PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to DIEGO

FINANCING CO. ("Holder"), or order, at such address as the holder hereof may specify,
the principal of TWELVE MILLION AND 00/100 PESOS (PHP12,000,000.00), Philippine
Currency, plus interest of TWELVE PERCENT (12%) PER ANNUM on the principal, at
an installment of ONE MILLION PESOS per month. Payments of the interest of the
installment of ONE MILLION per month shall commence on 1 October 1999 and
continue through 1 September 2000. The Borrower shall have the right at any time or
from time to time to pay all or a portion of the principal without premium or penalty.
Prepayments may not be reborrowed.

Any default or delay in the payment of any installment shall bear a penalty of
THREE (3%) PERCENT per month by way of liquidated damages.

Should suit be brought to recover on this note, or should the same be placed in'
hands of an attorney for collection, Maker promises to attorney fees equal to FIFTEEN
(15%) PERCENT of the principal and costs incurred in connection therewith. This note
shall be governed and construed accordance with the laws of the Philippines, and suit
hereon may be brought in the Regional Trial Court of Makati City, Metro Manila, and for
this purpose Maker hereby expressly consents to the venue and jurisdiction of said
court.

Failure of Holder to exercise any option hereunder shall not constitute a waiver of
the right to exercise the same in the event of any subsequent default or in the event of
the continuance of any existing default after demand for strict performance hereof.

Maker hereby waives demand, diligence, presentment for payment, protest or

notice of demand and exercise of any option hereunder. Maker or each individual and
entity signing this note, whether or not as a Maker, further agrees that the granting of
any extension or extensions of time for payment of any sum or sums due hereunder, or
under any other instrument securing this note, or for the performance of any covenant,
condition or agreement hereof or thereof or the taking release of other or additional
security shall in no way release or discharge the liability the Maker or any signor or any
guarantor hereof.

Time is of the essence of this note and each and every term and provision herein
is intended to insure the prompt payment of the obligation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Note this day of
October, 1999.

Borrower:

Holder:
 CANCELLATION OF DEED OF ABSOLUTE SALE

  KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

This Cancellation of Deed of Absolute Sale, made and entered this ____ day of June
1998, by and between:

SALVADOR B. LOCSIN, of legal age, Filipino, widow, and with residence

address at No. 9, Mapagkawanggawa St., Sakatuna Village, Quezon City, and
hereinafter referred to as the SELLER;

and

JESUS SALVADOR G. LOCSIN, JR, of legal age, Filipino, single and with
residence address at No. 9, Mapagkawanggawa St., Sakatuna Village, Quezon City;

ENRIQUE GABRIEL G. LOCSIN, of legal age, Filipino, married to MA.

GERALDINE ROSAL, with residence address at Lot 9 Block 4 Mozart St., Greenville
Subdivision, Sauyo, Quezon City,
hereinafter referred to as the BUYERS.

WITNESSETH: THAT

WHEREAS, on 16 January 1997, the parties executed a Deed of Absolute Sale over a
parcel of land registered as TCT No. N-139672 in the Registry of Deeds of Quezon City,
which transaction was entered into in the notarial book of Notary Public Dulcisimo S.
Manay, Jr. as Doc. No. 72; Page No. 15; Book No. VII; Series of 1997, a copy of which
is hereto attached as Annex A;

WHEREAS, the parties wish to CANCEL, RESCIND and ANNUL said Deed of Absolute
Sale and declare the same VOID AB INITIO for failure to effect the necessary
consideration and include the names of all actual BUYERS of the real property;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, the parties hereby

unconditionally CANCEL, RESCIND, ANNUL and declare VOID AB INITIO and without
legal effect whatsoever the Deed of Absolute Sale executed by the parties on 16
January 1998.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto signed this CANCELLATION OF

DEED OF ABSOLUTE SALE this _____ day of ____________ 1998 at the date and
place first above mentioned.

SALVADOR B. LOCSIN
            Seller
TIN: 104-017-792
ENRIQUE GABRIEL G. LOCSIN
            Buyer
TIN: 178-805-171

JESUS SALVADOR G. LOCSIN , JR.

            Buyer
TIN: 150-541-213

Signed in the presence of:

_______________________      __________________________

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Republic of the Philippines)

Makati City, Metro Manila  ) S.S.

BEFORE ME, a Notary Public for and in the City of Makati, Metro Manila, personally
appeared:

Name                CTC No.                   Place                      Date

Salvador B. Locsin

Enrique Gabriel G. Locsin        16343223E Q.C. 1-2-98

Jesus Salvador G. Locsin, Jr. 16426997E Q.C. 1-15-98

known to me to be the same persons who executed the foregoing document of

CANCELLATION OF DEED OF ABSOLUTE SALE and they acknowledged to me that
they executed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing document consists of three (3) pages including
this page, and that the parties and their witnesses signed their names and on one (1)
parcel of land covered by TCT No. N-139672 with the Registry of Deeds of Quezon
City.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set may hand and affixed my notarial seal
this ____ day of ____________ 1998.

Doc. No. ____;

Page No. ____;
Book No. ____;
Series of 2000.
Republic of the Philippines)
Makati City, Metro Manila  ) S.S.

 
COMPROMISE AGREEMENT
[With Waiver, Release and Quitclaim] 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

This Memorandum of Undertaking [With Waiver, Release and Quitclaim], executed this
____ day of February 1999 in Makati City, Metro Manila, by and among:

MARIA CARLOS TRINIDAD, JOSE LAURO TRINIDAD, SONIA CARLOS

TRINIDAD, all of legal age, married, with postal address at c/o CHAVEZ LAURETA &
ASSOCIATES, Penthouse, Heart Tower, 108 Valero St., Salcedo Village, Makati City, Metro
Manila, herein represented by JOSE LAURO TRINIDAD by virtue of a Special Power of
Attorney executed on 25 April 1994, and hereinafter referred to as the FIRST PARTIES;

METROPOLITAN DOCTORS, INC., doing business under the name and style as
METROPOLITAN MEDICAL CENTER, a corporation duly organized and existing under
Philippine laws, with business address at c/o EDSA, Mandaluyong City, Metro Manila, Metro
Manila, herein represented by its Medical Director, CARLOS P. LOPEZ, M.D., hereinafter
referred to as the SECOND PARTY; and

DRA. VISITACION V. LUNA, DRA. ANITA CARMEN-ROCES and DRA. MARIA

LUISA ROBERTS, with postal address at c/o METROPOLITAL MEDICAL CENTER,
Mandaluyong City, Metro Manila, hereinafter referred to as the THIRD PARTIES;

 WITNESSETH: THAT

WHEREAS, the FIRST PARTIES are the plaintiffs in Civil Case No. 94-1602, entitled
"MARIA CARLOS TRINIDAD, et al.," versus "METROPOLITAN DOCTORS, INC., et al.,"
pending in the Regional Trial Court of Makati City, Branch 65 (Civil Case No. 95-6503),
hereinafter referred to as the "Pending Case";

WHEREAS the SECOND PARTY and THIRD PARTIES are the defendants in said
Pending Case;

WHEREAS, all the parties are desirous of settling amicably the Pending Case, which as
been pending for almost five (5) years, and thereby put to rest a long and costly litigation;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, the parties hereby

undertake as follows:

1. The SECOND PARTY shall voluntarily undertake the following:

1.1. to make available to MARIA CARLOS TRINIDAD a private room at the Makati
Medical Center which is appropriate/adequate, considering her present medical condition,
including the continued use of the hospital bed she is now using and a sofa bed, all free of charge
and for as long as she remains clinically alive and in need of medical attention; and
 1.2. provide MARIA CARLOS TRINIDAD, likewise free of charge, medicine, drugs,
life-support systems, medical equipment and other facilities, medical assistance, neurological
treatment and other appropriate medical services from competent nurses, doctors or specialists –
which may be advisable or necessary to maintain her in her present condition, including
treatment of complications or illnesses of whatever kind or nature which may arise from said
treatment or condition.

2. The THIRD PARTIES, individually, undertake to make available their expertise or

services when and as needed by MARIA CARLOS TRINIDAD, upon request by the FIRST
PARTIES or the SECOND PARTY: Provided, that, if for any reason whatsoever the THIRD
PARTIES are unable to do so, they shall exert their best efforts to make available the services of
a substitute doctor or specialist, likewise free of charge.

3. The parties agree to, and shall cause, the dismissal, with prejudice, of the Pending
Case, including all claims and counterclaims therein, and agree not to file any similar case,
whether civil, administrative or criminal, of any kind or nature whatsoever, arising from the
same facts, incident, claim, cause or causes of action.

4. Except as provided in paragraphs 1 and 2 hereof, the parties hereby mutually,

irrevocably, freely and voluntarily release and forever discharge one another, including the
officers, directors, employees, stockholders, successors-in-interest of the SECOND PARTY and
the heirs and assigns of the THIRD PARTIES, from any and all manner of action, causes of
action, sum of money, damages, liability, responsibility, obligation, claims and demands
whatsoever in law or equity, which they had, now have, or may have against each other,
including, but not limited to, actual, moral, exemplary and all other damages or causes of action
provided for under the law, if any, arising, directly or indirectly, from the facts and
circumstances giving rise to, surrounding or arising from the complaint and/or counterclaims in
the Pending Case , all of which claims or causes of action by these presents the parties hereby
abandon and waive.

5. This agreement shall not in any way be construed as an admission on the part of any
party of any fault, negligence or liability, of whatever kind and nature, in connection with the
Pending Case.

6. In case of material breach of the terms and conditions of this agreement, the innocent
party is hereby authorized to apply for a writ of execution in the Pending Case for the purpose of
compelling compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement.

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the partieshave hereunto set their hand this ____ day of
November 1999 in Makati City, Metro Manila.

JOSE LAURO TRINIDAD                      METROPOLITAN DOCTORS, INC.

For himself and in behalf of                                    Second Party
MARIA CARLOS TRINIDAD
SONIA CARLOS TRINIDAD                
        First Parties                                  By:
                                                                  CARLOS P. LOPEZ, M.D.
                                                                         Medical Director

The THIRD PARTIES:

DRA. VISITACION V. LUNA

DRA. ANITA CARMEN-ROCES

DRA. MARIA LUISA ROBERTS

 
Witnessed By:
__________________________   __________________________
 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

BEFORE ME, a Notary Public for and in the City of Makati, Metro Manila, personally appeared:

Name              CTC No.                     Place                    Date 

 

JOSE LAURO TRINIDAD

CARLOS P. LOPEZ

VISITCACION V. LUNA

ANITA CARMEN-ROCES

MARIA LUIS ROBERTS

GRACE LUNA

and they acknowledged to me that they are the same persons who executed the foregoing
instrument, consisting of four (4) pages, including this page; that Hideaki Tateishi and Raul G.
Fores are both duly authorized to appear in behalf of their respective principals; and that they
executed the foregoing instrument as their own free and voluntary act and deed, for themselves
and/or in behalf of their respective principals.

Doc. No. ____;

Page No. ____;
Book No. ____;
Series of 2000.

Republic of the Philippines)

Makati City, Metro Manila ) S.S.

AFFIDAVIT OF LOSS
 I, WILHELMINA A. POBRE, of legal age, married, Filipino citizen, with residence
address at 51-G Yakal Street, Makati City, under oath, depose and state:

(1) I, together with my husband, own a Certificate Of Participation No. 0044335 issued
by Security Bank in the principal amount of P100,000.00.

(2) On January 10, 1999 I lost the original of the above Certificate of Participation when
we moved to our new house in Makati City, during which we relocated a number of
personal possessions.

(3) Diligent search of said document among our personal effects proved futile and
unavailing.

(4) I am executing this affidavit to comply with the requirements of Security Bank for the
reconstitution of said document.

Affiant further sayeth naught.

 WILHELMINA A. POBRE

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of August 1999 in Makati

City, Metro Manila, affiant exhibiting to her Community Tax Certificate No. __________
issued on _____________ at ____________.

Doc. No. ____;

Page No. ____;
Book No. ____;
Series of 1999.

 
 

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES)

CITY OF MANILA                   ) S.S.
 
AFFIDAVIT OF DESISTANCE

        I, Juan del la Cruz, of legal age, single, and a resident of # 123 Main
St., Malate, Manila, after having duly sworn to in accordance with law
hereby depose and state:
 
        1. I am the complaining witness for Serious Physical Injuries against
Jesus Santos in the case entitled "People of the Philippines versus Jesus
Santos", Criminal Case No. 12345, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch No.
11, City of Manila.
 
        2. After my sober and soul searching assessment and analysis of the
incident, I have realized that because I was not wearing my eyeglasses and it
was dark, I can not point out, without a doubt the accused or any other
person/s who inflicted harm against me.
 
        3. Since I could not state with certainty and without doubt the liability
of Jesus Santos, in fairness to him, I am permanently withdrawing my
 complaint against him. I clear him of whatever responsibility or liability to
me.
 
        4. I hereby inform the City Prosecutor of Manila that I am withdrawing
my complaint for Serious Physical Injuries in Criminal Case No. 12345
entitled "People of the Philippines versus Jesus Santos", Metropolitan Trial
Court, Branch No. 11, City of Manila.
 
        5. I likewise request the Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch No. 11, City
of Manila to dismiss with prejudice the said criminal case.
 
        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereby set my hand this 22nd day of
September 2007 at the City of Manila.
 
 
 
Juan de la Cruz
Complaining Witness
 
 
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 22nd day of January
2008 at the City of Manila, Philippines.
 
 
 
Romeo Abad
Public Prosecutor

Republic of the Philippines )

In the City of Pasig )

AFFIDAVIT

I, P02 RODERICK F QUITON, of legal age, Filipino, married, a bonafide

member of the Philippine National Police and presently assigned with
National Capital Region Police Office, Eastern Police District, Pre-Charge
Investigation Branch (PCIB), after having been sworn to in accordance with
law, hereby depose and state, THAT:

1. Sometime on June 2004, I was among those Police Officers

conducting Police Checkpoint along Marcos Highway, Marikina
City, headed and under the command of
_________________________;

2. In the conduct of our operation at the said checkpoint, our entire

unit were always in full uniform and our name thereon is easily
and clearly visible to the general public;
3. Vehemently, I was never been involved in any “kotong” activities
nor have exacted any money at said checkpoint, much less
PINSP_________ could have been involved as such;

4. In fact, no single complaint has ever been lodged against me nor

any member of our unit on such kotong activities, except the
barefaced, unsubstantiated and hearsay allegation/complaint of
one RUDY SANTOS against our superior;

5. Granting for the sake of argument, a prudent man may wonder

why only our superior PINSP_________ and none of us has been
named or imp leaded in the hearsay complaint by no less a third
party, if not the same is false and unfounded;

6. Perhaps, if there is any truth to such alleged “kotong” activities,

most likely, the real complainant must have seen and known
my/our name and not of our superior, for simple reason that I
myself was on the forefront conducting inspection at said
checkpoint. While, PINSP________ was supervising and
monitoring us. And most often than not, he was coordinating
with other Mobil Unit/HQ for possible track down against those
carnappers and criminals on the loose;

7. Accordingly, if the real complaint, and not RUDY SANTOS, has a

cause of action against PINSP_________ , he should come out in
open and personally take the cudgels and confront his alleged
offenders, otherwise it bespeak of paranoia;

8. Moreover, I have reasonable belief that RUDY SANTOS is a

fictitious person, because in no occasion that he has ever
appeared or attended any hearing conducted by the proper
authority on his complaint of alleged “kotong” activities of
PINSP_________ and his men, despite notice;

9. Well and then, in all proposition, the barefaced, unsubstantiated

and baseless “hearsay” allegation