The Intamicy Factor
The Intamicy Factor
The Intamicy Factor
R
forming and maintaining relationships. elationships provoke our deepest emotions of joy and
She is the author of several extraordinary fulfillment as well as pain and loss. When we are secure
books, including Facing Love Addiction. in our knowledge of ourselves and are unafraid of com-
municating to our partners the truth of who we are, our sense
As one of the pioneers in the field of of personal power and contentment makes life worth living and
recovery, her development of theories our place in it comfortable. We don’t have to disguise our motives
on the effects of childhood trauma
“Maintaining respect in or to make up lies or to attack or to defend because we imagine
that the expression of our true selves will reveal us as being inad-
became the foundation of The Meadows’ the face of relational equate. We are willing to be seen in our faulted and wonderful
programs and is, in large measure, the difficulties requires the humanity, and we expect that this presentation of our humanity
reason for its success. is just what our intimate partner wants. Achieving this kind of
practice of boundaries self-esteem-building confidence is what maturity is all about.
that gives us the gift of When people fail at relationships, it is because the model of
relationality that they take into adulthood was formed for them in
controlled vulnerability.” childhood by immature parents who passed on to them their own
relational dysfunction. They taught their children every lesson
but the lesson of inherent worth. In order to be “successful”
children in such a family, the children were assigned roles,
which were aimed at serving the parents, not the children. They
became Little Miss Perfect, the Abandoned Child, the Heroine
Continued On Page 4
I N S I D E T H I S I S S U E
Lawrence S. Freundlich War and Trauma: Politic al and Personal . . . .
page 2 .
Lawrence S. Freundlich is the president On Loving Yourself . . . . . . . . . . . .
page 3 .
of Freundlich Communications, a New The Meadows Workshops . . . . . . . . . .
page 6 .
York book packager. He is the author,
Ott awa Talk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
page 8 .
with artist George Rodrigue, of Blue Dog
and of a biography of the great restau- Alumni Retreat . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
page 9 .
rateur Jerome Brody, A Life Well Spent. Scheduled Lectures & Workshops . . . . . . . page 11
Continued From Page 1
or Hero, Mommy or Daddy’s Little Girl or Man, the Scapegoat, the Family without some sort of permission from the other person. Seeking permission
Counselor, the Caretaker, the “6-year-old grown-up,” “the 14-year-old infant.” is an act of respect and love, and centers us in the truth of our wanting to
These roles are where they looked for their value. Self-esteem was not part be physically intimate with this other person.
of the equation.
The receiver of affection must practice containment, also. As the other
These roles either disempowered them when they couldn’t live up to their person approaches us, we think of containing his affectionate offer so that
parents’ expectations or falsely empowered them when they learned to what is offered matches what fits us. Protecting yourself and evaluating the
esteem themselves for playing roles that had little or nothing to do with their content of an incoming offer is an act of self-esteem. You are centering on
childhood needs and robbed them of their spontaneity. the truth of who you are and the kind of physical intimacy that fits your
authentic feelings.
Having a good relationship is such a tricky business—this business of shar-
ing truth with another—of talking and listening. The voices of our falsely Let us consider the sexual boundary. I have a responsibility as I am
empowered and disempowered childhoods still fight for a place in the script. approaching somebody sexually to contain myself sexually in the interest
They try to take over our vocal chords when we seek to share our adult of the comfort of the other person. This action involves the establishment
truths and drag us back to the familiar roles of Mama’s Boy, the Scapegoat, of the external sexual boundary. The boundary statement that sets up the
Abandoned Child, etc. healthy exercise of the sexual motive is: “I have a right to control with whom,
when, where and how I am going to be sexual. And the same is true for
It takes authentic self-esteem to give those abusive voices closure. When you.”
they are silenced or under control, relationships happen. Then we receive
communication from our partners without the shame or fear or panic that If I concentrate on the first part, this boundary empowers me to make my
drives old voices to command us to attack or to defend or to flee. From this own decision about whether to be sexual with someone, and, if I agree to
place of self-esteem, we present our truth with love for our partner—or at a be sexual, I still have the responsibility and the right to determine when, where
minimum, with respect. and how I want to do that. When I protect myself this way, I am in an act of
self-love. I am dealing with the truth of my sexual motive and my partner’s.
Maintaining respect in the face of relational difficulties requires the prac-
tice of boundaries that gives us the gift of controlled vulnerability. Personal Our physical sexual boundary must be in place when someone is
boundaries protect us from incoming, disturbing emotion while still keeping approaching us with sexual motives. We have to be respectful of what they
the possibility of intimacy alive. Personal boundaries enable us to contain our are saying to us about when, where and how. We cannot just demand our
own emotions while we are on the giving end, so that we remain respectful, way. As we are being physically or sexually intimate, we either signal our
but not so guarded that we wall-off or blockade ourselves from intimacy. availability or discourage it, but with respect.
There are two kinds of boundaries that relate to physical and sexual con- When you have a functional boundary, you protect and contain yourself
tact or sharing. One refers to non-sexual closeness and touching and is while remaining vulnerable enough for intimacy, but not so vulnerable that
called the non-sexual physical boundary. The other is about sexuality and is you can be easily damaged.
called the physical sexual boundary.
The two boundaries we exercise when we are relating intimately in the
There is also an internal boundary that we use when we share intellect areas of intellect and emotion are the internal listening boundary and the
(ideas) and emotions. To function intimately in relationship, we work both internal talking boundary. Almost all troubled relationships suffer from partners
our external physical and sexual boundaries, and our internal boundaries of who have boundary failures that damage their ability to listen or talk without
mind and emotion. interference from their trauma histories.
Physical boundaries become relevant when we physically approach some- Our internal listening boundary protects us from the thought and emotions
one with the intention of getting physically close or when we invite someone of our partner as he reaches out for intimacy with us. We exercise our internal
to be physically close to us. These kinds of non-sexual approaches and invi- talking boundary in order to protect our partner as we reach out for intellectual
tations are in the realm of the affectionate. Generally, whether being and emotional intimacy with him.
approached affectionately or approaching affectionately, we relax.
When someone is talking to and emoting at us, our internal listening
These affectionate approaches require controlled containment, because it boundary allows us to remain sensitive and engaged, while at the same
is abusive to engage someone in physical intimacy, even if it is non-sexual, time protected from painful, false or irrelevant data and emotion.
4
I NTRODUCI NG