YEF ECE MT FinalVersion
YEF ECE MT FinalVersion
YEF ECE MT FinalVersion
net/publication/325495136
CITATION READS
1 404
6 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Mohamed Tanta on 09 June 2018.
Abstract—Nowadays, railway electrification is the most efficient The paper is organized as follows: Section II describes the
way to power the trains. However, power quality (PQ) phenomena PQ phenomena in AC railway electrification, Section III
toward public power systems (PPSs) have always a main concern presents the hazards associated to the PQ deterioration in AC
to the railway operators, especially when the single-phase traction railway electrification. Section IV discusses the conventional
power system is interconnected to the three-phase PPS. The last PQ compensation methods. Section V presents the PQ
decades have witnessed an on-going evolution of PQ improvement compensation methods based on power electronics
and traction power supply systems, contributing to diminish the compensators. Finally, section VI summarizes the conclusion of
negative impacts of AC railway networks on PQ of the three-phase
the work.
PPS. In this context, this paper presents a global overview of the
PQ phenomena in AC railway electrification, as well as the
impacts of the potential hazards on the safe operation of electrified II. PQ PHENOMENA IN AC RAILWAY ELECTRIFICATION
railways. The paper also reviews PQ improvement methods from The typical PQ problems in high-speed electrified railways
the early use of AC railway electrification until the emergence of are the system currents imbalance, harmonic content, low power
the new power electronics devices in railways industry. factor, low-frequency voltage fluctuations and the voltage arcing
[1]. The next subsections present a described overview of the PQ
Keywords— Negative Sequence Components (NSCs); Power problems in electrified railways.
Quality (PQ); Public Power System (PPS); Traction Power System
(TPS). A. Currents Imbalance
The PPS is considered balanced when the three-phase
I. INTRODUCTION voltages and currents are sinusoidal and have the same
Railway electrification has been set out in the early of 20th amplitude with a phase angle difference of 120˚. However, in
century. It was undertaken in many countries because of its AC railway electrification, the NSCs of voltages are normally
advantages such as the lower air pollution, the higher efficiency, negligible since the TPS is connected to an infinite bus-bar of
and the reduced Carbon Dioxide emissions [1]. From the early the PPS through several power transformers [1]. It is expected
use of railway electrification, the power quality (PQ) that the infinite bus-bar has always constant RMS voltage
improvement was a significant concern for the railway operators values. Therefore, system imbalance in AC railway
and the scholars. Therefore, many research studies have been electrification usually refers to the NSCs of currents injected in
devoted for this purpose. Nowadays, most of the high-speed the PPS [1]. Considering the other possibility, which could
electric trains are using the AC power for a long-distance happen when the TPS is not connected to an infinite bus-bar,
electrification [2]. The single-phase AC traction power system then, voltage drops in the three-phase system will be noticeable.
(TPS) is connected through several power transformers to the Using uncontrolled loads, the three-phase voltage unbalance will
three-phase public power system (PPS). Consequently, the result in three-phase currents imbalance. In other words, the
electrified railways are causing significant harmonic distortion NSCs of voltages will produce the NSCs of currents as well [3].
and unbalance in voltages and in currents on both PPS and TPS. The traction motors of electric locomotives are normally
However, the PQ improvement on TPS was not under interest designed to properly operate at reduced voltage amplitude by
because the traction load has a poor PQ by nature [3], and most 24%, or at bigger amplitudes by 10%, than the nominal voltage
of PQ studies in AC railway electrification are focusing on the [3]. Hence, currents imbalance has more priority to be solved
PQ improvement of the PPS. than the voltage problems in AC railway electrification.
uy PQ of the PPS.
ux
A. Static VAr Compensator (SVC)
(a)
In the late 1970s, a solution based on power electronics
C B A switches was introduced to improve the PQ. The thyristor power
switches took the main interest in that epoch and they were
LeBlanc N1 N1 N1 mainly used for the dynamic compensation. Some of the SVC
Transformer structures are designed to combine several reactive elements that
N2 N2 2 N2 N2 N2 could be fixed or controlled by thyristor power switches. SVCs
3 3 3 3 3
iy ix are well recognized to compensate both of NSCs and reactive
power, but their main drawback is the production of harmonic
uy ux content that results from the low switching frequency of the
thyristor power switches [18]. The SVC installation can be
(b) accomplished via a step-down transformer at the PPS, as shown
C B A in Fig. 3, or at the secondary feeder sections of the V/V power
Impedance Matching transformer, i.e., the TPS.
Transformer
N1 N1 N1 The SVC is branded nowadays as a low-cost compensator
iy ix
N2 because it may reduce the power factor of the system when it is
3-1 3-1
uy 2
N2
N2 N2 2
N2 ux designed for NSCs compensation. In other words, there is a
tradeoff between power factor correction and NSCs
(c) compensation when using the SVC [4]. If the system carries
Fig. 2. Balanced railway power transformers; (a) Scott transformer; reactive power, then the SVC cannot be a useful compensator.
(b) LeBlanc transformer; (c) Impedance matching transformer. Therefore, the manufacturers nowadays are customizing the
SVC to fit each customer with their specific needs, since there
D. Using Passive Power Filters are various SVC types in the market.
Passive filters present a simple structure, containing passive PPS
elements such as inductors and capacitors. These filters were Coupling
220 kV
firstly used in 1940 to reduce the injection of harmonic currents Transformer
from locomotive converters to the TPS [17]. This was the
typically used method for harmonic reduction and power factor SVC V/V Transformer
correction in railway electrification. Normally, these passive
power devices can be used in conjunction with a balanced power
TPS 25 kV
transformer or power electronics compensators to reduce the
compensator power ratings, costs, and volume [6]. There are
many types of passive power filters, such as the single-tuned,
double-tuned or third-tuned ones [1]. In general, these types of Fig. 3. SVC compensator connected to the PPS via a step-down transformer.
filters can diminish the low-order harmonic content (e.g., 5th and
7th), whereas the damping passive filter has been proposed to B. Static Synchronous Compensator (STATCOM)
eliminate higher order harmonics [1]. In order to limit the During the last two decades, the insulated-gate bipolar
harmonic distortion to an allowable level, installing passive filter transistor (IGBT) power switches have begun replacing the
banks linked in parallel was the recommended solution to Thyristor based SVCs. Consequently, the static synchronous
perceive the filtering effect, which might require a large space compensator (STATCOM) devices have been considered as the
for installation, besides the high implementation costs [1]. next-generation of the power compensators [2]. These devices
Another problem was related to the change in the filter consist of a voltage-source converter with a DC-link capacitor,
parameters affected by the heat or lifetime, which gradually coupling transformer and inductances installed on the AC side.
caused misoperations in the filter functionality. It is noteworthy
STATCOM devices can be used in medium voltage levels at
that the compensation system, when using the passive power
the frequency of 50 Hz or 60 Hz. Consequently, they are
filters, cannot reach a unitary power factor correction, as long as
normally manufactured with a bigger volume in comparison to
the reactive power of the TPS changes frequently. The fixed
SVCs devices. Fig. 4 shows the STATCOM device connected in
capacitor value in each passive filter cannot totally compensate
parallel with the PPS. This parallel connection signifies that the
the reactive power, since these devices are not able to follow the
STATCOM can be connected or disconnected without
dynamic changes in time [1].
disturbing the operation of the traction substation.
Consequently, the robustness and readiness of the railway continuous catenary line without any NSs. On the other hand,
substation will not be affected by the STATCOM operation. and since the V/V power transformer is not used in conjunction
Moreover, the STATCOM does not require an internal power with SFC, the overload capability of this system is very limited
supplier, meaning that this device has a neutral contribution in comparing to the STATCOM and the RPC compensators [20].
terms of the active power. By another meaning, STATCOM will In addition, two coupling transformers are required to
not consume active power, and its main objective is to exchange interconnect the SFC between the different voltage levels of the
only reactive power with the PPS. As a result, the volt-ampere PPS and the TPS. However, the new and innovative topologies
(VA) rate of the STATCOM can be significantly lower than the are recommending the SFC based on the modular multilevel
traction substation VA rate [19]. Compared to the SVC, converter (MMC), which can be connected directly to the high
STATCOM behaves as a bidirectional reactive power voltage levels and dispensing the need of coupling transformers
compensator, with a faster response time, larger load capability, installation [20].
lower harmonic contents and more compact design structure.
PPS
PPS 220 kV
220 KV
Coupling
Coupling Transformer
Transformer