DT RTP Nov
DT RTP Nov
DT RTP Nov
The direct tax laws, as amended by the Finance Act, 2019, the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 and
Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2019, including significant notifications and circulars issued
upto 30th April, 2020 are applicable for November, 2020 examination. The relevant assessment
year for November, 2020 examination is A.Y.2020-21. The amendments made by the Taxation
Laws (Amendment) Act, 2019 and significant notifications/circulars issued upto 30 th April, 2020,
relevant for November, 2020 examination but not covered in the October, 2019 edition of the
Study Material, are given hereunder:
PART – I : DIRECT TAX LAWS
The October, 2019 edition of the Study Material incorporates the amendments made by the
Taxation Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2019, promulgated by the President of India on
20.9.2019. The same has been subsequently approved by the Cabinet, consequent to whi ch,
the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2019, with certain further changes, was introduced in the
Parliament. The same has been passed by both Houses of the Parliament and has received
the assent of the President of India on 11.12.2019. This Act shall be deemed to have come into
force on 20.9.2019.
On account of the subsequent amendments brought in through the Taxation Laws (Amendment)
Bill, 2019 introduced in the Parliament, students are advised to ignore Annexures 1, 2 and
3 of Chapter 12 in the printed copy of Module 2 of the October 2019 edition and instead,
read the Annexures given hereunder:
Annexure 1
Insertion of new sections 115BAB and 115BAA providing for concessional rate of tax in
respect of certain domestic companies
New sections 115BAB and 115BAA have been inserted by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act,
2019, providing for concessional rates of tax and exemption from minimum alternate tax (MAT)
in respect of certain domestic companies with effect from A.Y.2020-21. The provisions of these
two new sections are tabulated hereunder -
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Particulars Section 115BAB Section 115BAA
(1) Applicability Domestic manufacturing Any domestic
company company
(2) Rate of tax 15% 22%
(3) Rate of surcharge 10% 10%
(4) Effective rate of tax (including 17.16% 25.168%
surcharge & HEC) [Tax@15% (+) [Tax@22% (+)
Surcharge@10% (+) Surcharge@10%
HEC@4%] (+)
HEC@4%]
(5) Applicability of MAT Not applicable Not applicable
(6) Manner of computation of tax liability
Particulars Section 115BAB Section 115BAA
Income on which concessional The rate of tax (i.e., 17.16%) is The rate of tax
rate of tax is applicable applicable in respect of (i.e., 25.168%) is
income derived from or notwithstanding
incidental to manufacturing or anything
brought 115BAA.
forward from Note - If a company
earlier years has b/f MAT credit, it
can first exhaust the
MAT credit, and
thereafter opt for
section 115BAA in a
subsequent previous
year.
Particulars Section 115BAB Section 115BAA
(11) Adjustments If the Assessing Officer opines that the No such requirement
for course of business between the company to make any
transactions and any other person having close adjustment
with persons connection therewith is so arranged that the
having close business transacted between them
connection produces more than the ordinary profits to
the company, he is empowered to take into
account the amount of profits as may be
reasonably deemed to have been derived
therefrom, while computing profits and gains
of such company.
In case the arrangement referred above
involves a specified domestic transaction
referred to in section 92BA, then, the amount
of profits from such transaction would be
determined by considering the arm’s length
price (ALP).
The amount, being profits in excess of the
amount of the profits determined by the
Assessing Officer, shall be deemed to be
the income of the person.
The income-tax on the income so deemed
shall be subject to tax@34.32%(i.e.,
tax@30% + surcharge @10% +HEC@4%).
Note – The scope of “specified domestic
transaction” referred to in section 92BA has
been expanded to include within its ambit,
any business transacted between such
persons with close connection, where one
such person is a company claiming benefit
under section 115BAB.
(b) such machinery or plant is imported into India from any country outside India;
(c) no deduction on account of depreciation in respect of such machinery or plant has been
allowed or is allowable under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in computing the
total income of any person for any period prior to the date of installation of the mach inery
or plant by the person.
Further, where in the case of a person, any machinery or plant or any part thereof previously
used for any purpose is put to use by the company and the total value of the machinery or plant
or part so transferred does not exceed 20% of the total value of the machinery or plant used by
the company, then, the condition specified that the company does not use any machinery or
plant previously used for any purpose would be deemed to have been complied with.
Note - Students are advised to ignore the last paragraph in page no.1.38 and the first
paragraph in page no. 1.39 given in italics in Chapter 1: Basic Concepts of the printed copy
of Module 1 of the October, 2019 Edition of the Study Material, which incorporates the provision
relating to surcharge as inserted by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2019
promulgated on 20.9.2019. Consequent to the amendment effected by the Taxation Laws
(Amendment) Act, 2019 as assented by the President of India on 11.12.2019 , surcharge of
10% would be leviable on the income-tax computed on the total income of a company
opting for the provisions of section 115BAA or 115BAB.
Annexure 2
Rates of Surcharge applicable to Individuals/HUF/AOPs/BOIs/Artificial Juridical Persons
for A.Y.2020-21
Rate of Example
Particulars surcharge
Components of total Applicable rate
on income-
income of surcharge
tax
(i) Where the total 10% • STCG u/s 111A Surcharge would
income (including ` 30 lakhs; be levied@10% on
income u/s 111A and • LTCG u/s 112A income-tax
112A) > ` 50 lakhs ` 25 lakhs; and computed on total
income of ` 95
but ≤ ` 1 crore • Other income ` 40 lakhs.
lakhs
(ii) Where total income 15% • STCG u/s 111A Surcharge would
(including income u/s ` 60 lakhs; be levied@15% on
111A and 112A) • LTCG u/s 112A income-tax
exceeds ` 1 crore but ` 65 lakhs; and computed on total
does not exceed ` 2 income of ` 1.75
crore • Other income ` 50 crores.
lakhs
(iii) Where total income 25% • STCG u/s 111A Surcharge would
(excluding income u/s ` 54 lakh; be levied @15%
111A and 112A) • LTCG u/s 112A on income-tax on:
exceeds ` 2 crore but ` 55 lakh; and • STCG of ` 54
does not exceed ` 5 lakhs
crore • Other income ` 3
crores chargeable to
tax u/s 111A;
The rate of surcharge Not and
on the income-tax exceeding • LTCG of ` 55
payable on the portion 15% lakhs
of income chargeable chargeable to
to tax u/s 111A and tax u/s 112A.
112A
Surcharge@25%
would be leviable
on income-tax
computed on other
income of ` 3
crores included in
total income
(iv) Where total income 37% • STCG u/s 111A Surcharge@15% is
(excluding income u/s ` 50 lakhs; leviable on income-
111A and 112A) • LTCG u/s 112A ` 65 tax on:
exceeds ` 5 crore lakhs; and • STCG of ` 50
Rate of surcharge on Not • Other income ` 6 lakhs
the income-tax exceeding crore chargeable to
payable on the portion 15% tax u/s 111A;
of income chargeable and
to tax u/s 111A and • LTCG of ` 65
112A lakhs
chargeable to
tax u/s 112A.
Surcharge@37%
is leviable on the
income-tax
computed on other
income of ` 6
crores included in
total income.
(v) Where total income 15% • STCG u/s 111A Surcharge would
(including income u/s ` 60 lakhs; be levied@15% on
Note – Students are advised to ignore the table containing rates of surcharge for
individuals/HUF/AOP/BOI and Artificial Juridical Persons given in pages 1.35-1.36 of Chapter
1 in Module 1 of the printed copy of the October, 2019 Edition of the Study Material and
instead, read the contents of the above table.
Annexure 3
Rates of Surcharge applicable on tax on total income of Individuals/AOPs/BOIs/Artificial
Juridical Persons (having any income under section 115AD) for payment of advance
tax for A.Y.2020-21
Rate of Example
Particulars surcharge
on income- Components of total Applicable rate of
tax income surcharge
(i) Where the total income 10% • Capital gains on Surcharge would
> ` 50 lakhs but ≤ ` 1 securities referred be levied@10% on
crore to in section income-tax
115AD(1)(b) ` 60 computed on total
lakhs; and income of ` 95
• Other income ` 35 lakhs.
lakhs;
(ii) Where total income > 15% • Capital gains on Surcharge would
` 1 crore but ≤ ` 2 securities referred be levied@15% on
crore to in section income-tax
115AD(1)(b) computed on total
` 1.20 crore; and income of ` 1.80
• Other income ` 60 crore.
lakhs;
(iii) Where total income 25% • Capital gains on Surcharge would
[excluding STCG/ securities referred be levied:
LTCG on securities to in section @15% on income-
referred to in 115AD(1)(b) tax leviable on
section115AD(1)(b)] > ` 1.20 crore; and capital gains of
` 2 crore but ≤ ` 1.20 crore referred
` 5 crore
Such persons should maintain a separate bank account from which withdrawal is made only for the
purposes of -
(i) purchase of foreign currency from foreign tourists or non-residents visiting India or from
resident Indians on their return to India, in cash as per the directions or guidelines issued
by RBI; or
(ii) disbursement of inward remittances to the recipient beneficiaries in India in cash under
Money Transfer Service Scheme (MTSS) of the RBI;
The exemption from the requirement to deduct tax u/s 194N would be available only if a
certificate is furnished by the authorised dealers and their franchise agent and sub -agent, and
the Full-Fledged Money Changers (FFMC) and their franchise agent to the bank that withdrawal
is only for the purposes specified above and the directions or guidelines issued by the RBI have
been adhered to.
“Authorised dealer” means any person who is authorised by the RBI as an authorised dealer to
deal in foreign exchange [Section 10(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999].
Information to be furnished where tax is not deductible or deductible at lower rate under
section 194N [Notification No. 98/2019, dated 18.11.2019]
The proviso to section 194N provides that no tax is, however, required to be deducted at source
on any payment made to -
(i) the Government
(ii) any banking company or co-operative society engaged in carrying on the business of
banking or a post-office
(iii) any business correspondent of a banking company or co-operative society engaged in
carrying on the business of banking, in accordance with the RBI guidelines.
(iv) any white label ATM operator of a banking company or co-operative society engaged in
carrying on the business of banking, in accordance with the authorisation issued by the
RBI under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007.
(v) such other person or class of persons notified by the Central Government in consultation
with the RBI.
Accordingly, the CBDT has, vide this notification, inserted clause (ix) in Rule 31A(4) to provide
that the deductor, at the time of preparing statement of tax deducted at source, shall furnish the
particulars of amount paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in view of the exemption
provided in point no. (iii) or (iv) above or in view of the Notification No. 80/2019, dated
15.10.2019 issued under point (v) above.
Time limit, form and manner of depositing tax deducted at source under section 194M
prescribed [Notification No. 98/2019, dated 18.11.2019]
Section 194M, inserted with effect from 1.9.2019, provides for deduction of tax at source @5% by
an individual or a HUF responsible for paying any sum during the financial year to any resident –
(i) for carrying out any work (including supply of labour for carrying out any work) in pursuance
of a contract; or
(ii) by way of commission (not being insurance commission referred to in section 194D) or
brokerage; or
(iii) by way of fees for professional services.
Only individuals and HUFs (other than those who are required to deduct income-tax as per the
provisions of section 194C or 194H or 194J) are required to deduct tax in respect of the above
sums payable during the financial year to a resident, if the aggregate of s uch sums, credited or
paid, exceed ` 50 lakhs.
Consequent to insertion of section 194M, the CBDT has, vide this notification, amended Rule
30, 31 and 31A in the following manner to specify the time limit for depositing the tax deducted
at source, challan-cum- statement, certificate for deduction of tax at source:
Rule No. Provision
Rule Time limit and prescribed form for remittance of TDS
30(2C) Any sum deducted under section 194M shall be paid to the credit of the Central
Government within a period of thirty days from the end of the month in which
the deduction is made and shall be accompanied by a challan-cum statement
in Form No. 26QD.
Rule Manner of remittance of TDS
30(6C) Where tax deducted is to be deposited accompanied by a challan-cum-
statement in Form No.26QD, the amount of tax so deducted shall be deposited
to the credit of the Central Government by remitting it electronically within
thirty days from the end of the month in which the deduction is made into the
Reserve Bank of India or the State Bank of India or any authorised bank.
Rule Certificate for deduction of tax at source and time limit for furnishing
31(3C) such certificate to the payee
Every person responsible for deduction of tax under section 194M shall furnish
the certificate of deduction of tax at source in Form No.16D to the payee
within fifteen days from the due date for furnishing the challan-cum-
statement in Form No.26QD under rule 31A after generating and downloading
the same from the web portal specified by the Principal Director General of
Income-tax (Systems) or the Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or the
person authorised by him.
Accordingly, the CBDT has, vide this notification, inserted Rule 119AA to prescribe the following
electronic modes payment, namely -
(i) Debit Card powered by RuPay;
(ii) Unified Payments Interface (UPI) (BHIM-UPI); and
(iii) Unified Payments Interface Quick Response Code (UPI QR Code) (BHIM-UPI QR Code).
Permissible “Other electronic modes” prescribed for the purpose of certain sections
[Notification No. 8/2020, dated 29.01.2020]
The following sections have been amended by the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 to permit
payment/receipt referred to therein by other electronic modes to be prescribed, in addition to
account payee cheque/bank draft and Electronic Clearing System (ECS) through bank account.
Section Description of payment/receipt Study Material
Page no.
Chapter 6: Profits and Gains of business or profession
35AD(8) Mode of payment of an amount exceeding ` 10,000 in a day 6.76
for capital expenditure in respect of specified business
40A(3)/ Mode of payment or aggregate of payments exceeding 6.130/6.131
(3A) ` 10,000 in a day towards any expenditure (exceeding
` 35,000 in a day, in case of payment to transport operator)
43(1) Mode of payment or aggregate of payments exceeding 6.40
` 10,000 in a day to a person for acquisition of asset (for
inclusion in actual cost for computing depreciation)
44AD(1) Receipts, included in “turnover/gross receipts”, qualifying for 6.155
computation of presumptive income @ concessional rate of 6%
43CA Mode of payment of part or whole of consideration for transfer of 6.144
stock-in trade, being land or building or both, on or before the
date of agreement for considering stamp duty value on the date
of agreement for the purpose of determining full value of
consideration for computing profits and gains from business or
profession
Chapter 7: Capital Gains
50C Mode of payment of part or whole of consideration for transfer 7.70
of capital asset, being land or building or both, on or before
the date of agreement for considering stamp duty value on the
date of agreement for the purpose of determining full value of
consideration for computing capital gains
56(2)(x) Mode of receipt of part or whole of consideration for transfer 8.15
of immovable property, being land or building or both, on or
Accordingly, the CBDT has, vide this notification, inserted Rule 6ABBA to prescribe the following
electronic modes through which payment can be made or money can be received, for the
purposes of above sections cited in the above table -
(a) Credit Card;
(b) Debit Card;
(c) Net Banking;
(d) IMPS (Immediate Payment Service);
(e) UPI (Unified Payment Interface);
(f) RTGS (Real Time Gross Settlement);
(g) NEFT (National Electronic Funds Transfer), and
(h) BHIM (Bharat Interface for Money) Aadhar Pay.
Note – Consequent to insertion of Rule 6ABBA, Rule 6DD which specifies the cases and
circumstances where disallowance under section 40A(3) would not be attracted, has been
amended w.e.f. 29.1.2020 to omit clause (j) thereof providing for exclusion of payment required
to be made on a day on which the banks were closed either on account of holiday or strike from
the purview of section 40A(3). Accordingly, w.e.f. 29.1.2020, payment in excess of the
prescribed limit made otherwise than by prescribed modes on a day on which the banks are
closed on account of holiday or strike would attract disallowance under section 40A(3).
PART - II: INTERNATIONAL TAXATION
Chapter 1: Transfer Pricing & Other Anti-avoidance Measures
Time limit for repatriation of excess money or part thereof and manner of computation of
interest on excess money not repatriated prescribed [Notification No. 76/2019, dated
30.9.2019]
Section 92CE(2) requires repatriation, within the prescribed time, of the excess money or part
thereof, as the case may be, which is available with the associated enterprise, in a case where,
as a result of primary adjustment to the transfer price, there is an increase in the total income
or reduction in the loss, as the case may be, of the assessee. If the excess money or part
thereof is not repatriated to India within the prescribed time, it shall be deemed to be an advance
made by the assessee to such associated enterprise and the interest on such advance, shall be
computed in the prescribed manner.
The CBDT has, vide this notification, amended Rule 10CB(1) which prescribes the time limit for
repatriation of excess money or part thereof i.e., on or before 90 days from the specified date.
The 90 days period is to be reckoned from the date specified in column (2) in the cases
mentioned in column (1) of the table below. Further, the date from which interest is chargeable
on the excess money or part thereof which is not repatriated in the cases mentioned in column
(1) is given in column (3) in the table below:
Time limit for Date from which interest is
repatriation of chargeable on the non-
Case excess money or repatriated excess money or
part thereof: Within part thereof within the
90 days from specified time limit
(1) (2) (3)
(i) Where primary adjustments to the due date of filing of the due date of filing of return
transfer price have been made return u/s 139(1) u/s 139(1)
suo-motu by the assessee in
his return of income
(ii) If primary adjustments to the date of the said the date of the said order
transfer price as determined in order
From the options (a), (b), (c) and (d) given in each question, choose the most appropriate
option.
1. The following are the details relating to four resident entities, AB & Co, LM & Co, PQ & Co
and XY & Co. for P.Y.2019-20 –
Particulars AB & Co. LM & Co. PQ & Co. XY & Co.
(Firm) (Firm) (LLP) (Firm)
(1) Nature of business/ Retail Business of Wholesale Interior
profession trading plying, hiring trading decoration
or leasing
goods
carriages
(2) System of Mercantile Cash Mercantile Cash
accounting
(3) Turnover/Gross ` 200 lakhs ` 101 lakhs ` 100 lakhs ` 50 lakhs
receipts
(4) Amount received by ` 150 lakhs ` 80 lakhs ` 70 lakhs ` 45 lakhs
way of RTGS/NEFT
in the P.Y.2019-20
[included in (3)
above]
(5) Amount received by ` 30 lakhs ` 21 lakhs ` 10 lakhs ` 5 lakhs
way of cash in the
P.Y.2019-20
[included in (3)
above]
(6) Amount received by ` 20 lakhs - ` 20 lakhs -
way of RTGS/NEFT
between 1.4.2020
and 31.7.2020
(7) Working partners’ ` 5 lakhs ` 1.50 lakhs ` 3 lakhs ` 5 lakhs
salary
(8) Interest on ` 1 lakhs ` 0.50 lakhs - ` 2 lakhs
capital@12% paid to
partners
(9) Profit as per books ` 5.60 lakhs ` 4.10 lakhs ` 4.50 lakhs ` 20 lakhs
of account
maintained as per
section 44AA [after
deducting working
partners’ salary and
interest on capital]
(10) No. of vehicles - 10 (See Note - -
owned 2 below for
details)
Notes – (1) It may be assumed that partners’ salary and interest are authorised by the
partnership deed, relates to a period after the partnership deed and is within the
permissible limits laid down under section 40(b).
(2) The details of vehicles owned by M/s. LM & Co. are as follows –
Gross Vehicle Number Date of purchase Date when first put
Weight (in kgs) to use
(1) 8,000 3 28.5.2019 1.6.2019
(2) 9,000 2 31.7.2019 1.8.2019
(3) 10,000 1 17.8.2019 20.8.2019
(4) 11,000 1 30.9.2019 1.10.2019
(5) 12,000 1 11.11.2019 13.11.2019
(6) 13,000 2 31.12.2019 1.1.2020
From the details given above, choose the most appropriate option to the questions given below:
(i) Which of the four entities are eligible to declare income on presumptive basis under
the Income-tax Act, 1961 for A.Y.2020-21?
(a) Only AB & Co and LM & Co
(b) Only AB & Co and XY & Co.
(c) AB & Co, PQ & Co and XY & Co.
(d) AB & Co, LM & Co and XY & Co.
(ii) What is the business income to be declared by AB & Co. and PQ & Co. for A.Y.2020-
21, assuming that the entities wish to make maximum tax savings without getting
their books of account audited?
(a) ` 12.60 lakhs and ` 4.50 lakhs, respectively
(b) ` 6.60 lakhs and ` 3.20 lakhs, respectively
(c) ` 5.60 lakhs and ` 4.50 lakhs, respectively
(v) Would your answer to sub-parts (iii) and (iv) change, if the firms decide to get their
books of accounts audited?
(a) No, there would be no change in the answer to either sub-part (iii) or sub-part (iv)
(b) Yes, there would be change in answer to both sub-parts (iii) and (iv)
(c) There would be a change in the answer to sub-part (iii) but not in the answer to
sub-part (iv)
(d) There would be a change in the answer to sub-part (iv) but not in the answer
to sub-part (iii)
2. Mr. Hari, a property dealer, sold a building in the course of his business to his friend Mr.
Rajesh, who is a dealer in automobile spare parts, for ` 100 lakh on 1.1.2020, when the
stamp duty value was ` 120 lakh. The agreement was, however, entered into on 1.9.2019
when the stamp duty value was ` 105 lakh. Mr. Hari had received a down payment of ` 15
lakh by NEFT from Mr. Rajesh on the date of agreement. Mr. Hari has purchased the
building for ` 50 lakh on 12.7.2018.
Mr. Ravi, a retail trader sold a residential house to Mr. Vallish, a wholesale trader for ` 50
lakh on 1.2.2020, when the stamp duty value was ` 70 lakh. The agreement was, however,
entered into on 1.8.2019 when the stamp duty value was ` 55 lakh. Mr. Ravi had received a
down payment of ` 5 lakh by a crossed cheque from Mr. Vallish on the date of agreement.
Mr. Ravi has purchased the building for ` 32 lakh on 17.8.2018.
Based on the above facts, choose the most appropriate option to the questions given below–
(i) What is the amount of income chargeable to tax in the hands of Mr. Hari in respect
of the above transaction and under which head is it taxable?
(a) ` 70 lakh is taxable as his business income
(b) ` 55 lakh is taxable as his business income
(c) ` 50 lakh is taxable as his business income
(d) ` 50 lakh is taxable as short-term capital gains
(ii) Is any amount taxable in the hands of Mr. Rajesh in respect of the above transaction?
If so, what is the amount and under which head is it taxable?
(a) No amount is taxable in the hands of Mr. Rajesh
(b) ` 20 lakh is taxable under the head “Income from Other Sources”
(c) ` 5 lakh is taxable ünder the head “Income from Other Sources”
(d) ` 5 lakh is taxable as his business income.
(iii) What is the amount of income chargeable to tax in the hands of Mr. Ravi in respect
of the above transaction and under which head is it taxable?
(a) ` 18 lakh is taxable as short-term capital gains
(b) ` 23 lakh is taxable as short-term capital gains
(c) ` 38 lakh is taxable as short-term capital gains
(d) ` 38 lakh is taxable as his business income.
(iv) Is any amount taxable in the hands of Mr. Vallish in respect of the above
transaction? If so, what is the amount and under which head is it taxable?
(a) No amount is taxable in the hands of Mr. Vallish
(b) ` 20 lakh is taxable under the head “Income from Other Sources”
(c) ` 5 lakh is taxable ünder the head “Income from Other Sources”
(d) ` 5 lakh is taxable as his business income.
(v) Is tax deductible by Mr. Rajesh and Mr. Vallish on making payment to the seller?
(a) Yes, tax is deductible at source by both Mr. Rajesh and Mr. Vallish
(b) No, tax is not deductible at source by either Mr. Rajesh or Mr. Vallish
(c) Tax is deductible at source by Mr. Rajesh but not by Mr. Vallish
(d) Tax is deductible at source by Mr. Vallish but not Mr. Rajesh
3. The following are the particulars relating to four Indian companies, namely, A Ltd., B Ltd.,
C Ltd. and D Ltd. –
(i) What would be the tax liability of B Ltd. for A.Y.2020-21, if it avails the beneficial tax
rates under the special provisions inserted by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act,
2019 in the Income-tax Act, 1961 by fulfilling the conditions specified thereunder?
Assume that the gross total income reflects the computation under the special
provisions.
(a) ` 70,47,040
(b) ` 22,88,000
(c) ` 25,16,800
(d) ` 17,16,000
(ii) What would be the tax liability of A Ltd. for A.Y.2020-21, if it avails the beneficial tax
rates under the special provisions inserted by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act,
2019 in the Income-tax Act, 1961 by fulfilling the conditions specified thereunder?
Assume that the gross total income reflects the computation under the special
provisions.
(a) ` 1,23,32,320
(b) ` 40,84,040
(c) ` 59,89,984
(d) ` 84,08,000
(iii) What would be the tax liability of A Ltd. and B Ltd. for A.Y.2020-21, if they do not
opt for the special provisions inserted by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2019
in the Income-tax Act, 1961? Assume that the gross total income reflects the
computation under the special provisions. Ignore MAT.
(a) ` 9,88,000; ` 7,80,000
(b) ` 11,85,600; ` 9,36,000
(c) ` 96,81,360; ` 9,36,000
(d) ` 96,81,360; Nil
(iv) What would be the quantum of penalty payable by C Ltd. under section 270A,
assuming that the under-reporting of income is not due to mis-reporting and none
of the additions made in the assessment qualifies under section 270A(6)? Assume
that C Ltd. has not opted for the special provisions inserted by the Taxation Laws
(Amendment) Act, 2019.
(a) ` 58,24,000
(b) ` 69,88,800
(c) ` 87,36,000
(d) ` 1,04,83,200
(v) What would be the quantum of penalty payable by D Ltd. under section 270A,
assuming that the under-reporting of income is due to mis-reporting? Assume that D
Ltd. has not opted for the special provisions inserted by the Taxation Laws
(Amendment) Act, 2019.
(a) ` 1,16,48,000
(b) ` 1,39,77,600
(c) ` 2,91,20,000
(d) ` 3,49,44,000
4. A Ltd., an Indian company, bought back its listed shares from its shareholders and B Ltd.,
an Indian company, bought back its unlisted shares from its shareholders in the month of
March, 2020. What are the tax consequences of such buyback in the hands of A Ltd., B
Ltd. and the shareholders?
(a) Additional income-tax @23.296% of the distributed income is leviable in the hands
of A Ltd. and B Ltd.; income arising to shareholders is exempt.
(b) Income arising to shareholders from buyback is taxable in their individual hands;
No distribution tax is leviable in the hands of A Ltd. and B Ltd.
(c) Additional income-tax @23.296% of the distributed income is leviable in the hands
of A Ltd.; income arising to shareholders of B Ltd. is taxable in their individual hands
(d) Additional income-tax @23.296% of the distributed income is leviable in the hands
of B Ltd.; income arising to shareholders of A Ltd. is taxable in their individual hands
5. Mr. Ganesh and Mr. Rajesh, resident Indians aged 60 years and 80 years, respectively,
have not furnished their returns of income for the P.Y.2019-20. However, the total income
assessed in respect of such year under section 144 is ` 8 lakhs and ` 5 lakhs, respectively.
Is penalty leviable under section 270A, and if so, what is the quantum of penalty?
(a) No penalty is leviable under section 270A in the hands of either Mr. Ganesh or Mr.
Rajesh
(b) Yes; ` 36,400 and ` 5,200, respectively
(c) Yes; ` 37,700 and ` 6,500, respectively
(d) Penalty of ` 36,400 leviable in the hands of Mr. Ganesh; No penalty leviable in the
hands of Mr. Rajesh.
6. Ms. X & Co and Ms. Y & Co are non-resident firms in receipt of fees for technical services
of ` 20 lakhs each in the P.Y.2019-20 from an Indian company, A Ltd. in pursuance of an
agreement with A Ltd. approved by the Central Government. M/s. X & Co. does not have
any fixed place of profession in India whereas M/s. Y & Co. has a fixed place of profession
in India and the contract is effectively connected with such fixed place of profession. The
revenue expenditure incurred by X & Co. to earn FTS is ` 2 lakhs. The following are the
details pertaining to Y & Co.-
7. A Ltd., an Indian company, borrowed money from B Inc. in Country B, C Ltd. in Country
C, D Inc. in Country D and E Ltd. in Country E, the details of which are given hereunder-
Lender Amount borrowed Interest paid in Is it an Associated
by A Ltd. the P.Y.2019-20 Enterprise of A Ltd.?
B Inc. ` 15 crores ` 1.50 crores Yes
C Ltd. ` 25 crores ` 2.50 crores No
D Inc. ` 25 crores ` 2.50 crores Yes
E Ltd. ` 15 crores ` 1.50 crores No
B Inc. has provided guarantee of loan taken by A Ltd. from C Ltd. D Inc. has deposited
` 15 crores with E Ltd. Earnings before Interest, Tax and Depreciation of A Ltd. for
A.Y.2020-21 is ` 10 crores. What is the interest to be disallowed under section 94B for
A.Y.2020-21?
(a) ` 1 crore
(b) ` 3 crores
(c) ` 4 crores
(d) ` 5 crores
8. M Ltd. and N Ltd. are Indian companies which have to pay interest of ` 2 lakhs and ` 1
lakh outside India to Mr. P, a non-resident, during the P.Y.2019-20 on rupee denominated
bonds issued in January, 2019 and April, 2019, respectively. Which of the following
statements are correct relating to liability of M Ltd. and N Ltd. to deduct tax at source on
such interest payable to Mr. P?
(a) Both M Ltd. and N Ltd. do not have to deduct tax at source on such interest
(b) Both M Ltd. and N Ltd. have to deduct tax at source@5.2%
(c) M Ltd. does not have to deduct tax at source but N Ltd. has to deduct tax at
source@5.2%
(d) N Ltd. does not have to deduct tax at source but M Ltd. has to deduct tax at
source@5.2%
9. Under which of the following cases, will arm’s length price be determined by considering
the median of the dataset?
Case Most Appropriate No. of entries Does the price at which the
Method in the dataset transaction is undertaken fall
within the arm’s length range
beginning from the 35th percentile
of the dataset and ending on the
65th percentile of the dataset?
I CUP 5 -
II RPM 6 Yes
III TNMM 7 Yes
IV Cost Plus 8 No
(a) II and III
(b) I and IV
(c) Only IV
(d) Only I
10. Mr. Akash made the following cash withdrawals during the P.Y.2019-20 -
11. Which of the following orders are not appealable before Commissioner (Appeals)?
(a) An order of penalty under section 271B for failure to get accounts audited.
(b) An order made under section 163 treating the assessee as an agent of a non-
resident.
(c) An order of assessment passed by the Assessing Officer in pursuance of directions
of Dispute Resolution Panel
(d) An order made under section 201 deeming a person to be an assessee-in-default
for non-deduction of tax at source
12. Which of the following statements are correct in relation to the power of an income-tax
authority to collect information which may be useful for the purposes of the Income-tax
Act, 1961?
(i) The income-tax authority can enter the place of business of the assessee only
after sunrise and before sunset
(ii) The income-tax authority may enter the place of business only during the hours
at which such place is open for conduct of business
(iii) The income-tax authority may impound and retain in his custody for a period not
exceeding 15 days books of account or other documents inspected by him. If
he wishes to retain for a period exceeding 15 days, he has to take the prior
approval of Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner.
(iv) The income-tax authority can on no account remove or cause to be removed from
the building or place he has entered any books of account or other documents.
The correct answer is -
(a) (i) and (iii)
(b) (i) and (iv)
(c) (ii) and (iii)
(d) (ii) and (iv)
DESCRIPTIVE QUESTIONS
13. ABC Ltd. had started availing exemption under section 80-IC on setting up of a new
industrial unit in Himachal Pradesh in April, 2011 to manufacture sports equipment. The
company had availed deduction of 100% of profits for a period of 5 years from A.Y.2012-
13 to A.Y.2016-17. For A.Y.2017-18 to A.Y.2021-22, in the normal course, deduction would
be admissible at 30% of the profits and gains. However, in the P.Y.2016-17, ABC Ltd.
carried out substantial expansion of its existing unit by increasing its investment in plant
and machinery by 60% of the book value of plant and machinery as on 1.4.2016. From
A.Y.2017-18, ABC Ltd. claimed deduction at 100% of profits, instead of 30%, on the basis
of the Supreme Court ruling in Pr. CIT v. Aarham Softronics (2019) 412 ITR 623, that
a fresh period of 5 years, qualifying for deduction@100% of profits and gains, would
commence from the year of substantial expansion. Is the claim of ABC Ltd. valid? Discuss.
14. PQR Ltd, a company manufacturing footwear and leather products for the past ten years,
had a net profit of ` 544 lakhs as per the statement of profit and loss for the year ended
31st March, 2020. The company was subject to tax audit under section 44AB. The net
profit is arrived at after debiting or crediting the following amounts:
(i) Depreciation as per Companies Act, 2013 is ` 64 lakhs.
(ii) A sundry creditor whose dues of ` 64 lakhs were outstanding since long time, has
been settled for ` 52 lakhs on 31st March, 2020 based on compromise settlement.
The amount waived has been credited to the statement of profit and loss.
(iii) Employers' contribution of ` 6 lakhs to EPF for the month of March, 2020 was
deposited on 30th June, 2020.
(iv) Interest payments debited ` 60 lakhs (Includes interest on term loan of ` 50 lakhs
availed on 1-4-2019 at interest rate of 12% p.a. towards purchase of machinery during
the year).
(v) Payment of ` 20 lakhs without deduction of tax to XYZ & Co., a sub-contractor, for
processing raw leather supplied by PQR Ltd. is debited to statement of profit & loss.
Additional Information:
(1) The company has not made provision for an amount of ` 24 lakhs being a fair estimate
of the amount as payable to workers towards periodical wage revision once in 3 years
in respect of existing employees. The provision is estimated on a reasonable certainty
of the revision once in 3 years.
(2) The written down values of assets before allowing depreciation as per Income-tax
Rules are as under:
Factory Buildings: ` 360 lakhs;
Plant & Machinery: ` 340 lakhs (inclusive of machinery costing ` 60 lakhs
acquired on 1.4.2019 and put to use on 1.11.2019)
Computers: ` 30 lakhs
It may be noted that the above values have been duly recognised while providing
depreciation in the books of accounts.
(3) During the year 2019-20, the company has employed 24 additional employees
(qualified as "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947). All these employees
contribute to a recognized provident fund. 12 out of 24 employees joined on 1.6.201 9
on a salary of ` 23,000 per month, 4 joined on 1.7.2019 on a salary of ` 25,500 per
month, and 8 joined on 1.11.2019 on a salary of ` 20,000 per month. The salaries
of 2 employees who joined on 1.6.2019 are being settled by bearer cheques every
month.
(4) Employees contribution to EPF of ` 3 lakhs recovered from their salaries for the
month of March 2020 and shown in the Balance Sheet under the head Sundry
Creditors was remitted on 31 st July, 2020.
Compute the total income and tax liability of PQR Ltd. for the Assessment Year 2020-21.
The turnover of the company for the year ended 31.3.2018 was ` 251 crores. Ignore the
provisions of MAT. Assume that the company does not opt for the special provisions
inserted by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2019.
15. Sowbaghya, a charitable trust, is registered under section 12AA of the Act. On 1.4.2019, it
got merged with M/s. LMN (P) Ltd., which is a company engaged in manufacturing of
furniture. All the assets and liabilities of the erstwhile trust became the assets and liabilities
of M/s. LMN (P) Ltd. which is not entitled for registration under section 12AA. The trust
appointed a registered valuer for the valuation of its assets and liabilities. From the
following particulars (including the valuation report), calculate the tax liability in the hands
of the trust arising as a result of such merger, giving reasons for treatment of each item:
(i) Stamp duty value of land held ` 30 lakhs. However; if this land is sold in the open
market, it would ordinarily fetch ` 34 lakhs. The book value of the land is ` 40 lakhs.
(ii) 75,000 equity shares in XYZ Ltd. traded in National Stock Exchange. The lowest
price per share on 1.4.2019 was ` 150 and the highest price on that day was ` 170.
The book value was ` 134 lakhs.
(iii) 55,000 preference shares held in ABC Ltd. The shares will fetch ` 88 lakhs, if they
are sold in the open market on 1.4.2019. Book value was ` 50 Lakhs.
(iv) Corpus fund as on 1.4.2019 ` 30 Lakhs.
(v) Outside liabilities ` 180 lakhs
(vi) Provision for taxation ` 10 lakhs.
(vii) Liabilities in respect of payment of various utility bills ` 12 lakhs.
16. Mr. Suresh aged 60 years, is a resident and ordinarily resident in India for the A.Y.
2020-21. He owns an apartment in Sharjah, U.A.E., which he purchased on 1.4.2008, and
he also has a bank account in the Bank of Sharjah.
(a) Mr. Suresh contends that since his total income of ` 3,00,000 for the P.Y.2019-20,
comprising of income from house property and bank interest, is less than the basic
exemption limit, he need not file his return of income for A.Y.2020-21.
(b) Mr. Suresh also contends that the notice issued by the Assessing Officer under
section 148 in September, 2019 for A.Y.2009-10 is not valid due to the following
reasons –
(i) There is no escaped income relating to that year; and
(ii) The time period prescribed in section 149 for issuing notice under section 148
for A.Y.2009-10 has since lapsed.
Discuss the correctness of the above contentions of Mr. Suresh.
17. M/s. Himalaya LLP filed its return of income for the A.Y. 2018-19 on 23-07-2018. The
assessment u/s 143(3) was completed on 27 th April, 2019. The Assessing Officer made
two additions to the income of the LLP, namely, ` 20 lakhs towards unexplained investment
u/s 69 and ` 3 lakhs u/s 40(b) due to excess interest paid to partners.
The LLP, being aggrieved, contested the addition of ` 20 lakhs under section 69 and
filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The appeal was decided on 12th
February, 2021 against the LLP.
In March, 2021, the LLP approaches you to know whether it should apply for revision to
Principal Commissioner u/s 264 or for rectification u/s 154 to the Assessing Officer as
regards disallowance u/s 40(b). You are required to advise the LLP, keeping in mind the
relevant provisions of income-tax law.
18. Is issue of notice under section 143(2) mandatory for making a regular assessment under
section 143(3)? Can failure on the part of the Assessing Officer to issue notice under
section 143(2) be treated as a defect curable under section 292BB, if the assessee
participates in assessment proceedings? Discuss, with the aid of a recent Supreme Court
ruling.
19. Mr. Hari, a resident aged 42 years is a salaried employee employed with Omega P Ltd. He
received the following components of his salary income during the previous year 2019-20.
Basic Salary ` 60,000 p.m.
Dearness Allowance 12% of basic salary
Transport Allowance ` 10,000 p.m.
Medical Allowance ` 5,000 p.m.
He contributed ` 18,000 to approved Pension Fund of LIC. He also paid ` 2,00,000 by
crossed cheque for mediclaim premium to insure the health of his mother, a resident aged
61 years, who is not dependent on him as a lumpsum payment for 5 years including the
current previous year.
He also delivered guest lecture in a reputed university in Country X during the year. He
received ` 8,00,000 from such university after deduction of tax of ` 2,00,000 in Country X.
India does not have any double taxation avoidance agreement under section 90 of the
Income-tax Act, 1961, with Country X. Compute the tax liability of Mr. Hari for the A.Y.
2020-21.
20. Examine whether transfer pricing provisions under the Income-tax Act, 1961 would be
attracted in respect of the following cases -
(i) Transfer of process patents by Rho Ltd., an Indian company, to ABC Inc., a US
company, which guarantees 12% of the borrowings of Rho Ltd.
(ii) Marketing management services provided by Athena, a Greece company to Alpha
Ltd., an Indian company. Athena is a “specified foreign company” as defined in
section 115BBD, in relation to Alpha Ltd.
(iii) Gamma Ltd., an Indian company, has two units, Delta & Phi. Unit Delta, which
commenced business four years back, is engaged in the development of a highway
project, for which purpose an agreement has been entered into with the Central
Government. Unit Phi is carrying on the business of trading in steel. Unit Phi
transfers 25,000 metric tons of steel of the value of ` 30,000 per MT to Unit Delta for
` 20,000 per MT.
(iv) Purchase of machinery by Beta Ltd., an Indian company, from Huff AG, a German
company. Beta Ltd. is the subsidiary of Huff AG.
machinery (before taking depreciation in any year), as on the first day of the previous year
in which the substantial expansion is undertaken.
Section 80-IC(2)(b)(ii) requires that the undertaking or enterprise should begin to
manufacture or produce any article or thing specified in the Fourteenth Schedule or
commence operation specified in that Schedule and undertake substantial expansion
during the period between 7.1.2003 and 31.3.2012 in the State of Himachal Pradesh.
This issue of whether deduction@100% of profits and gains under section 80-IC can be
claimed for a fresh period where an entity has already claimed deduction@100% of profits
and gains for a period of five years came up before the Supreme Court in Pr. CIT v. Aarham
Softronics [2019] 412 ITR 623. The Apex Court noted that as per the definition of “initial
assessment year”, the first two events i.e., the previous year in which the undertaking or
the enterprise begins to manufacture or produce article or things; or commences operation
are relatable to new units, whereas third incident i.e., completes substantial expansion,
would occur in respect of existing units. The benefit of section 80-IC is, thus, admissible
not only when an undertaking or enterprise sets up new unit and starts manufacturing or
producing article or things. The advantage of this provision also accrues to existing units,
if they carry out "substantial expansion" of their units by investing required capital, in the
assessment year relevant to the previous year.
The Apex Court also observed that the various provisions of section 80-IC should be read
conjointly, i.e., sub-section (2)(b)(ii), sub-section (3)(ii), sub-section (6) and sub-section
(8)(v) and (ix). Sub-section (3) enumerates the deduction, as being 100% of profits and
gains for the first 5 initial assessment years commencing with the initial assessment year
and thereafter, 25% (or 30% where the assessee is a company) of the profits and gains.
The deduction at 25% or 30% for the next 5 years is on the assumption that the new unit
remains static in so far as expansion thereof is concerned. However, the moment
“substantial expansion” takes place, another "initial assessment year" gets triggered. This
new event entitles that unit to start getting deduction at 100% of the profits and gains. At
the same time, new period of 10 years does not start, on account of the cap under sub -
section (6) of section 80-IC. Thus, the total period for which deduction can be allowed is
capped at 10 years, however, there is no cap on quantum.
However, the substantial expansion should have also taken place on or before 31.3.2012
as per section 80-IC(2)(b)(ii), for the entity to be entitled to benefit of 100% deduction for
a fresh period on the basis of such substantial expansion. In this case, however, the
substantial expansion took place after 31.3.2012, in the P.Y.2016-17. Hence, the rationale
of the above Supreme Court ruling cannot be applied to the case on hand, since the
condition laid down in section 80-IC(2)(b)(ii) is not satisfied. The claim of ABC Ltd. is,
therefore, not correct. Accordingly, even though it has undertaken “substantial
expansion” during the P.Y.2016-17, it would be entitled to a deduction of only 30% of
profits and gains from A.Y.2017-18 to A.Y.2021-22.
14. Computation of Total Income of PQR Ltd. for the A.Y. 2020-21
Particulars Amount (`)
Net profit as per the statement of profit and loss 5,44,00,000
Add: Items debited but to be considered separately
or to be disallowed
(i) Depreciation charged as per Companies Act, 2013 64,00,000
(iii) Employer’s contribution to EPF Nil
[As per section 43B, employers’ contribution to
EPF is allowable as deduction, since the same
has been deposited on or before the ‘due date’ of
filing of return under section 139(1) i.e.,
30.9.2020. Since the same has been debited to
statement of profit and loss, no further adjustment
is necessary]
(iv) Interest on term loan for purchase of plant and 3,50,000
machinery [` 50 lakhs x 12% x 7/12]
[As per the proviso to section 36(1)(iii), interest
paid in respect of capital borrowed for acquisition
of an asset for the period from the date of
borrowing till the date on which such asset is first
put to use shall not be allowed as deduction. Since
the same has been debited to statement of profit
and loss, it has to be added back while computing
business income]
(v) Payment to XYZ & Co., a sub-contractor, without 6,00,000
deduction of tax [30% of ` 20 lakh]
[Under section 40(a)(ia), 30% of any sum paid to
any resident on which tax is deductible is
disallowed if tax is not deducted at source. In this
case, TDS provisions under section 194C are
attracted on payment for processing of raw
material. Since tax has not been deducted on such
payment, 30% of the expenditure shall be
disallowed] 73,50,000
6,17,50,000
Add: Amount taxable but not credited to statement of
profit and loss
AI(5) Employee’s contribution to EPF 3,00,000
1 Employee contribution to PF deposited after the due date under PF Act is not allowable as deduction as per section 36(1)(va).
This view has been affirmed by the Gujarat High Court in CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (2014) 366 ITR 170.
Alternate view that the same is allowable as deduction if deposited on or before the due date of filing of return is possible as
per the Delhi High Court ruling in CIT v. AIMIL (2010) 321 ITR 508 and the Uttrakhand High Court ruling in the case of CIT
v. Kichha Sugar Co. Ltd. (2013) 356 ITR 351.
A.Y.2009-10 is valid, since the extended time limit of sixteen years from the end of
the relevant assessment year has not expired.
17. Section 264(4)(c) provides that the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has no power
to revise any order which has been made the subject matter of an appeal to the
Commissioner (Appeals), even if the relief claimed in the petition is different from the relief
claimed in appeal. The concept of total merger would apply in the case of section 264. It
was so held by the Supreme Court in the case of Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd v. CIT (2000)
243 ITR 898.
Section 154(1A) provides that where any matter had been considered and decided in any
proceeding by way of appeal or revision relating to an order, Assessing Officer may amend
the order for rectification of mistake apparent from the record, in relation to a matter other
than the matter which has been considered and decided. The concept of partial merger
would apply in the case of section 154.
In the present case, since the order passed by the Assessing Officer in respect of the
addition of unexplained investment of ` 20 lakhs became the subject matter of an appeal
to the Commissioner (Appeals), the assessee, M/s. Himalaya LLP, cannot apply for revision
under section 264 even if the subject matter of revision i.e., addition of ` 3 lakhs under
section 40(b) is different from the subject matter of appeal.
However, M/s. Himalaya LLP can apply to the Assessing Officer for rectification of the order
in respect of addition of ` 3 lakh under section 40(b), if the mistake is apparent from the
record, as this matter has not been considered and decided in any proceeding by wa y of
appeal or revision.
In the view of above, the assessee, M/s. Himalaya LLP should seek rectification under
section 154.
18. Issue of notice under section 143(2) is mandatory for making a regular assessment under
section 143(3). Section 292BB is a deeming provision that seeks to cure defects in any
notice issued under any provision of the Income-tax Act, 1961, if the assessee has
participated in the proceedings. Section 292BB provides that where the assessee has
participated in the proceedings, any notice which is required to be served upon him shall
be deemed to have been duly served and the assessee would be precluded from taking
any objection that the notice was (a) not served upon him; or (b) not served upon him in
time; or (c) served upon him in an improper manner.
The issue as to whether the Assessing Officer’s omission to issue notice under section
143(2) is a defect curable under section 292BB if the assessee participates in the
assessment proceedings came up before the Supreme Court in CIT v. Laxman Das
Khandelwal (2019) 417 ITR 325.
The Supreme Court observed that the law on the point as regards applicability of the
requirement of issue of notice under section 143(2) is quite clear. According to section
292BB, if the assessee had participated in the proceedings, by way of legal fiction, notice
issued would be deemed to be valid even if there be infractions as detailed in the said
section. The scope of the provision is to make service of notice having certain infirmities
to be proper and valid if there was requisite participation on the part of the assessee. It is,
however, to be noted that the section does not save complete absence of issue of notice.
For section 292BB to apply, the notice must have emanated from the Department. It
is only the infirmities in the manner of service of notice that the section seeks to cure. The
section is not intended to cure complete absence of notice itself.
The Supreme Court, accordingly, held that non-issuance of notice under section 143(2) is
not a curable defect under section 292BB inspite of participation by the assessee in
assessment proceedings.
19. Computation of total income of Mr. Hari for A.Y.2020-21
Particulars ` `
Salaries [Indian Income]
Basic Salary (` 60,000 x 12 months) 7,20,000
Dearness Allowance (12% of basic salary of ` 7,20,000) 86,400
Transport Allowance (` 10,000 x 12) [Fully taxable] 1,20,000
Medical Allowance (` 5,000 x 12) [Fully taxable] 60,000
Gross Salary 9,86,400
Less: Standard deduction u/s 16(ia) 50,000
Lower of actual salary or ` 50,000
Net Salary 9,36,400
Income from Other Sources [Foreign Income]
Income from lectures in foreign university [` 8,00,000 plus
tax deducted at source of ` 2,00,000] 10,00,000
Gross Total Income 19,36,400
Less: Deduction under Chapter VIA
Under section 80CCC – Contribution to approved 18,000
Pension Fund of LIC
Under section 80D – Medical insurance premium of
mother, being a resident senior citizen for the year
2019-20, ` 40,000 [being 1/5 th of the lumpsum
premium of ` 2,00,000 paid for 5 years] fully
allowable, even though she is not dependent on him,
since the same does not exceed ` 50,000 40,000
58,000
Total Income 18,78,400