Key Takeaways: Economic Inequality
Key Takeaways: Economic Inequality
Key Takeaways: Economic Inequality
The same analysis can be applied to wealth distribution (the "wealth Gini
coefficient"), but because wealth is more difficult to measure than income, Gini
coefficients usually refer to income and appear simply as "Gini coefficient" or
"Gini index," without specifying that they refer to income. Wealth Gini
coefficients tend to be much higher than those for income.
In the graph below, the 47th percentile corresponds to 10.46% in Haiti and 17.42% in
Bolivia, meaning that the bottom 47% of Haitians take in 10.46% of their nation's total
income and the bottom 47% of Bolivians take in 17.42% of theirs. The straight line
represents a hypothetically equal society: the bottom 47% take in 47% of national income.
To estimate the income Gini coefficient for Haiti in 2012, we would find the area below its
Lorenz curve: around 0.2. Subtracting that figure from 0.5 (the area under the line of
equality), we get 0.3, which we then divide by 0.5. This yields an approximate Gini of 0.6 or
60%. The CIA gives the actual Gini for Haiti in 2012 as 60.8% (see below). This figure
represents extremely high inequality; only Micronesia, the Central African Republic, South
Africa, and Lesotho are more unequal, according to the CIA.
Another way of thinking about the Gini coefficient is as a measure of deviation from perfect
equality. The further a Lorenz curve deviates from the perfectly equal straight line (which
represents a Gini coefficient of 0), the higher the Gini coefficient and the less equal the
society. In the example above, Haiti is more unequal than Bolivia.
Christoph Lakner of the World Bank and Branko Milanovic of the City University of New
York estimate that the global income Gini coefficient was 0.705 in 2008, down from 0.722 in
1988. Figures vary considerably, however. DELTA economists François Bourguignon and
Christian Morrisson estimate that the figure was 0.657 in both 1980 and 1992. Bourguignon
and Morrisson's work shows a sustained growth in inequality since 1820 when the global
Gini coefficient was 0.500. Lakner and Milanovic's shows a decline in inequality around the
beginning of the 21st century, as does a 2015 book by Bourguignon:
Source: World Bank.
Economic expansion in Latin America, Asia, and Eastern Europe has driven much of the
recent decline in income inequality. While inequality between countries has fallen in recent
decades, however, inequality within countries has risen.
Gini Within Countries
Below are the income Gini coefficients of every country for which the CIA World
Factbook provides data:
Some of the world's poorest countries (Central African Republic) have some of the world's
highest Gini coefficients (61.3), while many of the wealthiest (Denmark) have some of the
lowest (28.8). Yet the relationship between income inequality and GDP per capita is not one
of perfect negative correlation, and the relationship has varied over time. Michail Moatsos
of Utrecht University and Joery Baten of Tuebingen University show that from 1820 to 1929,
inequality rose slightly – then tapered off – as GDP per capita increased. From 1950 to 1970,
inequality tended to fall off as GDP per capita rose above a certain threshold. From 1980 to
2000 inequality fell with higher GDP per capita then curved back up sharply.
Shortcomings
Though useful for analyzing economic inequality, the Gini coefficient has some
shortcomings. The metric's accuracy is dependent on reliable GDP and income data. Shadow
economies and informal economic activity are present in every country. Informal economic
activity tends to represent a larger portion of true economic production in developing
countries and at the lower end of the income distribution within countries. In both cases this
means that the Gini index of measured incomes will overstate true income inequality.
Accurate wealth data is even more difficult to come by due to the popularity of tax havens.
Another flaw is that very different income distributions can result in identical Gini
coefficients. Because the Gini attempts to distill a two dimensional area (the gap between the
Lorenz curve and the equality line) down in to a single number, it obscures information about
the "shape" of inequality. In everyday terms, this would be similar to describing the contents
of a photo solely by it's length along one edge, or the simple average brightness value of the
pixels. While using the Lorenz curve as a supplement can provide more information in this
respect, it also does not show demographic variations among subgroups within the
distribution, such as a the distribution of incomes across age, race, or social groups. In that
vein, understanding demographics can be important for understanding what a given Gini
coefficient represents. For example, a large retired population pushes the Gini higher.
Put your trading skills to the test with our FREE Stock Simulator. Compete with thousands of
Investopedia traders and trade your way to the top! Submit trades in a virtual environment before
you start risking your own money. Practice trading strategies so that when you're ready to enter the
real market, you've had the practice you need. Try our Stock Simulator today >>
Related Terms
Lorenz Curve
The Lorenz curve is a graphical representation of wealth or income
distribution.
more
How Income Inequality Works
Income inequality is how unevenly income is distributed throughout a
population. The less equal the distribution, the higher income inequality is.
more
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Gross domestic product (GDP) is the monetary value of all finished goods and
services made within a country during a specific period.
more
Per Capita GDP Definition
Per capita GDP is a metric that breaks down a country's GDP per person and
is calculated by dividing the GDP of a country by its population.
more
The meaning of the term Third World
Third World is an outdated and offensive phrase historically used to describe
economically developing nations.
more
Everything You Need to Know About Per Capita and Its Uses
Per capita is a Latin term that translates to "by head" and that is interpreted as
meaning per person. It is the average per person.
more