Unit 15 Reading and Visualizing Gender: Structure
Unit 15 Reading and Visualizing Gender: Structure
Unit 15 Reading and Visualizing Gender: Structure
15.1 INTRODUCTION
In Unit 13 we examined the relation between gender and language and discussed
how the two are mutually dependent. We also focused on the different modes to
know how men and women communicate effectively when most of their ways of
communication are directly opposite. This led us to discuss various social and
cultural factors that influence language. Unit 14 has equipped us to understand
the difference between male language and female language and think of the
possibility of gender neutral language. In the present unit we shall see how to
give a gendered reading to literature and other life situations to visualize gender.
15.2 OBJECTIVES
After completing this Unit, you will be able to:
Explain concepts of close reading, visualizing and representation;
the need to give gender-specific reading so as to examine how cultural factors
are linked to emotional expressions; and also to our understanding;
how and where men and women writers differ in their choice of words,
what images are formed and how we, as readers or viewers interpret them. 175
Gender, Representation and This will lead us to discern the hidden meaning of a text, be it a literary text
Media
or a media report or TV show or Ad. Concomitantly, we shall be equipped
to understand the gendered use of language
For example, a male character in a story or play or novel calls a woman babe.
‘Babe’ is a diminutive word. A ‘baby’ or ‘babe’ is small, helpless and dependent.
There is no doubt that this is a term of endearment but it reduces a woman to a
non-entity. It displays the authority of the man and in its ultimate analysis, it
speaks of male domination. Till recently, women did not object to this appellation
because it was considered a flattering personal compliment. But when feminism
made women aware of the effect of language and the power-play, women realized
that this is not a compliment to their sex. They found it offensive and took objection
to it.
Likewise, words like queen, princess, honey, kitten, and doll are insulting and
women have started rejecting these as they are sex privatization
176
stereotype(source?). These appellations have superficial attributes and they Reading and Visualizing
Gender
encourage men to see women as helpless and dependent. The side-effect is: if
women are described only by such superficial attributes, conversely, men appear
more individual and strong on whom women depend.
Socially, women are expected to express their individuality through their physical
appearance or beauty or through carrying out gendered roles. They are thus
stereotyped as a class: they look alike, they think alike, and they are beautiful
but have no brains. Such socio-cultural parameters keep sex oppression going
on. The image becomes extension of oneself; it gets hard to distinguish the real
person from his latest image. Men see women not only as an image; but as an
image of sex appeal.
Look at some of the fairy tales. The story of Cinderella , for example. We all
have liked it since childhood but read it closely and you will realize that Cinderella
is beautiful but she is helpless; she has sex appeal but she is almost doll-like.
And she needs a prince to rescue her. Through fairy tales such as these we are
still taught that we are princesses, someday our prince will come, we will be
picked up, carried off to a palace to live happily ever after.
How would you visualize a girl or a woman? Probably, you will make a
stereotypical mental image: weak, submissive, emotional quiet, engaged in
household work, nurturing children, not much educated. How would you visualize
a boy or a man? The stereotypical picture is: aggressive, assertive, dominating,
loud, messy, scientific mind, outdoor life, interested in games and sports. These
mental images are socio-cultural and may be different in different cultures.
In many textbook images or magazine pictures we still find the father sitting
comfortably and reading a newspaper, while the mother slogging in the kitchen.
Here we can visualize that boys and men are presented as universal figures in
which women/girls are invisibly included. The image of the mother is reduced to
177
Gender, Representation and a performer of household chores. Obviously, she does not have an individual
Media
personality; and thus shown to have no choice. This type of approach encodes
women’s fear of public spaces and men’s incompetence in household work.
Further, this has implications for division of labor: childcare and household work
is for women, public life is for men.
To explain what we said just now, we give you below two pictures. Look at them
and visualize the scene and interpret it with the tool of gender:
Picture 1. In this picture boys are doing all outdoor work, imitating their father.
Gender roles are all masculine.
Picture 2. Here girls are playing at household chores and imitating their mothers.
178 Gender roles are clearly feminine.
Researchers have observed that stereotypical conceptions of girls and boys occur Reading and Visualizing
Gender
even in schools. Usually, teachers also have patronizing attitudes toward girl
students; they give more space to boys. The girls’ performance in science subjects
are not as highly valued as the boys’, and this outlook can ultimately have
consequences for girls’ attitudes towards science.
Check your Progress Exercise 1
1) What attributes would come to your mind while visualizing ‘mother’?
2) What is gender stereotyping? Give two examples – one male one female
stereotype
3) Write a note on Close Reading (50 words)
4) Fill in the Blanks:
i) Girls imitate their .... (mothers/fathers/ teachers)
ii) Boys like .... activities (indoor/homely/outdoor)
iii) Boys gender roles are .... (masculine/boyish/)
iv) False individuality hinders a girl’s development of .... personality (
real/ feminine/brain)
We need the term ‘women are writing’ if only to remind us of the social
conditioning and conditions under which women wrote and are still writing.
That women are viewed as being incessant ‘gossips’ or chatterers distract from
the fact that in the world of the written world they are silenced, censored,
persecuted and marginalized when they seek to go beyond the topics allocated to
them as ‘good’ women.
An example from literature can illustrate how language creates and sustains
gender. The dialogue below is from Shashi Deshpande’s novel The Dark Holds
No Terrors. A mother is addressing her seven year old daughter. The words are
simple but when you visualize gender role you find their real implications:
Mother: Don’t go out in the sun. You’ll get even darker.
Saru (daughter): Who cares?
M: We have to care if you don’t. We have to get you married.
S: I don’t want to get married
M: You can’t live forever with us.
S: Why not?
M: You Can’t.
S: And Dhruva? (her brother)
M: He’s different. He’s a boy.
Read this carefully and evaluate these words and see how harmful they are for
the little girl’s psyche. This brief conversation highlights the following issues:
Gender role: Marriage is a woman’s final destiny for which she is prepared
from her childhood. She has to be fair-skinned (this is society’s definition of the
masculine/feminine).
Gender stereotype: Saru cannot live with her parents; Dhruva can because he is
a boy.
180
Gender stratification: Saru is ranked at a lower level vis-à-vis her brother. Reading and Visualizing
Gender
Gender ideology: Mother’s ideas and values legitimize sex role for her daughter;
she has to be pretty, fair, married.
181
Gender, Representation and
Media
15.5.3 Self and Other
When there is ‘self’, there is the ‘other’. In literature, women have been treated
as objects rather than as subjects. As object one loses one’s individuality. One
becomes the ‘Other.’ Men are often portrayed as powerful and in control of things.
Man is the subject, the decision maker. Woman has a secondary position. In the
patriarchal system, man is in a speaking position, so he is the ‘self’, all those
about whom or for whom he speaks are the ‘other’. The speaker has the active
role and an element of control. Women are deprived of this central/active role
and are herefore, muted.
Just a few lines from a short story can illustrate how women express themselves
frankly: “For the past two days Khatija was living in unbearable pain. Even now
there were no sign of her giving birth to a baby. She tried to keep the pain to
herself as much as possible. At times, she felt like screaming but she was dreaded
by the thought that others might hear it.” (‘The Birth’ by Sarah Aboobacker).
This is a typical female experience and only a woman can give expression to it.
Analyzing literature, media and other fields to examine women’s representation
by both men and women is important to ensure in future a balanced picture of
power-relations.
182
Reading and Visualizing
15.8 THE PROBLEM OF MISREPRESENTATION Gender
15.10 SUMMING UP
In this unit we have focused on language and gender from several angles.
The ability to use language, whether oral or written, is one of the most
important characteristics of human beings.
In analyzing language we go beyond the boundaries of grammatical analysis
of a text. We are aware of grammar but we see functions within the language
as it is spoken or written and also how words (language) function within
the context.
Focus is also on the social action of the language of the users communicating
in a particular social and cultural context.
We know by now that language is a tool. Not only that, it is a powerful and
essential tool which people use to express, control and also alter existing
power relations. 183
Gender, Representation and
Media 15.11 GLOSSARY
Gender Attribution: Gender attribution is a process. In this process, society
ascribes or assigns a sex or gender on to an individual with or without knowing
concretely what sex that person is or what gender they identify as.
Coates, J. and Cameron D. (eds.) (1998) Women and Their Speech Communities.
Longman: London and New York.
James, D., and Clarke S. (1993) ‘Women, Men and Interruptions A Critical
Review’, in Deborah Tannen (ed.) Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford
University Press: New York and Oxford.
Lakeoff, R. (1975) Language and a Woman’s Place. Harper and Rowe: New
York.
184