Second Officers Appraisal

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Document No.

FPP 13-04
FLEET PERSONNEL MANUAL Revision No. & Date 00, 01.07.2017
Page 1 of 3

SECOND OFFICER’S APPRAISAL

1.1 ASSESSMENT GRADING


Definition Explanation Score
Very good Consistently performs at an exceptional level. 5
Good Frequently performs at an exceptional level – Exceeds expectations 4
Average Consistently performs at a satisfactory level – Meets expectations. 3
Satisfactory Most duties satisfactorily performed – Some improvement needed. 2
Poor Consistently performs at an unacceptable level. 1

VESSEL: QMS AL BAHIA


EMPLOYEE’S (2ND/O.) NAME: MOHAMED ABDELRAHMAN MOHAMED MARWAN
KEY PERFORMANCE ACTIVITIES AND INDICATORS RELATED TO THE SCORED
FACTORS PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (1 to 5)
1- Fully familiar with company HSE policy and procedures
2-Company policies, Objectives and procedures are being
complied with
3-Fully familiar with international, national, oil field and
client safety regulations and they are being observed
during operations
4-Participate in drills carried out and properly recorded
5- Participate in maintenance of life saving and firefighting
equipment and associated records
6- Participate in maintenance of oil pollution prevention
1. SSHEQ
equipment and associated records
7- Participating ISPS code observed
8- Participate in risk assessment , JHA, PTW, toolbox
meetings carried out regularly
9-Medical supplies level maintained and medical log up to
date
10-Garbage management requirements complied with
11-Level of safety awareness and promotion of safe
practices
Total : /11
2. OPERATIONS AND 1-Knowledge and management of cargo operation
MAINTENANCE (deck cargo, dry and liquid bulk)
2-Ships handling skills
(Capability, understanding of berthing /un berthing the
vessel )
3-Navigational watch keeping standards
4-Compliance with planned maintenance schedules
5- Participate in updating the inventories, charts,
publications etc.
6-Knowledge and abilities during offshore operations
(towing, anchor handling, mooring etc)
7-Knowledge of requirements for watertight integrity of
the vessel
8-Knowledge and ability to organise deck crew for day to
day routine work
9-Knowledge and standards related to preparation of the
vessel for sea (securing of cargo, testing of equipment,
etc)
10-Knowledge of the vessel’s stability and stability
calculations
Total /10
Document No. FPP 13-04
FLEET PERSONNEL MANUAL Revision No. & Date 00, 01.07.2017
Page 2 of 3

SECOND OFFICER’S APPRAISAL

Co-operate closely with the chief officer and other HOD’s


on board and other employees to provide the highest
3. CUSTOMER FOCUS support to ensure that all tasks assigned to the vessel are
completed up to the client’s satisfaction
Total /1
1-Ability to receive and issue orders and relay information
over the radio
2-Ability to operate GMDSS equipment
3-Liaison with other departments on board
4. COMMUNICATIONS 4-Ability to provide clear reports to the Master during
maneuvering
5-On time reporting of incidents, accidents or other
undesired occurrences
Total /5
1- Understand the job requirements and where necessary
identify new skills, techniques and processes that
5. TRAINING & compliment his knowledge and advance the company
DEVELOPMENT business
2- Assist with the development of other employees
3-Crew motivation and promotion of HSE culture
Total /3
1- Level of moral and discipline
2-Control and supervision of catering staff
6. GENERAL
3-Control and supervision of deck ratings
Total /3

Performance Appraisal
.
Indicate in box, Total Score divided by the Number of Scored factors.
ASSESSMENT GRADE:
(i.e. sum of factors 1, 2, 3 & 4 divided by 4)
Document No. FPP 13-04
FLEET PERSONNEL MANUAL Revision No. & Date 00, 01.07.2017
Page 3 of 3

SECOND OFFICER’S APPRAISAL

Rating Description

4.7 – 5.0 VG Very good Consistently performs at an excellent level.


Frequently performs at an exceptional level – Exceeds
4.0 – 4.6 G Good
expectations
3.0 – 3.9 A Average Consistently performs at a satisfactory level – Meets expectations.
Satisfactor
2.4 – 2.9 S Most duties satisfactorily performed – Some improvement needed.
y
1.0 - 2.3 P Poor Consistently performs at an unacceptable level.
RATING: (Write VG, G, A, S, or P in the box)

Master’s Name: __________A. G. SANCHEZ_____ Signature: _______________________

Review period from _24.08.2019________to_24.06.2019_______, Assessment Date:___________

Comments if any: ______________________________________________________________

Employee’s Signature and remarks if any:___________________________________________

Management Comments:________________________________________________________

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy