The document provides an overview of main foreign direct investment theories from a historical perspective. It discusses how early economic theories viewed international trade and investment. It also outlines the development of transnational corporations in the mid-20th century and how this provided an empirical basis for theories to explain foreign direct investment decisions and behavior. Theories have been refined over time but have not provided perfect tools to predict investment behavior.
The document provides an overview of main foreign direct investment theories from a historical perspective. It discusses how early economic theories viewed international trade and investment. It also outlines the development of transnational corporations in the mid-20th century and how this provided an empirical basis for theories to explain foreign direct investment decisions and behavior. Theories have been refined over time but have not provided perfect tools to predict investment behavior.
The document provides an overview of main foreign direct investment theories from a historical perspective. It discusses how early economic theories viewed international trade and investment. It also outlines the development of transnational corporations in the mid-20th century and how this provided an empirical basis for theories to explain foreign direct investment decisions and behavior. Theories have been refined over time but have not provided perfect tools to predict investment behavior.
The document provides an overview of main foreign direct investment theories from a historical perspective. It discusses how early economic theories viewed international trade and investment. It also outlines the development of transnational corporations in the mid-20th century and how this provided an empirical basis for theories to explain foreign direct investment decisions and behavior. Theories have been refined over time but have not provided perfect tools to predict investment behavior.
In the nineteenth century, classical economic theories (e.g. those of Adam
Smith, David Ricardo) regarded international trade as a motor of economic internationalization and integration. Internationalization through trade was considered an essential catalyst for generating domestic wealth, espe- cially when a country sought specialization in those economic activities where it had comparative advantages. Private companies had become the principal economic agents of the capitalist system in place, and leading scholars in countries with open economies like England favoured deregula- tion and liberalization in all possible spheres of economic life so that trade relations could be expanded with other countries. Unlike the ‘intervention- ists’ in France, the liberal ‘free traders’ in England and the United States emphasized the importance of a ‘natural order of things’ pushing for a lean State that would interfere as little as possible in the ‘invisible’ hand of the market, which would always find its own equilibrium.1 International trade was initially promoted by mainly Dutch, English and French companies in overseas colonies, where they controlled sales outlets, and warehousing and assembly facilities. These companies had also estab- lished some manufacturing capabilities in distant markets, but it took almost a century – towards the mid-1950s – before transnational corpora- tions (TNCs) in the modern sense started appearing in the United States, with full-fledged production networks spanning the globe. The position of uncontested leadership acquired by some of these corporations enabled them to commit part of their human and financial resources to productive investments in the growing markets of Latin America and Europe, where they benefited from postwar reconstruction efforts. These extensive internationalization activities of US corporations like Coca-Cola, Dupont, General Electric, General Motors, IBM and Xerox provided academicians and analysts in the United States and Europe with the empirical basis for identifying explanatory variables of FDI decisions and behaviour patterns.
It was at that time that western scholars began to devise comprehensive
theories for explaining the origin and causes of FDI, as well as its impact on the economies of host and home countries. Theories and concepts of foreign investment have been adjusted and constantly refined since the 1960s, but they have not yet been able to provide foolproof analytical tools to governments seeking to anticipate FDI company behaviour ex-ante and to effectively influence international movements of capital, technology and know-how. Certain paradigms, however, contain interesting findings, which can be of assistance in formu- lating and implementing strategic FDI policies for economic growth and industrial development. Broad empirical research also offers valuable insights into shifts of global FDI patterns and motivations of foreign investors in response to economic policies and incentives in host countries. For several decades, scholars and policy-makers in transition countries were practically excluded from the public debate on global business inte- gration and the role of FDI in national economies. Systemic and ideological differences did not permit free research and policy suggestions on this issue. The theories described in this chapter aim to help readers from Russia and other transition economies understand the historical stages of business transnationalization through FDI in western and developing countries, and its impact on national economies and world trade. They serve as a basis for further analysis of inbound and outbound FDI and to understand why certain nations and sectors remain more competitive than others. Future research and observation will need to be focused on companies from western countries, which are major capital generators for global investment.2 In the coming years, decision-makers in transition countries will need to draw on international findings to build their political and legal frameworks for attracting FDI, which is becoming a scarce but indispens- able factor for economic development and technology transfer. Strategic FDI policies should one day enable local manufacturers to gain ownership- specific advantages3 and become themselves foreign investors, thus pushing transition countries further up the investment development path.4 Transition countries like Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic are already reaping the fruit of carefully designed FDI policies, which are also the result of in-depth analysis of prevailing theories and experiences made in other FDI recipient countries (e.g. China, Spain, United Kingdom). A number of disciplines have attempted to provide a theoretical frame- work for explaining the transnationalization of business and foreign invest- ment behaviour of corporations: economics, international business strategy, marketing, and even political science and sociology. Each of these subject areas offers an understanding of the nature and conditions of over- seas investment and capital commitment, from their specific disciplinary angle. For example, ‘product policy’ within the functional business area of marketing provides the basis for the international product cycle paradigm.5