. Clinical practice guidelines on 10. Bradley LD. Diagnosis of abnormal uterine
menorrhagia: management of abnormal bleeding with biopsy or hysteroscopy.
uterine bleeding before menopause. Eur J Menopause 2011 Apr;18(4):425-33. PMID:
Obstet Gynecol Reprod Bio 2010 21701428.
Oct;152(2):133-7. PMID: 20688424. 11. Doubilet PM. Diagnosis of abnormal uterine
3. Albers JR, Hull SK, Wesley RM. Abnormal bleeding with imaging. Menopause 2011
uterine bleeding. Am Fam Physician 2004 Apr;18(4):421-4. PMID: 21701427.
Apr 15;69(8):1915-26. PMID: 15117012. 12. Woolcock JG, Critchley HO, Munro MG, et
4. Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical gynecologic al. Review of the confusion in current and
endocrinology and infertility. 8th ed. historical terminology and definitions for
Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer disturbances of menstrual bleeding. Fertil
Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Steril 2008;90(6):2269-80. PMID:
2011. 18258230.
5. Hallberg L, Hogdahl AM, Nilsson L, et al. 13. Rahn DD, Abed H, Sung VW, et al.; Society
Menstrual blood loss—a population study. of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic
Variation at different ages and attempts to Review Group. Systematic review highlights
define normality. Acta Obstet Gynecol difficulty interpreting diverse clinical
Scand 1966;45(3):320-51. PMID: 5922481. outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding
trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2011 Mar;64(3):293-
6. Treloar AE, Boynton RE, Behn BG, et al. 300. PMID: 20705427.
Variation of the human menstrual cycle
through reproductive life. Int J Fertil 1967 14. Fraser IS, Critchley HO, Munro MG, et al.
Jan-Mar;12(1 Pt 2):77-126. PMID: 5419031. A process designed to lead to international
agreement on terminologies and definitions
7. Belsey EM, Pinol AP. Menstrual bleeding used to describe abnormalities of menstrual
patterns in untreated women. Task Force on bleeding. Fertil Steril 2007 Mar;87(3):466-
Long-Acting Systemic Agents for Fertility 76. PMID: 17362717.
Regulation. Contraception 1997
Feb;55(2):57-65. PMID: 9071513. 15. Fraser IS, Critchley HO, Munro MG, et al.
Can we achieve international agreement on
8. Matteson KA, Clark MA. Questioning our terminologies and definitions used to
questions: do frequently asked questions describe abnormalities of menstrual
adequately cover the aspects of women's bleeding? Hum Reprod 2007
lives most affected by abnormal uterine Mar;22(3):635-43. PMID: 17204526.
bleeding? Opinions of women with
abnormal uterine bleeding participating in 16. Munro MG, Critchley HO, Fraser IS; FIGO
focus group discussions. Women Health Working Group on Menstrual Disorders.
2010 Mar;50(2):195-211. PMID: 20437305. The FIGO classification of causes of
abnormal uterine bleeding. Int J Gynaecol
Obstet 2011 Apr;113(1):1-2. PMID:
21316671.

94
17. Hale GE, Zhao X, Hughes CL, et al. 26. Jensen JT, Lefebvre P, Laliberte F, et al.
Endocrine Features of Menstrual Cycles in Cost Burden and Treatment Patterns
Middle and Late Reproductive Age and the Associated with Management of Heavy
Menopausal Transition Classified According Menstrual Bleeding. J Womens Health
to the Staging of Reproductive Aging (Larchmt) 2012 Feb 23PMID: 22360696.
Workshop (STRAW) Staging System. J Clin
27. Samuel NC, Justin Clark T. Future research
Endocrinol Metab 2007 August 1,
into abnormal uterine bleeding. Best Pract
2007;92(8):3060-7. PMID: 17550960.
Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007;21(6):1023-
18. Heller DS. Pathologic basis for abnormal 40. PMID: 17584533.
uterine bleeding with organic uterine
28. Espey E, Ogburn T. Long-acting reversible
pathologies. Menopause 2011
contraceptives: intrauterine devices and the
Apr;18(4):412-5. PMID: 21701425.
contraceptive implant. Obstet Gynecol 2011
19. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins— Mar;117(3):705-19. PMID: 21343774.
Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.
29. Endrikat J, Vilos G, Muysers C, et al. The
14: management of anovulatory bleeding.
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system
Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001 Mar;72(3):263-
provides a reliable, long-term treatment
71. PMID: 11296797.
option for women with idiopathic
20. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins— menorrhagia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011
Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. Apr 8PMID: 21475963.
59: clinical management guidelines for
30. Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception
obstetricians-gynecologists: intrauterine
in the United States: 1982-2008. Vital
device. Obstet Gynecol 2005
Health Stat 23 2010 Aug(29):1-44. PMID:
Jan;105(1):223-32. PMID: 15625179.
20939159.
21. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—
31. Xu X, Macaluso M, Ouyang L, et al.
Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.
Revival of the intrauterine device: increased
110: noncontraceptive uses of hormonal
insertions among US women with employer-
contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol 2010
sponsored insurance, 2002-2008.
Jan;115(1):206-18. PMID: 20027071.
Contraception 2012 Feb;85(2):155-9. PMID:
22. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins— 22067778.
Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.
32. Smith SK, Abel MH, Kelly RW, et al.
121: long-acting reversible contraception:
Prostaglandin synthesis in the endometrium
implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet
of women with ovular dysfunctional uterine
Gynecol 2011 Jul;118(1):184-96. PMID:
bleeding. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1981
21691183.
Apr;88(4):434-42. PMID: 7225303.
23. Ely JW, Kennedy CM, Clark EC, et al.
33. Pinkerton JV. Pharmacological therapy for
Abnormal uterine bleeding: a management
abnormal uterine bleeding. Menopause 2011
algorithm. J Am Board Fam Med 2006 Nov-
Apr;18(4):453-61. PMID: 21701432.
Dec;19(6):590-602. PMID: 17090792.
34. Lethaby A, Augood C, Duckitt K, et al.
24. National Collaborating Centre for Women's
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for
and Children's Health. Heavy Menstrual
heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane
Bleeding. NICE Clinical Guideline CG44.
Database Syst Rev 2007(4):CD000400.
London: Institute for Health and Clinical
PMID: 17943741.
Excellence; 2007.
35. Lumsden MA, Wedisinghe L. Tranexamic
25. Matteson KA, Anderson BL, Pinto SB, et al.
acid therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.
Practice patterns and attitudes about treating
Expert Opin Pharmacother 2011
abnormal uterine bleeding: a national survey
Sep;12(13):2089-95. PMID: 21767224.
of obstetricians and gynecologists. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 2011 May 14PMID: 36. Farquhar C, Brown J. Oral contraceptive pill
21737060. for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev 2009(4):CD000154.
PMID: 19821266.

95
37. Telner DE, Jakubovicz D. Approach to 46. Fu R, Gartlehner G, Grant M, et al.
diagnosis and management of abnormal Conducting quantitative synthesis when
uterine bleeding. Can Fam Physician 2007 comparing medical interventions: AHRQ
Jan;53(1):58-64. PMID: 17872610. and the Effective Health Care Program. J
Clin Epidemiol 2011 Nov;64(11):1187-97.
38. Kiley J, Hammond C. Combined oral
PMID: 21477993.
contraceptives: a comprehensive review.
Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007 Dec;50(4):868- 47. Owens DK, Lohr KN, Atkins D, et al.
77. PMID: 17982329. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength
of a body of evidence when comparing
39. Norman RJ, Noakes M, Wu R, et al.
medical interventions—agency for
Improving reproductive performance in
healthcare research and quality and the
overweight/obese women with effective
effective health-care program. J Clin
weight management. Hum Reprod Update
Epidemiol 2010 May;63(5):513-23. PMID:
2004 May-Jun;10(3):267-80. PMID:
19595577.
15140873.
48. Atkins D, Chang SM, Gartlehner G, et al.
40. Livdans-Forret AB, Harvey PJ, Larkin-Thier
Assessing applicability when comparing
SM. Menorrhagia: a synopsis of
medical interventions: AHRQ and the
management focusing on herbal and
Effective Health Care Program. J Clin
nutritional supplements, and chiropractic. J
Epidemiol 2011 Nov;64(11):1198-207.
Can Chiropr Assoc 2007 Dec;51(4):235-46.
PMID: 21463926.
PMID: 18060009.
49. Karakus S, Kiran G, Ciralik H. Efficacy of
41. Methods Guide for Effectiveness and
micronised vaginal progesterone versus oral
Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. AHRQ
dydrogestrone in the treatment of irregular
Publication No. 10(11)-EHC063-EF.
dysfunctional uterine bleeding: a pilot
Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare
randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J
Research and Quality; August 2011.
Obstet Gynaecol 2009 Dec;49(6):685-8.
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov.
PMID: 20070724.
42. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The
50. Davis A, Godwin A, Lippman J, et al.
PRISMA statement for reporting systematic
Triphasic norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol for
reviews and meta-analyses of studies that
treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding.
evaluate health care interventions:
Obstet Gynecol 2000 Dec;96(6):913-20.
explanation and elaboration. J Clin
PMID: 11084177.
Epidemiol 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34. PMID:
19631507. 51. Fleming R, Hopkinson ZE, Wallace AM, et
al. Ovarian function and metabolic factors in
43. Chou R, Aronson N, Atkins D, et al. AHRQ
women with oligomenorrhea treated with
series paper 4: assessing harms when
metformin in a randomized double blind
comparing medical interventions: AHRQ
placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol
and the effective health-care program. J Clin
Metab 2002 Feb;87(2):569-74. PMID:
Epidemiol 2010 May;63(5):502-12. PMID:
11836287.
18823754.
52. Moghetti P, Castello R, Negri C, et al.
44. Avoiding bias in selecting studies. AHRQ
Metformin effects on clinical features,
Draft Manuscript: Methods Guide for
endocrine and metabolic profiles, and
Effectiveness and Comparative
insulin sensitivity in polycystic ovary
Effectiveness Reviews. AHRQ Publication
syndrome: a randomized, double-blind,
No. 10(11)-EHC063-EF. Rockville, MD:
placebo-controlled 6-month trial, followed
Agency for Healthcare Research and
by open, long-term clinical evaluation. J
Quality; June 23 2011.
Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000 Jan;85(1):139-
www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov.
46. PMID: 10634377.
45. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al.
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for
assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
BMJ 2011;343:d5928. PMID: 22008217.

96
53. Elkind-Hirsch K, Marrioneaux O, Bhushan 61. Endrikat J, Shapiro H, Lukkari-Lax E, et al.
M, et al. Comparison of single and A Canadian, multicentre study comparing
combined treatment with exenatide and the efficacy of a levonorgestrel-releasing
metformin on menstrual cyclicity in intrauterine system to an oral contraceptive
overweight women with polycystic ovary in women with idiopathic menorrhagia. J
syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009 Apr;31(4):340-7.
2008;93(7):2670-8. PMID: 18460557. PMID: 19497153.
54. Oner G, Muderris, II. Clinical, endocrine 62. Kucuk T, Ertan K. Continuous oral or
and metabolic effects of metformin vs N- intramuscular medroxyprogesterone acetate
acetyl-cysteine in women with polycystic versus the levonorgestrel releasing
ovary syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol intrauterine system in the treatment of
Reprod Biol 2011 Nov;159(1):127-31. perimenopausal menorrhagia: a randomized,
PMID: 21831508. prospective, controlled clinical trial in
female smokers. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol
55. Paoletti AM, Cagnacci A, Depan GF, et al.
2008;35(1):57-60. PMID: 18390083.
The chronic administration of cabergoline
normalizes androgen secretion and improves 63. Reid PC, Virtanen-Kari S. Randomised
menstrual cyclicity in women with comparative trial of the levonorgestrel
polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril intrauterine system and mefenamic acid for
1996;66(4):527-32. PMID: 8816612. the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia: a
multiple analysis using total menstrual fluid
56. Ornstein RM, Copperman NM, Jacobson
loss, menstrual blood loss and pictorial
MS. Effect of weight loss on menstrual
blood loss assessment charts. BJOG 2005
function in adolescents with polycystic
Aug;112(8):1121-5. PMID: 16045528.
ovary syndrome. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol
2011;24(3):161-5. PMID: 21419674. 64. Irvine GA, Campbell-Brown MB, Lumsden
MA, et al. Randomised comparative trial of
57. Jedel E, Labrie F, Oden A, et al. Impact of
the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and
electro-acupuncture and physical exercise on
norethisterone for treatment of idiopathic
hyperandrogenism and oligo/amenorrhea in
menorrhagia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998
women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a
Jun;105(6):592-8. PMID: 9647148.
randomized controlled trial. Am J Physiol
Endocrinol Metab 2011 Jan;300(1):E37-45. 65. Lahteenmaki P, Haukkamaa M, Puolakka J,
PMID: 20943753. et al. Open randomised study of use of
levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system
58. Cai XM, Wu J. The mind-tranquilizing and
as alternative to hysterectomy. BMJ 1998
menstruation-regulating method for
Apr 11;316(7138):1122-6. PMID: 9552948.
acupuncture treatment of delayed menstrual
cycle—a clinical controlled study. J Tradit 66. Bonnar J, Sheppard BL. Treatment of
Chin Med 2009 Mar;29(1):35-8. PMID: menorrhagia during menstruation:
19514186. randomised controlled trial of ethamsylate,
mefenamic acid, and tranexamic acid. BMJ
59. Shaaban MM, Zakherah MS, El-Nashar SA,
1996 Sep 7;313(7057):579-82. PMID:
et al. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
8806245.
system compared to low dose combined oral
contraceptive pills for idiopathic 67. van Eijkeren MA, Christiaens GC, Geuze
menorrhagia: a randomized clinical trial. HJ, et al. Effects of mefenamic acid on
Contraception 2011 Jan;83(1):48-54. PMID: menstrual hemostasis in essential
21134503. menorrhagia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992
May;166(5):1419-28. PMID: 1595797.
60. Kaunitz AM, Bissonnette F, Monteiro I, et
al. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine 68. Fraser IS, McCarron G. Randomized trial of
system or medroxyprogesterone for heavy 2 hormonal and 2 prostaglandin-inhibiting
menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled agents in women with a complaint of
trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010 Sep;116(3):625- menorrhagia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
32. PMID: 20733445. 1991 Feb;31(1):66-70. PMID: 1872778.

97
69. Grover V, Usha R, Gupta U, et al. 78. Lukes AS, Moore KA, Muse KN, et al.
Management of cyclical menorrhagia with Tranexamic acid treatment for heavy
prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor. Asia menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled
Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 1990 trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010 Oct;116(4):865-
Sep;16(3):255-9. PMID: 2088249. 75. PMID: 20859150.
70. Cameron IT, Haining R, Lumsden MA, et 79. Kriplani A, Kulshrestha V, Agarwal N, et al.
al. The effects of mefenamic acid and Role of tranexamic acid in management of
norethisterone on measured menstrual blood dysfunctional uterine bleeding in
loss. Obstet Gynecol 1990 Jul;76(1):85-8. comparison with medroxyprogesterone
PMID: 2359570. acetate. J Obstet Gynaecol 2006
Oct;26(7):673-8. PMID: 17071438.
71. Andersch B, Milsom I, Rybo G. An
objective evaluation of flurbiprofen and 80. Preston JT, Cameron IT, Adams EJ, et al.
tranexamic acid in the treatment of Comparative study of tranexamic acid and
idiopathic menorrhagia. Acta Obstet norethisterone in the treatment of ovulatory
Gynecol Scand 1988;67(7):645-8. PMID: menorrhagia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995
3073625. May;102(5):401-6. PMID: 7612535.
72. Vargyas JM, Campeau JD, Mishell DR, Jr. 81. Freeman EW, Lukes A, VanDrie D, et al. A
Treatment of menorrhagia with dose-response study of a novel, oral
meclofenamate sodium. Am J Obstet tranexamic formulation for heavy menstrual
Gynecol 1987 Oct;157(4 Pt 1):944-50. bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011
PMID: 3314521. Oct;205(4):319 e1-7. PMID: 21777897.
73. Tsang BK, Domingo MT, Spence JE, et al. 82. Fraser IS, Romer T, Parke S, et al. Effective
Endometrial prostaglandins and treatment of heavy and/or prolonged
menorrhagia: influence of a prostaglandin menstrual bleeding with an oral
synthetase inhibitor in vivo. Can J Physiol contraceptive containing estradiol valerate
Pharmacol 1987 Oct;65(10):2081-4. PMID: and dienogest: A randomized, double-blind
3123043. Phase III trial. Human Reproduction
2011;26(10):2698-708. PMID: 21784734.
74. Cameron IT, Leask R, Kelly RW, et al. The
effects of danazol, mefenamic acid, 83. Jensen JT, Parke S, Mellinger U, et al.
norethisterone and a progesterone- Effective treatment of heavy menstrual
impregnated coil on endometrial bleeding with estradiol valerate and
prostaglandin concentrations in women with dienogest: A randomized controlled trial.
menorrhagia. Prostaglandins 1987 Obstetrics and Gynecology
Jul;34(1):99-110. PMID: 3685399. 2011;117(4):777-87. PMID: 21422847.
75. Hall P, Maclachlan N, Thorn N, et al. 84. Abu Hashim H, Alsherbini W, Bazeed M.
Control of menorrhagia by the cyclo- Contraceptive vaginal ring treatment of
oxygenase inhibitors naproxen sodium and heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized
mefenamic acid. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987 controlled trial with norethisterone.
Jun;94(6):554-8. PMID: 3304401. Contraception 2012 Mar;85(3):246-52.
PMID: 22067765.
76. Fraser IS, Pearse C, Shearman RP, et al.
Efficacy of mefenamic acid in patients with 85. Vuorma S, Rissanen P, Aalto AM, et al.
a complaint of menorrhagia. Obstet Gynecol Impact of patient information booklet on
1981 Nov;58(5):543-51. PMID: 7029369. treatment decision—a randomized trial
among women with heavy menstruation.
77. Najam R, Agarwal D, Tyagi R, et al.
Health Expect 2003 Dec;6(4):290-7. PMID:
Comparison of traneximic acid with a
15040791.
combination of traneximic acid and
mefenamic acid in reducing menstrual blood 86. Kennedy AD, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A, et al.
loss in ovulatory dysfunctional uterine Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on
bleeding (DUB). Journal of Clinical and treatment choices, health outcomes, and
Diagnostic Research 2010;4(5):3020-5. costs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA
2002 Dec 4;288(21):2701-8. PMID:
12460093.

98
87. Protheroe J, Bower P, Chew-Graham C, et 97. Spiller HA, Quadrani DA. Toxic effects
al. Effectiveness of a computerized decision from metformin exposure. Ann
aid in primary care on decision making and Pharmacother 2004 May;38(5):776-80.
quality of life in menorrhagia: results of the PMID: 15031415.
MENTIP randomized controlled trial.
98. Chan KA, Truman A, Gurwitz JH, et al. A
Medical Decision Making 2007;27(5):575-
cohort study of the incidence of serious
84. PMID: 17898242.
acute liver injury in diabetic patients treated
88. Shaw ST, Jr., Aaronson DE, Moyer DL. with hypoglycemic agents. Arch Intern Med
Quantitation of menstrual blood loss— 2003 Mar 24;163(6):728-34. PMID:
further evaluation of the alkaline hematin 12639207.
method. Contraception 1972 Jun;5(6):497-
99. Bodmer M, Meier C, Krahenbuhl S, et al.
513. PMID: 4650663.
Metformin, sulfonylureas, or other
89. Hallberg L, Nilsson L. Determination of antidiabetes drugs and the risk of lactic
menstrual blood loss. Scand J Clin Lab acidosis or hypoglycemia: a nested case-
Invest 1964;16:244-8. PMID: 14161862. control analysis. Diabetes Care 2008
Nov;31(11):2086-91. PMID: 18782901.
90. Zakherah MS, Sayed GH, El-Nashar SA, et
al. Pictorial blood loss assessment chart in 100. Lewis JD, Capra AM, Achacoso NS, et al.
the evaluation of heavy menstrual bleeding: Medical therapy for diabetes is associated
diagnostic accuracy compared to alkaline with increased use of lower endoscopy.
hematin. Gynecol Obstet Invest Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007
2011;71(4):281-4. PMID: 21228538. Nov;16(11):1195-202. PMID: 17603822.
91. Janssen CA, Scholten PC, Heintz AP. A 101. LeBlanc E, O'Connor E, Whitlock EP, et al.
simple visual assessment technique to Screening for and Management of Obesity
discriminate between menorrhagia and and Overweight in Adults. Evidence Report
normal menstrual blood loss. Obstet No. 89. AHRQ Publication No. 11-05159-
Gynecol 1995 Jun;85(6):977-82. PMID: EF-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for
7770270. Healthcare Research and Quality; Oct 2011.
92. Higham JM, O'Brien PM, Shaw RW. 102. Salpeter SR, Greyber E, Pasternak GA, et al.
Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis
pictorial chart. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990 with metformin use in type 2 diabetes
Aug;97(8):734-9. PMID: 2400752. mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2010(1):CD002967. PMID: 20091535.
93. Fraser IS, McCarron G, Markham R. A
preliminary study of factors influencing 103. Salvo F, Fourrier-Reglat A, Bazin F, et al.
perception of menstrual blood loss volume. Cardiovascular and gastrointestinal safety of
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984 Aug NSAIDs: a systematic review of meta-
1;149(7):788-93. PMID: 6380294. analyses of randomized clinical trials. Clin
Pharmacol Ther 2011 Jun;89(6):855-66.
94. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, et al.
PMID: 21471964.
Decision aids for people facing health
treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane 104. Bennett WL, Wilson LM, Bolen S, et al.
Database Syst Rev 2011(10):CD001431. Oral Diabetes Medications for Adults With
PMID: 21975733. Type 2 Diabetes: An Update. AHRQ
Publication No. 11-EHC038-EF. Rockville,
95. Gemzell-Danielsson K, Inki P, Boubli L, et
MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and
al. Bleeding pattern and safety of
Quality; Mar 2011.
consecutive use of the levonorgestrel-
releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS)—a 105. Saenz A, Fernandez-Esteban I, Mataix A, et
multicentre prospective study. Hum Reprod al. Metformin monotherapy for type 2
2010 Feb;25(2):354-9. PMID: 19955104. diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev 2005(3):CD002966. PMID: 16034881.
96. Glucophage [package insert]. Princeton, NJ:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2009.

99
106. Qaseem A, Humphrey LL, Sweet DE, et al. 118. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L.
Oral pharmacologic treatment of type 2 The effects of depot medroxyprogesterone
diabetes mellitus: a clinical practice acetate and intrauterine device use on
guideline from the American College of fracture risk in Danish women.
Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2012 Feb Contraception 2008 Dec;78(6):459-64.
7;156(3):218-31. PMID: 22312141. PMID: 19014791.
107. Byetta [package insert]. San Diego, CA: 119. Rosenberg L, Zhang Y, Constant D, et al.
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2011. Bone status after cessation of use of
injectable progestin contraceptives.
108. Dore DD, Seeger JD, Arnold Chan K. Use
Contraception 2007 Dec;76(6):425-31.
of a claims-based active drug safety
PMID: 18061699.
surveillance system to assess the risk of
acute pancreatitis with exenatide or 120. Aktun H, Moroy P, Cakmak P, et al. Depo-
sitagliptin compared to metformin or Provera: use of a long-acting progestin
glyburide. Curr Med Res Opin 2009 injectable contraceptive in Turkish women.
Apr;25(4):1019-27. PMID: 19278373. Contraception 2005 Jul;72(1):24-7. PMID:
15964288.
109. Dore DD, Bloomgren GL, Wenten M, et al.
A cohort study of acute pancreatitis in 121. Lidegaard O, Lokkegaard E, Jensen A, et al.
relation to exenatide use. Diabetes Obes Thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction
Metab 2011 Jun;13(6):559-66. PMID: with hormonal contraception. N Engl J Med
21320263. 2012 Jun 14;366(24):2257-66. PMID:
22693997.
110. Elashoff M, Matveyenko AV, Gier B, et al.
Pancreatitis, pancreatic, and thyroid cancer 122. Sundstrom A, Seaman H, Kieler H, et al.
with glucagon-like peptide-1-based The risk of venous thromboembolism
therapies. Gastroenterology 2011 associated with the use of tranexamic acid
Jul;141(1):150-6. PMID: 21334333. and other drugs used to treat menorrhagia: a
case-control study using the General
111. Waugh N, Cummins E, Royle P, et al.
Practice Research Database. BJOG 2009
Newer Agents for Blood Glucose Control in
Jan;116(1):91-7. PMID: 19016686.
Type 2 Diabetes (Supplement). London:
National Institute for Health and Clinical 123. Lethaby A, Irvine G, Cameron I. Cyclical
Excellence.; 2009. progestogens for heavy menstrual bleeding.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
112. Shyangdan DS, Royle P, Clar C, et al.
2008(1):CD001016. PMID: 18253983.
Glucagon-like peptide analogues for type 2
diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst 124. Grimes DA, Lopez LM, O'Brien PA, et al.
Rev 2011(10):CD006423. PMID: 21975753. Progestin-only pills for contraception.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
113. Aygestin [package insert]. Sellersville, PA:
2010(1):CD007541. PMID: 20091638.
Teva Women's Health, Inc.; 2010.
125. Natazia [package insert]. Wayne, NJ: Bayer
114. Crinone [package insert]. Livingston, NJ:
HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2012.
Columbia Laboratories, Inc.; 2009.
126. Loestrin 1/20 [package insert]. Pomona,
115. Depo-Provera CI [package insert]. New
NY: Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2009.
York, NY: Pharmacia & Upjohn Company;
2011. 127. Nordette [package insert]. Sellersville, PA:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; 2010.
116. Provera [package insert]. New York, NY:
Pharmacia and Upjohn Company; 2009. 128. Ortho Tri-Cyclen [package insert]. Raritan,
NJ: Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals,
117. van Hylckama Vlieg A, Helmerhorst FM,
Inc.; 2010.
Rosendaal FR. The risk of deep venous
thrombosis associated with injectable depot- 129. Manzoli L, De Vito C, Marzuillo C, et al.
medroxyprogesterone acetate contraceptives Oral contraceptives and venous
or a levonorgestrel intrauterine device. thromboembolism: a systematic review and
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010 meta-analysis. Drug Saf 2012 Mar
Nov;30(11):2297-300. PMID: 20798377. 1;35(3):191-205. PMID: 22283630.

100
130. Martinez F, Ramirez I, Perez-Campos E, et 141. Scholz H, Trenkwalder C, Kohnen R, et al.
al. Venous and pulmonary Dopamine agonists for restless legs
thromboembolism and combined hormonal syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
contraceptives. Systematic review and meta- 2011(3):CD006009. PMID: 21412893.
analysis. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health
142. Rasmussen VG, Ostergaard K, Dupont E, et
Care 2012 Feb;17(1):7-29. PMID:
al. The risk of valvular regurgitation in
22239262.
patients with Parkinson's disease treated
131. Gallo MF, Lopez LM, Grimes DA, et al. with dopamine receptor agonists. Mov
Combination contraceptives: effects on Disord 2011 Apr;26(5):801-6. PMID:
weight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 21671508.
2011(9):CD003987. PMID: 21901687.
143. Bogazzi F, Manetti L, Raffaelli V, et al.
132. Lawrie TA, Helmerhorst FM, Maitra NK, et Cabergoline therapy and the risk of cardiac
al. Types of progestogens in combined oral valve regurgitation in patients with
contraception: effectiveness and side-effects. hyperprolactinemia: a meta-analysis from
Cochrane Database Syst Rev clinical studies. J Endocrinol Invest 2008
2011(5):CD004861. PMID: 21563141. Dec;31(12):1119-23. PMID: 19246980.
133. Edelman AB, Gallo MF, Jensen JT, et al. 144. Smith CA, Zhu X, He L, et al. Acupuncture
Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use for primary dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane
of combined oral contraceptives for Database Syst Rev 2011(1):CD007854.
contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev PMID: 21249697.
2005(3):CD004695. PMID: 16034942.
145. Zhu X, Hamilton KD, McNicol ED.
134. Van Vliet HA, Grimes DA, Helmerhorst Acupuncture for pain in endometriosis.
FM, et al. Biphasic versus triphasic oral Cochrane Database Syst Rev
contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane 2011(9):CD007864. PMID: 21901713.
Database Syst Rev 2006(3):CD003283.
146. Cheong YC, Hung Yu Ng E, Ledger WL.
PMID: 16856002.
Acupuncture and assisted conception.
135. Van Vliet HA, Grimes DA, Lopez LM, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Triphasic versus monophasic oral 2008(4):CD006920. PMID: 18843737.
contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane
147. Smith CA, Crowther CA. Acupuncture for
Database Syst Rev 2011(11):CD003553.
induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst
PMID: 22071807.
Rev 2004(1):CD002962. PMID: 14973999.
136. Cabergoline [package insert]. Sellersville,
148. Mirena [package insert]. Wayne, NJ: Bayer
PA: Teva Pharmaceuticals 2011.
HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2009.
137. Andersohn F, Garbe E. Cardiac and
149. FDA. FDA approves additional use for IUD
noncardiac fibrotic reactions caused by
Mirena to treat heavy menstrual bleeding in
ergot-and nonergot-derived dopamine
IUD users [Internet]. 2009.
agonists. Mov Disord 2009 Jan
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom
15;24(1):129-33. PMID: 19170199.
/PressAnnouncements/2009/ucm184747.htm
138. Schade R, Andersohn F, Suissa S, et al. . Accessed May 11, 2012.
Dopamine agonists and the risk of cardiac-
150. FDA. Statistics filing memorandum for a
valve regurgitation. N Engl J Med 2007 Jan
supplemental NDA (Mirena).FDA; 2009.
4;356(1):29-38. PMID: 17202453.
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Devel
139. Renoux C, Dell'Aniello S, Brophy JM, et al. opmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResou
Dopamine agonist use and the risk of heart rces/UCM245687.pdf.
failure. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2012
151. Zhou L, Harrison-Woolrych M, Coulter
Jan;21(1):34-41. PMID: 22109939.
DM. Use of the New Zealand Intensive
140. Tang H, Hunter T, Hu Y, et al. Cabergoline Medicines Monitoring Programme to study
for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev device (Mirena). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug
2012(2):CD008605. PMID: 22336848. Saf 2003 Jul-Aug;12(5):371-7. PMID:
12899110.

101
152. Harrison-Woolrych M, Zhou L, Coulter D. 161. Merki-Feld GS, Hund M. Clinical
Insertion of intrauterine devices: a experience with NuvaRing in daily practice
comparison of experience with Mirena and in Switzerland: cycle control and
Multiload Cu 375 during post-marketing acceptability among women of all
monitoring in New Zealand. N Z Med J reproductive ages. Eur J Contracept Reprod
2003 Aug 8;116(1179):U538. PMID: Health Care 2007 Sep;12(3):240-7. PMID:
14513085. 17763262.
153. Paterson H, Clifton J, Miller D, et al. Hair 162. Brucker C, Karck U, Merkle E. Cycle
loss with use of the levonorgestrel control, tolerability, efficacy and
intrauterine device. Contraception 2007 acceptability of the vaginal contraceptive
Oct;76(4):306-9. PMID: 17900442. ring, NuvaRing: results of clinical
experience in Germany. Eur J Contracept
154. Van Houdenhoven K, van Kaam KJ, van
Reprod Health Care 2008 Mar;13(1):31-8.
Grootheest AC, et al. Uterine perforation in
PMID: 17853162.
women using a levonorgestrel-releasing
intrauterine system. Contraception 2006 163. Brache V, Faundes A. Contraceptive vaginal
Mar;73(3):257-60. PMID: 16472566. rings: a review. Contraception 2010
Nov;82(5):418-27. PMID: 20933115.
155. van Grootheest K, Sachs B, Harrison-
Woolrych M, et al. Uterine perforation with 164. Martins SL, Curtis KM, Glasier AF.
the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine Combined hormonal contraception and bone
device: analysis of reports from four health: a systematic review. Contraception
national pharmacovigilance centres. Drug 2006 May;73(5):445-69. PMID: 16627030.
Saf 2011 Jan 1;34(1):83-8. PMID:
165. Rott H. Thrombotic risks of oral
21142273.
contraceptives. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol
156. Lidegaard O, Nielsen LH, Skovlund CW, et 2012 Aug;24(4):235-40. PMID: 22729096.
al. Risk of venous thromboembolism from
166. Flurbiprofen tablet [package insert]. Detroit,
use of oral contraceptives containing
MI: Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories,
different progestogens and oestrogen doses:
Inc.; 2007.
Danish cohort study, 2001-9. BMJ
2011;343:d6423. PMID: 22027398. 167. Meclofenamate sodium [package insert].
Morgantown, WV: Mylan Pharmaceuticals,
157. Lethaby AE, Cooke I, Rees M. Progesterone
Inc.; 2006.
or progestogen-releasing intrauterine
systems for heavy menstrual bleeding. 168. Naprosyn [package insert]. South San
Cochrane Database Syst Rev Francisco, CA: Genentech USA, Inc.; 2010.
2005(4):CD002126. PMID: 16235297.
169. Marjoribanks J, Proctor M, Farquhar C, et
158. Marjoribanks J, Lethaby A, Farquhar C. al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for
Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database Syst
menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010(1):CD001751. PMID: 20091521.
Rev 2006(2):CD003855. PMID: 16625593.
170. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Gonzalez-Perez A,
159. French R, Van Vliet H, Cowan F, et al. Bueno H, et al. NSAID use selectively
Hormonally impregnated intrauterine increases the risk of non-fatal myocardial
systems (IUSs) versus other forms of infarction: a systematic review of
reversible contraceptives as effective randomised trials and observational studies.
methods of preventing pregnancy. Cochrane PLoS One 2011;6(2):e16780. PMID:
Database Syst Rev 2004(3):CD001776. 21347435.
PMID: 15266453.
171. Lysteda [package insert]. Parsippany, NJ:
160. NuvaRing [package insert]. Whitehouse Ferring Pharmaceutical; 2011.
Station, NJ: Merck & Co.; 2012.
172. FDA. New Drug Application: 22-430
(Tranexamic Acid) Summary Review.Center
for Drug Evaluation and Research; 2009.
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_d
ocs/nda/2009/022430s000sumr.pdf.

102
173. Naoulou B, Tsai MC. Efficacy of 179. Coulter A, Kelland J, Peto V, et al. Treating
tranexamic acid in the treatment of menorrhagia in primary care. An overview
idiopathic and non-functional heavy of drug trials and a survey of prescribing
menstrual bleeding: A systematic review. practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012 1995 Summer;11(3):456-71. PMID:
May;91(5):529-37. PMID: 22229782. 7591547.
174. Lethaby A, Farquhar C, Cooke I. 180. Stern D, Reissman D. Specialty pharmacy
Antifibrinolytics for heavy menstrual cost management strategies of private health
bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev care payers. J Manag Care Pharm 2006 Nov-
2000(4):CD000249. PMID: 11034679. Dec;12(9):736-44. PMID: 17249906.
175. Sukeik M, Alshryda S, Haddad FS, et al. 181. Kim YA, Rascati KL, Prasla K, et al.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the Retrospective evaluation of the impact of
use of tranexamic acid in total hip copayment increases for specialty
replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011 medications on adherence and persistence in
Jan;93(1):39-46. PMID: 21196541. an integrated health maintenance
organization system. Clin Ther 2011
176. Alshryda S, Sarda P, Sukeik M, et al.
May;33(5):598-607. PMID: 21665044.
Tranexamic acid in total knee replacement: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone 182. Hartung DM, Carlson MJ, Kraemer DF, et
Joint Surg Br 2011 Dec;93(12):1577-85. al. Impact of a Medicaid copayment policy
PMID: 22161917. on prescription drug and health services
utilization in a fee-for-service Medicaid
177. Vuorma S, Teperi J, Aalto AM, et al. A
population. Med Care 2008 Jun;46(6):565-
randomized trial among women with heavy
72. PMID: 18520310.
menstruation — impact of a decision aid on
treatment outcomes and costs. Health Expect 183. Neugut AI, Subar M, Wilde ET, et al.
2004 Dec;7(4):327-37. PMID: 15544685. Association between prescription co-
payment amount and compliance with
178. Stewart A, Cummins C, Gold L, et al. The
adjuvant hormonal therapy in women with
effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing
early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011
intrauterine system in menorrhagia: a
Jun 20;29(18):2534-42. PMID: 21606426.
systematic review. BJOG 2001
Jan;108(1):74-86. PMID: 11213008.

103
Abbreviations and Acronyms
ARHQ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
CER Comparative Effectiveness Review
CINAHL Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature
COC Combined oral contraceptive
g Gram
GnRH Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone
HRQoL-4 Health related quality of life survey-based questionnaire
IM Intramuscular
IUD Intrauterine device
kg Kilogram
KQ Key Questions
LHRH Luteinizing Hormone-releasing Hormone
LNG-IUS Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system
MBL Menstrual blood loss
mcg Microgram
MeSH Medical Subject Heading
mg Milligram
MIQ Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire
mmol Millimolar
MPA Medroxyprogesterone acetate
N Number
NS Non-significant
NSAID Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug
OR Odds ratio
PBLAC Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart
PCOS Polycystic ovary syndrome
PICOTS Population, Interventions, Comparators, Outcomes, Timing, Settings
RCT Randomized Controlled Trials
RR Relative Risk
SOE Strength of Evidence
TEP Technical Expert Panel
TXA Tranexamic acid

104
Appendix A. Literature Search Strategies

Table A1: KQ1 search strategy and results from PubMed (pubmed.gov interface)
Terms Results
#1 uterine hemorrhage[mh:noexp] OR metrorrhagia[mh] OR menstruation 20,586
disturbances[mh:noexp] OR menorrhagia[mh] OR oligomenorrhea[mh] OR
menorrhagia[tiab] OR metrorrhagia[tiab] OR menometrorrhagia[tiab] OR
polymenorrhea[tiab] OR oligomenorrhea[tiab] OR hypermenorrhea[tiab] OR dysfunctional
uterine bleeding[tiab] OR excessive uterine bleeding[tiab] OR abnormal uterine
bleeding[tiab] OR irregular uterine bleeding[tiab] OR ((ovulation dysfunction[tiab] OR
ovulatory dysfunction[tiab]) AND (bleeding[tiab] OR hemorrhage[tiab] OR
haemorrhage[tiab])) OR ((anovulation[mh] OR anovulation[tiab] OR anovulatory[tiab]) AND
(hemorrhage[tiab] OR haemorrhage[tiab] OR bleeding[tiab]))
#2 therapy[sh:noexp] OR drug therapy[mh] OR drug therapy[sh] OR contraceptives, oral[mh] 3,994,137
OR contraceptive agents, female[pa] OR progestins[mh] OR progestins[pa] OR
contraceptive devices, female[mh:noexp] OR intrauterine devices[mh] OR anti-
inflammatory agents, non-steroidal[mh] OR anti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidal[pa] OR
antifibrinolytic agents[mh] OR antifibrinolytic agents[pa] OR complementary therapies[mh]
OR cam[sb] OR diet therapy[mh] OR diet therapy[sh] OR exercise therapy[mh] OR
psychotherapy[mh]
#3 #1 AND #2 AND english[la] AND humans[mh] AND 1980:2012[dp] 4,846
#4 #3 AND editorial[pt] 30
#5 #3 AND letter[pt] 190
#6 #3 AND comment[pt] 100
#7 #3 AND case reports[pt] 872
#8 #3 AND review[pt] 1,078
#9 #3 AND news[pt] 11
#10 #3 AND newspaper article[pt] 5
#11 #3 AND historical article[pt] 12
#12 #3 AND clinical conference[pt] 7
#13 #3 AND practice guideline[pt] 23
#14 #3 AND meta-analysis[pt] 43
#15 #3 AND congresses[pt] 6
#16 #3 AND consensus development conference[pt] 11
#17 #3 AND retracted publication[pt] 3
#18 #3 AND jsubsetk 21
#19 #4 OR #5 OR #6 OR #7 OR #8 OR #9 OR #10 OR #11 OR #12 OR #13 OR #14 OR #15 2,090*
OR #16 OR #17 OR #18
#20 #3 NOT #19 2,756
#21 #20 AND (random allocation[mh] OR double-blind method[mh] OR single-blind 1,374
method[mh] OR randomized controlled trial[pt] OR controlled clinical trial[pt] OR clinical
trial[pt] OR clinical trial[tiab] OR random[tiab] OR randomized[tiab] OR randomised[tiab]
OR randomly[tiab] OR assigned[tiab] OR allocated[tiab] OR control[tiab] OR
controlled[tiab] OR controls[tiab])
Key: [dp] publication date; jsubsetk consumer health subset; [la] language; [mh] medical subject heading; [pa] pharmacological
action; [pt] publication type; [sb] subset search; [sh] subheading; [tiab] keyword in title or abstract.
* Note: numbers may not tally as some articles are excluded in more than one category.

A-1
Table A2: KQ1 search strategy and results from CINAHL (EBSCOhost interface)
Terms Results
#1 (MH "Uterine Hemorrhage") OR (MH "Metrorrhagia") OR (MH "Menorrhagia") OR (MH 1,933
"Menstruation Disorders") OR menorrhagia OR metrorrhagia OR menometrorrhagia OR
polymenorrhea OR oligomenorrhea OR hypermenorrhea OR dysfunctional uterine
bleeding OR excessive uterine bleeding OR abnormal uterine bleeding OR irregular
uterine bleeding OR ovulation dysfunction OR ovulatory dysfunction OR ((anovulation OR
anovulatory OR cyclic OR cyclical) AND (hemorrhage OR haemorrhage OR bleeding))
#2 (MH "Therapeutics") OR therapeutic OR therapeutics OR therapy OR therapies OR 888,917
treatment OR treatments OR management OR (MH "Drug Therapy+") OR drug therapy
OR (MH "Contraceptives, Oral+") OR oral contraceptive OR oral contraceptives OR (MH
"Intrauterine Devices") OR intrauterine device OR intrauterine devices OR intrauterine
system OR intrauterine systems OR IUD OR IUS OR vaginal ring OR (MH "Progestational
Hormones+") OR progestin OR progestins OR progestogen OR progestogens OR (MH
"Antiinflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal+") OR non-steroidal anti-inflammatory OR
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory OR non-steroidal antiinflammatory OR nonsteroidal
antiinflammatory OR NSAID OR NSAIDs OR (MH "Antifibrinolytic Agents") OR
antifibrinolytic OR anti-fibrinolytic OR antifibrinolytics OR anti-fibrinolytics OR tranexamic
acid OR aminocaproic acid OR (MH "Natural and Biologically Based Therapies+") OR (MH
"Acupuncture+") OR (MH "Alternative Therapies") OR alternative medicine OR
complementary medicine OR herbal medicine OR chinese medicine OR acupuncture OR
phytotherapy OR (MH "Life Style Changes") OR (MH "Exercise+") OR (MH "Therapeutic
Exercise+") OR exercise OR (MH "Weight Loss") OR weight loss OR (MH "Stress
Management") OR stress reduction
#3 #1 AND #2 1,267
#4 #3 AND limiters: English language; Human 376
#5 #3 AND limiters: English language; Human; Exclude MEDLINE records 33

A-2
Table A3: KQ1 search strategy and results from EMBASE (OVID interface)
Terms Results
#1 exp uterus bleeding/ OR menstruation disorder/ OR exp "menorrhagia and metrorrhagia"/ 27,343
OR (uterine hemorrhage OR metrorrhagia OR menorrhagia OR menometrorrhagia OR
polymenorrhea OR oligomenorrhea OR hypermenorrhea OR dysfunctional uterine
bleeding OR excessive uterine bleeding OR abnormal uterine bleeding OR irregular
uterine bleeding OR ((ovulation dysfunction OR ovulatory dysfunction) AND (bleeding OR
hemorrhage OR hemorrhage)) OR ((anovulation OR anovulation OR anovulatory) AND
(hemorrhage OR haemorrhage OR bleeding))).mp
#2 exp oral contraceptive agent/ OR exp intrauterine contraceptive device/ OR exp 929,093
vagina ring/ OR exp gestagen/ OR exp nonsteroid antiinflammatory agent/ OR
exp antifibrinolytic agent/ OR exp alternative medicine/ OR exp traditional
medicine/ OR exp acupuncture/ OR exp diet therapy/ OR exp weight reduction/
OR exp stress management/ OR exp relaxation training/
#3 1 AND 2, limited to human and English language and 1980-2012 6,055
#4 3 AND review.pt 1,823
#5 3 AND conference paper.pt 273
#6 3 AND conference abstract.pt 84
#7 3 AND editorial.pt 96
#8 3 AND letter.pt 213
#9 3 AND note.pt 138
#10 3 AND short survey.pt 148
#11 3 AND case report/ 641
#12 3 AND practice guideline/ 184
#13 3 AND systematic review/ 158
#14 3 AND meta analysis/ 138
#15 4 OR 5 OR 6 OR 7 OR 8 OR 9 OR 10 OR 11 OR 12 OR 13 OR 14 3,365*
#16 3 NOT 15 2,690
#17 16 AND (exp clinical trial/ OR exp controlled clinical trial/) AND (exp randomization/ OR 573**
randomized controlled trial/ OR (random OR randomly OR randomized OR
randomised).mp)
Key: / subject term; exp explode term; .mp keyword, subject term, or substance term; .pt publication type.
* Note: numbers may not tally as some articles are excluded in more than one category.
**After removal of 213 citations duplicated in PubMed, 360 unique citations retained for review

A-3
Table A4: KQ2 search strategy and results from PubMed (pubmed.gov interface)
Search terms Search
results
#1 levonorgestrel/ae[mh] OR intrauterine devices, medicated/ae[mh] OR 23,134
norethindrone/ae[mh] OR ethinyl estradiol/ae[mh] OR medroxyprogesterone
acetate/ae[mh] OR mefenamic acid/ae[mh] OR norgestrel/ae[mh] OR genistein/ae[mh] OR
dydrogesterone/ae[mh] OR tranexamic acid/ae[mh] OR ethamsylate/ae[mh] OR
flurbiprofen/ae[mh] OR naproxen/ae[mh] OR indomethacin/ae[mh] OR metformin/ae[mh]
OR progesterone/ae[mh:noexp] OR contraceptives, oral, combined/ae[mh:noexp] OR anti-
inflammatory agents, non-steroidal/ae[mh:noexp] OR ((ferric
carboxymaltose[supplementary concept] OR ferrous sulfate[supplementary concept] OR
exenatide[supplementary concept] OR norgestimate, ethinyl estradiol drug
combination[supplementary concept] OR estradiol Valerate, dienogest drug
combination[nm] OR dienogest[nm]) AND ae[sh])
#2 cohort studies[mh] OR product surveillance, postmarketing[mh] OR clinical trial, phase 1,373,280
IV[pt] OR databases, factual[mh] OR adverse drug reaction reporting systems[mh] OR
case control studies[mh] OR cohort[tiab]
#3 #1 AND #2 AND eng[la] AND humans[mh] AND 1980:2012[dp] 3,142
#4 #3 AND review[pt] 218
#5 #3 AND case reports[pt] 138
#6 #3 AND letter[pt] 124
#7 #3 AND comment[pt] 84
#8 #3 AND meta-analysis[pt] 51
#9 #3 AND practice guideline[pt] 2
#10 #3 AND editorial[pt] 22
#11 #3 AND biography[pt] 1
#12 #3 AND congresses[pt] 2
#13 #3 AND consensus development conference[pt] 2
#14 #3 AND historical article[pt] 2
#15 #3 AND in vitro[pt] 4
#16 #3 AND news[pt] 6
#17 #3 AND retracted publication[pt] 2
#18 #3 NOT (#4 OR #5 OR #6 OR #7 OR #8 OR #9 OR #10 OR #11 OR #12 OR #13 OR #14 2,611
OR #15 OR #16 OR #17)
Key: [tiab] title/abstract word; [mh] MeSH heading; [mh:noexp] MeSH heading not exploded to narrower terms; [la] language;
[pt] publication type

A-4
Table A5: KQ2 search strategy and results from PubMed (pubmed.gov interface) for update
Search terms Search
results
#1 intrauterine devices, medicated/ae[mh] OR medroxyprogesterone acetate/ae[mh] OR 4,055*
dydrogesterone/ae[mh] OR tranexamic acid/ae[mh] OR ethamsylate/ae[mh] OR
metformin/ae[mh] OR progesterone/ae[mh:noexp] OR ((exenatide[supplementary concept]
OR cabergoline[supplementary concept) AND ae[sh])
#2 cohort studies[mh] OR product surveillance, postmarketing[mh] OR clinical trial, phase 1,410,620
IV[pt] OR databases, factual[mh] OR adverse drug reaction reporting systems[mh] OR
case control studies[mh] OR cohort[tiab]
#3 #1 AND #2 AND eng[la] AND humans[mh] AND 1980:2012[dp] 672
#4 #3 AND review[pt] 35
#5 #3 AND case reports[pt] 25
#6 #3 AND letter[pt] 26
#7 #3 AND comment[pt] 16
#8 #3 AND meta-analysis[pt] 6
#9 #3 AND practice guideline[pt] 2
#10 #3 AND editorial[pt] 4
#11 #3 AND biography[pt] 0
#12 #3 AND congresses[pt] 0
#13 #3 AND consensus development conference[pt] 0
#14 #3 AND historical article[pt] 2
#15 #3 AND in vitro[pt] 1
#16 #3 AND news[pt] 0
#17 #3 AND retracted publication[pt] 0
#18 #3 NOT (#4 OR #5 OR #6 OR #7 OR #8 OR #9 OR #10 OR #11 OR #12 OR #13 OR #14 576**
OR #15 OR #16 OR #17)
Key: [tiab] title/abstract word; [mh] MeSH heading; [mh:noexp] MeSH heading not exploded to narrower terms; [la] language;
[pt] publication type
* Search Strategy for literature update for KQ2 was revised to include on only the interventions identified for KQ1
** Includes 78 new items added with June 2012 update

A-5
Appendix B. Abstract Review Form (KQ1)

First Author, Year: ____________________________

Endnote Reference ID #: ______ Abstractor Initials: __ __ __

KQ1A: What is the evidence for the effectiveness of medical, behavioral, and complementary and alternative
medicine interventions (e.g., hormonal treatment, weight loss, or acupuncture) for improving short and long-term
outcomes in women with irregular uterine bleeding?

KQ1B: What is the evidence for the effectiveness of medical, behavioral, and complementary and alternative
medicine interventions (e.g., hormonal treatment, weight loss, or acupuncture) for improving short and long-term
outcomes in women with abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding?

Primary Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria


1. Paper reports original research (i.e., paper is not a review, editorial, Cannot
X-1 Yes No
commentary, letter to editor, etc.). Determine
Cannot
X-2 2. Paper published in English language. Yes No
Determine
Cannot
X-3 3. Eligible study design: randomized controlled trial. Yes No
Determine
4. Study compares at least two nonsurgical intervention(s) among women
with chronic problem bleeding (i.e., abnormal uterine bleeding,
menorrhagia, menometrorrhagia, metrorrhagia, uterine hemorrhage, Cannot
Yes No
anovulatory bleeding, oligomenorrhea, dysfunctional uterine bleeding). Determine

If “no”, check one or more of the following reasons for exclusion:


□ Study is basic science, anatomy, imaging, prevalence, physiology,
X-4
diagnostic, biomarker, or biological mechanism study only.
X-9 □ Contraceptive efficacy or effectiveness study.
□ Study population consists exclusively of women whose bleeding is
caused by: structural abnormality (e.g., fibroids, polyps, adenomyosis);
X-6
cancer; medication side effect; endometrial hyperplasia; or systemic
disease (e.g., thyroid disease, coagulopathy).
X-7 □ Study population consists of post-menopausal women.
□ Study evaluates surgical or invasive intervention(s) only or surgical or
X-8
invasive intervention is the only comparator.
□ Other (e.g., intervention unlikely to be used in the primary care setting;
X-5 intervention not approved for use in the U.S.; bleeding related to
pregnancy; acute/emergent bleeding, etc.)

Retain for:

□ Background/Discussion □ Review of references □ Harms data □ Other_________________

COMMENTS:

B-1
Appendix C. Abstract Review Form (KQ2)
First Author, Year: ____________________________

Endnote Reference ID #: ______ Abstractor Initials: __ __ __

KQ2. What are the harms, including adverse events, associated with medical, behavioral, and complementary and
alternative medicine interventions (e.g., hormonal treatment, weight loss, or acupuncture) in women with irregular
uterine bleeding or abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding?

Primary Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

1. Paper reports original research (i.e., paper is not a review, editorial, Cannot
X-1 Yes No
commentary, letter to editor, etc.). Determine
2. Paper reports data from a population* of 1600 or more. Cannot
X-2 Yes No
*overall population or number of records in the database Determine
Cannot
X-3 3. An objective of the paper is the reporting of harms data. Yes No
Determine
4. Paper reports harms data for one or more of the selected interventions Cannot
X-4 Yes No
addressed in KQ1. (listed below) Determine
Harms data is associated with one or more selected interventions from KQ1:
□ LNG-IUS (Mirena®)
□ Progestogen
□ Tranexamic acid (Lysteda®)
□ Other (i.e., cabergoline, exenatide, ethamsylate, metformin)

Retain for:

□ Background/Discussion □ Review of references □ Other_________________

COMMENTS:

C-1
Appendix D. Full-Text Review Form (KQ1)
First Author, Year: ____________________________

Endnote Reference ID #: ______ Abstractor Initials: __ __ __

KQ1A: What is the evidence for the effectiveness of medical, behavioral, and complementary and alternative
medicine interventions (e.g., hormonal treatment, weight loss, or acupuncture) for improving short and long-term
outcomes in women with irregular uterine bleeding?

KQ1B: What is the evidence for the effectiveness of medical, behavioral, and complementary and alternative
medicine interventions (e.g., hormonal treatment, weight loss, or acupuncture) for improving short and long-term
outcomes in women with abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding?
Primary Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
X-1 1. Paper reports original research (i.e., paper is not a review, editorial, commentary, letter to
Yes No
editor, etc.)
X-2 2. Eligible study design: randomized controlled trial Yes No
3. Study reports baseline and outcome data for a study population with ≥80 percent women
in the target population or reports baseline and outcome data for a subset of women in the
target population. Yes No

If “no”, classify exclusion as related to one or more of the reasons below:


X-6 □ Study population >20 percent women whose bleeding is caused by: structural abnormality
(e.g., fibroids, polyps, adenomyosis); cancer; medication side effect; endometrial
hyperplasia; or systemic disease (e.g., thyroid disease, coagulopathy).
X-7 □ Study population consists of post-menopausal women.
X-10 □ Study does not report baseline and outcome data for a study population with ≥80 percent
women in the target population or a subset of women in the target population.
4. Study informs a key question. Yes No

If “no”, classify exclusion as related to one or more of the reasons below:


X-4 □ Study is basic science, anatomy, imaging, prevalence, physiology, diagnostic, biomarker,
or biological mechanism study only
X-9 □ Study evaluates contraceptive efficacy or effectiveness only
X-8 □ Study evaluates surgical or invasive intervention(s) only or surgical or invasive
intervention is the only comparator
X-5 □ Other (e.g., intervention unlikely to be used in the primary care setting; intervention not
approved for use in the U.S.; bleeding related to pregnancy; acute/emergent bleeding, etc.).
If “yes”, check one or both KQs below:
□ KQ1A: Effectiveness of a medical, behavioral or complementary and alternative medicine
(CAM) intervention (e.g. hormonal treatment, weight loss, or acupuncture) for improving
short and long-term outcomes in women with irregular abnormal bleeding
□ KQ1B: Effectiveness of a medical, behavioral or complementary and alternative medicine
(CAM) intervention (e.g. hormonal treatment, weight loss, or acupuncture) for improving
short and long-term outcomes in women with abnormal cyclic bleeding
□ Unclear/ discuss
Retain for:

□ Background/Discussion □ Review of references □ Harms data □ Other_________________

COMMENTS:

D-1
Appendix E. Full-Text Review Form (KQ2)
First Author, Year: ____________________________

Endnote Reference ID #: ______ Abstractor Initials: __ __ __

KQ2. What are the harms, including adverse events, associated with medical, behavioral, and complementary and
alternative medicine interventions (e.g., hormonal treatment, weight loss, or acupuncture) in women with irregular
uterine bleeding or abnormal cyclic uterine bleeding?

Primary Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria


1. Paper reports original research (i.e., paper is not a review, editorial, commentary, letter
X-1 Yes No
to editor, etc.).
2. Paper reports data from a population of 1600 or more.
X-2 Yes No
*overall population or number of records in the database
3. Paper reports harms from one or more of the selected interventions included in KQ1.
X-4 Yes No
If “yes”, specify below.
□ LNG-IUS (Mirena®)
□ Progestogen including:
• depot or oral medroxyprogesterone
• norethisterone/ norethindrone
• oral dydrogesterone
• vaginal progesterone
• progesterone coil
□ Tranexamic acid (Lysteda®)
□ Other including:
• cabergoline
• ethamsylate
• exenatide
• metformin
4. Study addresses KQ2.
Yes No
If “no”, classify exclusion as related to one or more of the reasons below.
□ Reporting of harms is from a general population or reporting of harms is not an
X-3
objective of the paper/study.
□ Study is basic science, anatomy, imaging, prevalence, physiology, diagnostic,
X-5
biomarker, or biological mechanism study only.
X-6 □ Study of men only.
□ Study population consists of post-menopausal women or a population aged over 65
X-7
years.
X-8 □ Other

Retain for:

□ Background/Discussion □ Review of references □ Other_________

COMMENTS:

E-1
Appendix F. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool
Use the modified Cochrane Collaboration tool to assess risk of bias for randomized controlled trials. Bias is assessed
as a judgment (high, low, or unclear) for individual elements from five domains (selection, performance, attrition,
reporting, and other).

AUB KQ1 Risk of Bias Assessment (Reference ID # )


Low Risk of Unclear Risk of Reviewer Reviewer
Domain Description High Risk of Bias
Bias Bias Assessment Comments

Selection bias Described the Selection bias Random Not described in


Random method used to (biased sequence sufficient detail
sequence generate the allocation to generation
generation allocation interventions) method
sequence in due to should High
sufficient detail to inadequate produce Low
allow an generation of a comparable Unclear
assessment of randomized groups
whether it should sequence
produce
comparable groups
Selection bias Described the Selection bias Intervention Not described in
Allocation method used to (biased allocations sufficient detail
concealment conceal the allocation to likely could
allocation interventions) not have been
sequence in due to foreseen in
High
sufficient detail to inadequate before or
Low
determine whether concealment of during
Unclear
intervention allocations prior enrollment
allocations could to assignment
have been
foreseen before or
during enrollment
Reporting bias Stated how the Reporting bias Selective Insufficient
Selective possibility of due to selective outcome information to
reporting selective outcome outcome reporting bias permit High
reporting was reporting not detected judgment† Low
examined by the Unclear
authors and what
was found
Other bias Any important Bias due to No other bias There may be a
Other sources concerns about problems not detected risk of bias, but
of bias bias not addressed covered there is either
above* elsewhere in the insufficient
table information to
assess whether
High
an important risk
Low
of bias exists or
Unclear
insufficient
rationale or
evidence that an
identified
problem will
introduce bias
* If particular questions/entries were pre-specified in the study's protocol, responses should be provided for each question/entry.
† It is likely that the majority of studies will fall into this category.
Assess each main or class of outcomes for each of the following. Indicate the specific outcome.

F-1
AUB KQ1 Risk of Bias Assessment (Reference ID # )
Outcome:

Unclear Risk of Reviewer Reviewer


Domain Description High Risk of Bias Low Risk of Bias
Bias Assessment Comments

Performance Described all Performance Blinding was Not described


bias measures used, if bias due to likely effective. in sufficient
Blinding any, to blind study knowledge of the detail
(participants participants and allocated
and personnel from interventions by
personnel) knowledge of participants and
High
which intervention personnel during
Low
a participant the study.
Unclear
received. Provided
any information
relating to whether
the intended
blinding was
effective.
Detection bias Described all Detection bias Blinding was Not described
Blinding measures used, if due to likely effective. in sufficient
(outcome any, to blind knowledge of the detail
assessment) outcome assessors allocated
from knowledge of interventions by
which intervention outcome High
a participant assessors. Low
received. Provided Unclear
any information
relating to whether
the intended
blinding was
effective.
Attrition bias Described the Attrition bias due Handling of Insufficient
Incomplete completeness of to amount, incomplete reporting of
outcome data outcome data for nature or outcome data attrition/exclusi
each main handling of was complete ons to permit
outcome, including incomplete and unlikely to judgment (e.g.,
attrition and outcome data. have produced number
exclusions from the bias randomized not
analysis. Stated stated, no
whether attrition reasons for High
and exclusions missing data Low
were reported, the provided) Unclear
numbers in each
intervention group
(compared with
total randomized
participants),
reasons for
attrition/exclusions
where reported.

F-2
Appendix G. Cochrane Risk of Bias Criteria
a
Criteria for judging risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool

Bias Judgment Criteria

The investigators describe a random component in the sequence generation process such
as:
• Referring to a random number table;
• Using a computer random number generator;
• Coin tossing;
• Shuffling cards or envelopes;
‘Low risk’ of bias.
• Throwing dice;
• Drawing of lots;
• Minimization*.
RANDOM
SEQUENCE *Minimization may be implemented without a random element, and this is considered to be
GENERATION equivalent to being random.
Selection bias
(biased The investigators describe a non-random component in the sequence generation process.
allocation to Usually, the description would involve some systematic, non-random approach, for
interventions) example:
due to • Sequence generated by odd or even date of birth;
inadequate • Sequence generated by some rule based on date (or day) of admission;
generation of a • Sequence generated by some rule based on hospital or clinic record number.
randomised
sequence. ‘High risk’ of bias.
Other non-random approaches happen much less frequently than the systematic
approaches mentioned above and tend to be obvious. They usually involve judgement or
some method of non-random categorization of participants, for example:
• Allocation by judgement of the clinician;
• Allocation by preference of the participant;
• Allocation based on the results of a laboratory test or a series of tests;
• Allocation by availability of the intervention.
‘Unclear risk’ of Insufficient information about the sequence generation process to permit judgement of
bias. ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’.
Participants and investigators enrolling participants could not foresee assignment because
one of the following, or an equivalent method, was used to conceal allocation:
• Central allocation (including telephone, web-based and pharmacy-controlled
‘Low risk’ of bias.
randomization);
• Sequentially numbered drug containers of identical appearance;
ALLOCATION • Sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.
CONCEALMENT Participants or investigators enrolling participants could possibly foresee assignments and
Selection bias thus introduce selection bias, such as allocation based on:
(biased
• Using an open random allocation schedule (e.g. a list of random numbers);
allocation to
• Assignment envelopes were used without appropriate safeguards (e.g. if
interventions)
‘High risk’ of bias. envelopes were unsealed or nonopaque or not sequentially numbered);
due to
inadequate • Alternation or rotation;
concealment of • Date of birth;
allocations prior • Case record number;
to assignment. • Any other explicitly unconcealed procedure.
Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’. This is usually the
case if the method of concealment is not described or not described in sufficient detail to
‘Unclear risk’ of
allow a definite judgement – for example if the use of assignment envelopes is described,
bias.
but it remains unclear whether envelopes were sequentially numbered, opaque and
sealed.
Any of the following:
SELECTIVE
• The study protocol is available and all of the study’s pre-specified (primary and
REPORTING
secondary) outcomes that are of interest in the review have been reported in the
Reporting bias
‘Low risk’ of bias. pre-specified way;
due to selective
outcome • The study protocol is not available but it is clear that the published reports
reporting. include all expected outcomes, including those that were pre-specified
(convincing text of this nature may be uncommon).

G-1
Bias Judgment Criteria

Any one of the following:


• Not all of the study’s pre-specified primary outcomes have been reported;
• One or more primary outcomes is reported using measurements, analysis
methods or subsets of the data (e.g. subscales) that were not pre-specified;
• One or more reported primary outcomes were not pre-specified (unless clear
‘High risk’ of bias. justification for their reporting is provided, such as an unexpected adverse
effect);
• One or more outcomes of interest in the review are reported incompletely so that
they cannot be entered in a meta-analysis;
• The study report fails to include results for a key outcome that would be
expected to have been reported for such a study.
‘Unclear risk’ of Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’. It is likely that the
bias. majority of studies will fall into this category.
‘Low risk’ of bias. The study appears to be free of other sources of bias.

OTHER BIAS There is at least one important risk of bias. For example, the study:
Bias due to • Had a potential source of bias related to the specific study design used; or
‘High risk’ of bias.
problems not • Has been claimed to have been fraudulent; or
covered • Had some other problem.
elsewhere in the
table. There may be a risk of bias, but there is either:
‘Unclear risk’ of
• Insufficient information to assess whether an important risk of bias exists; or
bias.
• Insufficient rationale or evidence that an identified problem will introduce bias.
Any one of the following:
• No blinding or incomplete blinding, but the review authors judge that the
BLINDING OF ‘Low risk’ of bias. outcome is not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding;
PARTICIPANTS • Blinding of participants and key study personnel ensured, and unlikely that the
AND blinding could have been broken.
PERSONNEL
Performance bias Any one of the following:
due to • No blinding or incomplete blinding, and the outcome is likely to be influenced by
knowledge of the lack of blinding;
‘High risk’ of bias.
allocated • Blinding of key study participants and personnel attempted, but likely that the
interventions by blinding could have been broken, and the outcome is likely to be influenced by
participants and lack of blinding.
personnel during
the study. Any one of the following:
‘Unclear risk’ of
• Insufficient information to permit judgment of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’;
bias.
• The study did not address this outcome.
Any one of the following:
• No blinding of outcome assessment, but the review authors judge that the
‘Low risk’ of bias. outcome measurement is not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding;
BLINDING OF • Blinding of outcome assessment ensured, and unlikely that the blinding could
OUTCOME have been broken.
ASSESSMENT
Detection bias Any one of the following:
due to • No blinding of outcome assessment, and the outcome measurement is likely to
knowledge of the be influenced by lack of blinding;
‘High risk’ of bias.
allocated • Blinding of outcome assessment, but likely that the blinding could have been
interventions by broken and the outcome measurement is likely to be influenced by lack of
outcome blinding.
assessors.
Any one of the following:
‘Unclear risk’ of
• Insufficient information to permit judgment of ‘Low risk’ or ‘High risk’;
bias.
• The study did not address this outcome.

G-2
Bias Judgment Criteria

Any one of the following:


• No missing outcome data;
• Reasons for missing outcome data unlikely to be related to true outcome (for
survival data, censoring unlikely to be introducing bias);
• Missing outcome data balanced in numbers across intervention groups, with
similar reasons for missing data across groups;
‘Low risk’ of bias. • For dichotomous outcome data, the proportion of missing outcomes compared
with observed event risk not enough to have a clinically relevant impact on the
intervention effect estimate;
• For continuous outcome data, plausible effect size (difference in means or
standardized difference in means) among missing outcomes not enough to
have a clinically relevant impact on observed effect size;
INCOMPLETE • Missing data have been imputed using appropriate methods.
OUTCOME DATA
Any one of the following:
Attrition bias due
• Reason for missing outcome data likely to be related to true outcome, with
to amount,
either imbalance in numbers or reasons for missing data across intervention
nature or
groups;
handling of
incomplete • For dichotomous outcome data, the proportion of missing outcomes compared
outcome data. with observed event risk enough to induce clinically relevant bias in intervention
‘High risk’ of bias. effect estimate;
• For continuous outcome data, plausible effect size (difference in means or
standardized difference in means) among missing outcomes enough to induce
clinically relevant bias in observed effect size;
• ‘As-treated’ analysis done with substantial departure of the intervention
received from that assigned at randomization;
• Potentially inappropriate application of simple imputation.
Any one of the following:
• Insufficient reporting of attrition/exclusions to permit judgement of ‘Low risk’ or
‘Unclear risk’ of
‘High risk’ (e.g. number randomized not stated, no reasons for missing data
bias.
provided);
• The study did not address this outcome.
Note: a Adapted from the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool. See Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne JA. Chapter 8:
Assessing the risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of
interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.

G-3
Appendix H. Thresholds for Quality Assessment
Quality assessment thresholds for Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) Tool: There are three categories for
describing the quality of studies: “Good”, “Fair”, and “Poor”. In order to assign a study to a category, we
need to establish the threshold between good and fair quality studies and between fair and poor quality
studies. Cochrane Collaboration uses strict criteria for the quality ratings.

Cochrane Collaboration criteria for quality ratings:


• A good quality study must meet all criteria (Low RoB).
• A fair quality study does not meet, or it is not clear that it meets, at least one criterion, but it has no
known important limitation that could invalidate its results (Moderate RoB).
• A poor quality study has important limitations and/or at least one criterion is not met (High RoB).

Modifications of criteria for quality ratings:


• If all criteria are rated as “low” = Low RoB = Good Quality
• If one criterion is rated as “high” or 1-2 criteria are “unclear”, and the assessment is that this was
unlikely to have biased the outcome, and there is no known important limitation that could invalidate
the results = Low RoB = Good Quality
o Example: not blinded, but blinding was not possible and based upon design and outcomes, it
is unlikely that the lack of blinding could have affected the outcome measure or other factor
that would introduce bias
• If one criterion is rated as “high” or 1-2 criteria are “unclear”, and the assessment is that this was
likely to have biased the outcome, and there is no known important limitation that could invalidate
the results = Moderate RoB = Fair Quality
o Could be poor, if the factors were considered to combine to important limitations
• If one criterion is rated as “high” and 3 are “unclear = Moderate RoB = Fair Quality
o Could be poor, if the factors were considered to combine to important limitations
• If two criteria are rated as “high”, and all other criteria are ‘low’, and the assessment that this was
unlikely to have biased the outcome, and there are no known important limitations that could
invalidate the results = Moderate RoB = Fair Quality
• If two criteria are rated as “high”, and all other criteria are ‘low’, and the assessment that this was
likely to have biased the outcome, and there are important limitations that could invalidate the results
= High RoB = Poor Quality
• If three or more criteria are rated as “high” = High RoB = Poor Quality
• If four or more criteria are rated as “unclear”= High RoB = Poor Quality

Low RoB criteria High RoB criteria Unclear RoB criteria Rating
7 0 0 Good
5-6 0-1 0-2 Good or Fair
3-5 0-2 0-3 Fair or Poor
0-4 2-7 0-7 Poor
0-3 0-7 4-7 Poor

H-1
Appendix I. Risk of Bias and Quality Score for
Individual Studies

(patients and personnel)

(outcome assessment)
Random Sequence

Outcome Data
Concealment
Generation

Incomplete

Other Bias
Allocation

Reporting
Selective

Blinding

Blinding
Quality
Author, Year
Score

Abu Hashim et al., 20121 + + + - - + + Fair

Andersch et al., 19882 ? ? ? ? ? + + Poor

Bonnar and Sheppard, 19963 + ? ? - - + + Poor

Cai and Wu, 20094 + + + ? ? + + Fair

Cameron et al., 19875 ? ? ? - - ? ? Poor

Cameron et al., 19906 ? ? + ? ? + + Poor

Davis et al., 20007 + + + + + + + Good

Elkind-Hirsch et al., 20088 + ? + - - - + Poor

Endrikat et al., 20099 + - + - ? + - Poor

Fleming et al., 200210 + + + + + - + Fair

Fraser and McCarron, 199111 ? ? + - - - + Poor

Fraser et al., 198112; 198413 ? ? + + + + + Fair

Fraser et al., 201114 + + ? + + + + Good

Freeman et al., 201115 ? ? + + ? + + Fair

Grover et al., 199016 ? ? ? ? ? ? - Poor

Hall et al., 198717 + + + + + - + Fair

Irvine et al., 199818 + + ? ? - + + Fair

Jedel et al., 201119 + + + - ? - + Poor

Jensen et al., 2011 20


+ + ? + + + + Good

Karakus et al., 200921 + - ? - ? - ? Poor

Kaunitz et al., 201022 + + + - ? + + Fair

Kennedy et al., 200223 + + + - - - + Poor

Kriplani et al., 200624 + ? ? - - - + Poor

Kucuk and Ertan, 200825 - - ? ? ? + + Poor

Lahteenmaki et al., 199826 + + ? ? - + + Poor

Lukes et al., 201027 + + + + + + + Good

Moghetti et al., 200028 ? ? ? + + ? + Poor

I-1
(patients and personnel)

(outcome assessment)
Random Sequence

Outcome Data
Concealment
Generation

Incomplete

Other Bias
Allocation

Reporting
Selective

Blinding

Blinding
Quality
Author, Year
Score

Najam et al., 201029 + ? ? - - + + Poor

Oner and Muderris, 201130 ? ? + ? ? - ? Poor

Ornstein et al., 201131 ? ? + - ? - - Poor

Paoletti et al., 199632 + ? + + + + + Good

Preston et al., 199533 + + ? + + - + Fair

Protheroe et al., 200734 + + ? - - + ? Poor

Reid and Vitaren-Kari, 200535 + + ? - - + + Poor

Shabaan etal., 201136 + - + - ? + - Poor

Tsang et al., 198737 ? ? + + + - + Poor

van Eijkeren et al., 199238 + + + + + - + Fair

Vargyas et al., 198739 + + + + + + + Good

Vuorma et al., 200440, 41 + + + - - + + Poor

Totals
+ 27 19 23 14 13 24 31
? 11 16 16 8 13 3 4
- 1 4 0 17 13 12 4
Notes: Low risk of bias: +; High risk of bias: -; Unclear risk of bias: ?

I-2
References

1. Abu Hashim H, Alsherbini W, Bazeed M. Contraceptive with a complaint of menorrhagia. Aust N Z J Obstet
vaginal ring treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: a Gynaecol. 1991 Feb;31(1):66-70. PMID 1872778.
randomized controlled trial with norethisterone.
Contraception. 2012 Mar;85(3):246-52. PMID 22067765. 12. Fraser IS, Pearse C, Shearman RP, et al. Efficacy of
mefenamic acid in patients with a complaint of
2. Andersch B, Milsom I, Rybo G. An objective evaluation menorrhagia. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Nov;58(5):543-51.
of flurbiprofen and tranexamic acid in the treatment of PMID 7029369.
idiopathic menorrhagia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
1988;67(7):645-8. PMID 3073625. 13. Fraser IS, McCarron G, Markham R. A preliminary
study of factors influencing perception of menstrual blood
3. Bonnar J, Sheppard BL. Treatment of menorrhagia loss volume. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Aug
during menstruation: randomised controlled trial of 1;149(7):788-93. PMID 6380294.
ethamsylate, mefenamic acid, and tranexamic acid. BMJ.
1996 Sep 7;313(7057):579-82. PMID 8806245. 14. Fraser IS, Romer T, Parke S, et al. Effective treatment
of heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding with an oral
4. Cai XM, Wu J. The mind-tranquilizing and contraceptive containing estradiol valerate and dienogest: A
menstruation-regulating method for acupuncture treatment randomized, double-blind Phase III trial. Human
of delayed menstrual cycle--a clinical controlled study. J Reproduction. 2011;26(10):2698-708. PMID 21784734.
Tradit Chin Med. 2009 Mar;29(1):35-8. PMID 19514186.
15. Freeman EW, Lukes A, VanDrie D, et al. A dose-
5. Cameron IT, Leask R, Kelly RW, et al. The effects of response study of a novel, oral tranexamic formulation for
danazol, mefenamic acid, norethisterone and a heavy menstrual bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011
progesterone-impregnated coil on endometrial Oct;205(4):319 e1-7. PMID 21777897.
prostaglandin concentrations in women with menorrhagia.
Prostaglandins. 1987 Jul;34(1):99-110. PMID 3685399. 16. Grover V, Usha R, Gupta U, et al. Management of
cyclical menorrhagia with prostaglandin synthetase
6. Cameron IT, Haining R, Lumsden MA, et al. The effects inhibitor. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990
of mefenamic acid and norethisterone on measured Sep;16(3):255-9. PMID 2088249.
menstrual blood loss. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;76(1):85-8.
PMID 2359570. 17. Hall P, Maclachlan N, Thorn N, et al. Control of
menorrhagia by the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors naproxen
7. Davis A, Godwin A, Lippman J, et al. Triphasic sodium and mefenamic acid. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987
norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol for treating dysfunctional Jun;94(6):554-8. PMID 3304401.
uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Dec;96(6):913-20.
PMID 11084177. 18. Irvine GA, Campbell-Brown MB, Lumsden MA, et al.
Randomised comparative trial of the levonorgestrel
8. Elkind-Hirsch K, Marrioneaux O, Bhushan M, et al. intrauterine system and norethisterone for treatment of
Comparison of single and combined treatment with idiopathic menorrhagia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998
exenatide and metformin on menstrual cyclicity in Jun;105(6):592-8. PMID 9647148.
overweight women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 19. Jedel E, Labrie F, Oden A, et al. Impact of electro-
2008;93(7):2670-8. PMID 18460557. acupuncture and physical exercise on hyperandrogenism
and oligo/amenorrhea in women with polycystic ovary
9. Endrikat J, Shapiro H, Lukkari-Lax E, et al. A syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Physiol
Canadian, multicentre study comparing the efficacy of a Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jan;300(1):E37-45. PMID
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system to an oral 20943753.
contraceptive in women with idiopathic menorrhagia. J
Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Apr;31(4):340-7. PMID 20. Jensen JT, Parke S, Mellinger U, et al. Effective
19497153. treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding with estradiol
valerate and dienogest: A randomized controlled trial.
10. Fleming R, Hopkinson ZE, Wallace AM, et al. Ovarian Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;117(4):777-87. PMID
function and metabolic factors in women with 21422847.
oligomenorrhea treated with metformin in a randomized
double blind placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol 21. Karakus S, Kiran G, Ciralik H. Efficacy of micronised
Metab. 2002 Feb;87(2):569-74. PMID 11836287. vaginal progesterone versus oral dydrogestrone in the
treatment of irregular dysfunctional uterine bleeding: a
11. Fraser IS, McCarron G. Randomized trial of 2 pilot randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet
hormonal and 2 prostaglandin-inhibiting agents in women Gynaecol. 2009 Dec;49(6):685-8. PMID 20070724.

I-3
Adolescent Gynecology. 2011;24(3):161-5. PMID
22. Kaunitz AM, Bissonnette F, Monteiro I, et al. 21419674.
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or
medroxyprogesterone for heavy menstrual bleeding: a 32. Paoletti AM, Cagnacci A, Depan GF, et al. The chronic
randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 administration of cabergoline normalizes androgen
Sep;116(3):625-32. PMID 20733445. secretion and improves menstrual cyclicity in women with
polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertility and Sterility.
23. Kennedy AD, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A, et al. Effects of 1996;66(4):527-32. PMID 8816612.
decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health
outcomes, and costs: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 33. Preston JT, Cameron IT, Adams EJ, et al. Comparative
2002 Dec 4;288(21):2701-8. PMID 12460093. study of tranexamic acid and norethisterone in the
treatment of ovulatory menorrhagia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
24. Kriplani A, Kulshrestha V, Agarwal N, et al. Role of 1995 May;102(5):401-6. PMID 7612535.
tranexamic acid in management of dysfunctional uterine
bleeding in comparison with medroxyprogesterone acetate. 34. Protheroe J, Bower P, Chew-Graham C, et al.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Oct;26(7):673-8. PMID Effectiveness of a computerized decision aid in primary
17071438. care on decision making and quality of life in menorrhagia:
Results of the MENTIP randomized controlled trial.
25. Kucuk T, Ertan K. Continuous oral or intramuscular Medical Decision Making. 2007;27(5):575-84. PMID
medroxyprogesterone acetate versus the levonorgestrel 17898242.
releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of
perimenopausal menorrhagia: a randomized, prospective, 35. Reid PC, Virtanen-Kari S. Randomised comparative
controlled clinical trial in female smokers. Clin Exp Obstet trial of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and
Gynecol. 2008;35(1):57-60. PMID 18390083. mefenamic acid for the treatment of idiopathic
menorrhagia: a multiple analysis using total menstrual fluid
26. Lahteenmaki P, Haukkamaa M, Puolakka J, et al. Open loss, menstrual blood loss and pictorial blood loss
randomised study of use of levonorgestrel releasing assessment charts. BJOG. 2005 Aug;112(8):1121-5. PMID
intrauterine system as alternative to hysterectomy. BMJ. 16045528.
1998 Apr 11;316(7138):1122-6. PMID 9552948.
36. Shaaban MM, Zakherah MS, El-Nashar SA, et al.
27. Lukes AS, Moore KA, Muse KN, et al. Tranexamic Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system compared to
acid treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized low dose combined oral contraceptive pills for idiopathic
controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;116(4):865-75. menorrhagia: a randomized clinical trial. Contraception.
PMID 20859150. 2011 Jan;83(1):48-54. PMID 21134503.

28. Moghetti P, Castello R, Negri C, et al. Metformin 37. Tsang BK, Domingo MT, Spence JE, et al.
effects on clinical features, endocrine and metabolic Endometrial prostaglandins and menorrhagia: influence of
profiles, and insulin sensitivity in polycystic ovary a prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor in vivo. Can J Physiol
syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Pharmacol. 1987 Oct;65(10):2081-4. PMID 3123043.
6-month trial, followed by open, long-term clinical
evaluation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Jan;85(1):139- 38. van Eijkeren MA, Christiaens GC, Geuze HJ, et al.
46. PMID 10634377. Effects of mefenamic acid on menstrual hemostasis in
essential menorrhagia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992
29. Najam R, Agarwal D, Tyagi R, et al. Comparison of May;166(5):1419-28. PMID 1595797.
traneximic acid with a combination of traneximic acid and
mefenamic acid in reducing menstrual blood loss in 39. Vargyas JM, Campeau JD, Mishell DR, Jr. Treatment
ovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB). Journal of of menorrhagia with meclofenamate sodium. Am J Obstet
Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2010;4(5):3020-5. Gynecol. 1987 Oct;157(4 Pt 1):944-50. PMID 3314521.

30. Oner G, Muderris, II. Clinical, endocrine and 40. Vuorma S, Teperi J, Aalto AM, et al. A randomized
metabolic effects of metformin vs N-acetyl-cysteine in trial among women with heavy menstruation -- impact of a
women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Obstet decision aid on treatment outcomes and costs. Health
Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):127-31. PMID Expect. 2004 Dec;7(4):327-37. PMID 15544685.
21831508.
41. Vuorma S, Rissanen P, Aalto AM, et al. Impact of
31. Ornstein RM, Copperman NM, Jacobson MS. Effect of patient information booklet on treatment decision--a
Weight Loss on Menstrual Function in Adolescents with randomized trial among women with heavy menstruation.
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Journal of Pediatric and Health Expect. 2003 Dec;6(4):290-7. PMID 15040791.

I-4
Appendix J. Evidence Table
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #121)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: NR Therapeutic effect on Overall quality:
Cai and Wu, 2009 Mind tranquilizing and • Delayed menstrual disease condition, n (%): Fair
a
menstruation promoting cycle (TCM diagnosis Cured :
Country: method. Acupoints: of dysfunctional G1: 16 (76.19) Risk of bias:
China Shenting (GV24), bilateral uterine bleeding of G2: 1 (6.25) Randomization:
b
Siguan and bilateral the ovulatory type) Markedly relieved : Low
Enrollment period: Sanyinjiao (SP6). with menstrual cycles G1: 3 (14.29)
November 2004 to Shenting was transversely lasting 36 to 50 days G2: 5 (31.25) Allocation
c
October 2005 punctured and Siguan and Improved : concealment:
Sanyinjiao were needled Exclusion criteria: G1: 2 (9.52) Low
Intervention setting: perpendicularly. Organic pathologic G2: 9 (56.25)
d
Outpatient changes Failed : Selective reporting:
Comparator: G1: 0 (0) Low
Funding: Routine acupuncture N at enrollment: G2: 1 (6.25)
NR method for treating G1: 23 G1 vs. G2: p<0.05 Blinding
delayed menstrual cycle of G2: 17 patients/personnel:
Author industry the liver-qi stagnation type. Therapeutic effects for Unclear
relationship Acupoints: bilateral N at followup: regulating menstruation,
disclosures: Xingjian (LR2), Ligou (LR G1: 21 n (%): Blinding outcome
NR 5), Xuehai (Sp 10), Diji G2: 16 Cured: assessment:
(SP8) and Zigong (EX- G1: 14 (66.67) Unclear
Study Design: CA1) all perpendicularly Age, range in years: G2: 3 (18.75)
RCT punctured. G1+G2: (18, 42) Markedly relieved: Incomplete outcome
G1: 4 (19.05) reporting:
Blinding: Both groups used No. 32 BMI: G2: 4 (25.00) Low
Patients filiform needles NR Improved:
manipulated with the even G1: 3 (14.29) Other:
method. After arrival of qi Parity: G2: 6 (37.50) Low
needles retained for 30 NR Failed:
minutes and manipulated G1: 0 (0)
every 10 minutes. Race/ethnicity: G2: 3 (18.75)
Treatment given every NR G1 vs. G2: p<0.05
other day, with 2 day
interval in the weekend for Therapeutic effects on
3 menstrual cycles. symptoms, n (%):
Cured:

J-1
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Groups: G1: 11 (52.38)
G1: Mind tranquilizing and G2: 2 (12.5)
menstruation promoting Markedly relieved:
acupuncture G1: 9 (42.86)
G2: Routine acupuncture G2: 5 (31.25)
Improved:
Followup: G1: 1 (4.76)
3 cycles G2: 8 (50.0)
Failed:
G1: 0 (0)
G2: 1 (6.25)
G1 vs. G2: p<0.05

Bleeding:
NR

Quality of life:
NR

Pain:
NR

Sexual function:
NR

Patient satisfaction:
NR

Fertility:
G1: 4/5
G2: 1/1

Time to conception:
NR

Additional
interventions:
NR
Table Notes: a Disappearance of all symptoms and integral score decreased by ≥90%; b Disappearance of most of the symptoms, and the integral score decreased by ≥70%, but
<90%; c Improved: Alleviation of the symptoms and the integral score decreased by ≥30%, but <79%; d No obvious improvement in the symptoms and the integral score decreased
by <30%.

J-2
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #631)

Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality


Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Investigator-rated overall Overall quality:
Davis et al., 2000 Days 1-7: 0.180 mg • Aged 15 to 50 years Duration of abnormal assessment of symptom Good
norgestimate/0.035 mg Good general health uterine bleeding, mean resolution, %:
Country: ethinyl estradiol; Not pregnant or nursing months ± SD: Excellent: Risk of bias:
United States Days 8-14: 0.215 mg At least 2-month history of G1: 77.4 ± 73.5 G1: 41.2 Randomization:
norgestimate/0.035 mg menorrhagic, G2: 68.3 ± 71.2 G2: 10.5 Low
Enrollment period: ethinyl estradiol; menometrorrhagic, Good:
May 1997 to October Days 15-21: 0.250 mg oligomenorrheic or Duration of abnormal G1: 26.8 Allocation
1998 norgestimate/0.035 mg polymenorrheic uterine bleeding, median G2: 15.8 concealment:
ethinyl estradiol; dysfunctional uterine months: Fair: Low
Intervention setting: Days 22-28: inactive bleeding not attributed to G1: 67.6 G1: 13.4
16 sites tablets systemic disease or G2: 40.5 G2: 9.5 Selective
structural pathology No change: reporting:
a
Funding: Comparator: Bleeding pattern history, G1: 10.3 Low
Ortho-McNeil Days 1-28: placebo Exclusion criteria: n (%): G2: 46.3
Pharmaceutical tablets History of endometrial Metrorrhagia: Worse: Blinding
Corporation ablation and undergone G1: 23 (23.7) G1: 2.1 patients/personnel:
Groups: dilation and curettage G2: 26 (27.4) G2: 2.1 Low
Author industry G1: Triphasic within 90 days before Menometrorrhagia: Unable to evaluate:
relationship norgestimate/ethinyl screening visit G1: 29 (29.9) G1: 6.2 Blinding outcome
disclosures: estradiol G2: 33 (34.7) G2: 15.8 assessment:
5/5 G2: Placebo N at enrollment: Oligomenorrhea: G1 vs. G2: p<0.001 Low
G1: 101 G1: 54 (55.7)
Study Design: Followup: G2: 100 G2: 54 (56.8) Subject-rated assessment Incomplete
RCT 3 28-day treatment (ITT) Polymenorrhea: of symptom improvement, outcome reporting:
cycles (84 days) G1: 97 G1: 20 (20.6) %: Low
Blinding: G2: 95 G2: 20 (21.1) Much improved:
Patients, investigators G1: 49.5 Other:
N at followup: Hemoglobin, mean g/dl ± G2: 19.8 Low
G1: 60 SD: Improved:
G2: 64 G1: 12.7 ± 1.2 G1: 23.7
G2: 12.85 ± 1.1 G2: 19.8
Age, mean years ± SD: Slightly improved:
G1: 29.8 ± 8.9 Quality of life: G1: 14.0
b c
G2: 29.3 ± 8.1 SF-36 score, mean: G2: 5.8
Physical functioning: No change:
BMI: G1: 88.60 G1: 8.6
NR G2: 88.71 G2: 47.7
Role functioning/physical: Worse:

J-3
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Weight, mean pounds ± G1: 87.10 G1: 2.2
SD: G2: 89.12 G2: 3.5
G1: 173.4 ± 55.9 Bodily pain: Don’t know:
G2: 171.1 ± 48.5 G1: 70.99 G1: 2.2
G2: 74.81 G2: 3.5
Race, n (%): General health: G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
White: G1: 75.00
G1: 73 (75.3) G2: 77.36 Quality of life:
b c
G2: 66 (69.5) Vitality: SF-36 score, mean
Black: G1: 57.04 change from baseline ±
d
G1: 16 (16.5) G2: 60.06 SD:
G2: 22 (23.2) Social functioning: Physical functioning:
Asian: G1: 84.01 G1: 4.19 ± 16.83
G1: 4 (4.1) G2: 85.15 G2: 0.47 ± 13.35
G2: 1 (1.1) Role functioning/ G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
Other: emotional: Role functioning/physical:
G1: 4 (4.1) G1: 78.85 G1: 1.61 ± 24.59
G2: 6 (6.3) G2: 82.75 G2: 1.18 ± 30.11
Mental health: G1 vs. G2: p=0.160
G1: 72.52 Bodily pain:
G2: 75.29 G1: 4.45 ± 22.58
Reported health transition: G2: 0.15 ± 20.77
G1: 41.13 G1 vs. G2: p=0.896
G2: 43.24 General health:
Sexual functioning: G1: 1.58 ± 15.02
G1: 19.27 G2: 1.12 ± 11.29
G2: 17.35 G1 vs. G2: p=0.265
Vitality:
G1: 6.18 ± 17.70
G2: 3.94 ± 17.22
G1 vs. G2: p=0.410
Social functioning:
G1: 0.40 ± 20.06
G2: -1.76 ± 21.58
G1 vs. G2: p=0.735
Role functioning/emotional:
G1: 6.09 ± 30.67
G2: 2.75 ± 29.64
G1 vs. G2: p=0.694
Mental health:
G1: 4.52 ± 14.03

J-4
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G2: 1.65 ± 17.12
G1 vs. G2: p=0.935
Reported health transition:
G1: -4.03 ± 28.62
G2: -4.41 ± 21.88
G1 vs. G2: p=0.109
Sexual functioning:
G1: -2.51 ± 22.75
G2: -0.10 ± 26.05
G1 vs. G2: p=0.404

Patient satisfaction:

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional interventions:
NR

Adverse events:
Discontinued study
prematurely, n (%):
G1: 16 (15.8)
G2: 19 (19)

Discontinued due to
adverse events, n:
G1: 4
G2: 3
Table Notes: Blood loss estimated from PBLAC Higham et al.; a Subjects could have more than one category of bleeding pattern history; b Medical Outcome Study, 36-item short-
form health survey plus five items from the full set on sexual functioning; c Quality of life scores transformed to a 0-100 scale with a higher score indicating better quality of life,
except for reported health transition and sexual functioning, for which a higher score indicates a lower quality; d Significance is computed using analysis of covariance with
adjustment for baseline score, study centers, and interaction terms.

J-5
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1431)
Intervention(s)/ a Outcome Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Measure(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Elkind-Hirsch et al., Exenatide 5 µg by Aged 18 to 40 years Cycle changes measured Cycle changes Poor
2008 subcutaneous injection Polycystic ovary syndrome by menstrual frequency measured by menstrual
b b
twice a day and increased Overweight/obese (BMI index, mean ± SD: frequency index, mean Risk of bias:
Country: to 10 µg twice per day >27) G1: 0.22 ± 0.04 ± SD: Randomization:
United States after 1 month. Menstrual disorders (fewer G2: 0.21 ± 0.04 G1: 0.57 ± 0.08 Low
than six menstruations in G3: 0.29 ± 0.04 G2: 0.49 ± 0.08
Enrollment period: Comparator: 12 months) G3: 0.83 ± 0.08 Allocation
August 2006 to June Metformin 500 mg for two One of the following two Absolute weight, mean kg G1+G2+G3 vs. BL: concealment:
2007 weeks and gradually criteria: ± SD: p=0.0001 Unclear
increased to 1000 mg either clinical and/or G1: 110.5 ± 6 G3 vs. G1: p=0.091
Intervention twice a day; biochemical G2: 113.4 ± 7 G3 vs. G2: p=0.018 Selective reporting:
setting: hyperandrogenism G3: 112 ± 8 Low
Outpatient clinics Combination: metformin (excluding secondary Ovulatory rate,%:
500 mg for two weeks and causes) and/or polycystic Abdominal girth, mean cm G1: 50 Blinding
Funding: gradually increased to ovaries ± SD: G2: 29 patients/personnel:
Amylin 1000 mg twice a day plus G1: 120.4 ± 4.5 G3: 86 High
Pharmaceuticals, exenatide 5 µg by Exclusion criteria: G2: 123.4 ± 4.3 G3 vs. G1: p<0.001
Inc/Eli Lilly Corp subcutaneous injection Diabetics G3: 122 ± 4.4 G3 vs. G2: p<0.001 Blinding outcome
twice a day and increased Smokers assessment:
2
Author industry to 10 µg twice per day Those who used injectable BMI, mean kg/m ± SD: Weight changes: High
relationship after 1 month. hormonal contraceptive G1: 40.3 ± 2 Weight loss, mean kg ±
disclosures: within 6 months G2: 43.3 ± 2 SD: Incomplete
2/5 All groups received Those taking sex G3: 40.9 ± 2 G1: 3.2 ± 0.1 outcome reporting:
treatment for 24 weeks. hormones, drugs that G2: 1.6 ± 0.2 High
Study Design: affect gastrointestinal G3: 6 ± 0.5
RCT Groups: motility or carbohydrate G1+G2+G3 vs. BL: Other:
G1: Exenatide metabolism, or lipid- p=0.001 Low
Blinding: G2: Metformin lowering and/or anti- G1 vs. G2: p=0.019
None G3: Combination obesity drugs within 3 G3 vs. G2: p=0.003
metformin and exenatide months of
the study Abdominal girth, mean ±
Followup: SD:
24 weeks N at enrollment: G1: 119.6 ± 4.3
G1: 20 G2: 123.9 ± 4.4
G2: 20 G3: 116 ± 4.3
G3: 20 G1+G2+G3 vs. BL:
p=0.047
N at followup: G3 vs. G2: p=0.04
G1: 14

J-6
Intervention(s)/ a Outcome Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Measure(s) Risk of Bias
2
G2: 14 BMI, mean kg/m ± SD:
G3: 14 G1: 39.3 ± 2
G2: 42.3 ± 2
Age, mean years ± SD: G3: 39.2 ± 2
G1: 28.2 ± 1.1 G1+G2+G3 vs. BL:
G2: 27.7 ± 1.3 p<0.0001
G3: 32.1 ± 0.7
G1 vs. G2 vs. G3: p=NS Quality of life:
NR
2
BMI, mean kg/m ± SD:
G1: 39.9 ± 1.5 Pain:
G2: 41.3 ± 1.8 NR
G3: 41.2 ± 1.7
G1 vs. G2 vs. G3: p=NS Sexual function:
NR
Parity:
NR Patient satisfaction:
NR
Race, n (%):
Caucasian: Fertility:
G1+G2+G3: 40 (67) NR
African-American:
G1+G2+G3: 20 (33) Time to conception:
NR

Additional
interventions:
NR

Adverse events, n (%):


Nausea:
G1: 3 (15)
G2: 4 (20)
G3: 9 (45)
Diarrhea:
G1: 0
G2: 6 (30)
G3: 2 (20)
Bloating:
G1: 0
G2: 2 (10)

J-7
Intervention(s)/ a Outcome Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Measure(s) Risk of Bias
G3: 1 (5)
Vomiting:
G1: 1 (5)
G2: 1 (5)
G3: 2 (10)
Cramping
(gastrointestinal):
G1: 1 (5)
G2: 0
G3: 0
Headache:
G1: 1 (5)
G2: 0
G3: 0
Indigestion/heartburn:
G1: 0
G2: 0
G3: 2 (10)
Stomachache:
G1: 0
G2: 1 (5)
G3: 0
Constipation:
G1: 0
G2: 1 (5)
G3: 1 (5)
Fatigue:
G1: 0
G2: 2 (10)
G3: 1 (5)
Dizzy:
G1: 0
G2: 0
G3: 2 (10)
Injection site pain/bruise:
G1: 1 (5)
G2: NA
G3: 2 (10)
Pregnancy:
G1: 1 (5)
G2: 2 (10)

J-8
Intervention(s)/ a Outcome Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Measure(s) Risk of Bias
G3: 1 (5)
Menstrual cramps:
G1: 0
G2: 1 (5)
G3: 0
Dysfunctional menstrual
bleeding:
G1: 1 (5)
G2: 1 (5)
G3: 0
Acne:
G1: 0
G2: 0
G3: 1 (5)
Migraines:
G1: 0
G2: 1 (5)
G3: 0
Hot flashes:
G1: 0
G2: 1 (5)
G3: 0
Table Notes: a Baseline measures for the subset of subjects who competed the trial (n=14 in each group); b Cycle event rate (normalized to 12 per 52 weeks)

J-9
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #564)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Menstrual cycle: Menstrual cycle: Overall quality:
Fleming et al., Metformin 850 mg • Aged <35 years Menses per year, mean Observation weeks, n: Fair
2002 once per day for first • Oligomenorrhea (cycle (95% CI): G1: 345
week, then 850 mg length ≥41 days; <8 G1: 4.6 (3.5, 5.6) G2: 503 Risk of bias:
Country: twice daily for 15 cycles per year) or G2: 4.0 (3.1, 4.9) Randomization:
United Kingdom more weeks amenorrhea and PCOS Luteal weeks, n (luteal ratio Low
Reproductive hormones: %):
Enrollment Comparator: Exclusion criteria: Day 1 estradiol, mean G1: 78 (23) Allocation
period: Placebo Significant pmol/liter (95% CI): G2: 66 (13) concealment:
NR hyperprolactinemia G1: 142 (123, 161) G1 vs. G2: p<0.001 Low
Groups: Abnormal thyroid G2: 164 (110, 217)
Intervention G1: Metformin function tests Luteal phase with Pmax <7 Selective reporting:
setting: G2: Placebo Congenital adrenal Day 1 testosterone, mean ng/ml, n (%): Low
NR hyperplasia nmol/l (95% CI): G1: 2 (8)
Followup: G1: 3.1 (2.4, 3.8) G2: 5 (13) Blinding
Funding: 16 weeks N at enrollment: G2: 3.8 (3.4, 4.5) G1 vs. G2: p=NS patients/personnel:
Sponsored by the G1: 45 Low
Scottish Office G2: 47 Time to first ovulation, mean
days (95% CI): Blinding outcome
Author industry N at followup: G1: 23.6 (17, 30) assessment:
relationship G1: 26 G2: 41.8 (28, 56) Low
disclosures: G2: 39 G1 vs. G2: p=0.02
NR Incomplete outcome
Age, mean years (95% Reproductive hormones: reporting:
Study Design: CI): Day 8 estradiol, mean pmol/l High
RCT G1: 28.6 (26.9 to 30.3) (95% CI):
G2: 29.2 (27.5 to 30.7) G1: 226 (150, 302) Other:
Blinding: G2: 183 (127, 240) Low
2
Patients, BMI, mean kg/m : G1 vs. BL: p<0.03
investigators G1: 34.2 G2 vs. BL: p=NS
G2: 35.0
Day 8 testosterone, mean
nmol/l (95% CI):
G1: 3.5 (2.8, 4.2)
G2: 4.2 (3.5, 4.9)
G1 vs. BL: p=NS
G2 vs. BL: p=NS

Metabolic parameters:

J-10
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
2
BMI at week 14, mean kg/m :
G1: 34.6
G2: 35.6
G1 vs. BL: p=0.03
G2 vs. BL: p=0.04

Quality of life:
NR

Pain:
NR

Sexual function:
NR

Patient satisfaction:
NR

Fertility:
Pregnancies during study:
G1: 5
G2: 3

Pregnancies in patients who


declared wish to conceive:
G1: 4/23
G2: 1/19
G1 vs. G2: p=0.23

Additional interventions:
NR

J-11
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #25)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention(s): Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Jedel et al., 2011 Low frequency electro- • Ultrasound verified Menstrual frequency, Change in menstrual Poor
a
acupuncture : Western polycystic ovaries with mean days per month frequency at week 16 from
Country: medical acupuncture ≥12 follicles 2 to 9 mm ± SD: baseline, mean days per Risk of bias:
Sweden given twice weekly for 2 and/or ovarian volume G1: 0.28 ± 0.28 month ± SD (% change): Randomization:
weeks, once a week for ≥10 ml in one or both G2: 0.26 ± 0.33 G1: 0.41 ± 0.33 (146) Low
Enrollment period: 6 weeks and once every ovaries together with G3: 0.23 ± 0.28 G2: 0.14 ± 0.33 (58)
November 2005 to other week for 8 weeks either oligomenorrhea, G3: -0.04 ± 0.007 (-17) Allocation
January 2008 (total 14 treatments over amenorrhea, and/or G1 vs. BL: p<0.001 concealment::
16 weeks) clinical signs of G2 vs. BL: p=NS Low
Intervention setting: hyperandrogenism G3 vs. BL: p=NS
Sahlgrenska University Comparator(s): (hirsutism or acne) Selective reporting:
Hospital Physical exercise: 16 Change in menstrual Low
weeks of regular Exclusion criteria: frequency at week 32 from
Funding: exercise including brisk Aged ≥38 years baseline, mean days per Blinding
Grants from the Osher walking, cycling, or any Any pharmacological month ± SD (% change): patients/personnel:
center for Integrative other aerobic exercise at treatment within 12 G1: 0.33 ± 0.37 (121) High
medicine, Swedish pace faster than normal weeks or breast feeding G2: 0.11 ± 0.36 (42)
Medical Research walking that could be within 24 weeks of study G3: -0.04 ± 0.07 (-17) Blinding outcome
Council, Novo Nordisk sustained for at least 30 entry G1 vs. BL: p=0.003 assessment:
Foundation, Wilhelm min at least 3 days per Cardiovascular disease, G2 vs. BL: p=NS Unclear
and Martina week. diabetes mellitus, or G3 vs. BL: p=NS
Lundgren’s Science endocrine or neoplastic Incomplete outcome
fund, Haljmar No active intervention. causes of Quality of life: reporting:
Svensson Foundation, hyperandrogenemia NR High
b
Tore Nilson Groups: including androgen
Foundation, Ake G1: Acupuncture secreting tumors, Pain: Other:
Wiberg Foundation, G2: Exercise Cushing’s syndrome, NR Low
Alderbert Research G3: No intervention congenital adrenal
Foundation, Ekhaga hyperplasia and Sexual function:
Foundation and the Followup: hyperprolactinemia NR
Swedish Federal 12 week observation
Government followed by 16 weeks of N at enrollment: Patient satisfaction:
intervention followed by G1: 33 NR
Author industry 16 weeks followup G2: 34
relationship (44 week study) G3: 17 Fertility:
disclosures: NR
None N at followup:
12 week observation Time to conception:
Study Design: period: NR

J-12
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
RCT G1: 29
G2: 30 Additional interventions:
Blinding: G3: 15 NR
None 16 week treatment period:
c
G1: 24 Adverse events:
G2: 22 Isolated redness and
G3: 13 subsequent hematomas,
16 week followup: n:
G1: 21 G1: 3
G2: 18 G2: 0
G3: 11 G3: 0
Dizziness, n:
Age, mean years ± SD: G1: 1
G1: 29.7 ± 4.3 G2: 0
G2: 30.2 ± 4.7 G3: 0
G3: 30.1 ± 4.2 Nausea, n:
G1: 1
2
BMI, mean kg/m ± SD: G2: 0
G1: 29.1 ± 8.83 G3: 0
G2: 27.7 ± 6.44
G3: 26.8 ± 5.56

BMI ≥30, n (%):


G1: 11/29 (38)
G2: 11/30 (37)
G3: 4/15 (27)

Parity:
NR

Race/ethnicity:
NR
Notes: a Details about needle placement given in text on pg E38; b All three groups of women received oral information about the benefits of regular physical exercise and were
instructed to complete an exercise diary during weeks 1-32 of the study; c No long-term adverse events in G1 and no short-term or long-term adverse events in G2 and G3.

J-13
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #76)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Secretory endometrium Bleeding: Overall quality:
a
Karakus et al., Vaginal micronized • Aged 35 to 45 years in endometrial sample, Irregular bleeding pattern, Poor
2009 progesterone (8% gel) 90 • No menopausal n (%): n (%):
mg, every other evening from symptoms G1: 8 (29.6) First cycle: Risk of bias:
Country: menstrual cycle day 17 to 27 • Did not take hormone G2: 6 (22.2) G1: 2 (7.4) Randomization:
Turkey therapy G1 vs. G2: p=0.412 G2: 5 (18.5) Low
Comparator: • Diagnosed with G1 vs. G2: p=0.42
Enrollment Dydrogesterone 10 mg orally dysfunctional uterine Second cycle: Allocation
period: twice daily for 10 days bleeding G1: 3 (11.1) concealment:
August 2004 to starting on cycle day 15 • No contraindication for G2: 3 (11.1) High
April 2005 progesterone or G1 vs. G2: p=1.0
Groups: progestins Third cycle: Selective reporting:
Intervention G1: Vaginal progesterone • Endometrial thickness G1: 2 (7.4) Unclear
setting: G2: Oral progesterone >5 mm by G2: 4 (14.8)
Outpatient clinic transvaginal G1 vs. G2: p=0.67 Blinding
Followup: ultrasound patients/personnel:
Funding: 3 cycles Secretory endometrium in High
NR Exclusion criteria: endometrial sample, n (%):
Taking anticoagulants G1: 24 (88.9) Blinding outcome
Author industry or antiprostaglandins G2: 22 (81.5) assessment:
relationship Prefer hormonal G1 vs. G2: p=0.732 Unclear
disclosures: contraceptive
NR methods Quality of life: Incomplete outcome
Known intolerance to NR reporting:
Study Design: progesterone or High
RCT progestins Pain:
NR Other:
Blinding: N at enrollment: Unclear
None G1: 34 Sexual function:
G2: 35 NR

N at followup: Patient satisfaction:


G1: 27 Self-reported patient
G2: 27 satisfaction with treatment,
n (%):
Age, mean years ± SD: G1: 23 (85)
G1: 39.1 ± 3.6 G2: 21 (78)
G2: 39.6 ± 3.0 G1 vs. G2: p=0.491

2
BMI, mean kg/m ± SD: Fertility:

J-14
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G1: 29.2 ± 5.4 NR
G2: 30.3 ± 3.7
G1 vs. G2: p=0.371 Time to conception:
NR
Gravidity, mean ± SD:
G1: 4.4 ± 2.1 Additional interventions:
b
G2: 4.8 ± 2.3 See comment
G1 vs. G2: p=0.584
Adverse events, n:
Parity, mean ± SD: Groin pain:
G1: 3.0 ± 1.4 G1: 1
G2: 3.6 ± 2.2 G2: 0
G1 vs. G2: p=0.209 5-kg weight gain:
G1: 1
Race/ethnicity: G2: 0
NR Ovarian cyst:
G2: 1
G2: 0
Table Notes: a Regular bleeding: cycle length less than 35 days and no intermenstrual bleeding; b Oral estrogen added for n=1 in G2 because of 45-day menstrual delay.

J-15
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #700)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Moghetti et al., 2000 Oral metformin 500 Women aged 18 to 35 Severe oligomenorrhea (6 Menstrual frequency Poor
c
mg once daily for first years or fewer menses per year), improvement, median (IQR):
Country: week; 500 mg twice • Polycystic ovary n (%): G1: NR Risk of bias:
a
Italy a day for a second syndrome G1+G2: 20 (87) G2: NR Randomization:
d
week; 500 mg three Normal glucose tolerance G1 vs. G2: p=0.002 Unclear
Enrollment period: times a day for 24 Referred for menstrual Less severe menstrual
NR weeks abnormalities with or irregularities, n (%): Menstrual pattern improved: Allocation
without hirsutism G1+G2: 3 (13) G1: 5 concealment:
Intervention Comparator: G2: 0 Unclear
setting: Placebo Exclusion criteria: Androstenedione, mean
Hospital clinic See inclusion criteria nmol/l ± SD: Androstenedione, mean nmol/l ± Selective reporting:
Groups: G1: 12.5 ± 1.5 SD: Unclear
b
Funding: G1: Metformin N at enrollment : G2: 10.3 ± 0.7 G1: 13.6 ± 2.1
Grants from Italian G2: Placebo G1+G2: 23 G2: 10.7 ± 1.0 Blinding
Ministry of Higher Free testosterone, mean G1 vs. G2: p=0.74 patients/personnel:
Education and Followup: N at followup: pmol/l ± SD: Low
Scientific Research, 26 weeks G1+G2: 23 G1: 11.6 ± 1.8 Free testosterone, mean pmol/l
and Regione de G2: 10.7 ± 1.4 ± SD: Blinding outcome
Veneto Age, mean years ± SD: G1: 8.7 ± 1.5 assessment:
G1: 23.9 ± 1.2 G2: 10.4 ± 1.7 Low
Author industry G2: 21.4 ± 1.4 G1 vs. G2: p=0.04
relationship Incomplete outcome
2
disclosures: BMI, mean kg/m ± SD: Quality of life: reporting:
NR G1: 27.1 ± 1.5 NR Unclear
G2: 32.6 ± 1.1
Study Design: G1 vs. G2: p<0.05 Pain: Other:
RCT NR Low
Parity:
Blinding: NR Sexual function:
Patients, NR
investigators Race/ethnicity:
NR Patient satisfaction:
NR

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

J-16
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias

Additional interventions:
NR
Table Notes: a PCOS diagnosed by presence of hyperandrogenic chronic anovulation, after exclusion of Cushing’s syndrome, late onset 21-hydroxylase deficiency, thyroid
dysfunction, hyperprolactinemia or androgen secreting tumors; b The authors do not report how many subjects were randomized to treatment and placebo; c Results only displayed
graphically in Figure 1 (pg. 142); d After controlling for baseline BMI and androstenedione.

J-17
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1777)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Menstrual cycle: Menstrual cycle: Overall quality:
a
Oner and Muderris, 1.5 g/day metformin PCOS with hirsutism and Poor
2011 (500 mg 3 times per menstrual irregularity Regular, n (%): Regular, n (%):
day) G1: 5 (17) G1: 14 (47) Risk of bias:
Country: Exclusion criteria: G2: 13 (29) G2: 24 (53) Randomization:
Turkey Comparator: Congenital adrenal G1 vs. G2: p=NS G1 vs. G2: p=NS Unclear
1.8 g/day N-acetyl- hyperplasia, Cushing’s
Enrollment period: cysteine (600 mg 3 syndrome or androgen Irregular, n (%): Irregular, n (%): Allocation
March 2008 to April times per day) secreting tumors, thyroid G1: 25 (83) G1: 16 (53) concealment:
2009 disease, G2: 32 (71) G2: 21 (47) Unclear
Groups: hyperprolactinemia G1 vs. G2: p=NS G1 vs. G2: p=NS
Intervention G1: Metformin Diabetes mellitus or Selective reporting:
setting: G2: N-acetyl-cysteine impaired glucose Restoration of menstrual Low
University tolerance regularity, n (%):
gynecologic Followup: Use of drugs known to G1: 9 (36) Blinding
endocrinology clinic 24 weeks affect carbohydrate G2: 11 (34) patients/personnel:
metabolism within 3 G1 vs. G2: p=NS Unclear
Funding: months preceding the
NR study Quality of life: Blinding outcome
NR assessment:
Author industry N at enrollment: Unclear
relationship G1: 50 Pain:
disclosures: G2: 50 NR Incomplete outcome
NR reporting:
N at followup: Sexual function: High
Study Design: G1: 30 NR
RCT G2: 45 Other:
Patient satisfaction: Unclear
Blinding: Age, mean years ± SD: NR
NR G1: 22.6 ± 4.8
G2: 23.7 ± 4.4 Fertility:
NR
2
BMI, mean kg/m ± SD:
G1: 24.3 ± 6.2 Time to conception:
G2: 23.0 ± 4.6 NR

Parity: Additional interventions:


NR NR

Race/ethnicity: Adverse Events:

J-18
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
NR Discontinued due to
gastrointestinal side
effects, n (%):
G1: 2 (4)
G2: NR
Table Notes: a PCOS defined as presence of at least two of following three criteria: (1) oligo- or anovulation, (2) clinical and/or chemical signs of hyperandrogenism and/or (3)
polycystic ovaries.

J-19
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1363)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Cycle changes, mean ± SD: Cycle changes, mean ± SD: Overall quality:
Ornstein et al., Hypocaloric low fat Aged 12 to 22 years G1+G2: 0.6 ± 0.6 G1+G2: 1.6 ± 1.3, Poor
2011 diet Postmenarche ≥2 years G1+G2 vs. BL: p=0.003
Diagnosed with PCOS Weight, mean kg ± SD: Risk of bias:
th
Country: Comparator: BMI 85 percentile G1+G2: 95.1 ± 18.6 Weight , mean kg ± SD: Randomization:
United States Carbohydrate G1+G2: 89 ± 18 Unclear
restriction without Exclusion criteria: Waist circumference, mean G1+G2 vs. BL: p<0.0001
Enrollment caloric or fat targets Use of medications known cm ± SD: Allocation
period: to cause menstrual G1+G2: 103.3 ± 12.3 Waist circumference, mean concealment:
NR Groups: dysfunction or to affect cm ± SD: Unclear
2
G1: Low fat diet insulin secretion or BMI, kg/m ± SD: G1+G2: 97.6 ± 13
Intervention G2: Low carbohydrate action G1+G2: 35.7 ± 6 G1+G2 vs. BL: p=0.01 Selective
setting: diet Endocrinopathies reporting:
2
Hospital including non-classic 21- BMI, kg/m ± SD: Low
Followup: hydroxylase deficiency, G1+G2: 32.9 ± 5.8
Funding: 12 weeks thyroid dysfunction, G1+G2 vs. BL: p<0.0001 Blinding patients/
Long Island Jewish Cushing’s syndrome, personnel:
Medical Center hyperprolactinemia, and Quality of life: High
Small Grants diabetes mellitus NR
Androgen-producing
Author industry tumors Pain: Blinding outcome
relationship Renal or hepatic disease NR assessment:
disclosures: Pregnancy Unclear
None Sexual function:
N at enrollment: NR Incomplete
Study Design: G1: 12 outcome reporting:
RCT G2: 12 Patient satisfaction: High
NR
Blinding: N at followup: Other:
None G1: 7 Fertility: High
G2: 9 NR

Age, mean ± SD years: Time to conception:


G1+G2: 15.8 ± 2.2 NR

BMI: Additional interventions:


NR NR

Parity: Adverse Events:


NR NR

J-20
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Race/ethnicity, n (%):
White (non Latina):
G1+G2: 8 (50)
Latina:
G1+G2: 3 (19)
Black:
G1+G2: 2 (13)
South Asian:
G1+G2: 2 (13)
Asian:
G1+G2: 1 (6)

J-21
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1675)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Menstrual cycle: Menstrual cycle: Overall quality:
a
Paoletti et al., 1996 Cabergoline, one 0.5 mg • Aged 20 to 28 years Oligomenorrhea, n: Regular cycles, n: Good
tablet every week for ≥4 • Lean polycystic ovary G1a: 3/8 G1a: 3/8
Country: months syndrome: persistent G2a: 3/6 G2a: 0/6 Risk of bias:
Italy amenorrhea or Randomization:
Comparator: oligomenorrhea of Amenorrhea, n: Spontaneous menses Low
Enrollment Placebo perimenarchal onset G1a: 5/8 within 32 to 37 days from
period: • Controls were healthy G2a: 3/6 onset of treatment, n: Allocation
NR Groups: women with: regular G1a: 5/8 concealment:
G1: Cabergoline menstrual cycles G2a: 0/6 Unclear
Intervention G2: Placebo
setting: Ga: Polycystic ovary Exclusion criteria: Persistent Selective reporting:
Clinic syndrome See inclusion criteria oligomenorrhea, n: Low
Gb: Control G2a: 3/6
Funding: N at enrollment: Blinding
NR Followup: G1a: 8 Persistent amenorrhea, n: patients/personnel:
4 cycles G1b: 8 G2a: 3/6 Low
Author industry G2a: 6
relationship G2b: 7 Quality of life: Blinding outcome
disclosures: NR assessment:
NR N at followup: Low
G1a: 8 Patient satisfaction:
Study Design: G1b: 8 NR Incomplete outcome
RCT G2a: 6 reporting:
G2b: 7 Fertility: Low
Blinding: NR
Subjects, Age, years mean ± SD: Other:
investigators Ga: 22 ± 3 Time to conception: Low
Gb: 23 ± 2 NR
2 Additional
BMI, mean kg/m ± SD:
Ga: 22.9 ± 0.29 interventions:
Gb: 22.7 ± 0.38 NR

Parity:
NR

Race/ethnicity:
NR
Table Notes: a 28-day intervals.

J-22
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1783)

Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality


Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Abu Hashim et al., Nuvaring, 15 mcg of Heavy menstrual PBAC, mean score ± SD: PBAC, mean score ± SD: Fair
2011 ethinyl estradiol and bleeding (mean PBAC G1: 287.8 ± 77.4 G1: 90.2 ± 24.4
120 mcg of score >185 for two G2: 302.4 ± 84.6 G2: 92.3 ± 26.7 Risk of bias:
Country: etonogestrel; inserted control cycles) G1 vs. G2: p=NS Randomization:
Egypt between days 1-5 of Parous women desiring Cycle length, mean days G1 vs. BL: p<0.001 Low
cycle for three weeks contraception ± SD: G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
Enrollment period: followed by one week Age 20-35 G1: 26.9 ± 3.7 Allocation
July 2008 to ring free. Good general health G2: 27.2 ± 4.4 PBAC score reduction from concealment:
September 2010 with regular menstrual baseline, (%): Low
Comparator: cycle and evidence of Menses duration, mean G1: 68.6
Intervention setting: Norethisterone acetate ovulation days ± SD: G2: 69.5 Selective reporting:
University outpatient tablets 5 mg three Normal pelvic exam G1: 8.8 ± 2.7 G1 vs. G2: p=NS Low
clinic and private times daily from days with uterus < 10 cm G2: 8.4 ± 2.6
practice 5-26 of cycle for three No pathology identified Menses duration, mean Blinding
cycles in pelvic ultrasound, Hemoglobin, g/dL ± SD: days ± SD: patients/personnel:
Funding: normal histology on G1: 10.5 ± 1.3 G1: 5.3 ± 1.2 High
None. Groups: endometrial biopsy, G2: 10.7 ± 1.2 G2: 5.5 ± 1.1
NuvaRing provided by G1: Vaginal ring negative cervical G1 vs. G2: p=NS Blinding outcome
Organon Egypt and G2: Norethisterone smear Ferritin (mcg/dL) G1 vs. BL: p<0.001 assessment:
sanitary pads by No contraindication to G1: 18.4 ± 3.3 G2 vs. BL: p<0.001 High
Proctor and Gamble, Followup: either contraceptive G2: 17.1 ± 2.9
Cairo, Egypt 3 months vaginal ring or Hemoglobin, g/dL ± SD: Incomplete outcome
norethisterone Quality of life: G1: 11.3 ± 1.2 reporting:
Author industry Self-rated health ≥ very G2: 11.4 ± 1.1 Low
relationship Exclusion criteria: good, n (%): G1 vs. G2: p=NS
disclosures: Pregnancy G1: 2 (4.1) G1 vs. BL: p=0.02 Other:
2
NR BMI >30 kg/m G2: 2 (4.2) G2 vs. BL: p=0.03 Low
Smokers Feeling physically unwell,
Study Design: Current IUD use mean number of days ± Ferritin (mcg/dL)
RCT AUB not fully SD: G1: 36.7 ± 6.2
investigated G1: 7.4 ± 1.8 G2: 35.1 ± 5.7
Blinding: Hormone therapy or any G2: 7.5 ± 2.1 G1 vs. G2: p=NS
Outcome assessors medication that might Feeling mentally unwell, G1 vs. BL: p=0.01
(laboratory and affect MBL within mean number of days ± G2 vs. BL: p=0.01
statistical) previous three months SD:
Used injectable G1: 5.8 ± 1.7 Quality of life:
hormones for G2: 6.2 ± 1.6 Self-rated health ≥ very
contraception No regular activity, mean good, n (%):

J-23
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
previous 12 months number lost days ± SD: G1: 17 (35.4)
Use of drugs that G1: 6.4 ± 2.1 G2: 14 (29.7)
interfere with G2: 6.3 ± 2.3 G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
contraceptive G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
hormone metabolism
Previous endometrial Feeling physically unwell,
resection/ablation and mean number of days ±
other pathology SD:
Heavy menstrual G1: 3.3 ± 1.1
bleeding of endocrine G2: 3.5 ± 1.3
or systemic origin G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
N at enrollment:
G1: 48 Feeling mentally unwell,
G2: 47 mean number of days ±
SD:
N at followup: G1: 4.7 ± 1.2
G1: 48 G2: 5.1 ± 1.3
G2: 47 G1 vs. BL: p=NS
G2 vs. BL: p=NS
Age, mean years ± SD:
G1: 27.8 ± 4.9 No regular activity, mean
G2: 28.2 ± 4.4 number of lost days ± SD:
G1: 1.7 ± 1.2
2
BMI, mean kg/m ± SD: G2: 2.6 ± 1.4
G1: 24.8 ± 3.8 G1 vs. BL: p=0.002
G2: 25.4 ± 3.2 G2 vs. BL: p=0.03

Parity, n (%): Pain:


1 NR
G1: 5 (10.4)
G2: 6 (12.8) Sexual function:
2 NR
G1: 14 (29.2)
G2: 10 (21.3) Patient satisfaction:
≥3 Very satisfied/satisfied, n
G1: 29 (60.4) (%):
G2: 31 (65.9) G1: 34 (70.8)
NR G2: 20 (42.5)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.003
Race/ethnicity: Uncertain/dissatisfied, n

J-24
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
NR (%):
G1: 14 (33.4)
G2: 27 (57.5)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.003
Continued treatment, n (%):
G1: 37 (77)
G2: 12 (25.5)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.001
Discontinued treatment, n
(%):
G1: 11 (23)
G2: 35 (74.5)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.001

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional interventions:
NR

Adverse Events:
Nausea, n (%):
G1: 1 (2)
G2: 2 (4.2)
G1 vs. G2: p=NS
Headache, n (%):
G1: 3 (6.25)
G2: 2 (4.2)
G1 vs. G2: p=NS
Breast tenderness, n (%):
G1: 2 (4.2)
G2: 3 (6.4)
G1 vs. G2: p=NS
Breakthrough
bleeding/spotting, n (%):
G1: 2 (4.2)
G2: 6 (12.8)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.02

J-25
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Leukorrhea, n (%):
G1: 5 (10.4)
G2: 1 (2.1)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.01
Vaginal discomfort, n (%):
G1: 2 (4.2)
G2: NA
G1 vs. G2: p=0.003
Vaginitis, n (%):
G1: 4 (8.3)
G2: 1 (2.1)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.03
Ring-related events, n (%):
G1: 3 (6.25)
G2: NA
p=0.002

J-26
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1170)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Andersch et al., Flurbiprofen 100 mg, • Idiopathic MBL measured using the MBL measured using the Poor
1988 2 times per day on menorrhagia alkaline hematin method, alkaline hematin method, mean
days 1-5 for cycles 3 MBL >80 ml during 2 mean ml (SE) (range): ml (SE) (range): Risk of bias:
Country: and 4 followed by periods G1+G2: 295 (52) (81, 701) Ga: 223 (44) (50, 636) Randomization:
Sweden tranexamic acid for No history or Gb: 155 (33) (36, 511) Unclear
cycles 5 and 6 evidence of pelvic Hemoglobin, mean g/l (SE):
Enrollment pathology G1+G2: 127.4 (3.7) MBL change from baseline, %, Allocation
period: Comparator: p-value: concealment:
NR Oral tranexamic acid Exclusion criteria: Ga: -24, p<0.01 Unclear
1.5 g, 3 times per day Menorrhagia caused Gb: -53, p< 0.01
Intervention on days 1-3; 1 g twice by uterine myomata Ga vs. Gb: p<0.01 Selective reporting:
setting: daily on days 4 and 5 Menorrhagia caused Unclear
NR for cycles 3 and 4 by intrauterine Hemoglobin, mean g/l (SE), p
followed by device value: Blinding
Funding: flurbiprofen for cycles Use of oral Ga: 127.1 (3.4), p=ns patients/personnel:
University of 5 and 6 contraceptives or Gb: 126.2 (3.0), p=ns Unclear
Goteborg and The intrauterine device
Goteborg Medical Groups: Pregnancy in Quality of life: Blinding outcome
Society G1: Flurbiprofen first previous 6 months NR assessment:
then tranexamic acid Unclear
Author industry G2: Tranexamic acid N at enrollment: Pain:
relationship first then flurbiprofen G1+G2: 15 NR Incomplete outcome
disclosures: Ga: Flurbiprofen reporting:
NR Gb: Tranexamic acid N at followup: Sexual function: Low
G1+G2: 15 NR
Study Design: Followup: Other:
a
RCT (crossover) 6 months Age, mean years Patient satisfaction: Low
(range): NR
Blinding: G1+G2: 40.5 (34, 49)
NR Fertility:
BMI: NR
NR
Time to conception:
Parity, mean (range): NA
G1+G2: 1.7 (0, 3)
Additional interventions:
Race/ethnicity: NR
NR
b
Adverse events :

J-27
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Patient complained of side
effects which they attributed to
medication, n:
Ga: 7
Gb: 4
Vomiting and difficulty
swallowing, n:
Ga: NR
Gb: 3
Table Notes: a Cycles 1 and 2 Control –no treatment followed by 4 treatment cycles (cross over after 4th cycle); b "Treatment with tranexamic acid caused nausea, dizziness,
numbness, “restless legs”, headache and in 3 women vomiting and difficulty swallowing. Flurbiprofen caused tiredness, stomach pains and nausea. No patient discontinued therapy
due to side effects."

J-28
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #871)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention/ Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Bonnar and Comparator: • Aged 35 to 46 years MBL measured by MBL measured by Poor
Sheppard, Tranexamic acid 1 g six • Complaint of regular alkaline hematin alkaline hematin
1996 hourly; mefenamic acid heavy menstrual method during 3 cycles method during 3 Risk of bias:
500 mg eight hourly; bleeding pretreatment, mean ml: treatment cycles, mean Randomization:
Country: ethamsylate 500 mg six Mean menstrual loss G1: 164 ml: Low
Ireland hourly >80 ml measured G2: 186 G1: 75
over three G3: 170 G2: 148 Allocation concealment:
Enrollment period: All treatments taken for consecutive G3: 175 Unclear
NR five days from day 1 of menstrual periods MBL duration, mean
bleeding for three cycles before treatment days ± SD: MBL change, n (%): Selective reporting:
Intervention G1: 5.5 ± 1.4 Less: Unclear
setting: Groups: Exclusion criteria: G2: 5.8 ± 1.3 G1: 18 (69)
University G1: Tranexamic acid Organic causes of G3: 5.7 ± 1.1 G2: 13 (57) Blinding patients/personnel:
department of OB- G2: Mefenamic acid menorrhagia G3: 12 (44) High
GYN G3: Ethamsylate excluded by Sanitary towels, mean Same:
hysteroscopy, ± SD: G1: 4 (15) Blinding outcome
Funding: Followup: endometrial biopsy, G1: 23 ± 7.0 G2: 5 (22) assessment:
Health Research 3 cycles cervical smear test 3 G2: 25 ± 7.0 G3: 5 (19) High
Board of Ireland and to 12 months before G3: 25 ± 9.0 Greater:
Pharmacia, Sweden enrollment G1: 4 (15) Incomplete outcome
History of renal or G2: 4 (17) reporting:
Author industry hepatic impairment G3: 8 (30) Low
relationship Previous
disclosures: thromboembolic Dysmenorrhea change, Other:
None disease n (%): Low
Inflammatory bowel Better:
Study Design: disease G1: 5 (19)
RCT Peptic or intestinal G2: 3 (13)
ulceration G3: 1 (4)
Blinding: Coagulation or Same:
None fibrinolytic disorders G1: 14 (54)
G2: 11 (48)
N at enrollment: G3: 19 (70)
G1: 27 Worse:
G2: 25 G1: 7 (27)
G3: 29 G2: 8 (35)
G3: 4 (15)
N at followup:
G1: 26 MBL duration, mean

J-29
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G2: 23 days ± SD:
G3: 27 G1: 4.9 ± 1.8
G2: 5.3 ± 1.3
Age, mean years ± G3: 5.7 ± 2.0
SD:
G1: 40 ± 5 Sanitary towels, mean
G2: 38 ± 8 ± SD, p value:
G3: 37 ± 8 G1: 20 ± 6.0, p<0.01
G2: 23 ± 9.0, p<0.05
BMI: G3: 25 ± 9.0
NR G1 vs. BL: p<0.01
G2 vs. BL: p<0.05
Height, mean cm ± G3 vs. BL: p=NS
SD:
G1: 160 ± 6 Quality of life:
G2: 161 ± 6 NR
G3: 164 ± 7
Pain:
Weight, mean kg ± NR
SD:
G1: 66 ± 10 Sexual function:
G2: 66 ± 12 NR
G3: 64 ± 9
Patient satisfaction:
Parity: Wish to continue
NR treatment at end of
study, n (%):
Race/ethnicity: G1: 20 (77)
NR G2: 17 (74)
G3: NR

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional
interventions:
NR

J-30
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Adverse events:
a
Withdrawal, n:
G1: 4
G2: 3
G3: 11

Withdrawal due to
unwanted event such
as nausea, headache
or dizziness, n:
G1: 3
G2: 1
G3: 4

Table Notes: a Reasons for withdrawal: poor efficacy (G3: n=5; G2: n=1); unwanted event such as nausea, headache and dizziness (G1: n=3; G2: n=1; G3: n=4).

J-31
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1116)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Cameron et al., 1990 Mefenamic acid, 500 Heavy menstruation MBL measured by MBL measured by alkaline Poor
mg three times daily on defined by average alkaline hematin hematin method, median ml
Country: days 1-5 of menses MBL >80 ml per cycle method, median ml (range): Risk of bias:
United Kingdom (range): G1: 81 (22, 193) Randomization:
Comparator: Exclusion criteria: G1: 123 (86, 237) G2: 92 (43, 189) Unclear
Enrollment period: Norethisterone, 5 mg Organic disease G2: 109 (81, 236) G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
NR twice daily on cycle Receiving medical G2 vs. BL: p<0.002 Allocation
days 19-26 treatment for Duration at cycle 1, concealment:
Intervention menorrhagia median days (range): MBL change, median % Unclear
setting: Groups: G1: 7 (5, 8) (range):
Outpatient G1: Mefenamic acid N at enrollment: G2: 7 (5, 10) G1: -24 (-83, 5) Selective reporting:
department G2: Norethisterone G1: 17 G2: -20 (-53, 2) Low
G2: 15 Duration at cycle 2, G1 vs. G2: p>0.1
Funding: 2 control cycles median days (range): Blinding
Parke-Davis Cycle 1 N at followup: G1: 6 (4, 9) Duration at cycle 3, median patients/personnel:
Research Cycle 2 G1: 17 G2: 6 (4, 9) days (range): Unclear
Laboratories, G2:15 G1: 6 (5, 9)
Eastleigh, UK 2 treatment cycles Cycle length at cycle 1, G2: 6 (4, 8) Blinding outcome
Cycle 3 Age, median years median days (range): assessment:
Author industry Cycle 4 (range): G1: 28 (21, 35) Duration at cycle 4, median Unclear
relationship G1: 40 (27, 48) G2: 28 (21, 35) days (range):
disclosures: G2: 40 (21, 51) G1: 5 (3, 8) Incomplete outcome
NR Cycle length at cycle 2, G2: 6 (4, 8) reporting:
BMI: median days (range): G1 vs. BL: p<0.01 Low
Study Design: NR G1: 27 (21, 33) G2 vs. BL: p=NS
RCT G2: 29 (21, 31) Other:
Height, median cm Cycle length at cycle 3, Low
Blinding: (range): median days (range):
NR G1: 163 (154, 177) G1: 27 (25, 37)
G2: 163 (150, 181) G2: 29 (28, 32)

Weight, median kg Cycle length at cycle 4,


(range): median days (range):
G1: 67 (52, 92) G1: 28 (25, 32)
G2: 65 (48, 102) G2: 29 (26, 35)
G1 vs. BL: p=NS
Parity: G2 vs. BL: p=NS
NR
Quality of life:

J-32
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Race/ethnicity: NR
NR
Pain, n (%):
Abdominal pain:
G1: 3 (18)
G2: 3 (20)
Headache:
G1: 4 (24)
G2: 5 (33)

Sexual function:
NR

Patient satisfaction:
NR

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional interventions:
NR

Adverse events, n (%):


Any side effect:
G1: 10 (59)
G2: 9 (60)
Nausea:
G1: 2 (12)
G2: 1 (7)
a
Other :
G1: 2 (12)
G2: 1 (7)

Table Notes: a Not including abdominal pain or headache.

J-33
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1184)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Cameron et al., 1987 Mefenamic acid 500 Mean MBL >50 ml MBL measured by alkaline MBL measured by alkaline Poor
mg three times per hematin method, median ml hematin method, median ml
Country: day for the first five Exclusion criteria: (range): (range): Risk of bias:
United Kingdom days of cycle; See inclusion criteria G1: 68 (61, 169) G1: 47 (39, 210) Randomization:
G2: 94 (55, 312) G2: 110 (24, 222) Unclear
Enrollment period: Comparator: N at enrollment: G3: 71 (56, 164) G3: 45 (31, 77)
NR Norethisterone 5 mg G1: 8 G1 vs. BL: p=0.05 Allocation
two times per day on G2: 8 MBL measured by alkaline G2 vs. BL: p=NS concealment:
Intervention setting: cycle days 15 to 25; G3: 8 hematin method, followup G3 vs. BL: p<0.05 Unclear
Hospital Progesterone- group, median ml (range):
impregnated coil N at followup: G1: 85 (68, 169) Number of bleeding days: Selective reporting:
b
Funding: releasing 65 mcg G1: 6 G2: 131 (55, 259) No difference vs. baseline Unclear
Birthright research progesterone G2: 7 G3: 64 (56, 164)
grant, Royal College daily G3: 6 Endometrial prostaglandin, Blinding
of Obstetricians and Number of bleeding days, median pg/mg (range): patients/personnel:
Gynaecologists Two control cycles, Age, median years median (range): G1: 546 (412, 3434) High
two treatment cycles (range): G1: 5 (4, 7) G2: 985 (55, 1987)
Author industry G1: 40 (33, 48) G2: 6 (4, 7) G3: 273 (178, 832) Blinding outcome
a
relationship Groups : G2: 39 (35, 46) G3: 5 (4, 6) G1 vs. BL: p=NS assessment:
disclosures: G1: Mefenamic acid G3: 40 (29, 42) G2 vs. BL: p=NS High
NR G2: Norethisterone Cycle length, median days G3 vs. BL: p=0.05
G3: Progesterone- BMI: (range): Incomplete outcome
Study Design: impregnated coil NR G1: 28 (23, 38) Quality of life: reporting:
RCT G2: 28 (24, 30) NR Unclear
Followup: Weight, median kg G3: 26 (23, 30)
Blinding: 4 months (range): Pain: Other:
NR G1: 64 (50, 70) Endometrial prostaglandin, NR Unclear
G2: 64 (52, 73) median pg/mg (range):
G3: 70 (54, 89) G1: 412 (256, 9506) Sexual function:
G2: 770 (152, 2251) NR
Height, median cm G3: 842 (265, 1630)
(range): Patient satisfaction:
G1: 162 (149, 164) NR
G2: 164 (152, 169)
G3: 162 (145, 164) Fertility:
NR
Parity, median
(range): Time to conception:
G1: 4 (2, 4) NR

J-34
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G2: 4 (1, 4)
G3: 2 (2, 4) Additional interventions:
NR
Race/ethnicity:
NR Adverse events:
NR
Table Notes: a Does not include a treatment group randomized to danazol (n=6); b Baseline refers to control cycles.

J-35
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #123)
Intervention(s)/ Baseline Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Measure(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Endrikat et al., 2009 LNG-IUS 52 mg Aged ≥30 years MBL measured by MBL measured by PBLAC Poor
levonorgestrel released Healthy PBLAC score, score at 12 months,
Country: up to 20 µg per 24 hours • Diagnosis of idiopathic median: median: Risk of bias:
Canada inserted within 7 days of menorrhagia assessed by G1: 228 G1: 13 Randomization:
start of last menstrual MBL score ≥100 on G2: 290 G2: 72 Low
Enrollment period: period for 12 months PBLAC for two G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
a
NR consecutive cycles Hemoglobin, mean G2 vs. BL: p<0.001 Allocation
Comparator: Normal or only slightly g/L: G1 vs. G2: p=0.002 concealment:
Intervention setting: One tablet daily for 12 enlarged uterus G1: 126 High
9 centers months of COC G2: 125 MBL measured by PBLAC
containing 1 mg Exclusion criteria: score at 12 months, Selective reporting:
Funding: norethindrone acetate and Contraindications for LNG- estimate for median Low
Bayer Schering 20 µg ethinyl estradiol for IUS and COC use difference (95% CI):
Pharma AG, Berlin, days 1-21 and placebo Metabolic and endocrine G1 vs. G2: -62 (-89, -18) Blinding
Germany tablet for days 22-28 diseases patients/personnel:
Diagnostically unclassified MBL measured by PBLAC High
Author industry Groups: genital bleeding score at 12 months, mean
relationship G1: LNG-IUS History of liver or vascular % change: Blinding outcome
disclosures: G2: COC disease G1: -83 assessment:
5/6 Concomitant use of G2: -68 Unclear
Followup: medications that could
b
Study Design: 12 months influence study objective, Treatment success, n (%): Incomplete
RCT including: sex steroids; G1: 16/20 (80.0) outcome reporting:
tranexamic acid; NSAIDs; G2: 7/19 (36.8) Low
Blinding: platelet aggregation G1 vs. G2: p<0.009
Open-label inhibitors; anticoagulants; Other:
and drugs known to induce Hemoglobin at 12 months, High
or inhibit liver enzymes mean g/L:
Intramural or subserous G1: 134
fibroids of mean diameter G2: 136
≥4 cm or submucous
fibroids Hemoglobin at 12 months,
Adenomyosis or endometrial baseline-adjusted mean
abnormalities (e.g., polyps g/L change:
or hyperplasia) G1: +8.6
Perimenopausal G2: +9.6
N at enrollment: G1 vs. G2: p=0.711
G1: 20
G2: 19

J-36
Intervention(s)/ Baseline Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Measure(s) Risk of Bias
Hemoglobin, estimate for
N at followup: mean difference (95% CI):
G1: 17 G1 vs. G2: -0.99 (-6.43,
G2: 12 4.45)

Time since start of Quality of life:


menorrhagia, mean years ± Menorrhagia severity
c
SD: score :
G1: 10.0 ± 8.23 6 months:
G2: 6.1 ± 4.4 G1: NR
G2: NR
Age, mean years ± SD: G1 vs. G2: p=0.045
G1: 41.8 ± 4.3 12 months:
G2: 42.4 ± 4.4 G1: NR
G2: NR
2
BMI, mean kg/m ± SD G1 vs. G2: p=NS
G1: 24.3 ± 1.9
G2: 22.6 ± 2.3 Menorrhagia severity
score, estimated mean %
Births, n (%) difference at 6 months
0: (95% CI):
d
G1: 3 (15.0) G1 vs. G2: -6.37 (-12.61,
G2: 3 (15.8) -0.14)
1:
G1: 6 (30.0) Pain:
G2: 4 (21.1) NR
2:
G1: 6 (30.0) Sexual function:
G2: 10 (52.6) NR
≥3:
G1: 5 (25.0) Patient satisfaction:
G2: 2 (10.5) NR

Race/ethnicity: Fertility:
NR NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional interventions:
NR

J-37
Intervention(s)/ Baseline Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Measure(s) Risk of Bias

Adverse events:
Discontinued study
(reasons were
intermenstrual bleeding,
menstrual disorder, and
headache), n:
G1: 1
G2: 5

Table Notes: a Hemoglobin analyzed in the sub-population who had not used iron supplements during the study. Results were similar to whole study population (data not shown); b
Treatment success defined as MBL score < 100 at 12 months; treatment failure recorded if MBL score ≥ 100 or if treatment was discontinued; c Assessed by condition specific
questionnaire (see: Ruta et al.) but scores only displayed graphically; d Menorrhagia severity scores significantly lower (better quality of life) in G1 compared to G2 at 6 months.

J-38
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1349)
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
a
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria : Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Fraser et al., Estradiol valerate/ Aged 18 or older MBL measured by the MBL measured by the Good
2011 dienogest, oral 7 Heavy menstrual bleeding alkaline hematin method, alkaline hematin method,
consecutive treatment Two or more menstrual mean ml ± SD: mean ml ± SD: Risk of bias:
Country: cycles of 28 days each bleeding episodes with a G1: 639.4 + 513.5 G1: 175.8 ± 200.8 Randomization:
Australia, Europe (estradiol valerate 3 MBL of >80 ml, G2: 645.1 + 391.2 G2: 553.6 + 308.0 Low
mg on days 1-2, prolonged menstrual
Enrollment estradiol valerate 2 mg bleeding (≥8 days) and/or Bleeding and spotting days, MBL measured by the Allocation
period: /dienogest 2 mg on frequent menstrual 90-day run-in phase, mean: alkaline hematin method, concealment:
d
February 2006 to days 3-7, estradiol bleeding (>5 episodes G1: 23.0 mean change ml ± SD: Low
May 2008 valerate 2 mg/ with a minimum of 20 G2: 21.0 G1: -485 ± 409.6
dienogest 3 mgs on bleeding days overall) G2: -93.2 ± 268.0 Selective reporting:
Intervention days 8-24, estradiol during the 90 day run-in Bleeding only days, 90-day G1 vs. G2: p<0.0001 Unclear
setting: valerate 1 mg on days phase run-in phase, mean ± SD:
34 centers 25-26, placebo on Willing to use barrier G1: 17.3 ± 6.7 MBL < 80 ml for each Blinding
days 27-28) method of contraception G2: 16.6 ± 6.7 episode, n (%): patients/personnel:
Funding: Normal endometrial biopsy G1: 86/136 (63.2) Low
Bayer Health Comparator: result or mild, simple Spotting only days, 90-day G2: 11/76 (14.5)
Care Placebo endometrial hyperplasia run-in phase, mean ± SD: Blinding outcome
Pharmaceuticals 6 months prior to study G1: 5.7 ± 5.6 Bleeding and spotting assessment:
Groups: entry G2: 4.4 ± 5.1 days, 90-day efficacy Low
Author industry G1: Estradiol phase, mean:
relationship valerate/dienogest Exclusion criteria: Bleeding episodes, 90-day G1: 21.3 Incomplete outcome
disclosures: G2: Placebo Abnormal transvaginal run-in phase, mean ± SD: G2: 19.1 reporting:
7/7 ultrasound G1: 3.5 ± 0.6 Low
Followup: Abnormal lab values which G2: 3.4 ± 0.7 Bleeding and spotting
d
Study Design: 8 months were clinically significant days, mean change : Other:
RCT History of endometrial Sanitary protection items, 90- G1: -1.6 Low
ablation day run-in phase, mean ± G2: -1.9
Blinding: Dilatation and curettage 2 SD:
Patients, months preceding the G1: 81.6 ± 32.7 Bleeding only days, 90-day
investigators study G2: 82.0 ± 39.3 efficacy phase, mean ±
Bleeding due to organic SD:
pathology determined Hemoglobin, mean g/dl ± SD: G1: 13.7 ± 7.0
during 90 day run-in G1: 12.1 ± 1.2 G2: 14.9 ± 5.7
phase including chronic G2: 12.1 ± 1.4
endometriosis, Bleeding only days, mean
d
adenomyosis, Hematocrit, mean % ± SD: change ± SD:
endometriosis, G1: 39.7 ± 3.7 G1: -3.7 ± 8.4
endometrial polyps, G2: 39.8 ± 4.2 G2: -2.1 ± 7.2

J-39
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
leiomyomas or uterine G1 vs. G2: p=0.0186
malignancy Ferritin, mean ng/ml ± SD:
Unwilling to discontinue G1: 13.6 ± 13.6 Spotting only days, 90-day
tranexamic acid or G2: 13.9 ± 14.5 efficacy phase, mean ±
NSAIDs during menses SD:
2
BMI >32 kg/m G1: 7.6 ± 7.8
Women aged 35 or older G2: 4.2 ± 5.5
who smoked more than
10 cigarettes per day (or Spotting only days, mean
d
any number of cigarettes change ± SD:
in Australia and the UK) G1: 2.1 ± 8.2
Contraindications to the G2: -0.2 ± 6.0
use of combined oral
contraceptives Bleeding episodes, 90-day
efficacy phase, mean ±
N at enrollment: SD:
G1: 149 G1: 3.1 ± 0.9
G2: 82 G2: 3.1 ± 0.6

N at followup: Bleeding episodes, mean


d
G1: 109 change ± SD:
G2: 62 G1: -0.4 ± 1.1
G2: -0.4 ± 0.7
Age, mean years ± SD: G1 vs. G2: p=0.5095
G1: 39.5 ± 6.6
G2: 38.5 ± 7.5 Sanitary protection items,
90-day efficacy phase,
2
BMI, mean kg/m ± SD: mean ± SD:
G1: 24.6 ± 3.5 G1: 43.3 ± 31.7
G2: 25.7 ± 3.0 G2: 64.8 ± 26.3

Weight, mean kg ± SD: Sanitary protection items,


d
G1: 69.8 ± 11.8 mean change ± SD:
G2: 71.6 ± 10.2 G1: -38.4 ± 30.0
G2: -16.5 ± 32.2
Parity: G1 vs. G2: p<0.0001
NR
Reduction in MBL volume,
Race/ethnicity, n (%): mean % (median):
Caucasian: G1: 69.4 (79.2)
G1: 144 (96.6) G2: 5.8 (7.4)

J-40
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G2: 80 (97.6) G1 vs. G2: p<0.0001
Black:
G1: 1 (0.7) ≥20% reduction in MBL,%:
G2: 0 (0) G1: 94
Asian: G2: 40
G1: 2 (1.3)
G2: 1 (1.2) ≥50% reduction in MBL,%:
Other: G1: 84
G1: 2 (1.3) G2: 12
G2: 1 (1.2)
≥80% reduction in MBL,%:
b
Bleeding symptoms, n G1: 50
(%): G2: 0
Prolonged bleeding:
G1: 20 (13.4) Hemoglobin, adjusted
G2: 10 (12.2) change from baseline,
Frequent bleeding: mean g/dl:
G1: 0 G1: +0.70
G2: 0 G2: +0.05
Heavy bleeding: G1 vs. G2: p<0.0001
G1: 136 (91.3)
G2: 76 (92.7) Hematocrit, adjusted
change from baseline,
mean %:
G1: +1.5
G2: -0.05
G1 vs. G2: p<0.0049

Ferritin, adjusted change


from baseline, mean ng/ml:
G1: +8.6
G2: +0.4
G1 vs. G2: p<0.0017

Patient reported
improvement in bleeding
symptoms, %:
G1: 77.9
G2: 45.1
G1 vs. G2: p<0.0001

J-41
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
c
Responder status, n (%):
Complete:
G1: 44 (29.5)
G2: 1 (1.2)
e
Partial or non-responder :
G1: 64 (43.0)
G2: 61 (74.4)
Missing data:
G1: 41 (27.5)
G2: 20 (24.4)

Complete response rate


(excluding patients with
missing data), % (95% CI):
G1: 40.7 (31.4, 50.6)
G2: 1.6 (0.0, 8.7)

Quality of life:
NR

Pain:
NR

Sexual function:
NR

Patient satisfaction:
NR

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional interventions:
Concomitant use of iron, n
(%):
G1: 28/149 (18.8)
G2: 27/82 (32.9)

J-42
Table Notes: See #1365 Jensen et al same study protocol used in United States and Canada; a Use of medications to relieve women of heavy menstrual bleeding (sex steroids,
NSAIDS, tranexamic acid) was not allowed during study period; b Some women presented with multiple symptoms. c Complete response to treatment defined as composite of
following components: no bleeding episodes lasting more than 7 days, no more than 4 bleeding episodes overall, no bleeding episodes with blood loss volume ≥80 ml, no more
than one bleeding episode increase from baseline, no more than 24 days of bleeding overall and no increase from baseline in total number of bleeding days. In addition patients
recruited because of presence of prolonged bleeding were required to demonstrate a decrease of at least 2 days in maximum duration of a bleeding cycle. Patients recruited because
of heavy bleeding, the blood loss volume had to <80 ml and had to represent a decrease of at least 50% relative to average blood loss volume per episode during the study
recruitment phase; d Change from 90 day run-in phase to 90-day efficacy phase; e Detail on criteria not achieved in partial or non-responders presented in Table 2 of manuscript
(pg. 2702).

J-43
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1103)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
a
Author: Intervention : Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Fraser et al., 1991 Mefenamic acid, 500 mg • Menorrhagia MBL measured by MBL measured by Poor
every 6-8 hours from first Regular periods alkaline hematin alkaline hematin
Country: sign of menses until 24 Ovulating method in cycles 1 and method during 2 Risk of bias:
Australia hours after usual duration of No hormonal therapy in 2, mean ml ± SD: mefenamic acid Randomization:
heavy bleeding for a the previous 3 months G1: 131.1 ± 80.8 treatment cycles, mean Unclear
Enrollment period: maximum of 5 days; G2: 101.0 ± 52.5 ml ± SD:
NR Naproxen, 500 mg at first Exclusion criteria: G1: 105.1 ± 88.6 Allocation concealment:
onset of menses followed Menorrhagia due to G2: 62.9 ± 27.7 Unclear
Intervention setting: by 250 mg every 6-8 hours pelvic causes
NR until 24 hours after usual Menorrhagia due to MBL % change from Selective reporting:
duration of heavy bleeding systemic causes baseline during 2 Low
Funding: for a maximum of 5 days mefenamic acid
Parke-Davis N at enrollment: treatment cycles: Blinding
Company Comparator: G1: 15 G1: -20 patients/personnel:
Sydney, Australia Mefenamic acid, 500 mg G2: 15 G2: -38 High
every 6-8 hours from first G1 vs. BL: p=0.198
Author industry sign of menses until 24 N at followup: G2 vs. BL: p=0.002 Blinding outcome
relationship hours after usual duration of G1: 14 assessment:
disclosures: heavy bleeding for a G2: 12 MBL during 2 no High
NR maximum of 5 days; treatment cycles 5 and
Low dose combined oral Age: 6, mean ml ± SD: Incomplete outcome
Study Design: contraceptive (ethinyl NR G1: 131.9 ± 71.6 reporting:
RCT (cross-over) estradiol 30 µg and G2: 90.9 ± 61.3 High
levonorgestrel 150 µg) daily BMI:
Blinding: for 21 out of 28 days NR MBL during 2 treatment Other:
None cycles (G1: naproxen; Low
b
Groups : Parity: G2: COC), mean ml ±
G1: Cycles 1 and 2: no NR SD:
treatment Gb: 115.6 ± 113.0
Cycles 3 and 4: mefenamic Race/ethnicity: Gc: 57.8 ± 34.8
acid or naproxen NR
Cycles 5 and 6: no MBL % change from
treatment baseline during 2
Cycles 7 and 8: mefenamic treatment cycles (G1:
acid or naproxen naproxen; G2: COC):
Gb: -12
G2: Cycles 1 and 2: no Gc: -43
treatment Gb vs. BL: p=0.079
Cycles 3 and 4: mefenamic Gc vs. BL: p<0.001

J-44
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
acid or combined
monophasic oral MBL reduction during 2
contraceptive treatment cycles with
Cycles 5 and 6: no mefenamic acid
treatment compared to 2
Cycles 7 and 8: mefenamic treatment cycles with
acid or combined naproxen and COC:
monophasic oral Gb vs. Ga: p=0.129
contraceptive Gc vs. Ga: p=0.079
c
Ga: Mefenamic acid Clinically significant
Gb: Naproxen reduction in MBL during
Gc: Combined oral 2 mefenamic acid
contraceptive treatment cycles, n (%):
G1: 8/14 (57)
Followup: G2: 10/12 (83)
8 cycles
c
Clinically significant
reduction in MBL during
2 treatment cycles, n
(%):
Gb: 9/14 (64)
Gc: 9/12 (75)

Quality of life:
NR

Pain:
NR

Sexual function:
NR

Patient satisfaction:
NR

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

J-45
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias

Additional
interventions:
NR

Table Notes: a A third group, not included in this review, received mefenamic acid and danazol (n=15); b The order of treatment within each group was randomized; c Objective
reduction of 20% between the mean of first two cycles and mean of each 2 treatment cycles.

J-46
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1304, #1255)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Fraser et al., 1981 Mefenamic acid Menorrhagia Menorrhagia duration, MBL measured by alkaline Fair
a
Fraser et al., 1984 500mg, 3 times/day, mean years ± SD: hematin method, mean ml
onset to end of menses Exclusion criteria: G1+G2: 11.2 ± 9.4 (SE): Risk of bias:
Country: for 2 cycles followed by See inclusion criteria All patients (n=69): Randomization:
Australia placebo for 2 cycles Dysmenorrhea Ga: 48.1 (4.4) Unclear
a
N at enrollment : duration, mean years ± Gb: 66.9 (4.7)
Enrollment period: Comparator: G1+G2: 85 SD: Ga vs. Gb: p<0.001 Allocation
NR Placebo for two cycles G1+G2: 11.6 ± 8.5 True menorrhagia (n=30): concealment:
followed by mefenamic N at followup: Ga: 77.2 (8.7) Unclear
Intervention setting: acid for 2 cycles G1: 38 Bleeding days per Gb: 110 (5.9)
NR G2: 31 cycle, mean ± SD: Ga vs. Gb: p<0.001 Selective reporting:
Groups: G1+G2: 3.3 ± 1.8 MBL <80 ml (n=39): Low
Funding: G1: Mefenamic acid first Age years, mean ± Ga: 36.9 (3.4)
Park-Davis and Co then placebo SD: Pain, days per cycle, Gb: 45.8 (2.6) Blinding
Australian National G2: Placebo first then G1+G2: 33 ± 6.9 mean ± SD: Ga vs. Gb: p<0.025 patients/personnel:
Health and Medical mefenamic acid G1: 3.1 ± 1.9 MBL <35 ml (n=14): Low
Research council Ga: Mefenamic acid BMI: G2: 3.1 ± 1.7 Ga: 31.6 (7.9)
Gb: Placebo NR Gb: 24.7 (1.4) Blinding outcome
Author industry Ga vs. Gb: p=NS assessment:
relationship Followup: Parity: Low
disclosures: 4 cycles NR MBL measured by alkaline
NR hematin method, mean ml Incomplete outcome
Race/ethnicity: (SE): reporting:
Study Design: NR G1a: 55.2 (4.9) High/Low
RCT (crossover) G1b: 69.4 (5.5)
G2a: 63.7 (4.7) Other:
Blinding: G2b: 39.8 (4.2) Low
Patients, clinicians G1a vs. G1b: p<0.05
G2a vs. G2b: p<0.001
G1a vs. G2a: p<0.02
G1b vs. G2b: p<0.4

Bleeding days per cycle,


mean (SE):
Ga: 4.9 (0.14)
Gb: 5.3 (0.14)
Ga vs. Gb: p<0.003

Pain:

J-47
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Abdominal pain, days per
cycle, mean (SE):
Ga: 1.5 (0.13)
Gb: 2.1 (0.15)
Ga vs. Gb: p<0.001

Headache, days per cycle,


mean (SE):
Ga: 0.8 (0.14)
Gb: 1.6 (0.16)
Ga vs. Gb: p<0.001

Nausea, days per cycle, mean


(SE):
Ga: 0.6 (0.09)
Gb: 0.7 (0.10)
Ga vs. Gb: p=NS

Diarrhea, days per cycle,


mean (SE):
Ga: 0.22 (0.06)
Gb: 0.45 (0.09)
Ga vs. Gb: p<0.008

Depression, days per cycle,


mean ± SD:
Ga: 0.8 (0.15)
Gb: 1.1 (0.14)
Ga vs. Gb: p=NS

Breast symptoms, days per


cycle, mean (SE):
Ga: 0.9 (0.13)
Gb: 1.1 (0.18)
Ga vs. Gb: p=NS

Quality of life:
NR

Patient satisfaction:
NR

J-48
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional interventions:
NR

Table Notes: a Intrauterine device (n=6), fibroids (n=2), and Von Willebrand’s disease (n=1); b Comparison of patients’ subjective assessment of menstrual blood loss (60/69 87%)
provided perception data accurate enough for analysis.

J-49
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1767)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Freeman et al., 2011 3.9 g/day tranexamic Aged 18-49 MBL measured by MBL mean reduction Fair
acid (1.3 g 3 times daily) Average MBL during alkaline hematin from baseline, mL/cycle:
Country: for up to 5 consecutive two pretreatment method, mean mL/cycle: G1: 65.3 Risk of bias:
United States days cycles ≥80 G1: 169.0 G2: 46.5 Randomization:
No abnormal findings at G2: 178.0 G3: 3.0 Unclear
Enrollment period: Comparator: cervical cytology G3: 153.6 G1 vs. BL: p<0.0001
December 2006 to 1.95 g/day tranexamic screening G2 vs. BL: p<0.0001 Allocation concealment:
May 2008 acid (0.65 g 3 times a Duration, mean years ± G3 vs. BL: p=NS Unclear
day) for up to 5 Exclusion criteria: SD: G1 vs. G3: p<0.0001
Intervention setting: consecutive days History or presence of G1: 11.9 ± 8.9 G2 vs. G3: p<0.0001 Selective reporting:
63 participating study clinically significant G2: 12.1 ± 9.4 Low
sites Placebo disease G3: 10.0 ± 8.4 MBL % reduction from
History of bilateral baseline: Blinding
Funding: Groups: oophorectomy or G1: 38.6 patients/personnel:
Ferring G1: Tranexamic acid hysterectomy G2: 26.1 Low
Pharmaceuticals, Inc (3.9 g) Pregnant, breastfeeding G3: 1.9
G2: Tranexamic acid or planning Blinding outcome
Author industry (1.95 g) pregnancy during the Quality of life: assessment:
relationship G3: Placebo study NR Unclear
disclosures: Women with fibroids
5/6 Followup: requiring surgical Pain: Incomplete outcome
3 cycles management NR reporting:
Study Design: Low
RCT N at enrollment: Sexual function:
G1: 118 NR Other:
Blinding: G2: 117 Low
Patients, investigators G3: 69 Patient satisfaction:
NR
N at followup:
G1: 112 Fertility:
G2: 115 NR
G3: 67
Time to conception:
Age, mean years NR
(range):
G1: 39.2 (20-50) Additional
G2: 40.2 (20-49) interventions:
G3: 38.9 (19-48) NR

J-50
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
BMI: Adverse Events, n (%):
NR At least 1 adverse event:
G1: 97 (84.4)
Parity: G2: 104 (90.4)
NR G3: 56 (83.6)
Viral upper respiratory
Race/ethnicity, n (%): infection:
White: G1: 8 (7.0)
G1: 77 (67.0) G2: 12 (10.4)
G2: 76 (66.1) G3: 3 (4.5)
G3: 43 (64.2) Fatigue:
Black: G1: 4 (3.5)
G1: 34 (29.6) G2: 13 (11.3)
G2: 31 (27.0) G3: 3 (4.5)
G3: 22 (32.8) Musculoskeletal pain:
Asian: G1: 6 (5.2)
G1: 0 G2: 10 (8.7)
G2: 3 (2.6) G3: 2 (3.0)
G3: 0 Arthralgia:
Native American: G1: 5 (4.4)
G1: 1 (0.9) G2: 7 (6.1)
G2: 0 G3: 1 (1.5)
G3: 0 Myalgia:
Pacific Islander: G1: 6 (5.2)
G1: 0 G2: 5 (4.4)
G2: 1 (0.9) G3: 0
G3: 0 Nasal congestion:
Other: G1: 3 (2.6)
G1: 3 (2.6) G2: 8 (7.0)
G2: 4 (3.5) G3: 0
G3: 2 (3.0) Sinusitis:
G1: 3 (2.6)
G2: 7 (6.1)
G3: 1 (1.5)
Multiple allergies:
G1: 4 (3.5)
G2: 6 (5.2)
G3: 0
Throat irritation:
G1: 0
G2: 7 (6.1)

J-51
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G3: 2 (3.0)
Anemia:
G1: 1 (0.9)
G2: 6 (5.2)
G3: 1 (1.5)
Nausea:
G1: 1 (0.9)
G2: 1 (0.9)
G3: 1 (1.5)
Diarrhea/upper
abdominal pain:
G1: 0
G2: 1 (0.9)
G3: 0
Lenticular opacity:
G1: 1 (0.9)
G2: 0
G3: 0
Blurred vision:
G1: 1 (0.9)
G2: 0
G3: 1 (1.5)
Withdrawal from study
for AEs not treatment
a
related :
G1: 1 (0.9)
G2: 3 (2.6)
G3: 1 (1.5)
Serious AE’s not
considered related to
b
treatment :
G1: 1 (0.9)
G2: 1 (0.9)
G3: 0
Table Notes:a mild myalgia (1 subject in G1); moderate anemia, moderate menorrhagia, severe anemia (1 subject each in G2) moderate headache (1 subject in G3); b1 subject in
G1 experienced severe dyspepsia, gastritis, and chest pain and 1 subject in G2 experienced severe ovarian torsion on day 56 of study

J-52
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1114)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Grover et al., 1990 Mefenamic acid Aged 19-50 years Menorrhagia duration, Relief of menorrhagia, %: Poor
500 mg 8 hourly from Cyclical menorrhagia mean months ± SD: G1: 86
Country: first day of cycle for 5 defined subjectively G1: 36 ± 2.5 G2: 20 Risk of bias:
India days or cessation of Normal cervical cytology G2: 32 ± 2.4 G1 vs. G2: p<0.001 Randomization:
menses and secretory Unclear
Enrollment period: endometrium Bleeding days per Bleeding days per cycle,
January 1987 to Comparator: cycle, mean ± SD: mean ± SD: Allocation concealment:
c
October 1989 Placebo tablets 3 Exclusion criteria: G1: 9.7 ± 3.1 G1: 4.1 ± 0.6 Unclear
times per day from History of drug sensitivity, G2: 8.8 ± 3.5 G2: NR
Intervention setting: first day of menses for thyroid, hepatic or renal Selective reporting:
Hospital 5 days disease Amount of bleeding Amount of bleeding Unclear
(measured subjectively (measured subjectively
Funding: Groups: N at enrollment: by pads changed per by pads changed per Blinding
NR G1: Mefenamic acid G1: 40 day), mean ± SD: day), mean ± SD: patients/personnel:
G2: Placebo G2: 40 G1: 15.2 ± 3.1 G1: 6.5 ± 0.02 Unclear
Author industry G2: 14.7± 3.1 G2: NR
relationship Followup: N at followup: Blinding outcome
disclosures: 3 cycles G1: 40 Quality of life: assessment:
NR G2: 40 NR Unclear

Study Design: Age, mean years ± SD: Pain: Incomplete outcome


RCT G1: 35.8 ± 7.5 NR reporting:
G2: 35 ± 6.4 Unclear
Blinding: Sexual function:
Patients, clinicians BMI: NR Other:
NR High
Patient satisfaction:
Parity 2-4, %: NR
G1+G2: 80
Fertility:
Race/ethnicity: NR
NR
Time to conception:
a
Contraception, laparo- NR
scopic or post partum
tubal ligation, %: Additional
G1: 43 interventions:
G2: 42 Hysterectomy, n (%):
G1: 2/40 (5)

J-53
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
No previous treatment, %: G2: NR
G1+G2: 73
Adverse events:
Previous hormonal Gastritis, n (%):
b
therapy, %: G1: 1 (2.5)
G1+G2: 27 G2: 0
Table Notes: a No study patient was using an intrauterine device or hormonal contraception; b Combination pills or medroxyprogesterone acetate tablets 10 mg daily; c Authors
state this is significant reduction from before treatment.

J-54
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1190)
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding Bleeding Overall quality:
Hall et al., 1987 Naproxen loading dose • Aged 18 years through MBL measured using the MBL measured using the Fair
550 mg followed by 275 menopause alkaline hematin method, alkaline hematin method
Country: mg every 6 hours for 5 Dysfunctional uterine median ml (range): (with slight modification to Risk of bias:
United Kingdom days bleeding G1: 118.5 (68, 186) accommodate bulky Randomization:
MBL of >80ml confirmed G2: 129.3 (58, 369) material at phase 1), Low
Enrollment Comparator: in 2 initial control cycles G1 vs. G2: p=0.92 median ml (range):
period: Mefenamic acid 500 mg G1: 67.0 (15, 151) Allocation
NR every 8 hours Exclusion criteria: Bleeding days per cycle, G2: 68.0 (22, 381) concealment:
Pelvic inflammation mean ± SD: G1 vs. BL: p<0.001 Low
Intervention Groups: Uterine fibroids G1: 8.0 ± 2.8 G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
setting: G1: Naproxen in phase 1 Local disease G2: 6.6 ± 1.5 G1 vs. G2: p=0.84 Selective reporting:
Outpatient clinics and mefenamic acid in Gross cyclic irregularities Low
phase 2 Taking NSAIDs, steroids Hemoglobin, mean g/dl ± MBL at treatment phase 2,
Funding: G2: Mefenamic acid in Drug sensitivity SD: G1: 64.5 (22-135) Blinding
NR phase 1 and naproxen Disorder requiring medical G1: 13.0 ± 1.0 G2: 67.3 (18-357) patients/personnel:
sodium in phase 2 care G2: 12.1 ± 1.70 G1 vs. BL: p<0.001 Low
Author industry Ga: Naproxen Poor clinic attendance G1 vs. G2: p=0.06 G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
relationship Gb: Mefenamic acid G1 vs. G2: p=0.69 Blinding outcome
disclosures: N at enrollment :
a
Serum iron, mean μmol/l ± assessment:
NR Followup: G1: 19 SD: Bleeding days per cycle, Low
6 cycles G2: 19 G1: 14.3 ± 5.96 mean, p value:
Study Design: G2: 11.8 ± 7.95 G1a: 6.4 Incomplete outcome
RCT (crossover) N at follow-up: G1b: 5.9 reporting:
G1: 17 Tampons used, mean: G2a: 5.9 High
Blinding: G2: 16 G1: 31 G2b: 6.0
Patients, clinicians G2: 32 G1a vs. BL: p=0.01 Other:
Age, mean years ± SD: G1b vs. BL: p=0.01 Low
G1: 40.5 ± 3.6 G2a vs. BL: p=0.004
G2: 38.1 ± 4.7 G2b vs. BL: p=0.03

BMI: Tampons used, mean:


NR G1a: 23
G1b: 23
Parity: G2a: 25
NR G2b: 25
G1a vs. BL: p=0.003
Race/ethnicity: G1b vs. BL: p=0.005
NR G2a vs. BL: p=0.003
G2b vs. BL: p=0.017

J-55
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Menorrhagia duration,
mean number of months Quality of life:
± SD: NR
G1: 55.8 ± 53.0
G2: 45.0 ± 41.4 Pain:
NR

Sexual function:
NR

Patient satisfaction:
NR

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional interventions:
NR

Adverse events, n:
Any side effects:
Ga: 18
Gb: 15
b
Gastrointestinal :
Ga: 13
Gb: 6
Central nervous system
c
symptoms :
Ga: 5
Gb: 6
d
Other :
Ga: NR
Gb: NR

Table Notes: a 50 patients at baseline, 9 withdrew before treatment, 1 withdrew in first treatment phase, 5 had <80 cc mbl, so 35 analyzed; b Included nausea, diarrhea, abdominal
discomfort and anorexia; c Complaints of light headedness, dizziness, tiredness and headache; d A small number of patients in each treatment group noted weight increase, limb
pain, pelvic discomfort, and post menstrual discharge.

J-56
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #789)

Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality


Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Irvine et al., 1998 Levonorgestrel- • Aged 18 to 45 years MBL measured using MBL measured using alkaline Fair
releasing intrauterine • Parous alkaline haematin method, haematin method, median ml
Country: system inserted • Good general health median ml (range): (range): Risk of bias:
United Kingdom within the first seven with a regular G1: 105 (82, 780) Cycle 1: Randomization:
days of menses menstrual cycle G2: 120 (82, 336) G1: 16 (0, 62) Low
Enrollment • Normal pelvic G2: 46 (0, 213)
period: Comparator: examination with a Hemoglobin, median g/dL Cycle 3: Allocation
NR Norethisterone, 5 mg sound measurement of (range): G1: 6 (0, 284) concealment:
three times daily from the uterus of <10 cm G1: 12.8 (11.7, 13.8) G2: 20 (4, 137) Low
Intervention cycle day 5 to 26 for • Negative cervical G2: 13.1 (11.1, 15.5) G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
setting: three cycles cytology G2 vs. BL: p<0.001 Selective reporting:
Clinic • Measured menstrual Serum ferritin, median ng/l Unclear
Groups: blood loss >80 ml (range): MBL measured using alkaline
Funding: G1: LNG-IUS G1: 19 (4, 49) haematin method, median Blinding
NR G2: Norethisterone Exclusion criteria: G2: 14 (<1, 53) reduction ml (range): patients/personnel:
Treated with steroid Cycle 1: Unclear
Author industry Followup: hormones or Reported intermenstrual G1: 92 (63, 718)
relationship 3 months anticoagulants bleeding, n (%): G2: 75 (-96, 225) Blinding outcome
disclosures: during the previous G1: 11/22 (50) Cycle 3: assessment:
NR three months G2: 8/22 (36) G1: 104 (-108, 73) High
• Used injectable G2: 94 (56, 209)
Study Design: hormones for Mood swings, n (%): G1 vs. G2: p=0.56 Incomplete outcome
RCT contraception during the G1: 19/22 (86) reporting:
G2: 20/22 (91) Hemoglobin/serum ferritin: Low
previous 12 months
Blinding: G1: NR
None N at enrollment: Breast tenderness, n (%): G2: NR Other:
G1: 22 G1: 19/22 (86) G1 vs. BL: p=NS Low
G2: 22 G2: 16/22 (73) G2 vs. BL: p=NS

N at followup: Periods interfered with Reported intermenstrual


G1: 20 daily life, n (%): bleeding, n (%)
G2: 16 G1: 20/22 (91) G1: 10/19 (53)
G2: 18/22 (82) G2: 2/12 (17)
Age, median years
(range): Mood swings at 3 months, n
G1: 38.5 (31, 45) (%):
G2: 39 (30, 45) G1: 12/19 (63)
G2: 7/12 (58)

J-57
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Height, median cm G1 vs. BL: p=0.038
(range): G2 vs. BL: p=0.038
G1: 158.5 (152, 170) G1 vs. G2: p=NS
G2: 159.5 (147, 178)
Breast tenderness at 3 months,
Weight, median kg n (%):
(range): G1: 14/19 (74)
G1: 69.9 (52.1, 116.0) G2: 2/12 (17)
G2: 71.4 (46.4, 96.6) G1 vs. BL: p=0.0003
G2 vs. BL: p=0.0003
Parity, median (range): G1 vs. G2: p=0.0008
G1: 2 (1, 5)
G2: 2 (1, 5) Periods interfered with daily life
at 3 months, n (%):
Race/ethnicity: G1: 6/19 (32)
NR G2: 2/12 (17)
G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
G1 vs. G2: p=NR

Well or very well satisfied with


treatment, n (%):
G1: 14/22 (64)
G2: 8/18 (44)

Moderately or poorly satisfied


with treatment, n (%):
G1: 8/22 (36)
G2: 10/18 (56)

Continuation with the treatment,


n (%):
G1: 17/22 (77)
G2: 4/18 (22)

Adverse events, n:
Withdrawal from study:
G1: 2
G2: 6
Unacceptable drug related side
effects:

J-58
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G1: 1
G2: 2
Perceived treatment failure:
G1: 0
G2: 2
Prolonged amenorrhea:
G1: 0
G2: 1
LNG-IUS expulsion:
G1: 1
G2: NA
Default from final visit:
G1: 0
G2: 1
Serious adverse events:
G1: 0
G2: 0

J-59
a
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1365 )
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Jensen et al., Estradiol valerate 3 • Aged 18 or older MBL measured by the alkaline MBL measured by the alkaline Good
2011 mg on days 1–2; • Heavy menstrual hematin method, mean ml ± hematin method, mean ml ±
estradiol valerate 2 bleeding (at least two SD: SD: Risk of bias:
Country: mg/dienogest 2 mg bleeding episodes G1: 518 ± 382 G1: 196 ± 267 Randomization:
United States, on days 3–7; with a measured G2: 618 ± 432 G2: 444 ± 306 Low
Canada estradiol valerate 2 volume of ≥ 80 ml),
mg/dienogest 3 mg prolonged menstrual Bleeding and spotting days, MBL measured by the alkaline Allocation
Enrollment on days 8–24; bleeding (at least two 90-day run-in phase, mean ± hematin method, mean concealment:
e
period: estradiol valerate 1 bleeding episodes SD: change ml ± SD: Low
December 2005 mg on days 25–26; each lasting ≥ 8 days), G1: 25.1 ± 10.5 G1: -353 ± 309
to May 2008 placebo on days frequent bleeding (> 5 G2: 24.7 ± 9.7 G2: -130 ± 338 Selective reporting:
27–28. bleeding episodes G1 vs. G2: p<0.001 Unclear
Intervention with a min of 20 Bleeding only days, 90-day
setting: Comparator: bleeding days overall) run-in phase, mean ± SD: Reduction in MBL volume, Blinding
47 centers Placebo or combination of any G1: 18.6 ± 7.5 mean % (median %): patients/personnel:
above criteria G2: 17.9 ± 6.5 G1: 64.2 (70.6) Low
Funding: Groups: confirmed by use of G2: 7.8 (18.7)
Bayer G1: Estradiol electronic diaries and Spotting only days, 90-day G1 vs. G2: p<0.001 Blinding outcome
HealthCare valerate/dienogest hemoglobin extraction run-in phase, mean ± SD: assessment:
Pharmaceuticals G2: Placebo from sanitary products G1: 6.5 ± 6.0 ≥20% reduction in MBL,%: Low
• Women > 40 years G2: 6.8 ± 6.2 G1: 91
Author industry Followup: had to have follicle- G2: 51 Incomplete outcome
relationship 30 days stimulating hormone Bleeding episodes, 90-day reporting:
disclosures: level <40 miu/mL run-in phase, mean ± SD: ≥50% reduction in MBL,%: Low
5/5 • Normal endometrial G1: 3.5 ± 0.8 G1: 80
biopsy or mild simple G2: 3.5 ± 0.8 G2: 17 Other:
Study Design: endometrial Low
RCT hyperplasia 6 months Sanitary protection items, 90- ≥80% reduction in MBL,%:
before study entry day run-in phase, mean ± SD: G1: 45
Blinding: • Willing to use a barrier G1: 90 ± 42 G2: 5
Patients, method of G2: 96 ± 45
clinicians contraception and to Increase in MBL volume
use (and collect) all Hemoglobin, mean g/dl ± SD: during treatment, %:
sanitary protection G1: 12.2 ± 1.3 G1: 5
items (pads and G2: 12.0 ± 1.4 G2: 20
tampons)
Hematocrit, mean % ± SD: MBL <80 ml for each episode,
Exclusion criteria: G1: 37.3 ± 3.6 n (%):
Abnormal transvaginal G2: 37.0 ± 3.8 G1: 51/91 (56)

J-60
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
ultrasonogram defined G2: 16/60 (26.7)
as the presence of Ferritin, mean ng/ml ± SD:
uterine pathology, G1: 23.2 ± 35.1 Bleeding and spotting days,
(e.g., fibroids or G2: 21.2 ± 18.6 90-day efficacy phase, mean ±
polyps whose size or SD:
location would be G1: 23.5 ± 13.1
associated with heavy G2: 22.9 ± 10.2
menstrual bleeding)
Clinically significant Bleeding and spotting days,
e
abnormal values for mean change ± SD:
any laboratory G1: -1.1 ± 14.0
examination G2: -2.3 ± 6.7
undergone in the 2
months before the Bleeding only days, 90-day
study efficacy phase, mean ± SD:
Endometrial ablation or G1: 15.3 ± 9.6
dilatation and G2: 16.0 ± 6.1
curettage
Organic pathology Bleeding only days, mean
e
including von change ± SD:
Willebrand disease, G1: -2.8 ± 10.8
chronic endometritis, G2: -2.2 ± 4.6
adenomyosis, G1 vs. G2: p=0.024
endometriosis,
endometrial polyps, Spotting only days, 90-day
significant efficacy phase, mean ± SD:
leiomyomas, or G1: 8.2 ± 8.4
uterine malignancy G2: 6.9 ± 6.7
Use of agents intended
for the treatment of Spotting only days, mean
e
symptoms of change ± SD:
abnormal uterine G1: +1.7 ± 8.2
bleeding (e.g., G2: -0.2 ± 4.9
tranexamic acid,
nonsteroidal anti- Bleeding episodes, 90-day
inflammatory drugs, efficacy phase, mean ± SD:
and sex steroids) G1: 3.0 ± 1.2
2
BMI >32 kg/m G2: 3.2 ± 0.7
Smoking more than 10
cigarettes per day (in Bleeding episodes, mean
e
women older than 35 change ± SD:

J-61
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
years) G1: -0.5 ± 1.5
Contraindications for G2: -0.30 ± 0.9
the use of COCs G1 vs. G2: p=0.080

N at enrollment: Sanitary protection items, 90-


G1: 120 day efficacy phase, mean ±
G2: 70 SD:
G1: 51 ± 49
N at followup: G2: 69 ± 29
G1: 84
G2: 51 Sanitary protection items,
e
mean change ± SD:
Age, mean years ± SD: G1: -44 ± 41
G1: 36.9 ± 7.5 G2: -21 ± 43
G2: 37.0 ± 6.7 G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
2
BMI, mean kg/m ± SD: Hemoglobin, adjusted change
G1: 26.3 ± 3.6 from baseline, mean g/dl:
G2: 25.8 ± 3.6 G1: +0.6
G2: +0.1
Weight, mean kg ± SD: G1 vs. G2: p=0.0004
G1: 71.3 ± 11.1
G2: 69.5 ± 11.8 Hematocrit, adjusted change
from baseline, %:
Parity: G1: +1.4
NR G2: -0.05
G1 vs. G2: p=0.001
Race/ethnicity, n (%):
White: Ferritin, adjusted change from
G1: 71(59.2) baseline, mean ng/ml:
G2: 46(65.7) G1: +2.9
Black: G2: -0.4
G1: 38(31.7) G1 vs. G2: p=0.011
G2:14( 20.0)
Hispanic: Patient reported improvement
G1: 8(6.7) in bleeding symptoms, %:
G2: 6(8.6) G1: 81.2
G2: 38.3
bc
Bleeding symptoms, G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
n (%):
c
Prolonged bleeding: Responder status (ITT), n

J-62
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G1: 26 (21.7) (%):
G2: 12 (17.1) Complete:
Frequent bleeding: G1: 35 (29.2)
G1: 4 (3.3) G2: 2 (2.9)
G2: 2 ( 2.9) G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
Heavy bleeding:
d
G1: 91 (75.8) Partial or non-responder :
G2: 60 (85.7) G1: 45 (37.5)
G2: 46 (65.7)
Missing data:
G1: 40 (33.3)
G2: 22 (31.4)

Complete response rate


(evaluable participants
excluding missing data), n (%):
G1: 35/80 (43.8)
G2: 2/48 (4.2)

Quality of life:
NR

Pain:
NR

Sexual function:
NR

Patient satisfaction:
NR

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional interventions:
NR

Adverse events:

J-63
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Any adverse event, n (%):
G1: 80/119 (67.2)
G2: 36/66 (54.5)

Discontinued treatment due to


adverse events, n (%):
G1: 11 (9.2)
G2: 4 (6.1)
f
Serious adverse event, n:
G1: 1
G2: 1

Adverse event, n (%):


Acne:
G1: 6 (5.0)
G2: 0
Anemia:
G1: 2 (1.7)
G2: 4 (6.1)
Anxiety:
G1: 1 (0.8)
G2: 3 (4.5)
Arthralgia:
G1: 0
G2: 3 (4.5)
Back pain:
G1: 3 (2.5)
G2: 3 (4.5)
Breast pain:
G1: 5 (4.2)
G2: 0
Breast tenderness:
G1: 4 (3.4)
G2: 1 (1.5)
Bronchitis:
G1: 3 (2.5)
G2: 2 (3.0)
Cervical dysplasia:
G1: 3 (2.5)
G2: 2 (3.0)

J-64
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Chest pain:
G1: 1 (0.8)
G2: 2 (3.0)
Depression:
G1: 3 (2.5)
G2: 1 (1.5)
Diarrhea:
G1: 3 (2.5)
G2: 2 (3.0)
Dizziness:
G1: 0
G2: 2 (3.0)
Dysmenorrhea:
G1: 3 (2.5)
G2: 2 (3.0)
Dyspepsia:
G1: 3 (2.5)
G2: 0
Fatigue:
G1: 4 (3.4)
G2: 3 (4.5)
Gastroenteritis:
G1: 3 (2.5)
G2: 0
Headache:
G1: 5 (4.2)
G2: 9 (13.6)
Hypertension:
G1: 2 (1.7)
G2: 2 (3.0)
Hypoesthesia:
G1: 1 (0.8)
G2: 2 (3.0)
Influenza:
G1: 3 (2.5)
G2: 0
Insomnia:
G1: 1 (0.8)
G2: 2 (3.0)
Metrorrhagia:
G1: 6 (5.0)

J-65
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G2: 0
Migraine:
G1: 3 (2.5)
G2: 0
Nasopharyngitis:
G1: 9 (7.6)
G2: 6 (9.1)
Nausea:
G1: 6 (5.0)
G2: 5 (7.6)
Sinusitis:
G1: 4 (3.4)
G2: 1 (1.5)
Tension headache:
G1: 4 (3.4)
G2: 0
Upper respiratory tract
infection:
G1: 4 (3.4)
G2: 1 (1.5)
Vaginal infection:
G1: 3 (2.5)
G2: 0
Vaginitis bacterial:
G1: 6 (5.0)
G2: 4 (6.1)
Vomiting:
G1: 2 (1.7)
G2: 2 (3.0)
Vulvovaginal mycotic infection:
G1: 4 (3.4)
G2: 3 (4.5)
Weight increase:
G1: 7 (5.9)
G2: 0
Table Notes: a See #1349 Fraser et al; same study protocol used in Australia and Europe; b Some participants presented with multiple symptoms; c Complete response to treatment
defined as composite of following components: no bleeding episodes lasting more than 7 days, no more than 4 bleeding episodes overall, no bleeding episodes with blood loss
volume ≥80 ml, no more than one bleeding episode increase from baseline, no more than 24 days of bleeding overall and no increase from baseline in total number of bleeding
days. In addition patients recruited because of presence of prolonged bleeding were required to demonstrate a decrease of at least 2 days in maximum duration of a bleeding cycle.
Patients recruited because of heavy bleeding, the blood loss volume for each episode had to <80 ml and had to represent a decrease of at least 50% from the average of the
qualifying bleeding episodes (ie episodes with blood loss volume ≥ 80 mL during the run-in phase); d Detail on criteria not achieved in partial or non-responders presented in Table

J-66
2 of manuscript (pg. 781); e Change from 90-day run-in to 90-day efficacy phase* compared with change from baseline with placebo; f Serious treatment emergent adverse events
in treatment group a myocardial infarction and in placebo group hospitalization for a suicide attempt.

J-67
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #32)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality and
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Kaunitz et al., 2010 Levonorgestrel-releasing • Aged ≥18 years MBL measured using the MBL measured using Fair
intrauterine system (LNG- • Parous alkaline hematin method, the alkaline hematin
Country: IUS) placed within 7 days • Idiopathic heavy MBL median ml (range): method at mid-study, Risk of Bias:
United States, of onset of menstruation (≥80 ml per cycle) G1: 148.0 (68.3, 431.4) median ml (range): Randomization:
Canada, Brazil (in case of initial confirmed in at least two G2: 154.2 (63.4, 456.0) G1: 30.3 (0, 317.5) Low
placement failure, only screening menstrual G2: 136.2 (0, 404.8)
Enrollment period: one attempt at cycles before Cycle length, mean days ± Allocation
July 2006 to June replacement could be randomization SD: MBL at end of study, concealment:
2008 made) Desiring intrauterine G1: 27.2 ± 3.4 median ml (range): Low
contraception and willing G2: 27.3 ± 2.3 G1: 7.1 (0, 1435.6)
Intervention Comparator: to use barrier G2: 121.5 (0, 437.7) Selective reporting:
setting: Oral contraception if required Low
55 centers medroxyprogesterone 10 MBL change from
mg one daily for 10 days Exclusion criteria: baseline, mean ml Blinding
Funding: each cycle starting on Changes in menstrual (95% CI): patients/personnel:
Bayer Schering cycle day 16 regularity, hot flushes, Mid-study: High
Pharma AG sleeping disorders or G1: -108.3 (-125.4,
Groups: changes in mood within -91.2) Blinding outcome
Author industry G1: LNG-IUS 3 months preceding G2: -21.2 (-38.1, -4.3) assessment:
relationship G2: Medroxyprogesterone study End of study: Unclear
disclosures: Breastfeeding G1: -114.7 (-144.2,
4/6 Followup: Congenital or acquired -85.1) Incomplete outcome
Cycle 3 and cycle 6; uterine abnormality G2: -39.0 (-68.2, -9.8) reporting:
Study Design: 6 months including fibroids if they Low
RCT distorted the uterine MBL change from
cavity or cervical canal baseline, median ml Other:
Blinding: History of organic causes (range): Low
None of AUB (e.g., Mid-Study:
endometriosis, G1: -115.1 (-405.8,
adenomyosis, 54.4)
a G2: -3.2 (-270.9,
endometrial polyps)
Use of LNG-IUS or copper 146.7)
IUD during 30 days G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
before the study End of study:
History of vascular or G1: -128.8 (-393.6,
coagulation disorders 1242.2)
Concomitant use of G2: -17.8 (-271.5,
medication or presence 78.6)
of underlying G1 vs. G2: p<0.001

J-68
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality and
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
disease/condition known
to affect metabolism or MBL % change from
pharmacokinetics of baseline, mean ± SD:
study medication Mid-study:
2
BMI >35 kg/m G1: -61.7 ± 41.8
G2: -11.1 ± 42.5
N at enrollment: G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
G1: 82 End of study:
G2: 83 G1: -70.8 ± 88.3
G2: -21.5 ± 35.8
N at followup: G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
G1: 73
G2: 72 MBL % change from
baseline, median
Age, mean years ± SD: (range):
G1: 38.3 ± 5.2 Mid-study:
G2: 39.3 ± 5.4 G1: -83.2 (-100.0,
44.3)
2
BMI, mean kg/m ± SD: G2: -2.2 (-100.0,
G1: 27.2 ± 3.9 231.5)
G2: 27.4 ± 4.6 End of study:
G1: -95.4 (-100.0,
Parous, %: 642.3)
G1+G2: 100 G2: -13.1 (-100.0,
51.1)
Births, mean number
(range): Proportion in which
G1: 2.5 (1, 5) treatment was
b
G2: 2.6 (1, 7) successful, n (%)
G1: 67/79 (84.8)
Race/ethnicity, n (%): G2: 18/81 (22.2)
White: G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
G1: 56 (68.3)
G2: 62 (74.7) Quality of life:
Black: NR
G1: 17 (20.7)
G2: 13 (15.7) Pain:
Hispanic: NR
G1: 6 (7.3)
G2: 6 (7.2) Sexual function:
Asian: NR

J-69
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality and
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G1: 2 (2.4)
G2: 1 (1.2) Patient satisfaction:
Other: NR
G1: 1 (1.2)
G2: 1 (1.2) Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional
interventions:
NR

Adverse events:
Deaths or serious
adverse events, n:
G1: 0
G2: 0

Withdrawal from study,


n:
G1: 4
G2: 2
c
Expulsion of LNG-IUS,
n:
Full:
G1: 2
G1: NA
Partial:
G1: 2
G2: NA

Drug related adverse


events, n (%):
G1+G2: 69 (42.6)
Headache:
G1: 13 (16.3)
G2: 9 (11.0)
Ovarian cyst:

J-70
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality and
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G1: 10 (12.5)
G2: 2 (2.4)
Vaginitis, bacterial:
G1: 9 (11.3)
G2: 3 (3.7)
Urinary tract infection:
G1: 6 (7.5)
G2: 3 (3.7)
Acne:
G1: 5 (6.3)
G2: 5 (6.1)
Hypertension:
G1: 5 (6.3)
G2: 1 (1.2)
Sinusitis:
G1: 5 (6.3)
G2: 3 (3.7)
Upper respiratory tract
infection:
G1: 5 (6.3)
G2: 1 (1.2)
Breast tenderness:
G1: 4 (5.0)
G2: 3 (3.7)
Fatigue:
G1: 4 (5.0)
G2: 2 (2.4)
Pelvic pain:
G1: 4 (5.0)
G2: 2 92.4)
Increased weight:
G1: 4 (5.0)
G2: 5 (6.1)
Lower abdominal pain:
G1: 3 (3.8)
G2: 5 (6.1)
Table Notes: a Three or more subserous or intramural fibroids with a total volume of less than 5 cm3 were acceptable; b Treatment success defined as MBL <80 ml at end of study
and 50% or greater reduction in MBL from baseline. c One woman experienced heavy bleeding after expulsion of the system.

J-71
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #493)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Knowledge of available Clinicians perception of Overall quality:
a
Kennedy et al., Interview group • Referred from primary to treatments, mean ± SD: consultation length “longer Poor
2002 received booklet and secondary care with G1: 65 ± 23.2 than usual”, %:
videotape at their uncomplicated G2: 66 ± 21.2 G1: 28.5 Risk of bias:
Country: home 6 weeks before menorrhagia if referral G3: 68 ± 21.0 G2: 16.9 Randomization:
England (UK) consultation and had related to new episode of G3: 18.9 Low
b
an interview menorrhagia Menorrhagia severity,
Enrollment immediately before • Deemed nonurgent by mean ± SD: Health status measured by Allocation
c
period: consultation their consultant G1: 48 ± 14.8 SF-36 score, role physical concealment:
October 1996 to G2: 47 ± 13.8 dimension: Low
February 1998 Information group Exclusion criteria: G3: 47 ± 14.8 G1: NR
received booklet and See inclusion criteria G2: NR Selective reporting:
Intervention videotape at their Treatment preference held, G3: NR Low
setting: home 6 weeks before N at enrollment: n (%): G1 vs. G2: p=NS
6 hospitals consultation (Randomized) G1: 139 (47.6) G1 vs. G3: p=0.04 Blinding
G1: 300 G2: 117 (41.1) G2 vs. G3: p=NS patients/personnel:
Funding: Comparator: G2: 296 G3: 130 (45.6) High
Grant from UK Standard practice G3: 298 Bleeding:
National Health control group (Returned baseline NR Blinding outcome
Service received no questionnaire) assessment:
intervention G1: 298 Quality of life: High
Author industry G2: 293 NR
relationship Groups: G3: 294 Incomplete outcome
disclosures: G1: Interview plus Pain: reporting:
None information N at followup: NR High
G2: Information only G1: 215
Study Design: G3: Control G2: 206 Sexual function: Other:
RCT G3: 204 NR Low
Followup:
Blinding: 2 years Age, mean years ± SD: Patient satisfaction:
None (not possible) (questionnaires sent G1: 41 ± 6.9 Self reported
at 6,12, and 24 G2: 40 ± 7.2
months post G3: 40 ± 7.0
opportunity to take part
consultation) in treatment decision
Age leaving full-time making, OR (95% CI):
education, n (%): G1 vs. G3: 1.49 (1.11, 2.01)
≤16: G2 vs. G3: 1.24 (0.91, 1.69)
G1: 171 (57.0) G1 vs. G2: p=NS
G2: 171 (57.8) G1 vs. G3: p=0.008
G3: 172 (57.7) G2 vs. G3: p=NS

J-72
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
17-18:
G1: 69 (23.0) Self reported rating of
G2: 74 (25.0)
G3: 73 (24.5) overall results of
≥ 19: treatment, OR (95%
G1: 50 (16.7) CI):
G2: 44 (14.9) G1 vs. G3: 1.44 (1.03, 2.01)
G3: 44 (14.8) G2 vs. G3: 1.16 (0.85, 1.60)
Unknown: G1 vs. G2: p=NS
G1: 10 (3.3) G1 vs. G3: p=0.03
G2: 7 (2.4) G2 vs. G3: p=NS
G3: 9 (3.0)
Fertility:
Menorrhagia duration, n NR
(%):
Less than 1 year: Time to conception:
G1: 63 (21.2) NR
G2: 73 (25.0)
G3: 64 (21.8) Additional interventions
1-2 years: (during 2 year followup):
G1: 58 (19.5) Underwent at least one
G2: 64 (21.9) d
treatment, n (%):
G3: 67 (22.9) G1: 212 (83.8)
2-3 years: G2: 204 (78.9)
G1: 48 (16.2) G3: 196 (80.3)
G2: 40 (13.7)
G3: 45 (15.4) Hysterectomy, n (%):
More than 3 years: G1: 81 (38.2)
G1: 128 (43.1) G2: 98 (48.0)
G2: 115 (39.4) G3: 94 (48.0)
G3: 117 (39.9) OR (95% CI):
G1 vs. G3: 0.60 (0.38, 0.96)
Previous treatment, n (%): G2 vs. G3: 1.16 (0.73, 1.85)
Hormonal drugs: G1 vs. G2: p=NS
G1: 84 (32.7) G1 vs. G3: p=0.04
G2: 91 (36.1) G2 vs. G3: p=NS
G3: 99 (40.1)
Non-hormonal drugs: Endometrial destruction, n
G1: 96 (37.4) (%):
G2: 108 (42.9) G1: 25 (11.8)
G3: 103 (41.7) G2: 15 (7.4)

J-73
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Oral contraceptive pill: G3: 16 (8.2)
G1: 61 (23.7) OR (95% CI):
G2: 55 (21.8) G1 vs. G3: 0.88 (0.33, 2.30)
G3: 58 (23.5) G2 vs. G3: 0.51 (0.18, 1.42)
Dilation and curettage:
G1: 55 (21.4) Drug therapy, n (%):
G2: 64 (25.4) G1: 145 (68.4)
G3: 55 (22.3) G2: 138 (67.6)
G3: 119 (60.7)
Ever had any surgery, n OR (95% CI):
(%): G1 vs. G3: 1.48 (0.93, 2.36)
G1: 248 (84.9) G2 vs. G3: 1.40 (0.87, 2.25)
G2: 236 (83.1)
G3: 238 (83.2) Other treatment, n (%):
G1: 43 (20.3)
G2: 39 (19.1)
G3: 36 (18.4)
OR (95% CI):
G1 vs. G3: 1.14 (0.68, 1.89)
G2 vs. G3: 0.99 (0.59, 1.67)

Underwent or waiting for


hysterectomy, n (%):
G1: 82 (38.7)
G2: 101 (49.3)
G3: 101 (51.5)
OR (95% CI):
G1 vs. G3: 0.53 (0.35, 0.83)
G2 vs. G3: 1.03 (0.67, 1.60)

Table Notes: a Scored 0-2 for knowledge of 7 treatment options, then transformed to a 0-100 scale; b Assessed using a menorrhagia outcome scale; c Adjusted mean health status
scores only displayed graphically in figure 2 (pg. 2704), no other dimensions showed a significant difference between groups; d Women may have received more than 1 treatment.

J-74
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #267)
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Kriplani et al., Tranexamic acid 500 mg • Menorrhagia (PBLAC MBL, measured by MBL, measured by Poor
2006 four times daily for five days score >100) PBLAC score, mean: PBLAC score, mean:
starting on cycle day one G1: 356.94 Month one: Risk of bias:
Country: Exclusion criteria: G2: 370.24 G1: 149.17 Randomization:
India Comparator: Fibroids, adenomyosis, G2: 167.93 Low
Medroxyprogesterone endometriosis, atypia Duration of bleeding, Month two:
Enrollment acetate 10 mg twice daily on endometrial mean days: G1: 138.92 Allocation concealment:
period: from cycle day 5 to 25 for 3 histopathology G1: 7.08 G2: 179.51 Unclear
November 2002 to months Thyroid disease G2: 8.36 Month three:
November 2004 Hormone therapy in G1: 141.64 Selective reporting:
Groups: previous 3 months Cycle length, mean G2: 156.67 Unclear
Intervention G1: Tranexamic acid days: Month six:
setting: G2: Medroxyprogesterone N at enrollment: G1: 26.9 G1: 239.6 Blinding
Hospital/clinic G1: 50 G2: 26.6 G2: 242.6 patients/personnel:
single site Followup: G2: 50 High
6 months Hemoglobin, mean g%: PBLAC score, %
Funding: N at followup: G1: 10.71 change: Blinding outcome
Indian Council of G1: 49 G2: 10.83 Month one: assessment:
Medical Research G2: 45 G1: -58.2 High
Endometrial thickness, G2: -54.6
Author industry Duration of menorrhagia, mean mm: Month two: Incomplete outcome
relationship mean months: G1: 7.40 G1: -61.0 reporting:
disclosures: G1: 26 G2: 7.46 G2: -51.5 High
NR G2: 24 Month three:
G1: -60.3 Other:
Study Design: Age, mean years ± SD G2: -57.7 Low
RCT (range): Month six:
G1: 36.43 ± 8.25 (15, 50) G1: -32.0
Blinding: G2: 36.67 ± 7.54 (19, 49) G2: -35.3
None
Parity, mean (range) PBLAC score < 100 at
G1: 3.06 ± 1.38 (0, 8) month three, n (%):
G2: 2.84 ± 1.26 (0, 6) G1: 19 (38.8)
G2: 15 (33.3)
Courses completed:
1: Hemoglobin at month
G1: 48 three, mean g%:
G2: 45 G1: 11.2
2: G2: 11.4

J-75
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G1: 48 G1 vs. BL: p=0.003
G2: 41 G2 vs. BL: p=0.019
3:
G1: 47 Lack of response to
G2: 33 treatment, n (%):
G1: 3 (6.1)
Race/ethnicity: G2: 13 (28.9)
NR G1 vs. G2: p=0.003

Quality of life:
NR

Pain:
NR

Sexual function:
NR

Patient satisfaction:
Liked treatment well or
very well, %:
G1: 78.7
G2: 69.7

Elected to continue
treatment, %:
G1: 63.8
G2: 48.5

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional
interventions:
Hysterectomy during 6
month study period, n
(%):
G1: 2 (4)

J-76
Study Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Description Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G2: 8 (17.8)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.002

Hysterectomy at one
year after stopping
study, n:
G1: 8/30
G2: 1/25
Table Notes: No additional medication allowed during study period. Iron supplementation was given only when hemoglobin level was < 8 g%.

J-77
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #189)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality: Poor
• Menorrhagia
a
Kucuk et al., 2008 LNG-IUS(Mirena) on MBL, measured by MBL at 6 months,
b
cycle day 2 or 3 Perimenopausal modified PBLAC score, measured by modified Risk of bias:
Country: Smoker mean ± SD: PBLAC score, mean ± Randomization:
Turkey Comparators: G1: 287 ± 57 SD: High
Single shot of depot Exclusion criteria: G2: 284 ± 50 G1: 77 ± 41
Enrollment period: medroxyprogesterone Organic pathology G3: 230 ± 36 G2: 146 ± 21 Allocation
August 2005 to May acetate on first day of Occasional smokers G3: 154 ± 30 concealment:
2006 cycle Irregular bleeding but Menstruation duration, G1 vs. BL: p<0.001 High
non-menorrhagic mean days ± SD: G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
Intervention setting: Medroxyprogesterone G1: 9 ± 2 G3 vs. BL: p<0.001 Selective reporting:
Single center acetate 5 mg tablet N at enrollment: G2: 9 ± 2 G1 vs. G2: p<0.01 Unclear
every day starting on first G1: 44 G3: 9 ± 1 G1 vs. G3: p<0.01
Funding: day of cycle G2: 44 G2 vs. G3: p=NS Blinding
NR G3: 44 Hemoglobin, mean g/dl patients/personnel:
Groups: ± SD: Treatment success, n Unclear
Author industry G1: LNG-IUS N at followup: G1: 10.1 ± 0.4 (%):
relationship G2: Depot medroxy- G1: 44 G2: 9.7 ± 0.4 G1: 38 (86) Blinding outcome
disclosures: progesterone G2: 44 G3: 10.2 ± 0.7 G2: 33 (75) assessment:
NR G3: Medroxyproges- G3: 44 G3: 30 (68) Unclear
terone
Study Design: Age, mean years ± SD: Menstruation duration, Incomplete outcome
RCT Followup: G1: 42.8 ± 1.1 mean days ± SD: reporting:
6 months G2: 43.1 ± 1.6 G1: 5 ± 2 Low
Blinding: G3: 42.6 ± 1.9 G2: 7 ± 1
None G3: 5 ± 1 Other:
2
BMI, mean kg/m ± SD: G1 vs. BL: p<0.001 Low
G1: 29.1 ± 3.3 G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
G2: 27.1 ± 4.4 G3 vs. BL: p<0.001
G3: 26.4 ± 3.9 G1 vs. G2: p=NS
G1 vs. G3: p=NS
Parity, mean ± SD: G2 vs. G3: p=NS
G1: 1.9 ± 0.3
G2: 1.8 ± 0.4 Hemoglobin, mean g/dl ±
G3: 1.9 ± 0.6 SD, p-value:
G1: 10.9 ± 0.4
Smoker, %: G2: 10.2 ± 0.4
G1: 100 G3: 10.8 ± 0.7
G2: 100 G1 vs. BL: p<0.01
G3: 100 G2 vs. BL: p<0.01

J-78
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G3 vs. BL: p<0.01
Race/ethnicity: G1 vs. G2: p<0.05
NR G1 vs. G3: p<0.05
G2 vs. G3: p=NS

Quality of life:
NR

Pain
NR

Sexual function:
NR

Patient satisfaction:
NR

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional
interventions:
NR

Adverse events, n (%):


Irregular bleeding:
G1: 6 (13.6)
G2: 9 (20.4)
G3: 12 (27.2)
Breast tenderness:
G1: 6 (13.6)
G2: 9 (20.4)
G3: 12 (27.2)
Willing to continue
treatment:
G1: 38 (86.3)
G2: 25 (56.8)
G3: 19 (43.1)

J-79
Table Notes: a Diagnosis established after following diagnostic workup: hemogram, modified PBLAC, prothrombin time, activated prothrombin time, ALT, AST, hormonal
profile including FSH, LH, estradiol, prolactin, B-HCG, sTSH, T3 T1, Pap smear, endometrial biopsy, transvaginal sonography and saline infusion sonography, and diagnostic
office hysteroscopy when needed; b Women over age 40; c PBLAC score >185 considered unresponsive; PBLAC score <185 considered response.

J-80
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #802)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Menstrual Bleeding: Overall quality:
Lahteenmaki et al., Levonorgestrel- • Women with disturbance: Bleeding, median days per Poor
b
1998 releasing intrauterine spontaneous cycles General well being month:
system inserted scheduled to undergo VAS, median (95% CI): Months 1 to 3: Risk of bias:
Country: according to hysterectomy for G1: 90 (74, 94) G1: NR Randomization:
Finland instructions treatment of excessive G2: 87 (77, 92) G2: NR Low
uterine bleeding with or G1 vs. G2: p=NS G1 vs. G2: p=NS
Enrollment period: Comparator: without dysmenorrhea Months 4 to 6: Allocation concealment:
November 1991 to Existing medical Work performance VAS, G1: NR Low
December 1993 treatment Exclusion criteria: median (95% CI): G2: NR
One fibroid >3 cm in G1: 79 (62, 89) G1 vs. G2: p=NS Selective reporting:
Intervention Groups: diameter or more than G2: 75 (61, 80) Unclear
setting: G1: LNG-IUS 3 uterine fibroids as G1 vs. G2: p=NS Spotting, median days per
b
3 clinics G2: Control (current assessed by month: Blinding
medical treatment) ultrasonography Physical activity VAS, Months 1 to 3: patients/personnel:
Funding: History or current median (95% CI): G1: NR Unclear
Leiras Oy, Turku, Followup: malignancy or active G1: 88 (64, 95) G2: NR
Finland G1: 12 months liver disease G2: 78 (64, 92) G1 vs. G2: p=0.001 Blinding outcome
G2: 6 months Adnexal tumors or cysts G1 vs. G2: p=NS Months 4 to 6: assessment:
Author industry Pelvic Inflammatory G1: NR High
relationship Disease within the Sex life VAS, median G2: NR
disclosures: previous 12 months (95% CI): G1 vs. G2: p=0.016 Incomplete outcome
None G1: 68 (49, 86) reporting:
N at enrollment: G2: 66 (52, 80) Menstrual disturbance: Low
Study Design: G1: 28 G1 vs. G2: p=NS General well being VAS,
RCT G2: 28 median (95% CI): Other:
Leisure time activity 6 months: Low
Blinding: N at followup: VAS, median (95% CI): G1: 24 (14, 40)
None G1: 27 G1: 76 (54, 86) G2: 79 (64, 87)
a
G2: 26 G2: 74 (64, 85) G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
G1 vs. G2: p=NS 12 months:
Age, mean years ± SD: G1: 10 (4, 29)
G1: 42.7 ± 3.4 G2: NR
G2: 41.7 ± 4.5
Work performance VAS,
BMI: median (95% CI):
NR 6 months:
G1: 20 (5, 35)
Parity: G2: 76 (54, 87)
NR G1 vs. G2: p<0.001

J-81
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
12 months:
Race/ethnicity: G1: 6 (3, 11)
NR G2: NR

Physical activity VAS,


median (95% CI):
6 months:
G1: 27 (9, 38)
G2: 78 (55, 88)
G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
12 months:
G1: 10 (3, 28)
G2: NR

Sex life VAS, median (95%


CI):
6 months:
G1: 36 (17, 49)
G2: 66 (51, 85)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.002
12 months:
G1: 8 (3, 28)
G2: NR

Leisure time activity VAS,


median (95% CI):
6 months:
G1: 11 (5, 27)
G2: 74 (54, 86)
G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
12 months:
G1: 6 (3, 29)
G2: NR

Additional interventions:
Cancelled hysterectomy at 6
months, % (95% CI):
G1: 64.3 (44.1, 81.4)
G2: 14.3 (4.0, 32.7)
G1 vs. G2: p<0.001

J-82
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Underwent hysterectomy at
12 months, n (%):
G1: 12 (57)
G2: NR

Switched to LNG-IUS at 6
months, n:
G1: NA
G2: 2/26

Continued with LNG-IUS at


average followup of 3 years,
n (%):
G1: 13 (48)
G2: NR

Adverse events, n:
Serious adverse events:
G1+G2: 0

Table Notes: a At 6 months, two women in G2 switched to LNG-IUS; b Values only displayed graphically in Figures 1 and 3 (pg. 1124).

J-83
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #29)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Lukes et al., 2010 Tranexamic acid 1.3 g • Aged 18 to 49 years Duration of heavy MBL measured by the Good
c
per dose (two 650 mg • History of three or more menstrual bleeding, alkaline hematin method
Country: tablets) to start at onset consecutive days of mean years ± SD: reduction, mean ml (%): Risk of bias:
United States of heavy bleeding, 3 heavy bleeding over at G1: 9.9 ± 9.3 G1: 69.6 (40.4) Randomization:
times daily at least 6 least 4 of last 6 menstrual G2: 10.1 ± 8.6 G2: 12.6 (8.2) Low
Enrollment period: hours apart for up to 5 periods G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
October 2006 to May days per cycle over 6 During two-cycle Uterine leiomyomas Allocation
2008 menstrual cycles pretreatment baseline present at baseline, n MBL reduction ≥50 ml, % concealment:
(maximum dose 3.9 g) phase, menstrual blood (%): of cycles: Low
Intervention setting: loss had to be at least 60 G1: 42 (36.5) G1: 56
Outpatient clinic at 40 Comparator: ml during first period and G2: 26 (36.1) G2: 19 Selective reporting:
sites Placebo average at least 80 ml G1 vs G2: p<0.001 Low
over both cycles MBL measured by the
Funding: Groups: Normal findings on pelvic alkaline hematin MBL reduction ≥36 ml, % Blinding
c
Xanodyne G1: Tranexamic acid exam method, mean ml ± SD: of cycles: patients/personnel:
Pharmaceuticals and G2: Placebo No clinically important G1: 172.3 ± 95.6 G1: 69 Low
Ferring cervical cytology G2: 153.0 ± 66.6 G2: 29
Pharmaceuticals Followup: abnormalities or uterine G1 vs. G2: p=0.11 G1 vs. G2: p<0.001 Blinding outcome
6 cycles pathologic findings by assessment:
Author industry transvaginal Anemia, n (%): MBL <80 ml, cycles (%): Low
a
relationship ultrasonography G1: 39/115 (33.9) G1: 181/426 (43)
disclosures: History of regularly G2: 13/72 (18.1) G2: 43/254 (17) Incomplete outcome
11/12 occurring menstrual G1 vs. G2: p<0.001 reporting:
periods of no more than Low
Study Design: 10 days duration and Women with ≥50%
RCT cycle length of 21 to 35 reduction in MBL from Other:
days baseline, %: Low
Blinding: Normal color vision G1: 35
Patients, investigators G2: 7
b
Exclusion criteria: G1 vs G2: p<0.001
History or presence of
significant medical Hemoglobin level change
problems (e.g., from baseline, mean g/dl
thromboembolic disease, ± SD:
coagulopathy, G1: 0.02 ± 1.10
subarachnoid G2: 0.34 ± 0.66
hemorrhage, G1 vs. BL: p=NS
endocrinopathy, or ocular G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
disease

J-84
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Severe anemia Ferritin concentration
(hemoglobin < 8 g/dL) change from baseline,
Pregnant or lactating mean ng/ml ± SD:
History or presence of G1: -1.21 ± 12.70
endometrial abnormalities G2: -2.68 ± 16.15
or cervical carcinoma G1 vs. BL: p=NS
Anovulatory dysfunctional G2 vs. BL: p=NS
uterine bleeding,
metrorrhagia, Treatment compliance, %
menometrorrhagia, or tablets taken:
polymenorrhea G1+G2: 96.3 (n=188)
Glaucoma, ocular
hypertension, macular Treatment days per cycle,
degeneration or mean:
retinopathies G1: 3.4
G2: 3.3
N at enrollment:
G1: 123 Quality of life:
G2: 73 MIQ limitation score,
changes in least-squares
N at followup ITT: mean from baseline ± SD:
G1: 115 Social or leisure activities:
G2: 72 G1: 0.85 ± 0.13
G2: 0.44 ± 0.12
N completed study: G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
G1: 94 Physical activity:
G2: 54 G1: 0.87 ± 0.13
G2: 0.40 ± 0.14
Age, mean years ± SD: G1 vs. G2: p< 0.001
G1: 38.7 ± 6.4
G2: 38.7 ± 6.8 Pain:
NR
Race, n (%):
White: Sexual function:
G1: 86 (73.5) NR
G2: 51 (70.8)
African American: Patient satisfaction:
G1: 23 (19.6) NR
G2: 18 (25.0)
Asian: Fertility:
G1: 1 (0.9) NR

J-85
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G2: 1 91.4)
Other: Time to conception:
G1: 7 (6.0) NR
G2: 2 (2.8)
Additional
Years of alcohol use, n interventions:
(%): NR
Less than 1:
G1: 1 (1.9) Adverse events:
G2: 1 (2.9) Serious adverse events
1-5: (all judged unrelated to
G1: 9 (17.0) study treatment), n:
G2: 7 (20.0) G1: 5
More than 5: G2: 1
G1: 43 (81.1)
G2: 27 (77.1) Ocular-related adverse
events judged possibly or
Years of tobacco use, n probably study related, n:
(%): G1: 2
Less than 1: G2: 5
G1: 1 (2.4)
f
G2: 1 (3.7) Frequently reported
1-5: treatment emergent
G1: 9 (22.0) adverse events, n (%):
G2: 5 (18.5) Menstrual
More than 5: discomfort/cramps
G1: 31 (75.6) G1: 72 (61.5)
G2: 21 (77.8) G2: 36 (50.0)
Headache:
G1: 65 (55.6)
G2: 36 (50.0)
Back pain:
G1: 28 (23.9)
G2: 14 (19.4)
Nausea:
G1: 17 (14.5)
G2: 11 (15.3)
Anemia:
G1: 12 (10.3)
G2: 4 (5.6)
Arthralgia:

J-86
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G1: 11 (9.4)
G2: 5 (6.9)
Viral upper respiratory
tract infection:
G1: 9 (7.7)
G2: 7 (9.7)
Multiple allergies
G1: 10 (8.5)
G2: 5 (6.9)
Abdominal discomfort:
G1: 8 (6.8)
G2: 6 (8.3)
Cough:
G1: 7 (6.0)
G2: 5 (6.9)
Insomnia:
G1: 6 (5.1)
G2: 6 (8.3)
Fatigue:
G1: 8 (6.8)
G2: 3 (4.2)
Muscle cramps:
G1: 8 (6.8)
G2: 3 (4.2)
Dyspepsia:
G1: 3 (2.6)
G2: 8 (11.1)
Migraine:
G1: 7 (6.0)
G2: 4 (5.6)
Sinus headache:
G1: 9 (7.7)
G2: 2 (2.8)

Table Notes: a Transvaginal ultrasonogram considered abnormal if endometrial thickness was > 12 mm or if the endometrial thickness was 5 to 12 mm and patient’s clinical
history suggested long-term unopposed estrogen exposure (≥ 1 year). If transvaginal ultrasonogram was considered abnormal, normal results on endometrial biopsy were required.
Presence of leiomyomas was not considered an abnormal finding unless they were of sufficient number and size to warrant surgical management; b Participants were not allowed to
use anticoagulants, aspirin, dong quai, aminocaproic acid, hydroxychloroquine during the study. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and NSAIDs were not allowed during menstrual
periods, but were permitted during intermenstrual phase of the cycle. Use of acetaminophen, analgesic opioids, oral iron therapy, and vitamins were permitted throughout the
study. Oral iron therapy prescribed at investigator’s discretion for women with hemoglobin levels between 11 g/dL-12 g/dL at baseline. It was required for women with baseline
hemoglobin < 11 g/dL and for women whose hemoglobin declined to < 11 g/dL during the study; c Prespecified three component primary efficacy endpoint for mean reduction in

J-87
MBL: 1) significantly greater than placebo group; 2) greater than 50 mL from baseline; and 3) greater reduction in MBL previously established to be perceived as meaningful (36
mL or higher); d 1 each of: tachycardia, acute bronchitis, hypoglycemia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and urticaria; e Deep vein thrombosis; f Events that occurred in more than 10
participants irrespective of causality.

J-88
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1381)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Najam et al., 2010 Tranexamic acid 500 Aged 12 to 45 years MBL measured by MBL measured by Poor
a a
mg thrice daily, from Endometrial thickness less PBLAC, score, mean PBLAC score, mean:
Country: cycle day 1 to cycle than 5 mm using (range): 1 month: Risk of bias:
India day 5 transvaginal sonography G1: 250 (221, 267) G1: 185 Randomization:
evaluation on cycle day 4, G2: 246 (213, 254) G2: 155 Low
Enrollment Comparator: 5, or 6 for married women 6 months:
period: Combination Normal Pap test, thyroid Hemoglobin, mean g/dl G1: 125, p> 0.05 Allocation
October 2008 to tranexamic acid 500 function test, renal function (range): G2: 100, p< 0.01 concealment:
September mg and mefenamic tests, liver function tests, G1: 9.5 (7.2, 11.8) G1 vs. BL: p=NS Unclear
2009 acid 250 mg thrice coagulation profile G2: 8.6 (6.5, 10.2) G2 vs. BL: p<0.01
daily from cycle day 1 Endometrium sampling for Selective reporting:
Intervention to cycle day 5 for 3 the secretory phase, only in No anemia (hemoglobin Hemoglobin, mean g/dl: Unclear
setting: cycles cases of the >11 gm %), n (%): 1 month:
Teaching hospital perimenopausal age group G1: 2 (1.8) G1: 10.2 Blinding
Groups: G2: 4 (3.6) G2: 10.6 patients/personnel:
Funding: G1: Tranexamic acid Exclusion criteria: G1 vs. BL: p=NS High
NR G2: Tranexamic acid History of recent intrauterine Mild anemia (hemo- G2 vs. BL: p=0.04
plus mefenamic acid device or hormonal therapy globin 10-11 gm %), n 3 months: Blinding outcome
Author industry Anovulatory or irregular (%): G1: 11.4 assessment:
relationship Followup: cycles G1: 13 (23.6) G2: 11.8, High
disclosures: 6 months Pregnancy, pelvic pathology, G2: 17 (30.9) G1 vs. BL: p=NS
NR coagulation disturbances, G2 vs. BL: p=0.02 Incomplete outcome
polycystic ovarian disease Moderate anemia 6 months: reporting:
Study Design: Thyroid, liver or renal (hemoglobin 7-9.9 gm G1: 12.0 Low
RCT dysfunction %), n (%): G2: 12.3
G1: 33 (60) G1 vs. BL: p=0.04 Other:
Blinding: N at enrollment: G2: 27 (49) G2 vs. BL: p=0.016 Low
Single blinded G1: 55
G2: 55 Severe anemia (hemo- Quality of life:
globin 4-6.9 gm %), n NR
N at followup: (%):
G1: 55 G1: 8 (7.2) Pain:
G2: 55 G2: 6 (5.4) NR

Age, mean years (range): Sexual function:


G1: 37 (13, 49) NR
G2: 39 (12, 47)
Patient satisfaction:
2
BMI, mean kg/m : NR

J-89
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G1: 22
G2: 21 Fertility:
NR
Parity:
NR Time to conception:
NR
Race/ethnicity:
NR Additional interventions:
NR
Menorrhagia, n (%):
G1+G2: 75 (68) Adverse events, n (%):
Nausea and
Polymenorrhagia, n (%): gastrointestinal
G1+G2: 28 (25.4) disturbances:
G1: 9 (16.4)
Metrorrhagia, n (%): G2: 8 (14.5)
G1+G2: 7 (6.3) Leg cramps:
G1: 7 (12.7)
Symptom duration, median G2: 12 (21.8)
months (range):
G1: 10.5 (4.5, 16)
G2: 11.7 (3.6, 13.6)

Table Notes: a PBAC score of ≥100 indicates diagnosis of menorrhagia and signifies that MBL is more than 80 ml.

J-90
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #935)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Preston et al., 1995 Tranexamic acid • Aged 18 or older MBL measured using MBL measured using Fair
1 gm, 4 times a day • Cycle length 28 ± 7 the alkaline hematin the alkaline hematin
Country: on days 1 to 4 and days method at cycles 1 and method at cycles 3 and Risk of bias:
a c
United Kingdom placebo on days 19 to • No hormone therapy 2 combined, mean ml ± 4 combined, mean ml ± Randomization:
26 within previous 3 SD: SD: Low
Enrollment months G1: 175 ± 84 G1: 97 ± 89
period: Comparator: • Not taking medication G2: 173 ± 85 G2: 208 ± 135 Allocation concealment:
NR Placebo on days 1 to which might affect G1 vs. BL: p<0.0001 Low
b
4 and norethisterone MBL Hemoglobin, mean g/dl G2 vs. BL: p=0.26
Intervention 5 mg twice per day on • No contraindication to ± SD: G1 vs. G2: p<0.0001 Selective reporting:
setting: days 19 to 26 either drug G1: 12.3 ± 1.2 Unclear
Hospitals and • Normal renal function G2: 12.0 ± 1.4 MBL estimated
clinics Cycle 1: Placebo (serum creatinine <125 reduction from baseline, Blinding patients/personnel:
b
Cycle 2: Placebo µmol/l) Serum ferritin, mean ml (95% CI): Low
Funding: Cycle 3: Treatment • Normal pelvic μg/l ± SD: G1: 79 (62, 108)
Pharmacia Cycle 4: Treatment examination G1: 11.2 ± 11.4 G2: -34 (-64, 2) Blinding outcome
G2: 8.9 ± 7.2 G1 vs. G2: 113 (71, assessment:
• Negative cervical
Author industry Groups: 155) Low
cytology b
relationship G1: Tranexamic acid Transferrin, mean g/dl ±
• Menorrhagia (average
disclosures: G2: Norethisterone SD: MBL % change from Incomplete outcome
MBL over 2 cycles >80
NR G1: 3.68 ± 0.42 baseline, mean (range): reporting:
ml per cycle)
Followup: G2: 3.64 ± 0.56 G1: -45 (-93, 23) High
Regular cycle
Study Design: 4 months G2: 20 (-62, 114)
RCT, double blind, Other:
Exclusion criteria:
placebo controlled MBL < 80 ml per cycle, Low
See inclusion criteria
n:
Blinding: G1: 14/25
N at enrollment:
Patients, clinicians G2: 2/21
G1: 25
G2: 21
Hemoglobin, mean g/dl
± SD:
N at followup:
G1: 12.9 ± 0.9
G1: 25
G2: 12.6 ± 1.6
G2: 21
Serum ferritin, mean μg/l
Age, mean years ± SD:
± SD:
G1: 40.6 ± 4.7
G1: 11.5 ± 6.0
G2: 39.3 ± 7.1
G2: 10.3 ± 6.8
BMI:

J-91
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
NR Transferrin, mean g/dl ±
SD:
Weight, mean kg ± SD: G1: 3.34 ± 0.34
G1: 71.2 ± 14.9 G2: 4.74 ± 0.53
G2: 63.5 ± 9.2
G1 vs. G2: p<0.048 Quality of life:
General health, n (%):
Parity, n (%): Better:
0: G1: 12 (50)
G1: 1 (4) G2: 6 (30)
G2: 1 (5) Same/worse:
1: G1: 12 (50)
G1: 2 (8) G2: 14 (70)
G2: 3 (14)
2: Amount of flooding and
G1: 13 (52) leakage, n (%):
G2: 10 (48) Better:
3: G1: 20 (83)
G1: 9 (36) G2: 9 (45)
G2: 6 (29) Same/worse:
4: G1: 4 (17)
G1: 0 G2: 11 (55)
G2: 1 (5) G1 vs. G2: p=0.008

Race/ethnicity: Limitation of social


NR activities, n (%):
Better:
G1: 16 (67)
G2: 9 (45)
Same/worse:
G1: 8 (33)
G2: 11 (55)

Pain:
Abdominal pain, n (%):
Better:
G1: 9 (38)
G2: 4 (20)
Same/worse:
G1: 15 (62)
G2: 16 (80)

J-92
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias

Sexual function, n (%):


Better:
G1: 11 (46)
G2: 3 (15)
Same/worse:
G1: 13 (54)
G2: 17 (85)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.029

Patient satisfaction:
Assessment of blood
loss during treatment
compared to placebo
cycle, n (%):
Better:
G1: NR
G2: NR
Same/worse:
G1: NR
G2: NR
d
G1 vs. G2: p=0.002

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional
interventions:
NR

Adverse events:
Dysmenorrhea, %:
G1: 80
G2: 85
Headache, %:
G1: 32
G2: 48
Gastrointestinal

J-93
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
symptoms including
diarrhea, nausea,
vomiting, and
dyspepsia, %:
G1: 12
G2: 33

Weight gain, n:
G1: 2
G2: 0

Table Notes: a Data also given for cycles 1 and 2 separately; b Laboratory values are from the pre-placebo phase; c Data also given for cycles 3 and 4 separately; d Patients treated
with tranexamic acid were significantly better than those treated with norethisterone.

J-94
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1441)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Decisional Conflict Scale Decisional Conflict Scale Overall quality:
b b
Protheroe et al., Self-directed, • Aged 30-55 years total score, mean ± SD: total score at 2 weeks, Poor
2007 interactive • Menorrhagia and consulted G1: 51 ± 20.6 mean ± SD:
computerized decision their general practitioner in G2: 50 ± 19.4 G1: 23.4 ± 14.3 (n=69) Risk of bias:
Country: aid (Clinical Guidance the previous week G2: 40.5 ± 18.3 (n=69) Randomization:
United Kingdom Tree) and patient Spielberger State-Trait G1 vs. G2: p<0.001 Low
c
information leaflet Exclusion criteria: Anxiety Inventory score,
Enrollment • Heavy menstrual bleeding mean ± SD: Decisional Conflict Scale
b
Allocation
period: Treatment options caused by physical G1: 12.7 ± 4.2 total score at 2 weeks, concealment:
July 2003 to included watchful pathology such as confirmed G2: 13.4 ± 4.2 adjusted difference (95% Low
January 2005 waiting, nonhormonal or provisional diagnosis of CI):
drug treatments cancer, endometriosis, Menorrhagic Specific G1 vs. G2: -16.6 (-21.5, Selective reporting:
b
Intervention (mefenamic acid, fibroids, polyps and cysts Utility Scale score, -11.7) Unclear
setting: tranexamic acid, • Inability to understand mean ± SD:
19 general NSAIDS and English G1: 36.2 ± 19.6 Spielberger State-Trait Blinding
c
practices ethamsylate), hormonal • Considered unsuitable by G2: 39.9 ± 21.8 Anxiety Inventory score, patients/personnel:
medications (COC and their general practitioner mean ± SD: High
Funding: progestogens), LNG- (including terminal illness, Knowledge (% of correct 2 weeks:
Grant from Medical IUS (Mirena) and mental health problems) answers), mean ± SD: G1: 11.6 ± 3.7 (n=59) Blinding outcome
Research Council surgical options G1: 36.7 ± 18.8 G2: 12.2 ± 3.7 (n=61) assessment:
(transcervical N at enrollment: G2: 36.5 ± 21.0 G1 vs. G2: p=0.16 High
Author industry endometrial resection, G1: 74 6 months:
relationship abdominal or vaginal G2: 72 Baseline treatment G1: 11.2 ± 4.2 (n=47) Incomplete
disclosures: hysterectomy) preference, n (%): G2: 13.3 ± 4.9 (n=52) outcome reporting:
None N at followup (%): Had a treatment G1 vs. G2: p=0.067 Low
Comparator: G1: 60 (81) preference at baseline:
Study Design: Control: Patient G2: 56 (78) G1: 47 (63) Spielberger State-Trait Other:
c
RCT information leaflet G2: 45 (62) Anxiety Inventory score, Unclear
alone Age years, mean ± SD: Tablets: adjusted difference (95%
Blinding: G1: 41 ± 5.2 G1: 20 (27) CI):
NR Groups: G2: 41 ± 5.4 G2: 22 (30.5) 2 weeks:
G1: Decision aid Surgery: G1 vs. G2: -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
G2: Control BMI: G1: 22 (30) 6 months:
NR G2: 18 (25) G1 vs. G2: -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Followup: Hormone intrauterine
6 months Parity: device: Menorrhagic Specific
NR G1: 5 (6.5) Utility Scale score, mean
G2: 5 (7) ± SD:
Race/ethnicity: Unsure: G1: 59.3 ± 30.0 (n=60)
NR G1: 27 (36.5) G2: 50.9 ± 25.1 (n=56)

J-95
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G2: 27 (37.5) G1 vs. G2: p=0.033
Achieved higher education, n
(%): Menorrhagic Specific
G1: 17 (23) Utility Scale score,
G2: 15 (21) adjusted difference (95%
CI):
G1 vs. G2: 10.9 (0.9,
21.0)

Knowledge (% of correct
answers), mean ± SD:
G1: 59.7 ± 18.4 (n=54)
G2: 48.8 ± 19.6 (n=54)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.014

Knowledge (% of correct
answers), adjusted
difference (95% CI):
G1 vs. G2: 9.3 (1.9, 16.6)

Bleeding:
NR

Quality of life:
NR

Pain:
NR

Sexual function:
NR

Patient satisfaction:
NR

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

J-96
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Additional
a
interventions, n (%):
Treatment at 6 months:
G1: 40 (71)
G2: 45 (80)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.268
Treatment preference at
two weeks:
G1: 49 (88)
G2: 38 (68)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.011
Post intervention
preference matches
treatment received:
G1: 23 (58) n=40
G2: 20 (44) n=45
G1 vs. G2: p=0.198
Hospital appointment:
G1: 19 (34)
G2: 21 (38)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.659
Surgical treatment:
G1: 7 (13)
G2: 3 (5)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.139
Mirena:
G1: 13 (23)
G2: 15 (27)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.625
Medical treatment:
G1: 20 (36)
G2: 27 (48)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.198

Table Notes: a For G1 and G2 total n=56 in each group unless otherwise noted; b Scale 0-100; c Scale 6-24, where higher score indicates higher anxiety.

J-97
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #341)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Reid and Virtanen- LNG-IUS, 52 mg • Aged 18 to 47 years MBL, measured by MBL, measured by modified Poor
Kari, 2005 levonorgestrel in Good general health with modified alkaline alkaline hematin technique,
cylinder initial release regular, ovulatory menstrual hematin technique, median ml (range): Risk of bias:
Country: rate 20 µg per 24 cycles of 21 to 35 days median ml (range): Cycle 3: Randomization:
United Kingdom hours Idiopathic menorrhagia (MBL G1: 122 (81, 375) G1: 12 (0, 240) Low
≥80 mL) confirmed in one G2: 121 (85, 389) G2: 94 (29, 219)
Enrollment period: Comparator: cycle within 4 month period G1 vs. G2: p<0.001 Allocation
May 1996 to Oral mefenamic acid, preceding study Total menstrual fluid Cycle 6: concealment:
a
December 1998 500 mg three times loss, median mL G1: 5 (0, 45) Low
daily for first 4 days Exclusion criteria: (range): G2: 100 (46, 168)
Intervention setting: of cycle Undiagnosed abnormal G1: 183 (103-527) G1 vs. G2: p< 0.001 Selective reporting:
District general bleeding G2: 211 (91-491) Unclear
hospital Groups: Anovulatory Total menstrual fluid loss,
G1: LNG-IUS Submucous fibroids or PBAC score, median median mL (range): Blinding
Funding: G2: Mefenamic acid fibroids with total volume of (range): Cycle 3: patients/personnel:
3
Schering Oy >5 cm defined by G1: 240 (91-545) G1: 53 (0, 459) High
Followup: ultrasound scan G2: 233 (77-469) G2: 151 (57, 280)
Author industry 6 cycles Uterine size of >10 cm G1 vs. G2: p<0.001 Blinding outcome
relationship Abnormal cervical cytology Cycle 6: assessment:
disclosures: Untreated hypertension G1: 27 (0, 156) High
2/2 Abnormal thyroid or liver G2: 157 (76, 319)
function tests G1 vs. G2: p<0.001 Incomplete outcome
Study Design: Asthma reporting:
RCT Intrauterine device PBAC score, median Low
Treated for menorrhagia or (range):
Blinding: used hormonal Cycle 3: Other:
None contraceptives within G1: 49 (0, 286) Low
previous 4 months G2: 161 (77, 262)
G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
N at enrollment: Cycle 6:
G1: 25 G1: 25 (0, 402)
G2: 26 G2: 159 (50, 307)
G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
N at followup (cycle 6):
G1: 21 Quality of life:
G2: 21 NR

Age, mean years: Sexual function:


G1: 39.4 NR

J-98
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G2: 38.5
Patient satisfaction:
BMI: NR
NR
Fertility:
Parity: NR
NR
Time to conception:
Race/ethnicity: NR
NR
Additional interventions:
NR

Adverse events, n:
Abdominal pain:
G1: 8/25
G2: 2/26
Headache:
G1:10/25
G2: 10/25
Breast pain:
G1: 6/25
G2: 2/26
Nausea:
G1: 2/25
G2: 4/26
Diarrhea:
G1: 1/25
G2: 4/25
Upper respiratory infection:
G1: 5/25
G2: 5/26
LNG-IUS expulsion:
G1: 4/25
G2: NA

Table Notes: a Total menstrual fluid loss was determined by difference in weight between returned sanitary material and original weight. Correlations between change in total
menstrual fluid loss and PBAC scores over the six cycles when all patients were analyzed together (r=0.88, p<0.0001). PBAC scores correlated with changes in MBL (r=0.53, p=
0.0007) and total menstrual fluid loss (r=0.58, p=0.0002).

J-99
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #17)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Shaaban et al., 2011 Levonorgestrel-releasing • Heavy menstrual MBL measured by MBL measured by Poor
intrauterine system bleeding (self alkaline hematin alkaline hematin method
a
Country: inserted per described) method, mean ml ± SD: at 12 months, mean ml Risk of bias:
Egypt manufacturer’s • Requested G1: 300.0 ± 150.1 ± SD: Randomization:
instructions contraception G2: 274.3 ± 142.6 G1: 44.4 ± 34.9 Low
Enrollment period: • 20 to 50 years old at G1 vs. G2: p=0.383 G2: 118.2 ± 75.0
May 2003 to March Comparator: initial assessment G1 vs. BL: p<0.001 Allocation concealment:
2004 Low dose combined oral • Regular cycle PBLAC, mean score ± G2 vs. BL: p<0.001 High
contraceptive (30 mcg of • Living in nearby area SD: G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
Intervention setting: ethinyl estradiol/150 mcg G1: 306.7 ± 131.8 Selective reporting:
Gynecology outpatient levonorgestrel) Exclusion criteria: G2: 323.8 ± 97.3 MBL reduction at 12 Low
clinic, Assiut University Pregnancy or history of G1 vs. G2: p=0.787 months, mean % ± SD:
Groups: ectopic pregnancy G1: 87.4 ± 11.3 Blinding
Funding: G1: LNG-IUS Puerperal sepsis Hemoglobin, mean g/dl G2: 35.0 ± 77.0 patients/personnel:
Lab work funding G2: Combined oral Pelvic inflammatory ± SD: G1 vs. G2: p=0.013 High
provided by Assiut contraceptive disease G1: 10.2 ± 1.3
University; LNG-IUS Evidence of defective G2: 10.5 ± 1.2 PBLAC at 12 months, Blinding outcome
a
donated by Bayer Followup: coagulation G1 vs. G2: p=0.207 mean score ± SD: assessment:
Schering Pharma AG; 12 months Ultrasound G1: 31.6 ± 35.1 Unclear
sanitary pads provided abnormalities Ferritin, mean µg/dl ± G2: 273.0 ± 238.4
by Proctor and including fibroid of SD: G1 vs. BL: p<0.001 Incomplete outcome
Gamble any size G1: 31.8 ± 108.3 G2 vs. BL: p=0.129 reporting:
History or evidence of G2: 88.8 ± 193.6 G1 vs. G2: p<0.001 Low
Author industry malignancy or G1 vs. G2: p=0.057
a
relationship hyperplasia in the PBLAC score reduction Other:
disclosures: endometrial biopsy Uterine weight, mean g at 6 months, mean % ± High
NR Incidental adnexal ± SD: SD:
abnormality on G1: 115.9 ± 38.6 G1: 89.5 ± 11.7
Study Design: ultrasound G2: 128.7 ± 38.0 G2: 41.6 ± 53.6
RCT Contraindications to G1 vs. G2: p=0.080 G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
COC
Blinding: Previous endometrial HRQoL-4, health ≥ very PBLAC score reduction
None ablation or resection good, n (%): at 12 months, mean % ±
Uninvestigated G1: 3 (5.3) SD:
postcoital bleeding G2: 3 (5.3) G1: 86.6 ± 17.0
Untreated abnormal G2: 2.5 ± 93.2
cervical cytology Physically unhealthy G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
days in past month,
N at enrollment: mean ± SD: Hemoglobin at 12

J-100
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G1: 56 G1: 7.4 ± 2.7 months, mean g/dl ± SD:
G2: 56 G2: 7.5 ± 2.6 G1: 11.4 ± 1.0
G2: 10.1 ± 1.2
N (%) at followup: Mentally unhealthy days G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
G1: 48 (85.7) in past month, mean ± G2 vs. BL: p=0.081
G2: 47 (83.9) SD: G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
G1: 5.9 ± 2.8
Age, mean years ± SD: G2: 6.2 ± 3.1 Ferritin at 12 months,
G1: 39.3 ± 6.7 mean µg/dL ± SD:
G2: 38.7 ± 5.2 Activity limitation (lost G1: 88.5 ± 101.6
days) in past month, G2: 54.3 ± 91.3
Age at menarche, mean ± SD: G1 vs. BL: p=0.005
mean years ± SD: G1: 6.8 ± 2.6 G2 vs. BL: p=0.230
G1: 11.6 ± 1.0 G2: 7.0 ± 2.7 G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
G2: 11.5 ± 1.4
Uterine weight at 12
2
BMI, mean kg/m ± SD: months, mean g ± SD:
G1: 29.6 ± 5.9 G1: 98.2 ± 33.3
G2: 31.1 ± 5.7 G2: 154.8 ± 54.0
G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
2
BMI >30 kg/m , n (%): G2 vs. BL: p=0.004
G1: 25 (48.1) G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
G2: 32 (57.1)
Total bleeding days per
a
Parity: year, mean ± SD:
NR G1: 34.5 ± 12.0
G2: 65.1 ± 15.3
Previous deliveries, G1 vs. G2: p<0.001
median (IQR):
G1: 3 (1, 6.4) Total spotting days per
a
G2: 3 (2, 6) year, mean ± SD:
G1: 20.7 ± 8.9
Race/ethnicity: G2: 18.0 ± 10.6
NR G1 vs. G2: p=0.273

Quality of life:
HRQoL-4, health ≥ very
good at 12 months, n
(%):
G1: 15 (26.8)
G2: 13 (23.2)

J-101
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
G1 vs. G2: p=0.129

Physically unhealthy
days in past month at 12
months, mean ± SD:
G1: 3.7 ± 2.0
G2: 4.7 ± 2.7
G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
G2 vs. BL: p=0.034
G1 vs. G2: p=0.186

Mentally unhealthy days


in past month at 12
months, mean ± SD:
G1: 6.7 ± 3.1
G2: 4.4 ± 1.7
G1 vs. BL: p=0.954
G2 vs. BL: p=0.357
G1 vs. G2: p=0.003

Activity limitation (lost


days) in past month at
12 months, mean ± SD:
G1: 1.6 ± 2.4
G2: 6.7 ± 2.2
G1 vs. BL: p=0.003
G2 vs. BL: p=0.794
G1 vs. G2: p<0.001

Pain:
NR

Sexual function:
NR

Patient satisfaction:
NR

Fertility:

J-102
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional
interventions:
NR

Adverse Events:
b
Treatment failure, n
(%):
G1: 6 (11)
G2: 18 (32)
G1 vs. G2: HR=0.30
(95% CI: 0.14, 0.73),
p=0.007

Treatment failure
reasons, n:
Removal for lost threads
with persistent bleeding:
G1: 1
G2: NR
Expulsion:
G1: 1
G2: NR
Persistent bleeding:
G1: 4
G2: NR

Table Notes: a Patients with amenorrhea were considered to have a MBL of 0 mL, PBLAC score of 0 and no bleeding or spotting; b Treatment failure defined as initiation of an
alternative medical treatment, need for surgery, confirmed expulsion, or removal of LNG-IUS.

J-103
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1180)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
b
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: NR Bleeding: Overall quality:
Tsang et al., 1987 Mefenamic acid 500 • Menorrhagia (mean MBL measured by the alkaline Poor
mg at onset of MBL of 80 ml or hematin method reduction during
Country: menses followed by more per cycle or treatment cycle, n: Risk of bias:
Canada 250 mg every 6 hours history of prolonged G1+G2: 8/10 Randomization:
for 3 to 5 days for or profuse menses Unclear
Enrollment period: cycles 2 and 3 that warranted MBL reduction during treatment
NR followed by placebo medical and/or cycle vs. non treatment cycle, n: Allocation
for cycles 4 and 5. surgical intervention) G1+G2: p<0.05 concealment:
Intervention setting: • Regular menstrual Unclear
NR Comparator: cycles Endometrial prostaglandin levels
Placebo for cycles 2 lower during treatment cycle, n: Selective reporting:
Funding: and 3 followed by Exclusion criteria: G1+G2: 9/10 Low
Grants from Medical mefenamic acid for See inclusion criteria
Research Council of cycles 4 and 5. Quality of life: Blinding
Canada; Parke-Davis N at enrollment: NR patients/personnel:
a
Canada, Inc, Ottawa Cycle 1: Non G1+G2: 14 Low
Civic Hospital fund and treatment for Pain:
University Medical everyone N at followup: NR Blinding outcome
Research fund; Dept of G1+G2: 10 assessment:
Obstetrics and Groups: Sexual function: Low
Gynecology, University G1: Mefenamic acid Age: NR
of Ottawa G2: Placebo NR Incomplete outcome
Patient satisfaction: reporting:
Author industry Followup: BMI: NR High
relationship 5 months NR
disclosures: Fertility: Other:
NR Race/ethnicity: NR Low
NR
Study Design: Time to conception:
RCT (crossover) Parity: NR
NR
Blinding: Additional interventions, n:
Patients, investigators Hysterectomy:
G1+G2: 1/14
Combined oral contraceptive:
G1+G2: 1/14
Table Notes: a Mefenamic acid was a gift of Parke-Davis; b Results only displayed graphically.

J-104
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1059)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall quality:
Van Eijkeren et al., Mefenamic acid Aged <45 years MBL, mean ml ± SD: MBL, mean ml ± SD: Fair
1992 (Ponstan) 500 mg, 3 • Scheduled G1: 108 ± 27 G1: 65 ± 19
times per day starting hysterectomy G2: 151 ± 46 G2: 189 ± 69 Risk of bias:
Country: 5 days before Measured menstrual G1 vs. G2: p=0.09 G1 vs. BL: p=0.01 Randomization:
Netherlands expected menstrual blood loss >80ml G2 vs. BL: p=0.46 Low
cycle date until Regular menstrual cycle
Enrollment period: menstrual bleeding Other: Allocation
NR arrested. Exclusion criteria: Midluteal progesterone level, concealment:
Use of intrauterine device mean nmol/l ± SD: Low
Intervention Comparator: Use of NSAIDs or G1: 27.3 ± 14.9
setting: Placebo, 3 times per medications interfering G2: 40.6 ± 19.8 Selective reporting:
Hospital day with homeostasis Low
Contraindications against Progesterone level at
Funding: Groups: use of NSAIDS, such as operation, mean nmol/l ± SD: Blinding
NR G1: Mefenamic acid liver or kidney function G1: 4.7 ± 3 patients/personnel:
G2: Placebo impairments, stomach G2: 3.8 ± 3.5 Low
Author industry ulcers, or asthmatic
relationship Followup: bronchitis Plasma levels of mefenamic Blinding outcome
disclosures: One control cycle, Use of hormonal acid at medicated cycle, mean assessment:
NR one medicated cycle, medications mcg/ml ± SD: Low
hysterectomy at G1: 4.39 ± 3.09
Study Design: following cycle N at enrollment: G2: NA Incomplete outcome
RCT G1+G2: 19 reporting:
Plasma levels of mefenamic High
Blinding: N at followup: acid at operation, mean
Patients, clinicians G1: 6 mcg/ml ± SD: Other:
G2: 5 G1: 2.69 ± 4.44 Low
G2: NA
Age, mean years ± SD:
G1: 39.8 ± 3.6 Interval between onset of
G2: 39.4 ± 3.0 menstruation and operation,
mean ± SD:
BMI: G1: 10.5 ± 5.2
NR G2: 13.4 ± 5.8
G1 vs. G2: p=NS
Parity:
NR Quality of life:
NR
Race/ethnicity:

J-105
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
NR Pain:
NR

Sexual function:
NR

Patient satisfaction:
NR

Fertility:
NR

Time to conception:
NR

Additional interventions:
NR

Adverse events:
Discontinued medication
because of severe skin rash
and itching, n:
G1: 1
G2: 0

J-106
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #1179)
Intervention(s)/ Baseline Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Measure(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Bleeding: Bleeding: Overall Quality:
Vargyas et al., 1987 Meclofenamate sodium • Aged 16 to 42 years MBL measured by MBL measured by alkaline Good
(meclomen), 100 mg three History of menorrhagia alkaline hematin hematin method, during
Country: times per day for two >60 ml in one method, mean ml treatment and placebo Risk of bias:
United States cycles followed by observation cycle (SE): cycles, mean ml (SE): Randomization:
placebo for two cycles Negative pregnancy test G1: 141 (17.5) Ga: 69.0 (6.34) Low
Enrollment period: G2: 141.8 (26.5) Gb: 135.6 (11.3)
NR Comparator: Exclusion criteria: G1+G2: 141.6 (15.9) Allocation
Placebo, three times per Anovulatory cycles MBL % change during concealment:
Intervention day for two cycles, (proliferative Number of bleeding treatment and placebo Low
setting: followed by meclomen for endometrium) days per cycle, cycles from baseline, mean
Academic medical two cycles Histological evidence of mean (SE): (SE): Selective reporting:
center pathological changes in G1+G2: 6.3 (0.41) Ga: -48.9 (3.7) Low
Medication initiated after the endometrium Gb: -9.2 (5.3)
Funding: onset of menses and (hyperplasia or atypia) Hemoglobin, median Ga vs. Gb: p<0.0001 Blinding
NR continued for 6 days or Extrauterine disease gm/dl: patients/personnel:
until end of menses Palpable leiomyoma G1+G2: 13.2 Number of bleeding days Low
Author industry whichever came first Known sensitivity to per cycle, mean (SE):
relationship fenamates Hematocrit, median Ga: 4.8 (0.20) Blinding outcome
disclosures: Groups: Anticoagulant therapy %: Gb: 5.4 (0.18) assessment:
NR G1: Meclomen first then Thyroid dysfunction G1+G2: 39.4 Ga vs. BL: p<0.0003 Low
placebo Hepatic disease Gb vs. BL: p=NS
Study Design: G2: Placebo first Renal disease Ferritin, median Ga vs. Gb: p<0.0003 Incomplete outcome
RCT (crossover) thenmeclomen Abnormal cervical ng/ml: reporting:
Ga: Meclomen cytological findings G1+G2: 16.0 Number of pads/tampons Low
Blinding: Gb: Placebo used, mean (SE):
Patients, clinicians N at enrollment: Ga: 15.5 (0.9) Other:
Followup: G1: 15 Gb: 27.6 (2.1) Low
Observation phase: 2 G2: 17 Ga vs. BL: p<0.0001
months Gb vs. BL: p=NS
Treatment phase: 2 N at follow-up: Ga vs. Gb: p<0.0001
months G1: 13
G2: 16 Hemoglobin, gm/dl, median:
G1+G2: 12.8
Age, mean years (range): G1+G2 vs. BL: p=NS
G1: 36.4 (19, 45)
G2: 35.3 (29, 43) Hematocrit, %, median:
G1+G2: 38.9
Race/ethnicity, n: G1+G2 vs. BL: p=NS
White:

J-107
Intervention(s)/ Baseline Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Measure(s) Risk of Bias
G1: 12
G2: 13 Ferritin, ng/ml, median:
Black: G1+G2: 14.8
G1: 3 G1+G2 vs. BL: p=NS
G2: 3
Quality of life:
BMI: NR
NR
Pain:
Weight, mean pounds Menstrual symptom severity
a
(range): assessed by patient rating,
G1:149.3 (108, 213) mean score per cycle:
G2: 164.7 (120, 130) Dysmenorrhea:
Ga: 0.89
Parity: Gb: 1.38
G1+G2: All but 4 patients Ga vs. Gb: p<0.006
had one or more living Backache:
children Ga: 0.20
Gb: 0.50
Contraception, n (%): Ga vs. Gb: p<0.02
Intrauterine device: Headache:
G1+G2: 7 (21) Ga: 0.25
Previous sterilization: Gb: 0.63
G1+G2: 6 (18) Ga vs. Gb: p<0.002
Barrier methods: Nausea:
G1+G2: 2 (15) Ga: 0.13
Partners with vasectomies Gb: 0.17
or not sexually active: Ga vs. Gb: p=NS
G1+G2: 11 Vomiting:
Ga: 0.0
Dysmenorrhea, n (%): Gb: 0.05
Severe: Ga vs. Gb: p=NS
G1+G2: 10 (31)
Moderate: Sexual function:
G1+G2: 16 (50) NR
Dysmenorrheic:
G1+G2: 6 (18) Patient satisfaction:
NR

Fertility:
NR

J-108
Intervention(s)/ Baseline Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Measure(s) Risk of Bias

Time to conception:
NR

Additional interventions:
NR
b
Adverse events :
Nausea/vomiting, n:
Ga: 4
Gb: NR

Epigastric distress, n:
Ga: 1
Gb: NR

Table Notes: a Patient rated on a daily basis from none=0 to severe=3; b One patient discontinued the study because of gastric distress after one cycle of Meclomen. Two patients
discontinued after screening phase for personal reasons.

J-109
AUB KQ1 Evidence Table (Reference ID #415, #379)
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
Author: Intervention: Inclusion criteria: Inconvenience due to heavy Satisfaction with Overall quality:
a
Vuorma et al., 2004 Information group- • Aged 35 to 54 years bleeding, mean (SE): communication with Poor
Vuorma et al., 2003 mailed a decision-aid • Referral for menorrhagia G1: 19.2 (0.34) personnel in gynecology
i
booklet explaining or fibroids G2: 19.5 (0.35) outpatient clinics, median Risk of bias:
Country: menorrhagia and risks • Heavy menstruation as b
(IQR): Randomization:
Finland and benefits of main gynecological Menstrual pain, mean (SE): G1: 36 (30, 39) Low
treatment options. complaint G1: 4.9 (0.27) G2: 36.5 (31, 40)
Enrollment period: G2: 4.7 (0.27) G1 vs. G2: p=0.6 Allocation
January 1997 to Comparator: Exclusion criteria: concealment:
September 1999 Usual care Symptoms other than heavy Periods perceived as very Change in anxiety level at Low
menstrual bleeding main heavy, n (%): 3 months, median (IQR):
Intervention Groups: cause for medical care G1: 112 (61) G1: 1 (-5, 5) Selective
setting: G1: Information G2: 115 (64) G2: -1 (-4, 4) reporting:
Gynecology G2: Control N at enrollment: G1 vs. G2: p=0.3 Low
outpatient clinics at G1: 184 Irregular periods, n (%):
14 hospitals Followup: G2: 179 G1: 42 (23) Increase in treatment Blinding
12 months G2: 46 (26) methods mentioned (max patients/personn
Funding: N at followup: 6) between follow-up and el:
STAKES, National G1: 156 Pelvic pain or pressure, n baseline, mean (SE): High
Research and G2: 159 (%): G1: 0.48 (0.102)
Development Centre G1: 86 (47) G2: 0.45 (0.102) Blinding outcome
for Welfare and Age, mean years (SE): G2: 80 (45) G1 vs. G2: p=0.8 assessment:
Health, and Public G1: 44.5 (0.31) High
c
Health Doctoral G2: 44.3 (0.31) Anxiety, mean (SE): Treatment planned after 3
Programmes of G1: 36.1 (0.80) months, n (%): Incomplete
Helsinki and BMI: G2: 35.9 (0.81) Hysterectomy: outcome
Tempere universities NR G1: 99 (54) reporting:
Inconvenience due to heavy G2: 85 (49) Low
ad
Author industry Parity: bleeding, mean (SE): G1 vs. G2: p=0.2
relationship NR G1: 19.1 (0.38) Minor surgery or LNG-IUS: Other:
disclosures: G2: 19.5 (0.37) G1: 38 (21) Low
None Race/ethnicity: G2: 52 (29)
bd
NR Menstrual pain, mean G1 vs. G2: p=0.06
Study Design: (SE): Change in birth control
RCT Education <12 years, n (%): G1: 4.8 (0.29) method:
G1: 104 (57) G2: 4.7 (0.29) G1: 4 (2)
Blinding: G2: 94 (53) G2: 3 (2)
cd
None Anxiety, mean (SE): G1 vs. G2: p=1.0
G1: 36.0 (0.85) Oral medication:
G2: 35.8 (0.85) G1: 33 (18)

J-110
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G2: 15 (8)
d
Rand-36 scores, mean G1 vs. G2: p=0.007
(SE): No treatment decision:
General health: G1: 8 (4)
G1: 66 (1.5) G2: 20 (11)
G2: 67 (1.5) G1 vs. G2: p=0.02
Physical functioning: No visit to outpatient clinic:
G1: 86 (1.3) G1: 2 (1)
G2: 85 (1.3) G2: 4 (2)
Emotional well-being: G1 vs. G2: p=0.4
G1: 69 (1.6)
G2: 69 (1.5) Actual treatment received
Social functioning: up to 12 months after first
G1: 75 (1.9) visit, n (%):
G2: 74 (1.8) Hysterectomy:
Energy: G1: 98 (53)
G1: 55 (1.8) G2: 88 (49)
G2: 55 (1.8) G1 vs. G2: p=0.4
Pain: Minor surgery or LNG-IUS:
G1: 68 (1.8) G1: 30 (16)
G2: 69 (1.8) G2: 46 (26)
Role functioning/physical: G1 vs. G2: p=0.03
G1: 65 (3.0) Other:
G2: 67 (3.0) G1: 54 (29)
Role functioning/emotional: G2: 44 (25)
G1: 64 (3.1) G1 vs. G2: p=0.3
G2: 72 (3.1) No treatment and no visit
to outpatient clinic:
Perceived health VAS, G1: 2 (1)
mean (SE): G2: 1 (1)
G1: 73 (1.4) G1 vs. G2: p=0.4
G2: 73 (1.4)
Number of surgical
de
Psychosomatic symptoms, procedures used within 1
mean (SE): year, mean (SE):
G1: 31.8 (0.59) G1: 0.70 (0.04)
G2: 32.1 (0.58) G2: 0.73 (0.04)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.6
df
Sexual satisfaction, women
with partners, mean (SE): Rand-36 scores, mean
G1: 23.7 (0.42) change (SE):

J-111
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G2: 24.2 (0.42) General health:
G1: 2.2 (1.23)
dg
Sexual problems, women G2: 2.8 (1.22)
with partners, mean (SE): G1 vs. BL: p=0.07
G1: 4.70 (0.20) G2 vs. BL: p=0.03
G2: 4.33 (0.20) G1 vs. G2: p=0.7
Physical functioning
dh
Partner satisfaction, G1: 2.4 (1.33)
women with partners, mean G2: 2.2 (1.32)
(SE): G1 vs. BL: p=0.04
G1: 17.1 (0.27) G2 vs. BL: p=0.1
G2: 17.1 (0.27) G1 vs. G2: p=0.9
Emotional well-being:
G1: 4.7 (1.40)
G2: 5.3 (1.39)
G1 vs. BL: p=0.001
G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
G1 vs. G2: p=0.7
Social functioning:
G1: 5.2 (1.98)
G2: 7.1 (1.96)
G1 vs. BL: p=0.01
G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
G1 vs. G2: p=0.5
Energy:
G1: 8.9 (1.72)
G2: 8.8 (1.71)
G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
G1 vs. G2: p=0.9
Pain:
G1: 6.5 (1.96)
G2: 6.2 (1.95)
G1 vs. BL: p=0.002
G2 vs. BL: p=0.001
G1 vs. G2: p=0.9
Role functioning/physical:
G1: 9.2 (3.41)
G2: 6.3 (3.38)
G1 vs. BL: p=0.007
G2 vs. BL: p=0.07

J-112
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
G1 vs. G2: p=0.5
Role functioning/emotional:
G1: 12.6 (3.13)
G2: 1.9 (3.09)
G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
G2 vs. BL: p=0.5
G1 vs. G2: p=0.01

Perceived health VAS,


mean change (SE):
G1: 2.6 (1.38)
G2: 3.6 (1.36)
G1 vs. BL: p=0.09
G2 vs. BL: p=0.003
G1 vs. G2: p=0.6
e
Psychosomatic symptoms,
mean change (SE):
G1: 3.4 (53)
G2: 3.8 (0.53)
G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
G1 vs. G2: p=0.5

Inconvenience due to
a
heavy bleeding, mean
change (SE):
G1: 10.4 (0.58)
G2: 10.5 (0.57)
G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
G1 vs. G2: p=0.9
b
Menstrual pain, mean
change (SE):
G1: 4.7 (0.29)
G2: 4.6 (0.29)
G1 vs. BL: p<0.001
G2 vs. BL: p<0.001
G1 vs. G2: p=0.8

J-113
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias
c
Anxiety, mean change
(SE):
G1: 2.0 (0.78)
G2: 1.0 (0.78)
G1 vs. BL: p=0.012
G2 vs. BL: p=0.199
G1 vs. G2: p=0.4
f
Sexual satisfaction,
women with partners,
mean change (SE):
G1: 0.29 (0.37)
G2: -0.14 (0.36)
G1 vs. BL: p=0.487
G2 vs. BL: p=0.688
G1 vs. G2: p=0.4
g
Sexual problems, women
with partners, mean
change (SE):
G1: -0.23 (0.18)
G2: -0.15 (0.18)
G1 vs. BL: p=0.224
G2 vs. BL: p=0.444
G1 vs. G2: p=0.8
h
Partner satisfaction,
women with partners,
mean change (SE):
G1: -0.08 (0.18)
G2: -0.13 (0.18)
G1 vs. BL: p=0.659
G2 vs. BL: p=0.436
G1 vs. G2: p=0.9

Satisfaction with outcome


of treatment VAS, median
(IQR):
G1: 94 (75, 100)
G2: 95 (75, 100)
G1 vs. G2: p=0.9

J-114
Intervention(s)/ Overall Quality
Study Description Patient Population Baseline Measure(s) Outcome Measure(s)
Comparator(s) Risk of Bias

Table Notes and Comments: a Scale 5-25; b Scale for menstrual pain was calculated by multiplying the intensity of pain (0 for no pain to 6 for heaviest possible pain) by the
frequency of pain (0 for never to 2 for every period); c Scale 20-80, higher score indicates higher level of anxiety; d Data from subset of women who gave 12-month follow-up
information G1 (n=156) and G2 (n=159); e Scale 18-72; f Scale 5-35; g Scale 2-14; h Scale 3-21; i Scale 8-40.

J-115
Appendix K. Reasons for Exclusion (KQ1)
Exclusion
Exclusion Reason Count
Code
Not original research (e.g. review articles, systematic reviews, editorials,
X-1 74
commentaries, letters to editor, etc.).
X-2 Not published in English language. 0
X-3 Not eligible study design (i.e., not a randomized controlled trial). 430
Study is basic science, anatomy, imaging, prevalence, physiology, diagnostic,
X-4 700
biomarker, or biological mechanism study only.
Does not address key question/other (e.g., intervention unlikely to be used in the
X-5 primary care setting; intervention not approved for use in the U.S.; bleeding related to 1273
pregnancy; acute/emergent bleeding, etc.).
Study population consists of 20 percent or more women whose bleeding is caused by:
structural abnormality (e.g., fibroids, polyps, adenomyosis); cancer; medication side
X-6 300
effect; endometrial hyperplasia; or systemic disease (e.g., thyroid disease,
coagulopathy).
X-7 Study population consists of post-menopausal women. 249
Study evaluates surgical or invasive intervention(s) only or surgical or invasive
X-8 220
intervention is the only comparator.
X-9 Study evaluates contraceptive efficacy or effectiveness only. 621
Study does not report baseline and outcome data for a study population with ≥80
X-10 87
percent women in the target population or a subset of women in the target population.
X-11 Unable to obtain 4
X-12 Duplicate 1

K-1
References

1. Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine Contraception. 2001 Apr;63(4):167-86. PMID: 11376646.
devices. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. World Health X-4, X-5
Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1987;753:1-91. PMID: 3118580. X-
1, X-3, X-5, X-9, X-10 14. Levonorgestrel intra-uterine system for menorrhagia.
Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin. 2001;39(11):85-7. PMID:
2. Phase III clinical trial with Norplant II (two covered 11760591. X-1, X-3, X-10
rods): report on five years of use. Contraception. 1993
Aug;48(2):120-32. PMID: 8403909. X-3, X-9 15. Information from your family doctor. Birth control
pills and bleeding. Am Fam Physician. 2002 May
3. Hysteroscopic surgery for dysfunctional uterine 15;65(10):2083. PMID: 12046777. X-1, X-3, X-5, X-10
bleeding. Professional Nurse. 1994;10(3):142-3. X-8
16. Hysterectomy improves quality-of-life in women with
4. Menstrual regulation by mifepristone plus prolonged abnormal uterine bleeding. Evidence Based
prostaglandin: results from a multicentre trial. World Healthcare and Public Health. 2004;8(5):306-7. X-8
Health Organization Task Force on Post-Ovulatory
Methods of Fertility Regulation. Hum Reprod. 1995 17. Anastrozole: new indication. Adjuvant treatment of
Feb;10(2):308-14. PMID: 7769054. X-3, X-5, X-6 non metastatic breast cancer: useful for some patients.
Prescrire Int. 2005 Apr;14(76):43-4. PMID: 15875334. X-
5. Long-term reversible contraception. Twelve years of 1, X-4, X-5, X-9
experience with the TCu380A and TCu220C.
Contraception. 1997 Dec;56(6):341-52. PMID: 9494767. 18. Estrogen and progestogen therapy in postmenopausal
X-9 women. Fertility and Sterility. 2008;90(5 SUPPL):S88-
S102. PMID: 19007655. X-1, X-3, X-7
6. A double-blind study comparing the contraceptive
efficacy, acceptability and safety of two progestogen-only 19. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 451: Von Willebrand
pills containing desogestrel 75 micrograms/day or disease in women. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1439-
levonorgestrel 30 micrograms/day. Collaborative Study 43. PMID: 20134302. X-1, X-4, X-5, X-9
Group on the Desogestrel-containing Progestogen-only Pill.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1998 Dec;3(4):169- 20. Urinary problems after hysterectomy. Journal of the
78. PMID: 10036599. X-9 National Medical Association. 2010;102(7). X-8

7. Thermal ablation as a treatment for dysfunctional 21. Abbott JA, Hawe J, Garry R. Quality of life should be
uterine bleeding. Point of View. 1998;36(1):14-20. X-8 considered the primary outcome for measuring success of
endometrial ablation. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003
8. The safety and contraceptive efficacy of a 24-day low- Nov;10(4):491-5; discussion 5. PMID: 14738636. X-4, X-
dose oral contraceptive regimen containing gestodene 60 5, X-8, X-9
microg and ethinylestradiol 15 microg. Eur J Contracept
Reprod Health Care. 1999 Nov;4 Suppl 2:9-15. PMID: 22. Abdel Malak K, Shawki O. Management of
14677620. X-4, X-5 menorrhagia with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system
versus endometrial resection. Gynecological Surgery.
9. Levonorgestrel intrauterine device: new preparation. An 2006;3(4):275-80. X-8
alternative. Prescrire Int. 1999 Dec;8(44):175-7. PMID:
11503815. X-1, X-4, X-5 23. Abdel-Aleem H, Shaaban OM, Amin AF, et al.
Tamoxifen treatment of bleeding irregularities associated
10. Raloxifene: new preparation. Not better than with Norplant use. Contraception. 2005 Dec;72(6):432-7.
oestrogen. Prescrire Int. 1999 Dec;8(44):165-7. PMID: PMID: 16307966. X-5, X-6
11503811. X-1, X-4, X-5, X-7, X-9
24. Abdelrazik N, Ghanem H. Failure of puberty in
11. Which operation for menorrhagia? Drug and Egyptian beta thalassemic patients: experience in north east
Therapeutics Bulletin. 2000;38(10):77-80. X-1, X-3, X-5, region - Dakahlia province. Hematology. 2007
X-8 Oct;12(5):449-56. PMID: 17852439. X-4, X-5, X-9

12. Levonorgestrel. New preparation. Emergency 25. Abdulwahid NA, Adams J, van der Spuy ZM, et al.
contraceptive. Prescrire International. 2000;9(45):202-4. Gonadotrophin control of follicular development. Clin
PMID: 11503796. X-1, X-3, X-5, X-9 Endocrinol (Oxf). 1985 Dec;23(6):613-26. PMID:
3938350. X-3, X-4, X-5
13. Post-marketing surveillance of Norplant contraceptive
implants: I. Contraceptive efficacy and reproductive health. 26. Aberg LE, Tiitinen A, Autti TH, et al.
Hyperandrogenism in girls with juvenile neuronal ceroid

K-2
lipofuscinosis. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2002;6(4):199-205. a randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 1996 Dec;66(6):962-8.
PMID: 12374586. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9 PMID: 8941062. X-5, X-7

27. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, et al. 38. Aisien AO, Enosolease ME. Safety, efficacy and
Improvement of spontaneous pregnancy rate after stopping acceptability of implanon a single rod implantable
gonadotropin therapy for anovulatory infertility. Fertil contraceptive (etonogestrel) in University of Benin
Steril. 1991 Apr;55(4):722-5. PMID: 1901280. X-3, X-5 Teaching Hospital. Niger J Clin Pract. 2010 Sep;13(3):331-
5. PMID: 20857796. X-4, X-5
28. Abou-Salem N, Elmazny A, El-Sherbiny W. Value of
3-dimensional sonohysterography for detection of 39. Akase T, Onodera S, Jobo T, et al. A comparative
intrauterine lesions in women with abnormal uterine study of the usefulness of toki-shakuyaku-san and an oral
bleeding. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Mar- iron preparation in the treatment of hypochromic anemia in
Apr;17(2):200-4. PMID: 20226408. X-4, X-5, X-9 cases of uterine myoma. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2003
Sep;123(9):817-24. PMID: 14513774. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-7,
29. Adam J. Contraception and therapy with Tri Regol X-9
tablet. Ther Hung. 1991;39(2):75-7. PMID: 1948781. X-3,
X-9 40. Akerlund M, Rode A, Westergaard J. Comparative
profiles of reliability, cycle control and side effects of two
30. Adeyemi AS, Adekanle DA. Progestogen-only oral contraceptive formulations containing 150 mug
injectable contraceptive: experience of women in Osogbo, desogestrel and either 30 mug or 20 mug ethinyl oestradiol.
southwestern Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2012 Jan- British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Mar;11(1):27-31. PMID: 22199044. X-3, X-9 1993;100(9):832-8. X-9

31. Affinito P, Monterubbianesi M, Primizia M, et al. 41. Akhter H, Dunson TR, Amatya RN, et al. A five-year
Efficacy, cycle control and side-effects of two monophasic clinical evaluation of Norplant contraceptive subdermal
combination oral contraceptives: implants in Bangladeshi acceptors. Contraception. 1993
Gestodene/ethinylestradiol and Jun;47(6):569-82. PMID: 8334891. X-3, X-6, X-9
norgestimate/ethinylestradiol. Gynecological
Endocrinology. 1993;7(4):259-66. PMID: 8147235. X-9 42. Akkad AA, Habiba MA, Ismail N, et al. Abnormal
uterine bleeding on hormone replacement: the importance
32. Agarwal K, Sharma U, Acharya V. Microbial and of intrauterine structural abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol.
cytopathological study of intrauterine contraceptive device 1995 Sep;86(3):330-4. PMID: 7651636. X-3, X-5, X-6, X-
users. Indian J Med Sci. 2004 Sep;58(9):394-9. PMID: 8
15470281. X-4, X-5
43. Al Inizi SA, Ezimokhai M. Vaginal misoprostol versus
33. Agnusdei D, Gennari C, Bufalino L. Prevention of dinoprostone for the management of missed abortion. Int J
early postmenopausal bone loss using low doses of Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Oct;83(1):73-4. PMID: 14511878.
conjugated estrogens and the non-hormonal, bone-active X-5, X-9
drug ipriflavone. Osteoporosis International.
1995;5(6):462-6. PMID: 8695969. X-7 44. Al-Azzawi F, Buckler HM. Comparison of a novel
vaginal ring delivering estradiol acetate versus oral
34. Agosta C, Atlante M, Benvenuti C. Randomized estradiol for relief of vasomotor menopausal symptoms.
controlled study on clinical efficacy of isoflavones plus Climacteric. 2003;6(2):118-27. PMID: 12841882. X-7
Lactobacillus sporogenes, associated or not with a natural
anxiolytic agent in menopause. Minerva Ginecol. 2011 45. Al-Azzawi F, Wahab M, Habiba M, et al. Continuous
Feb;63(1):11-7. PMID: 21311416. X-5, X-7, X-9 combined hormone replacement therapy compared with
tibolone. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;93(2):258-64.
35. Ahmed WU, Kirmani SR, Qureshi H, et al. PMID: 9932566. X-7
Misoprostol in the treatment of NSAID-induced
gastroduodenal lesions. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1991 46. al-Azzawi F, Wahab M, Thompson J, et al.
Oct;10(4):135-6. PMID: 1748495. X-5 Acceptability and patterns of endometrial bleeding in
estradiol-based HRT regimens: a comparative study of
36. Ahrendt HJ, Makalova D, Parke S, et al. Bleeding cyclical sequential combinations of trimegestone or
pattern and cycle control with an estradiol-based oral norethisterone acetate. Climacteric. 2001 Dec;4(4):343-54.
contraceptive: a seven-cycle, randomized comparative trial PMID: 11770191. X-5, X-7, X-10
of estradiol valerate/dienogest and ethinyl
estradiol/levonorgestrel. Contraception. 2009 47. Al-Azzawi F, Wahab M, Thompson J, et al.
Nov;80(5):436-44. PMID: 19835717. X-5 Acceptability and patterns of uterine bleeding in sequential
trimegestone-based hormone replacement therapy: a dose-
37. AinMelk Y. Comparison of two continuous combined ranging study. Hum Reprod. 1999 Mar;14(3):636-41.
estrogen progestogen regimens in postmenopausal women: PMID: 10221688. X-5, X-9

K-3
48. Albert A, Altabre C, Baro F, et al. Efficacy and safety 60. Amesse LS, Boyce C, Pfaff-Amesse T. Menstrual
of a phytoestrogen preparation derived from Glycine max control in the developmentally delayed adolescent: new
(L.) Merr in climacteric symptomatology: a multicentric, treatment options. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2006
open, prospective and non-randomized trial. Jun;19(3):237-41. PMID: 16731421. X-1, X-3, X-5, X-10
Phytomedicine. 2002 Mar;9(2):85-92. PMID: 11995954.
X-4, X-5, X-7 61. Amesse LS, Pfaff-Amesse T, Leonardi R, et al. Oral
contraceptives and DDAVP nasal spray: patterns of use in
49. Alborzi S, Parsanezhad ME, Dehbashi S. A managing vWD-associated menorrhagia: a single-
comparison of hysteroscopic endometrial ablation for institution study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2005
abnormal uterine bleeding in two groups of patients with or Jul;27(7):357-63. PMID: 16012324. X-4, X-5, X-6
without endometrial preparation. Middle East Fertility
Society Journal. 2002;7(2):135-9. X-8 62. Amso NN, Fernandez H, Vilos G, et al. Uterine
endometrial thermal balloon therapy for the treatment of
50. Alexandersen P, Byrjalsen I, Christiansen C. menorrhagia: long-term multicentre follow-up study. Hum
Piperazine oestrone sulphate and interrupted norethisterone Reprod. 2003 May;18(5):1082-7. PMID: 12721188. X-4,
in postmenopausal women: Effects on bone mass, X-5, X-8
lipoprotein metabolism, climacteric symptoms, and adverse
effects. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 63. Amso NN, Stabinsky SA, McFaul P, et al. Uterine
2000;107(3):356-64. PMID: 10740332. X-7 thermal balloon therapy for the treatment of menorrhagia:
the first 300 patients from a multi-centre study.
51. Alford WS, Hopkins MP. Endometrial rollerball International Collaborative Uterine Thermal Balloon
ablation. J Reprod Med. 1996 Apr;41(4):251-4. PMID: Working Group. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998
8728077. X-4, X-5, X-8, X-9 May;105(5):517-23. PMID: 9637121. X-4, X-5, X-8

52. Al-Khawajah MM. Finasteride for hirsutism: A dose 64. Anderer P, Saletu B, Gruber D, et al. Age-related
finding study. Saudi Medical Journal. 1998;19(1):19-21. cognitive decline in the menopause: Effects of hormone
X-5 replacement therapy on cognitive event-related potentials.
Maturitas. 2005;51(3):254-69. PMID: 15978969. X-7
53. Allais G, Bussone G, Airola G, et al. Oral
contraceptive-induced menstrual migraine. Clinical aspects 65. Andersch B. The effect of various oral contraceptive
and response to frovatriptan. Neurol Sci. 2008 May;29 combinations on premenstrual symptoms. Int J Gynaecol
Suppl 1:S186-90. PMID: 18545931. X-4, X-5, X-9 Obstet. 1982 Dec;20(6):463-9. PMID: 6130993. X-3, X-5

54. Allais G, Bussone G, D'Andrea G, et al. Almotriptan 66. Andersen LF, Meinert L, Rygaard C, et al. Thermal
12.5 mg in menstrually related migraine: a randomized, balloon endometrial ablation: safety aspects evaluated by
double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2011 serosal temperature, light microscopy and electron
Jan;31(2):144-51. PMID: 20660540. X-4, X-5, X-9 microscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998
Jul;79(1):63-8. PMID: 9643406. X-4, X-5, X-8
55. Allais G, Sanchez del Rio M, Diener HC, et al.
Perimenstrual migraines and their response to preventive 67. Andersen PE, Lund N, Justesen P, et al. Uterine artery
therapy with topiramate. Cephalalgia. 2011 Jan;31(2):152- embolization of symptomatic uterine fibroida . Initial
60. PMID: 20650999. X-4, X-5, X-9 success and short-term results. Acta Radiol. 2001
Mar;42(2):234-8. PMID: 11259954. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8
56. Al-Quaiz JM. Iron deficiency anemia. A study of risk
factors. Saudi Med J. 2001 Jun;22(6):490-6. PMID: 68. Andersen T, Astrup A, Quaade F. Dexfenfluramine as
11426238. X-4, X-5, X-9 adjuvant to a low-calorie formula diet in the treatment of
obesity: A randomized clinical trial. International Journal
57. Althaus F. Sterilization is unlikely to alter most of Obesity. 1992;16(1):35-40. PMID: 1314242. X-5
women's menstrual symptoms. Family Planning
Perspectives. 1990 1990 Jan-Feb;22(1):44-5. X-8 69. Andersson JK, Rybo G. Levonorgestrel-releasing
intrauterine device in the treatment of menorrhagia. Br J
58. Alvarez-Sanchez F, Brache V, Thevenin F, et al. Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Aug;97(8):690-4. PMID: 2119218.
Hormonal treatment for bleeding irregularities in Norplant X-3
implant users. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Mar;174(3):919-
22. PMID: 8633669. X-5, X-6 70. Andersson K. Intrauterine release of levonorgestrel. A
contraceptive and therapeutical system. Acta Obstetricia et
59. Ambriz R, Pizzuto J, Morales M, et al. Therapeutic Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1995;74(3):236-7. X-1, X-3,
effect of danazol on metrorrhagia in patients with X-9, X-10
idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Nouv Rev Fr
Hematol. 1986;28(5):275-9. PMID: 3808937. X-3, X-6 71. Andersson K, Mattsson LA, Rybo G, et al. Intrauterine
release of levonorgestrel--a new way of adding progestogen

K-4
in hormone replacement therapy. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 82. Appel TB, Kambi AA, Birdsall C, et al. A comparison
Jun;79(6):963-7. PMID: 1579323. X-5, X-10 of a new graduated estrogen formulation with three
constant-dosed oral contraceptives. Contraception. 1987
72. Andersson K, Ryde-Blomqvist E, Lindell K, et al. Jun;35(6):523-32. PMID: 3311619. X-9
Perforations with intrauterine devices. Report from a
Swedish survey. Contraception. 1998 Apr;57(4):251-5. 83. Archer DF, Dorin M, Lewis V, et al. Effects of lower
PMID: 9649917. X-4, X-5, X-9 doses of conjugated equine estrogens and
medroxyprogesterone acetate on endometrial bleeding.
73. Andolsek L, Kozuh-novak M, Waszak C. A Fertil Steril. 2001 Jun;75(6):1080-7. PMID: 11384630. X-
comparative study of the nylon T and copper T 200. 5, X-7
Contracept Deliv Syst. 1983 Sep;4(4):297-300. PMID:
12265805. X-9 84. Archer DF, Dorin MH, Heine W, et al. Uterine
bleeding in postmenopausal women on continuous therapy
74. Annos T, Thompson IE, Taymor ML. Luteal phase with estradiol and norethindrone acetate. Endometrium
deficiency and infertility: difficulties encountered in Study Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Sep;94(3):323-9.
diagnosis and treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 1980 PMID: 10472853. X-5, X-6, X-7
Jun;55(6):705-10. PMID: 7383457. X-5
85. Archer DF, Dorin MH, Heine W, et al. Uterine
75. Anstee P, Kovacs GT. A prospective randomized study bleeding in postmenopausal women on continuous therapy
comparing the clinical effects of a norethisterone and a with estradiol and norethindrone acetate. Obstetrics and
levonorgestrel containing low dose oestrogen oral Gynecology. 1999;94(3):323-9. PMID: 10472853. X-7
contraceptive pills. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993
Feb;33(1):81-3. PMID: 8498949. X-9 86. Archer DF, Hendrix S, Gallagher JC, et al.
Endometrial effects of tibolone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
76. Anthuber S, Schramm GA, Heskamp ML. Six-month 2007 Mar;92(3):911-8. PMID: 17192288. X-5, X-7, X-9
evaluation of the benefits of the low-dose combined oral
contraceptive chlormadinone acetate 2 mg/ethinylestradiol 87. Archer DF, Lewis V, Carr BR, et al.
0.03 mg in young women: results of the prospective, Bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens (BZA/CE): incidence
observational, non-interventional, multicentre TeeNIS of uterine bleeding in postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril.
study. Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(4):211-20. PMID: 2009 Sep;92(3):1039-44. PMID: 19635614. X-5, X-7
20225905. X-4, X-5, X-6
88. Archer DF, Lobo RA, Land HF, et al. A comparative
77. Anttila L, Koskinen P, Erkkola R, et al. Serum study of transvaginal uterine ultrasound and endometrial
testosterone, androstenedione and luteinizing hormone biopsy for evaluating the endometrium of postmenopausal
levels after short-term medroxyprogesterone acetate women taking hormone replacement therapy. Menopause.
treatment in women with polycystic ovarian disease. Acta 1999 Fall;6(3):201-8. PMID: 10486789. X-4, X-5, X-7
Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Sep;73(8):634-6. PMID:
7941988. X-3, X-4 89. Archer DF, Maheux R, DelConte A, et al. A new low-
dose monophasic combination oral contraceptive (Alesse)
78. Anttila L, Kunz M, Marr J. Bleeding pattern with with levonorgestrel 100 micrograms and ethinyl estradiol
drospirenone 3 mg+ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg 24/4 combined 20 micrograms. North American Levonorgestrel Study
oral contraceptive compared with desogestrel 150 Group (NALSG). Contraception. 1997 Mar;55(3):139-44.
mcg+ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg 21/7 combined oral PMID: 9115001. X-4, X-5
contraceptive. Contraception. 2009 Nov;80(5):445-51.
PMID: 19835718. X-5 90. Archer DF, Maheux R, DelConte A, et al. Efficacy and
safety of a low-dose monophasic combination oral
79. Apgar BS, DeWitt D. Diagnostic hysteroscopy. Am contraceptive containing 100 microg levonorgestrel and 20
Fam Physician. 1992 Nov;46(5 Suppl):19S-24S, 9S-32S, microg ethinyl estradiol (Alesse). North american
5S-6S. PMID: 1442472. X-1, X-3, X-4, X-5 Levonorgestrel Study Group (NALSG). Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 1999 Nov;181(5 Pt 2):39-44. PMID: 10561674.
80. Api O, Unal O, Ugurel V, et al. Analgesic efficacy of X-4, X-5
intravenous paracetamol for outpatient fractional curettage:
a randomised, controlled trial. Int J Clin Pract. 2009 91. Archer DF, Philput CA, Weber ME. Management of
Jan;63(1):105-11. PMID: 18422592. X-5, X-9 irregular uterine bleeding and spotting associated with
Norplant. Hum Reprod. 1996 Oct;11 Suppl 2:24-30. PMID:
81. Apostol G, Cady RK, Laforet GA, et al. Divalproex 8982742. X-4, X-5, X-6
extended-release in adolescent migraine prophylaxis:
Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 92. Archer DF, Philput CB, Levine AS, et al. Effects of
study. Headache. 2008;48(7):1012-25. PMID: 18705027. ethinyl estradiol and ibuprofen compared to placebo on
X-5 endometrial bleeding, cervical mucus and the postcoital test
in levonorgestrel subcutaneous implant users.

K-5
Contraception. 2008 Aug;78(2):106-12. PMID: 18672110. women. Maturitas. 2004;48(3):197-207. PMID: 15207885.
X-3, X-5, X-6 X-7

93. Archer DF, Pickar JH. Hormone replacement therapy: 104. Arvidsson C, Hellborg M, Gemzell-Danielsson K.
effect of progestin dose and time since menopause on Preference and acceptability of oral versus vaginal
endometrial bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 administration of misoprostol in medical abortion with
Dec;96(6):899-905. PMID: 11084175. X-5, X-7 mifepristone. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Nov
1;123(1):87-91. PMID: 16260342. X-5, X-9
94. Archer DF, Pickar JH. The assessment of bleeding
patterns in postmenopausal women during continuous 105. Aslan DL, Crapanzano JP, Harshan M, et al. The
combined hormone replacement therapy: A review of Bethesda System 2001 recommendation for reporting of
methodology and recommendations for reporting of the benign appearing endometrial cells in Pap tests of women
data. Climacteric. 2002;5(1):45-59. PMID: 11974559. X-1, age 40 years and older leads to unwarranted surveillance
X-3, X-7 when followed without clinical qualifiers. Gynecol Oncol.
2007 Oct;107(1):86-93. PMID: 17604086. X-4, X-5, X-9
95. Archer DF, Pickar JH, Bottiglioni F. Bleeding patterns
in postmenopausal women taking continuous combined or 106. Asuncion M, Calvo RM, San Millan JL, et al. A
sequential regimens of conjugated estrogens with prospective study of the prevalence of the polycystic ovary
medroxyprogesterone acetate. Menopause Study Group. syndrome in unselected Caucasian women from Spain. J
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;83(5 Pt 1):686-92. PMID: Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Jul;85(7):2434-8. PMID:
8164926. X-7 10902790. X-4, X-5, X-9

96. Archer DF, Thorneycroft IH, Foegh M, et al. Long- 107. Ataya K, Mercado A, Kartaginer J, et al. Bone density
term safety of drospirenone-estradiol for hormone therapy: and reproductive hormones in patients with neuroleptic-
a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Menopause. induced hyperprolactinemia. Fertil Steril. 1988
2005 Nov-Dec;12(6):716-27. PMID: 16278615. X-5, X-7 Dec;50(6):876-81. PMID: 2904890. X-3, X-4, X-5

97. Arias F. Cervical cerclage for the temporary treatment 108. Au CL, Affandi B, Rogers PA. Immunohistochemical
of patients with placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 staining of von Willebrand factor in endometrium of
Apr;71(4):545-8. PMID: 3353045. X-5 women during the first year of Norplant implants use.
Contraception. 1994 Nov;50(5):477-89. PMID: 7859456.
98. Arias RD, Jain JK, Brucker C, et al. Changes in X-3, X-4
bleeding patterns with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate
subcutaneous injection 104 mg. Contraception. 2006 109. Aubeny E. RU486 combined with PG analogs in
Sep;74(3):234-8. PMID: 16904417. X-4, X-5, X-6 voluntary termination of pregnancy. Adv Contracept. 1991
Dec;7(4):339-43. PMID: 1776558. X-3, X-5
99. Armanini D, Castello R, Scaroni C, et al. Treatment of
polycystic ovary syndrome with spironolactone plus 110. Aubeny E, Peyron R, Turpin CL, et al. Termination of
licorice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 early pregnancy (up to 63 days of amenorrhea) with
Mar;131(1):61-7. PMID: 17113210. X-4, X-5, X-9 mifepristone and increasing doses of misoprostol
[corrected]. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1995;40 Suppl
100. Arowojolu AO. Treatment of endometriosis with 2:85-91. PMID: 8574255. X-3, X-5
depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: a preliminary
experience. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2000 Mar;29(1):55-8. 111. Aufricht C, Marik JL, Ettenger RB. Subcutaneous
PMID: 11379470. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9 recombinant human erythropoietin in chronic renal
allograft dysfunction. Pediatr Nephrol. 1998 Jan;12(1):10-
101. Arowojolu AO, Okewole IA, Adekunle AO. 3. PMID: 9502558. X-5, X-9
Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of
two regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency 112. Ayers JW, Birenbaum DL, Menon KM. Luteal phase
contraception in Nigerians. Contraception. 2002 dysfunction in endometriosis: elevated progesterone levels
Oct;66(4):269-73. PMID: 12413624. X-4, X-5, X-9 in peripheral and ovarian veins during the follicular phase.
Fertil Steril. 1987 Jun;47(6):925-9. PMID: 3595900. X-3,
102. Arowojolu AO, Otolorin EO, Ladipo OA. X-4
Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper
375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative 113. Ayton RA, Darling GM, Murkies AL, et al. A
clinical trial. African journal of medicine and medical comparative study of safety and efficacy of continuous low
sciences. 1995;24(1):59-65. PMID: 7495202. X-9 dose oestradiol released from a vaginal ring compared with
conjugated equine oestrogen vaginal cream in the treatment
103. Arrenbrecht S, Caubel P, Garnero P, et al. The effect of postmenopausal urogenital atrophy. Br J Obstet
of continuous oestradiol with intermittent norgestimate on Gynaecol. 1996 Apr;103(4):351-8. PMID: 8605133. X-5,
bone mineral density and bone turnover in post-menopausal X-7

K-6
114. Azlin MIN, Maryasalwati I, Norzilawati MN, et al. 125. Bai W, Henneicke-von Zepelin HH, Wang S, et al.
The efficacy of etoricoxib vs mefenamic acid in the Efficacy and tolerability of a medicinal product containing
treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea: A randomised an isopropanolic black cohosh extract in Chinese women
comparative trial. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. with menopausal symptoms: a randomized, double blind,
2008;28(4):424-6. PMID: 18604680. X-5, X-10 parallel-controlled study versus tibolone. Maturitas. 2007
Sep 20;58(1):31-41. PMID: 17587516. X-4, X-5, X-7, X-9
115. Azziz R, Black VY, Knochenhauer ES, et al.
Ovulation after glucocorticoid suppression of adrenal 126. Bailie GR. Efficacy and safety of ferric
androgens in the polycystic ovary syndrome is not carboxymaltose in correcting iron-deficiency anemia: a
predicted by the basal dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate review of randomized controlled trials across different
level. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Mar;84(3):946-50. indications. Arzneimittelforschung. 2010;60(6a):386-98.
PMID: 10084576. X-3, X-5 PMID: 20648930. X-1, X-4, X-5, X-9

116. Azziz R, Rittmaster RS, Fox LM, et al. Role of the 127. Bain C, Parkin DE, Cooper KG. Is outpatient
ovary in the adrenal androgen excess of hyperandrogenic diagnostic hysteroscopy more useful than endometrial
women. Fertil Steril. 1998 May;69(5):851-9. PMID: biopsy alone for the investigation of abnormal uterine
9591492. X-4, X-5, X-9 bleeding in unselected premenopausal women? A
randomised comparison. BJOG. 2002 Jul;109(7):805-11.
117. Azziz R, Zacur HA. 21-Hydroxylase deficiency in PMID: 12135218. X-4, X-5, X-8
female hyperandrogenism: screening and diagnosis. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab. 1989 Sep;69(3):577-84. PMID: 128. Balasch J, Creus M, Fabregues F, et al. Midluteal
2547827. X-3, X-4 immunoreactive alpha-inhibin serum concentrations as
markers of luteal phase deficiency. Hum Reprod. 1996
118. Ba MG, Moreau JC, Sokal D, et al. A 5-year clinical Dec;11(12):2591-4. PMID: 9021356. X-4, X-5, X-9
evaluation of Norplant implants in Senegal. Contraception.
1999 Jun;59(6):377-81. PMID: 10518232. X-4, X-5, X-6 129. Balasch J, Creus M, Marquez M, et al. The
significance of luteal phase deficiency on fertility: a
119. Bachmann G, Sulak PJ, Sampson-Landers C, et al. diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Hum Reprod. 1986
Efficacy and safety of a low-dose 24-day combined oral Apr;1(3):145-7. PMID: 3114310. X-3, X-4, X-5
contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol
and 3 mg drospirenone. Contraception. 2004 130. Balen AH, Mulders AG, Fauser BC, et al.
Sep;70(3):191-8. PMID: 15325887. X-4, X-5 Pharmacodynamics of a single low dose of long-acting
recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH-carboxy
120. Bachmann GA, Timmons MC, Abernethy WD. terminal peptide, corifollitropin alfa) in women with World
Breakthrough bleeding patterns in two continuous Health Organization group II anovulatory infertility.
combined estrogen/progestogen hormone replacement Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.
therapies, one of which d androgens. Journal of Women's 2004;89(12):6297-304. PMID: 15579793. X-4, X-5
Health. 1996;5(3):205-12. X-7
131. Bannemerschult R, Hanker JP, Wunsch C, et al. A
121. Backman C, Sandstrom B, Solheim F. Changes in multicenter, uncontrolled clinical investigation of the
central circulation in premenopausal women during contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and safety of a new
application of an estradiol valerate-norgestrel combination low dose oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms
(Cyclabil). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. ethinyl estradiol and 100 micrograms levonorgestrel over
1981;106:47-50. PMID: 6951875. X-3, X-4, X-5 six treatment cycles. Contraception. 1997 Nov;56(5):285-
90. PMID: 9437556. X-3, X-9
122. Baerug U, Winge T, Nordland G, et al. Do
combinations of 1 mg estradiol and low doses of NETA 132. Bapst JL, Ermer JC, Ferron GM, et al.
effectively control menopausal symptoms? Climacteric. Pharmacokinetics and safety of tanaproget, a nonsteroidal
1998 Sep;1(3):219-28. PMID: 11907946. X-4, X-5, X-7, progesterone receptor agonist, in healthy women.
X-9 Contraception. 2006;74(5):414-8. PMID: 17046384. X-4,
X-5
123. Bagaria M, Suneja A, Vaid NB, et al. Low-dose
mifepristone in treatment of uterine leiomyoma: a 133. Baracat EC, Barbosa IC, Giordano MG, et al. A
randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. randomized, open-label study of conjugated equine
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Feb;49(1):77-83. PMID: estrogens plus medroxyprogesterone acetate versus
19281585. X-5, X-6, X-9 tibolone: effects on symptom control, bleeding pattern,
lipid profile and tolerability. Climacteric. 2002
124. Bahamondes L, Diaz J, Petta C, et al. Comparison of Mar;5(1):60-9. PMID: 11974560. X-5, X-7
the performances of TCu380A and TCu380S IUDs up to
five years. Advances in Contraception. 1999;15(4):275-81. 134. Barbosa IC, Filho CI, Faggion D, Jr., et al.
PMID: 11145369. X-9 Prospective, open-label, noncomparative study to assess
cycle control, safety and acceptability of a new oral

K-7
contraceptive containing gestodene 60 microg and Gynecological Endocrinology. 2007;23(1):38-44. PMID:
ethinylestradiol 15 microg (Minesse). Contraception. 2006 17484511. X-5
Jan;73(1):30-3. PMID: 16371291. X-4, X-5, X-9
146. Batzer FR. Formulation and noncontraceptive uses of
135. Barbosa IC, Maia H, Jr., Coutinho E, et al. Effects of the new, low-dose oral contraceptive. J Reprod Med. 1984
a single Silastic contraceptive implant containing Jul;29(7 Suppl):503-12. PMID: 6237195. X-1, X-3, X-5
nomegestrol acetate (Uniplant) on endometrial morphology
and ovarian function for 1 year. Contraception. 2006 147. Baveja R, Bichille LK, Coyaji KJ, et al. Randomized
Dec;74(6):492-7. PMID: 17157108. X-4, X-5, X-9 clinical trial with intrauterine devices (levonorgestrel
intrauterine device (LNG), CuT 380Ag, CuT 220C and
136. Barnabei VM, Grady D, Stovall DW, et al. CuT 200B). A 36-month study. Indian Council of Medical
Menopausal symptoms in older women and the effects of Research Task Force on IUD. Contraception. 1989
treatment with hormone therapy. Obstetrics and Jan;39(1):37-52. PMID: 2491981. X-9
Gynecology. 2002;100(6):1209-18. PMID: 12468165. X-6,
X-7 148. Baveja R, Bichille LK, Coyaji KJ, et al. Randomized
clinical trial with intrauterine devices (levonorgestrel
137. Barr F, Brabin L, Agbaje S, et al. Reducing iron intrauterine device (LNG), CuT 380Ag, CuT 220C and
deficiency anaemia due to heavy menstrual blood loss in CuT 200B). A 36-month study. Contraception.
Nigerian rural adolescents. Public Health Nutr. 1998 1989;39(1):37-52. PMID: 2491981. X-9
Dec;1(4):249-57. PMID: 10933425. X-4, X-5, X-9
149. Baweja R, Bhattacharya SK, Choudhury SD, et al.
138. Barrington JW, Arunkalaivanan AS, Abdel-Fattah M. Indian Council of Medical Research. Task Force on
Comparison between the levonorgestrel intrauterine system Hormonal Contraception: Phase II randomized clinical trial
(LNG-IUS) and thermal balloon ablation in the treatment of with norethisterone oenanthate 50 mg alone and in
menorrhagia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 May combination with 5 mg or 2.5 mg of either estradiol
1;108(1):72-4. PMID: 12694974. X-8 valerate or cypionate as a monthly injectable contraceptive.
Contraception. 1985 Oct;32(4):383-94. PMID: 3907967.
139. Baskett TF, Farrell SA, Zilbert AW. Uterine fluid X-9
irrigation and absorption in hysteroscopic endometrial
ablation. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Dec;92(6):976-8. PMID: 150. Bayhan G, Bahceci M, Demirkol T, et al. A
9840561. X-5, X-8, X-9 comparative study of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone
agonist and finasteride on idiopathic hirsutism. Clinical and
140. Bassol S, Cravioto MC, Durand M, et al. Mesigyna Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000;27(3-
once-a-month combined injectable contraceptive: 4):203-6. PMID: 11214952. X-5, X-10
experience in Latin America. Contraception. 2000
May;61(5):309-16. PMID: 10906501. X-4, X-5 151. Beals KA. Eating disorder and menstrual dysfunction
screening, education, and treatment programs: survey
141. Batar I, Kuukankorpi A, Rauramo I, et al. Two-year results from NCAA Division 1 schools. Physician &
clinical experience with Nova-T 380, a novel copper-silver Sportsmedicine. 2003;31(7):33-8. PMID: 20086473. X-3,
IUD. Adv Contracept. 1999;15(1):37-48. PMID: 10794045. X-5
X-4, X-5
152. Beeby D, Morgan Hughes JO. Oxytocic drugs and
142. Bates GW, Bates SR, Whitworth NS. Reproductive anaesthesia. A controlled clinical trial of ergometrine,
failure in women who practice weight control. Fertil Steril. syntocinon and normal saline during evacuation of the
1982 Mar;37(3):373-8. PMID: 6800847. X-3, X-5 uterus after spontaneous abortion. Anaesthesia. 1984
Aug;39(8):764-7. PMID: 6383111. X-5
143. Bath LE, Critchley HO, Chambers SE, et al. Ovarian
and uterine characteristics after total body irradiation in 153. Beitins IZ, McArthur JW, Turnbull BA, et al.
childhood and adolescence: response to sex steroid Exercise induces two types of human luteal dysfunction:
replacement. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 confirmation by urinary free progesterone. J Clin
Dec;106(12):1265-72. PMID: 10609720. X-4, X-5, X-6, X- Endocrinol Metab. 1991 Jun;72(6):1350-8. PMID:
9 1902847. X-3, X-4, X-5

144. Battino S, Ben-Ami M, Geslevich Y, et al. Factors 154. Belsey EM. The association between vaginal bleeding
associated with withdrawal bleeding after administration of patterns and reasons for discontinuation of contraceptive
oral dydrogesterone or medroxyprogesterone acetate in use. Contraception. 1988 Aug;38(2):207-25. PMID:
women with secondary amenorrhea. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2971506. X-3, X-5, X-6
1996;42(2):113-6. PMID: 8878716. X-5
155. Belsey EM, Machin D, d'Arcangues C. The analysis
145. Batukan C, Muderris II, Ozcelik B, et al. Comparison of vaginal bleeding patterns induced by fertility regulating
of two oral contraceptives containing either drospirenone or methods. World Health Organization Special Programme
cyproterone acetate in the treatment of hirsutism. of Research, Development and Research Training in

K-8
Human Reproduction. Contraception. 1986 Sep;34(3):253- hirsutism. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1995;103(1):15-
60. PMID: 3539509. X-1, X-3, X-5 20. PMID: 7621099. X-3, X-5

156. Benagiano G, Kivinen ST, Fadini R, et al. Zoladex 167. Bewtra C, Kable WT, Gallagher JC. Endometrial
(goserelin acetate) and the anemic patient: results of a histology and bleeding patterns in menopausal women
multicenter fibroid study. Fertil Steril. 1996 treated with estrogen and continuous or cyclic progestin. J
Aug;66(2):223-9. PMID: 8690106. X-5, X-6 Reprod Med. 1988 Feb;33(2):205-8. PMID: 2832598. X-7

157. Ben-Chetrit A, Hochner-Celnikier D, Lindenberg T, 168. Bhattacharya S, Mollison J, Pinion S, et al. A


et al. Vaginal ring delivering estradiol and progesterone: a comparison of bladder and ovarian function two years
possible alternative to relieve climacteric symptoms. Isr following hysterectomy or endometrial ablation. Br J
Med Assoc J. 2005 May;7(5):302-6. PMID: 15909462. X- Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Sep;103(9):898-903. PMID:
5, X-7 8813310. X-5, X-8

158. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Mashiach R, et al. 169. Bhattacharya S, Parkin DE, Reid TM, et al. A
Pregnancy outcome of threatened abortion with prospective randomised study of the effects of prophylactic
subchorionic hematoma: possible benefit of bed-rest? Isr antibiotics on the incidence of bacteraemia following
Med Assoc J. 2003 Jun;5(6):422-4. PMID: 12841015. X-4, hysteroscopic surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.
X-5, X-9 1995 Nov;63(1):37-40. PMID: 8674563. X-5, X-8

159. Bennett KL, Ohrmundt C, Maloni JA. Preventing 170. Bij de Vaate AJ, van Doorninck CE, Visser M, et al.
intravasation in women undergoing hysteroscopic Endometrial aspiration before or after saline infusion
procedures. AORN J. 1996 Nov;64(5):792-9. PMID: sonography and the effect on specimen quality: a
8922218. X-4, X-5, X-8, X-9 randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Sep-
Oct;15(5):580-3. PMID: 18675597. X-4, X-5, X-9
160. Benster B, Carey A, Wadsworth F, et al. A double-
blind placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of 171. Biller BM, Baum HB, Rosenthal DI, et al.
progestelle progesterone cream on postmenopausal women. Progressive trabecular osteopenia in women with
Menopause International. 2009;15(2):63-9. PMID: hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
19465671. X-7 1992 Sep;75(3):692-7. PMID: 1517356. X-3, X-5

161. Berenson AB, Wiemann CM. Patient satisfaction and 172. Billiet K, Dhont M, Vervaet C, et al. A multi-center
side effects with levonorgestrel implant (Norplant) use in prospective, randomized, double-blind trial studying the
adolescents 18 years of age or younger. Pediatrics. 1993 effect of misoprostol on the outcome of intrauterine
Aug;92(2):257-60. PMID: 8337026. X-3, X-5, X-9 insemination. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008;66(3):145-51.
PMID: 18493141. X-5, X-9
162. Berenson AB, Wiemann CM, Rickerr VI, et al.
Contraceptive outcomes among adolescents prescribed 173. Bingol B, Gunenc MZ, Gedikbasi A, et al.
Norplant implants versus oral contraceptives after one year Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion
of use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Mar;176(3):586-92. sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography and
PMID: 9077611. X-4, X-5 hysteroscopy in postmenopausal bleeding. Arch Gynecol
Obstet. 2011 Jul;284(1):111-7. PMID: 20665218. X-3, X-
163. Berga SL, Marcus MD, Loucks TL, et al. Recovery of 4, X-5, X-7
ovarian activity in women with functional hypothalamic
amenorrhea who were treated with cognitive behavior 174. Birbara C, Ruoff G, Sheldon E, et al. Efficacy and
therapy. Fertility and Sterility. 2003 01 Oct;80(4):976-81. safety of rofecoxib 12.5 mg and celecoxib 200 mg in two
PMID: 2003406231. X-5 similarly designed osteoarthritis studies. Current Medical
Research and Opinion. 2006;22(1):199-210. PMID:
164. Bergman A, Ebel D, Liu F, et al. Absolute 16393445. X-5
bioavailability of sitagliptin, an oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4
inhibitor, in healthy volunteers. Biopharmaceutics and 175. Bitto A, Granese R, Triolo O, et al. Genistein
Drug Disposition. 2007;28(6):315-22. PMID: 17575559. aglycone: a new therapeutic approach to reduce
X-4, X-5 endometrial hyperplasia. Phytomedicine. 2010
Sep;17(11):844-50. PMID: 20570122. X-6
165. Berkowitz RS, Bernstein MR, Harlow BL, et al.
Case-control study of risk factors for partial molar 176. Bjarnadottir RI, Tuppurainen M, Killick SR.
pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Sep;173(3 Pt Comparison of cycle control with a combined contraceptive
1):788-94. PMID: 7573245. X-3, X-5 vaginal ring and oral levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;186(3):389-95. PMID:
166. Bertoli A, Fusco A, Magnani A, et al. Efficacy of 11904596. X-4, X-5
low-dose GnRH analogue (Buserelin) in the treatment of

K-9
177. Blankstein J, Rabinovici J, Goldenberg M, et al. BJOG. 2004 Oct;111(10):1095-102. PMID: 15383112. X-
Changing pituitary reactivity to follicle-stimulating 5, X-8
hormone and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone after
induced ovulatory cycles and after anovulation in patients 188. Bonn M, Eydeler U, Barkworth M, et al.
with polycystic ovarian disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Bioequivalence study of generic tablet formulations
1987 Dec;65(6):1164-7. PMID: 3119650. X-4, X-5, X-10 containing ethinylestradiol and chlormadinone acetate in
healthy female volunteers. Arzneimittel Forschung/Drug
178. Bloch-Thomsen A, Silvestri S, Christiansen C, et al. Research. 2009;59(12):651-8. PMID: 20108652. X-4
Associated response in bone mineral density and
atherogenic lipid profile during treatment with two 189. Bonnar J. Acquired bleeding disorders: bleeding in
different selective estrogen receptor modulators: obstetrics and surgery. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public
Levormeloxifene and raloxifene. Climacteric. Health. 1993;24 Suppl 1:10-2. PMID: 7886547. X-3, X-5
2003;6(2):159-67. PMID: 12841887. X-5, X-7
190. Bonnema RA, McNamara MC, Spencer AL.
179. Blode H, Klipping C, Richard F, et al. Bioequivalence Contraception choices in women with underlying medical
study of an oral contraceptive containing conditions. Am Fam Physician. 2010 Sep 15;82(6):621-8.
ethinylestradiol/drospirenone/levomefolate calcium relative PMID: 20842989. X-1, X-4, X-5, X-9
to ethinylestradiol/drospirenone and to levomefolate
calcium alone. Contraception. 2012 February;85(2):177-84. 191. Boonkasemsanti W, Reinprayoon D, Pruksananonda
PMID: 2012035448. X-3, X-4, X-9, X-10 K, et al. The effect of transdermal oestradiol on bleeding
pattern, hormonal profiles and sex steroid receptor
180. Blum M, Blum G. The possible relationship between distribution in the endometrium of Norplant users. Hum
menorrhagia and occult hypothyroidism in IUD-wearing Reprod. 1996 Oct;11 Suppl 2:115-23. PMID: 8982753. X-
women. Adv Contracept. 1992 Dec;8(4):313-7. PMID: 4, X-5, X-6
1290333. X-3, X-4, X-5
192. Boonyarangkul A, Taneepanichskul S. Comparison of
181. Blumenfeld Z, Von Wolff M. GnRH-analogues and cycle control and side effects between transdermal
oral contraceptives for fertility preservation in women contraceptive patch and an oral contraceptive in women
during chemotherapy. Human Reproduction Update. older than 35 years. Journal of the Medical Association of
2008;14(6):543-52. PMID: 18824495. X-1, X-3, X-5 Thailand. 2007;90(9):1715-9. PMID: 17957909. X-9

182. Boateng J, Chi IC, Jones DB. An evaluation of six 193. Bouchard P, De Cicco-Nardone F, Spielmann D, et al.
new intrauterine devices. Adv Contracept. 1994 Bleeding profile and endometrial safety of continuous
Mar;10(1):57-70. PMID: 8030456. X-1, X-3, X-5, X-9 combined regimens 1 mg 17beta-estradiol/trimegestone
versus 1 or 2 mg 17beta-estradiol/norethisterone acetate in
183. Boerrigter PJ, van de Weijer PH, Baak JP, et al. postmenopausal women. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2005
Endometrial response in estrogen replacement therapy Sep;21(3):142-8. PMID: 16353319. X-5, X-7
quarterly combined with a progestogen. Maturitas. 1996
May;24(1-2):63-71. PMID: 8794436. X-5, X-7 194. Boucher M, Horbay GL, Griffin P, et al. Double-
blind, randomized comparison of the effect of carbetocin
184. Bolaji, II, Mortimer G, Grimes H, et al. Clinical and oxytocin on intraoperative blood loss and uterine tone
evaluation of near-continuous oral micronized progesterone of patients undergoing cesarean section. J Perinatol. 1998
therapy in estrogenized postmenopausal women. Gynecol May-Jun;18(3):202-7. PMID: 9659650. X-5, X-9
Endocrinol. 1996 Feb;10(1):41-7. PMID: 8737191. X-3,
X-7 195. Bourdy G, Walter A. Maternity and medicinal plants
in Vanuatu. I. The cycle of reproduction. J
185. Bonduelle M, Walker JJ, Calder AA. A comparative Ethnopharmacol. 1992 Oct;37(3):179-96. PMID: 1453707.
study of danazol and norethisterone in dysfunctional X-3, X-5
uterine bleeding presenting as menorrhagia. Postgrad Med
J. 1991 Sep;67(791):833-6. PMID: 1835005. X-5 196. Braam LAJLM, Knapen MHJ, Geusens P, et al.
Factors Affecting Bone Loss in Female Endurance
186. Bongers MY, Bourdrez P, Heintz AP, et al. Bipolar Athletes. A Two-Year Follow-Up Study. American Journal
radio frequency endometrial ablation compared with of Sports Medicine. 2003;31(6):889-95. PMID: 14623654.
balloon endometrial ablation in dysfunctional uterine X-3, X-5
bleeding: impact on patients' health-related quality of life.
Fertil Steril. 2005 Mar;83(3):724-34. PMID: 15749505. X- 197. Bratby MJ, Walker WJ. Uterine artery embolisation
5, X-8 for symptomatic adenomyosis--mid-term results. Eur J
Radiol. 2009 Apr;70(1):128-32. PMID: 18280686. X-4, X-
187. Bongers MY, Bourdrez P, Mol BW, et al. 5, X-8, X-9
Randomised controlled trial of bipolar radio-frequency
endometrial ablation and balloon endometrial ablation. 198. Brenner B, Wiis J. Experience with recombinant-
activated factor VII in 30 patients with congenital factor

K-10
VII deficiency. Hematology. 2007 Feb;12(1):55-62. PMID: monophasic desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives.
17364994. X-4, X-5, X-9 Gynecological Endocrinology. 2000;14(2):90-8. PMID:
10836195. X-6, X-9
199. Breum L, Bjerre U, Bak JF, et al. Long-term effects
of fluoxetine on glycemic control in obese patients with 210. Bruni V, Pontello V, Luisi S, et al. An open-label,
non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or glucose multicentre trial to evaluate the vaginal bleeding pattern of
intolerance: Influence on muscle glycogen synthase and the combined contraceptive vaginal ring NuvaRing. Eur J
insulin receptor kinase activity. Metabolism: Clinical and Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jul;139(1):65-71.
Experimental. 1996;44(12):1570-6. PMID: 8786726. X-4, PMID: 18358586. X-4, X-5
X-5
211. Brynhildsen J, Hammar M. Low dose transdermal
200. Brill K, Schnitker J, Albring M. Clinical experience estradiol/norethisterone acetate treatment over 2 years does
with a modern low-dose gestodene-containing oral not cause endometrial proliferation in postmenopausal
contraceptive in adolescents. Adv Contracept. 1994 women. Menopause. 2002 Mar-Apr;9(2):137-44. PMID:
Dec;10(4):237-47. PMID: 7740990. X-3, X-9 11875333. X-5, X-7

201. Broocks A, Pirke KM, Schweiger U, et al. Cyclic 212. Buasang K, Taneepanichskul S. Efficacy of celecoxib
ovarian function in recreational athletes. J Appl Physiol. on controlling irregular uterine bleeding secondary to
1990 May;68(5):2083-6. PMID: 2361910. X-3, X-4, X-5 Jadelle use. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Mar;92(3):301-7.
PMID: 19301720. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
202. Brooks PG, Serden SP. Preparation of the
endometrium for ablation with a single dose of leuprolide 213. Buchanan RB, Blamey RW, Durrant KR, et al. A
acetate depot. J Reprod Med. 1991 Jul;36(7):477-8. PMID: randomized comparison of tamoxifen with surgical
1941784. X-3, X-5, X-8 oophorectomy in premenopausal patients with advanced
breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1986 Sep;4(9):1326-30. PMID:
203. Brown LM, Pottern LM, Hoover RN. Prenatal and 3528402. X-5
perinatal risk factors for testicular cancer. Cancer Res. 1986
Sep;46(9):4812-6. PMID: 3731127. X-3, X-5 214. Buckley RG, King KJ, Disney JD, et al. Serum
progesterone testing to predict ectopic pregnancy in
204. Brown PM, Farquhar CM, Lethaby A, et al. Cost- symptomatic first-trimester patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2000
effectiveness analysis of levonorgestrel intrauterine system Aug;36(2):95-100. PMID: 10918099. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
and thermal balloon ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding.
BJOG. 2006 Jul;113(7):797-803. PMID: 16827763. X-8 215. Buckshee K, Banerjee K, Bhatla H. Uterine balloon
therapy to treat menorrhagia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998
205. Browne DS. Endometrial resection--a comparison of Nov;63(2):139-43. PMID: 9856319. X-4, X-5, X-8
techniques. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996
Nov;36(4):448-52. PMID: 9006832. X-4, X-5, X-8 216. Buehler JW, Schulz KF, Grimes DA, et al. The risk of
serious complications from induced abortion: do personal
206. Bruce D, Robinson J, Rymer J. Long-term effects of characteristics make a difference? Am J Obstet Gynecol.
tibolone on the endometrium as assessed by bleeding 1985 Sep 1;153(1):14-20. PMID: 4036997. X-3, X-5
episodes, transvaginal scan and endometrial biopsy.
Climacteric. 2004 Sep;7(3):261-6. PMID: 15669550. X-4, 217. Bulletti C, Flamigni C, Prefetto RA, et al.
X-5, X-7 Dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB). Ann N Y Acad Sci.
1994 Sep 30;734:80-90. PMID: 7978956. X-5
207. Bruhat M, Rudolf K, Vaheri R, et al. Effective
bleeding control and symptom relief by lower dose 218. Buppasiri P, Tangmanowutikul S, Yoosuk W.
regimens of continuous combined hormone replacement Randomized controlled trial of mefenamic acid vs
therapy: a randomized comparative dose-ranging study. paracervical block for relief of pain for outpatient uterine
Maturitas. 2001 Dec 14;40(3):259-71. PMID: 11731187. curettage. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Jul;88(7):881-5. PMID:
X-5, X-7 16241013. X-5, X-9

208. Bruni V, Croxatto H, De La Cruz J, et al. A 219. Burch D, Bieshuevel E, Smith S, et al. Can
comparison of cycle control and effect on well-being of endometrial protection be inferred from the bleeding
monophasic gestodene-, triphasic gestodene- and pattern on combined cyclical hormone replacement
monophasic desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives. therapy. Maturitas. 2000 Feb 15;34(2):155-60. PMID:
Gestodene Study Group. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2000 10714910. X-5, X-7
Apr;14(2):90-8. PMID: 10836195. X-4, X-5
220. Burch DJ, Spowart KJ, Jesinger DK, et al. A dose-
209. Bruni V, Croxatto H, De La Cruz J, et al. A ranging study of the use of cyclical dydrogesterone with
comparison of cycle control and effect on well-being of continuous 17 beta oestradiol. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995
monophasic gestodene-, triphasic gestodene- and Mar;102(3):243-8. PMID: 7794851. X-7

K-11
221. Busacca M, Luchini S, Molinari MA, et al. therapy in lupus nephritis (long-term outcome). Clin
Hysteroscopic pictures following danazol therapy in Rheumatol. 2006 Nov;25(6):782-8. PMID: 16547692. X-4,
endometrial hyperplasia. Acta Eur Fertil. 1987 May- X-5, X-9
Jun;18(3):197-201. PMID: 3439406. X-3
232. Caliskan E, Filiz T, Yucesoy G, et al. Sublingual
222. Busfield RA, Farquhar CM, Sowter MC, et al. A versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening PRIOR to
randomised trial comparing the levonorgestrel intrauterine manual vacuum aspiration under local anaesthesia: A
system and thermal balloon ablation for heavy menstrual randomized study. European Journal of Contraception and
bleeding. BJOG. 2006 Mar;113(3):257-63. PMID: Reproductive Health Care. 2007;12(4):372-7. PMID:
16487195. X-8 17853158. X-5

223. Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Moore KA, et al. 233. Cameron IT, Baird DT. A controlled release form of
Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire: assessing the influence 16,16-dimethyl-trans-delta 2-PGE, methyl ester for early
of heavy menstrual bleeding on quality of life. Curr Med abortion. Contraception. 1986 Feb;33(2):121-5. PMID:
Res Opin. 2010 Dec;26(12):2745-55. PMID: 21043553. X- 3698593. X-3, X-5
4, X-5, X-9
234. Cameron ST, Glasier AF, Gebbie A, et al.
224. Buyuk E, Durmusoglu F, Dokmeci C. Effect of initial Comparison of a transdermal continuous combined and an
gestagen treatment on bleeding patterns in postmenopausal interrupted progestogen HRT. Maturitas. 2006 Jan
women receiving continuous combined hormone 10;53(1):19-26. PMID: 16325020. X-5, X-7
replacement therapy. Menopause. 1999 Summer;6(2):156-
60. PMID: 10374223. X-4, X-5, X-7 235. Cameron ST, Walker J, Chambers S, et al.
Comparison of transvaginal ultrasound, saline infusion
225. Byrjalsen I, Alexandersen P, Christiansen C. sonography and hysteroscopy to investigate
Piperazine oestrone sulphate and interrupted postmenopausal bleeding and unscheduled bleeding on
norethisterone: effects on the postmenopausal HRT. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001 Aug;41(3):291-4.
endometrium. BJOG. 2000 Mar;107(3):347-55. PMID: PMID: 11592543. X-4, X-5, X-7
10740331. X-4, X-5, X-7
236. Candiani GB, Vercellini P, Fedele L, et al. Use of
226. Byrjalsen I, Bjarnason NH, Christiansen C. goserelin depot, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist,
Progestational effects of combinations of gestodene on the for the treatment of menorrhagia and severe anemia in
postmenopausal endometrium during hormone replacement women with leiomyomata uteri. Acta Obstet Gynecol
therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar;180(3 Pt 1):539- Scand. 1990;69(5):413-5. PMID: 2148663. X-3, X-6
49. PMID: 10076125. X-5, X-7
237. Canning S, Waterman M, Orsi N, et al. The efficacy
227. Byrjalsen I, Thormann L, Meinecke B, et al. of hypericum perforatum (st john's wort) for the treatment
Sequential estrogen and progestogen therapy: assessment of of premenstrual syndrome: A randomized, double-blind,
progestational effects on the postmenopausal endometrium. placebo-controlled trial. CNS Drugs. 2010;24(3):207-25.
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Apr;79(4):523-8. PMID: 1532445. PMID: 20155996. X-5
X-4, X-7
238. Cano A, Tarin JJ, Duenas JL. Two-year prospective,
228. Byrjalsen I, Thormann L, Riis BJ, et al. Secretory randomized trial comparing an innovative twice-a- week
endometrial protein PP14 in serum from post-menopausal progestin regimen with a continuous combined regimen as
women receiving continuous combined oestradiol- postmenopausal hormone therapy. Fertility and Sterility.
cyproterone acetate: correlation with serum hormone 1999;71(1):129-36. PMID: 9935129. X-7
concentrations and bleeding patterns. Maturitas. 1992
Aug;15(1):39-46. PMID: 1388220. X-3, X-4, X-7 239. Canto De Cetina TE, Canto P, Ordonez Luna M.
Effect of counseling to improve compliance in Mexican
229. Cachrimanidou AC, Hellberg D, Nilsson S, et al. women receiving depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate.
Long-interval treatment regimen with a desogestrel- Contraception. 2001 Mar;63(3):143-6. PMID: 11368986.
containing oral contraceptive. Contraception. 1993 X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
Sep;48(3):205-16. PMID: 8222651. X-5, X-6, X-9
240. Canto de Cetina TE, Luna MO, Cetina Canto JA, et
230. Cai XM, Wu J. The mind-tranquilizing and al. Menstrual pattern and lipid profiles during use of
menstruation-regulating method for acupuncture treatment medroxyprogesterone acetate and estradiol cypionate and
of delayed menstrual cycle - A clinical controlled study. NET-EN (200 mg) as contraceptive injections.
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2009;29(1):35-8. Contraception. 2004 Feb;69(2):115-9. PMID: 14759615.
PMID: 19514186. X-12 X-4, X-5

231. Calguneri M, Ozbalkan Z, Ozturk MA, et al. 241. Carbonell JL, Rodriguez J, Aragon S, et al. Vaginal
Intensified, intermittent, low-dose intravenous misoprostol 1000 microg for early abortion. Contraception.
cyclophosphamide together with oral alternate-day steroid 2001 Mar;63(3):131-6. PMID: 11368984. X-4, X-5, X-9

K-12
253. Cetin NN, Karabacak O, Korucuoglu U, et al.
242. Carbonell JL, Rodriguez J, Delgado E, et al. Vaginal Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog combined with a
misoprostol 800 microg every 12 h for second-trimester low-dose oral contraceptive to treat heavy menstrual
abortion. Contraception. 2004 Jul;70(1):55-60. PMID: bleeding. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Mar;104(3):236-9.
15208053. X-4, X-5, X-9 PMID: 19062012. X-5

243. Carbonell JL, Varela L, Velazco A, et al. The use of 254. Cetinkalp S, Karadeniz M, Erdogan M, et al. The
misoprostol for abortion at < or = 9 weeks' gestation. Eur J effects of rosiglitazone, metformin, and estradiol-
Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1997 Sep;2(3):181-5. cyproterone acetate on lean patients with polycystic ovary
PMID: 9678090. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9 syndrome. Endocrinologist. 2009;19(3):94-7. X-4, X-5, X-
10
244. Cardamakis E, Georgopoulos A, Fotopoulos A, et al.
Clinical experience with Norplant subdermal implant 255. Chabbert-Buffet N, Pintiaux-Kairis A, Bouchard P.
system as long-term contraception during adolescence. Eur Effects of the progesterone receptor modulator VA2914 in
J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2002 Mar;7(1):36-40. a continuous low dose on the hypothalamic-pituitary-
PMID: 12041863. X-4, X-5, X-6 ovarian axis and endometrium in normal women: a
prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin
245. Carlborg L. Comparison of contraceptive Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Sep;92(9):3582-9. PMID:
acceptability of levonorgestrel and ethinyl oestradiol 17579200. X-4, X-5, X-9
administered in one three-phasic (Trionetta) and one
monophasic (Neovletta) version. Contraception. 256. Chadha Y, Mollison J, Howie F, et al. Guidelines in
1983;27(5):439-52. PMID: 6349925. X-9 gynaecology: evaluation in menorrhagia and in urinary
incontinence. BJOG. 2000 Apr;107(4):535-43. PMID:
246. Carr BR. Cycle control with desogestrel-containing 10759275. X-4, X-5, X-9
oral contraceptives--comparison of a monophasic and
triphasic regimen. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1993 Sep- 257. Chakraborti AS, Chatterjee P, Dutta S, et al. Rate of
Oct;38(5):274-9. PMID: 8298666. X-3, X-5, X-9 formation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in IUD-fitted
human endometrium--a preliminary report. Int J Fertil.
247. Carr BR, DelConte A. Using a low-dose 1982;27(3):132-3. PMID: 6128316. X-3, X-4, X-5
contraceptive in women 35 years of age and over: 20
microg estradiol/100 microg levonorgestrel. Contraception. 258. Chamberlain G. Comparing treatments for
2002 Jun;65(6):397-402. PMID: 12127636. X-4, X-5 menorrhagia. Nurs Times. 1992 Mar 11-17;88(11):46.
PMID: 1297082. X-1, X-3, X-5, X-10
248. Carranza-Lira S, Martinez-Chequer JC, Santa Rita
MT, et al. Endometrial changes according to hormone 259. Chamberlain G, Freeman R, Price F, et al. A
replacement therapy schedule. Menopause. 1998 comparative study of ethamsylate and mefenamic acid in
Summer;5(2):86-9. PMID: 9689201. X-3, X-4, X-7, X-8 dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991
Jul;98(7):707-11. PMID: 1883797. X-3
249. Castaman G, Tosetto A, Federici AB, et al. Bleeding
tendency and efficacy of anti-haemorrhagic treatments in 260. Chamberlain JA, Jamieson WM. Patient response to
patients with type 1 von Willebrand disease and increased endometrial ablation with the Nd:YAG laser. Laser
von Willebrand factor clearance. Thromb Haemost. 2011 Nursing. 1989;3(3):5-11. X-3, X-8
Apr;105(4):647-54. PMID: 21264446. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
261. Chan CC, To WW. Antepartum hemorrhage of
250. Castelo-Branco C, Vicente JJ, Pons F, et al. Bone unknown origin--what is its clinical significance? Acta
mineral density in young, hypothalamic oligoamenorrheic Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999 Mar;78(3):186-90. PMID:
women treated with oral contraceptives. J Reprod Med. 10078578. X-4, X-5, X-9
2001 Oct;46(10):875-9. PMID: 11725730. X-5, X-6, X-9
262. Chan KK, Tam KF, Tse KY, et al. The use of vaginal
251. Cayan F, Dilek U, Pata O, et al. Comparison of the antimicrobial after large loop excision of transformation
effects of hormone therapy regimens, oral and vaginal zone: a prospective randomised trial. BJOG. 2007
estradiol, estradiol + drospirenone and tibolone, on sexual Aug;114(8):970-6. PMID: 17635487. X-5, X-9
function in healthy postmenopausal women. Journal of
Sexual Medicine. 2008;5(1):132-8. PMID: 17961145. X-7 263. Chan YF, Ho PC, Ma HK. Blood loss in termination
of early pregnancy by vacuum aspiration and by
252. Cetin A, Cetin M. Diagnostic and therapeutic combination of mifepristone and gemeprost. Contraception.
decision-making with transvaginal sonography for first 1993 Jan;47(1):85-95. PMID: 8436004. X-3, X-5
trimester spontaneous abortion, clinically thought to be
incomplete or complete. Contraception. 1998 264. Chang BH, Edelman A, Godder K. Management of
Jun;57(6):393-7. PMID: 9693399. X-4, X-5, X-9 menstrual bleeding and cycle control after hematopoietic
stem cell transplant. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008
Jan;100(1):76-7. PMID: 17612542. X-5, X-9

K-13
ring used by lactating women. Contraception. 1998
265. Chatterjee R, Banerjee S, Ghosh KK, et al. A study of Jun;57(6):371-9. PMID: 9693396. X-3, X-9
postpill amenorrhea. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1980 Sep-
Oct;18(2):113-4. PMID: 6108247. X-3, X-5, X-6 275. Cheng L, Zhu H, Wang A, et al. Once a month
administration of mifepristone improves bleeding patterns
266. Chattopdhyay B, Nigam A, Goswami S, et al. Clinical in women using subdermal contraceptive implants releasing
outcome of levonorgestrel intra-uterine system in idiopathic levonorgestrel. Hum Reprod. 2000 Sep;15(9):1969-72.
menorrhagia. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2011 PMID: 10966997. X-5, X-6
Jul;15(7):764-8. PMID: 21780544. X-4
276. Cheng WC, Yen ML, Hsu SHJ, et al. Effects of
267. Chaudhuri SK, Das A, De KC, et al. Some hitherto raloxifene, one of the selective estrogen receptor
unreported findings on the extragenital effects of modulators, on pituitary-ovary axis and prolactin in
progesterone in human females--a clinical study. Indian J postmenopausal women. Endocrine. 2004;23(2-3):215-8.
Physiol Pharmacol. 1994 Jul;38(3):174-80. PMID: PMID: 15146102. X-7
7814077. X-3
277. Cheng WF, Lin HH, Torng PL, et al. Comparison of
268. Chaudhury N, Gupta AN, Hazra MN, et al. Phase III- endometrial changes among symptomatic tamoxifen-treated
clinical trial with Norplant-2 (covered rods). Report of a and nontreated premenopausal and postmenopausal breast
24-month study. National Programme of Research in cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Aug;66(2):233-7.
Human Reproduction. Division of Human Resource PMID: 9264568. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-7, X-9
Development Research Indian Council of Medical
Research Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India. Contraception. 278. Chetri M, Bhatta A, Amatya RN, et al. Five-year
1988 Dec;38(6):659-73. PMID: 3146464. X-3, X-5, X-9 evaluation of safety, efficacy and acceptability of Norplant
implants in Nepal. Adv Contracept. 1996 Sep;12(3):187-
269. Chavez A, DelConte A. A comparison of cycle 99. PMID: 8910661. X-4, X-5
control with monophasic levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol
100 micrograms/20 micrograms versus triphasic 279. Cheung TH, Lo KW, Yim SF, et al. Dose effects of
norethindrone/ethinylestradiol 500-750-1000 progesterone in add-back therapy during GnRHa treatment.
micrograms/35 micrograms: a multicenter, randomized, J Reprod Med. 2005 Jan;50(1):35-40. PMID: 15730171.
open-label study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. X-5, X-9
1999 Jun;4(2):75-83. PMID: 10427482. X-5
280. Chick P. Prescribing an oral contraceptive for the
270. Chavez A, DelConte A. A comparison of cycle individual woman. Aust Fam Physician. 1980 Feb;Suppl:8-
control with monophasic levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol 12. PMID: 6444808. X-5, X-9
100 mug/20 mug versus triphasic
norethindrone/ethinylestradiol 500-750-1000 mug/35 mug: 281. Chimbira TH, Anderson AB, Naish C, et al.
A multicenter, randomized, open-label study. European Reduction of menstrual blood loss by danazol in
Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care. unexplained menorrhagia: lack of effect of placebo. Br J
1999;4(2):75-83. PMID: 10427482. X-9 Obstet Gynaecol. 1980 Dec;87(12):1152-8. PMID:
7002206. X-3, X-5
271. Cheewadhanaraks S, Peeyananjarassri K, Choksuchat
C, et al. Interval of injections of intramuscular depot 282. Chiwuzie J, Braimoh S, Unuigbe J, et al. Causes of
medroxyprogesterone acetate in the long-term treatment of maternal mortality in a semi-urban Nigerian setting. World
endometriosis-associated pain: A randomized comparative Health Forum. 1995;16(4):405-8. PMID: 8534349. X-3, X-
trial. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 5
2009;68(2):116-21. PMID: 19556801. X-5, X-10
283. Chlebowski RT, Wactawski-Wende J, Ritenbaugh C,
272. Chen AY, Mottl-Santiago J, Vragovic O, et al. et al. Estrogen plus progestin and colorectal cancer in
Bleeding after medication-induced termination of postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar
pregnancy with two dosing schedules of mifepristone and 4;350(10):991-1004. PMID: 14999111. X-5, X-7
misoprostol. Contraception. 2006 Apr;73(4):415-9. PMID:
16531178. X-4, X-5, X-9 284. Chompootaweep S, Kochagarn E, Tang-Usaha J, et
al. Experience of Thai women in Bangkok with Norplant-2
273. Chen H, Li J, Cui T, et al. Adjuvant gonadotropin- implants. Contraception. 1998 Oct;58(4):221-5. PMID:
releasing hormone analogues for the prevention of 9866003. X-3, X-9
chemotherapy induced premature ovarian failure in
premenopausal women. Cochrane Database of Systematic 285. Christodoulacos G, Panoulis C, Botsis D, et al.
Reviews. 2011(11). X-1, X-3, X-5 Transvaginal sonographic monitoring of the uterine effects
of raloxifene and a continuous combined replacement
274. Chen JH, Wu SC, Shao WQ, et al. The comparative therapy in postmenopausal women. Maturitas.
trial of TCu 380A IUD and progesterone-releasing vaginal 2002;42(1):77-84. PMID: 12020983. X-4, X-7

K-14
286. Christodoulakos GE, Botsis DS, Lambrinoudaki IV, 296. Cirkel U, Ochs H, Schneider HP. A randomized,
et al. A 5-year study on the effect of hormone therapy, comparative trial of triptorelin depot (D-Trp6-LHRH) and
tibolone and raloxifene on vaginal bleeding and danazol in the treatment of endometriosis. Eur J Obstet
endometrial thickness. Maturitas. 2006 Mar 20;53(4):413- Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995 Mar;59(1):61-9. PMID:
23. PMID: 16140483. X-4, X-5, X-7 7781864. X-5, X-6, X-10

287. Chuansumrit A, Wangruangsatid S, Lektrakul Y, et 297. Claessens EA, Cowell CA. Acute adolescent
al. Control of bleeding in children with Dengue menorrhagia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Feb
hemorrhagic fever using recombinant activated factor VII: 1;139(3):277-80. PMID: 6970521. X-3, X-5
a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2005 Nov;16(8):549-55. PMID: 298. Clark LR, Barnes-Harper KT, Ginsburg KR, et al.
16269927. X-5, X-9 Menstrual irregularity from hormonal contraception: a
cause of reproductive health concerns in minority
288. Chung JW, Jeong HJ, Joh JH, et al. Percutaneous adolescent young women. Contraception. 2006
transcatheter angiographic embolization in the management Sep;74(3):214-9. PMID: 16904414. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
of obstetric hemorrhage. J Reprod Med. 2003
Apr;48(4):268-76. PMID: 12746991. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8 299. Clark TJ, Gupta JK. Outpatient thermal balloon
ablation of the endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2004
289. Chuni N, Chandrashekhar TS. Early pregnancy Nov;82(5):1395-401. PMID: 15533366. X-4, X-5, X-8
termination with a simplified mifepristone: Medical
abortion outpatient regimen. Kathmandu Univ Med J 300. Clark TJ, Samuel N, Malick S, et al. Bipolar
(KUMJ). 2009 Jul-Sep;7(27):209-12. PMID: 20071864. X- radiofrequency compared with thermal balloon endometrial
4, X-5, X-9 ablation in the office: A randomized controlled trial.
Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;117(1):109-18. PMID:
290. Churchyard GJ, Morgan C, Adams E, et al. A phase 21173651. X-8
iia randomized clinical trial of a multiclade HIV-1 DNA
prime followed by a multiclade RAD5 HIV-1 vaccine boost 301. Clegg JP, Guest JF, Hurskainen R. Cost-utility of
in healthy adults (HVTN204). PLoS One. 2011;6(8)PMID: levonorgestrel intrauterine system compared with
21857901. X-5 hysterectomy and second generation endometrial ablative
techniques in managing patients with menorrhagia in the
291. Chwalisz K, Elger W, Stickler T, et al. The effects of UK. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jul;23(7):1637-48. PMID:
1-month administration of asoprisnil (J867), a selective 17559758. X-5, X-8, X-9
progesterone receptor modulator, in healthy premenopausal
women. Human Reproduction. 2005;20(4):1090-9. PMID: 302. Clisham PR, Cedars MI, Greendale G, et al. Long-
15665012. X-5 term transdermal estradiol therapy: effects on endometrial
histology and bleeding patterns. Obstet Gynecol. 1992
292. Chwalisz K, Larsen L, Mattia-Goldberg C, et al. A Feb;79(2):196-201. PMID: 1731285. X-7
randomized, controlled trial of asoprisnil, a novel selective
progesterone receptor modulator, in women with uterine 303. Clisham PR, de Ziegler D, Lozano K, et al.
leiomyomata. Fertil Steril. 2007 Jun;87(6):1399-412. Comparison of continuous versus sequential estrogen and
PMID: 17307170. X-5, X-6 progestin therapy in postmenopausal women. Obstet
Gynecol. 1991 Feb;77(2):241-6. PMID: 1846438. X-7
293. Cicardi M, Castelli R, Zingale LC, et al. Side effects
of long-term prophylaxis with attenuated androgens in 304. Cobb KL, Bachrach LK, Greendale G, et al.
hereditary angioedema: comparison of treated and Disordered eating, menstrual irregularity, and bone mineral
untreated patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 density in female runners. Medicine and Science in Sports
Feb;99(2):194-6. PMID: 9042044. X-4, X-5, X-9 and Exercise. 2003;35(5):711-9. PMID: 12750578. X-3, X-
4, X-5
294. Cicinelli E, de Ziegler D, Alfonso R, et al.
Endometrial effects, bleeding control, and compliance with 305. Cobb KL, Bachrach LK, Sowers M, et al. The effect
a new postmenopausal hormone therapy regimen based on of oral contraceptives on bone mass and stress fractures in
transdermal estradiol gel and every-other-day vaginal female runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007
progesterone in capsules: a 3-year pilot study. Fertil Steril. Sep;39(9):1464-73. PMID: 17805075. X-5, X-9
2005 Jun;83(6):1859-63. PMID: 15950667. X-4, X-5, X-7
306. Cochrane R, Regan L. Undetected gynaecological
295. Cicinelli E, Pinto V, Tinelli R, et al. Rapid disorders in women with renal disease. Hum Reprod. 1997
endometrial preparation for hysteroscopic surgery with oral Apr;12(4):667-70. PMID: 9159421. X-4, X-5, X-9
desogestrel plus vaginal raloxifene: a prospective,
randomized pilot study. Fertility and Sterility. 307. Coelingh Bennink HJ, van der Steeg HJ. Failure of
2007;88(3):698-701. PMID: 17678902. X-5, X-6 bromocriptine to restore the menstrual cycle in
normoprolactinemic post-pill amenorrhea. Fertil Steril.
1983 Feb;39(2):238-40. PMID: 6822306. X-5, X-6, X-10

K-15
319. Connor PD, Tavernier LA, Thomas SM, et al.
308. Coenen CMH, Thomas CMG, Borm GF, et al. Determining risk between Depo-Provera use and increased
Changes in androgens during treatment with four low-dose uterine bleeding in obese and overweight women. J Am
contraceptives. Contraception. 1996;53(3):171-6. PMID: Board Fam Pract. 2002 Jan-Feb;15(1):7-10. PMID:
8689882. X-4, X-5 11841143. X-4, X-5, X-9

309. Cohen CR, Brown J, Moscicki AB, et al. A phase I 320. Contreras CM, Azamar-Arizmendi G, Saavedra M, et
randomized placebo controlled trial of the safety of 3% al. A Five-Day Gradual Reduction Regimen of
SPL7013 Gel (VivaGel(R)) in healthy young women Chlormadinone Reduces Premenstrual Anxiety and
administered twice daily for 14 days. PLoS One. Depression: A Pilot Study. Archives of Medical Research.
2011;6(1):e16258. PMID: 21311578. X-5 2006;37(7):907-13. PMID: 16971235. X-5

310. Cohen I, Azaria R, Fishman A, et al. Endometrial 321. Cooper KG, Grant AM, Garratt AM. The impact of
cancers in postmenopausal breast cancer patients with using a partially randomised patient preference design
tamoxifen treatment. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1999 when evaluating alternative managements for heavy
Oct;18(4):304-9. PMID: 10542937. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-7 menstrual bleeding. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997
Dec;104(12):1367-73. PMID: 9422014. X-5, X-8
311. Cohen I, Figer A, Tepper R, et al. Ovarian
overstimulation and cystic formation in premenopausal 322. Cooper KG, Jack SA, Parkin DE, et al. Five-year
tamoxifen exposure: comparison between tamoxifen- follow up of women randomised to medical management or
treated and nontreated breast cancer patients. Gynecol transcervical resection of the endometrium for heavy
Oncol. 1999 Feb;72(2):202-7. PMID: 10021302. X-4, X-5, menstrual loss: clinical and quality of life outcomes. BJOG.
X-6, X-9 2001 Dec;108(12):1222-8. PMID: 11843383. X-5, X-8

312. Colacurci N, De Placido G, Mollo A, et al. Short-term 323. Cooper KG, Parkin DE, Garratt AM, et al. A
use of Goserelin depot in the treatment of dysfunctional randomised comparison of medical and hysteroscopic
uterine bleeding. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. management in women consulting a gynaecologist for
1995;22(3):212-9. PMID: 7554259. X-3 treatment of heavy menstrual loss. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1997 Dec;104(12):1360-6. PMID: 9422013. X-4, X-8
313. Colao A, Pivonello R, Di Somma C, et al. Growth
hormone excess with onset in adolescence: clinical 324. Cooper KG, Parkin DE, Garratt AM, et al. Two-year
appearance and long-term treatment outcome. Clin follow up of women randomised to medical management or
Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007 May;66(5):714-22. PMID: transcervical resection of the endometrium for heavy
17388794. X-4, X-5, X-9 menstrual loss: clinical and quality of life outcomes. Br J
Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Mar;106(3):258-65. PMID:
314. Cole LP, Potts DM, Aranda C, et al. An evaluation of 10426646. X-5, X-8
the TCu 380Ag and the Multiload Cu375. Fertil Steril.
1985 Feb;43(2):214-7. PMID: 3881295. X-9 325. Corson SL. A multicenter evaluation of endometrial
ablation by Hydro ThermAblator and rollerball for
315. Colgan TJ, Pendergast S, LeBlanc M. The treatment of menorrhagia. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc.
histopathology of uterine leiomyomas following treatment 2001 Aug;8(3):359-67. PMID: 11509774. X-5, X-8
with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues. Hum
Pathol. 1993 Oct;24(10):1073-7. PMID: 8406417. X-3, X- 326. Corson SL, Brill AI, Brooks PG, et al. One-year
6, X-8 results of the Vesta system for endometrial ablation.
Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic
316. Collett D, Weerasooriya N. A modelling approach to Laparoscopists. 2000;7(4):489-97. PMID: 11044499. X-8
the analysis of menstrual diary data. Stat Med. 1993 May
30;12(10):955-65. PMID: 8337552. X-3, X-4, X-5 327. Coskun E, Cakiroglu Y, Aygun BK, et al. Effect of
copper intrauterine device on the cyclooxygenase and
317. Comparato MR, Yabur JA, Bajares M. Contraceptive inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in the luteal
efficacy and acceptability of a monophasic oral phase endometrium. Contraception. 2011 Dec;84(6):637-
contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinyl estradiol and 41. PMID: 22078195. X-3, X-4, X-5
150 microg desogestrel in Latin-American women. Adv
Contracept. 1998 Mar;14(1):15-26. PMID: 9587005. X-3, 328. Cosman F, Baz-Hecht M, Cushman M, et al. Short-
X-9 term effects of estrogen, tamoxifen and raloxifene on
hemostasis: A randomized-controlled study and review of
318. Confino E, Ismajovich B, Rudick A, et al. the literature. Thrombosis Research. 2005;116(1):1-3.
Comparison between OM-GA Cu and Copper-T IUCDs. PMID: 15850603. X-7
Contraception. 1983 Dec;28(6):521-5. PMID: 6370586. X-
9 329. Costa SH, Vessey MP. Misoprostol and illegal
abortion in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Lancet. 1993 May
15;341(8855):1258-61. PMID: 8098402. X-3, X-5

K-16
menopausal symptoms? Journal of Alternative and
330. Coulter A, Peto V, Doll H. Patients' preferences and Complementary Medicine. 2003;9(4):529-38. PMID:
general practitioners' decisions in the treatment of 14499029. X-3, X-5
menstrual disorders. Fam Pract. 1994 Mar;11(1):67-74.
PMID: 8034155. X-3 341. Creasy GW, Fisher AC, Hall N, et al. Transdermal
contraceptive patch delivering norelgestromin and ethinyl
331. Coulter A, Peto V, Jenkinson C. Quality of life and estradiol: Effects on the lipid profile. Journal of
patient satisfaction following treatment for menorrhagia. Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and
Fam Pract. 1994 Dec;11(4):394-401. PMID: 7895967. X-3 Gynecologist. 2003;48(3):179-86. PMID: 12698776. X-4,
X-5
332. Coutinho EM. One year contraception with a single
subdermal implant containing nomegestrol acetate 342. Creatsas G, Cardamakis E, Deligeoroglou E, et al.
(Uniplant). Contraception. 1993 Jan;47(1):97-105. PMID: Tenoxicam versus lynestrenol-ethinyl estradiol treatment of
8436005. X-3, X-9 dysfunctional uterine bleeding cases during adolescence. J
Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 1998 Nov;11(4):177-80. PMID:
333. Coutinho EM, Boulanger GA, Goncalves MT. 9806127. X-5
Regression of uterine leiomyomas after treament with
gestrinone, an antiestrogen, antiprogesterone. American 343. Creinin MD, Harwood B, Guido RS, et al.
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1986;155(4):761-7. Endometrial thickness after misoprostol use for early
PMID: 3532799. X-3, X-6 pregnancy failure. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004
Jul;86(1):22-6. PMID: 15207665. X-4, X-5, X-9
334. Coutinho EM, de Souza JC, Athayde C, et al.
Multicenter clinical trial on the efficacy and acceptability 344. Creinin MD, Meyn LA, Borgatta L, et al. Multicenter
of a single contraceptive implant of nomegestrol acetate, comparison of the contraceptive ring and patch: a
Uniplant. Contraception. 1996 Feb;53(2):121-5. PMID: randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008
8838490. X-3, X-9 Feb;111(2 Pt 1):267-77. PMID: 18238962. X-5

335. Coutinho EM, Spinola P, Barbosa I, et al. 345. Creinin MD, Schlaff W, Archer DF, et al.
Multicenter, double-blind, comparative clinical study on Progesterone receptor modulator for emergency
the efficacy and acceptability of a monthly injectable contraception: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics
contraceptive combination of 150 mg and Gynecology. 2006;108(5):1089-97. PMID: 17077229.
dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide and 10 mg estradiol X-5
enanthate compared to a monthly injectable contraceptive
combination of 90 mg dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide 346. Creinin MD, Schreiber CA, Bednarek P, et al.
and 6 mg estradiol enanthate. Contraception. 1997 Mifepristone and misoprostol administered simultaneously
Mar;55(3):175-81. PMID: 9115007. X-5 versus 24 hours apart for abortion: A randomized
controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology.
336. Coutinho EM, Spinola P, Tomaz G, et al. Efficacy, 2007;109(4):885-94. PMID: 17400850. X-5
acceptability, and clinical effects of a low-dose injectable
contraceptive combination of dihydroxyprogesterone 347. Crosignani PG, Luciano A, Ray A, et al.
acetophenide and estradiol enanthate. Contraception. 2000 Subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate versus
Apr;61(4):277-80. PMID: 10899484. X-4, X-5, X-6 leuprolide acetate in the treatment of endometriosis-
associated pain. Human Reproduction. 2006;21(1):248-56.
337. Cox M, Tripp J, Blacksell S. Clinical performance of PMID: 16176939. X-5, X-6, X-10
the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in routine use by the
UK Family Planning and Reproductive Health Research 348. Crosignani PG, Vercellini P, Mosconi P, et al.
Network: 5-year report. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device versus
2002 Apr;28(2):73-7. PMID: 12396776. X-4, X-5 hysteroscopic endometrial resection in the treatment of
dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 1997
338. Cox M, Tripp J, Blacksell S. Clinical performance of Aug;90(2):257-63. PMID: 9241305. X-8
the Nova T380 intrauterine device in routine use by the UK
Family Planning and Reproductive Health Research 349. Croxatto HB. Clinical profile of Implanon: a single-
Network: 5-year report. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. rod etonogestrel contraceptive implant. Eur J Contracept
2002 Apr;28(2):69-72. PMID: 12396775. X-4, X-5 Reprod Health Care. 2000 Sep;5 Suppl 2:21-8. PMID:
11246604. X-4, X-5
339. Cramer DW, Liberman RF, Hornstein MD, et al.
Basal hormone levels in women who use acetaminophen 350. Croxatto HB, Brache V, Massai R, et al. Feasibility
for menstrual pain. Fertil Steril. 1998 Aug;70(2):371-3. study of Nestorone-ethinylestradiol vaginal contraceptive
PMID: 9696240. X-4, X-5, X-9 ring for emergency contraception. Contraception. 2006
Jan;73(1):46-52. PMID: 16371294. X-4, X-5, X-9
340. Cramer EH, Jones P, Keenan NL, et al. Is naturopathy
as effective as conventional therapy for treatment of

K-17
361. Dahmoun M, Odmark IS, Risberg B, et al. Apoptosis,
351. Croxatto HB, Massai MR, Salvatierra AM, et al. proliferation, and sex steroid receptors in postmenopausal
Effects of a sequential regimen of mifepristone- endometrium before and during HRT. Maturitas. 2004 Oct
medroxyprogesterone acetate on ovarian function, 15;49(2):114-23. PMID: 15474755. X-4, X-5, X-7
endometrial development and hormonal parameters.
Contraception. 1996 Aug;54(2):79-86. PMID: 8842583. X- 362. Danli S, Qingxiang S, Guowei S. A multicentered
4, X-5 clinical trial of the long-acting injectable contraceptive
Depo Provera in Chinese women. Contraception. 2000
352. Croxatto HB, Urbancsek J, Massai R, et al. A Jul;62(1):15-8. PMID: 11024223. X-4, X-5, X-6
multicentre efficacy and safety study of the single
contraceptive implant Implanon. Implanon Study Group. 363. D'Anna R, Cannata ML, Atteritano M, et al. Effects
Hum Reprod. 1999 Apr;14(4):976-81. PMID: 10221230. of the phytoestrogen genistein on hot flushes,
X-3, X-9 endometrium, and vaginal epithelium in postmenopausal
women: A 1-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-
353. Csemiczky G, Dieben T, Coeling Bennink HJ, et al. controlled study. Menopause. 2007;14(4):648-55. PMID:
The pharmacodynamic effects of an oral contraceptive 17251874. X-7
containing 3 mg micronized 17 beta-estradiol and 0.150 mg
desogestrel for 21 days, followed by 0.030 mg desogestrel 364. d'Arcangues C, Piaggio G, Brache V, et al.
only for 7 days. Contraception. 1996 Dec;54(6):333-8. Effectiveness and acceptability of vitamin E and low-dose
PMID: 8968661. X-4, X-9 aspirin, alone or in combination, on Norplant-induced
prolonged bleeding. Contraception. 2004 Dec;70(6):451-
354. Csermely T, Halvax L, Schmidt E, et al. Occurrence 62. PMID: 15541406. X-5, X-6
of osteopenia among adolescent girls with
oligo/amenorrhea. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2002 Apr;16(2):99- 365. Darney P, Patel A, Rosen K, et al. Safety and efficacy
105. PMID: 12012630. X-4, X-5, X-9 of a single-rod etonogestrel implant (Implanon): results
from 11 international clinical trials. Fertil Steril. 2009
355. Cuong DT, My Huong NT. Comparative phase III May;91(5):1646-53. PMID: 18423453. X-4, X-5
clinical trial of two injectable contraceptive preparations,
depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate and Cyclofem, in 366. Dasgupta PR, Dutta S, Banerjee P, et al. Vitamin E
Vietnamese women. Contraception. 1996 Sep;54(3):169- (alpha tocopherol) in the management of menorrhagia
79. PMID: 8899259. X-9 associated with the use of intrauterine contraceptive
devices (IUCD). Int J Fertil. 1983;28(1):55-6. PMID:
356. Cusan L, Dupont A, Gomez JL, et al. Comparison of 6134690. X-5, X-6
flutamide and spironolactone in the treatment of hirsutism:
A randomized controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility. 367. Datey S, Gaur LN, Saxena BN. Vaginal bleeding
1994;61(2):281-7. PMID: 8299783. X-5 patterns of women using different contraceptive methods
(implants, injectables, IUDs, oral pills)--an Indian
357. Czeizel A, Keller S, Bod M. An aetiological experience. An ICMR Task Force Study. Indian Council of
evaluation of increased occurrence of congenital limb Medical Research. Contraception. 1995 Mar;51(3):155-65.
reduction abnormalities in Hungary, 1975-1978. Int J PMID: 7621684. X-3, X-6, X-9
Epidemiol. 1983 Dec;12(4):445-9. PMID: 6654566. X-3,
X-5 368. David M, Chen FC, Lichtenegger W. NO-donor
nitroglycerin versus the prostaglandin gemeprost for
358. da Silva MO, Costa MM. Reason, myths and cervical ripening in first trimester missed abortion. Int J
fantasies: preliminary data and reflections about the Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Oct;83(1):71-2. PMID: 14511877.
Portuguese experience with LNG-IUS-induced X-4, X-5, X-9
hypomenorrhea. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care.
1999 Mar;4(1):21-5. PMID: 10367192. X-4, X-5 369. Davies AJ, Anderson AB, Turnbull AC. Reduction by
naproxen of excessive menstrual bleeding in women using
359. Dada OA, Godfrey EM, Piaggio G, et al. A intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Jan;57(1):74-8.
randomized, double-blind, noninferiority study to compare PMID: 7005780. X-5, X-6
two regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency
contraception in Nigeria. Contraception. 2010;82(4):373-8. 370. Davies GC, Feng LX, Newton JR, et al. Release
PMID: 20851232. X-5, X-9 characteristics, ovarian activity and menstrual bleeding
pattern with a single contraceptive implant releasing 3-
360. Dahlgren E, Johansson S, Lindstedt G, et al. Women ketodesogestrel. Contraception. 1993 Mar;47(3):251-61.
with polycystic ovary syndrome wedge resected in 1956 to PMID: 8462316. X-3, X-4, X-5, X-9
1965: a long-term follow-up focusing on natural history
and circulating hormones. Fertil Steril. 1992 371. Davies GC, Huster WJ, Lu Y, et al. Adverse events
Mar;57(3):505-13. PMID: 1740195. X-3, X-4, X-5 reported by postmenopausal women in controlled trials
with raloxifene. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Apr;93(4):558-65.
PMID: 10214833. X-4, X-5, X-7

K-18
372. Davies KE, Halkes M, Swart M, et al. Paracervical 383. De Luis DA, Becerra A, Lahera M, et al. A
local anaesthetic block as a useful adjunct for analgesia randomized cross-over study comparing cabergoline and
following endometrial balloon thermoablation. Journal of quinagolide in the treatment of hyperprolactinemic patients.
One-Day Surgery. 2007;17(3):76-8. X-3, X-5, X-8, X-10 J Endocrinol Invest. 2000 Jul-Aug;23(7):428-34. PMID:
11005266. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
373. Davis A, Westhoff C, De Nonno L. Bleeding patterns
after early abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol or 384. De Nonno LJ, Westhoff C, Fielding S, et al. Timing
manual vacuum aspiration. J Am Med Womens Assoc. of pain and bleeding after mifepristone-induced abortion.
2000;55(3 Suppl):141-4. PMID: 10846324. X-4, X-5, X-6, Contraception. 2000 Dec;62(6):305-9. PMID: 11239617.
X-9 X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9

374. Davis AR, Hendlish SK, Westhoff C, et al. Bleeding 385. de Souza SS, Camargos AF, de Rezende CP, et al. A
patterns after misoprostol vs surgical treatment of early randomized prospective trial comparing the levonorgestrel-
pregnancy failure: results from a randomized trial. Am J releasing intrauterine system with thermal balloon ablation
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;196(1):31 e1-7. PMID: for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.
17240222. X-5, X-9 Contraception. 2010 Mar;81(3):226-31. PMID: 20159179.
X-5, X-8
375. Davis AR, Robilotto CM, Westhoff CL, et al.
Bleeding patterns after vaginal misoprostol for treatment of 386. de Ziegler D, Ferriani R, Moraes LA, et al. Vaginal
early pregnancy failure. Hum Reprod. 2004 Jul;19(7):1655- progesterone in menopause: Crinone 4% in cyclical and
8. PMID: 15178656. X-4, X-5, X-9 constant combined regimens. Hum Reprod. 2000 Jun;15
Suppl 1:149-58. PMID: 10928426. X-4, X-5, X-7
376. De Aloysio D, Altieri P, Penacchioni P, et al.
Bleeding patterns in recent postmenopausal outpatients 387. Delconte A, Loffer F, Grubb GS. Cycle control with
with uterine myomas: Comparison between two regimens oral contraceptives containing 20 mug of ethinyl estradiol:
of HRT. Maturitas. 1998;29(3):261-4. PMID: 9699198. X- A multicenter, randomized comparison of
6, X-7 levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol (100 mug/20 mug) and
norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol (1000 mug/20 mug).
377. de Castro A, Perez-Iglesias R, Vicandi F, et al. Contraception. 1999;59(3):187-93. PMID: 10382082. X-9
Comparison of two copper IUDs: the MLCu375 and the
Nova-T. Adv Contracept. 1987 Dec;3(4):319-22. PMID: 388. Demarquay G, Caclin A, Brudon F, et al. Exacerbated
3445799. X-9 attention orienting to auditory stimulation in migraine
patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Sep;122(9):1755-63.
378. de Cetina TC, Reyes LP, Gamboa LV, et al. A PMID: 21396888. X-4, X-5, X-9
comparative clinical trial of Norinyl 1 + 35 versus Norinyl
1 + 50 in Merida, Yucatan, Mexico. Adv Contracept. 1990 389. Dempsey A, Roca C, Westhoff C. Vaginal estrogen
Jun;6(2):125-39. PMID: 2206018. X-9 supplementation during Depo-Provera initiation: A
randomized controlled trial. Contraception.
379. De Falco M, Staibano S, D'Armiento FP, et al. 2010;82(3):250-5. PMID: 20705153. X-6
Preoperative treatment of uterine leiomyomas: clinical
findings and expression of transforming growth factor- 390. Dennehy CE. The Use of Herbs and Dietary
beta3 and connective tissue growth factor. J Soc Gynecol Supplements in Gynecology:An Evidence-Based Review.
Investig. 2006 May;13(4):297-303. PMID: 16697947. X-4, Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health.
X-5, X-6, X-8, X-9 2006;51(6):402-9. PMID: 17081929. X-1, X-3, X-5

380. De Franciscis P, Cobellis L, Fornaro F, et al. Low- 391. Dennis AR, Leeson-Payne CG, Hobbs GJ. Analgesia
dose hormone therapy in the perimenopause. Int J after Caesarean section - The use of rectal diclofenac as an
Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Aug;98(2):138-42. PMID: adjunct to spinal morphine. Anaesthesia. 1995;50(4):297-9.
17572422. X-10 PMID: 7747843. X-5

381. De Lena M, Tommasi S, Schittulli F, et al. Sequential 392. Descargues G, Douvrin F, Degre S, et al. Abnormal
alternate administration of tamoxifen and placentation and selective embolization of the uterine
medroxyprogesterone acetate in advanced breast cancer: arteries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001
clinical-biological randomized study. Tumori. 1990 Apr Nov;99(1):47-52. PMID: 11604185. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8
30;76(2):190-5. PMID: 2139523. X-5, X-7
393. Dessole S, Coccollone E, Ambrosini G, et al.
382. De Leo V, la Marca A, Morgante G, et al. Oligomenorrhea treatment by purified FSH using a fixed
Comparison of two HRT regimens with bimonthly and protocol. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1996;42(3):187-90.
monthly progestin administration in postmenopause. PMID: 8938472. X-3, X-5
Maturitas. 1999 Jan 4;31(2):171-7. PMID: 10227012. X-4,
X-5, X-7

K-19
(Bravelle has equivalent efficacy to follitropin-beta
394. DeVore GR, Owens O, Kase N. Use of intravenous (Follistim ) in infertile women undergoing in vitro
Premarin in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine fertilization. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.
bleeding--a double-blind randomized control study. Obstet 2003;1(03)PMID: 14609434. X-5
Gynecol. 1982 Mar;59(3):285-91. PMID: 6281704. X-5,
X-10 406. Dieben TO, op ten Berg MT, Coelingh Bennink HJ.
Cycle control and side effects of a new combiphasic oral
395. Dhingra N, Punia RS, Radotra A, et al. Arias-Stella contraceptive regimen. Arzneimittelforschung. 1994
reaction in upper genital tract in pregnant and non-pregnant Jul;44(7):877-9. PMID: 7945527. X-3, X-9
women: a study of 120 randomly selected cases. Arch
Gynecol Obstet. 2007 Jul;276(1):47-52. PMID: 17219163. 407. Dildy GA, Scott JR, Saffer CS, et al. An effective
X-4, X-5, X-9 pressure pack for severe pelvic hemorrhage. Obstet
Gynecol. 2006 Nov;108(5):1222-6. PMID: 17077246. X-4,
396. Di Carlo C, Sammartino A, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. X-5, X-8, X-9
Bleeding patterns during continuous estradiol with different
sequential progestogens therapy. Menopause. 2005 Sep- 408. Dittrich R, Parker L, Rosen JB, et al. Transdermal
Oct;12(5):520-5. PMID: 16145305. X-5, X-7 contraception: Evaluation of three transdermal
norelgestromin/ethinyl estradiol doses in a randomized,
397. Di Carlo C, Tommaselli GA, Gargano V, et al. multicenter, dose-response study. American Journal of
Transdermal estradiol and oral or vaginal natural Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;186(1):15-20. PMID:
progesterone: bleeding patterns. Climacteric. 2010 11810078. X-9
Oct;13(5):442-6. PMID: 20575654. X-5, X-7
409. Dockeray CJ, Sheppard BL, Bonnar J. Comparison
398. Di Caro S, Hamad GG, Fernstrom MH, et al. Medical between mefenamic acid and danazol in the treatment of
strategies for weight loss in the overweight and obese established menorrhagia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989
patient. Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica. Jul;96(7):840-4. PMID: 2765430. X-5
2006;52(4):415-30. PMID: 17108871. X-1, X-3, X-5
410. Dockeray CJ, Sheppard BL, Daly L, et al. The
399. Di Lieto A, Catalano D, Miranda L, et al. Action of a fibrinolytic enzyme system in normal menstruation and
prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor on IUD associated excessive uterine bleeding and the effect of tranexamic
uterine bleeding. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1987;14(1):41- acid. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1987
4. PMID: 3102127. X-3, X-5, X-6 Apr;24(4):309-18. PMID: 2953634. X-3, X-4

400. Diamond MP, Greene JW, Thompson JM, et al. 411. Dodick DW, Freitag F, Banks J, et al. Topiramate
Interaction of anticonvulsants and oral contraceptives in versus amitriptyline in migraine prevention: A 26-week,
epileptic adolescents. Contraception. 1985 Jun;31(6):623- multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy,
32. PMID: 4042660. X-3, X-5, X-6 parallel-group noninferiority trial in adult migraineurs.
Clinical Therapeutics. 2009;31(3):542-59. PMID:
401. Diaz J, Bahamondes L, Monteiro I, et al. 19393844. X-5
Acceptability and performance of the levonorgestrel-
releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) in Campinas, Brazil. 412. Doherty L, Harper A, Russell M. Menorrhagia
Contraception. 2000 Aug;62(2):59-61. PMID: 11102588. management options. Ulster Med J. 1995 Apr;64(1):64-71.
X-4 PMID: 7502405. X-3, X-5

402. Diaz S, Herreros C, Juez G, et al. Fertility regulation 413. Doll H, Brown S, Thurston A, et al. Pyridoxine
in nursing women: VII. Influence of NORPLANT (vitamin B6) and the premenstrual syndrome: a randomized
levonorgestrel implants upon lactation and infant growth. crossover trial. The Journal of the Royal College of General
Contraception. 1985 Jul;32(1):53-74. PMID: 3931973. X- Practitioners. 1989;39(326):364-8. PMID: 2558186. X-5
6, X-9
414. Donnez J, Tatarchuk TF, Bouchard P, et al. Ulipristal
403. Dickason LA, Dinsmoor MJ. Red blood cell acetate versus placebo for fibroid treatment before surgery.
transfusion and cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 2;366(5):409-20. PMID:
1992 Aug;167(2):327-30; discussion 30-2. PMID: 22296075. X-6
1497033. X-3, X-5
415. Donnez J, Tomaszewski J, Vazquez F, et al. Ulipristal
404. Dickerson J, Bressler R, Christian CD. Liver function acetate versus leuprolide acetate for uterine fibroids. N
tests and low-dose estrogen oral contraceptives. Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 2;366(5):421-32. PMID: 22296076.
Contraception. 1980 Dec;22(6):597-603. PMID: 7214908. X-6
X-3, X-4
416. Donnez J, Vilos G, Gannon MJ, et al. Goserelin
405. Dickey RP, Nichols JE, Steinkampf MP, et al. Highly acetate (Zoladex) plus endometrial ablation for
purified human-derived follicle-stimulating hormone dysfunctional uterine bleeding: a 3-year follow-up

K-20
evaluation. Fertil Steril. 2001 Mar;75(3):620-2. PMID: contraceptive containing drospirenone and ethinylestradiol.
11239552. X-8 European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive
Health Care. 2010;15(5):314-25. PMID: 20695770. X-4,
417. Donnez J, Vilos G, Gannon MJ, et al. Goserelin X-9
acetate (Zoladex) plus endometrial ablation for
dysfunctional uterine bleeding: a large randomized, double- 428. Dunphy BC, Goerzen J, Greene CA, et al. A double-
blind study. Fertil Steril. 1997 Jul;68(1):29-36. PMID: blind randomised study comparing danazol and
9207580. X-5, X-8, X-9 medroxyprogesterone acetate in the management of
menorrhagia. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
418. Doren M, Rubig A, Coelingh Bennink HJ, et al. 1998;18(6):553-5. PMID: 15512177. X-5
Impact on uterine bleeding and endometrial thickness:
tibolone compared with continuous combined estradiol and 429. Dunson TR, McLaurin VL, Israngkura B, et al. A
norethisterone acetate replacement therapy. Menopause. comparative study of two low-dose combined oral
1999 Winter;6(4):299-306. PMID: 10614676. X-5, X-7 contraceptives: results from a multicenter trial.
Contraception. 1993 Aug;48(2):109-19. PMID: 8403908.
419. Dorenberg EJ, Novakovic Z, Smith HJ, et al. Uterine X-9
fibroid embolization can still be improved: observations on
post-procedure magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol. 430. Durning P, Sellwood RA. Bromocriptine in severe
2005 Aug;46(5):547-53. PMID: 16224935. X-4, X-5, X-6, cyclical breast pain. Br J Surg. 1982 May;69(5):248-9.
X-8, X-9 PMID: 7042033. X-5

420. Doyle M, Warwick A, Redman C, et al. Does 431. Dushay J, Gao C, Gopalakrishnan GS, et al. Short-
application of Monsel's solution after loop diathermy term exenatide treatment leads to significant weight loss in
excision of the transformation zone reduce post operative a subset of obese women without diabetes. Diabetes Care.
discharge? Results of a prospective randomised controlled 2012 January;35(1):4-11. PMID: 2012180104. X-5
trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Dec;99(12):1023-4.
PMID: 1341890. X-5, X-8 432. Dusterberg B, Ellman H, Muller U, et al. A three-year
clinical investigation into efficacy, cycle control and
421. Dreher E, von Fischer B. Treatment of primary tolerability of a new low-dose monophasic oral
dysmenorrhea and dysmenorrhea because of IUP with PG- contraceptive containing gestodene. Gynecol Endocrinol.
synthetase inhibitors. Adv Prostaglandin Thromboxane 1996 Feb;10(1):33-9. PMID: 8737190. X-3, X-9
Res. 1980;8:1487-93. PMID: 6769316. X-3, X-5, X-10
433. Edelman AB, Koontz SL, Nichols MD, et al.
422. Droegemueller W, Katta LR, Bright TG, et al. Continuous oral contraceptives: are bleeding patterns
Triphasic Randomized Clinical Trial: comparative dependent on the hormones given? Obstet Gynecol. 2006
frequency of intermenstrual bleeding. Am J Obstet Mar;107(3):657-65. PMID: 16507938. X-6, X-9, X-10
Gynecol. 1989 Nov;161(5):1407-11. PMID: 2686457. X-6,
X-9 434. Edelman DA, Kothenbeutel R, Levinski MJ, et al.
Comparative trials of low-dose combined oral
423. D'Souza RE, Masters T, Bounds W, et al. contraceptives. Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the
Randomised controlled trial assessing the acceptability of Obstetrician and Gynecologist. 1983;28(3):195-200. PMID:
GyneFix versus Gyne-T380S for emergency contraception. 6854550. X-9
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2003 Apr;29(2):23-9.
PMID: 12681033. X-5, X-9 435. Edlund M, Andersson K, Rybo G, et al. Reduction of
menstrual blood loss in women suffering from idiopathic
424. Du MK, Zheng HM, Chen HC, et al. Study of menorrhagia with a novel antifibrinolytic drug (Kabi 2161).
Norplant implants in Shanghai: three-year experience. Int J Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Nov;102(11):913-7. PMID:
Gynaecol Obstet. 1990 Dec;33(4):345-57. PMID: 1979289. 8534629. X-5
X-3, X-9
436. Edlund M, Blomback M, Fried G. Desmopressin in
425. Duclos M. A critical assessment of hormonal methods the treatment of menorrhagia in women with no common
used in monitoring training status in athletes. International coagulation factor deficiency but with prolonged bleeding
SportMed Journal. 2008;9(2):56-66. X-1, X-3, X-5 time. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2002 Apr;13(3):225-31.
PMID: 11943936. X-5
426. Duflos-Cohade C, Amandruz M, Thibaud E. Pubertal
metrorrhagia. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 1996 437. Egarter C, Geurts P, Boschitsch E, et al. The effects
Feb;9(1):16-20. PMID: 9551371. X-4, X-5, X-9 of estradiol valerate plus medroxyprogesterone acetate and
conjugated estrogens plus medrogestone on climacteric
427. Duijkers IJM, Klipping C, Grob P, et al. Effects of a symptoms and metabolic variables in perimenopausal
monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing women. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica.
nomegestrol acetate and 17beta-oestradiol on ovarian 1996;75(4):386-93. PMID: 8638462. X-5, X-10
function in comparison to a monophasic combined oral

K-21
449. Ellison PT, Lager C, Calfee J. Low profiles of
438. Egarter C, Huber J, Leikermoser R, et al. Tibolone salivary progesterone among college undergraduate
versus conjugated estrogens and sequential progestogen in women. J Adolesc Health Care. 1987 Mar;8(2):204-7.
the treatment of climacteric complaints. Maturitas. 1996 PMID: 3818407. X-3, X-4
Feb;23(1):55-62. PMID: 8861087. X-5, X-7
450. El-Mahgoub S. The norgestrel-T-IUD. Contraception.
439. Eisinger SH, Fiscella J, Bonfiglio T, et al. Open-label 1980 Sep;22(3):271-86. PMID: 7438754. X-4, X-9
study of ultra low-dose mifepristone for the treatment of
uterine leiomyomata. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 451. El-Mazny A, Abou-Salem N. A double-blind
2009 Oct;146(2):215-8. PMID: 19586708. X-4, X-5, X-6, randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol for
X-9 cervical priming before outpatient hysteroscopy. Fertil
Steril. 2011 Oct;96(4):962-5. PMID: 21575939. X-4, X-5
440. El Beltagy NS, Darwish EA, Kasem MS, et al.
Comparison between Cupper T380 IUD and Multiload 375 452. Elnashar A, Abdelmageed E, Fayed M, et al.
IUD in early post partum insertion. Middle East Fertility Clomiphene citrate and dexamethazone in treatment of
Society Journal. 2011;16(2):143-8. X-9 clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome: a
prospective placebo-controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2006
441. El Sahwi S, Kamel M, Haiba N, et al. Hysteroscopic Jul;21(7):1805-8. PMID: 16543255. X-5, X-10
and hysterosalpingographic study after intrauterine
insertion of quinacrine pellets for non-surgical sterilization. 453. Elomaa K, Ranta S, Tuominen J, et al. Charcoal
Advances in Contraceptive Delivery Systems. 1992;8(1- treatment and risk of escape ovulation in oral contraceptive
2):151-9. PMID: 12285561. X-5, X-9 users. Human Reproduction. 2001;16(1):76-81. PMID:
11139541. X-9
442. Elbehery MM, Nouh AA, Mohamed ML, et al.
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 and glycodelin 454. Elovainio M, Teperi J, Aalto AM, et al. Depressive
levels in uterine flushing before and after hysteroscopic symptoms as predictors of discontinuation of treatment of
polypectomy. Clin Lab. 2011;57(11-12):953-7. PMID: menorrhagia by levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
22239027. X-3, X-4, X-8 system. Int J Behav Med. 2007;14(2):70-5. PMID:
17926434. X-5, X-8
443. Elder MG. Injectable contraception. Clin Obstet
Gynaecol. 1984 Dec;11(3):723-41. PMID: 6239732. X-1, 455. Elsedeek MS. Puerperal and menstrual bleeding
X-3, X-5, X-9, X-10 patterns with different types of contraceptive device fitted
during elective cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.
444. Elder MG, Lawson JP, Elstein M, et al. The efficacy 2012 Jan;116(1):31-4. PMID: 22036512. X-5, X-9, X-10
and acceptability of a low-dose levonorgestrel intravaginal
ring for contraception in a UK cohort. Contraception. 1991 456. Elstein M. IUCD liability. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
Feb;43(2):129-37. PMID: 1904020. X-3, X-9 1982 Sep;89(Suppl 4):11-9. PMID: 7150526. X-1, X-3, X-
5
445. Eldred JM, Haynes PJ, Thomas EJ. A randomized
double blind placebo controlled trial of the effects on bone 457. Eltabbakh GH, Piver MS, Hempling RE, et al.
metabolism of the combination of nafarelin acetate and Estrogen replacement therapy following oophorectomy in
norethisterone. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1992 Oct;37(4):354- women with a family history of ovarian cancer. Gynecol
9. PMID: 1483292. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9, X-10 Oncol. 1997 Jul;66(1):103-7. PMID: 9234929. X-4, X-5,
X-9
446. Elechi EN, Elechi GN. Surgical management of
patients with severe anaemia due to acute blood loss: a case 458. Emde C, Cilluffo T, Bauerfeind P, et al. Effect of a
for withholding perioperative blood transfusion. East Afr slow-release formula of trimoprostil on intragastric acidity
Med J. 1995 Jun;72(6):343-4. PMID: 7497999. X-3, X-5 in healthy volunteers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1988
Apr;2(2):135-41. PMID: 2979239. X-3, X-4, X-5
447. Elkind-Hirsch KE, Darensbourg C, Ogden B, et al.
Contraceptive vaginal ring use for women has less adverse 459. Emsley R, Oosthuizen P, Koen L, et al. Oral versus
metabolic effects than an oral contraceptive. Contraception. injectable antipsychotic treatment in early psychosis: post
2007;76(5):348-56. PMID: 17963858. X-4 hoc comparison of two studies. Clin Ther. 2008
Dec;30(12):2378-86. PMID: 19167596. X-5, X-9
448. Elkind-Hirsch KE, Phillips K, Bello SM, et al.
Sequential hormonal supplementation with vaginal 460. Endrikat J, Cronin M, Gerlinger C, et al. Open,
estradiol and progesterone gel corrects the effect of multicenter comparison of efficacy, cycle control, and
clomiphene on the endometrium in oligo-ovulatory women. tolerability of a 23-day oral contraceptive regimen with 20
Human Reproduction. 2002;17(2):295-8. PMID: 11821266. microg ethinyl estradiol and 75 microg gestodene and a 21-
X-5, X-6, X-10 day regimen with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 150
microg desogestrel. Contraception. 2001 Sep;64(3):201-7.
PMID: 11704101. X-5

K-22
and hysteroscopy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004
461. Endrikat J, Cronin M, Gerlinger C, et al. Double- Jan;83(1):89-95. PMID: 14678091. X-4, X-5, X-7
blind, multicenter comparison of efficacy, cycle control,
and tolerability of a 23-day versus a 21-day low-dose oral 470. Epstein E, Valentin L. Rebleeding and endometrial
contraceptive regimen containing 20 microg ethinyl growth in women with postmenopausal bleeding and
estradiol and 75 microg gestodene. Contraception. 2001 endometrial thickness < 5 mm managed by dilatation and
Aug;64(2):99-105. PMID: 11704086. X-5 curettage or ultrasound follow-up: a randomized controlled
study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;18(5):499-
462. Endrikat J, Dusterberg B, Ruebig A, et al. 504. PMID: 11844172. X-5, X-7
Comparison of efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability of
two low-dose oral contraceptives in a multicenter clinical 471. Erel CT, Senturk LM, Oral E, et al. Adrenal
study. Contraception. 1999 Nov;60(5):269-74. PMID: androgenic response to 2-hour ACTH stimulation test in
10717778. X-5 women with PCOS. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1998
Aug;12(4):223-9. PMID: 9798131. X-4, X-5, X-9
463. Endrikat J, Hite R, Bannemerschult R, et al.
Multicenter, comparative study of cycle control, efficacy 472. Erel CT, Senturk LM, Oral E, et al. Results of the
and tolerability of two low-dose oral contraceptives ACTH stimulation test in hirsute women. J Reprod Med.
containing 20 mug ethinylestradiol/100 mug levonorgestrel 1999 Mar;44(3):247-52. PMID: 10202742. X-3, X-4, X-5
and 20 mug ethinylestradiol/500 mug norethisterone.
Contraception. 2001;64(1):3-10. PMID: 11535206. X-9 473. Eriksen B. A randomized, open, parallel-group study
on the preventive effect of an estradiol-releasing vaginal
464. Endrikat J, Lange E, Kunz M, et al. A one-year ring (Estring) on recurrent urinary tract infections in
randomized double-blind, multicentre study to evaluate the postmenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999
effects of an oestrogen-reduced, continuous combined May;180(5):1072-9. PMID: 10329858. X-5, X-7
hormone replacement therapy preparation containing 1 mg
oestradiol valerate and 2 mg dienogest on metabolism in 474. Erkkola R, Mattila L, Powles T, et al. Bone mineral
postmenopausal women. European Journal of density and lipid changes during 5 years of follow-up in a
Contraception and Reproductive Health Care. study of prevention of breast cancer with toremifene in
2007;12(3):229-39. PMID: 17763261. X-4, X-7 healthy, high-risk pre- and post-menopausal women. Breast
Cancer Research and Treatment. 2005;93(3):277-87.
465. Endrikat J, Muller U, Dusterberg B. A twelve-month PMID: 16172794. X-5
comparative clinical investigation of two low-dose oral
contraceptives containing 20 micrograms 475. Eschenbach DA. Earth, motherhood, and the
ethinylestradiol/75 micrograms gestodene and 30 intrauterine device. Fertil Steril. 1992 Jun;57(6):1177-9.
micrograms ethinylestradiol/75 micrograms gestodene, PMID: 1601138. X-1, X-3, X-9, X-10
with respect to efficacy, cycle control, and tolerance.
Contraception. 1997 Mar;55(3):131-7. PMID: 9115000. X- 476. Esteve JL, Varela L, Velazco A, et al. Early abortion
6, X-9 with 800 micrograms of misoprostol by the vaginal route.
Contraception. 1999 Apr;59(4):219-25. PMID: 10457865.
466. Endrikat J, Muller U, Dusterberg B. A twelve-month X-4, X-5, X-9
comparative clinical investigation of two low-dose oral
contraceptives containing 20 mug ethinylestradiol/75 mug 477. Ettinger B, Kenemans P, Johnson SR, et al.
gestodene and 30 mug ethinylestradiol/75 mug gestodene, Endometrial effects of tibolone in elderly, osteoporotic
with respect to efficacy, cycle control, and tolerance. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;112(3):653-9. PMID:
Contraception. 1997;55(3):131-7. PMID: 9115000. X-9 18757665. X-5, X-7, X-9

467. Endrikat JS, Milchev NP, Kapamadzija A, et al. 478. Evans KD. A cost utility analysis of
Bleeding pattern, tolerance and patient satisfaction with a sonohysterography compared with hysteroscopic evaluation
drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive evaluated in for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Journal of Diagnostic
3488 women in Europe, the Middle East and Canada. Medical Sonography. 2000;16(2):68-72. X-3, X-4, X-8
Contraception. 2009 Jun;79(6):428-32. PMID: 19442777.
X-4, X-5 479. Ezechi OC, Jogo A, Gab-Okafor C, et al. Effect of
HIV-1 infection and increasing immunosuppression on
468. Engman M, Granberg S, Williams AR, et al. menstrual function. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010
Mifepristone for treatment of uterine leiomyoma. A Oct;36(5):1053-8. PMID: 21058440. X-4, X-5
prospective randomized placebo controlled trial. Hum
Reprod. 2009 Aug;24(8):1870-9. PMID: 19389793. X-5, 480. Facchinetti F, De Pietri R, Giunchi M, et al. Use of
X-6, X-9 meclofenamic acid in gynecology and obstetrics: effects on
postsurgical stress. Clin J Pain. 1991;7 Suppl 1:S60-3.
469. Epstein E. Management of postmenopausal bleeding PMID: 1810523. X-5
in Sweden: a need for increased use of hydrosonography

K-23
481. Facchinetti F, Neri I, Fava M, et al. Menstrual-related
mood changes in patients with oligomenorrhea. Gynecol 493. Farr G, Amatya R, Acosta M, et al. Clinical
Obstet Invest. 1994;38(2):122-6. PMID: 7959339. X-3, X- performance of the TCu 380A and Lippes Loop IUDs in
4, X-5 three developing countries. Contraception. 1995
Jul;52(1):17-22. PMID: 8521710. X-3, X-5, X-9
482. Fairburn CG, Jones R, Peveler RC, et al.
Psychotherapy and bulimia nervosa. Longer-term effects of 494. Farr G, Amatya R, Betancourt JD, et al. Clinical
interpersonal psychotherapy, behavior therapy, and performance of the TCu 380A and TCu 220C IUDs in four
cognitive behavior therapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 developing country family planning clinics. Contraception.
Jun;50(6):419-28. PMID: 8498876. X-5 1994 Nov;50(5):417-29. PMID: 7859451. X-9

483. Falaschi P, Martocchia A, Proietti A, et al. High 495. Farr G, Amatya R, Doh A, et al. An evaluation of the
incidence of hyperandrogenism-related clinical signs in copper-T 380A IUD's safety and efficacy at three African
patients with multiple sclerosis. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. centers. Contraception. 1996 May;53(5):293-8. PMID:
2001 Aug;22(4):248-50. PMID: 11524631. X-4, X-5, X-6, 8724619. X-4, X-5, X-9
X-9
496. Farr G, Rivera R, Amatya R. Non-physician insertion
484. Falcone T, Desjardins C, Bourque J, et al. of IUDs: clinical outcomes among TCu380A insertions in
Dysfunctional uterine bleeding in adolescents. J Reprod three developing-country clinics. Adv Contracept. 1998
Med. 1994 Oct;39(10):761-4. PMID: 7837120. X-3 Mar;14(1):45-57. PMID: 9587008. X-3, X-5, X-9

485. Fallahian M, Ilkhani M. Menstrual disorders in 497. Faundes A, Alvarez F, Brache V, et al. Endometrial
nongenital tuberculosis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. thickness and oestradiol concentration in women with
2006;2006:18452. PMID: 17093348. X-4, X-5, X-9 bleeding complaints during use of Norplant implants. Hum
Reprod. 1998 Jan;13(1):188-91. PMID: 9512255. X-4, X-
486. Fanta M, Hill M, Belacek J, et al. Comparison of 5, X-9
corticoid substitution versus combined oral contraception
administration in the treatment of non-classic adrenal 498. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Baglioni A, et al. Intranasal
hyperplasia: a prospective study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009 buserelin versus surgery in the treatment of uterine
Jun;25(6):398-402. PMID: 19903032. X-4, X-5, X-9 leiomyomata: long-term follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
Reprod Biol. 1991 Jan 4;38(1):53-7. PMID: 1899079. X-6,
487. Farhi J, Orvieto R, Homburg R. Administration of X-8
clomiphene citrate in patients with polycystic ovary
syndrome, without inducing withdrawal bleeding, achieves 499. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Raffaelli R, et al. A randomized
comparable treatment characteristics and outcome. Fertil study of the effects of tibolone and transdermal estrogen
Steril. 2010 Apr;93(6):2077-9. PMID: 19732872. X-3, X-5 replacement therapy in postmenopausal women with
uterine myomas. European Journal of Obstetrics
488. Farkas M, Szigethy A, Sas M. Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2000;88(1):91-4.
Clinicopharmacological examination of Anteovin. Ther PMID: 10659924. X-6, X-7
Hung. 1987;35(1):14-8. PMID: 3438859. X-3, X-9, X-10
500. Feely M, Gibson J. Intermittent clobazam for
489. Farquhar CM. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system: catamenial epilepsy: tolerance avoided. J Neurol Neurosurg
a simple and effective alternative for the management of Psychiatry. 1984 Dec;47(12):1279-82. PMID: 6392481. X-
menorrhagia? Med J Aust. 2002 Oct 21;177(8):444-5. 3, X-5
PMID: 12381255. X-8
501. Fender GR, Prentice A, Gorst T, et al. Randomised
490. Farquhar CM, Prentice A, Barlow DH, et al. Effective controlled trial of educational package on management of
treatment of subfertility: introducing the Cochrane menorrhagia in primary care: the Anglia menorrhagia
Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group. Hum Reprod. education study. BMJ. 1999 May 8;318(7193):1246-50.
1999 Jul;14(7):1678-83. PMID: 10402367. X-1, X-4, X-5, PMID: 10231255. X-5, X-10, OTHER
X-9
502. Feng C, Sun CC, Wang TT, et al. Decreased
491. Farr G, Amatya R. Contraceptive efficacy of the expression of endometrial vessel AQP1 and endometrial
Copper T380A and the Multiload Cu250 IUD in three epithelium AQP2 related to anovulatory uterine bleeding in
developing countries. Adv Contracept. 1994 Jun;10(2):137- premenopausal women. Menopause. 2008 Jul-Aug;15(4 Pt
49. PMID: 7942261. X-9 1):648-54. PMID: 18463544. X-4, X-5

492. Farr G, Amatya R. Contraceptive efficacy of the 503. Ferenczy A, Gelfand MM, van de Weijer PH, et al.
Copper T 380A and Copper T 200 intrauterine devices: Endometrial safety and bleeding patterns during a 2-year
results from a comparative clinical trial in six developing study of 1 or 2 mg 17 beta-estradiol combined with
countries. Contraception. 1994 Mar;49(3):231-43. PMID: sequential 5-20 mg dydrogesterone. Climacteric. 2002
8200217. X-9 Mar;5(1):26-35. PMID: 11974556. X-5, X-7

K-24
and exogenous gonadotrophins. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
504. Fernandez H, Capella S, Audibert F. Uterine thermal 1985 Apr;92(4):369-73. PMID: 3921050. X-3, X-4, X-5
balloon therapy under local anaesthesia for the treatment of
menorrhagia: a pilot study. Hum Reprod. 1997 515. Florio P, Gubbini G, Marra E, et al. A retrospective
Nov;12(11):2511-4. PMID: 9436696. X-4, X-5, X-8, X-9 case-control study comparing hysteroscopic resection
versus hormonal modulation in treating menstrual disorders
505. Fernandez H, Lucas C, Hedon B, et al. One year due to isthmocele. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011
comparison between two add-back therapies in pateints Jun;27(6):434-8. PMID: 21204608. X-4, X-5, X-8
treated with a GmRH agonist for symptomatic
endometriosis: A randomized double-blind trial. Human 516. Focan C, Beauduin M, Majois F, et al. High-dose oral
Reproduction. 2004;19(6):1465-71. PMID: 15105403. X- medroxyprogesterone acetate or tamoxifen as adjuvant
4, X-5, X-10 hormone therapy for node-negative early-stage breast
cancer: Randomized trial with 7-year update. Clinical
506. Fernandez H, Sefrioui O, Virelizier C, et al. Breast Cancer. 2004;5(2):136-41. PMID: 15245618. X-5
Hysteroscopic resection of submucosal myomas in patients
with infertility. Hum Reprod. 2001 Jul;16(7):1489-92. 517. Foden-Shroff J, Redman CW, Tucker H, et al. Do
PMID: 11425835. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9 routine antibiotics after loop diathermy excision reduce
morbidity? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Sep;105(9):1022-5.
507. Fernandez-Mentoli ME, Diez-Gibert O, Samaniego PMID: 9763056. X-5, X-8, X-9
JM, et al. Total and unbound cytosolic estrogen and
progesterone receptors in myometrium and fibroid after 518. Fogelholm M, Hiilloskorpi H. Weight and diet
gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment. Fertility concerns in Finnish female and male athletes. Med Sci
and Sterility. 1995;63(3):522-7. PMID: 7851581. X-4, X-6 Sports Exerc. 1999 Feb;31(2):229-35. PMID: 10063811.
X-4, X-5, X-9
508. Ferrari CI, Abs R, Bevan JS, et al. Treatment of
macroprolactinoma with cabergoline: a study of 85 519. Foidart JM, Sulak PJ, Schellschmidt I, et al. The use
patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1997 Apr;46(4):409-13. of an oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and
PMID: 9196602. X-4, X-5, X-9 drospirenone in an extended regimen over 126 days.
Contraception. 2006 Jan;73(1):34-40. PMID: 16371292.
509. Ferrero S, Camerini G, Seracchioli R, et al. Letrozole X-4, X-5
combined with norethisterone acetate compared with
norethisterone acetate alone in the treatment of pain 520. Foidart JM, Wuttke W, Bouw GM, et al. A
symptoms caused by endometriosis. Human Reproduction. comparative investigation of contraceptive reliability, cycle
2010;24(12):3033-41. PMID: 19726448. X-3, X-5, X-6 control and tolerance of two monophasic oral
contraceptives containing either drospirenone or
510. Ferrero S, Venturini PL, Gillott DJ, et al. Letrozole desogestrel. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000
and norethisterone acetate versus letrozole and triptorelin in Jun;5(2):124-34. PMID: 10943575. X-4, X-5
the treatment of endometriosis related pain symptoms: A
randomized controlled trial. Reproductive Biology and 521. Fontaine D, Lazorthes Y, Mertens P, et al. Safety and
Endocrinology. 2011;9(88)PMID: 21693037. X-5, X-10 efficacy of deep brain stimulation in refractory cluster
headache: A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind
511. Ferry S, Hannaford P, Warskyj M, et al. Carpal tunnel trial followed by a 1-year open extension. Journal of
syndrome: a nested case-control study of risk factors in Headache and Pain. 2010;11(1):23-31. PMID: 19936616.
women. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Mar 15;151(6):566-74. X-5
PMID: 10733038. X-4, X-5, X-9
522. Foster PA. The reproductive health of women with
512. Fine PM. Ulipristal acetate: A new emergency von Willebrand Disease unresponsive to DDAVP: results
contraceptive that is safe and more effective than of an international survey. On behalf of the Subcommittee
levonorgestrel. Women's Health. 2011;7(1):9-17. PMID: on von Willebrand Factor of the Scientific and
21175385. X-1, X-5, X-9 Standardization Committee of the ISTH. Thromb Haemost.
1995 Aug;74(2):784-90. PMID: 8585022. X-3, X-6
513. Fleischmann R, Vencovsky J, Van Vollenhoven RF,
et al. Efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol 523. Fouda UM, Yossef D, Gaafar HM. Uterine artery
monotherapy every 4 weeks in patients with rheumatoid blood flow in patients with copper intrauterine device-
arthritis failing previous disease-modifying antirheumatic induced abnormal uterine bleeding. Middle East Fertility
therapy: The FAST4WARD study. Annals of the Society Journal. 2010;15(3):168-73. X-3, X-4, X-5
Rheumatic Diseases. 2009;68(6):805-11. PMID: 19015206.
X-5 524. Frajndlich R, von Eye Corleta H, Frantz N. Color
Doppler sonographic study of the uterine artery in patients
514. Fleming R, Haxton MJ, Hamilton MP, et al. using intrauterine contraceptive devices. J Ultrasound Med.
Successful treatment of infertile women with 2000 Aug;19(8):577-9. PMID: 10944044. X-4, X-5, X-9
oligomenorrhoea using a combination of an LHRH agonist

K-25
cost?... commentary on Gracia CR, Barnhart KT.
525. Franke HR, Snaaijer FF, Houben PW, et al. Diagnosing ectopic pregnancy: decision analysis
Treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding in the comparing six strategies. OBSTET GYNECOL
perimenopause: the effects of adding combined 2001;97:464-70. Evidence-Based Practice. 2001;4(7):10-1,
estradiol/norethisterone acetate therapy to goserelin acetate insert 2p. X-1, X-3, X-5
treatment--a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind
trial. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006 Dec;22(12):692-7. PMID: 536. Friberg B, Persson BR, Willen R, et al. Endometrial
17162712. X-5 destruction by hyperthermia--a possible treatment of
menorrhagia. An experimental study. Acta Obstet Gynecol
526. Franke HR, Snaaijer FF, Houben PWH, et al. Scand. 1996 Apr;75(4):330-5. PMID: 8638450. X-4, X-5,
Treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding in the X-8
perimenopause: The effects of adding combined
estradiol/norethisterone acetate therapy to goserelin acetate 537. Friedman AJ, Daly M, Juneau-Norcross M, et al.
treatment - A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind Long-term medical therapy for leiomyomata uteri: A
trial. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2006;22(12):692-7. prospective, randomized study of leuprolide acetate depot
PMID: 17162712. X-5 plus either oestrogen-progestin or progestin 'add-back' for 2
years. Human Reproduction. 1994;9(9):1618-25. PMID:
527. Franssen AM, Kauer FM, Rolland R, et al. The effect 7836510. X-6
of LHRH agonist therapy in the treatment of endometriosis
(Dutch experience). Prog Clin Biol Res. 1986;225:201-10. 538. Friedman AJ, Hoffman DI, Comite F, et al. Treatment
PMID: 3097666. X-11 of leiomyomata uteri with leuprolide acetate depot: a
double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. The
528. Fraser DI, Padwick ML, Whitehead MI, et al. The Leuprolide Study Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1991
effects of the addition of nomegestrol acetate to post- May;77(5):720-5. PMID: 1901638. X-5, X-6
menopausal oestrogen therapy. Maturitas. 1989
Mar;11(1):21-34. PMID: 2725335. X-7 539. Fruzzetti F, De Lorenzo D, Ricci C, et al. Clinical and
endocrine effects of flutamide in hyperandrogenic women.
529. Fraser IS. Treatment of ovulatory and anovulatory Fertil Steril. 1993 Nov;60(5):806-13. PMID: 8224265. X-5
dysfunctional uterine bleeding with oral progestogens. Aust
N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Nov;30(4):353-6. PMID: 540. Fukui H, Toyoshima K, Komaki R. Psychological and
2150587. X-3 neuroendocrinological effects of odor of saffron (Crocus
sativus). Phytomedicine. 2011 Jun 15;18(8-9):726-30.
530. Fraser IS, Healy DL, Torode H, et al. Depot goserelin PMID: 21242071. X-4, X-5
and danazol pre-treatment before rollerball endometrial
ablation for menorrhagia. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 541. Fulghesu AM, Angioni S, Frau E, et al. Ultrasound in
Apr;87(4):544-50. PMID: 8602306. X-5, X-8, X-9 polycystic ovary syndrome - The measuring of ovarian
stroma and relationship with circulating androgens: Results
531. Fraser IS, McCarron G, Markham R, et al. Long-term of a multicentric study. Human Reproduction.
treatment of menorrhagia with mefenamic acid. Obstet 2007;22(9):2501-8. PMID: 17635847. X-3, X-4, X-5
Gynecol. 1983 Jan;61(1):109-12. PMID: 6337354. X-3
542. Funder JW. Eplerenone: Hypertension, heart failure
532. Fraser IS, Weisberg E, Minehan E, et al. A detailed and the importance of mineralocorticoid receptor blockade.
analysis of menstrual blood loss in women using Norplant Future Cardiology. 2006;2(5):535-41. PMID: 19804189.
and Nestorone progestogen-only contraceptive implants or X-1, X-3, X-5
vaginal rings. Contraception. 2000 Apr;61(4):241-51.
PMID: 10899479. X-4, X-5, X-6 543. Funk S, Miller MM, Mishell DR, Jr., et al. Safety and
efficacy of Implanon, a single-rod implantable
533. Frederick JL, Chenette PE, Paulson RJ, et al. Random contraceptive containing etonogestrel. Contraception. 2005
urinary pregnanediol glucuronide measurements in May;71(5):319-26. PMID: 15854630. X-4, X-5
pregnancy: lack of utility for evaluation of first-trimester
vaginal bleeding. Hum Reprod. 1990 May;5(4):468-70. 544. Furst DE, Manorama MV, Mary M, et al. Double-
PMID: 2362010. X-3, X-4, X-5 blind, randomized, controlled, pilot study comparing
classic ayurvedic medicine, methotrexate, and their
534. French JI, McGregor JA, Draper D, et al. Gestational combination in rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Clinical
bleeding, bacterial vaginosis, and common reproductive Rheumatology. 2011;17(4):185-92. PMID: 21617554. X-5
tract infections: risk for preterm birth and benefit of
treatment. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 May;93(5 Pt 1):715-24. 545. Furtado RNV, Oliveira LM, Natour J. Polyarticular
PMID: 10912974. X-4, X-5, X-9 corticosteroid injection versus systemic administration in
treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients: A randomized
535. French L. What strategy is most likely to result in the controlled study. Journal of Rheumatology.
least missed ectopic pregnancies, while also considering the 2005;32(9):1691-8. PMID: 16142862. X-5
likelihood of interruption of intrauterine pregnancy and

K-26
546. Gaete X, Vivanco M, Eyzaguirre FC, et al. Menstrual 556. Gardner FJ, Konje JC, Abrams KR, et al. Endometrial
cycle irregularities and their relationship with HbA1c and protection from tamoxifen-stimulated changes by a
insulin dose in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: a randomised
Fertil Steril. 2010 Oct;94(5):1822-6. PMID: 19796762. X- controlled trial. Lancet. 2000 Nov 18;356(9243):1711-7.
4, X-5, X-6, X-9 PMID: 11095258. X-5, X-7

547. Galley P, Thiollet M. A double-blind, placebo- 557. Garry R. Endometrial laser ablation. Baillieres Clin
controlled trial of a new veno-active flavonoid fraction (S Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Jun;9(2):317-28. PMID: 7554615.
5682) in the treatment of symptomatic capillary fragility. X-3, X-8
Int Angiol. 1993 Mar;12(1):69-72. PMID: 8376915. X-5,
X-6 558. Gaspard UJ, Deville JL, Dubois M. Clinical
experience with a triphasic oral contraceptive ('Trinordiol')
548. Gallo MF, Nanda K, Grimes DA, et al. 20 g versus in young women. Curr Med Res Opin. 1983;8(6):395-404.
>20 g estrogen combined oral contraceptives for PMID: 6406157. X-3, X-9
contraception. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
2008(4)PMID: 18843653. X-9 559. Gebauer G, Hafner A, Siebzehnrubl E, et al. Role of
hysteroscopy in detection and extraction of endometrial
549. Gama CRB, Gama GF, Lasmar RB, et al. Clinical polyps: results of a prospective study. Am J Obstet
assessment of ethinylestradiol and cyproterone acetate in Gynecol. 2001 Jan;184(2):59-63. PMID: 11174480. X-4,
menstrual irregularities of hyper-androgenic origin. Revista X-5, X-6, X-7, X-8
Brasileira de Medicina. 2010;67(9):319-25. X-5
560. Gelfand MM, Ferenczy A. A prospective 1-year study
550. Gambacciani M, Cappagli B, Piaggesi L, et al. of estrogen and progestin in postmenopausal women:
Ipriflavone prevents the loss of bone mass in effects on the endometrium. Obstet Gynecol. 1989
pharmacological menopause induced by GnRH-agonists. Sep;74(3 Pt 1):398-402. PMID: 2548135. X-3, X-7
Calcif Tissue Int. 1997;61 Suppl 1:S15-8. PMID: 9263611.
X-4, X-5 561. Geller SE, Harlow SD, Bernstein SJ. Differences in
menstrual bleeding characteristics, functional status, and
551. Gangale MF, Miele L, Lanzone A, et al. Long-term attitudes toward menstruation in three groups of women.
metformin treatment is able to reduce the prevalence of Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine.
metabolic syndrome and its hepatic involvement in young 1999;8(4):533-40. PMID: 10839708. X-3, X-4, X-5
hyperinsulinaemic overweight patients with polycystic
ovarian syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011 562. Gemzell-Danielsson K, Inki P, Boubli L, et al.
Oct;75(4):520-7. PMID: 21569072. X-3, X-4 Bleeding pattern and safety of consecutive use of the
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS)--a
552. Gao J, Sun HZ, Song GY, et al. Clinical investigation multicentre prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2010
of a low-dose levonorgestrel-releasing vaginal ring. Fertil Feb;25(2):354-9. PMID: 19955104. X-4, X-5
Steril. 1986 Oct;46(4):626-30. PMID: 3093283. X-3, X-9
563. Gemzell-Danielsson K, Schellschmidt I, Apter D. A
553. Gao J, Wang SL, Wu SC, et al. Comparison of the randomized, phase II study describing the efficacy,
clinical performance, contraceptive efficacy and bleeding profile, and safety of two low-dose levonorgestrel-
acceptability of levonorgestrel-releasing IUD and Norplant- releasing intrauterine contraceptive systems and Mirena.
2 implants in China. Contraception. 1990 May;41(5):485- Fertility and Sterility. 2012 March;97(3):616-22.e3. PMID:
94. PMID: 2112079. X-9 2012128428. X-9, X-10

554. Garceau RJ, Wajszczuk CJ, Kaunitz AM. Bleeding 564. Gemzell-Danielsson K, van Heusden AM, Killick SR,
patterns of women using Lunelle monthly contraceptive et al. Improving cycle control in progestogen-only
injections (medroxyprogesterone acetate and estradiol contraceptive pill users by intermittent treatment with a
cypionate injectable suspension) compared with those of new anti-progestogen. Hum Reprod. 2002
women using Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 (norethindrone/ethinyl Oct;17(10):2588-93. PMID: 12351534. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
estradiol triphasic) or other oral contraceptives.
Contraception. 2000 Dec;62(6):289-95. PMID: 11239615. 565. Genazzani AD, Lanzoni C, Ricchieri F, et al.
X-4, X-5, X-6 Metformin administration is more effective when non-
obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome show both
555. Garcia-Giralt E, Ayme Y, Carton M, et al. Second hyperandrogenism and hyperinsulinemia. Gynecol
and third line hormonotherapy in advanced post- Endocrinol. 2007 Mar;23(3):146-52. PMID: 17454168. X-
menopausal breast cancer: A multicenter randomized trial 4, X-5, X-9
comparing medroxyprogesterone acetate with
aminoglutethimide in patients who have become resistant 566. Geng SS, Li HZ, Wu XK, et al. Effect of Wujijing
to tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. Oral Liquid on menstrual disturbance of women. J
1992;24(2):139-45. PMID: 8443401. X-7

K-27
Ethnopharmacol. 2010 Apr 21;128(3):649-53. PMID:
20051257. X-6, X-10 577. Ghosh AK, Konar JR. The relative value of two
concentrations of hypertonic saline for midtrimester
567. Geraghty P. Beyond birth control. The health benefits abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1980 Jan-Feb;17(4):368-
of hormonal contraception. Adv Nurse Pract. 2009 71. PMID: 6102059. X-5
Feb;17(2):47-8, 50, 2. PMID: 19999425. X-1, X-3, X-5,
X-10 578. Giacovazzo M, Gallo MF, Guidi V, et al. Nimesulide
in the treatment of menstrual migraine. Drugs. 1993;46
568. Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Anastrozole Suppl 1:140-1. PMID: 7506154. X-5
versus tamoxifen treatment in postmenopausal women with
endocrine-responsive breast cancer and tamoxifen-induced 579. Gibson JH, Mitchell A, Reeve J, et al. Treatment of
endometrial pathology. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Feb reduced bone mineral density in athletic amenorrhea: a
15;12(4):1245-50. PMID: 16489080. X-5, X-7, X-9 pilot study. Osteoporos Int. 1999;10(4):284-9. PMID:
10692976. X-4, X-5, X-9
569. Gerli S, Gholami H, Manna C, et al. Use of ethinyl
estradiol to reverse the antiestrogenic effects of clomiphene 580. Gilbert WM, Moore TR, Resnik R, et al.
citrate in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a Angiographic embolization in the management of
comparative, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2000 hemorrhagic complications of pregnancy. Am J Obstet
Jan;73(1):85-9. PMID: 10632418. X-5, X-9 Gynecol. 1992 Feb;166(2):493-7. PMID: 1536217. X-3, X-
5, X-8
570. Gerli S, Mignosa M, Di Renzo GC. Effects of inositol
on ovarian function and metabolic factors in women with 581. Ginsburg J, Prelevic G, Butler D, et al. Clinical
PCOS: a randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial. experience with tibolone (Livial) over 8 years. Maturitas.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2003 Nov-Dec;7(6):151-9. 1995 Jan;21(1):71-6. PMID: 7731388. X-3, X-7
PMID: 15206484. X-4, X-5, X-9
582. Glasier A, Thong KJ, Dewar M, et al. Mifepristone
571. Gerli S, Papaleo E, Ferrari A, et al. Randomized, (RU 486) compared with high-dose estrogen and
double blind placebo-controlled trial: effects of myo- progestogen for emergency postcoital contraception. New
inositol on ovarian function and metabolic factors in England Journal of Medicine. 1992;327(15):1041-4. PMID:
women with PCOS. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2007 1522839. X-5, X-9
Sep-Oct;11(5):347-54. PMID: 18074942. X-4, X-5
583. Glasier AF, Wang H, Davie JE, et al. Administration
572. Geyman JP, Oliver LM, Sullivan SD. Expectant, of an antiprogesterone up-regulates estrogen receptors in
medical, or surgical treatment of spontaneous abortion in the endometrium of women using Norplant: a pilot study.
first trimester of pregnancy? A pooled quantitative Fertil Steril. 2002 Feb;77(2):366-72. PMID: 11821099. X-
literature evaluation. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1999 Jan- 4, X-5, X-6
Feb;12(1):55-64. PMID: 10050644. X-1, X-4, X-5, X-8, X-
9 584. Glueck CJ, Phillips H, Cameron D, et al. Continuing
metformin throughout pregnancy in women with polycystic
573. Ghadirian AM, Chouinard G, Annable L. Sexual ovary syndrome appears to safely reduce first-trimester
dysfunction and plasma prolactin levels in neuroleptic- spontaneous abortion: a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2001
treated schizophrenic outpatients. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1982 Jan;75(1):46-52. PMID: 11163815. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
Aug;170(8):463-7. PMID: 6124580. X-3, X-5, X-6
585. Gnoth C, Frank-Herrmann P, Schmoll A, et al. Cycle
574. Ghatak SB, Panchal SJ. Ulipristal acetate- a novel characteristics after discontinuation of oral contraceptives.
oral emergency contraceptive: Hype or hope? International Gynecol Endocrinol. 2002 Aug;16(4):307-17. PMID:
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 12396560. X-4, X-5, X-9
2010;4(3):152-5. X-1, X-3, X-5, X-9
586. Godfrey EM, Wu S, Dong J, et al. Gestrinone
575. Ghazizadeh S, Bakhtiari F, Rahmanpour H, et al. A compared with mifepristone for emergency contraception:
randomized clinical trial to compare levonorgestrel- A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology.
releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) vs trans- ervical 2010;115(4):740-4. PMID: 20308833. X-5
endometrial resection for treatment of menorrhagia.
International Journal of Women's Health. 2011;3(1):207- 587. Gol M, Akan P, Dogan E, et al. Effects of estrogen,
11. PMID: 2011702821. X-8 raloxifene, and hormone replacement therapy on serum C-
reactive protein and homocysteine levels. Maturitas.
576. Gheorghiade M, Khan S, Blair JEA, et al. The effects 2006;53(3):252-9. PMID: 15990257. X-7
of eplerenone on length of stay and total days of heart
failure hospitalization after myocardial infarction in 588. Goldberg AB, Cardenas LH, Hubbard AE, et al. Post-
patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. abortion depot medroxyprogesterone acetate continuation
American Heart Journal. 2009;158(3):437-43. PMID: rates: a randomized trial of cyclic estradiol. Contraception.
19699868. X-5 2002 Oct;66(4):215-20. PMID: 12413614. X-5, X-9

K-28
the treatment of severe fibrocystic breast disease. Eur J
589. Goldenberg M, Cohen SB, Etchin A, et al. A Gynaecol Oncol. 1984;5(2):85-9. PMID: 6373293. X-5
randomized prospective comparative study of general
versus epidural anesthesia for transcervical hysteroscopic 601. Grady D, Applegate W, Bush T, et al. Heart and
endometrial resection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 estrogen/progestin replacement study (HERS): Design,
Feb;184(3):273-6. PMID: 11228472. X-4, X-5, X-8, X-9 methods, and baseline characteristics. Controlled Clinical
Trials. 1998;19(4):314-35. PMID: 9683309. X-7
590. Goldenberg M, Zolti M, Bider D, et al. The effect of
intracervical vasopressin on the systemic absorption of 602. Grady D, Sawaya GF, Johnson KC, et al. MF101, a
glycine during hysteroscopic endometrial ablation. Obstet selective estrogen receptor beta modulator for the treatment
Gynecol. 1996 Jun;87(6):1025-9. PMID: 8649684. X-4, X- of menopausal hot flushes: a phase II clinical trial.
5, X-8, X-9 Menopause. 2009 May-Jun;16(3):458-65. PMID:
19182698. X-5, X-7, X-9
591. Goldrath MH. Uterine tamponade for the control of
acute uterine bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Dec 603. Graser T, Koytchev R, Muller A, et al. Comparison of
15;147(8):869-72. PMID: 6650623. X-3, X-5 the efficacy and endometrial safety of two estradiol
valerate/dienogest combinations and Kliogest for
592. Goldrath MH. Use of danazol in hysteroscopic continuous combined hormone replacement therapy in
surgery for menorrhagia. J Reprod Med. 1990 Jan;35(1 postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2000 Jun;3(2):109-
Suppl):91-6. PMID: 2136915. X-3, X-8 18. PMID: 11910651. X-5, X-7

593. Goldrath MH. Evaluation of HydroThermAblator and 604. Graser T, Muller A, Mellinger U, et al. Continuous-
rollerball endometrial ablation for menorrhagia 3 Years combined treatment of the menopause with combinations
after treatment. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 of oestradiol valerate and dienogest - A dose-ranging study.
Nov;10(4):505-11. PMID: 14738639. X-5, X-8 Maturitas. 2000;35(3):253-61. PMID: 10936742. X-7

594. Goldstein SR, Bhattoa HP, Neven P, et al. 605. Graser T, Romer T, Wiedey KD, et al. Climodien
Gynecologic effects of arzoxifene in postmenopausal (estradiol valerate 2 mg plus dienogest 2 mg) is safe and
women with osteoporosis or low bone mass. Menopause. effective in the treatment of postmenopausal complaints.
2012 Jan;19(1):41-7. PMID: 21993078. X-5, X-7 Climacteric. 2001 Dec;4(4):332-42. PMID: 11770190. X-
4, X-5, X-7
595. Gompel A, Bergeron C, Jondet M, et al. Endometrial
safety and tolerability of AERODIOL(R) (intranasal 606. Graser T, Rossner P, Schubert K, et al. A comparative
estradiol) for 1 year. Maturitas. 2000 Oct 31;36(3):209-15. study of two levonorgestrel-containing hormone
PMID: 11063903. X-4, X-5, X-7 replacement therapy regimens of efficacy and tolerability
variables. Maturitas. 1997 Dec 15;28(2):169-79. PMID:
596. Gong C, Song E, Jia W, et al. A double-blind 9522325. X-5, X-7
randomized controlled trial of toremifen therapy for
mastalgia. Archives of Surgery. 2006;141(1):43-7. PMID: 607. Gray RH, Parker RA, Diethelm P. Vaginal bleeding
16415410. X-5 disturbances associated with the discontinuation of long-
acting injectable contraceptives. From the World Health
597. Gong Y, Zha Q, Li L, et al. Efficacy and safety of Organization Special Programme for Research,
Fufangkushen colon-coated capsule in the treatment of Development, and Research Training in Human
ulcerative colitis compared with mesalazine: A double- Reproduction; Task Force on Long-acting Systemic Agents
blinded and randomized study. Journal of for the Regulation of Fertility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981
Ethnopharmacology. 2012 01 Jun;141(2):592-8. PMID: Mar;88(3):317-21. PMID: 7008825. X-9
2012284219. X-5
608. Gray RH, Parker RA, Diethelm P. Vaginal bleeding
598. Gonzalez-Barcena D, Alvarez RB, Ochoa EP, et al. disturbances associated with the discontinuation of long-
Treatment of uterine leiomyomas with luteinizing acting injectable contraceptives. British Journal of
hormone-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix. Hum Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1981;88(3):317-21. PMID:
Reprod. 1997 Sep;12(9):2028-35. PMID: 9363724. X-4, 7008825. X-6, X-9
X-5, X-6
609. Greenblatt RB. Dwarfs, standing on the shoulders of
599. Gorgen H, Api M, Akca A, et al. Use of the giants, see further. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1982;112 Pt A:1-11.
Levonorgestrel-IUS in the treatment of menorrhagia: PMID: 7163294. X-1, X-3, X-5, X-10
assessment of quality of life in Turkish users. Arch
Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jun;279(6):835-40. PMID: 610. Greenspan SL, Resnick NM, Parker RA. The effect of
19018547. X-4 hormone replacement on physical performance in
community-dwelling elderly women. American Journal of
600. Gorins A, Perret F, Tournant B, et al. A French Medicine. 2005;118(11):1232-9. PMID: 16271907. X-7
double-blind crossover study (danazol versus placebo) in

K-29
621. Guichard JP, Sauron R, Jones AB. Comparison of the
611. Greenwood LH, Glickman MG, Schwartz PE, et al. pharmacokinetics of 17 beta-estradiol after a single 4-day
Obstetric and nonmalignant gynecologic bleeding: application of Oesclim 50, Oesclim 100, and Vivelle 0.05
treatment with angiographic embolization. Radiology. 1987 (Menorest 50) transdermal delivery systems. J Clin
Jul;164(1):155-9. PMID: 3495816. X-3, X-5, X-8 Pharmacol. 1999 Aug;39(8):811-6. PMID: 10434233. X-5,
X-7
612. Grimbizis G, Tsalikis T, Tzioufa V, et al. Regression
of endometrial hyperplasia after treatment with the 622. Guida M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Bramante S, et al.
gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue triptorelin: a Effects of two types of hormonal contraception - Oral
prospective study. Hum Reprod. 1999 Feb;14(2):479-84. versus intravaginal - On the sexual life of women and their
PMID: 10099998. X-3, X-6 partners. Human Reproduction. 2005;20(4):1100-6. PMID:
15608030. X-5, X-9
613. Grimes DA, Mishell DR, Jr., Shoupe D, et al. Early
abortion with a single dose of the antiprogestin RU-486. 623. Guida M, Pellicano M, Zullo F, et al. Outpatient
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jun;158(6 Pt 1):1307-12. operative hysteroscopy with bipolar electrode: A
PMID: 2454578. X-3, X-5 prospective multicentre randomized study between local
anaesthesia and conscious sedation. Human Reproduction.
614. Grodnitskaya EE, Grigoryan OR, Klinyshkova EV, et 2003;18(4):840-3. PMID: 12660281. X-8
al. Effect on carbohydrate metabolism and analysis of
acceptability (menstrual cycle control) of extended 624. Guidotti M, Mauri M, Barrila C, et al. Frovatriptan
regimens of the vaginally inserted hormone-releasing vs. transdermal oestrogens or naproxen sodium for the
system 'NuvaRing' as compared with the standard 21/7 prophylaxis of menstrual migraine. J Headache Pain. 2007
regime in reproductive-age women with type 1 diabetes Oct;8(5):283-8. PMID: 17955167. X-4, X-5, X-9
mellitus. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2010;26(9):663-8.
PMID: 20334583. X-5 625. Guilleminault C, Stoohs R, Kim YD, et al. Upper
airway sleep-disordered breathing in women. Ann Intern
615. Grubb GS, Welch JD, Cole L, et al. A comparative Med. 1995 Apr 1;122(7):493-501. PMID: 7872583. X-3,
evaluation of the safety and contraceptive effectiveness of X-5
65 mg and 100 mg of 90-day norethindrone (NET)
injectable microspheres: a multicenter study. Fertil Steril. 626. Gull B, Carlsson S, Karlsson B, et al. Transvaginal
1989 May;51(5):803-10. PMID: 2523322. X-9 ultrasonography of the endometrium in women with
postmenopausal bleeding: is it always necessary to perform
616. Gruber DM, Huber JC, Melis GB, et al. A comparison an endometrial biopsy? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000
of the cycle control, safety, and efficacy profile of a 21-day Mar;182(3):509-15. PMID: 10739500. X-4, X-5, X-7
regimen of ethinylestradiol 20mug and drospirenone 3mg
with a 21-day regimen of ethinylestradiol 20mug and 627. Gultekin M, Diribas K, Buru E, et al. Role of a non-
desogestrel 150mug. Treatments in Endocrinology. hormonal oral anti-fibrinolytic hemostatic agent
2006;5(2):115-21. PMID: 16542051. X-9 (tranexamic acid) for management of patients with
dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol.
617. Gu SJ, Du MK, Zhang LD, et al. A 5-year evaluation 2009;36(3):163-5. PMID: 19860359. X-4
of NORPLANT contraceptive implants in China. Obstet
Gynecol. 1994 May;83(5 Pt 1):673-8. PMID: 8164924. X- 628. Gunson MJ, Arnett GW, Formby B, et al. Oral
3, X-9 contraceptive pill use and abnormal menstrual cycles in
women with severe condylar resorption: a case for low
618. Guazzelli CA, Barreiros FA, Barbosa R, et al. serum 17beta-estradiol as a major factor in progressive
Extended regimens of the vaginal contraceptive ring: cycle condylar resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
control. Contraception. 2009 Nov;80(5):430-5. PMID: 2009 Dec;136(6):772-9. PMID: 19962599. X-4, X-5, X-9
19835716. X-4, X-5, X-9
629. Gupta AN, Dhaliwal LK, Gulati K. Clinical
619. Gudmundsson JA, Nillius SJ, Bergquist C. Intranasal performance with contraceptive vaginal rings containing
peptide contraception by inhibition of ovulation with the levonorgestrel. Indian J Med Res. 1986 Sep;84:321-5.
gonadotropin-releasing hormone superagonist nafarelin: six PMID: 3102365. X-3, X-9, X-10
months' clinical results. Fertil Steril. 1986 May;45(5):617-
23. PMID: 2938984. X-3, X-9 630. Gupta B, Mittal S, Misra R, et al. Levonorgestrel-
releasing intrauterine system vs. transcervical endometrial
620. Guest J, Chien P, Thomson M, et al. Randomised resection for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Int J Gynaecol
controlled trial comparing efficacy of same day Obstet. 2006 Dec;95(3):261-6. PMID: 16999960. X-8
administration of mifepristone and misoprostol for
termination of pregnancy with the standard 36- to 48-hour 631. Gupta P, Singh S, Goyal V, et al. Low-dose
protocol. BJOG. 2005 Oct;112(10):1457. PMID: topiramate versus lamotrigine in migraine prophylaxis (the
16167962. X-5, X-9 Lotolamp study). Headache. 2007;47(3):402-12. PMID:
17371357. X-5

K-30
632. Gurates B, Parmaksiz C, Kilic G, et al. Treatment of 643. Halmesmaki KH, Hurskainen RA, Cacciatore B, et al.
symptomatic uterine leiomyoma with letrozole. Reprod Effect of hysterectomy or LNG-IUS on serum inhibin B
Biomed Online. 2008 Oct;17(4):569-74. PMID: 18854113. levels and ovarian blood flow. Maturitas. 2007 Jul
X-4, X-5, X-6 20;57(3):279-85. PMID: 17329045. X-4, X-5, X-8

633. Gusberg SB. An approach to the control of carcinoma 644. Halmesmaki KH, Paavonen JA, Tuppurainen MT, et
of the endometrium. CA Cancer J Clin. 1980 Jan- al. Randomized controlled trial of the effect of
Feb;30(1):16-22. PMID: 6766346. X-5 hysterectomy or LNG-IUS use on bone mineral density: A
five-year follow-up. Therapy. 2006;3(4):509-15. X-8
634. Guzick DS, Wing R, Smith D, et al. Endocrine
consequences of weight loss in obese, hyperandrogenic, 645. Hamilton RA, Grant AM, Henry OA, et al. The
anovulatory women. Fertility and Sterility. 1994;61(4):598- management of bleeding in early pregnancy. Ir Med J. 1991
604. PMID: 8150098. X-3, X-5, X-10 Mar;84(1):18-9. PMID: 2045259. X-3, X-5

635. Hakimian S, Cheng-Hakimian A, Anderson GD, et al. 646. Hammar M, Christau S, Nathorst-Boos J, et al. A
Rufinamide: A new anti-epileptic medication. Expert double-blind, randomised trial comparing the effects of
Opinion on Pharmacotherapy. 2007;8(12):1931-40. PMID: tibolone and continuous combined hormone replacement
17696794. X-1, X-3, X-5 therapy in postmenopausal women with menopausal
symptoms. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Aug;105(8):904-11.
636. Halbe HW, de Melo NR, Bahamondes L, et al. PMID: 9746385. X-5, X-7
Efficacy and acceptability of two monophasic oral
contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol and either 647. Hammar ML, van de Weijer P, Franke HR, et al.
desogestrel or gestodene. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Tibolone and low-dose continuous combined hormone
Care. 1998 Sep;3(3):113-20. PMID: 9853201. X-9 treatment: vaginal bleeding pattern, efficacy and
tolerability. BJOG. 2007 Dec;114(12):1522-9. PMID:
637. Hald K, Klow NE, Qvigstad E, et al. Laparoscopic 17995496. X-5, X-7
occlusion compared with embolization of uterine vessels: a
randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 648. Hammerstein J, Daume E, Simon A, et al. Influence
Jan;109(1):20-7. PMID: 17197583. X-5, X-6, X-8 of gestodene and desogestrel as components of low-dose
oral contraceptives on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl
638. Hald K, Klow NE, Qvigstad E, et al. Treatment of estradiol (EE2), on serum CBG and on urinary cortisol and
uterine myomas with transvaginal uterine artery occlusion: 6 beta-hydroxycortisol. Contraception. 1993
possibilities and limitations. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. Mar;47(3):263-81. PMID: 8462317. X-4
2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):631-5. PMID: 18722975. X-4, X-5, X-
6, X-8, X-9 649. Hamou JE. Microhysteroscopy. Clin Obstet Gynecol.
1983 Jun;26(2):285-301. PMID: 6406117. X-4, X-5, X-8
639. Hall P, Bahamondes L, Diaz J, et al. Introductory
study of the once-a-month, injectable contraceptive 650. Hampton NR, Rees MC, Lowe DG, et al.
Cyclofem in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Peru. Levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with
Contraception. 1997 Dec;56(6):353-9. PMID: 9494768. X- conjugated oral equine estrogen: a successful regimen for
4, X-5, X-9 HRT in perimenopausal women. Hum Reprod. 2005
Sep;20(9):2653-60. PMID: 15905289. X-4, X-5, X-9
640. Halmesmaki K, Hurskainen R, Teperi J, et al. The
effect of hysterectomy or levonorgestrel-releasing 651. Hampton RM, Fisher AC, Pagano S, et al. Scheduled
intrauterine system on sexual functioning among women and unscheduled bleeding patterns with two combined
with menorrhagia: a 5-year randomised controlled trial. hormonal contraceptives: application of new
BJOG. 2007 May;114(5):563-8. PMID: 17439564. X-8 recommendations for standardization. Fertil Steril. 2009
Aug;92(2):434-40. PMID: 18930189. X-4, X-5, X-9
641. Halmesmaki K, Hurskainen R, Tiitinen A, et al. A
randomized controlled trial of hysterectomy or 652. Hampton RM, Short M, Bieber E, et al. Comparison
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the of a novel norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol oral contraceptive
treatment of menorrhagia-effect on FSH levels and (Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo) with the oral contraceptive Loestrin
menopausal symptoms. Hum Reprod. 2004 Feb;19(2):378- Fe 1/20. Contraception. 2001;63(6):289-95. PMID:
82. PMID: 14747185. X-5, X-8, X-9 11672549. X-9

642. Halmesmaki K, Hurskainen R, Tiitinen A, et al. A 653. Hampton RM, Zhang HF, Barnowski C, et al.
randomized controlled trial hysterectomy of levenorgestrel- Bleeding patterns with monophasic and triphasic low-dose
releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of ethinyl estradiol combined oral contraceptives.
menorrhagia - Effect of FSH levels and menopausal Contraception. 2008 Jun;77(6):415-9. PMID: 18477490.
symptoms. Human Reproduction. 2004;19(2):378-82. X-4, X-5, X-9
PMID: 14747185. X-8

K-31
menorrhagia. Br J Anaesth. 1992 Feb;68(2):151-4. PMID:
654. Hanggi W, Bersinger N, Altermatt HJ, et al. 1540456. X-8
Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and
endometrial biopsy in endometrial surveillance in 665. Hashemi F, Pasyar N, Dehbashi S. Relationship of
postmenopausal HRT users. Maturitas. 1997 chemotherapeutic agents with menstrual disorders in
Jun;27(2):133-43. PMID: 9255748. X-5, X-7, X-8, X-9 nursing staff. Journal of Nursing & Midwifery.
2009;19(64):38-. X-11
655. Haoula ZJ, Walker KF, Powell MC. Levonorgestrel
intra-uterine system as a treatment option for complex 666. Hassan WA, Darwish AM. Impact of pulmonary
endometrial hyperplasia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod tuberculosis on menstrual pattern and fertility. Clin Respir
Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):176-9. PMID: 21741152. X-3, X-6 J. 2010 Jul;4(3):157-61. PMID: 20565494. X-4, X-5, X-9

656. Hapangama DK, Critchley HO, Henderson TA, et al. 667. Hassanin IM, Shahin AY, Abdel-Hafeez AT, et al.
Mifepristone-induced vaginal bleeding is associated with Bilateral uterine artery ligation via minilaparotomy for
increased immunostaining for cyclooxygenase-2 and heavy menstrual bleeding. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008
decrease in prostaglandin dehydrogenase in luteal phase Dec;103(3):222-6. PMID: 18805523. X-4, X-5, X-8
endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002
Nov;87(11):5229-34. PMID: 12414896. X-4, X-5, X-6, X- 668. Haugan T, Skjeldestad FE, Halvorsen LE, et al. A
9 randomized trial on the clinical performance of Nova T380
and Gyne T380 Slimline copper IUDs. Contraception. 2007
657. Haq G, Tayyab S. Control of postpartum and post Mar;75(3):171-6. PMID: 17303485. X-4, X-5
abortal haemorrhage with uterine packing. J Pak Med
Assoc. 2005 Sep;55(9):369-71. PMID: 16302468. X-4, X- 669. Hawe JA, Phillips AG, Chien PF, et al. Cavaterm
5, X-9 thermal balloon ablation for the treatment of menorrhagia.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Nov;106(11):1143-8. PMID:
658. Harada T, Momoeda M, Terakawa N, et al. 10549958. X-4, X-5, X-8
Evaluation of a low-dose oral contraceptive pill for primary
dysmenorrhea: A placebo-controlled, double-blind, 670. Hayes JL, Achilles SL, Creinin MD, et al. Outcomes
randomized trial. Fertility and Sterility. 2011;95(6):1928- of medical abortion through 63 days in women with twin
31. PMID: 21420678. X-5 gestations. Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):505-7. PMID:
22018125. X-3, X-5
659. Harden CL, Herzog AG, Nikolov BG, et al. Hormone
replacement therapy in women with epilepsy: A 671. Haynes PJ, Flint AP, Hodgson H, et al. Studies in
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. menorrhagia: (a) mefenamic acid, (b) endometrial
Epilepsia. 2006;47(9):1447-51. PMID: 16981859. X-5, X- prostaglandin concentrations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1980
7 May-Jun;17(6):567-72. PMID: 6106574. X-3

660. Harding CM, Vail C, Brown R. Effect of oral 672. Hays J, Ockene JK, Brunner RL, et al. Effects of
contraceptives and some psychological factors on the estrogen plus progestin on health-related quality of life. N
menstrual experience. J Biosoc Sci. 1985 Jul;17(3):291- Engl J Med. 2003 May 8;348(19):1839-54. PMID:
304. PMID: 4040913. X-3, X-5, X-10 12642637. X-7

661. Harel Z, Biro F, Kollar L, et al. Supplementation with 673. He CH, Shi YE, Xu JQ, et al. A multicenter clinical
vitamin C and/or vitamin B(6) in the prevention of Depo- study on two types of levonorgestrel tablets administered
Provera side effects in adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc for postcoital contraception. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1991
Gynecol. 2002 Jun;15(3):153-8. PMID: 12106752. X-5, X- Sep;36(1):43-8. PMID: 1683301. X-5, X-9
6, X-9
674. He Y, Lu A, Zha Y, et al. Correlations between
662. Harper C, Winikoff B, Ellertson C, et al. Blood loss symptoms as assessed in traditional Chinese medicine
with mifepristone--misoprostol abortion: measures from a (TCM) and ACR20 efficacy response: A comparison study
trial in China, Cuba and India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 in 396 patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with TCM
Oct;63(1):39-49. PMID: 9849710. X-4, X-5, X-9 or Western medicine. Journal of Clinical Rheumatology.
2007;13(6):317-21. PMID: 18176139. X-5
663. Harrison RF, Barry-Kinsella C. Efficacy of
medroxyprogesterone treatment in infertile women with 675. Heber KR. Medroxyprogesterone acetate as an
endometriosis: A prospective, randomized, placebo- injectable contraceptive. Aust Fam Physician. 1988
controlled study. Fertility and Sterility. 2000;74(1):24-30. Mar;17(3):199-201, 4. PMID: 2965570. X-3, X-5, X-9, X-
PMID: 10899492. X-10 10

664. Hasham F, Garry R, Kokri MS, et al. Fluid absorption 676. Hee P, Pagel JD. Primary carcinoma of the fallopian
during laser ablation of the endometrium in the treatment of tube. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1987
Jun;25(2):131-8. PMID: 3609428. X-3, X-5

K-32
intrauterine system on lower abdominal pain and back pain
677. Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, Broekmans FJ, et al. among women treated for menorrhagia: a five-year
Loss of ovarian reserve after uterine artery embolization: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
randomized comparison with hysterectomy. Hum Reprod. 2009;88(12):1389-96. PMID: 19878089. X-5, X-8
2007 Jul;22(7):1996-2005. PMID: 17582145. X-5, X-6, X-
8 688. Heliovaara-Peippo S, Halmesmaki K, Hurskainen R,
et al. The effect of hysterectomy or levonorgestrel-releasing
678. Heikinheimo O, Inki P, Kunz M, et al. Predictors of intrauterine system on lower urinary tract symptoms: a 10-
bleeding and user satisfaction during consecutive use of the year follow-up study of a randomised trial. BJOG. 2010
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Hum Reprod. Apr;117(5):602-9. PMID: 20156209. X-5, X-8
2010 Jun;25(6):1423-7. PMID: 20378611. X-4, X-5
689. Heliovaara-Peippo S, Oksjoki R, Halmesmaki K, et
679. Heikinheimo O, Inki P, Kunz M, et al. Double-blind, al. The effect of hysterectomy or levonorgestrel-releasing
randomized, placebo-controlled study on the effect of intrauterine system on cardiovascular disease risk factors in
misoprostol on ease of consecutive insertion of the menorrhagia patients: A 10-year follow-up of a randomised
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception. trial. Maturitas. 2011;69(4):354-8. PMID: 21684096. X-8
2010;81(6):481-6. PMID: 20472114, X-5
690. Hellberg D, Nilsson S. Pilot study to evaluate a new
680. Heikinheimo O, Vani S, Carpen O, et al. Intrauterine regimen to treat climacteric complaints with cyclic
release of progesterone antagonist ZK230211 is feasible combined oestradiol valerate/medroxyprogesterone acetate.
and results in novel endometrial effects: a pilot study. Hum Maturitas. 1987 Apr;9(1):103-7. PMID: 2955203. X-3, X-7
Reprod. 2007 Sep;22(9):2515-22. PMID: 17636280. X-4,
X-5, X-9 691. Hellgren M, Conard J, Norris L, et al. Cardiovascular
risk markers during treatment with estradiol and
681. Heikkila M. Puerperal insertion of a copper-releasing trimegestone or dydrogesterone. Maturitas. 2009 Mar
and a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive 20;62(3):287-93. PMID: 19268506. X-4, X-5, X-7, X-9
device. Contraception. 1982 Jun;25(6):561-72. PMID:
6811195. X-3, X-4, X-9 692. Hemmerling A, Harrison W, Schroeder A, et al.
Phase 1 dose-ranging safety trial of Lactobacillus crispatus
682. Heikkinen J, Vaheri R, Timonen U. Long-term safety CTV-05 for the prevention of bacterial vaginosis. Sex
and tolerability of continuous-combined hormone therapy Transm Dis. 2009 Sep;36(9):564-9. PMID: 19543144. X-
in postmenopausal women: Results from a seven-year 4, X-5, X-9
randomised comparison of low and standard doses. Journal
of the British Menopause Society. 2004;10(3):95-102. 693. Hergenroeder AC, Smith EO, Shypailo R, et al. Bone
PMID: 15494100. X-7 mineral changes in young women with hypothalamic
amenorrhea treated with oral contraceptives,
683. Heikkinen J, Vaheri R, Timonen U. A 10-year follow- medroxyprogesterone, or placebo over 12 months. Am J
up of postmenopausal women on long-term continuous Obstet Gynecol. 1997 May;176(5):1017-25. PMID:
combined hormone replacement therapy: Update of safety 9166162. X-5, X-9
and quality-of-life findings. Journal of the British
Menopause Society. 2006;12(3):115-25. PMID: 16953985. 694. Herzog AG. Continuous bromocriptine therapy in
X-5, X-7 menstrual migraine. Neurology. 1997 Jan;48(1):101-2.
PMID: 9008502. X-4, X-5, X-9
684. Heikkinen JE, Vaheri RT, Ahomaki SM, et al.
Optimizing continuous-combined hormone replacement 695. Herzog AG, Coleman AE, Jacobs AR, et al. Interictal
therapy for postmenopausal women: A comparison of six EEG discharges, reproductive hormones, and menstrual
different treatment regimens. American Journal of disorders in epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2003 Nov;54(5):625-37.
Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000;182(3):560-7. PMID: PMID: 14595652. X-4, X-5, X-9
10739508. X-7
696. Hickey M, Carati C, Manconi F, et al. The
685. Heisterberg L, Sonne-Holm S, Andersen JT, et al. measurement of endometrial perfusion in norplant users: a
Risk factors in first-trimester abortion. Acta Obstet pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2000 May;15(5):1086-91. PMID:
Gynecol Scand. 1982;61(4):357-60. PMID: 7148411. X-3, 10783358. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
X-4, X-5
697. Hickey M, Dwarte D, Fraser IS. Precise
686. Helge EW, Kanstrup IL. Bone density in female elite measurements of intrauterine vascular structures at
gymnasts: impact of muscle strength and sex hormones. hysteroscopy in menorrhagia and during Norplant use.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Jan;34(1):174-80. PMID: Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3190-6. PMID: 9853879.
11782664. X-4, X-5, X-9 X-3, X-4

687. Heliovaara-Peippo S, Halmesmaki K, Hurskainen R, 698. Hickey M, Dwarte D, Fraser IS. Superficial
et al. The effect of hysterectomy or levonorgestrel-releasing endometrial vascular fragility in Norplant users and in

K-33
women with ovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Hum
Reprod. 2000 Jul;15(7):1509-14. PMID: 10875858. X-4, 709. Hirakawa M, Tajima T, Yoshimitsu K, et al. Uterine
X-5 artery embolization along with the administration of
methotrexate for cervical ectopic pregnancy: technical and
699. Hickey M, Fraser I, Dwarte D, et al. Endometrial clinical outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009
vasculature in Norplant users: preliminary results from a Jun;192(6):1601-7. PMID: 19457824. X-4, X-5, X-9
hysteroscopic study. Hum Reprod. 1996 Oct;11 Suppl
2:35-44. PMID: 8982744. X-4, X-5, X-6 710. Hirvonen E, Allonen H, Anttila M, et al. Oral
contraceptive containing natural estradiol for
700. Hickey M, Higham J, Sullivan M, et al. Endometrial premenopausal women. Maturitas. 1995 Jan;21(1):27-32.
bleeding in hormone replacement therapy users: PMID: 7731379. X-3, X-9
preliminary findings regarding the role of matrix
metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) and tissue inhibitors of 711. Hirvonen E, Cacciatore B, Wahlstrom T, et al. Effects
MMPs. Fertil Steril. 2001 Feb;75(2):288-96. PMID: of transdermal oestrogen therapy in postmenopausal
11172829. X-4, X-5, X-7, X-9 women: a comparative study of an oestradiol gel and an
oestradiol delivering patch. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997
701. Hickey M, Pillai G, Higham JM, et al. Changes in Nov;104 Suppl 16:26-31. PMID: 9389780. X-5, X-7
endometrial blood vessels in the endometrium of women
with hormone replacement therapy-related irregular 712. Hirvonen E, Crona N, Wahlstrom T, et al. Effect of
bleeding. Hum Reprod. 2003 May;18(5):1100-6. PMID: an estradiol gel with monthly or quarterly progestogen on
12721191. X-4, X-5, X-6 menopausal symptoms and bleeding. Climacteric. 2000
Dec;3(4):262-70. PMID: 11910586. X-4, X-5, X-7
702. Hidalgo M, Bahamondes L, Perrotti M, et al.
Bleeding patterns and clinical performance of the 713. Hirvonen E, Lamberg-Allardt C, Lankinen KS, et al.
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) up to Transdermal oestradiol gel in the treatment of the
two years. Contraception. 2002 Feb;65(2):129-32. PMID: climacterium: a comparison with oral therapy. Br J Obstet
11927115. X-4, X-5, X-6 Gynaecol. 1997 Nov;104 Suppl 16:19-25. PMID: 9389779.
X-5, X-7, X-9
703. Hidalgo MM, Lisondo C, Juliato CT, et al. Ovarian
cysts in users of Implanon and Jadelle subdermal 714. Hirvonen E, Salmi T, Puolakka J, et al. Can progestin
contraceptive implants. Contraception. 2006 be limited to every third month only in postmenopausal
May;73(5):532-6. PMID: 16627041. X-4, X-5, X-9 women taking estrogen? Maturitas. 1995 Jan;21(1):39-44.
PMID: 7731382. X-3, X-7
704. Higham JM, Shaw RW. A comparative study of
danazol, a regimen of decreasing doses of danazol, and 715. Horn SD, Prather S, Jones CA. A cohort analysis of
norethindrone in the treatment of objectively proven pre-menopausal women with dysfunctional uterine
unexplained menorrhagia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 bleeding. HMO Pract. 1996 Jun;10(2):59-64. PMID:
Nov;169(5):1134-9. PMID: 8238173. X-5 10158542. X-4, X-5, X-8

705. Hill GA, Wheeler JM. Incidence of breakthrough 716. Horwitz RI, Feinstein AR. The problem of
bleeding during oral contraceptive therapy. J Reprod Med. "protopathic bias" in case-control studies. Am J Med. 1980
1991 Apr;36(4 Suppl):334-9. PMID: 2046082. X-3, X-4, Feb;68(2):255-8. PMID: 7355896. X-3, X-5
X-5, X-9
717. Hourihan HM, Sheppard BL, Bonnar J. A
706. Hillard PJ. The patient's reaction to side effects of morphometric study of the effect of oral norethisterone or
oral contraceptives. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 levonorgestrel on endometrial blood vessels.
Nov;161(5):1412-5. PMID: 2589465. X-3, X-9 Contraception. 1986 Dec;34(6):603-12. PMID: 3103980.
X-3, X-4
707. Hingorani V, Jalnawala SF, Kochhar M. Task force
on hormonal contraception. Phase II randomized 718. Hovik P, Sundsbak HP, Gaasemyr M, et al.
comparative clinical trial of Norplant(R) (six capsules) with Comparison of continuous and sequential oestrogen-
Norplant(R)-2 (two covered rods) subdermal implants for progestogen treatment in women with climacteric
long-term contraception: Report of a 24-month study. symptoms. Maturitas. 1989 Mar;11(1):75-82. PMID:
Contraception. 1986;33(3):233-44. PMID: 3087694. X-9 2498620. X-4, X-5, X-7, X-10

708. Hingorani V, Jalnawala SF, Kochhar M, et al. Phase 719. Hreinsson J, Rosenlund B, Friden B, et al.
II randomized comparative clinical trial of Norplant (six Recombinant LH is equally effective as recombinant hCG
capsules) with Norplant-2 (two covered rods) subdermal in promoting oocyte maturation in a clinical in-vitro
implants for long-term contraception: report of a 24-month maturation programme: A randomized study. Human
study. National Programme of Research in Human Reproduction. 2003;18(10):2131-6. PMID: 14507834. X-5
Reproduction. Contraception. 1986 Mar;33(3):233-44.
PMID: 3087694. X-9

K-34
731. Hurskainen R, Teperi J, Rissanen P, et al. Quality of
720. Huang KE, Bonfiglio TA, Muechler EK. Transient life and cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing
hyperprolactinemia in infertile women with luteal phase intrauterine system versus hysterectomy for treatment of
deficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Oct;78(4):651-5. PMID: menorrhagia: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2001 Jan
1923170. X-3, X-4, X-5 27;357(9252):273-7. PMID: 11214131. X-5, X-8

721. Hubacher D, Reyes V, Lillo S, et al. Preventing 732. Hurskainen R, Teperi J, Rissanen P, et al. Clinical
copper intrauterine device removals due to side effects outcomes and costs with the levonorgestrel-releasing
among first-time users: Randomized trial to study the effect intrauterine system or hysterectomy for treatment of
of prophylactic ibuprofen. Human Reproduction. menorrhagia: randomized trial 5-year follow-up. JAMA.
2006;21(6):1467-72. PMID: 16484309. X-5 2004 Mar 24;291(12):1456-63. PMID: 15039412. X-8

722. Huber J, Palacios S, Berglund L, et al. Effects of 733. Hussein M. Transvaginal Doppler sonography for
tibolone and continuous combined hormone replacement evaluation of irregular uterine bleeding with DMPA. Arch
therapy on bleeding rates, quality of life and tolerability in Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Jun;283(6):1325-8. PMID:
postmenopausal women. BJOG. 2002 Aug;109(8):886-93. 20582427. X-4, X-5, X-9
PMID: 12197367. X-5, X-7
734. Hutspardol S, Sirachainan N, Soisamrong A, et al.
723. Huber MG, Wildschut HI, Boer K, et al. Umbilical Hemostatic defects in Thai adolescents with menorrhagia. J
vein administration of oxytocin for the management of Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Apr;93(4):436-42. PMID:
retained placenta: is it effective? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 20462086. X-4, X-5, X-6
1991 May;164(5 Pt 1):1216-9. PMID: 1709781. X-5
735. Ibanez L, Hall JE, Potau N, et al. Ovarian 17-
724. Hudita D, Posea C, Ceausu I, et al. Efficacy and hydroxyprogesterone hyperresponsiveness to gonadotropin-
safety of oral tibolone 1.25 or 2.5 mg/day vs. placebo in releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist challenge in women
postmenopausal women. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. with polycystic ovary syndrome is not mediated by
2003 Sep-Oct;7(5):117-25. PMID: 15214586. X-5, X-7 luteinizing hormone hypersecretion: Evidence from GnRH
agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation
725. Huggins GR. IUD use and unexplained vaginal testing. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.
bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Oct;58(4):409-16. PMID: 1996;81(11):4103-7. PMID: 8923867. X-3, X-4
7279336. X-3, X-5, X-6
736. Ibanez L, Lopez-Bermejo A, Diaz M, et al. Early
726. Hui-Qin L, Zhuan-Chong F, Yu-Bao W, et al. metformin therapy (age 8-12 years) in girls with precocious
Performance of the frameless IUD (Flexigard prototype pubarche to reduce hirsutism, androgen excess, and
inserter) and the TCu380A after six years as part of a WHO oligomenorrhea in adolescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
multicenter randomized comparative clinical trial in parous 2011 Aug;96(8):E1262-7. PMID: 21632811. X-5, X-10
women. Adv Contracept. 1999;15(3):201-9. PMID:
11019951. X-4, X-5 737. Ibanez L, Ong K, Ferrer A, et al. Low-dose flutamide-
metformin therapy reverses insulin resistance and reduces
727. Humpl T, Reyes JT, Holtby H, et al. Beneficial effect fat mass in nonobese adolescents with ovarian
of oral sildenafil therapy on childhood pulmonary arterial hyperandrogenism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003
hypertension: Twelve-month clinical trial of a single-drug, Jun;88(6):2600-6. PMID: 12788862. X-4, X-5, X-9
open-label, pilot study. Circulation. 2005;111(24):3274-80.
PMID: 15956137. X-3, X-5 738. Ibanez L, Potau N, Marcos MV, et al. Treatment of
hirsutism, hyperandrogenism, oligomenorrhea,
728. Hurskaienen R, Teperi J, Rissanen P. A dyslipidemia, and hyperinsulinism in nonobese, adolescent
levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system was more cost girls: effect of flutamide. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000
effective than was hysterectomy for menorrhagia. Evidence Sep;85(9):3251-5. PMID: 10999817. X-4, X-5, X-9
Based Medicine. 2001;6(4). X-8
739. Ibanez L, Potau N, Marcos MV, et al. Corticotropin-
729. Hurskainen R, Salmi A, Paavonen J, et al. Expression releasing hormone: A potent androgen secretagogue in girls
of sex steroid receptors and Ki-67 in the endometria of with hyperandrogenism after precocious pubarche. Journal
menorrhagic women: effects of intrauterine levonorgestrel. of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.
Mol Hum Reprod. 2000 Nov;6(11):1013-8. PMID: 2000;84(12):4602-6. PMID: 10599726. X-4, X-5
11044464. X-4, X-5
740. Ibanez L, Valls C, de Zegher F. Discontinuous low-
730. Hurskainen R, Teperi J, Aalto AM, et al. dose flutamide-metformin plus an oral or a transdermal
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or contraceptive in patients with hyperinsulinaemic
hysterectomy in the treatment of essential menorrhagia: hyperandrogenism: Normalizing effects on CRP, TNF-
predictors of outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 alpha and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio. Human
Apr;83(4):401-3. PMID: 15005790. X-8 Reproduction. 2006;21(2):451-6. PMID: 16239318. X-4,
X-5, X-10

K-35
1.5% for uterine irrigation. Obstet Gynecol. 1992
741. Ibanez L, Valls C, Potau N, et al. Sensitization to Aug;80(2):218-22. PMID: 1635735. X-3, X-8
insulin in adolescent girls to normalize hirsutism,
hyperandrogenism, oligomenorrhea, dyslipidemia, and 752. Istre O, Trolle B. Treatment of menorrhagia with the
hyperinsulinism after precocious pubarche. J Clin levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus endometrial
Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Oct;85(10):3526-30. PMID: resection. Fertil Steril. 2001 Aug;76(2):304-9. PMID:
11061495. X-4, X-5, X-9 11476777. X-5, X-8

742. Ikomi A, Gupta N. Randomised controlled trial exists 753. Itoi H, Minakami H, Iwasaki R, et al. Comparison of
of levonorgestrel intrauterine system for menorrhagia. the long-term effects of oral estriol with the effects of
BMJ. 1998 Oct 31;317(7167):1250. PMID: 9794876. X-1, conjugated estrogen on serum lipid profile in early
X-3 menopausal women. Maturitas. 2000 Oct 31;36(3):217-22.
PMID: 11063904. X-4, X-5, X-7
743. Imani B, Eijkemans MJ, te Velde ER, et al. Predictors
of patients remaining anovulatory during clomiphene 754. Jabiry-Zieniewicz Z, Kaminski P, Bobrowska K, et al.
citrate induction of ovulation in normogonadotropic Menstrual function in female liver transplant recipients of
oligoamenorrheic infertility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998 reproductive age. Transplant Proc. 2009 Jun;41(5):1735-9.
Jul;83(7):2361-5. PMID: 9661609. X-3, X-5 PMID: 19545718. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9

744. Imani B, Eijkemans MJ, te Velde ER, et al. Predictors 755. Jack SA, Cooper KG, Seymour J, et al. A randomised
of chances to conceive in ovulatory patients during controlled trial of microwave endometrial ablation without
clomiphene citrate induction of ovulation in endometrial preparation in the outpatient setting: patient
normogonadotropic oligoamenorrheic infertility. J Clin acceptability, treatment outcome and costs. BJOG. 2005
Endocrinol Metab. 1999 May;84(5):1617-22. PMID: Aug;112(8):1109-16. PMID: 16045526. X-8
10323389. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
756. Jain A, Katewa SS, Chaudhary BL, et al. Folk herbal
745. Inki P, Hurskainen R, Palo P, et al. Comparison of medicines used in birth control and sexual diseases by
ovarian cyst formation in women using the levonorgestrel- tribals of southern Rajasthan, India. J Ethnopharmacol.
releasing intrauterine system vs. hysterectomy. Ultrasound 2004 Jan;90(1):171-7. PMID: 14698527. X-4, X-5, X-9
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Oct;20(4):381-5. PMID: 12383322.
X-4, X-5, X-8, X-9 757. Jain J, Jakimiuk AJ, Bode FR, et al. Contraceptive
efficacy and safety of DMPA-SC. Contraception. 2004
746. Irahara M, Uemura H, Yasui T, et al. Efficacy of Oct;70(4):269-75. PMID: 15451329. X-4, X-5
every-other-day administration of conjugated equine
estrogen and medroxyprogesterone acetate on 758. Jain JK, Meckstroth KR, Mishell DR, Jr. Early
gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists treatment in pregnancy termination with intravaginally administered
women with endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest. sodium chloride solution-moistened misoprostol tablets:
2001;52(4):217-22. PMID: 11729332. X-5, X-6, X-9 historical comparison with mifepristone and oral
misoprostol. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec;181(6):1386-
747. Ismail SI, Pugh DH, Gower-Thomas K, et al. A pilot 91. PMID: 10601917. X-4, X-5, X-9
evaluation of saline sonohysterography for postmenopausal
bleeding with thickened endometrium. J Obstet Gynaecol. 759. Jain JK, Nicosia AF, Nucatola DL, et al. Mifepristone
2009 Feb;29(2):132-4. PMID: 19274548. X-4, X-5, X-7 for the prevention of breakthrough bleeding in new starters
of depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate. Steroids. 2003
748. Isojarvi JI, Laatikainen TJ, Pakarinen AJ, et al. Nov;68(10-13):1115-9. PMID: 14668006. X-4, X-5, X-6
Menstrual disorders in women with epilepsy receiving
carbamazepine. Epilepsia. 1995 Jul;36(7):676-81. PMID: 760. Jakubowicz DL, Godard E, Dewhurst J. The
7555984. X-3, X-4, X-5 treatment of premenstrual tension with mefenamic acid:
analysis of prostaglandin concentrations. Br J Obstet
749. Isojarvi JI, Tauboll E, Pakarinen AJ, et al. Altered Gynaecol. 1984 Jan;91(1):78-84. PMID: 6362715. X-3, X-
ovarian function and cardiovascular risk factors in 4, X-5, X-10
valproate-treated women. Am J Med. 2001 Sep;111(4):290-
6. PMID: 11566460. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9 761. Janssen CA. Menorrhagia and 3-keto-desogestrel-
copper medicated intrauterine device. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
750. Istre O, Johnstad B, Skajaa K, et al. Effects of Reprod Biol. 1999 Aug;85(2):135-6. PMID: 10610326. X-
indomethacin on postoperative pain and nausea after 1, X-3
transcervical endometrial resection. Gynaecological
Endoscopy. 1994;3(4):225-8. X-5, X-8 762. Janssen CA, Scholten PC, Heintz AP. The effect of
low-dose 3-keto-desogestrel added to a copper-releasing
751. Istre O, Skajaa K, Schjoensby AP, et al. Changes in intrauterine contraceptive device on menstrual blood loss: a
serum electrolytes after transcervical resection of double-blind, dose-finding, placebo-controlled study. Am J
endometrium and submucous fibroids with use of glycine

K-36
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Mar;182(3):575-81. PMID: Technolog Med Sci. 2005;25(3):346-7, 67. PMID:
10739510. X-5, X-9, X-10 16201292. X-5, X-9

763. Janssen OE, Mehlmauer N, Hahn S, et al. High 774. Jirapinyo M, Theppisai U, Manonai J, et al. Effect of
prevalence of autoimmune thyroiditis in patients with combined oral estrogen/progestogen preparation (Kliogest)
polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004 on bone mineral density, plasma lipids and postmenopausal
Mar;150(3):363-9. PMID: 15012623. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9 symptoms in HRT-naive Thai women. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand. 2003 Sep;82(9):857-66. PMID: 12911449.
764. Jarrell A, Olsen ME. Patient satisfaction with thermal X-5, X-7
balloon endometrial ablation. A retrospective review. J
Reprod Med. 2003 Aug;48(8):635-6. PMID: 12971146. X- 775. Joffe H, Cohen LS, Suppes T, et al. Valproate is
4, X-5, X-8 associated with new-onset oligoamenorrhea with
hyperandrogenism in women with bipolar disorder. Biol
765. Jarvela I, Tekay A, Santala M, et al. Thermal balloon Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 1;59(11):1078-86. PMID: 16448626.
endometrial ablation therapy induces a rise in uterine blood X-4, X-5, X-9
flow impedance: a randomized prospective color Doppler
study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jan;17(1):65-70. 776. Joffre F, Tubiana JM, Pelage JP. FEMIC (Fibromes
PMID: 11244659. X-5, X-8 Embolises aux MICrospheres calibrees): uterine fibroid
embolization using tris-acryl microspheres. A French
766. Jarvela I, Tekay A, Santala M, et al. Ultrasonographic multicenter study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2004 Nov-
features following thermal balloon endometrial ablation Dec;27(6):600-6. PMID: 15578135. X-4, X-5, X-8
therapy. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.
2002;54(1):11-6. PMID: 12297711. X-3, X-4, X-8 777. Johannisson E, Landgren BM, Diczfalusy E.
Endometrial morphology and peripheral steroid levels in
767. Jenkinson C, Peto V, Coulter A. Measuring change women with and without intermenstrual bleeding during
over time: a comparison of results from a global single item contraception with the 300 mug norethisterone (NET)
of health status and the multi-dimensional SF-36 health minipill. Contraception. 1982;25(1):13-30. PMID:
status survey questionnaire in patients presenting with 7060371. X-3, X-4, X-6
menorrhagia. Qual Life Res. 1994 Oct;3(5):317-21. PMID:
7841965. X-3 778. Johnson JV, Davidson M, Archer D, et al.
Postmenopausal uterine bleeding profiles with two forms of
768. Jenkinson C, Peto V, Coulter A. Making sense of continuous combined hormone replacement therapy.
ambiguity: evaluation of internal reliability and face Menopause. 2002 Jan-Feb;9(1):16-22. PMID: 11791082.
validity of the SF 36 questionnaire in women presenting X-5, X-7
with menorrhagia. Quality in Health Care. 1996;5(1):9-12.
PMID: 10157276. X-3, X-4, X-5 779. Johnson JV, Grubb GS, Constantine GD. Endometrial
histology following 1 year of a continuous daily regimen of
769. Jensen JT. Noncontraceptive applications of the levonorgestrel 90 micro g/ethinyl estradiol 20 micro g.
levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Curr Womens Health Contraception. 2007 Jan;75(1):23-6. PMID: 17161119. X-
Rep. 2002 Dec;2(6):417-22. PMID: 12429074. X-1, X-4, 4, X-5
X-5, X-9
780. Johnson JV, Grubb GS, Constantine GD. Endometrial
770. Jensen JT, Nelson AL, Costales AC. Subject and histology following 1 year of a continuous daily regimen of
clinician experience with the levonorgestrel-releasing levonorgestrel 90 mug/ethinyl estradiol 20 mug.
intrauterine system. Contraception. 2008 Jan;77(1):22-9. Contraception. 2007;75(1):23-6. PMID: 17161119. X-3, X-
PMID: 18082662. X-4, X-5 4

771. Jensen LC, Obel EB, Lindhard A, et al. Frequency of 781. Johnson N, Priestnall M, Marsay T, et al. A
curettage in middle-aged women treated with sequential randomised trial evaluating pain and bleeding after a first
preparations versus untreated women. Maturitas. 1992 trimester miscarriage treated surgically or medically. Eur J
Aug;15(1):61-9. PMID: 1326709. X-3, X-5, X-8 Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 Apr;72(2):213-5.
PMID: 9134405. X-5, X-9
772. Jimenez MF, Vetori D, Fagundes PA, et al.
Subendometrial microvascularization and uterine artery 782. Jones KP, Ravnikar VA, Schiff I. Results of human
blood flow in IUD-induced side effects (levonorgestrel menopausal gonadotropin therapy at the Boston Hospital
intrauterine system and copper intrauterine device). for Women (1979-1981). Int J Fertil. 1987 Mar-
Contraception. 2008 Oct;78(4):324-7. PMID: 18847582. Apr;32(2):131-4. PMID: 2883138. X-3, X-5
X-4, X-5, X-9
783. Joshi UM, Joshi JV, Donde UM, et al. Phase I
773. Jin Z, Huang G. Prevention and treatment of vaginal comparative clinical trial with subdermal implants--
bleeding after drug-induced abortion by Yaoliuan capsule bioabsorbable levonorgestrel or norethisterone pellet fused
and its effects on menses recovery. J Huazhong Univ Sci

K-37
with cholesterol. Contraception. 1985 Jan;31(1):71-82. 794. Kaneshiro B, Edelman A, Carlson NE, et al. A
PMID: 3921309. X-3, X-5, X-9 randomized controlled trial of subantimicrobial-dose
doxycycline to prevent unscheduled bleeding with
784. Jovanovic R, Barone CM, Van Natta FC, et al. continuous oral contraceptive pill use. Contraception. 2012
Preventing infection related to insertion of an intrauterine April;85(4):351-8. PMID: 2012157298. X-6
device. J Reprod Med. 1988 Apr;33(4):347-52. PMID:
3367334. X-3, X-5, X-9 795. Kanetsky PA, Mandelblatt J, Richart R, et al. Risk
factors for cervical cancer in a black elderly population:
785. Julian S, Naftalin NJ, Clark M, et al. An integrated preliminary findings. Ethn Dis. 1992 Fall;2(4):337-42.
care pathway for menorrhagia across the primary- PMID: 1337003. X-3, X-5
secondary interface: patients' experience, clinical outcomes,
and service utilisation. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 796. Kang JL, Wang DY, Wang XX, et al. Up-regulation
Apr;16(2):110-5. PMID: 17403756. X-4, X-5, X-9 of apoptosis by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist
in cultures of endometrial cells from women with
786. Junge W, El-Samalouti V, Gerlinger C, et al. Effects symptomatic myomas. Hum Reprod. 2010 Sep;25(9):2270-
of menopausal hormone therapy on hemostatic parameters, 5. PMID: 20634188. X-4, X-5
blood pressure, and body weight: Open-label comparison of
randomized treatment with estradiol plus drospirenone 797. Kapp KS, Poschauko J, Tauss J, et al. Analysis of the
versus estradiol plus norethisterone acetate. European prognostic impact of tumor embolization before definitive
Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol
Biology. 2009;147(2):195-200. PMID: 19879683. X-7 Biol Phys. 2005 Aug 1;62(5):1399-404. PMID: 16029799.
X-4, X-5, X-9
787. Jung-Hoffmann C, Kuhl H. Intra- and interindividual
variations in contraceptive steroid levels during 12 798. Karkanis SG, Caloia D, Salenieks ME, et al.
treatment cycles: no relation to irregular bleedings. Randomized controlled trial of rectal misoprostol versus
Contraception. 1990 Oct;42(4):423-38. PMID: 2147887. oxytocin in third stage management. J Obstet Gynaecol
X-3, X-5, X-6 Can. 2002 Feb;24(2):149-54. PMID: 12196880. X-5, X-9

788. Junquera F, Feu F, Papo M, et al. A multicenter, 799. Kashanian M, Shahpourian F, Zare O. A comparison
randomized, clinical trial of hormonal therapy in the between monophasic levonorgestrel-ethinyl estradiol
prevention of rebleeding from gastrointestinal 150/30 and triphasic levonorgestrel-ethinyl estradiol 50-75-
angiodysplasia. Gastroenterology. 2001;121(5):1073-9. 125/30-40-30 contraceptive pills for side effects and patient
PMID: 11677198. X-5 satisfaction: a study in Iran. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod
Biol. 2010 May;150(1):47-51. PMID: 20185226. X-5
789. Kadir RA, Lee CA, Sabin CA, et al. DDAVP nasal
spray for treatment of menorrhagia in women with 800. Kaunitz AM. Efficacy, cycle control, and safety of
inherited bleeding disorders: a randomized placebo- two triphasic oral contraceptives: Cyclessa
controlled crossover study. Haemophilia. 2002 (desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol) and ortho-Novum 7/7/7
Nov;8(6):787-93. PMID: 12410648. X-5, X-6, X-9 (norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol): a randomized clinical
trial. Contraception. 2000 May;61(5):295-302. PMID:
790. Kaewrudee S, Taneepanichskul S, Jaisamraun U, et 10906499. X-5
al. The effect of mefenamic acid on controlling irregular
uterine bleeding secondary to Norplant use. Contraception. 801. Kaunitz AM, Burkman RT, Fisher AC, et al. Cycle
1999 Jul;60(1):25-30. PMID: 10549449. X-4, X-5, X-6 control with a 21-day compared with a 24-day oral
contraceptive pill: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet
791. Kalmuss D, Davidson AR, Cushman LF, et al. Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1205-12. PMID: 19935020. X-
Determinants of early implant discontinuation among low- 4, X-5
income women. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Nov-
Dec;28(6):256-60. PMID: 8959415. X-4, X-5, X-9 802. Kaunitz AM, Darney PD, Ross D, et al. Subcutaneous
DMPA vs. intramuscular DMPA: a 2-year randomized
792. Kamm MA, Lichtenstein GR, Sandborn WJ, et al. study of contraceptive efficacy and bone mineral density.
Randomised trial of once- or twice-daily MMX mesalazine Contraception. 2009 Jul;80(1):7-17. PMID: 19501210. X-5
for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis. Gut.
2008;57(7):893-902. PMID: 18272546. X-5 803. Kaunitz AM, Garceau RJ, Cromie MA. Comparative
safety, efficacy, and cycle control of Lunelle monthly
793. Kaneshiro B, Edelman A, Carlson N, et al. Treatment contraceptive injection (medroxyprogesterone acetate and
of unscheduled bleeding in continuous oral contraceptive estradiol cypionate injectable suspension) and Ortho-
users with doxycycline: a randomized controlled trial. Novum 7/7/7 oral contraceptive (norethindrone/ethinyl
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;115(6):1141-9. PMID: estradiol triphasic). Lunelle Study Group. Contraception.
20502283. X-5, X-6 1999 Oct;60(4):179-87. PMID: 10640164. X-4, X-5

K-38
804. Kauppila A, Heikkinen J, Viinikka L. Dynamic 815. Khaund A, Moss JG, McMillan N, et al. Evaluation of
evaluation of prolactin secretion by successive TRH and the effect of uterine artery embolisation on menstrual blood
metoclopramide stimulations. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). loss and uterine volume. BJOG. 2004 Jul;111(7):700-5.
1986 Jan;111(1):10-6. PMID: 3080846. X-3, X-4, X-5 PMID: 15198761. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8

805. Kaya A, Aydin N, Topsever P, et al. Efficacy of 816. Kilic S, Yilmaz N, Zulfikaroglu E, et al.
sibutramine, orlistat and combination therapy on short-term Inflammatory-metabolic parameters in obese and nonobese
weight management in obese patients. Biomed normoandrogenemic polycystic ovary syndrome during
Pharmacother. 2004 Dec;58(10):582-7. PMID: 15589067. metformin and oral contraceptive treatment. Gynecological
X-5, X-9 Endocrinology. 2011;27(9):622-9. PMID: 21105835. X-4,
X-5, X-6, X-10
806. Kayikcioglu F, Gunes M, Ozdegirmenci O, et al.
Effects of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on 817. Kilic S, Yuksel B, Doganay M, et al. The effect of
glucose and lipid metabolism: a 1-year follow-up study. levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device on menorrhagia
Contraception. 2006 May;73(5):528-31. PMID: 16627040. in women taking anticoagulant medication after cardiac
X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9 valve replacement. Contraception. 2009 Aug;80(2):152-7.
PMID: 19631790. X-5, X-6
807. Kazerooni T, Zolghadri J. The comparison of
bleeding patterns with high-dose and low-dose hormone 818. Kilonzo MM, Sambrook AM, Cook JA, et al. A cost-
replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. Gynecol utility analysis of microwave endometrial ablation versus
Endocrinol. 2004 Aug;19(2):64-8. PMID: 15624267. X-4, thermal balloon endometrial ablation. Value Health. 2010
X-5, X-7 Aug;13(5):528-34. PMID: 20712602. X-4, X-5, X-8

808. Kazi A, Holck SE, Diethelm P. Phase IV study of the 819. Kim CY, Chung S, Lee JN, et al. A 12-week,
injection Norigest in Pakistan. Contraception. 1985 naturalistic switch study of the efficacy and tolerability of
Oct;32(4):395-403. PMID: 3907968. X-3, X-9 aripiprazole in stable outpatients with schizophrenia or
schizoaffective disorder. International Clinical
809. Keder LM, Rulin MC, Gruss J. Compliance with Psychopharmacology. 2009;24(4):181-8. PMID: 19451828.
depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: a randomized, X-5
controlled trial of intensive reminders. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 1998 Sep;179(3 Pt 1):583-5. PMID: 9757955. X- 820. Kim KS, Pae CU, Chae JH, et al. Effects of
5, X-6, X-9 olanzapine on prolactin levels of female patients with
schizophrenia treated with risperidone. J Clin Psychiatry.
810. Kekkonen R, Lahteenmaki P, Luukkainen T, et al. 2002 May;63(5):408-13. PMID: 12019665. X-4, X-5, X-9
Sequential regimen of the antiprogesterone RU486 and
synthetic progestin for contraception. Fertil Steril. 1993 821. Kim MD, Kim YM, Kim HC, et al. Uterine artery
Oct;60(4):610-5. PMID: 8405512. X-3, X-4, X-5 embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis: a new
technical development of the 1-2-3 protocol and predictive
811. Kelekci KH, Kelekci S, Yengel I, et al. Cyproterone factors of MR imaging affecting outcomes. J Vasc Interv
acetate or drospirenone containing combined oral Radiol. 2011 Apr;22(4):497-502. PMID: 21377897. X-4,
contraceptives plus spironolactone or cyproterone acetate X-5, X-8
for hirsutism: Randomized comparison of three regimens.
Journal of Dermatological Treatment. 2012 June;23(3):177- 822. Kim MD, Lee HS, Lee MH, et al. Long-term results
83. PMID: 2012280528. X-5 of symptomatic fibroids treated with uterine artery
embolization: in conjunction with MR evaluation. Eur J
812. Kenemans P, Bundred NJ, Foidart JM, et al. Safety Radiol. 2010 Feb;73(2):339-44. PMID: 19084365. X-4, X-
and efficacy of tibolone in breast-cancer patients with 5, X-6, X-8
vasomotor symptoms: a double-blind, randomised, non-
inferiority trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2009;10(2):135-46. 823. Kim SW, Shin IS, Kim JM, et al. Amisulpride versus
PMID: 19167925. X-5, X-7, X-10 risperidone in the treatment of depression in patients with
schizophrenia: A randomized, open-label, controlled trial.
813. Khan SA, Ul Amin Z, Fouzia, et al. A comparative Progress in Neuro Psychopharmacology and Biological
trial of copper T 380 and Cu 375 IUCD. J Ayub Med Coll Psychiatry. 2007;31(7):1504-9. PMID: 17692448. X-5
Abbottabad. 2010 Jul-Sep;22(3):185-7. PMID: 22338452.
X-3, X-9 824. Kim YH, Chung HH, Kang SB, et al. Safety and
usefulness of intravenous iron sucrose in the management
814. Khanna A, Biswas AK, Dubey B, et al. Fibrinolytic of preoperative anemia in patients with menorrhagia: a
activity in bleeding associated with intrauterine phase IV, open-label, prospective, randomized study. Acta
contraceptive devices. Indian J Med Res. 1992 Jun;96:147- Haematol. 2009;121(1):37-41. PMID: 19332985. X-4, X-5,
9. PMID: 1512035. X-3, X-4 X-9

K-39
825. Kinon BJ, Gilmore JA, Liu H, et al. Prevalence of containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and either desogestrel or
hyperprolactinemia in schizophrenic patients treated with gestodene in Thai women. Contraception. 1995
conventional antipsychotic medications or risperidone. Apr;51(4):225-9. PMID: 7796587. X-9
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2003 Apr;28 Suppl 2:55-68.
PMID: 12650681. X-4, X-5, X-9 836. Koh SC, Singh K. The effect of levonorgestrel-
releasing intrauterine system use on menstrual blood loss
826. Kircher C, Smith KP. Acarbose for polycystic ovary and the hemostatic, fibrinolytic/inhibitor systems in women
syndrome. Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Jun;42(6):847-51. with menorrhagia. J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jan;5(1):133-
PMID: 18460589. X-1, X-4, X-5, X-9 8. PMID: 17010149. X-4, X-5, X-6

827. Kirkman RJ, Pedersen JH, Fioretti P, et al. Clinical 837. Kohnen G, Campbell S, Irvine GA, et al. Endothelin
comparison of two low-dose oral contraceptives, Minulet receptor expression in human decidua. Mol Hum Reprod.
and Mercilon, in women over 30 years of age. 1998 Feb;4(2):185-93. PMID: 9542978. X-4, X-5, X-9
Contraception. 1994 Jan;49(1):33-46. PMID: 8137624. X-
6, X-9 838. Koike K, Yamamoto Y, Suzuki N, et al. Efficacy of
porcine placental extracts with hormone therapy for
828. Kirss F, Lang K, Tuimala R. Feminine life-course of postmenopausal women with knee pain. Climacteric. 2012
Estonian women born in 1937-47: a questionnaire survey. February;15(1):30-5. PMID: 2012007553. X-7
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(2):224-8. PMID:
16532919. X-4, X-5, X-9 839. Koltun W, Lucky AW, Thiboutot D, et al. Efficacy
and safety of 3 mg drospirenone/20 mcg ethinylestradiol
829. Kirtava A, Crudder S, Dilley A, et al. Trends in oral contraceptive administered in 24/4 regimen in the
clinical management of women with von Willebrand treatment of acne vulgaris: a randomized, double-blind,
disease: a survey of 75 women enrolled in haemophilia placebo-controlled trial. Contraception. 2008;77(4):249-56.
treatment centres in the United States. Haemophilia. 2004 PMID: 18342647. X-5
Mar;10(2):158-61. PMID: 14962204. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
840. Komulainen MH, Kroger H, Tuppurainen MT, et al.
830. Kitawaki J, Kusuki I, Yamanaka K, et al. HRT and Vit D in prevention of non-vertebral fractures in
Maintenance therapy with dienogest following postmenopausal women; A 5 year randomized trial.
gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment for Maturitas. 1998;31(1):45-54. PMID: 10091204. X-7
endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. European Journal of
Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 841. Kong GW, Yim SF, Cheung TH, et al. Cryotherapy as
2011;157(2):212-6. PMID: 21474232. X-3, X-6 the treatment modality of postcoital bleeding: a randomised
clinical trial of efficacy and safety. Aust N Z J Obstet
831. Kittelsen N, Istre O. A randomized study comparing Gynaecol. 2009 Oct;49(5):517-24. PMID: 19780737. X-5,
levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG IUS) and X-9
transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) in the
treatment of menorrhagia: Preliminary results. 842. Koninckx PR, Spielmann D. A comparative 2-year
Gynaecological Endoscopy. 1998;7(2):61-5. X-8 study of the effects of sequential regimens of 1 mg 17beta-
estradiol and trimegestone with a regimen containing
832. Kjotrod SB, von During V, Carlsen SM. Metformin estradiol valerate and norethisterone on the bleeding profile
treatment before IVF/ICSI in women with polycystic ovary and endometrial safety in postmenopausal women.
syndrome; a prospective, randomized, double blind study. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2005;21(2):82-9. PMID:
Human Reproduction. 2004;19(6):1315-22. PMID: 16294460. X-7
15117902. X-4, X-5, X-10
843. Korytkowski MT, Mokan M, Horwitz MJ, et al.
833. Klipping C, Duijkers I, Fortier MP, et al. Long-term Metabolic effects of oral contraceptives in women with
tolerability of ethinylestradiol 20 mug/drospirenone 3 mg polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995
in a flexible extended regimen: Results from a randomised, Nov;80(11):3327-34. PMID: 7593446. X-3, X-4
controlled, multicentrestudy. Journal of Family Planning
and Reproductive Health Care. 2012 April;38(2):84-93. 844. Kotsa K, Yavropoulou MP, Anastasiou O, et al. Role
PMID: 2012264031. X-9 of vitamin D treatment in glucose metabolism in polycystic
ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2009 Sep;92(3):1053-8.
834. Klipping C, Duijkers I, Fortier MP, et al. PMID: 18930208. X-4, X-5, X-9
Contraceptive efficacy and tolerability of ethinylestradiol
20 mug/drospirenone 3 mg in a flexible extended regimen: 845. Kouides PA, Byams VR, Philipp CS, et al. Multisite
An open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled study. management study of menorrhagia with abnormal
Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. laboratory haemostasis: a prospective crossover study of
2012 April;38(2):73-83. PMID: 2012264030. X-9 intranasal desmopressin and oral tranexamic acid. Br J
Haematol. 2009 Apr;145(2):212-20. PMID: 19236375. X-
835. Koetsawang S, Charoenvisal C, Banharnsupawat L, et 6
al. Multicenter trial of two monophasic oral contraceptives

K-40
857. Kubba AA. The benefits of oral contraceptives. J R
846. Kozman E, Collins P, Howard A, et al. The effect of Soc Health. 1985 Apr;105(2):73-4. PMID: 3921718. X-11
an intrauterine application of two percent lignocaine gel on
pain perception during Vabra endometrial sampling: a 858. Kucuk M, Okman TK. Intrauterine instillation of
randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BJOG. trichloroacetic acid is effective for the treatment of
2001 Jan;108(1):87-90. PMID: 11213009. X-5, X-9 dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Fertil Steril. 2005
Jan;83(1):189-94. PMID: 15652906. X-4
847. Krassas GE, Pontikides N, Kaltsas T, et al.
Disturbances of menstruation in hypothyroidism. Clin 859. Kucukozkan T, Kadioglu BG, Uygur D, et al.
Endocrinol (Oxf). 1999 May;50(5):655-9. PMID: Chemical ablation of endometrium with trichloroacetic
10468932. X-4, X-5, X-6 acid. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004 Jan;84(1):41-6. PMID:
14698828. X-5, X-8
848. Krettek JE, Arkin SI, Chaisilwattana P, et al.
Chlamydia trachomatis in patients who used oral 860. Kuhl H, Gahn G, Romberg C. A randomized cross-
contraceptives and had intermenstrual spotting. Obstet over comparison of two low-dose oral contraceptives upon
Gynecol. 1993 May;81(5 ( Pt 1)):728-31. PMID: 8469461. hormonal and metabolic parameters: I. Effects upon sexual
X-3, X-4, X-5 hormone levels. Contraception. 1985;31(6):583-93. PMID:
2931247. X-4, X-6, X-9
849. Krikun G, Critchley H, Schatz F, et al. Abnormal
uterine bleeding during progestin-only contraception may 861. Kulkarni S, Wynter HH, Desai P. Hysteroscopic
result from free radical-induced alterations in angiopoietin assessment of abnormal uterine bleeding in users of the
expression. Am J Pathol. 2002 Sep;161(3):979-86. PMID: intrauterine contraceptive device. West Indian Med J. 1993
12213726. X-4, X-5, X-9 Sep;42(3):124-5. PMID: 8273322. X-3, X-4, X-5

850. Kriplani A, Agarwal N. Effects of metformin on 862. Kuppermann M, Varner RE, Summitt RL, Jr., et al.
clinical and biochemical parameters in polycystic ovary Effect of hysterectomy vs medical treatment on health-
syndrome. J Reprod Med. 2004 May;49(5):361-7. PMID: related quality of life and sexual functioning: the medicine
15214709. X-4, X-5, X-9 or surgery (Ms) randomized trial. JAMA. 2004 Mar
24;291(12):1447-55. PMID: 15039411. X-8
851. Kriplani A, Manchanda R, Monga D, et al. Depot
medroxy progesterone acetate: a poor preparatory agent for 863. Kurtoglu M, Koksoy C, Hasan E, et al. Long-term
endometrial resection. Gynecol Obstet Invest. efficacy and safety of once-daily enoxaparin plus warfarin
2001;52(3):180-3. PMID: 11598360. X-4, X-5, X-8 for the outpatient ambulatory treatment of lower-limb deep
vein thrombosis in the TROMBOTEK trial. J Vasc Surg.
852. Kriplani A, Manchanda R, Nath J, et al. A 2010 Nov;52(5):1262-70. PMID: 20732787. X-4, X-5, X-9
randomized trial of danazol pretreatment prior to
endometrial resection. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 864. Kwak HM, Chi I, Gardner SD, et al. Menstrual
2002 Jun 10;103(1):68-71. PMID: 12039468. X-5, X-8 pattern changes in laparoscopic sterilization patients whose
last pregnancy was terminated by therapeutic abortion. A
853. Kriplani A, Periyasamy AJ, Agarwal N, et al. Effect two-year follow-up study. J Reprod Med. 1980
of oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol combined Aug;25(2):67-71. PMID: 7411527. X-3, X-5, X-8
with drospirenone vs. desogestrel on clinical and
biochemical parameters in patients with polycystic ovary 865. Kwiecien M, Edelman A, Nichols MD, et al.
syndrome. Contraception. 2010;82(2):139-46. PMID: Bleeding patterns and patient acceptability of standard or
20654754. X-4, X-5, X-10 continuous dosing regimens of a low-dose oral
contraceptive: A randomized trial. Contraception.
854. Kriplani A, Singh BM, Lal S, et al. Efficacy, 2003;67(1):9-13. PMID: 12521651. X-9
acceptability and side effects of the levonorgestrel
intrauterine system for menorrhagia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 866. Kyriakis KP, Kontochristopoulos GJ, Panteleos DN.
2007 Jun;97(3):190-4. PMID: 17382331. X-4 Experience with low-dose thalidomide therapy in chronic
discoid lupus erythematosus. Int J Dermatol. 2000
855. Kritz-Silverstein D, Wingard DL, Garland FC. The Mar;39(3):218-22. PMID: 10759967. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
association of behavior and lifestyle factors with menstrual
symptoms. Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based 867. Ladson G, Dodson WC, Sweet SD, et al. The effects
Medicine. 1999;8(9):1185-93. PMID: 10595332. X-3, X-4, of metformin with lifestyle therapy in polycystic ovary
X-5 syndrome: A randomized double-blind study. Fertility and
Sterility. 2011;95(3):1059-66. PMID: 21193187. X-5, X-
856. Kroencke TJ, Scheurig C, Poellinger A, et al. Uterine 10
artery embolization for leiomyomas: percentage of
infarction predicts clinical outcome. Radiology. 2010 868. LaGuardia KD, Fisher AC, Bainbridge JD, et al.
Jun;255(3):834-41. PMID: 20392986. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8 Suppression of estrogen-withdrawal headache with

K-41
extended transdermal contraception. Fertility and Sterility. Reprod. 2003 Apr;18(4):694-9. PMID: 12660258. X-4, X-
2005;83(6):1875-7. PMID: 15950671. X-5, X-9 5, X-9

869. LaGuardia KD, Shangold G, Fisher A, et al. Efficacy, 879. Lappohn RE, van de Wiel HB, Brownell J. The effect
safety and cycle control of five oral contraceptive regimens of two dopaminergic drugs on menstrual function and
containing norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol. psychological state in hyperprolactinemia. Fertil Steril.
Contraception. 2003 Jun;67(6):431-7. PMID: 12814811. 1992 Aug;58(2):321-7. PMID: 1353028. X-5, X-6
X-5
880. Larsson PG, Bergman B, Forsum U, et al. Treatment
870. Lakha F, Ho PC, Van der Spuy ZM, et al. A novel of bacterial vaginosis in women with vaginal bleeding
estrogen-free oral contraceptive pill for women: complications or discharge and harboring Mobiluncus.
multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled trial of Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1990;29(4):296-300. PMID:
mifepristone and progestogen-only pill (levonorgestrel). 2361638. X-5, X-6
Hum Reprod. 2007 Sep;22(9):2428-36. PMID: 17609247.
X-5 881. Laufe LE, Sokal DC, Cole LP, et al. Phase I
prehysterectomy studies of the transcervical administration
871. Lal S, Kriplani A, Kulshrestha V, et al. Efficacy of of quinacrine pellets. Contraception. 1996 Sep;54(3):181-6.
mifepristone in reducing intermenstrual vaginal bleeding in PMID: 8899260. X-4, X-5, X-8, X-9
users of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Int J
Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 May;109(2):128-30. PMID: 882. Laurikka-Routti M, Haukkamaa M, Lahteenmaki P.
20223454. X-4 Suppression of ovarian function with the transdermally
given synthetic progestin ST 1435. Fertil Steril. 1992
872. Landgren BM, Aedo AR, Johannisson E, et al. Oct;58(4):680-4. PMID: 1426309. X-3, X-4, X-5, X-9
Studies on a vaginal ring releasing levonorgestrel at an
initial rate of 27 micrograms/24 h when used alone or in 883. Lawrie TA, Hofmeyr GJ, De Jager M, et al. A
combination with transdermal systems releasing estradiol. double-blind randomised placebo controlled trial of
Contraception. 1994 Jul;50(1):87-100. PMID: 7924325. X- postnatal norethisterone enanthate: the effect on postnatal
3, X-6, X-9 depression and serum hormones. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1998 Oct;105(10):1082-90. PMID: 9800931. X-5, X-6, X-
873. Landgren BM, Aedo AR, Johannisson E, et al. 9
Studies on a vaginal ring releasing levonorgestrel at an
initial rate of 27 mug/24h when used alone or in 884. Lazovic G, Radivojevic U, Milicevic S, et al. The
combination with transdermal systems releasing estradiol. most frequent hormone dysfunctions in juvenile bleeding.
Contraception. 1994;50(1):87-100. PMID: 7924325. X-3, Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;52(1):35-40.
X-4, X-5, X-9 PMID: 17987886. X-4, X-5

874. Landgren BM, Johannisson E, Masironi B, et al. 885. Lazzarin N, Vaquero E, Exacoustos C, et al. Low-
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigations with dose aspirin and omega-3 fatty acids improve uterine artery
vaginal devices releasing levonorgestrel at a constant, near blood flow velocity in women with recurrent miscarriage
zero order rate. Contraception. 1982 Dec;26(6):567-85. due to impaired uterine perfusion. Fertility and Sterility.
PMID: 6820337. X-3, X-4 2009;92(1):296-300. PMID: 18692841. X-4, X-5

875. Landgren MB, Bennink HJ, Helmond FA, et al. Dose- 886. Learman LA, Summitt RL, Jr., Varner RE, et al.
response analysis of effects of tibolone on climacteric Hysterectomy versus expanded medical treatment for
symptoms. BJOG. 2002 Oct;109(10):1109-14. PMID: abnormal uterine bleeding: clinical outcomes in the
12387462. X-5, X-7 medicine or surgery trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;103(5
Pt 1):824-33. PMID: 15121552. X-8
876. Lang EK, Myers L. Outcome of superselective uterine
artery embolization of fibroids. Journal of Women's 887. Lebwohl M, Ortonne JP, Andres P, et al. Calcitriol
Imaging. 2004;6(1):23. X-3, X-8 ointment 3 microg/g is safe and effective over 52 weeks for
the treatment of mild to moderate plaque psoriasis. Cutis.
877. Langer RD, Landgren BM, Rymer J, et al. Effects of 2009 Apr;83(4):205-12. PMID: 19445311. X-4, X-5, X-9
tibolone and continuous combined conjugated equine
estrogen/medroxyprogesterone acetate on the endometrium 888. Lefebvre Y, Proulx L, Elie R, et al. The effects of
and vaginal bleeding: results of the OPAL study. Am J RU-38486 on cervical ripening. Clinical studies. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;195(5):1320-7. PMID: Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jan;162(1):61-5. PMID: 2301519.
16875644. X-5, X-7 X-3, X-5

878. Laoag-Fernandez JB, Maruo T, Pakarinen P, et al. 889. Legro RS. Polycystic ovary syndrome: Current and
Effects of levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine system on future treatment paradigms. American Journal of Obstetrics
the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and and Gynecology. 1998;179(6 II):S101-S8. PMID: 9855616.
adrenomedullin in the endometrium in adenomyosis. Hum X-1, X-3, X-5

K-42
satisfaction. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008
890. Legro RS, Muhleman DR, Comings DE, et al. A Sep;13(3):231-7. PMID: 18609346. X-4
dopamine D3 receptor genotype is associated with
hyperandrogenic chronic anovulation and resistant to 900. Lethaby A, Hickey M, Garry R, et al. Endometrial
ovulation induction with clomiphene citrate in female resection / ablation techniques for heavy menstrual
Hispanics. Fertil Steril. 1995 Apr;63(4):779-84. PMID: bleeding. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
7890062. X-3, X-4, X-5 2009(4)PMID: 19821278. X-8

891. Legro RS, Myers ER, Barnhart HX, et al. The 901. Lethaby A, Shepperd S, Farquhar C, et al.
Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome study: baseline Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for
characteristics of the randomized cohort including racial heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database of
effects. Fertil Steril. 2006 Oct;86(4):914-33. PMID: Systematic Reviews. 1999(2). X-8
16963034. X-5, X-9
902. Leyden J, Shalita A, Hordinsky M, et al. Efficacy of a
892. Legro RS, Urbanek M, Kunselman AR, et al. Self- low-dose oral contraceptive containing 20 mug of ethinyl
selected women with polycystic ovary syndrome are estradiol and 100 mug of levonorgestrel for the treatment of
reproductively and metabolically abnormal and moderate acne: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
undertreated. Fertil Steril. 2002 Jul;78(1):51-7. PMID: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
12095490. X-4, X-5, X-9 2002;47(3):399-409. PMID: 12196750. X-5, X-9

893. Lei ZW, Wu SC, Garceau RJ, et al. Effect of 903. Lhomme C, Brault P, Bourhis JH, et al. Prevention of
pretreatment counseling on discontinuation rates in Chinese menstruation with leuprorelin (GnRH agonist) in women
women given depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate for undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy or
contraception. Contraception. 1996 Jun;53(6):357-61. radiochemotherapy for hematological malignancies: a pilot
PMID: 8773423. X-4, X-5 study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2001 Sep-Oct;42(5):1033-41.
PMID: 11697620. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
894. Leissinger C, Becton D, Cornell C, Jr., et al. High-
dose DDAVP intranasal spray (Stimate) for the prevention 904. Li A, Felix JC, Yang W, et al. Effect of mifepristone
and treatment of bleeding in patients with mild haemophilia on endometrial matrix metalloproteinase expression and
A, mild or moderate type 1 von Willebrand disease and leukocyte abundance in new medroxyprogesterone acetate
symptomatic carriers of haemophilia A. Haemophilia. 2001 users. Contraception. 2007 Jul;76(1):57-65. PMID:
May;7(3):258-66. PMID: 11380629. X-4, X-5, X-6 17586139. X-4, X-5, X-9

895. Lelaidier C, Baton-Saint-Mleux C, Fernandez H, et al. 905. Li L, Zhou Z, Huang L. Abnormal expression of
Mifepristone (RU 486) induces embryo expulsion in first MMP-9 and imbalance of MMP-9/TIMP-1 is associated
trimester non-developing pregnancies: a prospective with prolonged uterine bleeding after a medical abortion
randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 1993 Mar;8(3):492-5. with mifepristone and misoprostol. Acta Obstet Gynecol
PMID: 8473474. X-5 Scand. 2009;88(6):673-9. PMID: 19353331. X-4, X-5, X-9

896. Lemay A, Faure N. Sequential estrogen-progestin 906. Li X, Liu R, Zhang W, et al. Up-regulation of
addition to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist Fas/FasL activation contribute to the apoptosis
suppression for the chronic treatment of ovarian enhancement of RU486 by Gong-Qing Decoction, a
hyperandrogenism: a pilot study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. traditional Chinese prescription. Journal of
1994 Dec;79(6):1716-22. PMID: 7989480. X-3 Ethnopharmacology. 2011;134(2):386-92. PMID:
21195151. X-5
897. Leminen H, Heliovaara-Peippo S, Halmesmaki K, et
al. The effect of hysterectomy or levonorgestrel-releasing 907. Lian F, Liu HP, Wang YX, et al. Expressions of
intrauterine system on premenstrual symptoms in women VEGF and Ki-67 in eutopic endometrium of patients with
treated for menorrhagia: secondary analysis of a endometriosis and effect of Quyu Jiedu Recipe on VEGF
randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. expression. Chin J Integr Med. 2007 Jun;13(2):109-14.
2012 Mar;91(3):318-25. PMID: 22168810. X-8 PMID: 17609908. X-4, X-5

898. Lete I, del Carme Cuesta M, Marin JM, et al. 908. Liao EY, Luo XH, Deng XG, et al. The effect of low
Acceptability of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in dose nylestriol-levonorgestrel replacement therapy on bone
the long-term treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: how mineral density in women with postmenopausal
many women choose to use a second device? Eur J Obstet osteoporosis. Endocrine Research. 2003;29(2):217-26.
Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Jan;154(1):67-70. PMID: PMID: 12856809. X-7
20728261. X-4
909. Lim AK, Agarwal R, Seckl MJ, et al. Embolization of
899. Lete I, Obispo C, Izaguirre F, et al. The bleeding residual uterine vascular malformations in patients
levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Mirena) for treatment of with treated gestational trophoblastic tumors. Radiology.
idiopathic menorrhagia. Assessment of quality of life and

K-43
2002 Mar;222(3):640-4. PMID: 11867779. X-4, X-5, X-6, ovary and uterus. Adv Prostaglandin Thromboxane Res.
X-8, X-9 1980;8:1371-90. PMID: 7376986. X-3, X-4

910. Lim LS, McCarthy TG, Yong YM, et al. Post- 922. Lindoff C, Rybo G, Astedt B. Treatment with
abortion insertion of MLCu 250 and MLCu 375--a tranexamic acid during pregnancy, and the risk of thrombo-
comparative trial. Contraception. 1985 May;31(5):471-7. embolic complications. Thromb Haemost. 1993 Aug
PMID: 4028724. X-9 2;70(2):238-40. PMID: 8236125. X-3, X-5

911. Limpaphayom KK, Bunyavejchevin S. Clinical 923. Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Fishel S, et al. Evaluation of two
effects of 17 beta-estradiol and norethisterone acetate in doses of recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation
postmenopausal Thai women. J Med Assoc Thai. 2000 in an unselected group of women undergoing follicular
Apr;83(4):407-16. PMID: 10808701. X-5, X-7 stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2005
Feb;83(2):309-15. PMID: 15705367. X-5, X-9
912. Lin CH, Kuo CC, Chou LS, et al. A randomized,
double-blind comparison of risperidone versus low-dose 924. Lissak A, Fruchter O, Mashiach S, et al. Immediate
risperidone plus low-dose haloperidol in treating versus delayed treatment of perimenopausal bleeding due
schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology. to benign causes by balloon thermal ablation. J Am Assoc
2010;30(5):518-25. PMID: 20814315. X-5 Gynecol Laparosc. 1999 May;6(2):145-50. PMID:
10226122. X-3, X-5, X-8
913. Lin H. Comparison between microwave endometrial
ablation and total hysterectomy. Chin Med J (Engl). 2006 925. Liu X. TCM treatment for severe climacteric
Jul 20;119(14):1195-7. PMID: 16863612. X-4, X-5, X-8 dysfunctional uterine bleeding--a report of 43 cases. J
Tradit Chin Med. 2007 Mar;27(1):46-8. PMID: 17393627.
914. Lin KC. Relationship between pituitary reserve and X-3
efficacy of bromocriptine in women with euprolactinemic
ovulatory dysfunction. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi. 926. Lockwood CJ, Kumar P, Krikun G, et al. Effects of
1994 May;10(5):222-8. PMID: 8040924. X-3, X-4, X-5 thrombin, hypoxia, and steroids on interleukin-8 expression
in decidualized human endometrial stromal cells:
915. Lin SQ, Sun LZ, Lin JF, et al. Estradiol 1mg and implications for long-term progestin-only contraceptive-
drospirenone 2mg as hormone replacement therapy in induced bleeding. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004
postmenopausal Chinese women. Climacteric. Mar;89(3):1467-75. PMID: 15001649. X-4, X-5, X-9
2011;14(4):472-81. PMID: 21469973. X-7
927. Lockwood CJ, Nemerson Y, Krikun G, et al. Steroid-
916. Lin X, Gao ES, Li D, et al. Preventive treatment of modulated stromal cell tissue factor expression: a model for
intrauterine device-induced menstrual blood loss with the regulation of endometrial hemostasis and menstruation.
tranexamic acid in Chinese women. Acta Obstet Gynecol J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993 Oct;77(4):1014-9. PMID:
Scand. 2007;86(9):1126-9. PMID: 17712656. X-5, X-6, X- 8408448. X-3, X-4
9
928. Lockwood CJ, Runic R, Wan L, et al. The role of
917. Lin YH, Hwang JL, Huang LW, et al. Use of tissue factor in regulating endometrial haemostasis:
sublingual buprenorphine for pain relief in office implications for progestin-only contraception. Hum
hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jul- Reprod. 2000 Aug;15 Suppl 3:144-51. PMID: 11041230.
Aug;12(4):347-50. PMID: 16036196. X-5, X-9 X-4, X-5

918. Lindenfeld EA, Langer RD. Bleeding patterns of the 929. Loffer FD, Grainger D. Five-year follow-up of
hormone replacement therapies in the postmenopausal patients participating in a randomized trial of uterine
estrogen and progestin interventions trial. Obstetrics and balloon therapy versus rollerball ablation for treatment of
Gynecology. 2002;100(5):853-63. PMID: 12423841. X-7 menorrhagia. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002
Nov;9(4):429-35. PMID: 12386351. X-4, X-5, X-8
919. Lindgren R, Risberg B, Hammar M, et al.
Endometrial effects of transdermal estradiol/norethisterone 930. Lofgren E, Tapanainen JS, Koivunen R, et al. Effects
acetate. Maturitas. 1992 Aug;15(1):71-8. PMID: 1528133. of carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine on the reproductive
X-3, X-7 endocrine function in women with epilepsy. Epilepsia.
2006 Sep;47(9):1441-6. PMID: 16981858. X-4, X-5, X-9
920. Lindholm A, Bixo M, Bjorn I, et al. Effect of
sibutramine on weight reduction in women with polycystic 931. Loh FH, Chen LH, Yu SL, et al. The efficacy of two
ovary syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- dosages of a continuous combined hormone replacement
controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2008 May;89(5):1221-8. regimen. Maturitas. 2002 Feb 26;41(2):123-31. PMID:
PMID: 17603048. X-5, X-9 11836043. X-5, X-7

921. Lindner HR, Zor U, Kohen F, et al. Significance of 932. Lok IH, Chan M, Tam WH, et al. Patient-controlled
prostaglandins in the regulation of cyclic events in the sedation for outpatient thermal balloon endometrial

K-44
ablation. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002 desogestrel on carbohydrate metabolism. Contraception.
Nov;9(4):436-41. PMID: 12386352. X-4, X-5, X-8, X-9 2002 Dec;66(6):411-5. PMID: 12499033. X-4, X-5, X-9

933. Lok IH, Leung PL, Ng PS, et al. Life-table analysis of 944. Luisi M, Franchi F, Bianchi S, et al. Radio-
the success of thermal balloon endometrial ablation in the immunoassay of salivary progesterone for monitoring
treatment of menorrhagia. Fertil Steril. 2003 ovarian function in female infertility. Ann Biol Clin (Paris).
Nov;80(5):1255-9. PMID: 14607584. X-4, X-5, X-8 1987;45(4):449-52. PMID: 3674548. X-3, X-4, X-5

934. Lokugamage AU, Paine M, Bassaw-Balroop K, et al. 945. Luisi S, Razzi S, Lazzeri L, et al. Efficacy of vaginal
Active management of the third stage at caesarean section: danazol treatment in women with menorrhagia during
a randomised controlled trial of misoprostol versus fertile age. Fertil Steril. 2009 Oct;92(4):1351-4. PMID:
syntocinon. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001 18930222. X-4
Nov;41(4):411-4. PMID: 11787915. X-5, X-9
946. Lukes AS, Muse K, Richter HE, et al. Estimating a
935. London RS, Sundaram GS, Murphy L, et al. The meaningful reduction in menstrual blood loss for women
effect of alpha-tocopherol on premenstrual with heavy menstrual bleeding. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010
symptomatology: a double-blind study. J Am Coll Nutr. Nov;26(11):2673-8. PMID: 20942615. X-3, X-4
1983;2(2):115-22. PMID: 6350402. X-5
947. Lundvall F, Nielsen NC. The hemostatic effect of
936. Longo MF, Cohen DR, Hood K, et al. Involving tranexamic acid in conisatio colli uteri. Acta Obstet
patients in primary care consultations: assessing Gynecol Scand. 1984;63(1):81-4. PMID: 6372362. X-5, X-
preferences using discrete choice experiments. Br J Gen 8
Pract. 2006 Jan;56(522):35-42. PMID: 16438813. X-3, X-
4, X-5, X-9 948. Luque-Ramirez M, Alvarez-Blasco F, Botella-
Carretero JI, et al. Increased body iron stores of obese
937. Lopez G, Rodriguez A, Rengifo J, et al. Two-year women with polycystic ovary syndrome are a consequence
prospective study in Colombia of Norplant implants. Obstet of insulin resistance and hyperinsulinism and are not a
Gynecol. 1986 Aug;68(2):204-8. PMID: 3090492. X-3, X- result of reduced menstrual losses. Diabetes Care. 2007
9 Sep;30(9):2309-13. PMID: 17536071. X-4, X-5, X-9

938. Loprinzi CL, Levitt R, Barton D, et al. Phase III 949. Luukkainen T, Allonen H, Haukkamaa M, et al.
comparison of depomedroxyprogesterone acetate to Effective contraception with the levonorgestrel-releasing
venlafaxine for managing hot flashes: North Central Cancer intrauterine device: 12-month report of a European
Treatment Group Trial N99C7. Journal of Clinical multicenter study. Contraception. 1987 Aug;36(2):169-79.
Oncology. 2007;24(9):1409-14. PMID: 16505409. X-5 PMID: 3123132. X-3, X-9

939. Loprinzi CL, Michalak JC, Schaid DJ, et al. Phase III 950. Luukkainen T, Allonen H, Nielsen NC, et al. Five
evaluation of four doses of megestrol acetate as therapy for years' experience of intrauterine contraception with the
patients with cancer anorexia and/or cachexia. Journal of Nova-T and the Copper-T-200. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983
Clinical Oncology. 1993;11(4):762-7. PMID: 8478668. X- Dec 15;147(8):885-92. PMID: 6650625. X-9
5
951. Luukkainen T, Heikinheimo O, Haukkamaa M, et al.
940. Loucopoulos A, Ferin M. The treatment of luteal Inhibition of folliculogenesis and ovulation by the
phase defects with pulsatile infusion of gonadotropin- antiprogesterone RU 486. Fertil Steril. 1988 Jun;49(6):961-
releasing hormone. Fertil Steril. 1987 Dec;48(6):933-6. 3. PMID: 3371492. X-3, X-4, X-5
PMID: 3119374. X-3, X-5
952. Luukkainen T, Pakarinen P, Toivonen J. Progestin-
941. Lu W, Li Q, Li J, et al. Polysaccharide from Patrinia releasing intrauterine systems. Semin Reprod Med. 2001
heterophylla Bunge inhibits HeLa cell proliferation through Dec;19(4):355-63. PMID: 11727177. X-1, X-3, X-5
induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. Laboratory
Medicine. 2009;40(3):161-6. X-3, X-4 953. Lydeking-Olsen E, Beck-Jensen JE, Setchell KDR, et
al. Soymilk or progesterone for prevention of bone loss: A
942. Lubbert H, Nauert C. Continuous versus cyclical 2 year randomized, placebo-controlled trial. European
transdermal estrogen replacement therapy in Journal of Nutrition. 2004;43(4):246-57. PMID: 15309425.
postmenopausal women: influence on climacteric X-7
symptoms, body weight and bleeding pattern. Maturitas.
1997 Dec 15;28(2):117-25. PMID: 9522319. X-5, X-7 954. M, Vardhanabhuti VV, Pearson SA. Education and
Service Delivery: The use of transvaginal ultrasound
943. Ludicke F, Gaspard UJ, Demeyer F, et al. evaluation premicrowave endometrial ablation. Ultrasound.
Randomized controlled study of the influence of two low 2011;19(1):36-8. X-8
estrogen dose oral contraceptives containing gestodene or

K-45
955. Ma W, Bai W, Lin C, et al. Effects of Sanyinjiao
(SP6) with electroacupuncture on labour pain in women 966. Maia H, Jr., Pimentel K, Casoy J, et al. Aromatase
during labour. Complement Ther Med. 2011 Jan;19 Suppl expression in the eutopic endometrium of myomatous uteri:
1:S13-8. PMID: 21195290. X-5, X-9 the influence of the menstrual cycle and oral contraceptive
use. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2007 Jun;23(6):320-4. PMID:
956. MacGregor EA, Brandes JL, Silberstein S, et al. 17616855. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
Safety and tolerability of short-term preventive
frovatriptan: a combined analysis. Headache. 2009 967. Mainini G, Scaffa C, Rotondi M, et al. Local estrogen
Oct;49(9):1298-314. PMID: 19788471. X-5, X-9 replacement therapy in postmenopausal atrophic vaginitis:
efficacy and safety of low dose 17beta-estradiol vaginal
957. MacGregor EA, Frith A, Ellis J, et al. Prevention of tablets. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2005;32(2):111-3.
menstrual attacks of migraine: a double-blind placebo- PMID: 16108394. X-5, X-7
controlled crossover study. Neurology. 2006 Dec
26;67(12):2159-63. PMID: 17190936. X-5, X-9 968. Makarainen L, Ylikorkala O. Primary and myoma-
associated menorrhagia: role of prostaglandins and effects
958. MacGregor EA, Victor TW, Hu X, et al. of ibuprofen. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Sep;93(9):974-8.
Characteristics of menstrual vs nonmenstrual migraine: a PMID: 3533137. X-5, X-6
post hoc, within-woman analysis of the usual-care phase of
a nonrandomized menstrual migraine clinical trial. 969. Makarainen L, Ylikorkala O. Ibuprofen prevents
Headache. 2010 Apr;50(4):528-38. PMID: 20236340. X-4, IUCD-induced increases in menstrual blood loss. Br J
X-5, X-9 Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Mar;93(3):285-8. PMID: 3516203.
X-5, X-6
959. Machado RB, de Melo NR, Maia H, Jr. Bleeding
patterns and menstrual-related symptoms with the 970. Makhubele JC. Indigenous knowledge in the context
continuous use of a contraceptive combination of of sexual and reproductive health and rights amongst the
ethinylestradiol and drospirenone: a randomized study. Tsonga/ Shangaan speaking people in a rural community of
Contraception. 2010 Mar;81(3):215-22. PMID: 20159177. Limpopo Province: A social work perspective.
X-5 International Journal of Health Promotion & Education.
2011;49(4):161-8. X-3, X-5, X-7
960. Madden T, Proehl S, Allsworth JE, et al. Naproxen or
estradiol for bleeding and spotting with the levonorgestrel 971. Maloney JM, Dietze Jr P, Watson D, et al. A
intrauterine system: A randomized controlled trial. randomized controlled trial of a low-dose combined oral
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012 contraceptive containing 3 mg drospirenone plus 20 mug
February;206(2):129.e1-.e8. PMID: 2012063049. X-5, X- ethinylestradiol in the treatment of acne vulgaris: Lesion
9, X-10 counts, investigator ratings and subject self-assessment.
Journal of Drugs in Dermatology. 2009;8(9):837-44.
961. Mady MA, Kossoff EH, McGregor AL, et al. The PMID: 19746676. X-5
ketogenic diet: adolescents can do it, too. Epilepsia. 2003
Jun;44(6):847-51. PMID: 12790900. X-4, X-5, X-9 972. Maloney JM, Dietze P, Watson D, et al. Treatment of
acne using A 3-milligram drospirenone/20-microgram
962. Magalhaes J, Aldrighi JM, de Lima GR. Uterine ethinyl estradiol oral contraceptive administered in a 24/4
volume and menstrual patterns in users of the regimen: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system with idiopathic Gynecology. 2008;112(4):773-81. PMID: 18827119. X-5
menorrhagia or menorrhagia due to leiomyomas.
Contraception. 2007 Mar;75(3):193-8. PMID: 17303488. 973. Mannix LK, Loder E, Nett R, et al. Rizatriptan for the
X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9 acute treatment of ICHD-II proposed menstrual migraine:
two prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-
963. Magill PJ, Beaumont G, Gringras M, et al. blind studies. Cephalalgia. 2007 May;27(5):414-21. PMID:
Investigation of the efficacy of progesterone pessaries in 17448179. X-5, X-9
the relief of symptoms of premenstrual syndrome. British
Journal of General Practice. 1995;45(400):589-93. PMID: 974. Mansour D, Verhoeven C, Sommer W, et al. Efficacy
8554838. X-5, X-6 and tolerability of a monophasic combined oral
contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate and 17beta-
964. Magos A, Brincat M, Zilkha KJ, et al. Serum oestradiol in a 24/4 regimen, in comparison to an oral
dopamine beta-hydroxylase activity in menstrual migraine. contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol and drospirenone
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985 Apr;48(4):328-31. in a 21/7 regimen. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care.
PMID: 4039748. X-3, X-4, X-5 2011 Dec;16(6):430-43. PMID: 21995590. X-9

965. Maia H, Jr., Maltez A, Coelho G, et al. Insertion of 975. Marbaix E, Vekemans M, Galant C, et al. Circulating
mirena after endometrial resection in patients with sex hormones and endometrial stromelysin-1 (matrix
adenomyosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003 metalloproteinase-3) at the start of bleeding episodes in
Nov;10(4):512-6. PMID: 14738640. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8

K-46
levonorgestrel-implant users. Hum Reprod. 2000 Aug;15 on bleeding patterns after induction of abortion with
Suppl 3:120-34. PMID: 11041228. X-4, X-5 mifepristone and a prostaglandin pessary. Contraception.
1998 Aug;58(2):99-103. PMID: 9773264. X-5, X-9
976. Marchant-Haycox S, Liu D, Nicholas N, et al.
Patients' expectations of outcome of hysterectomy and 987. Martin V, Cady R, Mauskop A, et al. Efficacy of
alternative treatments for menstrual problems. J Behav rizatriptan for menstrual migraine in an early intervention
Med. 1998 Jun;21(3):283-97. PMID: 9642573. X-4, X-5, model: a prospective subgroup analysis of the rizatriptan
X-8, X-9 TAME (Treat A Migraine Early) studies. Headache. 2008
Feb;48(2):226-35. PMID: 18005144. X-4, X-5, X-9
977. Marchbanks PA, Coulam CB, Annegers JF. An
association between clomiphene citrate and ectopic 988. Martinez GH, Castaneda A, Correa JE. Vaginal
pregnancy: a preliminary report. Fertil Steril. 1985 bleeding patterns in users of Perlutal, a once-a-month
Aug;44(2):268-70. PMID: 4018282. X-3, X-5, X-9 injectable contraceptive consisting of 10 mg estradiol
enanthate combined with 150 mg dihydroxyprogesterone
978. Marchini M, Dorta M, Bombelli F, et al. Effects of acetophenide. A trial of 5462 woman-months.
clomiphene citrate on cervical mucus: analysis of some Contraception. 1998 Jul;58(1):21-7. PMID: 9743892. X-3,
influencing factors. Int J Fertil. 1989 Mar-Apr;34(2):154-9. X-5, X-6
PMID: 2565319. X-3, X-4, X-5
989. Masahashi T, Wu MC, Ohsawa M, et al.
979. Marcus DA, Bernstein CD, Sullivan EA, et al. A Spironolactone therapy for hyperandrogenic anovulatory
prospective comparison between ICHD-II and probability women--clinical and endocrinological study. Nihon Sanka
menstrual migraine diagnostic criteria. Headache. 2010 Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1986 Jan;38(1):95-101. PMID:
Apr;50(4):539-50. PMID: 20236338. X-4, X-5, X-9 3950464. X-3, X-5

980. Marcus DA, Bernstein CD, Sullivan EA, et al. 990. Massai MR, Diaz S, Quinteros E, et al. Contraceptive
Perimenstrual eletriptan prevents menstrual migraine: an efficacy and clinical performance of Nestorone implants in
open-label study. Headache. 2010 Apr;50(4):551-62. postpartum women. Contraception. 2001 Dec;64(6):369-
PMID: 20236337. X-4, X-5, X-9 76. PMID: 11834236. X-4, X-5

981. Marsh F, Kremer C, Duffy S. Delivering an effective 991. Massai MR, Pavez M, Fuentealba B, et al. Effect of
outpatient service in gynaecology. A randomised controlled intermittent treatment with mifepristone on bleeding
trial analysing the cost of outpatient versus daycase patterns in Norplant implant users. Contraception. 2004
hysteroscopy. BJOG. 2004 Mar;111(3):243-8. PMID: Jul;70(1):47-54. PMID: 15208052. X-5, X-6
14961886. X-5, X-8
992. Matsumoto Y, Yamabe S, Sugishima T, et al.
982. Marsh F, Thewlis J, Duffy S. Thermachoice Perception of oral contraceptives among women of
endometrial ablation in the outpatient setting, without local reproductive age in Japan: a comparison with the USA and
anesthesia or intravenous sedation: a prospective cohort France. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011 Jul;37(7):887-92.
study. Fertil Steril. 2005 Mar;83(3):715-20. PMID: PMID: 21450030. X-3, X-5
15749503. X-4, X-5, X-8
993. Mattsson LA. Safety and tolerability of pulsed
983. Marsh F, Thewlis J, Duffy S. Randomized controlled estrogen therapy: Key factors for an improved compliance.
trial comparing Thermachoice III* in the outpatient versus Climacteric. 2002;5(SUPPL. 2):40-5. PMID: 12482110. X-
daycase setting. Fertil Steril. 2007 Mar;87(3):642-50. 1, X-5
PMID: 17109859. X-5, X-8
994. Mattsson LA, Bohnet HG, Gredmark T, et al.
984. Marsh MM, Butt AR, Riley SC, et al. Continuous, combined hormone replacement: Randomized
Immunolocalization of endothelin and neutral comparison of transdermal and oral preparations. Obstetrics
endopeptidase in the endometrium of users of subdermally and Gynecology. 1999;94(1):61-5. PMID: 10389719. X-7
implanted levonorgestrel (Norplant). Hum Reprod. 1995
Oct;10(10):2584-9. PMID: 8567775. X-3, X-4, X-9 995. Mattsson LA, Skouby S, Mattila L, et al. Efficacy and
tolerability of continuous combined hormone replacement
985. Marslew U, Overgaard K, Riis BJ, et al. Two new therapy in early postmenopausal women. Menopause
combinations of estrogen and progestogen for prevention of International. 2007;13(3):124-31. PMID: 17785038. X-7
postmenopausal bone loss: long-term effects on bone,
calcium and lipid metabolism, climacteric symptoms, and 996. Mattsson LA, Skouby SO, Heikkinen J, et al. A low-
bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Feb;79(2):202-10. PMID: dose start in hormone replacement therapy provides a
1309944. X-7 beneficial bleeding profile and few side-effects:
randomized comparison with a conventional-dose regimen.
986. Martin CW, Brown AH, Baird DT. A pilot study of Climacteric. 2004 Mar;7(1):59-69. PMID: 15259284. X-5,
the effect of methotrexate or combined oral contraceptive X-7

K-47
997. Matuszkiewicz-Rowinska J, Skorzewska K, personality characteristics and menstrual irregularity in
Radowicki S, et al. Endometrial morphology and pituitary- college women. Appetite. 2003 Apr;40(2):185-92. PMID:
gonadal axis dysfunction in women of reproductive age 12781168. X-4, X-5, X-9
undergoing chronic haemodialysis--a multicentre study.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Aug;19(8):2074-7. PMID: 1009. McLintock C, McCowan LM, North RA. Maternal
15173376. X-4, X-5, X-9 complications and pregnancy outcome in women with
mechanical prosthetic heart valves treated with enoxaparin.
998. Mavrelos D, Ben-Nagi J, Davies A, et al. The value BJOG. 2009 Nov;116(12):1585-92. PMID: 19681850. X-
of pre-operative treatment with GnRH analogues in women 4, X-5, X-9
with submucous fibroids: a double-blind, placebo-
controlled randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2010 1010. Meirik O, Rowe PJ, Peregoudov A, et al. The
Sep;25(9):2264-9. PMID: 20663795. X-5, X-6, X-8 frameless copper IUD (GyneFix) and the TCu380A IUD:
results of an 8-year multicenter randomized comparative
999. Mayagoitia SB, Hernandez-Morales C, Macias AM, trial. Contraception. 2009 Aug;80(2):133-41. PMID:
et al. Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist for 19631788. X-5
postpartum contraception. Adv Contracept. 1996
Mar;12(1):27-41. PMID: 8739514. X-5, X-9 1011. Menyhart K. Therapeutic usefulness of anteovin.
Ther Hung. 1989;37(3):168-71. PMID: 2588200. X-3
1000. Mazaro-Costa R, Andersen ML, Hachul H, et al.
Medicinal plants as alternative treatments for female sexual 1012. Mercorio F, De Simone R, Di Carlo C, et al.
dysfunction: Utopian vision or possible treatment in Effectiveness and mechanism of action of desmopressin in
climacteric women? Journal of Sexual Medicine. the treatment of copper intrauterine device-related
2010;7(11):3695-714. PMID: 20722793. X-1, X-3, X-5 menorrhagia: a pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2003
Nov;18(11):2319-22. PMID: 14585881. X-4, X-5, X-6
1001. McArthur JW, Turnbull BA, Pehrson J, et al.
Nalmefene enhances LH secretion in a proportion of oligo- 1013. Mercorio F, De Simone R, Landi P, et al. Oral
amenorrheic athletes. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1993 dexketoprofen for pain treatment during diagnostic
Apr;128(4):325-33. PMID: 8498150. X-3, X-4, X-5 hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women. Maturitas.
2002;43(4):277-81. PMID: 12468136. X-7
1002. McBride D, Hardoon S, Walters K, et al. Explaining
variation in referral from primary to secondary care: cohort 1014. Merrill JT, Wallace DJ, Petri M, et al. Safety profile
study. BMJ. 2010;341:c6267. PMID: 21118873. X-4, X-5, and clinical activity of sifalimumab, a fully human anti-
X-7, X-9 interferon alpha monoclonal antibody, in systemic lupus
erythematosus: A phase I, multicentre, double-blind
1003. McCowan KA, Edelstein S. Are female ultra- randomised study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.
endurance triathletes getting a sufficient daily carbohydrate 2011;70(11):1905-13. PMID: 21798883. X-5
intake? Topics in Clinical Nutrition. 2006;21(2):139-44.
X-3, X-5 1015. Messina ML, Bozzini N, Halbe HW, et al. Uterine
artery embolization for the treatment of uterine
1004. McEwan J. Hormonal contraceptive methods. leiomyomata. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Oct;79(1):11-6.
Practitioner. 1985 May;229(1403):415-23. PMID: PMID: 12399085. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8
4011568. X-9
1016. Meuwissen JHJM, Beijers-De Bie L, Vihtamaki T,
1005. McGavigan CJ, Dockery P, Metaxa-Mariatou V, et et al. A 1-year comparison of the efficacy and clinical
al. Hormonally mediated disturbance of angiogenesis in the tolerance in postmenopausal women of two hormone
human endometrium after exposure to intrauterine replacement therapies containing estradiol in combination
levonorgestrel. Hum Reprod. 2003 Jan;18(1):77-84. PMID: with either norgestrel or trimegestone. Gynecological
12525444. X-4, X-5, X-6 Endocrinology. 2001;15(5):349-58. PMID: 11727357. X-7

1006. McIvor J, Cameron EW. Pregnancy after uterine 1017. Meyer BH, Muller RO, De la Rey N, et al. The
artery embolization to control haemorrhage from effects of buserelin microparticles on ovarian function in
gestational trophoblastic tumour. Br J Radiol. 1996 healthy women. South African Medical Journal.
Jul;69(823):624-9. PMID: 8696698. X-4, X-5, X-9 1995;85(8):766-7. PMID: 8553146. X-4, X-9

1007. McKenzie J, Fisher BM, Jaap AJ, et al. Effects of 1018. Meyer WR, Walsh BW, Grainger DA, et al. Thermal
HRT on liver enzyme levels in women with type 2 balloon and rollerball ablation to treat menorrhagia: a
diabetes: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clinical multicenter comparison. Obstet Gynecol. 1998
Endocrinology. 2006;65(1):40-4. PMID: 16817817. X-4, Jul;92(1):98-103. PMID: 9649102. X-5, X-8
X-5
1019. Michielutte R, Diseker RA, Corbett WT, et al.
1008. McLean JA, Barr SI. Cognitive dietary restraint is Characteristics of women with cervical intraepithelial
associated with eating behaviors, lifestyle practices,

K-48
dysplasia. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1983;130:203-15. PMID: 1030. Mints M, Luksha L, Kublickiene K. Altered
6622455. X-5 responsiveness of small uterine arteries in women with
idiopathic menorrhagia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008
1020. Micks E, Jensen JT. Estradiol valerate and Dec;199(6):646 e1-5. PMID: 18667186. X-4, X-5
dienogest: a novel four-phasic oral contraceptive pill
effective for pregnancy prevention and treatment of heavy 1031. Mishell DR, Jr., Shoupe D, Moyer DL, et al.
menstrual bleeding. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2011 Postmenopausal hormone replacement with a combination
Sep;7(5):513-24. PMID: 21879819. X-1, X-3, X-5 estrogen-progestin regimen for five days per week. J
Reprod Med. 1991 May;36(5):351-5. PMID: 2061882. X-
1021. Miech RP. Pathopharmacology of excessive 3, X-7
hemorrhage in mifepristone abortions. Ann Pharmacother.
2007 Dec;41(12):2002-7. PMID: 17956963. X-1, X-4, X-5, 1032. Mitchell ES, Woods NF, Bryant J. Understanding
X-9 the menopausal transition: bleeding patterns during the
menopausal transition... 34th Annual Communicating
1022. Mieszczak J, Lowe ES, Plourde P, et al. The Nursing Research Conference/15th Annual WIN Assembly,
aromatase inhibitor anastrozole is ineffective in the "Health Care Challenges Beyond 2001: Mapping the
treatment of precocious puberty in girls with McCune- Journey for Research and Practice," held April 19-21, 2001
Albright syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 in Seattle, Washington. Communicating Nursing Research.
Jul;93(7):2751-4. PMID: 18397987. X-4, X-5, X-9 2001;34:203-. X-1, X-3, X-5

1023. Migoya E, Larson P, Bergman A, et al. Sitagliptin, a 1033. Mizrak A, Ugur GM, Erdaloglu P, et al. Intra-uterine
dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, does not affect the bupivacaine and levobupivacaine. Australian and New
pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol or norethindrone in Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
healthy female subjects. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2010;50(1):65-9. PMID: 20219000. X-4, X-5, X-8
2011;51(9):1319-25. PMID: 21209231. X-4, X-5, X-9
1034. Mizunuma H, Okano H, Soda M, et al. Prevention of
1024. Miller L, Hughes JP. Continuous combination oral postmenopausal bone loss with minimal uterine bleeding
contraceptive pills to eliminate withdrawal bleeding: a using low dose continuous estrogen/progestin therapy: a 2-
randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;101(4):653-61. year prospective study. Maturitas. 1997 May;27(1):69-76.
PMID: 12681866. X-4, X-5, X-9 PMID: 9158080. X-4, X-5, X-7, X-9

1025. Miller L, Notter KM. Menstrual reduction with 1035. Mlcochova H, Horejsi J, Martinek J, et al. Treatment
extended use of combination oral contraceptive pills: of autoimunne ovarian damage in adolescent girls. Neuro
Randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology. Endocrinol Lett. 2005 Apr;26(2):131-5. PMID: 15855884.
2001;98(5):771-8. PMID: 11704167. X-6, X-9 X-4, X-5, X-9

1026. Miller L, Verhoeven CH, Hout J. Extended regimens 1036. Mohamed AMM, El-Sherbiny WSM, Mostafa WAI.
of the contraceptive vaginal ring: a randomized trial. Obstet Combined contraceptive ring versus combined oral
Gynecol. 2005 Sep;106(3):473-82. PMID: 16135576. X-9, contraceptive (30-mug ethinylestradiol and 3-mg
X-10 drospirenone). International Journal of Gynecology and
Obstetrics. 2011;114(2):145-8. PMID: 21669426. X-9
1027. Miller S, Fathalla MM, Ojengbede OA, et al.
Obstetric hemorrhage and shock management: using the 1037. Mohan PC, Tan BS, Kwek BH, et al. Uterine artery
low technology Non-pneumatic Anti-Shock Garment in embolisation for symptomatic fibroids in a tertiary hospital
Nigerian and Egyptian tertiary care facilities. BMC in Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2005
Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:64. PMID: 20955600. X-4, Jan;34(1):78-83. PMID: 15726223. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8, X-
X-5, X-9 9

1028. Milsom I, Andersson K, Andersch B, et al. A 1038. Molina RC, Sandoval JZ, Montero AV, et al.
comparison of flurbiprofen, tranexamic acid, and a Comparative performance of a combined injectable
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device contraceptive (50 mg norethisterone enanthate plus 5mg
in the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia. Am J Obstet estradiol valerate) and a combined oral contraceptive (0.15
Gynecol. 1991 Mar;164(3):879-83. PMID: 1900665. X-3 mg levonorgestrel plus 0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol) in
adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009
1029. Milsom I, Lete I, Bjertnaes A, et al. Effects on cycle Feb;22(1):25-31. PMID: 19232299. X-4, X-5, X-9
control and bodyweight of the combined contraceptive ring,
NuvaRing, versus an oral contraceptive containing 30 mug 1039. Momoeda M, Harada T, Terakawa N, et al. Long-
ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone. Human term use of dienogest for the treatment of endometriosis. J
Reproduction. 2006;21(9):2304-11. PMID: 16763008. X- Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Dec;35(6):1069-76. PMID:
6, X-9 20025633. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9

K-49
1040. Monteiro I, Bahamondes L, Diaz J, et al. Egypt. African Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health.
Therapeutic use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine 2011 2011 Jan-Mar;5(1):37-42. X-3, X-5, X-6, X-10
system in women with menorrhagia: a pilot study(1).
Contraception. 2002 May;65(5):325-8. PMID: 12057782. 1052. Mossa B, Imperato F, Marziani R, et al. Hormonal
X-4 replacement therapy and evaluation of intrauterine
pathology in postmenopausal women: a ten-year study. Eur
1041. Moodley J, Cohen M, Devraj K, et al. Vaginal J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24(6):507-12. PMID: 14658591.
absorption of low-dose tranexamic acid from impregnated X-4, X-5, X-7
tampons. S Afr Med J. 1992 Feb 1;81(3):150-2. PMID:
1734554. X-3, X-5, X-6, X-10 1053. Mourali M, Fkih C, Essoussi-Chikhaoui J, et al.
Gestational trophoblastic disease in Tunisia. Tunis Med.
1042. Moore C, Carol W, Graser T, et al. Influence of 2008 Jul;86(7):665-9. PMID: 19472728. X-4, X-5, X-9
dienogest on ovulation in young fertile women. Clinical
Drug Investigation. 1999;18(4):271-8. X-4, X-5, X-9 1054. Movafegh A, Eslamian L, Dorabadi A. Effect of
intravenous tranexamic acid administration on blood loss
1043. Moore KA, Callahan TS, Maison-Blanche P, et al. during and after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.
Thorough cardiac QTc interval conductance assessment of 2011 Dec;115(3):224-6. PMID: 21872857. X-5
a novel oral tranexamic acid treatment for heavy menstrual
bleeding. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010 1055. Muasher SJ, Kruithoff C, Simonetti S, et al.
Oct;11(14):2281-90. PMID: 20698724. X-4, X-5, X-9 Controlled preparation of the endometrium with exogenous
steroids for the transfer of frozen-thawed pre-embryos in
1044. Moore KA, Morin I, Marenco T, et al. patients with anovulatory or irregular cycles. Hum Reprod.
Pharmacokinetic studies in women of 2 novel oral 1991 Mar;6(3):443-5. PMID: 1955555. X-3, X-5
formulations of tranexamic acid therapy for heavy
menstrual bleeding. American Journal of Therapeutics. 1056. Mukherjee GG, Gajaraj AJ, Mathias J, et al.
2012 May;19(3):190-8. PMID: 2012282788. X-4 Treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding with micronized
flavonoids. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 May;89(2):156-7.
1045. Moore N, Charlesworth A, Van Ganse E, et al. Risk PMID: 15847886. X-3
factors for adverse events in analgesic drug users: Results
from the PAIN study. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug 1057. Mulders AG, Eijkemans MJ, Imani B, et al.
Safety. 2003;12(7):601-10. PMID: 14558184. X-5 Prediction of chances for success or complications in
gonadotrophin ovulation induction in normogonadotrophic
1046. Moraes-de-Souza H, Kerbauy J, Yamamoto M, et al. anovulatory infertility. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003
Depressed cell-mediated immunity in iron-deficiency Sep;7(2):170-8. PMID: 14567885. X-4, X-5, X-9
anemia due to chronic loss of blood. Braz J Med Biol Res.
1984;17(2):143-50. PMID: 6518338. X-3, X-4, X-5 1058. Mulligan K, Zackin R, Clark RA, et al. Effect of
nandrolone decanoate therapy on weight and lean body
1047. Moreau C, Trussell J, Gilbert F, et al. Oral mass in HIV-infected women with weight loss: A
contraceptive tolerance: does the type of pill matter? Obstet randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter
Gynecol. 2007 Jun;109(6):1277-85. PMID: 17540798. X- trial. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2005;165(5):578-85.
4, X-5, X-9 PMID: 15767536. X-5

1048. Moreno J, Rowan AJ. A comparative study of 1059. Muneyyirci-Delale O, Richard-Davis G, Morris T, et
Norinyl 1/35 versus Brevicon in Panama City, Panama. al. Goserelin Acetate 10.8 mg Plus Iron Versus Iron
Contraception. 1987 Dec;36(6):615-25. PMID: 3446438. Monotherapy Prior to Surgery in Premenopausal Women
X-9 with Iron-Deficiency Anemia Due to Uterine Leiomyomas:
Results from a Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter,
1049. Moro M, Maraschini C, Toja P, et al. Comparison Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Clinical Therapeutics.
between a slow-release oral preparation of bromocriptine 2007;29(8):1682-91. PMID: 17919549. X-6, X-8
and regular bromocriptine in patients with
hyperprolactinemia: a double blind, double dummy study. 1060. Muneyyirci-Delale O, Weisberg GW. Do heavier
Horm Res. 1991;35(3-4):137-41. PMID: 1806467. X-3, X- women benefit from a higher dose of leuprolide acetate for
5 suppression of serum estradiol? Int J Fertil Womens Med.
2000 Nov-Dec;45(6):368-71. PMID: 11140546. X-4, X-5,
1050. Morris EP, Rymer J, Robinson J, et al. Efficacy of X-6
tibolone as "add-back therapy" in conjunction with a
gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue in the treatment 1061. Munro MG, Mainor N, Basu R, et al. Oral
of uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2008 Feb;89(2):421-8. medroxyprogesterone acetate and combination oral
PMID: 17572410. X-5, X-6, X-9 contraceptives for acute uterine bleeding: a randomized
controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;108(4):924-9.
1051. Morris JL, Meyer C, Fathalla MMF, et al. Treating PMID: 17012455. X-5, X-9
uterine atony with the nonpneumatic anti-shock garment in

K-50
1072. Nahidi F, Jalalinia S. Comparing the complications
1062. Murphy PA, Kern SE, Stanczyk FZ, et al. of 2 copper intrauterine devices: T380A and Cu-Safe 300.
Interaction of St. John's Wort with oral contraceptives: East Mediterr Health J. 2008 Jan-Feb;14(1):95-102. PMID:
effects on the pharmacokinetics of norethindrone and 18557456. X-4, X-5, X-9
ethinyl estradiol, ovarian activity and breakthrough
bleeding. Contraception. 2005 Jun;71(6):402-8. PMID: 1073. Nakagawa K, Takahashi Y, Ito M, et al. Intraovarian
15914127. X-4, X-5, X-9 arterial blood flow resistance in oligomenorrheal infertile
women. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006 Mar;23(3):105-10.
1063. Murray SC, Muse KN. Effective treatment of severe PMID: 16758342. X-4, X-5, X-9
menstrual migraine headaches with gonadotropin-releasing
hormone agonist and "add-back" therapy. Fertil Steril. 1997 1074. Nakajima ST, Archer DF, Ellman H. Efficacy and
Feb;67(2):390-3. PMID: 9022620. X-3, X-5 safety of a new 24-day oral contraceptive regimen of
norethindrone acetate 1 mg/ethinyl estradiol 20 micro g
1064. Muse K, Lukes AS, Gersten J, et al. Long-term (Loestrin 24 Fe). Contraception. 2007 Jan;75(1):16-22.
evaluation of safety and health-related quality of life in PMID: 17161118. X-4, X-5
women with heavy menstrual bleeding treated with oral
tranexamic acid. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2011 1075. Nakajima ST, Brumsted JR, Riddick DH, et al.
Nov;7(6):699-707. PMID: 21867401. X-3 Absence of progestational activity of oral spironolactone.
Fertil Steril. 1989 Jul;52(1):155-8. PMID: 2744183. X-3,
1065. Muzii L, Boni T, Bellati F, et al. GnRH analogue X-4, X-5, X-6
treatment before hysteroscopic resection of submucous
myomas: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. 1076. Nand SL, Webster MA, Baber R, et al. Bleeding
Fertil Steril. 2010 Sep;94(4):1496-9. PMID: 19541299. X- pattern and endometrial changes during continuous
5, X-6, X-8, X-9 combined hormone replacement therapy. The Ogen/Provera
Study Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 May;91(5 Pt 1):678-
1066. Muzii L, Maneschi F, Marana R, et al. Oral 84. PMID: 9572210. X-5, X-7
Estroprogestins after Laparoscopic Surgery to Excise
Endometriomas: Continuous or Cyclic Administration? 1077. Nand SL, Webster MA, Wren BG. Continuous
Results of a Multicenter Randomized Study. Journal of combined piperazine oestrone sulphate and
Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2011;18(2):173-8. PMID: medroxyprogesterone acetate hormone replacement
21262590. X-5, X-6, X-8 therapy--a study of bleeding pattern, endometrial response,
serum lipid and bone density changes. Aust N Z J Obstet
1067. Mwamburi DM, Gerrior J, Wilson IB, et al. Gynaecol. 1995 Feb;35(1):92-6. PMID: 7772012. X-7
Comparing megestrol acetate therapy with oxandrolone
therapy for HIV-related weight loss: Similar results in 2 1078. Nappi C, Farace MJ, Leone F, et al. Effect of a
months. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2004;38(6):895-902. combination of ethinylestradiol and desogestrel in
PMID: 14999637. X-5 adolescents with oligomenorrhea and ovarian
hyperandrogenism. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.
1068. Myburgh KH, Watkin VA, Noakes TD. Are risk 1987 Jul;25(3):209-19. PMID: 2956138. X-3, X-5
factors for menstrual dysfunction cumulative? Physician &
Sportsmedicine. 1992;20(4):114. X-3, X-4, X-5, X-10 1079. Nappi RE, Sances G, Sommacal A, et al. Different
effects of tibolone and low-dose EPT in the management of
1069. Nabavi SM, Koupai SA, Nejati MR, et al. Menstrual postmenopausal women with primary headaches.
irregularities and related plasma hormone levels in multiple Menopause. 2006;13(5):818-25. PMID: 16894336. X-5, X-
sclerosis patients treated with beta interferone. Acta Med 7
Iran. 2010 Jan-Feb;48(1):36-41. PMID: 21137667. X-4, X-
5, X-6, X-9 1080. Narbone MC, Ruello C, Oliva A, et al. Hormonal
disregulation and catamenial epilepsy. Funct Neurol. 1990
1070. Nagele F, Lockwood G, Magos AL. Randomised Jan-Mar;5(1):49-53. PMID: 2119330. X-3, X-4, X-5
placebo controlled trial of mefenamic acid for
premedication at outpatient hysteroscopy: a pilot study. Br 1081. Nassaralla CL, Stanford JB, Daly KD, et al.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jul;104(7):842-4. PMID: Characteristics of the menstrual cycle after discontinuation
9236652. X-4, X-5, X-8, X-9 of oral contraceptives. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011
Feb;20(2):169-77. PMID: 21219248. X-4, X-5, X-9
1071. Nagele F, O'Connor H, Baskett TF, et al.
Hysteroscopy in women with abnormal uterine bleeding on 1082. Nathirojanakun P, Taneepanichskul S,
hormone replacement therapy: a comparison with Sappakitkumjorn N. Efficacy of a selective COX-2
postmenopausal bleeding. Fertil Steril. 1996 inhibitor for controlling irregular uterine bleeding in
Jun;65(6):1145-50. PMID: 8641488. X-4, X-5, X-7, X-8, DMPA users. Contraception. 2006 Jun;73(6):584-7. PMID:
X-9 16730488. X-5, X-6

K-51
1083. Navarro PA, Kaddouz D, de Ziegler D, et al. bromocriptine. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1989 Oct;31(4):391-
Vaginal administration of allopregnanolone to 400. PMID: 2576397. X-3, X-5
postmenopausal women undergoing estrogen replacement
therapy: preliminary results. Maturitas. 2003 Oct 1094. Newman LC, Lipton RB, Lay CL, et al. A pilot
20;46(2):147-52. PMID: 14559386. X-4, X-5, X-7 study of oral sumatriptan as intermittent prophylaxis of
menstruation-related migraine. Neurology. 1998
1084. Nazar H, Usmanghani K. Clinical evaluation to Jul;51(1):307-9. PMID: 9674831. X-4, X-5, X-9
assess the safety and efficacy of coded herbal medicine
"Dysmo-off" versus allopathic medicine "Diclofenac 1095. Newton KM, Reed SD, LaCroix AZ, et al.
Sodium" for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. Treatment of vasomotor symptoms of menopause with
Journal of Herbal Pharmacotherapy. 2006;6(1):21-39. black cohosh, multibotanicals, soy, hormone therapy, or
PMID: 17135158. X-5, X-10 placebo: A randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine.
2006;145(12):869-79. PMID: 17179056. X-5
1085. Need JA, Forbes KL, Milazzo L, et al. Danazol in
the treatment of menorrhagia: the effect of a 1 month 1096. Nezhat C, Karpas AE, Greenblatt RB, et al.
induction dose (200 mg) and 2 month's maintenance Estradiol implants for conception control. Am J Obstet
therapy (200 mg, 100 mg, 50 mg or placebo). Aust N Z J Gynecol. 1980 Dec 15;138(8):1151-6. PMID: 7446623. X-
Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Nov;32(4):346-52. PMID: 1290434. 3, X-9
X-5
1097. Ngai SW, Chan YM, Tang OS, et al. Vaginal
1086. Nel A, Smythe S, Young K, et al. Safety and misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester
pharmacokinetics of dapivirine delivery from matrix and spontaneous miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2001
reservoir intravaginal rings to HIV-negative women. Jul;16(7):1493-6. PMID: 11425836. X-5, X-9
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes.
2009;51(4):416-23. PMID: 19623693. X-4, X-5 1098. Ngai SW, Fan S, Li S, et al. A randomized trial to
compare 24 h versus 12 h double dose regimen of
1087. Nelskyla K, Korttila K, Yli-Hankala A. Comparison levonorgestrel for emergency contraception. Human
of sevoflurane-nitrous oxide and propofol-alfentanil-nitrous Reproduction. 2005;20(1):307-11. PMID: 15567882. X-5
oxide anaesthesia for minor gynaecological surgery. British
Journal of Anaesthesia. 1999;83(4):576-9. PMID: 1099. Ngai SW, Yeung KC, Lao T, et al. Oral misoprostol
10673872. X-5, X-8 versus mifepristone for cervical dilatation before vacuum
aspiration in first trimester nulliparous pregnancy: a double
1088. Nelson AL. Levonorgestrel intrauterine system: a blind prospective randomised study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
first-line medical treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding. 1996 Nov;103(11):1120-3. PMID: 8917000. X-5, X-9
Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2010 May;6(3):347-56.
PMID: 20426599. X-1, X-3, X-5, X-10 1100. Nguyen TN, Blum J, Durocher J, et al. A
randomized controlled study comparing 600 versus 1,200
1089. Nett R, Mannix LK, Mueller L, et al. Rizatriptan microg oral misoprostol for medical management of
efficacy in ICHD-II pure menstrual migraine and incomplete abortion. Contraception. 2005 Dec;72(6):438-
menstrually related migraine. Headache. 2008 42. PMID: 16307967. X-5, X-9
Sep;48(8):1194-201. PMID: 18422606. X-5, X-9
1101. Nicholas SL, Rulin MC. Acute vaginal bleeding in
1090. Neuwirth RS, Duran AA, Singer A, et al. The women undergoing liver transplantation. Am J Obstet
endometrial ablator: a new instrument. Obstet Gynecol. Gynecol. 1994 Mar;170(3):733-6. PMID: 8141191. X-3,
1994 May;83(5 Pt 1):792-6. PMID: 8164945. X-3, X-8 X-5, X-6

1091. Neven P, Lunde T, Benedetti-Panici P, et al. A 1102. Nielsen J, Emborg C, Gydesen S, et al. Augmenting
multicentre randomised trial to compare uterine safety of clozapine with sertindole: A double-blind, randomized,
raloxifene with a continuous combined hormone placebo-controlled study. Journal of Clinical
replacement therapy containing oestradiol and Psychopharmacology. 2012 April;32(2):173-8. PMID:
norethisterone acetate. BJOG. 2003 Feb;110(2):157-67. 2012136444. X-5
PMID: 12618160. X-5, X-7, X-9
1103. Nielsen TF, Ravn P, Bagger YZ, et al. Pulsed
1092. Neveu N, Granger L, St-Michel P, et al. Comparison estrogen therapy in prevention of postmenopausal
of clomiphene citrate, metformin, or the combination of osteoporosis. A 2-year randomized, double blind, placebo-
both for first-line ovulation induction and achievement of controlled study. Osteoporosis International.
pregnancy in 154 women with polycystic ovary syndrome. 2004;15(2):168-74. PMID: 14647880. X-7
Fertil Steril. 2007 Jan;87(1):113-20. PMID: 17081535. X-
4, X-5, X-9 1104. Nijland EA, Nathorst-Boos J, Palacios S, et al.
Improved bleeding profile and tolerability of tibolone
1093. Newman CB, Hurley AM, Kleinberg DL. Effect of versus transdermal E2/NETA treatment in postmenopausal
CV 205-502 in hyperprolactinaemic patients intolerant of

K-52
women with female sexual dysfunction. Climacteric. 2009 1116. Nyboe Andersen A, Balen A, Platteau P, et al.
Apr;12(2):114-21. PMID: 19177255. X-5, X-7, X-9 Predicting the FSH threshold dose in women with WHO
Group II anovulatory infertility failing to ovulate or
1105. Nilsen JF, Bassoe CF. Contraception in general conceive on clomiphene citrate. Hum Reprod. 2008
practice analyzed by a computerized medical record. Scand Jun;23(6):1424-30. PMID: 18372254. X-4, X-5, X-9
J Prim Health Care. 1987 Nov;5(4):217-20. PMID:
3423491. X-3, X-5 1117. Nygren KG, Rybo G. Prostaglandins and
menorrhagia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl.
1106. Nilsson CG, Allonen H, Diaz J, et al. Two years' 1983;113:101-3. PMID: 6344539. X-1, X-3, X-5
experience with two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
devices and one copper-releasing intrauterine device: a 1118. Oddsson K, Leifels-Fischer B, Wiel-Masson D, et al.
randomized comparative performance study. Fertil Steril. Superior cycle control with a contraceptive vaginal ring
1983 Feb;39(2):187-92. PMID: 6401636. X-9 compared with an oral contraceptive containing 30 microg
ethinylestradiol and 150 microg levonorgestrel: a
1107. Nilsson CG, Holma P. Menstrual blood loss with randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2005 Feb;20(2):557-62.
contraceptive subdermal levonorgestrel implants. Fertil PMID: 15539438. X-5
Steril. 1981 Mar;35(3):304-6. PMID: 6781939. X-3, X-5,
X-9 1119. Oddsson K, Leifels-Fischer B, Wiel-Masson D, et al.
Superior cycle control with a contraceptive vaginal ring
1108. Nilsson CG, Luukkainen T, Diaz J, et al. Intrauterine compared with an oral contraceptive containing 30 mug
contraception with levonorgestrel: A comparative ethinylestradiol and 150 mug levonorgestrel: A randomized
randomised clinical performance study. Lancet. trial. Human Reproduction. 2005;20(2):557-62. PMID:
1981;1(8220):577-80. PMID: 6110819. X-9 15539438. X-6, X-9

1109. Nixon RM, Duffy SW, Fender GR. Imputation of a 1120. Odmark IS, Bixo M, Englund D, et al. Endometrial
true endpoint from a surrogate: application to a cluster safety and bleeding pattern during a five-year treatment
randomized controlled trial with partial information on the with long-cycle hormone therapy. Menopause. 2005 Nov-
true endpoint. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003 Sep 24;3:17. Dec;12(6):699-707. PMID: 16278613. X-4, X-5, X-7
PMID: 14507420. X-3, X-5, X-10
1121. O'Donovan C, Kusumakar V, Graves GR, et al.
1110. Nixon RM, Duffy SW, Fender GR, et al. Menstrual abnormalities and polycystic ovary syndrome in
Randomization at the level of primary care practice: use of women taking valproate for bipolar mood disorder. J Clin
pre-intervention data and random effects models. Stat Med. Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;63(4):322-30. PMID: 12000206. X-
2001 Jun 30;20(12):1727-38. PMID: 11406837. X-3, X-5, 4, X-5, X-6, X-9
X-10
1122. Oguz S, Sargin A, Kelekci S, et al. The role of
1111. Nixon RM, Thompson SG. Baseline adjustments for hormone replacement therapy in endometrial polyp
binary data in repeated cross-sectional cluster randomized formation. Maturitas. 2005;50(3):231-6. PMID: 15734604.
trials. Statistics in Medicine. 2003;22(17):2673-92. PMID: X-5
12939779. X-1, X-3, X-5, X-10
1123. Ojule JD, Oriji VK, Okongwu C. A five year review
1112. Noerpramana NP. Blood-lipid fractions: the side- of the complications of progestogen only injectable
effects and continuation of Norplant use. Adv Contracept. contraceptive at the University of Port-Harcourt Teaching
1997 Mar;13(1):13-37. PMID: 9181182. X-4, X-5, X-6, X- Hospital. Niger J Med. 2010 Jan-Mar;19(1):87-95. PMID:
9 20232762. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9

1113. Norris RV. Progesterone for premenstrual tension. J 1124. Okon MA, Lee S, Laird SM, et al. A prospective
Reprod Med. 1983 Aug;28(8):509-16. PMID: 6355465. X- randomized controlled study comparing the morphological
1, X-3, X-5 and biochemical responses of the endometrium to two
different forms of 'period-free' hormone replacement
1114. Notelovitz M. Contraceptive efficacy and safety of a therapy. Human Reproduction. 1998;13(8):2261-5. PMID:
monophasic oral contraceptive containing 150 micrograms 9756307. X-7
desogestrel and 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol: United
States clinical experience using a "Sunday start" approach. 1125. Okon MA, Lee S, Laird SM, et al. A prospective
Fertil Steril. 1995 Aug;64(2):261-6. PMID: 7615100. X-3, randomized controlled study comparing two doses of
X-9 gestodene in cyclic combined HRT preparations on
endometrial physiology. Hum Reprod. 2001
1115. Nutley T, Dunson TR. Treatment of bleeding Jun;16(6):1244-50. PMID: 11387299. X-5, X-7
problems associated with progestin-only contraceptives:
survey results. Adv Contracept. 1997 Dec;13(4):419-28. 1126. Oksa S, Luukkaala T, Maenpaa J. Toremifene for
PMID: 9404551. X-4, X-5, X-6 premenstrual mastalgia: a randomised, placebo-controlled

K-53
crossover study. BJOG. 2006 Jun;113(6):713-8. PMID: 1137. Ozdegirmenci O, Kayikcioglu F, Akgul MA, et al.
16709215. X-5, X-9 Comparison of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus
hysterectomy on efficacy and quality of life in patients with
1127. Oksa S, Parkkola R, Luukkaala T, et al. Breast adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):497-502. PMID:
magnetic resonance imaging findings in women treated 21074150. X-5, X-6, X-8
with toremifene for premenstrual mastalgia. Acta Radiol.
2009 Nov;50(9):984-9. PMID: 19863407. X-4, X-5, X-9 1138. Paffenbarger RS, Jr., Kampert JB, Chang HG.
Characteristics that predict risk of breast cancer before and
1128. Oliveira-Ribeiro M, Petta CA, De Angelo Andrade after the menopause. Am J Epidemiol. 1980
LA, et al. Endometrial histology, microvascular density and Aug;112(2):258-68. PMID: 7416152. X-3, X-5
caliber, and matrix metalloproteinase-3 in users of the
Nestorone-releasing contraceptive implant with and 1139. Pafumi C, Ciotta L, Farina M, et al. Uterine bleeding
without endometrial breakthrough bleeding. Contraception. pattern during low dosage Noretisterone acetate and 17-b-
2006 Jun;73(6):634-40. PMID: 16730498. X-4, X-5, X-6, Estradiol treatment in postmenopausal patients. Minerva
X-9 Ginecol. 2002 Dec;54(6):513-8. PMID: 12432336. X-4, X-
5, X-6, X-7
1129. Olsson SE. Contraception with subdermal implants
releasing levonorgestrel. A clinical and pharmacological 1140. Pakarinen P, Luukkainen T. Five years' experience
study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1987;142:1-45. with a small intracervical/intrauterine levonorgestrel-
PMID: 3116821. X-9 releasing device. Contraception. 2005 Nov;72(5):342-5.
PMID: 16246659. X-4, X-5
1130. Omodei U, Ferrazzi E, Ramazzotto F, et al.
Endometrial evaluation with transvaginal ultrasound during 1141. Pakarinen P, Luukkainen T, Elomaa K, et al. A 12-
hormone therapy: a prospective multicenter study. Fertil month comparative clinical investigation of a
Steril. 2004 Jun;81(6):1632-7. PMID: 15193487. X-4, X-5, levonorgestrel- releasing intracervical device situated in the
X-7, X-9 uterine cavity or cervical canal. Contraception.
1996;54(3):187-92. PMID: 8899261. X-9
1131. Orrego JJ, Chandler WF, Barkan AL. Pergolide as
primary therapy for macroprolactinomas. Pituitary. 2000 1142. Pakarinen P, Toivonen J, Luukkainen T.
Dec;3(4):251-6. PMID: 11788013. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9 Randomized comparison of levonorgestrel- and copper-
releasing intrauterine systems immediately after abortion,
1132. Otero-Flores JB, Guerrero-Carreno FJ, Vazquez- with 5 years' follow-up. Contraception. 2003 Jul;68(1):31-
Estrada LA. A comparative randomized study of three 4. PMID: 12878284. X-5, X-6
different IUDs in nulliparous Mexican women.
Contraception. 2003 Apr;67(4):273-6. PMID: 12684147. 1143. Pakarinen PI, Suvisaari J, Luukkainen T, et al.
X-4, X-5 Intracervical and fundal administration of levonorgestrel
for contraception: endometrial thickness, patterns of
1133. Otolorin EO, Falase EA, Ladipo OA. A comparative bleeding, and persisting ovarian follicles. Fertil Steril. 1997
study of three oral contraceptives in Ibadan: Norinyl 1/35, Jul;68(1):59-64. PMID: 9207585. X-5
Lo-Ovral and Noriday 1/50. Afr J Med Med Sci. 1990
Mar;19(1):15-22. PMID: 2109515. X-9 1144. Pal MN, Pal I. Menstrual behaviour with steroid
implant. J Indian Med Assoc. 1981 Jul 1;77(1):16-7.
1134. Overton C, Hargreaves J, Maresh M. A national PMID: 7328324. X-3, X-5, X-9, X-10
survey of the complications of endometrial destruction for
menstrual disorders: the MISTLETOE study. Minimally 1145. Palacios S, Pornel B, Vazquez F, et al. Long-term
Invasive Surgical Techniques--Laser, EndoThermal or endometrial and breast safety of a specific, standardized
Endorescetion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 soy extract. Climacteric. 2010 Aug;13(4):368-75. PMID:
Dec;104(12):1351-9. PMID: 9422012. X-4, X-5, X-8 20380569. X-4, X-5, X-7

1135. Ovesen P, Moller J, Moller N, et al. Growth 1146. Palomba S, Orio F, Jr., Falbo A, et al. Prospective
hormone secretory capacity and serum insulin-like growth parallel randomized, double-blind, double-dummy
factor I levels in primary infertile, anovulatory women with controlled clinical trial comparing clomiphene citrate and
regular menses. Fertil Steril. 1992 Jan;57(1):97-101. metformin as the first-line treatment for ovulation induction
PMID: 1730338. X-3, X-4 in nonobese anovulatory women with polycystic ovary
syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jul;90(7):4068-
1136. Oyelola OO, Okonofua FE, Adediran TO. Menstrual 74. PMID: 15840746. X-5, X-10
bleeding pattern and iron status in women fitted with
copper and non-medicated intrauterine contraceptive 1147. Palomba S, Orio F, Jr., Falbo A, et al. Metformin
devices. East Afr Med J. 1994 Apr;71(4):268-70. PMID: administration and laparoscopic ovarian drilling improve
8062778. X-3, X-5, X-9 ovarian response to clomiphene citrate (CC) in oligo-
anovulatory CC-resistant women with polycystic ovary

K-54
syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005 Dec;63(6):631-5. Maturitas. 2009 Jul 20;63(3):240-5. PMID: 19410392. X-
PMID: 16343096. X-4, X-5, X-9 5, X-7

1148. Palomba S, Orio Jr F, Nardo LG, et al. Metformin 1158. Parazzini F, Bortolotti A, Chiantera V, et al.
administration versus laparoscopic ovarian diathermy in Goserelin acetate to avoid hysterectomy in pre-menopausal
clomiphene citrate-resistant women with polycystic ovary women with fibroids requiring surgery. Eur J Obstet
syndrome: A prospective parallel randomized double-blind Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999 Nov;87(1):31-3. PMID:
placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology 10579613. X-5, X-6, X-8
and Metabolism. 2004;89(10):4801-9. PMID: 15472166.
X-5, X-8 1159. Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, Negri E, et al. Lifelong
menstrual pattern and risk of breast cancer. Oncology. 1993
1149. Palomba S, Orio Jr F, Russo T, et al. Long-term Jul-Aug;50(4):222-5. PMID: 8497374. X-3, X-4, X-5
effectiveness and safety of GnRH agonist plus raloxifene
administration in women with uterine leiomyomas. Human 1160. Park H, Yoon BS, Seong SJ, et al. Can misoprostol
Reproduction. 2004;19(6):1308-14. PMID: 15117890. X- reduce blood loss in laparoscopy-assisted vaginal
3, X-6 hysterectomy? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011
Jun;51(3):248-51. PMID: 21631445. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8
1150. Palomba S, Orio Jr F, Russo T, et al. BsmI vitamin
D receptor genotypes influence the efficacy of 1161. Parker RA, McDaniel EB. The use of quinesterol for
antiresorptive treatments in postmenopausal osteoporotic the control of vaginal bleeding irregularities caused by
women. A 1-year multicenter, randomized and controlled DMPA. Contraception. 1980 Jul;22(1):1-7. PMID:
trial. Osteoporosis International. 2005;16(8):943-52. 7418403. X-6
PMID: 15739035. X-7
1162. Parker WH. Etiology, symptomatology, and
1151. Palomba S, Russo T, Orio F, Jr., et al. Effectiveness diagnosis of uterine myomas. Fertility and Sterility.
of combined GnRH analogue plus raloxifene administration 2007;87(4):725-36. PMID: 17430732. X-1, X-3, X-5
in the treatment of uterine leiomyomas: a prospective,
randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. 1163. Parmigiani L, Furtado RNV, Lopes RV, et al. Joint
Hum Reprod. 2002 Dec;17(12):3213-9. PMID: 12456626. lavage associated with triamcinolone hexacetonide
X-5, X-6 injection in knee osteoarthritis: A randomized double-blind
controlled study. Clinical Rheumatology.
1152. Palomba S, Sena T, Morelli M, et al. Effect of 2010;29(11):1311-5. PMID: 20623311. X-5
different doses of progestin on uterine leiomyomas in
postmenopausal women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod 1164. Parsey KS, Pong A. An open-label, multicenter
Biol. 2002 May 10;102(2):199-201. PMID: 11950491. X- study to evaluate Yasmin, a low-dose combination oral
4, X-5, X-7 contraceptive containing drospirenone, a new progestogen.
Contraception. 2000 Feb;61(2):105-11. PMID: 10802275.
1153. Palomba S, Sena T, Noia R, et al. Transdermal X-4, X-5
hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women
with uterine leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 1165. Paschopoulos M, Lavasidis LG, Vrekoussis T, et al.
Dec;98(6):1053-8. PMID: 11755553. X-5, X-6, X-7 Greek experience in the use of Thermachoice for treating
heavy menstrual bleeding: prospective study. Ann N Y
1154. Palombo-Kinne E, Schellschmidt I, Schumacher U, Acad Sci. 2006 Dec;1092:460-5. PMID: 17308173. X-3,
et al. Efficacy of a combined oral contraceptive containing X-5, X-8
0.030 mg ethinylestradiol/2 mg dienogest for the treatment
of papulopustular acne in comparison with placebo and 1166. Pasquale SA, Brandeis V, Cruz RI, et al. Norplant
0.035 mg ethinylestradiol/2 mg cyproterone acetate. contraceptive implants: rods versus capsules.
Contraception. 2009;79(4):282-9. PMID: 19272497. X-5 Contraception. 1987 Sep;36(3):305-16. PMID: 3119287.
X-3, X-9
1155. Pan JF, Yu YL, Wang LJ, et al. The morphologic
changes of endometrial spiral arterioles in IUD-induced 1167. Pasquale SA, Foldesy RG, Levine JP, et al.
menorrhagia. Adv Contracept. 1994 Sep;10(3):213-22. Peripheral progesterone (P) levels and endometrial
PMID: 7863847. X-3, X-4 response to various dosages of vaginally administered P in
estrogen-primed women. Fertil Steril. 1997 Nov;68(5):810-
1156. Panay N, Pritsch M, Alt J. Cyclical dydrogesterone 5. PMID: 9389807. X-4, X-5, X-7, X-9
in secondary amenorrhea: results of a double-blind,
placebo-controlled, randomized study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1168. Pasquale SA, Knuppel RA, Owens AG, et al.
2007 Nov;23(11):611-8. PMID: 17891596. X-5, X-9 Irregular bleeding, body mass index and coital frequency in
Norplant contraceptive users. Contraception. 1994
1157. Panjari M, Bell RJ, Jane F, et al. The safety of 52 Aug;50(2):109-16. PMID: 7956210. X-3, X-6, X-9
weeks of oral DHEA therapy for postmenopausal women.

K-55
1169. Pauleta JR, Clode N, Graca LM. Expectant 1180. Pfeifer S, Patrizio P. The female athlete: Some
management of incomplete abortion in the first trimester. gynecologic considerations. Sports Medicine and
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Jul;106(1):35-8. PMID: Arthroscopy Review. 2002;10(1):2-9. X-1, X-3, X-5
19329115. X-4, X-5, X-9
1181. Pfrunder A, Schiesser M, Gerber S, et al. Interaction
1170. Pazos F, Escobar-Morreale HF, Balsa J, et al. of St John's wort with low-dose oral contraceptive therapy:
Prospective randomized study comparing the long-acting a randomized controlled trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003
gonadotropin- releasing hormone agonist triptorelin, Dec;56(6):683-90. PMID: 14616430. X-4, X-5, X-6
flutamide, and cyproterone acetate, used in combination
with an oral contraceptive, in the treatment of hirsutism. 1182. Phaliwong P, Taneepanichskul S. The effect of
Fertility and Sterility. 1999;71(1):122-8. PMID: 9935128. mefenamic acid on controlling irregular uterine bleeding
X-5 second to Implanon use. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Oct;87
Suppl 3:S64-8. PMID: 21213495. X-5, X-6
1171. Pearlstein TB, Bachmann GA, Zacur HA, et al.
Treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder with a new 1183. Phemister DA, Laurent S, Harrison FN, Jr. Use of
drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive formulation. Norplant contraceptive implants in the immediate
Contraception. 2005;72(6):414-21. PMID: 16307962. X-5 postpartum period: safety and tolerance. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 1995 Jan;172(1 Pt 1):175-9. PMID: 7847530. X-
1172. Peillon F, Vincens M, Cesselin F, et al. Exaggerated 5, X-9
prolactin response of thyrotropin-releasing hormone in
women with anovulatory cycles: possible role of 1184. Phittayawechwiwat W, Thanantaseth C, Ayudhya
endogenous estrogens and effect of bromocriptine. Fertil NI, et al. Oral etoricoxib for pain relief during fractional
Steril. 1982 Apr;37(4):530-5. PMID: 6802681. X-3, X-4, curettage: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai.
X-5 2007 Jun;90(6):1053-7. PMID: 17624196. X-5, X-9

1173. Pelissier C, Maroni M, Yaneva H, et al. 1185. Phittayawechwiwat W, Thanantaseth C, Ayudhya


Chlormadinone acetate versus micronized progesterone in NIN, et al. Oral etoricoxib for pain relief during fractional
the sequential combined hormone replacement therapy of curettage: A ramdomized controlled trial. Journal of the
the menopause. Maturitas. 2001 Oct 31;40(1):85-94. Medical Association of Thailand. 2007;90(6):1053-7.
PMID: 11684377. X-5, X-7 PMID: 17624196. X-5, X-8

1174. Peres MF, Zukerman E, da Cunha Tanuri F, et al. 1186. Phupong V, Sophonsritsuk A, Taneepanichskul S.
Melatonin, 3 mg, is effective for migraine prevention. The effect of tranexamic acid for treatment of irregular
Neurology. 2004 Aug 24;63(4):757. PMID: 15326268. X- uterine bleeding secondary to Norplant use. Contraception.
5, X-9 2006 Mar;73(3):253-6. PMID: 16472565. X-5, X-6, X-9

1175. Perino A, Castelli A, Cucinella G, et al. A 1187. Piaggio G, Pinol AP. Use of the equivalence
randomized comparison of endometrial laser intrauterine approach in reproductive health clinical trials. Statistics in
thermotherapy and hysteroscopic endometrial resection. medicine. 2001;20(23):3571-7. PMID: 11746338. X-1, X-
Fertil Steril. 2004 Sep;82(3):731-4. PMID: 15374722. X-5, 3, X-5
X-8
1188. Pickar JH, Bottiglioni F, Archer DF. Amenorrhea
1176. Perino A, Chianchiano N, Petronio M, et al. Role of frequency with continuous combined hormone replacement
leuprolide acetate depot in hysteroscopic surgery: a therapy: a retrospective analysis. Menopause Study Group.
controlled study. Fertil Steril. 1993 Mar;59(3):507-10. Climacteric. 1998 Jun;1(2):130-6. PMID: 11913408. X-4,
PMID: 8458448. X-3, X-8 X-5, X-7

1177. Perlitz Y, Rahav D, Ben-Ami M. Endometrial 1189. Pillai M, O'Brien K, Hill E. The levonorgestrel
ablation using hysteroscopic instillation of hot saline intrauterine system (Mirena) for the treatment of menstrual
solution into the uterus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. problems in adolescents with medical disorders, or physical
2001 Nov;99(1):90-2. PMID: 11604192. X-4, X-5, X-8 or learning disabilities. BJOG. 2010 Jan;117(2):216-21.
PMID: 19874296. X-4
1178. Petta CA, Amatya R, Farr G. Clinical evaluation of
the TCu 380A IUD at six Latin American centers. 1190. Pinto AB, Binder EF, Kohrt WM, et al. Effects of
Contraception. 1994 Jul;50(1):17-25. PMID: 7924319. X- trimonthly progestin administration on the endometrium in
3, X-9 elderly postmenopausal women who receive hormone
replacement therapy: a pilot study. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1179. Pezeshki K, Feldman J, Stein DE, et al. Bleeding 2003 Jul;189(1):11-5. PMID: 12861131. X-4, X-5, X-7
and spontaneous abortion after therapy for infertility. Fertil
Steril. 2000 Sep;74(3):504-8. PMID: 10973646. X-4, X-5, 1191. Pirke KM, Fichter MM, Chlond C, et al.
X-6, X-9 Disturbances of the menstrual cycle in bulimia nervosa.

K-56
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1987 Aug;27(2):245-51. PMID: 1202. Pornel B, Spielmann D. A study of the control of
3665132. X-3, X-4, X-5 climacteric symptoms in postmenopausal women following
sequential regimens of 1 mg 17beta-estradiol and
1192. Pirke KM, Schweiger U, Broocks A, et al. trimegestone compared with a regimen containing 1 mg
Luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone estradiol valerate and norethisterone over a two-year
secretion patterns in female athletes with and without period. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2005 Aug;21(2):74-81. PMID:
menstrual disturbances. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1990 16294458. X-5, X-7
Sep;33(3):345-53. PMID: 2123757. X-3, X-4
1203. Powles TJ, Ashley S, Tidy A, et al. Twenty-year
1193. Pirke KM, Schweiger U, Strowitzki T, et al. Dieting follow-up of the Royal Marsden randomized, double-
causes menstrual irregularities in normal weight young blinded tamoxifen breast cancer prevention trial. Journal of
women through impairment of episodic luteinizing the National Cancer Institute. 2007;99(4):283-90. PMID:
hormone secretion. Fertil Steril. 1989 Feb;51(2):263-8. 17312305. X-5
PMID: 2912772. X-3, X-4, X-5
1204. Prasad RN, Choolani M, Roy A, et al. Blood loss in
1194. Pisco JM, Bilhim T, Duarte M, et al. Management of termination of early pregnancy with mifepristone and
uterine artery embolization for fibroids as an outpatient gemeprost. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995
procedure. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Jun;20(6):730-5. Aug;35(3):329-31. PMID: 8546658. X-3, X-5
PMID: 19339205. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8, X-9
1205. Preuss HG, Bagchi D, Bagchi M, et al. Effects of a
1195. Piya-Anant M, Koetsawang S, Patrasupapong N, et natural extract of (-)-hydroxycitric acid (HCA-SX) and a
al. Effectiveness of Cyclofem in the treatment of depot combination of HCA-SX plus niacin-bound chromium and
medroxyprogesterone acetate induced amenorrhea. Gymnema sylvestre extract on weight loss. Diabetes,
Contraception. 1998 Jan;57(1):23-8. PMID: 9554247. X-4, Obesity and Metabolism. 2004;6(3):171-80. PMID:
X-5, X-6, X-9 15056124. X-5

1196. Place VA, Powers M, Darley PE, et al. A double- 1206. Prezelj J, Kocijancic A, Andolsek L.
blind comparative study of Estraderm and Premarin in the Dexamethasone and spironolactone in the treatment of non-
amelioration of postmenopausal symptoms. Am J Obstet tumorous hyperandrogenism. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1989
Gynecol. 1985 Aug 15;152(8):1092-9. PMID: 2992278. X- Dec;3(4):281-8. PMID: 2516705. X-3, X-4, X-5, X-6
7
1207. Price TM, Dupuis RE, Carr BR, et al. Single- and
1197. Plewig G, Cunliffe WJ, Binder N, et al. Efficacy of multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of a low-dose oral
an oral contraceptive containing EE 0.03 mg and CMA 2 contraceptive in women with chronic renal failure
mg (Belara) in moderate acne resolution: a randomized, undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993
double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III trial. May;168(5):1400-6. PMID: 8498419. X-3, X-4
Contraception. 2009;80(1):25-33. PMID: 19501212. X-5
1208. Prince MI, Mitchison HC, Ashley D, et al. Oral
1198. Plotkin D, Miller S, Nakajima S, et al. Lowering low antioxidant supplementation for fatigue associated with
density lipoprotein cholesterol with simvastatin, a hydroxy- primary biliary cirrhosis: Results of a multicentre,
3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, does not randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial.
affect luteal function in premenopausal women. Journal of Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2002;87(7):3155- 2003;17(1):137-43. PMID: 12492743. X-5
61. PMID: 12107216. X-4, X-5
1209. Prior J, Burdge D, Maan E, et al. Fragility fractures
1199. Poindexter A, Reape KZ, Hait H. Efficacy and and bone mineral density in HIV positive women: a case-
safety of a 28-day oral contraceptive with 7 days of low- control population-based study. Osteoporos Int. 2007
dose estrogen in place of placebo. Contraception. 2008 Oct;18(10):1345-53. PMID: 17665239. X-4, X-5, X-9
Aug;78(2):113-9. PMID: 18672111. X-4, X-5
1210. Prior JC, Vigna YM, Barr SI, et al. Cyclic
1200. Poindexter AN, Burkman R, Fisher AC, et al. Cycle medroxyprogesterone treatment increases bone density: a
control, tolerability, and satisfaction among women controlled trial in active women with menstrual cycle
switching from 30-35 microg ethinyl estradiol-containing disturbances. Am J Med. 1994 Jun;96(6):521-30. PMID:
oral contraceptives to the triphasic norgestimate/25 microg 8017450. X-5, X-10
ethinyl estradiol-containing oral contraceptive Ortho Tri-
Cyclen LO. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2003 Jul- 1211. Prior MV, Phipps JH, Roberts T, et al. Treatment of
Aug;48(4):163-72. PMID: 13677549. X-4, X-5 menorrhagia by radiofrequency heating. Int J
Hyperthermia. 1991 Mar-Apr;7(2):213-20. PMID:
1201. Polednak AP, Janerich DT. Maternal factors in 1880453. X-3, X-8
congenital limb-reduction defects. Teratology. 1985
Aug;32(1):41-50. PMID: 4035591. X-3, X-5 1212. Pritts EA, Ryan IP, Mueller MD, et al. Angiogenic
effects of norplant contraception on endometrial histology

K-57
and uterine bleeding. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 postpartum uterine hemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.
Apr;90(4):2142-7. PMID: 15623808. X-4, X-5 2010 May;109(2):160-1. PMID: 20176354. X-5, X-8, X-9

1213. Privitera MD, Brodie MJ, Mattson RH, et al. 1224. Qi A, Yi T, Liu X, et al. Clinical observations on
Topiramate, carbamazepine and valproate monotherapy: treatment of lupus nephritis with kidney-nourishing and
Double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy. toxin-removing method - A report of 60 cases. Journal of
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2003;107(3):165-75. Traditional Chinese Medicine. 2006;26(4):269-74. X-5, X-
PMID: 12614309. X-9 6

1214. Privrel T, Daubenfeld O. Clinical experience in 1225. Qian HL, Wang HF, Yang ML. The expression of
Switzerland with the new monophasic oral contraceptive angiopoietin-1 and -2 in the endometrium of women with
Minulet (75 mcg gestodene, 30 mcg ethinyl oestradiol). Br abnormal bleeding induced by an intra-uterine device. J Int
J Clin Pract. 1988 Jul;42(7):292-8. PMID: 3075505. X-3, Med Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;38(1):100-10. PMID: 20233519.
X-9, X-10 X-4, X-5, X-6

1215. Procter-Gray E, Cobb KL, Crawford SL, et al. Effect 1226. Quenby S, Farquharson RG. Human chorionic
of oral contraceptives on weight and body composition in gonadotropin supplementation in recurring pregnancy loss:
young female runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 a controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 1994 Oct;62(4):708-10.
Jul;40(7):1205-12. PMID: 18580398. X-5, X-9 PMID: 7646609. X-5

1216. Prollius A, de Vries C, Loggenberg E, et al. Uterine 1227. Quereux C, Pornel B, Bergeron C, et al. Continuous
artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: the effect of combined hormone replacement therapy with 1 mg 17beta-
the large uterus on outcome. BJOG. 2004 Mar;111(3):239- oestradiol and 5 mg dydrogesterone (Femoston-conti):
42. PMID: 14961885. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8 endometrial safety and bleeding profile. Maturitas. 2006
Feb 20;53(3):299-305. PMID: 16043317. X-4, X-5, X-7
1217. Pron G, Bennett J, Common A, et al. The Ontario
Uterine Fibroid Embolization Trial. Part 2. Uterine fibroid 1228. Querido L, Ketting E, Haspels AA. IUD insertion
reduction and symptom relief after uterine artery following induced abortion. Contraception. 1985
embolization for fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2003 Jan;79(1):120- Jun;31(6):603-10. PMID: 3899506. X-3, X-5, X-9
7. PMID: 12524074. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8
1229. Quigg M, Smithson SD, Fowler KM, et al. Laterality
1218. Pron G, Cohen M, Soucie J, et al. The Ontario and location influence catamenial seizure expression in
Uterine Fibroid Embolization Trial. Part 1. Baseline patient women with partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2009 Jul
characteristics, fibroid burden, and impact on life. Fertil 21;73(3):223-7. PMID: 19620611. X-4, X-5, X-9
Steril. 2003 Jan;79(1):112-9. PMID: 12524073. X-4, X-5,
X-6, X-8 1230. Qureshi NS, Edi-Osagie EC, Ogbo V, et al. First
trimester threatened miscarriage treatment with human
1219. Protheroe J, Bower P, Chew-Graham C. The use of chorionic gonadotrophins: a randomised controlled trial.
mixed methodology in evaluating complex interventions: BJOG. 2005 Nov;112(11):1536-41. PMID: 16225575. X-
identifying patient factors that moderate the effects of a 5, X-9
decision aid. Fam Pract. 2007 Dec;24(6):594-600. PMID:
18039724. X-5 1231. Rabe T, Mueck AO, Deuringer FU, et al. Spacing-
out of progestin--efficacy, tolerability and compliance of
1220. Pulkkinen MO. Uterine activity and blood flow in two regimens for hormonal replacement in the late
response to sulprostone during midtrimester pregnancy postmenopause. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1997 Dec;11(6):383-
termination. Arch Gynecol. 1981;231(1):57-9. PMID: 92. PMID: 9476087. X-5, X-7, X-9
7332359. X-5
1232. Rabe T, Runnebaum B, Kohlmeier M, et al. Clinical
1221. Pulkkinen MO, Dusterberg B, Hasan H, et al. and metabolic effects of gestodene and levonorgestrel.
Norethisterone acetate and ethinylestradiol in early human International journal of fertility. 1987;32:29-44. PMID:
pregnancy. Teratology. 1984 Apr;29(2):241-9. PMID: 2906345. X-9
6429876. X-5, X-6
1233. Rachmiel M, Kives S, Atenafu E, et al. Primary
1222. Pulle C, Sturlese E. Clinical trial comparing the amenorrhea as a manifestation of polycystic ovarian
activity and efficacy of ibuprofen isobutanolammonium vs syndrome in adolescents: a unique subgroup? Arch Pediatr
Benzydamine hydrochloride, applied as vaginal irrigations, Adolesc Med. 2008 Jun;162(6):521-5. PMID: 18524741.
in patients with vaginitis. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. X-4, X-5, X-9
2002;29(3):173-9. PMID: 12519036. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
1234. Radowicki S, Kunicki M. Prostate specific antigen
1223. Purohit R, Sharma J. Cervical clamping following in women with menstrual disturbances and fibrocystic
ultrasound-guided uterocervical packing to control mastopathy. J Endocrinol Invest. 2009 Nov;32(10):821-4.
PMID: 19602918. X-4, X-5, X-9

K-58
ovary syndrome: a pilot study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol.
1235. Radulovic N, Norstrom A, Ekerhovd E. Outpatient 2009 Jun;48(2):142-7. PMID: 19574176. X-4, X-5, X-9
cervical ripening before first-trimester surgical abortion: a
comparison between misoprostol and isosorbide 1247. Rasuli P, Hammond I, Al-Mutairi B, et al. Spherical
mononitrate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(3):344- versus conventional polyvinyl alcohol particles for uterine
8. PMID: 17364311. X-5, X-9 artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008
Jan;19(1):42-6. PMID: 18192466. X-5, X-8, X-9
1236. Radwanska E, Headley SK, Dmowski P. Evaluation
of ovarian function after tubal sterilization. J Reprod Med. 1248. Rath W, Meyer D, Hildebrandt J, et al. Comparative
1982 Jul;27(7):376-84. PMID: 6811740. X-3, X-4, X-5 study of various intracervically administered PG gel
preparations for termination of first trimester pregnancies.
1237. Raffone E, Rizzo P, Benedetto V. Insulin sensitiser Contraception. 1983 Sep;28(3):209-22. PMID: 6357631.
agents alone and in co-treatment with r-FSH for ovulation X-5
induction in PCOS women. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010
Apr;26(4):275-80. PMID: 20222840. X-5, X-9 1249. Rattanachaiyanont M, Angsuwathana S, Techatrisak
K, et al. Clinical and pathological responses of progestin
1238. Rafie S, Choy KA. Procedures to improve therapy for non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a
prescribing and dispensing of oral contraceptives at an prospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005
academic medical center. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012 Apr;31(2):98-106. PMID: 15771634. X-4
Feb 1;69(3):249-52. PMID: 22261948. X-3, X-5
1250. Rattanachaiyanont M, Leerasiri P, Indhavivadhana
1239. Ragni MV, Jankowitz RC, Jaworski K, et al. Phase S. Effectiveness of intrauterine anesthesia for pain relief
II prospective open-label trial of recombinant interleukin- during fractional curettage. Obstet Gynecol. 2005
11 in women with mild von Willebrand disease and Sep;106(3):533-9. PMID: 16135583. X-5, X-9
refractory menorrhagia. Thromb Haemost. 2011
Oct;106(4):641-5. PMID: 21833452. X-3 1251. Raudaskoski T, Tapanainen J, Tomas E, et al.
Intrauterine 10 microg and 20 microg levonorgestrel
1240. Ragueneau-Majlessi I, Levy RH, Janik F. systems in postmenopausal women receiving oral oestrogen
Levetiracetam does not alter the pharmacokinetics of an replacement therapy: clinical, endometrial and metabolic
oral contraceptive in healthy women. Epilepsia. response. BJOG. 2002 Feb;109(2):136-44. PMID:
2002;43(7):697-702. PMID: 12102671. X-4, X-9 11888095. X-5, X-7

1241. Rai VS, Gillmer MD, Gray W. Is endometrial pre- 1252. Raudaskoski TH, Lahti EI, Kauppila AJ, et al.
treatment of value in improving the outcome of Transdermal estrogen with a levonorgestrel-releasing
transcervical resection of the endometrium? Hum Reprod. intrauterine device for climacteric complaints: clinical and
2000 Sep;15(9):1989-92. PMID: 10967001. X-4, X-5, X-9 endometrial responses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995
Jan;172(1 Pt 1):114-9. PMID: 7847516. X-7
1242. Raja A, Hashmi SN, Sultana N, et al. Presentation of
polycystic ovary syndrome and its management with 1253. Rauramo I, Elo I, Istre O. Long-term treatment of
clomiphene alone and in combination with metformin. J menorrhagia with levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus
Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2005 Apr-Jun;17(2):50-3. endometrial resection. Obstet Gynecol. 2004
PMID: 16092652. X-4, X-5, X-9 Dec;104(6):1314-21. PMID: 15572496. X-8

1243. Ramos R, Apelo R, Osteria T, et al. A comparative 1254. Raynaud JP, Levrier M, Calaf J, et al. Comparison
analysis of three different dose combinations of oral of the efficacy and tolerability of a new once-a-week
contraceptives. Contraception. 1989 Feb;39(2):165-77. matricial estradiol transdermal system (Estrapatch 40 and
PMID: 2495891. X-9 Estrapatch 60) with a twice week system. J Steroid
Biochem Mol Biol. 2005 Feb;93(2-5):309-18. PMID:
1244. Rasgon NL, Altshuler LL, Gudeman D, et al. 15860275. X-5, X-7
Medication status and polycystic ovary syndrome in
women with bipolar disorder: a preliminary report. J Clin 1255. Razavi MK, Hwang G, Jahed A, et al. Abdominal
Psychiatry. 2000 Mar;61(3):173-8. PMID: 10817101. X-4, myomectomy versus uterine fibroid embolization in the
X-5, X-6, X-9 treatment of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas. AJR Am J
Roentgenol. 2003 Jun;180(6):1571-5. PMID: 12760922.
1245. Rasgon NL, Reynolds MF, Elman S, et al. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8
Longitudinal evaluation of reproductive function in women
treated for bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2005 1256. Razzi S, Luisi S, Ferretti C, et al. Use of a
Dec;89(1-3):217-25. PMID: 16171873. X-4, X-5, X-9 progestogen only preparation containing desogestrel in the
treatment of recurrent pelvic pain after conservative
1246. Rashidi B, Haghollahi F, Shariat M, et al. The surgery for endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod
effects of calcium-vitamin D and metformin on polycystic Biol. 2007 Dec;135(2):188-90. PMID: 16963174. X-5, X-9

K-59
1257. Rebar RW, Trabal J, Mortola J. Low-dose esterified
estrogens (0.3 mg/day): long-term and short-term effects on 1268. Rich AD, Manyonda IT, Patel R, et al. A
menopausal symptoms and quality of life in comparison of the efficacy of danazol, norethisterone,
postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2000 Sep;3(3):176- cyproterone acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate in
82. PMID: 11910619. X-5, X-7 endometrial thinning prior to ablation: A pilot study.
Gynaecological Endoscopy. 1995;4(1):59-61. X-3, X-5, X-
1258. Recio R, Hernandez-Morales C, Perez-Rodriguez 6
RM, et al. Effects of low steroid doses administered in the
mid and late follicular phase on the LH surge, ovarian 1269. Richter HE, Learman LA, Lin F, et al.
steroids and follicular maturation in eumenorrheic women. Medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment of abnormal
Adv Contracept. 1997 Mar;13(1):39-46. PMID: 9181183. uterine bleeding: factors predicting satisfaction. Am J
X-3, X-4 Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):37-42. PMID: 12861135.
X-3
1259. Rees MC, Kuhl H, Engelstein M, et al. Endometrial
safety and tolerability of triphasic sequential hormone 1270. Richtig E, Soyer HP, Posch M, et al. Prospective,
replacement estradiol valerate/medroxyprogesterone randomized, multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled
acetate therapy regimen. Climacteric. 2004 Mar;7(1):23-32. trial comparing adjuvant interferon alfa and isotretinoin
PMID: 15259280. X-5, X-7 with interferon alfa alone in stage IIA and IIB melanoma:
European cooperative adjuvant melanoma treatment study
1260. Reid RL, Fortier MP, Smith L, et al. Safety and group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007;23(34):8655-63.
bleeding profile of continuous levonorgestrel 90 PMID: 16260701. X-5
mcg/ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg based on 2 years of clinical
trial data in Canada. Contraception. 2010 Dec;82(6):497- 1271. Rickenlund A, Thoren M, Nybacka A, et al. Effects
502. PMID: 21074011. X-4, X-5, X-9 of oral contraceptives on diurnal profiles of insulin, insulin-
like growth factor binding protein-1, growth hormone and
1261. Reig E. Tramadol in musculoskeletal pin - A survey. cortisol in endurance athletes with menstrual disturbance.
Clinical Rheumatology. 2002;21(1 SUPPL):S9-S12. Hum Reprod. 2010 Jan;25(1):85-93. PMID: 19840988. X-
PMID: 11954901. X-1, X-3, X-5 4, X-5

1262. Reinders DM, Baldwin SA, Bert JL. Endometrial 1272. Rigaud AS, Andre G, Vellas B, et al. No additional
thermal balloon ablation using a high temperature, pulsed benefit of HRT on response to rivastigmine in menopausal
system: a mathematical model. J Biomech Eng. 2003 women with AD. Neurology. 2003;60(1):148-50. PMID:
Dec;125(6):841-51. PMID: 14986409. X-4, X-5, X-8, X-9 12525745. X-3, X-5, X-7

1263. Reinprayoon D, Gilmore C, Farr G, et al. Twelve- 1273. Rivera R, Chen-Mok M, McMullen S. Analysis of
month comparative multicenter study of the TCu 380A and client characteristics that may affect early discontinuation
ML 250 intrauterine devices in Bangkok, Thailand. of the TCu-380A IUD. Contraception. 1999 Sep;60(3):155-
Contraception. 1998 Oct;58(4):201-6. PMID: 9865999. X- 60. PMID: 10640159. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
3, X-9
1274. Rizk DE. Subdermal levonorgestrel implants. Three
1264. Reisman H, Martin D, Gast MJ. A multicenter years' experience in Cairo, Egypt. J Reprod Med. 1995
randomized comparison of cycle control and laboratory Sep;40(9):638-44. PMID: 8576880. X-3, X-9
findings with oral contraceptive agents containing 100 mug
levonorgestrel with 20 mug ethinyl estradiol or triphasic 1275. Roberts TE, Tsourapas A, Middleton LJ, et al.
norethindrone with ethinyl estradiol. American Journal of Hysterectomy, endometrial ablation, and levonorgestrel
Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999;181(5 II):S45-S52. X-6, releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for treatment of
X-9 heavy menstrual bleeding: cost effectiveness analysis.
BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors
1265. Rekers H. Multicenter trial of a monophasic oral Edition). 2011;342(7805):1012-. X-1, X-3, X-5, X-8
contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and desogestrel.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1988;67(2):171-4. PMID: 1276. Rodeghiero F, Castaman G, Mannucci PM.
2972160. X-3, X-9 Prospective multicenter study on subcutaneous
concentrated desmopressin for home treatment of patients
1266. Reslova T, Tosner J, Resl M, et al. Endometrial with von Willebrand disease and mild or moderate
polyps. A clinical study of 245 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet. hemophilia A. Thromb Haemost. 1996 Nov;76(5):692-6.
1999;262(3-4):133-9. PMID: 10326632. X-4, X-5, X-6, X- PMID: 8950775. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
7
1277. Rogers PA. Endometrial vasculature in Norplant
1267. Rice C, Killick S, Hickling D, et al. Ovarian activity users. Hum Reprod. 1996 Oct;11 Suppl 2:45-50. PMID:
and vaginal bleeding patterns with a desogestrel-only 8982745. X-4, X-5, X-6
preparation at three different doses. Hum Reprod. 1996
Apr;11(4):737-40. PMID: 8671319. X-9

K-60
women. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005;105(6):1397-
1278. Rogers PA, Lederman F, Plunkett D, et al. Bcl-2, 404. PMID: 15932835. X-7
Fas and caspase 3 expression in endometrium from
levonorgestrel implant users with and without breakthrough 1289. Ronnerdag M, Odlind V. Health effects of long-term
bleeding. Hum Reprod. 2000 Aug;15 Suppl 3:152-61. use of the intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing system. A
PMID: 11041231. X-4, X-5 follow-up study over 12 years of continuous use. Acta
Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999 Sep;78(8):716-21. PMID:
1279. Rogers PA, Martinez F, Girling JE, et al. Influence 10468065. X-4, X-5, X-6
of different hormonal regimens on endometrial
microvascular density and VEGF expression in women 1290. Ronnerdag M, Odlind V. Late bleeding problems
suffering from breakthrough bleeding. Hum Reprod. 2005 with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system:
Dec;20(12):3341-7. PMID: 16085661. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9 evaluation of the endometrial cavity. Contraception. 2007
Apr;75(4):268-70. PMID: 17362704. X-4, X-5, X-9
1280. Rogers PA, Plunkett D, Affandi B. Perivascular
smooth muscle alpha-actin is reduced in the endometrium 1291. Rorarius MG, Suominen P, Baer GA, et al.
of women with progestin-only contraceptive breakthrough Diclofenac and ketoprofen for pain treatment after elective
bleeding. Hum Reprod. 2000 Aug;15 Suppl 3:78-84. caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 1993 Mar;70(3):293-7.
PMID: 11041224. X-4, X-5 PMID: 8471372. X-5

1281. Rogerson L, Duffy S, Crocombe W, et al. 1292. Rosen DM, Peek MJ. Do women with placenta
Management of menorrhagia--SMART study (Satisfaction praevia without antepartum haemorrhage require
with Mirena and Ablation: a Randomised Trial). BJOG. hospitalization? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994
2000 Oct;107(10):1325-6. PMID: 11028596. X1, X-3, X-5, May;34(2):130-4. PMID: 7980298. X-3, X-5
X-6, X-8
1293. Rosenberg MJ, Meyers A, Roy V. Efficacy, cycle
1282. Rogerson L, Hawe J, Duffy S. Modern approaches control, and side effects of low- and lower-dose oral
to management of menorrhagia. Hospital medicine. contraceptives: a randomized trial of 20 micrograms and 35
1998;61(2):90-2. PMID: 10748784. X-1, X-3, X-5, X-10 micrograms estrogen preparations. Contraception. 1999
Dec;60(6):321-9. PMID: 10715366. X-5
1283. Rojanasakul A, Sirimongkolkasem R, Piromsawasdi
S, et al. Effects of combined ethinylestradiol and 1294. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Higgins JE. The effect
desogestrel on hormone profiles and sex hormone binding of desogestrel, gestodene, and other factors on spotting and
globulin in women with polycystic ovarian disease. bleeding. Contraception. 1996 Feb;53(2):85-90. PMID:
Contraception. 1987 Dec;36(6):633-40. PMID: 2965636. 8838484. X-9
X-3
1295. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Stevens CM. Smoking
1284. Rolnick SJ, Flores SK, Fowler SE, et al. Conducting and cycle control among oral contraceptive users. Am J
randomized, controlled trials. Experience with the Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;174(2):628-32. PMID: 8623797.
dysfunctional uterine bleeding intervention trial. J Reprod X-3, X-5, X-9
Med. 2001 Jan;46(1):1-5, discussion -6. PMID: 11209624.
X-8 1296. Rosencrantz MA, Coffler MS, Haggan A, et al.
Clinical evidence for predominance of delta-5 steroid
1285. Romer T. Prospective comparison study of production in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J
levonorgestrel IUD versus Roller-Ball endometrial ablation Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Apr;96(4):1106-13. PMID:
in the management of refractory recurrent hypermenorrhea. 21270326. X-4, X-5, X-9
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000 May;90(1):27-9.
PMID: 10767506. X-5, X-8 1297. Rosetta L, Harrison GA, Read GF. Ovarian
impairments of female recreational distance runners during
1286. Romer T, Muller J. A simple method of coagulating a season of training. Ann Hum Biol. 1998 Jul-
endometrium in patients with therapy-resistant, recurring Aug;25(4):345-57. PMID: 9667360. X-4, X-5, X-9
hypermenorrhea. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999
Aug;6(3):265-8. PMID: 10459024. X-4, X-5, X-8 1298. Ross AH, Boyd ME, Colgan TJ, et al. Comparison
of transdermal and oral sequential gestagen in combination
1287. Romer T, Schwesinger G. Hormonal inhibition of with transdermal estradiol: effects on bleeding patterns and
endometrium for transcervical endometrial ablation--a endometrial histology. Obstet Gynecol. 1993
prospective study with a 2-year follow-up. Eur J Obstet Nov;82(5):773-9. PMID: 8414325. X-5, X-6, X-7
Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 Aug;74(2):201-3. PMID:
9306119. X-4, X-5, X-8, X-9 1299. Ross D, Cooper AJ, Pryse-Davies J, et al.
Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study of the
1288. Ronkin S, Northington R, Baracat E, et al. endometrial effects of a vaginal progesterone gel in
Endometrial effects of bazedoxifene acetate, a novel estrogen-treated postmenopausal women. Am J Obstet
selective estrogen receptor modulator, in postmenopausal

K-61
Gynecol. 1997 Oct;177(4):937-41. PMID: 9369848. X-5, structure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Oct;85(10):3853-
X-7 9. PMID: 11061549. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9

1300. Roux C, Pelissier C, Fechtenbaum J, et al. 1311. Rutanen E, Hurskainen R, Finne P, et al. Induction
Randomized, double-masked, 2-year comparison of of endometrial plasminogen activator-inhibitor 1: a possible
tibolone with 17beta-estradiol and norethindrone acetate in mechanism contributing to the effect of intrauterine
preventing postmenopausal bone loss. Osteoporos Int. 2002 levonorgestrel in the treatment of menorrhagia. Fertil Steril.
Mar;13(3):241-8. PMID: 11991445. X-5, X-7 2000 May;73(5):1020-4. PMID: 10785231. X-4, X-5, X-8

1301. Roy S, Mishell DR, Jr., Robertson DN, et al. Long- 1312. Ruuskanen A, Hippelainen M, Sipola P, et al.
term reversible contraception with levonorgestrel-releasing Uterine artery embolisation versus hysterectomy for
Silastic rods. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Apr leiomyomas: primary and 2-year follow-up results of a
1;148(7):1006-13. PMID: 6424474. X-4, X-5, X-9 randomised prospective clinical trial. Eur Radiol. 2010
Oct;20(10):2524-32. PMID: 20526776. X-5, X-8
1302. Roy S, Shaw ST, Jr. Role of prostaglandins in IUD-
associated uterine bleeding--effect of a prostaglandin 1313. Rybo G, Nilsson S, Sikstrom B, et al. Naproxen in
synthetase inhibitor (ibuprofen). Obstet Gynecol. 1981 menorrhagia. Lancet. 1981 Mar 14;1(8220 Pt 1):608-9.
Jul;58(1):101-6. PMID: 7243136. X-5, X-6 PMID: 6110836. X-1, X-3

1303. Rozenberg S, Caubel P, Lim PC. Constant estrogen, 1314. Saarikoski S, Yliskoski M, Penttila I. Sequential use
intermittent progestogen vs. continuous combined hormone of norethisterone and natural progesterone in pre-
replacement therapy: tolerability and effect on vasomotor menopausal bleeding disorders. Maturitas. 1990
symptoms. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Mar;72(3):235-43. Jun;12(2):89-97. PMID: 2255266. X-4, X-6
PMID: 11226444. X-4, X-5, X-7
1315. Saav I, Aronsson A, Marions L, et al. Cervical
1304. Rozenberg S, Ylikorkala O, Arrenbrecht S. priming with sublingual misoprostol prior to insertion of an
Comparison of continuous and sequential transdermal intrauterine device in nulliparous women: A randomized
progestogen with sequential oral progestogen in controlled trial. Human Reproduction. 2007;22(10):2647-
postmenopausal women using continuous transdermal 52. PMID: 17652452. X-5
estrogen: vasomotor symptoms, bleeding patterns, and
serum lipids. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 1997;42 Suppl 1316. Sabatini R, Cagiano R. Comparison profiles of cycle
2:376-87. PMID: 9397385. X-4, X-5, X-7 control, side effects and sexual satisfaction of three
hormonal contraceptives. Contraception. 2006
1305. Rubinacci A, Peruzzi E, Modena AB, et al. Effect of Sep;74(3):220-3. PMID: 16904415. X-5, X-9
low-dose transdermal E<sub>2</sub>/NETA on the
reduction of postmenopausal bone loss in women. 1317. Sabatini R, Orsini G, Cagiano R, et al.
Menopause. 2003;10(3):241-9. PMID: 12792297. X-7 Noncontraceptive benefits of two combined oral
contraceptives with antiandrogenic properties among
1306. Rubinacci A, Peruzzi E, Modena AB, et al. Effect of adolescents. Contraception. 2007;76(5):342-7. PMID:
low-dose transdermal E2/NETA on the reduction of 17963857. X-3, X-5, X-9
postmenopausal bone loss in women. Menopause. 2003
May/June;10(3):241-9. PMID: 2003237886. X-7 1318. Sadan O, Frohlich EP, Driscoll JA, et al. Is it safe to
prescribe hormonal contraception and replacement therapy
1307. Rulin MC, Turner JH, Dunworth R, et al. Post-tubal to patients with premalignant and malignant uterine
sterilization syndrome--a misnomer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. cervices? Gynecol Oncol. 1989 Aug;34(2):159-63. PMID:
1985 Jan 1;151(1):13-9. PMID: 3966496. X-3, X-5, X-6 2753422. X-3, X-4, X-5

1308. Ruminjo JK, Sekadde-Kigondu CB, Karanja JG, et 1319. Sadan O, Ginath S, Sofer D, et al. The role of
al. Comparative acceptability of combined and progestin- tamoxifen in the treatment of symptomatic uterine
only injectable contraceptives in Kenya. Contraception. leiomyomata -- a pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod
2005 Aug;72(2):138-45. PMID: 16022854. X-5 Biol. 2001 Jun;96(2):183-6. PMID: 11384804. X-5, X-6

1309. Runic R, Schatz F, Krey L, et al. Alterations in 1320. Sahota J, Barnes PMF, Mansfield E, et al. Initial UK
endometrial stromal cell tissue factor protein and experience of the levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive
messenger ribonucleic acid expression in patients intravaginal ring. Advances in Contraception.
experiencing abnormal uterine bleeding while using 1999;15(4):313-24. PMID: 11145373. X-3, X-9
Norplant-2 contraception. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997
Jun;82(6):1983-8. PMID: 9177417. X-4, X-5, X-6 1321. Sahota P, Prabhakar S, Kharbanda PS, et al. Seizure
type, antiepileptic drugs, and reproductive endocrine
1310. Runic R, Schatz F, Wan L, et al. Effects of norplant dysfunction in Indian women with epilepsy: a cross-
on endometrial tissue factor expression and blood vessel sectional study. Epilepsia. 2008 Dec;49(12):2069-77.
PMID: 18503558. X-4, X-5, X-9

K-62
1331. Samsioe G, Dvorak V, Genazzani AR, et al. One-
1322. Said S, Omar K, Koetsawang S. A multicentred year endometrial safety evaluation of a continuous
phase III comparative clinical trial of depot- combined transdermal matrix patch delivering low-dose
medroxyprogesterone acetate given three-monthly at doses estradiol-norethisterone acetate in postmenopausal women.
of 100 mg or 150 mg: I. Contraceptive efficacy and side Maturitas. 2007;57(2):171-81. PMID: 17317046. X-7
effects. Contraception. 1986;34(3):223-35. PMID:
2947777. X-9 1332. Samsioe G, Hruska J. Optimal tolerability of ultra-
low-dose continuous combined 17beta-estradiol and
1323. Said S, Omar K, Koetsawang S, et al. A norethisterone acetate: laboratory and safety results.
multicentered phase III comparative clinical trial of depot- Climacteric. 2010 Feb;13(1):34-44. PMID: 20001563. X-4,
medroxyprogesterone acetate given three-monthly at doses X-5, X-7
of 100 mg or 150 mg: II. The comparison of bleeding
patterns. World Health Organization. Task Force on Long- 1333. Sanada M, Higashi Y, Nakagawa K, et al. A
Acting Systemic Agents for Fertility Regulation Special comparison of low-dose and standard-dose oral estrogen on
Programme of Research, Development and Research forearm endothelial function in early postmenopausal
Training in Human Reproduction. Contraception. 1987 women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Mar;88(3):1303-9.
Jun;35(6):591-610. PMID: 2959448. X-6, X-9 PMID: 12629123. X-4, X-5, X-7

1324. Said S, Sadek W, Kholeif A, et al. A multicentred 1334. Sandstrom O, Brooks L, Schantz A, et al.
phase III comparative study of two hormonal contraceptive Interruption of early pregnancy with mifepristone in
preparations given once-a-month by intramuscular combination with gemeprost. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
injection. II. The comparison of bleeding patterns. 1999 Oct;78(9):806-9. PMID: 10535346. X-5, X-8, X-9
Contraception. 1989;40(5):531-51. PMID: 2692962. X-5
1335. Sang GW, Shao QX, Ge RS, et al. A multicentred
1325. Said S, Sadek W, Rocca M, et al. Clinical evaluation phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem
of the therapeutic effectiveness of ethinyl oestradiol and and Injectable No. 1 given by intramuscular injection to
oestrone sulphate on prolonged bleeding in women using Chinese women. II. The comparison of bleeding patterns.
depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Contraception. 1995 Mar;51(3):185-92. PMID: 7621686.
World Health Organization, Special Programme of X-6, X-9
Research, Development and Research Training in Human
Reproduction, Task Force on Long-acting Systemic Agents 1336. Sang GW, Shao QX, Ge RS, et al. A multicentred
for Fertility Regulation. Hum Reprod. 1996 Oct;11 Suppl phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem
2:1-13. PMID: 8982739. X-4, X-5, X-6 and Injectable No. 1 given monthly by intramuscular
injection to Chinese women. I. Contraceptive efficacy and
1326. Sakamoto S, Yoshino H, Shirahata Y, et al. sid effects. Contraception. 1995 Mar;51(3):167-83. PMID:
Pharmacotherapeutic effects of kuei-chih-fu-ling-wan 7621685. X-9
(keishi-bukuryo-gan) on human uterine myomas. Am J
Chin Med. 1992;20(3-4):313-7. PMID: 1471615. X-3, X-6 1337. Sang GW, Weng LJ, Shao QX, et al. Termination of
early pregnancy by two regimens of mifepristone with
1327. Saleh WA, Burkman RT, Zacur HA, et al. A misoprostol and mifepristone with PG05--a multicentre
randomized trial of three oral contraceptives: comparison randomized clinical trial in China. Contraception. 1994
of bleeding patterns by contraceptive types and steroid Dec;50(6):501-10. PMID: 7705093. X-5
levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;168(6 Pt 1):1740-5;
discussion 5-7. PMID: 8317516. X-4, X-6, X-9, X-10 1338. Santagostino E, Mancuso ME, Morfini M, et al.
Solvent/detergent plasma for prevention of bleeding in
1328. Salem HT, Salah M, Aly MY, et al. Acceptability of recessively inherited coagulation disorders: dosing,
injectable contraceptives in Assiut, Egypt. Contraception. pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy. Haematologica.
1988 Dec;38(6):697-710. PMID: 2975583. X-6, X-9, X-10 2006 May;91(5):634-9. PMID: 16670069. X-4, X-5, X-9

1329. Salim R, Lee C, Davies A, et al. A comparative 1339. Sapire KE. A study of bleeding patterns with two
study of three-dimensional saline infusion injectable contraceptives given postpartum and the effect of
sonohysterography and diagnostic hysteroscopy for the two non-hormonal treatments. Adv Contracept. 1991
classification of submucous fibroids. Hum Reprod. 2005 Dec;7(4):379-87. PMID: 1837974. X-3, X-5, X-10
Jan;20(1):253-7. PMID: 15498782. X-4, X-5, X-6
1340. Saracoglu OF, Aksel S, Yeoman RR, et al.
1330. Samsioe G, Boschitsch E, Concin H, et al. Endometrial estradiol and progesterone receptors in
Endometrial safety, overall safety and tolerability of patients with luteal phase defects and endometriosis. Fertil
transdermal continuous combined hormone replacement Steril. 1985 Jun;43(6):851-5. PMID: 3996629. X-3, X-4
therapy over 96 weeks: A randomized open-label study.
Climacteric. 2006;9(5):368-79. PMID: 17080587. X-7 1341. Sathanandan M, Macnamee MC, Rainsbury P, et al.
Replacement of frozen-thawed embryos in artificial and

K-63
natural cycles: a prospective semi-randomized study. Hum endometriosis-associated pain. Fertil Steril. 2006
Reprod. 1991 May;6(5):685-7. PMID: 1939549. X-5 Feb;85(2):314-25. PMID: 16595206. X-5, X-9

1342. Saure A, Hirvonen E, Milsom I, et al. A randomized, 1352. Schmidt-Gollwitzer M, Hardt W, Schmidt-
double-blind, multicentre study comparing the clinical Gollwitzer K, et al. Influence of the LH-RH analogue
effects of two sequential estradiol-progestin combinations buserelin on cyclic ovarian function and on endometrium.
containing either desogestrel or norethisterone acetate in A new approach to fertility control? Contraception. 1981
climacteric women with estrogen deficiency symptoms. Feb;23(2):187-95. PMID: 6786826. X-3, X-5
Maturitas. 1996 May;24(1-2):111-8. PMID: 8794442. X-5,
X-7, X-9 1353. Schnabel P, Merki-Feld GS, Malvy A, et al.
Bioequivalence and X-ray visibility of a radiopaque
1343. Saure A, Planellas J, Poulsen HK, et al. A double- etonogestrel implant versus a non-radiopaque implant: A 3-
blind, randomized, comparative study evaluating clinical year, randomized, double-blind study. Clinical Drug
effects of two sequential estradiol-progestogen Investigation. 2012;32(6):413-22. PMID: 2012278342. X-
combinations containing either desogestrel or 4, X-5, X-9
medroxyprogesterone acetate in climacteric women.
Maturitas. 2000 Feb 15;34(2):133-42. PMID: 10714908. 1354. Schorn MN. The effect of guided imagery on the
X-5, X-6, X-7 third stage of labor: a pilot study. J Altern Complement
Med. 2009 Aug;15(8):863-70. PMID: 19678776. X-4, X-5,
1344. Savabi-Esfahany M, Fadaei S, Yousefy A. Use of X-9
combined oral contraceptives: retrospective study in
Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 1355. Schroeder B, Hertweck SP, Sanfilippo JS, et al.
2006 May-Jul;12(3-4):417-22. PMID: 17037711. X-4, X-5, Correlation between glycemic control and menstruation in
X-9 diabetic adolescents. J Reprod Med. 2000 Jan;45(1):1-5.
PMID: 10664939. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
1345. Sayed GH, Zakherah MS, El-Nashar SA, et al. A
randomized clinical trial of a levonorgestrel-releasing 1356. Schulman S, Kinnman N, Lindmarker P, et al. A
intrauterine system and a low-dose combined oral randomized study of alpha-interferon plus ribavirin for 6
contraceptive for fibroid-related menorrhagia. Int J months or 12 months for the treatment of chronic hepatitis
Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Feb;112(2):126-30. PMID: C in patients with bleeding disorders. Haemophilia.
21092958. X-5, X-6 2002;8(2):129-35. PMID: 11952848. X-5, X-6

1346. Scappaticci FA, Skillings JR, Holden SN, et al. 1357. Schulz KD, Schmidt-Rhode P, Weymar P, et al. The
Arterial thromboembolic events in patients with metastatic influence of a polychemotherapeutic regimen on the female
carcinoma treated with chemotherapy and bevacizumab. endocrine control mechanisms in mammary carcinoma
Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2007;99(16):1232- patients. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1980;71:162-8.
9. PMID: 17686822. X-1, X-3, X-5 PMID: 7367730. X-5

1347. Schaff EA, Fielding SL, Westhoff C. Randomized 1358. Schwartz JI, Agrawal NGB, Hartford AH, et al. The
trial of oral versus vaginal misoprostol 2 days after effect of etoricoxib on the pharmacodynamics and
mifepristone 200 mg for abortion up to 63 days of pharmacokinetics of warfarin. Journal of Clinical
pregnancy. Contraception. 2002 Oct;66(4):247-50. PMID: Pharmacology. 2007;47(5):620-7. PMID: 17442687. X-4,
12413620. X-5, X-9 X-5

1348. Schaison G. Emergency contragestion. 1359. Schwartz JI, Liu F, Wang YH, et al. Effect of
Contraception. 1987;36 Suppl:7-11. PMID: 2445524. X-6 laropiprant, a PGD2 receptor 1 antagonist, on estradiol and
norgestimate pharmacokinetics after oral contraceptive
1349. Schaison G, George M, Lestrat N, et al. Effects of administration in women. American Journal of
the antiprogesterone steroid RU 486 during midluteal phase Therapeutics. 2009;16(6):487-95. PMID: 19940609. X-4
in normal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985
Sep;61(3):484-9. PMID: 2991322. X-3, X-5, X-9 1360. Schweiger U, Laessle R, Pfister H, et al. Diet-
induced menstrual irregularities: effects of age and weight
1350. Schatz F, Kuczynski E, Kloosterboer HJ, et al. loss. Fertil Steril. 1987 Nov;48(5):746-51. PMID: 3117591.
Tibolone and its metabolites enhance tissue factor and PAI- X-3, X-4, X-5
1 expression in human endometrial stromal cells: Evidence
of progestogenic effects. Steroids. 2005 Nov;70(12):840-5. 1361. Scialli AR, Jestila KJ. Sustained benefits of
PMID: 16011840. X-4, X-5, X-7 leuprolide acetate with or without subsequent
medroxyprogesterone acetate in the nonsurgical
1351. Schlaff WD, Carson SA, Luciano A, et al. management of leiomyomata uteri. Fertil Steril. 1995
Subcutaneous injection of depot medroxyprogesterone Aug;64(2):313-20. PMID: 7615109. X-5, X-6
acetate compared with leuprolide acetate in the treatment of

K-64
1362. Sculpher MJ, Dwyer N, Browning J, et al. A survey 1373. Shaaban MM, Segal S, Salem HT, et al.
of women's preferences regarding alternative surgical Sonographic assessment of ovarian and endometrial
treatments for menorrhagia. Health Expectations. changes during long-term Norplant use and their
1998;1(2):96-105. PMID: 11281864. X-3, X-5, X-8 correlation with hormonal levels. Fertil Steril. 1993
May;59(5):998-1002. PMID: 8486202. X-3, X-4, X-5, X-9
1363. Segal SJ, Alvarez-Sanchez F, Brache V, et al.
Norplant implants: the mechanism of contraceptive action. 1374. Shaamash AH, Zakhari MM. Increased serum levels
Fertil Steril. 1991 Aug;56(2):273-7. PMID: 1906407. X-3, of nitric oxide metabolites among users of levonorgestrel-
X-4, X-5, X-9 releasing implants [corrected] a possible role in progestin-
induced bleeding. Hum Reprod. 2005 Jan;20(1):302-6.
1364. Seibold JR, Korn JH, Simms R, et al. Recombinant PMID: 15471931. X-4, X-5, X-9
human relaxin in the treatment of scleroderma. A
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann 1375. Shabanova SS, Ananieva LP, Alekberova ZS, et al.
Intern Med. 2000 Jun 6;132(11):871-9. PMID: 10836913. Ovarian function and disease activity in patients with
X-5, X-6, X-9 systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008
May-Jun;26(3):436-41. PMID: 18578965. X-4, X-5, X-9
1365. Sekhavat L, Tabatabaii A, Dalili M, et al. Efficacy
of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss after cesarean 1376. Shade AR. Gynecologic and obstetric problems of
section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Jan;22(1):72-5. the female dancer. Clin Sports Med. 1983 Nov;2(3):515-23.
PMID: 19165682. X-5, X-9 PMID: 6686087. X-1, X-3, X-5

1366. Sena-Martins M, Roteli-Martins CM, Tadini V, et al. 1377. Shamonki MI, Ziegler WF, Badger GJ, et al.
Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of Prediction of endometrial ablation success according to
symptomatic myomas in Brazilian women. Sao Paulo Med perioperative findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000
J. 2003 Sep 1;121(5):185-90. PMID: 14666289. X-4, X-5, May;182(5):1005-7. PMID: 10819809. X-4, X-5, X-8
X-6, X-8
1378. Shangold MM, Tomai TP, Cook JD, et al. Factors
1367. Sendag F, Terek MC, Karadadas N. Sequential associated with withdrawal bleeding after administration of
combined transdermal and oral postmenopausal hormone oral micronized progesterone in women with secondary
replacement therapies: effects on bleeding patterns and amenorrhea. Fertil Steril. 1991 Dec;56(6):1040-7. PMID:
endometrial histology. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2001 1743319. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-10
Nov;265(4):209-13. PMID: 11789748. X-5, X-7
1379. Shannon C, Wiebe E, Jacot F, et al. Regimens of
1368. Senthong AJ, Taneepanichskul S. The effect of misoprostol with mifepristone for early medical abortion: a
tranexamic acid for treatment irregular uterine bleeding randomised trial. BJOG. 2006 Jun;113(6):621-8. PMID:
secondary to DMPA use. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 16709204. X-5, X-9
Apr;92(4):461-5. PMID: 19374294. X-6
1380. Shapley M, Jordan K, Croft PR. Why women
1369. Serden SP, Brooks PG. Treatment of abnormal consult with increased vaginal bleeding: a case-control
uterine bleeding with the gynecologic resectoscope. J study. Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Feb;52(475):108-13. PMID:
Reprod Med. 1991 Oct;36(10):697-9. PMID: 1835500. X- 11885820. X-4, X-5, X-9
3, X-8
1381. Shapley M, Jordan K, Croft PR. Increased vaginal
1370. Serfaty D, Vree ML. A comparison of the cycle bleeding: the reasons women give for consulting primary
control and tolerability of two ultra low-dose oral care. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 Jan;23(1):48-50. PMID:
contraceptives containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol 12623484. X-4, X-5, X-9
and either 150 micrograms desogestrel or 75 micrograms
gestodene. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1998 1382. Shapley M, Jordan K, Croft PR. An investigation in
Dec;3(4):179-89. PMID: 10036600. X-6, X-9 primary care of the relationship between consultation
behaviour, increased vaginal bleeding and mental disorder.
1371. Serra GB, Panetta V, Colosimo M, et al. Efficacy of J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Sep;24(6):684-6. PMID:
leuprorelin acetate depot in symptomatic fibromatous uteri: 16147612. X-4, X-5, X-9
the Italian Multicentre Trial. Clin Ther. 1992;14 Suppl
A:57-73. PMID: 1606594. X-3, X-6 1383. Sharma D, Dahiya K, Dora A, et al. Effect of
rosiglitazone in spontaneous and clomiphene citrate-
1372. Serup J, Bostofte E, Larsen S, et al. Effectivity and induced ovulation in women with polycystic ovary
acceptability of oral contraceptives containing natural and syndrome. Journal of Gynecologic Surgery.
artificial estrogens in combination with a gestagen. A 2006;22(4):151-6. X-5
controlled double-blind investigation. Acta Obstet Gynecol
Scand. 1981;60(2):203-6. PMID: 7018165. X-6, X-9 1384. Sharma JB, Aruna J, Kumar P, et al. Comparison of
efficacy of oral drotaverine plus mefenamic acid with
paracervical block and with intravenous sedation for pain

K-65
relief during hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy. Indian J
Med Sci. 2009 Jun;63(6):244-52. PMID: 19602758. X-5, 1396. Shokry M, Shahin AY, Fathalla MM, et al. Oral
X-8, X-9 misoprostol reduces vaginal bleeding following surgical
evacuation for first trimester spontaneous abortion. Int J
1385. Shaw RW, Fraser HM. Use of a superactive Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Nov;107(2):117-20. PMID:
luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist in 19616778. X-5, X-9
the treatment of menorrhagia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984
Sep;91(9):913-6. PMID: 6433966. X-3 1397. Shoupe D. Multicenter randomized comparative trial
of two low-dose triphasic combined oral contraceptives
1386. Shaw RW, Symonds IM, Tamizian O, et al. containing desogestrel or norethindrone. Obstet Gynecol.
Randomised comparative trial of thermal balloon ablation 1994 May;83(5 Pt 1):679-85. PMID: 8164925. X-9
and levonorgestrel intrauterine system in patients with
idiopathic menorrhagia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 1398. Shoupe D, Mishell DR, Jr., Brenner PF, et al.
Aug;47(4):335-40. PMID: 17627692. X-8 Pregnancy termination with a high and medium dosage
regimen of RU 486. Contraception. 1986 May;33(5):455-
1387. Shaw ST, Jr., Macaulay LK, Sun NC, et al. Changes 61. PMID: 3757511. X-5
of plasminogen activator in human uterine tissue induced
by intrauterine contraceptive devices. Contraception. 1983 1399. Showstack J, Lin F, Learman LA, et al. Randomized
Feb;27(2):131-40. PMID: 6682747. X-9 trial of medical treatment versus hysterectomy for
abnormal uterine bleeding: resource use in the Medicine or
1388. Shawki O, Peters A, Abraham-Hebert S. Surgery (Ms) trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006
Hysteroscopic endometrial destruction, optimum method Feb;194(2):332-8. PMID: 16458625. X-8
for preoperative endometrial preparation: a prospective,
randomized, multicenter evaluation. JSLS. 2002 Jan- 1400. Shravage J, Mekhala D, Bellad MB, et al.
Mar;6(1):23-7. PMID: 12002292. X-5, X-8 Ormeloxifene versus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)
in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding: A
1389. Shearman RP. Oral contraceptives. Aust Fam double-blind randomized controlled trial. Journal of
Physician. 1984 Sep;13(9):685-91. PMID: 6508652. X-1, SAFOG. 2011 January-April;3(1):21-4. PMID:
X-3, X-5, X-10 2011698238. X-5

1390. Sheffer AL, Fearon DT, Austen KF. Clinical and 1401. Shy KK, McTiernan AM, Daling JR, et al. Oral
biochemical effects of stanozolol therapy for hereditary contraceptive use and the occurrence of pituitary
angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1981 Sep;68(3):181- prolactinoma. JAMA. 1983 Apr 22-29;249(16):2204-7.
7. PMID: 6790595. X-3, X-5 PMID: 6834618. X-3, X-5

1391. Sheikh-El-Arab Elsedeek M, Elmaghraby HAH. 1402. Sibai BM, Caritis SN, Thom E, et al. Low-dose
Predictors and characteristics of letrozole induced ovulation aspirin in nulliparous women: safety of continuous epidural
in comparison with clomiphene induced ovulation in block and correlation between bleeding time and maternal-
anovulatory PCOS women. Middle East Fertility Society neonatal bleeding complications. National Institute of Child
Journal. 2011;16(2):125-30. X-5 Health and Human Developmental Maternal-Fetal
Medicine Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995
1392. Sheppard BL, Bonnar J. The response of May;172(5):1553-7. PMID: 7755070. X-5
endometrial blood vessels to intrauterine contraceptive
devices: an electron microscopic study. Br J Obstet 1403. Siboni SM, Spreafico M, Calo L, et al.
Gynaecol. 1980 Feb;87(2):143-54. PMID: 7362802. X-3, Gynaecological and obstetrical problems in women with
X-4 different bleeding disorders. Haemophilia. 2009
Nov;15(6):1291-9. PMID: 19664014. X-4, X-5, X-9
1393. Sheth A, Jain U, Sharma S. A randomized, double-
blind study of two combined and two progestogen-only oral 1404. Sica S, Salutari P, Di Mario A, et al. Treatment and
contraceptives. Contraception. 1982;25(3):243-52. PMID: prophylaxis of hypermenorrhea with leuprorelin in
6804162. X-9 premenopausal women affected by acute leukemia at
diagnosis. Am J Hematol. 1996 Mar;51(3):248-9. PMID:
1394. Shobeiri SF, Sharei S, Heidari A, et al. Portulaca 8619413. X-1, X-3, X-5, X-10
oleracea L. in the treatment of patients with abnormal
uterine bleeding: a pilot clinical trial. Phytother Res. 2009 1405. Sidhu MS, Kent DR. Effects of prostaglandin E2
Oct;23(10):1411-4. PMID: 19274703. X-4 analogue suppository on blood loss in suction abortion.
Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jul;64(1):128-30. PMID: 6738937.
1395. Shobokshi A, Shaarawy M. Correction of insulin X-5
resistance and hyperandrogenism in polycystic ovary
syndrome by combined rosiglitazone and clomiphene 1406. Siegberg R, Nilsson CG, Stenman UH, et al. Sex
citrate therapy. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2003 Feb;10(2):99- hormone profiles in oligomenorrheic adolescent girls and
104. PMID: 12593999. X-4, X-5, X-9

K-66
the effect of oral contraceptives. Fertil Steril. 1984 1417. Simsek T, Karakus C, Trak B. Impact of different
Jun;41(6):888-93. PMID: 6233177. X-3, X-4 hormone replacement therapy regimens on the size of
myoma uteri in postmenopausal period: tibolone versus
1407. Siegberg R, Nilsson CG, Stenman UH, et al. The transdermal hormonal replacement system. Maturitas. 2002
effect of oral contraceptives on hormone profiles of Jul 25;42(3):243-6. PMID: 12161049. X-4, X-5, X-7
oligomenorrheic adolescent cycles. Contraception. 1987
Jan;35(1):29-40. PMID: 3568657. X-3, X-5 1418. Singer A, Almanza R, Gutierrez A, et al.
Preliminary clinical experience with a thermal balloon
1408. Siegberg R, Ylostalo P, Laatikainen T, et al. endometrial ablation method to treat menorrhagia. Obstet
Endocrine and clinical effects of spironolactone in female Gynecol. 1994 May;83(5 Pt 1):732-4. PMID: 8164933. X-
hyperandrogenism. Arch Gynecol. 1987;240(2):67-73. 3, X-8
PMID: 3566358. X-6
1419. Singh M, Saxena BB, Raghubanshi RS, et al.
1409. Siegler AM. Therapeutic hysteroscopy. Acta Eur Biodegradable norethindrone (NET:cholesterol)
Fertil. 1986 Nov-Dec;17(6):467-71. PMID: 3630558. X-1, contraceptive implants: phase II-A: a clinical study in
X-3, X-5 women. Contraception. 1997 Jan;55(1):23-33. PMID:
9013058. X-3, X-9
1410. Siegler AM, Kontopoulos VG. Lysis of intrauterine
adhesions under hysteroscopic control. A report of 25 1420. Singh M, Saxena BB, Singh R, et al. Contraceptive
operations. J Reprod Med. 1981 Jul;26(7):372-4. PMID: efficacy of norethindrone encapsulated in injectable
7277346. X-3, X-5, X-8 biodegradable poly-dl-lactide-co-glycolide microspheres
(NET-90): phase III clinical study. Adv Contracept. 1997
1411. Sihvo S, Ollila E, Hemminki E. Perceptions and Mar;13(1):1-11. PMID: 9181181. X-4, X-5
satisfaction among Norplant users in Finland. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand. 1995 Jul;74(6):441-5. PMID: 7604687. X- 1421. Singh N, Ghosh B, Naha M, et al. Vaginal
3, X-9 misoprostol for cervical priming prior to diagnostic
hysteroscopy - Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction: A
1412. Silberstein SD, Berner T, Tobin J, et al. Scheduled randomized controlled trial. Archives of Gynecology and
short-term prevention with frovatriptan for migraine Obstetrics. 2009;279(1):37-40. PMID: 18449549. X-4, X-5
occurring exclusively in association with menstruation.
Headache. 2009 Oct;49(9):1283-97. PMID: 19751371. X- 1422. Siskin GP, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Goodwin SC, et
4, X-5, X-9 al. A prospective multicenter comparative study between
myomectomy and uterine artery embolization with
1413. Silberstein SD, Massiou H, Le Jeunne C, et al. polyvinyl alcohol microspheres: long-term clinical
Rizatriptan in the treatment of menstrual migraine. Obstet outcomes in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. J
Gynecol. 2000 Aug;96(2):237-42. PMID: 10908770. X-4, Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006 Aug;17(8):1287-95. PMID:
X-5, X-9 16923975. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8

1414. Simbar M, Tehrani FR, Hashemi Z, et al. A 1423. Siskin GP, Stainken BF, Dowling K, et al.
comparative study of Cyclofem and depot Outpatient uterine artery embolization for symptomatic
medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) effects on uterine fibroids: experience in 49 patients. J Vasc Interv
endometrial vasculature. Journal of Family Planning and Radiol. 2000 Mar;11(3):305-11. PMID: 10735424. X-4, X-
Reproductive Health Care. 2007;33(4):271-6. PMID: 5, X-6
17925114. X-4, X-5, X-9
1424. Sivin I, Alvarez F, Mishell DR, Jr., et al.
1415. Simon JA, Liu JH, Speroff L, et al. Reduced vaginal Contraception with two levonorgestrel rod implants. A 5-
bleeding in postmenopausal women who receive combined year study in the United States and Dominican Republic.
norethindrone acetate and low-dose ethinyl estradiol Contraception. 1998 Nov;58(5):275-82. PMID: 9883382.
therapy versus combined conjugated equine estrogens and X-4, X-5, X-6
medroxyprogesterone acetate therapy. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2003 Jan;188(1):92-9. PMID: 12548201. X-5, X- 1425. Sivin I, Campodonico I, Kiriwat O, et al. The
7 performance of levonorgestrel rod and Norplant
contraceptive implants: A 5 year randomized study. Human
1416. Simon JA, Symons JP. Unscheduled bleeding during Reproduction. 1999;13(12):3371-8. PMID: 9886517. X-9
initiation of continuous combined hormone replacement
therapy: A direct comparison of two combinations of 1426. Sivin I, Croxatto H, Bahamondes L, et al. Two-year
norethindrone acetate and ethinyl estradiol to performance of a Nestorone-releasing contraceptive
medroxyprogesterone acetate and conjugated equine implant: a three-center study of 300 women. Contraception.
estrogens. Menopause. 2001;8(5):321-7. PMID: 11528357. 2004 Feb;69(2):137-44. PMID: 14759619. X-4, X-5
X-7
1427. Sivin I, Diaz S, Croxatto HB, et al. Contraceptives
for lactating women: a comparative trial of a progesterone-

K-67
releasing vaginal ring and the copper T 380A IUD. dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981
Contraception. 1997 Apr;55(4):225-32. PMID: 9179454. Apr;88(4):434-42. PMID: 7225303. X-3, X-4
X-4, X-5
1439. Smits MG, van der Meer YG, Pfeil JP, et al.
1428. Sivin I, Mishell DR, Jr., Victor A, et al. A Perimenstrual migraine: effect of Estraderm TTS and the
multicenter study of levonorgestrel-estradiol contraceptive value of contingent negative variation and exteroceptive
vaginal rings. III-Menstrual patterns. An international temporalis muscle suppression test. Headache. 1994
comparative trial. Contraception. 1981 Oct;24(4):377-92. Feb;34(2):103-6. PMID: 8163364. X-5
PMID: 6797783. X-6, X-9
1440. Snead DB, Weltman A, Weltman JY, et al.
1429. Sivin I, Robertson DN, Stern J, et al. Norplant: Reproductive hormones and bone mineral density in
reversible implant contraception. Stud Fam Plann. 1980 women runners. J Appl Physiol. 1992 Jun;72(6):2149-56.
Jul-Aug;11(7-8):227-35. PMID: 6996230. X-1, X-3, X-9, PMID: 1385803. X-3, X-4
X-10
1441. Socolov D, Blidaru I, Tamba B, et al.
1430. Sivin I, Sanchez FA, Diaz S, et al. Three-year Levonorgestrel releasing-intrauterine system for the
experience with NORPLANT subdermal contraception. treatment of menorrhagia and/or frequent irregular uterine
Fertil Steril. 1983 Jun;39(6):799-808. PMID: 6406273. X- bleeding associated with uterine leiomyoma. Eur J
3, X-9 Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011 Dec;16(6):480-7.
PMID: 21942657. X-3, X-6
1431. Sivin I, Stern J. Health during prolonged use of
levonorgestrel 20 mug/d and the copper TCu 380Ag 1442. Sojo-Aranda I, Alonso-Uriarte R, Gonzalez-Diddi
intrauterine contraceptive devices: A multicenter study. M, et al. The biological expression of natural progesterone.
Fertility and Sterility. 1994;61(1):70-7. PMID: 8293847. J Steroid Biochem. 1988 Aug;31(2):219-22. PMID:
X-9 3404991. X-3, X-5

1432. Sivin I, Stern J, Coutinho E, et al. Prolonged 1443. Sone M, Arai Y, Shimizu T, et al. Phase I/II
intrauterine contraception: a seven-year randomized study multiinstitutional study of uterine artery embolization with
of the levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day (LNg 20) and the Copper gelatin sponge for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata: Japan
T380 Ag IUDS. Contraception. 1991 Nov;44(5):473-80. Interventional Radiology in Oncology Study Group study. J
PMID: 1797462. X-9 Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Nov;21(11):1665-71. PMID:
20884240. X-4, X-5, X-8
1433. Sivin I, Stern J, Diaz J, et al. Two years of
intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with 1444. Sotnikova LS, Abramova EV, Shevtsova NM, et al.
copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and Clinical study of the efficiency of Poetam in the treatment
levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices. Contraception. 1987 of the anemic syndrome in pubertal uterine hemorrhages.
Mar;35(3):245-55. PMID: 3111785. X-9 Bull Exp Biol Med. 2006 Jul;142(1):61-5. PMID:
17369904. X-3, X-4, X-5
1434. Sivin I, Tatum HJ. Four years of experience with the
TCu 380A intrauterine contraceptive device. Fertil Steril. 1445. Sotnikova LS, Shevtsova NM, Sherstoboev EY, et
1981 Aug;36(2):159-63. PMID: 7262334. X-3, X-9 al. Complex application of preparation containing ultralow
doses of antibodies for the treatment of anemia caused by
1435. Sivin I, Viegas O, Campodonico I, et al. Clinical pubertal uterine bleedings. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2009
performance of a new two-rod levonorgestrel contraceptive Sep;148(3):505-7. PMID: 20396724. X-3
implant: a three-year randomized study with Norplant
implants as controls. Contraception. 1997 Feb;55(2):73-80. 1446. Sotnikova LS, Zhdanov VV, Udut VV, et al.
PMID: 9071515. X-4, X-5 Influence of poetam preparation on the state of autonomic
nervous system in patients with severe anemia caused by
1436. Skibola CF. The effect of Fucus vesiculosus, an dysfunctional uterine bleedings. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2009
edible brown seaweed, upon menstrual cycle length and Sep;148(3):508-10. PMID: 20396725. X-3, X-5, X-10
hormonal status in three pre-menopausal women: a case
report. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2004 Aug 4;4:10. 1447. Soysal M, Soysal S, Ozer S. A randomized
PMID: 15294021. X-4 controlled trial of levonorgestrel releasing IUD and thermal
balloon ablation in the treatment of menorrhagia. Zentralbl
1437. Small DS, Wrishko RE, Ernest ICS, et al. Effect of Gynakol. 2002 Apr;124(4):213-9. PMID: 12080483. X-5,
age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of X-8
prasugrel during multiple dosing: An open-label, single-
sequence, clinical trial. Drugs and Aging. 2009;26(9):781- 1448. Soysal S, Soysal ME. The efficacy of
90. PMID: 19728751. X-3, X-5 levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in selected
cases of myoma-related menorrhagia: a prospective
1438. Smith SK, Abel MH, Kelly RW, et al. Prostaglandin controlled trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2005;59(1):29-35.
synthesis in the endometrium of women with ovular PMID: 15377823. X-4, X-5, X-6

K-68
1460. Stamets K, Taylor DS, Kunselman A, et al. A
1449. Speroff L, Haney AF, Gilbert RD, et al. Efficacy of randomized trial of the effects of two types of short-term
a new, oral estradiol acetate formulation for relief of hypocaloric diets on weight loss in women with polycystic
menopause symptoms. Menopause. 2006;13(3):442-50. ovary syndrome. Fertility and Sterility. 2004
PMID: 16735941. X-7 March;81(3):630-7. PMID: 2004135257. X-5, X-10

1450. Spies JB, Benenati JF, Worthington-Kirsch RL, et 1461. Stanback J, Grimes D. Can intrauterine device
al. Initial experience with use of tris-acryl gelatin removals for bleeding or pain be predicted at a one-month
microspheres for uterine artery embolization for follow-up visit?: A multivariate analysis. Contraception.
leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001 Sep;12(9):1059- 1998;58(6):357-60. PMID: 10095972. X-3, X-5, X-6
63. PMID: 11535768. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8
1462. Stein RC, Rawson NSB, Gazet JC, et al. Gestrinone
1451. Spies JB, Cooper JM, Worthington-Kirsch R, et al. in mastalgia: A randomized double blind placebo
Outcome of uterine embolization and hysterectomy for controlled trial. Breast. 1994;3(2):90-3. X-5
leiomyomas: results of a multicenter study. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):22-31. PMID: 15295340. X-4, 1463. Steiner AZ, Xiang M, Mack WJ, et al. Unopposed
X-5, X-6, X-8 estradiol therapy in postmenopausal women: results from
two randomized trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2007
1452. Spies JB, Cornell C, Worthington-Kirsch R, et al. Mar;109(3):581-7. PMID: 17329508. X-5, X-7
Long-term outcome from uterine fibroid embolization with
tris-acryl gelatin microspheres: results of a multicenter 1464. Stener-Victorin E, Jedel E, Janson PO, et al. Low-
study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Feb;18(2):203-7. PMID: frequency electroacupuncture and physical exercise
17327552. X-4, X-5, X-8, X-9 decrease high muscle sympathetic nerve activity in
polycystic ovary syndrome. Am J Physiol Regul Integr
1453. Spitz IM, Bardin CW, Benton L, et al. Early Comp Physiol. 2009 Aug;297(2):R387-95. PMID:
pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol 19494176. X-4, X-5
in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr
30;338(18):1241-7. PMID: 9562577. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9 1465. Stener-Victorin E, Waldenstrom U, Tagnfors U, et
al. Effects of electro-acupuncture on anovulation in women
1454. Spona J, Elstein M, Feichtinger W, et al. Shorter with polycystic ovary syndrome. Acta Obstetricia et
pill-free interval in combined oral contraceptives decreases Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2000;79(3):180-8. PMID:
follicular development. Contraception. 1996;54(2):71-7. 10716298. X-3, X-5
PMID: 8842582. X-9
1466. Stephanie R, Labied S, Blacher S, et al. Endometrial
1455. Sporrong T, Hellgren M, Samsioe G, et al. vessel maturation in women exposed to levonorgestrel-
Comparison of four continuously administered progestogen releasing intrauterine system for a short or prolonged
plus oestradiol combinations for climacteric complaints. Br period of time. Hum Reprod. 2007 Dec;22(12):3084-91.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Oct;95(10):1042-8. PMID: PMID: 17921480. X-4, X-5
3056498. X-5, X-7
1467. Stephen LJ, Kwan P, Shapiro D, et al. Hormone
1456. Sporrong T, Rybo G, Mattsson LA, et al. An profiles in young adults with epilepsy treated with sodium
objective and subjective assessment of uterine blood loss in valproate or lamotrigine monotherapy. Epilepsia. 2001
postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy. Aug;42(8):1002-6. PMID: 11554885. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 May;99(5):399-401. PMID:
1535788. X-7 1468. Stephenson K, Neuenschwander PF, Kurdowska
AK, et al. Transdermal progesterone: Effects on
1457. Sporrong T, Samsioe G, Larsen S, et al. A novel menopausal symptoms and on thrombotic, anticoagulant,
statistical approach to analysis of bleeding patterns during and inflammatory factors in postmenopausal women.
continuous hormone replacement therapy. Maturitas. 1989 International Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding.
Sep;11(3):209-15. PMID: 2593864. X-7 2008;12(4):295-304. X-7

1458. Stadberg E, Mattsson LA, Uvebrant M. 17 beta- 1469. Stevenson JC, Durand G, Kahler E, et al. Oral ultra-
estradiol and norethisterone acetate in low doses as low dose continuous combined hormone replacement
continuous combined hormone replacement therapy. therapy with 0.5 mg 17beta-oestradiol and 2.5 mg
Maturitas. 1996 Feb;23(1):31-9. PMID: 8861084. X-7 dydrogesterone for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms:
Results from a double-blind, controlled study. Maturitas.
1459. Stadtmauer L, Harrison DD, Boyd J, et al. Pilot 2010;67(3):227-32. PMID: 20688442. X-7
study evaluating a progesterone vaginal ring for luteal-
phase replacement in donor oocyte recipients. Fertility and 1470. Stewart FH, Kaunitz AM, LaGuardia KD, et al.
Sterility. 2009;92(5):1600-5. PMID: 18990373. X-5 Extended use of transdermal norelgestromin/ethinyl
estradiol: A randomized trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology.
2005;105(6):1389-96. PMID: 15932834. X-5, X-6, X-9

K-69
systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Lab Immunol. 1984
1471. Stovall TG, Muneyyirci-Delale O, Summitt Jr RL, et Jan;13(1):11-4. PMID: 6371236. X-5
al. GnRH agonist and iron versus placebo and iron in the
anemic patient before surgery for leiomyomas: A 1481. Subakir SB, Abdul Madjid O, Sabariah S, et al.
randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology. Oxidative stress, vitamin E and progestin breakthrough
1995;86(1):65-71. PMID: 7784025. X-6 bleeding. Hum Reprod. 2000 Aug;15 Suppl 3:18-23.
PMID: 11041217. X-4, X-5
1472. Stovall TG, Muneyyirci-Delale O, Summitt RL, Jr.,
et al. GnRH agonist and iron versus placebo and iron in the 1482. Subakir SB, Hadisaputra W, Handoyo AE, et al.
anemic patient before surgery for leiomyomas: a Endometrial angiogenic response in Norplant users. Hum
randomized controlled trial. Leuprolide Acetate Study Reprod. 1996 Oct;11 Suppl 2:51-5. PMID: 8982746. X-3,
Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;86(1):65-71. PMID: X-4, X-6
7784025. X-6, X-8
1483. Subakir SB, Setiadi E, Affandi B, et al. Benefits of
1473. Strokosch GR, Friedman AJ, Wu SC, et al. Effects vitamin E supplementation to Norplant users--in vitro and
of an Oral Contraceptive (Norgestimate/Ethinyl Estradiol) in vivo studies. Toxicology. 2000 Aug 7;148(2-3):173-8.
on Bone Mineral Density in Adolescent Females with PMID: 10962136. X-4, X-5, X-6
Anorexia Nervosa: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled
Study. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2006;39(6):819-27. 1484. Subtil D, Goeusse P, Puech F, et al. Aspirin (100
PMID: 17116511. X-5 mg) used for prevention of pre-eclampsia in nulliparous
women: The Essai Regional Aspirine Mere-Enfant study
1474. Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Ring KD, et al. A (Part 1). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and
randomized trial examining the effectiveness of switching Gynaecology. 2003;110(5):475-84. PMID: 12742332. X-5
from olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone to aripiprazole
to reduce metabolic risk: Comparison of Antipsychotics for 1485. Suhonen SP, Allonen HO, Lahteenmaki P.
Metabolic Problems (CAMP). American Journal of Sustained-release estradiol implants and a levonorgestrel-
Psychiatry. 2011;168(9):947-56. PMID: 21768610. X-5 releasing intrauterine device in hormone replacement
therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Feb;172(2 Pt 1):562-
1475. Strowitzki T, Kirsch B, Elliesen J. Efficacy of 7. PMID: 7856686. X-7
ethinylestradiol 20 mug/drospirenone 3 mg in a flexible
extended regimen in women with moderate-to-severe 1486. Suhonen SP, Holmstrom T, Allonen HO, et al.
primary dysmenorrhoea: An open-label, multicentre, Intrauterine and subdermal progestin administration in
randomised, controlled study. Journal of Family Planning postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy. Fertil Steril.
and Reproductive Health Care. 2012 April;38(2):94-101. 1995 Feb;63(2):336-42. PMID: 7843440. X-7
PMID: 2012264032. X-5
1487. Sulak PJ, Caubel P, Lane R. Efficacy and safety of a
1476. Sturdee DW, Archer DF, Rakov V, et al. Ultra-low- constant-estrogen, pulsed-progestin regimen in hormone
dose continuous combined estradiol and norethisterone replacement therapy. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 1999 Nov-
acetate: improved bleeding profile in postmenopausal Dec;44(6):286-96. PMID: 10617250. X-5, X-7
women. Climacteric. 2008 Feb;11(1):63-73. PMID:
18202966. X-5, X-7 1488. Sulak PJ, Kuehl TJ, Coffee A, et al. Prospective
analysis of occurrence and management of breakthrough
1477. Sturdee DW, Barlow DH, Ulrich LG, et al. Is the bleeding during an extended oral contraceptive regimen.
timing of withdrawal bleeding a guide to endometrial safety American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
during sequential oestrogen-progestagen replacement 2006;195(4):935-41. PMID: 16647684. X-3, X-6
therapy? UK Continuous Combined HRT Study
Investigators. Lancet. 1994 Oct 8;344(8928):979-82. 1489. Sulak PJ, Smith V, Coffee A, et al. Frequency and
PMID: 7934429. X-3, X-7 management of breakthrough bleeding with continuous use
of the transvaginal contraceptive ring: a randomized
1478. Sturdee DW, Rantala ML, Colau JC, et al. The controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;112(3):563-71.
acceptability of a small intrauterine progestogen-releasing PMID: 18757653. X-5, X-7
system for continuous combined hormone therapy in early
postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2004 Dec;7(4):404- 1490. Sundarrajan C, Liao WX, Roy AC, et al. Association
11. PMID: 15799612. X-4, X-5, X-7, X-9 between estrogen receptor-beta gene polymorphisms and
ovulatory dysfunctions in patients with menstrual disorders.
1479. Sturdee DW, Van de Weijer P, Von Holst T. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Jan;86(1):135-9. PMID:
Endometrial safety of a transdermal sequential estradiol- 11231990. X-4, X-5, X-9
levonorgestrel combination. Climacteric. 2002;5(2):170-7.
PMID: 12051113. X-7 1491. Sundstrom A, Seaman H, Kieler H, et al. The risk of
venous thromboembolism associated with the use of
1480. Sturgess AD, Evans DT, Mackay IR, et al. Effects of tranexamic acid and other drugs used to treat menorrhagia:
the oestrogen antagonist tamoxifen on disease indices in a case-control study using the General Practice Research

K-70
Database. BJOG. 2009 Jan;116(1):91-7. PMID: 19016686. 1502. Takahashi K, Karino K, Kanasaki H, et al. Altered
X-4 kinetics of pituitary response to gonadotropin-releasing
hormone in women with variant luteinizing hormone:
1492. Suri V, Aggarwal N, Kaur R, et al. Safety of correlation with ovulatory disorders. Horm Res.
intrauterine contraceptive device (copper T 200 B) in 2004;61(1):27-32. PMID: 14646399. X-4, X-5, X-9
women with cardiac disease. Contraception. 2008
Oct;78(4):315-8. PMID: 18847580. X-4, X-5, X-9 1503. Takeuchi H, Kobori H, Kikuchi I, et al. A
prospective randomized study comparing endocrinological
1493. Suthipongse W, Taneepanichskul S. An open-label and clinical effects of two types of GnRH agonists in cases
randomized comparative study of oral contraceptives of uterine leiomyomas or endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol
between medications containing 3 mg drospirenone/30 mug Res. 2000 Oct;26(5):325-31. PMID: 11147718. X-4, X-5,
ethinylestradiol and 150 mug levonogestrel/30 mug X-6
ethinylestradiol in Thai women. Contraception.
2004;69(1):23-6. PMID: 14720615. X-9 1504. Takeuchi S, Futamura N, Takubo S, et al. Polycystic
ovary syndrome treated with laparoscopic ovarian drilling
1494. Suzuki N, Uebaba K, Kohama T, et al. French with a harmonic scalpel: A prospective, randomized study.
maritime pine bark extract significantly lowers the Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and
requirement for analgesic medication in dysmenorrhea: A Gynecologist. 2002;47(10):816-20. PMID: 12418063. X-8
multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
study. Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the 1505. Taler SJ, Coulam CB, Annegers JF, et al. Case-
Obstetrician and Gynecologist. 2008;53(5):338-46. PMID: control study of galactorrhea and its relationship to the use
18567279. X-3, X-5 of oral contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol. 1985
May;65(5):665-8. PMID: 4039047. X-3, X-5
1495. Swahn ML, Kovacs L, Cekan SZ, et al. Termination
of early pregnancy with ZK 98,734: pharmacokinetic 1506. Tam WH, Yuen PM, Shan Ng DP, et al. Health
behaviour and clinical effect. Hum Reprod. 1994 status function after treatment with thermal balloon
Jan;9(1):57-63. PMID: 8195352. X-3, X-5 endometrial ablation and levonorgestrel intrauterine system
for idiopathic menorrhagia: a randomized study. Gynecol
1496. Swenson I, Khan AR, Jahan FA. A randomized, Obstet Invest. 2006;62(2):84-8. PMID: 16612101. X-8
single blind comparative trial of norethindrone enanthate
and depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate in Bangladesh. 1507. Tan D, Haines CJ, Limpaphayom KK, et al. Relief
Contraception. 1980 Mar;21(3):207-15. PMID: 6446442. of vasomotor symptoms and vaginal atrophy with three
X-6, X-9 doses of conjugated estrogens and medroxyprogesterone
acetate in postmenopausal Asian women from 11 countries:
1497. Symons J, Kempfert N, Speroff L. Vaginal bleeding The Pan-Asia menopause (PAM) study. Maturitas.
in postmenopausal women taking low-dose norethindrone 2005;52(1):35-51. PMID: 16211697. X-7
acetate and ethinyl estradiol combinations. The FemHRT
Study Investigators. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Sep;96(3):366- 1508. Taneepanichskul S, Kriengsinyot R, Jaisamrarn U. A
72. PMID: 10960627. X-5, X-7 comparison of cycle control, efficacy, and side effects
among healthy Thai women between two low-dose oral
1498. Symons J, Kempfert N, Speroff L. Vaginal bleeding contraceptives containing 20 microg ethinylestradio1/75
in postmenopausal women taking low-dose norethindrone microg gestodene (Meliane) and 30 microg
acetate and ethinyl estradiol combinations. Mechanisms of ethinylestradio1/75 microg gestodene (Gynera).
Development. 2000;96(2):366-72. PMID: 10960627. X-7 Contraception. 2002 Dec;66(6):407-9. PMID: 12499032.
X-5
1499. Tagore S, Yim CF, Kwek K. Dengue haemorrhagic
fever complicated by eclampsia in pregnancy. Singapore 1509. Taneepanichskul S, Reinprayoon D, Phaosavadi S.
Med J. 2007 Oct;48(10):e281-3. PMID: 17909667. X-1, X- DMPA use above the age of 35 in Thai women.
4, X-5, X-9 Contraception. 2000 Apr;61(4):281-2. PMID: 10899485.
X-4, X-5, X-6
1500. Tahara M, Shimizu T, Shimoura H. Preliminary
report of treatment with oral contraceptive pills for 1510. Taner C, Inal M, Basogul O, et al. Comparison of
intermenstrual vaginal bleeding secondary to a cesarean the clinical efficacy and safety of flutamide versus
section scar. Fertil Steril. 2006 Aug;86(2):477-9. PMID: flutamide plus an oral contraceptive in the treatment of
16769058. X-4, X-5, X-9 hirsutism. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;54(2):105-8. PMID:
12566753. X-5, X-9
1501. Tai BC, Peregoudov A, Machin D. A competing risk
approach to the analysis of trials of alternative intra-uterine 1511. Tang GW, Lo SS. Levonorgestrel intrauterine device
devices (IUDs) for fertility regulation. Statistics in in the treatment of menorrhagia in Chinese women:
Medicine. 2001;20(23):3589-600. PMID: 11746339. X-9 efficacy versus acceptability. Contraception. 1995
Apr;51(4):231-5. PMID: 7796588. X-3

K-71
1512. Tang OS, Gao PP, Cheng L, et al. A randomized Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol.
double-blind placebo-controlled study to assess the effect 2011;9:144. PMID: 22044512. X-3, X-4
of oral contraceptive pills on the outcome of medical
abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol. Hum Reprod. 1523. Tehrani FR, Simbar M, Tohidi M, et al. The
1999 Mar;14(3):722-5. PMID: 10221703. X-5, X-9 prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in a community
sample of Iranian population: Iranian PCOS prevalence
1513. Tang OS, Lee SW, Ho PC. A prospective study. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.
randomized study on the measured blood loss in medical 2011;9(39)PMID: 21435276. X-3, X-4
termination of early pregnancy by three different
misoprostol regimens after pretreatment with mifepristone. 1524. Teichmann A, Apter D, Emerich J, et al.
Hum Reprod. 2002 Nov;17(11):2865-8. PMID: 12407040. Continuous, daily levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol vs. 21-
X-5, X-9 day, cyclic levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol: efficacy, safety
and bleeding in a randomized, open-label trial.
1514. Tang OS, Xu J, Cheng L, et al. The effect of Contraception. 2009 Dec;80(6):504-11. PMID: 19913143.
contraceptive pills on the measured blood loss in medical X-4, X-5
termination of pregnancy by mifepristone and misoprostol:
a randomized placebo controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2002 1525. Terakawa N, Inoue M, Shimizu I, et al. Preliminary
Jan;17(1):99-102. PMID: 11756369. X-5, X-9 report on the use of danazol in the treatment of endometrial
adenomatous hyperplasia. Cancer. 1988 Dec
1515. Tang T, Glanville J, Hayden CJ, et al. Combined 15;62(12):2618-21. PMID: 3191463. X-3, X-9
lifestyle modification and metformin in obese patients with
polycystic ovary syndrome. A randomized, placebo- 1526. Thomas AG, Klihr-Beall S, Siqueira L, et al.
controlled, double-blind multicentre study. Human Concentration of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and
Reproduction. 2006;21(1):80-9. PMID: 16199429. X-5 pain scores in adolescents: A randomized clinical trial.
Contraception. 2005;72(2):126-9. PMID: 16022852. X-5,
1516. Tantbirojn P, Taneepanichskul S. Clinical X-6, X-9
comparative study of oral contraceptives containing 30
microg ethinylestradiol/150 microg levonorgestrel, and 35 1527. Thomas EJ. Add-back therapy for long-term use in
microg ethinylestradiol/250 microg norgestimate in Thai dysfunctional uterine bleeding and uterine fibroids. Br J
women. Contraception. 2002 Dec;66(6):401-5. PMID: Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Oct;103 Suppl 14:18-21. PMID:
12499031. X-5 8916983. X-3, X-6

1517. Tantiwattanakul P, Taneepanichskul S. Effect of 1528. Thomas EJ, Okuda KJ, Thomas NM. The
mefenamic acid on controlling irregular uterine bleeding in combination of a depot gonadotrophin releasing hormone
DMPA users. Contraception. 2004 Oct;70(4):277-9. PMID: agonist and cyclical hormone replacement therapy for
15451330. X-5, X-6 dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991
Nov;98(11):1155-9. PMID: 1836959. X-3
1518. Taskin O, Buhur A, Birincioglu M, et al.
Endometrial Na+, K+-ATPase pump function and 1529. Thomson RL, Buckley JD, Moran LJ, et al. The
vasopressin levels during hysteroscopic surgery in patients effect of weight loss on anti-Mullerian hormone levels in
pretreated with GnRH agonist. J Am Assoc Gynecol overweight and obese women with polycystic ovary
Laparosc. 1998 May;5(2):119-24. PMID: 9564057. X-4, syndrome and reproductive impairment. Hum Reprod. 2009
X-5, X-8 Aug;24(8):1976-81. PMID: 19380385. X-4, X-5, X-9

1519. Taskin O, Yalcinoglu A, Kucuk S, et al. The degree 1530. Thongrong P, Jarruwale P, Panichkul P.
of fluid absorption during hysteroscopic surgery in patients Effectiveness of paracervical block versus intravenous
pretreated with goserelin. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. morphine during uterine curettage: a randomized controlled
1996 Aug;3(4):555-9. PMID: 9050688. X-5, X-8, X-9 trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Apr;94(4):403-7. PMID:
21591523. X-5, X-8
1520. Tatum HJ, Beltran RS, Ramos R, et al. Immediate
postplacental insertion of GYNE-T 380 and GYNE-T 380 1531. Thonneau P, Poirel H, Fougeyrollas B, et al. A
postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: randomized comparative analysis of fall in haemoglobin following
study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov;175(5):1231-5. abortions conducted by mifepristone (600 mg) and vacuum
PMID: 8942493. X-5 aspiration. Hum Reprod. 1995 Jun;10(6):1512-5. PMID:
7593526. X-3, X-5
1521. Teal SB, Dempsey-Fanning A, Westhoff C.
Predictors of acceptability of medication abortion. 1532. Thorburn J, Berntsson C, Philipson M, et al.
Contraception. 2007 Mar;75(3):224-9. PMID: 17303494. Background factors of ectopic pregnancy. I. Frequency
X-5, X-9 distribution in a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
Reprod Biol. 1986 Dec;23(5-6):321-31. PMID: 3803684.
1522. Tehrani FR, Rashidi H, Azizi F. The prevalence of X-3, X-4, X-5
idiopathic hirsutism and polycystic ovary syndrome in the

K-72
1544. Tur-Kaspa I, Gal M, Hartman M, et al. A
1533. Tice JA, Ettinger B, Ensrud K, et al. Phytoestrogen prospective evaluation of uterine abnormalities by saline
Supplements for the Treatment of Hot Flashes: The infusion sonohysterography in 1,009 women with infertility
Isoflavone Clover Extract (ICE) Study: A Randomized or abnormal uterine bleeding. Fertil Steril. 2006
Controlled Trial. Journal of the American Medical Dec;86(6):1731-5. PMID: 17007850. X-4, X-5, X-9
Association. 2003;290(2):207-14. PMID: 12851275. X-5,
X-7 1545. Turnbull AC, Rees MC. Gestrinone in the treatment
of menorrhagia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990
1534. Tolley E, Loza S, Kafafi L, et al. The impact of Aug;97(8):713-5. PMID: 2205289. X-3
menstrual side effects on contraceptive discontinuation:
findings from a longitudinal study in Cairo, Egypt. 1546. Turner JA, Mancl L, Huggins KH, et al. Targeting
International Family Planning Perspectives. 2005;31(1):15- temporomandibular disorder pain treatment to hormonal
23. PMID: 15888405. X-3, X-4, X-5 fluctuations: A randomized clinical trial. Pain.
2011;152(9):2074-84. PMID: 21680092. X-5
1535. Toppozada M, El-Attar A, El-Ayyat MA, et al.
Management of uterine bleeding by PGs or their synthesis 1547. Ulmann A, Dubois C, Philibert D. Fertility control
inhibitors. Adv Prostaglandin Thromboxane Res. with RU 486. Horm Res. 1987;28(2-4):274-8. PMID:
1980;8:1459-63. PMID: 6769315. X-5, X-10 3331378. X-1, X-3, X-5

1536. Towers CV, Pircon RA, Heppard M. Is tocolysis 1548. Ulmann A, Silvestre L. RU486: the French
safe in the management of third-trimester bleeding? Am J experience. Hum Reprod. 1994 Jun;9 Suppl 1:126-30.
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;180(6 Pt 1):1572-8. PMID: PMID: 7962459. X-3, X-5
10368505. X-4, X-5, X-9
1549. Ulmann A, Teutsch G, Philibert D. RU 486. Sci Am.
1537. Trambert JJ, Einstein MH, Banks E, et al. Uterine 1990 Jun;262(6):42-8. PMID: 2343294. X-11
artery embolization in the management of vaginal bleeding
from cervical pregnancy: a case series. J Reprod Med. 2005 1550. Ulstein M, Svendsen E, Steier A, et al. Clinical
Nov;50(11):844-50. PMID: 16419633. X-4, X-5, X-8, X-9 experience with a triphasic oral contraceptive. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand. 1984;63(3):233-6. PMID: 6428157. X-3,
1538. Tredway DR, Buraglio M, Hemsey G, et al. A phase X-9
I study of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and
safety of single- and multiple-dose anastrozole in healthy, 1551. Umbarje K. Thermal Balloon Endometrial Ablation
premenopausal female volunteers. Fertil Steril. 2004 (TBEA): an audit of pain management. Journal of One-Day
Dec;82(6):1587-93. PMID: 15589864. X-4, X-5, X-9 Surgery. 2009;19(3):78-80. X-8

1539. Trivedi P, Rocha I, Padhye A. Is routine 1552. Unfer V, Casini ML, Costabile L, et al. High dose of
preoperative preparation necessary for hysteroscopic phytoestrogens can reverse the antiestrogenic effects of
endometrial resection? Gynaecological Endoscopy. clomiphene citrate on the endometrium in patients
1999;8(5):287-91. X-8 undergoing intrauterine insemination: a randomized trial. J
Soc Gynecol Investig. 2004 Jul;11(5):323-8. PMID:
1540. Tsikouras P, Liberis V, Galazios G, et al. Uterine 15219887. X-5, X-9
sarcoma: a report of 57 cases over a 16-year period
analysis. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2008;29(2):129-34. PMID: 1553. Ushiroyama T, Araki R, Sakuma K, et al. Efficacy
18459545. X-4, X-5, X-9 of the kampo medicine Xiong-Gui-Jiao-Ai-Tang, a
traditional herbal medicine, in the treatment of threatened
1541. Tuchman M, Hee A, Emeribe U, et al. Efficacy and abortion in early pregnancy. American Journal of Chinese
tolerability of zolmitriptan oral tablet in the acute treatment Medicine. 2006;34(5):731-40. PMID: 17080540. X-5
of menstrual migraine. CNS Drugs. 2006;20(12):1019-26.
PMID: 17140280. X-5, X-9 1554. Ushiroyama T, Ikeda A, Higashio S, et al. Unkei-to
for correcting luteal phase defects. J Reprod Med. 2003
1542. Tuchman MM, Hee A, Emeribe U, et al. Oral Sep;48(9):729-34. PMID: 14562640. X-4, X-5, X-9
zolmitriptan in the short-term prevention of menstrual
migraine: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. CNS 1555. Ushiroyama T, Ikeda A, Sakai M, et al. Effects of
Drugs. 2008;22(10):877-86. PMID: 18788838. X-5, X-9 unkei-to, an herbal medicine, on endocrine function and
ovulation in women with high basal levels of luteinizing
1543. Tuppurainen M, Harma K, Komulainen M, et al. hormone secretion. J Reprod Med. 2001 May;46(5):451-6.
Effects of continuous combined hormone replacement PMID: 11396371. X-4, X-5, X-10
therapy and clodronate on bone mineral density in
osteoporotic postmenopausal women: A 5-year follow-up. 1556. Utian WH, Burry KA, Archer DF, et al. Efficacy and
Maturitas. 2010;66(4):423-30. PMID: 20547017. X-7 safety of low, standard, and high dosages of an estradiol
transdermal system (Esclim) compared with placebo on
vasomotor symptoms in highly symptomatic menopausal

K-73
patients. The Esclim Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1999 Jul;181(1):71-9. PMID: 10411798. X-5, X-7, X-9 1567. van Dessel HJ, Schoot BC, Schipper I, et al.
Circulating immunoreactive and bioactive follicle
1557. Utian WH, Gass MLS, Pickar JH. Body mass index stimulating hormone concentrations in anovulatory infertile
does not influence response to treatment, nor does body women and during gonadotrophin induction of ovulation
weight change with lower doses of conjugated estrogens using a decremental dose regimen. Hum Reprod. 1996
and medroxyprogesterone acetate in early postmenopausal Mar;11(3):478-85. PMID: 8671250. X-3, X-4, X-5
women. Menopause. 2004;11(3):306-14. PMID: 15167310.
X-7 1568. Van Doorn HC, Timmermans A, Opmeer BC, et al.
What is the recurrence rate of postmenopausal bleeding in
1558. Uygur D, Yesildaglar N, Erkaya S. Effect on sexual women who have a thin endometrium during a first episode
life - A comparison between tibolone and continuous of postmenopausal bleeding? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
combined conjugated equine estrogens and 2008;87(1):89-93. PMID: 18158632. X-4, X-5, X-7
medroxyprogesterone acetate. Gynecological
Endocrinology. 2005;20(4):209-12. PMID: 16019363. X-7 1569. van Eijkeren MA, Christiaens GC, Geuze JJ, et al.
Morphology of menstrual hemostasis in essential
1559. Vairojanavong K, Limchitti D, Sasivimolkul V. menorrhagia. Lab Invest. 1991 Feb;64(2):284-94. PMID:
Clinical trial of the efficacy of mefenamic acid in relief of 1997737. X-3, X-4
menorrhagia and/or dysmenorrhoea. J Med Assoc Thai.
1983 Feb;66(2):99-105. PMID: 6343540. X-3, X-5 1570. van Kets H, Vrijens M, Van Trappen Y, et al. The
frameless GyneFix intrauterine implant: a major
1560. van de Weijer PH, Barentsen R, de Vries M, et al. improvement in efficacy, expulsion and tolerance. Adv
Relationship of estradiol levels to breakthrough bleeding Contracept. 1995 Jun;11(2):131-42. PMID: 7491854. X-3,
during continuous combined hormone replacement therapy. X-9
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Apr;93(4):551-7. PMID: 10214832.
X-5, X-6, X-7 1571. Van Kets HE, Van der Pas H, Delbarge W, et al. A
randomized comparative study of the TCu380A and Cu-
1561. van de Weijer PH, Barentsen R, Kenemans P. Safe 300 IUDs. Adv Contracept. 1995 Jun;11(2):123-9.
Women's expectations and acceptance of cyclic induced PMID: 7491853. X-9
HRT bleeds. Maturitas. 1998 Nov 16;30(3):257-63. PMID:
9881325. X-3, X-5, X-6 1572. van Santbrink EJ, Hohmann FP, Eijkemans MJ, et
al. Does metformin modify ovarian responsiveness during
1562. van de Weijer PH, Scholten PC, van der Mooren exogenous FSH ovulation induction in
MJ, et al. Bleeding patterns and endometrial histology normogonadotrophic anovulation? A placebo-controlled
during administration of low-dose estradiol sequentially double-blind assessment. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005
combined with dydrogesterone. Climacteric. 1999 Apr;152(4):611-7. PMID: 15817918. X-5, X-9
Jun;2(2):101-9. PMID: 11910662. X-5, X-7
1573. Van Wyck DB, Mangione A, Morrison J, et al.
1563. van de Weijer PH, Sturdee DW, von Holst T. Large-dose intravenous ferric carboxymaltose injection for
Estradiol and levonorgestrel: effects on bleeding pattern iron deficiency anemia in heavy uterine bleeding: a
when administered in a sequential combined regimen with randomized, controlled trial. Transfusion. 2009
a new transdermal patch. Climacteric. 2002 Mar;5(1):36- Dec;49(12):2719-28. PMID: 19682342. X-5
44. PMID: 11974558. X-5, X-7
1574. Vance ML, Cragun JR, Reimnitz C, et al. CV 205-
1564. van den Berg I, Liem YS, Wesseldijk F, et al. 502 treatment of hyperprolactinemia. J Clin Endocrinol
Complex regional pain syndrome type 1 may be associated Metab. 1989 Feb;68(2):336-9. PMID: 2521863. X-4, X-5
with menstrual cycle disorders: a case-control study.
Complement Ther Med. 2009 Oct-Dec;17(5-6):262-8. 1575. Vandever MA, Kuehl TJ, Sulak PJ, et al. Evaluation
PMID: 19942105. X-4, X-5, X-9 of pituitary-ovarian axis suppression with three oral
contraceptive regimens. Contraception. 2008;77(3):162-70.
1565. Van Den Heuvel MW, Van Bragt AJM, Alnabawy PMID: 18279685. X-4, X-5, X-9
AKM, et al. Comparison of ethinylestradiol
pharmacokinetics in three hormonal contraceptive 1576. Varner RE, Ireland CC, Summitt RL, Jr., et al.
formulations: The vaginal ring, the transdermal patch and Medicine or Surgery (Ms): a randomized clinical trial
an oral contraceptive. Contraception. 2005;72(3):168-74. comparing hysterectomy and medical treatment in
PMID: 16102549. X-4, X-9 premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Control Clin Trials. 2004 Feb;25(1):104-18. PMID:
1566. van der Straten A, Napierala S, Cheng H, et al. A 14980755. X-8
randomized controlled safety trial of the diaphragm and
cellulose sulfate microbicide gel in sexually active women 1577. Vega RR, Barraza-Vazquez A, Vega MG, et al.
in Zimbabwe. Contraception. 2007;76(5):389-99. PMID: GnRH agonist for postpartum contraception: biochemical,
17963865. X-5, X-9

K-74
hormonal and endometrial effects. Adv Contracept. 1996 1588. Vercellini P, Vendola N, Colombo A, et al.
Mar;12(1):15-25. PMID: 8739513. X-4, X-5, X-9 Veralipride for hot flushes during gonadotropin-releasing
hormone agonist treatment. Gynecol Obstet Invest.
1578. Veldhuis HM, Vos AG, Lagro-Janssen AL. 1992;34(2):102-4. PMID: 1398260. X-3, X-5, X-6
Complications of the intrauterine device in nulliparous and
parous women. Eur J Gen Pract. 2004 Sep;10(3):82-7. 1589. Vetr M, Sobek A. Low dose spironolactone in the
PMID: 15534571. X-4, X-5, X-9 treatment of female hyperandrogenemia and hirsutism.
Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med. 1993;135:55-7.
1579. Venkatachalam S, Bagratee JS, Moodley J. Medical PMID: 7976677. X-3, X-5
management of uterine fibroids with medroxyprogesterone
acetate (Depo Provera): a pilot study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1590. Vickers MR, Martin J, Meade TW, et al. The
2004 Oct;24(7):798-800. PMID: 15763792. X-4, X-5, X-6, Women's International Study of Long-duration Oestrogen
X-9 after Menopause (WISDOM): A randomised controlled
trial. BMC Women's Health. 2007;7(2)PMID: 17324282.
1580. Vercellin P, Perin A, Consonn R, et al. Does X-7
preoperative treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing
hormone agonist improve the outcome of endometrial 1591. Vidal-Puig AJ, Munoz-Torres M, Jodar-Gimeno E,
resection? J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998 et al. Ketoconazole therapy: hormonal and clinical effects
Nov;5(4):357-60. PMID: 9782138. X-4, X-5, X-8 in non-tumoral hyperandrogenism. Eur J Endocrinol. 1994
Apr;130(4):333-8. PMID: 8162160. X-3, X-5
1581. Vercellini P, Barbara G, Somigliana E, et al.
Comparison of contraceptive ring and patch for the 1592. Vigano GL, Mannucci PM, Lattuada A, et al.
treatment of symptomatic endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2010 Subcutaneous desmopressin (DDAVP) shortens the
May 1;93(7):2150-61. PMID: 19328469. X-4, X-5, X-9 bleeding time in uremia. Am J Hematol. 1989
May;31(1):32-5. PMID: 2705441. X-3, X-6
1582. Vercellini P, Bocciolone L, Colombo A, et al.
Gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist treatment before 1593. Vilos GA, Fortin CA, Sanders B, et al. Clinical trial
hysterectomy for menorrhagia and uterine leiomyomas. of the uterine thermal balloon for treatment of menorrhagia.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993 Jul;72(5):369-73. PMID: J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997 Nov;4(5):559-65.
8392268. X-3, X-6, X-8 PMID: 9348362. X-4, X-5, X-8

1583. Vercellini P, Colombo A, Mauro F, et al. 1594. Vilos GA, Vilos EC, Pendley L. Endometrial
Paracervical anesthesia for outpatient hysteroscopy. ablation with a thermal balloon for the treatment of
Fertility and Sterility. 1994;62(5):1083-5. PMID: 7646610. menorrhagia. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996
X-5, X-8 May;3(3):383-7. PMID: 9050660. X-4, X-5, X-8

1584. Vercellini P, De Giorgi O, Oldani S, et al. Depot 1595. Vimala N, Mittal S, Kumar S, et al. A randomized
medroxyprogesterone acetate versus an oral contraceptive comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol for
combined with very-low-dose danazol for long-term cervical priming before suction termination of first-
treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. trimester pregnancy. Contraception. 2004 Aug;70(2):117-
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 20. PMID: 15288215. X-5, X-9
1996;175(2):396-401. PMID: 8765259. X-5, X-10
1596. Vincent AJ, Malakooti N, Zhang J, et al.
1585. Vercellini P, Perino A, Consonni R, et al. Treatment Endometrial breakdown in women using Norplant is
with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist before associated with migratory cells expressing matrix
endometrial resection: a multicentre, randomised controlled metalloproteinase-9 (gelatinase B). Hum Reprod. 1999
trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Jun;103(6):562-8. PMID: Mar;14(3):807-15. PMID: 10221718. X-3, X-4
8645650. X-5, X-8, X-9
1597. Vincent AJ, Zhang J, Ostor A, et al. Matrix
1586. Vercellini P, Sacerdote P, Trespidi L, et al. metalloproteinase-1 and -3 and mast cells are present in the
Veralipride for hot flushes induced by a gonadotropin- endometrium of women using progestin-only
releasing hormone agonist: a controlled study. Fertil Steril. contraceptives. Hum Reprod. 2000 Jan;15(1):123-30.
1994 Nov;62(5):938-42. PMID: 7926138. X-5, X-6 PMID: 10611200. X-4, X-5

1587. Vercellini P, Soma M, Moro GL. Gestrinone versus 1598. Vincent AJ, Zhang J, Ostor A, et al. Decreased
a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist for the treatment tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase in the endometrium of
of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis: A women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: a role
multicenter, randomized, double-blind study. Fertility and for altered endometrial matrix metalloproteinase/tissue
Sterility. 1996;66(6):911-9. PMID: 8941054. X-4, X-5, X- inhibitor of metalloproteinase balance in the pathogenesis
10 of abnormal uterine bleeding? Hum Reprod. 2002
May;17(5):1189-98. PMID: 11980737. X-4, X-5

K-75
1599. Vincenti E, Tambuscio B, Marchesoni D, et al. Use 1609. Vuorma S, Rissanen P, Aalto AM, et al. Factors
of intramyometrial injection of prostaglandin F 2 alpha in predicting choice of treatment for menorrhagia in
the management of intractable hemorrhage due to uterine gynaecology outpatient clinics. Soc Sci Med. 2003
atony. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1982;9(1):26-30. PMID: Apr;56(8):1653-60. PMID: 12639582. X-4
6959742. X-3, X-5
1610. Wahab M, Al-Azzawi F. Trimegestone: Expanding
1600. Viniker DA. Late luteal phase dydrogesterone in therapeutic choices for the treatment of the menopause.
combination with clomiphene or tamoxifen in the treatment Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs. 2001;10(9):1737-
of infertility associated with irregular and infrequent 44. PMID: 11772282. X-1, X-3, X-5
menstruation: enhancing patient compliance. Hum Reprod.
1996 Jul;11(7):1435-7. PMID: 8671482. X-3, X-5 1611. Wahab M, Thompson J, Al-Azzawi F. The
distribution of endometrial leukocytes and their
1601. Volkers NA, Hehenkamp WJ, Birnie E, et al. proliferation markers in trimegestone-treated
Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the postmenopausal women compared to the endometrium of
treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 2 years' outcome the natural cycle: A dose-ranging study. Human
from the randomized EMMY trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Reproduction. 1999;14(5):1201-6. PMID: 10325261. X-3,
2007 Jun;196(6):519 e1-11. PMID: 17547877. X-5, X-6, X-4, X-7
X-8, X-9
1612. Wahab M, Thompson J, Al-Azzawi F. The effect of
1602. von Holst T, Lang E, Winkler U, et al. Bleeding submucous fibroids on the dose-dependent modulation of
patterns in peri and postmenopausal women taking a uterine bleeding by trimegestone in postmenopausal
continuous combined regimen of estradiol with women treated with hormone replacement therapy. BJOG.
norethisterone acetate or a conventional sequential regimen 2000 Mar;107(3):329-34. PMID: 10740328. X-5, X-7
of conjugated equine estrogens with medrogestone.
Maturitas. 2002 Dec 10;43(4):265-75. PMID: 12468135. 1613. Wahab M, Thompson J, Whitehead M, et al. The
X-5, X-6, X-7 effect of a change in the dose of trimegestone on the pattern
of bleeding in estrogen-treated post-menopausal women: 6
1603. von Kesseru E, Aydinlik S, Etchepareborda JJ. month extension of a dose-ranging study. Hum Reprod.
Multicentred, phase III clinical trial of norethisterone 2002 May;17(5):1386-90. PMID: 11980769. X-4, X-5, X-7
enanthate 50 mg plus estradiol valerate 5 mg as a monthly
injectable contraceptive; final three-year report. 1614. Walberg JL, Johnston CS. Menstrual function and
Contraception. 1994 Oct;50(4):329-37. PMID: 7813221. eating behavior in female recreational weight lifters and
X-3, X-9 competitive body builders. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991
Jan;23(1):30-6. PMID: 1997810. X-3, X-4, X-5
1604. von Kesseru E, Aydinlik S, Etchepareborda JJ, et al.
A multicentred, two-year, phase III clinical trial of 1615. Walberg-Rankin J, Edmonds CE, Gwazdauskas FC.
norethisterone enanthate 50 mg plus estradiol valerate 5 mg Diet and weight changes of female bodybuilders before and
as a monthly injectable contraceptive. Contraception. 1991 after competition. Int J Sport Nutr. 1993 Mar;3(1):87-102.
Dec;44(6):589-98. PMID: 1773616. X-3, X-9 PMID: 8499941. X-3, X-5

1605. von Kesseru E, Etchepareborda JJ, Wikinski R, et al. 1616. Wang F, Shen X, Guo X, et al. Analgesic
Premenopause contraception with monthly injectable effectiveness of flurbiprofen axetil after uterine curettage
Mesigyna with special emphasis on serum lipid and bone on abortion: A randomized controlled trial. Acute Pain.
density patterns. Contraception. 2000 May;61(5):317-22. 2009;11(2):43-50. X-5
PMID: 10906502. X-4, X-5, X-6
1617. Wang HS, Wang TH, Soong YK. Low dose
1606. Von Seggern RL, Mannix LK, Adelman JU. flutamide in the treatment of acne vulgaris in women with
Rofecoxib in the Prevention of Perimenstrual Migraine: An or without oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea. Changgeng Yi
Open-Label Pilot Trial. Headache. 2004;44(2):160-5. Xue Za Zhi. 1999 Sep;22(3):423-32. PMID: 10584414. X-
PMID: 14756855. X-5 4, X-5, X-6, X-9

1607. Vorsanger GJ, Xiang J, Gana TJ, et al. Extended- 1618. Wang HS, Wang TH, Soong YK. Cyclic changes in
release tramadol (tramadol ER) in the treatment of chronic serum levels of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1
low back pain. Journal of Opioid Management. in women treated with clomiphene citrate and tamoxifen.
2008;4(2):87-97. PMID: 18557165. X-5 Gynecol Endocrinol. 2000 Aug;14(4):236-44. PMID:
11075292. X-4, X-5
1608. Vuorma S, Rissanen P, Aalto AM, et al. Impact of
patient information booklet on treatment decision - A 1619. Wang HS, Wang TH, Soong YK. Elevation of
randomized trial among women with heavy menstruation. insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 mRNA
Health Expectations. 2003;6(4):290-7. PMID: 15040791. expression following hormone replacement therapy. Hum
X-5 Reprod. 2000 Jan;15(1):50-4. PMID: 10611187. X-4, X-5,
X-7

K-76
1620. Wang IY, Russell P, Fraser IS. Endometrial 1631. Wasnich RD, Bagger YZ, Hosking DJ, et al.
morphometry in users of intrauterine contraceptive devices Changes in bone density and turnover after alendronate or
and women with ovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding: estrogen withdrawal. Menopause. 2004;11(6 I):622-30.
a comparison with normal endometrium. Contraception. PMID: 15545790. X-7
1995 Apr;51(4):243-8. PMID: 7796590. X-3, X-4
1632. Watson P, Besch N, Bowes WA, Jr. Management of
1621. Wang J, Zhang G, Shi H, et al. Dextran uterine acute and subacute puerperal inversion of the uterus. Obstet
artery embolization to treat fibroids. Chin Med J (Engl). Gynecol. 1980 Jan;55(1):12-6. PMID: 7352052. X-3, X-5,
2002 Aug;115(8):1132-6. PMID: 12215276. X-4, X-5, X- X-6
6, X-8
1633. Webb A, Shochet T, Bigrigg A, et al. Effect of
1622. Wang MC, Hsu MC, Chien LW, et al. Effects of hormonal emergency contraception on bleeding patterns.
auricular acupressure on menstrual symptoms and nitric Contraception. 2004 Feb;69(2):133-5. PMID: 14759618.
oxide for women with primary dysmenorrhea. Journal of X-4, X-5, X-9
Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2009;15(3):235-
42. PMID: 19292653. X-5 1634. Weeks AD, Duffy SR, Walker JJ. Uterine
ultrasonographic changes with gonadotropin-releasing
1623. Wang Y, Xu B, Dai S, et al. An efficient hormone agonists. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jan;180(1 Pt
conservative treatment modality for cervical pregnancy: 1):8-13. PMID: 9914569. X-4, X-5, X-8, X-9
angiographic uterine artery embolization followed by
immediate curettage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 1635. Weeks AD, Duffy SR, Walker JJ. A double-blind
Jan;204(1):31 e1-7. PMID: 20889136. X-4, X-5, X-9 randomised trial of leuprorelin acetate prior to
hysterectomy for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. BJOG.
1624. Warming L, Ravn P, Spielman D, et al. 2000 Mar;107(3):323-8. PMID: 10740327. X-5, X-8
Trimegestone in a low-dose, continuous-combined
hormone therapy regimen prevents bone loss in osteopenic 1636. Wegienka G, Baird DD. Potential bias due to
postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2004 May- excluding oral contraceptive users when estimating
Jun;11(3):337-42. PMID: 15167314. X-5, X-7 menstrual cycle characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Nov
15;158(10):947-50. PMID: 14607802. X-4, X-5, X-9
1625. Warner P. Preferences regarding treatments for
period problems: relationship to menstrual and 1637. Wehr E, Pieber TR, Obermayer-Pietsch B. Effect of
demographic factors. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 vitamin D3 treatment on glucose metabolism and menstrual
Jun;15(2):93-110. PMID: 7921011. X-3, X-5 frequency in polycystic ovary syndrome women: a pilot
study. J Endocrinol Invest. 2011 Nov;34(10):757-63.
1626. Warner P, Critchley HO, Lumsden MA, et al. PMID: 21613813. X-3, X-5
Referral for menstrual problems: cross sectional survey of
symptoms, reasons for referral, and management. BMJ. 1638. Weingrill CO, Mussio W, Moraes CR, et al. Long-
2001 Jul 7;323(7303):24-8. PMID: 11440940. X-4, X-5, X- acting oral bromocriptine (Parlodel SRO) in the treatment
9 of hyperprolactinemia. Fertil Steril. 1992 Feb;57(2):331-5.
PMID: 1735484. X-5, X-6
1627. Warner P, Guttinger A, Glasier AF, et al.
Randomized placebo-controlled trial of CDB-2914 in new 1639. Weinstein MC. Estrogen use in postmenopausal
users of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system women--costs, risks, and benefits. N Engl J Med. 1980 Aug
shows only short-lived amelioration of unscheduled 7;303(6):308-16. PMID: 6770270. X-1, X-3, X-7
bleeding. Hum Reprod. 2010 Feb;25(2):345-53. PMID:
19897857. X-4, X-5, X-9 1640. Weisberg E, Brache V, Alvarez F, et al. Clinical
performance and menstrual bleeding patterns with three
1628. Warren MP, Brooks-Gunn J, Fox RP, et al. dosage combinations of a Nestorone progestogen/ethinyl
Persistent osteopenia in ballet dancers with amenorrhea and estradiol contraceptive vaginal ring used on a bleeding-
delayed menarche despite hormone therapy: A longitudinal signaled regimen. Contraception. 2005 Jul;72(1):46-52.
study. Fertility and Sterility. 2003;80(2):398-404. PMID: PMID: 15964292. X-5, X-6, X-9, X-10
12909505. X-5
1641. Weisberg E, Croxatto HB, Findlay JK, et al. A
1629. Warren MP, Perlroth NE. The effects of intense randomized study of the effect of mifepristone alone or in
exercise on the female reproductive system. Journal of conjunction with ethinyl estradiol on ovarian function in
Endocrinology. 2001;170(1):3-11. PMID: 11431132. X-1, women using the etonogestrel-releasing subdermal implant,
X-3, X-5 Implanon(R). Contraception. 2011 Dec;84(6):600-8.
PMID: 22078189. X-4
1630. Wartenberg KE, Mayer SA. Reducing the risk of
ICH enlargement. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 1642. Weisberg E, Fraser IS, Lacarra M, et al. Efficacy,
2007;261(1-2):99-107. PMID: 17631908. X-5 bleeding patterns, and side effects of a 1-year contraceptive

K-77
vaginal ring. Contraception. 1999;59(5):311-8. PMID: 1653. Westphal LM, Polan ML, Trant AS. Double-blind,
10494485. X-3, X-9 placebo-controlled study of FertilityBlend: A nutritional
supplement for improving fertility in women. Clinical and
1643. Weisberg E, Fraser IS, Mishell Jr DR, et al. A Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;33(4):205-
comparative study of two contraceptive vaginal rings 8. PMID: 17211965. X-5
releasing norethindrone acetate and differing doses of
ethinyl estradiol. Contraception. 1999;59(5):305-10. PMID: 1654. White WB, Hanes V, Chauhan V, et al. Effects of a
10494484. X-3, X-9 new hormone therapy, drospirenone and 17-beta-estradiol,
in postmenopausal women with hypertension.
1644. Weisberg E, Hickey M, Palmer D, et al. A pilot Hypertension. 2006;48(2):246-53. PMID: 16801478. X-7
study to assess the effect of three short-term treatments on
frequent and/or prolonged bleeding compared to placebo in 1655. Wiegratz I, Stahlberg S, Manthey T, et al. Effect of
women using Implanon. Hum Reprod. 2006 Jan;21(1):295- extended-cycle regimen with an oral contraceptive
302. PMID: 16284061. X-5, X-6, X-9 containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and 2 mg dienogest on
bleeding patterns, safety, acceptance and contraceptive
1645. Weisberg E, Hickey M, Palmer D, et al. A efficacy. Contraception. 2011;84(2):133-43. PMID:
randomized controlled trial of treatment options for 21757054. X-9
troublesome uterine bleeding in Implanon users. Hum
Reprod. 2009 Aug;24(8):1852-61. PMID: 19369294. X-5, 1656. Wigington S. Depo-Provera: an injectable
X-6 contraceptive. Nurs Times. 1981 Oct 14-20;77(42):1794-8.
PMID: 6458020. X-1, X-3, X-5, X-10
1646. Weisberg M, Goldrath MH, Berman J, et al.
Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation using free heated saline 1657. Wijesinghe PS, Padumadasa GS, Palihawadana TS,
for the treatment of menorrhagia. J Am Assoc Gynecol et al. A trial of expectant management in incomplete
Laparosc. 2000 Aug;7(3):311-6. PMID: 10924623. X-4, X- miscarriage. Ceylon Med J. 2011 Mar;56(1):10-3. PMID:
5, X-8 21542427. X-5, X-9

1647. Weise HC, Fiedler K, Kato K. Buserelin suppression 1658. Wiklund I, Karlberg J, Mattsson LA. Quality of life
of endogenous gonadotropin secretion in infertile women of postmenopausal women on a regimen of transdermal
with ovarian feedback disorders given human estradiol therapy: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.
menopausal/human chorionic gonadotropin treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Mar;168(3 Pt 1):824-30.
Fertil Steril. 1988 Mar;49(3):399-403. PMID: 3125067. X- PMID: 8456888. X-7
3, X-5, X-10
1659. Wilansky DL, Greisman B. Early hypothyroidism in
1648. Welt CK, Chan JL, Bullen J, et al. Recombinant patients with menorrhagia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989
human leptin in women with hypothalamic amenorrhea. N Mar;160(3):673-7. PMID: 2929691. X-3, X-4, X-6
Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 2;351(10):987-97. PMID: 15342807.
X-4, X-5, X-9 1660. Wildemeersch D, Batar I, Affandi B, et al. The
'frameless' intrauterine system for long-term, reversible
1649. Wen J, Li Y, Wang L, et al. Comparative cost- contraception: A review of 15 years of clinical experience.
effectiveness of three intrauterine devices: A multi-center Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research.
randomized trial. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine. 2003;29(3):164-73. PMID: 12841701. X-1, X-3, X-5, X-9
2010;3(2):76-82. PMID: 21349048. X-5, X-9
1661. Wildemeersch D, Dhont M, Temmerman M, et al.
1650. Weng LJ, Xu D, Zheng HZ, et al. Clinical GyneFix-LNG: preliminary clinical experience with a
experience with triphasic oral contraceptive (Triquilar) in copper and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.
527 women in China. Contraception. 1991 Mar;43(3):263- Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1999 Mar;4(1):15-9.
71. PMID: 2036797. X-3, X-9 PMID: 10367191. X-4

1651. Westhoff C, Kaunitz AM, Korver T, et al. Efficacy, 1662. Wildemeersch D, Schacht E. Treatment of
safety, and tolerability of a monophasic oral contraceptive menorrhagia with a novel 'frameless' intrauterine
containing nomegestrol acetate and 17beta-estradiol: A levonorgestrel-releasing drug delivery system: a pilot
randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology. study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2001
2012 May;119(5):989-99. PMID: 2012235235. X-9 Jun;6(2):93-101. PMID: 11518454. X-3

1652. Westhoff C, Osborne LM, Schafer JE, et al. 1663. Wildemeersch D, Schacht E, Wildemeersch P.
Bleeding patterns after immediate initiation of an oral Contraception and treatment in the perimenopause with a
compared with a vaginal hormonal contraceptive. novel "frameless" intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing drug
Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005;106(1):89-96. PMID: delivery system: an extended pilot study. Contraception.
15994622. X-6, X-9 2002 Aug;66(2):93-9. PMID: 12204781. X-4, X-5, X-9

K-78
1664. Wildemeersch D, Schacht E, Wildemeersch P. 1675. Wollter-Svensson LO, Stadberg E, Andersson K, et
Performance and acceptability of intrauterine release of al. Intrauterine administration of levonorgestrel 5 and 10
levonorgestrel with a miniature delivery system for microg/24 hours in perimenopausal hormone replacement
hormonal substitution therapy, contraception and treatment therapy. A randomized clinical study during one year. Acta
in peri and postmenopausal women. Maturitas. 2003 Mar Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997 May;76(5):449-54. PMID:
28;44(3):237-45. PMID: 12648887. X-4 9197448. X-5, X-10

1665. Wildemeersch D, van der Pas H, Thiery M, et al. 1676. Wollter-Svensson LO, Stadberg E, Andersson K, et
The Copper-Fix (Cu-Fix): a new concept in IUD al. Intrauterine administration of levonorgestrel 5 and 10
technology. Adv Contracept. 1988 Sep;4(3):197-205. mug/24 hours in perimenopausal hormone replacement
PMID: 3071109. X-1, X-3, X-9 therapy. A randomized clinical study during one year. Acta
Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1997;76(5):449-
1666. Wilkens J, Chwalisz K, Han C, et al. Effects of the 54. PMID: 9197448. X-4, X-5
selective progesterone receptor modulator asoprisnil on
uterine artery blood flow, ovarian activity, and clinical 1677. Wong AYK, Tang L. An open and randomized
symptoms in patients with uterine leiomyomata scheduled study comparing the efficacy of standard danazol and
for hysterectomy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 modified triptorelin regimens for postoperative disease
Dec;93(12):4664-71. PMID: 18765509. X-4, X-5, X-6 management of moderate to severe endometriosis. Fertility
and Sterility. 2004;81(6):1522-7. PMID: 15193471. X-5,
1667. Williams DB, Voigt BJ, Fu YS, et al. Assessment of X-8
less than monthly progestin therapy in postmenopausal
women given estrogen replacement. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 1678. Wong RC, Bell RJ, Thunuguntla K, et al. Implanon
Nov;84(5):787-93. PMID: 7936513. X-7 users are less likely to be satisfied with their contraception
after 6 months than IUD users. Contraception. 2009
1668. Williams NI, Reed JL, Leidy HJ, et al. Estrogen and Nov;80(5):452-6. PMID: 19835719. X-4, X-5, X-9
progesterone exposure is reduced in response to energy
deficiency in women aged 25-40 years. Hum Reprod. 2010 1679. Wonodirekso S, Affandi B, Siregar B, et al.
Sep;25(9):2328-39. PMID: 20605898. X-3, X-5, X-10 Endometrial epithelial integrity and subepithelial reticular
fibre expression in progestin contraceptive acceptors. Hum
1669. Wimberly YH, Cotton S, Wanchick AM, et al. Reprod. 2000 Aug;15 Suppl 3:189-96. PMID: 11041235.
Attitudes and experiences with levonorgestrel 100 X-4, X-5
microg/ethinyl estradiol 20 microg among women during a
3-month trial. Contraception. 2002 Jun;65(6):403-6. PMID: 1680. Wood SL, Brain PH. Medical management of
12127637. X-4, X-5, X-9 missed abortion: a randomized clinical trial. Obstet
Gynecol. 2002 Apr;99(4):563-6. PMID: 12039111. X-5,
1670. Wing DA, Paul RH, Millar LK. Management of the X-9
symptomatic placenta previa: a randomized, controlled trial
of inpatient versus outpatient expectant management. Am J 1681. Woolley JA, Seleem S, Hills FA, et al. Raised
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;175(4 Pt 1):806-11. PMID: circulating levels of interleukin-6 in women with an
8885726. X-4, X-5, X-9 intrauterine contraceptive device. Gynecol Obstet Invest.
1996;42(4):241-3. PMID: 8979095. X-3, X-4, X-5
1671. Winkler UH. The effect of tranexamic acid on the
quality of life of women with heavy menstrual bleeding. 1682. Worthington-Kirsch RL, Popky GL, Hutchins FL,
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Dec 1;99(2):238- Jr. Uterine arterial embolization for the management of
43. PMID: 11788179. X-4 leiomyomas: quality-of-life assessment and clinical
response. Radiology. 1998 Sep;208(3):625-9. PMID:
1672. Winkler UH, Ferguson H, Mulders JAPA. Cycle 9722838. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8
control, quality of life and acne with two low-dose oral
contraceptives containing 20 mug ethinylestradiol. 1683. Wren BG, McFarland K, Edwards L, et al. Effect of
Contraception. 2004;69(6):469-76. PMID: 15157791. X-6, sequential transdermal progesterone cream on
X-9 endometrium, bleeding pattern, and plasma progesterone
and salivary progesterone levels in postmenopausal
1673. Witjaksono J, Lau TM, Affandi B, et al. Oestrogen women. Climacteric. 2000 Sep;3(3):155-60. PMID:
treatment for increased bleeding in Norplant users: 11910616. X-4, X-5, X-7
preliminary results. Hum Reprod. 1996 Oct;11 Suppl
2:109-14. PMID: 8982752. X-5, X-6 1684. Wright VC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, et al.
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United
1674. Wolfe BMJ, Koval JJ, Nisker JA. Impact on States, 2001. MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly
postmenopausal symptoms of adding continuous C-21 Report. 2004;53(SS-1):1-20. PMID: 15123982. X-3, X-5
versus C-19 progestin to estrogen. Maturitas.
1999;33(2):153-61. PMID: 10597880. X-7 1685. Wu S, Godfrey EM, Wojdyla D, et al. Copper
T380A intrauterine device for emergency contraception: a

K-79
prospective, multicentre, cohort clinical trial. BJOG. 2010 1696. Yarkoni S, Anteby SO. Treatment of IUD related
Sep;117(10):1205-10. PMID: 20618314. X-4, X-5 menorrhagia by indomethacin. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol.
1984;11(4):120-2. PMID: 6437699. X-5, X-6
1686. Wu YJJ, Luo SF, Yang SH, et al. Vascular response
of Raynaud's phenomenon to nifedipine or herbal 1697. Yasui T, Uemura H, Tezuka M, et al. Biological
medication (Duhuo-Tisheng Tang with Danggui-Sini effects of hormone replacement therapy in relation to serum
Tang): A preliminary study. Chang Gung Medical Journal. estradiol levels. Horm Res. 2001;56(1-2):38-44. PMID:
2008;31(5):492-502. PMID: 19097597. X-3, X-5 11815726. X-5, X-7

1687. Xiao B, Wu SC, Chong J, et al. Therapeutic effects 1698. Yeh LLL, Liu JY, Lin KS, et al. A randomised
of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the placebo-controlled trial of a traditional Chinese herbal
treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia. Fertil Steril. 2003 formula in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea. PLoS
Apr;79(4):963-9. PMID: 12749438. X-4 One. 2007;2(8)PMID: 17710126. X-5

1688. Xiao B, Zeng T, Wu S, et al. Effect of 1699. Yeshaya A, Orvieto R, Kauschansky A, et al. A
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device on hormonal delayed starting schedule of oral contraception: the effect
profile and menstrual pattern after long-term use. on the incidence of breakthrough bleeding and compliance
Contraception. 1995 Jun;51(6):359-65. PMID: 7554977. in women. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1996
X-3, X-4 Sep;1(3):263-5. PMID: 9678125. X-4, X-5, X-6

1689. Xiao BL, Zhang XL, Feng DD. Pharmacokinetic and 1700. Yildirim G, Tugrul S, Uslu H, et al. Effects of two
pharmacodynamic studies of vaginal rings releasing low- different regimens of continuous hormone replacement
dose levonorgestrel. Contraception. 1985 Nov;32(5):455- therapy on endometrial histopathology and postmenopausal
71. PMID: 3936678. X-3, X-9 uterine bleeding. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006
Feb;273(5):268-73. PMID: 16315025. X-5, X-7
1690. Xing S, Wu Y, Liu J, et al. A comparison of two
different dosages of conjugated equine estrogen in 1701. Yildizhan B, Yildizhan R, Ozkesici B, et al.
continuous combined hormone replacement therapy with Transvaginal ultrasonography and saline infusion
progestin. Chin Med J (Engl). 2003 Apr;116(4):584-7. sonohysterography for the detection of intra-uterine lesions
PMID: 12875727. X-5, X-7 in pre- and post-menopausal women with abnormal uterine
bleeding. J Int Med Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;36(6):1205-13.
1691. Yamashita Y, Harada M, Yamamoto H, et al. PMID: 19094428. X-4, X-5
Transcatheter arterial embolization of obstetric and
gynaecological bleeding: efficacy and clinical outcome. Br 1702. Yin M, Zhu P, Luo H, et al. The presence of mast
J Radiol. 1994 Jun;67(798):530-4. PMID: 8032805. X-3, cells in the human endometrium pre- and post-insertion of
X-6, X-8 intrauterine devices. Contraception. 1993 Sep;48(3):245-
54. PMID: 8222654. X-3, X-4
1692. Yang LC, Lan Y, Hu J, et al. Relatively high bone
mineral density in Chinese adolescent dancers despite 1703. Yingna S, Yang X, Xiuyu Y, et al. Clinical
lower energy intake and menstrual disorder. Biomed characteristics and treatment of gestational trophoblastic
Environ Sci. 2010 Apr;23(2):130-6. PMID: 20514988. X- tumor with vaginal metastasis. Gynecol Oncol. 2002
4, X-5, X-9 Mar;84(3):416-9. PMID: 11855880. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-9

1693. Yang TS, Liang WH, Chang SP, et al. Effects of 1704. Ylanen K, Laatikainen T, Lahteenmaki P, et al.
period-free hormone replacement therapy in Subdermal progestin implant (Nestorone) in the treatment
postmenopausal women in Taiwan. Chinese Medical of endometriosis: clinical response to various doses. Acta
Journal. 2002;65(1):23-8. PMID: 11939671. X-7 Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Feb;82(2):167-72. PMID:
12648180. X-4, X-5, X-8
1694. Yang TS, Tsan SH, Chen CR, et al. Evaluation of
conjugated estrogen plus medroxyprogesterone acetate 1705. Ylikorkala O, Pekonen F. Naproxen reduces
versus tibolone in early postmenopausal Chinese women. idiopathic but not fibromyoma-induced menorrhagia.
Chinese Medical Journal. 1999;62(5):308-15. PMID: Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Jul;68(1):10-2. PMID: 3523328. X-
10389286. X-7 3, X-5, X-6

1695. Yanushpolsky E, Hurwitz S, Greenberg L, et al. 1706. Ylikorkala O, Tiitinen A, Hulkko S, et al. Decrease
Patterns of luteal phase bleeding in in vitro fertilization in symptoms, blood loss and uterine size with nafarelin
cycles supplemented with Crinone vaginal gel and with acetate before abdominal hysterectomy: a placebo-
intramuscular progesterone--impact of luteal estrogen: controlled, double-blind study. Hum Reprod. 1995
prospective, randomized study and post hoc analysis. Fertil Jun;10(6):1470-4. PMID: 7593517. X-3, X-8
Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):617-20. PMID: 20537624. X-5, X-6,
X-9 1707. Ylikorkala O, Viinikka L. Comparison between
antifibrinolytic and antiprostaglandin treatment in the

K-80
reduction of increased menstrual blood loss in women with 1717. Zapico A, Grassa A, Martinez E, et al. Endometrial
intrauterine contraceptive devices. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. resection and preoperative LH-RH agonists: a prospective
1983 Jan;90(1):78-83. PMID: 6336951. X-5, X-6 5-year trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Mar
1;119(1):114-8. PMID: 15734095. X-4, X-5, X-6, X-8, X-9
1708. Ylikorkala O, Wahlstrom T, Caubel P, et al.
Intermittent progestin administration as part of hormone 1718. Zervou S, Klentzeris LD, Old RW. Nitric oxide
replacement therapy: long-term comparison between synthase expression and steroid regulation in the uterus of
estradiol 1 mg combined with intermittent norgestimate and women with menorrhagia. Mol Hum Reprod. 1999
estradiol 2 mg combined with constant norethisterone Nov;5(11):1048-54. PMID: 10541567. X-4, X-5
acetate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Jul;81(7):654-
60. PMID: 12190841. X-5, X-7 1719. Zhang HJ. 76 cases of hypomenorrhea treated by
acupuncture to regulate the menstrual cycle. J Tradit Chin
1709. Yong EL, Glasier A, Hillier H, et al. Effect of Med. 2009 Sep;29(3):177-8. PMID: 19894379. X-3, X-5,
cyclofenil on hormonal dynamics, follicular development X-10
and cervical mucus in normal and oligomenorrhoeic
women. Hum Reprod. 1992 Jan;7(1):39-43. PMID: 1720. Zhao G, Li M, Zhu P, et al. A preliminary
1551955. X-4, X-5 morphometric study on the endometrium from patients
treated with indomethacin-releasing copper intrauterine
1710. Yonkers KA, Brown C, Pearlstein TB, et al. device. Hum Reprod. 1997 Jul;12(7):1563-6. PMID:
Efficacy of a new low-dose oral contraceptive with 9262297. X-4, X-5, X-6
drospirenone in premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Obstet
Gynecol. 2005 Sep;106(3):492-501. PMID: 16135578. X- 1721. Zhao S, Choksuchat C, Zhao Y, et al. Effects of
5, X-9 doxycycline on serum and endometrial levels of MMP-2,
MMP-9 and TIMP-1 in women using a levonorgestrel-
1711. Youssef G, Maguid AA, El-Inany H. Progesterone releasing subcutaneous implant. Contraception. 2009
supplementation in clomiphene citrate treated anovulatory Jun;79(6):469-78. PMID: 19442784. X-4, X-5, X-9
patients with menstrual irregularities: A randomized
controlled trial. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 1722. Zheng SR, Zheng HM, Qian SZ, et al. A randomized
2000;5(3):209-12. X-5 multicenter study comparing the efficacy and bleeding
pattern of a single-rod (Implanon) and a six-capsule
1712. Yuan HN, Wang CY, Sze CW, et al. A randomized, (Norplant) hormonal contraceptive implant. Contraception.
crossover comparison of herbal medicine and 1999 Jul;60(1):1-8. PMID: 10549446. X-5, X-6
bromocriptine against risperidone-induced
hyperprolactinemia in patients with schizophrenia. J Clin 1723. Zheng SR, Zheng HM, Qian SZ, et al. A long-term
Psychopharmacol. 2008 Jun;28(3):264-370. PMID: study of the efficacy and acceptability of a single-rod
18480682. X-5, X-9 hormonal contraceptive implant (Implanon) in healthy
women in China. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care.
1713. Zachariae H, Abrams B, Bleehen SS, et al. 1999 Jun;4(2):85-93. PMID: 10427483. X-4, X-5
Conversion of psoriasis patients from the conventional
formulation of cyclosporin A to a new microemulsion 1724. Zheng XL, Lo LL. Studies on IUD-induced
formulation: a randomized, open, multicentre assessment of menorrhagia and increased synthesis of prostacyclin in
safety and tolerability. Dermatology. 1998;196(2):231-6. endometrium. J Tongji Med Univ. 1988;8(4):232-4. PMID:
PMID: 9568413. X-5, X-9 3150468. X-3, X-4, X-5, X-6

1714. Zafar S. Role of metformin in correcting 1725. Zhou L, Xiao B. Emergency contraception with
hyperinsulinemia, menstrual irregularity and anovulation in Multiload Cu-375 SL IUD: a multicenter clinical trial.
polycystic ovary syndrome. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. Contraception. 2001 Aug;64(2):107-12. PMID: 11704087.
2005 Oct-Dec;17(4):54-6. PMID: 16599037. X-4, X-5, X-9 X-4, X-5, X-9

1715. Zaidi J, Jacobs H, Campbell S, et al. Blood flow 1726. Zhu PD, Luo HZ, Xu RH, et al. The effect of
changes in the ovarian and uterine arteries in women with intrauterine devices, the stainless steel ring, the copper
polycystic ovary syndrome who respond to clomiphene T220, and releasing levonorgestrel, on the bleeding profile
citrate: correlation with serum hormone concentrations. and the morphological structure of the human
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Sep;12(3):188-96. endometrium--a comparative study of three IUDs. A
PMID: 9793191. X-3, X-4 morphometric study of 96 cases. Contraception. 1989
Oct;40(4):425-38. PMID: 2510968. X-3, X-4
1716. Zalel Y, Shulman A, Lidor A, et al. The local
progestational effect of the levonorgestrel-releasing 1727. Zhuang Y, Huang L. Uterine artery embolization
intrauterine system: a sonographic and Doppler flow study. compared with methotrexate for the management of
Hum Reprod. 2002 Nov;17(11):2878-80. PMID: 12407042. pregnancy implanted within a cesarean scar. Am J Obstet
X-4, X-5, X-6 Gynecol. 2009 Aug;201(2):152 e1-3. PMID: 19527897. X-
5, X-9

K-81
Fertility and Sterility. 2004;82(5):1303-8. PMID:
1728. Ziaei S, Rajaei L, Faghihzadeh S, et al. Comparative 15533351. X-5, X-6, X-10
study and evaluation of side effects of low-dose
contraceptive pills administered by the oral and vaginal 1732. Zupi E, Sbracia M, Marconi D, et al. TNFalpha
route. Contraception. 2002 May;65(5):329-31. PMID: expression in hyperplastic endometrium. Am J Reprod
12057783. X-4, X-5 Immunol. 2000 Sep;44(3):153-9. PMID: 11028902. X-4,
X-5
1729. Zulian E, Sartorato P, Benedini S, et al.
Spironolactone in the treatment of polycystic ovary 1733. Zwart JJ, Yazdani ST, Harvey MS, et al.
syndrome: effects on clinical features, insulin sensitivity Underreporting of major obstetric haemorrhage in the
and lipid profile. J Endocrinol Invest. 2005 Jan;28(1):49- Netherlands. Transfus Med. 2010 Apr;20(2):118-22.
53. PMID: 15816371. X-4, X-5, X-9 PMID: 19708894. X-4, X-5, X-9

1730. Zupi E, Luciano AA, Marconi D, et al. The use of 1734. Lukes AS, Freeman EW, Van Drie D, et al. Safety
topical anesthesia in diagnostic hysteroscopy and of tranexamic acid in women with heavy menstrual
endometrial biopsy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994 bleeding: an open-label extension study. Womens Health
May;1(3):249-52. PMID: 9050495. X-4, X-8 (Lond Engl). 2011 Sep;7(5):591-8. PMID: 21879827. X-3

1731. Zupi E, Marconi D, Sbracia M, et al. Add-back


therapy in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain.

K-82
Appendix L. Reasons for Exclusion (KQ2)
Exclusion
Exclusion reason Count
code

Not original research (e.g. review articles, systematic reviews, editorials,


X-1 104
commentaries, letters to editor, etc.).
X-2 Does not include data from a population of 1600 or more. 1916
Reporting of harms is from a general population or reporting of harms is not an
X-3 913
objective of the paper/study.
Does not report harms data for a selected intervention included in KQ1 (i.e., LNG-
X-4 2044
IUS; progestogen; tranexamic acid; cabergoline; ethamsylate; exenatide; metformin).
Study is basic science, anatomy, imaging, prevalence, physiology, diagnostic,
X-5 4
biomarker, or biological mechanism study only.
X-6 Study of men only. 17
Study population consists of post-menopausal women or a population aged over 65
X-7 101
years.
X-8 Other 26
X-11 Unable to obtain 4
X-12 Duplicate 0

L-1
References

1. Tranexamic acid. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 1987 Sep 12. Venous thrombosis with cyproterone. Prescrire Int.
25;29(749):89-90. PMID: 3626975. X-1 2002 Aug;11(60):116. PMID: 12199266. X-1

2. Epithelial ovarian cancer and combined oral 13. Coxibs: no better than other NSAIDS. Prescrire Int.
contraceptives. The WHO Collaborative Study of 2004 Dec;13(74):226. PMID: 15612145. X-1
Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives. Int J Epidemiol.
1989 Sep;18(3):538-45. PMID: 2807655. X-4 14. Analysis and recommendations for agency action
regarding nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and
3. Breast cancer and combined oral contraceptives: results cardiovascular risk. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother.
from a multinational study. The WHO Collaborative Study 2005;19(4):83-97. PMID: 16431839. X-1
of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives. Br J Cancer. 1990
Jan;61(1):110-9. PMID: 2404507. X-4 15. Drug-induced male infertility. Prescrire Int. 2007
Feb;16(87):22. PMID: 17323530. X-4, X-6
4. Single dose cabergoline versus bromocriptine in
inhibition of puerperal lactation: randomised, double blind, 16. Drospirenone: high risk of venous thrombosis.
multicentre study. European Multicentre Study Group for Prescrire Int. 2011 Feb;20(113):43-5. PMID: 21488592.
Cabergoline in Lactation Inhibition. BMJ. 1991 Jun X-1
8;302(6789):1367-71. PMID: 1676318. X-2
17. Aabakken L, Weberg R, Lygren I, et al.;
5. Comparison of two androgens plus depot- Gastrointestinal bleeding: dyspeptic symptoms and clinical
medroxyprogesterone acetate for suppression to course in relation to use of non-steroidal antiinflammatory
azoospermia in indonesian men. World Health drugs. Scand J Rheumatol. 1991;20(5):366-9. PMID:
Organization. Task Force on Methods for the Regulation of 1947900. X-2
Male Fertility. Fertil Steril. 1993 Dec;60(6):1062-8. PMID:
8243687. X-2, X-3, X-4 18. Aabakken L, Weberg R, Lygren I, et al.;
Gastrointestinal bleeding associated with the use of non-
6. History of long-term use of depot-medroxyprogesterone steroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs--symptomatology and
acetate in patients with cervical dysplasia; case-control clinical course. Agents Actions. 1992;Spec No:C86-7.
analysis nested in a cohort study. The New Zealand PMID: 1442342. X-2, X-4
Contraception and Health Study Group. Contraception.
1994 Nov;50(5):443-9. PMID: 7859453. X-8 19. Aalykke C, Lauritsen JM, Hallas J, et al.; Helicobacter
pylori and risk of ulcer bleeding among users of
7. Effect of different progestagens in low oestrogen oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a case-control study.
contraceptives on venous thromboembolic disease. World Gastroenterology. 1999 Jun;116(6):1305-9. PMID:
Health Organization Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular 10348813. X-2, X-3, X-4
Disease and Steroid Hormone Contraception. Lancet. 1995
Dec 16;346(8990):1582-8. PMID: 7500749. X-4 20. Aarsand AK, Carlsen SM; Folate administration
reduces circulating homocysteine levels in NIDDM patients
8. Haemorrhagic stroke, overall stroke risk, and combined on long-term metformin treatment. J Intern Med. 1998
oral contraceptives: results of an international, multicentre, Aug;244(2):169-74. PMID: 10095804. X-2, X-3, X-4
case-control study. WHO Collaborative Study of
Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone 21. Abbasi AA, Kasmikha R, Sotingeanu DG; Metformin-
Contraception. Lancet. 1996 Aug 24;348(9026):505-10. induced lacticacidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes
PMID: 8757152. X-4 mellitus. Endocr Pract. 2000 Nov-Dec;6(6):442-6. PMID:
11155215. X-2
9. Long-term reversible contraception. Twelve years of
experience with the TCu380A and TCu220C. 22. Abbasi S, Gerdes JS, Sehdev HM, et al.; Neonatal
Contraception. 1997 Dec;56(6):341-52. PMID: 9494767. outcome after exposure to indomethacin in utero: a
X-2, X-4 retrospective case cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003
Sep;189(3):782-5. PMID: 14526313. X-2, X-4
10. Premature closure of the fetal ductus arteriosus after
maternal use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. 23. Abdala C; Effects of aspirin on distortion product
Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee. Med J Aust. otoacoustic emission suppression in human adults: a
1998 Sep 7;169(5):270-1. PMID: 9762067. X-2 comparison with neonatal data. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005
Sep;118(3 Pt 1):1566-75. PMID: 16240817. X-4
11. Are adult drugs cool for kids? Diabetes Obes Metab.
2001 Oct;3(5):383. PMID: 11710340. X-1 24. Abid S, Mumtaz K, Jafri W, et al.; Pill-induced
esophageal injury: endoscopic features and clinical

L-2
outcomes. Endoscopy. 2005 Aug;37(8):740-4. PMID: anti-inflammatory drugs. J R Soc Med. 2001
16032493. X-2 Oct;94(10):512-4. PMID: 11581344. X-2

25. Abraham NS, Castillo DL, Hartman C; National 36. Affandi B, Santoso SS, Djajadilaga, et al.; Five-year
mortality following upper gastrointestinal or cardiovascular experience with Norplant. Contraception. 1987
events in older veterans with recent nonsteroidal anti- Oct;36(4):417-28. PMID: 3127111. X-2, X-3, X-4
inflammatory drug use. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008
Jul;28(1):97-106. PMID: 18397385. X-4, X-7 37. Agrawal A, Gerson CR, Seligman I, et al.;
Postoperative hemorrhage after tonsillectomy: use of
26. Abraham NS, Cohen DC, Rivers B, et al.; Validation ketorolac tromethamine. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
of administrative data used for the diagnosis of upper 1999 Mar;120(3):335-9. PMID: 10064634. X-2, X-4
gastrointestinal events following nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory drug prescription. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 38. Agrawal NM, Patel R, Mahatma M, et al.;
2006 Jul 15;24(2):299-306. PMID: 16842456. X-2, X-3, X- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acute upper
4 gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective study. J Assoc Acad
Minor Phys. 1991;2(2):64-6. PMID: 1810582. X-2
27. Abraham NS, Hartman C, Hasche J; Reduced
hospitalization cost for upper gastrointestinal events that 39. Agrawal NM, Roth S, Graham DY, et al.; Misoprostol
occur among elderly veterans who are gastroprotected. Clin compared with sucralfate in the prevention of nonsteroidal
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Apr;8(4):350-6; quiz e45. anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastric ulcer. A
PMID: 20096378. X-4, X-7 randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Aug
1;115(3):195-200. PMID: 1905501. X-2, X-3, X-4
28. Abraham S, Luscombe G, Soo I; Oral contraception
and cyclic changes in premenstrual and menstrual 40. Aguas M, Pons M, Barrera N, et al.; Prevention of
experiences. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs-induced gastropathy:
Sep;24(3):185-93. PMID: 14584305. X-2, X-3, X-4 follow up of protocol adherence. Rev Esp Enferm Dig.
2002 Nov;94(11):679-86. PMID: 12690991. X-2
29. Abramov Y, Borik S, Yahalom C, et al.; Does
postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy affect 41. Aguilar C, Reza A, Garcia JE, et al.; Biguanide related
intraocular pressure? J Glaucoma. 2005 Aug;14(4):271-5. lactic acidosis: incidence and risk factors. Arch Med Res.
PMID: 15990606. X-2, X-4 1992 Spring;23(1):19-24. PMID: 1308787. X-2, X-4

30. Abs R, Verhelst J, Maiter D, et al.; Cabergoline in the 42. Ahmed YI, Azeem S, Khan O, et al.; Stevens Johnson
treatment of acromegaly: a study in 64 patients. J Clin syndrome in Pakistan: a ten-year survey. J Pak Med Assoc.
Endocrinol Metab. 1998 Feb;83(2):374-8. PMID: 9467544. 2004 Jun;54(6):312-5. PMID: 15366796. X-2, X-4
X-2
43. Ahsberg K, Hoglund P, Kim WH, et al.; Impact of
31. Acharya M, Dunning J; Does the use of non-steroidal aspirin, NSAIDs, warfarin, corticosteroids and SSRIs on
anti-inflammatory drugs after cardiac surgery increase the the site and outcome of non-variceal upper and lower
risk of renal failure? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 gastrointestinal bleeding. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010
Oct;11(4):461-7. PMID: 20639308. X-2, X-4 Dec;45(12):1404-15. PMID: 20695720. X-2, X-4

32. Achkar JP, Al-Haddad M, Lashner B, et al.; 44. Ahsberg K, Hoglund P, Stael von Holstein C;
Differentiating risk factors for acute and chronic pouchitis. Mortality from peptic ulcer bleeding: the impact of
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jan;3(1):60-6. PMID: comorbidity and the use of drugs that promote bleeding.
15645406. X-2, X-3 Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Sep;32(6):801-10. PMID:
20653635. X-2, X-4
33. Adams HP, Jr., Nibbelink DW, Torner JC, et al.;
Antifibrinolytic therapy in patients with aneurysmal 45. AinMelk Y; Comparison of two continuous combined
subarachnoid hemorrhage. A report of the cooperative estrogen progestogen regimens in postmenopausal women:
aneurysm study. Arch Neurol. 1981 Jan;38(1):25-9. PMID: a randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 1996 Dec;66(6):962-8.
7458720. X-2, X-3, X-4 PMID: 8941062. X-2, X-4

34. Adeyemi AS, Adekanle DA; Progestogen-only 46. Aisien AO; Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD):
injectable contraceptive: experience of women in Osogbo, acceptability and effectiveness in a tertiary institution. Afr J
southwestern Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2012 Jan- Med Med Sci. 2007 Sep;36(3):193-200. PMID: 18390056.
Mar;11(1):27-31. PMID: 22199044. X-2 X-4

35. Adhiyaman V, Asghar M, Oke A, et al.; 47. Aisien AO, Enosolease ME; Haemostatic function in
Nephrotoxicity in the elderly due to co-prescription of Norplant (levonorgestrel) users: a 3-year prospective
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and nonsteroidal experience in Benin-City, Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J.
2009 Jun;16(2):126-31. PMID: 19606192. X-2

L-3
and NSAID use. Endoscopy. 1996 Feb;28(2):229-33.
48. Aisien AO, Enosolease ME, Shobowale MO; PMID: 8739738. X-2
Evaluation of haemostatic function in Nigerian Norplant
acceptors after 12 months of use. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 61. Al-Azzam SI, AlMahasneh F, Mhaidat N, et al.;
May;25(4):377-81. PMID: 16091325. X-2, X-3, X-4 Prophylactic use of aspirin does not induce anaemia among
adults. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2010 Aug;35(4):415-9. PMID:
49. Aisien AO, Sagay AS, Imade GE, et al.; Changes in 20853549. X-4
menstrual and haematological indices among Norplant
acceptors. Contraception. 2000 Apr;61(4):283-6. PMID: 62. Albengres E; Features of the French postmarketing
10899486. X-4 drug surveillance system. Application to cutaneous effects
of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. J Rheumatol
50. Aithal PG, Day CP; The natural history of Suppl. 1988 Oct;17:20-3. PMID: 3204616. X-1, X-2, X-3,
histologically proved drug induced liver disease. Gut. 1999 X-4
May;44(5):731-5. PMID: 10205214. X-2, X-3, X-4
63. Albu S, Tomescu E, Mexca Z, et al.; Recurrence rates
51. Aizen E, Kagan G, Assy B, et al.; Effect of non- in endonasal surgery for polyposis. Acta Otorhinolaryngol
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on natural killer cell Belg. 2004;58(1):79-86. PMID: 15517841. X-2
activity in patients with dementia. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005
Feb;7(2):78-81. PMID: 15729955. X-2, X-3, X-4 64. Aldoori WH, Giovannucci EL, Rimm EB, et al.; Use
of acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
52. Akhtar AJ, Shaheen M; Upper gastrointestinal toxicity drugs: a prospective study and the risk of symptomatic
of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in African- diverticular disease in men. Arch Fam Med. 1998 May-
American and Hispanic elderly patients. Ethn Dis. 2003 Jun;7(3):255-60. PMID: 9596460. X-6
Fall;13(4):528-33. PMID: 14632273. X-2
65. Aldrete JA; Epidural injections of indomethacin for
53. Akhtar AJ, Shaheen MA; For the patient. Treating postlaminectomy syndrome: a preliminary report. Anesth
pain without causing complications. Ethn Dis. 2003 Analg. 2003 Feb;96(2):463-8, table of contents. PMID:
Fall;13(4):550. PMID: 14632282. X-1 12538197. X-2, X-4

54. Akima S, Kent A, Reynolds GJ, et al.; Indomethacin 66. Aldrink JH, Ma M, Wang W, et al.; Safety of
and renal impairment in neonates. Pediatr Nephrol. 2004 ketorolac in surgical neonates and infants 0 to 3 months
May;19(5):490-3. PMID: 15007713. X-4 old. J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Jun;46(6):1081-5. PMID:
21683202. X-2, X-4
55. Akre K, Ekstrom AM, Signorello LB, et al.; Aspirin
and risk for gastric cancer: a population-based case-control 67. Alexandersen P, Byrjalsen I, Christiansen C;
study in Sweden. Br J Cancer. 2001 Apr 6;84(7):965-8. Piperazine oestrone sulphate and interrupted norethisterone
PMID: 11286478. X-4 in postmenopausal women: effects on bone mass,
lipoprotein metabolism, climacteric symptoms, and adverse
56. Akyol-Salman I, Lece-Sertoz D, Baykal O; Topical effects. BJOG. 2000 Mar;107(3):356-64. PMID: 10740332.
pranoprofen 0.1% is as effective anti-inflammatory and X-2, X-4
analgesic agent as diclofenac sodium 0.1% after strabismus
surgery. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jun;23(3):280-3. 68. Alexandersen P, Haarbo J, Christiansen C; Impact of
PMID: 17593012. X-2, X-3, X-4 combined hormone replacement therapy on serum lipid
metabolism: new aspects. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1997
57. al-Alaiyan S, Seshia MM, Casiro OG; Aug;11(4):281-8. PMID: 9272426. X-2, X-4
Neurodevelopmental outcome of infants exposed to
indomethacin antenatally. J Perinat Med. 1996;24(4):405- 69. Alexandersen P, Riis BJ, Christiansen C;
11. PMID: 8880639. X-2, X-4 Monofluorophosphate combined with hormone
replacement therapy induces a synergistic effect on bone
58. Alam S, Purdie DM, Johnson AG; Evaluation of the mass by dissociating bone formation and resorption in
potential interaction between NaCl and prostaglandin postmenopausal women: a randomized study. J Clin
inhibition in elderly individuals with isolated systolic Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Sep;84(9):3013-20. PMID:
hypertension. J Hypertens. 1999 Aug;17(8):1195-202. 10487657. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 10466476. X-2, X-3, X-4
70. Alexopoulou A, Dourakis SP, Mantzoukis D, et al.;
59. Al-Amro SA, Al-Kharfi TM, Thabit AA, et al.; Risk Adverse drug reactions as a cause of hospital admissions: a
factors for acute retinopathy of prematurity. Ann 6-month experience in a single center in Greece. Eur J
Ophthalmol (Skokie). 2007 Spring;39(2):107-11. PMID: Intern Med. 2008 Nov;19(7):505-10. PMID: 19013378. X-
17984498. X-2, X-4 2

60. al-Assi MT, Genta RM, Karttunen TJ, et al.; Ulcer site 71. Aljadhey H, Tu W, Hansen RA, et al.; Risk of
and complications: relation to Helicobacter pylori infection hyperkalemia associated with selective COX-2 inhibitors.

L-4
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Nov;19(11):1194-8. 83. Amar YG, Frenkiel S, Sobol SE; Outcome analysis of
PMID: 20842761. X-2, X-4 endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic sinusitis in patients
having Samter's triad. J Otolaryngol. 2000 Feb;29(1):7-12.
72. Allen B, Edwards IR; A safety profile of controlled PMID: 10709165. X-2, X-3, X-4
release naproxen tablets. N Z Med J. 1989 Jun
28;102(870):310-2. PMID: 2662065. X-2, X-4 84. Ambegaonkar A, Livengood K, Craig T, et al.;
Predicting the risk for gastrointestinal toxicity in patients
73. Allen LaPointe NM, Kramer JM, DeLong ER, et al.; taking NSAIDs: the Gastrointestinal Toxicity Survey. Adv
Patient-reported frequency of taking aspirin in a population Ther. 2004 Sep-Oct;21(5):288-300. PMID: 15727398. X-2
with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2002 May
1;89(9):1042-6. PMID: 11988192. X-3, X-4 85. Amin SB, Kamaluddeen M, Sangem M;
Neurodevelopmental outcome of premature infants after
74. Allonen H, Luukkainen T, Nielsen NC, et al.; Factors exposure to antenatal indomethacin. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
affecting the clinical performance of Nova T and Copper T 2008 Jul;199(1):41 e1-8. PMID: 18455131. X-2, X-4
200. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Oct;64(4):524-9. PMID:
6384847. X-3, X-4 86. Andersch B, Milsom I, Rybo G; An objective
evaluation of flurbiprofen and tranexamic acid in the
75. Allred J, Wong W, Kafetz K; Elderly people taking treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia. Acta Obstet Gynecol
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are unlikely to have Scand. 1988;67(7):645-8. PMID: 3073625. X-2
excess renal impairment. Postgrad Med J. 1989
Oct;65(768):735-7. PMID: 2616399. X-2, X-4 87. Andersen H, Jacobsen BB, Kastrup KW, et al.;
Treatment of girls with excessive height prediction.
76. al-Momen AK, al-Meshari A, al-Nuaim L, et al.; Follow-up of forty girls treated with intramuscular estradiol
Intravenous iron sucrose complex in the treatment of iron and progesterone. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1980
deficiency anemia during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol May;69(3):293-7. PMID: 7376855. X-2, X-3, X-4
Reprod Biol. 1996 Nov;69(2):121-4. PMID: 8902444. X-2,
X-4 88. Andersen V, Ostergaard M, Christensen J, et al.;
Polymorphisms in the xenobiotic transporter Multidrug
77. Alobid I, Benitez P, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, et al.; The Resistance 1 (MDR1) and interaction with meat intake in
impact of asthma and aspirin sensitivity on quality of life of relation to risk of colorectal cancer in a Danish prospective
patients with nasal polyposis. Qual Life Res. 2005 case-cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:407. PMID:
Apr;14(3):789-93. PMID: 16022071. X-2, X-3, X-4 19930591. X-2, X-3

78. Alsheikh-Ali AA, Abourjaily HM, Karas RH; Risk of 89. Andersohn F, Schade R, Suissa S, et al.;
adverse events with concomitant use of atorvastatin or Cyclooxygenase-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
simvastatin and glucose-lowering drugs drugs and the risk of ischemic stroke: a nested case-control
(thiazolidinediones, metformin, sulfonylurea, insulin, and study. Stroke. 2006 Jul;37(7):1725-30. PMID: 16728684.
acarbose). Am J Cardiol. 2002 Jun 1;89(11):1308-10. X-4
PMID: 12031736. X-4
90. Andersohn F, Suissa S, Garbe E; Use of first- and
79. Alvares JF, Kulkarni SG, Bhatia SJ, et al.; Prospective second-generation cyclooxygenase-2-selective nonsteroidal
evaluation of medication-induced esophageal injury and its antiinflammatory drugs and risk of acute myocardial
relation to esophageal function. Indian J Gastroenterol. infarction. Circulation. 2006 Apr 25;113(16):1950-7.
1999 Jul-Sep;18(3):115-7. PMID: 10407565. X-2, X-4 PMID: 16618816. X-4

80. Alvarez C, Marti-Bonmati L, Novella-Maestre E, et al.; 91. Anderson GL, Chlebowski RT, Rossouw JE, et al.;
Dopamine agonist cabergoline reduces hemoconcentration Prior hormone therapy and breast cancer risk in the
and ascites in hyperstimulated women undergoing assisted Women's Health Initiative randomized trial of estrogen plus
reproduction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 progestin. Maturitas. 2006 Sep 20;55(2):103-15. PMID:
Aug;92(8):2931-7. PMID: 17456571. X-2 16815651. X-7

81. Alvarez F, Brache V, Tejada AS, et al.; Sex hormone 92. Anderson M, Bedi SS, Boston PF, et al.; A long-term
binding globulin and free levonorgestrel index in the first study of flurbiprofen sustained-release. Br J Clin Pract.
week after insertion of Norplant implants. Contraception. 1988 Jan;42(1 Suppl):15-8. PMID: 3196643. X-2
1998 Oct;58(4):211-4. PMID: 9866001. X-2, X-3, X-4
93. Andersson K, Batar I, Rybo G; Return to fertility after
82. Alvarez-Sanchez F, Brache V, Thevenin F, et al.; removal of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device
Hormonal treatment for bleeding irregularities in Norplant and Nova-T. Contraception. 1992 Dec;46(6):575-84.
implant users. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Mar;174(3):919- PMID: 1493717. X-2, X-4
22. PMID: 8633669. X-2, X-3, X-4
94. Andolsek KM, Burkman RT, Jr., Kafrissen ME, et al.;
Metabolic effects and efficacy of a triphasic oral

L-5
contraceptive (norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol). Int J Fertil Fertil Steril. 2001 Jun;75(6):1080-7. PMID: 11384630. X-
Menopausal Stud. 1993;38 Suppl 3:122-5. PMID: 8260970. 7
X-11
106. Archer DF, Dorin MH, Heine W, et al.; Uterine
95. Andolsek L, Kovacic J, Kozuh M, et al.; Influence of bleeding in postmenopausal women on continuous therapy
oral contraceptives on the incidence of premalignant and with estradiol and norethindrone acetate. Endometrium
malignant lesions of the cervix. Contraception. 1983 Study Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Sep;94(3):323-9.
Dec;28(6):505-19. PMID: 6673904. X-4 PMID: 10472853. X-2, X-4

96. Andrade P, Brinca A, Goncalo M; Patch testing in 107. Archer DF, Furst K, Tipping D, et al.; A randomized
fixed drug eruptions--a 20-year review. Contact Dermatitis. comparison of continuous combined transdermal delivery
2011 Oct;65(4):195-201. PMID: 21702758. X-2 of estradiol-norethindrone acetate and estradiol alone for
menopause. CombiPatch Study Group. Obstet Gynecol.
97. Andriessen P, Struis NC, Niemarkt H, et al.; 1999 Oct;94(4):498-503. PMID: 10511348. X-2, X-4
Furosemide in preterm infants treated with indomethacin
for patent ductus arteriosus. Acta Paediatr. 2009 108. Archer DF, Philput CA, Weber ME; Management of
May;98(5):797-803. PMID: 19187396. X-2, X-3, X-4 irregular uterine bleeding and spotting associated with
Norplant. Hum Reprod. 1996 Oct;11 Suppl 2:24-30. PMID:
98. Anker SD, Comin Colet J, Filippatos G, et al.; Ferric 8982742. X-2, X-4
carboxymaltose in patients with heart failure and iron
deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 17;361(25):2436-48. 109. Archer DF, Pickar JH; Hormone replacement
PMID: 19920054. X-2, X-3, X-4 therapy: effect of progestin dose and time since menopause
on endometrial bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2000
99. Anstee P, Kovacs GT; A prospective randomized Dec;96(6):899-905. PMID: 11084175. X-4, X-7
study comparing the clinical effects of a norethisterone and
a levonorgestrel containing low dose oestrogen oral 110. Archer DF, Pickar JH, Bottiglioni F; Bleeding
contraceptive pills. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 patterns in postmenopausal women taking continuous
Feb;33(1):81-3. PMID: 8498949. X-2 combined or sequential regimens of conjugated estrogens
with medroxyprogesterone acetate. Menopause Study
100. Anthuber S, Schramm GA, Heskamp ML; Six-month Group. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;83(5 Pt 1):686-92.
evaluation of the benefits of the low-dose combined oral PMID: 8164926. X-7
contraceptive chlormadinone acetate 2 mg/ethinylestradiol
0.03 mg in young women: results of the prospective, 111. Archimandritis A, Tzivras M, Sougioultzis S, et al.;
observational, non-interventional, multicentre TeeNIS Rapid urease test is less sensitive than histology in
study. Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(4):211-20. PMID: diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with
20225905. X-4 non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 Apr;15(4):369-73. PMID:
101. Antonucci R, Cuzzolin L, Arceri A, et al.; Changes 10824879. X-2, X-3, X-4
in urinary PGE2 after ibuprofen treatment in preterm
infants with patent ductus arteriosus. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 112. Ardizzone S, Maconi G, Russo A, et al.; Randomised
2009 Mar;65(3):223-30. PMID: 19048246. X-2, X-4 controlled trial of azathioprine and 5-aminosalicylic acid
for treatment of steroid dependent ulcerative colitis. Gut.
102. Anwar M; An evaluation of IUD insertion by a non- 2006 Jan;55(1):47-53. PMID: 15972298. X-2, X-3, X-4
clinical delivery system. Adv Contracept. 1992
Dec;8(4):303-12. PMID: 1290332. X-2 113. Arellano FM, Yood MU, Wentworth CE, et al.; Use
of cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors (COX-2) and prescription
103. Araujo E, Jr., Bernardini L, Frederick JL, et al.; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) in UK
Prospective randomized comparison of human chorionic and USA populations. Implications for COX-2
gonadotropin versus intramuscular progesterone for luteal- cardiovascular profile. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006
phase support in assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Dec;15(12):861-72. PMID: 17086563. X-4
Genet. 1994 Feb;11(2):74-8. PMID: 7819706. X-2, X-4
114. Argina H, Lukman HY; Norplant implants in
104. Arboleya LR, de la Figuera E, Soledad Garcia M, et Ethiopia. East Afr Med J. 1997 Apr;74(4):258-62. PMID:
al.; Experience of rofecoxib in patients with osteoarthritis 9299831. X-2, X-3, X-4
previously treated with traditional non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs in Spain: results of phase 2 of the 115. Armero C, Garcia-Donato G, Lopez-Quilez A;
VICOXX study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(4):288-97. Bayesian methods in cost-effectiveness studies: objectivity,
PMID: 12841921. X-2, X-3, X-4 computation and other relevant aspects. Health Econ. 2010
Jun;19(6):629-43. PMID: 19424994. X-1, X-2
105. Archer DF, Dorin M, Lewis V, et al.; Effects of
lower doses of conjugated equine estrogens and 116. Armstrong D, Arnold R, Classen M, et al.;
medroxyprogesterone acetate on endometrial bleeding. Prospective multicentre study of risk factors associated

L-6
with delayed healing of recurrent duodenal ulcers 127. Ashworth NL, Peloso PM, Muhajarine N, et al.; Risk
(RUDER). RUDER Study Group. Gut. 1993 of hospitalization with peptic ulcer disease or
Oct;34(10):1319-26. PMID: 8244095. X-4 gastrointestinal hemorrhage associated with nabumetone,
Arthrotec, diclofenac, and naproxen in a population based
117. Armstrong D, Blum AL, Arnold R, et al.; RUDER: cohort study. J Rheumatol. 2005 Nov;32(11):2212-7.
interim evaluation of a 2-year, multicentre study of risk PMID: 16265705. X-4
factors for duodenal ulcer relapse. Z Gastroenterol Verh.
1991 Mar;26:171-2. PMID: 1714137. X-4 128. Aslam N, Blunt S, Latthe P; Effectiveness and
tolerability of levonorgestrel intrauterine system in
118. Arnolds S, Dellweg S, Clair J, et al.; Further adolescents. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(5):489-91. PMID:
improvement in postprandial glucose control with addition 20604653. X-2, X-4
of exenatide or sitagliptin to combination therapy with
insulin glargine and metformin: a proof-of-concept study. 129. Asscheman H, Giltay EJ, Megens JA, et al.; A long-
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jul;33(7):1509-15. PMID: 20357372. term follow-up study of mortality in transsexuals receiving
X-2, X-3, X-4 treatment with cross-sex hormones. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011
Apr;164(4):635-42. PMID: 21266549. X-2
119. Arowojolu AO, Ladipo OA; Nonmenstrual adverse
events associated with subdermal contraceptive implants 130. Attanasio R, Baldelli R, Pivonello R, et al.;
containing normegestrel and levonorgestrel. Afr J Med Lanreotide 60 mg, a new long-acting formulation:
Med Sci. 2003 Mar;32(1):27-31. PMID: 15030062. X-2, effectiveness in the chronic treatment of acromegaly. J Clin
X-4 Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Nov;88(11):5258-65. PMID:
14602759. X-2, X-3, X-4
120. Arowojolu AO, Okewole IA; Vaginal bleeding
following the use of a single dose of 1.5mg levonorgestrel 131. Atteritano M, Marini H, Minutoli L, et al.; Effects of
(LNG) for emergency contraception. West Afr J Med. 2004 the phytoestrogen genistein on some predictors of
Jul-Sep;23(3):191-3. PMID: 15587826. X-2, X-3, X-4 cardiovascular risk in osteopenic, postmenopausal women:
a two-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
121. Arowojolu AO, Otolorin EO, Ladipo OA; Serum study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Aug;92(8):3068-75.
copper levels in users of multiload intra-uterine PMID: 17682090. X-2, X-3, X-4
contraceptive devices. Afr J Med Med Sci. 1989
Dec;18(4):295-9. PMID: 2558561. X-2, X-4 132. Attridge JT, Clark R, Gordon PV; New insights into
spontaneous intestinal perforation using a national data set
122. Arowojolu AO, Otolorin EO, Ladipo OA; (3): antenatal steroids have no adverse association with
Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper spontaneous intestinal perforation. J Perinatol. 2006
375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative Nov;26(11):667-70. PMID: 17024144. X-2, X-4
clinical trial. Afr J Med Med Sci. 1995 Mar;24(1):59-65.
PMID: 7495202. X-3, X-4 133. Attridge JT, Clark R, Walker MW, et al.; New
insights into spontaneous intestinal perforation using a
123. Arvanitakis Z, Grodstein F, Bienias JL, et al.; national data set: (2) two populations of patients with
Relation of NSAIDs to incident AD, change in cognitive perforations. J Perinatol. 2006 Mar;26(3):185-8. PMID:
function, and AD pathology. Neurology. 2008 Jun 16493433. X-2, X-3, X-4
3;70(23):2219-25. PMID: 18519870. X-2, X-4
134. Aun MV, Bisaccioni C, Garro LS, et al.; Outcomes
124. Asche CV, McAdam-Marx C, Shane-McWhorter L, and safety of drug provocation tests. Allergy Asthma Proc.
et al.; Evaluation of adverse events of oral 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):301-6. PMID: 21781406. X-2, X-4
antihyperglycemic monotherapy experienced by a geriatric
population in a real-world setting: a retrospective cohort 135. Avidan B, Sonnenberg A, Schnell TG, et al.; Risk
analysis. Drugs Aging. 2008;25(7):611-22. PMID: factors of oesophagitis in arthritic patients. Eur J
18582148. X-7 Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001 Sep;13(9):1095-9. PMID:
11564962. X-2
125. Ashorn M, Verronen P, Ruuska T, et al.; Upper
endoscopic findings in children with active juvenile chronic 136. Avidan B, Sonnenberg A, Schnell TG, et al.; Risk
arthritis. Acta Paediatr. 2003 May;92(5):558-61. PMID: factors for erosive reflux esophagitis: a case-control study.
12839284. X-2 Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jan;96(1):41-6. PMID:
11197285. X-4
126. Ashworth NL, Peloso PM, Muhajarine N, et al.; A
population based historical cohort study of the mortality 137. Awad JN, Kebaish KM, Donigan J, et al.; Analysis
associated with nabumetone, Arthrotec, diclofenac, and of the risk factors for the development of post-operative
naproxen. J Rheumatol. 2004 May;31(5):951-6. PMID: spinal epidural haematoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005
15124256. X-4 Sep;87(9):1248-52. PMID: 16129751. X-3, X-4

L-7
138. Awad OG, Fasano MB, Lee JH, et al.; Asthma prospective randomized clinical study. Klin Padiatr. 1999
outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery in aspirin-tolerant Nov-Dec;211(6):438-41. PMID: 10592922. X-2, X-3, X-4
versus aspirin-induced asthmatic patients. Am J Rhinol.
2008 Mar-Apr;22(2):197-203. PMID: 18416980. X-2, X-3, 150. Baeten JM, Nyange PM, Richardson BA, et al.;
X-4 Hormonal contraception and risk of sexually transmitted
disease acquisition: results from a prospective study. Am J
139. Axelrod D, Preston S; Comparison of parenteral Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;185(2):380-5. PMID:
adrenocorticotropic hormone with oral indomethacin in the 11518896. X-2
treatment of acute gout. Arthritis Rheum. 1988
Jun;31(6):803-5. PMID: 2454635. X-2, X-3, X-4 151. Baeyertz JD, Hartfield VJ; The Nova-T 200
intrauterine contraceptive device: a 12 year study. N Z Med
140. Aydinli B, Yilmaz O, Ozturk G, et al.; Is perforated J. 1997 May 9;110(1043):169-71. PMID: 9196502. X-2,
marginal ulcer after the surgery of gastroduodenal ulcer X-4
associated with inadequate treatment for Helicobacter
pylori eradication? Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007 152. Bagshaw SN, Edwards D, Tucker AK; Ethinyl
Sep;392(5):593-9. PMID: 17370084. X-2 oestradiol and D-norgestrel is an effective emergency
postcoital contraceptive: a report of its use in 1,200 patients
141. Ayral X, Mackillop N, Genant HK, et al.; in a family planning clinic. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol.
Arthroscopic evaluation of potential structure-modifying 1988 May;28(2):137-40. PMID: 3228408. X-2, X-3, X-4
drug in osteoarthritis of the knee. A multicenter,
randomized, double-blind comparison of tenidap sodium vs 153. Bahamondes L, Hidalgo M, Petta CA, et al.;
piroxicam. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 Mar;11(3):198- Enlarged ovarian follicles in users of a levonorgestrel-
207. PMID: 12623291. X-2, X-3, X-4 releasing intrauterine system and contraceptive implant. J
Reprod Med. 2003 Aug;48(8):637-40. PMID: 12971147.
142. Azoulay L, Schneider-Lindner V, Dell'aniello S, et X-2
al.; Combination therapy with sulfonylureas and
metformin and the prevention of death in type 2 diabetes: a 154. Bahamondes MV, Monteiro I, Canteiro R, et al.;
nested case-control study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. Length of the endometrial cavity and intrauterine
2010 Apr;19(4):335-42. PMID: 20052677. X-8 contraceptive device expulsion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.
2011 Apr;113(1):50-3. PMID: 21272883. X-2
143. Azuma A, Nukiwa T, Tsuboi E, et al.; Double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial of pirfenidone in patients with 155. Bahamondes MV, Monteiro I, Castro S, et al.;
idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. Prospective study of the forearm bone mineral density of
2005 May 1;171(9):1040-7. PMID: 15665326. X-2, X-4 long-term users of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
system. Hum Reprod. 2010 May;25(5):1158-64. PMID:
144. Ba MG, Moreau JC, Sokal D, et al.; A 5-year clinical 20185512. X-2
evaluation of Norplant implants in Senegal. Contraception.
1999 Jun;59(6):377-81. PMID: 10518232. X-2, X-4 156. Bahrami H, Daryani NE, Haghpanah B, et al.; Effects
of indomethacin on viral replication markers in
145. Backstrom M, Hagg S, Mjorndal T, et al.; Utilization asymptomatic carriers of hepatitis B: a randomized,
pattern of metamizole in northern Sweden and risk placebo-controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005
estimates of agranulocytosis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. Apr;100(4):856-61. PMID: 15784032. X-2, X-3, X-4
2002 Apr-May;11(3):239-45. PMID: 12051124. X-4
157. Bailey R, Sinha C, Burgess LP; Ketorolac
146. Bacq Y, Sapey T, Brechot MC, et al.; Intrahepatic tromethamine and hemorrhage in tonsillectomy: a
cholestasis of pregnancy: a French prospective study. prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Hepatology. 1997 Aug;26(2):358-64. PMID: 9252146. X-2 Laryngoscope. 1997 Feb;107(2):166-9. PMID: 9023238.
X-2, X-4
147. Bae SC, Corzillius M, Kuntz KM, et al.; Cost-
effectiveness of low dose corticosteroids versus non- 158. Bailie R, Katzenellenbogen J, Hoffman M, et al.; A
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and COX-2 specific case control study of breast cancer risk and exposure to
inhibitors in the long-term treatment of rheumatoid injectable progestogen contraceptives. Methods and
arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Jan;42(1):46-53. patterns of use among controls. S Afr Med J. 1997
PMID: 12509612. X-4 Mar;87(3):302-5. PMID: 9137342. X-2, X-4

148. Baenkler HW; Functional-eicosanoid-test (FET) and 159. Baiza-Duran LM, Quintana-Hau J, Tornero-Montano
disease. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2006 Dec;57 Suppl 12:65-72. R, et al.; Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a novel
PMID: 17244955. X-2, X-3, X-4 meloxicam ophthalmic formulation with a reference
diclofenac solution in cataract surgery. Int J Clin
149. Baenziger O, Waldvogel K, Ghelfi D, et al.; Can Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Feb;47(2):89-95. PMID: 19203564.
dopamine prevent the renal side effects of indomethacin? A X-4

L-8
160. Bak S, Andersen M, Tsiropoulos I, et al.; Risk of maintenance treatment, with special reference to
stroke associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory NSAID/aspirin-related ulcers. Clin Ther. 1991 Mar-
drugs: a nested case-control study. Stroke. 2003 Apr;13(2):304-18. PMID: 1863945. X-2, X-3, X-4
Feb;34(2):379-86. PMID: 12574546. X-4
172. Bannwarth B, Dorval E, Caekaert A, et al.; Influence
161. Bakhru A, Stanwood N; Performance of of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy on the
contraceptive patch compared with oral contraceptive pill occurrence of gastrointestinal events in patients treated
in a high-risk population. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 with conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs
Aug;108(2):378-86. PMID: 16880309. X-2, X-3, X-4 combined with omeprazole. J Rheumatol. 2002
Sep;29(9):1975-80. PMID: 12233895. X-2, X-3, X-4
162. Bakke OM, Manocchia M, de Abajo F, et al.; Drug
safety discontinuations in the United Kingdom, the United 173. Baraldi A, Ballestri M, Rapana R, et al.; Acute renal
States, and Spain from 1974 through 1993: a regulatory failure of medical type in an elderly population. Nephrol
perspective. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Jul;58(1):108-17. Dial Transplant. 1998;13 Suppl 7:25-9. PMID: 9870433.
PMID: 7628177. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4 X-2

163. Bakowsky VS, Hanly JG; Complications of 174. Barbosa IC, Filho CI, Faggion D, Jr., et al.;
nonsteroidal antiiflammatory drug gastropathy and use of Prospective, open-label, noncomparative study to assess
gastric cytoprotection: experience at a tertiary care health cycle control, safety and acceptability of a new oral
center. J Rheumatol. 1999 Jul;26(7):1557-63. PMID: contraceptive containing gestodene 60 microg and
10405945. X-2 ethinylestradiol 15 microg (Minesse). Contraception. 2006
Jan;73(1):30-3. PMID: 16371291. X-2, X-4
164. Balali-Mood M, Critchley JA, Proudfoot AT, et al.;
Mefenamic acid overdosage. Lancet. 1981 Jun 175. Bardia A, Olson JE, Vachon CM, et al.; Effect of
20;1(8234):1354-6. PMID: 6113321. X-2, X-4 aspirin and other NSAIDs on postmenopausal breast cancer
incidence by hormone receptor status: results from a
165. Baldaszti E, Wimmer-Puchinger B, Loschke K; prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011
Acceptability of the long-term contraceptive Feb;126(1):149-55. PMID: 20669045. X-4, X-7
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena): a 3-
year follow-up study. Contraception. 2003 Feb;67(2):87- 176. Barkin JS, Ross BS; Medical therapy for chronic
91. PMID: 12586318. X-2, X-3, X-4 gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin. Am J
Gastroenterol. 1998 Aug;93(8):1250-4. PMID: 9707046.
166. Balle C, Schollmeyer P; Morbidity of patients with X-2, X-4
analgesic-associated nephropathy on regular dialysis
treatment and after renal transplantation. Klin Wochenschr. 177. Barletta GM, Smoyer WE, Bunchman TE, et al.; Use
1990 Jan 4;68(1):38-42. PMID: 2106598. X-2, X-4 of mycophenolate mofetil in steroid-dependent and -
resistant nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2003
167. Balogh A; Clinical and endocrine effects of long- Aug;18(8):833-7. PMID: 12774223. X-2, X-4
term hormonal contraception. Acta Med Hung.
1986;43(2):97-102. PMID: 3588164. X-2, X-4 178. Barnabei VM, Cochrane BB, Aragaki AK, et al.;
Menopausal symptoms and treatment-related effects of
168. Balogun OR, Raji HO; Clinical experience with estrogen and progestin in the Women's Health Initiative.
injectable progestogen- only contraceptives at University of Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;105(5 Pt 1):1063-73. PMID:
Ilorin teaching hospital: a five year review. Niger Postgrad 15863546. X-4, X-7
Med J. 2009 Dec;16(4):260-3. PMID: 20037621. X-2, X-3,
X-4 179. Barnard L, Lavoie D, Lajeunesse N; Increase in
nonfatal digestive perforations and haemorrhages following
169. Banerji MA, Purkayastha D, Francis BH; Safety and introduction of selective NSAIDs: a public health concern.
tolerability of vildagliptin vs. thiazolidinedione as add-on Drug Saf. 2006;29(7):613-20. PMID: 16808553. X-4
to metformin in type 2 diabetic patients with and without
mild renal impairment: a retrospective analysis of the 180. Barnum JL, Sistino JJ; Renal dysfunction in cardiac
GALIANT study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 surgery: identifying potential risk factors. Perfusion. 2009
Nov;90(2):182-90. PMID: 20655609. X-8 Mar;24(2):139-42. PMID: 19654159. X-2

170. Banhidy F, Acs N, Puho E, et al.; A population-based 181. Baron JA, Cole BF, Sandler RS, et al.; A randomized
case-control teratologic study of oral dipyrone treatment trial of aspirin to prevent colorectal adenomas. N Engl J
during pregnancy. Drug Saf. 2007;30(1):59-70. PMID: Med. 2003 Mar 6;348(10):891-9. PMID: 12621133. X-2,
17194171. X-4 X-3, X-4

171. Bank S, Greenberg RE, Magier D, et al.; The 182. Barreiros FA, Guazzelli CA, Barbosa R, et al.;
efficacy and tolerability of famotidine and ranitidine on the Extended regimens of the contraceptive vaginal ring:
healing of active duodenal ulcer and during six-month

L-9
evaluation of clinical aspects. Contraception. 2010 194. Battistella M, Mamdami MM, Juurlink DN, et al.;
Mar;81(3):223-5. PMID: 20159178. X-2, X-4 Risk of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in warfarin users
treated with nonselective NSAIDs or COX-2 inhibitors.
183. Bartle WR, Gupta AK, Lazor J; Nonsteroidal anti- Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jan 24;165(2):189-92. PMID:
inflammatory drugs and gastrointestinal bleeding. A case- 15668365. X-4
control study. Arch Intern Med. 1986 Dec;146(12):2365-7.
PMID: 3490836. X-2, X-4 195. Baudouin C, Nordmann JP, Denis P, et al.; Efficacy
of indomethacin 0.1% and fluorometholone 0.1% on
184. Bas M, Greve J, Stelter K, et al.; Therapeutic conjunctival inflammation following chronic application of
efficacy of icatibant in angioedema induced by angiotensin- antiglaucomatous drugs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp
converting enzyme inhibitors: a case series. Ann Emerg Ophthalmol. 2002 Nov;240(11):929-35. PMID: 12486516.
Med. 2010 Sep;56(3):278-82. PMID: 20447725. X-2, X-3, X-2, X-4
X-4
196. Baughman RP, Lower EE; Leflunomide for chronic
185. Basnayake S, Higgins JE, Miller PC, et al.; Early sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2004
symptoms and discontinuation among users of oral Mar;21(1):43-8. PMID: 15127974. X-2, X-4
contraceptives in Sri Lanka. Stud Fam Plann. 1984 Nov-
Dec;15(6 Pt 1):285-90. PMID: 6393460. X-2 197. Baumelou E, Guiguet M, Mary JY; Epidemiology of
aplastic anemia in France: a case-control study. I. Medical
186. Bassol S, Alvarado G, Arreola RG, et al.; A 13- history and medication use. The French Cooperative Group
month multicenter clinical experience of a low-dose for Epidemiological Study of Aplastic Anemia. Blood.
monophasic oral contraceptive containing 20 microg 1993 Mar 15;81(6):1471-8. PMID: 8453094. X-2, X-4
ethinylestradiol and 75 microg gestodene in Latin
American women. Contraception. 2003 May;67(5):367-72. 198. Baur DM, Klotsche J, Hamnvik OP, et al.; Type 2
PMID: 12742559. X-2, X-4 diabetes mellitus and medications for type 2 diabetes
mellitus are associated with risk for and mortality from
187. Bassol S, Carranza-Lira S, Celis-Gonzalez C, et al.; cancer in a German primary care cohort. Metabolism. 2011
The impact of a monophasic continuous estro- Oct;60(10):1363-71. PMID: 21081242. X-2, X-4
progestogenic treatment on Latin American menopausal
women. Maturitas. 2005 Mar 14;50(3):189-95. PMID: 199. Bavry AA, Khaliq A, Gong Y, et al.; Harmful effects
15734600. X-2 of NSAIDs among patients with hypertension and coronary
artery disease. Am J Med. 2011 Jul;124(7):614-20. PMID:
188. Bastuji-Garin S, Zahedi M, Guillaume JC, et al.; 21596367. X-4
Toxic epidermal necrolysis (Lyell syndrome) in 77 elderly
patients. Age Ageing. 1993 Nov;22(6):450-6. PMID: 200. Bayan K, Tuzun Y, Yilmaz S, et al.; Clarifying the
8310891. X-2, X-7 relationship between ABO/Rhesus blood group antigens
and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Dis Sci. 2009
189. Batar I; One-year clinical experience with FlexiGard. May;54(5):1029-34. PMID: 18716867. X-2, X-3, X-4
Contraception. 1992 Oct;46(4):307-12. PMID: 1486769.
X-2, X-3, X-4 201. Bayoglu Tekin Y, Dilbaz B, Altinbas SK, et al.;
Postoperative medical treatment of chronic pelvic pain
190. Batar I, Lampe LG, Allonen H; Clinical experience related to severe endometriosis: levonorgestrel-releasing
with intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs) inserted intrauterine system versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone
with and without tail. Acta Chir Hung. 1988;29(4):385-93. analogue. Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):492-6. PMID:
PMID: 3239338. X-2, X-4 20883991. X-2, X-3

191. Batar I, Lampe LG, Allonen H; Clinical experiences 202. Beardon PH, Brown SV, McDevitt DG;
with intrauterine devices inserted with and without tail. Int Gastrointestinal events in patients prescribed non-steroidal
J Gynaecol Obstet. 1991 Oct;36(2):137-40. PMID: anti-inflammatory drugs: a controlled study using record
1683316. X-4 linkage in Tayside. Q J Med. 1989 Jun;71(266):497-505.
PMID: 2602546. X-4
192. Battaglia C, Cianciosi A, Mancini F, et al.; Angeliq
versus Activelle in normotensive postmenopausal women: 203. Becker A, Leber A, von Ziegler F, et al.; Comparison
a prospective, randomized pilot study. Menopause. 2009 of progression of coronary calcium in postmenopausal
Jul-Aug;16(4):803-9. PMID: 19194341. X-2 women on versus not on estrogen/progestin therapy. Am J
Cardiol. 2007 Feb 1;99(3):374-8. PMID: 17261401. X-2,
193. Battino S, Ben-Ami M, Geslevich Y, et al.; Factors X-7
associated with withdrawal bleeding after administration of
oral dydrogesterone or medroxyprogesterone acetate in 204. Beksinska ME, Kleinschmidt I, Smit JA, et al.; Bone
women with secondary amenorrhea. Gynecol Obstet Invest. mineral density in young women aged 19-24 after 4-5 years
1996;42(2):113-6. PMID: 8878716. X-2, X-3, X-4 of exclusive and mixed use of hormonal contraception.

L-10
Contraception. 2009 Aug;80(2):128-32. PMID: 19631787. 216. Berenson AB, Wiemann CM, Rickerr VI, et al.;
X-2 Contraceptive outcomes among adolescents prescribed
Norplant implants versus oral contraceptives after one year
205. Beksinska ME, Smit JA, Kleinschmidt I, et al.; of use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Mar;176(3):586-92.
Prospective study of weight change in new adolescent users PMID: 9077611. X-2
of DMPA, NET-EN, COCs, nonusers and discontinuers of
hormonal contraception. Contraception. 2010 Jan;81(1):30- 217. Bergenstal RM, Garrison LP, Jr., Miller LA, et al.;
4. PMID: 20004270. X-2, X-4 Exenatide BID Observational Study (ExOS): results for
primary and secondary endpoints of a prospective research
206. Bell D, Marasco S, Almeida A, et al.; Tranexamic study to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of exenatide
Acid in cardiac surgery and postoperative seizures: a case BID use in patients with type 2 diabetes in a real-world
report series. Heart Surg Forum. 2010 Aug;13(4):E257-9. setting. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Dec;27(12):2335-42.
PMID: 20719731. X-2 PMID: 22085180. X-2

207. Bellary SV, Isaacs PE, Lee FI; Upper gastrointestinal 218. Berger RE; Urinary tract infection in the users of
lesions in elderly patients presenting for endoscopy: depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate. J Urol. 2005
relevance of NSAID usage. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991 Sep;174(3):941. PMID: 16093999. X-1, X-2
Aug;86(8):961-4. PMID: 1858761. X-2
219. Berges-Gimeno MP, Simon RA, Stevenson DD; The
208. Belsey JD; Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory induced effect of leukotriene-modifier drugs on aspirin-induced
upper gastrointestinal event rates in patients awaiting joint asthma and rhinitis reactions. Clin Exp Allergy. 2002
replacement in the United Kingdom. An epidemiologically- Oct;32(10):1491-6. PMID: 12372130. X-2, X-4
based burden of disease model. Curr Med Res Opin.
2003;19(4):306-12. PMID: 12841923. X-1, X-4 220. Bergqvist A, Jacobson J, Harris S; A double-blind
randomized study of the treatment of endometriosis with
209. Benagiano G; Comparison of two monophasic oral nafarelin or nafarelin plus norethisterone. Gynecol
contraceptives: gestodene/ethinyl estradiol versus Endocrinol. 1997 Jun;11(3):187-94. PMID: 9209899. X-2,
desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol. Int J Fertil. 1989 Sep;34 X-3, X-4
Suppl:31-9. PMID: 2576255. X-2, X-4
221. Berlin JM, Rigel DS; Diclofenac sodium 3% gel in
210. Benahmed S, Picot MC, Dumas F, et al.; Accuracy of the treatment of actinic keratoses postcryosurgery. J Drugs
a pharmacovigilance algorithm in diagnosing drug Dermatol. 2008 Jul;7(7):669-73. PMID: 18664159. X-2,
hypersensitivity reactions. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul X-3, X-4
11;165(13):1500-5. PMID: 16009865. X-2, X-3, X-4
222. Berman M, Cardone D, Sharples L, et al.; Safety and
211. Benavides S, Striet J, Germak J, et al.; Efficacy and efficacy of aprotinin and tranexamic acid in pulmonary
safety of hypoglycemic drugs in children with type 2 endarterectomy surgery with hypothermia: review of 200
diabetes mellitus. Pharmacotherapy. 2005 Jun;25(6):803-9. patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Nov;90(5):1432-6. PMID:
PMID: 15927898. X-2, X-4 20971234. X-2

212. Bennett K, Teeling M, Feely J; "Selective" switching 223. Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, et al.; Efficacy
from non-selective to selective non-steroidal anti- and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for
inflammatory drugs. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Nov;59(8- severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 8;344(10):699-709.
9):645-9. PMID: 12942226. X-3, X-4 PMID: 11236773. X-3, X-4

213. Bensen WG, Zhao SZ, Burke TA, et al.; Upper 224. Bernier MO, Mikaeloff Y, Hudson M, et al.;
gastrointestinal tolerability of celecoxib, a COX-2 specific Combined oral contraceptive use and the risk of systemic
inhibitor, compared to naproxen and placebo. J Rheumatol. lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Apr
2000 Aug;27(8):1876-83. PMID: 10955327. X-4 15;61(4):476-81. PMID: 19333988. X-4

214. Berenson AB, Rahman M; Changes in weight, total 225. Bernstein CN, Singh S, Graff LA, et al.; A
fat, percent body fat, and central-to-peripheral fat ratio prospective population-based study of triggers of
associated with injectable and oral contraceptive use. Am J symptomatic flares in IBD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;200(3):329 e1-8. PMID: Sep;105(9):1994-2002. PMID: 20372115. X-2, X-3, X-4
19254592. X-2
226. Bertolini S, Elicio N, Cordera R, et al.; Effects of
215. Berenson AB, Wiemann CM; Use of levonorgestrel three low-dose oral contraceptive formulations on lipid
implants versus oral contraceptives in adolescence: a case- metabolism. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;66(4):327-
control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Apr;172(4 Pt 32. PMID: 2962417. X-2
1):1128-35; discussion 35-7. PMID: 7726249. X-2, X-4
227. Bertuola F, Morando C, Menniti-Ippolito F, et al.;
Association between drug and vaccine use and acute

L-11
immune thrombocytopenia in childhood: a case-control
study in Italy. Drug Saf. 2010 Jan 1;33(1):65-72. PMID: 239. Bilker WB, Berlin JA, Gail MH, et al.; An efficient
20000868. X-4 design for verifying disease outcome status in large cohorts
with rare exposures and low disease rates. Stat Med. 1999
228. Beunza JJ, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Bes-Rastrollo M, Nov 30;18(22):3021-36. PMID: 10544304. X-1
et al.; Aspirin, non-aspirin analgesics and the risk of
hypertension in the SUN cohort. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010 240. Biller BM, Molitch ME, Vance ML, et al.; Treatment
Mar;63(3):286-93. PMID: 20196989. X-4 of prolactin-secreting macroadenomas with the once-
weekly dopamine agonist cabergoline. J Clin Endocrinol
229. Beutler AI, Chesnut GT, Mattingly JC, et al.; FPIN's Metab. 1996 Jun;81(6):2338-43. PMID: 8964874. X-2
Clinical Inquiries. Aspirin use in children for fever or viral
syndromes. Am Fam Physician. 2009 Dec 15;80(12):1472. 241. Bingham CO, 3rd, Ince A, Haraoui B, et al.;
PMID: 20000310. X-1, X-4 Effectiveness and safety of etanercept in subjects with RA
who have failed infliximab therapy: 16-week, open-label,
230. Bhat P, Cervantes-Castaneda RA, Doctor PP, et al.; observational study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009
Mycophenolate mofetil therapy for sarcoidosis-associated May;25(5):1131-42. PMID: 19317607. X-3, X-4
uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2009 May-Jun;17(3):185-
90. PMID: 19585361. X-2, X-3, X-4 242. Bingham CO, 3rd, Sebba AI, Rubin BR, et al.;
Efficacy and safety of etoricoxib 30 mg and celecoxib 200
231. Bhattacharyya T, Levin R, Vrahas MS, et al.; mg in the treatment of osteoarthritis in two identically
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and nonunion of designed, randomized, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority
humeral shaft fractures. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Jun studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Mar;46(3):496-507.
15;53(3):364-7. PMID: 15934108. X-4 PMID: 16936327. X-2, X-3, X-4

232. Bianchi Porro G, Ardizzone S, Petrillo M, et al.; 243. Birt CM; The use of topical ketorolac 0.5% for pain
Endoscopic assessment of the effects of dipyrone relief following cyclophotocoagulation. Ophthalmic Surg
(metamizol) in comparison to paracetamol and placebo on Lasers Imaging. 2003 Sep-Oct;34(5):381-5. PMID:
the gastric and duodenal mucosa of healthy adult 14509461. X-2, X-3, X-4
volunteers. Digestion. 1996;57(3):186-90. PMID: 8739093.
X-2, X-4 244. Biskupiak JE, Brixner DI, Howard K, et al.;
Gastrointestinal complications of over-the-counter
233. Bianchi Porro G, Lazzaroni M, Petrillo M, et al.; nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. J Pain Palliat Care
Prevention of gastroduodenal damage with omeprazole in Pharmacother. 2006;20(3):7-14. PMID: 16931473. X-4
patients receiving continuous NSAIDs treatment. A double
blind placebo controlled study. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 245. Bitto A, Granese R, Triolo O, et al.; Genistein
1998 Feb;30(1):43-7. PMID: 9615264. X-2, X-3, X-4 aglycone: a new therapeutic approach to reduce
endometrial hyperplasia. Phytomedicine. 2010
234. Bianchi Porro G, Parente F, Imbesi V, et al.; Role of Sep;17(11):844-50. PMID: 20570122. X-2, X-3, X-4
Helicobacter pylori in ulcer healing and recurrence of
gastric and duodenal ulcers in longterm NSAID users. 246. Bivins HA, Jr., Newman RB, Fyfe DA, et al.;
Response to omeprazole dual therapy. Gut. 1996 Randomized trial of oral indomethacin and terbutaline
Jul;39(1):22-6. PMID: 8881802. X-2, X-4 sulfate for the long-term suppression of preterm labor. Am
J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Oct;169(4):1065-70. PMID:
235. Bianco MA, Rotondano G, Buri L, et al.; Gastro- 8238121. X-2, X-4
protective strategies in primary care in Italy: the "Gas.Pro."
survey. Dig Liver Dis. 2010 May;42(5):359-64. PMID: 247. Bjorklund K, Nordstrom ML, Odlind V; Combined
20005189. X-4 oral contraceptives do not increase the risk of back and
pelvic pain during pregnancy or after delivery. Acta Obstet
236. Biancone L, Tosti C, Geremia A, et al.; Rofecoxib Gynecol Scand. 2000 Nov;79(11):979-83. PMID:
and early relapse of inflammatory bowel disease: an open- 11081684. X-2
label trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Apr 1;19(7):755-
64. PMID: 15043516. X-2, X-4 248. Black C, Kaye JA, Jick H; Clinical risk factors for
venous thromboembolus in users of the combined oral
237. Biere-Rafi S, Di Nisio M, Gerdes V, et al.; Non- contraceptive pill. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of pulmonary Jun;53(6):637-40. PMID: 12047488. X-4
embolism. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011
Jun;20(6):635-42. PMID: 21462279. X-4 249. Blaicher AM, Landsteiner HT, Al-Falaki O, et al.;
Acetylsalicylic acid, diclofenac, and lornoxicam, but not
238. Bijol V, Mendez GP, Nose V, et al.; Granulomatous rofecoxib, affect platelet CD 62 expression. Anesth Analg.
interstitial nephritis: a clinicopathologic study of 46 cases 2004 Apr;98(4):1082-5, table of contents. PMID:
from a single institution. Int J Surg Pathol. 2006 15041603. X-2, X-3, X-4
Jan;14(1):57-63. PMID: 16501836. X-2, X-3, X-4

L-12
261. Blumenfeld Z, Boulman N, Leiba R, et al.; High C-
250. Blanco G, Martinez C, Ladero JM, et al.; Interaction reactive protein levels are associated with oral hormonal
of CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 genotypes modifies the risk for menopausal therapy but not with intrauterine levonorgestrel
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-related acute and transdermal estradiol. Scand J Clin Lab Invest.
gastrointestinal bleeding. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2008 2007;67(3):257-63. PMID: 17454839. X-2, X-3
Jan;18(1):37-43. PMID: 18216720. X-2, X-3, X-4
262. Bobrzynski A, Beben P, Budzynski A, et al.;
251. Blix HS, Viktil KK, Moger TA, et al.; Use of renal Incidence of complications of peptic ulcers in patients with
risk drugs in hospitalized patients with impaired renal Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection and/or NSAID use in the
function--an underestimated problem? Nephrol Dial era of Hp eradication. Med Sci Monit. 2002
Transplant. 2006 Nov;21(11):3164-71. PMID: 16880181. Aug;8(8):CR554-7. PMID: 12165741. X-4
X-2, X-3, X-4
263. Bodelon C, Doherty JA, Chen C, et al.; Use of
252. Blomqvist P, Feltelius N, Ekbom A, et al.; nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and risk of
Rheumatoid arthritis in Sweden. Drug prescriptions, costs, endometrial cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Dec
and adverse drug reactions. J Rheumatol. 2000 15;170(12):1512-7. PMID: 19897512. X-1, X-2, X-4
May;27(5):1171-7. PMID: 10813283. X-4
264. Bodmer M, Becker C, Meier C, et al.; Use of
253. Blonde L, Dailey GE, Jabbour SA, et al.; metformin and the risk of ovarian cancer: a case-control
Gastrointestinal tolerability of extended-release metformin analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Nov;123(2):200-4. PMID:
tablets compared to immediate-release metformin tablets: 21802715. X-4
results of a retrospective cohort study. Curr Med Res Opin.
2004 Apr;20(4):565-72. PMID: 15119994. X-2, X-4 265. Bodmer M, Becker C, Meier C, et al.; Use of
antidiabetic agents and the risk of pancreatic cancer: a case-
254. Blonde L, Klein EJ, Han J, et al.; Interim analysis of control analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr;107(4):620-
the effects of exenatide treatment on A1C, weight and 6. PMID: 22290402. X-3, X-8
cardiovascular risk factors over 82 weeks in 314
overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes 266. Bogazzi F, Buralli S, Manetti L, et al.; Treatment
Metab. 2006 Jul;8(4):436-47. PMID: 16776751. X-2, X-3, with low doses of cabergoline is not associated with
X-4 increased prevalence of cardiac valve regurgitation in
patients with hyperprolactinaemia. Int J Clin Pract. 2008
255. Bloom BS; Direct medical costs of disease and Dec;62(12):1864-9. PMID: 18462372. X-2
gastrointestinal side effects during treatment for arthritis.
Am J Med. 1988 Feb 22;84(2A):20-4. PMID: 3348239. X- 267. Boissonnault WG, Meek PD; Risk factors for anti-
3, X-4 inflammatory-drug- or aspirin-induced gastrointestinal
complications in individuals receiving outpatient physical
256. Bloom BS; Risk and cost of gastrointestinal side therapy services. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002
effects associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory Oct;32(10):510-7. PMID: 12403202. X-4
drugs. Arch Intern Med. 1989 May;149(5):1019-22. PMID:
2719496. X-4 268. Bokesch PM, Szabo G, Wojdyga R, et al.; A phase 2
prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing the
257. Blot WJ, Fischer T, Nielsen GL, et al.; Outcome of effects of tranexamic acid with ecallantide on blood loss
upper gastro-intestinal bleeding and use of ibuprofen versus from high-risk cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary
paracetamol. Pharm World Sci. 2004 Dec;26(6):319-23. bypass (CONSERV-2 Trial). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.
PMID: 15683100. X-2, X-4 2012 May;143(5):1022-9. PMID: 21724197. X-2, X-4

258. Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK; Over the counter non- 269. Bolaji, II, Mortimer G, Grimes H, et al.; Clinical
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of evaluation of near-continuous oral micronized progesterone
gastrointestinal bleeding. J Epidemiol Biostat. therapy in estrogenized postmenopausal women. Gynecol
2000;5(2):137-42. PMID: 10890286. X-2 Endocrinol. 1996 Feb;10(1):41-7. PMID: 8737191. X-2,
X-3, X-4
259. Blower AL, Brooks A, Fenn GC, et al.; Emergency
admissions for upper gastrointestinal disease and their 270. Bonanomi MT, Dantas NC, Medeiros FA; Retinal
relation to NSAID use. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997 nerve fibre layer thickness measurements in patients using
Apr;11(2):283-91. PMID: 9146764. X-2, X-4 chloroquine. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006
Mar;34(2):130-6. PMID: 16626426. X-2, X-3, X-4
260. Bluhm RE, Adedoyin A, McCarver DG, et al.;
Development of dapsone toxicity in patients with 271. Bonfils P, Avan P; Non-specific bronchial
inflammatory dermatoses: activity of acetylation and hyperresponsiveness is a risk factor for steroid insensitivity
hydroxylation of dapsone as risk factors. Clin Pharmacol in nasal polyposis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004 Apr;124(3):290-
Ther. 1999 Jun;65(6):598-605. PMID: 10391665. X-2, X-4 6. PMID: 15143747. X-2, X-3, X-4

L-13
283. Bosetti C, Talamini R, Franceschi S, et al.; Aspirin
272. Bonfils P, Avan P, Malinvaud D; Influence of allergy use and cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract. Br J
on the symptoms and treatment of nasal polyposis. Acta Cancer. 2003 Mar 10;88(5):672-4. PMID: 12618872. X-4
Otolaryngol. 2006 Aug;126(8):839-44. PMID: 16846927.
X-2, X-3, X-4 284. Bottoni A, Criscuolo D; Cutaneous adverse reactions
following the administration of nonsteroidal
273. Bonnar J, Sheppard BL; Treatment of menorrhagia antiinflammatory drugs and antibiotics: an Italian survey.
during menstruation: randomised controlled trial of Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1992 Jul;30(7):257-9.
ethamsylate, mefenamic acid, and tranexamic acid. BMJ. PMID: 1387114. X-2, X-4
1996 Sep 7;313(7057):579-82. PMID: 8806245. X-2, X-3,
X-4 285. Bouaziz E, Canonico M, Verstuyft C, et al.; Does the
progesterone receptor genetic polymorphism +331G/A hPR
274. Bonner GF, Fakhri A, Vennamaneni SR; A long- influence the risk of venous thromboembolism among
term cohort study of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug postmenopausal women using hormone therapy? The
use and disease activity in outpatients with inflammatory ESTHER Study. Maturitas. 2009 Oct 20;64(2):136-8.
bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004 Nov;10(6):751-7. PMID: 19782484. X-2, X-4, X-7
PMID: 15626893. X-2
286. Boukthir S, Mazigh SM, Kalach N, et al.; The effect
275. Bonner GF, Walczak M, Kitchen L, et al.; Tolerance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and Helicobacter
of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in patients with pylori infection on the gastric mucosa in children with
inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010
Aug;95(8):1946-8. PMID: 10950040. X-2, X-4 Feb;26(2):227-30. PMID: 19823852. X-2

276. Bonny AE, Britto MT, Huang B, et al.; Weight gain, 287. Boulinguez S, Reix S, Bedane C, et al.; Role of drug
adiposity, and eating behaviors among adolescent females exposure in aphthous ulcers: a case-control study. Br J
on depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA). J Pediatr Dermatol. 2000 Dec;143(6):1261-5. PMID: 11122030. X-2
Adolesc Gynecol. 2004 Apr;17(2):109-15. PMID:
15050987. X-2 288. Bouvy ML, Heerdink ER, Hoes AW, et al.; Effects
of NSAIDs on the incidence of hospitalisations for renal
277. Bor S, Dagli U, Sarer B, et al.; A retrospective study dysfunction in users of ACE inhibitors. Drug Saf.
demonstrating properties of nonvariceal upper 2003;26(13):983-9. PMID: 14583072. X-2
gastrointestinal bleeding in Turkey. Turk J Gastroenterol.
2011 Jun;22(3):249-54. PMID: 21805414. X-2 289. Bowker SL, Majumdar SR, Veugelers P, et al.;
Increased cancer-related mortality for patients with type 2
278. Borgstrom A, Kask K, Gulinello M, et al.; Patients diabetes who use sulfonylureas or insulin. Diabetes Care.
with adverse mood effects from combined oral 2006 Feb;29(2):254-8. PMID: 16443869. X-3
contraceptives have lower levels of prepulse inhibition than
healthy controls. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008 290. Bowrey DJ, Morris-Stiff GJ; Drug allergy: fact or
May;33(4):487-96. PMID: 18329179. X-2, X-3, X-4 fiction? Int J Clin Pract. 1998 Jan-Feb;52(1):20-1. PMID:
9536562. X-2, X-3, X-4
279. Bori Segura G, Torres y Gutierrez Rubio A, Herrera
Gomez LE, et al.; Efficacy and tolerability of acemetacin, 291. Boyapati SM, Bostick RM, McGlynn KA, et al.;
a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, in Mexican Calcium, vitamin D, and risk for colorectal adenoma:
patients: result of the ETAPAM Study. Proc West dependency on vitamin D receptor BsmI polymorphism
Pharmacol Soc. 2002;45:104-7. PMID: 12434547. X-4 and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use? Cancer
Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003 Jul;12(7):631-7. PMID:
280. Bornebroek M, de Lau LM, Haag MD, et al.; 12869402. X-2, X-4
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of
Parkinson disease. Neuroepidemiology. 2007;28(4):193-6. 292. Boyd EJ, Penston JG, Russell RI, et al.; Hiatal
PMID: 17851257. X-4 hernial ulcers: clinical features and follow-up. Postgrad
Med J. 1991 Oct;67(792):900-3. PMID: 1684655. X-2, X-
281. Bortnichak EA, Sachs RM; Piroxicam in recent 3, X-4
epidemiologic studies. Am J Med. 1986 Nov 28;81(5B):44-
8. PMID: 3491542. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4 293. Bozkurt B, Torre-Amione G, Warren MS, et al.;
Results of targeted anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy with
282. Bosetti C, Bravi F, Talamini R, et al.; Aspirin and etanercept (ENBREL) in patients with advanced heart
risk of endometrial cancer: a case-control study from Italy. failure. Circulation. 2001 Feb 27;103(8):1044-7. PMID:
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010 Sep;19(5):401-3. PMID: 11222463. X-2, X-4
20698055. X-2, X-4
294. Bracco F, Battaglia A, Chouza C, et al.; The long-
acting dopamine receptor agonist cabergoline in early
Parkinson's disease: final results of a 5-year, double-blind,

L-14
levodopa-controlled study. CNS Drugs. 2004;18(11):733- 306. Breuer-Katschinski B, Nemes K, Rump B, et al.;
46. PMID: 15330687. X-2 Long-term use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and
the risk of colorectal adenomas. The Colorectal Adenoma
295. Bradbury F; How important is the role of the Study Group. Digestion. 2000;61(2):129-34. PMID:
physician in the correct use of a drug? An observational 10705177. X-2, X-4
cohort study in general practice. Int J Clin Pract Suppl.
2004 Oct(144):27-32. PMID: 16035400. X-3, X-4 307. Bricker SR, Savage ME, Hanning CD; Peri-operative
blood loss and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: an
296. Bradley MC, Hughes CM, Cantwell MM, et al.; Non- investigation using diclofenac in patients undergoing
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and pancreatic cancer transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur J Anaesthesiol.
risk: a nested case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2010 Apr 1987 Nov;4(6):429-34. PMID: 3328684. X-2, X-6
27;102(9):1415-21. PMID: 20372155. X-4
308. Briesacher B, Kamal-Bahl S, Hochberg M, et al.;
297. Brahimi N, Routier E, Raison-Peyron N, et al.; A Three-tiered-copayment drug coverage and use of
three-year-analysis of fixed drug eruptions in hospital nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Arch Intern Med.
settings in France. Eur J Dermatol. 2010 Jul- 2004 Aug 9-23;164(15):1679-84. PMID: 15302639. X-3,
Aug;20(4):461-4. PMID: 20507840. X-2, X-4 X-4

298. Bramlage P, Binz C, Gitt AK, et al.; Diabetes 309. Brinker A, Goldkind L, Bonnel R, et al.;
treatment patterns and goal achievement in primary Spontaneous reports of hypertension leading to
diabetes care (DiaRegis) - study protocol and patient hospitalisation in association with rofecoxib, celecoxib,
characteristics at baseline. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010;9:53. nabumetone and oxaprozin. Drugs Aging. 2004;21(7):479-
PMID: 20843379. X-3, X-4 84. PMID: 15132714. X-3, X-4

299. Bratt H, Skjeldestad FE, Cullberg Valentin K; A 310. Briscoe TA, Anderson D, Usifo OS, et al.; A
randomized trial of three copper IUDs (MLCu250, retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of
MLCu375 and Nova-T). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. metformin in the African-American patient. J Natl Med
1988;67(3):247-51. PMID: 3051876. X-2, X-3, X-4 Assoc. 1997 Nov;89(11):728-30. PMID: 9375476. X-2

300. Braun JM, Schneider B, Beuth HJ; Therapeutic use, 311. Brock J, Sauaia A, Ahnen D, et al.; Process of care
efficiency and safety of the proteolytic pineapple enzyme and outcomes for elderly patients hospitalized with peptic
Bromelain-POS in children with acute sinusitis in ulcer disease: results from a quality improvement project.
Germany. In Vivo. 2005 Mar-Apr;19(2):417-21. PMID: JAMA. 2001 Oct 24-31;286(16):1985-93. PMID:
15796206. X-2, X-4 11667935. X-3, X-4

301. Brazer SR, Tyor MP, Pancotto FS, et al.; Studies of 312. Brown DA, Vartan CM; Risk of venous
gastric ulcer disease by community-based thromboembolism with drospirenone-containing oral
gastroenterologists. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 contraceptives. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2011 Jun
Jul;85(7):824-8. PMID: 2371983. X-2 1;68(11):1003-10. PMID: 21593228. X-1, X-2

302. Breda A, Bui MH, Liao JC, et al.; Association of 313. Brown EG, Waller PC, Sallie BA; Tiaprofenic acid
bowel rest and ketorolac analgesia with short hospital stay and severe cystitis. Postgrad Med J. 1998 Jul;74(873):443-
after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology. 2007 4. PMID: 9799928. X-4
May;69(5):828-31. PMID: 17482915. X-2, X-3, X-4
314. Brown JS, Kulldorff M, Chan KA, et al.; Early
303. Breitner JC, Haneuse SJ, Walker R, et al.; Risk of detection of adverse drug events within population-based
dementia and AD with prior exposure to NSAIDs in an health networks: application of sequential testing methods.
elderly community-based cohort. Neurology. 2009 Jun Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Dec;16(12):1275-84.
2;72(22):1899-905. PMID: 19386997. X-7 PMID: 17955500. X-2, X-3, X-4

304. Bremer JP, Ullrich S, Laudien M, et al.; 315. Brown MD; Norplant: a welcome new contraceptive.
Methotrexate plus leflunomide for the treatment of Kans Med. 1993 Apr;94(4):110-1. PMID: 8487456. X-1
relapsingWegener's granulomatosis. A retrospective
uncontrolled study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010 Jan- 316. Brown NJ, Berkowitz RG; Epistaxis in healthy
Feb;28(1 Suppl 57):67-71. PMID: 20412706. X-2, X-4 children requiring hospital admission. Int J Pediatr
Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Sep;68(9):1181-4. PMID:
305. Breuer T, Martin K, Wilhelm M, et al.; The blood 15302149. X-2, X-3, X-4
sparing effect and the safety of aprotinin compared to
tranexamic acid in paediatric cardiac surgery. Eur J 317. Brucker C; Controlled trial with a monthly
Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):167-71; author reply 71. combination injectable contraceptive in Europe. Gynecol
PMID: 19027313. X-2 Endocrinol. 2001 Aug;15 Suppl 3:11-4. PMID: 11570312.
X-2

L-15
318. Brune K, Katus HA, Moecks J, et al.; N-terminal 330. Burns B, Watkins L, Goadsby PJ; Treatment of
pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations predict the hemicrania continua by occipital nerve stimulation with a
risk of cardiovascular adverse events from bion device: long-term follow-up of a crossover study.
antiinflammatory drugs: a pilot trial. Clin Chem. 2008 Lancet Neurol. 2008 Nov;7(11):1001-12. PMID:
Jul;54(7):1149-57. PMID: 18451314. X-2, X-3, X-4 18845482. X-2, X-3, X-4

319. Brunser O, Espinoza J, Araya M, et al.; Chronic iron 331. Buse JB, Klonoff DC, Nielsen LL, et al.; Metabolic
intake and diarrhoeal disease in infants. A field study in a effects of two years of exenatide treatment on diabetes,
less-developed country. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1993 obesity, and hepatic biomarkers in patients with type 2
May;47(5):317-26. PMID: 8319667. X-2, X-4 diabetes: an interim analysis of data from the open-label,
uncontrolled extension of three double-blind, placebo-
320. Brzeski M, Madhok R, Capell HA; Evening primrose controlled trials. Clin Ther. 2007 Jan;29(1):139-53. PMID:
oil in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and side-effects of 17379054. X-2, X-3, X-4
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Br J Rheumatol.
1991 Oct;30(5):370-2. PMID: 1913008. X-2, X-3, X-4 332. Butler AJ, Green A, Cohen M; Multi-centre open
study of a triphasic levonorgestrel-ethinyloestradiol
321. Buchbinder R, Forbes A, Kobben F, et al.; Clinical combined oral contraceptive ('Trinordiol'). Curr Med Res
features of tiaprofenic acid (surgam) associated cystitis and Opin. 1987;10(8):503-13. PMID: 2960493. X-4
a study of risk factors for its development. J Clin
Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;53(10):1013-9. PMID: 11027933. X- 333. Buurma H, De Smet PA, Egberts AC; Clinical risk
2, X-4 management in Dutch community pharmacies: the case of
drug-drug interactions. Drug Saf. 2006;29(8):723-32.
322. Buck ML; Clinical experience with ketorolac in PMID: 16872246. X-4
children. Ann Pharmacother. 1994 Sep;28(9):1009-13.
PMID: 7803871. X-2, X-4 334. Buysschaert M, Preumont V, Oriot PR, et al.; One-
year metabolic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes
323. Buckshee K, Kumar S, Saraya L; Contraceptive treated with exenatide in routine practice. Diabetes Metab.
vaginal ring--a rising star on the contraceptive horizon. 2010 Nov;36(5):381-8. PMID: 20598606. X-2, X-4
Adv Contracept. 1990 Sep;6(3):177-83. PMID: 2123369.
X-2, X-4 335. Byamugisha JK, Mirembe FM, Faxelid E, et al.; A
randomized clinical trial of two emergency contraceptive
324. Bueno H, Bardaji A, Patrignani P, et al.; Use of non- pill regimens in a Ugandan population. Acta Obstet
steroidal antiinflammatory drugs and type-specific risk of Gynecol Scand. 2010 May;89(5):670-6. PMID: 20423278.
acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Apr X-2, X-4
15;105(8):1102-6. PMID: 20381660. X-4
336. Bytzer P, Talley NJ, Jones MP, et al.; Oral
325. Bunton RW, Barrett DC, Palmer DG; Reintroduction hypoglycaemic drugs and gastrointestinal symptoms in
of anti-inflammatory drug therapy after drug-associated diabetes mellitus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001
gastro-intestinal disturbances. N Z Med J. 1982 Aug Jan;15(1):137-42. PMID: 11136287. X-2
25;95(714):582-4. PMID: 6982441. X-2
337. Caballero-Gordo A, Lopez-Nazareno N, Calderay M,
326. Bunyaratavej N, Keorochana S, Pithkul S; Safety and et al.; Oral cabergoline. Single-dose inhibition of puerperal
efficacy of meloxicam 7.5 mg in the treatment of lactation. J Reprod Med. 1991 Oct;36(10):717-21. PMID:
osteoarthritis in Thai patients. J Med Assoc Thai. 2001 1683403. X-2
Oct;84 Suppl 2:S542-6. PMID: 11853278. X-2, X-4
338. Cabrol D, Jannet D, Pannier E; Treatment of
327. Burch DJ, Spowart KJ, Jesinger DK, et al.; A dose- symptomatic polyhydramnios with indomethacin. Eur J
ranging study of the use of cyclical dydrogesterone with Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996 May;66(1):11-5. PMID:
continuous 17 beta oestradiol. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 8735752. X-2, X-3, X-4
Mar;102(3):243-8. PMID: 7794851. X-2, X-4
339. Cady RK, Banks J, Jones BA, et al.; Postmarketing
328. Burkhardt H, Bruckner D, Gladisch R; Risk factors migraine survey of frovatriptan: effectiveness and
of worsening renal function in hospitalized elderly patients. tolerability vs previous triptans, NSAIDs or a combination.
J Nephrol. 2005 Mar-Apr;18(2):166-73. PMID: 15931644. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Nov;25(11):2711-21. PMID:
X-2, X-3, X-4 19778164. X-4

329. Burnhill MS; The use of a large-scale surveillance 340. Caglar GS, Tasci Y, Kayikcioglu F, et al.;
system in Planned Parenthood Federation of America Intravenous tranexamic acid use in myomectomy: a
clinics to monitor cardiovascular events in users of prospective randomized double-blind placebo controlled
combination oral contraceptives. Int J Fertil Womens Med. study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008
1999 Jan-Feb;44(1):19-30. PMID: 10206196. X-4 Apr;137(2):227-31. PMID: 17499419. X-2, X-3, X-4

L-16
prostaglandin concentrations in women with menorrhagia.
341. Cagnacci A, Ferrari S, Tirelli A, et al.; Route of Prostaglandins. 1987 Jul;34(1):99-110. PMID: 3685399.
administration of contraceptives containing X-2, X-3, X-4
desogestrel/etonorgestrel and insulin sensitivity: a
prospective randomized study. Contraception. 2009 352. Campbell DR, Haber MM, Sheldon E, et al.; Effect
Jul;80(1):34-9. PMID: 19501213. X-2, X-3, X-4 of H. pylori status on gastric ulcer healing in patients
continuing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy and
342. Cai XM, Wu J; The mind-tranquilizing and receiving treatment with lansoprazole or ranitidine. Am J
menstruation-regulating method for acupuncture treatment Gastroenterol. 2002 Sep;97(9):2208-14. PMID: 12358234.
of delayed menstrual cycle--a clinical controlled study. J X-2, X-3, X-4
Tradit Chin Med. 2009 Mar;29(1):35-8. PMID: 19514186.
X-2, X-3, X-4 353. Campbell K, Steele RJ; Non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs and complicated diverticular disease: a
343. Calabrese AT, Coley KC, DaPos SV, et al.; case-control study. Br J Surg. 1991 Feb;78(2):190-1.
Evaluation of prescribing practices: risk of lactic acidosis PMID: 2015469. X-2
with metformin therapy. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Feb
25;162(4):434-7. PMID: 11863476. X-2, X-3, X-4 354. Campbell KL, De Beaux AC; Non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs and appendicitis in patients aged over
344. Caldwell JR, Roth SH, Wu WC, et al.; Sucralfate 50 years. Br J Surg. 1992 Sep;79(9):967-8. PMID:
treatment of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced 1307702. X-2
gastrointestinal symptoms and mucosal damage. Am J
Med. 1987 Sep 28;83(3B):74-82. PMID: 3310631. X-2, X- 355. Campos-Fernandez Mdel M, Ponce-De-Leon-Rosales
3, X-4 S, Archer-Dubon C, et al.; Incidence and risk factors for
cutaneous adverse drug reactions in an intensive care unit.
345. Caldwell M, Reilly C; Effects of topical nepafenac Rev Invest Clin. 2005 Nov-Dec;57(6):770-4. PMID:
on corneal epithelial healing time and postoperative pain 16708902. X-2, X-4
after PRK: a bilateral, prospective, randomized, masked
trial. J Refract Surg. 2008 Apr;24(4):377-82. PMID: 356. Cannon GW, Holden WL, Juhaeri J, et al.; Adverse
18500088. X-2, X-3, X-4 events with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs
(DMARD): a cohort study of leflunomide compared with
346. Caliskan E, Ozturk N, Dilbaz BO, et al.; Analysis of other DMARD. J Rheumatol. 2004 Oct;31(10):1906-11.
risk factors associated with uterine perforation by PMID: 15468352. X-4
intrauterine devices. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care.
2003 Sep;8(3):150-5. PMID: 14667326. X-2, X-4 357. Cano A, Calaf J, Molina J; The lipid and clinical
effects of sequential transdermal estradiol and
347. Calle EE, Feigelson HS, Hildebrand JS, et al.; estradiol/norethisterone acetate in 674 women. Arch
Postmenopausal hormone use and breast cancer Gynecol Obstet. 2003 Oct;268(4):317-22. PMID:
associations differ by hormone regimen and histologic 14504877. X-2, X-4
subtype. Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;115(5):936-45. PMID:
19156895. X-4, X-7 358. Cano A, Tarin JJ, Duenas JL; Two-year prospective,
randomized trial comparing an innovative twice-a-week
348. Callejo J, Diaz J, Ruiz A, et al.; Effect of a low-dose progestin regimen with a continuous combined regimen as
oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol postmenopausal hormone therapy. Fertil Steril. 1999
and 150 microg desogestrel on dysmenorrhea. Jan;71(1):129-36. PMID: 9935129. X-2, X-4
Contraception. 2003 Sep;68(3):183-8. PMID: 14561538.
X-2, X-3, X-4 359. Canto TE, Vera L, Polanco LE, et al.; Mini-pill in
lactating women. Contraception. 1989 Jun;39(6):589-601.
349. Calvo-Alen J, De Cos MA, Rodriguez-Valverde V, et PMID: 2752751. X-2
al.; Subclinical renal toxicity in rheumatic patients
receiving longterm treatment with nonsteroidal 360. Capizzi R, Landi F, Milani M, et al.; Skin tolerability
antiinflammatory drugs. J Rheumatol. 1994 and efficacy of combination therapy with hydrogen
Sep;21(9):1742-7. PMID: 7799360. X-2 peroxide stabilized cream and adapalene gel in comparison
with benzoyl peroxide cream and adapalene gel in common
350. Cameron IT, Haining R, Lumsden MA, et al.; The acne. A randomized, investigator-masked, controlled trial.
effects of mefenamic acid and norethisterone on measured Br J Dermatol. 2004 Aug;151(2):481-4. PMID: 15327558.
menstrual blood loss. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;76(1):85-8. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 2359570. X-2, X-3, X-4
361. Capriles-Behrens E, Caplin J, Sanchez-Borges M;
351. Cameron IT, Leask R, Kelly RW, et al.; The effects NSAID facial angioedema in a selected pediatric atopic
of danazol, mefenamic acid, norethisterone and a population. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2000 Sep-
progesterone-impregnated coil on endometrial Oct;10(5):277-9. PMID: 11108437. X-2

L-17
362. Capuano A, Motola G, Russo F, et al.; Adverse drug
events in two emergency departments in Naples, Italy: an 374. Carson JL, Strom BL, Soper KA, et al.; The
observational study. Pharmacol Res. 2004 Dec;50(6):631-6. association of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with
PMID: 15501703. X-4 upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Arch Intern Med.
1987 Jan;147(1):85-8. PMID: 3492182. X-4
363. Carbonell N, Verstuyft C, Massard J, et al.;
CYP2C9*3 Loss-of-Function Allele Is Associated With 375. Carton E, Caldwell MT, McDonald G, et al.;
Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Related to the Use Specialized intestinal metaplasia in patients with gastro-
of NSAIDs Other Than Aspirin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg. 2000 Jan;87(1):116-
Jun;87(6):693-8. PMID: 20445534. X-2, X-4 21. PMID: 10606922. X-2, X-3, X-4

364. Carcopino X, Akkawi R, Conroy R, et al.; Specific 376. Caruso S, Agnello C, Intelisano G, et al.; Prospective
timing for colposcopy: is it worthwhile? Obstet Gynecol. study on sexual behavior of women using 30 microg
2008 Feb;111(2 Pt 1):373-7. PMID: 18238975. X-2, X-3, ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone oral contraceptive.
X-4 Contraception. 2005 Jul;72(1):19-23. PMID: 15964287. X-
2, X-4
365. Cardamakis E, Georgopoulos A, Fotopoulos A, et al.;
Clinical experience with Norplant subdermal implant 377. Caruso S, Grillo C, Agnello C, et al.; A prospective
system as long-term contraception during adolescence. Eur study evidencing rhinomanometric and olfactometric
J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2002 Mar;7(1):36-40. outcomes in women taking oral contraceptives. Hum
PMID: 12041863. X-2, X-4 Reprod. 2001 Nov;16(11):2288-94. PMID: 11679506. X-2,
X-4
366. Cardoso F, Polonia J, Santos A, et al.; Low-dose oral
contraceptives and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. Int 378. Carvajal A, Arias LH, Vega E, et al.;
J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997 Dec;59(3):237-43. PMID: Gastroprotection during the administration of non-steroidal
9486514. X-2 anti-inflammatory drugs. A drug-utilization study. Eur J
Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Aug;60(6):439-44. PMID:
367. Cardoso JC, Canelas MM, Goncalo M, et al.; 15221157. X-2, X-3, X-4
Photopatch testing with an extended series of
photoallergens: a 5-year study. Contact Dermatitis. 2009 379. Casado-Arroyo R, Scheiman JM, Polo-Tomas M, et
Jun;60(6):325-9. PMID: 19489967. X-2, X-3, X-4 al.; Underutilization of gastroprotection for at-risk patients
undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Spain
368. Carne X, Rios J, Torres F; Postmarketing cohort compared with the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
study to assess the safety profile of oral dexketoprofen 2010 Sep;32(5):689-95. PMID: 20626380. X-2, X-3, X-4
trometamol for mild to moderate acute pain treatment in
primary care. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2009 380. Casati V, Gerli C, Franco A, et al.; Tranexamic acid
Oct;31(8):533-40. PMID: 19967102. X-4 in off-pump coronary surgery: a preliminary, randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ann Thorac Surg.
369. Carney DE, Nicolette LA, Ratner MH, et al.; 2001 Aug;72(2):470-5. PMID: 11515884. X-2, X-4
Ketorolac reduces postoperative narcotic requirements. J
Pediatr Surg. 2001 Jan;36(1):76-9. PMID: 11150441. X-2, 381. Casella G, Villanacci V, Fisogni S, et al.; Colonic
X-3, X-4 left-side increase of eosinophils: a clue to drug-related
colitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Mar
370. Carr BR; Cycle control with desogestrel-containing 1;29(5):535-41. PMID: 19077107. X-2, X-3
oral contraceptives--comparison of a monophasic and
triphasic regimen. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1993 Sep- 382. Cassidy N, Duggan E, Williams DJ, et al.; The
Oct;38(5):274-9. PMID: 8298666. X-4 epidemiology and type of medication errors reported to the
National Poisons Information Centre of Ireland. Clin
371. Carson JL; A case study: nonsteroidal Toxicol (Phila). 2011 Jul;49(6):485-91. PMID: 21824059.
antiinflammatory drugs and gastrointestinal bleeding. J X-4
Rheumatol Suppl. 1988 Oct;17:24-7. PMID: 3264583. X- X-8
4
383. Cassina M, De Santis M, Cesari E, et al.; First
372. Carson JL, Strom BL, Duff A, et al.; Safety of trimester diclofenac exposure and pregnancy outcome.
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with respect to acute Reprod Toxicol. 2010 Nov;30(3):401-4. PMID: 20438830.
liver disease. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Jun 14;153(11):1331- X-2, X-4
6. PMID: 8507123. X-2, X-4
384. Castelao JE, Yuan JM, Gago-Dominguez M, et al.;
373. Carson JL, Strom BL, Morse ML, et al.; The relative Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and bladder cancer
gastrointestinal toxicity of the nonsteroidal anti- prevention. Br J Cancer. 2000 Apr;82(7):1364-9. PMID:
inflammatory drugs. Arch Intern Med. 1987 10755416. X-4
Jun;147(6):1054-9. PMID: 3496062. X-4

L-18
385. Castellsague J, Holick CN, Hoffman CC, et al.; Risk 396. Chalasani N, Patel K, Clark WS, et al.; The
of upper gastrointestinal complications associated with prevalence and significance of leukocytosis in upper
cyclooxygenase-2 selective and nonselective nonsteroidal gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Med Sci. 1998
antiinflammatory drugs. Pharmacotherapy. 2009 Apr;315(4):233-6. PMID: 9537636. X-2, X-3, X-4
Dec;29(12):1397-407. PMID: 19947799. X-4
397. Chalmers RT, Darling Iii RC, Wingard JT, et al.;
386. Castellsague X, Diaz M, Vaccarella S, et al.; Randomized clinical trial of tranexamic acid-free fibrin
Intrauterine device use, cervical infection with human sealant during vascular surgical procedures. Br J Surg.
papillomavirus, and risk of cervical cancer: a pooled 2010 Dec;97(12):1784-9. PMID: 20730858. X-2, X-4
analysis of 26 epidemiological studies. Lancet Oncol. 2011
Oct;12(11):1023-31. PMID: 21917519. X-1, X-4, X-8 398. Cham E, Hall L, Ernst AA, et al.; Awareness and use
of over-the-counter pain medications: a survey of
387. Castelo-Branco C, Moyano D, Gomez O, et al.; emergency department patients. South Med J. 2002
Long-term safety and tolerability of flutamide for the May;95(5):529-35. PMID: 12005011. X-2, X-3, X-4
treatment of hirsutism. Fertil Steril. 2009 Apr;91(4):1183-
8. PMID: 18339379. X-2, X-3, X-4 399. Chan AT, Manson JE, Albert CM, et al.;
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and
388. Castle PE, Walker JL, Schiffman M, et al.; Hormonal the risk of cardiovascular events. Circulation. 2006 Mar
contraceptive use, pregnancy and parity, and the risk of 28;113(12):1578-87. PMID: 16534006. X-4
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 among oncogenic HPV
DNA-positive women with equivocal or mildly abnormal 400. Chan FK, Hung LC, Suen BY, et al.; Celecoxib
cytology. Int J Cancer. 2005 Dec 20;117(6):1007-12. versus diclofenac and omeprazole in reducing the risk of
PMID: 15986443. X-4 recurrent ulcer bleeding in patients with arthritis. N Engl J
Med. 2002 Dec 26;347(26):2104-10. PMID: 12501222. X-
389. Catalano O; Greater curvature antral flattening due to 2, X-3, X-4
nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Rofo. 1997
Aug;167(2):122-4. PMID: 9309163. X-2 401. Chan FK, Sung JJ, Ching JY, et al.; Randomized trial
of low-dose misoprostol and naproxen vs. nabumetone to
390. Cataldi L, Leone R, Moretti U, et al.; Potential risk prevent recurrent upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in
factors for the development of acute renal failure in preterm users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Aliment
newborn infants: a case-control study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Jan;15(1):19-24. PMID: 11136274.
Neonatal Ed. 2005 Nov;90(6):F514-9. PMID: 16244211. X-2
X-2, X-4
402. Chan FK, Sung JJ, Chung SC, et al.; Randomised
391. Caughey GE, Roughead EE, Pratt N, et al.; Stroke trial of eradication of Helicobacter pylori before non-
risk and NSAIDs: an Australian population-based study. steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy to prevent peptic
Med J Aust. 2011 Nov 7;195(9):525-9. PMID: 22060087. ulcers. Lancet. 1997 Oct 4;350(9083):975-9. PMID:
X-7 9329511. X-2, X-3, X-4

392. Caunedo-Alvarez A, Gomez-Rodriguez BJ, Romero- 403. Chan HL, Wu JC, Chan FK, et al.; Is non-
Vazquez J, et al.; Macroscopic small bowel mucosal injury Helicobacter pylori, non-NSAID peptic ulcer a common
caused by chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs cause of upper GI bleeding? A prospective study of 977
(NSAID) use as assessed by capsule endoscopy. Rev Esp patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Apr;53(4):438-42.
Enferm Dig. 2010 Feb;102(2):80-5. PMID: 20361843. X-2 PMID: 11275883. X-4

393. Cebollero-Santamaria F, Smith J, Gioe S, et al.; 404. Chan JK, Sleat G, Sharma S, et al.; Gastroprotection
Selective outpatient management of upper gastrointestinal in trauma patients receiving non-steroidal anti-
bleeding in the elderly. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 inflammatory drugs. Surgeon. 2010 Aug;8(4):206-10.
May;94(5):1242-7. PMID: 10235201. X-2, X-3 PMID: 20569940. X-2, X-3, X-4

394. Cepeda MS, Farrar JT, Baumgarten M, et al.; Side 405. Chan SS, Luben R, Bergmann MM, et al.; Aspirin in
effects of opioids during short-term administration: effect the aetiology of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: a
of age, gender, and race. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2003 European prospective cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol
Aug;74(2):102-12. PMID: 12891220. X-4 Ther. 2011 Sep;34(6):649-55. PMID: 21790683. X-4

395. Cerhan JR, Anderson KE, Janney CA, et al.; 406. Chan TM, Tse KC, Tang CS, et al.; Long-term study
Association of aspirin and other non-steroidal anti- of mycophenolate mofetil as continuous induction and
inflammatory drug use with incidence of non-Hodgkin maintenance treatment for diffuse proliferative lupus
lymphoma. Int J Cancer. 2003 Sep 20;106(5):784-8. PMID: nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 Apr;16(4):1076-84.
12866040. X-4, X-7 PMID: 15728784. X-2, X-3, X-4

L-19
407. Chan TY, Critchley JA, Lau JT, et al.; The Physiol Pharmacol. 1994 Jul;38(3):174-80. PMID:
relationship between upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and 7814077. X-2, X-3
drug use: a case control study. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther.
1996 Jul;34(7):304-8. PMID: 8832307. X-2 419. Check JH, Rankin A, Teichman M; The risk of fetal
anomalies as a result of progesterone therapy during
408. Chande N, Driman DK, Reynolds RP; Collagenous pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1986 Apr;45(4):575-7. PMID:
colitis and lymphocytic colitis: patient characteristics and 3956772. X-2, X-3, X-4
clinical presentation. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005
Mar;40(3):343-7. PMID: 15932175. X-2, X-3, X-4 420. Cheetham TC, Levy G, Niu F, et al.; Gastrointestinal
safety of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and selective
409. Chang CH, Chen HC, Lin JW, et al.; Risk of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in patients on warfarin. Ann
hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal adverse events Pharmacother. 2009 Nov;43(11):1765-73. PMID:
associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a 19809010. X-4
nationwide case-crossover study in Taiwan.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Jul;20(7):763-71. 421. Cheetham TC, Levy G, Spence M; Predicting the risk
PMID: 21618340. X-4 of gastrointestinal bleeding due to nonsteroidal
antiinflammatory drugs: NSAID electronic assessment of
410. Chang CH, Lin JW, Chen HC, et al.; Non-steroidal risk. J Rheumatol. 2003 Oct;30(10):2241-4. PMID:
anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of lower gastrointestinal 14528523. X-4
adverse events: a nationwide study in Taiwan. Gut. 2011
Oct;60(10):1372-8. PMID: 21415083. X-4 422. Chegini N, Rhoton-Vlasak A, Williams RS;
Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-26 and tissue
411. Chang CH, Shau WY, Kuo CW, et al.; Increased risk inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-3 and -4 in
of stroke associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory endometrium throughout the normal menstrual cycle and
drugs: a nationwide case-crossover study. Stroke. 2010 alteration in users of levonorgestrel implants who
Sep;41(9):1884-90. PMID: 20671253. X-4 experience irregular uterine bleeding. Fertil Steril. 2003
Sep;80(3):564-70. PMID: 12969699. X-2, X-3, X-4
412. Chang CY, Wu MS, Lee CT, et al.; Prospective
survey for the etiology and outcome of peptic ulcer 423. Chen C, Li Y, Chen F, et al.; Estrogen receptor beta
bleeding: a community based study in southern Taiwan. J genetic variants and combined oral contraceptive use as
Formos Med Assoc. 2011 Apr;110(4):223-9. PMID: relates to the risk of hypertension in Chinese women. Arch
21540004. X-2 Med Res. 2010 Nov;41(8):599-605. PMID: 21199728. X-
2, X-3
413. Chang JY, Locke GR, Schleck CD, et al.; Risk
factors for chronic constipation and a possible role of 424. Chen CH, Chiu CC, Huang MC, et al.; Metformin for
analgesics. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2007 metabolic dysregulation in schizophrenic patients treated
Nov;19(11):905-11. PMID: 17988275. X-2 with olanzapine. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol
Psychiatry. 2008 May 15;32(4):925-31. PMID: 18082302.
414. Charonis G, Larsson PG; Prolonged use of X-2, X-3, X-4
intrauterine contraceptive device as a risk factor for tubo-
ovarian abscess. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 425. Chen FP, Lee N, Wang CH, et al.; Effects of
2009;88(6):680-4. PMID: 19412803. X-2 hormone replacement therapy on cardiovascular risk factors
in postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril. 1998
415. Chasan-Taber L, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, et al.; A Feb;69(2):267-73. PMID: 9496340. X-2, X-4
prospective study of oral contraceptives and NIDDM
among U.S. women. Diabetes Care. 1997 Mar;20(3):330-5. 426. Chen JY, Wu GJ, Mok MS, et al.; Effect of adding
PMID: 9051382. X-4 ketorolac to intravenous morphine patient-controlled
analgesia on bowel function in colorectal surgery patients--
416. Chassaignon C, Letoumelin P, Pateron D; Upper a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Acta
gastrointestinal haemorrhage in Emergency Departments in Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Apr;49(4):546-51. PMID:
France: causes and management. Eur J Emerg Med. 2003 15777304. X-2, X-3, X-4
Dec;10(4):290-5. PMID: 14676507. X-2, X-4
427. Chen MJ, Yang WS, Chen HF, et al.; Increased
417. Chattopdhyay B, Nigam A, Goswami S, et al.; follistatin levels after oral contraceptive treatment in obese
Clinical outcome of levonorgestrel intra-uterine system in and non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
idiopathic menorrhagia. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2011 Hum Reprod. 2010 Mar;25(3):779-85. PMID: 20093255.
Jul;15(7):764-8. PMID: 21780544. X-2, X-4 X-2, X-3, X-4

418. Chaudhuri SK, Das A, De KC, et al.; Some hitherto 428. Chen QJ, Xiang WP, Zhang DK, et al.; Efficacy and
unreported findings on the extragenital effects of safety of a levonorgestrel enteric-coated tablet as an over-
progesterone in human females--a clinical study. Indian J the-counter drug for emergency contraception: a Phase IV

L-20
clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2011 Sep;26(9):2316-21. 440. Cho E, Curhan G, Hankinson SE, et al.; Prospective
PMID: 21672924. X-4 evaluation of analgesic use and risk of renal cell cancer.
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Sep 12;171(16):1487-93. PMID:
429. Chen TM, Lin CC, Huang PT, et al.; Metformin 21911634. X-4
associated with lower mortality in diabetic patients with
early stage hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency 441. Choi HK, Seeger JD, Kuntz KM; Effects of
ablation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 May;26(5):858-65. rofecoxib and naproxen on life expectancy among patients
PMID: 21251068. X-2, X-3 with rheumatoid arthritis: a decision analysis. Am J Med.
2004 May 1;116(9):621-9. PMID: 15093759. X-4, X-7
430. Cheraghali AM; Injectable diclofenac: a painful shot
into Iran's health system. Soc Sci Med. 2006 442. Choi KH, Kim AJ, Son IJ, et al.; Risk factors of drug
Sep;63(6):1597-601. PMID: 16782253. X-2, X-4 interaction between warfarin and nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs in practical setting. J Korean Med Sci.
431. Cherian PT, Cherian S, Singh P; Long-term follow- 2010 Mar;25(3):337-41. PMID: 20191029. X-2
up of patients with gastric outlet obstruction related to
peptic ulcer disease treated with endoscopic balloon 443. Choi NK, Hahn S, Yoon BW, et al.; Potential bias
dilatation and drug therapy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 caused by control selection in secondary data analysis:
Sep;66(3):491-7. PMID: 17640640. X-2, X-3, X-4 nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and
hemorrhagic stroke. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010
432. Chi IC, Potts M, Wilkens LR, et al.; Performance of Jun;19(6):604-9. PMID: 20049849. X-4
the copper T-380A intrauterine device in breastfeeding
women. Contraception. 1989 Jun;39(6):603-18. PMID: 444. Choi NK, Park BJ, Jeong SW, et al.; Nonaspirin
2666018. X-2, X-4 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and hemorrhagic
stroke risk: the Acute Brain Bleeding Analysis study.
433. Chi IC, Waszak CS, Wilkens LR; Do insertion- Stroke. 2008 Mar;39(3):845-9. PMID: 18258834. X-4
related problems affect subsequent IUD performance?
Contraception. 1986 Nov;34(5):497-503. PMID: 3816233. 445. Chokrungvaranon N, Chentanez T, Arakaki RF;
X-2, X-4 Clinical experience with exenatide in predominantly Asian
and Pacific Islander patients with type 2 diabetes.
434. Chiba T, Sato K, Kudara N, et al.; Upper Endocrine. 2007 Dec;32(3):311-6. PMID: 18266113. X-2,
gastrointestinal disorders induced by non-steroidal anti- X-4
inflammatory drugs. Inflammopharmacology. 2008
Feb;16(1):16-20. PMID: 18256801. X-2 446. Choma NN, Griffin MR, Huang RL, et al.; An
algorithm to identify incident myocardial infarction using
435. Chin CJ, Franklin JH, Turner B, et al.; Ketorolac in Medicaid data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009
thyroid surgery: quantifying the risk of hematoma. J Nov;18(11):1064-71. PMID: 19718697. X-2, X-3, X-4
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun 1;40(3):196-9.
PMID: 21518639. X-2, X-4 447. Choo PW, Donahue JG, Platt R; Ibuprofen and skin
and soft tissue superinfections in children with varicella.
436. Chittacharoen A, Domhardt R, Manonai J, et al.; Ann Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;7(7):440-5. PMID: 9349910. X-
Efficacy and tolerability of the hormone replacement drug 4
estradiol valerate/levonorgestrel in the treatment of
menopausal syndrome in Thai women. Methods Find Exp 448. Chotnopparatpattara P, Taneepanichskul S,
Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Oct;25(8):645-51. PMID: 14671683. Treratanachat S, et al.; Relationship between progesterone
X-2, X-4 receptor level in endometrium and bleeding pattern in depot
medroxyprogesterone acetate users. J Med Assoc Thai.
437. Chlebowski RT, Anderson GL, Gass M, et al.; 2003 Feb;86(2):172-7. PMID: 12678156. X-2, X-3, X-4
Estrogen plus progestin and breast cancer incidence and
mortality in postmenopausal women. JAMA. 2010 Oct 449. Chou TC, Chang HY, Chen CJ, et al.; Effect of hand
20;304(15):1684-92. PMID: 20959578. X-7 dermatitis on the total body burden of chromium after
ferrous sulfate application in cement among cement
438. Chlebowski RT, Hendrix SL, Langer RD, et al.; workers. Contact Dermatitis. 2008 Sep;59(3):151-6. PMID:
Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and 18759895. X-2, X-3, X-4
mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the
Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2003 450. Choudhary DR, Naithani R, Mahapatra M, et al.;
Jun 25;289(24):3243-53. PMID: 12824205. X-7 Intracranial hemorrhage in childhood immune
thrombocytopenic purpura. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009
439. Chlebowski RT, Kuller LH, Prentice RL, et al.; Apr;52(4):529-31. PMID: 19058201. X-2, X-3, X-4
Breast cancer after use of estrogen plus progestin in
postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 451. Chow GK, Fabrizio MD, Steer T, et al.; Prospective
5;360(6):573-87. PMID: 19196674. X-4, X-7 double-blind study of effect of ketorolac administration

L-21
after laparoscopic urologic surgery. J Endourol. 2001 Int J Obes (Lond). 2005 Oct;29(10):1252-8. PMID:
Mar;15(2):171-4. PMID: 11325088. X-2, X-3, X-4 15997247. X-2

452. Chowdhury A, Ganguly G, Chowdhury D, et al.; 463. Clark MK, Sowers MR, Nichols S, et al.; Bone
Gastro-duodenal mucosal changes associated with low- mineral density changes over two years in first-time users
dose aspirin therapy: a prospective, endoscopic study. of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Fertil Steril. 2004
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2001 Nov-Dec;20(6):227-9. PMID: Dec;82(6):1580-6. PMID: 15589863. X-2
11817775. X-2, X-3, X-4
464. Clark MK, Stockdale CK, Railsback L, et al.;
453. Christen WG, Ajani UA, Schaumberg DA, et al.; Differences in cervical cytologic and histologic findings
Aspirin use and risk of cataract in posttrial follow-up of between women using depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate
Physicians' Health Study I. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 and oral contraceptives. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011
Mar;119(3):405-12. PMID: 11231774. X-4 Jul;15(3):219-23. PMID: 21716050. X-2

454. Christensen ST, Sondergaard B, Honore PH, et al.; 465. Clarke LL, Schmitt K, Bono CA, et al.; Norplant
Pharmacy student driven detection of adverse drug selection and satisfaction among low-income women. Am J
reactions in the community pharmacy setting. Public Health. 1998 Aug;88(8):1175-81. PMID: 9702143.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):399-404. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 21442686. X-2, X-3, X-4
466. Clayton R, Chaudhry S, Ali I, et al.; Mucosal (oral
455. Christie GA, Lucas C, Bateman DN, et al.; and vulval) lichen planus in women: are angiotensin-
Redefining the ACE-inhibitor dose-response relationship: converting enzyme inhibitors protective, and beta-blockers
substantial blood pressure lowering after massive doses. and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs associated with
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Dec;62(12):989-93. PMID: the condition? Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010 Jun;35(4):384-7.
17089106. X-2, X-3, X-4 PMID: 19874335. X-2

456. Chrubasik S, Kunzel O, Model A, et al.; Treatment 467. Cleophas TJ, Tavenier P, Niemeyer MG; The risk of
of low back pain with a herbal or synthetic anti-rheumatic: emergency intestinal bleeding among users of
a randomized controlled study. Willow bark extract for low acenocoumarin: a population-based cohort study.
back pain. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001 Dec;40(12):1388- Angiology. 1993 Feb;44(2):85-92. PMID: 8434814. X-2,
93. PMID: 11752510. X-2, X-3, X-4 X-4

457. Chrubasik S, Kunzel O, Thanner J, et al.; A 1-year 468. Clerc S, Vuilleumier H, Frascarolo P, et al.; Is the
follow-up after a pilot study with Doloteffin for low back effect of inguinal field block with 0.5% bupivacaine on
pain. Phytomedicine. 2005 Jan;12(1-2):1-9. PMID: postoperative pain after hernia repair enhanced by addition
15693701. X-2, X-3, X-4 of ketorolac or S(+) ketamine? Clin J Pain. 2005 Jan-
Feb;21(1):101-5. PMID: 15599137. X-2, X-3, X-4
458. Ciarrocca KN, Greenberg MS; A retrospective study
of the management of oral mucous membrane pemphigoid 469. Cleves MA, Savell VH, Jr., Raj S, et al.; Maternal
with dapsone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol use of acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
Endod. 1999 Aug;88(2):159-63. PMID: 10468458. X-2, X- drugs (NSAIDs), and muscular ventricular septal defects.
3, X-4 Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2004
Mar;70(3):107-13. PMID: 15039924. X-2, X-4
459. Cibere J, Sibley JT, Haga M; Rheumatologists'
adherence to guidelines for misoprostol use in patients at 470. Clinard F, Sgro C, Bardou M, et al.; Association
high risk for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug between concomitant use of several systemic NSAIDs and
gastropathy. J Rheumatol. 2002 Feb;29(2):339-46. PMID: an excess risk of adverse drug reaction. A case/non-case
11838854. X-2, X-3, X-4 study from the French Pharmacovigilance system database.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jun;60(4):279-83. PMID:
460. Cino M, Greenberg GR; Bone mineral density in 15103437. X-4
Crohn's disease: a longitudinal study of budesonide,
prednisone, and nonsteroid therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 471. Clinch D; Why not have definitive trials of
2002 Apr;97(4):915-21. PMID: 12003427. X-2, X-4 gastrointestinal safety for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs? Discussion paper. J R Soc Med. 1988
461. Civic D, Scholes D, Ichikawa L, et al.; Depressive Mar;81(3):158-60. PMID: 3357159. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4
symptoms in users and non-users of depot
medroxyprogesterone acetate. Contraception. 2000 472. Clinton OP, Priestman TJ, Latief TN, et al.; A
Jun;61(6):385-90. PMID: 10958882. X-2 prospective randomized trial to evaluate different oral dose
regimens of medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with
462. Clark MK, Dillon JS, Sowers M, et al.; Weight, fat advanced breast cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol).
mass, and central distribution of fat increase when women 1995;7(4):251-6. PMID: 8845325. X-2, X-3
use depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception.

L-22
484. Colao A, Vitale G, Di Sarno A, et al.; Prolactin and
473. Clunie M, Crone LA, Klassen L, et al.; Psychiatric prostate hypertrophy: a pilot observational, prospective,
side effects of indomethacin in parturients. Can J Anaesth. case-control study in men with prolactinoma. J Clin
2003 Jun-Jul;50(6):586-8. PMID: 12826551. X-2, X-4 Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Jun;89(6):2770-5. PMID:
15181056. X-2, X-3, X-4
474. Coaccioli S, Allegra A, Di Cato L, et al.; Clinical
efficacy and tolerance of nabumetone in articular and non- 485. Cole LP, Potts DM, Aranda C, et al.; An evaluation
articular rheumatic disorders: personal experience during of the TCu 380Ag and the Multiload Cu375. Fertil Steril.
12 weeks of treatment. Panminerva Med. 1998 1985 Feb;43(2):214-7. PMID: 3881295. X-2, X-4
Jun;40(2):110-5. PMID: 9689831. X-2, X-4
486. Collen MJ, Abdulian JD; Do non-steroidal anti-
475. Coffee AL, Sulak PJ, Kuehl TJ; Long-term inflammatory drugs cause duodenal ulcer? Evaluation of
assessment of symptomatology and satisfaction of an basal acid output and ulcer complications. J Gastroenterol
extended oral contraceptive regimen. Contraception. 2007 Hepatol. 1996 Jun;11(6):520-3. PMID: 8792303. X-2
Jun;75(6):444-9. PMID: 17519150. X-2, X-4
487. Colli E, Tong D, Penhallegon R, et al.; Reasons for
476. Cohen AD, Bonneh DY, Reuveni H, et al.; Drug contraceptive discontinuation in women 20-39 years old in
exposure and psoriasis vulgaris: case-control and case- New Zealand. Contraception. 1999 Apr;59(4):227-31.
crossover studies. Acta Derm Venereol. 2005;85(4):299- PMID: 10457866. X-4
303. PMID: 16191849. X-2
488. Collins AJ, Davies J, Dixon AS; A prospective
477. Cohen JS; Dose discrepancies between the endoscopic study of the effect of Orudis and Oruvail on the
Physicians' Desk Reference and the medical literature, and upper gastrointestinal tract, in patients with osteoarthritis.
their possible role in the high incidence of dose-related Br J Rheumatol. 1988 Apr;27(2):106-9. PMID: 3365527.
adverse drug events. Arch Intern Med. 2001 Apr X-3, X-4
9;161(7):957-64. PMID: 11295958. X-2, X-3, X-4
489. Colt HG, Shapiro AP; Drug-induced illness as a
478. Cohen M, Sapoznikov B, Niv Y; Primary and cause for admission to a community hospital. J Am Geriatr
secondary nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Soc. 1989 Apr;37(4):323-6. PMID: 2921453. X-2
Clin Gastroenterol. 2007 Oct;41(9):810-3. PMID:
17881925. X-3, X-4 490. Comfort MB, Tse AS, Tsang AC, et al.; A study of
the comparative efficacy of three common analgesics in the
479. Cohen S, Cannon GW, Schiff M, et al.; Two-year, control of pain after third molar surgery under local
blinded, randomized, controlled trial of treatment of active anaesthesia. Aust Dent J. 2002 Dec;47(4):327-30. PMID:
rheumatoid arthritis with leflunomide compared with 12587769. X-3, X-4
methotrexate. Utilization of Leflunomide in the Treatment
of Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial Investigator Group. Arthritis 491. Comfort VK, Code WE, Rooney ME, et al.;
Rheum. 2001 Sep;44(9):1984-92. PMID: 11592358. X-2, Naproxen premedication reduces postoperative tubal
X-3, X-4 ligation pain. Can J Anaesth. 1992 Apr;39(4):349-52.
PMID: 1348663. X-2, X-4
480. Colacurci N, De Placido G, Mollo A, et al.; Short-
term use of Goserelin depot in the treatment of 492. Confino E, Ismajovich B, Rudick A, et al.;
dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. Comparison between OM-GA Cu and Copper-T IUCDs.
1995;22(3):212-9. PMID: 7554259. X-2, X-3, X-4 Contraception. 1983 Dec;28(6):521-5. PMID: 6370586. X-
2, X-4
481. Colao A, Abs R, Barcena DG, et al.; Pregnancy
outcomes following cabergoline treatment: extended results 493. Conforti A, Leone R, Moretti U, et al.; Adverse drug
from a 12-year observational study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). reactions related to the use of NSAIDs with a focus on
2008 Jan;68(1):66-71. PMID: 17760883. X-2 nimesulide: results of spontaneous reporting from a
Northern Italian area. Drug Saf. 2001;24(14):1081-90.
482. Colao A, Di Sarno A, Guerra E, et al.; Predictors of PMID: 11735663. X-4
remission of hyperprolactinaemia after long-term
withdrawal of cabergoline therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 494. Connell EB; Minimizing the metabolic risks of oral
2007 Sep;67(3):426-33. PMID: 17573902. X-2, X-3 contraceptives through patient counseling and monitoring. J
Reprod Med. 1986 Sep;31(9 Suppl):934-8. PMID:
483. Colao A, Galderisi M, Di Sarno A, et al.; Increased 3772914. X-1
prevalence of tricuspid regurgitation in patients with
prolactinomas chronically treated with cabergoline. J Clin 495. Connelly CS, Panush RS; Should nonsteroidal anti-
Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Oct;93(10):3777-84. PMID: inflammatory drugs be stopped before elective surgery?
18682513. X-2 Arch Intern Med. 1991 Oct;151(10):1963-6. PMID:
1929684. X-2

L-23
496. Conner P, Soderqvist G, Skoog L, et al.; Breast cell
proliferation in postmenopausal women during HRT 507. Couser RJ, Hoekstra RE, Ferrara TB, et al.;
evaluated through fine needle aspiration cytology. Breast Neurodevelopmental follow-up at 36 months' corrected age
Cancer Res Treat. 2003 Mar;78(2):159-65. PMID: of preterm infants treated with prophylactic indomethacin.
12725416. X-2 Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Jun;154(6):598-602.
PMID: 10850507. X-2, X-4
497. Connor PD, Tavernier LA, Thomas SM, et al.;
Determining risk between Depo-Provera use and increased 508. Cox ER, Motheral B, Mager D; Verification of a
uterine bleeding in obese and overweight women. J Am decision analytic model assumption using real-world
Board Fam Pract. 2002 Jan-Feb;15(1):7-10. PMID: practice data: implications for the cost effectiveness of
11841143. X-2 cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors (COX-2s). Am J Manag Care.
2003 Dec;9(12):785-94. PMID: 14712755. X-3, X-4
498. Cooper JW; Adverse drug reaction-related
hospitalizations of nursing facility patients: a 4-year study. 509. Cox M, Blacksell S; Clinical performance of the
South Med J. 1999 May;92(5):485-90. PMID: 10342894. levonorgestrel intra-uterine system in routine use by the
X-2 UK Family Planning and Reproductive Health Research
Network: 12-month report. Br J Fam Plann. 2000
499. Cooper KG, Jack SA, Parkin DE, et al.; Five-year Jul;26(3):143-7. PMID: 10920290. X-2, X-3, X-4
follow up of women randomised to medical management or
transcervical resection of the endometrium for heavy 510. Cox M, Blacksell SE; Clinical performance of the
menstrual loss: clinical and quality of life outcomes. BJOG. Nova-T380 IUD in routine use by the UK Family Planning
2001 Dec;108(12):1222-8. PMID: 11843383. X-2, X-3, X- and Reproductive Health Research Network: 12-month
4 report. Br J Fam Plann. 2000 Jul;26(3):148-51. PMID:
10920291. X-2, X-4
500. Cooper KG, Parkin DE, Garratt AM, et al.; A
randomised comparison of medical and hysteroscopic 511. Cozzi R, Attanasio R, Lodrini S, et al.; Cabergoline
management in women consulting a gynaecologist for addition to depot somatostatin analogues in resistant
treatment of heavy menstrual loss. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. acromegalic patients: efficacy and lack of predictive value
1997 Dec;104(12):1360-6. PMID: 9422013. X-2, X-3, X-4 of prolactin status. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2004
Aug;61(2):209-15. PMID: 15272916. X-2, X-3
501. Cooper KG, Parkin DE, Garratt AM, et al.; Two-year
follow up of women randomised to medical management or 512. Cramer DW, Harlow BL, Titus-Ernstoff L, et al.;
transcervical resection of the endometrium for heavy Over-the-counter analgesics and risk of ovarian cancer.
menstrual loss: clinical and quality of life outcomes. Br J Lancet. 1998 Jan 10;351(9096):104-7. PMID: 9439495. X-
Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Mar;106(3):258-65. PMID: 2, X-3, X-4
10426646. X-2
513. Crandall CJ, Markovic D, Huang MH, et al.;
502. Cormican LJ, Farooque S, Altmann DR, et al.; Predictors of breast discomfort among women initiating
Improvements in an oral aspirin challenge protocol for the menopausal hormone therapy. Menopause. 2010 May-
diagnosis of aspirin hypersensitivity. Clin Exp Allergy. Jun;17(3):462-70. PMID: 20009961. X-2
2005 Jun;35(6):717-22. PMID: 15969660. X-2, X-4
514. Crawford ML, Waller PC, Wood SM; Severe cystitis
503. Cormio M, Citerio G, Spear S, et al.; Control of fever associated with tiaprofenic acid. Br J Urol. 1997
by continuous, low-dose diclofenac sodium infusion in Apr;79(4):578-84. PMID: 9126086. X-2, X-4
acute cerebral damage patients. Intensive Care Med. 2000
May;26(5):552-7. PMID: 10923729. X-2, X-4 515. Creinin MD, Lisman R, Strickler RC; Screening for
factor V Leiden mutation before prescribing combination
504. Corre KA, Spielberg TE; Adverse drug reaction oral contraceptives. Fertil Steril. 1999 Oct;72(4):646-51.
processing in the United States and its dependence on PMID: 10521103. X-1, X-4
physician reporting: zomepirac (Zomax) as a case in point.
Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Feb;17(2):145-9. PMID: 3257365. 516. Critchley HO, Wang H, Jones RL, et al.;
X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4 Morphological and functional features of endometrial
decidualization following long-term intrauterine
505. Cortes-Prieto J, Juez-Martel P; Incidences of breast levonorgestrel delivery. Hum Reprod. 1998
cancer throughout long-term hormone replacement therapy. May;13(5):1218-24. PMID: 9647550. X-2
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2007 May;104(3-5):180-9.
PMID: 17467269. X-2, X-3, X-4 517. Critchley HO, Wang H, Kelly RW, et al.; Progestin
receptor isoforms and prostaglandin dehydrogenase in the
506. Cote GA, Norvell JP, Rice JP, et al.; Use of endometrium of women using a levonorgestrel-releasing
gastroprotection in patients discharged from hospital on intrauterine system. Hum Reprod. 1998 May;13(5):1210-7.
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Ther. 2008 PMID: 9647549. X-2, X-4
Sep-Oct;15(5):444-9. PMID: 18806520. X-2, X-3, X-4

L-24
529. Currie CJ, Poole CD, Gale EA; The influence of
518. Cromer BA, Bonny AE, Stager M, et al.; Bone glucose-lowering therapies on cancer risk in type 2
mineral density in adolescent females using injectable or diabetes. Diabetologia. 2009 Sep;52(9):1766-77. PMID:
oral contraceptives: a 24-month prospective study. Fertil 19572116. X-3
Steril. 2008 Dec;90(6):2060-7. PMID: 18222431. X-2
530. Curtis JR, Cheng H, Delzell E, et al.; Adaptation of
519. Cromer BA, Smith RD, Blair JM, et al.; A Bayesian data mining algorithms to longitudinal claims
prospective study of adolescents who choose among data: coxib safety as an example. Med Care. 2008
levonorgestrel implant (Norplant), medroxyprogesterone Sep;46(9):969-75. PMID: 18725852. X-4
acetate (Depo-Provera), or the combined oral contraceptive
pill as contraception. Pediatrics. 1994 Nov;94(5):687-94. 531. Curtis JR, Olivieri J, Allison JJ, et al.; A group
PMID: 7936897. X-2, X-3, X-4 randomized trial to improve safe use of nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs. Am J Manag Care. 2005
520. Cromer BA, Stager M, Bonny A, et al.; Depot Sep;11(9):537-43. PMID: 16159043. X-2, X-3, X-4
medroxyprogesterone acetate, oral contraceptives and bone
mineral density in a cohort of adolescent girls. J Adolesc 532. Cury DB, Moss AC; Ocular manifestations in a
Health. 2004 Dec;35(6):434-41. PMID: 15581522. X-2 community-based cohort of patients with inflammatory
bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010 Aug;16(8):1393-
521. Cropsey KL, Matthews C, Campbel S, et al.; Long- 6. PMID: 19998457. X-2, X-4
term, reversible contraception use among high-risk women
treated in a university-based gynecology clinic: comparison 533. Cushman M, Kuller LH, Prentice R, et al.; Estrogen
between IUD and depo-provera. J Womens Health plus progestin and risk of venous thrombosis. JAMA. 2004
(Larchmt). 2010 Feb;19(2):349-53. PMID: 20109106. X-2 Oct 6;292(13):1573-80. PMID: 15467059. X-7

522. Cross RK, Wilson KT, Binion DG; Polypharmacy 534. Czeizel AE, Kodaj I; A changing pattern in the
and Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 May association of oral contraceptives and the different groups
15;21(10):1211-6. PMID: 15882241. X-2, X-3, X-4 of congenital limb deficiencies. Contraception. 1995
Jan;51(1):19-24. PMID: 7750279. X-4
523. Cruz-Correa M, Hylind LM, Romans KE, et al.;
Long-term treatment with sulindac in familial adenomatous 535. da Silva Dal Pizzol T, Schuler-Faccini L, Mengue SS,
polyposis: a prospective cohort study. Gastroenterology. et al.; Dipyrone use during pregnancy and adverse
2002 Mar;122(3):641-5. PMID: 11874996. X-2, X-4 perinatal events. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009
Mar;279(3):293-7. PMID: 18568358. X-4
524. Cullen DJ, Hawkey GM, Greenwood DC, et al.;
Peptic ulcer bleeding in the elderly: relative roles of 536. da Silva MO, Costa MM; Reason, myths and
Helicobacter pylori and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory fantasies: preliminary data and reflections about the
drugs. Gut. 1997 Oct;41(4):459-62. PMID: 9391242. X-2, Portuguese experience with LNG-IUS-induced
X-4 hypomenorrhea. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care.
1999 Mar;4(1):21-5. PMID: 10367192. X-2, X-3, X-4
525. Cullins VE, Blumenthal PD, Remsburg RE, et al.;
Preliminary experience with Norplant in an inner city 537. Dai C, Stafford RS, Alexander GC; National trends
population. Contraception. 1993 Feb;47(2):193-203. in cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor use since market release:
PMID: 8449019. X-2, X-3, X-4 nonselective diffusion of a selectively cost-effective
innovation. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jan 24;165(2):171-7.
526. Cunnington M, Webb D, Qizilbash N, et al.; Risk of PMID: 15668363. X-3, X-4
ischaemic cardiovascular events from selective
cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in osteoarthritis. 538. Dalmau A, Sabate A, Acosta F, et al.; Tranexamic
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Jun;17(6):601-8. acid reduces red cell transfusion better than epsilon-
PMID: 18383442. X-4 aminocaproic acid or placebo in liver transplantation.
Anesth Analg. 2000 Jul;91(1):29-34. PMID: 10866882. X-
527. Cuong DT, My Huong NT; Comparative phase III 2, X-3, X-4
clinical trial of two injectable contraceptive preparations,
depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate and Cyclofem, in 539. Dalton SO, Johansen C, Mellemkjaer L, et al.; Use of
Vietnamese women. Contraception. 1996 Sep;54(3):169- selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of upper
79. PMID: 8899259. X-2, X-4 gastrointestinal tract bleeding: a population-based cohort
study. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jan 13;163(1):59-64. PMID:
528. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rosner B, et al.; Frequency 12523917. X-4
of analgesic use and risk of hypertension in younger
women. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Oct 28;162(19):2204-8. 540. Dammann HG, Saleki M, Torz M, et al.; Effects of
PMID: 12390063. X-4 buffered and plain acetylsalicylic acid formulations with
and without ascorbic acid on gastric mucosa in healthy

L-25
subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Feb 1;19(3):367-
74. PMID: 14984384. X-2, X-4 552. de Aloysio D, Mauloni M, Roncuzzi A, et al.; Effects
of an oral contraceptive combination containing 0.150 mg
541. Daniel E, Thorne JE, Newcomb CW, et al.; desogestrel plus 0.020 mg ethinyl estradiol on healthy
Mycophenolate mofetil for ocular inflammation. Am J premenopausal women. Arch Gynecol Obstet.
Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;149(3):423-32 e1-2. PMID: 1993;253(1):15-9. PMID: 8328816. X-2, X-4
20042178. X-2, X-3, X-4
553. de Andrade RP; A multicenter clinical evaluation of
542. Daniels S, Robbins J, West CR, et al.; Celecoxib in a new monophasic combination: Minulet (gestodene and
the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea: results from two ethinyl estradiol). Int J Fertil. 1989 Sep;34 Suppl:22-30.
randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, PMID: 2576253. X-4
crossover studies. Clin Ther. 2009 Jun;31(6):1192-208.
PMID: 19695387. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4 554. De Bellis A, Colao A, Savoia A, et al.; Effect of
long-term cabergoline therapy on the immunological
543. Daperno M, Sostegni R, Canaparo R, et al.; pattern and pituitary function of patients with idiopathic
Prospective study of the effects of concomitant medications hyperprolactinaemia positive for antipituitary antibodies.
on thiopurine metabolism in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008 Aug;69(2):285-91. PMID:
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Oct 15;30(8):843-53. 18221394. X-2, X-3
PMID: 19650826. X-2, X-3, X-4
555. de Carvalho MN, Nobre F, Mendes MC, et al.; Low-
544. Dastjerdi MS, Kazemi F, Najafian A, et al.; An open- dose transdermal hormone therapy does not interfere with
label pilot study of the combination therapy of metformin the blood pressure of hypertensive menopausal women: a
and fluoxetine for weight reduction. Int J Obes (Lond). pilot study. Blood Press Monit. 2008 Oct;13(5):277-83.
2007 Apr;31(4):713-7. PMID: 16969361. X-2, X-3, X-4 PMID: 18799953. X-2, X-4

545. Davies NM, Jamali F; COX-2 selective inhibitors 556. De Caterina R, Ruigomez A, Rodriguez LA; Long-
cardiac toxicity: getting to the heart of the matter. J Pharm term use of anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of atrial
Pharm Sci. 2004 Oct 29;7(3):332-6. PMID: 15576013. X- fibrillation. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 13;170(16):1450-5.
1, X-4 PMID: 20837831. X-2

546. Davis A, Godwin A, Lippman J, et al.; Triphasic 557. De Groote D, Perrier d'Hauterive S, Pintiaux A, et al.;
norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol for treating dysfunctional Effects of oral contraception with ethinylestradiol and
uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Dec;96(6):913-20. drospirenone on oxidative stress in women 18-35 years old.
PMID: 11084177. X-2, X-3, X-4 Contraception. 2009 Aug;80(2):187-93. PMID: 19631796.
X-2
547. Davis AR, Kroll R, Soltes B, et al.; Occurrence of
menses or pregnancy after cessation of a continuous oral 558. de Jong DJ, Tielen J, Habraken CM, et al.; 5-
contraceptive. Fertil Steril. 2008 May;89(5):1059-63. Aminosalicylates and effects on renal function in patients
PMID: 17658522. X-2, X-3, X-4 with Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005
Nov;11(11):972-6. PMID: 16239842. X-2, X-4
548. Davis JM, Hendricks-Munoz KD, Hagberg D, et al.;
The effects of indomethacin on renal function and 559. de Jong JC, van den Berg PB, Tobi H, et al.;
intracranial hemorrhage in infants with patent ductus Combined use of SSRIs and NSAIDs increases the risk of
arteriosus. Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1990;14(1):15-9. PMID: gastrointestinal adverse effects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003
2311476. X-4 Jun;55(6):591-5. PMID: 12814454. X-4

549. Dawkins TN, Barclay CA, Gardiner RL, et al.; Safety 560. de Jonge ET, Yigit R, Molenberghs G, et al.;
of intravenous use of ketorolac in infants following Predictors of oligoamenorrhea at 1-year follow-up in
cardiothoracic surgery. Cardiol Young. 2009 premenopausal women using a levonorgestrel-releasing
Feb;19(1):105-8. PMID: 19134246. X-2, X-4 intrauterine system. Contraception. 2007 Aug;76(2):91-5.
PMID: 17656176. X-2, X-3, X-4
550. de Abajo FJ, Garcia Rodriguez LA; Risk of upper
gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation associated with 561. De Ledinghen V, Heresbach D, Fourdan O, et al.;
low-dose aspirin as plain and enteric-coated formulations. Anti-inflammatory drugs and variceal bleeding: a case-
BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2001;1:1. PMID: 11228592. X-4 control study. Gut. 1999 Feb;44(2):270-3. PMID: 9895389.
X-2
551. de Abajo FJ, Rodriguez LA, Montero D; Association
between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and upper 562. de Ledinghen V, Mannant PR, Foucher J, et al.; Non-
gastrointestinal bleeding: population based case-control steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and variceal bleeding: a
study. BMJ. 1999 Oct 23;319(7217):1106-9. PMID: case-control study. J Hepatol. 1996 May;24(5):570-3.
10531103. X-4 PMID: 8773912. X-2, X-4

L-26
563. De Santis M, Cavaliere AF, Straface G, et al.; Failure cohort study in patients with rheumatic disease. Clin Ther.
of the emergency contraceptive levonorgestrel and the risk 2000 Apr;22(4):400-10. PMID: 10823362. X-4
of adverse effects in pregnancy and on fetal development:
an observational cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2005 575. Deguchi M, Rapoff AJ, Zdeblick TA; Posterolateral
Aug;84(2):296-9. PMID: 16084867. X-2, X-3, X-4 fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: analysis of
fusion rate and clinical results. J Spinal Disord. 1998
564. De Silva B, Banney L, Uttley W, et al.; Dec;11(6):459-64. PMID: 9884288. X-2, X-3, X-4
Pseudoporphyria and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents
in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr 576. del Carmen Cravioto M, Alvarado G, Canto-de-
Dermatol. 2000 Nov-Dec;17(6):480-3. PMID: 11123786. Cetina T, et al.; A multicenter comparative study on the
X-2 efficacy, safety, and acceptability of the contraceptive
subdermal implants Norplant and Norplant-II.
565. De Valle MB, Av Klinteberg V, Alem N, et al.; Contraception. 1997 Jun;55(6):359-67. PMID: 9262932.
Drug-induced liver injury in a Swedish University hospital X-2, X-4
out-patient hepatology clinic. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2006 Oct 15;24(8):1187-95. PMID: 17014577. X-2, X-4 577. Del Dotto P, Gambaccini G, Caneparo D, et al.;
Bedtime cabergoline in Parkinson's disease patients with
566. de Vlam K, Lories RJ; Efficacy, effectiveness and excessive daytime sleepiness induced by dopamine
safety of etanercept in monotherapy for refractory psoriatic agonists. Neurol Sci. 2003 Oct;24(3):170-1. PMID:
arthritis: a 26-week observational study. Rheumatology 14598071. X-2
(Oxford). 2006 Mar;45(3):321-4. PMID: 16234275. X-2,
X-4 578. Delgrange E, Daems T, Verhelst J, et al.;
Characterization of resistance to the prolactin-lowering
567. de Vries F, Setakis E, van Staa TP; Concomitant use effects of cabergoline in macroprolactinomas: a study in
of ibuprofen and paracetamol and the risk of major clinical 122 patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009 May;160(5):747-52.
safety outcomes. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Sep;70(3):429- PMID: 19223454. X-2, X-3
38. PMID: 20716244. X-4
579. Delzell E, Shapiro S; Commentary on the National
568. de Vries NK, Jagroep FK, Jaarsma AS, et al.; Kidney Foundation position paper on analgesics and the
Continuous indomethacin infusion may be less effective kidney. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996 Nov;28(5):783-5. PMID:
than bolus infusions for ductal closure in very low birth 9158222. X-1
weight infants. Am J Perinatol. 2005 Feb;22(2):71-5.
PMID: 15731984. X-2, X-3, X-4 580. Demco TA, Sutton H, Demco CJ, et al.; Topical
diclofenac sodium compared with prednisolone acetate
569. de Waal WJ, Torn M, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama after phacoemulsification-lens implant surgery. Eur J
SM, et al.; Long term sequelae of sex steroid treatment in Ophthalmol. 1997 Jul-Sep;7(3):236-40. PMID: 9352276.
the management of constitutionally tall stature. Arch Dis X-2, X-4
Child. 1995 Oct;73(4):311-5. PMID: 7492194. X-2
581. Depont F, Fourrier A, Merliere Y, et al.; The
570. DeBisschop M; What are the risks of long-term CADEUS study: methods and logistics.
NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors? J Fam Pract. 2003 Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 May;16(5):571-80.
Mar;52(3):199-200. PMID: 12620173. X-1, X-3, X-4 PMID: 17121428. X-1, X-4, X-7

571. Dedier J, Stampfer MJ, Hankinson SE, et al.; 582. Dequeker J, Hawkey C, Kahan A, et al.;
Nonnarcotic analgesic use and the risk of hypertension in Improvement in gastrointestinal tolerability of the selective
US women. Hypertension. 2002 Nov;40(5):604-8; cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, meloxicam, compared
discussion 1-3. PMID: 12411450. X-4 with piroxicam: results of the Safety and Efficacy Large-
scale Evaluation of COX-inhibiting Therapies (SELECT)
572. Defrance C, Bousquet PJ, Demoly P; Evaluating the trial in osteoarthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Sep;37(9):946-
negative predictive value of provocation tests with 51. PMID: 9783758. X-4
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Allergy. 2011
Nov;66(11):1410-4. PMID: 21722141. X-2 583. Devi DP, Sushma M, Guido S; Drug-induced upper
gastrointestinal disorders requiring hospitalization: a five-
573. DeFronzo RA, Okerson T, Viswanathan P, et al.; year study in a South Indian hospital. Pharmacoepidemiol
Effects of exenatide versus sitagliptin on postprandial Drug Saf. 2004 Dec;13(12):859-62. PMID: 15386699. X-2
glucose, insulin and glucagon secretion, gastric emptying,
and caloric intake: a randomized, cross-over study. Curr 584. Devi K, George S, Criton S, et al.; Carbamazepine--
Med Res Opin. 2008 Oct;24(10):2943-52. PMID: the commonest cause of toxic epidermal necrolysis and
18786299. X-2 Stevens-Johnson syndrome: a study of 7 years. Indian J
Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2005 Sep-Oct;71(5):325-8.
574. Degner F, Sigmund R, Zeidler H; Efficacy and PMID: 16394456. X-2, X-4
tolerability of meloxicam in an observational, controlled

L-27
595. Diaz J, Faundes A, Olmos P, et al.; Bleeding
585. Devin JK, Lakhani VT, Byrd BF, 3rd, et al.; complaints during the first year of norplant implants use
Prevalence of valvular heart disease in a cohort of patients and their impact on removal rate. Contraception. 1996
taking cabergoline for management of hyperprolactinemia. Feb;53(2):91-5. PMID: 8838485. X-2, X-3, X-4
Endocr Pract. 2008 Sep;14(6):672-7. PMID: 18996784. X-
2 596. Diaz J, Pinto Neto A, Diaz M, et al.; Long-term
evaluation of the clinical performance of the TCu200B and
586. Dhawan V, Medcalf P, Stegie F, et al.; Retrospective the TCu380A in Campinas, Brazil. Adv Contracept. 1992
evaluation of cardio-pulmonary fibrotic side effects in Mar;8(1):67-72. PMID: 1590103. X-3, X-4
symptomatic patients from a group of 234 Parkinson's
disease patients treated with cabergoline. J Neural Transm. 597. Diaz J, Pinto Neto AM, Bahamondes L, et al.;
2005 May;112(5):661-8. PMID: 15785862. X-2 Performance of the copper T 200 in parous adolescents: are
copper IUDs suitable for these women? Contraception.
587. Di Carlo C, Tommaselli GA, Gargano V, et al.; 1993 Jul;48(1):23-8. PMID: 8403902. X-2, X-4
Transdermal estradiol and oral or vaginal natural
progesterone: bleeding patterns. Climacteric. 2010 598. Diaz RL, Gardeazabal J, Manrique P, et al.; Greater
Oct;13(5):442-6. PMID: 20575654. X-2, X-3, X-4 allergenicity of topical ketoprofen in contact dermatitis
confirmed by use. Contact Dermatitis. 2006
588. Di Fiore F, Lecleire S, Merle V, et al.; Changes in May;54(5):239-43. PMID: 16689806. X-4
characteristics and outcome of acute upper gastrointestinal
haemorrhage: a comparison of epidemiology and practices 599. Diaz S, Pavez M, Brandeis A, et al.; A longitudinal
between 1996 and 2000 in a multicentre French study. Eur study on cortisol, prolactin and thyroid hormones in users
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jun;17(6):641-7. PMID: of Norplant subdermal implants or a copper T device.
15879726. X-4 Contraception. 1989 Oct;40(4):505-17. PMID: 2510969.
X-2, X-4
589. Di Paolo MC, Paoluzi OA, Pica R, et al.;
Sulphasalazine and 5-aminosalicylic acid in long-term 600. Diaz S, Pavez M, Miranda P, et al.; Long-term
treatment of ulcerative colitis: report on tolerance and side- follow-up of women treated with Norplant implants.
effects. Dig Liver Dis. 2001 Oct;33(7):563-9. PMID: Contraception. 1987 Jun;35(6):551-67. PMID: 3117490.
11816545. X-2, X-4 X-2, X-4

590. Di Sarno A, Landi ML, Cappabianca P, et al.; 601. Diaz S, Zepeda A, Maturana X, et al.; Fertility
Resistance to cabergoline as compared with bromocriptine regulation in nursing women. IX. Contraceptive
in hyperprolactinemia: prevalence, clinical definition, and performance, duration of lactation, infant growth, and
therapeutic strategy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 bleeding patterns during use of progesterone vaginal rings,
Nov;86(11):5256-61. PMID: 11701688. X-2 progestin-only pills, Norplant implants, and Copper T 380-
A intrauterine devices. Contraception. 1997 Oct;56(4):223-
591. Di Silverio F, Sciarra A; Combination therapy of 32. PMID: 9408703. X-2, X-3, X-4
ethinylestradiol and somatostatin analogue reintroduces
objective clinical responses and decreases chromogranin a 602. Dichtwald S, Weinbroum AA, Sorkine P, et al.;
in patients with androgen ablation refractory prostate Metformin-associated lactic acidosis following acute
cancer. J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1812-6. PMID: 14532782. kidney injury. Efficacious treatment with continuous renal
X-2, X-3, X-4 replacement therapy. Diabet Med. 2012 Feb;29(2):245-50.
PMID: 21977945. X-2
592. Diav-Citrin O, Park YH, Veerasuntharam G, et al.;
The safety of mesalamine in human pregnancy: a 603. Diestelhorst M, Schmidl B, Konen W, et al.; Efficacy
prospective controlled cohort study. Gastroenterology. and tolerance of diclofenac sodium 0.1%, flurbiprofen
1998 Jan;114(1):23-8. PMID: 9428214. X-2, X-4 0.03%, and indomethacin 1.0% in controlling postoperative
inflammation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22 Suppl
593. Diaz J, Bahamondes L, Diaz M, et al.; Evaluation of 1:788-93. PMID: 9279673. X-2, X-3, X-4
the performance of the copper T380A IUD up to ten years.
Is this IUD a reversible but potentially permanent method? 604. Dincer D, Duman A, Dikici H, et al.; NSAID-related
Adv Contracept. 1992 Dec;8(4):275-80. PMID: 1290329. upper gastrointestinal bleeding: are risk factors considered
X-2, X-3, X-4 during prophylaxis? Int J Clin Pract. 2006 May;60(5):546-
8. PMID: 16700851. X-2
594. Diaz J, Bahamondes L, Monteiro I, et al.;
Acceptability and performance of the levonorgestrel- 605. Dinesh KU, Subish P, Pranaya M, et al.; Pattern of
releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) in Campinas, Brazil. potential drug-drug interactions in diabetic out-patients in a
Contraception. 2000 Aug;62(2):59-61. PMID: 11102588. tertiary care teaching hospital in Nepal. Med J Malaysia.
X-2 2007 Oct;62(4):294-8. PMID: 18551932. X-2, X-3, X-4

L-28
606. Ding WY, Lee CK, Choon SE; Cutaneous adverse 617. Domschke S, Domschke W; Longer relapse-free
drug reactions seen in a tertiary hospital in Johor, Malaysia. period after sucralfate than after H2-blocker treatment of
Int J Dermatol. 2010 Jul;49(7):834-41. PMID: 20618508. duodenal and gastric ulcers. Am J Med. 1991 Aug
X-2 8;91(2A):74S-83S. PMID: 1679297. X-3, X-4

607. Dinger J, Assmann A, Mohner S, et al.; Risk of 618. Donnenfeld ED, Nichamin LD, Hardten DR, et al.;
venous thromboembolism and the use of dienogest- and Twice-daily, preservative-free ketorolac 0.45% for
drospirenone-containing oral contraceptives: results from a treatment of inflammation and pain after cataract surgery.
German case-control study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;151(3):420-6 e1. PMID:
Care. 2010 Jul;36(3):123-9. PMID: 20659364. X-4 21145532. X-2, X-3, X-4

608. Dinger J, Bardenheuer K, Minh TD; Levonorgestrel- 619. Dore DD, Norman H, Loughlin J, et al.; Extended
releasing and copper intrauterine devices and the risk of case-control study results on thromboembolic outcomes
breast cancer. Contraception. 2011 Mar;83(3):211-7. among transdermal contraceptive users. Contraception.
PMID: 21310281. X-4 2010 May;81(5):408-13. PMID: 20399947. X-4

609. Dinger JC, Bardenheuer K, Assmann A; International 620. Doren M, Rubig A, Coelingh Bennink HJ, et al.;
Active Surveillance Study of Women Taking Oral Impact on uterine bleeding and endometrial thickness:
Contraceptives (INAS-OC Study). BMC Med Res tibolone compared with continuous combined estradiol and
Methodol. 2009;9:77. PMID: 19922634. X-1 norethisterone acetate replacement therapy. Menopause.
1999 Winter;6(4):299-306. PMID: 10614676. X-2, X-4
610. Dinger JC, Heinemann LA, Kuhl-Habich D; The
safety of a drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive: final 621. Dorjgochoo T, Shu XO, Li HL, et al.; Use of oral
results from the European Active Surveillance Study on contraceptives, intrauterine devices and tubal sterilization
oral contraceptives based on 142,475 women-years of and cancer risk in a large prospective study, from 1996 to
observation. Contraception. 2007 May;75(5):344-54. 2006. Int J Cancer. 2009 May 15;124(10):2442-9. PMID:
PMID: 17434015. X-4 19170208. X-4

611. Dinis PB, Gomes A; Sinusitis and asthma: how do 622. Dormuth CR, Maclure M, Carney G, et al.;
they interrelate in sinus surgery? Am J Rhinol. 1997 Nov- Rosiglitazone and myocardial infarction in patients
Dec;11(6):421-8. PMID: 9438054. X-2, X-3, X-4 previously prescribed metformin. PLoS One.
2009;4(6):e6080. PMID: 19562036. X-4
612. Diogo LP, Saitovitch D, Biehl M, et al.; Is there an
association between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 623. Dougados M, Gueguen A, Nakache JP, et al.;
and contrast nephropathy? Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010 Ankylosing spondylitis: what is the optimum duration of a
Dec;95(6):726-31. PMID: 21109911. X-2 clinical study? A one year versus a 6 weeks non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drug trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999
613. Dionne RA, Snyder J, Hargreaves KM; Analgesic Mar;38(3):235-44. PMID: 10325662. X-2, X-4
efficacy of flurbiprofen in comparison with acetaminophen,
acetaminophen plus codeine, and placebo after impacted 624. Dougherty PL; Menstrual suppression: benefits and
third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 risks of continuous combined oral contraceptives. Nurs
Sep;52(9):919-24; discussion 25-6. PMID: 8064454. X-3, Womens Health. 2008 Jun;12(3):243-8. PMID: 18557855.
X-4 X-1

614. Dizon CD, Allen LM, Ornstein MP; Menstrual and 625. Dowd JE, Cimaz R, Fink CW; Nonsteroidal
contraceptive issues among young women with antiinflammatory drug-induced gastroduodenal injury in
developmental delay: a retrospective review of cases at the children. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Sep;38(9):1225-31. PMID:
Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto. J Pediatr Adolesc 7575716. X-2
Gynecol. 2005 Jun;18(3):157-62. PMID: 15970247. X-2,
X-3, X-4 626. Doycheva D, Zierhut M, Blumenstock G, et al.;
Long-term results of therapy with mycophenolate mofetil
615. Doan S, Lerouic JF, Robin H, et al.; Treatment of in chronic non-infectious uveitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp
ocular cicatricial pemphigoid with sulfasalazine. Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;249(8):1235-43. PMID: 21720813.
Ophthalmology. 2001 Sep;108(9):1565-8. PMID: X-2, X-3, X-4
11535451. X-2, X-3, X-4
627. Doyle G, Furey S, Berlin R, et al.; Gastrointestinal
616. Dominick KL, Bosworth HB, Jeffreys AS, et al.; safety and tolerance of ibuprofen at maximum over-the-
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use among patients counter dose. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Jul;13(7):897-
with GI bleeding. Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Jul-Aug;38(7- 906. PMID: 10383524. X-2
8):1159-64. PMID: 15187205. X-4, X-7
628. Doyle NM, Gardner MO, Wells L, et al.; Outcome of
very low birth weight infants exposed to antenatal

L-29
indomethacin for tocolysis. J Perinatol. 2005
May;25(5):336-40. PMID: 15861198. X-2, X-3, X-4 641. Duong HV, Westfield KC, Chalkley TH; Ketorolac
tromethamine LS 0.4% versus nepafenac 0.1% in patients
629. Dreiser RL, Benevelli DC; Long term tolerability having cataract surgery. Prospective randomized double-
profile of nimesulide in the treatment of osteoarthritis. masked clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007
Drugs. 1993;46 Suppl 1:270-4. PMID: 7506188. X-2, X-4 Nov;33(11):1925-9. PMID: 17964399. X-2, X-3, X-4

630. Driver JA, Logroscino G, Lu L, et al.; Use of non- 642. Durrieu G, Olivier P, Montastruc JL; COX-2
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of Parkinson's inhibitors and arterial hypertension: an analysis of
disease: nested case-control study. BMJ. 2011;342:d198. spontaneous case reports in the Pharmacovigilance
PMID: 21252104. X-4, X-6 database. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Sep;61(8):611-4.
PMID: 16133552. X-2, X-3, X-4
631. Du MK, Chow LP, Zheng HM, et al.; A 10-year
follow-up study of contraceptive Norplant implants. Int J 643. Dushay J, Gao C, Gopalakrishnan GS, et al.; Short-
Gynaecol Obstet. 2000 Mar;68(3):249-56. PMID: term exenatide treatment leads to significant weight loss in
10699196. X-4 a subset of obese women without diabetes. Diabetes Care.
2012 Jan;35(1):4-11. PMID: 22040840. X-2
632. Du MK, Zheng HM, Chen HC, et al.; Study of
Norplant implants in Shanghai: three-year experience. Int J 644. Dusterberg B, Brill K; Clinical experience with a
Gynaecol Obstet. 1990 Dec;33(4):345-57. PMID: 1979289. low-dose oral contraceptive containing gestodene. Adv
X-2, X-3, X-4 Contracept. 1990 Dec;6 Suppl:37-49; discussion 50. PMID:
2291446. X-11
633. Duan L, Yan D, Zeng W, et al.; Effect of
progesterone treatment due to threatened abortion in early 645. Dutka J, Dutka L, Janiszewski M, et al.; Cost
pregnancy for obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Early Hum analysis and sociomedical aspects of the conservative and
Dev. 2010 Jan;86(1):41-3. PMID: 20079582. X-2, X-3, X- surgical treatment of hip osteoarthritis. Ortop Traumatol
4 Rehabil. 2008 Nov-Dec;10(6):537-46. PMID: 19153542.
X-2, X-3, X-4
634. Dubos F, Hue V, Grandbastien B, et al.; Bacterial
skin infections in children hospitalized with varicella: a 646. Earl HM, Rubens RD, Knight RK, et al.;
possible negative impact of non-steroidal anti- Norethisterone acetate in the treatment of advanced breast
inflammatory drugs? Acta Derm Venereol. 2008;88(1):26- cancer. Clin Oncol. 1984 Jun;10(2):103-9. PMID: 6734001.
30. PMID: 18176746. X-2, X-4 X-2, X-3, X-4

635. Dugoff L, Jones OW, 3rd, Allen-Davis J, et al.; 647. East-Innis AD, Thompson DS; Cutaneous drug
Assessing the acceptability of Norplant contraceptive in reactions in patients admitted to the dermatology unit at the
four patient populations. Contraception. 1995 Jul;52(1):45- University Hospital of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.
9. PMID: 8521714. X-2, X-3, X-4 West Indian Med J. 2009 Jun;58(3):227-30. PMID:
20043529. X-4
636. Duijkers I, Engels L, Klipping C; Length of the
menstrual cycle after discontinuation of oral contraceptives. 648. Ebeling K, Ray R, Nischan P, et al.; Combined oral
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2005 Feb;20(2):74-9. PMID: contraceptives containing chlormadinone acetate and breast
15823825. X-2, X-3, X-4 cancer: results of a case-control study. Br J Cancer. 1991
May;63(5):804-8. PMID: 1710136. X-4
637. Dunn K, Kovacs GT; Do copper containing
intrauterine contraceptive devices need to be changed after 649. Eberlein B, Eicke C, Reinhardt HW, et al.; Adjuvant
2 years? Clin Reprod Fertil. 1983 Dec;2(4):283-7. PMID: treatment of atopic eczema: assessment of an emollient
6678604. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4 containing N-palmitoylethanolamine (ATOPA study). J Eur
Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008 Jan;22(1):73-82. PMID:
638. Dunn N; 10-minute consultation: adverse drug event. 18181976. X-3, X-4
BMJ. 2003 May 10;326(7397):1018. PMID: 12742925.
X-1 650. Ebert MP, Schafer C, Chen J, et al.; Protective role of
heat shock protein 27 in gastric mucosal injury. J Pathol.
639. Dunn N, Thorogood M, Faragher B, et al.; Oral 2005 Oct;207(2):177-84. PMID: 16041694. X-3, X-4
contraceptives and myocardial infarction: results of the
MICA case-control study. BMJ. 1999 Jun 651. Edwards MJ, Kollenberg SJ, Brandt ML, et al.;
12;318(7198):1579-83. PMID: 10364115. X-3, X-4 Surgery for peptic ulcer disease in children in the post-
histamine2-blocker era. J Pediatr Surg. 2005
640. Dunson TR, McLaurin VL, Grubb GS, et al.; A May;40(5):850-4. PMID: 15937829. X-2, X-4
multicenter clinical trial of a progestin-only oral
contraceptive in lactating women. Contraception. 1993 652. Egarter C, Putz M, Strohmer H, et al.; Ovarian
Jan;47(1):23-35. PMID: 8435999. X-4 function during low-dose oral contraceptive use.

L-30
Contraception. 1995 Jun;51(6):329-33. PMID: 7554971. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.
X-2, X-4 2008;93(7):2670-8. PMID: 18460557. X-2, X-3, X-4

653. Egberg N, van Beek A, Gunnervik C, et al.; Effects 664. Elovainio M, Teperi J, Aalto AM, et al.; Depressive
on the hemostatic system and liver function in relation to symptoms as predictors of discontinuation of treatment of
Implanon and Norplant. A prospective randomized clinical menorrhagia by levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
trial. Contraception. 1998 Aug;58(2):93-8. PMID: system. Int J Behav Med. 2007;14(2):70-5. PMID:
9773263. X-2, X-4 17926434. X-2

654. Egberts AC, Meyboom RH, van Puijenbroek EP; Use 665. el-Reshaid K, Kapoor M, Johny KV, et al.; Acute
of measures of disproportionality in pharmacovigilance: renal failure in Kuwait--a prospective study. J Trop Med
three Dutch examples. Drug Saf. 2002;25(6):453-8. PMID: Hyg. 1993 Oct;96(5):323-9. PMID: 8411309. X-2, X-3, X-
12071783. X-1 4

655. Eilertsen AL, Sandvik L, Mowinckel MC, et al.; 666. Elseviers MM, D'Haens G, Lerebours E, et al.; Renal
Differential effects of conventional and low dose oral impairment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease:
hormone therapy (HT), tibolone, and raloxifene on association with aminosalicylate therapy? Clin Nephrol.
coagulation and fibrinolysis. Thromb Res. 2004 Feb;61(2):83-9. PMID: 14989626. X-2, X-4
2007;120(3):371-9. PMID: 17156824. X-2, X-3, X-4
667. Elwatidy S, Jamjoom Z, Elgamal E, et al.; Efficacy
656. Ekenel M, Avsar E, Imeryuz N, et al.; Effects of and safety of prophylactic large dose of tranexamic acid in
selective COX-2 inhibitors on the gastric permeability of spine surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind,
sucrose: a controlled study with placebo and ibuprofen. Eur placebo-controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Nov
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Apr;15(4):403-6. PMID: 15;33(24):2577-80. PMID: 19011538. X-2
12655261. X-2, X-4
668. Endo H, Hosono K, Inamori M, et al.; Characteristics
657. Ekici F, Atasay B, Gunlemez A, et al.; Management of small bowel injury in symptomatic chronic low-dose
of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Anadolu aspirin users: the experience of two medical centers in
Kardiyol Derg. 2006 Mar;6(1):28-33. PMID: 16524797. capsule endoscopy. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(6):544-9.
X-2, X-3, X-4 PMID: 19373431. X-2

658. Elder MG, Lawson JP, Elstein M, et al.; The efficacy 669. Endo N, Kato S, Haruyama K, et al.; Efficacy of
and acceptability of a low-dose levonorgestrel intravaginal bromfenac sodium ophthalmic solution in preventing
ring for contraception in a UK cohort. Contraception. 1991 cystoid macular oedema after cataract surgery in patients
Feb;43(2):129-37. PMID: 1904020. X-2, X-3, X-4 with diabetes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;88(8):896-900.
PMID: 19725815. X-2, X-3, X-4
659. Elhakim M, Siam A, Rashed I, et al.; Topical
tenoxicam from pharyngeal pack reduces postoperative 670. Endrikat J, Dusterberg B, Ruebig A, et al.;
sore throat. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000 Jul;44(6):733-6. Comparison of efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability of
PMID: 10903018. X-2, X-3, X-4 two low-dose oral contraceptives in a multicenter clinical
study. Contraception. 1999 Nov;60(5):269-74. PMID:
660. Eliakim R, Karmeli F, Rachmilewitz D; Ketotifen-- 10717778. X-2, X-4
old drug, new indication: reduction of gastric mucosal
injury. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993 Mar;28(3):202-4. 671. Endrikat J, Jaques MA, Mayerhofer M, et al.; A
PMID: 8446844. X-2, X-3, X-4 twelve-month comparative clinical investigation of two
low-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 micrograms
661. Eliakim R, Ophir M, Rachmilewitz D; Duodenal ethinylestradiol/75 micrograms gestodene and 20
mucosal injury with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. J micrograms ethinylestradiol/150 micrograms desogestrel,
Clin Gastroenterol. 1987 Aug;9(4):395-9. PMID: 3498747. with respect to efficacy, cycle control and tolerance.
X-2 Contraception. 1995 Oct;52(4):229-35. PMID: 8605781.
X-2
662. Elkik F, Basdevant A, Jackanicz TM, et al.;
Contraception in hypertensive women using a vaginal ring 672. Endrikat J, Klipping C, Cronin M, et al.; An open
delivering estradiol and levonorgestrel. J Clin Endocrinol label, comparative study of the effects of a dose-reduced
Metab. 1986 Jul;63(1):29-35. PMID: 3086360. X-2, X-3, oral contraceptive containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol
X-4 and 100 microg levonorgestrel on hemostatic, lipids, and
carbohydrate metabolism variables. Contraception. 2002
663. Elkind-Hirsch K, Marrioneaux O, Bhushan M, et al.; Mar;65(3):215-21. PMID: 11929643. X-2, X-4
Comparison of single and combined treatment with
exenatide and metformin on menstrual cyclicity in 673. Endrikat J, Mih E, Dusterberg B, et al.; A 3-year
overweight women with polycystic ovary syndrome. double-blind, randomized, controlled study on the influence
of two oral contraceptives containing either 20 microg or

L-31
30 microg ethinylestradiol in combination with tolerability in benign sport related soft-tissue injuries. Br J
levonorgestrel on bone mineral density. Contraception. Sports Med. 2007 Mar;41(3):134-9. PMID: 17138642. X-
2004 Mar;69(3):179-87. PMID: 14969664. X-2, X-4 2, X-3, X-4

674. Endrikat J, Noah M, Gerlinger C, et al.; Impact of 685. Espey E, Steinhart J, Ogburn T, et al.; Depo-provera
oral contraceptive use on APC-resistance: a prospective, associated with weight gain in Navajo women.
randomized clinical trial with three low-dose preparations. Contraception. 2000 Aug;62(2):55-8. PMID: 11102587. X-
Contraception. 2001 Oct;64(4):217-22. PMID: 11747870. 2
X-2, X-4
686. Espinoza LR, Jara LJ, Martinez-Osuna P, et al.;
675. Endrikat J, Shapiro H, Lukkari-Lax E, et al.; A Refractory nephrotic syndrome in lupus nephritis: favorable
Canadian, multicentre study comparing the efficacy of a response to indomethacin therapy. Lupus. 1993 Feb;2(1):9-
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system to an oral 14. PMID: 8485564. X-2, X-4
contraceptive in women with idiopathic menorrhagia. J
Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Apr;31(4):340-7. PMID: 687. Essving P, Axelsson K, Kjellberg J, et al.; Reduced
19497153. X-2, X-3 hospital stay, morphine consumption, and pain intensity
with local infiltration analgesia after unicompartmental
676. Engeland A, Skurtveit S, Morland J; Risk of road knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2009 Apr;80(2):213-9.
traffic accidents associated with the prescription of drugs: a PMID: 19404806. X-2, X-3, X-4
registry-based cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 2007
Aug;17(8):597-602. PMID: 17574863. X-4 688. Etienney I, Beaugerie L, Viboud C, et al.; Non-
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as a risk factor for acute
677. Engoren M, Hadaway J, Schwann TA, et al.; diarrhoea: a case crossover study. Gut. 2003
Ketorolac improves graft patency after coronary artery Feb;52(2):260-3. PMID: 12524410. X-2
bypass grafting: a propensity-matched analysis. Ann
Thorac Surg. 2011 Aug;92(2):603-9. PMID: 21801915. X- 689. Etminan M, Delaney JA, Bressler B, et al.; Oral
2, X-4 contraceptives and the risk of gallbladder disease: a
comparative safety study. CMAJ. 2011 May
678. Engoren MC, Habib RH, Zacharias A, et al.; 17;183(8):899-904. PMID: 21502354. X-4
Postoperative analgesia with ketorolac is associated with
decreased mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass 690. Etminan M, Levesque L, Fitzgerald JM, et al.; Risk
graft surgery in patients already receiving aspirin: a of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with oral
propensity-matched study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. bisphosphonates and non steroidal anti-inflammatory
2007 Dec;21(6):820-6. PMID: 18068059. X-2, X-4 drugs: a case-control study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009
Jun 1;29(11):1188-92. PMID: 19298582. X-4
679. Erbagci Z; Multiple NSAID intolerance in chronic
idiopathic urticaria is correlated with delayed, pronounced 691. Etminan M, Suissa S; NSAID use and the risk of
and prolonged autoreactivity. J Dermatol. 2004 Parkinson's disease. Curr Drug Saf. 2006 Aug;1(3):223-5.
May;31(5):376-82. PMID: 15187304. X-2 PMID: 18690932. X-4

680. Ericson A, Kallen BA; Nonsteroidal anti- 692. Evans A, Perez I, Yu G, et al.; Should stroke subtype
inflammatory drugs in early pregnancy. Reprod Toxicol. influence anticoagulation decisions to prevent recurrence in
2001 Jul-Aug;15(4):371-5. PMID: 11489592. X-4 stroke patients with atrial fibrillation? Stroke. 2001 Dec
1;32(12):2828-32. PMID: 11739981. X-2, X-3, X-4
681. Ernst E, Schmolzl C, Matrai A, et al.;
Hemorheological effects of oral contraceptives. 693. Evans JM, Macgregor AM, Murray FE, et al.; No
Contraception. 1989 Nov;40(5):571-80. PMID: 2692965. association between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
X-2, X-4 and acute appendicitis in a case-control study. Br J Surg.
1997 Mar;84(3):372-4. PMID: 9117311. X-2, X-4
682. Ernst ME, Iyer SS, Doucette WR; Drug-related
problems and quality of life in arthritis and low back pain 694. Evans JM, McGregor E, McMahon AD, et al.; Non-
sufferers. Value Health. 2003 Jan-Feb;6(1):51-8. PMID: steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and hospitalization for
12535238. X-2, X-3, X-4 acute renal failure. QJM. 1995 Aug;88(8):551-7. PMID:
7648241. X-4
683. Eroglu K, Akkuzu G, Vural G, et al.; Comparison of
efficacy and complications of IUD insertion in immediate 695. Evans JM, McMahon AD, McGilchrist MM, et al.;
postplacental/early postpartum period with interval period: Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and
1 year follow-up. Contraception. 2006 Nov;74(5):376-81. admission to hospital for upper gastrointestinal bleeding
PMID: 17046378. X-2, X-4 and perforation: a record linkage case-control study. BMJ.
1995 Jul 1;311(6996):22-6. PMID: 7613317. X-4
684. Esparza F, Cobian C, Jimenez JF, et al.; Topical
ketoprofen TDS patch versus diclofenac gel: efficacy and

L-32
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Jun;49(6):580-90. PMID:
696. Evans JM, McMahon AD, Murray FE, et al.; Non- 10848722. X-4
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are associated with
emergency admission to hospital for colitis due to 708. Farr G, Rivera R; Interactions between intrauterine
inflammatory bowel disease. Gut. 1997 May;40(5):619-22. contraceptive device use and breast-feeding status at time
PMID: 9203940. X-4 of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: analysis of
TCu-380A acceptors in developing countries. Am J Obstet
697. Evers S, Husstedt IW; Alternatives in drug treatment Gynecol. 1992 Jul;167(1):144-51. PMID: 1442918. X-4
of chronic paroxysmal hemicrania. Headache. 1996 Jul-
Aug;36(7):429-32. PMID: 8783475. X-2, X-3, X-4 709. Farr G, Rivera R, Amatya R; Non-physician insertion
of IUDs: clinical outcomes among TCu380A insertions in
698. Eyster ME, Asaad SM, Gold BD, et al.; Upper three developing-country clinics. Adv Contracept. 1998
gastrointestinal bleeding in haemophiliacs: incidence and Mar;14(1):45-57. PMID: 9587008. X-2, X-3, X-4
relation to use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Haemophilia. 2007 May;13(3):279-86. PMID: 17498077. 710. Faundes D, Bahamondes L, Faundes A, et al.; No
X-4 relationship between the IUD position evaluated by
ultrasound and complaints of bleeding and pain.
699. Fagnani F, Bouvenot G, Valat JP, et al.; Medico- Contraception. 1997 Jul;56(1):43-7. PMID: 9306030. X-2,
economic analysis of diacerein with or without standard X-3, X-4
therapy in the treatment of osteoarthritis.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Jan;13(1 Pt 2):135-46. PMID: 711. Fauno P, Petersen KD, Husted SE; Increased blood
10176148. X-2, X-3, X-4 loss after preoperative NSAID. Retrospective study of 186
hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993 Oct;64(5):522-
700. Fakeye O, Balogh S; Effect of Norplant 4. PMID: 8237316. X-2, X-4
contraceptive use on hemoglobin, packed cell volume and
menstrual bleeding patterns. Contraception. 1989 712. Fayaz MK, Abel RJ, Pugh SC, et al.; Opioid-sparing
Mar;39(3):265-74. PMID: 2496950. X-2, X-4 effects of diclofenac and paracetamol lead to improved
outcomes after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc
701. Famodu AA; Serial changes in plasma fibrinogen Anesth. 2004 Dec;18(6):742-7. PMID: 15650984. X-2, X-
concentration and fibrinolytic activity in African women on 4
oral contraceptive pills. Afr J Reprod Health. 1997
Sep;1(2):90-5. PMID: 10214418. X-2 713. Feenstra J, Heerdink ER, Grobbee DE, et al.;
Association of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with
702. Fan M, Sujuan G; Menstrual bleeding patterns in first occurrence of heart failure and with relapsing heart
Chinese women using the Norplant subdermal implant. failure: the Rotterdam Study. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Feb
Hum Reprod. 1996 Oct;11 Suppl 2:14-9. PMID: 8982740. 11;162(3):265-70. PMID: 11822918. X-4, X-7
X-2, X-4
714. Felder JB, Korelitz BI, Rajapakse R, et al.; Effects of
703. Fanos V, Benini D, Verlato G, et al.; Efficacy and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on inflammatory
renal tolerability of ibuprofen vs. indomethacin in preterm bowel disease: a case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol.
infants with patent ductus arteriosus. Fundam Clin 2000 Aug;95(8):1949-54. PMID: 10950041. X-2
Pharmacol. 2005 Apr;19(2):187-93. PMID: 15810899. X-
2, X-4 715. Felfernig M, Salat A, Kimberger O, et al.;
Preemptive analgesia by lornoxicam--an NSAID--
704. Farley TM, Meirik O, Chang CL, et al.; Combined significantly inhibits perioperative platelet aggregation. Eur
oral contraceptives, smoking, and cardiovascular risk. J J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Sep;25(9):726-31. PMID: 18471341.
Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Dec;52(12):775-85. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 10396518. X-4
716. Fenner H; Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of
705. Farmer RD, Lawrenson R; Utilization patterns of oral NSAIDs. A new methodological approach. Scand J
contraceptives in UK general practice. Contraception. 1996 Rheumatol Suppl. 1989;80:32-9. PMID: 2688078. X-1
Apr;53(4):211-5. PMID: 8706438. X-2, X-3, X-4
717. Fenske WK, Pournaras DJ, Aasheim ET, et al.; Can a
706. Farmer RD, Lawrenson RA, Thompson CR, et al.; protocol for glycaemic control improve type 2 diabetes
Population-based study of risk of venous thromboembolism outcomes after gastric bypass? Obes Surg. 2012
associated with various oral contraceptives. Lancet. 1997 Jan;22(1):90-6. PMID: 22052198. X-2
Jan 11;349(9045):83-8. PMID: 8996419. X-4
718. Ferenczy A, Gelfand MM; Endometrial histology
707. Farmer RD, Lawrenson RA, Todd JC, et al.; A and bleeding patterns in post-menopausal women taking
comparison of the risks of venous thromboembolic disease sequential, combined estradiol and dydrogesterone.
in association with different combined oral contraceptives. Maturitas. 1997 Apr;26(3):219-26. PMID: 9147354. X-2,
X-3, X-4

L-33
729. Fitzgerald GA; Coxibs and cardiovascular disease. N
719. Ferguson MA, Mackay SM, Ramchandani SR, et al.; Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1709-11. PMID:
Cryptogenic emboli in patients with patent foramen ovale 15470192. X-1
or atrial septal defect associated with the use of
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Cardiology. 730. Flach AJ, Dolan BJ, Donahue ME, et al.;
2009;113(1):20-4. PMID: 18931493. X-2 Comparative effects of ketorolac 0.5% or diclofenac 0.1%
ophthalmic solutions on inflammation after cataract
720. Ferraro-Peyret C, Coury F, Tebib JG, et al.; surgery. Ophthalmology. 1998 Sep;105(9):1775-9. PMID:
Infliximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing 9754191. X-2, X-4
spondylitis-induced specific antinuclear and
antiphospholipid autoantibodies without autoimmune 731. Flato B, Vinje O, Forre O; Toxicity of antirheumatic
clinical manifestations: a two-year prospective study. and anti-inflammatory drugs in children. Clin Rheumatol.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2004;6(6):R535-43. PMID: 15535831. 1998;17(6):505-10. PMID: 9890680. X-2
X-2, X-3, X-4
732. Fleischmann RM; Clinical efficacy and safety of
721. Ferrero S, Camerini G, Ragni N, et al.; nabumetone in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. J
Norethisterone acetate in the treatment of colorectal Rheumatol Suppl. 1992 Nov;36:32-40. PMID: 1474533.
endometriosis: a pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2010 X-4
Jan;25(1):94-100. PMID: 19820247. X-2, X-3, X-4
733. Fleming R, Hopkinson ZE, Wallace AM, et al.;
722. Ferrero S, Camerini G, Seracchioli R, et al.; Ovarian function and metabolic factors in women with
Letrozole combined with norethisterone acetate compared oligomenorrhea treated with metformin in a randomized
with norethisterone acetate alone in the treatment of pain double blind placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol
symptoms caused by endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2009 Metab. 2002 Feb;87(2):569-74. PMID: 11836287. X-2, X-
Dec;24(12):3033-41. PMID: 19726448. X-2, X-4 3

723. Fielder JH; The Vioxx debacle. IEEE Eng Med Biol 734. Fletcher AP; Profile of a large-scale cohort study.
Mag. 2005 Mar-Apr;24(2):106-9. PMID: 15825852. X-1 Drugs. 1990;40 Suppl 5:43-7. PMID: 2081492. X-11

724. Figueras A, Capella D, Castel JM, et al.; 735. Flick ED, Chan KA, Bracci PM, et al.; Use of
Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions to non- nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and non-Hodgkin
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A report from the lymphoma: a population-based case-control study. Am J
Spanish System of Pharmacovigilance, including an early Epidemiol. 2006 Sep 1;164(5):497-504. PMID: 16840523.
analysis of topical and enteric-coated formulations. Eur J X-4
Clin Pharmacol. 1994;47(4):297-303. PMID: 7875178. X-
4 736. Flint SR, O'Sullivan C, Arthur N; An update of
adverse drug reactions of relevance to general dental
725. Figus M, Fogagnolo P, Lazzeri S, et al.; Treatment of practice. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2000;46(2):67-70. PMID:
allergic conjunctivitis: results of a 1-month, single-masked 11326529. X-1
randomized study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep-
Oct;20(5):811-8. PMID: 20383847. X-2, X-3, X-4 737. Florentinus SR, Heerdink ER, de Boer A, et al.; The
trade-off between cardiovascular and gastrointestinal
726. Fiore LD, Ezekowitz MD, Brophy MT, et al.; effects of rofecoxib. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005
Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Jul;14(7):437-41. PMID: 15937867. X-4
Program Clinical Trial comparing combined warfarin and
aspirin with aspirin alone in survivors of acute myocardial 738. Foeldvari I, Szer IS, Zemel LS, et al.; A prospective
infarction: primary results of the CHAMP study. study comparing celecoxib with naproxen in children with
Circulation. 2002 Feb 5;105(5):557-63. PMID: 11827919. juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2009
X-3, X-4 Jan;36(1):174-82. PMID: 19012356. X-2

727. Fischer LM, Schlienger RG, Matter CM, et al.; 739. Fontana RJ, Sanyal AJ, Mehta S, et al.; Portal
Current use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the hypertensive gastropathy in chronic hepatitis C patients
risk of acute myocardial infarction. Pharmacotherapy. 2005 with bridging fibrosis and compensated cirrhosis: results
Apr;25(4):503-10. PMID: 15977911. X-4, X-7 from the HALT-C trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006
May;101(5):983-92. PMID: 16573786. X-2, X-3, X-4
728. Fisman EZ, Tenenbaum A, Benderly M, et al.;
Antihyperglycemic treatment in diabetics with coronary 740. Fontbonne A, Andre P, Eschwege E; BIGPRO
disease: increased metformin-associated mortality over a 5- (biguanides and the prevention of the risk of obesity): study
year follow-up. Cardiology. 1999;91(3):195-202. PMID: design. A randomized trial of metformin versus placebo in
10516414. X-3 the correction of the metabolic abnormalities associated
with insulin resistance. Diabete Metab. 1991 May;17(1 Pt
2):249-54. PMID: 1936485. X-1

L-34
752. Fourrier-Reglat A, Cuong HM, Lassalle R, et al.;
741. Ford AC, Forman D, Bailey AG, et al.; Who consults Concordance between prescriber- and patient-reported
with dyspepsia? Results from a longitudinal 10-yr follow- previous medical history and NSAID indication in the
up study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 May;102(5):957-65. CADEUS cohort. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010
PMID: 17313501. X-4 May;19(5):474-81. PMID: 20437457. X-4

742. Fored CM, Ejerblad E, Lindblad P, et al.; 753. Foutch PG; Diverticular bleeding: are nonsteroidal
Acetaminophen, aspirin, and chronic renal failure. N Engl J anti-inflammatory drugs risk factors for hemorrhage and
Med. 2001 Dec 20;345(25):1801-8. PMID: 11752356. X- can colonoscopy predict outcome for patients? Am J
2, X-4 Gastroenterol. 1995 Oct;90(10):1779-84. PMID: 7572894.
X-2
743. Forget P, Vandenhende J, Berliere M, et al.; Do
intraoperative analgesics influence breast cancer recurrence 754. Fraenkel L, Bogardus ST, Jr., Concato J, et al.;
after mastectomy? A retrospective analysis. Anesth Analg. Treatment options in knee osteoarthritis: the patient's
2010 Jun 1;110(6):1630-5. PMID: 20435950. X-2, X-4 perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jun 28;164(12):1299-
304. PMID: 15226163. X-2, X-3, X-4
744. Foroutan M, Loloei B, Irvani S, et al.; Accuracy of
rapid urease test in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection 755. Fraj J, Valero A, Vives R, et al.; Safety of triflusal
in patients using NSAIDs. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr- (antiplatelet drug) in patients with aspirin-exacerbated
Jun;16(2):110-2. PMID: 20339181. X-2, X-4 respiratory diseases. Allergy. 2008 Jan;63(1):112-5. PMID:
18053020. X-2, X-3, X-4
745. Forrest JB, Camu F, Greer IA, et al.; Ketorolac,
diclofenac, and ketoprofen are equally safe for pain relief 756. Franck H, Rau R, Herborn G; Thrombocytopenia in
after major surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Feb;88(2):227-33. patients with rheumatoid arthritis on long-term treatment
PMID: 11883386. X-4 with low dose methotrexate. Clin Rheumatol. 1996
May;15(3):266-70. PMID: 8793258. X-2, X-4
746. Fortuny J, Johnson CC, Bohlke K, et al.; Use of anti-
inflammatory drugs and lower esophageal sphincter- 757. Francois P, Desrumaux A, Cans C, et al.; Prevalence
relaxing drugs and risk of esophageal and gastric cancers. and risk factors of suppurative complications in children
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Oct;5(10):1154-9 e3. with pneumonia. Acta Paediatr. 2010 Jun;99(6):861-6.
PMID: 17644046. X-2, X-4 PMID: 20178517. X-2

747. Fortuny J, Kogevinas M, Garcia-Closas M, et al.; 758. Frankel A, Sohn A, Patel RV, et al.; Bilateral
Use of analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory comparison study of pimecrolimus cream 1% and a
drugs, genetic predisposition, and bladder cancer risk in ceramide-hyaluronic acid emollient foam in the treatment
Spain. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 of patients with atopic dermatitis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2011
Sep;15(9):1696-702. PMID: 16985032. X-2, X-4 Jun;10(6):666-72. PMID: 21637908. X-2, X-3, X-4

748. Fosbol EL, Folke F, Jacobsen S, et al.; Cause- 759. Fraser D, Whitehead M, Schenkel L, et al.; Does
specific cardiovascular risk associated with nonsteroidal low-dose, transdermal, norethisterone acetate reliably cause
antiinflammatory drugs among healthy individuals. Circ endometrial transformation in postmenopausal oestrogen-
Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Jul;3(4):395-405. PMID: users? Maturitas. 1993 Jan;16(1):23-30. PMID: 8429801.
20530789. X-4 X-2, X-4

749. Fosbol EL, Gislason GH, Jacobsen S, et al.; Risk of 760. Fraser IS, McCarron G; Randomized trial of 2
myocardial infarction and death associated with the use of hormonal and 2 prostaglandin-inhibiting agents in women
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) among with a complaint of menorrhagia. Aust N Z J Obstet
healthy individuals: a nationwide cohort study. Clin Gynaecol. 1991 Feb;31(1):66-70. PMID: 1872778. X-2, X-
Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Feb;85(2):190-7. PMID: 18987620. 3, X-4
X-4
761. Fraser IS, McCarron G, Markham R, et al.; Long-
750. Foster M, Kendall R, Todd M; COX-2 inhibitor term treatment of menorrhagia with mefenamic acid. Obstet
safety in the workers' compensation market. Lippincotts Gynecol. 1983 Jan;61(1):109-12. PMID: 6337354. X-2
Case Manag. 2005 Jul-Aug;10(4):217-20. PMID:
16056119. X-1 762. Fraser IS, Pearse C, Shearman RP, et al.; Efficacy of
mefenamic acid in patients with a complaint of
751. Fournier A, Berrino F, Clavel-Chapelon F; Unequal menorrhagia. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Nov;58(5):543-51.
risks for breast cancer associated with different hormone PMID: 7029369. X-2, X-3, X-4
replacement therapies: results from the E3N cohort study.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Jan;107(1):103-11. PMID: 763. Fraser IS, Romer T, Parke S, et al.; Effective
17333341. X-4 treatment of heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding
with an oral contraceptive containing estradiol valerate and

L-35
dienogest: A randomized, double-blind Phase III trial.
Human Reproduction. 2011;26(10):2698-708. PMID: 776. Froud T, Faradji RN, Pileggi A, et al.; The use of
21784734. X-2, X-3 exenatide in islet transplant recipients with chronic
allograft dysfunction: safety, efficacy, and metabolic
764. Fraser JS, Muller AF, Smith DJ, et al.; Renal tubular effects. Transplantation. 2008 Jul 15;86(1):36-45. PMID:
injury is present in acute inflammatory bowel disease prior 18622276. X-2, X-4
to the introduction of drug therapy. Aliment Pharmacol
Ther. 2001 Aug;15(8):1131-7. PMID: 11472315. X-2, X-3, 777. Fuchs N, Dusterberg B, Weber-Diehl F, et al.; The
X-4 effect on blood pressure of a monophasic oral contraceptive
containing ethinylestradiol and gestodene. Contraception.
765. Freedland SJ, Blanco-Yarosh M, Sun JC, et al.; 1995 Jun;51(6):335-9. PMID: 7554972. X-4
Ketorolac-based analgesia improves outcomes for living
kidney donors. Transplantation. 2002 Mar 15;73(5):741-5. 778. Fugere P; Five years experience of intrauterine
PMID: 11907420. X-2, X-3, X-4 contraception with the Nova-T. Contraception. 1990
Jan;41(1):1-7. PMID: 2302943. X-2, X-3, X-4
766. Friedman S, Flidel-Rimon O, Steinberg M, et al.;
Indomethacin tocolysis and white matter injury in preterm 779. Fujii AM, Brown E, Mirochnick M, et al.; Neonatal
infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005 Aug;18(2):87- necrotizing enterocolitis with intestinal perforation in
91. PMID: 16203592. X-4 extremely premature infants receiving early indomethacin
treatment for patent ductus arteriosus. J Perinatol. 2002
767. Fries J; Toward an understanding of NSAID-related Oct-Nov;22(7):535-40. PMID: 12368968. X-2, X-3, X-4
adverse events: the contribution of longitudinal data. Scand
J Rheumatol Suppl. 1996;102:3-8. PMID: 8628980. X-4 780. Fujii T, Nakabayashi T, Hashimoto S, et al.;
Correlation between serum triglycerides and gastro-
768. Fries JF; Safety issues related to DMARD therapy. J duodenal ulcer associated with low-dose aspirin.
Rheumatol Suppl. 1990 Nov;25:14-7. PMID: 2273518. X- Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Jul-Aug;56(93):1241-4.
1, X-4 PMID: 19760979. X-2, X-4

769. Fries JF; ARAMIS and toxicity measurement. 781. Fujimori S, Gudis K, Takahashi Y, et al.;
(Arthritis Rheumatism and Aging Medical Information Distribution of small intestinal mucosal injuries as a result
System). J Rheumatol. 1995 May;22(5):995-7. PMID: of NSAID administration. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010
8587097. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4 Jun;40(6):504-10. PMID: 20412292. X-2

770. Fries JF, Williams CA, Bloch DA; The relative 782. Fujisawa N, Inamori M, Endo H, et al.; Incidence of
toxicity of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Arthritis and risk factors for upper gastrointestinal complications in
Rheum. 1991 Nov;34(11):1353-60. PMID: 1953813. X-4 patients taking low-dose aspirin in Japan.
Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 Jan-Feb;58(105):229-34.
771. Fries JF, Williams CA, Bloch DA, et al.; PMID: 21510320. X-2, X-4
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated
gastropathy: incidence and risk factor models. Am J Med. 783. Fujita WH, McCormick CL, Parneix-Spake A; An
1991 Sep;91(3):213-22. PMID: 1892140. X-4 exploratory study to evaluate the efficacy of pimecrolimus
cream 1% for the treatment of pityriasis alba. Int J
772. Fries JF, Williams CA, Ramey D, et al.; The relative Dermatol. 2007 Jul;46(7):700-5. PMID: 17614797. X-2,
toxicity of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Arthritis X-3, X-4
Rheum. 1993 Mar;36(3):297-306. PMID: 8452574. X-4
784. Fuldeore MJ, Marx SE, Chwalisz K, et al.; Add-back
773. Friesecke S, Abel P, Roser M, et al.; Outcome of therapy use and its impact on LA persistence in patients
severe lactic acidosis associated with metformin with endometriosis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010
accumulation. Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R226. PMID: Mar;26(3):729-36. PMID: 20092387. X-2, X-3, X-4
21171991. X-2
785. Fuller JR, Bevin TH, Molteno AC, et al.; Anti-
774. Friis S, Thomassen L, Sorensen HT, et al.; inflammatory fibrosis suppression in threatened
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and breast cancer trabeculectomy bleb failure produces good long term
risk: a Danish cohort study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008 control of intraocular pressure without risk of sight
Apr;17(2):88-96. PMID: 18287865. X-4 threatening complications. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002
Dec;86(12):1352-4. PMID: 12446362. X-2, X-3, X-4
775. Fromm GL, Freedman RS, Fritsche HA, et al.;
Sequentially administered ethinyl estradiol and 786. Furberg CD, Vittinghoff E, Davidson M, et al.;
medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of refractory Subgroup interactions in the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin
epithelial ovarian carcinoma in patients with positive Replacement Study: lessons learned. Circulation. 2002 Feb
estrogen receptors. Cancer. 1991 Nov 1;68(9):1885-9. 26;105(8):917-22. PMID: 11864918. X-3, X-4
PMID: 1833046. X-2, X-3, X-4

L-36
Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Nov 10;111(1):78-82. PMID:
787. Gabb GM, Ryan P, Wing LM, et al.; Epidemiological 14557017. X-4
study of angioedema and ACE inhibitors. Aust N Z J Med.
1996 Dec;26(6):777-82. PMID: 9028507. X-2, X-3, X-4 799. Ganacharya S, Bhattoa HP, Batar I; Pre-malignant
and malignant cervical pathologies among inert and
788. Gabriel SE, Campion ME, O'Fallon WM; A cost- copper-bearing intrauterine contraceptive device users: a
utility analysis of misoprostol prophylaxis for rheumatoid 10-year follow-up study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health
arthritis patients receiving nonsteroidal antiinflammatory Care. 2006 Jun;11(2):89-97. PMID: 16854681. X-4
drugs. Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Mar;37(3):333-41. PMID:
8129789. X-2, X-3, X-4 800. Ganie MA, Khurana ML, Eunice M, et al.;
Comparison of efficacy of spironolactone with metformin
789. Gabriel SE, Sunku J, Salvarani C, et al.; Adverse in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome: an open-
outcomes of antiinflammatory therapy among patients with labeled study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004
polymyalgia rheumatica. Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Jun;89(6):2756-62. PMID: 15181054. X-2, X-4
Oct;40(10):1873-8. PMID: 9336424. X-2
801. Garamvolgyi G; Change to Tri-Regol from other oral
790. Gadsby R, Holden J; The Multiload CU250 in contraceptives. Ther Hung. 1991;39(3):122-4. PMID:
general practice. Practitioner. 1988 Dec;232(1460):1343, 7. 1818425. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 3256888. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4
802. Garbe E, Andersohn F, Bronder E, et al.; Drug
791. Gagne JJ, Maio V, Rabinowitz C; Prevalence and induced immune haemolytic anaemia in the Berlin Case-
predictors of potential drug-drug interactions in Regione Control Surveillance Study. Br J Haematol. 2011
Emilia-Romagna, Italy. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Sep;154(5):644-53. PMID: 21749359. X-2, X-4
Apr;33(2):141-51. PMID: 18315779. X-3, X-4
803. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Barreales Tolosa L; Risk of
792. Gal P, Ransom JL, Schall S, et al.; Indomethacin for upper gastrointestinal complications among users of
patent ductus arteriosus closure. Application of serum traditional NSAIDs and COXIBs in the general population.
concentrations and pharmacodynamics to improve Gastroenterology. 2007 Feb;132(2):498-506. PMID:
response. J Perinatol. 1990 Mar;10(1):20-6. PMID: 17258728. X-4
2313390. X-2, X-3, X-4
804. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Egan K, FitzGerald GA;
793. Galasko CS, Courtney P, Jayne M, et al.; Traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and
Comparison of the efficacy of naproxen sodium and postmenopausal hormone therapy: a drug-drug interaction?
dihydrocodeine tartrate in the treatment of post-operative PLoS Med. 2007 May;4(5):e157. PMID: 17518513. X-4
pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 1988;10(10):656-62. PMID:
3371081. X-2, X-3, X-4 805. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Gonzalez-Perez A; Risk of
breast cancer among users of aspirin and other anti-
794. Gallagher PF, Barry PJ, Ryan C, et al.; Inappropriate inflammatory drugs. Br J Cancer. 2004 Aug 2;91(3):525-9.
prescribing in an acutely ill population of elderly patients PMID: 15226764. X-4
as determined by Beers' Criteria. Age Ageing. 2008
Jan;37(1):96-101. PMID: 17933759. X-2, X-3, X-4 806. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Gonzalez-Perez A; Long-term
use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of
795. Gallelli L, Colosimo M, Pirritano D, et al.; myocardial infarction in the general population. BMC Med.
Retrospective evaluation of adverse drug reactions induced 2005;3:17. PMID: 16316472. X-4
by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clin Drug
Investig. 2007;27(2):115-22. PMID: 17217316. X-4 807. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Gonzalez-Perez A, Johansson
S, et al.; Risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease in
796. Gallerani M, Simonato M, Manfredini R, et al.; Risk the general population. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Aug
of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. J 15;22(4):309-15. PMID: 16097997. X-4
Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Jan;57(1):103-10. PMID: 15019017.
X-4 808. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Hernandez-Diaz S; Relative
risk of upper gastrointestinal complications among users of
797. Gallicchio L, Visvanathan K, Burke A, et al.; acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of Epidemiology. 2001 Sep;12(5):570-6. PMID: 11505178.
developing breast cancer in a population-based prospective X-4
cohort study in Washington County, MD. Int J Cancer.
2007 Jul 1;121(1):211-15. PMID: 17330846. X-4 809. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Hernandez-Diaz S;
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs as a trigger of clinical
798. Ganacharya S, Bhattoa HP, Batar I; Ectopic heart failure. Epidemiology. 2003 Mar;14(2):240-6. PMID:
pregnancy among non-medicated and copper-containing 12606892. X-4
intrauterine device users: a 10-year follow-up. Eur J Obstet

L-37
810. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Hernandez-Diaz S; Risk of 821. Gardner MO, Owen J, Skelly S, et al.; Preterm
uncomplicated peptic ulcer among users of aspirin and delivery after indomethacin. A risk factor for neonatal
nonaspirin nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Am J complications? J Reprod Med. 1996 Dec;41(12):903-6.
Epidemiol. 2004 Jan 1;159(1):23-31. PMID: 14693656. PMID: 8979204. X-2, X-4
X-4
822. Garza-Flores J; Cyclofem/Cyclo-Provera: emerging
811. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Jick H; Risk of upper countries' perspective. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Aug;62
gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation associated with Suppl 1:S31-6. PMID: 9806236. X-4
individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Lancet.
1994 Mar 26;343(8900):769-72. PMID: 7907735. X-4 823. Garza-Flores J, Martinez M, Valles De Bourges V, et
al.; Comparative assessment of two low-dose oral
812. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Lin KJ, Hernandez-Diaz S, et contraceptives, Lo-Femenal and Lo-Estrin, in Mexican
al.; Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with low-dose women. Adv Contracept. 1992 Dec;8(4):291-301. PMID:
acetylsalicylic acid alone and in combination with 1290331. X-2
clopidogrel and other medications. Circulation. 2011 Mar
15;123(10):1108-15. PMID: 21357821. X-4 824. Garza-Flores J, Moraks del Olmo A, Fuziwara JL, et
al.; Introduction of cyclofem once-a-month injectable
813. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Perez Gutthann S, Walker AM, contraceptive in Mexico. Contraception. 1998 Jul;58(1):7-
et al.; The role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in 12. PMID: 9743890. X-4
acute liver injury. BMJ. 1992 Oct 10;305(6858):865-8.
PMID: 1422399. X-4 825. Garza-Flores J, Valles de Bourges V, Martinez M, et
al.; Safety and efficacy of a combined oral contraceptive:
814. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Ruigomez A; Secondary gestodene 75 micrograms plus ethinyl estradiol 30
prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding associated micrograms in Mexican women. Adv Contracept. 1994
with maintenance acid-suppressing treatment in patients Mar;10(1):19-26. PMID: 8030449. X-2, X-4
with peptic ulcer bleed. Epidemiology. 1999
May;10(3):228-32. PMID: 10230829. X-2, X-3, X-4 826. Gasse C, Christensen S, Riis A, et al.; Preadmission
use of SSRIs alone or in combination with NSAIDs and 30-
815. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Ruigomez A, Jick H; A day mortality after peptic ulcer bleeding. Scand J
review of epidemiologic research on drug-induced acute Gastroenterol. 2009;44(11):1288-95. PMID: 19891579.
liver injury using the general practice research data base in X-4
the United Kingdom. Pharmacotherapy. 1997 Jul-
Aug;17(4):721-8. PMID: 9250549. X-4 827. Gasse C, Hollowell J, Meier CR, et al.; Drug
interactions and risk of acute bleeding leading to
816. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Tacconelli S, Patrignani P; hospitalisation or death in patients with chronic atrial
Role of dose potency in the prediction of risk of myocardial fibrillation treated with warfarin. Thromb Haemost. 2005
infarction associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory Sep;94(3):537-43. PMID: 16268469. X-4
drugs in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008
Nov 11;52(20):1628-36. PMID: 18992652. X-4 828. Gazarian M, Berkovitch M, Koren G, et al.;
Experience with misoprostol therapy for NSAID
817. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Walker AM, Perez Gutthann S; gastropathy in children. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and gastrointestinal Apr;54(4):277-80. PMID: 7763105. X-2, X-3, X-4
hospitalizations in Saskatchewan: a cohort study.
Epidemiology. 1992 Jul;3(4):337-42. PMID: 1637896. X- 829. Geborek P, Crnkic M, Petersson IF, et al.;
4 Etanercept, infliximab, and leflunomide in established
rheumatoid arthritis: clinical experience using a structured
818. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Williams R, Derby LE, et al.; follow up programme in southern Sweden. Ann Rheum
Acute liver injury associated with nonsteroidal anti- Dis. 2002 Sep;61(9):793-8. PMID: 12176803. X-2, X-4
inflammatory drugs and the role of risk factors. Arch Intern
Med. 1994 Feb 14;154(3):311-6. PMID: 8297198. X-4 830. Geczy M, Peltier L, Wolbach R; Naproxen
tolerability in the elderly: a summary report. J Rheumatol.
819. Garcia-Gonzalez MA, Lanas A, Savelkoul PH, et al.; 1987 Apr;14(2):348-54. PMID: 3599004. X-7
Association of interleukin 1 gene family polymorphisms
with duodenal ulcer disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2003 831. Geisser P, Rumyantsev V; Pharmacodynamics and
Dec;134(3):525-31. PMID: 14632761. X-2, X-3, X-4 safety of ferric carboxymaltose: a multiple-dose study in
patients with iron-deficiency anaemia secondary to a
820. Garcia-Porrua C, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Lopez-Lazaro gastrointestinal disorder. Arzneimittelforschung.
L; Drug associated cutaneous vasculitis in adults in 2010;60(6a):373-85. PMID: 20648929. X-2, X-4
northwestern Spain. J Rheumatol. 1999 Sep;26(9):1942-4.
PMID: 10493674. X-2 832. Gemzell-Danielsson K, Inki P, Boubli L, et al.;
Bleeding pattern and safety of consecutive use of the
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS)--a

L-38
multicentre prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2010 843. Giordano N, Senesi M, Battisti E, et al.; Tolerability
Feb;25(2):354-9. PMID: 19955104. X-2, X-4 of nabumetone: a pilot in vitro study showing absence of
injury to articular cartilage. Int J Tissue React. 1996;18(4-
833. Genkinger JM, De Vivo I, Stampfer MJ, et al.; 6):105-8. PMID: 9195245. X-4
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use and risk of bladder
cancer in the health professionals follow-up study. Int J 844. Giribela CR, Rubira MC, Melo NR, et al.; Effect of a
Cancer. 2007 May 15;120(10):2221-5. PMID: 17290403. low-dose oral contraceptive on venous endothelial function
X-4, X-6 in healthy young women: preliminary results. Clinics (Sao
Paulo). 2007 Apr;62(2):151-8. PMID: 17505700. X-2, X-4
834. Georgiev DB, Manassiev NA; Effect of long-term
continuous combined hormone replacement therapy with 845. Girolami A, Spiezia L, Girolami B, et al.; Effect of
estradiol valerate and either dienogest or norethisterone age on oral contraceptive-induced venous thrombosis. Clin
acetate on mammographic density in postmenopausal Appl Thromb Hemost. 2004 Jul;10(3):259-63. PMID:
women. Medscape Womens Health. 2002 Jul-Aug;7(4):1. 15247983. X-2, X-3
PMID: 12466733. X-2, X-3, X-4
846. Gisbert JP, Gonzalez L, de Pedro A, et al.;
835. Gerais AS, Alwahab S, Omran KF, et al.; A Helicobacter pylori and bleeding duodenal ulcer:
comparative study of two estrogen dosages in combined prevalence of the infection and role of non-steroidal anti-
oral contraceptives among Sudanese women. Int J inflammatory drugs. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001
Gynaecol Obstet. 1983 Dec;21(6):459-68. PMID: 6141106. Jul;36(7):717-24. PMID: 11444470. X-2, X-3, X-4
X-2, X-4
847. Gisbert JP, Legido J, Garcia-Sanz I, et al.;
836. Germond M, Capelli P, Bruno G, et al.; Comparison Helicobacter pylori and perforated peptic ulcer prevalence
of the efficacy and safety of two formulations of of the infection and role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
micronized progesterone (Ellios and Utrogestan) used as drugs. Dig Liver Dis. 2004 Feb;36(2):116-20. PMID:
luteal phase support after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 15002818. X-2
2002 Feb;77(2):313-7. PMID: 11821089. X-2, X-4
848. Gislason GH, Jacobsen S, Rasmussen JN, et al.; Risk
837. Geyer M, Peter S, Buhler H, et al.; Application of of death or reinfarction associated with the use of selective
bleeding prophylactic criteria (NICE) in patients with acute cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and nonselective nonsteroidal
gastrointestinal bleeding. A Swiss prospective study. Swiss antiinflammatory drugs after acute myocardial infarction.
Med Wkly. 2007 Mar 10;137(9-10):146-50. PMID: Circulation. 2006 Jun 27;113(25):2906-13. PMID:
17370155. X-2, X-3, X-4 16785336. X-4

838. Giannoudis PV, MacDonald DA, Matthews SJ, et al.; 849. Gislason GH, Rasmussen JN, Abildstrom SZ, et al.;
Nonunion of the femoral diaphysis. The influence of Increased mortality and cardiovascular morbidity
reaming and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Bone associated with use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Joint Surg Br. 2000 Jul;82(5):655-8. PMID: 10963160. X- in chronic heart failure. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jan
2 26;169(2):141-9. PMID: 19171810. X-4

839. Gibson PR, Fixa B, Pekarkova B, et al.; Comparison 850. Giugliano D, Quatraro A, Consoli G, et al.;
of the efficacy and safety of Eudragit-L-coated mesalazine Metformin for obese, insulin-treated diabetic patients:
tablets with ethylcellulose-coated mesalazine tablets in improvement in glycaemic control and reduction of
patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis. metabolic risk factors. Eur J Clin Pharmacol.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr 1;23(7):1017-26. 1993;44(2):107-12. PMID: 8453955. X-2, X-4
PMID: 16573804. X-2, X-3, X-4
851. Giuseppe P, Antonino R, Alessandro DB, et al.;
840. Giercksky KE; Piroxicam and gastrointestinal Floctafenine: a valid alternative in patients with adverse
bleeding. Am J Med. 1986 Nov 28;81(5B):2-5. PMID: reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Ann
3491541. X-2, X-4 Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Jan;78(1):74-8. PMID:
9012626. X-2, X-3, X-4
841. Giercksky KE, Huseby G, Rugstad HE;
Epidemiology of NSAID-related gastrointestinal side 852. Glantz S, Glantz JC, Campbell-Heider N, et al.;
effects. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1989;163:3-8. PMID: Norplant use among urban minority women in the United
2683027. X-4 States. Contraception. 2000 Feb;61(2):83-90. PMID:
10802272. X-2, X-3, X-4
842. Gill JK, Maskarinec G, Wilkens LR, et al.;
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and breast cancer 853. Glantz S, Schaff E, Campbell-Heider N, et al.;
risk: the multiethnic cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Nov Contraceptive implant use among inner city teens. J
15;166(10):1150-8. PMID: 17698973. X-4 Adolesc Health. 1995 May;16(5):389-95. PMID: 7662690.
X-2, X-3

L-39
854. Glasier A, Yan Y, Wellings K; How do health care
professionals respond to advice on adverse side effects of 866. Gokmen O, Yapar Eyi EG; Hormone replacement
contraceptive methods? The case of Depo Provera. therapy and lipid-lipoprotein concentrations. Eur J Obstet
Contraception. 2007 Jul;76(1):18-22. PMID: 17586131. X- Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999 Jul;85(1):31-41. PMID:
2, X-3, X-4 10428319. X-4, X-7

855. Glasier AF, Wang H, Davie JE, et al.; Administration 867. Golbs S, Domhardt R, Presl J, et al.; Clinical findings
of an antiprogesterone up-regulates estrogen receptors in with the oral contraceptive combination
the endometrium of women using Norplant: a pilot study. ethinylestradiol/dienogest in the Czech Republic. Methods
Fertil Steril. 2002 Feb;77(2):366-72. PMID: 11821099. X- Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Dec;24(10):689-96. PMID:
2, X-3, X-4 12616963. X-2

856. Gleason JM, Slezak JM, Jung H, et al.; Regular 868. Golbs S, Domhardt R, Radowicky S, et al.; Clinical
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and erectile findings with the oral contraceptive combination
dysfunction. J Urol. 2011 Apr;185(4):1388-93. PMID: ethinylestradiol/dienogest in Poland. Methods Find Exp
21334642. X-6 Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Nov;24(9):585-92. PMID:
12616705. X-2
857. Gleeson MH, Davis AJ; Non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs, aspirin and newly diagnosed colitis: a 869. Goldenberg NA, Jacobson L, Manco-Johnson MJ;
case-control study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Mar Brief communication: duration of platelet dysfunction after
15;17(6):817-25. PMID: 12641504. X-2 a 7-day course of Ibuprofen. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Apr
5;142(7):506-9. PMID: 15809462. X-2
858. Glueck CJ, Bornovali S, Pranikoff J, et al.;
Metformin, pre-eclampsia, and pregnancy outcomes in 870. Goldstein JL, Chan FK, Lanas A, et al.;
women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabet Med. 2004 Haemoglobin decreases in NSAID users over time: an
Aug;21(8):829-36. PMID: 15270785. X-2, X-4 analysis of two large outcome trials. Aliment Pharmacol
Ther. 2011 Oct;34(7):808-16. PMID: 21810115. X-4
859. Glueck CJ, Pranikoff J, Aregawi D, et al.; Prevention
of gestational diabetes by metformin plus diet in patients 871. Goldstein JL, Cryer B, Amer F, et al.; Celecoxib plus
with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2008 aspirin versus naproxen and lansoprazole plus aspirin: a
Mar;89(3):625-34. PMID: 17678910. X-2, X-3, X-4 randomized, double-blind, endoscopic trial. Clin
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Oct;5(10):1167-74. PMID:
860. Glueck CJ, Wang P, Kobayashi S, et al.; Metformin 17916545. X-2, X-4
therapy throughout pregnancy reduces the development of
gestational diabetes in women with polycystic ovary 872. Goldstein JL, Eisen GM, Lewis B, et al.; Video
syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2002 Mar;77(3):520-5. PMID: capsule endoscopy to prospectively assess small bowel
11872206. X-2, X-3, X-4 injury with celecoxib, naproxen plus omeprazole, and
placebo. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Feb;3(2):133-41.
861. Gobeaux-Castadot MJ, Boria MC, Chervenak FA, et PMID: 15704047. X-2
al.; Five year clinical experience with the Copper 7
intrauterine device. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1981 873. Goldstein JL, Huang B, Amer F, et al.; Ulcer
Jun;19(3):181-92. PMID: 6120864. X-2, X-3, X-4 recurrence in high-risk patients receiving nonsteroidalanti-
inflammatory drugs plus low-dose aspirin: results of a post
862. Godil A, DeGuzman L, Schilling RC, 3rd, et al.; HOC subanalysis. Clin Ther. 2004 Oct;26(10):1637-43.
Recent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use increases PMID: 15598480. X-2, X-3, X-4
the risk of early recurrence of bleeding in patients
presenting with bleeding ulcer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 874. Goldstein JL, Johanson JF, Suchower LJ, et al.;
Feb;51(2):146-51. PMID: 10650255. X-2 Healing of gastric ulcers with esomeprazole versus
ranitidine in patients who continued to receive NSAID
863. Goh H, Bourne R; Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy: a randomized trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005
drugs and perforated diverticular disease: a case-control Dec;100(12):2650-7. PMID: 16393215. X-2, X-3, X-4
study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002 Mar;84(2):93-6. PMID:
11995772. X-2 875. Goldstein JL, Lowry SC, Lanza FL, et al.; The
impact of low-dose aspirin on endoscopic gastric and
864. Goh JE, Sadler L, Rowan J; Metformin for duodenal ulcer rates in users of a non-selective non-
gestational diabetes in routine clinical practice. Diabet steroidal anti-inflammatory drug or a cyclo-oxygenase-2-
Med. 2011 Sep;28(9):1082-7. PMID: 21679232. X-2, X-3 selective inhibitor. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 May
15;23(10):1489-98. PMID: 16669964. X-2, X-7
865. Goicoechea M, Caramelo C, Ochando A, et al.;
Antiplatelet therapy alters iron requirements in 876. Goldstein JL, Zhao SZ, Burke TA, et al.; Incidence
hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000 of outpatient physician claims for upper gastrointestinal
Jul;36(1):80-7. PMID: 10873876. X-2, X-3, X-4 symptoms among new users of celecoxib, ibuprofen, and

L-40
naproxen in an insured population in the United States. Am contraceptive patch users. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jan;93(1):21-
J Gastroenterol. 2003 Dec;98(12):2627-34. PMID: 8. PMID: 18976753. X-2, X-3
14687808. X-4
887. Graff-Iversen S, Hammar N, Thelle DS, et al.;
877. Gomez F, Ruiz P, Lopez R, et al.; Treatment with Hormone therapy and mortality during a 14-year follow-up
megestrol acetate improves human immunodeficiency of 14 324 Norwegian women. J Intern Med. 2004
virus-associated immune thrombocytopenia. Clin Diagn Nov;256(5):437-45. PMID: 15485480. X-7
Lab Immunol. 2002 May;9(3):583-7. PMID: 11986264. X-
2, X-3, X-4 888. Graff-Iversen S, Tverdal A, Stensvold I;
Cardiovascular risk factors in Norwegian women using oral
878. Gomez HF, McClafferty HH, Flory D, et al.; contraceptives: results from a cardiovascular health
Prevention of gastrointestinal iron absorption by chelation screening 1985-88. Contraception. 1996 Jun;53(6):337-44.
from an orally administered premixed PMID: 8773420. X-4
deferoxamine/charcoal slurry. Ann Emerg Med. 1997
Nov;30(5):587-92. PMID: 9360566. X-3, X-4 889. Graham DJ, Campen D, Hui R, et al.; Risk of acute
myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death in patients
879. Goni AZ, Lacruz RL, Paricio JJ, et al.; The treated with cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective and non-selective
levonorgestrel intrauterine system as an alternative to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: nested case-control
hysterectomy for the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia. study. Lancet. 2005 Feb 5-11;365(9458):475-81. PMID:
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009 Sep;25(9):581-6. PMID: 15705456. X-4
19562603. X-2, X-3, X-4
890. Graham DY, Agrawal NM, Campbell DR, et al.;
880. Gonzalez Baron M, Feliu J, Espinosa E, et al.; Ulcer prevention in long-term users of nonsteroidal anti-
Comparison of two chemotherapeutic regimens--mitomycin inflammatory drugs: results of a double-blind, randomized,
+ vindesine + cisplatin (MVP) vs. mitomycin + ifosfamide multicenter, active- and placebo-controlled study of
+ cisplatin (MIP)--in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. misoprostol vs lansoprazole. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jan
ONCOPAZ Cooperative Group. Ann Oncol. 1994 28;162(2):169-75. PMID: 11802750. X-2, X-3, X-4
Apr;5(4):323-7. PMID: 8075028. X-2, X-4
891. Graham DY, Opekun AR, Willingham FF, et al.;
881. Gonzalez E, Gutierrez E, Galeano C, et al.; Early Visible small-intestinal mucosal injury in chronic NSAID
steroid treatment improves the recovery of renal function in users. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jan;3(1):55-9.
patients with drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis. PMID: 15645405. X-2, X-4
Kidney Int. 2008 Apr;73(8):940-6. PMID: 18185501. X-2,
X-3, X-4 892. Graham EM, Atz AM, Gillis J, et al.; Differential
effects of aprotinin and tranexamic acid on outcomes and
882. Gooch K, Culleton BF, Manns BJ, et al.; NSAID use cytokine profiles in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery. J
and progression of chronic kidney disease. Am J Med. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 May;143(5):1069-76.
2007 Mar;120(3):280 e1-7. PMID: 17349452. X-7, X-8 PMID: 22075061. X-2, X-4

883. Goodson NJ, Brookhart AM, Symmons DP, et al.; 893. Graser T, Koytchev R, Muller A, et al.; Comparison
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use does not appear of the efficacy and endometrial safety of two estradiol
to be associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in valerate/dienogest combinations and Kliogest for
patients with inflammatory polyarthritis: results from a continuous combined hormone replacement therapy in
primary care based inception cohort of patients. Ann postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2000 Jun;3(2):109-
Rheum Dis. 2009 Mar;68(3):367-72. PMID: 18408253. X- 18. PMID: 11910651. X-4, X-7
2, X-4
894. Greenberg JD, Bingham CO, 3rd, Abramson SB, et
884. Gordon P, Rutledge J, Sawin R, et al.; Early al.; Effect of cardiovascular comorbidities and concomitant
postnatal dexamethasone increases the risk of focal small aspirin use on selection of cyclooxygenase inhibitor among
bowel perforation in extremely low birth weight infants. J rheumatologists. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Feb 15;53(1):12-7.
Perinatol. 1999 Dec;19(8 Pt 1):573-7. PMID: 10645522. PMID: 15696570. X-4
X-2, X-3, X-4
895. Greenberg JD, Fisher MC, Kremer J, et al.; The
885. Gorgen H, Api M, Akca A, et al.; Use of the COX-2 inhibitor market withdrawals and prescribing
Levonorgestrel-IUS in the treatment of menorrhagia: patterns by rheumatologists in patients with gastrointestinal
assessment of quality of life in Turkish users. Arch and cardiovascular risk. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009 May-
Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jun;279(6):835-40. PMID: Jun;27(3):395-401. PMID: 19604430. X-3, X-4
19018547. X-2
896. Greendale GA, Espeland M, Slone S, et al.; Bone
886. Gracia CR, Sammel MD, Charlesworth S, et al.; mass response to discontinuation of long-term hormone
Sexual function in first-time contraceptive ring and replacement therapy: results from the Postmenopausal
Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Safety Follow-up

L-41
Study. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Mar 25;162(6):665-72.
PMID: 11911720. X-2, X-4 908. Gronich N, Lavi I, Rennert G; Higher risk of venous
thrombosis associated with drospirenone-containing oral
897. Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Sie A, et al.; Effects contraceptives: a population-based cohort study. CMAJ.
of estrogen and estrogen-progestin on mammographic 2011 Dec 13;183(18):E1319-25. PMID: 22065352. X-4
parenchymal density. Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin
Interventions (PEPI) Investigators. Ann Intern Med. 1999 909. Grosset K, Needleman F, Macphee G, et al.;
Feb 16;130(4 Pt 1):262-9. PMID: 10068383. X-2 Switching from ergot to nonergot dopamine agonists in
Parkinson's disease: a clinical series and five-drug dose
898. Greene GF, Millard OH, Norman RW, et al.; Cystitis conversion table. Mov Disord. 2004 Nov;19(11):1370-4.
associated with tiaprofenic acid. J Urol. 1994 PMID: 15389984. X-2, X-4, X-8
Oct;152(4):1101-2. PMID: 8072073. X-2
910. Grover R, Jones BM, Waterhouse N; The prevention
899. Greenson JK, Stern RA, Carpenter SL, et al.; The of haematoma following rhytidectomy: a review of 1078
clinical significance of focal active colitis. Hum Pathol. consecutive facelifts. Br J Plast Surg. 2001 Sep;54(6):481-
1997 Jun;28(6):729-33. PMID: 9191008. X-2 6. PMID: 11513508. X-2, X-3, X-4

900. Greer JB, Modugno F, Allen GO, et al.; Androgenic 911. Grover SA, Coupal L, Zowall H; Treating
progestins in oral contraceptives and the risk of epithelial osteoarthritis with cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitors:
ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):731-40. what are the benefits of avoiding blood pressure
PMID: 15802398. X-2, X-3, X-4 destabilization? Hypertension. 2005 Jan;45(1):92-7. PMID:
15545508. X-3, X-4
901. Griffin MR, Piper JM, Daugherty JR, et al.;
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and increased risk 912. Grover V, Usha R, Gupta U, et al.; Management of
for peptic ulcer disease in elderly persons. Ann Intern Med. cyclical menorrhagia with prostaglandin synthetase
1991 Feb 15;114(4):257-63. PMID: 1987872. X-7 inhibitor. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990
Sep;16(3):255-9. PMID: 2088249. X-2, X-3, X-4
902. Griffin MR, Smalley WE; Drugs and ulcers: clues
about mucosal protection from epidemiologic studies. J 913. Grubb GS, Moore D, Anderson NG; Pre-introductory
Clin Gastroenterol. 1995;21 Suppl 1:S113-9. PMID: clinical trials of Norplant implants: a comparison of
8775002. X-4, X-5 seventeen countries' experience. Contraception. 1995
Nov;52(5):287-96. PMID: 8585885. X-3, X-4
903. Grigorieva V, Chen-Mok M, Tarasova M, et al.; Use
of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system to treat 914. Gruber EM, Shukla AC, Reid RW, et al.; Synthetic
bleeding related to uterine leiomyomas. Fertil Steril. 2003 antifibrinolytics are not associated with an increased
May;79(5):1194-8. PMID: 12738516. X-2, X-3, X-4 incidence of baffle fenestration closure after the modified
Fontan procedure. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2000
904. Grimaldi-Bensouda L, Rossignol M, Danchin N, et Jun;14(3):257-9. PMID: 10890476. X-2, X-3, X-4
al.; Risk of ST versus non-ST elevation myocardial
infarction associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory 915. Gu SJ, Du MK, Zhang LD, et al.; A 5-year
drugs. Heart. 2011 Nov;97(22):1834-40. PMID: 21880652. evaluation of NORPLANT contraceptive implants in
X-4 China. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;83(5 Pt 1):673-8. PMID:
8164924. X-4
905. Grimmelt AC, Cohen CD, Fehr T, et al.; Safety and
tolerability of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) for treatment 916. Guang-Sheng F, Mei-Lu B, Li-Nan C, et al.; Efficacy
of iron deficiency in patients with chronic kidney disease and safety of the combined oral contraceptive
and in kidney transplant recipients. Clin Nephrol. 2009 ethinylestradiol/drospirenone (Yasmin) in healthy Chinese
Feb;71(2):125-9. PMID: 19203504. X-2, X-4 women: a randomized, open-label, controlled, multicentre
trial. Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(6):387-96. PMID:
906. Grodstein F, Skarupski KA, Bienias JL, et al.; Anti- 20201608. X-2, X-4
inflammatory agents and cognitive decline in a bi-racial
population. Neuroepidemiology. 2008;30(1):45-50. PMID: 917. Guazzelli CA, Barreiros FA, Barbosa R, et al.;
18259082. X-4, X-7 Extended regimens of the vaginal contraceptive ring: cycle
control. Contraception. 2009 Nov;80(5):430-5. PMID:
907. Grohs JG, Schmidt M, Wanivenhaus A; Selective 19835716. X-2, X-3, X-4
COX-2 inhibitor versus indomethacin for the prevention of
heterotopic ossification after hip replacement: a double- 918. Guazzelli CA, Jacobucci MS, Barbieri M, et al.;
blind randomized trial of 100 patients with 1-year follow- Monthly injectable contraceptive use by adolescents in
up. Acta Orthop. 2007 Feb;78(1):95-8. PMID: 17453399. Brazil: evaluation of clinical aspects. Contraception. 2007
X-2, X-4 Jul;76(1):45-8. PMID: 17586136. X-2, X-3, X-4

L-42
919. Gudmundsdottir ES, Jonsson H; CPH 82
(Reumacon) in refractory inflammatory arthritis. Scand J 931. Gutthann SP, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Raiford DS;
Rheumatol. 2000;29(5):323-5. PMID: 11093600. X-2, X-4 Individual nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and other
risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and
920. Guess HA, West R, Strand LM, et al.; Fatal upper perforation. Epidemiology. 1997 Jan;8(1):18-24. PMID:
gastrointestinal hemorrhage or perforation among users and 9116088. X-4
nonusers of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in
Saskatchewan, Canada 1983. J Clin Epidemiol. 932. Haag MD, Bos MJ, Hofman A, et al.;
1988;41(1):35-45. PMID: 3257254. X-4 Cyclooxygenase selectivity of nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs and risk of stroke. Arch Intern Med.
921. Gulliford M, Latinovic R; Mortality in type 2 2008 Jun 9;168(11):1219-24. PMID: 18541831. X-7
diabetic subjects prescribed metformin and sulphonylurea
drugs in combination: cohort study. Diabetes Metab Res 933. Hagglund H, Remberger M, Klaesson S, et al.;
Rev. 2004 May-Jun;20(3):239-45. PMID: 15133756. X-3 Norethisterone treatment, a major risk-factor for veno-
occlusive disease in the liver after allogeneic bone marrow
922. Gulmez SE, Droz-Perroteau C, Lassalle R, et al.; Are transplantation. Blood. 1998 Dec 15;92(12):4568-72.
traditional NSAIDs prescribed appropriately among French PMID: 9845522. X-2
elderly with osteoarthritis? Results from the CADEUS
cohort. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;67(8):833-8. 934. Hahn HS, Yoon SG, Hong JS, et al.; Conservative
PMID: 21387168. X-4, X-8 treatment with progestin and pregnancy outcomes in
endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009
923. Guney M, Oral B, Karahan N, et al.; Expression of Aug;19(6):1068-73. PMID: 19820370. X-2, X-3, X-4
leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) during the window of
implantation in copper T380A intrauterine device users. 935. Haimov-Kochman R, Doviner V, Amsalem H, et al.;
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007 Sep;12(3):212- Intraperitoneal levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device
9. PMID: 17763259. X-2, X-3, X-4 following uterine perforation: the role of progestins in
adhesion formation. Hum Reprod. 2003 May;18(5):990-3.
924. Gunter MJ, Canzian F, Landi S, et al.; Inflammation- PMID: 12721174. X-2
related gene polymorphisms and colorectal adenoma.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jun;15(6):1126- 936. Haines CJ, Chung TK, Lau TK; Sonographic
31. PMID: 16775170. X-2, X-3, X-4 measurement of endometrial thickness as a predictor of
vaginal bleeding in women using continuous combined
925. Gunthert AR, Faber M, Knappe G, et al.; Early onset hormone replacement therapy. Gynecol Obstet Invest.
vulvar Lichen Sclerosus in premenopausal women and oral 1997;44(3):187-90. PMID: 9359646. X-3, X-4
contraceptives. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008
Mar;137(1):56-60. PMID: 18055095. X-2 937. Hall P, Bahamondes L, Diaz J, et al.; Introductory
study of the once-a-month, injectable contraceptive
926. Gupta A, Daggett C, Ludwick J, et al.; Ketorolac Cyclofem in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Peru.
after congenital heart surgery: does it increase the risk of Contraception. 1997 Dec;56(6):353-9. PMID: 9494768. X-
significant bleeding complications? Paediatr Anaesth. 2005 4
Feb;15(2):139-42. PMID: 15675931. X-2, X-4
938. Hall P, Maclachlan N, Thorn N, et al.; Control of
927. Gupta I, Mahajan U, Sawhney H; Concurrent copper menorrhagia by the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors naproxen
T insertion with medical termination of pregnancy in sodium and mefenamic acid. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987
women with previous caesarean section delivery. Indian J Jun;94(6):554-8. PMID: 3304401. X-2, X-3, X-4
Med Res. 1988 May;87:450-2. PMID: 3169901. X-4
939. Hall R, Lonngren T, Tyden O, et al.; The intrauterine
928. Gurwitz JH, Avorn J, Bohn RL, et al.; Initiation of contraceptive device, "Multiload Cu 250": a regulatory
antihypertensive treatment during nonsteroidal anti- problem. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1991 Aug;14(1):41-7.
inflammatory drug therapy. JAMA. 1994 Sep PMID: 1947244. X-1, X-2, X-4
14;272(10):781-6. PMID: 8078142. X-4, X-7
940. Hallas J, Lauritsen J, Villadsen HD, et al.;
929. Gurwitz JH, Avorn J, Ross-Degnan D, et al.; Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and upper
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated azotemia gastrointestinal bleeding, identifying high-risk groups by
in the very old. JAMA. 1990 Jul 25;264(4):471-5. PMID: excess risk estimates. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995
2366280. X-2 May;30(5):438-44. PMID: 7638569. X-4

930. Guslandi M, Foppa L, Fanti L, et al.; Nonsteroidal 941. Halmesmaki KH, Paavonen JA, Tuppurainen MT, et
anti-inflammatory drugs and gastric mucosal blood flow. J al.; Randomized controlled trial of the effect of
Clin Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr;28(3):258-60. PMID: hysterectomy or LNG-IUS use on bone mineral density: A
10192617. X-2 five-year follow-up. Therapy. 2006;3(4):509-15. X-2

L-43
942. Hamid S, Yakoob J, Jafri W, et al.; Frequency of
NSAID induced peptic ulcer disease. J Pak Med Assoc. 954. Hannibal CG, Rossing MA, Wicklund KG, et al.;
2006 May;56(5):218-22. PMID: 16767948. X-2 Analgesic drug use and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Jun 15;167(12):1430-7. PMID:
943. Hammad TA, Graham DJ, Staffa JA, et al.; Onset of 18390840. X-2, X-4
acute myocardial infarction after use of non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 955. Hansen JM, Hallas J, Lauritsen JM, et al.; Non-
Apr;17(4):315-21. PMID: 18302311. X-4 steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and ulcer complications:
a risk factor analysis for clinical decision-making. Scand J
944. Hammerman C, Glaser J, Kaplan M, et al.; Gastroenterol. 1996 Feb;31(2):126-30. PMID: 8658033.
Indomethacin tocolysis increases postnatal patent ductus X-2, X-3, X-4
arteriosus severity. Pediatrics. 1998 Nov;102(5):E56.
PMID: 9794986. X-2, X-3, X-4 956. Hansen KE, Cush J, Singhal A, et al.; The safety and
efficacy of leflunomide in combination with infliximab in
945. Hammerstein J, Daume E, Simon A, et al.; Influence rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Apr
of gestodene and desogestrel as components of low-dose 15;51(2):228-32. PMID: 15077264. X-2, X-4
oral contraceptives on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl
estradiol (EE2), on serum CBG and on urinary cortisol and 957. Hardo PG, Chalmers DM, Jakeways M, et al.;
6 beta-hydroxycortisol. Contraception. 1993 Management of NSAIDs-related dyspepsia in the
Mar;47(3):263-81. PMID: 8462317. X-2, X-3, X-4 community. Br J Clin Pract. 1993 Sep-Oct;47(5):241-2.
PMID: 8292467. X-2, X-3, X-4
946. Hampton NR, Rees MC, Lowe DG, et al.;
Levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with 958. Harel Z, Biro FM, Kollar LM; Depo-Provera in
conjugated oral equine estrogen: a successful regimen for adolescents: effects of early second injection or prior oral
HRT in perimenopausal women. Hum Reprod. 2005 contraception. J Adolesc Health. 1995 May;16(5):379-84.
Sep;20(9):2653-60. PMID: 15905289. X-2, X-3, X-4 PMID: 7662688. X-2

947. Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ, Kornbluth A, et al.; 959. Harel Z, Biro FM, Kollar LM, et al.; Adolescents'
Delayed-release oral mesalamine at 4.8 g/day (800 mg reasons for and experience after discontinuation of the
tablet) for the treatment of moderately active ulcerative long-acting contraceptives Depo-Provera and Norplant. J
colitis: the ASCEND II trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Adolesc Health. 1996 Aug;19(2):118-23. PMID: 8863083.
Nov;100(11):2478-85. PMID: 16279903. X-2, X-3, X-4 X-2

948. Hancock DB, Haberg SE, Furu K, et al.; Oral 960. Harel Z, Johnson CC, Gold MA, et al.; Recovery of
contraceptive pill use before pregnancy and respiratory bone mineral density in adolescents following the use of
outcomes in early childhood. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraceptive
2011 Aug;22(5):528-36. PMID: 21294776. X-4 injections. Contraception. 2010 Apr;81(4):281-91. PMID:
20227543. X-2, X-4
949. Hancock DB, Martin ER, Stajich JM, et al.;
Smoking, caffeine, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory 961. Harel Z, Wolter K, Gold MA, et al.; Biopsychosocial
drugs in families with Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol. variables associated with substantial bone mineral density
2007 Apr;64(4):576-80. PMID: 17420321. X-2, X-4 loss during the use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate
in adolescents: adolescents who lost 5% or more from
950. Hanggi W, Bersinger N, Altermatt HJ, et al.; baseline vs. those who lost less than 5%. Contraception.
Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and 2010 Dec;82(6):503-12. PMID: 21074012. X-2
endometrial biopsy in endometrial surveillance in
postmenopausal HRT users. Maturitas. 1997 962. Harley C, Wagner S; The prevalence of cardiorenal
Jun;27(2):133-43. PMID: 9255748. X-2, X-4, X-7 risk factors in patients prescribed nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs: data from managed care. Clin Ther.
951. Hannaford P; Postmarketing surveillance study of 2003 Jan;25(1):139-49. PMID: 12637116. X-4
Norplant in developing countries. Lancet. 2001 Jun
9;357(9271):1815-6. PMID: 11410183. X-1, X-4 963. Harley EH, Dattolo RA; Ibuprofen for tonsillectomy
pain in children: efficacy and complications. Otolaryngol
952. Hannaford PC, Kay CR, Vessey MP, et al.; Head Neck Surg. 1998 Nov;119(5):492-6. PMID: 9807075.
Combined oral contraceptives and liver disease. X-2, X-4
Contraception. 1997 Mar;55(3):145-51. PMID: 9115002.
X-4 964. Harris CL, Raisch DW, Abhyankar U, et al.; GI risk
factors and use of GI protective agents among patients
953. Hannibal CG, Jensen A, Sharif H, et al.; Risk of receiving nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Ann
thyroid cancer after exposure to fertility drugs: results from Pharmacother. 2006 Nov;40(11):1924-31. PMID:
a large Danish cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2008 17047140. X-6
Feb;23(2):451-6. PMID: 18065402. X-4

L-44
965. Harris RE, Namboodiri KK, Farrar WB; 976. Hassanein M, Hanif W, Malik W, et al.; Comparison
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and breast cancer. of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor vildagliptin and the
Epidemiology. 1996 Mar;7(2):203-5. PMID: 8834563. X- sulphonylurea gliclazide in combination with metformin, in
4 Muslim patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus fasting
during Ramadan: results of the VECTOR study. Curr Med
966. Harris TG, Miller L, Kulasingam SL, et al.; Depot- Res Opin. 2011 Jul;27(7):1367-74. PMID: 21568833. X-2,
medroxyprogesterone acetate and combined oral X-4
contraceptive use and cervical neoplasia among women
with oncogenic human papillomavirus infection. Am J 977. Hauta-Aho M, Tirkkonen T, Vahlberg T, et al.; The
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):489 e1-8. PMID: effect of drug interactions on bleeding risk associated with
19375566. X-2 warfarin therapy in hospitalized patients. Ann Med.
2009;41(8):619-28. PMID: 19711211. X-4
967. Harrison-Woolrych M, Ashton J, Coulter D;
Insertion of the Multiload Cu375 intrauterine device; 978. Hawkey C, Kahan A, Steinbruck K, et al.;
experience in over 16,000 New Zealand women. Gastrointestinal tolerability of meloxicam compared to
Contraception. 2002 Dec;66(6):387-91. PMID: 12499029. diclofenac in osteoarthritis patients. International
X-4 MELISSA Study Group. Meloxicam Large-scale
International Study Safety Assessment. Br J Rheumatol.
968. Harrison-Woolrych M, Ashton J, Coulter D; Uterine 1998 Sep;37(9):937-45. PMID: 9783757. X-3, X-4
perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence
higher than previously reported? Contraception. 2003 979. Hawkey C, Talley NJ, Yeomans ND, et al.;
Jan;67(1):53-6. PMID: 12521659. X-4 Improvements with esomeprazole in patients with upper
gastrointestinal symptoms taking non-steroidal
969. Harrison-Woolrych M, Herbison P, McLean R, et al.; antiinflammatory drugs, including selective COX-2
Incidence of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients inhibitors. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 May;100(5):1028-36.
taking celecoxib compared with those taking rofecoxib: PMID: 15842575. X-4
interim results from the New Zealand Intensive Medicines
Monitoring Programme. Drug Saf. 2005;28(5):435-42. 980. Hawkey CJ; Naproxen sodium did not lead to
PMID: 15853444. X-4 substantially more upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding than
ibuprofen during short term use as an analgesic. Gut. 1998
970. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Rothbart RM, et al.; Stroke Sep;43(3):315. PMID: 9863472. X-1, X-2, X-4
with intermittent atrial fibrillation: incidence and predictors
during aspirin therapy. Stroke Prevention in Atrial 981. Hawkey CJ; Risk of ulcer bleeding in patients
Fibrillation Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 infected with Helicobacter pylori taking non-steroidal anti-
Jan;35(1):183-7. PMID: 10636278. X-2, X-3, X-4 inflammatory drugs. Gut. 2000 Mar;46(3):310-1. PMID:
10673289. X-2
971. Hartnell NR, Wilson JP; Replication of the Weber
effect using postmarketing adverse event reports 982. Hawkey CJ, Hawkey GM, Everitt S, et al.; Increased
voluntarily submitted to the United States Food and Drug risk of myocardial infarction as first manifestation of
Administration. Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Jun;24(6):743-9. ischaemic heart disease and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-
PMID: 15222664. X-2, X-3, X-4 inflammatory drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006
Jun;61(6):730-7. PMID: 16722837. X-2
972. Harvey PW, Heywood PF, Nesheim MC, et al.; The
effect of iron therapy on malarial infection in Papua New 983. Hawkey CJ, Naesdal J, Wilson I, et al.; Relative
Guinean schoolchildren. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1989 contribution of mucosal injury and Helicobacter pylori in
Jan;40(1):12-8. PMID: 2644855. X-3, X-4 the development of gastroduodenal lesions in patients
taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Gut. 2002
973. Hasan SS, Khan FH, Ahmed M; Comparison of Sep;51(3):336-43. PMID: 12171953. X-2, X-4
ketorolac with morphine for intra-operative analgesia in
patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. J Pak 984. Hayashi K, Walker AM; Japanese and American
Med Assoc. 2003 Oct;53(10):467-71. PMID: 14696887. reports of randomized trials: differences in the reporting of
X-2, X-4 adverse effects. Control Clin Trials. 1996 Apr;17(2):99-
110. PMID: 8860062. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4
974. Hassan EO, el-Nahal N, el-Hussein M; Acceptability
of the once-a-month injectable contraceptives Cyclofem 985. Hayashi Y, Yamamoto H, Kita H, et al.; Non-
and Mesigyna in Egypt. Contraception. 1994 steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced small bowel
May;49(5):469-88. PMID: 8045133. X-2, X-3, X-4 injuries identified by double-balloon endoscopy. World J
Gastroenterol. 2005 Aug 21;11(31):4861-4. PMID:
975. Hassan EO, Kafafi L, el Husseini M, et al.; The 16097059. X-2
acceptability of Norplant in Egypt. Adv Contracept. 1992
Dec;8(4):331-48. PMID: 1365819. X-3, X-4

L-45
986. Hayashi Y, Yamamoto H, Taguchi H, et al.; 997. Heinemann LA, Kluft C, Spannagl M, et al.; The
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced small-bowel association between extrinsic activated protein C resistance
lesions identified by double-balloon endoscopy: endoscopic and venous thromboembolism in women. Contraception.
features of the lesions and endoscopic treatments for 2002 Nov;66(5):297-304. PMID: 12443958. X-2, X-4
diaphragm disease. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44 Suppl 19:57-
63. PMID: 19148795. X-2 998. Helin-Salmivaara A, Huttunen T, Gronroos JM, et al.;
Risk of serious upper gastrointestinal events with
987. Haydardedeoglu B, Simsek E, Kilicdag EB, et al.; concurrent use of NSAIDs and SSRIs: a case-control study
Metabolic and endocrine effects of metformin and in the general population. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007
metformin plus cyclic medroxyprogesterone acetate in Apr;63(4):403-8. PMID: 17347805. X-4
women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Gynaecol
Obstet. 2009 Apr;105(1):32-5. PMID: 19155004. X-2 999. Helin-Salmivaara A, Huupponen R, Virtanen A, et
al.; Frequent prescribing of drugs with potential
988. Hayes E, Moroz L, Pizzi L, et al.; A cost decision gastrointestinal toxicity among continuous users of non-
analysis of 4 tocolytic drugs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Eur J Clin Pharmacol.
Oct;197(4):383 e1-6. PMID: 17904969. X-2, X-3, X-4 2005 Jul;61(5-6):425-31. PMID: 15952021. X-4

989. Hayes JH, Anderson KE, Folsom AR; Association 1000. Helin-Salmivaara A, Klaukka T, Huupponen R;
between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and the Heavy users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a
incidence of lung cancer in the Iowa women's health study. nationwide prescription database study in Finland. Eur J
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Sep;59(5-6):477-82. PMID:
Nov;15(11):2226-31. PMID: 17119050. X-4 12937872. X-3, X-4

990. Heaney M, Looney Y, McKinstry C, et al.; 1001. Helin-Salmivaara A, Saarelainen S, Gronroos JM, et
Sequential clot strength analyses following diclofenac in al.; Risk of upper gastrointestinal events with the use of
pediatric adenotonsillectomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 various NSAIDs: a case-control study in a general
Nov;17(11):1078-82. PMID: 17897274. X-2, X-3, X-4 population. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;42(8):923-32.
PMID: 17613921. X-4
991. Hedderson MM, Ferrara A, Williams MA, et al.;
Androgenicity of progestins in hormonal contraceptives 1002. Helin-Salmivaara A, Virtanen A, Vesalainen R, et
and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. al.; NSAID use and the risk of hospitalization for first
2007 May;30(5):1062-8. PMID: 17303784. X-2 myocardial infarction in the general population: a
nationwide case-control study from Finland. Eur Heart J.
992. Hedenmalm K, Samuelsson E; Fatal venous 2006 Jul;27(14):1657-63. PMID: 16731535. X-4
thromboembolism associated with different combined oral
contraceptives: a study of incidences and potential biases in 1003. Heliovaara-Peippo S, Halmesmaki K, Hurskainen R,
spontaneous reporting. Drug Saf. 2005;28(10):907-16. et al.; The effect of hysterectomy or levonorgestrel-
PMID: 16180940. X-4 releasing intrauterine system on lower urinary tract
symptoms: a 10-year follow-up study of a randomised trial.
993. Hedenmalm K, Samuelsson E, Spigset O; Pulmonary BJOG. 2010 Apr;117(5):602-9. PMID: 20156209. X-2
embolism associated with combined oral contraceptives:
reporting incidences and potential risk factors for a fatal 1004. Heliovaara-Peippo S, Oksjoki R, Halmesmaki K, et
outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Jun;83(6):576- al.; The effect of hysterectomy or levonorgestrel-releasing
85. PMID: 15144341. X-4 intrauterine system on cardiovascular disease risk factors in
menorrhagia patients: a 10-year follow-up of a randomised
994. Hedenmalm K, Spigset O; Agranulocytosis and other trial. Maturitas. 2011 Aug;69(4):354-8. PMID: 21684096.
blood dyscrasias associated with dipyrone (metamizole). X-2, X-4
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Jul;58(4):265-74. PMID:
12136373. X-4 1005. Helsper CW, Smeets HM, Numans ME, et al.;
Trends and determinants of adequate gastroprotection in
995. Heerdink ER, Leufkens HG, Herings RM, et al.; patients chronically using NSAIDs. Pharmacoepidemiol
NSAIDs associated with increased risk of congestive heart Drug Saf. 2009 Sep;18(9):800-6. PMID: 19572313. X-4
failure in elderly patients taking diuretics. Arch Intern Med.
1998 May 25;158(10):1108-12. PMID: 9605782. X-4, X-7 1006. Hemmelgarn B, Levesque LE, Suissa S; Anti-
diabetic drug use and the risk of motor vehicle crash in the
996. Heikkinen J, Vaheri R, Timonen U; A 10-year elderly. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Winter;13(1):e112-20.
follow-up of postmenopausal women on long-term PMID: 16585812. X-7
continuous combined hormone replacement therapy:
Update of safety and quality-of-life findings. J Br 1007. Henderson SO, Swadron S, Newton E; Comparison
Menopause Soc. 2006 Sep;12(3):115-25. PMID: 16953985. of intravenous ketorolac and meperidine in the treatment of
X-2, X-4

L-46
biliary colic. J Emerg Med. 2002 Oct;23(3):237-41. PMID: hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy? J Psychosom
12426013. X-2, X-4 Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Mar;17(1):21-8. PMID: 8860883.
X-2, X-4
1008. Hendricks SK, Smith JR, Moore DE, et al.;
Oligohydramnios associated with prostaglandin synthetase 1019. Henz S, Maeder MT, Huber S, et al.; Influence of
inhibitors in preterm labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 drugs and comorbidity on serum potassium in 15 000
Apr;97(4):312-6. PMID: 2340255. X-2, X-4 consecutive hospital admissions. Nephrol Dial Transplant.
2008 Dec;23(12):3939-45. PMID: 18614817. X-4
1009. Henker J, Muller S, Laass MW, et al.; Probiotic
Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) for successful 1020. Heresbach D, Raoul JL, Bretagne JF, et al.;
remission maintenance of ulcerative colitis in children and Helicobacter pylori: a risk and severity factor of non-
adolescents: an open-label pilot study. Z Gastroenterol. steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced gastropathy. Gut.
2008 Sep;46(9):874-5. PMID: 18810672. X-2, X-3, X-4 1992 Dec;33(12):1608-11. PMID: 1487160. X-2, X-3, X-4

1010. Hennekens CH, Borzak S; Cyclooxygenase-2 1021. Herings RM, Goettsch WG; Inadequate prevention
inhibitors and most traditional nonsteroidal anti- of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal events. Ann
inflammatory drugs cause similar moderately increased Pharmacother. 2004 May;38(5):760-3. PMID: 15031416.
risks of cardiovascular disease. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol X-4
Ther. 2008 Mar;13(1):41-50. PMID: 18287589. X-1, X-2,
X-3, X-4 1022. Hermansson M, Ekedahl A, Ranstam J, et al.;
Decreasing incidence of peptic ulcer complications after
1011. Hennessy S, Kinman JL, Berlin JA, et al.; Lack of the introduction of the proton pump inhibitors, a study of
hepatotoxic effects of parenteral ketorolac in the hospital the Swedish population from 1974-2002. BMC
setting. Arch Intern Med. 1997 Nov 24;157(21):2510-4. Gastroenterol. 2009;9:25. PMID: 19379513. X-4
PMID: 9385304. X-4
1023. Hernan MA, Logroscino G, Garcia Rodriguez LA;
1012. Henriksson AE, Nilsson TK, Bergavist D; Bleeding Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the incidence of
time and concentrations of von Willebrand factor in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2006 Apr 11;66(7):1097-9.
patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Eur J PMID: 16606925. X-4
Surg. 1996 Aug;162(8):627-31. PMID: 8891620. X-2, X-3,
X-4 1024. Hernandez-Diaz S, Garcia Rodriguez LA;
Cardioprotective aspirin users and their excess risk of upper
1013. Henriksson P, Blomback M, Bratt G, et al.; Effects gastrointestinal complications. BMC Med. 2006;4:22.
of oestrogen therapy and orchidectomy on coagulation and PMID: 16987411. X-3, X-4
prostanoid synthesis in patients with prostatic cancer. Med
Oncol Tumor Pharmacother. 1989;6(3):219-25. PMID: 1025. Hernandez-Diaz S, Rodriguez LA; Steroids and risk
2515399. X-2, X-4 of upper gastrointestinal complications. Am J Epidemiol.
2001 Jun 1;153(11):1089-93. PMID: 11390328. X-4
1014. Henriksson P, Edhag O, Eriksson A, et al.; Patients
at high risk of cardiovascular complications in oestrogen 1026. Herrera JA, Gonzalez M; Comparative evaluation
treatment of prostatic cancer. Br J Urol. 1989 of the effectiveness and tolerability of nimesulide versus
Feb;63(2):186-90. PMID: 2649197. X-2, X-6 rofecoxib taken once a day in the treatment of patients with
knee osteoarthritis. Am J Ther. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):468-
1015. Henry D, Dobson A, Turner C; Variability in the 72. PMID: 14624289. X-2, X-3, X-4
risk of major gastrointestinal complications from
nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. 1027. Herth FJ, Becker HD, Ernst A; Aspirin does not
Gastroenterology. 1993 Oct;105(4):1078-88. PMID: increase bleeding complications after transbronchial
8405852. X-4 biopsy. Chest. 2002 Oct;122(4):1461-4. PMID: 12377879.
X-2, X-4
1016. Henry D, Page J, Whyte I, et al.; Consumption of
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the development 1028. Hettinger ME, Gill DJ, Robin JB, et al.; Evaluation
of functional renal impairment in elderly subjects. Results of diclofenac sodium 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the
of a case-control study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997 treatment of ocular symptoms after bilateral radial
Jul;44(1):85-90. PMID: 9241101. X-2 keratotomy. Cornea. 1997 Jul;16(4):406-13. PMID:
9220237. X-3, X-4
1017. Henry DA; Epidemiological assessment of the
association between NSAIDS and peptic ulcer 1029. Heuser P, Tonga K, Hopkins R, et al.; Specific oral
complications. Agents Actions Suppl. 1988;24:85-94. contraceptive use and venous thromboembolism resulting
PMID: 3263760. X-1 in hospital admission. N Z Med J. 2004 Nov
26;117(1206):U1176. PMID: 15570345. X-2, X-4
1018. Henshaw C, Foreman D, Belcher J, et al.; Can one
induce premenstrual symptomatology in women with prior

L-47
1040. Hillman AL, Bloom BS; Economic effects of
1030. Hickey M, Dwarte D, Fraser IS; Superficial prophylactic use of misoprostol to prevent gastric ulcer in
endometrial vascular fragility in Norplant users and in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Arch
women with ovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Hum Intern Med. 1989 Sep;149(9):2061-5. PMID: 2505706. X-
Reprod. 2000 Jul;15(7):1509-14. PMID: 10875858. X-2, 3, X-4
X-3, X-4
1041. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C; Risk of myocardial
1031. Hickey M, Fraser IS; Surface vascularization and infarction in patients taking cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors or
endometrial appearance in women with menorrhagia or conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs:
using levonorgestrel contraceptive implants. Implications population based nested case-control analysis. BMJ. 2005
for the mechanisms of breakthrough bleeding. Hum Jun 11;330(7504):1366. PMID: 15947398. X-4
Reprod. 2002 Sep;17(9):2428-34. PMID: 12202436. X-2,
X-3, X-4 1042. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Logan R; Risk of
adverse gastrointestinal outcomes in patients taking cyclo-
1032. Hickok DE, Hollenbach KA, Reilley SF, et al.; The oxygenase-2 inhibitors or conventional non-steroidal anti-
association between decreased amniotic fluid volume and inflammatory drugs: population based nested case-control
treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents for analysis. BMJ. 2005 Dec 3;331(7528):1310-6. PMID:
preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 16322018. X-4
Jun;160(6):1525-30; discussion 30-1. PMID: 2660576. X-
2, X-4 1043. Hirneiss C, Neubauer AS, Kampik A, et al.;
Comparison of prednisolone 1%, rimexolone 1% and
1033. Hidalgo M, Bahamondes L, Perrotti M, et al.; ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% after cataract extraction: a
Bleeding patterns and clinical performance of the prospective, randomized, double-masked study. Graefes
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) up to Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug;243(8):768-73.
two years. Contraception. 2002 Feb;65(2):129-32. PMID: PMID: 15756571. X-2, X-4
11927115. X-2
1044. Hite RC, Bannemerschult R, Fox-Kuchenbecker P,
1034. Higashi N, Taniguchi M, Mita H, et al.; Clinical et al.; Large observational trial of a new low-dose oral
features of asthmatic patients with increased urinary contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol
leukotriene E4 excretion (hyperleukotrienuria): and 100 micrograms levonorgestrel (Miranova) in
Involvement of chronic hyperplastic rhinosinusitis with Germany. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1999
nasal polyposis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Mar;4(1):7-13. PMID: 10367190. X-4
Feb;113(2):277-83. PMID: 14767442. X-2, X-3, X-4
1045. Ho PC, Kwan MS; A prospective randomized
1035. Higashi N, Taniguchi M, Mita H, et al.; A comparison of levonorgestrel with the Yuzpe regimen in
comparative study of eicosanoid concentrations in sputum post-coital contraception. Hum Reprod. 1993
and urine in patients with aspirin-intolerant asthma. Clin Mar;8(3):389-92. PMID: 8473453. X-2, X-4
Exp Allergy. 2002 Oct;32(10):1484-90. PMID: 12372129.
X-3, X-4 1046. Hochain P, Berkelmans I, Czernichow P, et al.;
Which patients taking non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-
1036. Higham CE, Chung TT, Lawrance J, et al.; Long- inflammatory drugs bleed? A case-control study. Eur J
term experience of pegvisomant therapy as a treatment for Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995 May;7(5):419-26. PMID:
acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009 Jul;71(1):86-91. 7614104. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 19018786. X-2, X-4
1047. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Azen SP, et al.; Hormone
1037. Hilditch JR, Lewis J, Ross AH, et al.; A comparison therapy and the progression of coronary-artery
of the effects of oral conjugated equine estrogen and atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med.
transdermal estradiol-17 beta combined with an oral 2003 Aug 7;349(6):535-45. PMID: 12904518. X-2, X-4
progestin on quality of life in postmenopausal women.
Maturitas. 1996 Jul;24(3):177-84. PMID: 8844631. X-2, 1048. Hoer A, Gothe H, Schiffhorst G, et al.; Comparison
X-4 of the effects of diclofenac or other non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and diclofenac or other
1038. Hill GA, Wheeler JM; Incidence of breakthrough NSAIDs in combination with proton pump inhibitors (PPI)
bleeding during oral contraceptive therapy. J Reprod Med. on hospitalisation due to peptic ulcer disease.
1991 Apr;36(4 Suppl):334-9. PMID: 2046082. X-4 Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Aug;16(8):854-8.
PMID: 17323403. X-4
1039. Hill J, Bird H; Patient knowledge and
misconceptions of osteoarthritis assessed by a validated 1049. Hogan DB, Campbell NR, Crutcher R, et al.;
self-completed knowledge questionnaire (PKQ-OA). Prescription of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 May;46(5):796-800. PMID: elderly people in Alberta. CMAJ. 1994 Aug 1;151(3):315-
17178737. X-2, X-3, X-4 22. PMID: 8039085. X-4, X-7

L-48
1062. Hoppe G; Progestins and oral contraceptive-induced
1050. Hoibraaten E, Mowinckel MC, de Ronde H, et al.; lipoprotein changes: a prospective study. Contraception.
Hormone replacement therapy and acquired resistance to 1987 Mar;35(3):299-305. PMID: 2956056. X-1
activated protein C: results of a randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial. Br J Haematol. 2001 1063. Hoppu K, Kettunen K, Remes R; Maternal drug
Nov;115(2):415-20. PMID: 11703344. X-2, X-4 treatment and human milk banking. Int J Clin Pharmacol
Ther. 1994 Sep;32(9):488-90. PMID: 7820332. X-2, X-3,
1051. Holdaway IM, Croxson MS, Ibbertson HK, et al.; X-4
Cyproterone acetate as initial treatment and maintenance
therapy for hirsutism. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1985 1064. Horackova M, Charvat J, Hasa J, et al.; Life-
Aug;109(4):522-9. PMID: 2930987. X-2 threatening renal failure caused by vasomotor nephropathy
associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Int J
1052. Hollenz M, Stolte M, Leodolter A, et al.; NSAID- Clin Pharmacol Res. 2004;24(4):117-22. PMID: 15754916.
associated dyspepsia and ulcers: a prospective cohort study X-2, X-4
in primary care. Dig Dis. 2006;24(1-2):189-94. PMID:
16699277. X-2 1065. Horbach SJ, Lopes RD, da CGJC, et al.; Naproxen
as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after cardiac
1053. Holma P; Long-term experience with Norplant surgery: the NAFARM randomized trial. Am J Med. 2011
contraceptive implants in Finland. Contraception. 1985 Nov;124(11):1036-42. PMID: 22017782. X-2, X-3
Mar;31(3):231-41. PMID: 3922674. X-2, X-3, X-4
1066. Horlocker TT, Bajwa ZH, Ashraf Z, et al.; Risk
1054. Holmberg L, Iversen OE, Rudenstam CM, et al.; assessment of hemorrhagic complications associated with
Increased risk of recurrence after hormone replacement nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications in ambulatory
therapy in breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 pain clinic patients undergoing epidural steroid injection.
Apr 2;100(7):475-82. PMID: 18364505. X-2 Anesth Analg. 2002 Dec;95(6):1691-7, table of contents.
PMID: 12456441. X-2, X-4
1055. Holt S, Rigoglioso V, Sidhu M, et al.; Nonsteroidal
antiinflammatory drugs and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. 1067. Horn PL, Wrona S, Beebe AC, et al.; A
Dig Dis Sci. 1993 Sep;38(9):1619-23. PMID: 8359073. X- retrospective quality improvement study of ketorolac use
2, X-4 following spinal fusion in pediatric patients. Orthop Nurs.
2010 Sep-Oct;29(5):342-3. PMID: 20856090. X-2, X-3, X-
1056. Holt VL, Daling JR, McKnight B, et al.; Functional 4
ovarian cysts in relation to the use of monophasic and
triphasic oral contraceptives. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 1068. Horowitz J, Kukora JS, Ritchie WP, Jr.; All
Apr;79(4):529-33. PMID: 1553170. X-2, X-4 perforated ulcers are not alike. Ann Surg. 1989
Jun;209(6):693-6; discussion 6-7. PMID: 2730181. X-2, X-
1057. Holvoet J, Terriere L, Van Hee W, et al.; Relation 3, X-4
of upper gastrointestinal bleeding to non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs and aspirin: a case-control study. Gut. 1069. Horsdal HT, Sondergaard F, Johnsen SP, et al.;
1991 Jul;32(7):730-4. PMID: 1855677. X-2 Antidiabetic treatments and risk of hospitalisation with
myocardial infarction: a nationwide case-control study.
1058. Homouda K; The effect on intrauterine device Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):331-7.
position and performance of a modified TCu380A insertion PMID: 21442682. X-3
technique. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2002
Mar;7(1):31-5. PMID: 12041862. X-2, X-3, X-4 1070. Hosono S, Ohno T, Kimoto H, et al.; Reduction in
blood glucose values following indomethacin therapy for
1059. Hood HM, Wark C, Burgess PA, et al.; Screening patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatr Int. 1999 Oct;41(5):525-8.
for Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory PMID: 10530066. X-2, X-4
drug use in medicare patients hospitalized with peptic ulcer
disease. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Jan 25;159(2):149-54. 1071. Hosono S, Ohono T, Kimoto H, et al.; Preventive
PMID: 9927097. X-3, X-4 management of hypoglycemia in very low-birthweight
infants following indomethacin therapy for patent ductus
1060. Hook EB; Cardiovascular birth defects and prenatal arteriosus. Pediatr Int. 2001 Oct;43(5):465-8. PMID:
exposure to female sex hormones: a reevaluation of data 11737706. X-2, X-3, X-4
reanalysis from a large prospective study. Teratology. 1994
Mar;49(3):162-6. PMID: 8059421. X-4 1072. Houck CS, Wilder RT, McDermott JS, et al.; Safety
of intravenous ketorolac therapy in children and cost
1061. Hopkins C, Browne JP, Slack R, et al.; The Lund- savings with a unit dosing system. J Pediatr. 1996
Mackay staging system for chronic rhinosinusitis: how is it Aug;129(2):292-6. PMID: 8765630. X-4
used and what does it predict? Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg. 2007 Oct;137(4):555-61. PMID: 17903570. X-3, X-4 1073. Hov GG, Skjeldestad FE, Hilstad T; Use of IUD
and subsequent fertility--follow-up after participation in a

L-49
randomized clinical trial. Contraception. 2007 prospective two year follow up study of 209 patients. Gut.
Feb;75(2):88-92. PMID: 17241835. X-2, X-3, X-4 2002 Jul;51(1):15-20. PMID: 12077085. X-2, X-3

1074. Howard BV, Hsia J, Ouyang P, et al.; 1084. Hsu PI, Lai KH, Tseng HH, et al.; Risk factors for
Postmenopausal hormone therapy is associated with presentation with bleeding in patients with Helicobacter
atherosclerosis progression in women with abnormal pylori-related peptic ulcer diseases. J Clin Gastroenterol.
glucose tolerance. Circulation. 2004 Jul 13;110(2):201-6. 2000 Jun;30(4):386-91. PMID: 10875466. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 15226212. X-2
1085. Huang ES, Strate LL, Ho WW, et al.; Long-term
1075. Howard RL, Avery AJ, Howard PD, et al.; use of aspirin and the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Am
Investigation into the reasons for preventable drug related J Med. 2011 May;124(5):426-33. PMID: 21531232. X-4
admissions to a medical admissions unit: observational
study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Aug;12(4):280-5. 1086. Huang WF, Hsiao FY, Wen YW, et al.;
PMID: 12897361. X-4 Cardiovascular events associated with the use of four
nonselective NSAIDs (etodolac, nabumetone, ibuprofen, or
1076. Hoyo C, Cousins DS, Bisgrove EZ, et al.; Depo naproxen) versus a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor (celecoxib):
medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and combined oral a population-based analysis in Taiwanese adults. Clin Ther.
contraceptives and cervical carcinoma in-situ in women 2006 Nov;28(11):1827-36. PMID: 17213003. X-4
aged 50 years and under. West Indian Med J. 2004
Dec;53(6):406-12. PMID: 15816269. X-2 1087. Huang YC, Tsai SK, Huang CH, et al.; Intravenous
tenoxicam reduces uterine cramps after Cesarean delivery.
1077. Hritz I, Kuester D, Vieth M, et al.; Secretory Can J Anaesth. 2002 Apr;49(4):384-7. PMID: 11927478.
leukocyte protease inhibitor expression in various types of X-2, X-3, X-4
gastritis: a specific role of Helicobacter pylori infection.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Mar;18(3):277-82. 1088. Hubacher D, Chen PL, Park S; Side effects from the
PMID: 16462541. X-2, X-3, X-4 copper IUD: do they decrease over time? Contraception.
2009 May;79(5):356-62. PMID: 19341847. X-4
1078. Hsia J, Otvos JD, Rossouw JE, et al.; Lipoprotein
particle concentrations may explain the absence of 1089. Hubacher D, Fortney J; Follow-up visits after IUD
coronary protection in the women's health initiative insertion. Are more better? J Reprod Med. 1999
hormone trials. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008 Sep;44(9):801-6. PMID: 10509305. X-4
Sep;28(9):1666-71. PMID: 18599797. X-4
1090. Hubacher D, Goco N, Gonzalez B, et al.; Factors
1079. Hsia J, Simon JA, Lin F, et al.; Peripheral arterial affecting continuation rates of DMPA. Contraception. 1999
disease in randomized trial of estrogen with progestin in Dec;60(6):345-51. PMID: 10715369. X-2, X-3, X-4
women with coronary heart disease: the Heart and
Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study. Circulation. 2000 1091. Hubacher D, Lara-Ricalde R, Taylor DJ, et al.; Use
Oct 31;102(18):2228-32. PMID: 11056097. X-7 of copper intrauterine devices and the risk of tubal
infertility among nulligravid women. N Engl J Med. 2001
1080. Hsiang KW, Chen TS, Lin HY, et al.; Incidence and Aug 23;345(8):561-7. PMID: 11529209. X-4
possible risk factors for clinical upper gastrointestinal
events in patients taking selective cyclooxygenase-2 1092. Hubbard R, Venn A, Smith C, et al.; Exposure to
inhibitors: A prospective, observational, cohort study in commonly prescribed drugs and the etiology of cryptogenic
Taiwan. Clin Ther. 2010 Jul;32(7):1294-303. PMID: fibrosing alveolitis: a case-control study. Am J Respir Crit
20678677. X-2, X-4 Care Med. 1998 Mar;157(3 Pt 1):743-7. PMID: 9517585.
X-2, X-4
1081. Hsiao FY, Huang WF, Wen YW, et al.;
Thiazolidinediones and cardiovascular events in patients 1093. Hudic I, Szekeres-Bartho J, Fatusic Z, et al.;
with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study Dydrogesterone supplementation in women with threatened
of over 473,000 patients using the National Health preterm delivery--the impact on cytokine profile, hormone
Insurance database in Taiwan. Drug Saf. 2009;32(8):675- profile, and progesterone-induced blocking factor. J Reprod
90. PMID: 19591532. X-3 Immunol. 2011 Dec;92(1-2):103-7. PMID: 22032897. X-2

1082. Hsiao FY, Tsai YW, Wen YW, et al.; Relationship 1094. Hudson M, Rahme E, Richard H, et al.; Risk of
between cumulative dose of thiazolidinediones and clinical congestive heart failure with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory
outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients with history of heart drugs and selective Cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors: a class
failure: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan. effect? Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Apr 15;57(3):516-23. PMID:
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Aug;19(8):786-91. 17394181. X-7
PMID: 20607752. X-2, X-4
1095. Hudson M, Richard H, Pilote L; Differences in
1083. Hsu PI, Lai KH, Lo GH, et al.; Risk factors for outcomes of patients with congestive heart failure
ulcer development in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia: a prescribed celecoxib, rofecoxib, or non-steroidal anti-

L-50
inflammatory drugs: population based study. BMJ. 2005 1107. Hyvarinen H, Salmenkyla S, Sipponen P;
Jun 11;330(7504):1370. PMID: 15947399. X-4, X-7 Helicobacter pylori-negative duodenal and pyloric ulcer:
role of NSAIDs. Digestion. 1996;57(5):305-9. PMID:
1096. Huerta C, Castellsague J, Varas-Lorenzo C, et al.; 8886573. X-2, X-3, X-4
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of ARF in
the general population. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 1108. Iamandescu IB; NSAIDs-induced asthma:
Mar;45(3):531-9. PMID: 15754275. X-4 peculiarities related to background and association with
other drug or non-drugs etiological agents. Allergol
1097. Huerta C, Varas-Lorenzo C, Castellsague J, et al.; Immunopathol (Madr). 1989 Nov-Dec;17(6):285-90.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of first PMID: 2635829. X-2, X-4
hospital admission for heart failure in the general
population. Heart. 2006 Nov;92(11):1610-5. PMID: 1109. Iannucci TA, Besinger RE, Fisher SG, et al.; Effect
16717069. X-7 of dual tocolysis on the incidence of severe intraventricular
hemorrhage among extremely low-birth-weight infants. Am
1098. Hug H, Bagatto D, Dannecker R, et al.; ADRIS - J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;175(4 Pt 1):1043-6. PMID:
The Adverse Drug Reactions Information Scheme. Clin 8885773. X-2, X-4
Neuropharmacol. 2004 Jan-Feb;27(1):44-8. PMID:
15090937. X-1 1110. Ibanez L, Morlans M, Vidal X, et al.; Case-control
study of regular analgesic and nonsteroidal anti-
1099. Huggins GR; IUD use and unexplained vaginal inflammatory use and end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int.
bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Oct;58(4):409-16. PMID: 2005 Jun;67(6):2393-8. PMID: 15882284. X-4
7279336. X-4
1111. Ibanez L, Vidal X, Ballarin E, et al.; Population-
1100. Hui CK, Lai KC, Yuen MF, et al.; Does based drug-induced agranulocytosis. Arch Intern Med.
withholding aspirin for one week reduce the risk of post- 2005 Apr 25;165(8):869-74. PMID: 15851637. X-4
sphincterotomy bleeding? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002
May;16(5):929-36. PMID: 11966501. X-2, X-4 1112. Ibanez-Cuevas V, Lopez-Briz E, Guardiola-Chorro
MT; Pharmacist intervention reduces gastropathy risk in
1101. Huic M, Mucolic V, Vrhovac B, et al.; Adverse patients using NSAIDs. Pharm World Sci. 2008
drug reactions resulting in hospital admission. Int J Clin Dec;30(6):947-54. PMID: 18932013. X-4
Pharmacol Ther. 1994 Dec;32(12):675-82. PMID:
7881707. X-4 1113. Ibraheim M, Ikomi A; An evaluation of
troublesome inter-menstrual bleeding in menorrhagic users
1102. Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, et al.; Randomized trial of the LNG-IUS. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 May;25(4):384-
of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of 5. PMID: 16091327. X-2
coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart
and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) 1114. Idilman R, Bektas M, Cinar K, et al.; The
Research Group. JAMA. 1998 Aug 19;280(7):605-13. characteristics and clinical outcome of drug-induced liver
PMID: 9718051. X-7 injury: a single-center experience. J Clin Gastroenterol.
2010 Jul;44(6):e128-32. PMID: 20551776. X-4
1103. Hurskainen R, Teperi J, Rissanen P, et al.; Quality
of life and cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing 1115. Iglehart IW, 3rd, Edlow DW, Mills L, Jr., et al.; The
intrauterine system versus hysterectomy for treatment of presence of Campylobacter pylori in nonsteroidal
menorrhagia: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2001 Jan antiinflammatory drug associated gastritis. J Rheumatol.
27;357(9252):273-7. PMID: 11214131. X-2 1989 May;16(5):599-603. PMID: 2754664. X-2, X-3, X-4

1104. Hussain N, Alsulaiman R, Burtin P, et al.; The 1116. Iitaka K, Ishidate T, Hojo M, et al.; Idiopathic
safety of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients receiving membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis in Japanese
antiplatelet agents: a case-control study. Aliment children. Pediatr Nephrol. 1995 Jun;9(3):272-7. PMID:
Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Mar 1;25(5):579-84. PMID: 7632509. X-2, X-3, X-4
17305758. X-2, X-4
1117. Ike RW, Arnold WJ, Rothschild EW, et al.; Tidal
1105. Hwang H, Murphy JJ, Gow KW, et al.; Are irrigation versus conservative medical management in
localized intestinal perforations distinct from necrotizing patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: a prospective
enterocolitis? J Pediatr Surg. 2003 May;38(5):763-7. randomized study. Tidal Irrigation Cooperating Group. J
PMID: 12720189. X-2, X-3, X-4 Rheumatol. 1992 May;19(5):772-9. PMID: 1613709. X-2,
X-4
1106. Hynes MC, Calder P, Rosenfeld P, et al.; The use of
tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss during total hip 1118. Ikechebelu JI, Onwusulu DN; Missing IUD string:
arthroplasty: an observational study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. prevalence, diagnosis and retrieval in Nnewi, Nigeria.
2005 Mar;87(2):99-101. PMID: 15826417. X-2, X-3, X-4 Niger J Med. 2009 Jul-Sep;18(3):303-5. PMID: 20120651.
X-2, X-4

L-51
1130. Ishikawa S, Inaba T, Mizuno M, et al.; Incidence of
1119. Ilkhanoff L, Lewis JD, Hennessy S, et al.; Potential serious upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking
limitations of electronic database studies of prescription non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Japan. Acta Med
non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Okayama. 2008 Feb;62(1):29-36. PMID: 18323869. X-4
(NANSAIDs) and risk of myocardial infarction (MI).
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Aug;14(8):513-22. 1131. Isidro ML, Penin MA, Nemina R, et al.; Metformin
PMID: 15959879. X-3, X-4 reduces thyrotropin levels in obese, diabetic women with
primary hypothyroidism on thyroxine replacement therapy.
1120. Imhof M, Epstein S, Ohmann C, et al.; Poor late Endocrine. 2007 Aug;32(1):79-82. PMID: 17992605. X-2
prognosis of bleeding peptic ulcer. Langenbecks Arch
Surg. 2007 Sep;392(5):587-91. PMID: 17632731. X-2, X- 1132. Isik B, Arslan M, Ozsoylar O, et al.; Effects of
3, X-4 preoperative lornoxicam versus tramadol on postoperative
pain and adverse effects in adult tonsillectomy patients.
1121. Imperiale TF, Horwitz RI; Scientific standards and Agri. 2009 Jul;21(3):113-20. PMID: 19780002. X-2, X-4
the design of case-control research. Biomed Pharmacother.
1989;43(3):187-96. PMID: 2775855. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4 1133. Istre O, Trolle B; Treatment of menorrhagia with
the levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus endometrial
1122. Inki P, Hurskainen R, Palo P, et al.; Comparison of resection. Fertil Steril. 2001 Aug;76(2):304-9. PMID:
ovarian cyst formation in women using the levonorgestrel- 11476777. X-2
releasing intrauterine system vs. hysterectomy. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Oct;20(4):381-5. PMID: 12383322. 1134. Itsekson A, Lazarov A, Cordoba M, et al.;
X-2 Premenstrual syndrome and associated skin diseases related
to hypersensitivity to female sex hormones. J Reprod Med.
1123. Inman WH; Prescription-event monitoring. A 2004 Mar;49(3):195-9. PMID: 15098889. X-2
preliminary study of benoxaprofen and fenbufen. Acta Med
Scand Suppl. 1984;683:119-26. PMID: 6234753. X-1, X-4 1135. Izumi K, Kadono Y, Shima T, et al.;
Ethinylestradiol improves prostate-specific antigen levels
1124. Inoue M, Caldarone CA, Frndova H, et al.; Safety in pretreated castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.
and efficacy of ketorolac in children after cardiac surgery. Anticancer Res. 2010 Dec;30(12):5201-5. PMID:
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Sep;35(9):1584-92. PMID: 21187513. X-2, X-3, X-4
19562323. X-2, X-4
1136. Jackson-Northey K, Evans MF; Taking NSAIDs
1125. Insua J, Mavros P, Hunsche E, et al.; Exposure to during pregnancy. Is it safe? Can Fam Physician. 2002
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs among older adult Mar;48:483-5. PMID: 11935712. X-1, X-4
patients hospitalized for peptic ulcer disease in Argentina:
A case-control study. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006 1137. Jacob A, Matiello M, Weinshenker BG, et al.;
Sep;4(3):251-9. PMID: 17062326. X-2 Treatment of neuromyelitis optica with mycophenolate
mofetil: retrospective analysis of 24 patients. Arch Neurol.
1126. Inzucchi SE, Masoudi FA, Wang Y, et al.; Insulin- 2009 Sep;66(9):1128-33. PMID: 19752302. X-2, X-3, X-4
sensitizing antihyperglycemic drugs and mortality after
acute myocardial infarction: insights from the National 1138. Jacob AN, Salinas K, Adams-Huet B, et al.; Weight
Heart Care Project. Diabetes Care. 2005 Jul;28(7):1680-9. gain in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab.
PMID: 15983320. X-7 2007 May;9(3):386-93. PMID: 17391167. X-2, X-3, X-4

1127. Irani J, Ravery V, Pariente JL, et al.; Effect of 1139. Jacobs P, Fransman D, Coghlan P; Comparative
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and finasteride on bioavailability of ferric polymaltose and ferrous sulphate in
prostate cancer risk. J Urol. 2002 Nov;168(5):1985-8. iron-deficient blood donors. J Clin Apher. 1993;8(2):89-95.
PMID: 12394690. X-2 PMID: 8226711. X-2, X-3, X-4

1128. Irvine GA, Campbell-Brown MB, Lumsden MA, et 1140. Jain JK, Ota F, Mishell DR; Comparison of ovarian
al.; Randomised comparative trial of the levonorgestrel follicular activity during treatment with a monthly
intrauterine system and norethisterone for treatment of injectable contraceptive and a low-dose oral contraceptive.
idiopathic menorrhagia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Contraception. 2000 Mar;61(3):195-8. PMID: 10827333.
Jun;105(6):592-8. PMID: 9647148. X-2, X-3, X-4 X-2

1129. Ishikawa N, Fuchigami T, Matsumoto T, et al.; 1141. Jallad RS, Bronstein MD; Optimizing medical
Helicobacter pylori infection in rheumatoid arthritis: effect therapy of acromegaly: beneficial effects of cabergoline in
of drugs on prevalence and correlation with gastroduodenal patients uncontrolled with long-acting release octreotide.
lesions. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Jan;41(1):72-7. Neuroendocrinology. 2009;90(1):82-92. PMID: 19439914.
PMID: 11792883. X-2, X-3, X-4 X-2, X-3

L-52
1142. James MW, Chen CM, Goddard WP, et al.; Risk Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jan;300(1):E37-45. PMID:
factors for gastrointestinal malignancy in patients with 20943753. X-2, X-4
iron-deficiency anaemia. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005
Nov;17(11):1197-203. PMID: 16215432. X-2, X-3, X-4 1153. Jeffries MA, Scheiman JM, Fendrick AM;
Helicobacter pylori eradication: kill the bug and save the
1143. Jamison RN, Raymond SA, Slawsby EA, et al.; pill? Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Jul;93(7):1183-4. PMID:
Opioid therapy for chronic noncancer back pain. A 9672364. X-1, X-2
randomized prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998
Dec 1;23(23):2591-600. PMID: 9854758. X-2, X-4 1154. Jenner PN; A 12-month postmarketing surveillance
study of nabumetone. A preliminary report. Drugs. 1990;40
1144. Jankovic SM, Aleksic J, Rakovic S, et al.; Suppl 5:80-6. PMID: 2081502. X-4
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and risk of
gastrointestinal bleeding among patients on hemodialysis. J 1155. Jenq CC, Tian YC, Wu HH, et al.; Effectiveness of
Nephrol. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):502-7. PMID: 19662606. X- oral and intravenous iron therapy in haemodialysis patients.
2 Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Mar;62(3):416-22. PMID: 17511797.
X-2, X-3, X-4
1145. Janssen M, Dijkmans BA, Lamers CB, et al.; A
gastroscopic study of the predictive value of risk factors for 1156. Jensen JT, Parke S, Mellinger U, et al.; Effective
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated ulcer treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding with estradiol
disease in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Br J Rheumatol. valerate and dienogest: A randomized controlled trial.
1994 May;33(5):449-54. PMID: 8173849. X-2, X-3, X-4 Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;117(4):777-87. PMID:
21422847. X-2, X-3, X-4
1146. Jarernsiripornkul N, Chaisrisawadsuk S, Chaiyakum
A, et al.; Patient self-reporting of potential adverse drug 1157. Jeon SB, Song HS, Kim BJ, et al.; Biochemical
reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in aspirin resistance and recurrent lesions in patients with
Thailand. Pharm World Sci. 2009 Oct;31(5):559-64. acute ischemic stroke. Eur Neurol. 2010;64(1):51-7. PMID:
PMID: 19575308. X-3, X-4 20606449. X-2, X-3, X-4

1147. Jaspersen D, Labenz J, Willich SN, et al.; Long- 1158. Jespersen J, Endrikat J, Dusterberg B, et al.; A 1-
term clinical course of extra-oesophageal manifestations in year study to compare the hemostatic effects of oral
patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. A contraceptive containing 20 microg of ethinylestradiol and
prospective follow-up analysis based on the ProGERD 100 microg of levonorgestrel with 30 microg of
study. Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Apr;38(4):233-8. PMID: ethinylestradiol and 100 microg of levonorgestrel.
16413233. X-4 Contraception. 2005 Aug;72(2):98-104. PMID: 16022847.
X-2, X-4
1148. Jaszewski R; Frequency of gastroduodenal lesions
in asymptomatic patients on chronic aspirin or nonsteroidal 1159. Jeyakumar A, Brickman TM, Williamson ME, et al.;
antiinflammatory drug therapy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1990 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and postoperative
Feb;12(1):10-3. PMID: 2303676. X-2 bleeding following adenotonsillectomy in pediatric
patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008
1149. Jaszewski R, Calzada R, Dhar R; Persistence of Jan;134(1):24-7. PMID: 18209131. X-2, X-4
gastric ulcers caused by plain aspirin or nonsteroidal
antiinflammatory agents in patients treated with a 1160. Jick H, Jick SS, Gurewich V, et al.; Risk of
combination of cimetidine, antacids, and enteric-coated idiopathic cardiovascular death and nonfatal venous
aspirin. Dig Dis Sci. 1989 Sep;34(9):1361-4. PMID: thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives with
2766902. X-2, X-3, X-4 differing progestagen components. Lancet. 1995 Dec
16;346(8990):1589-93. PMID: 7500750. X-4
1150. Jaszewski R, Crane SA; The effect of 15(R)-15-
methyl prostaglandin E2 (Arbacet) on the healing of aspirin 1161. Jick H, Kaye JA, Russmann S, et al.; Nonsteroidal
or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-induced gastric antiinflammatory drugs and acute myocardial infarction in
mucosal lesions: an endoscopic study. Am J Gastroenterol. patients with no major risk factors. Pharmacotherapy. 2006
1987 Dec;82(12):1271-4. PMID: 3318402. X-2, X-3, X-4 Oct;26(10):1379-87. PMID: 16999647. X-4

1151. Jeanfils S, Joly P, Young P, et al.; Indomethacin 1162. Jick H, Kaye JA, Vasilakis-Scaramozza C, et al.;
treatment of eighteen patients with Sweet's syndrome. J Am Risk of venous thromboembolism among users of third
Acad Dermatol. 1997 Mar;36(3 Pt 1):436-9. PMID: generation oral contraceptives compared with users of oral
9091476. X-2, X-3, X-4 contraceptives with levonorgestrel before and after 1995:
cohort and case-control analysis. BMJ. 2000 Nov
1152. Jedel E, Labrie F, Oden A, et al.; Impact of electro- 11;321(7270):1190-5. PMID: 11073511. X-4
acupuncture and physical exercise on hyperandrogenism
and oligo/amenorrhea in women with polycystic ovary 1163. Jick H, Myers MW, Dean AD; The risk of
syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Physiol sulfasalazine- and mesalazine-associated blood disorders.

L-53
Pharmacotherapy. 1995 Mar-Apr;15(2):176-81. PMID: surveillance of serious adverse events. BMC Musculoskelet
7624265. X-4 Disord. 2008;9:48. PMID: 18405372. X-2, X-4

1164. Jick S, Kaye JA, Li L, et al.; Further results on the 1174. Jockheck M, Willms R, Volkmann R, et al.;
risk of nonfatal venous thromboembolism in users of the Prevention of periarticular heterotopic ossification after
contraceptive transdermal patch compared to users of oral endoprosthetic hip joint replacement by means of
contraceptives containing norgestimate and 35 microg of diclofenac. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;117(6-7):337-
ethinyl estradiol. Contraception. 2007 Jul;76(1):4-7. PMID: 40. PMID: 9709846. X-2, X-4
17586129. X-2, X-4
1175. Joeres-Nguyen-Xuan TH, Boehm SK, Joeres L, et
1165. Jick SS; The risk of gastrointestinal bleed, al.; Survival of the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917
myocardial infarction, and newly diagnosed hypertension (EcN) in the gastrointestinal tract given in combination
in users of meloxicam, diclofenac, naproxen, and with oral mesalamine to healthy volunteers. Inflamm
piroxicam. Pharmacotherapy. 2000 Jul;20(7):741-4. PMID: Bowel Dis. 2010 Feb;16(2):256-62. PMID: 19637333. X-
10907963. X-4 2, X-3, X-4

1166. Jick SS, Hagberg KW, Hernandez RK, et al.; 1176. Johannes CB, Koro CE, Quinn SG, et al.; The risk
Postmarketing study of ORTHO EVRA and levonorgestrel of coronary heart disease in type 2 diabetic patients
oral contraceptives containing hormonal contraceptives exposed to thiazolidinediones compared to metformin and
with 30 mcg of ethinyl estradiol in relation to nonfatal sulfonylurea therapy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007
venous thromboembolism. Contraception. 2010 May;16(5):504-12. PMID: 17245800. X-2, X-4
Jan;81(1):16-21. PMID: 20004268. X-4
1177. Johansson JE, Andersson SO, Holmberg L, et al.;
1167. Jick SS, Hernandez RK; Risk of non-fatal venous Primary orchiectomy versus estrogen therapy in advanced
thromboembolism in women using oral contraceptives prostatic cancer--a randomized study: results after 7 to 10
containing drospirenone compared with women using oral years of followup. J Urol. 1991 Mar;145(3):519-22;
contraceptives containing levonorgestrel: case-control discussion 22-3. PMID: 1997702. X-2, X-4
study using United States claims data. BMJ.
2011;342:d2151. PMID: 21511805. X-2, X-4 1178. John BK, Arramraju S, Shalomov A, et al.;
Antiplatelet agents do not impact the hospital course in
1168. Jick SS, Jick H; Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. J Clin Gastroenterol.
in users of four hormonal contraceptives: levonorgestrel- 2011 Aug;45(7):583-9. PMID: 21293292. X-2, X-4
containing oral contraceptives, norgestimate-containing
oral contraceptives, desogestrel-containing oral 1179. Johnsen SP, Larsson H, Tarone RE, et al.; Risk of
contraceptives and the contraceptive patch. Contraception. hospitalization for myocardial infarction among users of
2006 Oct;74(4):290-2. PMID: 16982227. X-4 rofecoxib, celecoxib, and other NSAIDs: a population-
based case-control study. Arch Intern Med. 2005 May
1169. Jick SS, Jick H; The contraceptive patch in relation 9;165(9):978-84. PMID: 15883235. X-4
to ischemic stroke and acute myocardial infarction.
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Feb;27(2):218-20. PMID: 1180. Johnsen SP, Pedersen L, Friis S, et al.; Nonaspirin
17253912. X-4 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of
hospitalization for intracerebral hemorrhage: a population-
1170. Jick SS, Kaye JA, Russmann S, et al.; Risk of based case-control study. Stroke. 2003 Feb;34(2):387-91.
nonfatal venous thromboembolism with oral contraceptives PMID: 12574547. X-4
containing norgestimate or desogestrel compared with oral
contraceptives containing levonorgestrel. Contraception. 1181. Johnsen SP, Sorensen HT, Mellemkjoer L, et al.;
2006 Jun;73(6):566-70. PMID: 16730485. X-2 Hospitalisation for upper gastrointestinal bleeding
associated with use of oral anticoagulants. Thromb
1171. Jimoh AA; Complications of intrauterine Haemost. 2001 Aug;86(2):563-8. PMID: 11522004. X-4
contraceptive device (IUD) use at the University of Ilorin
Teaching Hospital, Ilorin. Niger J Med. 2004 Jul- 1182. Johnsen V, Borg G, Trang LE, et al.; Auranofin
Sep;13(3):244-9. PMID: 15532225. X-2 (SK&F) in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from a 24-
month double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Effect on
1172. Jindabanjerd K, Taneepanichskul S; The use of clinical and biochemical assessments. Scand J Rheumatol.
levonorgestrel - IUD in the treatment of uterine myoma in 1989;18(5):251-60. PMID: 2688083. X-2, X-4
Thai women. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Oct;89 Suppl
4:S147-51. PMID: 17726816. X-2, X-3, X-4 1183. Johnson DE, Babaian RJ, Swanson DA, et al.;
Medical castration using megestrol acetate and minidose
1173. Jobanputra P, Amarasena R, Maggs F, et al.; estrogen. Urology. 1988 May;31(5):371-4. PMID:
Hepatotoxicity associated with sulfasalazine in 3284149. X-2, X-3, X-4
inflammatory arthritis: A case series from a local

L-54
1184. Johnson JA, Majumdar SR, Simpson SH, et al.; 1195. Juby A, Davis P; Psychological profiles of patients
Decreased mortality associated with the use of metformin with upper gastrointestinal symptomatology induced by
compared with sulfonylurea monotherapy in type 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Ann Rheum Dis.
diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002 Dec;25(12):2244-8. PMID: 1991 Apr;50(4):211-3. PMID: 2029202. X-2, X-3, X-4
12453968. X-3
1196. Julkunen HA; Oral contraceptives in systemic lupus
1185. Johnson KC, Margolis KL, Espeland MA, et al.; A erythematosus: side-effects and influence on the activity of
prospective study of the effect of hypertension and baseline SLE. Scand J Rheumatol. 1991;20(6):427-33. PMID:
blood pressure on cognitive decline and dementia in 1771400. X-2
postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative
Memory Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Aug;56(8):1449- 1197. Juurlink DN, Mamdani MM, Kopp A, et al.; Drug-
58. PMID: 18637980. X-3, X-4 induced lithium toxicity in the elderly: a population-based
study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 May;52(5):794-8. PMID:
1186. Johnson KH, Millard PS; Oral contraceptives and 15086664. X-2, X-4
breast cancer. J Fam Pract. 1996 Oct;43(4):340-1. PMID:
8874363. X-1, X-4 1198. Kabadi UM; United Kingdom prospective diabetes
study: a different perspective. Endocr Pract. 2002 Jan-
1187. Johnson M, Krosnick A, Carson P, et al.; A Feb;8(1):61-4. PMID: 11939763. X-1
retrospective chart review of uncontrolled use of metformin
as an add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes. Clin Ther. 1998 1199. Kaimal N, Schofield J, Zaki A, et al.; Effects of
Jul-Aug;20(4):691-8. PMID: 9737829. X-2, X-3, X-4 exenatide in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. QJM. 2012
Apr;105(4):321-6. PMID: 22056400. X-2, X-3
1188. Johnson RL, Hemington-Gorse SJ, Dhital SK; Do
cosmetic surgeons consider estrogen-containing drugs to be 1200. Kalaichelvan V, Maw AA, Singh K; Actinomyces
of significant risk in the development of in cervical smears of women using the intrauterine device
thromboembolism? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 in Singapore. Contraception. 2006 Apr;73(4):352-5. PMID:
Sep;32(5):743-7. PMID: 18446403. X-2, X-4 16531165. X-2, X-4

1189. Johnson ST, Fueger JT, Gottschall JL; One center's 1201. Kaliterna V, Kucisec-Tepes N, Pejkovic L, et al.;
experience: the serology and drugs associated with drug- An intrauterine device as a possible cause of change in the
induced immune hemolytic anemia--a new paradigm. microbial flora of the female genital system. J Obstet
Transfusion. 2007 Apr;47(4):697-702. PMID: 17381629. Gynaecol Res. 2011 Aug;37(8):1035-40. PMID: 21481090.
X-2, X-3, X-4 X-2

1190. Jones CW; A post-marketing surveillance study of 1202. Kallio H, Paloheimo M, Maunuksela EL;
Voltarol 75 mg SR in the primary care setting. Br J Clin Haemorrhage and risk factors associated with
Pract. 1996 Oct-Nov;50(7):390-5. PMID: 9015913. X-3, retrobulbar/peribulbar block: a prospective study in 1383
X-4 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Nov;85(5):708-11. PMID:
11094585. X-2, X-3, X-4
1191. Jonsson PE, Olsson AM, Petersson BA, et al.;
Intravenous indomethacin and oxycone-papaverine in the 1203. Kamber N, Davis WA, Bruce DG, et al.; Metformin
treatment of acute renal colic. A double-blind study. Br J and lactic acidosis in an Australian community setting: the
Urol. 1987 May;59(5):396-400. PMID: 3297230. X-2, X-3, Fremantle Diabetes Study. Med J Aust. 2008 Apr
X-4 21;188(8):446-9. PMID: 18429709. X-2, X-4

1192. Jordan HL, Bruinsma FJ, Thomson RJ, et al.; 1204. Kanat-Pektas M, Ozat M, Gungor T; The effects of
Adolescent exposure to high-dose estrogen and subsequent TCu-380A on cervicovaginal flora. Arch Gynecol Obstet.
effects on lactation. Reprod Toxicol. 2007 Nov-Dec;24(3- 2008 May;277(5):429-32. PMID: 17972087. X-2, X-4
4):397-402. PMID: 17531440. X-2, X-4
1205. Kane LA, Sparrow MJ; Postcoital contraception: a
1193. Jordan HL, Hopper JL, Thomson RJ, et al.; family planning study. N Z Med J. 1989 Apr
Influence of high-dose estrogen exposure during 12;102(865):151-3. PMID: 2649811. X-2, X-3, X-4
adolescence on mammographic density for age in
adulthood. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 1206. Kang NS, Yoo KH, Cheon H, et al.; Indomethacin
Jan;19(1):121-9. PMID: 20056630. X-2, X-3, X-4 treatment decreases renal blood flow velocity in human
neonates. Biol Neonate. 1999 Nov;76(5):261-5. PMID:
1194. Jorn LP, Lindstrand A, Toksvig-Larsen S; 10516392. X-2, X-4
Tourniquet release for hemostasis increases bleeding. A
randomized study of 77 knee replacements. Acta Orthop 1207. Kang SB, Cho KJ, Moon KH, et al.; Does low-dose
Scand. 1999 Jun;70(3):265-7. PMID: 10429602. X-2, X-3, aspirin increase blood loss after spinal fusion surgery?
X-4 Spine J. 2011 Apr;11(4):303-7. PMID: 21474081. X-2, X-
4

L-55
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Mar-Apr;49(44):345-8.
1208. Kaplan B, Farris KB, Kirking DM; Assessing PMID: 11995447. X-2
physician choice of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in
a health maintenance organization. Ann Pharmacother. 1220. Kaufman DW, Kelly JP; Acetylsalicylic acid and
1993 Nov;27(11):1393-9. PMID: 8286817. X-3, X-4 other salicylates in relation to Stevens-Johnson syndrome
and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001
1209. Kaplan RC, Heckbert SR, Koepsell TD, et al.; Risk Feb;51(2):174-6. PMID: 11259991. X-2, X-4
factors for hospitalized gastrointestinal bleeding among
older persons. Cardiovascular Health Study Investigators. J 1221. Kaufman DW, Kelly JP, Sheehan JE, et al.;
Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Feb;49(2):126-33. PMID: 11207865. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in relation to
X-7 major upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Pharmacol
Ther. 1993 Apr;53(4):485-94. PMID: 8477566. X-4
1210. Kaplan RC, Heckbert SR, Psaty BM; Risk factors
for hospitalized upper or lower gastrointestinal tract 1222. Kaufman DW, Kelly JP, Wiholm BE, et al.; The
bleeding in treated hypertensives. Prev Med. 2002 risk of acute major upper gastrointestinal bleeding among
Apr;34(4):455-62. PMID: 11914052. X-2 users of aspirin and ibuprofen at various levels of alcohol
consumption. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Nov;94(11):3189-
1211. Kapoor DA, Weitzel S, Mowad JJ, et al.; Use of 96. PMID: 10566713. X-4
indomethacin suppositories in the prophylaxis of recurrent
ureteral colic. J Urol. 1989 Dec;142(6):1428-30. PMID: 1223. Kaunitz AM, Bissonnette F, Monteiro I, et al.;
2685362. X-2, X-3, X-4 Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or
medroxyprogesterone for heavy menstrual bleeding: a
1212. Karakus S, Kiran G, Ciralik H; Efficacy of randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010
micronised vaginal progesterone versus oral dydrogestrone Sep;116(3):625-32. PMID: 20733445. X-2, X-4
in the treatment of irregular dysfunctional uterine bleeding:
a pilot randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet 1224. Kaunitz AM, Miller PD, Rice VM, et al.; Bone
Gynaecol. 2009 Dec;49(6):685-8. PMID: 20070724. X-2, mineral density in women aged 25-35 years receiving depot
X-3, X-4 medroxyprogesterone acetate: recovery following
discontinuation. Contraception. 2006 Aug;74(2):90-9.
1213. Karkouti K, Wijeysundera DN, Yau TM, et al.; The PMID: 16860045. X-2
risk-benefit profile of aprotinin versus tranexamic acid in
cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):21-9. 1225. Kaunitz AM, Portman DJ, Hait H, et al.; Adding
PMID: 19910626. X-3 low-dose estrogen to the hormone-free interval: impact on
bleeding patterns in users of a 91-day extended regimen
1214. Kars M, Delgado V, Holman ER, et al.; Aortic oral contraceptive. Contraception. 2009 May;79(5):350-5.
valve calcification and mild tricuspid regurgitation but no PMID: 19341846. X-2, X-4
clinical heart disease after 8 years of dopamine agonist
therapy for prolactinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 1226. Kawasaki T, Kurosawa H, Ikeda H, et al.; Additive
Sep;93(9):3348-56. PMID: 18559921. X-2 effects of glucosamine or risedronate for the treatment of
osteoarthritis of the knee combined with home exercise: a
1215. Karsay K; The relationship between vascular prospective randomized 18-month trial. J Bone Miner
headaches and low-dose oral contraceptives. Ther Hung. Metab. 2008;26(3):279-87. PMID: 18470670. X-2, X-3, X-
1990;38(4):181-5. PMID: 2094059. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4 4

1216. Kasemsarn P, Kulthanan K, Tuchinda P, et al.; 1227. Kawase Y, Ishii T, Arai H, et al.; Gastrointestinal
Cutaneous reactions to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory perforation in very low-birthweight infants. Pediatr Int.
drugs. J Drugs Dermatol. 2011 Oct;10(10):1160-7. PMID: 2006 Dec;48(6):599-603. PMID: 17168981. X-2
21968666. X-2
1228. Kay RM, Directo MP, Leathers M, et al.;
1217. Katic BJ, Golden W, Cady RK, et al.; GERD Complications of ketorolac use in children undergoing
prevalence in migraine patients and the implication for operative fracture care. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Oct-
acute migraine treatment. J Headache Pain. 2009 Nov;30(7):655-8. PMID: 20864848. X-2, X-4
Feb;10(1):35-43. PMID: 19009231. X-4
1229. Kay RM, Leathers M, Directo MP, et al.;
1218. Katschinski BD, Logan RF; Changes in birth-cohort Perioperative ketorolac use in children undergoing lower
pattern of peptic ulcer mortality in England and Wales. extremity osteotomies. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Oct-
Postgrad Med J. 1991 Sep;67(791):825-8. PMID: 1946128. Nov;31(7):783-6. PMID: 21926877. X-2, X-3, X-4
X-4
1230. Keating J, Chandran H; Antiinflammatory drugs
1219. Katsinelos P, Christodoulou K, Pilpilidis I, et al.; and emergency surgery for peptic ulcers in the Waikato. N
Colopathy associated with the systemic use of nonsteroidal Z Med J. 1992 Apr 8;105(931):127-9. PMID: 1560923. X-
antiinflammatory medications. An underestimated entity. 2, X-3

L-56
1243. Kerr SJ, Rowett DS, Sayer GP, et al.; All-cause
1231. Keder LM, Rulin MC, Gruss J; Compliance with mortality of elderly Australian veterans using COX-2
depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: a randomized, selective or non-selective NSAIDs: a longitudinal study. Br
controlled trial of intensive reminders. Am J Obstet J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Jun;71(6):936-42. PMID:
Gynecol. 1998 Sep;179(3 Pt 1):583-5. PMID: 9757955. X- 21276041. X-4, X-6
3, X-4
1244. Kerstens PJ, Boerbooms AM, Jeurissen ME, et al.;
1232. Keim SA, Klebanoff MA; Aspirin use and Radiological and clinical results of longterm treatment of
miscarriage risk. Epidemiology. 2006 Jul;17(4):435-9. rheumatoid arthritis with methotrexate and azathioprine. J
PMID: 16755260. X-4 Rheumatol. 2000 May;27(5):1148-55. PMID: 10813280.
X-2, X-3, X-4
1233. Kekkonen R, Lahteenmaki P, Luukkainen T, et al.;
Sequential regimen of the antiprogesterone RU486 and 1245. Kessing LV, Nilsson FM; Increased risk of
synthetic progestin for contraception. Fertil Steril. 1993 developing dementia in patients with major affective
Oct;60(4):610-5. PMID: 8405512. X-2, X-3, X-4 disorders compared to patients with other medical illnesses.
J Affect Disord. 2003 Feb;73(3):261-9. PMID: 12547295.
1234. Keles GT, Topcu I, Ekici Z, et al.; Evaluation of X-2, X-3, X-4
piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin as a preemptive analgesic in
functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1246. Kessler WF, Shires GT, 3rd, Fahey TJ, 3rd;
2010 Aug;43(8):806-11. PMID: 20602016. X-2, X-4 Surgical complications of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory
drug-induced small bowel ulceration. J Am Coll Surg. 1997
1235. Keljo DJ, Sugerman KS; Pancreatitis in patients Sep;185(3):250-4. PMID: 9291402. X-2
with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol
Nutr. 1997 Jul;25(1):108-12. PMID: 9226539. X-2 1247. Kewitz H; Rare but serious risks associated with
non-narcotic analgesics: clinical experience. Med Toxicol.
1236. Kellner H, Bornholdt K, Hein G; Leflunomide in 1986;1 Suppl 1:86-92. PMID: 3821433. X-4
the treatment of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis--
results of a prospective non-interventional study. Clin 1248. Keyl C, Uhl R, Beyersdorf F, et al.; High-dose
Rheumatol. 2010 Aug;29(8):913-20. PMID: 20496042. X- tranexamic acid is related to increased risk of generalized
2, X-4 seizures after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac
Surg. 2011 May;39(5):e114-21. PMID: 21295991. X-2
1237. Kelly JP, Kaufman DW, Jurgelon JM, et al.; Risk of
aspirin-associated major upper-gastrointestinal bleeding 1249. Khalafallah A, Dennis A, Bates J, et al.; A
with enteric-coated or buffered product. Lancet. 1996 Nov prospective randomized, controlled trial of intravenous
23;348(9039):1413-6. PMID: 8937281. X-2, X-3, X-4 versus oral iron for moderate iron deficiency anaemia of
pregnancy. J Intern Med. 2010 Sep;268(3):286-95. PMID:
1238. Kemmeren JM, Tanis BC, van den Bosch MA, et al.; 20546462. X-2, X-3, X-4
Risk of Arterial Thrombosis in Relation to Oral
Contraceptives (RATIO) study: oral contraceptives and the 1250. Khalid SK, Lane J, Navarro V, et al.; Use of over-
risk of ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2002 May;33(5):1202-8. the-counter analgesics is not associated with acute
PMID: 11988591. X-2 decompensation in patients with cirrhosis. Clin
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Sep;7(9):994-9; quiz 13-4.
1239. Kemppainen H, Raiha I, Sourander L; Clinical PMID: 19394441. X-2
presentation of bleeding peptic ulcer in the elderly. Aging
(Milano). 1996 Jun;8(3):184-8. PMID: 8862193. X-2 1251. Khan FM; A six-month parallel group comparison
of fenbufen and naproxen in the treatment of rheumatoid
1240. Kenangil G, Ozekmekci S, Koldas L, et al.; arthritis. Clin Ther. 1983;5(5):483-7. PMID: 6352034. X-
Assessment of valvulopathy in Parkinson's disease patients 2, X-3, X-4
on pergolide and/or cabergoline. Clin Neurol Neurosurg.
2007 May;109(4):350-3. PMID: 17307289. X-2 1252. Khan HA, Amitava AK; Topical diclofenac versus
dexamethasone after strabismus surgery: a double-blind
1241. Kennedy AD, Sculpher MJ, Coulter A, et al.; randomized clinical trial of anti-inflammatory effect and
Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment ocular hypertensive response. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007
choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomized Jul-Aug;55(4):271-5. PMID: 17595475. X-2, X-3, X-4
controlled trial. JAMA. 2002 Dec 4;288(21):2701-8.
PMID: 12460093. X-2, X-3, X-4 1253. Kharlip J, Salvatori R, Yenokyan G, et al.;
Recurrence of hyperprolactinemia after withdrawal of long-
1242. Kepczyk T, Kadakia SC; Prospective evaluation of term cabergoline therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009
gastrointestinal tract in patients with iron-deficiency Jul;94(7):2428-36. PMID: 19336508. X-2, X-3
anemia. Dig Dis Sci. 1995 Jun;40(6):1283-9. PMID:
7781448. X-2, X-3, X-4 1254. Khattab S, Mohsen IA, Aboul Foutouh I, et al.; Can
metformin reduce the incidence of gestational diabetes

L-57
mellitus in pregnant women with polycystic ovary 1265. Kim SH, Choi JH, Lee KW, et al.; The human
syndrome? Prospective cohort study. Gynecol Endocrinol. leucocyte antigen-DRB1*1302-DQB1*0609-DPB1*0201
2011 Oct;27(10):789-93. PMID: 21247239. X-2, X-3 haplotype may be a strong genetic marker for aspirin-
induced urticaria. Clin Exp Allergy. 2005 Mar;35(3):339-
1255. Khomassuridze AG, Tsertsvadze GL, Tsereteli TG; 44. PMID: 15784113. X-2, X-3, X-4
Intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease. Adv
Contracept. 1997 Mar;13(1):71-8. PMID: 9181187. X-2, 1266. Kim SH, Kang YM, Cho BY, et al.; Histamine N-
X-4 methyltransferase 939A>G polymorphism affects mRNA
stability in patients with acetylsalicylic acid-intolerant
1256. Khoo SK, Coglan MJ, Wright GR, et al.; Hormone chronic urticaria. Allergy. 2009 Feb;64(2):213-21. PMID:
therapy in women in the menopause transition. 19178400. X-3, X-4
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of
effects on body weight, blood pressure, lipoprotein levels, 1267. Kim SH, Nam EJ, Kim YK, et al.; Functional
antithrombin III activity, and the endometrium. Med J variability of the adenosine A3 receptor (ADORA3) gene
Aust. 1998 Mar 2;168(5):216-20. PMID: 9539899. X-2, X- polymorphism in aspirin-induced urticaria. Br J Dermatol.
4 2010 Nov;163(5):977-85. PMID: 20716228. X-2, X-3, X-4

1257. Kidon MI, Liew WK, Chiang WC, et al.; 1268. Kim SH, Son JK, Yang EM, et al.; A functional
Hypersensitivity to paracetamol in Asian children with promoter polymorphism of the human IL18 gene is
early onset of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug allergy. associated with aspirin-induced urticaria. Br J Dermatol.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2007;144(1):51-6. PMID: 2011 Nov;165(5):976-84. PMID: 21692767. X-2, X-4
17505137. X-2, X-3, X-4
1269. Kim SH, Ye YM, Lee SK, et al.; Association of
1258. Kierkegaard A; Side and site of deep vein TNF-alpha genetic polymorphism with HLA DPB1*0301.
thrombosis in women using oral contraceptives. Acta Clin Exp Allergy. 2006 Oct;36(10):1247-53. PMID:
Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1985;64(5):399-402. PMID: 17014432. X-2, X-3, X-4
4061060. X-2
1270. Kim SJ, Lo WR, Hubbard GB, 3rd, et al.; Topical
1259. Kiilholma P, Tuimala R, Kivinen S, et al.; ketorolac in vitreoretinal surgery: a prospective,
Comparison of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked trial. Arch
goserelin acetate alone versus goserelin combined with Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep;126(9):1203-8. PMID: 18779478.
estrogen-progestogen add-back therapy in the treatment of X-2, X-3, X-4
endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1995 Nov;64(5):903-8. PMID:
7589632. X-2, X-3, X-4 1271. Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Reilly M, et al.; Patients
exposed to rofecoxib and celecoxib have different odds of
1260. Kim J, Lee KH, Yoo S, et al.; Clinical nonfatal myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Feb
characteristics and risk factors of colistin-induced 1;142(3):157-64. PMID: 15684203. X-4
nephrotoxicity. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009
Nov;34(5):434-8. PMID: 19726164. X-2 1272. Kimmerle R, Weiss R, Berger M, et al.;
Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of a copper
1261. Kim JG, Graham DY; Helicobacter pylori infection intrauterine device (CU Safe 300) in type I diabetic women.
and development of gastric or duodenal ulcer in arthritic Diabetes Care. 1993 Sep;16(9):1227-30. PMID: 8404424.
patients receiving chronic NSAID therapy. The X-2, X-4
Misoprostol Study Group. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994
Feb;89(2):203-7. PMID: 8304304. X-2, X-3, X-4 1273. Kirkman RJ, Bromham DR, O'Connor TP, et al.;
Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel
1262. Kim JH, Park BL, Cheong HS, et al.; Genome-wide implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.
and follow-up studies identify CEP68 gene variants Br J Fam Plann. 1999 Jul;25(2):36-40. PMID: 10454652.
associated with risk of aspirin-intolerant asthma. PLoS X-2, X-3, X-4
One. 2010;5(11):e13818. PMID: 21072201. X-2, X-3, X-4
1274. Kirshon B, Poindexter AN, 3rd; Contraception: a
1263. Kim JT, Sherman O, Cuff G, et al.; A double-blind risk factor for endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1988
prospective comparison of rofecoxib vs ketorolac in Jun;71(6 Pt 1):829-31. PMID: 3368167. X-2, X-4
reducing postoperative pain after arthroscopic knee
surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Sep;17(6):439-43. PMID: 1275. Kitchen PA, Levi AJ, Domizio P, et al.;
16171664. X-2, X-3, X-4 Microscopic colitis: the tip of the iceberg? Eur J
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002 Nov;14(11):1199-204. PMID:
1264. Kim S, Martin C, Galanko J, et al.; Use of 12439114. X-2
nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and distal large bowel
cancer in whites and African Americans. Am J Epidemiol. 1276. Kivijarvi A, Gronroos M; Positional factors of the
2008 Dec 1;168(11):1292-300. PMID: 18945689. X-4 uterus play a contributing part in IUD failure. Acta Obstet

L-58
Gynecol Scand. 1983;62(1):67-70. PMID: 6858628. X-3,
X-4 1288. Kleynhans L, Du Plessis N, Black GF, et al.;
Medroxyprogesterone acetate alters Mycobacterium bovis
1277. Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Frich LH, Sojbjerg JO, et BCG-induced cytokine production in peripheral blood
al.; Heterotopic bone formation following total shoulder mononuclear cells of contraceptive users. PLoS One.
arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1989;4(2):99-104. PMID: 2011;6(9):e24639. PMID: 21931790. X-2
2501455. X-2, X-4
1289. Kluft C, Endrikat J, Mulder SM, et al.; A
1278. Kjos SL, Ballagh SA, La Cour M, et al.; The copper prospective study on the effects on hemostasis of two oral
T380A intrauterine device in women with type II diabetes contraceptives containing drospirenone in combination
mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Dec;84(6):1006-9. PMID: with either 30 or 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and a
7970454. X-2, X-4 reference containing desogestrel and 30 microg ethinyl
estradiol. Contraception. 2006 Apr;73(4):336-43. PMID:
1279. Kjos SL, Peters RK, Xiang A, et al.; Contraception 16531162. X-2, X-4
and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Latina women
with prior gestational diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 1998 Aug 1290. Knapp P, Gardner PH, Carrigan N, et al.; Perceived
12;280(6):533-8. PMID: 9707143. X-2 risk of medicine side effects in users of a patient
information website: a study of the use of verbal
1280. Kjos SL, Shoupe D, Douyan S, et al.; Effect of low- descriptors, percentages and natural frequencies. Br J
dose oral contraceptives on carbohydrate and lipid Health Psychol. 2009 Sep;14(Pt 3):579-94. PMID:
metabolism in women with recent gestational diabetes: 18992183. X-2, X-3, X-4
results of a controlled, randomized, prospective study. Am
J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Dec;163(6 Pt 1):1822-7. PMID: 1291. Kneer W, Rother I, Rother M, et al.; A multiple-
2256489. X-2, X-4 dose, open-label, safety, compliance, and usage evaluation
study of epicutaneously applied Diractin (ketoprofen in
1281. Kjotrod SB, von During V, Carlsen SM; Metformin Transfersome) in joint/musculoskeletal pain or soft tissue
treatment before IVF/ICSI in women with polycystic ovary inflammation. Curr Drug Saf. 2009 Jan;4(1):5-10. PMID:
syndrome; a prospective, randomized, double blind study. 19149519. X-2, X-4
Hum Reprod. 2004 Jun;19(6):1315-22. PMID: 15117902.
X-2, X-3, X-4 1292. Knijff-Dutmer EA, Postma MJ, van der Palen J, et
al.; Incremental cost-effectiveness of cyclooxygenase 2-
1282. Klavon SL, Grubb GS; Insertion site complications selective versus nonselective nonsteroidal anti-
during the first year of NORPLANT use. Contraception. inflammatory drugs in a cohort of coumarin users: a
1990 Jan;41(1):27-37. PMID: 2105871. X-4 pharmacoeconomic analysis linked to a case-control study.
Clin Ther. 2004 Jul;26(7):1160-7. PMID: 15336481. X-4
1283. Klein BE, Klein R, Lee KE, et al.; Drug use and
five-year incidence of age-related cataracts: The Beaver 1293. Knijff-Dutmer EA, Schut GA, van de Laar MA;
Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2001 Sep;108(9):1670-4. Concomitant coumarin-NSAID therapy and risk for
PMID: 11535471. X-4 bleeding. Ann Pharmacother. 2003 Jan;37(1):12-6. PMID:
12503926. X-4
1284. Klein WA, Krevsky B, Klepper L, et al.;
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and upper 1294. Knijff-Dutmer EA, Van der Palen J, Schut G, et al.;
gastrointestinal hemorrhage in an urban hospital. Dig Dis The influence of cyclo-oxygenase specificity of non-
Sci. 1993 Nov;38(11):2049-55. PMID: 8223081. X-2, X-3, steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on bleeding
X-4 complications in concomitant coumarine users. QJM. 2003
Jul;96(7):513-20. PMID: 12881594. X-2, X-3, X-4
1285. Kleinhans M, Linzbach L, Zedlitz S, et al.; Positive
patch test reactions to celecoxib may be due to irritation 1295. Kocak I, Yalvac IS, Kocak A, et al.; Comparison of
and do not correlate with the results of oral provocation. the anti-inflammatory effects of diclofenac and flurbiprofen
Contact Dermatitis. 2002 Aug;47(2):100-2. PMID: eye drops after cataract extraction. Acta Ophthalmol Scand.
12423408. X-2, X-3, X-4 1998 Jun;76(3):343-5. PMID: 9686850. X-2, X-4

1286. Kleinknecht D, Landais P, Goldfarb B; Drug- 1296. Koch M, Dezi A, Tarquini M, et al.; Prevention of
associated acute renal failure. A prospective collaborative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced
study of 81 biopsied patients. Adv Exp Med Biol. gastrointestinal mucosal injury: risk factors for serious
1987;212:125-8. PMID: 3618352. X-2 complications. Dig Liver Dis. 2000 Mar;32(2):138-51.
PMID: 10975790. X-4
1287. Kleinstein J; Efficacy and tolerability of vaginal
progesterone capsules (Utrogest 200) compared with 1297. Koetsawang S, Charoenvisal C, Banharnsupawat L,
progesterone gel (Crinone 8%) for luteal phase support et al.; Multicenter trial of two monophasic oral
during assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2005 contraceptives containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and
Jun;83(6):1641-9. PMID: 15950631. X-2, X-3, X-4 either desogestrel or gestodene in Thai women.

L-59
Contraception. 1995 Apr;51(4):225-9. PMID: 7796587. X-
2, X-3, X-4 1308. Koro CE, Bowlin SJ, Weiss SR; Antidiabetic
therapy and the risk of heart failure in type 2 diabetic
1298. Kohli HS; NSAIDs and bleeding ulcers. Natl Med J patients: an independent effect or confounding by
India. 1994 Nov-Dec;7(6):278-9. PMID: 7841880. X-1, indication. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005
X-4 Oct;14(10):697-703. PMID: 15654719. X-3

1299. Kohne CH, De Greve J, Hartmann JT, et al.; 1309. Koseoglu BG, Ozturk S, Kocak H, et al.; The
Irinotecan combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic effects of etodolac, nimesulid and naproxen sodium on the
acid or capecitabine plus celecoxib or placebo in the first- frequency of sister chromatid exchange after enclused third
line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. molars surgery. Yonsei Med J. 2008 Oct 31;49(5):742-7.
EORTC study 40015. Ann Oncol. 2008 May;19(5):920-6. PMID: 18972594. X-2, X-3
PMID: 18065406. X-2, X-3, X-4
1310. Kossoff EH, Mankad DN; Medication-overuse
1300. Kokki H, Kokki M; Ketoprofen versus paracetamol headache in children: is initial preventive therapy
(acetaminophen) or ibuprofen in the management of fever: necessary? J Child Neurol. 2006 Jan;21(1):45-8. PMID:
results of two randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, 16551452. X-2, X-3, X-4
parallel-group, repeated-dose, multicentre, phase III studies
in children. Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(6):375-86. PMID: 1311. Kotzan J, Wade W, Yu HH; Assessing NSAID
20380479. X-4 prescription use as a predisposing factor for
gastroesophageal reflux disease in a Medicaid population.
1301. Kokki H, Nikanne E, Ahonen R; The feasibility of Pharm Res. 2001 Sep;18(9):1367-72. PMID: 11683254.
pain treatment at home after adenoidectomy with X-4
ketoprofen tablets in small children. Paediatr Anaesth.
2000;10(5):531-5. PMID: 11012958. X-2, X-4 1312. Kouides PA, Byams VR, Philipp CS, et al.;
Multisite management study of menorrhagia with abnormal
1302. Kokki H, Nikanne E, Tuovinen K; I.v. laboratory haemostasis: a prospective crossover study of
intraoperative ketoprofen in small children during intranasal desmopressin and oral tranexamic acid. Br J
adenoidectomy: a dose-finding study. Br J Anaesth. 1998 Haematol. 2009 Apr;145(2):212-20. PMID: 19236375. X-
Dec;81(6):870-4. PMID: 10211011. X-2, X-4 2, X-3

1303. Kokki H, Salonen A, Nikanne E; Perioperative 1313. Kovo M, Weissman A, Gur D, et al.; Neonatal
intravenous ketoprofen neither prolongs operation time nor outcome in polycystic ovarian syndrome patients treated
delays discharge after adenoidectomy in children. Paediatr with metformin during pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal
Anaesth. 2001 Jan;11(1):59-64. PMID: 11123733. X-2, X- Med. 2006 Jul;19(7):415-9. PMID: 16923696. X-2
3, X-4
1314. Koyama H, Tominaga T, Asaishi K, et al.; A
1304. Kolt SD, Kronborg IJ, Yeomans ND; High randomized controlled comparative study of oral
prevalence of duodenal ulcer in Indochinese immigrants medroxyprogesterone acetate 1,200 and 600 mg in patients
attending an Australian university hospital. J Gastroenterol with advanced or recurrent breast cancer. Oncology.
Hepatol. 1993 Mar-Apr;8(2):128-32. PMID: 8471749. X- 1999;56(4):283-90. PMID: 10343191. X-2, X-4
4
1315. Kozer E, Barr J, Bulkowstein M, et al.; A
1305. Komericki P, Arbab E, Grims R, et al.; Tryptase as prospective study of multiple supratherapeutic
severity marker in drug provocation tests. Int Arch Allergy acetaminophen doses in febrile children. Vet Hum Toxicol.
Immunol. 2006;140(2):164-9. PMID: 16601354. X-2, X-3, 2002 Apr;44(2):106-9. PMID: 11931497. X-2, X-4
X-4
1316. Kozlowski KJ, Rickert VI, Hendon A, et al.;
1306. Koncz TA, Lister SP, Makinson GT; Adolescents and Norplant: preliminary findings of side
Gastroprotection in patients prescribed non-selective effects. J Adolesc Health. 1995 May;16(5):373-8. PMID:
NSAIDs, and the risk of related hospitalization. Curr Med 7662687. X-2, X-4
Res Opin. 2008 Dec;24(12):3405-12. PMID: 19032122.
X-4 1317. Kraag GR, Gordon DA, Menard HA, et al.; Patient
compliance with tenoxicam in family practice. Clin Ther.
1307. Koninckx PR, Spielmann D; A comparative 2-year 1994 May-Jun;16(3):581-93. PMID: 7923322. X-3, X-4
study of the effects of sequential regimens of 1 mg 17beta-
estradiol and trimegestone with a regimen containing 1318. Kremer JM, Malamood H, Maliakkal B, et al.; Fish
estradiol valerate and norethisterone on the bleeding profile oil dietary supplementation for prevention of indomethacin
and endometrial safety in postmenopausal women. Gynecol induced gastric and small bowel toxicity in healthy
Endocrinol. 2005 Aug;21(2):82-9. PMID: 16294460. X-2, volunteers. J Rheumatol. 1996 Oct;23(10):1770-3. PMID:
X-3, X-4 8895156. X-3, X-4

L-60
1319. Kresanov I, Nikkanen V, Klemi P; Disturbances of patch 1.3% (DETP) in minor soft tissue injury. Int J Sports
the endometrium in the luteal phase of cycles stimulated for Med. 2011 Aug;32(8):635-43. PMID: 21563042. X-2, X-3
in vitro fertilization and of normal cycles treated with
vaginal progesterone. Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl. 1330. Kulkarni J, Liew J, Garland KA; Depression
1994;208:33-9. PMID: 8092768. X-2, X-3, X-4 associated with combined oral contraceptives--a pilot
study. Aust Fam Physician. 2005 Nov;34(11):990. PMID:
1320. Kriplani A, Kulshrestha V, Agarwal N, et al.; Role 16299641. X-2
of tranexamic acid in management of dysfunctional uterine
bleeding in comparison with medroxyprogesterone acetate. 1331. Kulkarni SG, Parikh SS, Shankhpal PD, et al.;
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Oct;26(7):673-8. PMID: Gastric emptying of solids in long-term NSAID users:
17071438. X-2 correlation with endoscopic findings and Helicobacter
pylori status. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Feb;94(2):382-6.
1321. Kriplani A, Singh BM, Lal S, et al.; Efficacy, PMID: 10022633. X-2
acceptability and side effects of the levonorgestrel
intrauterine system for menorrhagia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1332. Kulnigg S, Stoinov S, Simanenkov V, et al.; A
2007 Jun;97(3):190-4. PMID: 17382331. X-2, X-4 novel intravenous iron formulation for treatment of anemia
in inflammatory bowel disease: the ferric carboxymaltose
1322. Krunic A, Ciurea A, Scheman A; Efficacy and (FERINJECT) randomized controlled trial. Am J
tolerance of acne treatment using both spironolactone and a Gastroenterol. 2008 May;103(5):1182-92. PMID:
combined contraceptive containing drospirenone. J Am 18371137. X-2, X-3, X-4
Acad Dermatol. 2008 Jan;58(1):60-2. PMID: 17964689.
X-2, X-3, X-4 1333. Kumar Nair PA, Pai MG, Gazal HA, et al.;
Indomethacin prophylaxis for intraventricular hemorrhage
1323. Kruse W, Eggert-Kruse W, Rampmaier J, et al.; in very low birth weight babies. Indian Pediatr. 2004
Compliance with short-term high-dose ethinyl oestradiol in Jun;41(6):551-8. PMID: 15235161. X-2, X-4
young patients with primary infertility. New insights from
the use of electronic devices. Agents Actions Suppl. 1334. Kumar RK, Yu VY; Prolonged low-dose
1990;29:105-15. PMID: 2316431. X-2, X-3, X-4 indomethacin therapy for patent ductus arteriosus in very
low birthweight infants. J Paediatr Child Health. 1997
1324. Kruse W, Eggert-Kruse W, Rampmaier J, et al.; Feb;33(1):38-41. PMID: 9069042. X-2, X-4
Compliance and adverse drug reactions: a prospective
study with ethinylestradiol using continuous compliance 1335. Kuo HW, Tsai SS, Tiao MM, et al.; Analgesic use
monitoring. Clin Investig. 1993 Jun;71(6):483-7. PMID: and the risk for progression of chronic kidney disease.
8353409. X-2, X-4 Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Jul;19(7):745-51.
PMID: 20582905. X-4
1325. Krysiak R, Gdula-Dymek A, Okopien B; Effect of
simvastatin and fenofibrate on cytokine release and 1336. Kupczyk M, Kuprys I, Gorski P, et al.; Aspirin
systemic inflammation in type 2 diabetes mellitus with intolerance and allergy to house dust mites: important
mixed dyslipidemia. Am J Cardiol. 2011 Apr factors associated with development of severe asthma. Ann
1;107(7):1010-8 e1. PMID: 21276586. X-2, X-3, X-4 Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004 Apr;92(4):453-8. PMID:
15104198. X-2, X-3, X-4
1326. Kubicsek T, Kazy Z, Czeizel AE; Teratogenic
potential of tribenoside, a drug for the treatment of 1337. Kupczyk M, Kurmanowska Z, Kuprys-Lipinska I, et
haemorrhoids and varicose veins--a population-based case- al.; Mediators of inflammation in nasal lavage from aspirin
-control study. Reprod Toxicol. 2011 May;31(4):464-9. intolerant patients after aspirin challenge. Respir Med.
PMID: 21182931. X-4 2010 Oct;104(10):1404-9. PMID: 20452758. X-2, X-4

1327. Kubota K, Kubota N, Pearce GL, et al.; Signalling 1338. Kuptniratsaikul V, Pinthong T, Bunjob M, et al.;
drug-induced rash with 36 drugs recently marketed in the Efficacy and safety of Derris scandens Benth extracts in
United Kingdom and studied by Prescription-Event patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Altern Complement
Monitoring. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Med. 2011 Feb;17(2):147-53. PMID: 21309709. X-2, X-3,
Apr;33(4):219-25. PMID: 7620692. X-4 X-4

1328. Kucuk T, Ertan K; Continuous oral or intramuscular 1339. Kurahara K, Matsumoto T, Iida M, et al.; Clinical
medroxyprogesterone acetate versus the levonorgestrel and endoscopic features of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of drug-induced colonic ulcerations. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001
perimenopausal menorrhagia: a randomized, prospective, Feb;96(2):473-80. PMID: 11232693. X-4
controlled clinical trial in female smokers. Clin Exp Obstet
Gynecol. 2008;35(1):57-60. PMID: 18390083. X-2, X-3 1340. Kurata JH, Nogawa AN, Noritake D; NSAIDs
increase risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in primary care
1329. Kuehl K, Carr W, Yanchick J, et al.; Analgesic patients with dyspepsia. J Fam Pract. 1997 Sep;45(3):227-
efficacy and safety of the diclofenac epolamine topical 35. PMID: 9300002. X-2

L-61
series. J Cutan Med Surg. 2002 Jul-Aug;6(4):320-6. PMID:
1341. Kurth T, Glynn RJ, Walker AM, et al.; Inhibition of 12118363. X-2, X-3
clinical benefits of aspirin on first myocardial infarction by
nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Circulation. 2003 Sep 1353. Lafrance JP, Miller DR; Selective and non-selective
9;108(10):1191-5. PMID: 12939216. X-4 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of acute
kidney injury. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009
1342. Kurth T, Glynn RJ, Walker AM, et al.; Analgesic Oct;18(10):923-31. PMID: 19585463. X-6, X-7
use and change in kidney function in apparently healthy
men. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Aug;42(2):234-44. PMID: 1354. Laharie D, Droz-Perroteau C, Benichou J, et al.;
12900803. X-4, X-6 Hospitalizations for gastrointestinal and cardiovascular
events in the CADEUS cohort of traditional or Coxib
1343. Kurth T, Hennekens CH, Sturmer T, et al.; NSAID users. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Mar;69(3):295-
Analgesic use and risk of subsequent hypertension in 302. PMID: 20233201. X-4
apparently healthy men. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Sep
12;165(16):1903-9. PMID: 16157836. X-6 1355. Laharie D, Seneschal J, Schaeverbeke T, et al.;
Assessment of liver fibrosis with transient elastography and
1344. Kushnir A, Pinheiro JM; Comparison of renal FibroTest in patients treated with methotrexate for chronic
effects of ibuprofen versus indomethacin during treatment inflammatory diseases: a case-control study. J Hepatol.
of patent ductus arteriosus in contiguous historical cohorts. 2010 Dec;53(6):1035-40. PMID: 20801541. X-2, X-4
BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2011;11:8. PMID: 21718490. X-2
1356. Lahteenmaki P, Bardin CW, Elomaa K, et al.;
1345. Kyriakidis AV, Perysinakis I, Alexandris I, et al.; Selection and performance of the levonorgestrel-releasing
Parecoxib sodium in the treatment of postoperative pain intrauterine system. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl.
after Lichtenstein tension-free mesh inguinal hernia repair. 1997;164:69-74. PMID: 9225643. X-2, X-3, X-4
Hernia. 2011 Feb;15(1):59-64. PMID: 20957399. X-2, X-
3, X-4 1357. Lahteenmaki P, Haukkamaa M, Puolakka J, et al.;
Open randomised study of use of levonorgestrel releasing
1346. La Vecchia C, Parazzini F, Negri E, et al.; Breast intrauterine system as alternative to hysterectomy. BMJ.
cancer and combined oral contraceptives: an Italian case- 1998 Apr 11;316(7138):1122-6. PMID: 9552948. X-2, X-
control study. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1989 3, X-4
Nov;25(11):1613-8. PMID: 2591454. X-4
1358. Lai KC, Chu KM, Hui WM, et al.; Celecoxib
1347. Laan W, Selten JP, Grobbee DE, et al.; Non- compared with lansoprazole and naproxen to prevent
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of psychosis. gastrointestinal ulcer complications. Am J Med. 2005
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2007 Mar;17(4):309-11. Nov;118(11):1271-8. PMID: 16271912. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 17097858. X-2, X-3, X-4
1359. Lai KC, Lam SK, Chu KM, et al.; Lansoprazole
1348. Labenz J, Peitz U, Kohl H, et al.; Helicobacter reduces ulcer relapse after eradication of Helicobacter
pylori increases the risk of peptic ulcer bleeding: a case- pylori in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug users--a
control study. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 randomized trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Oct
Mar;31(2):110-5. PMID: 10363194. X-2, X-3, X-4 15;18(8):829-36. PMID: 14535877. X-2, X-3, X-4

1349. Lachance K, Savoie M, Bernard M, et al.; Oral 1360. Lai KC, Lam SK, Chu KM, et al.; Lansoprazole for
ferrous sulfate does not increase preoperative hemoglobin the prevention of recurrences of ulcer complications from
in patients scheduled for hip or knee arthroplasty. Ann long-term low-dose aspirin use. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun
Pharmacother. 2011 Jun;45(6):764-70. PMID: 21666087. 27;346(26):2033-8. PMID: 12087138. X-2, X-3, X-4
X-2, X-3, X-4
1361. Laibovitz RA, Koester J, Schaich L, et al.; Safety
1350. LaCivita C, Funkhouser E, Miller MJ, et al.; and efficacy of diclofenac sodium 0.1% ophthalmic
Patient-reported communications with pharmacy staff at solution in acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. J Ocul
community pharmacies: the Alabama NSAID Patient Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Fall;11(3):361-8. PMID: 8590268.
Safety Study, 2005-2007. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 X-2, X-3, X-4
Sep-Oct;49(5):e110-7. PMID: 20797933. X-2, X-3
1362. Laine L; NSAID-induced gastroduodenal injury:
1351. Lacroix I, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Bagheri H, et al.; what's the score? Gastroenterology. 1991 Aug;101(2):555-
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced liver injury: a 7. PMID: 2065932. X-1, X-2
case-control study in primary care. Fundam Clin
Pharmacol. 2004 Apr;18(2):201-6. PMID: 15066135. X-2 1363. Laine L, Connors LG, Reicin A, et al.; Serious
lower gastrointestinal clinical events with nonselective
1352. LaDuca JR, Bouman PH, Gaspari AA; Nonsteroidal NSAID or coxib use. Gastroenterology. 2003
antiinflammatory drug-induced pseudoporphyria: a case Feb;124(2):288-92. PMID: 12557133. X-4

L-62
1364. Laine L, Curtis SP, Cryer B, et al.; Risk factors for 1375. Lanas A, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Arroyo MT, et al.;
NSAID-associated upper GI clinical events in a long-term Effect of antisecretory drugs and nitrates on the risk of
prospective study of 34 701 arthritis patients. Aliment ulcer bleeding associated with nonsteroidal anti-
Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Nov;32(10):1240-8. PMID: inflammatory drugs, antiplatelet agents, and anticoagulants.
20955443. X-4 Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Mar;102(3):507-15. PMID:
17338735. X-4
1365. Laine L, Curtis SP, Langman M, et al.; Lower
gastrointestinal events in a double-blind trial of the cyclo- 1376. Lanas A, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Arroyo MT, et al.;
oxygenase-2 selective inhibitor etoricoxib and the Risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding associated
traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac. with selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, traditional
Gastroenterology. 2008 Nov;135(5):1517-25. PMID: non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin
18823986. X-4 and combinations. Gut. 2006 Dec;55(12):1731-8. PMID:
16687434. X-4
1366. Laine L, Goldkind L, Curtis SP, et al.; How
common is diclofenac-associated liver injury? Analysis of 1377. Lanas A, Garcia-Tell G, Armada B, et al.;
17,289 arthritis patients in a long-term prospective clinical Prescription patterns and appropriateness of NSAID
trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Feb;104(2):356-62. PMID: therapy according to gastrointestinal risk and
19174782. X-4, X-7 cardiovascular history in patients with diagnoses of
osteoarthritis. BMC Med. 2011;9:38. PMID: 21489310.
1367. Laine L, Sloane R, Ferretti M, et al.; A randomized X-4
double-blind comparison of placebo, etodolac, and
naproxen on gastrointestinal injury and prostaglandin 1378. Lanas A, Hirschowitz BI; Significant role of aspirin
production. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Nov;42(5):428-33. use in patients with esophagitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1991
PMID: 8566633. X-2 Dec;13(6):622-7. PMID: 1761835. X-2, X-3, X-4

1368. Laine L, Wogen J, Yu H; Gastrointestinal health 1379. Lanas A, Remacha B, Sainz R, et al.; Study of
care resource utilization with chronic use of COX-2- outcome after targeted intervention for peptic ulcer
specific inhibitors versus traditional NSAIDs. resistant to acid suppression therapy. Am J Gastroenterol.
Gastroenterology. 2003 Aug;125(2):389-95. PMID: 2000 Feb;95(2):513-9. PMID: 10685760. X-2
12891540. X-4
1380. Lanas A, Rodrigo L, Marquez JL, et al.; Low
1369. Laine LA, Bentley E, Chandrasoma P; Effect of oral frequency of upper gastrointestinal complications in a
iron therapy on the upper gastrointestinal tract. A cohort of high-risk patients taking low-dose aspirin or
prospective evaluation. Dig Dis Sci. 1988 Feb;33(2):172-7. NSAIDS and omeprazole. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003
PMID: 3257437. X-2, X-4 Jul;38(7):693-700. PMID: 12889553. X-2, X-4

1370. Lal S, Kriplani A, Kulshrestha V, et al.; Efficacy of 1381. Lanas A, Sekar MC, Hirschowitz BI; Objective
mifepristone in reducing intermenstrual vaginal bleeding in evidence of aspirin use in both ulcer and nonulcer upper
users of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Int J and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology. 1992
Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 May;109(2):128-30. PMID: Sep;103(3):862-9. PMID: 1499936. X-2, X-4
20223454. X-2, X-3, X-4
1382. Lanas A, Serrano P, Bajador E, et al.; Risk of upper
1371. Lalau JD, Race JM; Lactic acidosis in metformin gastrointestinal bleeding associated with non-aspirin
therapy. Drugs. 1999;58 Suppl 1:55-60; discussion 75-82. cardiovascular drugs, analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-
PMID: 10576527. X-1, X-4 inflammatory drugs. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003
Feb;15(2):173-8. PMID: 12560762. X-4
1372. Lanas A, Bajador E, Serrano P, et al.; Effects of
nitrate and prophylactic aspirin on upper gastrointestinal 1383. Lang BA, Finlayson LA; Naproxen-induced
bleeding: a retrospective case-control study. J Int Med Res. pseudoporphyria in patients with juvenile rheumatoid
1998 Jun-Jul;26(3):120-8. PMID: 9718466. X-2, X-4 arthritis. J Pediatr. 1994 Apr;124(4):639-42. PMID:
8151484. X-2
1373. Lanas A, Bajador E, Serrano P, et al.;
Nitrovasodilators, low-dose aspirin, other nonsteroidal 1384. Lange R, Lentz R; Comparison ketoprofen,
antiinflammatory drugs, and the risk of upper ibuprofen and naproxen sodium in the treatment of tension-
gastrointestinal bleeding. N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep type headache. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1995;21(3):89-96.
21;343(12):834-9. PMID: 10995862. X-4 PMID: 7555617. X-2, X-4

1374. Lanas A, Fuentes J, Benito R, et al.; Helicobacter 1385. Langeveld JW, Lycklama a Nijeholt AA, Jonas U;
pylori increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding Oestrogen in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma. What is
in patients taking low-dose aspirin. Aliment Pharmacol the safe and effective dose of ethinyloestradiol? Br J Urol.
Ther. 2002 Apr;16(4):779-86. PMID: 11929396. X-2, X-4 1989 Jan;63(1):76-9. PMID: 2920266. X-2, X-4

L-63
Bleeding. Lancet. 1991 Jan 12;337(8733):85-9. PMID:
1386. Langman M, Kahler KH, Kong SX, et al.; Drug 1670734. X-4
switching patterns among patients taking non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs: a retrospective cohort study of a 1397. Laporte JR, Ibanez L, Vidal X, et al.; Upper
general practitioners database in the United Kingdom. gastrointestinal bleeding associated with the use of
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 Oct-Nov;10(6):517-24. NSAIDs: newer versus older agents. Drug Saf.
PMID: 11828834. X-3, X-4 2004;27(6):411-20. PMID: 15144234. X-4

1387. Langman M, Kong SX, Zhang Q, et al.; Safety and 1398. Larsen A, Kvien TK, Schattenkirchner M, et al.;
patient tolerance of standard and slow-release formulations Slowing of disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis
of NSAIDs. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003 Jan- patients during long-term treatment with leflunomide or
Feb;12(1):61-6. PMID: 12616849. X-4 sulfasalazine. Scand J Rheumatol. 2001;30(3):135-42.
PMID: 11469522. X-2, X-3, X-4
1388. Langman MJ; Anti-inflammatory drug intake and
the risk of ulcer complications. Med Toxicol. 1986;1 Suppl 1399. Larsen K, Tos M; A long-term follow-up study of
1:34-8. PMID: 3493403. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4 nasal polyp patients after simple polypectomies. Eur Arch
Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;254 Suppl 1:S85-8. PMID:
1389. Langman MJ; Ulcer complications associated with 9065636. X-2, X-3
anti-inflammatory drug use. What is the extent of the
disease burden? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 Jan- 1400. Larsson B, Hagstrom B, Viberg L, et al.; Long-term
Feb;10(1):13-9. PMID: 11417061. X-7 clinical experience with the Cu-7-IUD. Evaluation of a
prospective study. Contraception. 1981 Apr;23(4):387-97.
1390. Langman MJ, Weil J, Wainwright P, et al.; Risks of PMID: 7273759. X-2, X-4
bleeding peptic ulcer associated with individual non-
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Lancet. 1994 Apr 1401. Lassen A, Hallas J, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB;
30;343(8905):1075-8. PMID: 7909103. X-7 Complicated and uncomplicated peptic ulcers in a Danish
county 1993-2002: a population-based cohort study. Am J
1391. Lanza LL, Walker AM, Bortnichak EA, et al.; Gastroenterol. 2006 May;101(5):945-53. PMID: 16573778.
Peptic ulcer and gastrointestinal hemorrhage associated X-4
with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in patients
younger than 65 years. A large health maintenance 1402. Lassise DL, Savitz DA, Hamman RF, et al.;
organization cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Jul Invasive cervical cancer and intrauterine device use. Int J
10;155(13):1371-7. PMID: 7794085. X-4 Epidemiol. 1991 Dec;20(4):865-70. PMID: 1800424. X-2,
X-4
1392. Lao CS; Application of CUSUM technique and
beta-binomial model in monitoring adverse drug reactions. 1403. Lassner KJ, Chen CH, Kropsch LA, et al.;
J Biopharm Stat. 1997 May;7(2):227-39. PMID: 9136066. Comparative study of safety and efficacy of IUD insertions
X-4 by physicians and nursing personnel in Brazil. Bull Pan Am
Health Organ. 1995 Sep;29(3):206-15. PMID: 8520606. X-
1393. Lapane KL, Spooner JJ, Mucha L, et al.; Effect of 3, X-4
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use on the rate of
gastrointestinal hospitalizations among people living in 1404. Laszlo A, Kelly JP, Kaufman DE, et al.; Clinical
long-term care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 May;49(5):577-84. aspects of upper gastrointestinal bleeding associated with
PMID: 11380750. X-7 the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Am J
Gastroenterol. 1998 May;93(5):721-5. PMID: 9625116.
1394. Lapane KL, Spooner JJ, Pettitt D; The effect of X-2, X-4
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the use of
gastroprotective medication in people with arthritis. Am J 1405. Lawrenson R, Todd JC, Leydon GM, et al.;
Manag Care. 2001 Apr;7(4):402-8. PMID: 11310194. X-3, Validation of the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in
X-4 general practice database studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol.
2000 Jun;49(6):591-6. PMID: 10848723. X-2, X-3, X-4
1395. Lapeyre-Mestre M, de Castro AM, Bareille MP, et
al.; Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related hepatic 1406. Layton D, Heeley E, Hughes K, et al.; Comparison
damage in France and Spain: analysis from national of the incidence rates of selected gastrointestinal events
spontaneous reporting systems. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. reported for patients prescribed rofecoxib and meloxicam
2006 Aug;20(4):391-5. PMID: 16867024. X-4 in general practice in England using prescription-event
monitoring data. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003
1396. Laporte JR, Carne X, Vidal X, et al.; Upper May;42(5):622-31. PMID: 12709537. X-2, X-4
gastrointestinal bleeding in relation to previous use of
analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. 1407. Layton D, Heeley E, Shakir SA; Identification and
Catalan Countries Study on Upper Gastrointestinal evaluation of a possible signal of exacerbation of colitis
during rofecoxib treatment, using Prescription-Event

L-64
Monitoring data. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2004 Apr;29(2):171- 1418. Lee TY, Yang YS, Tseng LH, et al.; Norplant-2
81. PMID: 15068407. X-4 subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan. J
Formos Med Assoc. 1993 May;92(5):446-50. PMID:
1408. Layton D, Hughes K, Harris S, et al.; Comparison 8104598. X-2, X-4
of the incidence rates of selected gastrointestinal events
reported for patients prescribed celecoxib and meloxicam 1419. Leeyaphan C, Kulthanan K, Jongjarearnprasert K, et
in general practice in England using prescription-event al.; Drug-induced angioedema without urticaria:
monitoring (PEM) data. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 prevalence and clinical features. J Eur Acad Dermatol
Nov;42(11):1332-41. PMID: 12810929. X-4 Venereol. 2010 Jun;24(6):685-91. PMID: 19925599. X-4

1409. Layton D, Riley J, Wilton LV, et al.; Safety profile 1420. Legeby M, Sandelin K, Wickman M, et al.;
of rofecoxib as used in general practice in England: results Analgesic efficacy of diclofenac in combination with
of a prescription-event monitoring study. Br J Clin morphine and paracetamol after mastectomy and immediate
Pharmacol. 2003 Feb;55(2):166-74. PMID: 12580988. X- breast reconstruction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005
4 Oct;49(9):1360-6. PMID: 16146476. X-2, X-3, X-4

1410. Layton D, Souverein PC, Heerdink ER, et al.; 1421. Legras A, Giraudeau B, Jonville-Bera AP, et al.; A
Evaluation of risk profiles for gastrointestinal and multicentre case-control study of nonsteroidal anti-
cardiovascular adverse effects in nonselective NSAID and inflammatory drugs as a risk factor for severe sepsis and
COX-2 inhibitor users: a cohort study using pharmacy septic shock. Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R43. PMID: 19331665.
dispensing data in The Netherlands. Drug Saf. X-2, X-4
2008;31(2):143-58. PMID: 18217790. X-4
1422. Lehtinen K, Kaarela K, Ahonen M, et al.; A six-
1411. Lebbe M, Hubinont C, Bernard P, et al.; Outcome month follow-up study of a slow-release indomethacin
of 100 pregnancies initiated under treatment with tablet in rheumatic diseases. Clin Rheumatol. 1987
cabergoline in hyperprolactinaemic women. Clin Dec;6(4):606-7. PMID: 3329590. X-1
Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010 Aug;73(2):236-42. PMID:
20455894. X-2 1423. LeLorier J; Patterns of prescription of nonsteroidal
antiinflammatory drugs and gastroprotective agents. J
1412. Lee CH, Wang JD, Chen PC; Increased risk of Rheumatol Suppl. 1995 Feb;43:26-7. PMID: 7752128. X-
hospitalization for acute hepatitis in patients with previous 4, X-7
exposure to NSAIDs. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010
Jul;19(7):708-14. PMID: 20582911. X-4 1424. Lemberg A, Fernandez MA, Coll C, et al.; Reyes's
syndrome, encephalopathy, hyperammonemia and acetyl
1413. Lee J, Rajadurai VS, Tan KW, et al.; Randomized salicylic acid ingestion in a city hospital of Buenos Aires,
trial of prolonged low-dose versus conventional-dose Argentina. Curr Drug Saf. 2009 Jan;4(1):17-21. PMID:
indomethacin for treating patent ductus arteriosus in very 19149521. X-2, X-3, X-4
low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2003 Aug;112(2):345-
50. PMID: 12897285. X-2, X-3, X-4 1425. Lemmel EM, Leeb B, De Bast J, et al.; Patient and
physician satisfaction with aceclofenac: results of the
1414. Lee MC, Lee S, Suh DC, et al.; A cross-sectional European Observational Cohort Study (experience with
retrospective assessment of anti-arthritic drugs in patients aceclofenac for inflammatory pain in daily practice).
with arthritis in Korea. Curr Med Res Opin. Aceclofenac is the treatment of choice for patients and
2003;19(7):597-602. PMID: 14606981. X-2, X-3, X-4 physicians in the management of inflammatory pain. Curr
Med Res Opin. 2002;18(3):146-53. PMID: 12094824. X-3,
1415. Lee SC, Rha DW, Chang WH; Rapid analgesic X-4
onset of intra-articular hyaluronic acid with ketorolac in
osteoarthritis of the knee. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 1426. Leonardi C, Strober B, Gottlieb AB, et al.; Long-
2011;24(1):31-8. PMID: 21248398. X-2, X-3, X-4 term safety and efficacy of etanercept in patients with
psoriasis: an open-label study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2010
1416. Lee SH, Han CD, Yang IH, et al.; Prescription Aug;9(8):928-37. PMID: 20684143. X-2, X-3, X-4
pattern of NSAIDs and the prevalence of NSAID-induced
gastrointestinal risk factors of orthopaedic patients in 1427. Leonhardt A, Strehl R, Barth H, et al.; High
clinical practice in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2011 efficacy and minor renal effects of indomethacin treatment
Apr;26(4):561-7. PMID: 21468265. X-4 during individualized fluid intake in premature infants with
patent ductus arteriosus. Acta Paediatr. 2004
1417. Lee TA, Bartle B, Weiss KB; Impact of NSAIDS Feb;93(2):233-40. PMID: 15046280. X-2, X-4
on mortality and the effect of preexisting coronary artery
disease in US veterans. Am J Med. 2007 Jan;120(1):98 e9- 1428. Lera G, Vaamonde J, Rodriguez M, et al.;
16. PMID: 17208086. X-4, X-6 Cabergoline in Parkinson's disease: long-term follow-up.
Neurology. 1993 Dec;43(12):2587-90. PMID: 7902970.
X-2

L-65
Transnational Research Group on Oral Contraceptives and
1429. Leroy S, Marc E, Bavoux F, et al.; Hospitalization the Health of Young Women. BMJ. 1996 Jan
for severe bacterial infections in children after exposure to 13;312(7023):88-90. PMID: 8555936. X-2, X-4
NSAIDs: a prospective adverse drug reaction reporting
study. Clin Drug Investig. 2010;30(3):179-85. PMID: 1440. Li CF, Lee SS, Pun TC; A pilot study on the
20155990. X-2 acceptability of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device
by young, single, nulliparous Chinese females following
1430. Lesko SM, Louik C, Vezina RM, et al.; Asthma surgical abortion. Contraception. 2004 Mar;69(3):247-50.
morbidity after the short-term use of ibuprofen in children. PMID: 14969674. X-2, X-3, X-4
Pediatrics. 2002 Feb;109(2):E20. PMID: 11826230. X-4
1441. Li CF, Wong CY, Chan CP, et al.; A study of co-
1431. Lesko SM, O'Brien KL, Schwartz B, et al.; Invasive treatment of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
group A streptococcal infection and nonsteroidal (NSAIDs) with misoprostol for cervical priming before
antiinflammatory drug use among children with primary suction termination of first trimester pregnancy.
varicella. Pediatrics. 2001 May;107(5):1108-15. PMID: Contraception. 2003 Feb;67(2):101-5. PMID: 12586320.
11331694. X-2 X-2

1432. Lete I, del Carme Cuesta M, Marin JM, et al.; 1442. Li CH, Chang WH, Shih SC, et al.; Perforated
Acceptability of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in peptic ulcer in southeastern Taiwan. J Gastroenterol
the long-term treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding: how Hepatol. 2010 Sep;25(9):1530-6. PMID: 20796151. X-2,
many women choose to use a second device? Eur J Obstet X-3, X-4
Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Jan;154(1):67-70. PMID:
20728261. X-2, X-3 1443. Li CI, Beaber EF, Tang MT, et al.; Effect of depo-
medroxyprogesterone acetate on breast cancer risk among
1433. Lete I, Obispo C, Izaguirre F, et al.; The women 20 to 44 years of age. Cancer Res. 2012 Apr
levonorgestrel intrauterine system (Mirena) for treatment of 15;72(8):2028-35. PMID: 22369929. X-2
idiopathic menorrhagia. Assessment of quality of life and
satisfaction. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008 1444. Li DK, Liu L, Odouli R; Exposure to non-steroidal
Sep;13(3):231-7. PMID: 18609346. X-2, X-4 anti-inflammatory drugs during pregnancy and risk of
miscarriage: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2003
1434. Levi Z, Rozen P, Hazazi R, et al.; Sensitivity, but Aug 16;327(7411):368. PMID: 12919986. X-2
not specificity, of a quantitative immunochemical fecal
occult blood test for neoplasia is slightly increased by the 1445. Li L; A conditional sequential sampling procedure
use of low-dose aspirin, NSAIDs, and anticoagulants. Am J for drug safety surveillance. Stat Med. 2009 Nov
Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr;104(4):933-8. PMID: 19293792. 10;28(25):3124-38. PMID: 19691034. X-1, X-2
X-2, X-3
1446. Li Voti G, Acierno C, Tulone V, et al.; Relationship
1435. Levine RA, Petokas S, Nandi J, et al.; Effects of between upper gastrointestinal bleeding and non steroidal
nonsteroidal, antiinflammatory drugs on gastrointestinal anti-inflammatory drugs in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 1997
injury and prostanoid generation in healthy volunteers. Dig Apr;12(4):264-5. PMID: 9099642. X-2
Dis Sci. 1988 Jun;33(6):660-6. PMID: 3371138. X-2, X-4
1447. Li Y, Chen F, Zhou L, et al.; COC use, ACE/AGT
1436. Levy R, Matitiau A, Ben Arie A, et al.; gene polymorphisms, and risk of stroke. Pharmacogenet
Indomethacin and corticosteroids: an additive constrictive Genomics. 2010 May;20(5):298-306. PMID: 20300047.
effect on the fetal ductus arteriosus. Am J Perinatol. X-2, X-4
1999;16(8):379-83. PMID: 10772195. X-2, X-3, X-4
1448. Liao EY, Luo XH, Deng XG, et al.; The effect of
1437. Lewis JD, Schinnar R, Bilker WB, et al.; Validation low dose nylestriol-levonorgestrel replacement therapy on
studies of the health improvement network (THIN) bone mineral density in women with postmenopausal
database for pharmacoepidemiology research. osteoporosis. Endocr Res. 2003 May;29(2):217-26. PMID:
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Apr;16(4):393-401. 12856809. X-2, X-4
PMID: 17066486. X-2, X-3, X-4
1449. Liao WC, Hou MC, Chang CJ, et al.; Potential
1438. Lewis JD, Strom BL, Localio AR, et al.; Moderate precipitating factors of esophageal variceal bleeding: a
and high affinity serotonin reuptake inhibitors increase the case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011
risk of upper gastrointestinal toxicity. Pharmacoepidemiol Jan;106(1):96-103. PMID: 20823836. X-2, X-3, X-4
Drug Saf. 2008 Apr;17(4):328-35. PMID: 18188866. X-2,
X-3, X-4 1450. Licata A, Calvaruso V, Cappello M, et al.; Clinical
course and outcomes of drug-induced liver injury:
1439. Lewis MA, Spitzer WO, Heinemann LA, et al.; nimesulide as the first implicated medication. Dig Liver
Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of myocardial Dis. 2010 Feb;42(2):143-8. PMID: 19625223. X-2, X-4
infarction: an international case-control study.

L-66
1462. Lipscomb GR, Campbell F, Rees WD; The
1451. Lidegaard O; The influence of thrombotic risk influence of age, gender, Helicobacter pylori and smoking
factors when oral contraceptives are prescribed. A control- on gastric mucosal adaptation to non-steroidal anti-
only study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997 inflammatory drugs. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997
Mar;76(3):252-60. PMID: 9093141. X-2 Oct;11(5):907-12. PMID: 9354199. X-2

1452. Lidegaard O, Kreiner S; Cerebral thrombosis and 1463. Lipscomb GR, Rees WD; Gastric mucosal injury
oral contraceptives. A case-control study. Contraception. and adaptation to oral and rectal administration of
1998 May;57(5):303-14. PMID: 9673837. X-2 naproxen. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1996 Apr;10(2):133-8.
PMID: 8730240. X-2, X-4
1453. Lidegaard O, Lokkegaard E, Svendsen AL, et al.;
Hormonal contraception and risk of venous 1464. Lipson A, Stoy DB, LaRosa JC, et al.; Progestins
thromboembolism: national follow-up study. BMJ. and oral contraceptive-induced lipoprotein changes: a
2009;339:b2890. PMID: 19679613. X-4 prospective study. Contraception. 1986 Aug;34(2):121-34.
PMID: 3096633. X-2, X-4
1454. Liguori L; Iron protein succinylate in the treatment
of iron deficiency: controlled, double-blind, multicenter 1465. Lipworth L, Friis S, Blot WJ, et al.; A population-
clinical trial on over 1,000 patients. Int J Clin Pharmacol based cohort study of mortality among users of ibuprofen
Ther Toxicol. 1993 Mar;31(3):103-23. PMID: 8468108. X- in Denmark. Am J Ther. 2004 May-Jun;11(3):156-63.
2, X-3, X-4 PMID: 15133529. X-4

1455. Lim CH, Heatley RV; Prospective study of acute 1466. Lisse J, Espinoza L, Zhao SZ, et al.; Functional
gastrointestinal bleeding attributable to anti-inflammatory status and health-related quality of life of elderly
drug ingestion in the Yorkshire region of the United osteoarthritic patients treated with celecoxib. J Gerontol A
Kingdom. Postgrad Med J. 2005 Apr;81(954):252-4. Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M167-75. PMID:
PMID: 15811890. X-2 11253158. X-2, X-4

1456. Lindegard B, Hillbom M, Brody S; High-dose 1467. Lisse JR, Perlman M, Johansson G, et al.;
estrogen-progestagen oral contraceptives: a risk factor for Gastrointestinal tolerability and effectiveness of rofecoxib
aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage? Acta Neurol Scand. versus naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a
1987 Jul;76(1):37-45. PMID: 3630643. X-4 randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Oct
7;139(7):539-46. PMID: 14530224. X-4
1457. Lindh I, Ellstrom AA, Milsom I; The long-term
influence of combined oral contraceptives on body weight. 1468. Liu MY, Lin HH, Chen PC; Duodenal ulcer
Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1917-24. PMID: 21507999. hemorrhage with and without dyspepsia. Am J
X-2 Gastroenterol. 1990 Oct;85(10):1343-5. PMID: 2220727.
X-2, X-3, X-4
1458. Lindoff C, Rybo G, Astedt B; Treatment with
tranexamic acid during pregnancy, and the risk of thrombo- 1469. Liu NJ, Lee CS, Tang JH, et al.; Outcomes of
embolic complications. Thromb Haemost. 1993 Aug bleeding peptic ulcers: a prospective study. J Gastroenterol
2;70(2):238-40. PMID: 8236125. X-8 Hepatol. 2008 Aug;23(8 Pt 2):e340-7. PMID: 17944885.
X-2, X-4
1459. Lindquist M, Pettersson M, Edwards IR, et al.; How
does cystitis affect a comparative risk profile of tiaprofenic 1470. Livesey JR, Watson MG, Kelly PJ, et al.; Do
acid with other non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs? An patients with epistaxis have drug-induced platelet
international study based on spontaneous reports and drug dysfunction? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1995
usage data. ADR Signals Analysis Project (ASAP) Team. Oct;20(5):407-10. PMID: 8582070. X-2
Pharmacol Toxicol. 1997 May;80(5):211-7. PMID:
9181599. X-2, X-4 1471. Ljung R, Lu Y, Lagergren J; High concomitant use
of interacting drugs and low use of gastroprotective drugs
1460. Lindvall G, Sartipy U, Ivert T, et al.; Aprotinin is among NSAID users in an unselected elderly population: a
not associated with postoperative renal impairment after nationwide register-based study. Drugs Aging. 2011 Jun
primary coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 1;28(6):469-76. PMID: 21639406. X-4
Jul;86(1):13-9. PMID: 18573391. X-2, X-3, X-4
1472. Llorente Melero MJ, Tenias Burillo JM, Del Val
1461. Liossis SN, Bounas A, Andonopoulos AP; Antonana A, et al.; Influence of nonsteroidal anti-
Mycophenolate mofetil as first-line treatment improves inflammatory drugs on clinical course in upper
clinically evident early scleroderma lung disease. gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1999
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Aug;45(8):1005-8. PMID: Jul;91(7):497-507. PMID: 10477368. X-2
16490756. X-2, X-3, X-4
1473. Llorente Melero MJ, Tenias Burillo JM, Zaragoza
Marcet A; Comparative incidence of upper gastrointestinal

L-67
bleeding associated with individual non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2002 1484. Ludwig M, Schwartz P, Babahan B, et al.; Luteal
Jan;94(1):7-18. PMID: 12073673. X-4 phase support using either Crinone 8% or Utrogest: results
of a prospective, randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
1474. Lockhat FB, Emembolu JO, Konje JC; The Reprod Biol. 2002 Jun 10;103(1):48-52. PMID: 12039463.
evaluation of the effectiveness of an intrauterine- X-2, X-3, X-4
administered progestogen (levonorgestrel) in the
symptomatic treatment of endometriosis and in the staging 1485. Luisi S, Razzi S, Lazzeri L, et al.; Efficacy of
of the disease. Hum Reprod. 2004 Jan;19(1):179-84. vaginal danazol treatment in women with menorrhagia
PMID: 14688179. X-2, X-3, X-4 during fertile age. Fertil Steril. 2009 Oct;92(4):1351-4.
PMID: 18930222. X-2, X-4
1475. Lockhat FB, Emembolu JO, Konje JC; The
efficacy, side-effects and continuation rates in women with 1486. Lukes AS, Moore KA, Muse KN, et al.; Tranexamic
symptomatic endometriosis undergoing treatment with an acid treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized
intra-uterine administered progestogen (levonorgestrel): a 3 controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;116(4):865-75.
year follow-up. Hum Reprod. 2005 Mar;20(3):789-93. PMID: 20859150. X-2
PMID: 15608040. X-2, X-4
1487. Lund SS, Tarnow L, Stehouwer CD, et al.;
1476. Lockie LM; Tolerability and efficacy of long-term Targeting hyperglycaemia with either metformin or
daily administration of indomethacin for moderate to repaglinide in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes:
severe chronic arthritic disorders. Clin Ther. results from a randomized crossover trial. Diabetes Obes
1986;8(4):398-405. PMID: 3731210. X-2, X-4 Metab. 2007 May;9(3):394-407. PMID: 17391168. X-2, X-
3, X-4
1477. Loebstein R, Dushinat M, Vesterman-Landes J, et
al.; Database evaluation of the effects of long-term 1488. Lundberg GD; Esomeprazole prevents aspirin-
rosiglitazone treatment on cardiovascular outcomes in induced ulcers. Medscape J Med. 2008;10(12):285. PMID:
patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 19242591. X-4
Feb;51(2):173-80. PMID: 20484611. X-3
1489. Lundgren R, Sundin T, Colleen S, et al.;
1478. Lombroso GL, vicariotto F, Quaranta S, et al.; Cardiovascular complications of estrogen therapy for
Study of a new intrauterine device, the multiload 250 CU. nondisseminated prostatic carcinoma. A preliminary report
Acta Eur Fertil. 1980 Sep;11(3):221-4. PMID: 7468105. from a randomized multicenter study. Scand J Urol
X-2, X-3, X-4 Nephrol. 1986;20(2):101-5. PMID: 3529368. X-2, X-4

1479. Loperfido S, Monica F, Maifreni L, et al.; Bleeding 1490. Lundstrom E, Christow A, Kersemaekers W, et al.;
peptic ulcer occurring in hospitalized patients: analysis of Effects of tibolone and continuous combined hormone
predictive and risk factors and comparison with out-of- replacement therapy on mammographic breast density. Am
hospital onset of hemorrhage. Dig Dis Sci. 1994 J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Apr;186(4):717-22. PMID:
Apr;39(4):698-705. PMID: 8149834. X-2 11967497. X-2, X-4

1480. Lopez G, Rodriguez A, Rengifo J, et al.; Two-year 1491. Lundstrom E, Wilczek B, von Palffy Z, et al.;
prospective study in Colombia of Norplant implants. Obstet Mammographic breast density during hormone replacement
Gynecol. 1986 Aug;68(2):204-8. PMID: 3090492. X-2, X- therapy: effects of continuous combination, unopposed
4 transdermal and low-potency estrogen regimens.
Climacteric. 2001 Mar;4(1):42-8. PMID: 11379377. X-2
1481. Loughlin J, Seeger JD, Eng PM, et al.; Risk of
hyperkalemia in women taking 1492. Luo JC, Lin HY, Chang FY, et al.; Occurrence of
ethinylestradiol/drospirenone and other oral contraceptives. peptic ulcer disease in connective tissue disease patients
Contraception. 2008 Nov;78(5):377-83. PMID: 18929734. associated with xerostomia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003
X-4 Jan;17(2):217-24. PMID: 12534406. X-2

1482. Luchese S, Manica JL, Zielinsky P; Intrauterine 1493. Lurie G, Thompson P, McDuffie KE, et al.;
ductus arteriosus constriction: analysis of a historic cohort Association of estrogen and progestin potency of oral
of 20 cases. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2003 Oct;81(4):405-10, 399- contraceptives with ovarian carcinoma risk. Obstet
404. PMID: 14666282. X-2, X-3, X-4 Gynecol. 2007 Mar;109(3):597-607. PMID: 17329510. X-
4
1483. Lucky AW, Henderson TA, Olson WH, et al.;
Effectiveness of norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol in 1494. Luthra UK, Mitra AB, Prabhakar AK, et al.; Copper
treating moderate acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. containing intrauterine devices and cervical carcinogenesis-
1997 Nov;37(5 Pt 1):746-54. PMID: 9366821. X-2, X-3, -48 months follow up. Indian J Med Res. 1980
X-4 Nov;72:659-64. PMID: 7203566. X-4

L-68
1495. Luyckx AS, Gaspard UJ, Romus MA, et al.; syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Dec;93(12):1290-6.
Carbohydrate metabolism in women who used oral PMID: 3801360. X-2, X-3, X-4
contraceptives containing levonorgestrel or desogestrel: a
6-month prospective study. Fertil Steril. 1986 1506. Mahmood M, Malone DC, Skrepnek GH, et al.;
May;45(5):635-42. PMID: 2938985. X-2, X-3, X-4 Potential drug-drug interactions within Veterans Affairs
medical centers. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007 Jul
1496. Lyytinen HK, Dyba T, Ylikorkala O, et al.; A case- 15;64(14):1500-5. PMID: 17617500. X-3, X-4
control study on hormone therapy as a risk factor for breast
cancer in Finland: Intrauterine system carries a risk as well. 1507. Maia H, Jr., Casoy J, Correia T, et al.; Activation of
Int J Cancer. 2010 Jan 15;126(2):483-9. PMID: 19588504. NF-kappaB and COX-2 expression is associated with
X-7 breakthrough bleeding in patients using oral contraceptives
in extended regimens. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010
1497. Maca SM, Amon M, Findl O, et al.; Efficacy and Apr;26(4):265-9. PMID: 19757243. X-2, X-4, X-5
tolerability of preservative-free and preserved diclofenac
and preserved ketorolac eyedrops after cataract surgery. 1508. Maiden L, Thjodleifsson B, Seigal A, et al.; Long-
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 May;149(5):777-84. PMID: term effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and
20152959. X-2, X-3, X-4 cyclooxygenase-2 selective agents on the small bowel: a
cross-sectional capsule enteroscopy study. Clin
1498. MacDonald MR, Eurich DT, Majumdar SR, et al.; Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Sep;5(9):1040-5. PMID:
Treatment of type 2 diabetes and outcomes in patients with 17625980. X-2
heart failure: a nested case-control study from the U.K.
General Practice Research Database. Diabetes Care. 2010 1509. Maieron R, Stimac D, Avellini C, et al.; Acute
Jun;33(6):1213-8. PMID: 20299488. X-3 gastrointestinal bleeding due to Meckel's diverticulum
heterotopic gastric mucosa. Ital J Gastroenterol. 1996
1499. MacDonald TM, Morant SV, Goldstein JL, et al.; May;28(4):225-8. PMID: 8842839. X-2
Channelling bias and the incidence of gastrointestinal
haemorrhage in users of meloxicam, coxibs, and older, 1510. Maj S, Centkowski P; A prospective study of the
non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Gut. incidence of agranulocytosis and aplastic anemia associated
2003 Sep;52(9):1265-70. PMID: 12912856. X-4 with the oral use of metamizole sodium in Poland. Med Sci
Monit. 2004 Sep;10(9):PI93-5. PMID: 15328493. X-3, X-4
1500. MacDonald TM, Morant SV, Robinson GC, et al.;
Association of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of non- 1511. Maj S, Lis Y; The incidence of metamizole sodium-
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with continued exposure: induced agranulocytosis in Poland. J Int Med Res. 2002
cohort study. BMJ. 1997 Nov 22;315(7119):1333-7. PMID: Sep-Oct;30(5):488-95. PMID: 12449518. X-4
9402773. X-7
1512. Major CA, Lewis DF, Harding JA, et al.; Tocolysis
1501. Machado RB, de Melo NR, Maia H, Jr., et al.; with indomethacin increases the incidence of necrotizing
Effect of a continuous regimen of contraceptive enterocolitis in the low-birth-weight neonate. Am J Obstet
combination of ethinylestradiol and drospirenone on lipid, Gynecol. 1994 Jan;170(1 Pt 1):102-6. PMID: 8296809. X-
carbohydrate and coagulation profiles. Contraception. 2010 2, X-4
Feb;81(2):102-6. PMID: 20103445. X-2
1513. Malgarinos G, Gikas A, Delicha E, et al.; Pregnancy
1502. Madan J, Fiascone J, Balasubramanian V, et al.; and inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective case-control
Predictors of ductal closure and intestinal complications in study. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2007 Jul-
very low birth weight infants treated with indomethacin. Sep;111(3):613-9. PMID: 18293689. X-2, X-3, X-4
Neonatology. 2008;94(1):45-51. PMID: 18196930. X-2, X-
3, X-4 1514. Malhotra S, Jain S, Pandhi P; Drug-related visits to
the medical emergency department: a prospective study
1503. Maddali MM, Rajakumar MC; Tranexamic acid and from India. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Jan;39(1):12-
primary coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective 8. PMID: 11204932. X-4
study. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2007 Aug;15(4):313-
9. PMID: 17664205. X-2, X-3, X-4 1515. Malik MH, Gray J, Kay PR; Early aseptic loosening
of cemented total hip arthroplasty: the influence of non-
1504. Mafuva C, Djarova T, Matarira HT; Influence of steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and smoking. Int Orthop.
combined oral contraceptives on the onset of cervical 2004 Aug;28(4):211-3. PMID: 15048587. X-2, X-4
intraepithelial neoplasia. Afr J Health Sci. 2002 Jul-
Dec;9(3-4):129-37. PMID: 17298156. X-2 1516. Mamdani M, Juurlink DN, Lee DS, et al.; Cyclo-
oxygenase-2 inhibitors versus non-selective non-steroidal
1505. Magos AL, Brewster E, Singh R, et al.; The effects anti-inflammatory drugs and congestive heart failure
of norethisterone in postmenopausal women on oestrogen outcomes in elderly patients: a population-based cohort
replacement therapy: a model for the premenstrual study. Lancet. 2004 May 29;363(9423):1751-6. PMID:
15172772. X-4

L-69
urinary levels of collagen type II C-telopeptide degradation
1517. Mamdani M, Rochon P, Juurlink DN, et al.; Effect products and on the serum levels of hyaluronan and matrix
of selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors and naproxen on metalloproteinases-3 and -13 in patients with flare-up of
short-term risk of acute myocardial infarction in the osteoarthritis. Drugs R D. 2005;6(5):261-71. PMID:
elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Feb 24;163(4):481-6. 16128596. X-2
PMID: 12588209. X-7
1528. Manji RA, Grocott HP, Leake J, et al.; Seizures
1518. Mamdani M, Rochon PA, Juurlink DN, et al.; following cardiac surgery: the impact of tranexamic acid
Observational study of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage and other risk factors. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;59(1):6-13.
in elderly patients given selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 PMID: 22065333. X-8
inhibitors or conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs. BMJ. 2002 Sep 21;325(7365):624. PMID: 1529. Manning BJ, O'Brien N, Aravindan S, et al.; The
12242172. X-7 effect of aspirin on blood loss and transfusion requirements
in patients with femoral neck fractures. Injury. 2004
1519. Mamdani M, Warren L, Kopp A, et al.; Changes in Feb;35(2):121-4. PMID: 14736467. X-2, X-4
rates of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage after the
introduction of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in British 1530. Mansfield JC, Greenaway JR, Contractor BR, et al.;
Columbia and Ontario. CMAJ. 2006 Dec 5;175(12):1535- Open access gastroscopy findings are unrelated to the use
8. PMID: 17146090. X-4, X-7 of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Br J
Gen Pract. 1997 Dec;47(425):825-6. PMID: 9463986. X-4
1520. Man CY, Cheung IT, Cameron PA, et al.;
Comparison of oral prednisolone/paracetamol and oral 1531. Manson JE, Hsia J, Johnson KC, et al.; Estrogen
indomethacin/paracetamol combination therapy in the plus progestin and the risk of coronary heart disease. N
treatment of acute goutlike arthritis: a double-blind, Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 7;349(6):523-34. PMID: 12904517.
randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2007 X-7
May;49(5):670-7. PMID: 17276548. X-2, X-4
1532. Mao K, Guillebaud J; Influence of removal of
1521. Manas MD, Domper A, Albillos A, et al.; intrauterine contraceptive devices on colonisation of the
Endoscopic follow-up of gastric ulcer in a population at cervix by actinomyces-like organisms. Contraception. 1984
intermediate risk for gastric cancer. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. Dec;30(6):535-44. PMID: 6529911. X-2, X-4
2009 May;101(5):317-24. PMID: 19527077. X-2, X-3, X-4
1533. Maoz KB, Brenner S; Drug rash with eosinophilia
1522. Mangan SA, Larsen PG, Hudson S; Overweight and systemic symptoms syndrome: sex and the causative
teens at increased risk for weight gain while using depot agent. Skinmed. 2007 Nov-Dec;6(6):271-3. PMID:
medroxyprogesterone acetate. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 17975358. X-2, X-3, X-4
2002 Apr;15(2):79-82. PMID: 12057528. X-2
1534. Marini H, Bitto A, Altavilla D, et al.; Breast safety
1523. Mangano DT, Tudor IC, Dietzel C; The risk and efficacy of genistein aglycone for postmenopausal
associated with aprotinin in cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. bone loss: a follow-up study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
2006 Jan 26;354(4):353-65. PMID: 16436767. X-3 2008 Dec;93(12):4787-96. PMID: 18796517. X-2, X-4

1524. Mangoni AA, Woodman RJ, Gaganis P, et al.; Use 1535. Marini H, Bitto A, Altavilla D, et al.; Efficacy of
of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of genistein aglycone on some cardiovascular risk factors and
incident myocardial infarction and heart failure, and all- homocysteine levels: A follow-up study. Nutr Metab
cause mortality in the Australian veteran community. Br J Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 Jun;20(5):332-40. PMID: 19631515.
Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jun;69(6):689-700. PMID: X-2, X-4
20565461. X-7
1536. Marks M, Gravitt PE, Gupta SB, et al.; Combined
1525. Mangoni AA, Woodman RJ, Gilbert AL, et al.; Use oral contraceptive use increases HPV persistence but not
of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of new HPV detection in a cohort of women from Thailand. J
ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in the Australian veteran Infect Dis. 2011 Nov 15;204(10):1505-13. PMID:
community. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 21964399. X-2
May;19(5):490-8. PMID: 20437458. X-4, X-7
1537. Marpeau L, Bouillie J, Barrat J, et al.; Obstetrical
1526. Manguso F, Riccio E, Nucci G, et al.; Helicobacter advantages and perinatal risks of indomethacin: a report of
pylori infection in bleeding peptic ulcer patients after non- 818 cases. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1994 Mar-Apr;9(2):110-5.
steroidal antiinflammatory drug consumption. World J PMID: 8185837. X-2, X-4
Gastroenterol. 2011 Oct 28;17(40):4509-16. PMID:
22110282. X-2 1538. Marshall SF, Bernstein L, Anton-Culver H, et al.;
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and breast cancer
1527. Manicourt DH, Bevilacqua M, Righini V, et al.; risk by stage and hormone receptor status. J Natl Cancer
Comparative effect of nimesulide and ibuprofen on the Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):805-12. PMID: 15928301. X-4

L-70
Steril. 2002 Nov;78(5):1010-6. PMID: 12413986. X-2, X-
1539. Marteau P, Tennenbaum R, Elefant E, et al.; Foetal 3, X-4
outcome in women with inflammatory bowel disease
treated during pregnancy with oral mesalazine 1550. Mascarenhas L, van Beek A, Bennink HC, et al.; A
microgranules. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998 2-year comparative study of endometrial histology and
Nov;12(11):1101-8. PMID: 9845399. X-2, X-3, X-4 cervical cytology of contraceptive implant users in
Birmingham, UK. Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3057-60.
1540. Martin BK, Szekely C, Brandt J, et al.; Cognitive PMID: 9853856. X-2, X-3, X-4
function over time in the Alzheimer's Disease Anti-
inflammatory Prevention Trial (ADAPT): results of a 1551. Massai MR, Diaz S, Quinteros E, et al.;
randomized, controlled trial of naproxen and celecoxib. Contraceptive efficacy and clinical performance of
Arch Neurol. 2008 Jul;65(7):896-905. PMID: 18474729. Nestorone implants in postpartum women. Contraception.
X-7 2001 Dec;64(6):369-76. PMID: 11834236. X-2, X-4

1541. Martin HL, Jr., Nyange PM, Richardson BA, et al.; 1552. Massai MR, Pavez M, Fuentealba B, et al.; Effect of
Hormonal contraception, sexually transmitted diseases, and intermittent treatment with mifepristone on bleeding
risk of heterosexual transmission of human patterns in Norplant implant users. Contraception. 2004
immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Infect Dis. 1998 Jul;70(1):47-54. PMID: 15208052. X-2, X-3, X-4
Oct;178(4):1053-9. PMID: 9806034. X-8
1553. Massaro M, Di Carlo C, Gargano V, et al.; Effects
1542. Martin K, Breuer T, Gertler R, et al.; Tranexamic of the contraceptive patch and the vaginal ring on bone
acid versus varepsilon-aminocaproic acid: efficacy and metabolism and bone mineral density: a prospective,
safety in paediatric cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac controlled, randomized study. Contraception. 2010
Surg. 2011 Jun;39(6):892-7. PMID: 21115357. X-2 Mar;81(3):209-14. PMID: 20159176. X-2, X-4

1543. Martin K, Knorr J, Breuer T, et al.; Seizures after 1554. Masse PG, Livingstone MM, Duguay C, et al.;
open heart surgery: comparison of epsilon-aminocaproic Testing the tyrosine/catecholamine hypothesis of oral
acid and tranexamic acid. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. contraceptive-induced psychological side-effects: a
2011 Feb;25(1):20-5. PMID: 21272777. X-2 controlled study on triphasil. Ann Nutr Metab.
2001;45(3):102-9. PMID: 11423701. X-2
1544. Martin K, Wiesner G, Breuer T, et al.; The risks of
aprotinin and tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery: a one- 1555. Massimo Claar G, Monaco S, Del Veccho Blanco C,
year follow-up of 1188 consecutive patients. Anesth Analg. et al.; Omeprazole 20 or 40 mg daily for healing
2008 Dec;107(6):1783-90. PMID: 19020118. X-2 gastroduodenal ulcers in patients receiving non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998
1545. Martin RM, Biswas P, Mann RD; The incidence of May;12(5):463-8. PMID: 9663727. X-2, X-3, X-4
adverse events and risk factors for upper gastrointestinal
disorders associated with meloxicam use amongst 19,087 1556. Masso Gonzalez EL, Garcia Rodriguez LA; Proton
patients in general practice in England: cohort study. Br J pump inhibitors reduce the long-term risk of recurrent
Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Jul;50(1):35-42. PMID: 10886116. upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an observational study.
X-4 Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Sep 1;28(5):629-37. PMID:
18616644. X-2, X-3, X-4
1546. Martinez-Ramirez HR, Jalomo-Martinez B, Cortes-
Sanabria L, et al.; Renal function preservation in type 2 1557. Mastalerz L, Sanak M, Gawlewicz-Mroczka A, et
diabetes mellitus patients with early nephropathy: a al.; Prostaglandin E2 systemic production in patients with
comparative prospective cohort study between primary asthma with and without aspirin hypersensitivity. Thorax.
health care doctors and a nephrologist. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Jan;63(1):27-34. PMID: 17584993. X-3, X-4
2006 Jan;47(1):78-87. PMID: 16377388. X-2, X-3, X-4
1558. Masters T, Everett S, May M, et al.; Outcomes at 1
1547. Martini AC, Molina RI, Tissera AD, et al.; Analysis year for the first 200 patients fitted with GyneFix at
of semen from patients chronically treated with low or Margaret Pyke Centre. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health
moderate doses of aspirin-like drugs. Fertil Steril. 2003 Care. 2002 Jun;7(2):65-70. PMID: 12201324. X-2, X-4
Jul;80(1):221-2. PMID: 12849830. X-2, X-6
1559. Matikainen M, Kangas E; Relation of the use of
1548. Maru S, Koch GG, Stender M, et al.; Antidiabetic analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
drugs and heart failure risk in patients with type 2 diabetes (NSAIDs) to upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a preliminary
in the U.K. primary care setting. Diabetes Care. 2005 report of a Finnish case-control prospective study.
Jan;28(1):20-6. PMID: 15616228. X-3 Pharmacol Toxicol. 1994;75 Suppl 2:51-2. PMID:
7816782. X-2
1549. Maruo T, Mishell DR, Ben-Chetrit A, et al.;
Vaginal rings delivering progesterone and estradiol may be 1560. Matikainen M, Kangas E; Is there a relationship
a new method of hormone replacement therapy. Fertil between the use of analgesics and non-steroidal anti-

L-71
inflammatory drugs and acute upper gastrointestinal and potentially interacting drugs. Contraception. 2007
bleeding? A Finnish case-control prospective study. Scand Oct;76(4):278-81. PMID: 17900437. X-4
J Gastroenterol. 1996 Sep;31(9):912-6. PMID: 8888440.
X-2, X-4 1572. McAfee AT, Koro C, Landon J, et al.; Coronary
heart disease outcomes in patients receiving antidiabetic
1561. Matson SC, Henderson KA, McGrath GJ; Physical agents. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Jul;16(7):711-
findings and symptoms of depot medroxyprogesterone 25. PMID: 17551989. X-3
acetate use in adolescent females. J Pediatr Adolesc
Gynecol. 1997 Feb;10(1):18-23. PMID: 9061630. X-2 1573. McAlister FA, Eurich DT, Majumdar SR, et al.; The
risk of heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes treated
1562. Matsumoto T, Esaki M, Kurahara K, et al.; Double- with oral agent monotherapy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2008
contrast barium enteroclysis as a patency tool for Jul;10(7):703-8. PMID: 18571471. X-3
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced enteropathy.
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Nov;56(11):3247-53. PMID: 21567189. 1574. McAlister FA, Ghali WA, Gong Y, et al.; Aspirin
X-2, X-3, X-4 use and outcomes in a community-based cohort of 7352
patients discharged after first hospitalization for heart
1563. Matsumoto T, Iida M, Matsui T, et al.; Non-specific failure. Circulation. 2006 Jun 6;113(22):2572-8. PMID:
multiple ulcers of the small intestine unrelated to non- 16735672. X-4
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Clin Pathol. 2004
Nov;57(11):1145-50. PMID: 15509673. X-2, X-3, X-4 1575. McCarthy CJ, McDermott M, Hourihane D, et al.;
Chemical gastritis induced by naproxen in the absence of
1564. Matsumoto T, Nakamura S, Esaki M, et al.; Helicobacter pylori infection. J Clin Pathol. 1995
Endoscopic features of chronic nonspecific multiple ulcers Jan;48(1):61-3. PMID: 7706522. X-2, X-4
of the small intestine: comparison with nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory drug-induced enteropathy. Dig Dis Sci. 2006 1576. McCarthy T, Ramachandran L, Huang HS, et al.;
Aug;51(8):1357-63. PMID: 16868823. X-2, X-3, X-4 Postabortion insertion of the Nova T and MLCu250:
preliminary results of a comparative study. Adv
1565. Matsuno K, Kunihiro E, Yamatoya O, et al.; Contracept. 1985 Jun;1(2):161-5. PMID: 3842217. X-2, X-
Surveillance of adverse reactions due to ciprofloxacin in 4
Japan. Drugs. 1995;49 Suppl 2:495-6. PMID: 8549413. X-
4 1577. McFarlane-Anderson N, Bazuaye PE, Jackson MD,
et al.; Cervical dysplasia and cancer and the use of
1566. Matteson EL, Yachyshyn V, Yachyshyn J, et al.; hormonal contraceptives in Jamaican women. BMC
Trends in hospitalizations for gastrointestinal bleeding Womens Health. 2008;8:9. PMID: 18513406. X-2
among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Rochester,
Minnesota, 1950-1991. J Rheumatol. 1995 1578. McGavigan CJ, Dockery P, Metaxa-Mariatou V, et
Aug;22(8):1471-7. PMID: 7473468. X-2, X-3, X-4 al.; Hormonally mediated disturbance of angiogenesis in
the human endometrium after exposure to intrauterine
1567. Matthewson K, Pugh S, Northfield TC; Which levonorgestrel. Hum Reprod. 2003 Jan;18(1):77-84. PMID:
peptic ulcer patients bleed? Gut. 1988 Jan;29(1):70-4. 12525444. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 3343016. X-2, X-3
1579. McGettigan P, Han P, Henry D; Cyclooxygenase-2
1568. Matthieu L, Meuleman L, Van Hecke E, et al.; inhibitors and coronary occlusion--exploring dose-response
Contact and photocontact allergy to ketoprofen. The relationships. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Sep;62(3):358-65.
Belgian experience. Contact Dermatitis. 2004 PMID: 16934052. X-2, X-4
Apr;50(4):238-41. PMID: 15186381. X-2, X-4
1580. McGettigan P, Han P, Jones L, et al.; Selective
1569. May FW, Rowett DS, Gilbert AL, et al.; Outcomes COX-2 inhibitors, NSAIDs and congestive heart failure:
of an educational-outreach service for community medical differences between new and recurrent cases. Br J Clin
practitioners: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Med J Pharmacol. 2008 Jun;65(6):927-34. PMID: 18384446. X-2,
Aust. 1999 May 17;170(10):471-4. PMID: 10376022. X-2, X-3, X-4
X-3, X-4
1581. McGonigle KF, Karlan BY, Barbuto DA, et al.;
1570. Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Katz BP, et al.; Development of endometrial cancer in women on estrogen
Comparison of general internists, family physicians, and and progestin hormone replacement therapy. Gynecol
rheumatologists managing patients with symptoms of Oncol. 1994 Oct;55(1):126-32. PMID: 7959253. X-2, X-4
osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Care Res. 1997
Oct;10(5):289-99. PMID: 9362595. X-2, X-3, X-4 1582. McGough P, Bigrigg A; Effect of depot
medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone density in a Scottish
1571. McAdams M, Staffa JA, Dal Pan GJ; The industrial city. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007
concomitant prescribing of ethinyl estradiol/drospirenone Sep;12(3):253-9. PMID: 17763264. X-2

L-72
1583. McGwin G, Jr., Sims RV, Pulley L, et al.; Relations 1594. Meirik O, Farley TM, Sivin I; Safety and efficacy
among chronic medical conditions, medications, and of levonorgestrel implant, intrauterine device, and
automobile crashes in the elderly: a population-based case- sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;97(4):539-47.
control study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Sep 1;152(5):424-31. PMID: 11275025. X-4
PMID: 10981455. X-2, X-3, X-4
1595. Meirik O, Rowe PJ, Peregoudov A, et al.; The
1584. McKenna PJ, Mylotte MJ; Laparoscopic removal of frameless copper IUD (GyneFix) and the TCu380A IUD:
translocated intrauterine contraceptives devices. Br J Obstet results of an 8-year multicenter randomized comparative
Gynaecol. 1982 Feb;89(2):163-5. PMID: 6461352. X-2, X- trial. Contraception. 2009 Aug;80(2):133-41. PMID:
3, X-4 19631788. X-4

1585. McKenna TJ, Cunningham SK; A role for a non- 1596. Meisel AD; Clinical benefits and comparative
androgenic anovulant in the management of hirsutism. Ir J safety of piroxicam. Analysis of worldwide clinical trials
Med Sci. 1991 Jul;160(7):194-6. PMID: 1757211. X-2, X- data. Am J Med. 1986 Nov 28;81(5B):15-21. PMID:
3, X-4 3538866. X-1, X-4

1586. McLaurin VL, Dunson BA, Dunson TR; A 1597. Mejersjo C, Wenneberg B; Diclofenac sodium and
comparative study of 35 mcg and 50 mcg combined oral occlusal splint therapy in TMJ osteoarthritis: a randomized
contraceptives: results from a multicenter clinical trial. controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Oct;35(10):729-38.
Contraception. 1991 Nov;44(5):489-503. PMID: 1797464. PMID: 18482350. X-2, X-3, X-4
X-4
1598. Mellemkjaer L, Blot WJ, Sorensen HT, et al.; Upper
1587. McLeod RS, Wolff BG, Steinhart AH, et al.; gastrointestinal bleeding among users of NSAIDs: a
Prophylactic mesalamine treatment decreases postoperative population-based cohort study in Denmark. Br J Clin
recurrence of Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology. 1995 Pharmacol. 2002 Feb;53(2):173-81. PMID: 11851641. X-
Aug;109(2):404-13. PMID: 7615189. X-2, X-3, X-4 4

1588. McMahon AD; Observation and experiment with 1599. Meloni A, Melis M, Alba E, et al.; Medical therapy
the efficacy of drugs: a warning example from a cohort of in the management of preterm birth. J Matern Fetal
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and ulcer-healing drug Neonatal Med. 2009;22 Suppl 3:72-6. PMID: 19925364.
users. Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Sep 15;154(6):557-62. PMID: X-1
11549561. X-4
1600. Mendoza N, Pison JA, Fernandez M, et al.;
1589. McMahon AD, Evans JM, MacDonald TM; Prospective, randomised study with three HRT regimens in
Hypersensitivity reactions associated with exposure to postmenopausal women with an intact uterus. Maturitas.
naproxen and ibuprofen: a cohort study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Apr 25;41(4):289-98. PMID: 12034516. X-2
2001 Dec;54(12):1271-4. PMID: 11750197. X-4
1601. Menges M, Chan CC, Zeitz M, et al.; Higher
1590. McPherson C, Gal P, Ransom JL, et al.; concentration of matrix-metalloproteinase 1 (interstitial
Indomethacin pharmacodynamics are altered by surfactant: collagenase) in H. pylori-compared to NSAID-induced
a possible challenge to current indomethacin dosing gastric ulcers. Z Gastroenterol. 2000 Nov;38(11):887-91.
guidelines created before surfactant availability. Pediatr PMID: 11132534. X-2, X-3, X-4
Cardiol. 2010 May;31(4):505-10. PMID: 20063159. X-2,
X-3, X-4 1602. Menniti-Ippolito F, Sagliocca L, Da Cas R, et al.;
Niflumic acid and cutaneous reactions in children. Arch
1591. Meeker ND, Goldsby R, Terrill KR, et al.; Dapsone Dis Child. 2001 May;84(5):430-1. PMID: 11316692. X-4
therapy for children with immune thrombocytopenic
purpura. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003 Feb;25(2):173-5. 1603. Ment LR, Oh W, Ehrenkranz RA, et al.; Low-dose
PMID: 12571474. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4 indomethacin and prevention of intraventricular
hemorrhage: a multicenter randomized trial. Pediatrics.
1592. Mehta S, Dasarathy S, Tandon RK, et al.; A 1994 Apr;93(4):543-50. PMID: 8134206. X-2, X-3, X-4
prospective randomized study of the injurious effects of
aspirin and naproxen on the gastroduodenal mucosa in 1604. Ment LR, Vohr B, Allan W, et al.; Outcome of
patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Gastroenterol. children in the indomethacin intraventricular hemorrhage
1992 Aug;87(8):996-1000. PMID: 1642224. X-2 prevention trial. Pediatrics. 2000 Mar;105(3 Pt 1):485-91.
PMID: 10699097. X-2, X-4
1593. Mehta S, Lang B; Long-term followup of naproxen-
induced pseudoporphyria in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. 1605. Mercadante S, David F, Riina S, et al.; Injustifiable
Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Oct;42(10):2252-4. PMID: use of gastroprotection in advanced cancer patients. Palliat
10524703. X-2 Med. 2007 Oct;21(7):631-3. PMID: 17942503. X-2, X-3,
X-4

L-73
1606. Mercadante S, Fusco F, Valle A, et al.; Factors 50 patients. Acta Orthop. 2009 Feb;80(1):46-50. PMID:
involved in gastrointestinal bleeding in advanced cancer 19234885. X-2, X-3, X-4
patients followed at home. Support Care Cancer. 2004
Feb;12(2):95-8. PMID: 14673626. X-2, X-3 1617. Meunier A, Lisander B, Good L; Effects of
celecoxib on blood loss, pain, and recovery of function
1607. Merki-Feld GS, Gosewinkel A, Imthurn B, et al.; after total knee replacement: a randomized placebo-
Tubal pathology: the role of hormonal contraception, controlled trial. Acta Orthop. 2007 Oct;78(5):661-7. PMID:
intrauterine device use and Chlamydia trachomatis 17966026. X-2, X-3, X-4
infection. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2007;63(2):114-20.
PMID: 17095873. X-2, X-4 1618. Meyer AM, Ramzan NN, Heigh RI, et al.; Relapse
of inflammatory bowel disease associated with use of
1608. Merki-Feld GS, Neff M, Keller PJ; A 2-year nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Dig Dis Sci. 2006
prospective study on the effects of depot Jan;51(1):168-72. PMID: 16416231. X-2
medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone mass-response to
estrogen and calcium therapy in individual users. 1619. Michaelis J, Michaelis H, Gluck E, et al.;
Contraception. 2003 Feb;67(2):79-86. PMID: 12586317. Prospective study of suspected associations between certain
X-2 drugs administered during early pregnancy and congenital
malformations. Teratology. 1983 Feb;27(1):57-64. PMID:
1609. Merki-Feld GS, Rosselli M, Dubey RK, et al.; 6845218. X-4
Long-term effects of combined oral contraceptives on
markers of endothelial function and lipids in healthy 1620. Micu MC, Micu R, Ostensen M; Luteinized
premenopausal women. Contraception. 2002 unruptured follicle syndrome increased by inactive disease
Mar;65(3):231-6. PMID: 11929645. X-2, X-4 and selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors in women with
inflammatory arthropathies. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken).
1610. Merki-Feld GS, Schwarz D, Imthurn B, et al.; 2011 Sep;63(9):1334-8. PMID: 21618455. X-2, X-3
Partial and complete expulsion of the Multiload 375 IUD
and the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD after correct insertion. 1621. Mikaeloff Y, Kezouh A, Suissa S; Nonsteroidal
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Mar;137(1):92-6. anti-inflammatory drug use and the risk of severe skin and
PMID: 17353086. X-2 soft tissue complications in patients with varicella or zoster
disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Feb;65(2):203-9.
1611. Merry AF, Sidebotham DA, Middleton NG, et al.; PMID: 18251759. X-4
Tenoxicam 20 mg or 40 mg after thoracotomy: a
prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 1622. Mikos M, Grzanka P, Sladek K, et al.; High-
study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002 Apr;30(2):160-6. resolution computed tomography evaluation of peripheral
PMID: 12002922. X-2, X-4 airways in asthma patients: comparison of focal and diffuse
air trapping. Respiration. 2009;77(4):381-8. PMID:
1612. Mertens JC, Willemsen G, Van Saase JL, et al.; 18577849. X-2, X-3, X-4
Polymyalgia rheumatica and temporal arteritis: a
retrospective study of 111 patients. Clin Rheumatol. 1995 1623. Milam MR, Pollock JW, Nick AM, et al.; The effect
Nov;14(6):650-5. PMID: 8608683. X-2, X-4 of hormonal contraception on the adequacy of colposcopic
examination of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005
1613. Mesker T, van Rheenen PF, Norbruis OF, et al.; May;192(5):1368-9. PMID: 15902111. X-2, X-3, X-4
Pediatric Crohn's disease activity at diagnosis, its influence
on pediatrician's prescribing behavior, and clinical outcome 1624. Milano M; Increased risk for dental caries in
5 years later. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009 Nov;15(11):1670- asthmatic children. Tex Dent J. 1999 Sep;116(9):35-42.
7. PMID: 19418567. X-2, X-3, X-4 PMID: 10860081. X-2

1614. Messeri A, Busoni P, Noccioli B, et al.; Analgesic 1625. Miller K; Effect of gastric mucosal protection in
efficacy and tolerability of ketoprofen lysine salt vs nonrheumatoid patients with short-term nonsteroidal anti-
paracetamol in common paediatric surgery. A randomized, inflammatory drug therapy: a prospective randomized
single-blind, parallel, multicentre trial. Paediatr Anaesth. multicenter study. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997 May-
2003 Sep;13(7):574-8. PMID: 12950856. X-2, X-3, X-4 Jun;44(15):872-9. PMID: 9222707. X-2, X-3, X-4

1615. Metzner JE, Frank T, Kunz I, et al.; Study on the 1626. Miller L, Patton DL, Meier A, et al.;
pharmacokinetics of synthetic genistein after multiple oral Depomedroxyprogesterone-induced hypoestrogenism and
intake in post-menopausal women. Arzneimittelforschung. changes in vaginal flora and epithelium. Obstet Gynecol.
2009;59(10):513-20. PMID: 19998579. X-2, X-3, X-4 2000 Sep;96(3):431-9. PMID: 10960638. X-2

1616. Meunier A, Aspenberg P, Good L; Celecoxib does 1627. Millican S, Cottrell N, Green B; Do risk factors for
not appear to affect prosthesis fixation in total knee lactic acidosis influence dosing of metformin? J Clin Pharm
replacement: A randomized study using radiostereometry in Ther. 2004 Oct;29(5):449-54. PMID: 15482389. X-2, X-4

L-74
1628. Min KA, Zhu X, Oh JM, et al.; Effect of oxolamine
on anticoagulant effect of warfarin. Am J Health Syst 1640. Moggia AV, Harris GS, Dunson TR, et al.; A
Pharm. 2006 Jan 15;63(2):153-6. PMID: 16390929. X-4 comparative study of a progestin-only oral contraceptive
versus non-hormonal methods in lactating women in
1629. Miner P, Hanauer S, Robinson M, et al.; Safety and Buenos Aires, Argentina. Contraception. 1991
efficacy of controlled-release mesalamine for maintenance Jul;44(1):31-43. PMID: 1893700. X-2, X-4
of remission in ulcerative colitis. Pentasa UC Maintenance
Study Group. Dig Dis Sci. 1995 Feb;40(2):296-304. PMID: 1641. Moghetti P, Castello R, Negri C, et al.; Metformin
7851193. X-2, X-3, X-4 effects on clinical features, endocrine and metabolic
profiles, and insulin sensitivity in polycystic ovary
1630. Minocha A, Greenbaum DS, Gardiner J; Effect of syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on formation of 6-month trial, followed by open, long-term clinical
gallbladder stones. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1994 Dec;36(6):514- evaluation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Jan;85(1):139-
6. PMID: 7900267. X-2, X-4 46. PMID: 10634377. X-2, X-3, X-4

1631. Mira M, McNeil D, Fraser IS, et al.; Mefenamic 1642. Moghissi KS; Add-back therapy in the treatment of
acid in the treatment of premenstrual syndrome. Obstet endometriosis: the North American experience. Br J Obstet
Gynecol. 1986 Sep;68(3):395-8. PMID: 3526218. X-2, X- Gynaecol. 1996 Oct;103 Suppl 14:14. PMID: 8916981. X-
3, X-4 2

1632. Mishell DR, Jr., Roy S; Copper intrauterine 1643. Mogul HR, Peterson SJ, Weinstein BI, et al.;
contraceptive device event rates following insertion 4 to 8 Metformin and carbohydrate-modified diet: a novel obesity
weeks post partum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 May treatment protocol: preliminary findings from a case series
1;143(1):29-35. PMID: 7081309. X-2, X-3, X-4 of nondiabetic women with midlife weight gain and
hyperinsulinemia. Heart Dis. 2001 Sep-Oct;3(5):285-92.
1633. Misra JS, Engineer AD, Das K, et al.; Cervical PMID: 11975807. X-2, X-3, X-4
carcinogenesis and contraception. Diagn Cytopathol.
1991;7(4):346-52. PMID: 1935511. X-3 1644. Moise KJ, Jr.; Effect of advancing gestational age
on the frequency of fetal ductal constriction in association
1634. Misra JS, Engineer AD, Tandon P; Cervical with maternal indomethacin use. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
cytology associated with levonorgestrel contraception. Acta 1993 May;168(5):1350-3. PMID: 8498410. X-2, X-4
Cytol. 1995 Jan-Feb;39(1):45-9. PMID: 7847008. X-2
1645. Mok CC, Lau CS, Wong RW; Clinical
1635. Misra JS, Tandon P, Srivastava A, et al.; Cervical characteristics, treatment, and outcome of adult onset Still's
cytological studies in women inserted with Norplant-I disease in southern Chinese. J Rheumatol. 1998
contraceptive. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003 Sep;29(3):136-9. Dec;25(12):2345-51. PMID: 9858428. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 12951680. X-2, X-4
1646. Molina RC, Sandoval JZ, Montero AV, et al.;
1636. Mita H, Higashi N, Taniguchi M, et al.; Increase in Comparative performance of a combined injectable
urinary leukotriene B4 glucuronide concentration in contraceptive (50 mg norethisterone enanthate plus 5mg
patients with aspirin-intolerant asthma after intravenous estradiol valerate) and a combined oral contraceptive (0.15
aspirin challenge. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Aug;34(8):1262- mg levonorgestrel plus 0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol) in
9. PMID: 15298568. X-2, X-3, X-4 adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009
Feb;22(1):25-31. PMID: 19232299. X-2
1637. Miyake K, Ueki N, Suzuki K, et al.; Preventive
therapy for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced 1647. Momoeda M, Harada T, Terakawa N, et al.; Long-
ulcers in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the term use of dienogest for the treatment of endometriosis. J
current situation and a prospective controlled-study of the Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Dec;35(6):1069-76. PMID:
preventive effects of lansoprazole or famotidine. Aliment 20025633. X-2
Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Jun;21 Suppl 2:67-72. PMID:
15943850. X-2, X-3, X-4 1648. Mona Eng P, Seeger JD, Loughlin J, et al.; Serum
potassium monitoring for users of ethinyl
1638. Mockenhaupt M, Kelly JP, Kaufman D, et al.; The estradiol/drospirenone taking medications predisposing to
risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal hyperkalemia: physician compliance and survey of
necrolysis associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory knowledge and attitudes. Contraception. 2007
drugs: a multinational perspective. J Rheumatol. 2003 Feb;75(2):101-7. PMID: 17241838. X-2, X-3, X-4
Oct;30(10):2234-40. PMID: 14528522. X-4
1649. Monagle J, Molnar A, Shearer W; Oral medication
1639. Moffett BS, Wann TI, Carberry KE, et al.; Safety of for post-Caesarean analgesia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol.
ketorolac in neonates and infants after cardiac surgery. 1998 May;38(2):169-71. PMID: 9653853. X-2, X-4
Paediatr Anaesth. 2006 Apr;16(4):424-8. PMID: 16618297.
X-2, X-3, X-4

L-75
bias with NSAIDs. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004
1650. Montalto M, Curigliano V, Santoro L, et al.; Jun;13(6):345-53. PMID: 15170763. X-4
Prophylactic aspirin therapy does not increase faecal
calprotectin concentrations. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1661. Moreau C, Trussell J, Gilbert F, et al.; Oral
2006 Sep;18(9):965-7. PMID: 16894309. X-2, X-3, X-4 contraceptive tolerance: does the type of pill matter? Obstet
Gynecol. 2007 Jun;109(6):1277-85. PMID: 17540798. X-
1651. Monteiro I, Bahamondes L, Diaz J, et al.; 4
Therapeutic use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
system in women with menorrhagia: a pilot study(1). 1662. Morgando A, Giordanino C, Baronio M, et al.; Role
Contraception. 2002 May;65(5):325-8. PMID: 12057782. of Helicobacter pylori infection in peptic ulcer
X-2, X-3 haemorrhage. Minerva Med. 2006 Feb;97(1):47-50. PMID:
16565698. X-2
1652. Montes FR, Pardo DF, Carreno M, et al.; Risk
factors associated with postoperative seizures in patients 1663. Moride Y, Abenhaim L; Evidence of the depletion
undergoing cardiac surgery who received tranexamic acid: of susceptibles effect in non-experimental
a case-control study. Ann Card Anaesth. 2012 Jan- pharmacoepidemiologic research. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994
Mar;15(1):6-12. PMID: 22234015. X-2 Jul;47(7):731-7. PMID: 7722586. X-2, X-3, X-4

1653. Montes R, Nantes O, Alonso A, et al.; The 1664. Moride Y, Ducruet T, Boivin JF, et al.; Utilization
influence of polymorphisms of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 on of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Quebec:
major gastrointestinal bleeding risk in anticoagulated adherence to the Canadian consensus on prescription
patients. Br J Haematol. 2008 Dec;143(5):727-33. PMID: guidelines. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2005
18950464. X-2, X-3, X-4 Summer;12(2):e201-11. PMID: 15998959. X-3, X-4

1654. Moodley M, Sewart S, Herrington CS, et al.; The 1665. Moride Y, Ducruet T, Boivin JF, et al.; Prescription
interaction between steroid hormones, human channeling of COX-2 inhibitors and traditional
papillomavirus type 16, E6 oncogene expression, and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a
cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003 Nov- population-based case-control study. Arthritis Res Ther.
Dec;13(6):834-42. PMID: 14675321. X-2, X-3, X-4 2005;7(2):R333-42. PMID: 15743481. X-4

1655. Moon KW, Kim J, Kim JH, et al.; Risk factors for 1666. Morimoto LM, Newcomb PA, Ulrich CM, et al.;
acute kidney injury by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory Risk factors for hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps:
drugs in patients with hyperuricaemia. Rheumatology evidence for malignant potential? Cancer Epidemiol
(Oxford). 2011 Dec;50(12):2278-82. PMID: 22019809. X- Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Oct;11(10 Pt 1):1012-8. PMID:
2 12376501. X-2, X-3, X-4

1656. Moore N, Diris H, Martin K, et al.; NSAID use 1667. Morley-Forster P, Newton PT, Cook MJ; Ketorolac
profiles derived from reimbursement data in France. and indomethacin are equally efficacious for the relief of
Therapie. 2004 Sep-Oct;59(5):541-6. PMID: 15648307. X- minor postoperative pain. Can J Anaesth. 1993
2, X-3, X-4 Dec;40(12):1126-30. PMID: 8281587. X-2, X-3, X-4

1657. Moore RA, Derry S, McQuay HJ; Cyclo- 1668. Morris AJ, Murray L, Sturrock RD, et al.; Short
oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti- report: the effect of misoprostol on the anaemia of NSAID
inflammatory drugs: balancing gastrointestinal and enteropathy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1994 Jun;8(3):343-
cardiovascular risk. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 6. PMID: 7918931. X-2, X-3, X-4
2007;8:73. PMID: 17683540. X-4
1669. Morris CR, Harvey IM, Stebbings WS, et al.; Anti-
1658. Morabia A, Szklo M, Stewart W, et al.; Consistent inflammatory drugs, analgesics and the risk of perforated
lack of association between breast cancer and oral colonic diverticular disease. Br J Surg. 2003
contraceptives using either hospital or neighborhood Oct;90(10):1267-72. PMID: 14515298. X-4
controls. Prev Med. 1993 Mar;22(2):178-86. PMID:
8483857. X-2, X-4 1670. Morrison C, Waszak C, Katz K, et al.; Clinical
outcomes of two early postpartum IUD insertion programs
1659. Morales WJ, Madhav H; Efficacy and safety of in Africa. Contraception. 1996 Jan;53(1):17-21. PMID:
indomethacin compared with magnesium sulfate in the 8631184. X-2, X-3, X-4
management of preterm labor: a randomized study. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jul;169(1):97-102. PMID: 8333483. 1671. Morrison CS, Richardson BA, Celentano DD, et al.;
X-2, X-4 Prospective clinical trials designed to assess the use of
hormonal contraceptives and risk of HIV acquisition. J
1660. Morant SV, Pettitt D, MacDonald TM, et al.; Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005 Mar;38 Suppl 1:S17-8.
Application of a propensity score to adjust for channelling PMID: 15867602. X-8

L-76
1672. Mosis G, Dieleman JP, Stricker B, et al.; A 1683. Murata Y, Itakura A, Matsuzawa K, et al.; Possible
randomized database study in general practice yielded antenatal and perinatal related factors in development of
quality data but patient recruitment in routine consultation cystic periventricular leukomalacia. Brain Dev. 2005
was not practical. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 May;59(5):497- Jan;27(1):17-21. PMID: 15626536. X-2, X-3, X-4
502. PMID: 16632138. X-2, X-3, X-4
1684. Murkes D, Conner P, Leifland K, et al.; Effects of
1673. Motola D, Vargiu A, Leone R, et al.; Hepatic percutaneous estradiol-oral progesterone versus oral
adverse drug reactions: a case/non-case study in Italy. Eur J conjugated equine estrogens-medroxyprogesterone acetate
Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Jan;63(1):73-9. PMID: 17119945. on breast cell proliferation and bcl-2 protein in healthy
X-4 women. Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):1188-91. PMID:
21067727. X-2
1674. Motsko SP, Rascati KL, Busti AJ, et al.; Temporal
relationship between use of NSAIDs, including selective 1685. Muss HB, Case LD, Atkins JN, et al.; Tamoxifen
COX-2 inhibitors, and cardiovascular risk. Drug Saf. versus high-dose oral medroxyprogesterone acetate as
2006;29(7):621-32. PMID: 16808554. X-6, X-7 initial endocrine therapy for patients with metastatic breast
cancer: a Piedmont Oncology Association study. J Clin
1675. Moyes VJ, Metcalfe KA, Drake WM; Clinical use Oncol. 1994 Aug;12(8):1630-8. PMID: 8040675. X-2, X-3,
of cabergoline as primary and adjunctive treatment for X-4
acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008 Nov;159(5):541-5.
PMID: 18708434. X-2, X-3, X-4 1686. Muzii L, Marana R, Caruana P, et al.; Postoperative
administration of monophasic combined oral contraceptives
1676. Mudd PA, Katial RK, Alam R, et al.; Variations in after laparoscopic treatment of ovarian endometriomas: a
expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue prospective, randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000
inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in nasal mucosa of aspirin- Sep;183(3):588-92. PMID: 10992178. X-2, X-4
sensitive versus aspirin-tolerant patients with nasal
polyposis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 1687. Myer L, Denny L, Wright TC, et al.; Prospective
Oct;107(4):353-9. PMID: 21962096. X-2, X-3, X-4 study of hormonal contraception and women's risk of HIV
infection in South Africa. Int J Epidemiol. 2007
1677. Mudge DW, Tan KS, Miles R, et al.; Intravenous Feb;36(1):166-74. PMID: 17175547. X-8
versus oral iron supplementation for correction of post-
transplant anaemia in renal transplant patients. BMC 1688. Mylotte MJ, Loudon N; Interim insertion of
Nephrol. 2009;10:14. PMID: 19500381. X-1, X-2, X-3, X- Multiload Cu 250 IUCD. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982
4 Sep;89(Suppl 4):41-2. PMID: 6758838. X-2, X-4

1678. Mulberg AE, Linz C, Bern E, et al.; Identification 1689. Nachtigall LB, Valassi E, Lo J, et al.; Gender
of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-induced effects on cardiac valvular function in hyperprolactinaemic
gastroduodenal injury in children with juvenile rheumatoid patients receiving cabergoline: a retrospective study. Clin
arthritis. J Pediatr. 1993 Apr;122(4):647-9. PMID: Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010 Jan;72(1):53-8. PMID: 19508591.
8463919. X-2 X-2

1679. Muneyyirci-Delale O, Karacan M; Effect of 1690. Nachtigall MJ, Smilen SW, Nachtigall RD, et al.;
norethindrone acetate in the treatment of symptomatic Incidence of breast cancer in a 22-year study of women
endometriosis. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 1998 Jan- receiving estrogen-progestin replacement therapy. Obstet
Feb;43(1):24-7. PMID: 9532466. X-2, X-3 Gynecol. 1992 Nov;80(5):827-30. PMID: 1328978. X-2,
X-4
1680. Munger MA, Gardner SF, Ateshkadi A, et al.;
Misoprostol effects on diclofenac-induced cardiorenal 1691. Nagata C, Matsushita Y, Inaba S, et al.;
changes in salt-sensitive patients with hypertension: the Unapproved use of high-dose combined pills in Japan: a
MEDIC Study. Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Jul;28(7):834-42. community study on prevalence and health characteristics
PMID: 18576898. X-2, X-3, X-4 of the users. Prev Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;26(4):565-9. PMID:
9245680. X-4
1681. Munoz-Fernandez S, Hidalgo V, Fernandez-Melon
J, et al.; Sulfasalazine reduces the number of flares of 1692. Nahidi F, Jalalinia S; Comparing the complications
acute anterior uveitis over a one-year period. J Rheumatol. of 2 copper intrauterine devices: T380A and Cu-Safe 300.
2003 Jun;30(6):1277-9. PMID: 12784403. X-2, X-3, X-4 East Mediterr Health J. 2008 Jan-Feb;14(1):95-102. PMID:
18557456. X-2, X-4
1682. Munro FJ, Young SJ, Broome IJ, et al.; Intravenous
tenoxicam for analgesia following laparoscopic 1693. Najam R, Agarwal D, Tyagi R, et al.; Comparison
cholecystectomy. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998 of traneximic acid with a combination of traneximic acid
Feb;26(1):56-60. PMID: 9513669. X-3, X-4 and mefenamic acid in reducing menstrual blood loss in
ovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB). Journal of

L-77
Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2010;4(5):3020-5. X-2, 1704. Nesher G, Sonnenblick M, Dwolatzky T; Protective
X-3, X-4 effect of misoprostol on indomethacin induced renal
dysfunction in elderly patients. J Rheumatol. 1995
1694. Nakaoka S, Ishizaki T, Urushihara H, et al.; Apr;22(4):713-6. PMID: 7791169. X-2, X-3, X-4
Echocardiography for the detection of valvulopathy
associated with the use of ergot-derived dopamine agonists 1705. Nesher G, Zimran A, Hershko C; Reduced
in patients with Parkinson's disease. Intern Med. incidence of hyperkalemia and azotemia in patients
2011;50(7):687-94. PMID: 21467699. X-2, X-7 receiving sulindac compared with indomethacin. Nephron.
1988;48(4):291-5. PMID: 3362274. X-2, X-4
1695. Nakashima S, Arai S, Mizuno Y, et al.; A clinical
study of Japanese patients with ulcer induced by low-dose 1706. Ness RB, Dodge RC, Edwards RP, et al.;
aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Contraception methods, beyond oral contraceptives and
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Jun;21 Suppl 2:60-6. tubal ligation, and risk of ovarian cancer. Ann Epidemiol.
PMID: 15943849. X-2 2011 Mar;21(3):188-96. PMID: 21109450. X-4

1696. Nakayama M, Iwakiri R, Hara M, et al.; Low-dose 1707. Nessa A, Latif SA, Uddin MM, et al.; Serum HDL-
aspirin is a prominent cause of bleeding ulcers in patients cholesterol in women using low dose oral contraceptives.
who underwent emergency endoscopy. J Gastroenterol. Mymensingh Med J. 2007 Jul;16(2 Suppl):S3-6. PMID:
2009;44(9):912-8. PMID: 19436943. X-2, X-4 17917628. X-2, X-4

1697. Nakhai-Pour HR, Broy P, Sheehy O, et al.; Use of 1708. Nestrud RM, Hill DE, Arrington RW, et al.;
nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during Indomethacin treatment in patent ductus arteriosus. A
pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous abortion. CMAJ. double-blind study utilizing indomethacin plasma levels.
2011 Oct 18;183(15):1713-20. PMID: 21896698. X-4 Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1980;1(2-3):125-36. PMID: 6765467.
X-2, X-3, X-4
1698. Nanda K, Morrison CS, Kwok C, et al.;
Discontinuation of oral contraceptives and depot 1709. Nettis E, Colanardi MC, Ferrannini A, et al.;
medroxyprogesterone acetate among women with and Immune tolerance to drugs. (II).: Long-term tolerability of
without HIV in Uganda, Zimbabwe and Thailand. nimesulide in patients with NSAID hypersensitivity.
Contraception. 2011 Jun;83(6):542-8. PMID: 21570552. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2004 Aug;26(3):469-
X-4 80. PMID: 15518179. X-2, X-4

1699. Nankhonya JM, Datta-Chaudhuri ML, Bhan GL; 1710. Nettis E, Colanardi MC, Ferrannini A, et al.; Short-
Acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in older people: a term and long-term tolerability of rofecoxib in patients with
prospective study in two neighboring districts. J Am prior reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Geriatr Soc. 1997 Jun;45(6):752-4. PMID: 9180673. X-2, Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Jan;94(1):29-33.
X-3, X-4 PMID: 15702812. X-2, X-3, X-4

1700. Nappi C, Tommaselli GA, Morra I, et al.; Efficacy 1711. Nettis E, Colanardi MC, Paola RD, et al.; Tolerance
and tolerability of oral bovine lactoferrin compared to test in patients with multiple drug allergy syndrome.
ferrous sulfate in pregnant women with iron deficiency Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2001 Nov;23(4):617-
anemia: a prospective controlled randomized study. Acta 26. PMID: 11792020. X-2, X-3, X-4
Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(9):1031-5. PMID:
19639462. X-2, X-3, X-4 1712. Nettis E, Marcandrea M, Maggio GD, et al.;
Retrospective analysis of drug-induced urticaria and
1701. Narendranathan M, Chitra P, Kurien M, et al.; angioedema: a survey of 2287 patients. Immunopharmacol
Ketotifen in prevention of indomethacin-induced Immunotoxicol. 2001 Nov;23(4):585-95. PMID: 11792017.
gastropathy. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr- X-4
Jun;18(2):76-7. PMID: 10319538. X-2, X-3, X-4
1713. Neumann K; NIMRA-survey: NSAIDs impact on
1702. Neafsey PJ; Double trouble: acetaminophen mortality. Results of an Austrian Survey in 2006. Wien
increases the risk of upper GI complications for people Med Wochenschr. 2008;158(3-4):119-26. PMID:
taking NSAIDs. Home Healthc Nurse. 2004 Sep;22(9):641- 18330529. X-4
2. PMID: 15359177. X-1
1714. Neutel CI, Appel WC; The effect of alcohol abuse
1703. Nelson C, Rigel D, Smith S, et al.; Phase IV, open- on the risk of NSAID-related gastrointestinal events. Ann
label assessment of the treatment of actinic keratosis with Epidemiol. 2000 May;10(4):246-50. PMID: 10854958. X-
3.0% diclofenac sodium topical gel (Solaraze). J Drugs 4
Dermatol. 2004 Jul-Aug;3(4):401-7. PMID: 15303784. X-
2, X-3, X-4 1715. Neven P, Lunde T, Benedetti-Panici P, et al.; A
multicentre randomised trial to compare uterine safety of
raloxifene with a continuous combined hormone

L-78
replacement therapy containing oestradiol and circulatory arrest. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010
norethisterone acetate. BJOG. 2003 Feb;110(2):157-67. Feb;24(1):73-9. PMID: 19717314. X-2
PMID: 12618160. X-2, X-3, X-4
1727. Niebyl JR, Blake DA, White RD, et al.; The
1716. Ng A, Temple A, Smith G, et al.; Early analgesic inhibition of premature labor with indomethacin. Am J
effects of parecoxib versus ketorolac following Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Apr 15;136(8):1014-9. PMID:
laparoscopic sterilization: a randomized controlled trial. Br 7369252. X-2, X-3, X-4
J Anaesth. 2004 Jun;92(6):846-9. PMID: 15121727. X-2,
X-3, X-4 1728. Nielsen GL, Sorensen HT, Larsen H, et al.; Risk of
adverse birth outcome and miscarriage in pregnant users of
1717. Ng FH, Wong SY, Lam KF, et al.; Famotidine is non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: population based
inferior to pantoprazole in preventing recurrence of aspirin- observational study and case-control study. BMJ. 2001 Feb
related peptic ulcers or erosions. Gastroenterology. 2010 3;322(7281):266-70. PMID: 11157526. X-4
Jan;138(1):82-8. PMID: 19837071. X-2, X-3, X-4
1729. Nielsen GL, Sorensen HT, Mellemkjoer L, et al.;
1718. Ng JL, Morgan DJ, Loh NK, et al.; Life-threatening Risk of hospitalization resulting from upper gastrointestinal
hypokalaemia associated with ibuprofen-induced renal bleeding among patients taking corticosteroids: a register-
tubular acidosis. Med J Aust. 2011 Mar 21;194(6):313-6. based cohort study. Am J Med. 2001 Nov;111(7):541-5.
PMID: 21426288. X-2, X-4 PMID: 11705430. X-4

1719. Ng JM, Mellor DD, Masson EA, et al.; 1730. Nielsen NC, Nygren KG, Allonen H; Three years of
Sulphonyurea as a cause of severe hypoglycaemia in the experience after post-abortal insertion of Nova-T and
community. Prim Care Diabetes. 2010 Apr;4(1):61-3. Copper-T-200. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
PMID: 20064751. X-2, X-4 1984;63(3):261-4. PMID: 6730944. X-2, X-3, X-4

1720. Ng PC, So KW, Fok TF, et al.; Comparing sulindac 1731. Niemi T, Tanskanen P, Taxell C, et al.; Effects of
with indomethacin for closure of ductus arteriosus in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on hemostasis in
preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health. 1997 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J
Aug;33(4):324-8. PMID: 9323621. X-2, X-4 Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1999 Jul;11(3):188-94. PMID:
10414674. X-2, X-4
1721. Ng YW, Liang S, Singh K; Effects of Mirena
(levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system) and Ortho 1732. Nishiike S, Kato T, Nagai M, et al.; Preoperative
Gynae T380 intrauterine copper device on lipid flurbiprofen for pain prevention after tonsillectomy in
metabolism--a randomized comparative study. adults. J Clin Anesth. 2007 Dec;19(8):596-600. PMID:
Contraception. 2009 Jan;79(1):24-8. PMID: 19041437. X- 18083473. X-2, X-3, X-4
2, X-3
1733. Niv Y, Battler A, Abuksis G, et al.; Endoscopy in
1722. Nguyen M, Dougados M, Berdah L, et al.; asymptomatic minidose aspirin consumers. Dig Dis Sci.
Diacerhein in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip. 2005 Jan;50(1):78-80. PMID: 15712641. X-2, X-4
Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Apr;37(4):529-36. PMID: 8147930.
X-2, X-4 1734. Niwa K, Onogi K, Wu Y, et al.; Clinical implication
of medroxyprogesterone acetate against advanced ovarian
1723. Nguyen P, Nava-Ocampo A, Levy A, et al.; Effect carcinoma: a pilot study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol.
of iron content on the tolerability of prenatal multivitamins 2008;29(3):252-5. PMID: 18592789. X-2, X-3, X-4
in pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008;8:17.
PMID: 18482454. X-2, X-4 1735. Niwa Y, Nakamura M, Miyahara R, et al.;
Geranylgeranylacetone protects against diclofenac-induced
1724. Nichols GA, Conner C, Brown JB; Initial gastric and small intestinal mucosal injuries in healthy
nonadherence, primary failure and therapeutic success of subjects: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled
metformin monotherapy in clinical practice. Curr Med Res double-blind cross-over study. Digestion. 2009;80(4):260-
Opin. 2010 Sep;26(9):2127-35. PMID: 20658898. X-3, X- 6. PMID: 19844108. X-2, X-3, X-4
4
1736. Niwa Y, Nakamura M, Ohmiya N, et al.; Efficacy
1725. Nickel JC, Forrest JB, Tomera K, et al.; Pentosan of rebamipide for diclofenac-induced small-intestinal
polysulfate sodium therapy for men with chronic pelvic mucosal injuries in healthy subjects: a prospective,
pain syndrome: a multicenter, randomized, placebo randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over
controlled study. J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1252-5. PMID: study. J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(4):270-6. PMID:
15758763. X-2, X-3, X-4 18458842. X-2, X-3, X-4

1726. Nicolau-Raducu R, Subramaniam K, Marquez J, et 1737. Noble PW, Albera C, Bradford WZ, et al.;
al.; Safety and efficacy of tranexamic acid compared with Pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
aprotinin in thoracic aortic surgery with deep hypothermic

L-79
(CAPACITY): two randomised trials. Lancet. 2011 May 1749. O'Connor R, O'Leary M, Ballot J, et al.; A phase I
21;377(9779):1760-9. PMID: 21571362. X-2, X-3, X-4 clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the multi-drug
resistance protein-1 (MRP-1) inhibitor sulindac, in
1738. Noerpramana NP; A cohort study of Norplant combination with epirubicin in patients with advanced
implant: side-effects and acceptance. Adv Contracept. 1995 cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007 Jan;59(1):79-
Jun;11(2):97-114. PMID: 7491860. X-2, X-4 87. PMID: 16642371. X-2, X-3, X-4

1739. Noerpramana NP; Blood-lipid fractions: the side- 1750. Odin P, Oehlwein C, Storch A, et al.; Efficacy and
effects and continuation of Norplant use. Adv Contracept. safety of high-dose cabergoline in Parkinson's disease. Acta
1997 Mar;13(1):13-37. PMID: 9181182. X-2, X-4 Neurol Scand. 2006 Jan;113(1):18-24. PMID: 16367894.
X-2
1740. Noize P, Benard-Laribiere A, Aulois-Griot M, et al.;
Cutaneous adverse effects of ketoprofen for topical use: 1751. Odmark IS, Jonsson B, Backstrom T; Bleeding
clinical patterns and costs. Am J Clin Dermatol. patterns in postmenopausal women using continuous
2010;11(2):131-6. PMID: 20141234. X-2, X-4 combination hormone replacement therapy with conjugated
estrogen and medroxyprogesterone acetate or with 17beta-
1741. Noren GN, Sundberg R, Bate A, et al.; A statistical estradiol and norethindrone acetate. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
methodology for drug-drug interaction surveillance. Stat 2001 May;184(6):1131-8. PMID: 11349178. X-2, X-3, X-4
Med. 2008 Jul 20;27(16):3057-70. PMID: 18344185. X-1,
X-4 1752. O'Donovan DJ, Baetiong A, Adams K, et al.;
Necrotizing enterocolitis and gastrointestinal complications
1742. Norgard B, Fonager K, Pedersen L, et al.; Birth after indomethacin therapy and surgical ligation in
outcome in women exposed to 5-aminosalicylic acid during premature infants with patent ductus arteriosus. J Perinatol.
pregnancy: a Danish cohort study. Gut. 2003 2003 Jun;23(4):286-90. PMID: 12774134. X-2, X-4
Feb;52(2):243-7. PMID: 12524407. X-2, X-4
1753. Oeda T, Masaki M, Yamamoto K, et al.; High risk
1743. Norgard B, Pedersen L, Johnsen SP, et al.; COX-2- factors for valvular heart disease from dopamine agonists in
selective inhibitors and the risk of upper gastrointestinal patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm. 2009
bleeding in high-risk patients with previous gastrointestinal Feb;116(2):171-8. PMID: 19082526. X-2
diseases: a population-based case-control study. Aliment
Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Apr 1;19(7):817-25. PMID: 1754. Ofori B, Oraichi D, Blais L, et al.; Risk of
15043523. X-4 congenital anomalies in pregnant users of non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs: A nested case-control study. Birth
1744. Norton ME, Merrill J, Cooper BA, et al.; Neonatal Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2006 Aug;77(4):268-
complications after the administration of indomethacin for 79. PMID: 16929547. X-4
preterm labor. N Engl J Med. 1993 Nov 25;329(22):1602-
7. PMID: 8232428. X-2, X-3, X-4 1755. Oh JM, Kim SH, Suh CH, et al.; Lack of association
of glutathione S-transferase P1 Ile105Val polymorphism
1745. Ntaios G, Chatzinikolaou A, Kaiafa G, et al.; with aspirin-intolerant asthma. Korean J Intern Med. 2005
Evaluation of use of proton pump inhibitors in Greece. Eur Sep;20(3):232-6. PMID: 16295782. X-2, X-3, X-4
J Intern Med. 2009 Mar;20(2):171-3. PMID: 19327607. X-
3, X-4 1756. Ojala R, Ikonen S, Tammela O; Perinatal
indomethacin treatment and neonatal complications in
1746. Nunes AP, Lapane KL, Weinstock MA; Association preterm infants. Eur J Pediatr. 2000 Mar;159(3):153-5.
between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and PMID: 10664225. X-2, X-4
keratinocyte carcinomas of the skin among participants in
the Veterans Affairs Topical Tretinoin Chemoprevention 1757. Ojala R, Ruuska T, Karikoski R, et al.;
Trial. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Sep;20(9):922-9. Gastroesophageal endoscopic findings and gastrointestinal
PMID: 21688346. X-2 symptoms in preterm neonates with and without perinatal
indomethacin exposure. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001
1747. Nygren KG, Nielsen NC, Pyorala T, et al.; Feb;32(2):182-8. PMID: 11321390. X-2, X-4
Intrauterine contraception with Nova-T and copper-T-200
during three years. Contraception. 1981 Nov;24(5):529-42. 1758. Ojule JD, Oriji VK, Okongwu C; A five year
PMID: 7032839. X-2, X-4 review of the complications of progestogen only injectable
contraceptive at the University of Port-Harcourt Teaching
1748. O'Brien FB, Stewart WC, Sturtevant FM; Incidence Hospital. Niger J Med. 2010 Jan-Mar;19(1):87-95. PMID:
of pelvic inflammatory disease in clinical trials with Cu-7 20232762. X-2
(intrauterine copper contraceptive): a statistical analysis.
Contraception. 1983 Feb;27(2):111-22. PMID: 6851553. 1759. Okie S; Raising the safety bar--the FDA's coxib
X-4 meeting. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 31;352(13):1283-5.
PMID: 15800221. X-1

L-80
1760. Okunlola MA, Owonikoko KM, Roberts OA, et al.; 1771. Ooba N, Yamaguchi T, Kubota K; The impact in
Discontinuation pattern among IUCD users at the family Japan of regulatory action on prescribing of dopamine
planning clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan. J receptor agonists: analysis of a claims database between
Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Feb;26(2):152-6. PMID: 16483976. 2005 and 2008. Drug Saf. 2011 Apr 1;34(4):329-38. PMID:
X-2, X-4 21417505. X-3, X-4, X-8

1761. Oldfield K, Milne R, Vessey M; The effects on 1772. Ootani H, Iwakiri R, Shimoda R, et al.; Role of
mortality of the use of combined oral contraceptives. Br J Helicobacter pylori infection and nonsteroidal anti-
Fam Plann. 1998 Apr;24(1):2-6. PMID: 9719700. X-4 inflammatory drug use in bleeding peptic ulcers in Japan. J
Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan;41(1):41-6. PMID: 16501856. X-
1762. Olokoba AB, Olokoba LB, Jimoh AA; Upper 2, X-3, X-4
gastrointestinal tract bleeding in Ilorin, Nigeria--a report of
30 cases. Niger J Clin Pract. 2009 Sep;12(3):240-4. PMID: 1773. Opatrny L, Dell'Aniello S, Assouline S, et al.;
19803017. X-2, X-4 Hormone replacement therapy use and variations in the risk
of breast cancer. BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(2):169-75;
1763. Olsen JC, McGrath NA, Schwarz DG, et al.; A discussion 75. PMID: 18081598. X-7
double-blind randomized clinical trial evaluating the
analgesic efficacy of ketorolac versus butorphanol for 1774. Orlowski JP; Whatever happened to Reye's
patients with suspected biliary colic in the emergency syndrome? Did it ever really exist? Crit Care Med. 1999
department. Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;15(8):718-22. Aug;27(8):1582-7. PMID: 10470768. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 18637080. X-2, X-3, X-4
1775. Ornbjerg LM, Andersen HB, Kryger P, et al.; What
1764. Olsen NJ, Branch VK, Jonnala G, et al.; Phase 1, do patients in rheumatologic care know about the risks of
placebo-controlled, dose escalation trial of chicory root NSAIDs? J Clin Rheumatol. 2008 Apr;14(2):69-73. PMID:
extract in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. 18391673. X-2, X-3, X-4
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:156. PMID:
20618964. X-2, X-3, X-4 1776. Orr-Walker BJ, Evans MC, Ames RW, et al.; The
effect of past use of the injectable contraceptive depot
1765. Omar HA, Zakharia RM, Kanungo S, et al.; medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone mineral density in
Incidence of galactorrhea in young women using Depot- normal post-menopausal women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf).
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate. ScientificWorldJournal. 1998 Nov;49(5):615-8. PMID: 10197077. X-2, X-4
2006;6:538-41. PMID: 16680366. X-2
1777. Ortayli N, Bulut A, Sahin T, et al.; Immediate
1766. Onder G, Penninx BW, Landi F, et al.; Depression postabortal contraception with the levonorgestrel
and adverse drug reactions among hospitalized older adults. intrauterine device, Norplant, and traditional methods.
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Feb 10;163(3):301-5. PMID: Contraception. 2001 Jun;63(6):309-14. PMID: 11672552.
12578510. X-7 X-2, X-4

1767. Ong TZ, Hawkey CJ, Ho KY; Nonsteroidal anti- 1778. Ortonne JP, Queille-Roussel C, Duteil L; 3%
inflammatory drug use is a significant cause of peptic ulcer diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronic acid (Solaraze) does not
disease in a tertiary hospital in Singapore: a prospective induce photosensitivity or phototoxicity alone or in
study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct;40(9):795-800. combination with sunscreens. Eur J Dermatol. 2006 Jul-
PMID: 17016134. X-2, X-3 Aug;16(4):385-90. PMID: 16935795. X-2, X-4

1768. Ono M, Miki N, Amano K, et al.; Individualized 1779. Ostensen M, Ostensen H; Safety of nonsteroidal
high-dose cabergoline therapy for hyperprolactinemic antiinflammatory drugs in pregnant patients with rheumatic
infertility in women with micro- and macroprolactinomas. J disease. J Rheumatol. 1996 Jun;23(6):1045-9. PMID:
Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Jun;95(6):2672-9. PMID: 8782138. X-2, X-4
20357175. X-2, X-3
1780. Otley CC, Fewkes JL, Frank W, et al.;
1769. Ono M, Miki N, Kawamata T, et al.; Prospective Complications of cutaneous surgery in patients who are
study of high-dose cabergoline treatment of prolactinomas taking warfarin, aspirin, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
in 150 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 drugs. Arch Dermatol. 1996 Feb;132(2):161-6. PMID:
Dec;93(12):4721-7. PMID: 18812485. X-2, X-3 8629823. X-2, X-4

1770. Onodera T, Majima T, Sawaguchi N, et al.; Risk of 1781. Owens JM, Shroyer KR, Kingdom TT; Expression
deep venous thrombosis in drain clamping with tranexamic of cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase enzymes in nasal
acid and carbazochrome sodium sulfonate hydrate in total polyps of aspirin-sensitive and aspirin-tolerant patients.
knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Jan;27(1):105-8. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Jun;132(6):579-
PMID: 21435821. X-2 87. PMID: 16785401. X-2, X-3, X-4

L-81
1782. Owen-Smith V, Hannaford PC, Warskyj M, et al.; levonorgestrel-releasing intracervical device situated in the
Effects of changes in smoking status on risk estimates for uterine cavity or cervical canal. Contraception. 1996
myocardial infarction among women recruited for the Sep;54(3):187-92. PMID: 8899261. X-2
Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception
Study in the UK. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 1794. Pakarinen PI, Suvisaari J, Luukkainen T, et al.;
Jul;52(7):420-4. PMID: 9799875. X-4 Intracervical and fundal administration of levonorgestrel
for contraception: endometrial thickness, patterns of
1783. Ozcagli E, Sardas S, Biri A; Assessment of DNA bleeding, and persisting ovarian follicles. Fertil Steril. 1997
damage in postmenopausal women under hormone Jul;68(1):59-64. PMID: 9207585. X-2, X-3, X-4
replacement therapy. Maturitas. 2005 Jul 16;51(3):280-5.
PMID: 15978971. X-2, X-4 1795. Pal S, Bhattacharya KF, Agapito C, et al.; A study
of excessive daytime sleepiness and its clinical significance
1784. Ozdil B, Cosar A, Akkiz H, et al.; Atherosclerosis in three groups of Parkinson's disease patients taking
and acetylsalicylic acid are independent risk factors for pramipexole, cabergoline and levodopa mono and
hemorrhage in patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer. combination therapy. J Neural Transm. 2001;108(1):71-7.
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2011 Feb;11(1):53-6. PMID: PMID: 11261748. X-2
21220246. X-2, X-3, X-4
1796. Pala L, Monami M, Lamanna C, et al.; Failure to
1785. Ozkaya-Bayazit E, Bayazit H, Ozarmagan G; Drug metformin and insulin secretagogue monotherapy: an
related clinical pattern in fixed drug eruption. Eur J observational cohort study. Acta Diabetol. 2010
Dermatol. 2000 Jun;10(4):288-91. PMID: 10846256. X-2 Dec;47(Suppl 1):7-11. PMID: 19290462. X-2, X-3, X-4

1786. P S, P M, Pr S; Systemic adverse drug reactions: a 1797. Palayekar V, Joshi JV, Hazari KT, et al.; Chlamydia
preliminary report from the regional pharmacovigilance trachomatis detected in cervical smears from Copper-T
center, western Nepal. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2008 users by DFA test. Adv Contracept. 1996 Jun;12(2):145-52.
Oct;21(4):465-7. PMID: 18930872. X-2, X-4 PMID: 8863910. X-2, X-4

1787. Pacor ML, Di Lorenzo G, Mansueto P, et al.; 1798. Palikhe NS, Kim SH, Cho BY, et al.; Association of
Relationship between human leucocyte antigen class I and three sets of high-affinity IgE receptor (FcepsilonR1)
class II and chronic idiopathic urticaria associated with polymorphisms with aspirin-intolerant asthma. Respir Med.
aspirin and/or NSAIDs hypersensitivity. Mediators 2008 Aug;102(8):1132-9. PMID: 18595682. X-2, X-3, X-4
Inflamm. 2006;2006(5):62489. PMID: 17392574. X-2, X-
3, X-4 1799. Palma-Carlos AG, Medina M, Palma-Carlos ML;
Prevalence of drug allergy in an out-patient population. Eur
1788. Paganini-Hill A, Clark LJ, Henderson VW, et al.; Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 May;38(5):142-5. PMID:
Clock drawing: analysis in a retirement community. J Am 17058844. X-2
Geriatr Soc. 2001 Jul;49(7):941-7. PMID: 11527486. X-3,
X-4 1800. Palmer K; The Vioxx fallout. Minn Med. 2005
Mar;88(3):26-30. PMID: 15852592. X-1
1789. Page AJ, Reid SA, Speedy DB, et al.; Exercise-
associated hyponatremia, renal function, and nonsteroidal 1801. Palomba S, Falbo A, Di Cello A, et al.; Does
antiinflammatory drug use in an ultraendurance mountain metformin affect the ovarian response to gonadotropins for
run. Clin J Sport Med. 2007 Jan;17(1):43-8. PMID: in vitro fertilization treatment in patients with polycystic
17304005. X-2, X-4 ovary syndrome and reduced ovarian reserve? A
randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2011
1790. Page J, Henry D; Consumption of NSAIDs and the Nov;96(5):1128-33. PMID: 21917254. X-2, X-3
development of congestive heart failure in elderly patients:
an underrecognized public health problem. Arch Intern 1802. Palomba S, Falbo A, Russo T, et al.; Insulin
Med. 2000 Mar 27;160(6):777-84. PMID: 10737277. X-2 sensitivity after metformin suspension in normal-weight
women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol
1791. Pakalnis A, Butz C, Splaingard D, et al.; Emotional Metab. 2007 Aug;92(8):3128-35. PMID: 17519312. X-2,
problems and prevalence of medication overuse in pediatric X-3, X-4
chronic daily headache. J Child Neurol. 2007
Dec;22(12):1356-9. PMID: 18174551. X-2, X-3, X-4 1803. Palomba S, Orio F, Jr., Nardo LG, et al.; Metformin
administration versus laparoscopic ovarian diathermy in
1792. Pakarinen P, Luukkainen T; Five years' experience clomiphene citrate-resistant women with polycystic ovary
with a small intracervical/intrauterine levonorgestrel- syndrome: a prospective parallel randomized double-blind
releasing device. Contraception. 2005 Nov;72(5):342-5. placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004
PMID: 16246659. X-2, X-4 Oct;89(10):4801-9. PMID: 15472166. X-2, X-3, X-4

1793. Pakarinen P, Luukkainen T, Elomaa K, et al.; A 12- 1804. Palomba S, Orio F, Jr., Russo T, et al.; BsmI
month comparative clinical investigation of a vitamin D receptor genotypes influence the efficacy of

L-82
antiresorptive treatments in postmenopausal osteoporotic very low birth weight neonates. J Perinatol. 2006
women. A 1-year multicenter, randomized and controlled Aug;26(8):486-92. PMID: 16791261. X-2, X-4
trial. Osteoporos Int. 2005 Aug;16(8):943-52. PMID:
15739035. X-2, X-3, X-4 1815. Pardo Cabello AJ, Gonzalez Contreras LG,
Manzano Gamero MV, et al.; Prevalence of fatal adverse
1805. Pan YS, Chen LT, Tseng CA, et al.; Clinical and drug reactions in hospitalized patients. Int J Clin Pharmacol
endoscopic features of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory Ther. 2009 Oct;47(10):596-602. PMID: 19825322. X-2
drug-induced colorectal ulcerations. J Formos Med Assoc.
2005 Nov;104(11):804-10. PMID: 16496059. X-4 1816. Pareja JA, Caminero AB, Franco E, et al.; Dose,
efficacy and tolerability of long-term indomethacin
1806. Pandi SP, Hadjar LN, Prihyugiharto T; Introductory treatment of chronic paroxysmal hemicrania and
trial of the once-a-month injectable contraceptive, hemicrania continua. Cephalalgia. 2001 Nov;21(9):906-10.
Cyclofem, in Indonesia. Adv Contracept. 1993 PMID: 11903285. X-2, X-4
Mar;9(1):33-40. PMID: 8342452. X-3, X-4
1817. Parikh A, Scadding GK, Gray P, et al.; High levels
1807. Pandya BJ, Bron M, McCall T, et al.; Achieving of nitric oxide synthase activity are associated with nasal
glycemic goal with initial versus sequential combination polyp tissue from aspirin-sensitive asthmatics. Acta
therapy using metformin and pioglitazone in type 2 Otolaryngol. 2002 Apr;122(3):302-5. PMID: 12030579. X-
diabetes mellitus. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jan;27(1):189- 2, X-3, X-4
95. PMID: 21142610. X-2, X-3
1818. Parikh V, Gandhi AS; Safety of copper T as
1808. Pang W, Mok MS, Ku MC, et al.; Patient-controlled contraceptive after caesarean section. J Indian Med Assoc.
analgesia with morphine plus lysine acetyl salicylate. 1989 May;87(5):113-5. PMID: 2600433. X-2, X-3, X-4
Anesth Analg. 1999 Oct;89(4):995-8. PMID: 10512278.
X-2, X-4 1819. Parilla BV, Grobman WA, Holtzman RB, et al.;
Indomethacin tocolysis and risk of necrotizing
1809. Panidis D, Georgopoulos NA, Piouka A, et al.; The enterocolitis. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jul;96(1):120-3. PMID:
impact of oral contraceptives and metformin on anti- 10862854. X-2, X-4
Mullerian hormone serum levels in women with polycystic
ovary syndrome and biochemical hyperandrogenemia. 1820. Park HK, Lee SH, Chu K, et al.; Effects of
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011 Aug;27(8):587-92. PMID: celecoxib on volumes of hematoma and edema in patients
20836726. X-2, X-3 with primary intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci. 2009
Apr 15;279(1-2):43-6. PMID: 19168192. X-2, X-4
1810. Pantalone KM, Kattan MW, Yu C, et al.; The risk
of developing coronary artery disease or congestive heart 1821. Park JJ, Kim JW, Kim HJ, et al.; The prevalence of
failure, and overall mortality, in type 2 diabetic patients and risk factors for Barrett's esophagus in a Korean
receiving rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, metformin, or population: A nationwide multicenter prospective study. J
sulfonylureas: a retrospective analysis. Acta Diabetol. 2009 Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov-Dec;43(10):907-14. PMID:
Jun;46(2):145-54. PMID: 19194648. X-3 19417682. X-4

1811. Pantoja M, Medeiros T, Baccarin MC, et al.; 1822. Park JS, Chang HS, Park CS, et al.; Association
Variations in body mass index of users of depot- analysis of cysteinyl-leukotriene receptor 2 (CYSLTR2)
medroxyprogesterone acetate as a contraceptive. polymorphisms with aspirin intolerance in asthmatics.
Contraception. 2010 Feb;81(2):107-11. PMID: 20103446. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005 Jul;15(7):483-92. PMID:
X-2 15970796. X-2, X-3, X-4

1812. Papadima A, Lagoudianakis EE, Antonakis PT, et 1823. Park SY, Moon SH, Park MS, et al.; The effects of
al.; Parecoxib vs. lornoxicam in the treatment of ketorolac injected via patient controlled analgesia
postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a postoperatively on spinal fusion. Yonsei Med J. 2005 Apr
prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Eur J 30;46(2):245-51. PMID: 15861498. X-2, X-4
Anaesthesiol. 2007 Feb;24(2):154-8. PMID: 16938157. X-
2, X-3, X-4 1824. Parkin L, Sharples K, Hernandez RK, et al.; Risk of
venous thromboembolism in users of oral contraceptives
1813. Papatheodoridis GV, Papadelli D, Cholongitas E, et containing drospirenone or levonorgestrel: nested case-
al.; Effect of helicobacter pylori infection on the risk of control study based on UK General Practice Research
upper gastrointestinal bleeding in users of nonsteroidal Database. BMJ. 2011;342:d2139. PMID: 21511804. X-2,
anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Med. 2004 May X-4
1;116(9):601-5. PMID: 15093756. X-2, X-3, X-4
1825. Parthasarathi G, Ramesh M, Nyfort-Hansen K, et al.;
1814. Paquette L, Friedlich P, Ramanathan R, et al.; Clinical pharmacy in a South Indian teaching hospital. Ann
Concurrent use of indomethacin and dexamethasone Pharmacother. 2002 May;36(5):927-32. PMID: 11978174.
increases the risk of spontaneous intestinal perforation in X-2, X-3, X-4

L-83
1838. Pathan E, Gaitonde S, Rajadhyaksha S, et al.; A
1826. Partridge CG, Campbell JH, Alvarado F; The effect longitudinal study of serum creatinine levels in patients of
of platelet-altering medications on bleeding from minor rheumatoid arthritis on long term NSAID therapy. J Assoc
oral surgery procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Physicians India. 2003 Nov;51:1045-9. PMID: 15260386.
Jan;66(1):93-7. PMID: 18083421. X-2 X-2

1827. Pashankar DS, Bishop WP, Mitros FA; Chemical 1839. Patino FG, Olivieri J, Allison JJ, et al.; Nonsteroidal
gastropathy: a distinct histopathologic entity in children. J antiinflammatory drug toxicity monitoring and safety
Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002 Nov;35(5):653-7. PMID: practices. J Rheumatol. 2003 Dec;30(12):2680-8. PMID:
12454581. X-2 14719213. X-2, X-3, X-4

1828. Pasina L, Nobili A, Tettamanti M, et al.; Co- 1840. Patterson MK, Castellsague J, Walker AM;
prescription of gastroprotective agents in patients taking Hospitalization for peptic ulcer and bleeding in users of
non-selective NSAIDs or COX-2 selective inhibitors: selective COX-2 inhibitors and nonselective NSAIDs with
analysis of prescriptions. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 special reference to celecoxib. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug
Nov;48(11):735-43. PMID: 20979932. X-4 Saf. 2008 Oct;17(10):982-8. PMID: 18711705. X-4

1829. Paspatis GA, Matrella E, Kapsoritakis A, et al.; An 1841. Pavlicevic I, Kuzmanic M, Rumboldt M, et al.;
epidemiological study of acute upper gastrointestinal Interaction between antihypertensives and NSAIDs in
bleeding in Crete, Greece. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. primary care: a controlled trial. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2008
2000 Nov;12(11):1215-20. PMID: 11111778. X-2 Fall;15(3):e372-82. PMID: 18953082. X-2, X-3

1830. Pasquale SA, Knuppel RA, Owens AG, et al.; 1842. Pawaskar MD, Blickensderfer AL, Hoogwerf BJ, et
Irregular bleeding, body mass index and coital frequency in al.; Hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes using
Norplant contraceptive users. Contraception. 1994 concomitant exenatide BID and long-acting insulin therapy.
Aug;50(2):109-16. PMID: 7956210. X-2, X-4 J Med Econ. 2011;14(6):705-8. PMID: 21892855. X-3, X-
8
1831. Passalacqua G, Milanese M, Mincarini M, et al.;
Single-dose oral tolerance test with alternative compounds 1843. Pearce HM, Layton D, Wilton LV, et al.; Deep vein
for the management of adverse reactions to drugs. Int Arch thrombosis and pulmonary embolism reported in the
Allergy Immunol. 2002 Nov;129(3):242-7. PMID: Prescription Event Monitoring Study of Yasmin. Br J Clin
12444322. X-2 Pharmacol. 2005 Jul;60(1):98-102. PMID: 15963100. X-4

1832. Passarelli MC, Jacob-Filho W, Figueras A; Adverse 1844. Peck JD, Hulka BS, Poole C, et al.; Steroid
drug reactions in an elderly hospitalised population: hormone levels during pregnancy and incidence of
inappropriate prescription is a leading cause. Drugs Aging. maternal breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.
2005;22(9):767-77. PMID: 16156680. X-2, X-4 2002 Apr;11(4):361-8. PMID: 11927496. X-2, X-3, X-4

1833. Pastuszak A, Pinelli M, Koren G; Pregnancy 1845. Peckham GJ, Miettinen OS, Ellison RC, et al.;
outcome following fetal exposure to tiaprofenic acid in the Clinical course to 1 year of age in premature infants with
first trimester. Am J Perinatol. 1993 Sep;10(5):354-7. patent ductus arteriosus: results of a multicenter
PMID: 8240592. X-2, X-3, X-4 randomized trial of indomethacin. J Pediatr. 1984
Aug;105(2):285-91. PMID: 6379136. X-2, X-4
1834. Patel BR; A comparative study of subsyde-CR
versus meloxicam in rheumatic disorders. J Indian Med 1846. Pecora PG, Kaplan B; Corticosteroids and ulcers: is
Assoc. 2000 May;98(5):250-2. PMID: 11002624. X-4 there an association? Ann Pharmacother. 1996 Jul-
Aug;30(7-8):870-2. PMID: 8826575. X-1, X-2
1835. Patel H, Barr A, Jeejeebhoy KN; Renal effects of
long-term treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid. Can J 1847. Pedersen OD, Jensen HK; Long-term treatment
Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;23(3):170-6. PMID: 19319380. with transcutaneous estradiol and oral
X-2, X-4 medroxyprogesterone acetate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
1992 Dec;71(8):593-8. PMID: 1336917. X-2, X-4
1836. Patel P, Khulusi S, Mendall MA, et al.; Prospective
screening of dyspeptic patients by Helicobacter pylori 1848. Pedersen-Bjergaard U, Andersen M, Hansen PB;
serology. Lancet. 1995 Nov 18;346(8986):1315-8. PMID: Thrombocytopenia induced by noncytotoxic drugs in
7475768. X-2, X-3, X-4 Denmark 1968-91. J Intern Med. 1996 Jun;239(6):509-15.
PMID: 8656144. X-2
1837. Patel RM, Marfatia YS; Clinical study of cutaneous
drug eruptions in 200 patients. Indian J Dermatol Venereol 1849. Peers T, Stevens JE, Graham J, et al.; Norplant
Leprol. 2008 Jul-Aug;74(4):430. PMID: 18810845. X-2, implants in the UK: first year continuation and removals.
X-4 Contraception. 1996 Jun;53(6):345-51. PMID: 8773421.
X-3, X-4

L-84
and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med.
1850. Peltier AP; Practical management of NSAID 1994 Dec 22;331(25):1675-9. PMID: 7969358. X-2
gastropathy in rheumatic patients. Scand J Rheumatol
Suppl. 1989;78:12-7; discussion 30-2. PMID: 2786645. X- 1862. Perrone J, Phillips C, Gaieski D; Occult metformin
1, X-3, X-4 toxicity in three patients with profound lactic acidosis. J
Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;40(3):271-5. PMID: 18571361. X-2
1851. Penning-van Beest F, Erkens J, Petersen KU, et al.;
Main comedications associated with major bleeding during 1863. Persson I, Adami HO, Norell SE, et al.; Evaluation
anticoagulant therapy with coumarins. Eur J Clin of a prescription based record-linkage model for
Pharmacol. 2005 Jul;61(5-6):439-44. PMID: 15947920. epidemiological studies of long-term adverse effects of
X-4, X-8 drugs--with special regard to combined oral contraceptives.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;40(5):489-93. PMID: 1884723.
1852. Penning-van Beest FJ, Koerselman J, Herings RM; X-1, X-4
Quantity and quality of potential drug interactions with
coumarin anticoagulants in the Netherlands. Pharm World 1864. Persson I, Thurfjell E, Bergstrom R, et al.; Hormone
Sci. 2007 Dec;29(6):671-5. PMID: 17453356. X-4 replacement therapy and the risk of breast cancer. Nested
case-control study in a cohort of Swedish women attending
1853. Penston JG, Wormsley KG; Nine years of mammography screening. Int J Cancer. 1997 Sep
maintenance treatment with ranitidine for patients with 4;72(5):758-61. PMID: 9311590. X-4, X-7
duodenal ulcer disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1992
Oct;6(5):629-45. PMID: 1420753. X-2, X-4 1865. Persson PE, Nilsson OS, Berggren AM; Do non-
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs cause endoprosthetic
1854. Penta de Peppo A, Pierri MD, Scafuri A, et al.; loosening? A 10-year follow-up of a randomized trial on
Intraoperative antifibrinolysis and blood-saving techniques ibuprofen for prevention of heterotopic ossification after
in cardiac surgery. Prospective trial of 3 antifibrinolytic hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2005 Dec;76(6):735-40.
drugs. Tex Heart Inst J. 1995;22(3):231-6. PMID: 7580360. PMID: 16470423. X-2, X-4
X-2, X-3, X-4
1866. Peters N, Jay N, Barraud D, et al.; Metformin-
1855. Pentti K, Honkanen R, Tuppurainen MT, et al.; associated lactic acidosis in an intensive care unit. Crit
Hormone replacement therapy and mortality in 52- to 70- Care. 2008;12(6):R149. PMID: 19036140. X-8
year-old women: the Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and
Prevention Study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006 Jan;154(1):101- 1867. Petersen KR, Brooks L, Jacobsen N, et al.; Clinical
7. PMID: 16381998. X-4, X-7 performance of intrauterine devices in nulligravidae: is the
length of the endometrial cavity of significance? Acta Eur
1856. Perdriger A, Mariette X, Kuntz JL, et al.; Safety of Fertil. 1991 Jul-Aug;22(4):225-8. PMID: 1844327. X-2, X-
infliximab used in combination with leflunomide or 3, X-4
azathioprine in daily clinical practice. J Rheumatol. 2006
May;33(5):865-9. PMID: 16652418. X-2, X-4 1868. Petersen KR, Christiansen E, Madsbad S, et al.;
Metabolic and fibrinolytic response to changed insulin
1857. Perez Gutthann S, Garcia Rodriguez LA; The sensitivity in users of oral contraceptives. Contraception.
increased risk of hospitalizations for acute liver injury in a 1999 Dec;60(6):337-44. PMID: 10715368. X-2, X-4
population with exposure to multiple drugs. Epidemiology.
1993 Nov;4(6):496-501. PMID: 8268277. X-4 1869. Petersen KR, Skouby SO, Sidelmann J, et al.;
Assessment of endothelial function during oral
1858. Perez Gutthann S, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Raiford contraception in women with insulin-dependent diabetes
DS, et al.; Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the mellitus. Metabolism. 1994 Nov;43(11):1379-83. PMID:
risk of hospitalization for acute renal failure. Arch Intern 7968593. X-2, X-3
Med. 1996 Nov 25;156(21):2433-9. PMID: 8944736. X-4
1870. Petric M, Tasic L, Sukljevic S; Nonsteroidal anti-
1859. Perez-Gutthann S, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Duque- inflammatory drug usage and gastrointestinal outcomes in
Oliart A, et al.; Low-dose diclofenac, naproxen, and the Republic of Serbia. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother.
ibuprofen cohort study. Pharmacotherapy. 1999 2009;23(1):40-7. PMID: 19296354. X-4
Jul;19(7):854-9. PMID: 10417034. X-4
1871. Petty GW, Brown RD, Jr., Whisnant JP, et al.;
1860. Perez-Ruiz F, Calabozo M, Herrero-Beites AM, et Frequency of major complications of aspirin, warfarin, and
al.; Improvement of renal function in patients with chronic intravenous heparin for secondary stroke prevention. A
gout after proper control of hyperuricemia and gouty bouts. population-based study. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jan
Nephron. 2000 Nov;86(3):287-91. PMID: 11096285. X-2 5;130(1):14-22. PMID: 9890845. X-2, X-4

1861. Perneger TV, Whelton PK, Klag MJ; Risk of kidney 1872. Pham T, Le Henanff A, Ravaud P, et al.; Evaluation
failure associated with the use of acetaminophen, aspirin, of the symptomatic and structural efficacy of a new
hyaluronic acid compound, NRD101, in comparison with

L-85
diacerein and placebo in a 1 year randomised controlled
study in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1883. Pilotto A, Leandro G, Di Mario F, et al.; Role of
2004 Dec;63(12):1611-7. PMID: 15331394. X-2, X-3, X-4 Helicobacter pylori infection on upper gastrointestinal
bleeding in the elderly: a case-control study. Dig Dis Sci.
1873. Phemister DA, Laurent S, Harrison FN, Jr.; Use of 1997 Mar;42(3):586-91. PMID: 9073143. X-2
Norplant contraceptive implants in the immediate
postpartum period: safety and tolerance. Am J Obstet 1884. Pilotto A, Seripa D, Franceschi M, et al.; Genetic
Gynecol. 1995 Jan;172(1 Pt 1):175-9. PMID: 7847530. X- susceptibility to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-
2, X-4 related gastroduodenal bleeding: role of cytochrome P450
2C9 polymorphisms. Gastroenterology. 2007
1874. Phupong V, Sophonsritsuk A, Taneepanichskul S; Aug;133(2):465-71. PMID: 17681167. X-2, X-3, X-4
The effect of tranexamic acid for treatment of irregular
uterine bleeding secondary to Norplant use. Contraception. 1885. Pinheiro SP, Tworoger SS, Cramer DW, et al.; Use
2006 Mar;73(3):253-6. PMID: 16472565. X-2, X-3, X-4 of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents and incidence of
ovarian cancer in 2 large prospective cohorts. Am J
1875. Pierce SJ, Gazvani MR, Farquharson RG; Long- Epidemiol. 2009 Jun 1;169(11):1378-87. PMID: 19342401.
term use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs and X-4
hormone replacement therapy in the management of
endometriosis: a randomized trial with a 6-year follow-up. 1886. Pini LA, Sternieri E; Active reporting scheme: an
Fertil Steril. 2000 Nov;74(5):964-8. PMID: 11056241. X- example to evaluate specific adverse drug reactions. Acta
2, X-4 Physiol Hung. 1990;75 Suppl:237-8. PMID: 2371875. X-4

1876. Pietrzak B, Kaminski P, Wielgos M, et al.; 1887. Pink D, Lindner T, Mrozek A, et al.; Harm or
Combined oral contraception in women after renal benefit of hormonal treatment in metastatic low-grade
transplantation. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2006 endometrial stromal sarcoma: single center experience with
Oct;27(5):679-82. PMID: 17159814. X-2, X-4 10 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2006
Jun;101(3):464-9. PMID: 16368128. X-2, X-4
1877. Piette F, Teillet L, Naudin R, et al.; Efficacy of
misoprostol in the prophylaxis of gastroduodenal lesions 1888. Piper JM, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, et al.;
induced by short-term nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug Corticosteroid use and peptic ulcer disease: role of
therapy in elderly patients. A multicenter double-blind, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Ann Intern Med.
placebo-controlled trial. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1997 1991 May 1;114(9):735-40. PMID: 2012355. X-4, X-7
Apr;64(4):259-66. PMID: 9178399. X-2, X-3, X-4
1889. Piya-Anant M, Koetsawang S, Patrasupapong N, et
1878. Pikkarainen E, Lehtonen-Veromaa M, Mottonen T, al.; Effectiveness of Cyclofem in the treatment of depot
et al.; Estrogen-progestin contraceptive use during medroxyprogesterone acetate induced amenorrhea.
adolescence prevents bone mass acquisition: a 4-year Contraception. 1998 Jan;57(1):23-8. PMID: 9554247. X-2,
follow-up study. Contraception. 2008 Sep;78(3):226-31. X-3, X-4
PMID: 18692613. X-2
1890. Plaza V, Serrano J, Picado C, et al.; Frequency and
1879. Pillai L, Burnett BP, Levy RM; GOAL: multicenter, clinical characteristics of rapid-onset fatal and near-fatal
open-label, post-marketing study of flavocoxid, a novel asthma. Eur Respir J. 2002 May;19(5):846-52. PMID:
dual pathway inhibitor anti-inflammatory agent of botanical 12030723. X-2, X-3, X-4
origin. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 May;26(5):1055-63.
PMID: 20225990. X-2, X-4 1891. Plu-Bureau G, Le MG, Thalabard JC, et al.;
Percutaneous progesterone use and risk of breast cancer:
1880. Piller R, Chang-Claude J, Linseisen J; Plasma results from a French cohort study of premenopausal
enterolactone and genistein and the risk of premenopausal women with benign breast disease. Cancer Detect Prev.
breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006 Jun;15(3):225-32. 1999;23(4):290-6. PMID: 10403900. X-2, X-4
PMID: 16679865. X-2, X-3, X-4
1892. Pochobradsky MG, Mele G, Beretta A, et al.; Post-
1881. Pilotto A, Franceschi M, Leandro G, et al.; Proton- marketing survey of nimesulide in the short-term treatment
pump inhibitors reduce the risk of uncomplicated peptic of osteoarthritis. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1991;17(3):197-204.
ulcer in elderly either acute or chronic users of aspirin/non- PMID: 1914847. X-4
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Aliment Pharmacol
Ther. 2004 Nov 15;20(10):1091-7. PMID: 15569111. X-7 1893. Pohjolainen T, Jekunen A, Autio L, et al.;
Treatment of acute low back pain with the COX-2-selective
1882. Pilotto A, Franceschi M, Longoa MG, et al.; anti-inflammatory drug nimesulide: results of a
Helicobacter pylori infection and the prevention of peptic randomized, double-blind comparative trial versus
ulcer with proton pump inhibitors in elderly subjects taking ibuprofen. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jun
low-dose aspirin. Dig Liver Dis. 2004 Oct;36(10):666-70. 15;25(12):1579-85. PMID: 10851109. X-3, X-4, X-5
PMID: 15506665. X-2, X-3, X-4

L-86
1905. Prata N, Gessessew A, Cartwright A, et al.;
1894. Polaneczky M, Guarnaccia M, Alon J, et al.; Early Provision of injectable contraceptives in Ethiopia through
experience with the contraceptive use of depot community-based reproductive health agents. Bull World
medroxyprogesterone acetate in an inner-city clinic Health Organ. 2011 Aug 1;89(8):556-64. PMID: 21836754.
population. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jul-Aug;28(4):174-8. X-2, X-4
PMID: 8853283. X-2
1906. Pratt N, Roughead EE, Ryan P, et al.; Differential
1895. Polati E, Finco G, Gottin L, et al.; Prospective impact of NSAIDs on rate of adverse events that require
randomized double-blind trial of neurolytic coeliac plexus hospitalization in high-risk and general veteran
block in patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 1998 populations: a retrospective cohort study. Drugs Aging.
Feb;85(2):199-201. PMID: 9501815. X-2, X-3, X-4 2010 Jan 1;27(1):63-71. PMID: 20030433. X-4

1896. Polimeni G, Salvo F, Cutroneo P, et al.; Adverse 1907. Prentice RL, Chlebowski RT, Stefanick ML, et al.;
reactions induced by NSAIDs and antibacterials: analysis Estrogen plus progestin therapy and breast cancer in
of spontaneous reports from the Sicilian regional database. recently postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol. 2008
Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):449-59. PMID: 16689558. X-2 May 15;167(10):1207-16. PMID: 18372396. X-4, X-7

1897. Pongsatha S, Muttarak M, Chaovisitseree S, et al.; 1908. Prentice RL, Manson JE, Langer RD, et al.;
Mammographic changes related to different types of Benefits and risks of postmenopausal hormone therapy
hormonal therapies. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 when it is initiated soon after menopause. Am J Epidemiol.
Feb;89(2):123-9. PMID: 16578996. X-2 2009 Jul 1;170(1):12-23. PMID: 19468079. X-4, X-7

1898. Pongwecharak J, Tengmeesri N, Malanusorn N, et 1909. Preshaw PM, Knutsen MA, Mariotti A;
al.; Prescribing metformin in type 2 diabetes with a Experimental gingivitis in women using oral
contraindication: prevalence and outcome. Pharm World contraceptives. J Dent Res. 2001 Nov;80(11):2011-5.
Sci. 2009 Aug;31(4):481-6. PMID: 19462255. X-3 PMID: 11759012. X-2, X-4

1899. Pookarnjanamorakot C, Laohacharoensombat W, 1910. Preston JT, Cameron IT, Adams EJ, et al.;
Jaovisidha S; The clinical efficacy of piroxicam fast- Comparative study of tranexamic acid and norethisterone in
dissolving dosage form for postoperative pain control after the treatment of ovulatory menorrhagia. Br J Obstet
simple lumbar spine surgery: a double-blinded randomized Gynaecol. 1995 May;102(5):401-6. PMID: 7612535. X-2,
study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 1;27(5):447-51. X-4
PMID: 11880827. X-2, X-3, X-4
1911. Price-Forbes AN, Callaghan R, Allen ME, et al.; A
1900. Pope J, Jerome D, Fenlon D, et al.; Frequency of regional audit of the use of COX-2 selective non-steroidal
adverse drug reactions in patients with systemic lupus anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in rheumatology clinics
erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2003 Mar;30(3):480-4. in the West Midlands, in relation to NICE guidelines.
PMID: 12610805. X-2, X-4 Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jul;44(7):921-4. PMID:
15827035. X-4
1901. Post MS, Rosing J, Van Der Mooren MJ, et al.;
Increased resistance to activated protein C after short-term 1912. Protti A, Russo R, Tagliabue P, et al.; Oxygen
oral hormone replacement therapy in healthy post- consumption is depressed in patients with lactic acidosis
menopausal women. Br J Haematol. 2002 due to biguanide intoxication. Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R22.
Dec;119(4):1017-23. PMID: 12472583. X-2, X-3, X-4 PMID: 20170489. X-2, X-3, X-4

1902. Potter LS, Dalberth BT, Canamar R, et al.; Depot 1913. Proudman SM, Keen HI, Stamp LK, et al.;
medroxyprogesterone acetate pioneers. A retrospective Response-driven combination therapy with conventional
study at a North Carolina Health Department. disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs can achieve high
Contraception. 1997 Nov;56(5):305-12. PMID: 9437559. response rates in early rheumatoid arthritis with minimal
X-2 glucocorticoid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug
use. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Oct;37(2):99-111.
1903. Pradhan BB, Tatsumi RL, Gallina J, et al.; PMID: 17391739. X-2, X-4
Ketorolac and spinal fusion: does the perioperative use of
ketorolac really inhibit spinal fusion? Spine (Phila Pa 1914. Psaty BM, Weiss NS; NSAID trials and the choice
1976). 2008 Sep 1;33(19):2079-82. PMID: 18698276. X-2, of comparators--questions of public health importance. N
X-3, X-4 Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):328-30. PMID: 17251528.
X-1
1904. Prakash J, Niwas SS, Parekh A, et al.; Multiple
myeloma--presenting as acute kidney injury. J Assoc 1915. Publig W, Wustinger C, Zandl C; Non-steroidal
Physicians India. 2009 Jan;57:23-6. PMID: 19753754. X- anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) cause gastrointestinal
2, X-3, X-4 ulcers mainly in Helicobacter pylori carriers. Wien Klin
Wochenschr. 1994;106(9):276-9. PMID: 8023522. X-2

L-87
1926. Quiralte J, Saenz de San Pedro B, Florido JJ; Safety
1916. Pullar T, Murphy B, Taggart A, et al.; Patterns of of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor rofecoxib in
out-patients non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug patients with NSAID-induced cutaneous reactions. Ann
prescribing in two teaching hospital rheumatology units-- Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Jul;89(1):63-6. PMID:
implications for post-marketing surveillance. J Clin Pharm 12141722. X-2, X-4
Ther. 1990 Aug;15(4):267-72. PMID: 2229206. X-2, X-3,
X-4 1927. Rabe T, Mueck AO, Deuringer FU, et al.; Spacing-
out of progestin--efficacy, tolerability and compliance of
1917. Puri AS, Monga R, Garg S, et al.; Diaphragm two regimens for hormonal replacement in the late
disease of duodenum following long-term NSAIDs use: postmenopause. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1997 Dec;11(6):383-
endoscopic management. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep- 92. PMID: 9476087. X-2, X-4
Oct;23(5):189-90. PMID: 15599008. X-2, X-3, X-4
1928. Rabeneck L, Wristers K, Goldstein JL, et al.;
1918. Qin LH, Goldberg JM, Hao G; A 4-year follow-up Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of severity of
study of women with Norplant-2 contraceptive implants. dyspepsia assessment (SODA) in a randomized clinical
Contraception. 2001 Nov;64(5):301-3. PMID: 11777490. trial of a COX-2-specific inhibitor and traditional NSAID
X-2, X-4 therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jan;97(1):32-9. PMID:
11808967. X-4
1919. Quaratino D, Romano A, Papa G, et al.; Long-term
tolerability of nimesulide and acetaminophen in 1929. Radat F, Sakh D, Lutz G, et al.; Psychiatric
nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-intolerant patients. Ann comorbidity is related to headache induced by chronic
Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Jul;79(1):47-50. PMID: substance use in migraineurs. Headache. 1999 Jul-
9236499. X-2, X-3, X-4 Aug;39(7):477-80. PMID: 11279930. X-2, X-3, X-4

1920. Quehenberger P, Loner U, Kapiotis S, et al.; 1930. Rager KM, Fowler A, Omar HA; Successful
Increased levels of activated factor VII and decreased treatment of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate-related
plasma protein S activity and circulating thrombomodulin vaginal bleeding improves continuation rates in
during use of oral contraceptives. Thromb Haemost. 1996 adolescents. ScientificWorldJournal. 2006;6:353-5. PMID:
Nov;76(5):729-34. PMID: 8950781. X-4, X-5 16547584. X-2, X-3, X-4

1921. Quigley CA, Crowe BJ, Anglin DG, et al.; Growth 1931. Raghu G, Brown KK, Costabel U, et al.; Treatment
hormone and low dose estrogen in Turner syndrome: of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with etanercept: an
results of a United States multi-center trial to near-final exploratory, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care
height. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002 May;87(5):2033-41. Med. 2008 Nov 1;178(9):948-55. PMID: 18669816. X-2,
PMID: 11994337. X-2, X-3, X-4 X-3, X-4

1922. Quijada-Carrera J, Valenzuela-Castano A, 1932. Ragni N, Boccardo E, Viglino S, et al.; Oral


Povedano-Gomez J, et al.; Comparison of tenoxicam and contraception and breast pathology. Acta Eur Fertil. 1981
bromazepan in the treatment of fibromyalgia: a Jun;12(2):141-63. PMID: 6794288. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pain.
1996 May-Jun;65(2-3):221-5. PMID: 8826510. X-2, X-3, 1933. Rahman A, Segasothy M, Samad SA, et al.;
X-4 Analgesic use and chronic renal disease in patients with
headache. Headache. 1993 Sep;33(8):442-5. PMID:
1923. Quinones Estevez MD; Are selective COX-2 8262786. X-2
inhibitors a safe option in patients with intolerance to
nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs? J Investig Allergol 1934. Rahme E, Bardou M, Dasgupta K, et al.;
Clin Immunol. 2009;19(4):328-30. PMID: 19639736. X-2 Hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding associated with
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs among elderly
1924. Quiralte J, Blanco C, Castillo R, et al.; patients using low-dose aspirin: a retrospective cohort
Anaphylactoid reactions due to nonsteroidal study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Feb;46(2):265-72.
antiinflammatory drugs: clinical and cross-reactivity PMID: 16844699. X-4, X-7
studies. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997
Mar;78(3):293-6. PMID: 9087155. X-2, X-4 1935. Rahme E, Barkun A, Nedjar H, et al.;
Hospitalizations for upper and lower GI events associated
1925. Quiralte J, Delgado J, Saenz de San Pedro B, et al.; with traditional NSAIDs and acetaminophen among the
Safety of the new selective cyclooxygenase type 2 elderly in Quebec, Canada. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008
inhibitors rofecoxib and celecoxib in patients with Apr;103(4):872-82. PMID: 18371130. X-4, X-7
anaphylactoid reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004 Oct;93(4):360- 1936. Rahme E, Barkun AN, Toubouti Y, et al.; Do
4. PMID: 15521372. X-2, X-4 proton-pump inhibitors confer additional gastrointestinal
protection in patients given celecoxib? Arthritis Rheum.
2007 Jun 15;57(5):748-55. PMID: 17530673. X-3, X-4

L-88
1947. Ramakrishnan K, Johnson AD; Gastroduodenal
1937. Rahme E, Choquette D, Beaulieu M, et al.; Impact ulcer perforation. Br J Clin Pract. 1986 Sep;40(9):371-2.
of a general practitioner educational intervention on PMID: 3801262. X-2, X-4
osteoarthritis treatment in an elderly population. Am J Med.
2005 Nov;118(11):1262-70. PMID: 16271911. X-2, X-3, 1948. Ramam M, Bhat R, Jindal S, et al.; Patient-reported
X-4 multiple drug reactions: clinical profile and results of
challenge testing. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2010
1938. Rahme E, Joseph L, Kong SX, et al.; Jul-Aug;76(4):382-6. PMID: 20657119. X-2
Gastrointestinal health care resource use and costs
associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs versus 1949. Ramirez Hidalgo A, Pujol Ribera E; Use of the
acetaminophen: retrospective cohort study of an elderly intrauterine device: efficacy and safety. Eur J Contracept
population. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Apr;43(4):917-24. Reprod Health Care. 2000 Sep;5(3):198-207. PMID:
PMID: 10765939. X-4, X-7 11131785. X-2

1939. Rahme E, Joseph L, Kong SX, et al.; Cost of 1950. Ramsoekh D, van Leerdam ME, Rauws EA, et al.;
prescribed NSAID-related gastrointestinal adverse events Outcome of peptic ulcer bleeding, nonsteroidal anti-
in elderly patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 inflammatory drug use, and Helicobacter pylori infection.
Aug;52(2):185-92. PMID: 11488776. X-4, X-7 Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Sep;3(9):859-64. PMID:
16234022. X-2
1940. Rahme E, Nedjar H; Risks and benefits of COX-2
inhibitors vs non-selective NSAIDs: does their 1951. Rao G; Aspirin preparation and risk of GI bleeding.
cardiovascular risk exceed their gastrointestinal benefit? A J Fam Pract. 1997 Mar;44(3):242-3. PMID: 9071237. X-1,
retrospective cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 X-4
Mar;46(3):435-8. PMID: 17255138. X-7
1952. Rao GR, Ghosh S, Dhurat R, et al.; Efficacy, safety,
1941. Rahme E, Nedjar H, Bizzi A, et al.; Hospitalization and tolerability of microsphere adapalene vs. conventional
for gastrointestinal adverse events attributable to the use of adapalene for acne vulgaris. Int J Dermatol. 2009
low-dose aspirin among patients 50 years or older also Dec;48(12):1360-5. PMID: 20415678. X-2, X-4
using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a
retrospective cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 1953. Rashad S, Revell P, Hemingway A, et al.; Effect of
Nov 15;26(10):1387-98. PMID: 17892525. X-4, X-7 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the course of
osteoarthritis. Lancet. 1989 Sep 2;2(8662):519-22. PMID:
1942. Rahme E, Pettitt D, LeLorier J; Determinants and 2570233. X-2, X-4
sequelae associated with utilization of acetaminophen
versus traditional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in an 1954. Rasheed SM, Abdelmonem AM; Complications
elderly population. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 among adolescents using copper intrauterine contraceptive
Nov;46(11):3046-54. PMID: 12428249. X-7 devices. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Dec;115(3):269-72.
PMID: 21872240. X-2, X-4
1943. Rahme E, Watson DJ, Kong SX, et al.; Association
between nonnaproxen NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors and 1955. Rask O, Nilsson KO, Berntorp E; Oestrogen
hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction among the treatment of constitutional tall stature in girls: is there a risk
elderly: a retrospective cohort study. Pharmacoepidemiol of thrombosis or bleeding? Acta Paediatr. 2008
Drug Saf. 2007 May;16(5):493-503. PMID: 17086567. X- Mar;97(3):342-7. PMID: 18298783. X-2, X-4
4, X-7
1956. Raskin JB, White RH, Jaszewski R, et al.;
1944. Rajagopalan R, Iyer S, Perez A; Comparison of Misoprostol and ranitidine in the prevention of NSAID-
pioglitazone with other antidiabetic drugs for associated induced ulcers: a prospective, double-blind, multicenter
incidence of liver failure: no evidence of increased risk of study. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Feb;91(2):223-7. PMID:
liver failure with pioglitazone. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2005 8607484. X-2, X-3, X-4
Mar;7(2):161-9. PMID: 15715889. X-4
1957. Rasmussen VG, Poulsen SH, Dupont E, et al.; Heart
1945. Rakhshani F, Mohammadi M; Contraception valve disease associated with treatment with ergot-derived
continuation rates and reasons for discontinuation in dopamine agonists: a clinical and echocardiographic study
Zahedan, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. of patients with Parkinson's disease. J Intern Med. 2008
2004 May;10(3):260-7. PMID: 16212200. X-8 Jan;263(1):90-8. PMID: 18036161. X-2

1946. Ramadan FH, Masoodi N, El-Solh AA; Clinical 1958. Ratner RE, Maggs D, Nielsen LL, et al.; Long-term
factors associated with hyperkalemia in patients with effects of exenatide therapy over 82 weeks on glycaemic
congestive heart failure. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2005 control and weight in over-weight metformin-treated
Jun;30(3):233-9. PMID: 15896240. X-2, X-3, X-4 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes
Metab. 2006 Jul;8(4):419-28. PMID: 16776749. X-2, X-3,
X-4

L-89
1970. Raynauld JP, Martel-Pelletier J, Bias P, et al.;
1959. Rattray B, Nugent DJ, Young G; Celecoxib in the Protective effects of licofelone, a 5-lipoxygenase and
treatment of haemophilic synovitis, target joints, and pain cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, versus naproxen on cartilage
in adults and children with haemophilia. Haemophilia. loss in knee osteoarthritis: a first multicentre clinical trial
2006 Sep;12(5):514-7. PMID: 16919082. X-2, X-4 using quantitative MRI. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009
Jun;68(6):938-47. PMID: 18653484. X-2, X-3, X-4
1960. Raudaskoski TH, Tomas EI, Paakkari IA, et al.;
Serum lipids and lipoproteins in postmenopausal women 1971. Reasbeck PG, Rice ML, Reasbeck JC; Double-blind
receiving transdermal oestrogen in combination with a controlled trial of indomethacin as an adjunct to narcotic
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. Maturitas. analgesia after major abdominal surgery. Lancet. 1982 Jul
1995 Jun;22(1):47-53. PMID: 7666816. X-2, X-4 17;2(8290):115-8. PMID: 6123836. X-2, X-3, X-4

1961. Raverot G, Jacob M, Jouanneau E, et al.; Secondary 1972. Rebbeck TR, Troxel AB, Norman S, et al.;
deterioration of visual field during cabergoline treatment Pharmacogenetic modulation of combined hormone
for macroprolactinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009 replacement therapy by progesterone-metabolism
Apr;70(4):588-92. PMID: 18673461. X-2 genotypes in postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Am J
Epidemiol. 2007 Dec 15;166(12):1392-9. PMID:
1962. Rawal N, Kroner K, Simin-Geertsen M, et al.; 17827444. X-2, X-3, X-4
Safety of lornoxicam in the treatment of postoperative pain:
a post-marketing study of analgesic regimens containing 1973. Rehan N, Inayatullah A, Chaudhary I; Norplant:
lornoxicam compared with standard analgesic treatment in reasons for discontinuation and side-effects. Eur J
3752 day-case surgery patients. Clin Drug Investig. Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000 Jun;5(2):113-8.
2010;30(10):687-97. PMID: 20701400. X-4 PMID: 10943573. X-2, X-4

1963. Rawson NS; Impact of preexisting health conditions 1974. Reid PC, Virtanen-Kari S; Randomised comparative
on the outcome of an adverse drug reaction alerting trial of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and
program: gastrointestinal disorders before piroxicam and mefenamic acid for the treatment of idiopathic
sulindac therapy. Ann Pharmacother. 1995 Jul-Aug;29(7- menorrhagia: a multiple analysis using total menstrual fluid
8):676-80. PMID: 8520079. X-3, X-4 loss, menstrual blood loss and pictorial blood loss
assessment charts. BJOG. 2005 Aug;112(8):1121-5. PMID:
1964. Rawson NS, Inman WH; Prescription-Event 16045528. X-2, X-3
Monitoring. Recent experience with 5 NSAIDs. Med
Toxicol. 1986;1 Suppl 1:79-82. PMID: 3821431. X-4 1975. Reid RW, Zimmerman AA, Laussen PC, et al.; The
efficacy of tranexamic acid versus placebo in decreasing
1965. Rawson NS, Nourjah P, Grosser SC, et al.; Factors blood loss in pediatric patients undergoing repeat cardiac
associated with celecoxib and rofecoxib utilization. Ann surgery. Anesth Analg. 1997 May;84(5):990-6. PMID:
Pharmacother. 2005 Apr;39(4):597-602. PMID: 15755796. 9141920. X-2, X-3, X-4
X-4
1976. Reiff A, Lovell DJ, Adelsberg JV, et al.; Evaluation
1966. Ray WA, Chung CP, Stein CM, et al.; Risk of of the comparative efficacy and tolerability of rofecoxib
peptic ulcer hospitalizations in users of NSAIDs with and naproxen in children and adolescents with juvenile
gastroprotective cotherapy versus coxibs. Gastroenterology. rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-week randomized controlled
2007 Sep;133(3):790-8. PMID: 17854591. X-4 clinical trial with a 52-week open-label extension. J
Rheumatol. 2006 May;33(5):985-95. PMID: 16583464. X-
1967. Ray WA, Stein CM, Byrd V, et al.; Educational 2, X-4
program for physicians to reduce use of non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs among community-dwelling elderly 1977. Reijman M, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Pols HA, et al.; Is
persons: a randomized controlled trial. Med Care. 2001 there an association between the use of different types of
May;39(5):425-35. PMID: 11317091. X-2, X-3, X-4 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and radiologic
progression of osteoarthritis? The Rotterdam Study.
1968. Ray WA, Stein CM, Daugherty JR, et al.; COX-2 Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Oct;52(10):3137-42. PMID:
selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of 16200593. X-4, X-7
serious coronary heart disease. Lancet. 2002 Oct
5;360(9339):1071-3. PMID: 12383990. X-2, X-4 1978. Reinhart DJ, Goldberg ME, Roth JV, et al.;
Transdermal fentanyl system plus im ketorolac for the
1969. Ray WA, Varas-Lorenzo C, Chung CP, et al.; treatment of postoperative pain. Can J Anaesth. 1997
Cardiovascular risks of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory Apr;44(4):377-84. PMID: 9104519. X-2, X-4
drugs in patients after hospitalization for serious coronary
heart disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 1979. Reinprayoon D, Taneepanichskul S, Bunyavejchevin
May;2(3):155-63. PMID: 20031832. X-4 S, et al.; Effects of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive
implant (Implanon on parameters of breastfeeding

L-90
compared to those of an intrauterine device. Contraception.
2000 Nov;62(5):239-46. PMID: 11172794. X-2, X-4 1992. Riddle R, Ryser CN, Morton AA, et al.; The impact
on health-related quality of life from non-steroidal anti-
1980. Reiter SL, Baer LJ; Initial selection of oral inflammatory drugs, methotrexate, or steroids in treatment
contraceptives. J Reprod Med. 1990 May;35(5):547-8. for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2006
PMID: 2352250. X-2 Apr;31(3):262-71. PMID: 15872147. X-2, X-4

1981. Renier M, Buytaert P; Open prospective multicenter 1993. Riley AP, Stewart MK, Chakraborty J; Program-
trial with a new monophasic contraceptive combination and method-related determinants of first DMPA use
containing gestodene. Contraception. 1991 May;43(5):413- duration in rural Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann. 1994 Sep-
21. PMID: 1914456. X-4 Oct;25(5):255-67. PMID: 7871551. X-2, X-4

1982. Resseguie LJ, Hick JF, Bruen JA, et al.; Congenital 1994. Rimbas M, Marinescu M, Voiosu MR, et al.;
malformations among offspring exposed in utero to NSAID-induced deleterious effects on the proximal and
progestins, Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1936-1974. Fertil mid small bowel in seronegative spondyloarthropathy
Steril. 1985 Apr;43(4):514-9. PMID: 3987922. X-2, X-4 patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb 28;17(8):1030-5.
PMID: 21448355. X-2, X-3, X-4
1983. Reuben SS, Ablett D, Kaye R; High dose
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs compromise spinal 1995. Risques RA, Vaughan TL, Li X, et al.; Leukocyte
fusion. Can J Anaesth. 2005 May;52(5):506-12. PMID: telomere length predicts cancer risk in Barrett's esophagus.
15872130. X-2, X-4 Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007
Dec;16(12):2649-55. PMID: 18086770. X-2, X-3, X-4
1984. Rexrode KM, Buring JE, Glynn RJ, et al.;
Analgesic use and renal function in men. JAMA. 2001 Jul 1996. Ritchie LD; A clinical evaluation of flurbiprofen
18;286(3):315-21. PMID: 11466097. X-6 LAT and piroxicam gel: a multicentre study in general
practice. Clin Rheumatol. 1996 May;15(3):243-7. PMID:
1985. Reyes-Morales H, Mino-Leon D, Doubova SV, et 8793254. X-2, X-3, X-4
al.; Postmarketing pharmacovigilance of adverse drug
reactions: the case of rosiglitazone in Mexico. Int J Clin 1997. Rivera R, Gousse A; Does postmenopausal
Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jan;50(1):1-9. PMID: 22192639. X- hormone therapy cause urinary incontinence? Nat Clin
2, X-4 Pract Urol. 2006 Jun;3(6):304-5. PMID: 16763639. X-1,
X-2, X-4, X-7
1986. Rheinlaender C, Helfenstein D, Walch E, et al.;
Total serum bilirubin levels during cyclooxygenase 1998. Rivers JK, McLean DI; An open study to assess the
inhibitor treatment for patent ductus arteriosus in preterm efficacy and safety of topical 3% diclofenac in a 2.5%
infants. Acta Paediatr. 2009 Jan;98(1):36-42. PMID: hyaluronic acid gel for the treatment of actinic keratoses.
18764861. X-2, X-4 Arch Dermatol. 1997 Oct;133(10):1239-42. PMID:
9382562. X-2, X-3, X-4
1987. Rhemrev PE, van Os WA, Edelman DA, et al.;
Medical removals of the Multiload IUD. Adv Contracept. 1999. Rizk DE; Subdermal levonorgestrel implants. Three
1988 Jun;4(2):125-30. PMID: 3213669. X-3, X-4 years' experience in Cairo, Egypt. J Reprod Med. 1995
Sep;40(9):638-44. PMID: 8576880. X-2, X-4
1988. Rice MM, Graves AB, McCurry SM, et al.;
Postmenopausal estrogen and estrogen-progestin use and 2- 2000. Robe PA, Martin D, Albert A, et al.; A phase 1-2,
year rate of cognitive change in a cohort of older Japanese prospective, double blind, randomized study of the safety
American women: The Kame Project. Arch Intern Med. and efficacy of Sulfasalazine for the treatment of
2000 Jun 12;160(11):1641-9. PMID: 10847257. X-2 progressing malignant gliomas: study protocol of
[ISRCTN45828668]. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:29. PMID:
1989. Richards J, Johnson A, Fox G, et al.; A second 16448552. X-2, X-3, X-4
course of ibuprofen is effective in the closure of a clinically
significant PDA in ELBW infants. Pediatrics. 2009 2001. Robert E, Musatti L, Piscitelli G, et al.; Pregnancy
Aug;124(2):e287-93. PMID: 19651568. X-2, X-3, X-4 outcome after treatment with the ergot derivative,
cabergoline. Reprod Toxicol. 1996 Jul-Aug;10(4):333-7.
1990. Richardson BA, Otieno PA, Mbori-Ngacha D, et al.; PMID: 8829257. X-2, X-8
Hormonal contraception and HIV-1 disease progression
among postpartum Kenyan women. AIDS. 2007 Mar 2002. Robertson DJ, Larsson H, Friis S, et al.; Proton
30;21(6):749-53. PMID: 17413696. X-2 pump inhibitor use and risk of colorectal cancer: a
population-based, case-control study. Gastroenterology.
1991. Riddell RH, Tanaka M, Mazzoleni G; Non-steroidal 2007 Sep;133(3):755-60. PMID: 17678921. X-4
anti-inflammatory drugs as a possible cause of collagenous
colitis: a case-control study. Gut. 1992 May;33(5):683-6. 2003. Robinson JL, Griest S, James KE, et al.; Impact of
PMID: 1612488. X-2 aspirin intolerance on outcomes of sinus surgery.

L-91
Laryngoscope. 2007 May;117(5):825-30. PMID: Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jan;2(1):14-5. PMID:
17473677. X-2, X-3, X-4 16265092. X-1, X-2, X-4

2004. Robinson R, China S, Bunkheila A, et al.; Mirena 2015. Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Rao RS, et al.; Low-dose
intrauterine system in the treatment of menstrual disorders: oral contraceptive use and the risk of myocardial infarction.
a survey of UK patients' experience, acceptability and Arch Intern Med. 2001 Apr 23;161(8):1065-70. PMID:
satisfaction. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Oct;28(7):728-31. 11322840. X-4
PMID: 19065370. X-2
2016. Ross AH, Boyd ME, Colgan TJ, et al.; Comparison
2005. Rodriguez A, Reviriego J, Karamanos V, et al.; of transdermal and oral sequential gestagen in combination
Management of cardiovascular risk factors with with transdermal estradiol: effects on bleeding patterns and
pioglitazone combination therapies in type 2 diabetes: an endometrial histology. Obstet Gynecol. 1993
observational cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. Nov;82(5):773-9. PMID: 8414325. X-2, X-4
2011;10:18. PMID: 21314919. X-3, X-4
2017. Rossing MA, Daling JR, Weiss NS, et al.; Past use
2006. Roll A, Wuthrich B, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, et al.; of an intrauterine device and risk of tubal pregnancy.
Tolerance to celecoxib in patients with a history of adverse Epidemiology. 1993 May;4(3):245-51. PMID: 8512988.
reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Swiss X-2, X-4
Med Wkly. 2006 Oct 28;136(43-44):684-90. PMID:
17183430. X-2, X-3, X-4 2018. Roth S, Bennett R, Caldron P, et al.; Reduced risk
of NSAID gastropathy (GI mucosal toxicity) with
2007. Romer T; Prospective comparison study of nonacetylated salicylate (salsalate): an endoscopic study.
levonorgestrel IUD versus Roller-Ball endometrial ablation Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Feb;19(4 Suppl 2):11-9.
in the management of refractory recurrent hypermenorrhea. PMID: 2181673. X-2
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000 May;90(1):27-9.
PMID: 10767506. X-2, X-3 2019. Roth SH, Bennett R, Caldron P, et al.; A longterm
endoscopic evaluation of patients with arthritis treated with
2008. Romieu I, Fabre A, Fournier A, et al.; nabumetone vs naproxen. J Rheumatol. 1994
Postmenopausal hormone therapy and asthma onset in the Jun;21(6):1118-23. PMID: 7932425. X-2
E3N cohort. Thorax. 2010 Apr;65(4):292-7. PMID:
20142267. X-4, X-7 2020. Roth SH, Tindall EA, Jain AK, et al.; A controlled
study comparing the effects of nabumetone, ibuprofen, and
2009. Romsing J, Ostergaard D, Walther-Larsen S, et al.; ibuprofen plus misoprostol on the upper gastrointestinal
Analgesic efficacy and safety of preoperative versus tract mucosa. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Nov
postoperative ketorolac in paediatric tonsillectomy. Acta 22;153(22):2565-71. PMID: 8239849. X-2
Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Aug;42(7):770-5. PMID:
9698951. X-2, X-3, X-4 2021. Roth-Cline MD; Clinical trials in the wake of
Vioxx: requiring statistically extreme evidence of benefit to
2010. Ronnerdag M, Odlind V; Late bleeding problems ensure the safety of new drugs. Circulation. 2006 May
with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: 9;113(18):2253-9. PMID: 16684875. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4
evaluation of the endometrial cavity. Contraception. 2007
Apr;75(4):268-70. PMID: 17362704. X-2 2022. Roto P, Sainio H, Reunala T, et al.; Addition of
ferrous sulfate to cement and risk of chromium dermatitis
2011. Ronquist G, Rodriguez LA, Ruigomez A, et al.; among construction workers. Contact Dermatitis. 1996
Association between captopril, other antihypertensive drugs Jan;34(1):43-50. PMID: 8789225. X-2, X-4
and risk of prostate cancer. Prostate. 2004 Jan 1;58(1):50-6.
PMID: 14673952. X-3, X-4 2023. Roughead EE, Ramsay E, Pratt N, et al.; NSAID
use in individuals at risk of renal adverse events: an
2012. Rooney TW, Furst DE, Koehnke R, et al.; Aspirin is observational study to investigate trends in Australian
not associated with more toxicity than other nonsteroidal veterans. Drug Saf. 2008;31(11):997-1003. PMID:
antiinflammatory drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis 18840019. X-3, X-4
treated with methotrexate. J Rheumatol. 1993
Aug;20(8):1297-302. PMID: 8230008. X-2, X-4 2024. Roujeau JC, Kelly JP, Naldi L, et al.; Medication
use and the risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic
2013. Roos Y; Antifibrinolytic treatment in subarachnoid epidermal necrolysis. N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec
hemorrhage: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. STAR 14;333(24):1600-7. PMID: 7477195. X-2
Study Group. Neurology. 2000 Jan 11;54(1):77-82. PMID:
10636129. X-2, X-3, X-4 2025. Roumie CL, Arbogast PG, Mitchel EF, Jr., et al.;
Prescriptions for chronic high-dose cyclooxygenase-2
2014. Rosenberg JA, Goldstein JL; Safety and efficacy of inhibitors are often inappropriate and potentially
lumiracoxib compared with NSAIDs. Nat Clin Pract dangerous. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Oct;20(10):879-83.
PMID: 16191131. X-3, X-4

L-92
diagnosed in general practice. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2026. Roumie CL, Choma NN, Kaltenbach L, et al.; Non- 2004 Oct 1;20(7):751-60. PMID: 15379835. X-3, X-4
aspirin NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and risk for
cardiovascular events-stroke, acute myocardial infarction, 2037. Ruminjo JK, Achwal I, Ruminjo IN; Acceptability
and death from coronary heart disease. Pharmacoepidemiol of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Kenya.
Drug Saf. 2009 Nov;18(11):1053-63. PMID: 19637402. East Afr Med J. 1994 Sep;71(9):558-61. PMID: 7875087.
X-4 X-3, X-4

2027. Rovensky J, Micekova D; Six-month prospective 2038. Russo P, Papa V, Russo S, et al.; Topical
study to monitor the treatment of rheumatic diseases with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in uncomplicated
sustained-release flurbiprofen. Drugs Exp Clin Res. cataract surgery: effect of sodium naproxen. Eur J
2000;26(1):19-24. PMID: 10761533. X-2, X-3, X-4 Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep-Oct;15(5):598-606. PMID:
16167290. X-2, X-3, X-4
2028. Rovensky J, Micekova D, Gubzova Z, et al.;
Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with a topical non- 2039. Ryan P, Hetzel DJ, Shearman DJ, et al.; Risk
steroidal antiinflammatory drug. Results of a randomized, factors for ulcerative reflux oesophagitis: a case-control
double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the efficacy and study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995 May-Jun;10(3):306-
safety of a 5% ibuprofen cream. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 12. PMID: 7548808. X-2, X-4
2001;27(5-6):209-21. PMID: 11951579. X-2, X-4
2040. Ryan PJ, Singh SP, Guillebaud J; Depot
2029. Rowan JA; A trial in progress: gestational diabetes. medroxyprogesterone and bone mineral density. J Fam
Treatment with metformin compared with insulin (the Plann Reprod Health Care. 2002 Jan;28(1):12-5. PMID:
Metformin in Gestational Diabetes [MiG] trial). Diabetes 16259808. X-2
Care. 2007 Jul;30 Suppl 2:S214-9. PMID: 17596475. X-2
2041. Rybo G, Andersson K, Odlind V; Hormonal
2030. Rowlands S, Guillebaud J, Bounds W, et al.; Side intrauterine devices. Ann Med. 1993 Apr;25(2):143-7.
effects of danazol compared with an PMID: 8489751. X-8
ethinyloestradiol/norgestrel combination when used for
postcoital contraception. Contraception. 1983 Jan;27(1):39- 2042. Saag KG, Rubenstein LM, Chrischilles EA, et al.;
49. PMID: 6839757. X-2, X-3, X-4 Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and cognitive decline
in the elderly. J Rheumatol. 1995 Nov;22(11):2142-7.
2031. Rozenberg S, Ylikorkala O, Arrenbrecht S; PMID: 8596158. X-7
Comparison of continuous and sequential transdermal
progestogen with sequential oral progestogen in 2043. Sabatini R, Cagiano R; Comparison profiles of
postmenopausal women using continuous transdermal cycle control, side effects and sexual satisfaction of three
estrogen: vasomotor symptoms, bleeding patterns, and hormonal contraceptives. Contraception. 2006
serum lipids. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 1997;42 Suppl Sep;74(3):220-3. PMID: 16904415. X-2
2:376-87. PMID: 9397385. X-2
2044. Sachar D; Exposure to mesalamine during
2032. Rozendaal L, le Cessie S, Wit JM, et al.; Growth- pregnancy increased preterm deliveries (but not birth
reductive therapy in children with marfan syndrome. J defects) and decreased birth weight. Gut. 1998
Pediatr. 2005 Nov;147(5):674-9. PMID: 16291362. X-2, Sep;43(3):316. PMID: 9863473. X-2, X-4
X-4
2045. Sadikot SM, Mogensen CE; Risk of coronary artery
2033. Rubinstein ML, Halpern-Felsher BL, Irwin CE, Jr.; disease associated with initial sulphonylurea treatment of
An evaluation of the use of the transdermal contraceptive patients with type 2 diabetes: a matched case-control study.
patch in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2004 Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Dec;82(3):391-5. PMID:
May;34(5):395-401. PMID: 15093794. X-2, X-3, X-4 18945509. X-2, X-3, X-4

2034. Ruel MA, Wang F, Bourke ME, et al.; Is 2046. Sagay AS, Okeahialam BN, Imade GE;
tranexamic acid safe in patients undergoing coronary Electrocardiographic changes among Nigerian Norplant
endarterectomy? Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 May;71(5):1508- users. West Afr J Med. 2002 Apr-Jun;21(2):146-8. PMID:
11. PMID: 11383791. X-2, X-4 12403039. X-2, X-4

2035. Rugstad HE, Hundal O, Holme I, et al.; Piroxicam 2047. Sagay AS, Okeahialam BN, Imade GE, et al.;
and naproxen plasma concentrations in patients with Evaluation of cardiovascular morbidity in Nigerian women
osteoarthritis: relation to age, sex, efficacy and adverse after 3 years of Norplant contraception. Afr J Reprod
events. Clin Rheumatol. 1986 Sep;5(3):389-98. PMID: Health. 2008 Apr;12(1):47-53. PMID: 20695154. X-2, X-4
3536263. X-4
2048. Sahi SP, Basu SK, Bansal SK; Non-steroidal anti-
2036. Ruigomez A, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Wallander MA, inflammatory drugs and gastrointestinal bleeding in the
et al.; Natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

L-93
elderly. Br J Clin Pract. 1990 Jan;44(1):22-3, 7. PMID: Italian spontaneous reporting database (GIF). Pharmacol
2317434. X-2 Res. 2008 Sep-Oct;58(3-4):202-7. PMID: 18692136. X-4

2049. Sahin Y, Unluhizarci K, Yilmazsoy A, et al.; The 2060. Sammartino A, Di Carlo C, Mandato VD, et al.;
effects of metformin on metabolic and cardiovascular risk Effects of genistein on the endometrium: ultrasonographic
factors in nonobese women with polycystic ovary evaluation. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2003 Feb;17(1):45-9.
syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007 Dec;67(6):904-8. PMID: 12724018. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 17666089. X-2
2061. Sammour RN, Ohel G, Cohen M, et al.; Oral
2050. Sairanen J, Tammela TL, Leppilahti M, et al.; naproxen versus oral tramadol for analgesia after cesarean
Cyclosporine A and pentosan polysulfate sodium for the delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 May;113(2):144-7.
treatment of interstitial cystitis: a randomized comparative PMID: 21435642. X-2, X-3
study. J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2235-8. PMID: 16280777.
X-2, X-3, X-4 2062. Samonis G, Margioris AN, Bafaloukos D, et al.;
Prospective randomized study of aminoglutethimide (AG)
2051. Saito Y, Morimoto T, Ogawa H, et al.; Low-dose versus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) versus
aspirin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and reduced AG+MPA in generalized breast cancer. Oncology. 1994
glomerular filtration rate: subanalysis from the JPAD trial. Sep-Oct;51(5):411-5. PMID: 8052481. X-2, X-3, X-4
Diabetes Care. 2011 Feb;34(2):280-5. PMID: 21270185.
X-3, X-4 2063. Samsioe G, Boschitsch E, Concin H, et al.;
Endometrial safety, overall safety and tolerability of
2052. Sakai H, Minami Y, Kanetake H, et al.; Chemo- transdermal continuous combined hormone replacement
endocrine therapy for prostate cancer with bone metastasis. therapy over 96 weeks: a randomized open-label study.
Nagasaki Prostate Cancer Research Group. Cancer Climacteric. 2006 Oct;9(5):368-79. PMID: 17080587. X-2,
Chemother Pharmacol. 1994;35 Suppl:S23-6. PMID: X-3, X-4
7994782. X-2, X-3, X-4
2064. Samuelsson E, Hagg S; Incidence of venous
2053. Sakamoto C, Sugano K, Ota S, et al.; Case-control thromboembolism in young Swedish women and possibly
study on the association of upper gastrointestinal bleeding preventable cases among combined oral contraceptive
and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Japan. Eur J users. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Jul;83(7):674-81.
Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Sep;62(9):765-72. PMID: 16821007. PMID: 15225194. X-4
X-2
2065. Sanak M, Kielbasa B, Bochenek G, et al.; Exhaled
2054. Salih BA, Abasiyanik MF, Bayyurt N, et al.; H eicosanoids following oral aspirin challenge in asthmatic
pylori infection and other risk factors associated with peptic patients. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Dec;34(12):1899-904.
ulcers in Turkish patients: a retrospective study. World J PMID: 15663565. X-2, X-3, X-4
Gastroenterol. 2007 Jun 21;13(23):3245-8. PMID:
17589905. X-4 2066. Sanchez Andrada S, Rodriguez Valverde V; A
double-blind randomised controlled trial of droxicam
2055. Salim AS; A new approach to the treatment of versus indomethacin in rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs induced gastric Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(4):15-20. PMID: 1365485.
bleeding by free radical scavengers. Surg Gynecol Obstet. X-2, X-3, X-4
1993 May;176(5):484-90. PMID: 8480273. X-2, X-3, X-4
2067. Sanchez Palacios A, Schamann F, Garcia JA, et al.;
2056. Saloheimo P, Ahonen M, Juvela S, et al.; Regular Sensitization to neumoallergens influence in mothers of
aspirin-use preceding the onset of primary intracerebral asthmatic children. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1996
hemorrhage is an independent predictor for death. Stroke. Jan-Feb;24(1):7-12. PMID: 8882754. X-2, X-3, X-4
2006 Jan;37(1):129-33. PMID: 16322483. X-2, X-4
2068. Sander M, Spies CD, Martiny V, et al.; Mortality
2057. Salokorpi T, Eronen M, von Wendt L; Growth and associated with administration of high-dose tranexamic
development until 18 months of children exposed to acid and aprotinin in primary open-heart procedures: a
tocolytics indomethacin or nylidrin. Neuropediatrics. 1996 retrospective analysis. Crit Care. 2010;14(4):R148. PMID:
Aug;27(4):174-7. PMID: 8892364. X-2, X-4 20682059. X-2

2058. Salonen A, Silvola J, Kokki H; Does 1 or 2 g 2069. Sanders SA, Graham CA, Bass JL, et al.; A
paracetamol added to ketoprofen enhance analgesia in adult prospective study of the effects of oral contraceptives on
tonsillectomy patients? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 sexuality and well-being and their relationship to
Oct;53(9):1200-6. PMID: 19572937. X-2, X-3, X-4 discontinuation. Contraception. 2001 Jul;64(1):51-8.
PMID: 11535214. X-2
2059. Salvo F, Polimeni G, Cutroneo PM, et al.; Allergic
reactions to oral drugs: A case/non-case study from an 2070. Sandler DP, Burr FR, Weinberg CR; Nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk for chronic renal

L-94
disease. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Aug 1;115(3):165-72. Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J.
PMID: 2058870. X-2 2006 May-Jul;12(3-4):417-22. PMID: 17037711. X-2

2071. Sandoval HP, De Castro LE, Vroman DT, et al.; 2082. Savage AH, Anderson BL, Simhan HN; The safety
Evaluation of 0.4% ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic of prolonged indomethacin therapy. Am J Perinatol. 2007
solution versus 0.5% ketorolac tromethamine ophthalmic Apr;24(4):207-13. PMID: 17447185. X-2, X-4
solution after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens
implantation. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Aug;22(4):251- 2083. Savage KJ, Clarkson PM; Oral contraceptive use
7. PMID: 16910866. X-2, X-3, X-4 and exercise-induced muscle damage and recovery.
Contraception. 2002 Jul;66(1):67-71. PMID: 12169383.
2072. Sang GW, Shao QX, Ge RS, et al.; A multicentred X-2, X-4
phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem
and Injectable No. 1 given monthly by intramuscular 2084. Savage RL, Moller PW, Ballantyne CL, et al.;
injection to Chinese women. I. Contraceptive efficacy and Variation in the risk of peptic ulcer complications with
sid effects. Contraception. 1995 Mar;51(3):167-83. PMID: nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug therapy. Arthritis
7621685. X-4 Rheum. 1993 Jan;36(1):84-90. PMID: 8424842. X-2

2073. Sangem M, Asthana S, Amin S; Multiple courses of 2085. Sawaya GF, Grady D, Kerlikowske K, et al.; The
indomethacin and neonatal outcomes in premature infants. positive predictive value of cervical smears in previously
Pediatr Cardiol. 2008 Sep;29(5):878-84. PMID: 18094917. screened postmenopausal women: the Heart and
X-2, X-3, X-4 Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS). Ann Intern
Med. 2000 Dec 19;133(12):942-50. PMID: 11119395. X-
2074. Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Poindexter AN, 3rd, Bateman 7
L, et al.; Experiences of injectable contraceptive users in
an urban setting. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Aug;88(2):227-33. 2086. Sawhney MS, McDougall H, Nelson DB, et al.;
PMID: 8692507. X-2 Fecal occult blood test in patients on low-dose aspirin,
warfarin, clopidogrel, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
2075. Sapoznikov B, Vilkin A, Hershkovici M, et al.; drugs. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Jun;55(6):1637-42. PMID:
Minidose aspirin and gastrointestinal bleeding--a 20195757. X-2, X-3, X-4
retrospective, case-control study in hospitalized patients.
Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Sep;50(9):1621-4. PMID: 16133960. X- 2087. Saxena T, Maheshwari S, Goyal RK; Serum insulin
2, X-4 assay: an important therapeutic tool in management of
freshly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Assoc
2076. Sapp AV, Lindbloom EJ; Do third-generation oral Physicians India. 2000 Aug;48(8):815-7. PMID: 11273476.
contraceptives (OCs) increase the risk of venous X-2, X-3, X-4
thrombosis? J Fam Pract. 2001 Oct;50(10):893. PMID:
11674894. X-1, X-2, X-4 2088. Scapa E, Horowitz M, Waron M, et al.; Duodenal
ulcer in the elderly. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1989
2077. Saran R, Dykstra DM, Wolfe RA, et al.; Oct;11(5):502-6. PMID: 2794428. X-2, X-3
Association between vascular access failure and the use of
specific drugs: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns 2089. Scarabin PY, Plu-Bureau G, Zitoun D, et al.;
Study (DOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Dec;40(6):1255- Changes in haemostatic variables induced by oral
63. PMID: 12460045. X-3, X-4 contraceptives containing 50 micrograms or 30 micrograms
oestrogen: absence of dose-dependent effect on PAI-1
2078. Sardella A, Uglietti D, Demarosi F, et al.; activity. Thromb Haemost. 1995 Sep;74(3):928-32. PMID:
Benzydamine hydrochloride oral rinses in management of 8571323. X-2
burning mouth syndrome. A clinical trial. Oral Surg Oral
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999 Dec;88(6):683- 2090. Scaricabarozzi I, Chinea B, Scotti A; Imidazole
6. PMID: 10625850. X-2, X-3, X-4 salicylate in the treatment of osteoarthrosis and
musculoskeletal trauma: a postmarketing survey. Clin Ther.
2079. Sasahara K, Uchida Y, Matsuda K, et al.; Role of 1988;10(2):229-36. PMID: 3273866. X-2, X-4
energy metabolism in drug-induced acute gastric mucosal
injuries in humans. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000 2091. Schachter AD, Arbus GS, Alexander RJ, et al.;
Feb;15(2):127-32. PMID: 10735535. X-2, X-3, X-4 Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated
nephrotoxicity in Bartter syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 1998
2080. Saubermann LJ, Wolf JL; Mesalamine: safe at first Nov;12(9):775-7. PMID: 9874326. X-2, X-4
look. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1999 May;5(2):148-9. PMID:
10338388. X-4 2092. Schad SG, Kraus A, Haubitz I, et al.; Early onset
pauciarticular arthritis is the major risk factor for naproxen-
2081. Savabi-Esfahany M, Fadaei S, Yousefy A; Use of induced pseudoporphyria in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
combined oral contraceptives: retrospective study in Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9(1):R10. PMID: 17266758. X-2

L-95
2093. Schaefer MG, Plowman BK, Morreale AP, et al.; risks after coronary stent implantation. Pharmacotherapy.
Interaction of rofecoxib and celecoxib with warfarin. Am J 2011 May;31(5):458-68. PMID: 21923427. X-4
Health Syst Pharm. 2003 Jul 1;60(13):1319-23. PMID:
12901032. X-2, X-4 2105. Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, et al.; NSAID
switching and short-term gastrointestinal outcome rates
2094. Schaeverbeke T, Broutet N, Zerbib F, et al.; Should after the withdrawal of rofecoxib. Pharmacoepidemiol
we eradicate Helicobacter pylori before prescribing an Drug Saf. 2009 Dec;18(12):1134-42. PMID: 19844943.
NSAID? Result of a placebo-controlled study. Am J X-4
Gastroenterol. 2005 Dec;100(12):2637-43. PMID:
16393213. X-2, X-4 2106. Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, et al.; A
Medicare database review found that physician preferences
2095. Schalekamp T, Klungel OH, Souverein PC, et al.; increasingly outweighed patient characteristics as
Increased bleeding risk with concurrent use of selective determinants of first-time prescriptions for COX-2
serotonin reuptake inhibitors and coumarins. Arch Intern inhibitors. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jan;58(1):98-102.
Med. 2008 Jan 28;168(2):180-5. PMID: 18227365. X-4 PMID: 15649677. X-3, X-4

2096. Schatz H, Schoppel K, Lehwalder D, et al.; 2107. Schneider C, Jick SS, Meier CR; Risk of
Efficacy, tolerability and safety of nateglinide in cardiovascular outcomes in users of
combination with metformin. Results from a study under estradiol/dydrogesterone or other HRT preparations.
general practice conditions. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. Climacteric. 2009 Oct;12(5):445-53. PMID: 19565370. X-
2003 Aug;111(5):262-6. PMID: 12951631. X-4 4

2097. Schechter BA, Trattler W; Efficacy and safety of 2108. Schneider V, Levesque LE, Zhang B, et al.;
bromfenac for the treatment of corneal ulcer pain. Adv Association of selective and conventional nonsteroidal
Ther. 2010 Oct;27(10):756-61. PMID: 20845001. X-2, X-4 antiinflammatory drugs with acute renal failure: A
population-based, nested case-control analysis. Am J
2098. Scheiman JM; What are the effects of Epidemiol. 2006 Nov 1;164(9):881-9. PMID: 17005625.
cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitors on the small bowel? X-7
Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 May;2(5):212-
3. PMID: 16265202. X-2 2109. Schnitzer TJ, Kivitz A, Frayssinet H, et al.; Efficacy
and safety of naproxcinod in the treatment of patients with
2099. Schernhammer ES, Kang JH, Chan AT, et al.; A osteoarthritis of the knee: a 13-week prospective,
prospective study of aspirin use and the risk of pancreatic randomized, multicenter study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage.
cancer in women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jan 7;96(1):22- 2010 May;18(5):629-39. PMID: 20202489. X-2, X-4
8. PMID: 14709735. X-4
2110. Scholes D, LaCroix AZ, Ichikawa LE, et al.;
2100. Schiappacasse V, Diaz S, Zepeda A, et al.; Health Injectable hormone contraception and bone density: results
and growth of infants breastfed by Norplant contraceptive from a prospective study. Epidemiology. 2002
implants users: a six-year follow-up study. Contraception. Sep;13(5):581-7. PMID: 12192229. X-2
2002 Jul;66(1):57-65. PMID: 12169382. X-2, X-4
2111. Scholes D, LaCroix AZ, Ichikawa LE, et al.; The
2101. Schjerning Olsen AM, Fosbol EL, Lindhardsen J, et association between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate
al.; Duration of treatment with nonsteroidal anti- contraception and bone mineral density in adolescent
inflammatory drugs and impact on risk of death and women. Contraception. 2004 Feb;69(2):99-104. PMID:
recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with prior 14759613. X-2, X-4
myocardial infarction: a nationwide cohort study.
Circulation. 2011 May 24;123(20):2226-35. PMID: 2112. Schramm G, Heckes B; Switching hormonal
21555710. X-4 contraceptives to a chlormadinone acetate-containing oral
contraceptive. The Contraceptive Switch Study.
2102. Schmid M, Gode U, Schafer D, et al.; Arachidonic Contraception. 2007 Aug;76(2):84-90. PMID: 17656175.
acid metabolism in nasal tissue and peripheral blood cells X-4
in aspirin intolerant asthmatics. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999
Mar;119(2):277-80. PMID: 10320091. X-2, X-3, X-4 2113. Schuetz E, Sanchez J, Garcia-Barbal J, et al.;
Therapeutic activity, clinical and gastric tolerance of 20mg
2103. Schmidt M, Christiansen CF, Horvath-Puho E, et al.; daily dose of droxicam in comparison with piroxicam in
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and risk of patients with degenerative joint disease. Eur J Rheumatol
venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2011 Inflamm. 1991;11(4):21-8. PMID: 1365486. X-2, X-4
Jul;9(7):1326-33. PMID: 21592304. X-4
2114. Schultz ST, Klonoff-Cohen HS, Wingard DL, et al.;
2104. Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Maeng M, et al.; Acetaminophen (paracetamol) use, measles-mumps-rubella
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use and cardiovascular vaccination, and autistic disorder: the results of a parent

L-96
survey. Autism. 2008 May;12(3):293-307. PMID: Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;110(3):587-93. PMID:
18445737. X-2, X-4 17766604. X-4

2115. Schwarz BE, Pierce C, Walden CE, et al.; 2125. Segal R, Lubart E, Leibovitz A, et al.; Early and late
Reference period analysis of vaginal bleeding with effects of low-dose aspirin on renal function in elderly
triphasic oral contraceptive agents containing patients. Am J Med. 2003 Oct 15;115(6):462-6. PMID:
norethindrone or levonorgestrel: a comparison study. Int J 14563503. X-2, X-4
Fertil. 1992 May-Jun;37(3):176-82. PMID: 1355765. X-2,
X-3, X-4 2126. Segal R, Lubart E, Leibovitz A, et al.; Renal effects
of low dose aspirin in elderly patients. Isr Med Assoc J.
2116. Schwingl PJ, Shelton J; Modeled estimates of 2006 Oct;8(10):679-82. PMID: 17125112. X-2, X-3, X-4
myocardial infarction and venous thromboembolic disease
in users of second and third generation oral contraceptives. 2127. Segall-Gutierrez P, Xiang AH, Watanabe RM, et al.;
Contraception. 1997 Mar;55(3):125-9. PMID: 9114999. Deterioration in cardiometabolic risk markers in obese
X-2, X-4 women during depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use.
Contraception. 2012 Jan;85(1):36-41. PMID: 22067800.
2117. Scott DL, Berry H, Capell H, et al.; The long-term X-2
effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in
osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized placebo-controlled 2128. Segasothy M, Cheong I, Kong BC, et al.; Further
trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Oct;39(10):1095-101. evidence of analgesic nephropathy in Malaysia. Med J
PMID: 11035129. X-2, X-3, X-4 Malaysia. 1986 Dec;41(4):377-9. PMID: 3670164. X-2

2118. Scott KA, Martin JH, Inder WJ; Acidosis in the 2129. Segasothy M, Chin GL, Sia KK, et al.; Chronic
hospital setting: is metformin a common precipitant? Intern nephrotoxicity of anti-inflammatory drugs used in the
Med J. 2010 May;40(5):342-6. PMID: 19323699. X-2 treatment of arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1995 Feb;34(2):162-
5. PMID: 7704463. X-2
2119. Scuderi B, Driussi GB, Chizzolini M, et al.;
Effectiveness and tolerance of piroxicam 0.5% and 2130. Segasothy M, Samad SA, Zulfigar A, et al.; Chronic
diclofenac sodium 0.1% in controlling inflammation after renal disease and papillary necrosis associated with the
cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul;13(6):536-40. long-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as
PMID: 12948311. X-2, X-3, X-4 the sole or predominant analgesic. Am J Kidney Dis. 1994
Jul;24(1):17-24. PMID: 8023820. X-2
2120. Seaman HE, de Vries CS, Farmer RD; The risk of
liver disorders in women prescribed cyproterone acetate in 2131. Segstro R, Morley-Forster PK, Lu G; Indomethacin
combination with ethinyloestradiol (Dianette): a nested as a postoperative analgesic for total hip arthroplasty. Can J
case-control study using the GPRD. Pharmacoepidemiol Anaesth. 1991 Jul;38(5):578-81. PMID: 1934204. X-2, X-
Drug Saf. 2003 Oct-Nov;12(7):541-50. PMID: 14558177. 4
X-4
2132. Seidowsky A, Nseir S, Houdret N, et al.;
2121. Seaman HE, de Vries CS, Farmer RD; Venous Metformin-associated lactic acidosis: a prognostic and
thromboembolism associated with cyproterone acetate in therapeutic study. Crit Care Med. 2009 Jul;37(7):2191-6.
combination with ethinyloestradiol (Dianette): PMID: 19487945. X-2, X-3, X-4
observational studies using the UK General Practice
Research Database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004 2133. Sell S, Phillips O, Handel M; No difference
Jul;13(7):427-36. PMID: 15269926. X-4 between two doses of diclofenac in prophylaxis of
heterotopic ossifications after total hip arthroplasty. Acta
2122. Sebaldt RJ, Petrie A, Goldsmith CH, et al.; Orthop Scand. 2004 Feb;75(1):45-9. PMID: 15022805. X-
Appropriateness of NSAID and Coxib prescribing for 2, X-4
patients with osteoarthritis by primary care physicians in
Ontario: results from the CANOAR study. Am J Manag 2134. Sen M, Ozol D, Bozer M; Influence of preemptive
Care. 2004 Nov;10(11 Pt 1):742-50. PMID: 15623264. X- analgesia on pulmonary function and complications for
2, X-3, X-4 laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci. 2009
Dec;54(12):2742-7. PMID: 19117121. X-2, X-3, X-4
2123. See Y, Ng SC, Tho KS, et al.; Are antacids
necessary as routine prescriptives with non-steroidal anti- 2135. Sener M, Yilmazer C, Yilmaz I, et al.; Patient-
inflammatory drugs? Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1998 controlled analgesia with lornoxicam vs. dipyrone for acute
Mar;27(2):219-22. PMID: 9663314. X-2, X-4 postoperative pain relief after septorhinoplasty: a
prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
2124. Seeger JD, Loughlin J, Eng PM, et al.; Risk of study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Mar;25(3):177-82. PMID:
thromboembolism in women taking 17953792. X-2, X-3, X-4
ethinylestradiol/drospirenone and other oral contraceptives.

L-97
2136. Senna GE, Passalacqua G, Dama A, et al.;
Nimesulide and meloxicam are a safe alternative drugs for 2147. Shah DD, Fonarow GC, Horwich TB; Metformin
patients intolerant to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. therapy and outcomes in patients with advanced systolic
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Dec;35(10):393-6. heart failure and diabetes. J Card Fail. 2010 Mar;16(3):200-
PMID: 14768525. X-2, X-3, X-4 6. PMID: 20206893. X-2, X-4

2137. Sereepapong W, Chotnopparatpattara P, 2148. Shah JA, Edwards CM, Probert CS; Should
Taneepanichskul S, et al.; Endometrial progesterone and azathioprine and 5-aminosalicylates be coprescribed in
estrogen receptors and bleeding disturbances in depot inflammatory bowel disease?: an audit of adverse events
medroxyprogesterone acetate users. Hum Reprod. 2004 and outcome. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008
Mar;19(3):547-52. PMID: 14998949. X-2, X-3, X-4 Mar;20(3):169-73. PMID: 18301295. X-2, X-4

2138. Serni U; Global safety of etodolac: reports from 2149. Shah SK, Arthur A, Yang YC, et al.; A
worldwide postmarketing surveillance studies. Rheumatol retrospective study to investigate racial and ethnic
Int. 1990;10 Suppl:23-7. PMID: 2150568. X-1, X-4 variations in the treatment of psoriasis with etanercept. J
Drugs Dermatol. 2011 Aug;10(8):866-72. PMID:
2139. Serrano P, Lanas A, Arroyo MT, et al.; Risk of 21818507. X-2, X-3, X-4
upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking low-dose
aspirin for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. 2150. Shaheen SO, Newson RB, Henderson AJ, et al.;
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Nov;16(11):1945-53. Prenatal paracetamol exposure and risk of asthma and
PMID: 12390104. X-2, X-4 elevated immunoglobulin E in childhood. Clin Exp
Allergy. 2005 Jan;35(1):18-25. PMID: 15649261. X-4
2140. Shaaban MM, Salah M; A two-year experience with
Norplant implants in Assiut, Egypt. Contraception. 1984 2151. Shainhouse JZ, Grierson LM, Naseer Z; A long-
Apr;29(4):335-43. PMID: 6430639. X-2, X-3, X-4 term, open-label study to confirm the safety of topical
diclofenac solution containing dimethyl sulfoxide in the
2141. Shaaban MM, Salah M, Zarzour A, et al.; A treatment of the osteoarthritic knee. Am J Ther. 2010 Nov-
prospective study of NORPLANT implants and the TCu Dec;17(6):566-76. PMID: 20216203. X-2, X-4
380AgIUD in Assiut, Egypt. Stud Fam Plann. 1983 Jun-
Jul;14(6-7):163-9. PMID: 6414117. X-2, X-4 2152. Shamim N, Rehan N, Inayatullah A; Use of
Norplant in Pakistan: two years experience. J Pak Med
2142. Shaaban MM, Zakherah MS, El-Nashar SA, et al.; Assoc. 1994 Jan;44(1):3-7. PMID: 8158837. X-2, X-3, X-4
Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system compared to
low dose combined oral contraceptive pills for idiopathic 2153. Shankel SW, Johnson DC, Clark PS, et al.; Acute
menorrhagia: a randomized clinical trial. Contraception. renal failure and glomerulopathy caused by nonsteroidal
2011 Jan;83(1):48-54. PMID: 21134503. X-2, X-3, X-4 anti-inflammatory drugs. Arch Intern Med. 1992
May;152(5):986-90. PMID: 1580726. X-2
2143. Shaamash AH, Sayed GH, Hussien MM, et al.; A
comparative study of the levonorgestrel-releasing 2154. Shapiro S, Rosenberg L, Hoffman M, et al.; Risk of
intrauterine system Mirena versus the Copper T380A breast cancer in relation to the use of injectable
intrauterine device during lactation: breast-feeding progestogen contraceptives and combined
performance, infant growth and infant development. estrogen/progestogen contraceptives. Am J Epidemiol.
Contraception. 2005 Nov;72(5):346-51. PMID: 16246660. 2000 Feb 15;151(4):396-403. PMID: 10695598. X-4
X-2, X-4
2155. Shargil AA; Hormone replacement therapy in
2144. Shaamash AH, Zakhari MM; Increased serum perimenopausal women with a triphasic contraceptive
levels of nitric oxide metabolites among users of compound: a three-year prospective study. Int J Fertil.
levonorgestrel-releasing implants [corrected] a possible 1985;30(1):15, 8-28. PMID: 2862116. X-2, X-3, X-4
role in progestin-induced bleeding. Hum Reprod. 2005
Jan;20(1):302-6. PMID: 15471931. X-2, X-4 2156. Sharma A, Gupta R, Ram J, et al.; Topical ketorolac
0.5% solution for the treatment of vernal
2145. Shaarawy M, El-Mallah SY, Seoudi S, et al.; keratoconjunctivitis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1997
Effects of the long-term use of depot medroxyprogesterone Sep;45(3):177-80. PMID: 9475021. X-2, X-3, X-4
acetate as hormonal contraceptive on bone mineral density
and biochemical markers of bone remodeling. 2157. Sharma S; Upper gastrointestinal bleeding after hip
Contraception. 2006 Oct;74(4):297-302. PMID: 16982229. and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2006 Mar;29(3):255-7.
X-2 PMID: 16539204. X-2

2146. Shaffer CL, Gal P, Ransom JL, et al.; Effect of age 2158. Sharma S, Chang DW, Koutz C, et al.; Incidence of
and birth weight on indomethacin pharmacodynamics in hematoma associated with ketorolac after TRAM flap
neonates treated for patent ductus arteriosus. Crit Care breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001
Med. 2002 Feb;30(2):343-8. PMID: 11889306. X-2, X-4 Feb;107(2):352-5. PMID: 11214049. X-2, X-4

L-98
Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 1998 Mar;6(1):13-8. PMID:
2159. Sharma ST, Wickham EP, 3rd, Nestler JE; Changes 9798189. X-2, X-3, X-4
in glucose tolerance with metformin treatment in polycystic
ovary syndrome: a retrospective analysis. Endocr Pract. 2170. Sherman KJ, Daling JR, McKnight B, et al.;
2007 Jul-Aug;13(4):373-9. PMID: 17669713. X-2, X-3, X- Hormonal factors in vulvar cancer. A case-control study. J
4 Reprod Med. 1994 Nov;39(11):857-61. PMID: 7853273.
X-2, X-4
2160. Sharma VK, Sethuraman G, Kumar B; Cutaneous
adverse drug reactions: clinical pattern and causative 2171. Shi W, Wang YM, Li SL, et al.; Adverse effect of
agents--a 6 year series from Chandigarh, India. J Postgrad drug-induced emotional problems on work and daily
Med. 2001 Apr-Jun;47(2):95-9. PMID: 11832597. X-2 activities. A principal component as an independent
predictor of ADRs in Shanghai patients with osteo-
2161. Sharma VK, Sethuraman G, Minz A; Stevens arthropathy taking nabumetone. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther.
Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis and SJS- 2004 Jun;42(6):321-7. PMID: 15222724. X-2, X-3, X-4
TEN overlap: a retrospective study of causative drugs and
clinical outcome. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2008 2172. Shi W, Wang YM, Li SL, et al.; Risk factors of
May-Jun;74(3):238-40. PMID: 18583791. X-2 adverse drug reaction from non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs in Shanghai patients with arthropathy. Acta
2162. Shaw RW, Symonds IM, Tamizian O, et al.; Pharmacol Sin. 2004 Mar;25(3):357-65. PMID: 15000891.
Randomised comparative trial of thermal balloon ablation X-2
and levonorgestrel intrauterine system in patients with
idiopathic menorrhagia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 2173. Shibuya T, Ohkusa T, Yokoyama T, et al.; Colonic
Aug;47(4):335-40. PMID: 17627692. X-2, X-3 mucosal lesions associated with long-term or short-term
administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
2163. Shawki O, Peters A, Abraham-Hebert S; Colorectal Dis. 2010 Nov;12(11):1113-21. PMID:
Hysteroscopic endometrial destruction, optimum method 19817771. X-2, X-4
for preoperative endometrial preparation: a prospective,
randomized, multicenter evaluation. JSLS. 2002 Jan- 2174. Shiffman ML, Farrel MT, Yee YS; Risk of bleeding
Mar;6(1):23-7. PMID: 12002292. X-2, X-4 after endoscopic biopsy or polypectomy in patients taking
aspirin or other NSAIDS. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994 Jul-
2164. Shaya FT, Blume SW, Blanchette CM, et al.; Aug;40(4):458-62. PMID: 7926536. X-2, X-4
Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition and cardiovascular
effects: an observational study of a Medicaid population. 2175. Shimizu S, Nakamura S, Kishino M, et al.; Role of
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jan 24;165(2):181-6. PMID: antithrombotic therapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
15668364. X-4 drug use in bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers. Intern Med.
2009;48(9):631-7. PMID: 19420807. X-2
2165. Sheffield CA, Kane MP, Busch RS, et al.; Safety
and efficacy of exenatide in combination with insulin in 2176. Shin D, Kim S, Kim CS, et al.; Postoperative pain
patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr Pract. 2008 management using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
Apr;14(3):285-92. PMID: 18463034. X-2, X-3, X-4 for pediatric patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2001
Mar;12(2):129-33. PMID: 11314621. X-2, X-4
2166. Shegem NS, Alsheek Nasir AM, Batieha AM, et al.;
Effects of short term metformin administration on 2177. Shin YS, Lee YW, Choi YH, et al.; Spontaneous
androgens in diabetic men. Saudi Med J. 2004 reporting of adverse drug events by Korean regional
Jan;25(1):75-8. PMID: 14758385. X-2, X-3, X-4 pharmacovigilance centers. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.
2009 Oct;18(10):910-5. PMID: 19621345. X-2, X-4
2167. Shen B, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, et al.; Effect of
withdrawal of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use on 2178. Shiraishi M, Kamo T, Hotta M, et al.; Usefulness of
ileal pouch disorders. Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Dec;52(12):3321- switching to cabergoline from other dopamine agonists in
8. PMID: 17410449. X-2, X-3, X-4 patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. J Neural
Transm. 2004 Jun;111(6):725-32. PMID: 15168219. X-2
2168. Sheng J, Zhang WY, Zhang JP, et al.; The LNG-
IUS study on adenomyosis: a 3-year follow-up study on the 2179. Shiuey Y, Ambati BK, Adamis AP; A randomized,
efficacy and side effects of the use of levonorgestrel double-masked trial of topical ketorolac versus artificial
intrauterine system for the treatment of dysmenorrhea tears for treatment of viral conjunctivitis. Ophthalmology.
associated with adenomyosis. Contraception. 2009 2000 Aug;107(8):1512-7. PMID: 10919900. X-2, X-3, X-4
Mar;79(3):189-93. PMID: 19185671. X-2
2180. Shore-Lesserson L, Reich DL, Vela-Cantos F, et al.;
2169. Shepherd WF, Fsadni MG, Raj PS; A clinical Tranexamic acid reduces transfusions and mediastinal
evaluation of diclofenac-gentamicin combination eye drops drainage in repeat cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 1996
in the control of inflammation after cataract surgery. Jul;83(1):18-26. PMID: 8659732. X-2, X-4
Diclofenac-Gentamicin versus Gentamicin Study Group.

L-99
2181. Shorr RI, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, et al.; Concurrent 2192. Silverman HS, Pfeifer MP; Relation between use of
use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and oral anti-inflammatory agents and left ventricular free wall
anticoagulants places elderly persons at high risk for rupture during acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol.
hemorrhagic peptic ulcer disease. Arch Intern Med. 1993 1987 Feb 1;59(4):363-4. PMID: 3812291. X-2
Jul 26;153(14):1665-70. PMID: 8333804. X-4, X-7
2193. Silverstein FE, Faich G, Goldstein JL, et al.;
2182. Shorter NA, Liu JY, Mooney DP, et al.; Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal
Indomethacin-associated bowel perforations: a study of anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid
possible risk factors. J Pediatr Surg. 1999 Mar;34(3):442-4. arthritis: the CLASS study: A randomized controlled trial.
PMID: 10211650. X-2, X-4 Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study. JAMA. 2000
Sep 13;284(10):1247-55. PMID: 10979111. X-4
2183. Shoupe D; Multicenter randomized comparative
trial of two low-dose triphasic combined oral 2194. Simenon G, Van Gossum A, Adler M, et al.;
contraceptives containing desogestrel or norethindrone. Macroscopic and microscopic gut lesions in seronegative
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;83(5 Pt 1):679-85. PMID: spondyloarthropathies. J Rheumatol. 1990
8164925. X-2, X-4 Nov;17(11):1491-4. PMID: 1980311. X-2, X-4

2184. Shoupe D, Mishell DR, Jr., Bopp BL, et al.; The 2195. Simon CH, Dijkmans BA, Breedveld FC;
significance of bleeding patterns in Norplant implant users. Variations in the monitoring and management of the side
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Feb;77(2):256-60. PMID: 1899135. effects of antirheumatic drugs by means of laboratory tests.
X-2, X-3, X-4 Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1997 Nov-Dec;15(6):633-9. PMID:
9444419. X-2, X-3, X-4
2185. Shrivastava D, Rao TK, Sinert R, et al.; The
efficacy of erythropoietin in human immunodeficiency 2196. Simon JA, Lin F, Vittinghoff E, et al.; The relation
virus-infected end-stage renal disease patients treated by of postmenopausal hormone therapy to serum uric acid and
maintenance hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995 the risk of coronary heart disease events: the Heart and
Jun;25(6):904-9. PMID: 7771487. X-2, X-3, X-4 Estrogen-Progestin Replacement Study (HERS). Ann
Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;16(2):138-45. PMID: 16039873. X-7
2186. Shrivastava M, Uchit G, Chakravarti A, et al.;
Adverse drug reactions reported in Indira Gandhi 2197. Simon LS, Weaver AL, Graham DY, et al.; Anti-
Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur. J inflammatory and upper gastrointestinal effects of
Assoc Physicians India. 2011 May;59:296-9. PMID: celecoxib in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled
21751606. X-4 trial. JAMA. 1999 Nov 24;282(20):1921-8. PMID:
10580457. X-2
2187. Shulman LP; The use of triphasic oral
contraceptives in a continuous use regimen. Contraception. 2198. Simon LS, Zhao SZ, Arguelles LM, et al.;
2005 Aug;72(2):105-10. PMID: 16022848. X-2, X-4 Economic and gastrointestinal safety comparisons of
etodolac, nabumetone, and oxaprozin from insurance
2188. Sidney S, Petitti DB, Soff GA, et al.; Venous claims data from patients with arthritis. Clin Ther. 1998
thromboembolic disease in users of low-estrogen combined Nov-Dec;20(6):1218-35; discussion 192-3. PMID:
estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives. Contraception. 2004 9916614. X-4
Jul;70(1):3-10. PMID: 15208046. X-2
2199. Simunic V, Tomic V, Tomic J, et al.; Comparative
2189. Silberstein SD, Armellino JJ, Hoffman HD, et al.; study of the efficacy and tolerability of two vaginal
Treatment of menstruation-associated migraine with the progesterone formulations, Crinone 8% gel and Utrogestan
nonprescription combination of acetaminophen, aspirin, capsules, used for luteal support. Fertil Steril. 2007
and caffeine: results from three randomized, placebo- Jan;87(1):83-7. PMID: 17081536. X-2, X-3, X-4
controlled studies. Clin Ther. 1999 Mar;21(3):475-91.
PMID: 10321417. X-2, X-3, X-4 2200. Sinclair HK, Bond CM, Hannaford PC; Long term
follow-up studies of users of nonprescription medicines
2190. Sillars B, Davis WA, Hirsch IB, et al.; purchased from community pharmacies: some
Sulphonylurea-metformin combination therapy, methodological issues. Drug Saf. 2001;24(12):929-38.
cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: the PMID: 11735649. X-2, X-4
Fremantle Diabetes Study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010
Sep;12(9):757-65. PMID: 20649627. X-2 2201. Singh G, Fries JF, Williams CA, et al.; Toxicity
profiles of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in
2191. Silverberg KM, Vaughn TC, Hansard LJ, et al.; rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1991 Feb;18(2):188-94.
Vaginal (Crinone 8%) gel vs. intramuscular progesterone in PMID: 1673721. X-4
oil for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization: a large
prospective trial. Fertil Steril. 2012 Feb;97(2):344-8. 2202. Singh G, Ramey DR, Morfeld D, et al.;
PMID: 22188983. X-2, X-3, X-4 Gastrointestinal tract complications of nonsteroidal anti-

L-100
inflammatory drug treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. A 2214. Skander MP, Ryan FP; Non-steroidal anti-
prospective observational cohort study. Arch Intern Med. inflammatory drugs and pain free peptic ulceration in the
1996 Jul 22;156(14):1530-6. PMID: 8687261. X-4 elderly. BMJ. 1988 Oct 1;297(6652):833-4. PMID:
3140938. X-2, X-7
2203. Singh K, Viegas OA, Fong YF, et al.; Acceptability
of Norplant implants for fertility regulation in Singapore. 2215. Skjeldestad F, Bratt H; Fertility after complicated
Contraception. 1992 Jan;45(1):39-47. PMID: 1591920. X- and non-complicated use of IUDs. A controlled prospective
2, X-4 study. Adv Contracept. 1988 Sep;4(3):179-84. PMID:
3239478. X-2, X-3, X-4
2204. Singh K, Viegas OA, Loke DF, et al.; Evaluation of
liver function and lipid metabolism following Norplant-2 2216. Slattery ML, Curtin K, Ma K, et al.; Diet activity,
rods removal. Adv Contracept. 1993 Sep;9(3):233-9. and lifestyle associations with p53 mutations in colon
PMID: 8237578. X-2, X-4 tumors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002
Jun;11(6):541-8. PMID: 12050095. X-2, X-3, X-4
2205. Singh K, Viegas OA, Ratnam SS; Norplant
contraceptive subdermal implants: one year experience in 2217. Slattery ML, Schaffer D, Edwards SL, et al.; Are
Singapore. Contraception. 1988 May;37(5):457-69. PMID: dietary factors involved in DNA methylation associated
3136971. X-2, X-4 with colon cancer? Nutr Cancer. 1997;28(1):52-62. PMID:
9200151. X-4
2206. Singh K, Viegas OA, Ratnam SS; A three-year
evaluation of hemostatic function in Singaporean Norplant- 2218. Slatyer MA, Hensley MJ, Lopert R; A randomized
2 rod acceptors. Adv Contracept. 1990 Jun;6(2):81-9. controlled trial of piroxicam in the management of acute
PMID: 2119546. X-2 ankle sprain in Australian Regular Army recruits. The
Kapooka Ankle Sprain Study. Am J Sports Med. 1997 Jul-
2207. Singh R, al-Amari M; Clinical performance of Aug;25(4):544-53. PMID: 9240990. X-2, X-3, X-4
intrauterine device TCu-380 A in Benghazi, Libyan Arab
Jamahiriya. East Mediterr Health J. 2000 Sep-Nov;6(5- 2219. Smalley W, Stein CM, Arbogast PG, et al.;
6):1073-82. PMID: 12197330. X-2, X-4 Underutilization of gastroprotective measures in patients
receiving nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Arthritis
2208. Siskind V; Confidence intervals for the excess risk Rheum. 2002 Aug;46(8):2195-200. PMID: 12209525. X-3,
in case-control studies. Stat Med. 1996 Jul 30;15(14):1535- X-4
44. PMID: 8855479. X-1, X-2, X-8
2220. Smalley WE, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, et al.;
2209. Sivak-Sears NR, Schwartzbaum JA, Miike R, et al.; Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the incidence of
Case-control study of use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in elderly persons.
drugs and glioblastoma multiforme. Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Mar 15;141(6):539-45. PMID:
Jun 15;159(12):1131-9. PMID: 15191930. X-2, X-4 7900721. X-4, X-7

2210. Sivin I, Diaz S, Pavez M, et al.; Two-year 2221. Smedley FH, Taube M, Leach R, et al.; Non-
comparative trial of the Gyne T* 380 Slimline and Gyne T* steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ingestion: retrospective
380 intrauterine copper devices. Contraception. 1991 study of 272 bleeding or perforated peptic ulcers. Postgrad
Nov;44(5):481-7. PMID: 1797463. X-4 Med J. 1989 Dec;65(770):892-5. PMID: 2616429. X-2

2211. Sivin I, Mishell DR, Jr., Darney P, et al.; 2222. Smets HL, De Haes JF, De Swaef A, et al.;
Levonorgestrel capsule implants in the United States: a 5- Exposure of the elderly to potential nephrotoxic drug
year study. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Sep;92(3):337-44. PMID: combinations in Belgium. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.
9721766. X-2, X-4 2008 Oct;17(10):1014-9. PMID: 18763247. X-3, X-4

2212. Sivin I, Stern J; Health during prolonged use of 2223. Smith I, Wilde A; Secondary tonsillectomy
levonorgestrel 20 micrograms/d and the copper TCu 380Ag haemorrhage and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J
intrauterine contraceptive devices: a multicenter study. Laryngol Otol. 1999 Jan;113(1):28-30. PMID: 10341915.
International Committee for Contraception Research X-2
(ICCR). Fertil Steril. 1994 Jan;61(1):70-7. PMID: 8293847.
X-2 2224. Smith KJ, Skelton HG, Yeager J, et al.; Pruritus in
HIV-1 disease: therapy with drugs which may modulate the
2213. Sivin I, Stern J, Coutinho E, et al.; Prolonged pattern of immune dysregulation. Dermatology.
intrauterine contraception: a seven-year randomized study 1997;195(4):353-8. PMID: 9529556. X-4
of the levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day (LNg 20) and the Copper
T380 Ag IUDS. Contraception. 1991 Nov;44(5):473-80. 2225. Smith MA, Hampton C, Rodier L, et al.;
PMID: 1797462. X-2 Informatics. Detecting risks in elderly patients taking
NSAIDs. Nurse Pract. 2011 Apr;36(4):51-3. PMID:
21422979. X-1

L-101
2238. Sokic-Milutinovic A, Krstic M, Rozer-Smolovic B,
2226. Smith NL, Wiley JR, Legault C, et al.; Effect of et al.; Role of Helicobacter pylori infection in
progestogen and progestogen type on hemostasis measures gastroduodenal damage in patients starting NSAID therapy:
in postmenopausal women: the Postmenopausal 4 Months follow-up study. Dig Dis Sci. 2010
Estrogen/Progestin Intervention (PEPI) Study. Menopause. Oct;55(10):2887-92. PMID: 20094785. X-2
2008 Nov-Dec;15(6):1145-50. PMID: 19186375. X-2, X-7
2239. Solak O, Metin M, Esme H, et al.; Effectiveness of
2227. Smith TR, Sunshine A, Stark SR, et al.; Sumatriptan gabapentin in the treatment of chronic post-thoracotomy
and naproxen sodium for the acute treatment of migraine. pain. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Jul;32(1):9-12. PMID:
Headache. 2005 Sep;45(8):983-91. PMID: 16109111. X-2, 17442584. X-2, X-4
X-3, X-4
2240. Solomon DH, Avorn J, Sturmer T, et al.;
2228. Snaith A, Pugh L, Simpson CR, et al.; The potential Cardiovascular outcomes in new users of coxibs and
for interaction between warfarin and coprescribed nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: high-risk subgroups
medication: a retrospective study in primary care. Am J and time course of risk. Arthritis Rheum. 2006
Cardiovasc Drugs. 2008;8(3):207-12. PMID: 18533741. May;54(5):1378-89. PMID: 16645966. X-7
X-4
2241. Solomon DH, Cadarette SM, Choudhry NK, et al.;
2229. Snell ES; Regulatory decisions and the A cohort study of thiazolidinediones and fractures in older
pharmaceutical industry. Med Toxicol. 1986;1 Suppl adults with diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009
1:130-6. PMID: 3821429. X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4 Aug;94(8):2792-8. PMID: 19470635. X-7

2230. Snowden R; General assessment of the Multiload 2242. Solomon DH, Glynn RJ, Bohn R, et al.; The hidden
Cu250 intrauterine device. UK network of IUCD research cost of nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in
clinics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Sep;89(Suppl 4):58-65. older patients. J Rheumatol. 2003 Apr;30(4):792-8. PMID:
PMID: 7150529. X-2, X-3, X-4 12672201. X-4, X-7

2231. Snyder BK, Clark RF; Effect of magnesium 2243. Solomon DH, Glynn RJ, Rothman KJ, et al.;
hydroxide administration on iron absorption after a Subgroup analyses to determine cardiovascular risk
supratherapeutic dose of ferrous sulfate in human associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and
volunteers: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. coxibs in specific patient groups. Arthritis Rheum. 2008
1999 Apr;33(4):400-5. PMID: 10092717. X-2, X-3, X-4 Aug 15;59(8):1097-104. PMID: 18668605. X-4

2232. So LY, Fok TF, Sung RY, et al.; Preterm infants 2244. Solomon DH, Rassen JA, Glynn RJ, et al.; The
with patent ductus arteriosus: treatment with an enteral comparative safety of opioids for nonmalignant pain in
preparation of indomethacin. Ann Trop Paediatr. older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Dec 13;170(22):1979-
1992;12(4):403-8. PMID: 1283670. X-2, X-3, X-4 86. PMID: 21149754. X-4

2233. Sobande AA, Al-Bar HM, Archibong EI, et al.; 2245. Solomon DH, Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ, et al.;
Efficacy and acceptability of depo-medroxyprogesterone Relationship between selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors
acetate injection. As a method of contraception in Saudi and acute myocardial infarction in older adults. Circulation.
Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2000 Apr;21(4):348-51. PMID: 2004 May 4;109(17):2068-73. PMID: 15096449. X-7
11533816. X-2
2246. Solomon DH, Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ, et al.;
2234. Soderstrom RM; Will progesterone save the IUD? J Determinants of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor
Reprod Med. 1983 May;28(5):305-8. PMID: 6152982. X- prescribing: are patient or physician characteristics more
2 important? Am J Med. 2003 Dec 15;115(9):715-20. PMID:
14693324. X-7
2235. Soeprono R; Extended use of the Multiload Cu-250.
Adv Contracept. 1988 Jun;4(2):109-13. PMID: 3213667. 2247. Solomon KD, Turkalj JW, Whiteside SB, et al.;
X-4 Topical 0.5% ketorolac vs 0.03% flurbiprofen for inhibition
of miosis during cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997
2236. Soheilian M, Karimi S, Ramezani A, et al.; Pilot Sep;115(9):1119-22. PMID: 9298051. X-2, X-3, X-4
study of intravitreal injection of diclofenac for treatment of
macular edema of various etiologies. Retina. 2010 2248. Somigliana E, Vercellini P, Vigano P, et al.;
Mar;30(3):509-15. PMID: 19952986. X-2, X-4 Endometriosis and estroprogestins: the chicken or the egg
causality dilemma. Fertil Steril. 2011 Jan;95(1):431-3.
2237. Sohn SH, Penzias AS, Emmi AM, et al.; PMID: 20883987. X-2
Administration of progesterone before oocyte retrieval
negatively affects the implantation rate. Fertil Steril. 1999 2249. Sonmezer M, Atabekoglu C, Cengiz B, et al.;
Jan;71(1):11-4. PMID: 9935109. X-2, X-3, X-4 Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate in anticoagulated
patients with previous hemorrhagic corpus luteum. Eur J

L-102
Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2005 Mar;10(1):9-14. 2261. Sowers JR, White WB, Pitt B, et al.; The Effects of
PMID: 16036292. X-2 cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory therapy on 24-hour blood pressure in patients
2250. Sood A, Midha V, Sood N, et al.; Azathioprine with hypertension, osteoarthritis, and type 2 diabetes
versus sulfasalazine in maintenance of remission in severe mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jan 24;165(2):161-8.
ulcerative colitis. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2003 May- PMID: 15668361. X-2, X-4
Jun;22(3):79-81. PMID: 12839376. X-2, X-4
2262. Soylu A, Dolapcioglu C, Dolay K, et al.;
2251. Sood BG, Lulic-Botica M, Holzhausen KA, et al.; Endoscopic and histopathological evaluation of acute
The risk of necrotizing enterocolitis after indomethacin gastric injury in high-dose acetaminophen and nonsteroidal
tocolysis. Pediatrics. 2011 Jul;128(1):e54-62. PMID: anti-inflammatory drug ingestion with suicidal intent.
21690109. X-2, X-4 World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov 21;14(43):6704-10.
PMID: 19034975. X-2
2252. Sopena F, Lanas A, Sainz R; Esophageal motility
and intraesophageal pH patterns in patients with 2263. Soysal M, Soysal S, Ozer S; A randomized
esophagitis and chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory controlled trial of levonorgestrel releasing IUD and thermal
drug use. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998 Dec;27(4):316-20. balloon ablation in the treatment of menorrhagia. Zentralbl
PMID: 9855260. X-2 Gynakol. 2002 Apr;124(4):213-9. PMID: 12080483. X-2

2253. Soraisham AS, Dalgleish S, Singhal N; Antenatal 2264. Soysal ME, Soysal S, Gurses E, et al.; Laparoscopic
indomethacin tocolysis is associated with an increased need presacral neurolysis for endometriosis-related pelvic pain.
for surgical ligation of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm Hum Reprod. 2003 Mar;18(3):588-92. PMID: 12615830.
infants. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 May;32(5):435-42. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 20500951. X-2, X-4
2265. Speirs CJ, Dollery CT, Inman WH, et al.;
2254. Soraisham AS, Sauve R, Singhal N; Indomethacin Postmarketing surveillance of enalapril. II: Investigation of
tocolysis and neurodevelopmental outcome. Indian J the potential role of enalapril in deaths with renal failure.
Pediatr. 2011 Aug;78(8):946-52. PMID: 21318396. X-2, BMJ. 1988 Oct 1;297(6652):830-2. PMID: 2846102. X-2,
X-4 X-4

2255. Soranna L, Cucinelli F, Perri C, et al.; Individual 2266. Spektor S, Agus S, Merkin V, et al.; Low-dose
effect of E2 and dydrogesterone on insulin sensitivity in aspirin prophylaxis and risk of intracranial hemorrhage in
post-menopausal women. J Endocrinol Invest. 2002 patients older than 60 years of age with mild or moderate
Jun;25(6):547-50. PMID: 12109627. X-2, X-4 head injury: a prospective study. J Neurosurg. 2003
Oct;99(4):661-5. PMID: 14567600. X-2, X-4
2256. Sorensen HT, Jacobsen J, Norgaard M, et al.;
Newer cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors, other non- 2267. Spellacy WN, Birk SA, Buggie J, et al.; Prospective
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of acute carbohydrate metabolism studies in women using a low-
pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jul estrogen oral contraceptive for one year. J Reprod Med.
1;24(1):111-6. PMID: 16803609. X-4 1981 Jun;26(6):295-8. PMID: 7019435. X-2, X-3, X-4

2257. Sorensen HT, Mellemkjaer L, Blot WJ, et al.; Risk 2268. Spellacy WN, Tsibris AM, Tsibris JC, et al.;
of upper gastrointestinal bleeding associated with use of Carbohydrate metabolism studies after one year of using an
low-dose aspirin. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 oral contraceptive containing gestodene and ethinyl
Sep;95(9):2218-24. PMID: 11007221. X-2, X-4 estradiol. Contraception. 1994 Feb;49(2):125-30. PMID:
8143452. X-2, X-4
2258. Souter D, Harding J, McCowan L, et al.; Antenatal
indomethacin--adverse fetal effects confirmed. Aust N Z J 2269. Spiller HA, Weber JA, Winter ML, et al.;
Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Feb;38(1):11-6. PMID: 9521382. Multicenter case series of pediatric metformin ingestion.
X-2, X-4 Ann Pharmacother. 2000 Dec;34(12):1385-8. PMID:
11144693. X-2, X-4
2259. Souyri C, Olivier P, Grolleau S, et al.; Severe
necrotizing soft-tissue infections and nonsteroidal anti- 2270. Spitzer WO, Lewis MA, Heinemann LA, et al.;
inflammatory drugs. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2008 Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous
May;33(3):249-55. PMID: 18261144. X-2 thromboembolic disorders: an international case-control
study. Transnational Research Group on Oral
2260. Souza AI, Batista Filho M, Bresani CC, et al.; Contraceptives and the Health of Young Women. BMJ.
Adherence and side effects of three ferrous sulfate 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):83-8. PMID: 8555935. X-4
treatment regimens on anemic pregnant women in clinical
trials. Cad Saude Publica. 2009 Jun;25(6):1225-33. PMID: 2271. Sporrong T, Rybo G, Mattsson LA, et al.; An
19503953. X-2, X-4 objective and subjective assessment of uterine blood loss in
postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy.

L-103
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 May;99(5):399-401. PMID: ulcers and ulcer complications in patients with rheumatoid
1535788. X-2, X-3, X-4 arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Feb;67(2):256-9. PMID:
17604285. X-4
2272. Srinivasan S, Rao G; Does using nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during pregnancy increase 2283. Stein CM, Griffin MR, Taylor JA, et al.;
the risk of adverse events? J Fam Pract. 2001 Educational program for nursing home physicians and staff
May;50(5):467. PMID: 11350713. X-1 to reduce use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
among nursing home residents: a randomized controlled
2273. Srinivasjois RM, Nathan EA, Doherty DA, et al.; trial. Med Care. 2001 May;39(5):436-45. PMID: 11317092.
Renal impairment associated with indomethacin treatment X-2, X-3, X-4
for patent ductus arteriosus in extremely preterm neonates--
is postnatal age at start of treatment important? J Matern 2284. Stephanie R, Labied S, Blacher S, et al.;
Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006 Dec;19(12):793-9. PMID: Endometrial vessel maturation in women exposed to
17190690. X-2, X-3, X-4 levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for a short or
prolonged period of time. Hum Reprod. 2007
2274. Srisupandit S; A three-year study of the copper-7 Dec;22(12):3084-91. PMID: 17921480. X-2
minigravigard intrauterine contraceptive device in
nulliparous women. J Med Assoc Thai. 1988 2285. Stevens-Simon C, Kelly L, Wallis J; The timing of
Jun;71(6):294-7. PMID: 3171448. X-4 norplant insertion and postpartum depression in teenagers. J
Adolesc Health. 2000 Jun;26(6):408-13. PMID: 10822182.
2275. St Germaine CG, Bogaty P, Boyer L, et al.; Genetic X-2, X-4
polymorphisms and the cardiovascular risk of non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jun 2286. Stewart I, Thomas A; Mefenamic acid compared
15;105(12):1740-5. PMID: 20538124. X-2 with diclofenac sodium in elderly patients with
osteoarthritis. Br J Clin Pract. 1988 Aug;42(8):316-20.
2276. St Sauver JL, Lieber MM, Slager SL, et al.; PMID: 3061435. X-7
Associations between variants in the cyclooxygenase 2
enzyme gene (PTGS2) and development of benign prostate 2287. Stiasny-Kolster K, Benes H, Peglau I, et al.;
enlargement. BJU Int. 2011 Nov;108(10):1610-5. PMID: Effective cabergoline treatment in idiopathic restless legs
21481131. X-2, X-3, X-4 syndrome. Neurology. 2004 Dec 28;63(12):2272-9. PMID:
15623686. X-2
2277. Staab D, Kaufmann R, Brautigam M, et al.;
Treatment of infants with atopic eczema with pimecrolimus 2288. Stika CS, Gross GA, Leguizamon G, et al.; A
cream 1% improves parents' quality of life: a multicenter, prospective randomized safety trial of celecoxib for
randomized trial. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005 treatment of preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002
Sep;16(6):527-33. PMID: 16176401. X-2, X-3, X-4 Sep;187(3):653-60. PMID: 12237643. X-2, X-4

2278. Stack WA, Atherton JC, Hawkey GM, et al.; 2289. Stolk P, Souverein PC, Leufkens HG, et al.; The
Interactions between Helicobacter pylori and other risk association between exposure to COX-2 inhibitors and
factors for peptic ulcer bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. schizophrenia deterioration. A nested case-control study.
2002 Mar;16(3):497-506. PMID: 11876703. X-2, X-4 Pharmacopsychiatry. 2007 May;40(3):111-5. PMID:
17541886. X-4
2279. Stalman A, Tsai JA, Segerdahl M, et al.; Ketorolac
but not morphine exerts inflammatory and metabolic 2290. Stolte M, Karimi D, Vieth M, et al.; Strictures,
effects in synovial membrane after knee arthroscopy: a diaphragms, erosions or ulcerations of ischemic type in the
double-blind randomized prospective study using the colon should always prompt consideration of nonsteroidal
microdialysis technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov- anti-inflammatory drug-induced lesions. World J
Dec;34(6):557-64. PMID: 19916211. X-2, X-4 Gastroenterol. 2005 Oct 7;11(37):5828-33. PMID:
16270393. X-2, X-3, X-4
2280. Stanback J, Qureshi ZP, Sekkade-Kigondu C;
Advance provision of oral contraceptives to family 2291. Strate LL, Liu YL, Huang ES, et al.; Use of aspirin
planning clients in Kenya. East Afr Med J. 2002 or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increases risk for
May;79(5):257-8. PMID: 12638810. X-2, X-3, X-4 diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding. Gastroenterology.
2011 May;140(5):1427-33. PMID: 21320500. X-4
2281. Steen KS, Lems WF, Aertsen J, et al.; Incidence of
clinically manifest ulcers and their complications in 2292. Stray N, Weberg R; A prospective study of same
patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 day bi-directional endoscopy in the evaluation of patients
May;60(5):443-7. PMID: 11302864. X-2, X-4 with occult gastrointestinal bleeding. Scand J
Gastroenterol. 2006 Jul;41(7):844-50. PMID: 16785199.
2282. Steen KS, Nurmohamed MT, Visman I, et al.; X-2, X-3, X-4
Decreasing incidence of symptomatic gastrointestinal

L-104
2293. Stroehmann I; A rheumatologist's viewpoint. Eur J Ed. 2008 Mar;93(2):F94-9. PMID: 17768157. X-2, X-3, X-
Rheumatol Inflamm. 1991;11(3):7-11. PMID: 1365482. X- 4
1
2305. Suarez RD, Grobman WA, Parilla BV;
2294. Strom BL, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, et al.; Parenteral Indomethacin tocolysis and intraventricular hemorrhage.
ketorolac and risk of gastrointestinal and operative site Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;97(6):921-5. PMID: 11384697.
bleeding. A postmarketing surveillance study. JAMA. 1996 X-2, X-4
Feb 7;275(5):376-82. PMID: 8569017. X-4
2306. Sucato DJ, Lovejoy JF, Agrawal S, et al.;
2295. Strom BL, Carson JL, Schinnar R, et al.; The effect Postoperative ketorolac does not predispose to
of indication on the risk of hypersensitivity reactions pseudoarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion and
associated with tolmetin sodium vs other nonsteroidal instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine
antiinflammatory drugs. J Rheumatol. 1988 Apr;15(4):695- (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 1;33(10):1119-24. PMID:
9. PMID: 3397980. X-11 18449047. X-2, X-4

2296. Strom BL, Carson JL, Schinnar R, et al.; 2307. Sucato GS, Land SR, Murray PJ, et al.;
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and neutropenia. Adolescents' experiences using the contraceptive patch
Arch Intern Med. 1993 Sep 27;153(18):2119-24. PMID: versus pills. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011
8379803. X-4 Aug;24(4):197-203. PMID: 21454110. X-2, X-3

2297. Strom BL, Schinnar R, Bilker WB, et al.; 2308. Sudano I, Flammer AJ, Periat D, et al.;
Gastrointestinal tract bleeding associated with naproxen Acetaminophen increases blood pressure in patients with
sodium vs ibuprofen. Arch Intern Med. 1997 Dec 8- coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2010 Nov
22;157(22):2626-31. PMID: 9531232. X-4 2;122(18):1789-96. PMID: 20956208. X-2, X-3, X-4

2298. Sturdee DW, Ulrich LG, Barlow DH, et al.; The 2309. Sugiyama T, Nishikawa K, Komatsu Y, et al.;
endometrial response to sequential and continuous Attributable risk of H. pylori in peptic ulcer disease: does
combined oestrogen-progestogen replacement therapy. declining prevalence of infection in general population
BJOG. 2000 Nov;107(11):1392-400. PMID: 11117768. explain increasing frequency of non-H. pylori ulcers? Dig
X-7 Dis Sci. 2001 Feb;46(2):307-10. PMID: 11281179. X-2, X-
3, X-4
2299. Sturgeon SR, Brinton LA, Berman ML, et al.;
Intrauterine device use and endometrial cancer risk. Int J 2310. Suh DC, Hunsche E, Shin HC, et al.; Co-prescribing
Epidemiol. 1997 Jun;26(3):496-500. PMID: 9222773. X-2, of proton pump inhibitors among chronic users of NSAIDs
X-4 in the UK. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008 Apr;47(4):458-
63. PMID: 18263598. X-2, X-3, X-4
2300. Sturkenboom M, Nicolosi A, Cantarutti L, et al.;
Incidence of mucocutaneous reactions in children treated 2311. Suissa S; Statistical methods in
with niflumic acid, other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory pharmacoepidemiology. Principles in managing error. Drug
drugs, or nonopioid analgesics. Pediatrics. 2005 Saf. 1991 Sep-Oct;6(5):381-9. PMID: 1930744. X-1
Jul;116(1):e26-33. PMID: 15930187. X-4
2312. Suissa S, Ernst P, Hudson M, et al.; Newer disease-
2301. Sturkenboom MC, Burke TA, Dieleman JP, et al.; modifying antirheumatic drugs and the risk of serious
Underutilization of preventive strategies in patients hepatic adverse events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
receiving NSAIDs. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Nov;42 Am J Med. 2004 Jul 15;117(2):87-92. PMID: 15234643.
Suppl 3:iii23-31. PMID: 14585915. X-2, X-3, X-4 X-4

2302. Sturkenboom MC, Burke TA, Tangelder MJ, et al.; 2313. Suissa S, Spitzer WO, Rainville B, et al.; Recurrent
Adherence to proton pump inhibitors or H2-receptor use of newer oral contraceptives and the risk of venous
antagonists during the use of non-steroidal anti- thromboembolism. Hum Reprod. 2000 Apr;15(4):817-21.
inflammatory drugs. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 PMID: 10739826. X-4
Dec;18(11-12):1137-47. PMID: 14653834. X-2, X-3, X-4
2314. Sukel MP, van der Linden MW, Chen C, et al.;
2303. Sturkenboom MC, Romano F, Simon G, et al.; The Large-scale stopping and switching treatment with COX-2
iatrogenic costs of NSAID therapy: a population study. inhibitors after the rofecoxib withdrawal.
Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Apr 15;47(2):132-40. PMID: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Jan;17(1):9-19. PMID:
11954006. X-4 17963198. X-4

2304. Su BH, Lin HC, Chiu HY, et al.; Comparison of 2315. Suleiman UL, Harrison M, Britton A, et al.; H2-
ibuprofen and indometacin for early-targeted treatment of receptor antagonists may increase the risk of cardio-
patent ductus arteriosus in extremely premature infants: a oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a case-control study. Eur J
randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal

L-105
Cancer Prev. 2000 Jun;9(3):185-91. PMID: 10954258. X-
2, X-4 2328. Tadesse E, van Brandenburg WJ, Exalto N;
Intrauterine devices: results of a separate clinical and
2316. Suman VJ, Van Winter JT, Evans MP, et al.; ultrasound follow-up study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod
Levonorgestrel contraceptive implants in female patients 14 Biol. 1985 May;19(5):289-95. PMID: 3894102. X-2, X-4
to 21 years old. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998 Jan;73(1):10-6.
PMID: 9443673. X-2, X-3, X-4 2329. Taha AS, Angerson WJ, Prasad R, et al.; Upper
gastrointestinal bleeding and the changing use of COX-2
2317. Suri V, Aggarwal N, Kaur R, et al.; Safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and low-dose
intrauterine contraceptive device (copper T 200 B) in aspirin. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Oct 15;26(8):1171-
women with cardiac disease. Contraception. 2008 8. PMID: 17894659. X-4
Oct;78(4):315-8. PMID: 18847580. X-2, X-4
2330. Taheri M, Rahimi M, Naderi M, et al.; Effects of a
2318. Suwanmalee O, Taneepanichskul S; A clinical subdermal levonorgestrel contraceptive implant (Norplant)
study of transdermal contraceptive patch in Thai women. J on serum cholesterol, triglycerides, ALT and AST in
Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Oct;89 Suppl 4:S1-4. PMID: Iranian women. Contraception. 2006 Jan;73(1):56-8.
17726805. X-2, X-4 PMID: 16371296. X-2, X-3, X-4

2319. Svanes C, Soreide JA, Skarstein A, et al.; Smoking 2331. Takami T, Yoda H, Kawakami T, et al.; Usefulness
and ulcer perforation. Gut. 1997 Aug;41(2):177-80. PMID: of indomethacin for patent ductus arteriosus in full-term
9301495. X-2, X-4 infants. Pediatr Cardiol. 2007 Jan-Feb;28(1):46-50. PMID:
17203336. X-2, X-3, X-4
2320. Sweet BV, Townsend KA, Tsai CY; Risk
assessment of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity in 2332. Tal S, Shavit Y, Stern F, et al.; Association between
ambulatory care patients. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004 vitamin B12 levels and mortality in hospitalized older
Sep 15;61(18):1917-21. PMID: 15487881. X-2, X-4 adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Mar;58(3):523-6. PMID:
20158555. X-2, X-4
2321. Sweileh WM; Potential adverse effects of a low-
dose aspirin-diuretic combination on kidney function. Int J 2333. Talamini G, Tommasi M, Amadei V, et al.; Risk
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov;45(11):601-5. PMID: factors of peptic ulcer in 4943 inpatients. J Clin
18077925. X-2, X-4 Gastroenterol. 2008 Apr;42(4):373-80. PMID: 18277902.
X-4
2322. Swigris JJ, Olson AL, Fischer A, et al.;
Mycophenolate mofetil is safe, well tolerated, and 2334. Talamini G, Zamboni G, Cavallini G; Antral
preserves lung function in patients with connective tissue mucosal Helicobacter pylori infection density as a risk
disease-related interstitial lung disease. Chest. 2006 factor of duodenal ulcer. Digestion. 1997;58(3):211-7.
Jul;130(1):30-6. PMID: 16840379. X-2, X-4 PMID: 9243115. X-2, X-4

2323. Swislocki AL, Khuu Q, Liao E, et al.; Safety and 2335. Tam WH, Yuen PM, Shan Ng DP, et al.; Health
efficacy of metformin in a restricted formulary. Am J status function after treatment with thermal balloon
Manag Care. 1999 Jan;5(1):62-8. PMID: 10345968. X-2, endometrial ablation and levonorgestrel intrauterine system
X-4 for idiopathic menorrhagia: a randomized study. Gynecol
Obstet Invest. 2006;62(2):84-8. PMID: 16612101. X-2, X-
2324. Sy FS, Osteria TS, Opiniano V, et al.; Effect of oral 4
contraceptive on liver function tests of women with
schistosomiasis in the Philippines. Contraception. 1986 2336. Tamai H, Katoh K, Yamaguchi T, et al.; The impact
Sep;34(3):283-94. PMID: 3098499. X-2, X-4 of tranilast on restenosis after coronary angioplasty: the
Second Tranilast Restenosis Following Angioplasty Trial
2325. Szczeklik A, Nizankowska E, Duplaga M; Natural (TREAT-2). Am Heart J. 2002 Mar;143(3):506-13. PMID:
history of aspirin-induced asthma. AIANE Investigators. 11868058. X-2, X-3, X-4
European Network on Aspirin-Induced Asthma. Eur Respir
J. 2000 Sep;16(3):432-6. PMID: 11028656. X-2, X-4 2337. Tamblyn RM, McLeod PJ, Abrahamowicz M, et al.;
Do too many cooks spoil the broth? Multiple physician
2326. Szer IS, Goldenstein-Schainberg C, Kurtin PS; involvement in medical management of elderly patients and
Paucity of renal complications associated with nonsteroidal potentially inappropriate drug combinations. CMAJ. 1996
antiinflammatory drugs in children with chronic arthritis. J Apr 15;154(8):1177-84. PMID: 8612253. X-3, X-4
Pediatr. 1991 Nov;119(5):815-7. PMID: 1941392. X-2
2338. Tammemagi CM, Freedman MT, Church TR, et al.;
2327. Tadesse E; Return of fertility after an IUD removal Factors associated with human small aggressive non small
for planned pregnancy: a six year prospective study. East cell lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007
Afr Med J. 1996 Mar;73(3):169-71. PMID: 8698014. X-2, Oct;16(10):2082-9. PMID: 17932357. X-2, X-3, X-4
X-4

L-106
2339. Tan T, Cabrita IZ, Hensman D, et al.; Assessment 2350. Targownik LE, Metge CJ, Leung S, et al.; The
of cardiac valve dysfunction in patients receiving relative efficacies of gastroprotective strategies in chronic
cabergoline treatment for hyperprolactinaemia. Clin users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Endocrinol (Oxf). 2010 Sep;73(3):369-74. PMID: Gastroenterology. 2008 Apr;134(4):937-44. PMID:
20550538. X-2 18294634. X-4

2340. Taneepanichskul S, Intaraprasert S, Phuapradit W, et 2351. Tarone RE, Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK; Nonselective
al.; Use of Norplant implants in asymptomatic HIV-1 nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and
infected women. Contraception. 1997 Apr;55(4):205-7. gastrointestinal bleeding: relative and absolute risk
PMID: 9179451. X-2, X-4 estimates from recent epidemiologic studies. Am J Ther.
2004 Jan-Feb;11(1):17-25. PMID: 14704592. X-1
2341. Taneepanichskul S, Intaraprasert S, Theppisai U, et
al.; Bone mineral density in long-term depot 2352. Tartagni M, Schonauer LM, De Salvia MA, et al.;
medroxyprogesterone acetate acceptors. Contraception. Comparison of Diane 35 and Diane 35 plus finasteride in
1997 Jul;56(1):1-3. PMID: 9306024. X-2, X-4 the treatment of hirsutism. Fertil Steril. 2000
Apr;73(4):718-23. PMID: 10731531. X-2, X-3, X-4
2342. Taneepanichskul S, Intharasakda P; Efficacy and
side effects of Norplant use in Thai women above the age 2353. Tata LJ, Fortun PJ, Hubbard RB, et al.; Does
of 35 years. Contraception. 2001 Nov;64(5):305-7. PMID: concurrent prescription of selective serotonin reuptake
11777491. X-2, X-4 inhibitors and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
substantially increase the risk of upper gastrointestinal
2343. Taneepanichskul S, Tanprasertkul C; Use of bleeding? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Aug 1;22(3):175-
Norplant implants in the immediate postpartum period 81. PMID: 16091054. X-4
among asymptomatic HIV-1-positive mothers.
Contraception. 2001 Jul;64(1):39-41. PMID: 11535212. X- 2354. Tavani A, Scotti L, Bosetti C, et al.; Aspirin and
2, X-4 risk of renal cell cancer in Italy. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010
Jul;19(4):272-4. PMID: 20351553. X-2, X-4
2344. Tang OS, Tang G, Yip PS, et al.; Further evaluation
on long-term depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate use and 2355. Tay HL, Evans JM, McMahon AD, et al.; Aspirin,
bone mineral density: a longitudinal cohort study. nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and epistaxis. A
Contraception. 2000 Oct;62(4):161-4. PMID: 11137068. regional record linkage case control study. Ann Otol Rhinol
X-2, X-4 Laryngol. 1998 Aug;107(8):671-4. PMID: 9716869. X-4

2345. Tang T, Glanville J, Hayden CJ, et al.; Combined 2356. Techapornroong M, Akrawinthawong K,
lifestyle modification and metformin in obese patients with Cheungpasitporn W, et al.; Anaphylaxis: a ten years
polycystic ovary syndrome. A randomized, placebo- inpatient retrospective study. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol.
controlled, double-blind multicentre study. Human 2010 Dec;28(4):262-9. PMID: 21337910. X-4
Reproduction. 2006;21(1):80-9. PMID: 16199429. X-2, X-
3, X-4 2357. Teeling M, O'Connor H, Feely J, et al.; What
therapies have replaced rofecoxib in Ireland? Br J Clin
2346. Tangkiatkumjai M, Vadcharavivad S, Mahachai V; Pharmacol. 2007 Oct;64(4):536-41. PMID: 17555468. X-
Prediction of UGIB event in NSAID users: a model 4
development. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 May;88(5):672-7.
PMID: 16149687. X-2, X-3, X-4 2358. Teichmann A, Apter D, Emerich J, et al.;
Continuous, daily levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol vs. 21-
2347. Tanis BC, van den Bosch MA, Kemmeren JM, et al.; day, cyclic levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol: efficacy, safety
Oral contraceptives and the risk of myocardial infarction. N and bleeding in a randomized, open-label trial.
Engl J Med. 2001 Dec 20;345(25):1787-93. PMID: Contraception. 2009 Dec;80(6):504-11. PMID: 19913143.
11752354. X-2 X-2, X-4

2348. Tao MH, Xu WH, Zheng W, et al.; Oral 2359. Terra SG, Somayaji V, Schwartz S, et al.; A Dose-
contraceptive and IUD use and endometrial cancer: a Ranging Study of the DPP-IV Inhibitor PF-734200 Added
population-based case-control study in Shanghai, China. Int to Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes*. Exp Clin
J Cancer. 2006 Nov 1;119(9):2142-7. PMID: 16823853. Endocrinol Diabetes. 2011 Jul;119(7):401-7. PMID:
X-4 21472661. X-2, X-3, X-4

2349. Targownik LE, Al-Mamfud A; The prevalence of 2360. Tewari S, Kaushish R, Sharma S, et al.; Role of low
risk factors for gastrointestinal complications and use of dose aspirin in prevention of pregnancy induced
gastroprotection among persons hospitalized for hypertension. J Indian Med Assoc. 1997 Feb;95(2):43-4, 7.
cardiovascular disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Mar PMID: 9357241. X-2, X-4
15;23(6):743-9. PMID: 16556176. X-2, X-4

L-107
2361. Tharavanij T, Betancourt A, Messinger S, et al.; 2372. Thorogood M, Hannaford PC; The influence of oral
Improved long-term health-related quality of life after islet contraceptives on the risk of multiple sclerosis. Br J Obstet
transplantation. Transplantation. 2008 Nov 15;86(9):1161- Gynaecol. 1998 Dec;105(12):1296-9. PMID: 9883921. X-
7. PMID: 19005394. X-2, X-3, X-4 4

2362. Thiefin G, Schwalm MS; Underutilization of 2373. Thrift AG, McNeil JJ, Forbes A, et al.; Risk of
gastroprotective drugs in patients receiving non-steroidal primary intracerebral haemorrhage associated with aspirin
anti-inflammatory drugs. Dig Liver Dis. 2011 and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: case-control
Mar;43(3):209-14. PMID: 21051300. X-4 study. BMJ. 1999 Mar 20;318(7186):759-64. PMID:
10082697. X-2, X-4
2363. Thillainayagam AV, Tabaqchali S, Warrington SJ, et
al.; Interrelationships between Helicobacter pylori 2374. Tibble JA, Sigthorsson G, Foster R, et al.; Use of
infection, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and surrogate markers of inflammation and Rome criteria to
gastroduodenal disease. A prospective study in healthy distinguish organic from nonorganic intestinal disease.
volunteers. Dig Dis Sci. 1994 May;39(5):1085-9. PMID: Gastroenterology. 2002 Aug;123(2):450-60. PMID:
8174421. X-2, X-4 12145798. X-2, X-3, X-4

2364. Thomas DB, Ray RM; Depot-medroxyprogesterone 2375. Tilakaratne A, Soory M, Ranasinghe AW, et al.;
acetate (DMPA) and risk of invasive adenocarcinomas and Effects of hormonal contraceptives on the periodontium, in
adenosquamous carcinomas of the uterine cervix. WHO a population of rural Sri-Lankan women. J Clin
Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Periodontol. 2000 Oct;27(10):753-7. PMID: 11034123. X-
Contraceptives. Contraception. 1995 Nov;52(5):307-12. 2
PMID: 8585888. X-8
2376. Tildesley G, Ehsanullah RS, Wood JR; Ranitidine
2365. Thomas DB, Ye Z, Ray RM; Cervical carcinoma in in the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers associated
situ and use of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Br J
(DMPA). WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Rheumatol. 1993 Jun;32(6):474-8. PMID: 8508283. X-2,
Steroid Contraceptives. Contraception. 1995 Jan;51(1):25- X-3, X-4
31. PMID: 7750280. X-8
2377. Tilleul P, Weickmans H, Sean PT, et al.; Cost
2366. Thome-Kromer B, Bonk I, Klatt M, et al.; Toward analysis applied to postoperative analgesia regimens: a
the identification of liver toxicity markers: a proteome comparison between parecoxib and propacetamol. Pharm
study in human cell culture and rats. Proteomics. 2003 World Sci. 2007 Aug;29(4):374-9. PMID: 17310303. X-2,
Oct;3(10):1835-62. PMID: 14625847. X-2, X-3, X-4 X-3, X-4

2367. Thompson MR; Indomethacin and perforated 2378. Tilyard MW, Dovey SM; A comparison of
duodenal ulcer. Br Med J. 1980 Feb 16;280(6212):448. tiaprofenic acid, mefenamic acid and placebo in the
PMID: 7370529. X-2 treatment of dysmenorrhoea in general practice. Aust N Z J
Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 May;32(2):165-8. PMID: 1520205.
2368. Thomsen RW, Riis A, Christensen S, et al.; X-2, X-4
Outcome of peptic ulcer bleeding among users of
traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and 2379. Ting RZ, Szeto CC, Chan MH, et al.; Risk factors
selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors. Aliment Pharmacol of vitamin B(12) deficiency in patients receiving
Ther. 2006 Nov 15;24(10):1431-8. PMID: 17032286. X-4 metformin. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Oct 9;166(18):1975-9.
PMID: 17030830. X-2
2369. Thomsen SF, Kyvik KO, Skadhauge LR, et al.;
Regular use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs 2380. Titchen T, Cranswick N, Beggs S; Adverse drug
increases the risk of adult-onset asthma: a population-based reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, COX-2
follow-up study. Clin Respir J. 2009 Apr;3(2):82-4. PMID: inhibitors and paracetamol in a paediatric hospital. Br J
20298382. X-4 Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jun;59(6):718-23. PMID: 15948937.
X-3
2370. Thomson WM, Spencer AJ, Slade GD, et al.; Is
medication a risk factor for dental caries among older 2381. Todd J, Lawrenson R, Farmer RD, et al.; Venous
people? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002 thromboembolic disease and combined oral contraceptives:
Jun;30(3):224-32. PMID: 12000346. X-2, X-4 A re-analysis of the MediPlus database. Hum Reprod. 1999
Jun;14(6):1500-5. PMID: 10357966. X-4
2371. Thong-Ngam D, Chayanupatkul M, Klaikeaw N, et
al.; Effect of rebamipide on gastric ulcer healing caused by 2382. Toh S, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Hernan MA;
Helicobacter pylori and/or NSAIDs or non NSAIDs-non H. Confounding adjustment via a semi-automated high-
pylori. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Sep;92(9):1207-12. PMID: dimensional propensity score algorithm: an application to
19772181. X-2, X-3, X-4

L-108
electronic medical records. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. Clin Gastroenterol. 1994 Dec;19(4):278-82. PMID:
2011 Aug;20(8):849-57. PMID: 21717528. X-4 7876505. X-2, X-3, X-4

2383. Toker MI, Erdem H, Erdogan H, et al.; The effects 2393. Tremollieres FA, Pouilles JM, Ribot C; Withdrawal
of topical ketorolac and indomethacin on measles of hormone replacement therapy is associated with
conjunctivitis: randomized controlled trial. Am J significant vertebral bone loss in postmenopausal women.
Ophthalmol. 2006 May;141(5):902-5. PMID: 16527227. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(5):385-90. PMID: 11444087. X-2,
X-2, X-3, X-4 X-3, X-4

2384. Toljamo KT, Niemela SE, Karttunen TJ, et al.; The 2394. Trenkwalder C, Hogl B, Benes H, et al.;
role of Herpes simplex and Helicobacter pylori infection in Augmentation in restless legs syndrome is associated with
the etiology of persistent or recurrent gastric erosions: a low ferritin. Sleep Med. 2008 Jul;9(5):572-4. PMID:
follow-up study. Dig Dis Sci. 2002 Apr;47(4):818-22. 17921065. X-2
PMID: 11991616. X-2, X-3, X-4
2395. Trewin VF, Lawrence CJ, Rae SA, et al.;
2385. Tornhamre S, Ehnhage A, Kolbeck KG, et al.; Development and use of a gastropathy index for ranking
Uncoupled regulation of leukotriene C4 synthase in the safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the
platelets from aspirin-intolerant asthmatics and healthy elderly. J Clin Pharm Ther. 1994 Jun;19(3):209-14. PMID:
volunteers after aspirin treatment. Clin Exp Allergy. 2002 7962226. X-4, X-7
Nov;32(11):1566-73. PMID: 12569976. X-4
2396. Trinavarat A, Atchaneeyasakul LO,
2386. Torres DM, Jones FJ, Shaw JC, et al.; Rosiglitazone Surachatkumtonekul T, et al.; Comparison of topical
versus rosiglitazone and metformin versus rosiglitazone prednisolone acetate, ketorolac tromethamine and
and losartan in the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis fluorometholone acetate in reducing inflammation after
in humans: a 12-month randomized, prospective, open- phacoemulsification. J Med Assoc Thai. 2003
label trial. Hepatology. 2011 Nov;54(5):1631-9. PMID: Feb;86(2):143-50. PMID: 12678152. X-2, X-4
21748770. X-2, X-3, X-4
2397. Trinh XB, Tjalma WA, Makar AP, et al.; Use of the
2387. Torres-Galvan MJ, Ortega N, Sanchez-Garcia F, et levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in breast
al.; LTC4-synthase A-444C polymorphism: lack of cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2008 Jul;90(1):17-22. PMID:
association with NSAID-induced isolated periorbital 17706209. X-2
angioedema in a Spanish population. Ann Allergy Asthma
Immunol. 2001 Dec;87(6):506-10. PMID: 11770699. X-2, 2398. Trombetta D, Imbesi S, Vita G, et al.; Possible link
X-3, X-4 between history of hypersensitivity to a specific non-
steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and positive
2388. Tramer MR, Moore RA, Reynolds DJ, et al.; results following challenge test to alternative NSAIDS.
Quantitative estimation of rare adverse events which follow Arzneimittelforschung. 2009;59(8):410-4. PMID:
a biological progression: a new model applied to chronic 19813464. X-2, X-4
NSAID use. Pain. 2000 Mar;85(1-2):169-82. PMID:
10692616. X-1, X-2, X-4 2399. Trossarelli GF, Gennarelli G, Benedetto C, et al.;
Climacteric symptoms and control of the cycle in women
2389. Trattler W, McDonald M; Double-masked aged 35 years or older taking an oral contraceptive with
comparison of ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% versus 0.150 mg desogestrel and 0.020 mg ethinylestradiol.
nepafenac sodium 0.1% for postoperative healing rates and Contraception. 1995 Jan;51(1):13-8. PMID: 7750278. X-2
pain control in eyes undergoing surface ablation. Cornea.
2007 Jul;26(6):665-9. PMID: 17592313. X-2, X-3, X-4 2400. Trus T, Winthrop AL, Pipe S, et al.; Optimal
management of patent ductus arteriosus in the neonate
2390. Traversa G, Bianchi C, Da Cas R, et al.; Cohort weighing less than 800 g. J Pediatr Surg. 1993
study of hepatotoxicity associated with nimesulide and Sep;28(9):1137-9. PMID: 8308678. X-2, X-4
other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. BMJ. 2003 Jul
5;327(7405):18-22. PMID: 12842950. X-4 2401. Tsalikis T, Stamatopoulos P, Kalachanis J, et al.;
Experience with the MLCu250 IUD. Adv Contracept. 1986
2391. Traversa G, Walker AM, Ippolito FM, et al.; Dec;2(4):393-8. PMID: 3565139. X-2, X-3, X-4
Gastroduodenal toxicity of different nonsteroidal
antiinflammatory drugs. Epidemiology. 1995 Jan;6(1):49- 2402. Tsesmeli NE, Kotsaftis PS, Savopoulos CG, et al.;
54. PMID: 7888445. X-4 Incidence and etiology of acute non-malignant upper
gastrointestinal bleeding in northern Greece. J
2392. Tremaine WJ, Schroeder KW, Harrison JM, et al.; Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jul;22(7):1009-13. PMID:
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the 17608846. X-2
oral mesalamine (5-ASA) preparation, Asacol, in the
treatment of symptomatic Crohn's colitis and ileocolitis. J 2403. Tsokos M, Schmoldt A; Contribution of
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to deaths associated

L-109
with peptic ulcer disease: a prospective toxicological osteoarthritis. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Dec;92 Suppl
analysis of autopsy blood samples. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 6:S19-26. PMID: 20128070. X-4
2001 Dec;125(12):1572-4. PMID: 11735692. X-2
2414. Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Daffina R; Long-term
2404. Tsong Y; Comparing reporting rates of adverse treatment with mesalazine and rifaximin versus rifaximin
events between drugs with adjustment for year of alone for patients with recurrent attacks of acute
marketing and secular trends in total reporting. J Biopharm diverticulitis of colon. Dig Liver Dis. 2002 Jul;34(7):510-5.
Stat. 1995 Mar;5(1):95-114. PMID: 7613562. X-1, X-2, X- PMID: 12236485. X-2, X-3, X-4
3, X-4
2415. Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Giorgetti GM, et al.;
2405. Tsubota A, Kumada H, Arase Y, et al.; Combined Balsalazide and/or high-potency probiotic mixture (VSL#3)
ursodeoxycholic acid and glycyrrhizin therapy for chronic in maintaining remission after attack of acute,
hepatitis C virus infection: a randomized controlled trial in uncomplicated diverticulitis of the colon. Int J Colorectal
170 patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Dis. 2007 Sep;22(9):1103-8. PMID: 17390144. X-2, X-3,
Oct;11(10):1077-83. PMID: 10524635. X-2, X-4 X-4

2406. Tsuchiya T, Ayaki M, Onishi T, et al.; Three-year 2416. Tworoger SS, Fairfield KM, Colditz GA, et al.;
prospective randomized study of incidence of posterior Association of oral contraceptive use, other contraceptive
capsule opacification in eyes treated with topical diclofenac methods, and infertility with ovarian cancer risk. Am J
and betamethasone. Ophthalmic Res. 2003 Mar- Epidemiol. 2007 Oct 15;166(8):894-901. PMID: 17656616.
Apr;35(2):67-70. PMID: 12646745. X-2, X-4 X-4

2407. Tsumura H, Fujita T, Tamura I, et al.; Association 2417. Tzeng JI, Mok MS; Combination of intramuscular
between adherence to evidence-based guidelines for the Ketorolac and low dose epidural morphine for the relief of
prescription of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and post-caesarean pain. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994
the incidence of gastric mucosal lesions in Japanese Nov;23(6 Suppl):10-3. PMID: 7710217. X-2, X-4
patients. J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;45(9):944-51. PMID:
20499110. X-2 2418. Tzoulaki I, Molokhia M, Curcin V, et al.; Risk of
cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality among
2408. Tsuruoka N, Iwakiri R, Hara M, et al.; NSAIDs are patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed oral antidiabetes
a significant risk factor for colonic diverticular hemorrhage drugs: retrospective cohort study using UK general practice
in elder patients: evaluation by a case-control study. J research database. BMJ. 2009;339:b4731. PMID:
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jun;26(6):1047-52. PMID: 19959591. X-3
21198829. X-2, X-3, X-4
2419. Ubeira FM, Anadon AM, Salgado A, et al.;
2409. Tu P, Qiu S, Fang H, et al.; Acceptance, efficacy, Synergism between prior Anisakis simplex infections and
and side effects of Norplant implants in four counties in intake of NSAIDs, on the risk of upper digestive bleeding:
north China. Stud Fam Plann. 1997 Jun;28(2):122-31. a case-control study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011
PMID: 9216032. X-2, X-4 Jun;5(6):e1214. PMID: 21738810. X-2

2410. Tubert-Bitter P, Begaud B, Moride Y, et al.; 2420. Ucar SK, Paterson WF, Donaldson MD, et al.;
Comparing the toxicity of two drugs in the framework of Ethinyl estradiol treatment for growth limitation in girls
spontaneous reporting: a confidence interval approach. J with Marfan's syndrome--experience from a single center.
Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Jan;49(1):121-3. PMID: 8598505. Endocr Res. 2009;34(4):109-20. PMID: 19878071. X-2, X-
X-1, X-2, X-3, X-4 3, X-4

2411. Tugwell PS, Wells GA, Shainhouse JZ; 2421. Uchikova E, Pehlivanov B; Effect of two low-dose
Equivalence study of a topical diclofenac solution gestodene containing monophasic oral contraceptives on
(pennsaid) compared with oral diclofenac in symptomatic hemostasis in Bulgarian women. Expert Opin
treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized Pharmacother. 2008 Aug;9(11):1839-44. PMID: 18627323.
controlled trial. J Rheumatol. 2004 Oct;31(10):2002-12. X-2, X-4
PMID: 15468367. X-2, X-4
2422. Uchino J, Une Y, Sato Y, et al.; Chemohormonal
2412. Tuomikoski P, Haapalahti P, Sarna S, et al.; therapy of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J
Vasomotor hot flushes and 24-hour ambulatory blood Clin Oncol. 1993 Jun;16(3):206-9. PMID: 8393272. X-2,
pressure in normotensive women: A placebo-controlled X-4
trial on post-menopausal hormone therapy. Ann Med. 2010
Jul;42(5):334-43. PMID: 20429800. X-2 2423. Ullmann U, Oberwittle H, Grossmann M, et al.;
Repeated oral once daily intake of increasing doses of the
2413. Turajane T, Wongbunnak R, Patcharatrakul T, et al.; novel synthetic genistein product Bonistein in healthy
Gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risk of non-selective volunteers. Planta Med. 2005 Oct;71(10):891-6. PMID:
NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors in elderly patients with knee 16254818. X-2, X-4

L-110
2424. Ulstein M, Steier AJ, Hofstad T, et al.; Microflora 2436. Vally H, Taylor ML, Thompson PJ; The prevalence
of cervical and vaginal secretion in women using copper- of aspirin intolerant asthma (AIA) in Australian asthmatic
and norgestrel-releasing IUCDs. Acta Obstet Gynecol patients. Thorax. 2002 Jul;57(7):569-74. PMID: 12096197.
Scand. 1987;66(4):321-2. PMID: 3122515. X-2, X-3, X-4 X-4

2425. Um SJ, Lee SK, Kim YH, et al.; Clinical features of 2437. van Amerongen D; Removal rates of subdermal
drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome in 38 patients. J levonorgestrel implants. J Reprod Med. 1994
Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2010;20(7):556-62. Nov;39(11):873-6. PMID: 7853277. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 21313995. X-2
2438. van den Berg AA, Honjol NM, Prabhu NV, et al.;
2426. Underwood M, Ashby D, Cross P, et al.; Advice to Analgesics and ENT surgery. A clinical comparison of the
use topical or oral ibuprofen for chronic knee pain in older intraoperative, recovery and postoperative effects of
people: randomised controlled trial and patient preference buprenorphine, diclofenac, fentanyl, morphine, nalbuphine,
study. BMJ. 2008 Jan 19;336(7636):138-42. PMID: pethidine and placebo given intravenously with induction
18056743. X-2, X-3, X-4 of anaesthesia. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Dec;38(6):533-
43. PMID: 7888292. X-2, X-3, X-4
2427. Upadhyay R, Torley HI, McKinlay AW, et al.; Iron
deficiency anaemia in patients with rheumatic disease 2439. van den Hondel KE, Eijgelsheim M, Ruiter R, et al.;
receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: the role of Effect of short-term NSAID use on echocardiographic
upper gastrointestinal lesions. Ann Rheum Dis. 1990 parameters in elderly people: a population-based cohort
Jun;49(6):359-62. PMID: 2383058. X-2, X-3, X-4 study. Heart. 2011 Apr;97(7):540-3. PMID: 21097821. X-
4
2428. Uppalapati SS, Boylan JD, Stoltzfus J; Risk factors
involved in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers: a case- 2440. Van den Ouweland FA, Gribnau FW, Meyboom
control study. Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Mar;54(3):593-8. PMID: RH; Congestive heart failure due to nonsteroidal anti-
18648934. X-2, X-3, X-4 inflammatory drugs in the elderly. Age Ageing. 1988
Jan;17(1):8-16. PMID: 3364313. X-2
2429. Ursin G, Ross RK, Sullivan-Halley J, et al.; Use of
oral contraceptives and risk of breast cancer in young 2441. van der Heijden BJ, Carlus C, Narcy F, et al.;
women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1998 Jul;50(2):175-84. Persistent anuria, neonatal death, and renal microcystic
PMID: 9822222. X-4 lesions after prenatal exposure to indomethacin. Am J
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Sep;171(3):617-23. PMID: 8092206.
2430. Usichenko TI, Edinger H, Witstruck T, et al.; X-2, X-4
Millimetre wave therapy for pain relief after total knee
arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2008 2442. van der Heijden PG, van Puijenbroek EP, van
Jul;12(5):617-23. PMID: 18042413. X-2, X-3, X-4 Buuren S, et al.; On the assessment of adverse drug
reactions from spontaneous reporting systems: the
2431. Utz JP, Limper AH, Kalra S, et al.; Etanercept for influence of under-reporting on odds ratios. Stat Med. 2002
the treatment of stage II and III progressive pulmonary Jul 30;21(14):2027-44. PMID: 12111885. X-1
sarcoidosis. Chest. 2003 Jul;124(1):177-85. PMID:
12853521. X-2, X-3, X-4 2443. van der Hooft CS, Jong GW, Dieleman JP, et al.;
Inappropriate drug prescribing in older adults: the updated
2432. Vaisbich MH, Fujimura MD, Koch VH; Bartter 2002 Beers criteria--a population-based cohort study. Br J
syndrome: benefits and side effects of long-term treatment. Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Aug;60(2):137-44. PMID:
Pediatr Nephrol. 2004 Aug;19(8):858-63. PMID: 16042666. X-2, X-3, X-4
15206026. X-2, X-3, X-4
2444. van der Klauw MM, Stricker BH, Herings RM, et
2433. Valkhoff VE, van Soest EM, Sturkenboom MC, et al.; A population based case-cohort study of drug-induced
al.; Time-trends in gastroprotection with nonsteroidal anti- anaphylaxis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 Apr;35(4):400-8.
inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Aliment Pharmacol Ther. PMID: 8097922. X-2, X-4
2010 Jun;31(11):1218-28. PMID: 20222917. X-3, X-4
2445. Van der Linden MW, Gaugris S, Kuipers EJ, et al.;
2434. Vallette S, Serri K, Rivera J, et al.; Long-term Gastroprotection among new chronic users of non-steroidal
cabergoline therapy is not associated with valvular heart anti-inflammatory drugs: a study of utilization and
disease in patients with prolactinomas. Pituitary. adherence in The Netherlands. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009
2009;12(3):153-7. PMID: 18594989. X-2 Jan;25(1):195-204. PMID: 19210152. X-4

2435. Vallette S, Serri K, Serri O; Cabergoline therapy for 2446. van der Linden MW, Gaugris S, Kuipers EJ, et al.;
prolactinomas: is valvular heart disease a real safety COX-2 inhibitors: complex association with lower risk of
concern? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010 Jan;8(1):49- hospitalization for gastrointestinal events compared to
54. PMID: 20014934. X-1 traditional NSAIDs plus proton pump inhibitors.

L-111
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Oct;18(10):880-90. 2457. van Dongen H, van Aken J, Lard LR, et al.;
PMID: 19593747. X-4 Efficacy of methotrexate treatment in patients with
probable rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomized,
2447. van der Loo B, Braun J, Koppensteiner R; On- placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2007
treatment function testing of platelets and long-term May;56(5):1424-32. PMID: 17469099. X-2, X-3, X-4
outcome of patients with peripheral arterial disease
undergoing transluminal angioplasty. Eur J Vasc Endovasc 2458. van Eijkeren MA, Christiaens GC, Geuze HJ, et al.;
Surg. 2011 Dec;42(6):809-16. PMID: 21917489. X-2, X-3, Effects of mefenamic acid on menstrual hemostasis in
X-4 essential menorrhagia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992
May;166(5):1419-28. PMID: 1595797. X-2, X-3, X-4
2448. van der Mooren MJ, Demacker PN, Thomas CM, et
al.; A 2-year study on the beneficial effects of 17 beta- 2459. van Gelder MM, Roeleveld N, Nordeng H;
oestradiol-dydrogesterone therapy on serum lipoproteins Exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during
and Lp(a) in postmenopausal women: no additional pregnancy and the risk of selected birth defects: a
unfavourable effects of dydrogesterone. Eur J Obstet prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22174.
Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993 Dec 15;52(2):117-23. PMID: PMID: 21789231. X-4
8157140. X-2, X-4
2460. van Haselen RA, Fisher PA; A randomized
2449. van der Mooren MJ, Hanselaar AG, Borm GF, et al.; controlled trial comparing topical piroxicam gel with a
Changes in the withdrawal bleeding pattern and homeopathic gel in osteoarthritis of the knee.
endometrial histology during 17 beta-estradiol- Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Jul;39(7):714-9. PMID:
dydrogesterone therapy in postmenopausal women: a 2 10908688. X-2, X-4
year prospective study. Maturitas. 1994 Dec;20(2-3):175-
80. PMID: 7715470. X-2, X-4 2461. van Jaarsveld CH, Jahangier ZN, Jacobs JW, et al.;
Toxicity of anti-rheumatic drugs in a randomized clinical
2450. van der Steen WJ, Ho VK; Drugs versus diets: trial of early rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford).
disillusions with Dutch health care. Acta Biotheor. 2000 Dec;39(12):1374-82. PMID: 11136881. X-2
2001;49(2):125-40. PMID: 11450808. X-1
2462. van Kets H, Vrijens M, Van Trappen Y, et al.; The
2451. van der Velde G, Hogg-Johnson S, Bayoumi AM, et frameless GyneFix intrauterine implant: a major
al.; Identifying the best treatment among common improvement in efficacy, expulsion and tolerance. Adv
nonsurgical neck pain treatments: a decision analysis. Spine Contracept. 1995 Jun;11(2):131-42. PMID: 7491854. X-1,
(Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4 Suppl):S184-91. PMID: X-2, X-3, X-4
18204391. X-3, X-4
2463. van Kets HE, Thiery M, van der Pas H, et al.; Long-
2452. van der Velden T, Ping C; The introduction of term experience with Multiload intrauterine devices. Adv
Norplant in Cambodia through the private sector. Asia Pac Contracept. 1989 Sep;5(3):179-88. PMID: 2633607. X-1,
J Public Health. 2002;14(2):69-74. PMID: 12862410. X-2, X-4
X-3, X-4
2464. Van Kets HE, Van der Pas H, Delbarge W, et al.; A
2453. Van Deun A, Maug AK, Salim MA, et al.; Short, randomized comparative study of the TCu380A and Cu-
highly effective, and inexpensive standardized treatment of Safe 300 IUDs. Adv Contracept. 1995 Jun;11(2):123-9.
multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care PMID: 7491853. X-2, X-4
Med. 2010 Sep 1;182(5):684-92. PMID: 20442432. X-2,
X-3, X-4 2465. Van Lancker P, Vandekerckhove B, Cooman F; The
analgesic effect of preoperative administration of
2454. Van Dierendonck B, Ladipo OA, Ekwempu CC, et propacetamol, tenoxicam or a mixture of both in
al.; A multicenter clinical trial in Nigeria with Multiload- arthroscopic, outpatient knee surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol
Cu250 (MLCu250) and Multiload-Cu375 (MLCu375) Belg. 1999;50(2):65-9. PMID: 10418644. X-2, X-3, X-4
intrauterine devices. Adv Contracept. 1992 Dec;8(4):327-
30. PMID: 1290334. X-3, X-4 2466. van Lumig PP, Driessen RJ, Roelofs-Thijssen MA,
et al.; Relevance of laboratory investigations in monitoring
2455. van Dijk KN, ter Huurne K, de Vries CS, et al.; patients with psoriasis on etanercept or adalimumab. Br J
Prescribing of gastroprotective drugs among elderly Dermatol. 2011 Aug;165(2):375-82. PMID: 21428975. X-
NSAID users in The Netherlands. Pharm World Sci. 2002 2, X-3, X-4
Jun;24(3):100-3. PMID: 12136741. X-3, X-4
2467. Van Marter LJ, Leviton A, Allred EN, et al.;
2456. Van Dis ML, Parks ET; Prevalence of oral lichen Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn and
planus in patients with diabetes mellitus. Oral Surg Oral smoking and aspirin and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995 Jun;79(6):696- drug consumption during pregnancy. Pediatrics. 1996
700. PMID: 7621025. X-2 May;97(5):658-63. PMID: 8628603. X-2

L-112
2468. van Oijen MG, Dieleman JP, Laheij RJ, et al.; 2479. van Soest EM, Sturkenboom MC, Dieleman JP, et
Peptic ulcerations are related to systemic rather than local al.; Adherence to gastroprotection and the risk of NSAID-
effects of low-dose aspirin. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. related upper gastrointestinal ulcers and haemorrhage.
2008 Mar;6(3):309-13. PMID: 18242146. X-4 Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Jul 15;26(2):265-75. PMID:
17593072. X-4
2469. van Oijen MG, Koetsier MI, Laheij RJ, et al.;
Genetic polymorphisms in UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2480. van Soest EM, Valkhoff VE, Mazzaglia G, et al.;
1A6 are not associated with NSAIDs-related peptic ulcer Suboptimal gastroprotective coverage of NSAID use and
haemorrhage. Drug Metab Lett. 2009 Aug;3(3):199-204. the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and ulcers: an
PMID: 19799547. X-2, X-3, X-4 observational study using three European databases. Gut.
2011 Dec;60(12):1650-9. PMID: 21636644. X-4
2470. van Oijen MG, Laheij RJ, Koetsier M, et al.; Effect
of a specific cyclooxygenase-gene polymorphism (A- 2481. van Staa TP, Abenhaim L, Leufkens H; A study of
842G/C50T) on the occurrence of peptic ulcer hemorrhage. the effects of exposure misclassification due to the time-
Dig Dis Sci. 2006 Dec;51(12):2348-52. PMID: 17078001. window design in pharmacoepidemiologic studies. J Clin
X-2, X-3, X-4 Epidemiol. 1994 Feb;47(2):183-9. PMID: 8113827. X-2,
X-3, X-4
2471. van Overmeire B, Brus F, van Acker KJ, et al.;
Aspirin versus indomethacin treatment of patent ductus 2482. van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Cooper C; Use of
arteriosus in preterm infants with respiratory distress nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of fractures.
syndrome. Pediatr Res. 1995 Dec;38(6):886-91. PMID: Bone. 2000 Oct;27(4):563-8. PMID: 11033453. X-4
8618789. X-2, X-3, X-4
2483. van Staa TP, Rietbrock S, Setakis E, et al.; Does the
2472. Van Overmeire B, Slootmaekers V, De Loor J, et al.; varied use of NSAIDs explain the differences in the risk of
The addition of indomethacin to betamimetics for tocolysis: myocardial infarction? J Intern Med. 2008 Nov;264(5):481-
any benefit for the neonate? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod 92. PMID: 18624902. X-4
Biol. 1998 Mar;77(1):41-5. PMID: 9550199. X-2, X-4
2484. van Staa TP, Smeeth L, Persson I, et al.; What is the
2473. Van Overmeire B, Smets K, Lecoutere D, et al.; A harm-benefit ratio of Cox-2 inhibitors? Int J Epidemiol.
comparison of ibuprofen and indomethacin for closure of 2008 Apr;37(2):405-13. PMID: 18263647. X-4
patent ductus arteriosus. N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep
7;343(10):674-81. PMID: 10974130. X-2, X-4 2485. Van Staa TP, Travis S, Leufkens HG, et al.; 5-
aminosalicylic acids and the risk of renal disease: a large
2474. Van Overmeire B, Van de Broek H, Van Laer P, et British epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology. 2004
al.; Early versus late indomethacin treatment for patent Jun;126(7):1733-9. PMID: 15188168. X-4
ductus arteriosus in premature infants with respiratory
distress syndrome. J Pediatr. 2001 Feb;138(2):205-11. 2486. van Vlijmen EF, Brouwer JL, Veeger NJ, et al.;
PMID: 11174617. X-2, X-4 Oral contraceptives and the absolute risk of venous
thromboembolism in women with single or multiple
2475. van Puijenbroek EP, Egberts AC, Heerdink ER, et thrombophilic defects: results from a retrospective family
al.; Detecting drug-drug interactions using a database for cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 12;167(3):282-9.
spontaneous adverse drug reactions: an example with PMID: 17296885. X-2
diuretics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Eur J
Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Dec;56(9-10):733-8. PMID: 2487. van Vlijmen EF, Veeger NJ, Middeldorp S, et al.;
11214785. X-3, X-4 Thrombotic risk during oral contraceptive use and
pregnancy in women with factor V Leiden or prothrombin
2476. van Puijenbroek EP, Egberts AC, Meyboom RH, et mutation: a rational approach to contraception. Blood. 2011
al.; Different risks for NSAID-induced anaphylaxis. Ann Aug 25;118(8):2055-61; quiz 375. PMID: 21659542. X-2
Pharmacother. 2002 Jan;36(1):24-9. PMID: 11816253. X-
4 2488. Van Wyck DB, Mangione A, Morrison J, et al.;
Large-dose intravenous ferric carboxymaltose injection for
2477. van Rooijen M, Silveira A, Hamsten A, et al.; Sex iron deficiency anemia in heavy uterine bleeding: a
hormone--binding globulin--a surrogate marker for the randomized, controlled trial. Transfusion. 2009
prothrombotic effects of combined oral contraceptives. Am Dec;49(12):2719-28. PMID: 19682342. X-2, X-4
J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;190(2):332-7. PMID:
14981370. X-2 2489. Vandermeulen EP, Van Aken H, Scholtes JL, et al.;
Intravenous administration of tenoxicam 40 mg for post-
2478. Van Roon EN, Jansen TL, Mourad L, et al.; operative analgesia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled
Leflunomide in active rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective multicentre study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1997
study in daily practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 May;14(3):250-7. PMID: 9202910. X-2, X-3, X-4
Jun;57(6):790-7. PMID: 15151525. X-2, X-4

L-113
2490. Vandraas KF, Spigset O, Mahic M, et al.; Non- 2501. Velosa JA, Torres VE; Benefits and risks of
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: use and co-treatment nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in steroid-resistant
with potentially interacting medications in the elderly. Eur nephrotic syndrome. Am J Kidney Dis. 1986 Nov;8(5):345-
J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Aug;66(8):823-9. PMID: 50. PMID: 3788972. X-2
20405110. X-4
2502. Velten FW, Bayerl C, Baenkler HW, et al.;
2491. Vanek T, Jares M, Fajt R, et al.; Fibrinolytic Functional eicosanoid test and typing (FET) in
inhibitors in off-pump coronary surgery: a prospective, acetylsalicylic acid intolerant patients with urticaria. J
randomized, double-blind TAP study (tranexamic acid, Physiol Pharmacol. 2006 Dec;57 Suppl 12:35-46. PMID:
aprotinin, placebo). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 17244953. X-2, X-3, X-4
Oct;28(4):563-8. PMID: 16125959. X-2, X-4
2503. Venerito M, Treiber G, Wex T, et al.; Effects of
2492. Vanky E, Salvesen KA, Heimstad R, et al.; low-dose aspirin on gastric erosions, cyclooxygenase
Metformin reduces pregnancy complications without expression and mucosal prostaglandin-E2 do not depend on
affecting androgen levels in pregnant polycystic ovary Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
syndrome women: results of a randomized study. Hum 2006 Apr 15;23(8):1225-33. PMID: 16611284. X-2, X-4
Reprod. 2004 Aug;19(8):1734-40. PMID: 15178665. X-2,
X-4 2504. Venn A, Bruinsma F, Werther G, et al.; Oestrogen
treatment to reduce the adult height of tall girls: long-term
2493. Vargas E, Terleira A, Hernando F, et al.; Effect of effects on fertility. Lancet. 2004 Oct 23-
adverse drug reactions on length of stay in surgical 29;364(9444):1513-8. PMID: 15500896. X-2
intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3):694-8.
PMID: 12626971. X-2, X-4 2505. Ventura MT, Cenci L, Giuliano G, et al.;
Retrospective study of adverse reactions to non steroid anti-
2494. Vargyas JM, Campeau JD, Mishell DR, Jr.; inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): predictive value of
Treatment of menorrhagia with meclofenamate sodium. controlled challenge with alternative drugs.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Oct;157(4 Pt 1):944-50. PMID: Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 1999 Aug;21(3):455-
3314521. X-2, X-3, X-4 68. PMID: 10466074. X-4

2495. Varila E, Wahlstrom T, Rauramo I; A 5-year 2506. Venturoli S, Marescalchi O, Colombo FM, et al.; A
follow-up study on the use of a levonorgestrel intrauterine prospective randomized trial comparing low dose
system in women receiving hormone replacement therapy. flutamide, finasteride, ketoconazole, and cyproterone
Fertil Steril. 2001 Nov;76(5):969-73. PMID: 11704119. X- acetate-estrogen regimens in the treatment of hirsutism. J
2, X-3, X-4 Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Apr;84(4):1304-10. PMID:
10199771. X-2, X-3, X-4
2496. Vasisht KP, Chen SC, Peng Y, et al.; Limitations of
metformin use in patients with kidney disease: are they 2507. Vercellini P, Aimi G, Panazza S, et al.; A
warranted? Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010 Dec;12(12):1079- levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for the
83. PMID: 20977579. X-2, X-3 treatment of dysmenorrhea associated with endometriosis: a
pilot study. Fertil Steril. 1999 Sep;72(3):505-8. PMID:
2497. Veehof LJ, Stewart RE, Meyboom-de Jong B, et al.; 10519624. X-2, X-4
Adverse drug reactions and polypharmacy in the elderly in
general practice. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 2508. Vercellini P, Frontino G, De Giorgi O, et al.;
Sep;55(7):533-6. PMID: 10501824. X-7 Continuous use of an oral contraceptive for endometriosis-
associated recurrent dysmenorrhea that does not respond to
2498. Vekemans M, Delvigne A, Paesmans M; a cyclic pill regimen. Fertil Steril. 2003 Sep;80(3):560-3.
Continuation rates with a levonorgestrel-releasing PMID: 12969698. X-2, X-3, X-4
contraceptive implant (Norplant). A prospective study in
Belgium. Contraception. 1997 Nov;56(5):291-9. PMID: 2509. Verhamme KM, Dieleman JP, Van Wijk MA, et al.;
9437557. X-2, X-3, X-4 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and increased risk of
acute urinary retention. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul
2499. Veldhuis HM, Vos AG, Lagro-Janssen AL; 11;165(13):1547-51. PMID: 16009872. X-6
Complications of the intrauterine device in nulliparous and
parous women. Eur J Gen Pract. 2004 Sep;10(3):82-7. 2510. Verhelst J, Abs R, Maiter D, et al.; Cabergoline in
PMID: 15534571. X-2, X-4 the treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a study in 455
patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Jul;84(7):2518-22.
2500. Velentgas P, West W, Cannuscio CC, et al.; PMID: 10404830. X-2
Cardiovascular risk of selective cyclooxygenase-2
inhibitors and other non-aspirin non-steroidal anti- 2511. Vermillion ST, Newman RB; Recent indomethacin
inflammatory medications. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. tocolysis is not associated with neonatal complications in
2006 Sep;15(9):641-52. PMID: 16392153. X-4

L-114
preterm infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Nov;181(5 Pt 2523. Vlajkovic G, Sindjelic R, Stefanovic I; Ketorolac as
1):1083-6. PMID: 10561622. X-2, X-4 a pre-emptive analgesic in retinal detachment surgery: a
prospective, randomized clinical trial. Int J Clin Pharmacol
2512. Verrico MM, Weber RJ, McKaveney TP, et al.; Ther. 2007 May;45(5):259-63. PMID: 17542347. X-2, X-4
Adverse Drug Events Involving COX-2 Inhibitors. Ann
Pharmacother. 2003 Sep;37(9):1203-13. PMID: 12921500. 2524. Voaklander DC, Kelly KD, Rowe BH, et al.; Pain,
X-2, X-4 medication, and injury in older farmers. Am J Ind Med.
2006 May;49(5):374-82. PMID: 16526061. X-2, X-3, X-4
2513. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L;
Osteoarthritis and risk of fractures. Calcif Tissue Int. 2009 2525. Vogel RI, Gross JI; The effects of nonsteroidal anti-
Apr;84(4):249-56. PMID: 19234808. X-3, X-4 inflammatory analgesics on pain after periodontal surgery.
J Am Dent Assoc. 1984 Nov;109(5):731-4. PMID:
2514. Vidal X, Ibanez L, Vendrell L, et al.; Risk of upper 6333443. X-2, X-4
gastrointestinal bleeding and the degree of serotonin
reuptake inhibition by antidepressants: a case-control study. 2526. Vogel U, Christensen J, Wallin H, et al.;
Drug Saf. 2008;31(2):159-68. PMID: 18217791. X-4 Polymorphisms in genes involved in the inflammatory
response and interaction with NSAID use or smoking in
2515. Viegas OA, Singh K, Koh S, et al.; The effects of relation to lung cancer risk in a prospective study. Mutat
Norplant on clinical chemistry in Singaporean acceptors Res. 2008 Mar 1;639(1-2):89-100. PMID: 18164040. X-2,
after 1 year of use: I. Haemostatic changes. Contraception. X-3, X-4
1988 Sep;38(3):313-23. PMID: 3139360. X-2, X-4
2527. Vogel U, Segel S, Dethlefsen C, et al.;
2516. Vilar L, Canadas V, Arruda MJ, et al.; Comparison PPARgamma Pro12Ala polymorphism and risk of acute
of metformin, gliclazide MR and rosiglitazone in coronary syndrome in a prospective study of Danes. BMC
monotherapy and in combination for type 2 diabetes. Arq Med Genet. 2009;10:52. PMID: 19500413. X-4
Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2010 Mar;54(3):311-8. PMID:
20520962. X-2, X-4 2528. Vogel U, Segel S, Dethlefsen C, et al.; Associations
between COX-2 polymorphisms, blood cholesterol and risk
2517. Villanacci V, Casella G, Bassotti G; The spectrum of acute coronary syndrome. Atherosclerosis. 2010
of drug-related colitides: important entities, though Mar;209(1):155-62. PMID: 19748095. X-3, X-4
frequently overlooked. Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Jul;43(7):523-
8. PMID: 21324756. X-8 2529. Voke J, Keidan J, Pavord S, et al.; The management
of antenatal venous thromboembolism in the UK and
2518. Viola AS, Castro S, Bahamondes MV, et al.; A Ireland: a prospective multicentre observational survey. Br
cross-sectional study of the forearm bone mineral density in J Haematol. 2007 Nov;139(4):545-58. PMID: 17916101.
long-term current users of the injectable contraceptive X-2, X-4
depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Contraception. 2011
Nov;84(5):e31-7. PMID: 22018135. X-2 2530. Volpe A, Silferi M, Genazzani AD, et al.;
Contraception in older woman. Contraception. 1993
2519. Viola AS, Castro S, Marchi NM, et al.; Long-term Mar;47(3):229-39. PMID: 8462314. X-2
assessment of forearm bone mineral density in
postmenopausal former users of depot 2531. von Holst T, Lang E, Winkler U, et al.; Bleeding
medroxyprogesterone acetate. Contraception. 2011 patterns in peri and postmenopausal women taking a
Aug;84(2):122-7. PMID: 21757052. X-2 continuous combined regimen of estradiol with
norethisterone acetate or a conventional sequential regimen
2520. Visser LE, van Schaik RH, van Vliet M, et al.; of conjugated equine estrogens with medrogestone.
Allelic variants of cytochrome P450 2C9 modify the Maturitas. 2002 Dec 10;43(4):265-75. PMID: 12468135.
interaction between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs X-2, X-4
and coumarin anticoagulants. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005
Jun;77(6):479-85. PMID: 15961979. X-2 2532. Von Korff M, Galer BS, Stang P; Chronic use of
symptomatic headache medications. Pain. 1995
2521. Viswanathan P, Chaudhuri A, Bhatia R, et al.; Aug;62(2):179-86. PMID: 8545143. X-2, X-3, X-4
Exenatide therapy in obese patients with type 2 diabetes
mellitus treated with insulin. Endocr Pract. 2007 2533. Vonbach P, Reich R, Moll F, et al.; Risk factors for
Sep;13(5):444-50. PMID: 17872344. X-2, X-3, X-4 gastrointestinal bleeding: a hospital-based case-control
study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007 Dec 22;137(49-50):705-10.
2522. Vitale MG, Choe JC, Hwang MW, et al.; Use of PMID: 18197486. X-2, X-4
ketorolac tromethamine in children undergoing scoliosis
surgery. an analysis of complications. Spine J. 2003 Jan- 2534. Vonkeman HE, Braakman-Jansen LM, Klok RM, et
Feb;3(1):55-62. PMID: 14589246. X-2 al.; Incremental cost effectiveness of proton pump
inhibitors for the prevention of non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drug ulcers: a pharmacoeconomic analysis

L-115
linked to a case-control study. Arthritis Res Ther. of atopic dermatitis in children. Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1
2008;10(6):R144. PMID: 19077318. X-4 Pt 1):e2. PMID: 12093983. X-2, X-3, X-4

2535. Vonkeman HE, Fernandes RW, van der Palen J, et 2545. Waikakul S, Waikakul W; A post marketing survey
al.; Proton-pump inhibitors are associated with a reduced on the side-effects of loxoprofen. J Med Assoc Thai. 1999
risk for bleeding and perforated gastroduodenal ulcers Jul;82(7):721-6. PMID: 10511775. X-2, X-4
attributable to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a
nested case-control study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2546. Walker AM, Szneke P, Bianchi LA, et al.; 5-
2007;9(3):R52. PMID: 17521422. X-3, X-4 Aminosalicylates, sulfasalazine, steroid use, and
complications in patients with ulcerative colitis. Am J
2536. Vonkeman HE, van de Laar MA, van der Palen J, et Gastroenterol. 1997 May;92(5):816-20. PMID: 9149192.
al.; Allele variants of the cytochrome P450 2C9 genotype X-4
in white subjects from The Netherlands with serious
gastroduodenal ulcers attributable to the use of NSAIDs. 2547. Walker PC, Alrawi A, Mitchell JF, et al.;
Clin Ther. 2006 Oct;28(10):1670-6. PMID: 17157122. X- Medication use as a risk factor for falls among hospitalized
2, X-3, X-4 elderly patients. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 Dec
1;62(23):2495-9. PMID: 16303905. X-2
2537. Voskuyl AE, Van de Laar MA, Moens HJ, et al.;
Extra-articular manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis: risk 2548. Walker SL, Kennedy F, Niamh N, et al.;
factors for serious gastrointestinal events. Ann Rheum Dis. Nimesulide associated fulminant hepatic failure.
1993 Nov;52(11):771-5. PMID: 8250607. X-4 Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Nov;17(11):1108-12.
PMID: 18821716. X-2, X-4
2538. Voutilainen M, Sokka T, Juhola M, et al.;
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated upper 2549. Wallander MA, Johansson S, Ruigomez A, et al.;
gastrointestinal lesions in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Dyspepsia in general practice: incidence, risk factors,
Relationships to gastric histology, Helicobacter pylori comorbidity and mortality. Fam Pract. 2007 Oct;24(5):403-
infection, and other risk factors for peptic ulcer. Scand J 11. PMID: 17728288. X-3, X-4
Gastroenterol. 1998 Aug;33(8):811-6. PMID: 9754727. X-
2, X-3 2550. Wallenstein EJ, Fife D; Temporal patterns of
NSAID spontaneous adverse event reports: the Weber
2539. Vree ML, Schmidt J; A large observational clinical effect revisited. Drug Saf. 2001;24(3):233-7. PMID:
evaluation of a desogestrel-containing combiphasic oral 11347725. X-3, X-4
contraceptive in Germany. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health
Care. 2001 Jun;6(2):108-14. PMID: 11518448. X-4 2551. Waller PC, Ramsay LE; Arthritis and drug therapy
in the hypertension clinic. Biomed Pharmacother.
2540. Vreeburg EM, de Bruijne HW, Snel P, et al.; 1988;42(3):207-11. PMID: 3052606. X-2, X-3, X-4
Previous use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and
anticoagulants: the influence on clinical outcome of 2552. Wallerstedt SM, Gleerup H, Sundstrom A, et al.;
bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers. Eur J Gastroenterol Risk of clinically relevant bleeding in warfarin-treated
Hepatol. 1997 Jan;9(1):41-4. PMID: 9031897. X-2 patients--influence of SSRI treatment. Pharmacoepidemiol
Drug Saf. 2009 May;18(5):412-6. PMID: 19301238. X-2,
2541. Vuorma S, Teperi J, Aalto AM, et al.; A X-4
randomized trial among women with heavy menstruation --
impact of a decision aid on treatment outcomes and costs. 2553. Walling M; A multicenter efficacy and safety study
Health Expect. 2004 Dec;7(4):327-37. PMID: 15544685. of an oral contraceptive containing 150 micrograms
X-2, X-3 desogestrel and 30 micrograms ethinyl estradiol.
Contraception. 1992 Oct;46(4):313-26. PMID: 1486770.
2542. Wadelius M, Stjernberg E, Wiholm BE, et al.; X-2, X-4
Polymorphisms of NAT2 in relation to sulphasalazine-
induced agranulocytosis. Pharmacogenetics. 2000 2554. Walsh JS, Eastell R, Peel NF; Effects of Depot
Feb;10(1):35-41. PMID: 10739170. X-2, X-3, X-4 medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone density and bone
metabolism before and after peak bone mass: a case-control
2543. Wahl PM, Rodgers K, Schneeweiss S, et al.; study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Apr;93(4):1317-23.
Validation of claims-based diagnostic and procedure codes PMID: 18230659. X-2
for cardiovascular and gastrointestinal serious adverse
events in a commercially-insured population. 2555. Walsh JS, Eastell R, Peel NF; Depot
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Jun;19(6):596-603. medroxyprogesterone acetate use after peak bone mass is
PMID: 20140892. X-2, X-3, X-4 associated with increased bone turnover but no decrease in
bone mineral density. Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(3):697-
2544. Wahn U, Bos JD, Goodfield M, et al.; Efficacy and 701. PMID: 19013564. X-2
safety of pimecrolimus cream in the long-term management

L-116
2556. Walsh T, Grimes D, Frezieres R, et al.; Randomised 2567. Watson MG, Shenoi PM; Drug-induced epistaxis? J
controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics before insertion R Soc Med. 1990 Mar;83(3):162-4. PMID: 2325058. X-2
of intrauterine devices. IUD Study Group. Lancet. 1998
Apr 4;351(9108):1005-8. PMID: 9546505. X-3, X-4 2568. Weale AE, Warwick DJ, Durant N, et al.; Is there a
clinical interaction between low molecular weight heparin
2557. Walter RB, Milano F, Brasky TM, et al.; Long-term and non-steroidal analgesics after total hip replacement?
use of acetaminophen, aspirin, and other nonsteroidal anti- Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1995 Jan;77(1):35-7. PMID:
inflammatory drugs and risk of hematologic malignancies: 7717643. X-2, X-4
results from the prospective Vitamins and Lifestyle
(VITAL) study. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 10;29(17):2424-31. 2569. Weaver GA, Harper RL, Storey JA, et al.;
PMID: 21555699. X-4 Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are associated with
gastric outlet obstruction. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1995
2558. Wan LS, Stiber A, Lam LY; The levonorgestrel Apr;20(3):196-8. PMID: 7797825. X-2, X-4
two-rod implant for long-acting contraception: 10 years of
clinical experience. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;102(1):24-6. 2570. Weber-Diehl F, Unger R, Lachnit U; Triphasic
PMID: 12850601. X-2, X-4 combination of ethinyl estradiol and gestodene. Long-term
clinical trial. Contraception. 1992 Jul;46(1):19-27. PMID:
2559. Wang J, Donnan PT, MacDonald TM; An 1424620. X-4
approximate Bayesian risk-analysis for the gastro-intestinal
safety of ibuprofen. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2002 2571. Webster J, Piscitelli G, Polli A, et al.; Dose-
Dec;11(8):695-701. PMID: 12512246. X-4, X-8 dependent suppression of serum prolactin by cabergoline in
hyperprolactinaemia: a placebo controlled, double blind,
2560. Wang J, Mullins CD, Mamdani M, et al.; New multicentre study. European Multicentre Cabergoline Dose-
diagnosis of hypertension among celecoxib and finding Study Group. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1992
nonselective NSAID users: a population-based cohort Dec;37(6):534-41. PMID: 1286524. X-2
study. Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Jun;41(6):937-43. PMID:
17488830. X-4 2572. Webster J, Piscitelli G, Polli A, et al.; The efficacy
and tolerability of long-term cabergoline therapy in
2561. Wang ML, Miao F, Tang YH, et al.; Special hyperprolactinaemic disorders: an open, uncontrolled,
diaphragm-like strictures of small bowel unrelated to non- multicentre study. European Multicentre Cabergoline Study
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. World J Gastroenterol. Group. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1993 Sep;39(3):323-9.
2011 Aug 21;17(31):3596-604. PMID: 21987606. X-2 PMID: 7900937. X-2

2562. Wang SL, Wu SC, Xin XM, et al.; Three years' 2573. Weckx LL, Ruiz JE, Duperly J, et al.; Efficacy of
experience with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device celecoxib in treating symptoms of viral pharyngitis: a
and Norplant-2 implants: a randomized comparative study. double-blind, randomized study of celecoxib versus
Adv Contracept. 1992 Jun;8(2):105-14. PMID: 1519493. diclofenac. J Int Med Res. 2002 Mar-Apr;30(2):185-94.
X-2, X-3, X-4 PMID: 12025527. X-2, X-4

2563. Wang YP, Shi B, Chen YX, et al.; Drug-induced 2574. Weil J, Colin-Jones D, Langman M, et al.;
liver disease: an 8-year study of patients from one Prophylactic aspirin and risk of peptic ulcer bleeding. BMJ.
gastroenterological department. J Dig Dis. 2009 1995 Apr 1;310(6983):827-30. PMID: 7711618. X-2, X-3,
Aug;10(3):195-200. PMID: 19659787. X-2, X-4 X-4

2564. Ward MM, Kuzis S; Medication toxicity among 2575. Weil J, Langman MJ, Wainwright P, et al.; Peptic
patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 ulcer bleeding: accessory risk factors and interactions with
Jun 15;47(3):234-41. PMID: 12115151. X-2, X-4 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Gut. 2000
Jan;46(1):27-31. PMID: 10601050. X-2, X-4
2565. Warner JJ, Weideman RA, Kelly KC, et al.; The
risk of acute myocardial infarction with etodolac is not 2576. Weinbroum AA; Superiority of postoperative
increased compared to naproxen: a historical cohort epidural over intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in
analysis of a generic COX-2 selective inhibitor. J orthopedic oncologic patients. Surgery. 2005
Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Dec;13(4):252-60. Nov;138(5):869-76. PMID: 16291387. X-2, X-3, X-4
PMID: 18787084. X-2, X-4
2577. Weir MA, Gomes T, Mamdani M, et al.; Impaired
2566. Watson DJ, Bolognese JA, Yu C, et al.; Use of renal function modifies the risk of severe hypoglycaemia
gastroprotective agents and discontinuations due to among users of insulin but not glyburide: a population-
dyspepsia with the selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor based nested case-control study. Nephrol Dial Transplant.
etoricoxib compared with non-selective NSAIDs. Curr Med 2011 Jun;26(6):1888-94. PMID: 20974644. X-4, X-7
Res Opin. 2004 Dec;20(12):1899-908. PMID: 15701208.
X-4 2578. Weisberg F, Bouchard C, Moreau M, et al.;
Preference for and satisfaction of Canadian women with the

L-117
transdermal contraceptive patch versus previous
contraceptive method: an open-label, multicentre study. J 2590. Wharam PC, Speedy DB, Noakes TD, et al.;
Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Apr;27(4):350-9. PMID: NSAID use increases the risk of developing hyponatremia
15937609. X-2, X-3, X-4 during an Ironman triathlon. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006
Apr;38(4):618-22. PMID: 16679974. X-2
2579. Wells M, Sturdee DW, Barlow DH, et al.; Effect on
endometrium of long term treatment with continuous 2591. Whelan CT, Kaboli P, Zhang Q, et al.; Upper
combined oestrogen-progestogen replacement therapy: gastrointestinal hemorrhage: have new therapeutics made a
follow up study. BMJ. 2002 Aug 3;325(7358):239. PMID: difference? J Hosp Med. 2009 Sep;4(7):E6-10. PMID:
12153918. X-2, X-4 19753582. X-2

2580. Wemme H, Pohlenz J, Schonberger W; Effect of 2592. White E, Malone KE, Weiss NS, et al.; Breast
oestrogen/gestagen replacement therapy on liver enzymes cancer among young U.S. women in relation to oral
in patients with Ullrich-Turner syndrome. Eur J Pediatr. contraceptive use. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Apr
1995 Oct;154(10):807-10. PMID: 8529677. X-2 6;86(7):505-14. PMID: 8133534. X-4

2581. Wen SW, Yang T, Krewski D, et al.; Patterns of 2593. Wiegratz I, Stahlberg S, Manthey T, et al.; Effect of
pregnancy exposure to prescription FDA C, D and X drugs extended-cycle regimen with an oral contraceptive
in a Canadian population. J Perinatol. 2008 May;28(5):324- containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and 2 mg dienogest on
9. PMID: 18288118. X-4 bleeding patterns, safety, acceptance and contraceptive
efficacy. Contraception. 2011 Aug;84(2):133-43. PMID:
2582. Wen YK; Impact of acute kidney injury on 21757054. X-2
metformin-associated lactic acidosis. Int Urol Nephrol.
2009 Dec;41(4):967-72. PMID: 19280360. X-2 2594. Wiegratz I, Stahlberg S, Manthey T, et al.; Effects
of combined oral contraceptive ethinylestradiol (30 microg)
2583. Werler MM, Bosco JL, Shapira SK; Maternal and dienogest (2 mg) on carbohydrate metabolism during 1
vasoactive exposures, amniotic bands, and terminal year of conventional or extended-cycle use. Horm Metab
transverse limb defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Res. 2010 May;42(5):358-63. PMID: 20213585. X-2, X-4
Teratol. 2009 Jan;85(1):52-7. PMID: 19067400. X-2, X-3,
X-4 2595. Wierod FS, Frandsen NJ, Jacobsen JD, et al.; Risk
of haemorrhage from transurethral prostatectomy in
2584. Wernli KJ, Hampton JM, Trentham-Dietz A, et al.; acetylsalicylic acid and NSAID-treated patients. Scand J
Use of antidepressants and NSAIDs in relation to mortality Urol Nephrol. 1998 Apr;32(2):120-2. PMID: 9606784. X-2
in long-term breast cancer survivors. Pharmacoepidemiol
Drug Saf. 2011 Feb;20(2):131-7. PMID: 21254283. X-4 2596. Wijnands M, van Riel P, van 't Hof M, et al.;
Longterm treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory
2585. Wessinger S, Kaplan M, Choi L, et al.; Increased drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective drug survival
use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in patients study. J Rheumatol. 1991 Feb;18(2):184-7. PMID:
admitted with gastrointestinal haemorrhage: a multicentre 2023212. X-2, X-3, X-4
retrospective analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr
1;23(7):937-44. PMID: 16573796. X-2, X-3, X-4 2597. Wilcox CM, Alexander LN, Cotsonis GA, et al.;
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are associated with
2586. Westerlund T, Allebeck P, Marklund B, et al.; both upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Dis Sci.
Evaluation of a model for counseling patients with 1997 May;42(5):990-7. PMID: 9149053. X-4
dyspepsia in Swedish community pharmacies. Am J Health
Syst Pharm. 2003 Jul 1;60(13):1336-41. PMID: 12901035. 2598. Wilcox CM, Clark WS; Features associated with
X-2, X-3, X-4 painless peptic ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997
Aug;92(8):1289-92. PMID: 9260791. X-2, X-4
2587. Westhoff C, Truman C, Kalmuss D, et al.;
Depressive symptoms and Depo-Provera. Contraception. 2599. Wilcox CM, Shalek KA, Cotsonis G; Striking
1998 Apr;57(4):237-40. PMID: 9649914. X-2, X-4 prevalence of over-the-counter nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory drug use in patients with upper
2588. Westhoff C, Truman C, Kalmuss D, et al.; gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Jan
Depressive symptoms and Norplant contraceptive implants. 10;154(1):42-6. PMID: 8267488. X-2, X-3
Contraception. 1998 Apr;57(4):241-5. PMID: 9649915. X-
2, X-4 2600. Wildemeersch D, Janssens D, Andrade A; The
Femilis LNG-IUS: contraceptive performance-an interim
2589. Wetmore CM, Ichikawa L, LaCroix AZ, et al.; analysis. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009
Association between caffeine intake and bone mass among Apr;14(2):103-10. PMID: 19340705. X-2
young women: potential effect modification by depot
medroxyprogesterone acetate use. Osteoporos Int. 2008 2601. Wildemeersch D, Janssens D, Vrijens M, et al.;
Apr;19(4):519-27. PMID: 18004611. X-2, X-4 Ease of insertion, contraceptive efficacy and safety of new

L-118
T-shaped levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems. pylori eradication therapy in primary care. Aliment
Contraception. 2005 Jun;71(6):465-9. PMID: 15914138. Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Nov;15(11):1769-75. PMID:
X-2 11683691. X-3, X-4

2602. Wildemeersch D, Rowe PJ; Assessment of 2612. Williams HJ, Ward JR, Egger MJ, et al.;
menstrual blood loss in Belgian users of a new T-shaped Comparison of naproxen and acetaminophen in a two-year
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception. study of treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis
2005 Jun;71(6):470-3. PMID: 15914139. X-2, X-3, X-4 Rheum. 1993 Sep;36(9):1196-206. PMID: 8216413. X-2,
X-4
2603. Wildemeersch D, Schacht E; Contraception with a
novel 'frameless' intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing drug 2613. Willison DJ, Gaebel KA, Borden EK, et al.;
delivery system: a pilot study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Experience in the development of a postmarketing
Health Care. 2000 Dec;5(4):234-40. PMID: 11245550. X- surveillance network: the pharmacy medication monitoring
2, X-4 program. Ann Pharmacother. 1995 Dec;29(12):1208-13.
PMID: 8672822. X-2, X-3, X-4
2604. Wildemeersch D, Schacht E, Wildemeersch P;
Treatment of primary and secondary dysmenorrhea with a 2614. Wills BK, Bryant SM, Buckley P, et al.; Can acute
novel 'frameless' intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing drug overdose of metformin lead to lactic acidosis? Am J Emerg
delivery system: a pilot study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Med. 2010 Oct;28(8):857-61. PMID: 20887905. X-2
Health Care. 2001 Dec;6(4):192-8. PMID: 11848648. X-2,
X-4 2615. Wilson J; A randomised trial and a comparative
study of the copper 7 200 and the multiload copper 250
2605. Wildemeersch D, Schacht E, Wildemeersch P; intrauterine devices. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982
Performance and acceptability of intrauterine release of Feb;22(1):34-7. PMID: 7049154. X-2, X-3, X-4
levonorgestrel with a miniature delivery system for
hormonal substitution therapy, contraception and treatment 2616. Wilson JA, Romagnuolo J, Byrne TK, et al.;
in peri and postmenopausal women. Maturitas. 2003 Mar Predictors of endoscopic findings after Roux-en-Y gastric
28;44(3):237-45. PMID: 12648887. X-2, X-3 bypass. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct;101(10):2194-9.
PMID: 17032183. X-2, X-3
2606. Wilder-Smith CH, Hill L, Dyer RA, et al.;
Postoperative sensitization and pain after cesarean delivery 2617. Wilson JC; A prospective New Zealand study of
and the effects of single im doses of tramadol and fertility after removal of copper intrauterine contraceptive
diclofenac alone and in combination. Anesth Analg. 2003 devices for conception and because of complications: a
Aug;97(2):526-33, table of contents. PMID: 12873948. X- four-year study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989
2, X-3, X-4 Feb;160(2):391-6. PMID: 2916624. X-2, X-4

2607. Wildner-Christensen M, Hansen JM, De Muckadell 2618. Wilson JC; A New Zealand randomized
OB; Risk factors for dyspepsia in a general population: comparative study of three IUDs (Nova-T, MLCu375,
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cigarette smoking MLAgCu250): 1-, 2- and 3-year results. Adv Contracept.
and unemployment are more important than Helicobacter 1992 Jun;8(2):153-9. PMID: 1519497. X-2, X-3, X-4
pylori infection. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006
Feb;41(2):149-54. PMID: 16484119. X-4 2619. Wilson RG, Smith AN, Macintyre IM;
Complications of diverticular disease and non-steroidal
2608. Wile DJ, Toth C; Association of metformin, anti-inflammatory drugs: a prospective study. Br J Surg.
elevated homocysteine, and methylmalonic acid levels and 1990 Oct;77(10):1103-4. PMID: 2121310. X-2
clinically worsened diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33(1):156-61. PMID: 19846797. 2620. Wilting I, Movig KL, Moolenaar M, et al.; Drug-
X-2 drug interactions as a determinant of elevated lithium
serum levels in daily clinical practice. Bipolar Disord. 2005
2609. Wilkinson SM, Smith AG, Davis MJ, et al.; Jun;7(3):274-80. PMID: 15898965. X-2, X-4
Suspected cutaneous drug toxicity in rheumatoid arthritis--
an evaluation. Br J Rheumatol. 1993 Sep;32(9):798-803. 2621. Wingrave SJ; Progestogen effects and their
PMID: 8103699. X-2, X-4 relationship to lipoprotein changes. A report from the Oral
Contraception Study of the Royal College of General
2610. Williams AN, Simon RA, Woessner KM, et al.; The Practitioners. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl.
relationship between historical aspirin-induced asthma and 1982;105:33-6. PMID: 6805242. X-4
severity of asthma induced during oral aspirin challenges. J
Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Aug;120(2):273-7. PMID: 2622. Winkelmayer WC, Waikar SS, Mogun H, et al.;
17481713. X-2, X-4 Nonselective and cyclooxygenase-2-selective NSAIDs and
acute kidney injury. Am J Med. 2008 Dec;121(12):1092-8.
2611. Williams D, O'Kelly P, Kelly A, et al.; Lack of PMID: 19028206. X-7
symptom benefit following presumptive Helicobacter

L-119
2623. Winkler UH; The effect of tranexamic acid on the 2634. Womack JA, Scherzer R, Cole SR, et al.; Hormonal
quality of life of women with heavy menstrual bleeding. contraception and metabolic outcomes in women with or at
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001 Dec 1;99(2):238- risk for HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009
43. PMID: 11788179. X-2, X-3 Dec;52(5):581-7. PMID: 19950431. X-2, X-3

2624. Winkler UH, Holscher T, Schulte H, et al.; 2635. Wong A, Sibbald A, Ferrero F, et al.; Antipyretic
Ethinylestradiol 20 versus 30 micrograms combined with effects of dipyrone versus ibuprofen versus acetaminophen
150 micrograms desogestrel: a large comparative study of in children: results of a multinational, randomized,
the effects of two low-dose oral contraceptives on the modified double-blind study. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2001
hemostatic system. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1996 Jun;40(6):313-24. PMID: 11824173. X-2, X-3, X-4
Aug;10(4):265-71. PMID: 8908527. X-2, X-4
2636. Wood SL, Jarrell JJ, Swaby C, et al.; Endocrine
2625. Witjaksono J, Lau TM, Affandi B, et al.; Oestrogen disruptors and spontaneous premature labor: a case control
treatment for increased bleeding in Norplant users: study. Environ Health. 2007;6:35. PMID: 18005447. X-2,
preliminary results. Hum Reprod. 1996 Oct;11 Suppl X-3, X-4
2:109-14. PMID: 8982752. X-2, X-3, X-4
2637. Woods ER, Grace E, Havens KK, et al.;
2626. Wittpenn JR, Silverstein S, Heier J, et al.; A Contraceptive compliance with a levonorgestrel triphasic
randomized, masked comparison of topical ketorolac 0.4% and a norethindrone monophasic oral contraceptive in
plus steroid vs steroid alone in low-risk cataract surgery adolescent patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992
patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;146(4):554-60. Mar;166(3):901-7. PMID: 1550161. X-2, X-4
PMID: 18599019. X-2, X-3, X-4
2638. Woutersz TB, Korba VD; Five-year, multicenter
2627. Wohrl S, Vigl K, Stingl G; Patients with drug study of a triphasic, low-dose, combination oral
reactions -- is it worth testing? Allergy. 2006 contraceptive. Int J Fertil. 1988 Nov-Dec;33(6):406-10.
Aug;61(8):928-34. PMID: 16867044. X-2, X-3, X-4 PMID: 2906915. X-4

2628. Wolfe BM, Koval JJ, Nisker JA; Impact on 2639. Wright RL, Frost CJ, Turok DK; A qualitative
postmenopausal symptoms of adding continuous C-21 exploration of emergency contraception users' willingness
versus C-19 progestin to estrogen. Maturitas. 1999 Oct to select the copper IUD. Contraception. 2012
24;33(2):153-61. PMID: 10597880. X-2, X-4 Jan;85(1):32-5. PMID: 22067808. X-2, X-3, X-4

2629. Wolfe F, Anderson J, Burke TA, et al.; 2640. Wroblewski M, Ostberg H; Ulcer disease among
Gastroprotective therapy and risk of gastrointestinal ulcers: geriatric inpatients with positive faecal occult blood test
risk reduction by COX-2 therapy. J Rheumatol. 2002 and/or iron deficiency anaemia. A prospective study. Scand
Mar;29(3):467-73. PMID: 11908558. X-4 J Gastroenterol. 1990 May;25(5):489-95. PMID: 2359977.
X-2
2630. Wolfe F, Hawley DJ; The comparative risk and
predictors of adverse gastrointestinal events in rheumatoid 2641. Wu CJ, Hsu PI, Lo GH, et al.; Comparison of
arthritis and osteoarthritis: a prospective 13 year study of cetraxate-based and pantoprazole-based triple therapies in
2131 patients. J Rheumatol. 2000 Jul;27(7):1668-73. the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Chin Med
PMID: 10914849. X-4 Assoc. 2004 Apr;67(4):161-7. PMID: 15244013. X-2, X-3,
X-4
2631. Wolfe F, Michaud K, Stephenson B, et al.; Toward
a definition and method of assessment of treatment failure 2642. Wu CS, Wang SH, Chen PC, et al.; Does
and treatment effectiveness: the case of leflunomide versus famotidine have similar efficacy to misoprostol in the
methotrexate. J Rheumatol. 2003 Aug;30(8):1725-32. treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced
PMID: 12913927. X-2, X-3, X-4 gastropathy? Int J Clin Pract. 1998 Oct;52(7):472-4. PMID:
10622088. X-2, X-3, X-4
2632. Wolkenstein P, Chosidow O, Flechet ML, et al.;
Patch testing in severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions, 2643. Wu CY, Poon SK, Chen GH, et al.; Interaction
including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal between Helicobacter pylori and non-steroidal anti-
necrolysis. Contact Dermatitis. 1996 Oct;35(4):234-6. inflammatory drugs in peptic ulcer bleeding. Scand J
PMID: 8957644. X-2, X-3, X-4 Gastroenterol. 1999 Mar;34(3):234-7. PMID: 10232865.
X-2, X-4
2633. Wollter-Svensson LO, Stadberg E, Andersson K, et
al.; Intrauterine administration of levonorgestrel in two 2644. Wu CY, Wu MS, Chen CJ, et al.; The interaction of
low doses in HRT. A randomized clinical trial during one H. pylori infection and NSAIDs in cyclooxygenase-2
year: effects on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. mRNA expression in gastric antral, corpus mucosa, and
Maturitas. 1995 Nov;22(3):199-205. PMID: 8746877. X-2, gastric ulcer. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005 Jan;39(1):50-5.
X-4 PMID: 15599211. X-2

L-120
2656. Yanchick J, Magelli M, Bodie J, et al.; Time to
2645. Wu S, Godfrey EM, Wojdyla D, et al.; Copper significant pain reduction following DETP application vs
T380A intrauterine device for emergency contraception: a placebo for acute soft tissue injuries. Curr Med Res Opin.
prospective, multicentre, cohort clinical trial. BJOG. 2010 2010 Aug;26(8):1993-2002. PMID: 20575621. X-2, X-4
Sep;117(10):1205-10. PMID: 20618314. X-4
2657. Yang CP, Cherng CH, Wong CS, et al.; Effects of
2646. Wurnig C, Eyb R, Auersperg V; Indomethacin for intravenous ketorolac and fentanyl combined with
prevention of ectopic ossification in cementless hip midazolam on analgesia and side effects during
arthroplasties. A prospective 1-year study of 100 cases. extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Acta Anaesthesiol
Acta Orthop Scand. 1992 Dec;63(6):628-30. PMID: Sin. 2002 Mar;40(1):9-12. PMID: 11989050. X-2, X-4
1471510. X-2, X-4
2658. Yang MS, Lee SH, Kim TW, et al.; Epidemiologic
2647. Wysenbeek AJ, Klein Z, Nakar S, et al.; and clinical features of anaphylaxis in Korea. Ann Allergy
Assessment of cognitive function in elderly patients treated Asthma Immunol. 2008 Jan;100(1):31-6. PMID: 18254479.
with naproxen. A prospective study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. X-4
1988 Oct-Dec;6(4):399-400. PMID: 3229030. X-2, X-4
2659. Yang YX, Hennessy S, Propert K, et al.; Chronic
2648. Wysowski DK, Green L; Serious adverse events in proton pump inhibitor therapy and the risk of colorectal
Norplant users reported to the Food and Drug cancer. Gastroenterology. 2007 Sep;133(3):748-54. PMID:
Administration's MedWatch Spontaneous Reporting 17678926. X-4
System. Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Apr;85(4):538-42. PMID:
7898829. X-2, X-4 2660. Yaniv E, Shvero J, Hadar T; Hemostatic effect of
tranexamic acid in elective nasal surgery. Am J Rhinol.
2649. Xia HH, Phung N, Kalantar JS, et al.; Demographic 2006 Mar-Apr;20(2):227-9. PMID: 16686395. X-2, X-3,
and endoscopic characteristics of patients with Helicobacter X-4
pylori positive and negative peptic ulcer disease. Med J
Aust. 2000 Nov 20;173(10):515-9. PMID: 11194733. X-2, 2661. Yasmin E, Glanville J, Barth J, et al.; Effect of dose
X-3, X-4 escalation of metformin on clinical features, insulin
sensitivity and androgen profile in polycystic ovary
2650. Xiang AH, Kawakubo M, Kjos SL, et al.; Long- syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011
acting injectable progestin contraception and risk of type 2 May;156(1):67-71. PMID: 21277073. X-2, X-3
diabetes in Latino women with prior gestational diabetes
mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2006 Mar;29(3):613-7. PMID: 2662. Ye Z, Thomas DB, Ray RM; Combined oral
16505515. X-2 contraceptives and risk of cervical carcinoma in situ. WHO
Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid
2651. Xiao B, Wu SC, Chong J, et al.; Therapeutic effects Contraceptives. Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Feb;24(1):19-26.
of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the PMID: 7797343. X-4
treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia. Fertil Steril. 2003
Apr;79(4):963-9. PMID: 12749438. X-2, X-3 2663. Yeh TF, Goldbarg H, Pildes RS; Follow-up of
premature infants treated with indomethacin. J Pediatr.
2652. Yamada A, Sugimoto T, Kondo S, et al.; 1981 Aug;99(2):336. PMID: 7252709. X-1, X-2
Assessment of the risk factors for colonic diverticular
hemorrhage. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Jan;51(1):116-20. 2664. Yeh TF, Goldbarg HR, Henek T, et al.; Intravenous
PMID: 18085336. X-4 indomethacin therapy in premature infants with patent
ductus arteriosus. Causes of death and one-year follow-up.
2653. Yamamoto T, Mishina Y, Ebato T, et al.; Am J Dis Child. 1982 Sep;136(9):803-7. PMID: 7114004.
Prevalence of erosive esophagitis among Japanese patients X-2, X-3, X-4
taking low-dose aspirin. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010
Apr;25(4):792-4. PMID: 20074160. X-4 2665. Yeomans N, Lanas A, Labenz J, et al.; Efficacy of
esomeprazole (20 mg once daily) for reducing the risk of
2654. Yamamoto T, Umegae S, Matsumoto K; High-dose gastroduodenal ulcers associated with continuous use of
mesalazine treatment for ulcerative colitis patients who low-dose aspirin. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008
relapse under low-dose maintenance therapy. Dig Liver Oct;103(10):2465-73. PMID: 18637091. X-2, X-3, X-4
Dis. 2011 May;43(5):386-90. PMID: 21195041. X-2, X-3,
X-4 2666. Yeomans N, Wilson I, Langstrom G, et al.; Quality
of life in chronic NSAID users: a comparison of the effect
2655. Yanagi RM, Wilson A, Newfeld EA, et al.; of omeprazole and misoprostol. Scand J Rheumatol.
Indomethacin treatment for symptomatic patent ductus 2001;30(6):328-34. PMID: 11846050. X-2, X-4
arteriosus: a double-blind control study. Pediatrics. 1981
May;67(5):647-52. PMID: 7019841. X-2, X-3, X-4 2667. Yigit N, Kacar M, Yigit H, et al.; The effects of
copper contraceptive intrauterine device on the uterine
blood flow: A prospective transvaginal Doppler study. J

L-121
Clin Ultrasound. 2009 Sep;37(7):380-4. PMID: 19455700. intrauterine system: a sonographic and Doppler flow study.
X-2, X-3 Hum Reprod. 2002 Nov;17(11):2878-80. PMID: 12407042.
X-2, X-4
2668. Yilmaz H, Gurel S, Ozdemir O; Turkish patients
with osteoarthritis: their awareness of the side effects of 2679. Zalev AH, Gardiner GW, Warren RE; NSAID
NSAIDs. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jun;16(2):89-92. injury to the small intestine. Abdom Imaging. 1998 Jan-
PMID: 16252199. X-4 Feb;23(1):40-4. PMID: 9437061. X-2

2669. Yilmaz S, Bayan K, Dursun M, et al.; Does adding 2680. Zancan A, Locatelli C, Ramella F, et al.; A new
misoprostol to standard intravenous proton pump inhibitor model of pharmacovigilance? A pilot study. Biomed
protocol improve the outcome of aspirin/NSAID-induced Pharmacother. 2009 Jul;63(6):451-5. PMID: 18790597. X-
upper gastrointestinal bleeding?: a randomized prospective 2, X-3, X-4
study. Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Jan;52(1):110-8. PMID:
17151802. X-2, X-3, X-4 2681. Zandbelt MM, Houbiers JG, van den Hoogen FH, et
al.; Intranasal administration of recombinant human
2670. Yki-Jarvinen H, Ryysy L, Nikkila K, et al.; cartilage glycoprotein-39. A phase I escalating cohort study
Comparison of bedtime insulin regimens in patients with in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2006
type 2 diabetes mellitus. A randomized, controlled trial. Sep;33(9):1726-33. PMID: 16960935. X-2, X-4
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Mar 2;130(5):389-96. PMID:
10068412. X-2, X-4 2682. Zanettini R, Antonini A, Gatto G, et al.; Valvular
heart disease and the use of dopamine agonists for
2671. Ylikorkala O, Wahlstrom T, Caubel P, et al.; Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 4;356(1):39-
Intermittent progestin administration as part of hormone 46. PMID: 17202454. X-2
replacement therapy: long-term comparison between
estradiol 1 mg combined with intermittent norgestimate and 2683. Zanettini R, Antonini A, Gatto G, et al.; Regression
estradiol 2 mg combined with constant norethisterone of cardiac valvulopathy related to ergot-derived dopamine
acetate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Jul;81(7):654- agonists. Cardiovasc Ther. 2011 Dec;29(6):404-10. PMID:
60. PMID: 12190841. X-2, X-4 20553285. X-2

2672. Yoon NM, Cavaghan MK, Brunelle RL, et al.; 2684. Zapata-Colindres JC, Zepeda-Gomez S, Montano-
Exenatide added to insulin therapy: a retrospective review Loza A, et al.; The association of Helicobacter pylori
of clinical practice over two years in an academic infection and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in
endocrinology outpatient setting. Clin Ther. 2009 peptic ulcer disease. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006
Jul;31(7):1511-23. PMID: 19695400. X-2, X-3, X-4 Apr;20(4):277-80. PMID: 16609757. X-2

2673. Yoong WC, Tuck SM, Yardumian A; Red cell 2685. Zaporozhan VN, Khait OV, Tumasyan KP;
deformability in oral contraceptive pill users with sickle Norcolut with immune modulators in the complex
cell anaemia. Br J Haematol. 1999 Mar;104(4):868-70. treatment for hyperplastic uterine processes. Clin Exp
PMID: 10192452. X-2, X-4 Obstet Gynecol. 1993;20(1):13-9. PMID: 8462182. X-2,
X-4
2674. Younossi ZM, Strum WB, Schatz RA, et al.; Effect
of combined anticoagulation and low-dose aspirin 2686. Zaraa I, Jones M, Trojjet S, et al.; Severe adverse
treatment on upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Dis Sci. cutaneous drug eruptions: epidemiological and clinical
1997 Jan;42(1):79-82. PMID: 9009119. X-2, X-4 features. Int J Dermatol. 2011 Jul;50(7):877-80. PMID:
21699528. X-2
2675. Yu JO, Gundel RE; Use of Acular LS in the pain
management of keratoconus: a pilot study. Optom Vis Sci. 2687. Zecca E, Romagnoli C, De Carolis MP, et al.; Does
2010 Feb;87(2):125-30. PMID: 19996813. X-2, X-4 Ibuprofen increase neonatal hyperbilirubinemia? Pediatrics.
2009 Aug;124(2):480-4. PMID: 19620202. X-2, X-4
2676. Zabinski RA, Burke TA, Johnson J, et al.; An
economic model for determining the costs and 2688. Zeidler H; Epidemiology and NSAID induced
consequences of using various treatment alternatives for the gastropathy. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1991 Mar;28:2-5. PMID:
management of arthritis in Canada. Pharmacoeconomics. 2038013. X-1
2001;19 Suppl 1:49-58. PMID: 11280105. X-2, X-4
2689. Zembowicz A, Mastalerz L, Setkowicz M, et al.;
2677. Zackova M, Taddei S, Calo P, et al.; Ketorolac vs Safety of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors and increased
tramadol in the treatment of postoperative pain during leukotriene synthesis in chronic idiopathic urticaria with
maxillofacial surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2001 sensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Arch
Sep;67(9):641-6. PMID: 11731754. X-2, X-3, X-4 Dermatol. 2003 Dec;139(12):1577-82. PMID: 14676074.
X-2, X-3, X-4
2678. Zalel Y, Shulman A, Lidor A, et al.; The local
progestational effect of the levonorgestrel-releasing

L-122
2690. Zerr DM, Alexander ER, Duchin JS, et al.; A case- 2698. Zimmerman J, Arnon R, Ligumski M, et al.; Acute
control study of necrotizing fasciitis during primary upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Jerusalem 1988-91:
varicella. Pediatrics. 1999 Apr;103(4 Pt 1):783-90. PMID: causes, characteristics and relation to nonsteroidal anti-
10103303. X-2, X-4 inflammatory drugs. Isr J Med Sci. 1993 May;29(5):292-7.
PMID: 8314690. X-2, X-4
2691. Zhang J; Factors associated with copper T IUD
removal for bleeding/pain: a multivariate analysis. 2699. Zimmerman J, Meroz Y, Siguencia J, et al.; Upper
Contraception. 1993 Jul;48(1):13-21. PMID: 8403901. X- gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Comparison of the causes and
2, X-4 prognosis in primary and secondary bleeders. Scand J
Gastroenterol. 1994 Sep;29(9):795-8. PMID: 7824858. X-
2692. Zhang Y, Coogan PF, Palmer JR, et al.; Risk of 2, X-3, X-4
non-Hodgkin lymphoma and use of non-steroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006;30(1):99- 2700. Zimmermann T, Dietrich H, Wisser KH, et al.; The
101. PMID: 16495019. X-4 efficacy and tolerability of Valette: a postmarketing
surveillance study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care.
2693. Zhao S, Choksuchat C, Zhao Y, et al.; Effects of 1999 Sep;4(3):155-64. PMID: 10574641. X-4
doxycycline on serum and endometrial levels of MMP-2,
MMP-9 and TIMP-1 in women using a levonorgestrel- 2701. Zimran A, Kramer M, Plaskin M, et al.; Incidence
releasing subcutaneous implant. Contraception. 2009 of hyperkalaemia induced by indomethacin in a hospital
Jun;79(6):469-78. PMID: 19442784. X-2, X-4 population. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jul
13;291(6488):107-8. PMID: 3926071. X-1
2694. Zhao SZ, Burke TA, Whelton A, et al.; Cost of
heart failure among hypertensive users of nonspecific 2702. Zizic TM, Sutton JD, Stevens MB; A long-term
NSAIDs and COX-2-specific inhibitors. Am J Manag Care. evaluation of the treatment of osteoarthritis. Am J Med.
2002 Oct;8(15 Suppl):S414-27. PMID: 12416791. X-4 1986 Nov 28;81(5B):29-35. PMID: 3538868. X-2, X-3, X-
4
2695. Ziaei S, Ninavaei M, Faghihzadeh S; Urinary tract
infection in the users of depot-medroxyprogesterone 2703. Zochling J, Bohl-Buhler MH, Baraliakos X, et al.;
acetate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Oct;83(10):909- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in ankylosing
11. PMID: 15453884. X-2 spondylitis--a population-based survey. Clin Rheumatol.
2006 Nov;25(6):794-800. PMID: 16528455. X-2
2696. Zichella L, Sbrignadello C, Tomassini A, et al.;
Comparative study on the acceptability of two modern 2704. Zweifel SA, Engelbert M, Khan S, et al.;
monophasic oral contraceptive preparations: 30 microgram Retrospective review of the efficacy of topical bromfenac
ethinyl estradiol combined with 150 microgram desogestrel (0.09%) as an adjunctive therapy for patients with
or 75 microgram gestodene. Adv Contracept. neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2009
1999;15(3):191-200. PMID: 11019950. X-2, X-4 Nov-Dec;29(10):1527-31. PMID: 19898185. X-2, X-3, X-4

2697. Zimmerman J, Arnon R, Beeri R, et al.; Seasonal 2705. Zziwambazza W, Merkle CJ, Moore IM, et al.; The
fluctuations in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: lack of effects of norepinephrine infusion on the circulating
effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J lymphocyte counts of post-open heart surgery patients. Biol
Gastroenterol. 1992 Nov;87(11):1587-90. PMID: 1442678. Res Nurs. 2000 Jan;1(3):199-209. PMID: 11232215. X-2,
X-2, X-3, X-4 X-4

L-123
Appendix M. Labeled Indications for Drugs Included in
Review
Generic Name, Route Brand Name(s) (approval 1
1 Labeled Indications
of Administration date)
Intrauterine Device
2
Levonorgestrel- Mirena® • Intrauterine contraception for up to 5 years.
releasing intrauterine (December 6, 2000) • Treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding for women
system (52 mg, who choose to use intrauterine contraception as their
releasing ~0.02 mg/day) method of contraception.
(LNG-IUS; intrauterine
device) Mirena [package insert]. Wayne, NJ: Bayer HealthCare
Pharmaceuticals; 2009.

Daily Med (Mirena)


http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=92
231d6f-f4d8-43b0-aa95-f7cec1cc18c5
2
Contraceptive vaginal NuvaRing® • Prevention of pregnancy.
ring (October 3, 2001)
(etonogestrel/ethinyl NuvaRing [package insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ:
estradiol vaginal ring, Merck & Co; 2012.
delivers 0.120 mg/0.015
mg per day) DailyMed (NuvaRing)
http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=01
7343fb-86c4-45ab-9c47-52cc5b9f3a02
Antifibrinolytic Agents
2
Tranexamic acid (650 Lysteda® • Treatment of cyclic heavy menstrual bleeding.
mg) (November 13, 2009)
(oral) Lysteda [package insert]. Parsippany, NJ: Ferring
Pharmaceutical; 2011.

DailyMed (Lysteda)
http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=84
a65305-65d7-e7fd-66f3-dda8d8f920b1
Combined Oral Contraceptive Agents (COCs)
2
Estradiol valerate and Natazia® • Prevent pregnancy.
dienogest (May 6, 2010) • Treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding in women
(oral) without organic pathology who choose to use an oral
contraceptive as their method of contraception.
28 tablets in the
following order: 2 Natazia [package insert]. Wayne, NJ: Bayer HealthCare
tablets of 3 mg EV; 5 Pharmaceuticals; 2012.
tablets of 2 mg EV and
2 mg D; 17 tablets of 2 DailyMed (Natazia)
mg EV and 3 mg D; 2 http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=02
tablets of 1 mg EV; and c91fba-9c47-43ef-ac78-e82369798834
2 inert tablets.

M-1
Generic Name, Route Brand Name(s) (approval 1
1 Labeled Indications
of Administration date)
2
Ethinyl estradiol (0.03 Nordette-28® • Prevention of pregnancy.
mg) and levonorgestrel (July 21, 1982)
(0.15 mg) Nordette [package insert]. Sellersville, PA: Teva
3
(oral) Levora® Pharmaceuticals; 2010.
(December 13, 1993)
28 tablets: 21 tablets of DailyMed (Nordette)
3
0.030 mg EE and 0.15 Portia-28® http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=ef
mg L; and 7 inert tablets. (May 23, 2002) 68258d-9d09-43c9-af87-bfa4b3b0ee01
3
Altavera®
(August 2, 2010)
3
Marlissa®
(February 29, 2012)
3
Ethinyl estradiol (0.020 Loestrin 21 1/20® Loestrin:
mg) and norethindrone (October 1, 1976) • For the prevention of pregnancy in women who elect to
acetate (1 mg) use oral contraceptives as a method of contraception.
3
(oral) Microgestin 1/20®
(February 5, 2001) Minestrin:
21 tablets of 0.020 mg • For the control of contraception.
3
EE and 1 mg N. Junel 1/20®
(May 30, 2003) Loestrin [package insert]. Pomona, NY: Barr
Also available as 28-day harmaceuticals; 2009.
4
regimen with additional 7 Minestrin 1/20®
tablets containing 75 mg DailyMed (Loestrin)
ferrous fumarate http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=f4
(Loestrin Fe 1/20). 0605cf-9933-40d9-915a-ea6dbc0f169f

Minestrin 1/20 [package insert]. Fajardo, Puerto Rico:


Warner Chilcott; 2006.

M-2
Generic Name, Route Brand Name(s) (approval 1
1 Labeled Indications
of Administration date)
2 2 3
Norgestimate ethinyl Ortho Tri-Cyclen® Ortho Tri-Cyclen and Tri-Previfem :
estradiol, triphasic (July 3, 1992) • Prevention of pregnancy in women who elect to use
(oral) oral contraceptives as a method of contraception.
3
Tri-Sprintec® • Treatment of moderate acne vulgaris in females at
28 tablets: 7 tablets of (December 29, 2003) least 15 years of age, who have no known
0.180 mg N and 0.035 contraindications to oral contraceptive therapy and
3
mg EE; 7 tablets of Tri-Previfem® have achieved menarche. [The drug] should be used
0.215 mg N and 0.035 (March 26, 2004) for the treatment of acne only if the patient desires an
mg EE; 7 tablets of oral contraceptive for birth control.
5
0.250 mg N and 0.035 LexiComp lists additional
3
mg EE; and 7 inert brand names. Only those Tri-Sprintec labeling differs slightly on second indication:
tablets. detailed here are listed by • Treatment of moderate acne vulgaris in females, ≥15
the FDA as therapeutic years of age, who have no known contraindications to
equivalents. TriNessa is not oral contraceptive therapy, desire contraception, have
listed in Drugs@FDA, but it achieved menarche and are unresponsive to topical
does appear to be available anti-acne medications.
in the US (drugstore.com).
Ortho Tri-Cyclen [package insert]. Raritan, NJ: Ortho-
McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals; 2010.

DailyMed (Ortho Tri-Cyclen)


http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=38
4e7a40-dcbd-4908-bf5e-65abc9932973

Tri-Sprintec [package insert]. Pomona, NY: Barr


Laboratories; 2009.

DailyMed (Tri-Sprintec)
http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=84
3cbef6-cbfb-4a44-bb80-22930753e4c0

Tri-Previfem [package insert]. Huntsville, AL: Qualitest


Pharmaceuticals; 2011.

DailyMed (Tri-Previfem)
http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=dd
15dbd7-75b7-416e-af55-1e90c2bab051
Progestogens
5
Dydrogesterone (10 mg) Gynorest Reported use : Treatment of progesterone deficiencies;
(oral) counteract unopposed estrogen in hormone replacement
5
International brand names : therapy.
Dabroston; Dufaston;
Duphaston; Terolut

NOTE: Dydrogesterone is
not currently available in the
United States; the FDA lists
the marketing status of
dydrogesterone (Gynorest)
as discontinued. The drug is
available in other countries.

M-3
Generic Name, Route Brand Name(s) (approval 1
1 Labeled Indications
of Administration date)
2
Medroxyprogesterone Depo-Provera CI® Depo-Provera CI:
acetate (400 mg/mL) (October 29, 1992) • Prevention of pregnancy.
(injectable suspension)
2
Depo-subQ Provera 104® Depo-subQ Provera 104:
(December 17, 2004) • Prevention of pregnancy in women of child bearing
potential.
• Management of endometriosis-associated pain.

Depo-Provera CI [package insert]. New York City, NY:


Parmacia and Upjohn; 2011.

DailyMed (Depo-Provera)
http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=19
9cf13e-0859-4a73-9b45-e700d0cd1049

Depo-subQ Provera 104 [package insert]. New York City,


NY: Pharmacia and Upjohn; 2011.

DailyMed (Depo-subQ Provera)


http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=39
0087a6-f3c3-4f0b-a930-79acf412f153
2
Medroxyprogesterone Provera® • Treatment of secondary amenorrhea and abnormal
acetate (2.5 mg, 5 mg, or (June 18, 1959) uterine bleeding due to hormonal imbalance in the
10 mg) absence of organic pathology, such as fibroids or
(oral) uterine cancer.
• Reduce the incidence of endometrial hyperplasia in
nonhysterectomized postmenopausal women receiving
daily oral conjugated estrogens 0.625 mg tablets.

Provera [package insert]. New York City, NY: Pharmacia


and Upjohn; 2009.

DailyMed (Provera)
http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=a5
86be28-96af-4fed-a13f-9b94fd4c7405
2
Norethisterone Aygestin® • Treatment of secondary amenorrhea, endometriosis,
[norethindrone] (5 mg) (April 21, 1982) and abnormal uterine bleeding due to hormonal
(oral) imbalance in the absence of organic pathology, such
as submucous fibroids or uterine cancer.

Aygestin [package insert]. Pomona, NY: Duramed


Pharmaceuticals; 2010.

DailyMed (Aygestin)
http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=69
f5bc4b-758d-471b-ad8d-17c94f8e0963
2
Progesterone (4% [45 Crinone® • Progesterone supplementation or replacement as part
mg] or 8% [90 mg]) (July 31, 1997) of an Assisted Reproductive Technology ("ART")
(vaginal gel) treatment for infertile women with progesterone
deficiency.
• Secondary amenorrhea.

Crinone [package insert]. Morristown, NJ: Watson


Pharma; 2011.

DailyMed (Crinone)
http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=2c
8ffbd2-6b7a-42c7-b29e-e4de69dad9e6

M-4
Generic Name, Route Brand Name(s) (approval 1
1 Labeled Indications
of Administration date)
Progesterone (0.065 Progestasert • Prevention of pregnancy.
mg/day, according to (February 4, 1976)
multiple sources)
(coil/intrauterine insert) NOTE: The FDA lists the
marketing status of
Progestasert as
discontinued as of June 1,
2001.
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
2
Flurbiprofen (50 mg or Ansaid® • For relief of the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid
100 mg) (October 31, 1988) arthritis.
(oral) • For relief of the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis.

Ansaid [package insert]. New York City, NY: Pfizer /


Pharmacia & Upjohn Co.; 2010.

DailyMed (flurbiprofen)
http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=f5
6be63c-88e4-4b78-b12d-d80e3e8b3893
Meclofenamate sodium Meclomen • For the relief of mild to moderate pain.
(50 mg or 100 mg) (June 25, 1980) • For the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea and for the
(oral) treatment of idiopathic heavy menstrual blood loss.
NOTE: The FDA lists the • For relief of the signs and symptoms of acute and
marketing status of chronic rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.
Meclomen as discontinued.
The drug is available in the Meclofenamate sodium [package insert]. Morgantown,
US as generic. WV: Mylan Pharmaceuticals; 2006.

DailyMed (meclofenamate sodium)


http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=96
f19af4-de8f-4fd7-90d8-55fe6ebdd81d
2
Mefenamic acid (250 Ponstel® • For relief of mild to moderate pain in patients ≥14 years
mg) (March 28, 1967) of age, when therapy will not exceed one week (7
(oral) days).
• For treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.

Ponstel [package insert]. Atlanta, GA: Sciele Pharma;


2008.

DailyMed (Ponstel)
http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=d7
7e13db-d1b1-4dbf-9de8-80827018cf43

M-5
Generic Name, Route Brand Name(s) (approval 1
1 Labeled Indications
of Administration date)
2
Naproxen sodium Naprosyn® Naprosyn, EC-Naprosyn, Anaprox, Anaprox DS, and
(oral) (March 11, 1976) Naprosyn Suspension is indicated:
• For the relief of the signs and symptoms of
2
Naprosyn as 250 mg, Anaprox DS® rheumatoid arthritis.
375 mg, or 500 mg (September 4, 1980) • For the relief of the signs and symptoms of
tablets; Anaprox as 275 osteoarthritis.
3
mg tablets; Anaprox DS Anaprox® • For the relief of the signs and symptoms of ankylosing
as 550 mg tablets; (September 4, 1980) spondylitis.
others available.
2
• For the relief of the signs and symptoms of juvenile
Naprosyn Suspension® arthritis.
(March 23, 1987)
2
Naprosyn, Anaprox, Anaprox DS, and Naprosyn
EC-Naprosyn® Suspension is also indicated:
(October 14, 1994) • For relief of the signs and symptoms of tendonitis.
• For relief of the signs and symptoms of bursitis.
Also various OTC brands • For relief of the signs and symptoms of acute gout.
• For the management of pain.
• For the management of primary dysmenorrheal.

EC-Naprosyn / Naprosyn / Anaprox / Anaprox DS /


Naprosyn [package insert]. Nutley, NJ: Roche
Pharmaceuticals; 1999-200X.

DailyMed (Naprosyn)
http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=68
848217-03c9-4377-9be6-6f567e629129
Other Drugs
Cabergoline (0.5 mg) Dostinex • Treatment of hyperprolactinemic disorders, either
(oral) (December 23, 1996) idiopathic or due to pituitary adenomas.

NOTE: The FDA lists the Cabergoline [package insert]. Sellersville, PA: Teva
marketing status of Dostinex Pharmaceuticals; 2011.
as discontinued. The drug is
available in the US as DailyMed (cabergoline)
generic. http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=e4
97366b-a124-4d7f-bd45-a883c392d4bb
5 5
Etamsylate International brand names : Reported use : Prevention and treatment of capillary
[ethamsylate] (250 mg Altodor; Dicinone; Dicynene; hemorrhages; treatment of menorrhagia or metrorrhagia.
or 500 mg) Dicynone; Eselin; Ethamsyl;
(oral) Hemo 141; Hemoced;
Impedil

NOTE: Etamsylate is not


currently available in the
United States. The drug is
available in other countries.
2
Exenatide (0.25 mg/mL Byetta® • As an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic
as either 0.005 mg or (April 28, 2005) control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
0.01 mg per dose)
(injection) Byetta [package insert]. San Diego, CA: Amylin
Pharmaceuticals; 2011.

DailyMed (Byetta)
http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=75
1747da-7c1f-41ad-b1a6-a6d920f70599

M-6
Generic Name, Route Brand Name(s) (approval 1
1 Labeled Indications
of Administration date)
2
Metformin hydrochloride Glucophage® • As an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic
(oral) (March 3, 1995) control in adults and children with type 2 diabetes
mellitus.
2
Glucophage as 500 mg, Glucophage XR®
850 mg, or 1000 mg (October 13, 2000) Glucophage [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers
tablets; Glucophage XR Squibb; 2009.
2
as 500 mg or 750 mg Fortamet®
tablets; Fortamet and (April 28, 2004) DailyMed (Glucophage)
Glumetza as 500 mg or http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=4a
2
1000 mg tablets. Glumetza® 0166c7-7097-4e4a-9036-6c9a60d08fc6
(June 3, 2005)
N-acetyl-cysteine Mucomyst • Prevent or lessen hepatic injury after ingestion of
(oral; also available as (September 14, 1963; acetaminophen (acute poisoning or repeated
solution for inhalation, marketing discontinued) supratherapeutic ingestion).
IV injection, or ocular • Adjuvant therapy for patients with abnormal, viscid, or
2
solution) Acetadote® inspissated mucous secretions in conditions such as:
(injectable, IV) chronic broncopulmonary disease; acute
(January 23, 2004) bronchopulmonary disease; pulmonary complications
of cystic fibrosis; tracheostomy care; pulmonary
Acetylcysteine is also complications associated with surgery; during
available in tablet form as a anesthesia, post-traumatic chest conditions; atelectasis
dietary supplement under due to mucous obstruction; and diagnostic bronchial
various brand names. studies.

Acetadote [package insert]. Nashville, TN: Cumberland


Pharmaceuticals; 2011.

Acetylcysteine solution [package insert]. Lake Forest, IL:


Hospira, Inc.; 2004.

DailyMed (Acetadote)
http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=47
2f158a-5ab9-4308-8e49-1116e6ea3d39

DailyMed (acetylcysteine solution)


http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=55
58a5f5-e821-473b-7d8a-5d33d09f0586

Notes:

1
US-based information; brand names, therapeutic equivalency, dates of approval, and indications per FDA website
(Drugs@FDA) and individual package inserts, unless otherwise noted; last accessed September 4, 2012.

2
Listed by FDA as the Reference Listed Drug (RLD): an approved drug product to which new generic versions are compared to
show that they are bioequivalent.

3
Listed by FDA as therapeutic equivalent to RLD.

4
Canadian brand name and approval information.

5
Lexi-Comp OnlineTM, Lexi-Drugs International OnlineTM, Hudson, Ohio: Lexi-Comp, Inc.; September 4, 2012.

M-7
Appendix N. Harms from Package Inserts for Drugs Included in Review
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
Levonorgestrel-releasing Warnings and Precautions: "The data provided reflect the experience with the use
intrauterine system • If pregnancy should occur with Mirena in place, remove Mirena. of Mirena in the adequate and well-controlled studies
(LNG-IUS; Mirena®) • There is increased risk of ectopic pregnancy including loss of fertility, for contraception (n=2,339) and heavy menstrual
pregnancy loss, septic abortion (including septicemia, shock and bleeding (n=80). For the contraception indication,
death) and premature labor and delivery. Mirena was compared to a copper IUD (n=1,855), to
• Group A streptococcal infection has been reported; strict aseptic another formulation of levonorgestrel intrauterine
technique is essential during insertion. system (n=390) and to a combined oral contraceptive
• Before using Mirena, consider the risks of pelvic inflammatory disease (n=94) in women 18 to 35 years old. The data cover
(PID). more than 92,000 woman-months of exposure. For the
• Bleeding patterns become altered, may remain irregular and treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding indication
amenorrhea may ensue. (n=80), the subjects included women aged 26 to 50
• Perforation may occur during insertion. Risk is increased in women with confirmed heavy bleeding and exposed for a
with fixed retroverted uteri, during lactation, and postpartum. median of 183 treatment days of Mirena (range 7 to
• Embedment in the myometrium and partial or complete expulsion may 295 days). The frequencies of reported adverse drug
occur. reactions represent crude incidences. The adverse
reactions seen across the 2 indications overlapped,
• Persistent enlarged ovarian follicles should be evaluated.
and are reported using the frequencies from the
contraception studies."
Serious:
• Ectopic pregnancy - Incidence in clinical trials excluding women with
Mirena [package insert]. Wayne, NJ: Bayer HealthCare
risk factors for ectopic was 0.1% per year.
Pharmaceuticals; 2009.
• Intrauterine pregnancy - "As of September 2006, 390 live births out of
an estimated 9.9 million Mirena users had been reported."
• Group A streptococcal sepsis (GAS) – "As of September 2006, 9
cases of Group A streptococcal sepsis (GAS) out of an estimated 9.9
million Mirena users had been reported."
• Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
• Embedment
• Perforation
• Breast cancer – "Spontaneous reports of breast cancer have been
received during postmarketing experience with Mirena… Two
observational studies have not provided evidence of an increased risk
of breast cancer during the use of Mirena."

Most common (≥5% users):


• Uterine/vaginal bleeding alterations (51.9%)
• Amenorrhea (23.9%)
• Intermenstrual bleeding and spotting (23.4%)

N-1
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Abdominal/pelvic pain (12.8%)
• Ovarian cysts (12%)
• Headache/migraine (7.7%)
• Acne (7.2%)
• Depressed/altered mood (6.4%)
• Menorrhagia (6.3%)
• Breast tenderness/pain (4.9%)
• Vaginal discharge (4.9%)
• IUD expulsion (4.9%)

Other (<5% users):


• Nausea
• Nervousness
• Vulvovaginitis
• Dysmenorrhea
• Back pain
• Weight increase
• Decreased libido
• Cervicitis/Papanicolaou smear normal/class II
• Hypertension
• Dyspareunia
• Anemia
• Alopecia
• Skin disorders including eczema
• Pruritus
• Rash and urticaria
• Abdominal distention
• Hirsutism
• Edema

Postmarketing reports of:


• Device breakage
• Angioedema
Contraceptive vaginal ring Warning: NuvaRing [package insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ:
(NuvaRing®) Cigarette smoking increases the risk of serious cardiovascular events Merck & Co; 2012.
from combination oral contraceptive use. This risk increases with age,
particularly in women over 35 years of age and with the number of
cigarettes smoked. For this reason, COCs should not be used by women

N-2
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
who are over 35 years of age and smoke.

Most common (reported by 5-14% of women in clinical trials:


• Vaginitis
• Headache
• Upper respiratory infection
• Vaginal secretion
• Sinusitis
• Weight gain
• Nausea

Adverse events leading to discontinuation in 1-2.5% of women using


NuvaRing in trials:
• Device-related events (foreign body sensation, coital problems,
device explusion)
• Vaginal symptoms (discomfort/vaginitis/vaginal secretion)
• Headache
• Emotional lability
• Weight gain

Also any adverse reactions that are associated with the use of
combination hormonal contraceptives are also likely to apply to
combination vaginal hormonal contraceptives, such as NuvaRing.
Tranexamic acid Warnings and Precautions: "Lysteda safety derived from two randomized, double-
(oral; Lysteda®) • The risk of thrombotic and thromboembolic events may increase blind, placebo-controlled studies on treatment of heavy
further when hormonal contraceptives are administered with Lysteda, menstrual bleeding. Long-term safety was studied in
especially in women who are obese or smoke cigarettes. Women two open label studies."
using hormonal contraception should use Lysteda only if there is a "In one study, subjects with physician-diagnosed
strong medical need and the benefit of treatment will outweigh the heavy menstrual bleeding (not using the alkaline
potential increased risk of a thrombotic event. Do not use Lysteda in hematin methodology) were treated with 3900 mg/day
women who are taking more than the approved dose of a hormonal for up to 5 days during each menstrual period for up to
contraceptive. 27 menstrual cycles. A total of 781 subjects were
• Concomitant use of Lysteda with Factor IX complex concentrates, enrolled and 239 completed the study through 27
anti-inhibitor coagulant concentrates, or all-trans retinoic acid (oral menstrual cycles. A total of 12.4% of the subjects
tretinoin) may increase the risk of thrombosis. withdrew due to adverse events. Women using
• Visual or ocular adverse effects may occur with Lysteda. Immediately hormonal contraception were excluded from the
discontinue use if visual or ocular symptoms occur. study… A long-term open-label extension study of
• Cerebral edema and cerebral infarction may be caused by use of subjects from the two short-term efficacy studies was
Lysteda in women with subarachnoid hemorrhage. also conducted in which subjects were treated with
• Ligneous conjunctivitis has been reported in patients taking 3900 mg/day for up to 5 days during each menstrual

N-3
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
tranexamic acid. period for up to 9 menstrual cycles. A total of 288
subjects were enrolled and 196 subjects completed the
From RCTs for HMB: study through 9 menstrual cycles. A total of 2.1% of
G1: lysteda group (N=232) the subjects withdrew due to adverse events… The
G2: placebo group (N=139) types and severity of adverse events in these two long-
Total number of adverse events term open-label trials were similar to those observed in
G1: 1500 the double-blind, placebo-controlled studies although
G1: 923 the percentage of subjects reporting them was greater
Headache, including tension headache in the 27-month study, most likely because of the
G1: 117 (50.4%) longer study duration."
G2: 65 (46.8%)
Nasal and sinus symptoms, including nasal, respiratory tract and sinus Lysteda [package insert]. Parsippany, NJ: Ferring
congestion, sinusitis, acute sinusitis, sinus headache, allergic sinusitis, Pharmaceutical; 2011.
and sinus pain, and multiple allergies and seasonal allergies
G1: 59 (25.4%)
G2: 24 (17.3%)
Back pain
G1: 48 (20.7%)
G2: 21 (15.1%)
Abdominal pain, including abdominal tenderness and discomfort
G1:46 (19.8%)
G2: 25 (18.0%)
Musculoskeletal pain, including musculoskeletal discomfort and myalgia
G1: 26 (11.2%)
G2: 4 (2.9%)
Arthralgia, including joint stiffness and swelling
G1: 16 (6.9%)
G2: 7 (5.0%)
Muscle cramps and spasms
G1: 15 (6.5%)
G2: 8 (5.8%)
Migraine
G1: 14 (6.0%)
G2: 8 (5.8%)
Anemia
G1: 13 (5.6%)
G2: 5 (3.6%)
Fatigue
G1: 12 (5.2%)
G2: 6 (4.3%)

Postmarketing reports in patients receiving tranexamic acid for various

N-4
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
indications:
• Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea
• Allergic skin reactions
• Anaphylactic shock and anaphylactoid reactions
• Thrombotic events (e.g., deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism,
cerebral thrombosis, acute renal cortical necrosis, and central retinal
artery and vein obstruction) – including venous and arterial thrombotic
events in women who have used Lysteda concomitantly with
combined hormonal contraceptives
• Impaired color vision and other visual disturbances
• Dizziness
0.03 mg ethinyl estradiol Warning: "The relative risk of heart attack for current oral
and 0.15 mg levonorgestrel Cigarette smoking increases the risk of serious cardiovascular events contraceptive users has been estimated to be two to
(oral; Nordette-28®, others) from combination oral contraceptives (COC) use. This risk increases with six. The risk is very low under the age of 30."
age, particularly in women over 35 years of age, and with the number of
cigarettes smoked. For this reason, COCs should not be used by women "Case control studies have found the relative risk of
who are over 35 years of age and smoke. users compared to non-users to be 3 for the first
episode of superficial venous thrombosis, 4 to 11 for
Reported in patients taking oral contraceptives and believed to be drug- deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, and 1.5
related: to 6 for women with predisposing conditions for venous
• Nausea thromboembolic disease. Cohort studies have shown
• Vomiting the relative risk to be somewhat lower, about 3 for new
• Gastrointestinal symptoms (such as abdominal pain, cramps and cases and about 4.5 for new cases requiring
bloating) hospitalization. The approximate incidence of deep-
• Breakthrough bleeding vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in users of
• Spotting low dose (<50µg ethinyl estradiol) combination oral
• Change in menstrual flow contraceptives is up to 4 per 10,000 woman-years
• Amenorrhea compared to 0.5 to 3 per 10,000 woman-years for non-
users. However, the incidence is substantially less
• Temporary infertility after discontinuation of treatment
than that associated with pregnancy (6 per 10,000
• Edema/fluid retention
woman-years). The risk of thromboembolic disease
• Melasma/chloasma which may persist due to oral contraceptives is not related to length of
• Breast changes: tenderness, pain, enlargement, secretion use and disappears after pill use is stopped."
• Change in weight or appetite (increase or decrease)
• Change in cervical erosion and secretion "In a large study, the relative risk of thrombotic strokes
• Diminution in lactation when given immediately postpartum has been shown to range from 3 for normotensive
• Cholestatic jaundice users to 14 for users with severe hypertension. The
• Rash (allergic) relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke is reported to be 1.2
• Mood changes, including depression for nonsmokers who used oral contraceptives, 2.6 for
• Vaginitis, including candidiasis smokers who did not use oral contraceptives, 7.6 for
• Change in corneal curvature (steepening) smokers who used oral contraceptives, 1.8 for

N-5
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Intolerance to contact lenses normotensive users, and 25.7 for users with severe
• Mesenteric thrombosis hypertension. The attributable risk is also greater in
• Decrease in serum folate levels older women."
• Exacerbation of systemic lupus erythematosus
• Exacerbation of porphyria Nordette [package insert]. Sellersville, PA: Teva
• Exacerbation of chorea Pharmaceuticals; 2010.
• Aggravation of varicose veins
• Anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions, including urticaria, angioedema,
and severe reactions with respiratory and circulatory symptoms.

Reported in patients taking oral contraceptives, with association neither


confirmed nor refuted:
• Congenital anomalies
• Premenstrual syndrome
• Cataracts
• Optic neuritis, which may lead to partial or complete loss of vision
• Cystitis-like syndrome
• Nervousness
• Dizziness
• Hirsutism
• Loss of scalp hair
• Erythema multiforme
• Erythema nodosum
• Hemorrhagic eruption
• Impaired renal function
• Hemolytic uremic syndrome
• Budd-Chiari syndrome
• Acne
• Changes in libido
• Colitis
• Sickle-cell disease
• Cerebral-vascular disease with mitral valve prolapse
• Lupus-like syndromes
• Pancreatitis
• Dysmenorrhea
estradiol valerate and Warning: "A total of 2,131 women, 18 to 54 years of age, who
dienogest Cigarette smoking increases the risk of serious cardiovascular events took at least one dose of Natazia were enrolled in four
(oral; Natazia®) from combination oral contraceptives (COC) use. This risk increases with clinical phase 3 trials. A total of 1,867 subjects were
age, particularly in women over 35 years of age and with the number of included in two clinical phase 3 studies with a
cigarettes smoked. For this reason, COCs should not be used by women treatment duration up to 28 cycles with Natazia as an

N-6
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
who are over 35 years of age and smoke. oral contraceptive and 264 subjects in the two phase 3
clinical trials with a treatment duration of 7 cycles
Serious: evaluating Natazia in the treatment of heavy,
• Serious cardiovascular events and stroke prolonged, and/or frequent menstrual bleeding in
• Vascular events women without organic pathology."
• Liver disease
Including reports from clinical trials of: Natazia [package insert]. Wayne, NJ: Bayer
• Myocardial infarction (2 cases) HealthCare Pharmaceuticals; 2012.
• Ruptured ovarian cyst (2 cases)
• Deep vein thrombosis
• Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver
• Uterine leiomyoma
• Acute cholecystitis
• Chronic acalculous cholecystitis

Commonly reported:
• Irregular uterine bleeding
• Nausea
• Breast tenderness
• Headache

Common (≥2%):
• Headache (including migraines) (12.7%)
• Breast pain, discomfort or tenderness (7.0%)
• Menstrual disorders (metrorrhagia, menstruation irregular,
menorrhagia, vaginal hemorrhage, dysfunctional uterine bleeding,
genital hemorrhage, abnormal withdrawal bleeding, uterine
hemorrhage) (6.9%)
• Nausea or vomiting (6.0%)
• Acne (3.9%)
• Mood changes (depression, mood swings, depressed mood, mood
altered, affect lability, dysthymic disorder, crying) (3.0%)
• Increased weight (2.9%)

Led to study discontinuation:


11.4% of the women discontinued from the clinical trials due to an
adverse reaction; the most frequent adverse reactions leading to
discontinuation were:
• Menstrual disorder (metrorrhagia, menorrhagia, menstruation
irregular, genital hemorrhage, vaginal hemorrhage, dysfunctional
uterine bleeding) (2.3%)

N-7
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Mood changes (depression, mood swings, mood altered, depressed
mood, dysthymic disorder, crying) (1.2%)
• Acne (1.1%), headache (including migraines) (1.1%)
• Weight increased (0.7 %)

Postmarketing experience:
• Vascular disorders: Venous and arterial thromboembolic events
(including pulmonary emboli, deep vein thrombosis, cerebral
thrombosis, myocardial infarction and stroke), hypertension
• Hepatobiliary disorders: Gallbladder disease, hepatitis
• Immune system disorders: Hypersensitivity
• Metabolism and nutrition disorders: Fluid retention,
hypertriglyceridemia
• Nervous system disorders: Dizziness
• Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders: Chloasma, angioedema,
erythema nodosum, erythema multiforme
• Gastrointestinal disorders: Gastrointestinal symptoms (for example,
abdominal pain)
• Infections and infestations: Vulvovaginal candidiasis
0.20mg ethinyl estradiol Warning: Loestrin [package insert]. Pomona, NY: Barr
and 1mg norethindrone Cigarette smoking increases the risk of serious cardiovascular events Pharmaceuticals; 2009.
acetate (oral; Loestrin 21 from combination oral contraceptives (COC) use. This risk increases with
1/20®, others) age, particularly in women over 35 years of age, and with the number of NOTE: package insert includes 89 references, many of
cigarettes smoked. For this reason, COCs should not be used by women which are related to adverse effects.
who are over 35 years of age and smoke.

Increased risk of serious adverse reactions:


• Thrombophlebitis
• Arterial thromboembolism
• Pulmonary embolism
• Myocardial infarction
• Cerebral hemorrhage
• Cerebral thrombosis
• Hypertension
• Gallbladder disease
• Hepatic adenomas or benign liver tumors

Evidence of an association between the following conditions and the use


of oral contraceptives, although additional confirmatory studies are
needed:

N-8
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Mesenteric thrombosis
• Retinal thrombosis

Reported in patients receiving oral contraceptives and are believed to be


drug-related:
• Nausea
• Vomiting
• Gastrointestinal symptoms (such as abdominal cramps and bloating)
• Breakthrough bleeding
• Spotting
• Change in menstrual flow
• Amenorrhea
• Temporary infertility after discontinuation of treatment
• Edema
• Melasma which may persist
• Breast changes: tenderness, enlargement, secretion
• Change in weight (increase or decrease)
• Change in cervical erosion and secretion
• Diminution in lactation when given immediately postpartum
• Cholestatic jaundice
• Migraine
• Rash (allergic)
• Mental depression
• Reduced tolerance to carbohydrates
• Vaginal candidiasis
• Change in corneal curvature (steepening)
• Intolerance to contact lenses

Reported in users of oral contraceptives and the association has been


neither confirmed nor refuted:
• Pre-menstrual syndrome
• Cataracts
• Changes in appetite
• Cystitis-like syndrome
• Headache
• Nervousness
• Dizziness
• Hirsutism
• Loss of scalp hair
• Erythema multiforme

N-9
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Erythema nodosum
• Hemorrhagic eruption
• Vaginitis
• Porphyria
• Impaired renal function
• Hemolytic uremic syndrome
• Budd-Chiari syndrome
• Acne
• Changes in libido
• Colitis
norgestimate ethinyl Warning: Ortho Tri-cyclen [package insert]. Raritan, NJ: Ortho-
estradiol, triphasic Cigarette smoking increases the risk of serious cardiovascular events McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals; 2010.
(oral; Ortho Tri Cyclen®, from combination oral contraceptives (COC) use. This risk increases with
others) age, particularly in women over 35 years of age, and with the number of NOTE: package insert includes 101 references, many
cigarettes smoked. For this reason, COCs should not be used by women of which are related to adverse effects.
who are over 35 years of age and smoke.

An increased risk of the following serious adverse reactions has been


associated with the use of oral contraceptives:
• Thrombophlebitis and venous thrombosis with or without embolism
• Arterial thromboembolism
• Pulmonary embolism
• Myocardial infarction
• Cerebral hemorrhage
• Cerebral thrombosis
• Hypertension
• Gallbladder disease
• Hepatic adenomas or benign liver tumors

There is evidence of an association between the following conditions and


the use of oral contraceptives:
• Mesenteric thrombosis
• Retinal thrombosis

The following adverse reactions have been reported in patients receiving


oral contraceptives and are believed to be drug-related:
• Nausea
• Vomiting
• Gastrointestinal symptoms (such as abdominal cramps and bloating)
• Breakthrough bleeding

N-10
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Spotting
• Change in menstrual flow
• Amenorrhea
• Temporary infertility after discontinuation of treatment
• Edema
• Melasma which may persist
• Breast changes: Tenderness, enlargement, secretion
• Change in weight (increase or decrease)
• Change in cervical erosion and secretion
• Diminution in lactation when given immediately postpartum
• Cholestatic jaundice
• Migraine
• Allergic reaction, including rash, urticaria, angioedema
• Mental depression
• Reduced tolerance to carbohydrates
• Vaginal candidiasis
• Change in corneal curvature (steepening)
• Intolerance to contact lenses

The following adverse reactions have been reported in users of oral


contraceptives and a causal association has been neither confirmed nor
refuted:
• Pre-menstrual syndrome
• Cataracts
• Changes in appetite
• Cystitis-like syndrome
• Headache
• Nervousness
• Dizziness
• Hirsutism
• Loss of scalp hair
• Erythema multiforme
• Erythema nodosum
• Hemorrhagic eruption
• Vaginitis
• Porphyria
• Impaired renal function
• Hemolytic uremic syndrome
• Acne
• Changes in libido

N-11
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Colitis
• Budd-Chiari Syndrome
Dydrogesterone As for progestogens in general. Dydrogesterone. In: Micromedex® Healthcare Series.
(oral; Gynorest) Thomson Reuters (Healthcare) Inc.
Porphyria http://www.thomsonhc.com (accessed March 31,
NOTE: marketing • The Drug Database for Acute Porphyria, compiled by the Norwegian 2012).
discontinued in US; labels Porphyria Centre (NAPOS) and the Porphyria Centre Sweden,
are not available. classifies dydrogesterone as porphyrinogenic; it should be prescribed Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference.
only for compelling reasons and precautions should be taken in all Pharmaceutical Press. Electronic version, Thomson
patients. (The Drug Database for Acute Porphyria. Available at: Reuters (Healthcare) Inc. http://www.thomsonhc.com
http://www.drugs-porphyria.org (accessed 04/10/11)) (accessed March 31, 2012).

Pregnancy
• Anomalies (non-virilising) of the genito-urinary tract were found in a 4-
month-old baby whose mother had taken dydrogesterone 20 mg daily
from the eighth to twentieth week of pregnancy and 10 mg daily from
then until term.1 She had also been given hydroxyprogesterone
caproate 250 mg by intramuscular injection weekly from the eighth to
the twentieth week. (Roberts IF, West RJ. Teratogenesis and maternal
progesterone. Lancet 1977; ii: 982. (PubMed id:72325))
Medroxyprogesterone Warnings: Depo-Provera CI [package insert]. New York, NY:
acetate • Intrauterine exposure: "Several reports suggest an association Pharmacia and Upjohn Company; 2011.
(injectable; Depo-Provera between intrauterine exposure to progestational drugs in the first
CI®, others) trimester of pregnancy and genital abnormalities in male and female
fetuses. The risk of hypospadias (5 to 8 per 1,000 male births in the
general population) may be approximately doubled with exposure to
these drugs. There are insufficient data to quantify the risk to exposed
female fetuses, but insofar as some of these drugs induce mild
virilization of the external genitalia of the female fetus, and because of
the increased association of hypospadias in the male fetus, it is
prudent to avoid the use of these drugs during the first trimester of
pregnancy."
• Thromboembolic disorders
• Ocular disorders
• Lactation

Reported:
• Breakthrough bleeding
• Spotting
• Change in menstrual flow
• Amenorrhea

N-12
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Headache
• Nervousness
• Dizziness
• Edema
• Change in weight (increase or decrease)
• Changes in cervical erosion and cervical secretions
• Cholestatic jaundice, including neonatal jaundice
• Breast tenderness and galactorrhea
• Skin sensitivity reactions consisting of urticaria, pruritus, edema and
generalized rash
• Acne, alopecia and hirsutism
• Rash (allergic) with and without pruritis
• Anaphylactoid reactions and anaphylaxis
• Mental depression
• Pyrexia
• Fatigue
• Insomnia
• Nausea
• Somnolence

In a few instances there have been undesirable sequelae at the site of


injection, such as residual lump, change in color of skin, or sterile
abscess.

The following adverse reactions have been observed in patients receiving


estrogen-progestin combination drugs:
• Rise in blood pressure in susceptible individuals
• Premenstrual syndrome
• Changes in libido
• Changes in appetite
• Cystitis-like syndrome
• Headache
• Nervousness
• Fatigue
• Backache
• Hirsutism
• Loss of scalp hair
• Erythema multiforma
• Erythema nodosum
• Hemorrhagic eruption

N-13
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Itching
• Dizziness

The following laboratory results may be altered by the use of estrogen-


progestin combination drugs:
• Increased sulfobromophthalein retention and other hepatic function
tests
• Coagulation tests: increase in prothrombin factors VII, VIII, IX, and X
• Metyrapone test
• Pregnanediol determinations
• Thyroid function: increase in PBI, and butanol extractable protein
bound iodine and decrease in T3 uptake values
Medroxyprogesterone Warnings: Provera [package insert]. New York, NY: Pharmacia
acetate • Cardiovascular disorders and Upjohn Company; 2009.
(oral; Provera®) • Stroke
• Coronary heart disease
• Venous thromboembolism
• Malignant neoplasms (breast cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian
cancer)
• Dementia
• Visual abnormalities

The following adverse reactions have been reported in women taking


progestins, including PROVERA tablets, without concomitant estrogens
treatment:
• Genitourinary system:
Abnormal uterine bleeding (irregular, increase, decrease), change in
menstrual flow, breakthrough bleeding, spotting, amenorrhea,
changes in cervical erosion and cervical secretions.
• Breasts: Breast tenderness, mastodynia or galactorrhea has been
reported.
• Cardiovascular: Thromboembolic disorders including thrombophlebitis
and pulmonary embolism have been reported.
• Gastrointestinal: Nausea, cholestatic jaundice.
• Skin: Sensitivity reactions consisting of urticaria, pruritus, edema and
generalized rash have occurred. Acne, alopecia and hirsutism have
been reported.
• Eyes: Neuro-ocular lesions, e.g., retinal thrombosis and optic neuritis.
• Central nervous system: Mental depression, insomnia, somnolence,
dizziness, headache, nervousness.

N-14
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Miscellaneous: Hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis &
anaphylactoid reactions, angioedema), rash (allergic) with and without
pruritus, change in weight (increase or decrease), pyrexia, edema/fluid
retention, fatigue, decreased glucose tolerance.

The following additional adverse reactions have been reported with


estrogen and/or progestin therapy:
• Genitourinary system: Abnormal uterine bleeding/spotting, or flow;
breakthrough bleeding; spotting; dysmenorrheal/pelvic pain, increase
in size of uterine leiomyomata; vaginitis, including vaginal candidiasis;
change in amount of cervical secretion; changes in cervical ectropion;
ovarian cancer; endometrial hyperplasia; endometrial cancer.
• Breasts: Tenderness, enlargement, pain, nipple discharge,
galactorrhea; fibrocystic breast changes; breast cancer.
• Cardiovascular: Deep and superficial venous thrombosis; pulmonary
embolism; thrombophlebitis; myocardial infarction; stroke; increase in
blood pressure.
• Gastrointestinal: Nausea, vomiting; abdominal cramps, bloating;
cholestatic jaundice; increased incidence of gallbladder disease;
pancreatitis, enlargement of hepatic hemangiomas.
• Skin: Chloasma or melasma that may persist when drug is
discontinued; erythema multiforme; erythema nodosum; hemorrhagic
eruption; loss of scalp hair; hirsutism; pruritus, rash.
• Eyes: Retinal vascular thrombosis, intolerance to contact lenses.
• Central nervous system:
Headache; migraine; dizziness; mental depression; chorea;
nervousness; mood disturbances; irritability; exacerbation of epilepsy,
dementia.
• Miscellaneous: Increase or decrease in weight; reduced carbohydrate
tolerance; aggravation of porphyria; edema; arthalgias; leg cramps;
changes in libido; urticaria, angioedema, anaphylactoid/anaplylactic
reactions; hypocalcemia; exacerbation of asthma; increased
triglycerides.
Norethisterone Warnings: Aygestin [package insert]. Sellersville, PA: Teva
[norethindrone] • Cardiovascular disorders Pharmaceuticals; 2010.
(oral; Aygestin®) • Visual anomalies

The following adverse reactions have been observed in women taking


progestins:
• Breakthrough bleeding
• Spotting

N-15
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Change in menstrual flow
• Amenorrhea
• Edema
• Changes in weight (decreases, increases)
• Changes in the cervical squamo-columnar junction and cervical
secretions
• Cholestatic jaundice
• Rash (allergic) with and without pruritus
• Melasma or chloasma
• Clinical depression
• Acne
• Breast enlargement/tenderness
• Headache/migraine
• Urticaria
• Abnormalities of liver tests (i.e., AST, ALT, Bilirubin)
• Decreased HDL cholesterol and increased LDL/HDL ratio
• Mood swings
• Nausea
• Insomnia
• Anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions
• Thrombotic and thromboembolic events (e.g., deep vein thrombosis,
pulmonary embolism, retinal vascular thrombosis, cerebral thrombosis
and embolism)
• Optic neuritis (which may lead to partial or complete loss of vision)
Progesterone Warnings: Crinone [package insert]. Livingston, NJ: Columbia
(vaginal gel; Crinone®) The physician should be alert to the earliest manifestations of thrombotic Laboratories; 2009.
disorders (thrombophlebitis, cerebrovascular disorders, pulmonary
embolism, and retinal thrombosis).

In one clinical study for assisted reproductive technology, AEs associated


with treatment, occurring in 5% or more of women:
• Bloating 7%
• Cramps NOS 15%
• Pain 8%
• Dizziness 5%
• Headache 13%
• Nausea 7%
• Breast Pain 13%
• Moniliasis Genital 5%
• Vaginal Discharge 7%

N-16
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Pruritus Genital 5%

In a second clinical study for assisted reproductive technology (ART),


AEs associated with treatment, occurring in ≥5% of women:
• Abdominal Pain 12%
• Perineal Pain Female 17%
• Headache 17%
• Constipation 27%
• Diarrhea 8%
• Nausea 22%
• Vomiting 5%
• Arthralgia 8%
• Depression 11%
• Libido Decreased 10%
• Nervousness 16%
• Somnolence 27%
• Breast Enlargement 40%
• Dyspareunia 6%
• Nocturia 13%

In three clinical studies for secondary amenorrhea taking (either 4%, 8%)
Crinone along with estrogen, AEs associated with treatment, occurring in
5% or more of women:
• Abdominal Pain 5%, 9%
• Appetite Increased 5%, 8%
• Bloating 13%, 12%
• Cramps NOS 19%, 26%
• Fatigue 21%, 22%
• Headache 19%, 15%
• Nausea 8%, 6%
• Back Pain 8%, 3%
• Myalgia 8%, 0%
• Depression 19%, 15%
• Emotional Lability 23%, 22%
• Sleep Disorder 18%, 18%
• Vaginal Discharge 11%, 3%
• Upper Respiratory Tract Infection 5%, 8%
• Pruitis genital 2%, 6%

Reported in women at a frequency <5% in Crinone ART and secondary

N-17
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
amenorrhea studies and not listed above include:
• Mouth dry
• Sweating increased
• Abnormal crying
• Allergic reaction
• Allergy
• Appetite decreased
• Asthenia
• Edema
• Face edema
• Fever
• Hot flushes
• Influenza-like symptoms
• Water retention
• Xerophthalmia
• Syncope
• Migraine
• Tremor
• Dyspepsia
• Eructation
• Flatulence
• Gastritis
• Toothache
• Thirst
• Cramps legs
• Leg pain
• Skeletal pain
• Benign cyst
• Purpura
• Aggressive reactions
• Forgetfulness
• Insomnia
• Anemia
• Dysmenorrheal
• Premenstrual tension
• Vaginal dryness
• Infection
• Pharyngitis
• Sinusitis
• Urinary tract infection

N-18
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Asthma
• Dyspnea
• Hyperventilation
• Rhinitis
• Acne
• Pruritus
• Rash
• Seborrhea
• Skin discoloration
• Skin disorder
• Urticaria
• Cystitis
• Dysuria
• Micturition frequency
• Conjunctivitis
Progesterone See progesterone in general. Progesterone. In: Micromedex® Healthcare Series.
(coil; Progestasert) Thomson Reuters (Healthcare) Inc.
Common: http://www.thomsonhc.com (accessed March 31,
NOTE: marketing • Abdominal pain (vaginal insert, 12%) 2012).
discontinued in US; labels • Constipation (vaginal insert, 2% to 3%)
are not available. • Nausea (vaginal insert; 7% to 8%) "Progesterone." In: DrugPoints® System. Thomson
• Swollen abdomen (vaginal insert, 4%) Reuters (Healthcare) Inc. http://www.thomsonhc.com
• Post-oocyte retrieval (vaginal insert, 25% to 28%) (accessed March 31, 2012).
• Fatigue (vaginal insert, 2% to 3%)
Flurbiprofen Reported adverse events in patients receiving Ansaid or other NSAIDs Ansaid [package insert]. New York City, NY:
(oral; Ansaid®) Pharmacia & Upjohn Co.; 2010.
Warnings and Precautions:
• Cardiovascular thrombotic events, myocardial infarction, and stroke
• Hypertension
• Congestive heart failure and edema
• Gastrointestinal effects, including risk of ulceration, bleeding, and
perforation
• Renal effects
• Advanced renal disease
• Anaphylactoid reactions
• Skin reactions
• Hepatic effects; borderline elevations of liver tests can occur in up to
15% of patients taking NSAIDs including flurbiprofen
• Hematological effects

N-19
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Vision changes (blurred and/pr diminished vision)
• Cross reactivity in patients with aspirin-sensitive asthma

Incidence ≥1% from clinical trials:


• Edema
• Abdominal pain
• Constipation
• Diarrhea
• Dyspepsia/ heartburn
• Elevated liver enzymes
• Flatulence
• GI bleeding
• Nausea
• Vomiting
• Body weight changes
• Headache
• Nervousness and other manifestations of CNS stimulation (e.g.,
anxiety, insomnia, increased reflexes, tremor)
• Symptoms associated with CNS inhibition (e.g., amnesia, asthenia,
depression, malaise, somnolence)
• Rash,
• Changes in vision
• Dizziness/ vertigo
• Tinnitus
• Signs and symptoms suggesting urinary tract infection

Incidence <1% from clinical trials, postmarketing surveillance, or


literature, with probable causal relationship:
• Anaphylactic reaction
• Chills
• Fever
• Congestive heart failure
• Hypertension
• Vascular diseases
• Vasodilation
• Bloody diarrhea
• Esophageal disease
• Gastric / peptic ulcer disease
• Gastritis
• Jaundice (cholestatic and noncholestatic)

N-20
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Hematemesis
• Hepatitis
• Stomatitis / glossitis
• Aplastic anemia (including agranulocytosis or pancytopenia)
• Decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit
• Ecchymosis / purpura
• Eosinophilia
• Hemolytic anemia
• Iron deficiency anemia
• Leucopenia
• Thrombocytopenia
• Hyperuricemia
• Ataxia
• Cerebrovascular ischemia
• Confusion
• Paresthesia
• Twitching
• Asthma
• Epistaxis
• Angioedema
• Eczema
• Exfoliative dermatitis
• Photosensitivity
• Pruritus
• Toxic epidermal necrolysis
• Urticaria
• Conjunctivitis
• Parosmia
• Hematuria
• Interstitial nephritis
• Renal failure

Incidence <1% from clinical trials, postmarketing surveillance, or


literature, with causal relationship unknown:
• Angina pectoris
• Arrhythmias
• Myocardial infarction
• Appetite changes
• Cholecystitis
• Colitis

N-21
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Dry mouth
• Exacerbation of inflammatory bowel disease
• Periodontal abscess
• Small intestine inflammation with loss of blood and protein
• Lymphadenopathy
• Hyperkalemia
• Convulsion
• Cerebrovascular accident
• Emotional lability
• Hypertonia
• Meningitis
• Myasthenia
• Subarachnoid hemorrhage
• Bronchitis
• Dyspnea
• Hyperventilation
• Laryngitis
• Pulmonary embolism
• Pulmonary infarct
• Alopecia
• Dry skin
• Herpes simplex / zoster
• Nail disorder
• Sweating
• Changes in taste
• Corneal opacity
• Ear disease
• Glaucoma
• Retinal hemorrhage
• Retrobulbar neuritis
• Transient hearing loss
• Menstrual disturbances
• Prostate disease
• Vaginal and uterine hemorrhage
• Vulvovaginitis
Meclofenamate sodium Warnings: Meclofenamate sodium [package insert]. Morgantown,
(oral; Mecolmen®) • Risk of GI ulceration, bleeding and perforation with NSAID therapy WV: Mylan Pharmaceuticals; 2006.

Reported incidence greater than 1%: "[A]dverse reactions were observed in clinical trials
• Diarrhea (10% to 33%) and included observations from more than 2,700

N-22
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Nausea with or without vomiting (11%) patients, 594 of whom were treated for one year and
• Other gastrointestinal disorders (10%) 248 for at least two years."
• Anorexia
• Constipation "In approximately 4% of the patients in controlled
• Stomatitis studies, diarrhea was severe enough to require
• Peptic ulcer discontinuation of meclofenamate sodium."
• Edema
• Urticaria
• Pruritus
• Tinnitus

Reported incidence between 3% and 9%%:


• Abdominal pain
• Pyrosis
• Flatulence
• Rash
• Headache
• Dizziness

Reported incidence less than 1%, probably causally related:


• Bleeding and/or perforation with or without obvious ulcer formation
• Colitis
• Cholestatic jaundice
• Renal failure
• Neutropenia
• Thrombocytopenic purpura
• Leucopenia
• Agranulocytosis
• Hemolytic anemia
• Eosinophilia
• Decrease in hemoglobin and/or hematocrit
• Erythema multiforme
• Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
• Exfoliative dermatitis
• Alteration of liver function tests
• Lupus and serum sickness-like symptoms

Reported incidence less than 1%, causal relationship unknown:


• Palpitations
• Malaise

N-23
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Fatigue
• Paresthesia
• Insomnia
• Depression
• Blurred vision
• Taste disturbances
• Decreased visual acuity
• Temporary loss of vision
• Reversible loss of color vision
• Retinal changes including macular fibrosis
• Macular and perimacular edema
• Conjunctivitis
• Iritis
• Nocturia
• Paralytic ileus
• Erythema nodosum
• Hair loss
Mefenamic acid Warnings and precautions: Ponstel [package insert]. Atlanta, GA: Shionogi
(oral; Ponstel®) • Cardiovascular risk, including thrombotic events, hypertension, and Pharma; 2010.
congestive heart failure and edema
• Gastrointestinal risk

Most frequently reported, occurring in approximately 1-10% of patients:


• Abdominal pain
• Constipation
• Diarrhea
• Dyspepsia
• Flatulence
• Gross bleeding / perforation
• Heartburn
• Nausea
• GI ulcers (gastric / duodenal)
• Vomiting
• Abnormal renal function
• Anemia
• Dizziness
• Edema
• Elevated liver enzymes
• Headaches
• Increased bleeding time

N-24
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Pruritus
• Rashes
• Tinnitus

Additional adverse experiences reported occasionally include:


• Fever
• Infection
• Sepsis
• Congestive heart failure
• Hypertension
• Tachycardia
• Syncope
• Dry mouth
• Esophagitis
• Gastric/peptic ulcers
• Gastritis
• Gastrointestinal bleeding
• Glossitis
• Hematemesis
• Hepatitis
• Jaundice
• Ecchymosis
• Eosinophilia
• Leucopenia
• Melena
• Purpura
• Rectal bleeding
• Stomatitis
• Thrombocytopenia
• Weight changes
• Anxiety
• Asthenia
• Confusion
• Depression
• Dream abnormalities
• Drowsiness
• Insomnia
• Malaise
• Nervousness
• Paresthesia

N-25
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Somnolence
• Tremors
• Vertigo
• Asthma
• Dyspnea
• Alopecia
• Photosensitivity
• Pruritus
• Sweat
• Blurred vision
• Cystitis
• Dysuria
• Hematuria
• Interstitial nephritis
• Pliguria/polyuria
• Proteinuria
• Renal failure

Other adverse reactions, which occur rarely:


• Anaphylactoid reactions
• Appetite changes
• Death
• Arrhythmia
• Hypotension
• Myocardial infarction
• Palpitations
• Vasculitis
• Eructation
• Liver failure
• Pancreatitis
• Agranulocytosis
• Hemolytic anemia
• Aplastic anemia
• Lymphadenopathy
• Pancytopenia
• Hyperglycemia
• Convulsions
• Coma
• Hallucinations
• Meningitis

N-26
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Respiratory depression
• Pneumonia
• Angioedema
• Toxic epidermal necrosis
• Erythema multiforme
• Exfoliative dermatitis
• Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
• Urticaria
• Conjunctivitis
• Hearing impairment
Naproxen Incidence 3-9% of patients in clinical trials with naproxen: "Adverse reactions reported in controlled clinical trials
(oral; EC-Naprosyn®, • Heartburn in 960 patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis or
Naprosyn®, Anaprox®, • Abdominal pain osteoarthritis are listed [here]. In general, reactions in
Anaprox DS®, Naprosyn®, • Nausea patients treated chronically were reported 2 to 10 times
others) • Constipation more frequently than they were in short-term studies in
• Headache the 962 patients treated for mild to moderate pain or
• Dizziness for dysmenorrhea."
• Drowsiness
EC-Naprosyn / Naprosyn / Anaprox / Anaprox DS /
• Pruritus
Naprosyn [package insert]. Nutley, NJ: Roche
• Skin eruptions
Pharmaceuticals; 1999-200X.
• Ecchymoses
• Tinnitus
• Edema
• Dyspnea

Incidence <3% of patients in clinical trials with naproxen:


• Diarrhea
• Dyspepsia
• Stomatitis
• Lightheadedness
• Vertigo
• Sweating
• Purpura
• Visual disturbances
• Hearing disturbances
• Palpitations
• Thirst

Incidence <1% of patients in clinical trials with naproxen:


• Gastrointestinal bleeding

N-27
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Jaundice
• Melena
• Thrombocytopenia
• Agranulocytosis
• Inability to concentrate
• Skin rashes

Incidence <1% of patients in taking naproxen, from postmarketing


reports:
• Anaphylactoid reactions
• Angioneurotic edema
• Menstrual disorders
• Pyrexia (chills and fever)
• Congestive heart failure
• Vasculitis
• Hypertension
• Pulmonary edema
• Perforation
• Hematemesis
• Colitis
• Exacerbation of inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's
disease)
• Nonpeptic gastrointestinal ulceration
• Ulcerative stomatitis
• Esophagitis, peptic ulceration
• Abnormal liver function tests
• Hepatitis (some cases have been fatal)
• Eosinophilia
• Leucopenia
• Granulocytopenia
• Hemolytic anemia
• Aplastic anemia
• Hyperglycemia
• Hypoglycemia
• Depression
• Dream abnormalities
• Insomnia
• Malaise
• Myalgia
• Muscle weakness

N-28
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Aseptic meningitis
• Cognitive dysfunction
• Convulsions
• Eosinophilic pneumonitis
• Asthma
• Alopecia
• Urticaria
• Toxic epidermal necrolysis
• Erythema multiforme
• Erythema nodosum
• Fixed drug eruption
• Lichen planus
• Pustular reaction
• Systemic lupus erythematoses
• Bullous reactions, including Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
• Photosensitive dermatitis
• Photosensitivity reactions, including rare cases resembling porphyria
cutanea tarda (pseudoporphyria) or epidermolysis bullosa. If skin
fragility, blistering or other symptoms suggestive of pseudoporphyria
occur, treatment should be discontinued and the patient monitored.
• Hearing impairment
• Corneal opacity
• Papillitis
• Retrobulbar optic neuritis
• Papilledema
• Glomerular nephritis
• Hematuria
• Hyperkalemia
• Interstitial nephritis
• Nephrotic Syndrome
• Renal disease
• Renal failure
• Renal papillary necrosis
• Raised serum creatinine
• Infertility in women
Cabergoline Incidence during 4-week RCT (% in cabergoline group, % in placebo Cabergoline [package insert]. Sellersville, PA: Teva
(oral) group): Pharmaceuticals; 2011.
• Nausea (27, 20)
• Constipation (10, 0)
• Abdominal pain (5, 5)

N-29
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Dyspepsia (2, 0)
• Vomiting (2, 0)
• Headache (26, 25)
• Dizziness (15, 5)
• Paresthesia (1, 0)
• Vertigo (1, 0)
• Asthenia (9, 10)
• Fatigue (7, 0)
• Hot flashes (1, 5)
• Somnolence (5, 5)
• Depression (3, 5)
• Nervousness (2, 0)
• Postural hypotension (4, 0)
• Breast pain (1, 0)
• Dysmenorrhea (1, 0)
• Abnormal vision (1, 0)

Incidence during 8-week trial (% in cabergoline group, % in bromocriptine


group):
• Nausea (29, 43)
• Constipation (7, 9)
• Abdominal pain (5, 8)
• Dyspepsia (5, 7)
• Vomiting (4, 7)
• Dry mouth (2, 1)
• Diarrhea (2, 3)
• Flatulence (2, 1)
• Throat irritation (1, 0)
• Toothache (1, 0)
• Headache (26, 27)
• Dizziness (17, 18)
• Vertigo (4, 4)
• Paresthesia (2, 3)
• Asthenia (6, 6)
• Fatigue (5, 8)
• Syncope (1, 1)
• Influenza-like symptoms (1, 0)
• Malaise (1, 0)
• Periorbital edema (1, 1)
• Peripheral edema (1, 1)

N-30
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Depression (3, 2)
• Somnolence (2, 2)
• Anorexia (1, 1)
• Anxiety (1, 1)
• Insomnia (1, 1)
• Impaired concentration (1, 1)
• Nervousness (1, 2)
• Hot flashes (3, 1)
• Hypotension (1, 2)
• Dependent edema (1, 1)
• Palpitation (1, 2)
• Breast pain (2, 3)
• Dysmenorrhea (1, 1)
• Acne (1, 0)
• Pruritus (1, 1)
• Pain (2, 3)
• Arthralgia (1, 0)
• Rhinitis (1, 4)
• Abnormal vision (1, 1)

Reported at an incidence of < 1% in the overall clinical studies:


• Facial edema
• Influenza-like symptoms
• Malaise
• Hypotension
• Syncope
• Palpitations
• Dry mouth
• Flatulence
• Diarrhea
• Anorexia
• Weight loss
• Weight gain
• Somnolence
• Nervousness
• Paresthesia
• Insomnia
• Anxiety
• Nasal stuffiness
• Epistaxis

N-31
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Acne
• Pruritus
• Abnormal vision
• Dysmenorrhea
• Increased libido

Postmarketing surveillance data:


• Cardiac valvulopathy
• Extracardiac fibrotic reactions
• Hypersexuality
• Increased libido
• Pathological gambling
• Cases of alopecia
• Aggression and psychotic disorder

Etamsylate [ethamsylate] Precautions: Ethamsylate. In: Micromedex® Healthcare Series.


(oral) • Patients with asthma, allergies, or a history of allergic-type reactions Thomson Reuters (Healthcare) Inc.
to medications (potential for allergic phenomena; tablets/ampules http://www.thomsonhc.com (accessed March 31,
NOTE: not available in US; contain sodium sulfite) 2012).
labels are not available. • Patients with or a history of thromboembolism (eg, ischemic stroke,
pulmonary embolism, deep-vein thrombosis) DRUGDEX® System. Thomson Reuters (Healthcare)
• Renal impairment (most of a dose is excreted unchanged) Inc. http://www.thomsonhc.com (accessed March 31,
2012).
Adverse reactions:
• Thromboembolic disorder
• Rash
• Acute intermittent porphyria
• Gastrointestinal tract findings: nausea, abdominal discomfort, bitter
taste, and other nonspecific gastrointestinal disturbances have been
reported occasionally during oral therapy
• Backache (causality uncertain)
• Headache (causality is questionable)
Exenatide Hypoglycemia is a common adverse effect. Byetta [package insert]. San Diego, CA: Amylin
(injection; Byetta®, others) Pharmaceuticals; 2011.
Treatment-emergent ARs ≥2% incidence and greater incidence with
BYETTA treatment used with metformin and/or a sulfonylurea, excluding
hypoglycemia:
• Nausea
• Vomiting
• Diarrhea

N-32
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Feeling jittery
• Dizziness
• Headache
• Dyspepsia
• Asthenia
• Gastroesophageal reflux disease
• Hyperhidrosis

Treatment-emergent ARs ≥2% incidence and greater incidence with


BYETTA treatment used with thiazolidinedione, with or without metformin,
excluding hypoglycemia:
• Nausea
• Vomiting
• Dyspepsia
• Diarrhea
• Gastroesophageal reflux disease

Treatment-emergent ARs ≥2% incidence and greater incidence with


BYETTA treatment used with insulin glargine, with or without oral
antihyperglycemic medications, excluding hypoglycemia:
• Nausea
• Vomiting
• Diarrhea
• Headache
• Constipation
• Dyspepsia
• Asthenia
• Abdominal distension
• Decreased appetite
• Flatulence
• Gastroesophageal reflux disease

Postmarketing experience:
• Injection-site reactions
• Generalized pruritus and/or urticaria
• Macular or papular rash
• Angioedema
• Anaphylactic reaction
• International normalized ratio (INR) increased with concomitant
warfarin use sometimes associated with bleeding

N-33
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea resulting in dehydration
• Abdominal distension
• Abdominal pain
• Eructation
• Constipation
• Flatulence
• Acute pancreatitis
• Hemorrhagic and necrotizing pancreatitis sometimes resulting in death
• Dysgeusia
• Somnolence
• Altered renal function, including increased serum creatinine
• Renal impairment
• Worsened chronic renal failure or acute renal failure (sometimes
requiring hemodialysis)
• Kidney transplant and kidney transplant dysfunction
• Alopecia
Metformin Warning: Glucophage [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-
(oral; Glucophage®, others) • Lactic acidosis (boxed warning) Myers Squibb Company; 2009.

Most common (>5%) in placebo-controlled study of monotherapy:


• Diarrhea
• Nausea/vomiting
• Flatulence
• Asthenia
• Indigestion
• Abdominal discomfort
• Headache

Also reported (≥1.0% to ≤5%):


• Abnormal stools
• Hypoglycemia
• Myalgia
• Lightheaded
• Dyspnea
• Nail disorder
• Rash
• Sweating increased
• Taste disorder
• Chest discomfort
• Chills

N-34
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
• Flu Syndrome
• Flushing
• Palpitation
N-acetyl-cysteine Warning: Acetadote [package insert]. Nashville, TN: Cumberland
After proper administration of acetylcysteine, an increased volume of Pharmaceuticals; 2011.
liquified bronchial secretions may occur. When cough is inadequate, the
open airway must be maintained by mechanical suction if necessary. Aceytlcysteine solution [package insert]. Lake Forest,
When there is a mechanical block due to foreign body or local IL: Hospira, Inc.; 2004.
accumulation, the airway should be cleared by endotracheal aspiration,
with or without bronchoscopy. Asthmatics under treatment with
acetylcysteine should be watched carefully. Most patients with
bronchospasm are quickly relieved by the use of a bronchodilator given
by nebulization. If bronchospasm progresses, this medication should be
discontinued immediately.

Adverse reactions from intravenous include:


• Tachycardia not otherwise specified
• Nausea
• Vomiting not otherwise specified
• Anaphylactoid reaction
• Pharyngitis
• Rhinorrhea
• Rhonchi
• Throat tightness
• Pruritus
• Rash not otherwise specified
• Flushing

Adverse reactions from solution include:


• Stomatitis
• Nausea
• Vomiting
• Fever
• Rhinorrhea
• Drowsiness
• Clamminess
• Chest tightness
• Bronchoconstrictiong
• Acquired sensitization to acetylcysteine (rare)

N-35
Drug
Adverse Reactions / Effects Notes and References
(Route; Brand Name)
Adverse reactions from other oral preparations (e.g., tablets) are not
listed in package inserts.

Adverse reactions reported in postmarketing safety study of IV


formulation include:
• Urticaria/facial flushing (6.1%)
• Pruritus (4.3%)
• Respiratory symptoms (1.9%)
• Edema (1.6%)
• Hypotension (0.1%)
• Anaphylaxis (0.1%)

N-36
Appendix O. Systematic Reviewsa
Review Title Review Type
Findings
Author, Year Intervention
Efficacy of tranexamic Systematic review of 10 "Available evidence indicates that tranexamic acid therapy in
acid in the treatment of studies (5 double-blind women with idiopathic menorrhagia resulted in 34–54%
idiopathic and non- RCTs; 2 RCTs; 1 reduction in menstrual blood loss. Following tranexamic acid
functional heavy prospective cohort; 1 treatment, patient's quality-of-life parameters improved by 46–
menstrual bleeding: A comparative; 1 83%, compared with 15–45% for norethisterone treatment.
systematic review. observational study) When compared with placebo, tranexamic acid use
significantly decreased the blood loss by 70% in women with
Naoulou et al., 20121 Tranexamic acid menorrhagia secondary to an intrauterine device (p<0.001).
Limited evidence indicated potential benefit in fibroid patients
with menorrhagia. No thromboembolic event was reported in
all studies analyzed."
Tranexamic acid Systematic review "Although several treatment options are available for HMB,
therapy for heavy tranexamic acid is particularly useful in women who either
menstrual bleeding. Tranexamic acid desire immediate pregnancy or for whom hormonal treatment
is inappropriate. Tranexamic acid is a well-tolerated, cost-
Lumsden and effective drug that reduces menstrual blood loss in the range
Wedisinghe, 20112 of 34-59%. It improves the health-related quality of life in
women in HMB."
Effective treatment of Pooled analysis of 2 Mean blood loss reduced in women with heavy and/or
heavy and/or prolonged RCTs (421 women in ITT prolonged menstrual bleeding, and the effect is seen at the
menstrual bleeding population) first withdrawal bleed after initiation of treatment. The effect is
without organic cause: consistent across a larger and more diverse population of
pooled analysis of two Estradiol valerate / women.
multinational, dienogest
randomised, double- "Although not directly comparable, the median decrease in
blind, placebo- MBL achieved by treatment cycle 7 with E2V/DNG treatment
controlled trials of (88%) appears to approach that achieved with the LNG-IUS
oestradiol valerate and (median 95% and 96% reduction) over six cycles in two
dienogest. studies that also used the alkaline haematin method to
objectively assess blood loss in women with heavy menstrual
Fraser et al., 20113 bleeding."
Cost-effectiveness and Review "Treating heavy menstrual bleeding with the LNG-IUS was
quality of life found to be cost-effective in various countries and settings.
associated with heavy LNG-IUS Moreover, irrespective of the measuring instrument used,
menstrual bleeding health-related quality-of-life outcomes were found to be
among women using improved to a degree similar to that achieved with endometrial
the levonorgestrel- ablation or hysterectomy. In some cases, the LNG-IUS
releasing intrauterine appeared to be more effective and less costly than the
system. surgical options."

Blumenthal et al., 20114


Systematic review Systematic review " Many interventions for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) are
highlights difficulty tested in clinical trials, but the large number and diversity of
interpreting diverse Includes medical and outcomes reported limit the ability to compare treatments
clinical outcomes in surgical interventions across trials… There is a dearth of standardized outcome
abnormal uterine measures in AUB that identify symptoms of importance to
bleeding trials. patients. Further research is required to develop validated
measures that capture patient-based outcomes, are
Rahn et al., 20115 responsive to change, yet feasible to use in future trials."

O-1
Review Title Review Type
Findings
Author, Year Intervention
Clinical practice Clinical practice "In idiopathic AUB, the first-line treatment is medical, with
guidelines on guidelines efficacy ranked as follows: levonorgestrel IUD, tranexamic
menorrhagia: acid, oral contraceptives, either estrogens and progestins or
management of synthetic progestins only, 21 days a month, or NSAIDs. When
abnormal uterine hormone treatment is contraindicated or immediate pregnancy
bleeding before is desired, tranexamic acid is indicated. Iron must be included
menopause. for patients with iron-deficiency anemia. For women who do
not wish to become pregnant in the future and who have
Marret et al., 20106 idiopathic AUB, the long-term efficacy of conservative surgical
treatment is greater than that of oral medical treatment.
Placement of a levonorgestrel IUD (or administration of
tranexamic acid by default) is recommended for women with
idiopathic AUB. If this fails, a conservative surgical technique
must be proposed…"
Chinese Herbal Meta-analysis "Trials of CHM treatments with CWM treatments were
Medicine for compared with CWM treatments alone. Jadad scale and
Dysfunctional Uterine Chinese herbal medicine allocation concealment were used to assess the quality of
Bleeding: a Meta- (CHM) and conventional included studies. Four RCTs or quasi-RCTs involving 525
analysis. Western medicine (CWM) patients were included. The methodological quality was poor
in all trials except one trial. No serious adverse events were
Tu et al., 20097 reported in the included studies. With the lack of trials
comparing CHM with no treatment or placebo, it is impossible
to accurately evaluate the efficacy of CHM. However, CHM in
these studies seem to show an encouraging comparative
effectiveness with CWM. More RCTs with a higher quality are
required."
The experience of Systematic review and "These provided support for the fourth paper's conceptual
heavy menstrual meta-ethnography framework of a lay model of heavy menstrual bleeding which
bleeding: a systematic shows little overlap with the traditional clinical definition.
review and meta- Details of physical, practical and emotional elements of this
ethnography of model were identified. A matrix of uncertainties were identified
qualitative studies. suggesting reasons why women may or may not seek medical
help for heavy menstrual bleeding. Women and healthcare
Garside et al., 20088 professionals may conspire to privilege blood loss over other
symptoms and the disease model of heavy menstrual bleeding
is little help to either."
Abnormal uterine Systematic review of "Fifty different instruments were used to evaluate amount of
bleeding: a review of patient-based outcome bleeding, bleeding-related symptoms, or menstrual bleeding-
patient-based outcome measures (983 studies, specific quality of life. The quality of each of these instruments
measures. 80 eligible) was evaluated on eight psychometric properties. The majority
of instruments had no documentation of reliability, precision,
Matteson et al., 20099 or feasibility. There was no satisfactory evidence that any one
instrument completely addressed all eight psychometric
properties."
A systematic review Systematic review to "The prevalence of AUB among women of reproductive age
evaluating health- evaluate the impact of ranged from 10% to 30%. The HRQoL scores from the 36-
related quality of life, AUB on health-related item Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36)
work impairment, and quality of life and to suggested that women with AUB have HRQoL below the 25th
health-care costs and quantify the economic percentile of that for the general female population within a
utilization in abnormal burden from a societal similar age range. The conservatively estimated annual direct
uterine bleeding. perspective and indirect economic costs of AUB were approximately $1
billion and $12 billion, respectively. These figures do not
Liu et al., 200710 account for intangible costs and productivity loss due to
presenteeism."

O-2
Review Title Review Type
Findings
Author, Year Intervention
Current treatment of Review "Antifibrinolytic tranexamic acid is the most effective medical
dysfunctional uterine therapy to treat dysfunctional uterine bleeding. In general
bleeding. medical therapy is not as effective as endometrial resection in
terms of patient satisfaction and health related quality of life.
Bongers et al., 200411 The levonorgestrel releasing intra uterine device is an
effective treatment for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. No
difference in quality of life was observed in patients treated
with a levonorgestrel releasing intra uterine device as
compared to hysterectomy."
Quality of life Systematic review "A total of 19 articles, 8 on instrument development and 11 on
instruments in studies application, were included in the review. The generic Short
of menorrhagia: a Quality of life instruments Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF36) was used in
systematic review. 12/19 (63%) studies. Only two studies developed new specific
QoL instruments for menorrhagia but they complied with 7/17
Clark et al., 200212 (41%) and 10/17 (59%) of the quality criteria. Quality
assessment showed that only 7/19 (37%) studies complied
with more than half the criteria for face validity whereas 17/19
(90%) studies complied with more than half of the criteria for
measurement properties (P = 0.0001)."
ACOG practice bulletin: "The treatment of choice for anovulatory uterine bleeding is
management of medical therapy with oral contraceptives. Cyclic progestins
anovulatory bleeding also are effective. (Level A evidence)"
(2001)

American College of
Obstetricians and
Gynecologists13
The effectiveness of Systematic review (5 "Small studies of moderate quality indicate the LNG-IUS is an
the levonorgestrel- controlled trials and 5 effective treatment for menorrhagia. Costs may be less than
releasing intrauterine case series) for tranexamic acid in primary and secondary care. Although
system in menorrhagia: its use may reduce surgical waiting lists, cost effectiveness
a systematic review. LNG-IUS assessment requires longer follow up."

Stewart et al., 200114


Thrombotic risks of oral Review “The venous thromboembolism risk for transdermal COCs like
contraceptives. vaginal ring (Nuvaring) or patch (Evra) is as high as for COCs
Contraceptive vaginal ring of third or fourth generation.” “Second-generation COCs
should be first choice when prescribing hormonal
Rott, 201215 contraception”
Contraceptive vaginal Systematic review “The incidence of estrogen-related adverse events such as
rings: a review. breast tenderness, headache and nausea was similar
between the NuvaRing and COC users. The only difference…
Brache and Faundes, was the higher incidences of loca events such as leucorrhea,
201016 vaginitis, vaginal discomfort and ring-related events (foreign
body sensation, coital problems, expulsions).” (In Ring users)
Combined hormonal Systematic review (one “…measured changes in BMD among 105 users of a
contraception and bone vaginal ring cohort study) combined CRV (Nuvaring, 15 µg EE/120 µg etongestrel
health: a systematic daily)and 39 nonhormonal contraceptive users aged 18-35
review. Contraceptive vaginal ring years. Over 24 months, BMD at the spine and femoral neck
did not change significantly in the ring group but increases in
the control group (NuvaRing vs control, p<0.0001). Because
Martins et al., 200617 differences in BMD between the two groups were within 1 S.D.
of each other, the study authors did not consider them to be
clinically relevant.”
a
Does not include systematic reviews published by the Cochrane Collaboration or reviews of interventions (e.g., surgical
intervention, medical treatments not used in primary care) or populations (e.g., women with bleeding due to fibroids or systemic
disease, post-menopausal women, acute bleeding, etc.) outside the scope of this review.

O-3
References

1. Naoulou B, Tsai MC. Efficacy of tranexamic acid in the 9. Matteson KA, Boardman LA, Munro MG, et al.
treatment of idiopathic and non-functional heavy menstrual Abnormal uterine bleeding: a review of patient-based
bleeding: A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand outcome measures. Fertil Steril 2009 Jul;92(1):205-16.
2012 May;91(5):529-37. PMID: 22229782. PMID: 18635169.

2. Lumsden MA, Wedisinghe L. Tranexamic acid therapy 10. Liu Z, Doan QV, Blumenthal P, et al. A systematic
for heavy menstrual bleeding. Expert Opin Pharmacother review evaluating health-related quality of life, work
2011 Sep;12(13):2089-95. PMID: 21767224. impairment, and health-care costs and utilization in
abnormal uterine bleeding. Value Health 2007 May-
3. Fraser IS, Parke S, Mellinger U, et al. Effective Jun;10(3):183-94. PMID: 17532811.
treatment of heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding
without organic cause: pooled analysis of two 11. Bongers MY, Mol BW, Brolmann HA. Current
multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo- treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Maturitas 2004
controlled trials of oestradiol valerate and dienogest. Eur J Mar 15;47(3):159-74. PMID: 15036486.
Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011 Aug;16(4):258-69.
PMID: 21774563. 12. Clark TJ, Khan KS, Foon R, et al. Quality of life
instruments in studies of menorrhagia: a systematic review.
4. Blumenthal PD, Dawson L, Hurskainen R. Cost- Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002 Sep 10;104(2):96-
effectiveness and quality of life associated with heavy 104. PMID: 12206918.
menstrual bleeding among women using the levonorgestrel-
releasing intrauterine system. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011 13. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins--Gynecology.
Mar;112(3):171-8. PMID: 21269626. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 14: management of
anovulatory bleeding. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001
5. Rahn DD, Abed H, Sung VW, et al.; Society of Mar;72(3):263-71. PMID: 11296797.
Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group.
Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse 14. Stewart A, Cummins C, Gold L, et al. The
clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials. J Clin effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine
Epidemiol 2011 Mar;64(3):293-300. PMID: 20705427. system in menorrhagia: a systematic review. BJOG 2001
Jan;108(1):74-86. PMID: 11213008.
6. Marret H, Fauconnier A, Chabbert-Buffet N, et al.
Clinical practice guidelines on menorrhagia: management 15. Rott H. Thrombotic risks of oral contraceptives. Curr
of abnormal uterine bleeding before menopause. Eur J Opin Obstet Gynecol 2012 Aug;24(4):235-40. PMID:
Obstet Gynecol Reprod Bio 2010 Oct;152(2):133-7. PMID: 22729096.
20688424.
16. Brache V, Faundes A. Contraceptive vaginal rings: a
7. Tu X, Huang G, Tan S. Chinese Herbal Medicine for review. Contraception 2010 Nov;82(5):418-27. PMID:
Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding: a Meta-analysis. Evid 20933115.
Based Complement Alternat Med 2009 Mar;6(1):99-105.
PMID: 18955223. 17. Martins SL, Curtis KM, Glasier AF. Combined
hormonal contraception and bone health: a systematic
8. Garside R, Britten N, Stein K. The experience of heavy review. Contraception 2006 May;73(5):445-69. PMID:
menstrual bleeding: a systematic review and meta- 16627030.
ethnography of qualitative studies. J Adv Nurs 2008
Sep;63(6):550-62. PMID: 18808575.

O-4
Appendix P. Ongoing Studies

Study
Start
Name
Date Estima
Study
Interventions / Anticipa ted
Status Inclusion / Exclusion Criteria Sponsor
Groups ted Enroll
Location
Complet ment
Trial
ion Date
Identifier
Pretreatmen Inclusion Criteria: Drug: Scott and January 80
t With Women aged 18-45 years old with Norethindrone White 2011
Norethindro heavy periods acetate (Aygestin) Hospital & January
ne Acetate US pretreatment 5 mg Clinic 2013
Prior to tablets, three times
Levonorgest Exclusion Criteria: a day for 21 days
rel IUS Pregnant for 2 menstrual
Insertion for Currently using hormonal contraception cycles.
Heavy or hormonal therapy
Menstrual History of pelvic inflammatory disease Other: No
Bleeding Infected abortion within the last three pretreatment. LNG-
months IUS is placed
Currently Abnormal or cancerous cells of the without
recruiting cervix or uterus norethindrone
United Active infection of genital organs acetate
States Known or suspected breast cancer pretreatment.
NCT013910 Active liver disease or tumors
52 Allergy to levonorgestrel or
norethindrone
Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary
embolism, or history of arterial
thromboembolic disease
Mirena Inclusion Criteria: Drug: Bayer June 7500
Observation Older than 18 years with previously Levonorgestrel 2009
al Program taken decision of their gynecologist to releasing April
insert Mirena according to registered intrauterine device 2014
Currently indications (Mirena, BAY86-
recruiting 5028)
Kazakhstan Exclusion Criteria:
NCT008836 Contraindications to Mirena insertion,
62 according to approved prescribing
information.

Multicenter Inclusion Criteria: Drug: Mirena Bayer October 204


Study to Woman currently using MIRENA for (BAY86-5028) 2006
Investigate contraception or menorrhagia with Removal of first Septemb
the Bleeding duration use between 4 years 3 MIRENA and er 2012
Profile and months and 4 years 9 months and insertion of the
the Insertion willingness to continue with the second MIRENA at
Easiness in method. entry visit. Removal
Women Normal size uterus at insertion (6-10 cm) of MIRENA (in vitro
Inserted Clinically normal cervical smear result release rate 20
With a within 12 preceding months or at µg/24 h) at year 5
Second screening. visit.
Consecutive Clinically normal breast examination
MIRENA for findings. Drug: Cytotec,
Contraceptio single, sublingual
n or Exclusion Criteria: dose of 400 µg, 3

P-1
Study
Start
Name
Date Estima
Study
Interventions / Anticipa ted
Status Inclusion / Exclusion Criteria Sponsor
Groups ted Enroll
Location
Complet ment
Trial
ion Date
Identifier
Menorrhagia Menopausal symptoms impairing hours prior to the
patient's quality of life or current MIRENA removal
Ongoing estrogen therapy for menopausal and insertion
but not symptoms. procedure at entry
recruiting Known or suspected pregnancy. visit
Finland, Any distortion of the uterine cavity,
France, including congenital or acquired Drug: Placebo -
Ireland, uterine anomalies and fibroids single, sublingual
Sweden Current or recurrent pelvic inflammatory dose, 3 hours prior
NCT003931 disease. to the MIRENA
98 Abnormal uterine bleeding of unknown removal and
origin. insertion procedure
Acute cervicitis or vaginitis not at entry visit
responding to treatment.
History of, diagnosed or suspected
genital or other malignancy (excluding
treated squamous cell carcinoma of
the skin), and untreated cervical
dysplasia.
Any active acute liver disease or liver
tumor.

Publications:
Heikinheimo O, Inki P, Kunz M,
Parmhed S, Anttila AM, Olsson SE,
Hurskainen R, Gemzell-Danielsson K.
Double-blind, randomized, placebo-
controlled study on the effect of
misoprostol on ease of consecutive
insertion of the levonorgestrel-
releasing intrauterine system.
Contraception. 2010 Jun;81(6):481-6.
Epub 2010 Mar 1.
Gemzell-Danielsson K, Inki P, Boubli L,
O'Flynn M, Kunz M, Heikinheimo O.
Bleeding pattern and safety of
consecutive use of the levonorgestrel-
releasing intrauterine system (LNG-
IUS)--a multicentre prospective study.
Hum Reprod. 2010 Feb;25(2):354-9.
Epub 2009 Dec 1.
Evaluation Inclusion Criteria: Drug: CDB-2914 Bayer Novemb 50
of Whether Women aged 25-40 years in good health er 2011
the History of abnormal uterine bleeding August
Selective (anovulatory and ovulatory) 2014
Progesteron documented by menorrhagia impact
e Receptor questionnaire (MIQ) and menstrual
Modulator calendar
CDB-2914 Ovulatory women will be defined as
Can Reduce those who have menstrual cycles of 24
Bleeding in - 35 days and a progesterone value >
Premenopa 3.0 pg/mL between 5 and 9 days after
usal Women in-home documentation of an LH surge
With Anovulatory women will be defined as

P-2
Study
Start
Name
Date Estima
Study
Interventions / Anticipa ted
Status Inclusion / Exclusion Criteria Sponsor
Groups ted Enroll
Location
Complet ment
Trial
ion Date
Identifier
Abnormal those without an in-house LH surge in
Uterine whom progesterone values 3 and 4
Bleeding: A weeks after menses are < 3.0 ng/mL
Pilot Study Hemoglobin > 10 g/dL (for those wishing
surgery)
Not yet Willing and able to comply with study
recruiting requirements
United Using mechanical (condoms,
States diaphragms), sterilization or
NCT014937 abstinence methods of contraception
91 for the duration of the study
Negative urine pregnancy test
BMI less than or equal to 33, if a surgical
candidate or less than or equal to 35, if
not a surgical candidate.
Creatinine less than 1.3 mg/dL
Liver function tests within 130 percent of
upper limit
Women who elect surgery must state
that they do not desire further fertility.
Endometrial biopsy without endometrial
hyperplasia or neoplasia
Normal cervical cytology screening
within the last 12 months

Exclusion Criteria:
Significant abnormalities in the history,
physical or laboratory examination
Pregnancy or lactation
Use of oral, injectable or inhaled
glucocorticoids or megesterol within
the last year
History of malignancy within the past 5
years
Vaginal bleeding in context of anatomic
abnormality, endometrial neoplasia or
hyperplasia, cervical, vaginal, or vulvar
neoplasia or preneoplastic pathology
Use of estrogen or progesterone-
containing compounds
Current use of agents known to induce
hepatic P450 enzymes
Use of imidazoles
Current use of GnRH analogs or other
compounds that affect menstrual
cyclicity
Use of herbal medication having
estrogenic or antiestrogenic effects
within the past 3 months
Untreated cervical dysplasia
Need for interval use of narcotics
Abnormal adnexal/ovarian mass
Contradiction to anesthesia, for women
planning surgery

P-3
Study
Start
Name
Date Estima
Study
Interventions / Anticipa ted
Status Inclusion / Exclusion Criteria Sponsor
Groups ted Enroll
Location
Complet ment
Trial
ion Date
Identifier
Leiomyomata, polyps or other anatomic
causes of vaginal bleeding
Previous participation in the study
Thrombocytopenia defined as platelets <
150,000

Publications:
Batista MC, Cartledge TP, Zellmer AW,
Merino MJ, Axiotis C, Loriaux DL,
Nieman LK. Delayed endometrial
maturation induced by daily
administration of the antiprogestin RU
486: a potential new contraceptive
strategy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992
Jul;167(1):60-5.
Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Moore KA,
Richter HE, Rubin A, Patrick DL.
Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire:
assessing the influence of heavy
menstrual bleeding on quality of life.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010
Dec;26(12):2745-55. Epub 2010 Nov
3.
Cadepond F, Ulmann A, Baulieu EE.
RU486 (mifepristone): mechanisms of
action and clinical uses. Annu Rev
Med. 1997;48:129-56. Review.
DNG = dienogest; EV = estradiol valerate; GnRH: gonadotropin-releasing hormone; LNG-IUS = levonorgestrel-releasing
intrauterine system; TXA = tranexamic acid. MPA: medroxyprogesterone; DMPA: depot medroxyprogesterone

P-4

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy