FOREWORD

This report represents a joint effort by Col. Richard L. Weaver and 1st Lt. James
McAndrew to address the request made by Representative Steven H. Schiff (R-NM) for
information regarding an alleged crash of an unidentified flying object (UFO) that
occurred in the state in 1947. This publication duplicates the information provided to the
Secretary of the Air Force and to the General Accounting Office (GAO). It was written
as a result of Colonel Weaver’s and Lieutenant McAndrew’s efforts to locate the records
that explain the events of July 1947 leading to what is popularly known as the Roswell
Incident. The only information presented here that was not in the report delivered to the
Secretary of the Air Force and the GAO is the photograph section. It appears after
Colonel Weaver’s final attachment, at the very end of this book.

The importance of attachment 32, Lieutenant McAndrew’s synopsis, derives from his
description of Project MOGUL,the top-priority classified project of balloon-borne
experiments, which provides the explanation for the “Roswell Incident.” Interest abounds
surrounding the UFO wave of 1947 which began in the spring and did not dissipate until
fall. Interest in UFOs climaxed during the summer, when multiple sightings of such
objects occurred.

RICHARD P. HALLION
Air Force Historian

...
111
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This report and publication would not have been possible without the expert assistance
and outstanding cooperation of many persons and organizations. Appreciation is extended
to the Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force, Mr. William Davidson,
and to his predecessor, Mr. Robert McCormick. The Air Force Historian, Dr. Richard P.
Hallion, generously offered the services of his staff and facilities. Col. Jeffrey Butler, of
the Secretary of the Air Force Office of Security and Special Program Oversight, made
signal contributions to both the research and writing of this report.

The primary research conducted for this report was provided by the Secretary of the Air
Force’s Declassification and Review Team (SAF/AAZD), headed by Col. Linda Smith.
Lt. Col. Dale Freeman and Maj. Len Shoemaker initiated the project. Maj. Bill Coburn,
CMSgt. Owen Costello, and MSgt. Jean Hardin provided invaluable assistance throughout.
SSgt. Jim Bruns acquainted himself with the numerous research facilities available in the
Washington, DC, area, and contributed mightily to the effort. Grace Rowe, the Records
Manager for the Secretary of the Air Force, provided unparalled guidance and counsel to
help sort through fifty years of records amassed by the U.S. Air Force.

At Bolling AFB,we are indebted to Col. George Williams, Commander of the Air Force
History Support Office, and to his staff for their expert advice, guidance, and kind use of
facilities. Our foremost debt is owed to historian Sheldon Goldberg, who greatly assisted
our efforts. Additionally, historians Alfred Beck, William Heimdahl, Roger Miller, Eduard
Mark, and Jacob Neufeld shared with us their wide knowledge of Air Force history. Also,
Robert “Gus” Bell contributed with his attractive art work; Richard Wolf provided
invaluable computer expertise; and Maj. Myrt Wilson, SSgt. Steve Rapp, SRA Francis
Noel, and Debra Moss supplied essential administrative assistance. Thanks go to editor
Barbara Wittig for her efforts in this undertaking.

A special thank-you goes to Bruce Ashcroft, chief historian at the National Air
Intelligence Center, Wright Patterson AFB, OH. Mr. Ashcroft gave freely of his official
and personal time to provide assistance whenever we asked. Moreover, his unique
previous experience, as a historian in the State of New Mexico, added a wealth of detail
that would otherwise have been missed.

We must also express our sincerest gratitude to the staff of the USAF Phillips Laboratory,
Geophysics Directorate at Hanscom AFB, MA, especially to Lisa Duffeck, of the
Research Library, whose research talents contributed significantly to this report. We thank
John Armstrong, also of the Research Library, for having the foresight to preserve the old

V
balloon files; Neal Stark and Jack Griffin, of the Geophysical Directorate’s Aerospace
Engineering Group, whose corporate knowledge of Air Force ballooning answered many
difficult questions; and to historian Ruth Liebowitz for sharing her files and photographs.
Many thanks also to Sheilagh Banacos in Information Management and Evelyn Kindler
of the Public Affairs Office.

At the National Archives and Records Administration in Washington, DC, it was a

pleasure to collaborate with archivist Edward Reese of the Military Reference Branch. Mr.
Reese, who retired in October 1994 after more than fifty-three years of faithful civil
service, provided a much-welcomed professional logic and calm to our endeavors. Also
at the Military Reference Branch, Wil Mahoney’s knowledge of Air Force records proved
invaluable. At the Washington National Records Center in Suitland, MD, we thank
Reference Section archivist Carry Conn, who patiently led us through the stacks, and
Richard Boylan, Reference Branch Assistant Chief, for his truly prodigious memory. At
the National Personnel Records Center, in St. Louis, MO, archivists Bill Siebert and Eric
Voltz helped to map out a search plan, while Carl Paulson capably guided us through it.
Pearline Foster shared her time, personnel, and an all-important photocopier. At National
Archives 11 in College Park, MD, Allen Lewis graciously provided access to their
excellent facilities.

Numerous individuals agreed to be interviewed for this publication. We would like to

express our sincerest thanks to them and their spouses for helping guide us through the
complex maze of names, projects, and places that had been shrouded in secrecy by the
passing of nearly fifty years. Special thanks go to Athelstan and Kathy Spilhaus, Charles
and Wilma Moore, Col. Albert and Jean Trakowski, Lt. Col. Sheridan and Mary Cavitt,
and Maj. Irving Newton, USAF (Ret). Also sincerest thanks to Mrs. Emily Duffy and
Mrs. Mildred Crary for sharing their recollections and photographs of their distinguished
husbands.

We also put to good use the fine reference facilities at the Naval Research Laboratory in
Washington, DC, and thank Eileen Pickenpaugh, the Deputy Librarian, Murray Bradley,
head of Research Reports Section, and Ralph Peterson, the Research Report Librarian, all
of whom helped immeasurably to make our searches easier.

Our thanks go also to the men and women of the 913th Airlift Wing (AFRES) at Willow
Grove ARS, PA, especially to Col. Richard Moss, the 913th Airlift Wing Commander,
and Lt. Col. (Col. Select) Robert Hunter, the 913th Logistics Group Commander, for
providing end-of-year assistance. And we are grateful to CMSgt. Michael Breitenbach,
for sharing his very useful experiences and insights.

We are most grateful to the members of Air Force Publishing-Ray Del Villar, Linda
Garmon, and Jack Fischer-who brought this publication into print, and to SRA Garrety
Wood of the 1lth Communication Squadron Photo Lab for excellent photo reproduction
services.

In the course of researching and writing this report, numerous other individuals
contributed to the success of the project. Among them were Col. Gerald Merritt, Director,

vi
Clinical Investigations and Life Sciences Division, Headquarters Air Force Medical
Operating Agency, Bolling AFB, DC; John Jenkins, Freedom of Information Act
Manager, USAF Phillips Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, NM; George Horn, Technical
Publications Editor, Air Force Environmental Technical Applications Centers, Scott AFB,
IL; Steve Dean, Computer Specialist, Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, Pentagon;
George Cully, Historian, 81st Training Wing, Keesler AFB, MS; Gene Schreiner,
Technical Publications Editor, USAF Rome Laboratory, Griffiss AFB, NY; MSgt. A1
Mack, Historian, 49th Fighter Wing, Holloman AFB, NM; Lois Walker, Historian, Air
Force MatCriel Command, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH; TSgt. Donald Valentine,
Administrative Specialist, 89th Airlift Wing, Andrews AFB, MD; Maj. David Thurston,
Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs Office; Dr. Saxson and Betsy Hudon of the
University of Texas at Arlington Library; Col. Joseph Fletcher, USAF (Ret); Robert Todd;
Frank Press; Vance Mitchell; Lt. Col. Joseph Rogan; Maj. Kevin Stubbs; SRA Donald
Crissman; Francis Whedon; Richard Hassard; Joseph Worzel; John Peterson; Martin
Koenig; Eileen Ulrich Farnochi; and the late Vivian Bushnell. To all, we extend our
sincerest gratitude.

RICHARD L. WEAVER, COL, USAF

Director of Security and Special Program Oversight
SAFIAAZ

JAMES McANDREW, 1ST LT, USAFR

Declassification and Review Officer
SAFIAAZD

vii
 GUIDE FOR READERS

This publication contains two narratives: The Report of the Air Force Research Regarding
the “Rowel1 Incident” by Col. Richard L. Weaver and the Synopsis of Balloon Research
Findings by 1st Lt. James McAndrew. These are the same narratives and supporting
documents that went to the Secretary of the Air Force and to the Government Accounting
Office, except that a photograph section has been appended. It appears at the end of the
book, after Attachment 33.

Thirty-three attachments support Colonel Weaver’s Report. Attachment 32 consists of

Lieutenant McAndrew’s Synopsis, itself followed by eleven attachments and twenty-five
.appendices. McAndrew’s appendices reproduce the actual sources cited in his report.

The attachments to the Weaver Report are located by black tabs printed at the lower
right-hand comer of their cover pages, whereas the attachments to McAndrew’s Synopsis
are located by black tabs printed midway up the page. Appendices to the McAndrew
Synopsis are identified by gray tabs which apear at the top right-hand corners of their
respective cover pages (see below).
1 I

Weaver Attachments
’ McAndrew Attachments McAndrew Appendices

Choosing to distinguish attachments and appendices from each other by using separate
colors and placements for the tabs has been done to avoid creating ambiguity in
repaginating the original source material reproduced here. Because many of the
attachments and appendices appeared in previous publications and were integrally
numbered there, their original pagination has not been changed for the purposes of this
report. Additionally, any blank pages appearing in these source documents, though

ix
numbered there, were not printed as pages in the present document. This accounts for any
discontinuity present in the page numbering of the source material reprinted here.

Security markings have been deleted from previously classified documents. The reader
is advised that blacked-out areas noted in the top and bottom margins of pages printed
in this document indicate pages that originally contained classified information. These
pages have since been declassified, and so can be printed here.

Also, privacy act restrictions apply to witnesses whose statements and interviews are
reproduced for the purposes of this report. The reader will see that the addresses of such
individuals have been deleted. Such witnesses are identified by name only.

X
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Foreword .................................................... iii

Acknowledgments .............................................. v

Guide for Readers .............................................. ix

Introduction .................................................. 1

“Report of Air Force Research Regarding the ‘Roswell Incident’,’’ with

Memorandum for the. Secretary of the Air Force, by
Richard L. Weaver, Col, USAF, July 27,1994 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Attachments to Colonel Weaver’s Report of Air Force Research:

1. Washington Post, “GAO Turns to Alien Turf in Probe,” January 14, 1994
2. Letter and GAO Code 701034, Richard Davis, GAO, to William J. Perry, DOD,
February 15, 1994
3. Memo, Marcia J. Van Note, DODAG, for Distribution, subj: General
Accounting Office (GAO) Letter Dated February 9,1994 .... February 23,
1994
4. Memo with Indorsement, Vaughn E. Schlunz, SAFFMPF, for Distribution,
subj: GAO Review Letter Dated February 15,1994, “Records Management
Procedures .... February 24, 1994
5. Memo with Addendum, Robert J. McCormick, SAF/AA, for Distribution, subj:
GAO Review on Records Management Procedures Dealing with Weather
Balloons, Unknown Aircraft, and Similar Crash Incidents . . . . March 1,
1994
6. Memo with Attachments, AFAN for SAF/AA, Subj: GAO Inquiry into Records
Management Procedures Dealing with Weather Balloons, Unknown
Aircraft, and Similar Crash Incidents, March 14, 1994

xi
 7. Memo, Brig Gen James L. Cole, Jr., AFISE, for SAFIAAZ, subj: GAO Review
on Records Management Procedures with Weather Balloons, Unidentified
Aircraft, and Similar Crash Incidents . . ., March 14, 1994
8. Memo, Col Michael W. Schoenfeld, SAFIAQL, for SAFIAA, subj: GAO
Review on Records Management Procedures Dealing with Weather
Balloons, Unknown Aircraft, and Similar Crash Incidents . . ., March 22,
1994
9. Memo, Col Steve 0. Ouzts, AFKOWP, for SAF/AAZ, subj: GAO Review on
Records Management Procedures Dealing with Weather Balloons,
Unknown Aircraft, and Similar Crash Incidents . . ., March 9, 1994
10. Memo, Grace T. Rowe, SAFIAAIQ, for SAFIAAI, SAFIAAZ, subj: GAO
Review of Records Management Procedures Dealing with Weather
Balloons, Unknown Aircraft, and Similar Crash Incidents . . ., March 10,
1994
11. Memo with Attachment, Richard S. Rauschkolb, AFHRNCC, for AF/HO,
SAFIAAZ, subj: GAO Review on Records Management Procedures
Dealing with Weather Balloons, Unknown Aircraft, and Similar Crash
Incidents . . ., March 8, 1994
12. Memo, with Attachments, Edward C. Mishler, HQ AFOSI/HO, for SAFIAAZ,
subj: GAO Review on Records Management Procedures . . ., May 11,
1994
13. Records Searched
14. Letter, Lt Col Thomas Badger, Jr., HQIAAF, to Commanding General, AMC,
subj: Issuance of Orders, June 5, 1947
15. Appointment Book and Diary, Lt Gen Hoyt S. Vandenberg, July 7-9, [1947],
and July 5-9, 1947
16. Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Photographs of Balloon Debris, [July 9, 19471
17. Satement, Lt. Col. Sheridan D. Cavitt, USAF (Ret), May 24, 1994
18. Interview, Col Richard L. Weaver with Lt Col Sheridan D. Cavitt, USAF (Ret),
[May 24, 19941
19. Letters, Brig Gen E. O’Donnell to Commanding General AAF, July 8, 1946; Lt
Col W.H. Congdon and Col D.P. Graul to Commanding General AMC,
September 9, 1947; and Brig Gen Tom C. Rives to Commanding General
AAF,September 10, 1947
20. Statement, Athelstan F. Spilhaus, June 3, 1994
21. Statement, Charles B. Moore, June 8, 1994, and Hieroglyphic and Balloon
Train Drawings, August 28, 1992
22. Statement, Albert C. Trakowski, June 29, 1994
23. Interview, Col Jeffrey Butler and 1st Lt James McAndrew with Professor
Charles B. Moore, June 8, 1994
24. Interview, [Col Jeffrey Butler and 1st Lt James McAndrew with] Col Albert C.
Trakowski, USAF (Ret), June 29, 1994
25. Drawing, NYU Cluster Flight No. 2

xii
26. Photographs, Project MOGULBalloon Trains
27. Table No. 7, Summary of NYU Constant-Level Balloon Flights, November 20,
1946-July 5 , 1947
28. Museums Contacted
29. Blueprint, Comer Reflector, ML-307WAP Assembly
30. Statement, Irving Newton, July 21,1994
31. Photographs, ML307UAP Device with Vintage Neoprene Balloons and Debris

32. Synopsis of Balloon Research Findings, with Memorandum

for SAFIAAZ, Att: Colonel Richard L. Weaver, by
James McAndrew, 1st Lt, USAFR

Attachments to the McAndrew Synopsis:

1. Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Photographs of Balloon Debris, [July 9, 19471
2. Organizational Chart, Watson Laboratories, January 20, 1947
3. Drawing, NYU Cluster Flight No. 2
4. Illustrations, ANKRT-1 Sonabuoy
5. Blueprint, Comer Reflector, ML-307WAP Assembly
6. Table No. 7, Summary of NYU Constant-Level Balloon Flights, November
20, 19464eptember 9, 1947
7. Map of New Mexico
8. Illustration, Weather Balloon and Corner Reflector
9. Letter, Brig Gen E. O’Donnell to Commanding General AAF,July 8, 1946
10. Hieroglyphic Drawing, Charles B. Moore, August 28, 1992
11. Alamogordo News, “Fantasy of ‘Flying Disc’ Is Exlained Here: News Men
Watch Army Radar Crew Launch ‘Disc’,” July 10, 1947

Appendices to the McAndrew Synopsis:

1. Rowel1 Daily Record, July 9, 1947
2. Interview, Col Richard L. Weaver with Lt Col Sheridan D. Cavitt, USAF
(Ret), [May 24, 19941
3. Statement, Irving Newton, July 21, 1994
4. Letter, Lt Col Edward A. Doty to Mr David Bushnell, March 3, 1959
5. Letter, Brig Gen E. O’Donnell to Commanding General AAF,July 8, 1946
6. Report, Maurice Ewing for General Carl Spaatz, “Long Range Sound
Transmission in the Atmosphere,” n.d.
7. Report, HQ Fitzwilliam Fwd, “Sonic Balloon Test Kwajalein,” May 17,
1948

xiii
 8. Memo, Brig Gen Tom C. Rives to Maj Gen Curtis LeMay, subj: Relief of
Major R.T. Crane as Project Officer for MOGULand TORRID, June 18,
1946
9. Memo, Maj Gen Curtis E. LeMay to Maj Gen L.C. Craigie, April 16,
1947
10. New York University, Constant Level Balloons, Final Report, March 1,
1951
11. New York University, Constant Level Balloons, Section 1, General,
November 15, 1949
12. New York University, Constant Level Balloons, Section 3 , Summary of
Flights, July 15, 1949
13. New York University, Technical Report No. I , Constant Level Balloon,
April 1, 1948
14. Athelstan F. Spilhaus, C.S. Schneider, C.B. Moore, “Controlled-Altitude
Free Balloons,” Journal of Meteorology, Vol. 5 , August 1948
15. New York University, Progress Report No. 6, Constant Level Balloon,
Section 11, June 1947
16. New York University, Special Report No. 1, Constant Level Balloon, May
1947
17. Personal Journal of Albert P. Crary
18. New York University, Progress Report [No. 71, Constant Level Balloon,
Section 11, July 1947
19. New York University, Progress Report No. 4, Radio Transmitting,
Receiving and Recording Systemfor Constant Level Balloon, [Section
I], April 2, 1947
20. Interview, Col Jeffrey Butler and 1st Lt James McAndrew with Professor
Charles B. Moore, June 8, 1994
21. Report, Holloman AFB, “Progress Summary Report on U.S.A.F. Guided
Missile Test Activities,” August 1, 1948
22. Interview, [Col Jeffrey Butler and 1st Lt James McAndrew with] Col
Albert C.Trakowski, USAF (Ret., June 29, 1994
23. Report, Cambridge Field Station, Air Materiel Command, “Review of Air
Materiel Command Geophysical Activities by Brigadier General D.N.
Yates, and Staff, of the Air Weather Service,” February 10, 1949
24. New York University, Constant Level Balloons, Section 2, Operations,
January 31, 1949
25. Combined History, 509th Bomb Group and Roswell Army Airfield,
September 1-30, 1947

Attachment to Colonel Weaver’s Report of Air Force Research:

33. Mensuration Working Paper, with Drawing and Photo

xiv
 Photograph Section

General Carl A. Spaatz

Lt Gen Hoyt S. Vandenberg
General Nathan F. Twining
Maj Gen Curtis E. LeMay and Brig Gen Roger M. Ramey
Col William H. Blanchard
Maj Gen Clements McMullen
Brig Gen Donald N. Yates
Albert P. Crary and Phil Chantz
Dr. W. Maurice Ewing and Albert P. Crary
Dr. Althelstan F. Spilhaus and Col Marcellus Duffy
Capt Albert C. Trakowski and Dr. James Peoples
Charles B. Moore
U.S. Army GR-3 Sound Ranging Set, TNT Detonation, and Project MOGULPT Boat
Project MOGULNeoprene Balloons and Standard Meteorological Weather Balloons
MOGULBalloon Train, AN/FMQ-1 Radiosonde ReceiverRecorder, and Project MOGUL
Microphones
Polyethylene Balloons
Project MOGULBalloons
Seyfang Laboratory Balloons
Project MOGULBalloon Train Components and Debris Recovered
Heights of Familiar Architectural Structures Relative to the Length of a Project MOGUL
Balloon Train
Map of New Mexico

xv
 INTRODUCTION

Throughout the latter half of the twentieth century the subject of Unidentified Flying
Objects (UFOs) has evoked strong opinions and emotions. For some, the belief in or study
of UFOs has assumed the dimensions of a religious quest. Others remain nonbelievers or
at least skeptical of the existence of alien beings and elusive vehicles which never quite
seem to manifest themselves. Regardless of one’s conviction, nowhere has the debate
about UFOs been more spirited than over the events that unfolded near the small New
Mexico city of Roswell in the summer of 1947. Popularly known as the Roswell Incident,
this event has become the most celebrated UFO encounter of all time and has stimulated
enthusiasts like none other. Numerous witnesses, including former military personnel and
respectable members of the local community, have come forward with tales of humanoid
beings, alien technologies, and government cover-ups that have caused even the most
skeptical observer to pause and take notice. Inevitably these stories coming from the
desert have spawned countless articles, books, films, and even museums claiming to have
proof that visitors had come from outer space.

In February 1994, the Air Force was informed that the General Accounting Office (GAO),
an investigative agency of Congress, planned a formal audit to ascertain “the facts
regarding the reported crash of an UFO in 1949 [1947] at Roswell, New Mexico.”’ This
task was delegated to numerous agencies, but the focus was on the U.S. Air Force, the
agency most often accused of hiding information and records on Roswell. The Presidential
Science Advisor had also expressed an interest in the investigation. Thereupon, the
Secretary of the Air Force directed that a complete records search identify, locate, and
examine any and all information available on this subject. From the outset there was no
predisposition to refute or overlook any information. Moreover, if any of the information
discovered was under security classification, it was to be declassified, and if active or
former Air Force officials had been sworn to a secrecy oath, they were to be freed from
it. In short, the objective was to tell the Congress, and the American people, everything
the Air Force knew about the Roswell claims.

Subsequently, researchers conducted an extensive search of Air Force archives, record

centers, and scientific facilities. Seeking information that might help to explain peculiar
tales of odd wreckage and alien bodies, the researchers reviewed a monumental number

1 . Memo, Marcia J. Van Note, DODIIG, for Distribution, subj: General Accounting Office (GAO)
Letter Dated February 9, 1944 . . ., Feb 23, 1994.

1
of documents concerning a variety of events, including aircraft crashes, errant missile
tests, and nuclear mishaps.

The researchers reported to the Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force
(SAF/AA), the office responsible for both Air Force records and security policy oversight.
Within SAF/AA, the tasking fell to the Director of Security and Special Program
Oversight and its specialized subunit, the Declassification and Review Team. This team,
comprised entirely of Reservists, was well versed in the Air Force’s records system and
its complex declassification procedures. Previously, Declassification and Review Team
members demonstrated their expertise and effectiveness by declassifying millions of pages
of Southeast Asian War and Prisoner of War-Missing in Action records.

As this study makes abundantly clear, the Declassification and Review Team found no
evidence of any extraterrestrial craft or alien flight crew. In fact, what they did find had
been declassified for more than twenty years-a shadowy, formerly Top Secret project,
code-named MOGUL.

Project MOGULresulted from two important post-World War I1 priorities set by the
Commanding General of the Army Air Forces, Henry H. “Hap” Arnold. These were to
continue the cooperative wartime relationship between civilian research institutions and
the military, and to maintain America’s technological superiority, especially with respect
to guarding against a bolt from the blue-in other words, a devastating surprise attack.
MOGULaddressed both of these concerns. Developed partly under contract with leading
scientific institutions-such as New York University (NYU), Woods Hole Oceanographic
Institution, Columbia University, and the University of California at Los Angeles-
MOGUL’Sobjective was to develop a long-range system capable of detecting Soviet
nuclear detonations and ballistic missile launches.

Army Air Forces officials assembled an expert group of military and civilian scientists
to carry out the project. The group included Dr. W. Maurice Ewing of Columbia
University, a preeminent geophysicist and oceanographer; Dr. Athelstan F. Spilhaus, the
Director of Research at NYU who later advised five presidents on scientific and cultural
matters; Dr. James Peoples, the Air Force’s civilian project scientist and later editor of
the Journal of Geophysical Research; Albert P. Crary, also a civilian Air Force scientist,
known for significant contributions to Antarctic research; and Charles B. Moore, Project
Engineer at NYU and an atmospheric physicist who pioneered the use of giant plastic
research balloons still widely used today. Col. Marcellus Duffy, a respected Air Force
pilot and scientific administrator, led the project. Capt. Albert C. Trakowski, a young
Massachusetts Institute of Technology graduate, followed Duffy in the leadership role.

Determining whether the Soviets were testing nuclear devices was of the highest national
priority; it demanded the utmost secrecy if the information gained was to be useful. When
the Soviets exploded their first atomic device in August 1949, the experimental Project
MOGULwas not in operation. However, the explosion was detected by a specially
equipped Air Force B-29 aircraft. Accordingly, MOGULwas conducted under stringent
security-secluded laboratories, code words, maximum security clearances, and strictest
enforcement of need-to-know rules. Nevertheless, while the nature of the project remained

2
shrouded in secrecy, some of its operations obviously could not. The deployment of giant
trains of balloons-over thirty research balloons and experimental sensors strung together
and stretching more than 600 feet-could be neither disguised nor hidden from the public.
Moreover, operational necessity required that these balloons be launched during daylight
hours. It was therefore not surprising that these balloons were often mistaken for UFOs.
In fact, MOGULrecovery crews often listened to broadcasts of UFO reports to assist them
in their tracking operations. Additionally, the balloons were unsteerable, leading to such
amusing events as the one reported by the New York Times in which a secret MOGUL
balloon “floated blithely over the rooftops of Flatbush . . . causing general public
excitement . . . before it came to rest on top of a [Brooklyn] tavern.”’ In another episode,
MOGULballoon recovery technicians directed a B-17 bomber, which was tracking one
of the tests, to buzz and scare off a curious oil rig crew that was about to “capture” a
balloon train that had fallen near Roswell. The ruse worked. However, too much activity
was going on for the project to remain completely hidden. A MOGULproject officer later
noted, “It was like having an elephant in your backyard . . . and hoping no one would
n ~ t i c e . ”These
~ occurrences were typical, leading the recovery crews to describe
themselves as Bulloonatics, due to the predicaments in which the wandering balloons
sometimes placed them, but the information the balloons were attempting to obtain was
vital.

To attempt to limit unauthorized disclosure, the Air Force employed a security mechanism
known as compartmentation.Compartmentation controlled access to classified information
by dispersing portions of the research among several facilities and institutions. Each
participating entity received only enough information necessary to accomplish its assigned
tasks. In the case of MOGUL,only a small circle of Air Force officers received the
intimate details that linked together these unrelated research projects. The use of
compartmentation along with strict enforcement of the need to know enabled MOGULto
remain a secret-despite its obvious security difficulties-and to remain unevaluated for
many years as the cause of the Roswell Incident.

The issue of compartmentation was significant because some UFO researchers assert that
the persons who recovered the MOGULequipment, members of the 509th Bombardment
Group stationed at Roswell Army Airfield, should have been able to recognize the debris
collected at the crash site as that of a research balloon. Although members of the 509th
possessed high-level clearances, they were not privy to the existence of MOGUL;their job
was to deliver nuclear weapons, not to detect them. The unusual combination of
experimental equipment did not encourage easy identification that undoubtedly left some
members of the 509th with unanswered questions. Some UFO enthusiasts have
manipulated these unanswered questions to support their flyingTsaucerrecovery scenario,
while eagerly supplying unfounded explanations of extraterresti-ialvisitation and cosmic
conspiracy. Additionally, many claims of a flying saucer crash at Roswell rest on the
description of debris collected at the Foster ranch site. UFO researchers, including those

2. New York Times, “Balloon Staggers Down to Brooklyn Tavern, Hooks Itself to Roof and Upsets
Decorum,” Oct 1, 1948.
3. New York Times, “Wreckage of a ‘Spaceship’: Of This Earth (and U.S.),” Sep 18, 1994.

3
who are said to have known all about Mocut, apparently did not compare the
descriptions of the.suspect debris with that of the components of a Project MOGUL
balloon train. MOCUL reports and documents that contain descriptions, illustrations, and
photographs have been publicly available for at least twenty years. Had the researchers
even a cursory comparison, they would have found that the materials were
"ottrpt"t"a
suspiciously similar; detailed examination would have shown them to be one and the
same. In the final analysis, it appeils these individuals have pursued the convenient red
herring provided by Roswell Army Airfield, while the real explanation lay just over the
Sacramento Mountains at the MOCUT- launch site in Alamogordo.

This report explains the events that transpired in and near Roswell, New Mexico, in the
summer of 1947. It is based on written documentation and first-hand accounts of
participants, all of which are provided here in their entirety. While these answers are not
as titiliating as tales of unearthly craft and creatures, it is a fascinating story nonetheless.

JAMES MCANDREW, 1ST LT, USAFR

Declassification and Review Officer
SAF/AAZD

4
who are said to have known all about MOGUL, apparently did not compare the
descriptions of the suspect debris with that of the components of a Project MOGUL
balloon train. MOGULreports and documents that contain descriptions, illustrations, and
photographs have been publicly available for at least twenty years. Had the researchers
completed even a cursory comparison, they would have found that the materials were
suspiciously similar; detailed examination would have shown them to be one and the
same. In the final analysis, it appears these individuals have pursued the convenient red
herring provided by Roswell Army Airfield, while the real explanation lay just over the
Sacramento Mountains at the MOGULlaunch site in Alamogordo.

This report explains the events that transpired in and near Roswell, New Mexico, in the
summer of 1947. It is based on written documentation and first-hand accounts of
participants, all of which are provided here in their entirety. While these answers are not
as titillating as tales of unearthly craft and creatures, it is a fascinating story nonetheless.

JAMES McANDREW, 1ST LT, USAFR

Declassification and Review Officer
SAFIAAZD

4
 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC 20330-1000

OFFICE O F THE LECRETARV

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE

FROM: SAF/AAZ
1720 Air Force Pentagon
Washington, DC 20330- 1720

SUBJECT: Report of Air Force Research Regarding the "Roswell Incident"

Attached is a report prepared in support of a General Accounting Office (GAO)audit that

is seeking to identifj information concerning the "Roswell Incident." The report documents the
considerable effort expended by numerous Air Force offices and personnel in this matter.

The Air Force efforts did not identifj any indication that the "Roswell Incident" was any
type of extraterrestrial event or that the Air Force has engaged in a 47 year conspiracy or "cover-
up" of information relating to it. Therefore, it is assumed that pro-UFO groups will strongly
object to the attached report and denounce it as either shortsighted or a continuation of the
"cover-up" conspiracy. Nevertheless, the attached report is a good faith effort and the first time
any agency of the government has positively responded officially to the ever-dating claims
surrounding the Roswell matter.

Program Oversight

Attachment:
Report of Research Regarding
the "Roswell Incident", 27 Jul94

5
REPORT OF AIR FORCE RESEARCH
REGARDING THE
"ROSWELL INCIDENT"

JULY 1994
REPORT OF AIR FORCE RESEARCH
REGARDING THE
"ROSWELL INCIDENT"

JULY 1994
 REPORT OF AIR FORCE RESEARCH REGARDING
THE ”ROSWELL INCIDENT”

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The “Roswell Incident” refers to an event that supposedly happened in July, 1947,
wherein the Army Air Forces (AAF)allegedly recovered remains of a crashed
“flying disc” near Roswell, New Mexico. In February, 1994,the General Account-
ing Office (GAO), acting on the request of a New Mexico Congressman, initiated
an audit to attempt to locate records of such an incident and to determine if
records regarding it were properly handled. Although the GAO effort was to look
at a number of government agencies, the apparent focus was on the United States
Air Force (USAF). SAF/AAZ, as the Central Point of Contact for the GAO in this
matter, initiated a systematic search of current Air Force offices as well as
numerous archives and records centers that might help explain this matter.
Research revealed that the “Roswell Incident” was not even considered a UFO
event until the 1978-1980 time frame. Prior to that, the incident was dismissed
because the AAF originally identified the debris recovered as being that of a
weather balloon. Subsequently, various authors wrote a number of books claiming
that not only was debris from an alien spacecraft recovered, but also the bodies
of the craft’s alien occupants. These claims continue to evolve today and the Air
Force is now routinely accused of engaging in a “cover-upNof this supposed
event.

The research located no records at existing Air Force offices that indicated any
cover-up” by the USAF or any indication of such a recovery. Consequently,
11

efforts were intensified by Air Force researchers at numerous locations where

records for the period in question were stored. The records reviewed did not
reveal any increase in operations, security, or any other activity in July, 1947,that
indicated any such unusual event may have occurred. Records were located and
thoroughly explored concerning a then-Top Secret balloon project, designed to
attempt to monitor Soviet nuclear tests, known as Project MOGUL.Additionally,
several surviving project personnel were located and interviewed, as was the only
surviving person who recovered debris from the original Roswell site in 1947 and
the former officer who initially identified the wreckage as a balloon. Comparison
of all information ‘developedor obtained indicated that the material recovered
near Roswell was consistent with a balloon device and most likely from one of
the MOGUL balloons that had not been previously recovered. Air Force research
efforts did not disclose any records of the recovery of any “alien” bodies or
extraterrestrial materials.

9
USAF in September, 1947, the USAF inherited equipment, personnel, records,
policies, and procedures from the AAF.In this particular case, the Air Force also
inherited the allegation that it had “covered up” the ”Roswell Incident” and has
continued to do so for the next 47 years.

Within the Air Force, the Office of the Administrative Assistant to the Secretary
of the Air Force (SAF/AA) is responsible both for information management
procedures ( S A F / A A I ) and security policy and oversight ( S A F / A A Z ) . Because of
this organization, SAF/AA was the logical entity to assist the GAO in its audit,
and S A F / A A Z was officially named as the Central Point of Contact for this
endeavor (Atch 4).Subsequently, the then-Administrative Assistant, Mr. Robert
J. McCormick, issued a tasking memorandum dated March 1,1994 (Atch 5), to a
number of current Air Staff and Secretariat offices that might possibly have
records related to such an incident if, indeed, something had actually occurred.
This search for records was purposely limited to Air Force records and systems
since:

(a) The Air Force had no authority to compel other agencies to review their
records;
(b) The Air Force would have no way to monitor the completeness of their
efforts if they did; and
(c) the overall effort was the task and responsibility of the GAO-not the Air
Force.

During the in-briefing process with GAO, it was learned that this audit was,
indeed, generated at the specific request of Congressman Steven Schiff of New
Mexico. Earlier, Congressman Schiff had written to the Department of Defense
Legislative Liaison Office for information on the ”Roswell Incident” and had been
advised that it was part of the former UFO “Project Bluebook” that had previ-
ously been turned over to NARA by the Air Force. Congressman Schiff subse-
quently learned from NARA that, although they did, indeed, have the “Bluebook”
materials, the “Roswell Incident’’ was not part of that report. Congressman Schiff,
apparently perceiving that he had been ”stonewalled” by the DoD, then generated
the request for the aforementioned audit.

It is within this context that the following research and assistance efforts were
conducted in support of the GAO. This report is intended to stand as the final
official Air Force response regarding this matter.

THE ”ROSWELL INCIDENT‘‘-WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY REPORTED IN 1947

The modern preoccupation with what ultimately came to be called Unidentified
Flying Objects (UFOs) actually began in June, 1947. Although some pro-UFO
researchers argue that sightings of UFOs go back to Biblical times, most research-
ers will not dispute that anything in UFO history can compare with the phenome-
non that began in 1947.What was later characterized as “the UFO Wave of 1947”
began with 16 alleged sightings that occurred between May 17 and July 12,1947

11
(although some researchers claim there were as many as 800 sightings during that
period). Interestingly, the ”Roswell Incident” was not considered one of these
1947 events until the 1978-1980 time frame. There is no dispute, however, that
something happened near Roswell in July, 1947, since it was reported in a number
of contemporary newspaper articles, the most famous of which were the July 8
and July 9 editions of the Roswell Daily Record. The July 8 edition reported ”RAAF
Captures Flying Saucer On Ranch In Roswell Region,” while the next day‘s
edition reported, ”Ramey Empties Roswell Saucer” and ”Harassed Rancher Who
Located ’Saucer’ Sorry He Told About It.”

The first story reported that the Intelligence Officer of the 509th Bomb Group,
stationed at Roswell Army Air Field, Major Jesse A. Marcel, had recovered a
“flying disc” from the range lands of an unidentified rancher in the vicinity of
Roswell and that the disc had been ”flown to higher headquarters.” That same
story also reported that a Roswell couple claimed to have seen a large unidenti-
fied object fly by their home on July 2,1947.

The July 9 edition of the paper noted that Brigadier General Roger Ramey,
Commander of the Eighth Air Force at Forth Worth, Texas, stated that upon
examination the debris recovered by Marcel was determined to be a weather
balloon. The wreckage was described as a ”. . . bundle of tinfoil, broken wood
beams, and rubber remnants of a balloon. . . .” The additional story of the
“harassed rancher” identified him as W.W. Brazel of Lincoln County, New
Mexico. He claimed that he and his son, Vernon, found the material on June 14,
1947, when they ”came upon a large area of bright wreckage made up of rubber
strips, tinfoil, a rather tough paper, and sticks.” He picked up some of the debris
on July 4 and ”. . . the next day he first heard about the flying discs and won-
dered if what he had found might have been the remnants of one of these.”
Brazel subsequently went to Roswell on July 7 and contacted the Sheriff, who
apparently notified Major Marcel. Major Marcel and ”a man in plain clothes” then
accompanied Brazel home to pick up the rest of the pieces. The article further
related that Brazel thought that the material:

. . . might have been as large as a table top. The balloon which held
it up, if that is how it worked, must have been about 12 feet long,
he felt, measuring the distance by the size of the room in which he
sat. The rubber was smoky gray in color and scattered over an area
about 200 yards in diameter. When the debris was gathered up the
tinfoil, paper, tape, and sticks made a bundle about three feet long
and 7 or 8 inches thick, while the rubber made a bundle about 18
or 20 inches long and about 8 inches thick. In all, he estimated, the
entire lot would have weighed maybe five pounds. There was no
sign of any metal in the area which might have been used for an
engine and no sign of any propellers of any kind. Although at least
one paper fin had been glued onto some of the tinfoil. There were
no words to be found anywhere on the instrument although there
were letters on some of the parts. Considerable scotch tape and

12
 some tape with flowers printed upon it had been used in the
construction. No string or wire were to be found but there were
some eyelets in the paper to indicate that some sort of attachment
may have been used. Braze1 said that he had previously found two
weather balloons on the ranch, but .that what he found this time did
not in any way resemble either of these.

EVOLUTION OF THE EVENT FROM 1947 TO THE PRESENT

General Ramey’s press conference and rancher Brazel’s statement effectively

ended this as a UFO-related matter until 1978, although some UFO researchers
argue that there were several obtuse references to it in 1950’s-era literature.
Roswell, for example, is not referred to in the official USAF investigation of UFOs
reported in Project Bluebook or its predecessors, Project Sign and Project Grudge,
which ran from 1948-1969 (which Congressman Schiff subsequently learned when
he made his original inquiry).

In 1978, an article appeared in a tabloid newspaper, the National Enquirer, which

reported the former intelligence officer, Marcel, claimed that he had recovered
UFO debris near Roswell in 1947. Also in 1978, a UFO researcher, Stanton
Friedman, met with Marcel and began investigating the claims that the material
Marcel handled was from a crashed UFO. Similarly, two authors, William L.
Moore and Charles Berlitz, also engaged in research which led them to publish
a book, The Roswell Incident, in 1980. In this book they reported they interviewed
a number of persons who claimed to have been present at Roswell in 1947 and
professed to be either firsthand or secondhand witnesses to strange events that
supposedly occurred. Since 1978-1980, other UFO researchers, most notably
Donald Schmitt and Kevin Randle, claim to have located and interviewed even
more persons with supposed knowledge of unusual happenings at Roswell. These
included both civilian and former military persons.

Additionally, the Robert Stack-hosted television show ”Unsolved Mysteries”

devoted a large portion of one show to a “re-creation” of the supposed Roswell
events. Numerous other television shows have done likewise, particularly during
the last several years, and a made-for-TV movie on the subject is due to be
released this summer. The overall thrust of these articles, books, and shows is that
the “Roswell Incident” was actually the crash of a craft from another world, the
US Government recovered it, and has been “covering up” this fact from the
American public since 1947, using a combination of disinformation, ridicule, and
threats of bodily harm, to do so. Generally, the USAF bears the brunt of these
accusations.

From the rather benign description of the “event” and the recovery of some
material as described in the original newspaper accounts, the ”Roswell Incident”
has since grown to mythical (if not mystical) proportions in the eyes and minds
of some researchers, portions of the media and at least part of the American
public. There are also now several major variations of the “Roswell story.’‘ For

13
example, it was originally reported that there was only recovery of debris from
one site. This has since grown from a minimal amount of debris recovered from
a small area to airplane loads of debris from multiple huge "debris fields."
Likewise, the relatively simple description of sticks, paper, tape and tinfoil has
since grown to exotic metals with hieroglyphics and fiber optic-like materials.
Most versions now claim that there were two crash sites where debris was
recovered, and at the second site, alleged bodies of extraterrestrial aliens were
supposedly retrieved. The number of these "alien bodies" recovered also varied.
These claims are further complicated by the fact that UFO researchers are not in
agreement among themselves as to exactly where these recovery sites were
located or even the dates of the alleged crash(es).Consistently, however, the AAF
was accused of securing these sites, recovering all the material therefrom, keeping
locals away, and returning the recovered wreckage (and bodies) to Roswell under
extremely tight security for further processing and later exploitation.

Once back at Roswell. Army Air Field, it is generally alleged that special measures
were taken to notify higher headquarters and arrangements made to have
recovered materials shipped to other locations for analysis. These locations
include Fort Worth, Texas, the home of the Eighth Air Force Headquarters;
possibly Sandia Base (now Kirtland AFB), New Mexico; possibly Andrews Army
Air Field, Maryland; and always to Wright Field, now known as Wright-Patterson
AFB, Ohio. The latter location was the home of "T-2" which later became known
as the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) and the Air Materiel Command
(AMC), and would, in fact, be a logical location to study unknown materials from
whatever origin. Most of the Roswell stories that contain the recovery of alien
bodies also show them being shipped to Wright Field. Once the material and
bodies were dispersed for further analysis and /or exploitation, the government
in general, and the Army Air Forces in particular, engaged in covering up all
information relating to the alleged crash and recovery, including the use of
security oaths to military persons and the use of coercion (including alleged death
threats) to others. This, as theorized by some UFO researchers, has allowed the
government to keep the fact that there is intelligent extraterrestrial life from the
American public for 47 years. It also supposedly allowed the US Government to
exploit recovered extraterrestrialmaterials by reverse engineering them, ultimately
providing such things as fiber optic and stealth technology. The "death threats,"
oaths, and other forms of coercion alleged to have been meted out by the AAF
personnel to keep people from talking have apparently not been very effective,
as several hundred people are claimed to have come forward (without harm) with
some knowledge of the "Roswell Incident" during interviews with nongovern-
ment researchers and the media.

Adding some measure of credibility to the claims that have arisen since 1978 is
the apparent depth of research of some of the authors and the extent of their
efforts. Their claims are lessened somewhat, however, by the fact that almost all
their information came from verbal reports many years after the alleged incident
occurred. Many of the persons interviewed were, in fact, stationed at, or lived
near Roswell during the time in question, and a number of them claim military
14
service. Most, however, related their stories in their older years, well after the fact.
In other cases, the information provided is second or thirdhand, having been
passed through a friend or relative after the principal had died. What is uniquely
lacking in the entire exploration and exploitation of the "Roswell Incident" is
official positive documentary or physical evidence of any kind that supports the
claims of those who allege that something unusual happened. Conversely, there
has never been any previous documentary evidence produced by those who
would debunk the incident to show that something did not happen; although
logic dictates that bureaucracies do not spend time documenting nonevents.

SEARCH STRATEGY AND METHODOLOGY

To insure senior Air Force leadership that there were no hidden or overlooked
files that might relate to the "Roswell Incident," and to provide the GAO with the
best and most complete information available, S A l ? / A A Z constructed a strategy
based on direct tasking from the Office of the Secretary, to elicit information from
those functional offices and organizations where such information might logically
be contained. This included directing searches at current offices where special or
unusual projects might be carried out, as well as historical organizations, archives,
and records centers over which the Air Force exerted some degree of control.
Researchers did not, however, go to the US Army to review historical records in
areas such as missile launches from White Sands, or to the Department of Energy
to determine if its forerunner, the Atomic Energy Commission, had any records
of nuclear-related incidents that might have occurred at or near Roswell in 1947.
To do so would have encroached on GAOs charter in this matter. What Air Force
researchers did do, however, was to search for records still under Air Force
control pertaining to these subject areas.

In order to determine parameters for the most productive search of records, a

review was first conducted of the major works regarding the "Roswell Incident"
available in the popular literature. These works included: The Roswell Incident
(1980) by William Moore and Charles Berlitz; "Crashed Saucers: Evidence in
Search of Proof" (1985) by Moore; The UFO Crash at Roswell (1991) by Kevin
Randle and Donald Schmitt; The Truth About the UFO Crash at Roswell(1994),also
by Randle and Schmitt; The Roswell Report: A Historical Perspective (1991),George
M. Eberhart, editor; "The Roswell Events" (1993)compiled by Fred Whiting; Crash
at Corona (1992) by Stanton T. Friedman and Don Berliner; and numerous other
articles written by a combination of the above and other researchers. Collectively,
the above represent the "pro" UFO writers who allege that the government is
engaged in a conspiracy. There are no specific books written entirely on the theme
that nothing happened at Roswell. However, Curtis Peebles in Watch the Skies!
(1994) discussed the development of the UFO story and growth of subsequent
claims as a phenomenon. There has also been serious research as well as a
number of detailed articles written by so-called "debunkers" of Roswell and other
incidents, most notably Philip J. Klass, who writes The Skeptic's UFO Newsletter,
and Robert Todd, a private researcher. The concerns and claims of all the above
authors and others were considered in conducting the USAF records search.

15
It was also decided, particularly after a review of the above popular literature,
that no specific attempt would be made to try to refute, point by point, the
numerous claims made in the various publications. Many of these claims appear
to be hearsay, undocumented, taken out of context, self-serving, or otherwise
dubious. Additionally, many of the above authors are not even in agreement over
various claims. Most notable of the confusing and now ever-changing claims is
the controversy over the date@)of the alleged incident, the exact location(s) of the
purported debris, and the extent of the wreckage. Such discrepancies in claims
made the search much more difficult by greatly expanding the volume of records
that had to be searched.

An example of trying to deal with questionable claims is illustrated by the

following example: One of the popular books mentioned that was reviewed
claimed that the writers had submitted the names and serial numbers of ”over
two dozen” personnel stationed at Roswell in July, 1947, to the Veterans Adminis-
tration and the Defense Department to confirm their military service. They then
listed eleven of these persons by name and asked the question: “Why does neither
the Defense Department nor the Veteran’s Administration have records of any of
these men when we can document that each served at Roswell Army Air Field.”
That claim sounded serious so SAF/AAZD was tasked to check these eleven
names in the Personnel Records Center in St. Louis. Using only the names (since
the authors did not list the serial numbers) the researcher quickly found records
readily identifiable with eight of these persons. The other three had such common
names that there could have been multiple possibilities. Interestingly, one of the
listed ”missing” persons had a casualty report in his records reflecting that he
died in 1951, while the writers claimed to have interviewed him (or a person of
the exact same name) in 1990.

While the historical document search was in progress, it was decided to attempt
to locate and interview several persons identified as still living who could
possibly answer questions generated by the research. This had never been
officially done before, although most of the persons contacted reported that they
had also been contacted in the past by some of the listed authors or other private
researchers. In order to counter possible future arguments that the persons
interviewed were still ”covering up” material because of prior security oaths, the
interviewees were provided with authorization from either the Secretary of the
Air Force or the Senior Security Official of the Air Force that would officially
allow discussion of classified information, if applicable, or free them from any
prior restriction in discussing the matter, if such existed. Again, the focus was on
interviewing persons that could address specific issues raised by research and no
consideration was given to try and locate every alleged witness claimed to have
been contacted by the various authors. For example, one of the interviewees
thought vital to obtain an official signed, sworn statement from was Sheridan
Cavitt, Lt Col, USAF (Retired), who is the last living member of the three persons
universally acknowledged to have recovered material from the Foster Ranch.
Others were also interviewed as information developed (discussed in detail later).
Additionally, in some cases survivors of deceased persons were also contacted in

16
an attempt to locate various records thought to have been in the custody of the
deceased.

Even though Air Force research originally started in January, 1994, the first official
Air Force-wide tasking was directed by the March 1, 1994, memorandum from
SAF/AA (Atch 5) and was addressed to those current Air Staff elements that
would be the likely repository for any records, particularly if there was anything
of an extraordinary nature involved. This meant that the search was not limited
to unclassified materials, but also would include records of the highest classifica-
tion and compartmentation.

The specific Air Staff /Secretariat offices queried included the following:

(a) SAF/AAI, Directorate of Information Management

(b) SAF/AQL, Directorate of Electronics and Special Programs
(c) AF/SE, Air Force Safety
(d) AF/HO, Air Force Historian
(e) AF/IN, Air Force Intelligence [including the Air Force Intelligence Agency
(AFIA) and the National Air Intelligence Center (NAIC)]
(f) AF/XOW, Directorate of Weather
(g) [added later] The Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI)

In addition to the above Air Staff and Secretariat offices, SAF/AAZalso reviewed
appropriate classified records for any tie-in to this matter. With regards to highly
classified records, it should be noted that any programs that employ enhanced
security measures or controls are known as a Special Access Programs (SAPs).
The authority for such programs comes from Executive Order 12356 and flows
from the Department of Defense to the Services via DoD Directive 5205.7. These
programs are implemented in the Air Force by Policy Directive 16-7 and Air
Force Instruction 16-701. These directives contain detailed requirements for
controlling and reporting, in a very strict manner, all SAPs. This includes a report
from the Secretary of the Air Force to the Secretary of Defense (and ultimately to
Congress) on all SAPs submitted for approval, and a certification that there are
no "SAP-like" programs being operated. These reporting requirements are
stipulated in public law.

It followed that if the Air Force had recovered some type of extraterrestrial
spacecraft and/or bodies and was exploiting this for scientific and technology
purposes, then such a program would be operated as a Special Access Program
(SAP). SAF/AAZ, the Central Office for all Air Force SAPs, has knowledge of,
and security oversight over, all SAPs. SAF/AAZ categorically stated that no such
SAP or SAPs exist that pertain to extraterrestrial spacecraft/aliens.

Likewise, the Secretary of the Air Force and the Chief of Staff, who head the
Special Program Oversight Committee which oversees all sensitive programs in
the Air Force, had no knowledge of the existence of any such program involving,
or relating to, the events at Roswell or the alleged technology that supposedly

17
resulted therefrom. Besides the obvious irregularity and illegality of keeping such
information from the most senior Air Force officials, it would also be illogical,
since these officials are responsible for obtaining funding for operations, research,
development, and security. Without funding, such a program, operation, or
organization could not exist. Even to keep such a fact “covered-up” in some sort
of passive ’‘caretaker status” would involve money. More importantly, it would
involve people and create paperwork.

The aforementioned March 1,1994, SAF/AA tasking generated negative responses

(Atchs 6-12) from all recipients; i.e., all offices reported that they had no informa-
tion that would explain the incident. Consequently, these negative responses led
to an increase in the already ongoing historical research at records centers and
archives.

The extensive archival and records center search was systematically carried out
by the SAF/AAZD Declassification Review Team. This team is composed entirely
of Air Force Reserve personnel who have extensive training and experience in
large scale review of records. (Previous efforts include the Southeast Asia
Declassification Review, declassification of POW /MIA records, and the review of
the Gulf War Air Power Survey records.) The team members all had the requisite
security clearances for classified information and had the authority of the
Secretary of the Air Force to declassify any classified record they found that might
be related to Roswell. SAF/AAZD conducted reviews at a number of locations,
including the National Archives in Washington, DC; the National Personnel
Records Center, St. Louis, MO; the National Archives, Suitland MD; the National
Records Center, Suitland, MD; Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC;
Federal Records Center, Ft Worth, TX; the INSCOM Archives, Fort Meade, MD;
National Air and Space Museum, Washington, DC; Air Force Historical Research
Agency, Maxwell AFB, AL; Center for Air Force History, Bolling AFB, DC;
Phillips Laboratory, Hanscom AFB, MA and Kirtland AFB, NM; Rome Laboratory,
Griffiss AFB, NY; and the Library of Congress, Washington, DC.

A listing of the specific record areas searched is appended as Atch 13. The areas
included all those subject areas logically believed to possibly contain any
reference to activities at Roswell Army Air Field during the period of time in
question. It is anticipated that detractors from this effort will complain that “they
did not search record group x, box y, or reel z, etc.; that’s where the real records
are!” Such complaints are unavoidable and there is no possible way that the
millions of records under Air Force control could be searched page by page. The
team endeavored to make logical searches in those places where records would
likely be found. They were assisted in this task by archivists, historians, and
records management specialists, including experienced persons who have
continually worked in Army and Air Force records systems since 1943. The team
also searched some record areas that were recommended by serious private
researchers such as Robert Todd, who had independently obtained almost
encyclopedic knowledge of the complexities of Air Force records systems,
particularly those related to this subject area.

18
Not surprisingly, the research team found the usual number of problems in many
of the records centers (particularly St. Louis) with misfiling, lost or misplaced
documents, mismarking of documents, or the breaking up of record groups over
the years and refiling in different systems. This included, for example, a small
amount of missing ”decimal files” from the 509th Bomb Group at Roswell that
covered the years 1945-1949, that were marked on the index as ”destroyed.” The
researchers noted that there was no pattern to any anomalies found and that most
discrepancies were minor and consistent with what they had found in the past on
similar projects.

WHAT THE ROSWELL INCIDENT WAS NOT

Before discussing specific positive results that these efforts revealed, it is first
appropriate to discuss those things, as indicated by information available to the
Air Force, that the ”Roswell Incident” was not:

An Airplane Crash
Of all the things that are documented and tracked within the Air Force, among
the most detailed and scrupulous are airplane crashes. In fact, records of air
crashes go back to the first years of military flight. Safety records and reports are
available for all crashes that involved serious damage, injury, death, or a
combination of these factors. These records also include incidents involving
experimental or classified aircraft. USAF records showed that between June 24,
1947, and July 28, 1947, there were five crashes in New Mexico alone, involving
A-26C, P-51N, C-82A, P-80A, and PQ-14B aircraft; however, none of these
occurred on the date@)in question nor in the area(s) in question.

One of the additional areas specifically set forth by GAO in its efforts was to deal
with how the Air Force (and others) specifically documented ”. . . weather balloon
, . . and other crash incidents.” In this area, the search efforts revealed that there
are no air safety records pertaining to weather balloon crashes (all weather
balloons ”crash sooner or later); however, there are provisions for generating
reports of ”crashes” as ground safety incidents in the unlikely chance that a
balloon injures someone or causes damage. Such records are only maintained for
five years.

A Missile Crash
A crashed or errant missile, usually described as a captured German V-2 or one
of its variants, is sometimes set forth as a possible explanation for the debris
recovered near Roswell. Since much of this testing done at nearby White Sands
was secret at the time, it would be logical to assume that the government would
handle any missile mishap under tight security, particularly if the mishap
occurred on private land. From the records reviewed by the Air Force, however,
there was nothing located to suggest that this was the case. Although the bulk of
remaining testing records are under the control of the US Army, the subject has
also been very well documented over the years within Air Force records. There
would be no reason to keep such information classified today. The USAF found

19
 no indicators or even hints that a missile was involved in this matter.

A Nuclear Accident
’ One of the areas considered was that whatever happened near Roswell may have
involved nuclear weapons. This was a logical area of concern since the 509th
Bomb Group was the only military unit in the world at the time that had access
to nuclear weapons. Again, reviews of available records gave no indication that
this was the case. A number of records still classified Top Secret and Secret-
Restricted Data having to do with nuclear weapons were located in the Federal
Records Center in St. Louis, MO. These records, which pertained to the 509th, had
nothing to do with any activities that could have been misinterpreted as the
“Roswell Incident.” Also, any records of a nuclear-related incident would have
been inherited by the Department of Energy (DOE), and, had one occurred, it is
likely DOE would have publicly reported it as part of its recent declassification
and public release efforts. There were no ancillary records in Air Force files to
indicate the potential existence of such records within DOE channels, however.

A n Extraterrestrial Craft
The Air Force research found absolutely no indication that what happened near
Roswell in 1947, involved any type of extraterrestrial spacecraft. This, of course,
is the crux of this entire matter. “Pro-UFO persons who obtain a copy of this
report, at this point, most probably begin the “cover-up is still on” claims.
Nevertheless, the research indicated absolutely no evidence of any kind that a
spaceship crashed near Roswell or that any alien occupants were recovered
therefrom, in some secret military operation or otherwise. This does not mean,
however, that the early Air Force was not concerned about UFOs. However, in
the early days, ”UFO meant Unidentified Flying Object, which literally translated
as some object in the air that was not readily identifiable. It did not mean, as the
term has evolved in today’s language, to equate to alien spaceships. Records from
the period reviewed by Air Force researchers, as well as those cited by the
authors mentioned before, do indicate that the USAF was seriously concerned
about the inability to adequately identify unknown flying objects reported in
American airspace. All the records, however, indicated that the focus of concern
was not on aliens, hostile or otherwise, but on the Soviet Union. Many documents
from that period speak to the possibility of developmental secret Soviet aircraft
overflying US airspace. This, of course, was of major concern to the fledgling
USAF, whose job it was to protect these same skies.

The research revealed only one official AAF document that indicated that there
was any activity of any type that pertained to UFOs and Roswell in July, 1947.
This was a small section of the July Historical Report for the 509th Bomb Group
and Roswell Army Air Field that stated: ”The Office of Public Information was
quite busy during the month answering inquiries on the ’flying disc,’ which was
reported to be in possession of the 509th Bomb Group. The object turned out to
be a radar tracking balloon” (included with Atch 11).Additionally, this history
showed that the 509th Commander, Colonel Blanchard, went on leave on July 8,
1947, which would be a somewhat unusual maneuver for a person involved in

20
the supposed first ever recovery of extraterrestrial materials. (Detractors claim
Blanchard did this as a ploy to elude the press and go to the scene to direct the
recovery operations.) The history and the morning reports also showed that the
subsequent activities at Roswell during the month were mostly mundane and not
indicative of any unusual high-level activity, expenditure of manpower, resources
or security.

Likewise, the researchers found no indication of heightened activity anywhere

else in the military hierarchy in the July, 1947, message traffic or orders (to
include classified traffic). There were rio indications and warnings, notice of alerts,
or a higher tempo of operational activity reported that would be logically
generated if an alien craft, whose intentions were unknown, entered US territory.
To believe that such operational and high-level security activity could be
conducted solely by relying on unsecured telecommunications or personal contact
without creating any records of such activity certainly stretches the imagination
of those who have served in the military who know that paperwork of some kind
is necessary to accomplish even emergency, highly classified, or sensitive tasks.

An example of activity sometimes cited by pro-UFO writers to illustrate the point

that something unusual was going on was the travel of Lt Gen Nathan Twining,
Commander of the Air Materiel Command, to New Mexico in July, 1947.
Actually, records were located indicating that Twining went to the Bomb
Commanders’ Course on July 8, along with a number of other general officers,
and requested orders to do so a month before, on June 5, 1947 (Atch 14).

Similarly, it has also been alleged that General Hoyt Vandenberg, Deputy Chief
of Staff at the time, had been involved directing activity regarding events at
Roswell. Activity reports (Atch 15), located in General Vandenberg’s personal
papers stored in the Library of Congress, did indicate that on July 7,he was busy
with a ”flying disc” incident; however this particular incident involved Ellington
Field, Texas and the Spokane (Washington) Depot. After much discussion and
information gathering on this incident, it was learned to be a hoax. There is no
similar mention of his personal interest or involvement in Roswell events except
in the newspapers.

The above are but two small examples that indicate that if some event happened
that was one of the ”watershed happenings” in human history, the US military
certainly reacted in an unconcerned and cavalier manner. In an actual case, the
military would have had to order thousands of soldiers and airman, not only at
Roswell but throughout the US, to act nonchalantly, pretend to conduct and
report business as usual, and generate absolutely no paperwork of a suspicious
nature, while simultaneously anticipating that twenty years or more into the
future people would have available a comprehensive Freedom of Information Act
that would give them great leeway to review and explore government documents.
The records indicate that none of this happened (or if it did, it was controlled by
a security system so efficient and tight that no one, US or otherwise, has been
able to duplicate it since. If such a system had been in effect at the time, it would

21
have also been used to protect our atomic secrets from the Soviets, which history
has showed obviously was not the case). The records reviewed confirmed that no
such sophisticated and efficient security system existed.

WHAT THE “ROSWLL INCIDENT” WAS

As previously discussed, what was originally reported to have been recovered
was a balloon of some sort, usually described as a ”weather balloon,” although
the majority of the wreckage that was ultimately displayed by General Ramey
and Major Marcel in the famous photos (Atch 16) in Fort Worth was that of a
radar target normally suspended from balloons. This radar target, discussed in
more detail later, was certainly consistent with the description of July 9 newspa-
per article which discussed “tinfoil, paper, tape, and sticks.” Additionally, the
description of the “flying disc” was consistent with a document routinely used
by most pro-UFO writers to indicate a conspiracy in progress-the telegram from
the Dallas FBI office of July 8,1947. This document quoted in part states: ”. . . The
disc is hexagonal in shape and was suspended from a balloon by a cable, which
balloon was approximately twenty feet in diameter. . . . the object found resem-
bles a high altitude weather balloon with a radar reflector. . . . disc and balloon
being transported . . . .”

Similarly, while conducting the popular literature review, one of the documents
reviewed was a paper entitled “The Roswell Events” edited by Fred Whiting and
sponsored by the Fund for UFO Research (FLJFOR). Although it was not the
original intention to comment on what commercial authors interpreted or claimed
that other persons supposedly said, this particular document was different
because it contained actual copies of apparently authentic sworn affidavits
received from a number of persons who claimed to have some knowledge of the
Roswell event. Although many of the persons who provided these affidavits to
the FUFOR researchers also expressed opinions that they thought there was
something extraterrestrial about this incident, a number of them actually
described materials that sounded suspiciously like wreckage from balloons. These
included the following:

Jesse A. Marcel, MD (son of the late Major Jesse Marcel; 11 years old at the time
of the incident). Affidavit dated May 6, 1991. ”. . . There were three categories of
debris: a thick, foil like metallic gray substance; a brittle, brownish-black plastic-
like material, like Bakelite; and there were fragments of what appeared to be I-
beams. On the inner surface of the I-beam, there appeared to be a type of writing.
This writing was a purple-violet hue, and it had an embossed appearance. The
figures were composed of curved, geometric shapes. It had no resemblance to
Russian, Japanese or any other foreign language. It resembled hieroglyphics, but
it had no animal-like characters. . . .”

Loretta Proctor (former neighbor of rancher W.W. Brazel). Affidavit dated May
5,1991. ”. . . Brazel came to my ranch and showed my husband and me a piece
of material he said came from a large pile of debris on the property he managed.

22
The piece he brought was brown in color, similar to plastic . . . . ‘Mac’ said the
other material on the property looked like aluminum foil. It was very flexible and
wouldn’t crush or burn. There was also something he described as tape which
had printing on it. The color of the printing was a kind of purple . . . .’’

Bessie Brazel Schreiber (daughter of W.W. Brazel; 14 years old at the time of the
incident). Affidavit dated September 22,1993. ”. . . The debris looked like pieces
of a large balloon which had burst. The pieces were small, the largest I remember
measuring about the same as the diameter of a basketball. Most of it was a kind
of double-sided material, foil-like on one side and rubber-like on the other. Both
sides were grayish silver in color, the foil more silvery than the rubber. Sticks, like
kite sticks, were attached to some of the pieces with a whitish tape. The tape was
about two or three inches wide and had flower-like designs on it. The ’flowers’
were faint, a variety of pastel colors, and reminded me of Japanese paintings in
which the flowers are not all connected. I do not recall any other types of material
or markings, nor do I remember seeing gouges in the ground or any other signs
that anything may have hit the ground hard. The foil-rubber material could not
be torn like ordinary aluminum foil can be tom...”

Sally Strickland Tadolini (neighbor of W.W. Brazel; nine years old in 1947).
Affidavit dated September 27, 1993. “. . . What Bill showed us was a piece of
what I still think as fabric. It was something like aluminum foil, something like
satin, something like well-tanned leather in its toughness, yet was not precisely
like any one of those materials. ...It was about the thickness of very fine kidskin
glove leather and a dull metallic grayish silver, one side slightly darker than the
other. I do not remember it having any design or embossing on it . . . .”

Robert R. Porter (B-29 flight Engineer stationed at Roswell in 1947). Affidavit

dated June 7,1991. ”. . . On this occasion, I was a member of the crew which flew
parts of what we were told was a flying saucer to Fort Worth. The people on
board included ...and Maj Jesse Marcel. Capt. William E. Anderson said it was
from a flying saucer. After we arrived, the material was transferred to a B-25. I
was told they were going to Wright Field in Dayton, Ohio. I was involved in
loading the B-29 with the material, which was wrapped in packages with
wrapping paper. One of the pieces was triangle-shaped, about 2 1/2 feet across
the bottom. The rest were in small packages, about the size of a shoe box, The
brown paper was held with tape. The material was extremely lightweight. When
I picked it up, it was just like picking up an empty package. We loaded the
triangle shaped package and three shoe box-sized packages into the plane. All of
the packages could have fit into the trunk of a car. . . . When we came back from
lunch, they told us they had transferred the material to a B-25. They told us the
material was a weather balloon, but I’m certain it wasn’t a weather balloon. . . .”

In addition to those persons above still living who claim to have seen or exam-
ined the original material found on the Brazel Ranch, there is one additional
person who was universally acknowledged to have been involved in its recovery,
Sheridan Cavitt, Lt Col, USAF (Ret). Cavitt is credited in all claims of having

23
accompanied Major Marcel to the ranch to recover the debris, sometimes along
with his Counter Intelligence Corps (CIC) subordinate, Lewis Rickett, who, like
Marcel, is deceased. Although there does not appear to be much dispute that
Cavitt was involved in the material recovery, other claims about him prevail in
the popular literature. He is sometimes portrayed as a closed-mouth (or some-
times even sinister) conspirator who was one of the early individuals who kept
the “secret of Roswell” from getting out. Other things about him have been
alleged, including the claim that he wrote a report of the incident at the time that
has never surfaced.

Since Lt Col Cavitt, who had firsthand knowledge, was still alive, a decision was
made to interview him and get a signed sworn statement from him about his
version of the events. Prior to the interview, the Secretary of the Air Force
provided him with a written authorization and waiver to discuss classified
information with the interviewer and release him from any security oath he may
have taken. Subsequently, Cavitt was interviewed on May 24,1994, at his home.
Cavitt provided a signed, sworn statement (Atch 17) of his recollections in this
matter. He also consented to having the interview tape-recorded. A transcript of
that recording is at Atch 18. In this interview, Cavitt related that he had been
contacted on numerous occasions by UFO researchers and had willingly talked
with many of them; however, he felt that he had oftentimes been misrepresented
or had his comments taken out of context so that their true meaning was changed.
He stated unequivocally, however, that the material he recovered consisted of a
reflective sort of material like aluminum foil, and some thin, bamboo-like sticks.
He thought at the time, and continued to do so today, that what he found was
a weather balloon and has told other private researchers that. He also remem-
bered finding a small “black boxNtype of instrument, which he thought at the
time was probably a radiosonde. Lt Col Cavitt also reviewed the famous
Ramey/Marcel photographs (Atch 16) of the wreckage taken to Fort Worth (often
claimed by UFO researchers to have been switched and the remnants of a balloon
substituted for it), and he identified the materials depicted in those photos as
consistent with the materials that he recovered from the ranch. Lt Col Cavitt also
stated that he had never taken any oath or signed any agreement not to talk
about this incident and had never been threatened by anyone in the government
because of it. He did not even know the ”incident” was claimed to be anything
unusual until he was interviewed in the early 1980’s.

Similarly, Irving Newton, Major, USAF (Ret), was located and interviewed.
Newton was a weather officer assigned to Fort Worth, who was on duty when
the Roswell debris was sent there in July, 1947. He was told that he was to report
to General Ramey’s office to view the material. In a signed, sworn statement
(Atch 30) Newton related that ”. . . I walked into the General’s office where this
supposed flying saucer was lying all over the floor. As soon as I saw it, I giggled
and asked if that was the flying saucer . . . . I told them that this was a balloon
and a RAWIN target. . . .” Newton also stated that ”. . . while I was examining
the debris, Major Marcel was picking up pieces of the target sticks and trying to
convince me that some notations on the sticks were alien writings. There were

24
figures on the sticks, lavender or pink in color, appeared to be weather faded
markings, with no rhyme or reason [sic]. He did not convince me that these were
alien writings.” Newton concluded his statement by relating that ”. . . During the
ensuing years I have been interviewed by many authors, I have been quoted and
misquoted. The facts remain as indicated above. I was not influenced during the
original interview, nor today, to provide anything but what I know to be true,
that is, the material I saw in General Ramey’s office was the remains of a balloon
and a RAWIN target.‘’

Balloon Research
The original tasking from GAO noted that the search for information included
“weather balloons.’’ Comments about balloons and safety reports have already
been made; however the SAF/AAZ research efforts also focused on reviewing
historical records involving balloons, since, among other reasons, that was what
was officially claimed by the AAF to have been found and recovered in 1947.

As early as February 28, 1994, the AAZD research team found references to
balloon tests taking place at Alamogordo Army Air Field (now Holloman AFB)
and White Sands during June and July 1947, testing ”constant level balloons’’ and
a New York University (NYU)/Watson Labs effort that used ”. . . meteorological
devices . . . suspected for detecting shock waves generated by Soviet nuclear
explosions”-a possible indication of a cover story associated with the NYU
balloon project. Subsequently, a 1946 HQ AMC memorandum surfaced, describ-
ing the constant altitude balloon project and specified that the scientific data be
classified Top Secret Priority 1A. Its name was Project MOGUL(Atch 19).

Project MOGULwas a then-sensitive, classified project, whose purpose was to

determine the state of Soviet nuclear weapons research. This was the early Cold
War period and there was serious concern within the US government about the
Soviets’ developing a weaponized atomic device. Because the Soviet Union’s
borders were closed, the US Government sought to develop a long range nuclear
explosion detection capability. Long range, balloon-borne, low frequency acoustic
detection was posed to General Spaatz in 1945 by Dr. Maurice Ewing of Columbia
University as a potential solution (atmospheric ducting of low frequency pressure
waves had been studied as early as 1900).

As part of the research into this matter, AAZD personnel located and obtained
the original study papers and reports of the New York University project. Their
efforts also revealed that some of the individuals involved in Project MOGULwere
still living. These persons included the NYU constant altitude balloon Director of
Research, Dr. Athelstan F. Spilhaus; the Project Engineer, Professor Charles B.
Moore; and the military Project Officer, Colonel Albert C. Trakowski .

All of these persons were subsequently interviewed and signed sworn statements
about their activities. A copy of theses statements are appended at Atchs 20-22.
Additionally, transcripts of the interview with Moore and Trakowski are also
included (equipment malfunctioned during the interview of Spilhaus) (Atchs
23-24). These interviews confirmed that Project MOGULwas a compartmented,
sensitive effort. The NYU group was responsible for developing constant level
balloons and telemetering equipment that would remain at specified altitudes
(within the acoustic duct) while a group from Columbia was to develop acoustic
sensors. Doctor Spilhaus, Professor Moore, and certain others of the group were
aware of the actual purpose of the project, but they did not know of the project
nickname at the time. They handled casual inquiries and/or scientific inqui-
ries /papers in terms of “unclassified meteorological or balloon research.” Newly
hired employees were not made aware that there was anything special or
classified about their work; they were told only that their work dealt with
meteorological equipment.

An advance ground team, led by Albert P. Crary, preceded the NYU group to
Alamogordo Army Air Field, New Mexico, setting up ground sensors and
obtaining facilities for the NYU group. Upon their arrival, Professor Moore and
his team experimented with various configurations of neoprene balloons;
development of balloon “trains” (see illustration, Atch 25); automatic ballast
systems; and use of Naval sonobuoys (as the Watson Lab acoustical sensors had
not yet arrived). They also launched what they called ”service flights.” These
“service flights” were not logged nor fully accounted for in the published
Technical Reports generated as a result of the contract between NYU and Watson
Labs. According to Professor Moore, the ”service flights” were composed of
balloons, radar reflectors, and payloads specifically designed to test acoustic
sensors (both early sonobuoys and the later Watson Labs devices). The ”payload
equipment” was expendable, and some carried no “Reward” or ”Return to . . .”
tags because there was to be no association between these flights and the logged
constant altitude flights which were fully acknowledged. The NYU balloon flights
were listed sequentially in their reports (i.e., A, B, or 1,5, 6, 7,8,10 . . .), yet gaps
existed for Flights 2 4 and Flight 9. The interview with Professor Moore indicated
that these gaps were the unlogged ”service flights.”

Professor Moore, the on-scene Project Engineer, gave detailed information

concerning his team’s efforts. He recalled that radar targets were used for tracking
balloons because they did not have all the necessary equipment when they first
arrived in New Mexico. Some of the early developmental radar targets were
manufactured by a toy or novelty company. These targets were made up of
aluminum ”foil” or foil-backed paper, balsa wood beams that were coated in an
“Elmer’s-type” glue to enhance their durability, acetate and /or cloth reinforcing
tape, single strand and braided nylon twine, brass eyelets and swivels to form a
multi-faced reflector somewhat similar in construction to a box kite (see photo-
graphs, Atch 26). Some of these targets were also assembled with purplish-pink
tape with symbols on it (see drawing by Moore with Atch 21).

According to the log summary (Atch 27) of the NYU group, Flight A through
Flight 7 (November 20,1946-July 2,1947) were made with neoprene meteorologi-
cal balloons (as opposed to the later flights made with polyethylene balloons).
Professor Moore stated that the neoprene balloons were susceptible to degrada-

26
tion in the sunlight, turning from a milky white to a dark brown. He described
finding remains of balloon trains with reflectors and payloads that had landed in
the desert: the ruptured and shredded neoprene would ”almost look like dark
gray or black flakes or ashes after exposure to the sun for only a few days. The
plasticizers and antioxidants in the neoprene would emit a peculiar acrid odor
and the balloon material and radar target material would be scattered after
returning to earth depending on the surface winds.” Upon review of the local
newspaper photographs from General Ramey’s press conference in 1947 and
descriptions in popular books by individuals who supposedly handled the debris
recovered on the ranch, Professor Moore opined that the material was most likely
the shredded remains of a multi-neoprene balloon train with multiple radar
reflectors. The material and a ”black box,” described by Cavitt, was, in Moore’s
scientific opinion, most probably from Flight 4, a “service flight” that included a
cylindrical metal sonobuoy and portions of a weather instrument housed in a box,
which was unlike typical weather radiosondes which were made of cardboard.
Additionally, a copy of a professional journal maintained at the time by A.P.
Crary, provided to the Air Force by his widow, showed that Flight 4 was
launched on June 4, 1947, but was not recovered by the NYU group. It is very
probable that this Top Secret project balloon train (Flight 4), made up of unclassi-
fied components, came to rest some miles northwest of Roswell, NM, became
shredded in the surface winds, and was ultimately found by the rancher, Brazel,
ten days later. This possibility was supported by the observations of Lt Col Cavitt
(Atchs 17-18), the only living eyewitness to the actual debris field and the
material found. Lt Col Cavitt described a small area of debris which appeared, “to
resemble bamboo type square sticks one quarter to one half inch square, that were
very light, as well as some sort of metallic reflecting material that was also very
light . . . . I remember recognizing this material as being consistent with a weather
balloon.”

Concerning the initial announcement, ”RAAF Captures Flying Disc,” research

failed to locate any documented evidence as to why that statement was made.
However, on July 10,1947, following the Ramey press conference, the AZamogordo
News published an article with photographs demonstrating multiple balloons and
targets at the same location as the NYU group operated from at Alamogordo
Army Air Field. Professor Moore expressed surprise at seeing this since his was
the only balloon test group in the area. He stated, “It appears that there was some
type of umbrella cover story to protect our work with MOGUL.”Although the Air
Force did not find documented evidence that Gen. Ramey was directed to
espouse a weather balloon in his press conference, he may have done so because
he was either aware of Project MOGULand was trying to deflect interest from it,
or he readily perceived the material to be a weather balloon based on the
identification from his weather officer, Irving Newton. In either case, the materials
recovered by the AAF in July, 1947, were not readily recognizable as anything
special (only the purpose was special), and the recovered debris itself was
unclassified. Additionally, the press dropped its interest in the matter as quickly
as they had jumped on it. Hence, there would be no particular reason to further
document what quickly became a ”non-event.”

27
The interview with Colonel Trakowski (Atchs 23-24) also proved valuable
information. Trakowski provided specific details on Project MOGUL and described
how the security for the program was set up, as he was formerly the Top Secret
Control Officer for the program. He further related that many of the original
radar targets that were produced around the end of World War I1 were fabricated
by toy or novelty companies using a purplish-pink tape with flower and heart
symbols on it. Trakowski also recounted a conversation that he had with his
friend, and superior military officer in his chain of command, Colonel Marcellus
Duffy, in July, 1947.Duffy, formerly had Trakowski’s position on MOGUL, but had
subsequently been transferred to Wright Field. He stated: ”. . . Colonel Duffy
called me on the telephone from Wright Field and gave me a story about a fellow
that had come in from New Mexico, woke him up in the middle of the night or
some such thing with a handful of debris, and wanted him, Colonel Duffy, to
identify it. . , . He just said ’it sure looks like some of the stuff you’ve been
launching at Alamogordo’ and he described it, and I said ’yes, I think it is.’
Certainly Colonel Duffy knew enough about radar targets, radiosondes, balloon-
borne weather devices. He was intimately familiar with all that apparatus.’’

Attempts were made to locate Colonel Duffy but it was ascertained that he had
died. His widow explained that, although he had amassed a large amount of
personal papers relating to his Air Force activities, she had recently disposed of
these items. Likewise, it was learned that A.P. Crary was also deceased; however
his surviving spouse had a number of his papers from his balloon testing days,
including his professional journal from the period in question. She provided the
Air Force researchers with this material. It is discussed in more detail within Atch
32.Overall, it helps fill in gaps of the MOGm story.

During the period the Air Force conducted this research, it was discovered that
several others had also discovered the possibility that the “Roswell Incident” may
have been generated by the recovery of a Project MOGULballoon device. These
persons included Professor Charles B. Moore, Robert Todd, and coincidentally,
Karl Pflock, a researcher who is married to a staffer who works for Congressman
Schiff. Some of these persons provided suggestions as to where documentation
might be located in various archives, histories and libraries. A review of FOIA
requests revealed that Robert Todd, particularly, had become aware of Project
MOGULseveral years ago and had doggedly obtained from the Air Force, through
the FOIA, a large amount of material pertaining to it; long before the AAZD
researchers independently seized on the same possibility.

Most interestingly, as this report was being written, Pflock published his own
report of this matter under the auspices of FUFOR, entitled RosweZZ in Perspective
(1994).Pflock concluded from his research that the Braze1 Ranch debris originally
reported as a “flying disc” was probably debris from a MOGUL balloon; however,
there was a simultaneous incident that occurred not far away, which caused an
alien craft to crash and which the AAF subsequently recovered three alien bodies
therefrom. Air Force research did not locate any information to corroborate that
this incredible coincidence occurred, however.

28
In order to provide a more detailed discussion of the specifics of Project MOGUL
and how it appeared to be directly responsible for the “Roswell Incident,” a
SAF/AAZD researcher prepared a more detailed discussion on the balloon project
which is appended to this report as Atch 32.

Other Research
In the attempt to develop additional information that could help explain this
matter, a number of other steps were taken. First, assistance was requested from
various museums and other archives (Atch 28) to obtain information and/or
examples of the actual balloons and radar targets used in connection with Project
MOGULand to correlate them with the various descriptions of wreckage and
materials recovered. The blueprints for the ”Pilot Balloon Target ML307C/AP
Assembly” (generically, the radar target assembly) were located at the Army
Signal Corps Museum at Fort Monmouth and were obtained. A copy is appended
as Atch 29. This blueprint provides the specification for the foil material, tape,
wood, eyelets, and string used and the assembly instructions thereto. An actual
device was also obtained for study with the assistance of Professor Moore. (The
example actually procured was a 1953-manufactured model “C” as compared to
the Model B which was in use in 1947. Professor Moore related the differences
were minor.) An examination of this device revealed it to be simply made of
aluminum-colored foil-like material over a stronger paper-like material, attached
to balsa wood sticks, affixed with tape, glue, and twine. When opened, the device
appears as depicted in Atch 31 (contemporary photo) and Atch 25 (1947 photo,
in a ”balloon train“). When folded, the device is in a series of triangles, the largest
being 4 feet by 2 feet 10 inches. The smallest triangle section measures 2 feet by
2 feet 10 inches. (Compare with descriptions provided by Lt Col Cavitt and
others, as well as photos of wreckage.)

Additionally, the researchers obtained from the Archives of the University of

Texas-Arlington (UTA), a set of original (i.e., first generation) prints of the
photographs taken at the time by the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, that depicted
Ramey and Marcel with the wreckage. A close review of these photos (and a set
of first-generation negatives also subsequently obtained from UTA) revealed
several interesting observations. First, although in some of the literature cited
above, Marcel allegedly stated that he had his photo taken with the ”real” UFO
wreckage and then it was subsequently removed and the weather balloon
wreckage substituted for it, a comparison shows that the same wreckage appeared
in the photos of Marcel and Ramey. The photos also depicted that this material
was lying on what appeared to be some sort of wrapping paper (consistent with
affidavit excerpt of crew chief Porter, above). It was also noted that in the two
photos of Ramey he had a piece of paper in his hand. In one, it was folded over
so nothing could be seen. In the second, however, there appears to be text printed
on the paper. In an attempt to read this text to determine if it could shed any
further light on locating documents relating to this matter, the photo was sent to
a national-level organization for digitizing and subsequent photo interpretation
and analysis. This organization was also asked to scrutinize the digitized photos
for any indication of the flowered tape (or “hieroglyphics,” depending on the

29
point of view) that were reputed to be visible to some of the persons who
observed the wreckage prior to its getting to Fort Worth. This organization
reported on July 20, 1994, that even after digitizing, the photos were of insuffi-
cient quality to visualize either of the details sought for analysis. This organiza-
tion was able to obtain measurements from the ”sticks” visible in the debris after
it was ascertained by an interview of the original photographer what kind of
camera he used. The results of this process are provided in Atch 33, along with
a reference diagram and the photo from which the measurements were made. All
these measurements are compatible with the wooden materials used in the radar
target previously described.

CONCLUSION

The Air Force research did not locate or develop any information that the
”Roswell Incident’: was a UFO event. All available official materials, although
they do not directly address Roswell per se, indicate that the most likely source
of the wreckage recovered from the Braze1 Ranch was from one of the Project
MOGUL balloon trains. Although that project was Top Secret at the time, there was
also no specific indication found to indicate an official preplanned cover story was
in place to explain an event such as that which ultimately happened. It appears
that the identification of the wreckage as being part of a weather balloon device,
as reported in the newspapers at the time, was based on the fact that there was
no physical difference in the radar targets and the neoprene balloons (other than
the numbers and configuration) between MOGUL balloons and normal weather
balloons. Additionally, it seems that there was overreaction by Colonel Blanchard
and Major Marcel in originally reporting that a “flying disc” had been recovered
when, at that time, nobody knew for sure what that term even meant, since it had
only been in use for a couple of weeks.

Likewise, there was no indication in official records from the period that there
was heightened military operational or security activity which should have been
generated if this was, in fact, the first recovery of materials and/or persons from
another world. The postwar US military (or today’s for that matter) did not have
the capability to rapidly identify, recover, coordinate, cover up, and quickly
minimize public scrutiny of such an event. The claim that they did so without
leaving even a little bit of a suspicious paper trail for 47 years is incredible.

It should also be noted here that there was little mentioned in this report about
the recovery of the so-called ”alien bodies.’’ This is for several reasons: First, the
recovered wreckage was from a Project MOGUL balloon. There were no “alien”
passengers therein. Secondly, the pro-UFO groups who espouse the alien bodies
theories cannot even agree among themselves as to what, how many, and where
such bodies were supposedly recovered. Additionally, some of these claims have
been shown to be hoaxes, even by other UFO researchers. Thirdly, when such
claims are made, they are often attributed to people using pseudonyms or who
otherwise do not want to be publicly identified, presumably so that some sort of
retribution cannot be taken against them (notwithstanding that nobody has been
30
shown to have died, disappeared, or otherwise suffered at the hands of the
government during the last 47 years). Fourth, many of the persons making the
biggest claims of “alien bodies” make their living from the ”Roswell Incident.”
While having a commercial interest in something does not automatically make it
suspect, it does raise interesting questions related to authenticity. Such persons
should be encouraged to present their evidence (not speculation) directly to the
government and provide all pertinent details and evidence to support their claims
if honest fact-finding is what is wanted. Lastly, persons who have come forward
and provided their names and made claims may have, in good faith but in the
”fog of time,” misinterpreted past events. The review of Air Force records did not
locate even one piece of evidence to indicate that the Air Force has had any part
in an ”alien” body recovery operation or continuing cover-up.

During the course of this effort, the Air Force has kept in close touch with the
GAO and responded to their various queries and requests for assistance. This
report was generated as an official response to the GAO, and to document the
considerable effort expended by the Air Force on their behalf. It is anticipated that
that the GAO will request a copy of this report to help formulate the formal
report of their efforts. It is recommended that this document serve as the final Air
Fdrce report related to the Roswell matter, for the GAO, or any other inquiries.

Y&dL HARD L. WEAVER, COL, USAF

SECURITY AND SPECIAL

Attachments
1. Washington Post Article, ”GAO Turns to Alien Turf in New Probe,”
January 14,1994
2. GAO Memo, February 15,1994
3. DoD/IG Memo, February 23,1994
4. SAF/FM Memo, February 24,1994, w/Indorsement
5. SAF/AA Memo, March 1, 1994, w/ March 16,1994 Addendum
6. AF/IN Memo, March 14, 1994
7. AF/SE Memo, March 14, 1994
8. SAF/AQL Memo, March 22,1994
9. AF/XOWP Memo, March 9,1994
10. SAF/AAI Memo, March 10,1994
11. AF€-IRA/CC Memo, March 8,1994
12. AFOSI/HO Memo, May 11,1994

31
13. List of Locations and Records Searched
14. HQ AAF ”Issuance of Orders,” June 5, 1947
15. Copy of Vandenberg’s Appointment Book and Diary, July 7-9,1947
16. July 9, 1947 Photos of Balloon Wreckage, F t Worth Star Telegram
17. Signed Sworn Statement of Cavitt, May 24, 1994
18. Transcript of Cavitt Interview, May 24,1994
19. Letter, July 8, 1946, Project MOGUL
20. Signed Sworn Statement of Spilhaus, June 3,1994
21. Signed Sworn Statement of Moore, June 8, 1994
22. Signed Sworn Statement of Trakowski, June 29,1994
23. Transcript of Interview with Moore, June 8,1994
24. Transcript of Interview with Trakowski, June 29,1994
25. Illustration of Project MOGUL “Balloon Trains”
26. Two Photos of Project MOGUL”Balloon Trains”
27. Log Summary, NYU Constant Level Balloon Flights
28. List of Museums Contacted
29. Copy of Blueprint for ”Pilot Balloon Target, ML-307C/AP Assembly’’
30. Signed Sworn Statement of Newton, July 21, 1994
31. Photos of ML-307C/AP Device, With Vintage Neoprene Balloon and Debris
32. Synopsis of Balloon Research Findings by 1st Lt James McAndrew
33. ”Mensuration Working Paper,” With Drawing and Photo

32
-
A22 FRIDAY, JANUARY 14,1994 TAE WASmm posr

GAO Turns to Alien Turf in Probe

Bodies of Space Voyagers Said to Have Disappeared in 19 4 7
Schiff, however, said that at a routine Octo-
By William Claiborne
Washmgngton Post SUH Wnter ber meeting he had merely complained about
~
the Defense Department’s lack of responsive-
Where television’s “Unsolved Mysteries” has ness but a GAO official said, “We’re willing to
tried and failed, the General Accounting Office take a stab at it.“
is unafraid to venture. Schiff, in a telephone interview from Albu-
At the request of Rep. Steven Schiff (R- querque, said that last March, after receiving
N.M.), Congress’s investigative branch has inquiries from “UFO believers” and some Ros-
launched a study to determine whether the well residents who were in the military in
government covered up a story alleging that 1947,he wrote Defense Secretary Les Aspin
the bodies of alien space voyagers were re- asking for more information about the reported
moved from a crashed flying saucer found near spacecraft crash and the alleged disappearance
Roswell, N.M., in 1947. of the aliens’ bodies.
After the purported crash of the spacecraft, The crash of a mysterous object 75 miles
the bodies of the extraterrestrial visitors were northwest of Roswell. which the Air Force lat-
said by a local undertaker and other conspiracy e r claimed was a weather balloon equipped with
theorists to have been autopsied and secretly a radar-reflecting device, was the subject of
flown to an Air Force base in Ohio. several books and remains many UFO buffs’
Even though the “Roswell Incident” has been greatest riddle.
repeatedly dismissed by the Defense Depart- A privately owned museum in Roswell con-
ment as nothing more than UFO fantasizing tains a namber of documents and photographs
triggered by the discovery of a downed weath-
purporting to prove existence of the aliens. It
er balloon, the GAO has begun searching for also displays a re-creation of the spacecraft
documents to prove allegations that the Air
Force “suppressed” information sought by surrounded by figures portraying the dead ex-
traterrestrials.
Schiff.
Schiff is a member of the House Government UFO buffs contend the incident marked the
Operations Committee, which oversees the beginning of a government conspiracy to sup-
GAO. press evidence of alien life.
GAO spokeswoman Laura A. Kopelson said .Much of the speculation stems from claims
the office’s investigation, first reported in the by William Haut, a former Air Force public af-
Albuquerque Journal yesterday, stemmed from fairs officer, who said that on July 2, 1947,he An ”alien” depicted on NBC’s ‘UnSOiVed
a meeting in October between Schiff and GAO was told to prepare a news release reporting Mysteries,” which concluded Caw is unsolved.
Controlkr General Charles A. Bowsher. Schiff the Air Force had recovered .parts of a flying
complairied then that the Defense Department saucer and then was told to change the story to UFO sightings. That study, Schiff said, did not
had been “unresponsive” to his inquiries about report a weather balloon. deal with the Roswell case.
the 1947 incident. Also, a nurse reportedly told a local funeral “I was getting pretty upset at all the running
Kopelson said “as far as I know only one in- home director that she witnessed the autopsies around,” Schiff said, adding that at his meeting
vestigator had been assigned” to the case, and of the spacemen, whom she described as having with GAO officials, “they made an offer to
that not enough work had been done to report oversized heads and beetle-like features. The help.”
any results to SchifY. At another point, Kopel- nurse subsequently died in a plane crash. “Generally, I’m a skeptic on UFOs and alien
son said “the people doing it are either on sick After the autopsies, conspiracy theorists said beings, but there are indications from the run-
leave or are unavailable.” the bodies were flown to Fort Worth and then around that I got that whatever it was, it
She said there was no way of estimating how to what is now Wright-Patterson Air Force wasn’t a balloon. Apparently, it’s another gov-
much the investigation would cost, and that the Base in Ohio. ernment coverup.” Schiff said.
GAO does not release such information any- In 1989,NBC’s “Unsolved Mysteries” inves- He called the Defense Department’s lack of
way. tigated the controversy, which the program’s response “astounding,” and said government
GAO conducted 1,380inquiries into govern- host, Robert Stack, concluded remained un- accountability was an issue “even larger than
ment operations in 1992.Its budget has risen solved. UFOs.”
from $46.9 million in 1965 to $490 million last Schiff said after calling Aspin last March to Asked if the GAO might not be extending
year. The agency has been criticized, especially request a Defense Department briefing on the itself, Schiff acknowledged that the agency
by Republicans, as the “lap dog of the request- Roswell incident, he received a call from an Air ‘‘usually does fiscal investigations and at pres-
ers,” producing reports that tend to support Force lieutenant colonel, who brusquely told ent I can’t find a fiscal impact” in the Roswell
whatever conclusion the requesting member of him the documents had been turned over to the incident.
Congress suggests. National Archives. Had the agency said, “ ‘This is beyond our
Kopelson said Schiff had asked the GAO “to However, Schiff said, Archives officials told realm of expertise,’ ’’ Schdf said, “I wouldn’t
see if there is any evidence that information him they did not have the records on Roswell, insist on it.” He added, “If the Defense Depart-
regarding UFOs had been suppressed” follow- even though they did have records of “Project ment had been responsive, it wouldn’t have
ing the Roswell incident. Blue Book,” a 1969 h r Force study of reported come to this.”
 FE% 151996
FEP 9 1954

The Eonorable Willlam J. P e r r y

The Secretary of Defense
Attention: DOD Office o f the Inspector General
Director for GAO Surveys and Reviews
Dear Mr. Secretary:
In response to a congressional request, the General
Accounting Office is initiating a review of DOD's policies
and procedures f o r acquiring, classifying, retaining. and
disposing o f official government document8 dealing w i t h
weather balloon, aircraft, and similar crash incidents.
The review will involve t e s t i n g whether DOD, the military
services, specialized defense agencies, and others such as
the National Archives, have systematically followad the
proper procedures to ensure government accountabflity over
such records -
The work will be performed under GAO code 701034 by staff
from our National Security Analysis group i n
washington, D.C. If you have any questions concerning
this assignment, please contact either Mr. Gary Weeter,
A s s i s t a n t Director, at (202) 512-4603 or Mr. Jack Kriethe,
Evalustor-h-Chsrge at (202) 512-4567. This revicu has
been coordinated with Dan Chambers of the Inspector
General's Office.
Sincerely YOUSr

ichatd Davis
irector, National Security
Analysis
 GAO ENTRANCE CONFERENCE FOR
ASSIGNMENT CODE 701034

ISSUE:

Has the Government met its responsibility in the handling,

retention, and subsequent disposition of official records
concerning the investigation and reporting of air vehicle and other
crasl-! incidents similar to the reported crash of a weather balloon
near Roswell, New Mexico in July 1 9 4 7 .

SCOPE :

Initial work will be performed at the Department of Defense, the

Services, specialized defense agencies, and other executive branch
agencies as required.

APPROACH:

( I ) Interview responsible officials and review pertinent directives

and regulations to determine the executive branch policies and
procedures governing the reporting of air vehicle and similar crash
incidents.

( 2 ) Select a sample of crash incidents covering different time

periods ( 1 9 4 7 to present) to determine whether proper procedures
were followed.

( 3 ) For the incidents selected, determine whether proper records

management procedures were followed in the retention and subsequent
disposition of those records.

( 4 ) Determine the "OFFICIAL" explanation of what has become known

as the "Roswell Incident".
 INSPECTOR GENERAL
DeEPARTYtNtOF DLFENSE
400 ARMY NAVY DRIVE
A R U N t f O N . VIRGINIA 22202.2Ob4

Apalpsis FEB 231994

and Palleuup

The DoD Directive 7650.2 designatas this office as the

central DoD liaison f o r tasking, controlling, and monitoring CAO
s u m e y ! , review, and report activities, The enclosed mfomtion
Sheet .describesthe specific DoD procedures for tasking GAO
surveys/reviews and the DoD primary action o f f i c e (PAO)
responsibilities,
On February 15, 1994, we received the enclosed o f f i c i a l GAO
notification letter on t h e subject effort, The GAO National
Security and International A f f a i r s Division (National S u u r i t y
Analysis) is d o h g the work. The review is at the request of
Representative Steven 8 . Schiff (R-NX).
Representative Schiff requested h e GAO r e v i e w two i s m e a of
concern (1) the DoD records management procedures f o r crash
incidents involving w e a t h e r balloons and -own aircraft, such
as UFos and foreign aircraft, and (2) the facts regarding the
reported crash of en UFO h 1949 at R o s v a l l , New ldaYIC0. Shce
the UFO s t o r y appeared in an epiSOae of the television program
mvnsolved Mysteries," Representative SchifZ has received many
requests for an investigation into the alleged aDoD cover-up."
Apparently, reports on the incident were attributed to a weather
balloon crash.
The GAO 1s a d o u s to respond to Representative Schiff's
request and to d i s p e l any concerns t h a t the DoD is being
unresponsive. For that reason, it is important that w e identify
the correct DoD representatives so that the GAO can b e g h its
work. Since the enclosed GAO notification letter did not m e n t i o n
the Roswell incidqnt or specifically site unknown aircraft as the
area of interest, w e have been unable to detesmfne the
appropriate bob primary and collateral action offices.
 2

We have scheduled an entrance meeting w i t h the a 0 f o r .

February 28, 1994, 1O:OO a . m . , 4 0 0 Army Navy Drive, Room 7 3 0 ,
Arlington, VA. The entrance meeting should clarify the issues to
the extent t h a t a DoD primary action office can be identified.

-Please provide the name and telephone number of your

representative(s) for t h e entrance m e e t i n g - as soon as possible to
my action O f f i c e r , Pattie C i r i n o , ( 7 0 3 ) 693-0214. If she I s not
available, I can be reached on the same number.

1
Marcia J. Van Note
Director
GAO Sunreys and Reviews
Enclosures :
As stated
DISTRIBUTION: SEC USD (Pm)
SEC NAVY ASD(C3I)
SEC AIR FORCE D I R , JS
CMDT, USHC PIR, A M
USD (P) DIR, RSA
ATSD(LA) UScIEfcsPACB
ATSD (PA) USCINClTRANS
GC
 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
W A S H I N G T O N OC

MEMORANDUM FOR
-SAF/FM ---
X AF/INR _--
X AFAA/DO -AETC: FMFM
-SAF/AQXA ---
X AF/SPO -s-AFIA/CVS -WC/FMAP
-X-SAF/LLR -X-AF/HO -AFOTEC/RMR -?ACAF/IGIX
-X-SAF/PA ---
X AF/JAG -AFSPACECOM/FMP -ACC/FMP
- SAF/IA -AF/SCXX -AFCC/M A -USAFE/FMEP
-y-SAF/AAX (OPR) ---
X AF/XOS -AFMC/IGQ -AFMPC / RMM
-SAF/FMBMD -X-AF/ SE -ANGRC/ FMP
FROM: SAF/FMPF
SUBJECT: GAO Review Letter Dated February 15, 1994, "Records
Management Procedures,DealingWith Weather Balloon,
U n k n o w n Aircraft, and Similar Crash Incidents", (GAO
Code 701034) - - ACTION MEMORANDUM
This memo is to advise you of the subject review and to
request each organization indicated as OPR or OCR above to
designate a Central Point of Contact (CPC). The CPC should return
the indorsement immediately. This package is provided to other
listed organizations as information. Air Force Regulation 1 1 - 9
applies.
The CPC should further assess the potent:lal impact af =he GAO
rsview on the Air Force. if the assessment indicates the need,
rke CPC should brief :he Deputy Chief 3 5 Staff and other
zfficials, as appropriate.
An entrance meeting is scheduled for February 28, 1094, arr
5300 , in Room 730 at 400 Army N a w Drive, Arlingccn VA. The
SAF/ FMPF point of contact is Mrs. Ann Cook, Xoom 4C228, extens1
7 6 0 5~ i .

h(Liaison and Followup

Financiai Management :
: AtCh
1. 2oD(IG) Yemo, 'ebruary 1 3 , 1??4
:. Indorsement
 1 K;i: 1994
1st Indorsement
TO: SAF/FMPF, Room 4C328, Pentagon
SUBJECT: Central P o i n t of Contact, GAO Code .=.
1. cpc R i c h a r d L. Weaver , Col ,SA F/ AA Z , 50972 ,3-2013
NAME GRADE OFC SYMBOL ROOM EXT .

A l t Jeff Butler , L t Col ,S A F I A A Z , 50972 ,3-2013

NAME GRADE OFC SYMBOL ROOM EXT .
FAX Number 693-2059

2. You will be notified of any changes in the above designees.

SAF/AA f o c a l point for all audits and inspections is Ns. Carolyn
Lunsford, SAF/AAX, 697-9057, FAX 693-9763.

Colonel, USAF CC: SAF/AAZ

Director, Plans, Programs, & Budget SAF/AAIQ
Office of the Administrative Ass't
Memo,with Ad&ndum
Robert J. McComrick, S
Distribution
Subj: GAO Review on Rwmb
Management Procedm
with Weather B

Incidents . . .
 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC 20330-1000

OFFiCE OF THE S E C R E T A R Y 1 March 1994

MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: GAO Review on Records Management Procedures Dealing with
Weather Balloons, Unknown Aircraft, and Similar Crash Incidents (GAO
Code 701034) - ACTION MEMORANDUM

References: (a) 23 Feb 94 DoDAG Memorandum, Subj, same as above

(b) 15 Feb 94 GAO Memorandum of Review Notification
The Depamnent of Defense and other executive branch agencies are undergoing a
review by the GAO concerning whether the US government has "met its responsibility in
the handling, retention, and subsequent disposition of official records concerning the
investigation and reporting of air vehicle and other crash incidents similar to the reported
crash of a weather balloon near Roswell, New Mexico in July 1947". To fulfill the Air
Force portion of this review, addressees, as applicable, are requested to:
(a) identify pertinent directives concerning records retention and disposition;
(b) identify pertinent directives concerning reporting air vehicle crashes,
investigations, and wreckage/debris retention and disposition;
(c) identify my records (unclassified or classified)related to air vehicle (aircraft,
lighter-than-aircraft,rockedmissile, or other) impacts or crashes in New
Mexico from 20 June to 3 1 July 1947; identify record groups andfor other
indexes associated with these records for further review; and
(d) provide copies of pertinent directives (including any changes of policies on
rttention and disposition) and records (i.e., item c above) to SAF/AAZ, 1720
Air Force Pentagon, Washington DC 20330-1720.
Please provide your responses (interim or final) by 14 Mar 94. Contact Col
Weaver or Lt Col Butler at DSN 223-2013/7 or commercial (703) 693-2013/7 if there are
any questions.

2 Attachments: Administrative Assistanq

1. 23 Feb 94 DoDAG Memo w/encl
2. GAO Issue/Scope/Approach
DISTRIBUTION:
SAFIAAI
SAFIAQL
AF/SE
AF/HO
AFm
AF/xow
 DEPARTMENT OF T H E AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC 20330-1 0 0 0

OFFICE OF THE SECRITARV

16 March 1994
MEMORANDUM FOR AFOSVHO
FROM: SAF/AAZ
1720 Air Force Pentagon
Washington DC 20330-1720
SUBJECT: GAO Review on Records Management Procedures Dealing with
Weather Balloons, Unknown Aircraft, and Similar Crash Incidents (GAO
Code 701034) - ACTION MEMORANDUM

Reference: SAFIAA 1 Mar 94 Memorandum w/atch, Subj. same as above

SAF/AAZ has taken the lead for the Air Force in providing the GAO with all
pertinent records and information related to the above subject. Pan of this review will
involve retrieving records. histories, reports of investigations, ctc. related to sightings of
unknown aerial objects/phenomena
To insure that we have searched all applicable document holdin s, rcquest you
d
research AFOSI histories for any records that might be relevant to the A 0 review. Such
records might have been mated prior to the formal establishment of AFOSI, e.g.,
AAF/CIC or USA/CID records. Request you l i t your search to holdings within your
p w i e w for the period Jan 1947 through Dec 1953.
Please contact me or Lt CoI
this subject.

1 Attachment:
SAFIAA 1 Mar Memorandum
 D E P A R T M E N T OF THE AIR FORCE
H E A D Q U A R T E R S UNITED S T A T E S A I R F O R C E
I

Id
MEMORANDUM FOR SAF/MP'

FROM: AFilN

SUBJECT: GAO Inquiry into Records Management Procedures Dealing with Weather
Balloons, Unknown Aircraft, and Similar Crash Incidents -
INFORMATION MEMORANDUM

References: (a) SAF/AA Memorandum, 1 Mar 94

(b) Telecon: Lt Col Butler/AAZ - Mr. Foley/lNXA, 3 Mar 94

In response to references, the following informationis provided--with answers keyed to ref a:

a. None.

b. None.

c. None, but see below for related material.

d. None.

Ref para c above. Although we possess no official records related to the subject matter, we
do possess documents received from FOlA requesters that discuss the Roswell Incident which we
think may be pertinent to the GAO inquiry:

a. One is a FOlA request from Dr. Neal in California. It is of particular interest in that he
claims to know of a physician in California who allegedly participated in the hands-on pathological
exantination of four alien bodies. (Atch 1). Dr. Neal does not identify the individual.

b. There is a second document called 'Synopsis of Roswell Incident.' (Atch 2). In its
recapitulation of the events that allegedly transpired on that day in Roswell, the synopsis cites
several people who relate stories told to them by alleged eyewitnesses to the event.

We also attach a report from the National Air Intelligence Center (NAIC) at Wright-Patterson
AFB OH, which summarizes its research, and that of others at WPAFB. into UFOs and the Roswell
Incident (Atch 3). The NAlC report concludes that after exhaustive research there is no evidence
of the existence of any relevant documents, flying saucer debris, or space aliens on WPAFB.

AF/IN's POC is Mr. M. J. Foley, ~31664.

Attachments:
1. Dr. Neal's FOlA Letter
2. Synopsis of Roswell Incident
3. Summary of NAlC Research
 RICHARD M. NEAL, JR, MD, INC.

Feb'ruary 5, 1993

Freedom of Information Act Request

( 5 U . S . C . 552)
Department of the Air Force
P-9 'JSAF/DADF
Washington, DC 20380
RE: ALIEN WMANOIDS/UFO*S
Dear Sirs:
As a physician I have done personal/private research in the
field of Ufology for the past twenty years. Of great interest to
me is the July 2, 1947 crash of an extra-terrestrial object in New
Mexico.
Also of Greater interest is t h e recovery of 4 alien bodiss
from this crash -
a separate portion of the conpartment/control
room/crtw cabin area vas found several miles from the rest of the
UFC debris. There has been rumors of post-mortem examinations
being performed on these bodies.
The bodies were described as the body of a small humanoid, tan
(or sunburned) in color, approximately the size of a t e n year old
boy, was examined at a laboratory of the Cuggenheim Foundation then
on 23rd Street in New York City. The pathological examination
disclosed a human with a skeleton having two extra ribs on each
side, whose flesh had a somewhat higher mineral content than we
would consider normal and somewhat denser bones.
Regortedly, shortly after the discovery of this vehicle and
its occupants - it prompted then President Harry S. Truman to
appoint (on Sept. 18, 1947) a committee of twelve individuals -
called the '*Majestic-l2" or MJ-12 to secure and study the crashed
UFO debris and its occupants.
An important person -
one of the MJ-12, was an individual
named Dr. Detlev W. Bronk, a neurophysiologist. In June 1947 he
was named a member of the Scientific Advisory Committee of the
Brookhaven National Laboratory; he subsequently became the sixth
President of John Hopkins University ip 1949. It is believed that
Dr. Bronk was the medical director of a team that performed these
pathological examinations of the aliens; his medical team would be
restricted to a limited number of physicians
following:
-
such as the
Freedom of Information Ac;$.,$equest
February 5, 1993
Page 2 of 3

I). Pathologist
2). Radiologist
3). Neurophysiologist (Dr. Bronk)
4). Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeon
Presently living in Southern California is one of the
physicians who participated in this project. I must respect his
confidentially and anonymity. He is in his mid to late 70's and is
probably the last link (firsthand) to have experienced this
research on the alien bodies in 1947.
In regards to any release of this subject matter, existence of
this material/past research would not be exempt from mandatory
disclosures under the FOIA because it would not/does not interfere
with our national security nor knowledge of the above would give
any other foreign country a military advantage.
Serious UFO researchers believe that the Air F o r c e now wishes
the American public, t o know the truth, of the extra-terrestrial
origin of the UFO phenomena, and thus are "leaking" some
information out to various researchers.
Nationwide polls revealed that over 70% of our population
believes in the extra-terrestrial theory; movies such as "E.T.",
"Close Encounter of the Third Kind", "Hanger 18" and *'Cocoon'* are
being released to cushion the public to the truth. Could the
government/private corporation use subliminal suggestions in the
above movies or possibly TV -
To prepare this country eventually
to the truth that UFO's and aliens exist.
Being in this field of research -
specifically physiological
and psychological effects suffered secondary to individuals who
were allegedly abducted by aliens has increased my knowledge that
we are definitely being visited by an alien race. I have enclosed
for your review a brief synopsis of what occurred in and around
Roswell, New Mexico in July 1947. Please review this information.
Why have I decided to write at this time This is the 45th
year anniversary of UFO's -
many lectures and seminars will be
scheduled around the country to herald this event. Because of
this, it is hopeful that through the FOIA someone sympathetic to
our research efforts will release some "shocking" information for
us tc relay to the general public. It seems coincidental/ironic
that the most prominent seminar was the MUFON 1992 International
UFO Symposium on July 11-12, 1992 at the Convention Center in
Albuquerque, New Mexico.
 0
Freedom of Information Act Request
February 5, 1993
Page 3 of 3

PROJECT SIGMA

The project was originally established in 1954. Its mission

was to establish communications with aliens. This project met with
positive success ( S I C ) when in 1959, the United States established
primitive communications with the aliens. On April 25, 1964, a
USAF intelligence officer met two aliens at a pre-arranged location
in the desert of New Mexico. The contact lasted for approximately
three hours. The Air Force officer managed to exchange basic
information with the two aliens. The project is believed to be
continuing at an Air Force base in New Mexico.
I am respectfully requesting the following information:
1). An authentic photocopy of the "Majestic-12" (MJ-12)
2).
groups information -
a 9 page document (1947).
A n y photocopies of pathological reports (post-mortem)
performed on the aliens in 1947 (comparative anatomy).
3). A n y authentic photocopies of aliens
exposures: close-up photos, ctc.
-full body
4). Project Whirlwind - a UFO study done at M. I.T. in. 1949,
then referred back to the Dept. of Defense,
Although I realize that the government is reluctant in giving
out information, particularly to civilian researchers, my approach
wiii continue to be positive and will have a optimistic outlook.
While I might accurately anticipate some negative reactions to a11
this information (continued debunking) in the letter, I would
nevertheless value your response.
Sincere1 y ,

1
Richard M. Neal, Jr., M.D.

Enclosures
 SkNOPSIS OF ROSWELL _-INCIDENT
' According to Brig. Gen...Th omas 1. DuBosc (USAF,
mt.), who was Gen. Ram$s Chief of Staff. Maj Gen.
Clemnts McMullen, the Deputy and Acting Commander,
Strategic Air Command, ai & d m ' A m Air Reid,
ordered that some of -the debris recovered on the ranch be
brought directly to him in Washington. Gen. DuBose says
officials at the Headquarters of the Eighth Air Force were
d i d to tell the press that the mluial was from a weather
I am writing to request a clarifica- balloon ndar target, and that the weather balloon uplana-
tion of the U.S. Government's m m n f position concerning tion was a "cover story" -todivert the attention of the press.
evenu which occumd in and around Roswell, New Mex- The pilot who transported some of the wreckage. Oliver
ico. in July 1947. W.Henderson. said he saw the bodies of alien beings at the
According to newspaper accounts and eyewitness repom. Roswell base, according to his widow, Sappho Henderson.
a local rancher, William W. B r w l , discovered pieces of his daughter. Mary Kathryn Groode, and his friend, John
d bris from an object which cnshed on the property he Kromschroeder.
managed outside Corona, on or about July 2. 1947. He A mortician who worked for the f u n d home in
brought some of this material to the actention of Chaves Roswell. Glenn Dennis, says M A m j ~ I U K Cfriend told him
County Sheriff George Wilcox, who called the Roswell Ar- about participating in the autopsies of three alien bodies at
my Air Field. The base Intelligence Officer, Jesse A. Marcel. the base.
and a Counter Intelligence Corps Officer, Sheridan Cavitt. Thereforc. I m formally requesting that you seek to deter-
went to the m c h to inspect the material. mine whether the highly unusual material recovered near
They discovered a great deal of lightweight debris which Corona was from a "flying disc," a weather balloon. or
couldn't be cut, burned. or even dented with a sledgeham- something else.
mer. On orders from the base commander, Col. Willim Please dvise me. at your earliest opportunity, of the
Blanchard, the Public Information Officer, Walter G. Haut. United States Government's arrenr position on the nature
issued a news releve that the Amry Air Force had recovered of the material recovered outside Roswell, New Mexico, in
'lying disc." Some of the debris WJS flown to Fort Worth. July 1947. and its current explanation for dl official actions
as where the Commander of the Eighth Air Forre. Gen. taken with respect to this event,
Roger Ramey, identified the material for the press as the
remains qf a weather balloon and its radar target. Sincerely.
However, subsequent investigation has raised considenble
doubt about the weather balloon explanation. For e.xiunple:
H According to his son and neighbors. B n z e l was held
incommunicado by officials at the Ronvell base for nearly
a week, questioned extensively and ordered not to say
anything about his experience: however, in a newspaper in-
terview, he said that the material he recovered 'did not in
any way resemble a weather balloon," many of which he
had recovered on his property.
Sheriff Wdcox, to whom Bryel initially reported find-
ing the debris, also wasordered by the military not to say
anything, but members of his family say that not only did
-
he see debris at the crash site he also saw four "space"
beings." one of whom was alive. Moreover. his grand-
hughter, Barbara Duper. uns told by her grandmother. h e r
Wilcox, that the entire family was threatened with death by
the military if they discussed the incident.
H The former manager of KGFL Radio in Roswell, Jud
Roberts, says the station was threatened with loss of its
license by government officials in Washington, DC, if it
broadcast the story about the "flying saucer." In addition.
.rding to Lydia Sleppy, a secretary at KOAT Radio in
Jquerque, a wire transmission of the news story on the
event was intcrmpttd by a message something like: "CEASE
TRANSMISSION. NATIONAL SECURITY ITEM."
 SUMMARY OF HQ NAIC RESEARCH INTO THE ROSWELL INCIDENT,
UNIDENTIFIED FLYING SAUCERS, AND PROJECT BLUE BOOK

PURPOSE. To summarize sources of information used in the HQ NAIC study of the 1947
Roswell incident. Allegations are that a flying saucer(s) and/or alien(s) were found at the crash
site and transported to Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.

BACKGROUND. In 1993, Congressman Steven Schiff from New Mexico began an investigation
of the Roswell incident. Pursuant to that, a General Accounting Office auditor visited the HQ
NAlC History Office to see what records were available within the center. Also, a local
television station picked up the story. In addition to HQ NAIC records, the Historian visited
other base archives to search for material.

FIND1NGS.

1. A review of the HQ NAIC History Office and CIRC holdings, plus other base and
USAF Museum archives, encompassing several million pages of documents, did not turn up any
reference to the Roswell incident or the presence of flying saucer(s) and/or alien(s) at the base.

2. An electronic search of the Air Force Historical Research Agency archives, again,
several million pages of documents, did not turn up any reference to the Roswell incident or the
presence of flying saucer@) and/or alien(s) at Wright-Patterson AFB.

3. A review of the Dayton Daily News for July 1947, a l l of the UFO-related material
available in the Dayton, Centerville, and Woodbourne Public Libraries, as well as information
in the Wright State University holdings and material in the AFIT, Base Technical Library, and
Base Library did not turn up any conclusive evidence that flying saucer(s) and/or alien(s) had
ever been at Wright-Patterson.

4. Conversations with a dozen people who had worked in the Project Blue Book office
or with Blue Book materials did not turn up any evidence that there had ever been a flying
saucer(s) and/or alien(s) at Wright-Patterson.

5. Over the years, there have been several congressional investigations of this
organizations study of UFO reports. None has ever turned up evidence of a flying saucer(s)
and/or alien(s) at Wright-Patterson.

6, All of this organization’s UFO study files were transferred to the National Archives
and made available to the public.
CONCLUSIONS.

1. Concerted research has failed to turn up any evidence relating to the Roswell incident
or of a flying saucer(s) and/or alien@)at Wright-Patterson. Because this conclusion is based on
the absence of documentation, the issue can never be definitively resolved. There will always
be those who say "You didn't search hard enough" or "We know you really do have the
records/saucer(s)/aIien(s), but you are just not revealing them to us." It would almost be a
physical impossibility to search every desk drawer in every building on Wright-Patterson looking
for the report, if it ever existed, on Roswell-related material. HQ NAIC is convinced that no
such record currently exists.

2. Because no document has ever been found, however, leads center researchers to the
conclusion that the Roswell material, if it came to Wright-Patterson for analysis, was nothing
remarkable, certainly nothing extraterrestrial. The standard procedure for any government record
is that it is kept for some period of time, then retired or destroyed according to a general
schedule established by regulation. One might assume that a document purporting to be the true
analysis of extraterrestrial material would always be needed and, thus, would have been
preserved.

3. Because the Roswell incident occurred so long ago, now nearly 50 years ago, there
may be no record trail to follow to absolutely determine if a study had ever been conducted.

4. Despite the best efforts of UFO researchers over the years, not one scrap of physical
evidence or one incontestable photograph of either a flying saucer or an alien has ever been
found relating to the Roswell incident. Some researchers have devoted years of their lives to this
effort. Again, using an argument based on the absence of evidence, the fact that several hundred
man-years of effort have followed all of the research trails imaginable leads HQ NAIC to believe
that nothing extraterrestrial was found at Roswell.

5. The earliest UFO literature, books by Ruppelt, Keyhoe, and Menzel do not mention
the Roswell incident. Also, the Blue Book records and the Condon report do not mention the
Roswell incident, though many sightings from 1947 were investigated by this organization's
predecessors.

6. HQ NAIC realizes that the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, but every
reasonable avenue of research has been exhausted without finding evidence that a flying saucer(s)
and/or alien(s) have ever been at Wright-Patterson AFB.

7. Because the GAO will have searched the records of many federal agencies, HQ NAIC
suggests that they be contacted, or Congressman Schiff be contacted, for a comprehensive report
of their findings relating to the Roswell incident.
SUGGESTED READING.

Blue Book Special Report 14 and the Project Sign and Project Grudge reports. These
priinary documents should have been part of this organization's UFO study files and currently
available through the National Archives.

The UFO Controversy in America, David Michael Jacobs. Contains a comprehensive

review of documents belonging to this organization's UFO study files.

The Report on Unidentified Flyinn Objects, Edward Ruppelt. Ruppelt was the UFO study
project officer from 1951-1953 and he investigated a series of reports from 1947. He found
nothing, apparently, about the Roswell incident.

The UFO Experience, J. Allen Hynek. Written by the chief scientific advisor to this
organization for UFO studies. Associated with Sign/Grudge/Blue Book from 1948-1969, he
found nothing, apparently, about the Roswell incident.

Flyinn Saucers: Top Secret, Donald Keyhoe. Keyhoe helped establish NICAP and was
one of the earliest to allege that the government was withholding UFO "secrets" from the public.
He found nothing, apparently, about the Roswell incident.

Flying Saucers and the U.S. Air Force, Lawrence Tacker. States the official Air Force
position as of 1960 and includes earlier Air Force statements about UFOs.

HQ NAIC, March 1994

 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEAOOUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC

MEMORANDUM FOR S A F / A A z
ATTENTION: LT COL BUTLER

FROM: AF/SE

SUBJECT: GAO Review on Records Management Procedures Dealing with Weather Balloons,
Unknown Aircraft, and Similar Crash Incidents (GAO Code 701034) -
INFORMATION MEMORANDUM

In response to your memorandum dated 1 Mar 94, same subject, Air Force Safety has
identified 2 directives concerning the investigating and reporting of air vehicle crashes. One is
within our purview, while the other is managed by the Office of the Judge Advocate General.

AFR 127-4, Investigating and Reporting US Air Force Mishaps (attached), provides
guidance for Air Force safety investigations, to include "air vehicle mishaps." The mishap report
is used for mishap prevention purposes only and is not normally released outside Air Force
channels. It does not cover the investigation of air vehicle crashes belonging to other branches of
government or civilian crashes.

AFR 1 10- 14, Investigations of Aircrafl, Missile, and Nuclear and Space Accidents,
provides guidance for Accident Investigation Boards, which are convened primarily to obtain and
preserve available evidence for claims, litigation, disciplinary and administrative actions, and for
all other purposes. The accident report is normally releasable to the public.

Normally, the safety investigation is done first,after which the wreckagddebris retention
and disposition becomes the responsibility of the Accident Investigation Board. AFR 1 10-14,
paragraph 10, Disposition of Wreckage and Other Evidentiary Materials, states "HQUSAF/JACC
[now AFLSNJACT] manages the retention of aircraft wreckage for anticipated litigation or in
cases where there is a high degree of publicity. The Air Force is not under any general
requirement to retain wreckage for long periods of time, but in some cases, it is advantageous to
do while in others the wreckage can be disposed of quickly."

The Air Force Safety Agency searched the microfilm records (classified and unclassified)
for air vehicle mishaps for the period 20 June through 3 1 July 1947. The only mishaps reported in
New Mexico during that periods are as follows:
 2

AIRCRAFT DATE TIME* LOCATION

A-26C 24 June 1947 0809 7 miles northwest of Hobbs NM
P-5 1N 10 July 1947 1252 7 miles northwest ofHobbs NM
C-82A 12 July 1947 1206 7 miles southeast of Albuquerque NM
P-80A 18 July 1947 1200 Carrizozo NM
PQ- 14B 28 July 1947 0935 15 miles southwest of Alamogordo NM

* all times are Mountain Standard Time

We have no information regarding mishaps of air vehicles belonging to civilian or other
government agencies. Please note that mishaps involving unmanned air vehicles (which during the
1940s included remotely piloted aircraft, low-speed "cruise missiles" like the V- 1, and most
balloons) are considered "ground mishaps." Reports on such occurrences are not retained for an
extended period; AFR 4-20, vol11, Table 127-2, rule 4 directs the Air Force Safety Agency to
destroy them after 5 years.

J b S L. COLE, JR.,Brig Gen, USAF

Chief of Safety

Attachment:
AFR 127-4 '
cc:
AFLSNJACT (atch w/d)
 D E P A R T M E N T OF THE AIR F O R C E
WASHINGTON DC

OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY

MEMORANDUM FOR SAF/AA

FROM: SAFIAQL

SUBJECT: GAO Review on Records Management Procedures Dealing with

Weather Balloons, Unknown Aircraft, and Similar Crash Incidents (GAO
Code 701034) (Yourmemorandum, 1 Mar 1994)
-- INFORMATION MEMORANDUM

SAFIAQL is not the OPR for: 1) directives concerning records retention and
disposition or for 2) directives concerning reporting air vehicle crashes, investigations, and
wreckage/debris retention and disposition. Additionally, we do not possess any records
related to air vehicle impacts or crashes in New Mexico.
+
Memo
'
Col Steve 0.Ouzts, AF/XQWP, for
SAF/W
Subj: GAO Review an R e c o d
Management Procdurm Dealing
with Weather Balloons, Unknown
Aircraft, and Sirnilar Crash
Incidents . . .
March9, 1994
; i
 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS U N I T E D STATES AIR FORCE

09 Mar 94

MEMORANDUM FOR S A F / M
ATENTION: Lt Col Bulter

FROM: HQ USAFKOWP
1490 Air Force Pentagon
Washington DC 20330-1490

SUBJECT GAO Review on Records Management Procedures Dealing with Weather

Balloons, Unknown Aircraft, and Similar Crash Incidents (GAO Code
701034)-INFORMATION MEMORANDUM

Reference: 1 Mar 94 S A F Memorandum, Subj, same as above

There is no requirement for weather personnel to record weather balloon landings.

Only meteorological data are retained.

We did not find any records in the Air Force weather archives of a weather balloon
crash near Roswell, New Mexico from 20 June to 31 July 1947. If you have any
questions, my point of contact is Lt Col Jim Near DSNg4-5163.

/4c STEVE 0. ZTS,Col, USAF

chief, pok$Division
Directorate of Weather
DCS, Plans and Operations
 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC 20330-1000

OFFICE OF THE SECRRARI

10 March 1994
SAF/AAIQ
1610 Air Force Pentagon

SUBJECT: GAO Review of Records Management Procedures Dealing with

Weather Balloons, Unknown Aircraft, and Similar Crash
Incidents (GAO Code 701034) -
INFORMATION MEMORANDUM

Reference your memorandum, 1 March 1994, request items:

(a) Identify pertinent directives concerning records retention
and disposition.
The Air Force current regulation is AFR 4-20, Volume 2, Disposi-
tion of Air Force Records, Records Disposition Schedule,, dated 1
May 1992.
Earlier schedules were:
AFR 12-50 volume 11, Disposition of Air Force Records, Records
Disposition Standards, 30 October 1987; 31 January 1986; 14 May
1984.
AFM 12-50 Volume 11, Disposition of Air Force Documentation;
1 October 1969.
AFM 181-5, Records Management, Evaluation and Disposition of
Records, 1 December 1966; 1 July 1963; and 10 November 1958.
AFM 181-5, Records Management, Disposition of Records, 1 July
1956; and 1 August 1954.
AFM 181-5, Administration of Records, 1950.

(b) Identify pertinent directives concerning reporting Air

vehicle crashes, investigations, and wreckage/debris
retention and disposition.
AFR 110-14, Investigations of Aircraft, Missile, and Nuclear and
Space Accidents (AF/JACC) .
AFP 127-1 volume 1, US Air Force Guide to Mishap Investigation
(AFSA/SEP)
AFP 127, Volume 3, Safety Investigation Workbook (AFSA/SEP)
AFR 127-4, Investigating and Reporting US Air Force Mishaps
(AFSA/SEP)
AFR 127-11, Participation in a Military Civil Aircraft Accident
Safety Investigation (AFSA/SEP)
(c) Identify any records (unclassified or classified)
related to air vehicle(aircraft, lighter-than-aircraft,
rocket/missile, or other) impacts or crashes in New Mexico
from 20 June to 31 July 1947; identify record groups and/or
other indexes associated with these records for further
review.
We asked the National Personnel Records Center to see if they have
any files for Roswell Air Force Base for the 1947 time frame in
their holdings. They noted that the histories for the 509th Bomb
Group and Wing for Roswell Army Air Base for period of November-
December 1947 was transferred to Air University in 1953. The
regular 1947 records have been destroyed. They do have a packet
of Top Secret for 509th Bomb Wing, Walker Air Force Base,
Roswell, NM for 1949-1950. They said we would need to look
through this for any records.
(d) provide copies of pertinent directives (including any
changes of policies on retention and disposition) and
records (i.e.,item c above) to SAF/AAZ, 1720 Air Force
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20330-1720.
We are attaching appropriate extract from our disposition schedule
since 1950. This is our earliest schedule.

Chief, Records Management Branch

Directorate of Information Management
1 Atch
Extracts from AF
Records Schedules
($19
 with Attachment
s. J3&Wae&olts,AF%RA/cc,
for M/HO, SAWAM
S&j; C3AO Review on Rexords
Management %“roceduresDealing
 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE HISTOR1CM RESEARCH AGENCY
YAXWEtL AIR FORCE BASE. AUBAYA

8 Mar 94

MEMORANDUM FOR AFIHOr

SAFlAAZ~&
IN "URN-

FROM: AFHRA/CC
600 Chennault Circle
Maxwell AFB AT.,36 112-6424
SUBJECT: GAO Review on Records Management Procedures Dealing with
Weather Balloons, Unknown Aircraft, and Similar Crash Incidents

Reference: SAFIAAZ Ltr, 1 Mar 94

Attached are the results of the records search conducted at the Agency
pursuant to the instructions of referenced letter. Point of contact at this Agency is
Dr James Kitchens, DSN 493-5068 or commercial (205) 953-5068.

RICHARD S. RAUSCHKOLB
Colonel, USAF
Commander

Attachment:
AFHRA's Report
 REPORT

GAO INVESTIGATION OF "THE ROSWELL INCIDENT":

RELEVANT HOLDINGS AT THE AFHRA

8 March 1994

Preface

O n 1 March 1994 a facsimile transmission from the Secretary of the Air Force, Office of
Administrative Assistant (SAF/AA) directed the Historical Research Agency to support
the General Accounting Office's investigation of "the Roswell incident" Specifically, the
Agency was directed to identify any records in its possession concerning the
investigation and reporting of air vehicle and other crash incidents similar to the
reported crash of a weather balloon near Roswell, New Mexico, in July 1947 ("the
Roswell incident"). This report presents the search procedure and results and indicates
some possible additional locations for Air Force files on the Roswell incident.

Definition of a Search StratePy

The AFHRA/RSQ (Inquiries Branch) was assigned the task of responding to the
SAF/AAZ directive. On 2 March 1994, Inquiries Branch staff developed a list of possible
file locations which might contain relevant documents. Primary items on this list were
Roswell M d installation histories, together with unit histories of the Air Force
organizations stationed at Roswell in June-July 1947. In addition, the following rubrics
were identified for insertion into the Agency's finding aids:

Roswell
Roswell Army Air Field
Unidentified Flying Objects
uFo(s)
Weather Balloon(s)

-
Results of the Search Unit Histories

In June/ July 1947,the principal Air Force unit stationed at Roswell was the 509th Bomb
Group (H). This group, its constituent squadrons, and support organizations were
therefore indicated as the most likely locations for any reporting about the Roswell
incident in Agency files. On 3 March 1994, the unit histories of Air Force organizations
stationed at Roswell AAFld were retrieved and examined page-by-page for any entries
related to unidentified flying objects and/or the crash of a weather balloon near the base
in the June/July 1947 time frame. The results of this search were as follows:

509th Bomb Group (€3) - June/July 1947 - One brief passage mentioning the office
of Public Affairs and "flying disc" activities
in GP-509-HI, July 1947, p. 39 ( ~ e e
Appendix I).

393rd Bomb Sqdn - No AFHRA files for June/July 1947.

7l5th Bomb !3qdn - No AFHRA files for June/July 1947.

830th Bomb Sqdn - Nothing in unit h i s b r y for 24 May 1946-23 June 1947 (SQ-
BOMB-830-HI, 24 May 1946-23 June 1947).

1027th Air Materiel - Nothing in unit history for 17 Dec 1944-Nov 1947
Ssdn (SQ-SV-1027-HI, 17 Dec 1944Nov 1947).

427th AAF Base Unit - This unit's historical reports are included in Roswell AAFld
installation histories (AFHRA series 288.17-28,1947). No
mention of Rowell incident found.

390th Air Service Sqdn - No AFHRA files for June/July 1947.

1395th Military Police - No AFHRA files for June/July 1947.

Company (Aviation)

603rd Air Engineering - Nothing in unit history for Feb-Nov 1947 (SQ-ENGR-603-
Sqdn HI, Feb-Nov 1947).

It should be noted that the period from approximately 1946 to 1950 is the least well
documented era in the Air Force's unit history program. During this time of drastically
reduced forces and peacetime concerns, major unit histories were frequently thin and
their content sketchy at best Small units, especially support units, frequently did not
submit histories at all during the 1946-1947 period. Although we cannot be absolutely
sure that the histories marked "no holding'' in the above list were never written, it
appears virtually certain that they were not, in fact, ever created. If written, there is
good evidence through accessioning and microfilming records that the Agency never
received those indicated as absent from the AFHRA collection.

-
Result of the Search Base Histories

On 3 March 1994 the Agency's files of Roswell AAFld histories for June/ July 1947 were
examined. These base or installation histories are designated AFHRA 288.17-28, Roswell
M d Histories, Jan 1946-Dec1947 (3 vols), These histories amount to approximately
two linear inches and are largely concerned with administrative matters (number of
personnel, transfers, routine administrative actions, etc.). No mention of the Roswell
incident was found in them.

-
Result of the Search Card Catalog
- and IRIS

On 3 March 1994 appropriate rubrics in the Agency's card catalog such as "Roswell,"
"Roswell AAFld," W F q s ) , " "Unidentified Flying Objects," "Weather Balloon(s),"were

examined. No entries were found which identified information remotely related to the
Roswell incident.

The Agency's IRIS electronic data base was also queried for potential entries. The
following key words or phases were entered:

ROSWELL
UFO
UFOs
UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT
UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS
WEATHER BALLOON
WEATHER BALLOONS

The IRIS search produced no documents concerned with a flying disc and/or weather
balloon crash at Roswell M d . The I R E search, however, did reveal a substantial file
in AFHRA microfilm roll 33,764,beginning frame 562, which is Concerned with flying
disk reports in the western United States during the summer and fall of 1947. This file
was apparently maintained by the Air Force Missile Development Command. It reveals
contemporary investigative agencies, methods, and personalities both Air Force and
civilian, thus it provides archival clues for further investigation of the Roswell incident.
Extracts from microfilm roll 33,764 are attached as Appendix IL

Finally, a passage mentioning balloon operations from Holloman AFB during JuneJdy
1947 was located in AFHRA K280.10-54G,1947-1958,Con)ribufions of Balloon Operafions
to Reseurch and Development at the Air Fore Missile Development Center, Hollomun Air Force
Base, N. Mex., 2947-2950 (Holloman AFB, NM. AFMDC, n.d.), pp. 1-2(Appendix III).
This passage indicates that a cluster of "rubber-type weather balloons" was launched at
Holloman AFB on 5 June 1947, the equipment from which was recovered. A second
launch of polyethylene balloons was made on 3 July, the equipment for which was not
recovered.

Aircraft or "Vehicle"Crash Reports

The AFHRA does not hold aircraft accident reports. The office of record for such reports
is the Air Force Safety Agency/SERR, W a n d AFB, NM.
Summarv and Conclusions

The Historical Research Agency is primarily a repository for unit histories and
supporting documents, and it has never routinely received the kind of records which
might provide details of the Roswell incident If such records survive today, they will
undoubtedly be held by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA),
either at the Washington National Records Center (WNRC) or the Southwest Regional
Depository (Fort Worth, Texas).

Recommendations

Because the records management policy of the federal government requires that obsolete
office files be retired to the NARA, the WNRC and the NARA Southwest Regional
Depository might be searched for files related to the Roswell incident.

AFHRA microfilm roll 33,764indicates that the Fourth Air Force and its A-2 intelligence
section apparently carried out investigations of flying disks in the western US in 1947.
Research in the NARA, therefore, might reasonably include a search for surviving HQ
Fourth AF and Fourth AF A-2 Section files in the N U

YAMES H. mCHENS, III, PhD RICHARD S. RAUSCHKOLB-

Archivist Colonel, USAF
Inquiries Branch Commander

Appendix
1. 509 BG History, Jun/Jul47
2 Extract from "Flying Disks 1947" LJ 1
3. Ballon Operations at AFMDC, 1947-1950,pp 1-2
 :. I. ,

509mBo~~ AND
_ -

ROJWLLARMYAmF
_ c

1947
31JULY
1 TULY1947 THROUG~

'
- . _..
.

. ~.
 8 July 1947

1. Pursuant t o authority cxituincd i n Hqs. 8th Afr Borco TrX

nun:ar 4 1593 dated 5 July 19.:7, tli: undersigncd hcrcby nsaumcs
cG?maRd of tho Rasticll ;army L i t - F i c l d , Rosi:foll, Ee?v :kxico. zffcctivc
t h i s datc.

"A" 6: Fost (325)

Fer s ornol
Clnssificction
Iiqs. 8th AF
.
Hqs. SAC
Col Jonsings
 OZl”UiYIZATI0N

Amy s i g n i f i c a n t chsinges . i n o r g z n i z a t i o n as activation o r de-

r c t i v n t i o n o f u n i t s , or change o f comami, w i l l be d e a l t k i t h i n ‘;his -

chap tor .
L-L Colonal Tayno Jec:Sngs, ileputy Co.m-andor, assumed c o m a i d

0 f no $we11 Army A i r Z e l d on e J u l y 1947. Colonel i7. H. 9lanchard,

2omanding Officor went on losvo.
2/
L t Colonel Charles X. Hortat;on, Jr., w s assignad as Cmxancling

Officor o f J’qua:’,ron “A”, v i c e L t I=oIoml a i c h a r d P. Schmacher on

14 J u l y 1947. The Squadron A i j u t a n t , Captain Soman, was t r a n s f e r r e d

overseas and ?as r s g l a c s d by kFFtaiu Joseph A. Jones.
Somand of t21e 3rd Photo k o o r a t o r y U n i t (VH), nas a s s m e d bj

1st Lt Sarold 3. Araer ?er Paragraph 3, S p e c i a l Order, #139, Eeadquarters,

Roswell lamy A i r Tiell, d a t e d 1s July 1947. He r e l i e v e d 1st L t Le-ds

C. Bolianen who m s transfsrred t o the 701st M F BU, IIanil+&n Wsld,
California.

The 390th Air S e r v i c e Squadron received a new commandiri officor

iz tilo person o f L t Colonel S W t e r Yo Lucas, who assmed connand on

1 J u l y 1947. Colbnel LUCES r e l i e v s d L’c Colonel Tilliam C. Kiagsbwy

who thsn assumed s o m a d of the 715th Bomb Squadron (m),formerly

c o m a d o c ! by Colonel Lucas..

1st Lt 3. G. Hilburn, fonnor Assistant Base Adjvitant, t r a n s f e r r e d

’t?m Squedrm “A“, 427th IWF FU e0 603rd Air Engineering Squadron as

Sqxadron AdjGtaIIt. He replaces Cqtaia Earl.0. Cassy, who is on orders

for an overseas a s s i g m e n t to Project PAC

-I,?.G . 0 . f 5 , paragraph 1 - W F , Ros;=Il, flew Hexico.-

 Tho o t h e r threo S r i e f i n g s were those which m r e given t o t h o TIP

and a simulnted b r i a f i n q to a l a r g o group o f A i r Scouts r e p r a s e n t i n g

a l l of the troops i n ?Jew I b x i c o vhish rras given on 15 J u l y 1947.

Several small p r o j e c t s were completed during the month including

signs on a l l the office doors, a b u i l d i n g d i r c c t o r y , and a vmrld s i t u a t i o n

map vhick is main+ainsd on a day-to-day basis .

~~
%e B i s t o r i c a l Section o f 5-2 has been s e r i o u s l y handicapp:?d by
~ ~

the removal o f the r e g u l a r stenozrapher w i t h the r e d u c t i o n i n force.

Due to che f a c t e l a t q u a l i t y o f t h o d o p a r h m t r e p o r t s has

i n general been so inadequate; l e c t u r e s are being prepared t o be givoo

e a r l y i n August t o properly t r a i n the l i a i s o n r s p r e s o n t n t i v e s of ea&

departmezlt .
The OfMce o f Pu3lic I n f o m a t i o n was k e p t q u i t e busy during the -
month answering i n q u i r i s s on the " f l y i n g disc", which was reported to

be i n pqssesslon o f the 509th Bonb Group. zhe o b j e o t turned out to be

a radar t r a c k i n g balloon.

The main p r o j e c t o f the mont? m s making a l l arrangements f o r a

s u c c e s s f u l A i r Force Day. Lt. Colonel O l i v e r LaFbrge, A i r aeserve Corps,

at Santa Fey made atrangensnts f o r Colonel Blanchard to v i s i t t?m Governor
o f Bew Eexico and ask h h t o d e c l a r e A i r Force Day in Jew Kexico on

1 AUgUSt
 The Public Information O f f i c e was host during +he rnont2 to the

Sonior A i r Scouts of Se-:: Xerico, and to the s e v e r a l groups o f v i s i t k g

VIP‘s. Several easy c h a i r s and couches have been procurred to make the

Tu b l ic I n f o m a t i o n Office a more comfortable p l s c e i n which t;o e n t e r t a i n .

‘fie Public I n f o r n a t i o n O f f i c e r and t k o Commanding O f f i c e r were

guasts o f t h e Xiwenis Club o f itosr;ell a t a luncheon, f o r which Colorzel

3’- B. Blanchard was the g u e s t speaker. Colonel Blanchnrd spoke on the

fiJ‘;ure o f t h s A i r Force, snci tho talic was very w e l l received.

Arrangements have nox been mado to have the P.I.O. c a l l e d on

a l l crash c a l l s i n accordance with AAF 3egulation. I n the p a s t , t h e

F.I.0. has been c a l l e d t o o l a t e to get to the scene i n t h e to do &?y

good.

The 3rd Photo Labcrntory Unit (vii) is now comaarded by 1st L t

Irarolct W. Arner p e r paragraph 3, SO #139, H e a d q v x t s r s , this station,

datod 18 Jdly 1347. 1st Lt. Lewis C. Bohamin, former cornanding officer
of the 3rd Photo Lab Unit, w a s t r s n s f e r r e d to the 701st CV;F BU, Hamilton

Aeld, California.

The p r i n c i p a l d i f f i c u l t y regorted is P c r i t i c a l lack of photA8tat

paper. This has caused a large back l o g o f important work to p i l e up.

The following i s a breakdown o f work performed during the month

onding 31 July 19471

........3@580
Ccntn& P r i n t s . .
............. Proj e o t i o n Prints .......
...... .403
Photostats
Copy Negatives.. ........ 168 Grounri Negatives..
Aerial Roll film..
35 m film...........
.......
b...454
.285
741 feet
feet

40
 VISITOBZS

1 July 1947 - L,%adquarters,

t Colonel R. *%milton f k r t i n and Lt. Colonel Loberg,
Eighth Air Force, arrived this date t o
coordinate w i t h S-3 and check i m e n t o v of printing and
repwduction equipment.
2 July 1947 - Colonel Brown, Colonel Dubwe, and others from Headquarters,
Eighth A i r Force, arrived on official visit and inspect50Xh
Others included L t Colonel -Raymond 3, Spurgeon, t o coordi-
nate w i t h Adjutant’3 Section; L t Colonel aaJr C, Uta, t o
coordinate w i t h Engineering; and L t Colonel Donald 8. DunQs,
t o coordinate with the Legal Section (Judge Advocate).

2 July 1947 - arrived

Major 0”eal J.T. Archer, Headquarters, 3ighth Air Fome,
t o coordinate with S-3 on safety,
flylng
2 July 1947 - &.
Yr,E. %dt,Engineering &pot, St. Louis, Ussour%,
visited t o coordinate Officer.
with Theater

3 July 1947 - k. Giles, Fire hevention Inspector from Strategic Air

C o d , departed this s t a t i o n after completing his in-
spection of the Fire I ) e ~ ~ n t s ,
8 July 19L7 - Eighth Air Force Group Competition Inspection Team, u d e r
the supervision of Lt W o n e l Burns, arrived t o W e the
competition inspection. Major L. J. Seibert and k j o r
Rogers L. Pearson were amoq those present.
8 July 1947 - tki.o nJinspection.
o b H. Kawka, Sighth Air Force, arrived on an amaaunl-

9 July 1947 - S-4 was inspected by rbjor

V. Bra$.,
K. I). Thompson and Captain J.

10 July 1947 - &. E. S. Rupp axxi Mr. C. D. Hall, SAW, risited Base Supply
regardiii Quartermaster Stock %ntrol.
3.l July 19&7 - arrived
Captair! Billy M. Seargeant, 70th AAF BU, 103rd Veather Group,
on Weather Station Inspecticn.
11. July 19h7 - Captain Eciward G. Retartyk, B g h t h Air Force, arrived t o
coordinate with kdget and Fiscal Officer,
ll July 19L7 - ordinatedW. Rvitt,Budget andAnalyst,
a$., 3.
with
Cost Eighth Force, co-
Air
Fiscal Officer on cost a m l ~ 3 i s .
LI1 Jxly 19&7 - nate
Colonel Sager, Surgeon, Zighth A i r Force, arrived t o coordi-
with Station Hospital and Base Commanding Officer,
4 J a y 19117 - Headquarters,
captain R. R, Showalter, Jr., and i k j o r Boatright,
L, A.
Eighth Air Force, arrived t o coordinate with
S t a t i s t i c a l Control on cost analysis,

16 July 1947 - anBrigsdier Gmerzl Roger P. -%mey arrivsd from Ft Worth on

o f f i c i a l visit.
-
1 6 July 19&7 L t Colonel J, P. Hines, Ifajar Louis R, Fisian, Major H m d
A, Beck, and L t Colonel John 3, B e l l arrived Xrom & a d q u e
tcrs, Strategic A i r Command, f o r inspection ard cooKiinatfon
of s-lc Section,
1 7 July 1Fh7 - route
Brigadier General Roger Y. b
t o Tucson, Arizona.
y departed this s t a t i o n en-

21 July 1947 - Air

&.W, L, Tilson, Sum, arrived t o coordinate the
with
I n s t a l l a t i o n Officer and AACS, regarding Headquarters
AX projects,
22 July 19&7 - Dr, Ea. visit
for
U, Towmead, Ft Stanton,
FTS,
the Commanding
nith
Kew Mexico, arrived
Officer or Executive
Officer, . He is Chief Surgeon, k b l i c Health S e d c e ,
Ft Stanton.
23 July 1947 - 19 VIPCAPconsisting
also
of several college presidents and deans,
and National Gm-3 notables from the western states
arrived from Hamilten Field t o spend the night, They were
enrpute t o Eglin Field, Florida, t o witness demonstration
of latest arngr air force equipment.
214 July 1947 - cOUFteay
Tho above msntioned VIP
tour, including
base after a short
departed t h i 3
sample briefing.
a

24 July 1947 - b j o r R, J,
D, A, Hartzop, Jr,,
Jolmson and' Captain lV.
Amy AirForces, Washington, D, .arrived for imesti-
C,,
gation of the B-29 crash which occurred 20 lrsg 19h7.
25 July 1947 - SovernorofThomas
guests honor
J, W x y of h Bdexico, and party, nere the
of Romll An4p A i r Field, Brigadier General
Roger Y. Ranmy, Comnanding General, Zighth A i r Force, was one
of the v i s i t i n g dignitaries t o welcome the Governor.
 BI SLIOG r n Y

1. I i i s t c r i c a l Liaison O f f i c e r ' s Beports

2. Pissi.cn iiegorts, f i l e d i n I n t e l l i g e n c e Office

3. G?erat;ions Reports, f i l e d i n 3-3 C f f i c e

4. Zommndiog O f f i c s i ~Daily Diary, f i l e d in Ease

Ad j u t a n t s O f i i c o

5. T r m s c r i p t c f S t r f f Eee-kings

66
 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR F O R C E
A I R FORCE Of’CICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS

1 1 May 1994

MEMORANDUM FOR S A F / A A z

FROM: HQAFOSIIHO
226 Duncan Ave Suite 2 100
Bolling AFB,DC 20332-0001

SUBJECT: GAO Review on Records Management Procedures (Your memo 16 Mar 94)

1. This is to inform you that on 19 December 1975, the HQ AFOSI History office
transferred two cubic feet of documents consisting of directives and policy guidance
relating to the conduct of investigations of the type GAO is reviewing and all investigative
files covering the period of 1948 to 1968 to the National Archives. You will find attached
a copy of the Standard Form 135, Record Transmittal and Receipt, signed by the Assistant
Chief, Military Projects Branch, National Archives, on that date (atch 1). My predecessor,
who was instrumental in transferring these records informed me that these were the only
records that AFOSI held. Currently, anyone who requests information on the subject from
HQ AFOSUInformation Release is directed to the National Archives. Further, you will
find attached a copy of my input to a staff meeting of 8 February 1989 in which I noted
that 40 years earlier a meeting was held in the Southwest U.S.concerning subject (atch 2).
At that time, District 17, Kirtland AFB, NM,was designated to be responsible for
collection and reporting on aerial phenomena. That is about the only reference I’ve found
in AFOSI historical files relating to the subject for the period of 1948 to 1953. AFOSI did
not become operational until 1 August 1948, so we have no histories dealing with events
before that time.

2. If you have any fbrther questions, please contact me at DSN 297-5725 or Commercial
(202)767-5725.

EDWARD C. MISHLER
Historian

Attachments:
1. Copy of SF 135, 19 Dec 75
2. Copy of HO Input, 8 Feb 89 Staff Meeting

“HELPING TO PROTECT A GREAT WAY OF LIFE”

 --
S T A S J A R D fORM ! X
RECORDS TRANSMITTAL
7 0 1 E C O M l L E l E D A T FEDERAL RECOROS C f h l E R
JULY ‘%I i31TION ACCLSIK)I( ~ 1 RCCCRD GROUP N3
GEhCRAL SERVICES 6 C W l h AND RECEIPT
C C Y R ‘1‘ C I R l 01- i 4 “-375-209
SIGhATURL I O b l C RCCCRCS RCCCVL3
INSTRUCTIONS
Send original and two copies to appropriate ->f&
.- 112-17-75
Federal Records Center.
EXCEPTION-Send original and three copies to the A-S61sfA*lf c6 c
Alexandna, Virginia, Center /%),I* Y ./
?b:’,,ec . f S G b 4 ~ : h , h&f(G,.\ 1 4rL h
FROM: t h ’ a ~ wand oddrrra of Apency trorujerr6ng rrsordr) TO: Feberal Records Center, C s i l
HQ XFOSI/HO The..\rchivist.of t h e Unit d Srz:
Rm 1 - H -0 5 3 , F o r r e s t a l B l d g National Archives & Recorss Ser:
1,000 I n m n d e n c e Ave., SW Gene r a 1 S e r v i c e s .A dm 1 n 1 s t r a t i o i?
%. h ,.*- - 7 I n ,

2 SOUARE FEET OF SPACE CLEARED 3 FfLfNG EOUfPMENJ EMPTIED 4 CUIIC F i r OF crcsnx

’ TRANSFERRED
A OfFlCE I STORAGE b FILE CADINCTS (Na.) I TRANS F’lLfS (NO.) C SHELVING (LIi. f1.I

2 --
5 hAME OF AGENCY CLS-ODIAN OF RLCOROS 6 BUlLOlNG A h 0 R x ) U NO , 7 TELfFhO\E NO.

Kurt K . Kunze, C a p t , USAF, H i s t o r i a n F o r r e s t a l B l d g , Rm l I - ? - O $ j 6G53-39a-

50 AS XMEDULED WTMOUT FURTHER AGENCY CONCURRENCC’ 0 YES 0 NO
c
10 TITLE Chi e o c u m e n t a - 11. I ObTE
t i o n D i v , f b i ? e c t o r a t e ob 1 9 Dec -:
I2 80) I3
FRC ONLY (Shou orponiratimd canponml rrrafinp rrcwnd.) (Schdulr a i d IIor 5 0 )

S o u r c e d o c u m e n t s d a t i n g from 1 9 4 8 t o 1 9 6 8
c o n c e r n i n g t h e USAF i n v e s t i g a t i o n o f Un-
i d e n t i f i e d F l y i n g O b j e c t s (UFOs). T h e s e
r e c o r d s c o n t a i n d o c u m e n t s on i n v e s t i g a t i v e
p o l i c y and A i r Force O f f i c e of S p e c i a l
I n v e s t i g a t i o n r e p o r t s o f i n v e s t i g a t i o n s on
UFO s i g h t i n g s .
SOURCE DOCUMENTS
F i l e f o l d e r s 24-185-1 through 24-155-27 ( S o t e :
T h e r e i s n o f i l e f o r 2 4 - 1 8 5 - 5 ; t h e r e a r e two
f i l e s u n d e r t h e n u mb er 2 4 - 1 5 5 - 1 7 ; a n d t h e r e
is no f i l e f o r 24-1 8 5 -2 6 ) T h es e f i l e s c o n -
t a i n p o l i c y g u i d a n c e a n d AFOSI D i s t r i c t
r e p o r t s o f i n v e s t i g a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g UFOs
( f i l e d p r i m a r i l y by d i s t r i c t ) .
F i l e fo1de.r.s. 2 4 - 1 5 5 - 0 0 1 t h r o u g h 23-185-.008
’
~
c c n t a i n i n g p o l i c y g u i d a n c e an d XFOSI D i s t r i c t
r e p o r t s o f i n v e s t i g a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g UFOS
( f i l e d p r i m a r i l y i n chronological o r d e r . ) .
!

S T l Y D A * D fORU 135 (Lire Standard Form 13SA f o r continuation sheets) 135-‘C

JULT IY6I E D l T l O h
5-U I. G O V E R h W I - PRI\lI’& WflcT ‘ C f - O i S S - I 5 3 a 7 - C
 HO Input for 8 Peb 89 Staff Heating

The following are two old items from the APOSI arChfV88. ?ortY Years m o ,
representatives of US invertigative and intelligence agencies met in the
clouthwestern United States. They decided Dirtrict 17, Kirtland APB, NH, would
be responsfble for the overall collection and reporting on aerial phenomena.
These phenomena, later termed unidentified flying object8 or UFOs, had been
righted with some frequency In the New Hexico area. This program was
initfally called Project Sign, then Project Grudge, and was renamed Progect
Blue Book in 1951. NOTE: APOSI turned over all its investigative filer
pertaining to this project to the National Archives in 197& Twenty years
w , in response to the increasing drug problem in the Air Porce, OSI took
rteps to provide additional training. District 17 rponrored a narcotics
seminar at Kirtland AFB, NM, which 225 people from state and local law
enforcement sgencier M well as OSI w e n t o attended. OSI also developed M
advanced Narcotics Investigations Course designed to teach the latest technics
In combatting drug abuse.
ARCHIVES/ LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
NOTE: RECORD GROUP 310, RECORDSOF THE ARMY STAFF MESSAGECENTER, WERE SEARCHED FOR 1947.
RECORD OROUP ENTRY REEL I TITLE LOCATION

NIA NIA wpp

lr
r LIB OF CONGRESS

NIA NIA S P M R PAPERS LIB OF CONGRESS

NIA NIA TWINING PAPERS LIB OF CONGRESS

N/A NIA VANDENBERG PAPERS LIB OF CONGRESS

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

I8 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 I AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC
18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 I AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC
18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIRADJUTANT NARADC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC
18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC
18 1 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC
18 1 813 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 614 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 815 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 618 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 617 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 819 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 620 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 620 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 621 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 622 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 823 AIR ADJUTANT QENERAL NARA DC

18 1 624 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 ms AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 6a AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 1 627 AIR ADJUTANT GENERAL NARA DC

18 4 170 RECORDS OF ARMY AIR SUITLAND

18 4 im RECORDS OF ARMY AIR SUlTUND

18 4 392 RECORDS OF ARMY AIR SUKUND

18 4 3w RECORDS OF ARMY AIR SUKUND

18 4 304 RECORDS OF ARMY AIR SUITLAND

18 4 305 RECORDS OF ARMY AIR SUITLAND

18 4 306 RECORDS OF ARMY AIR SUITLAND

18 4 307 RECORDS OF ARMY AIR SUITLAND

159 IG REPORT- INDIVDUALS NARA SUITLAND

158 10 CORRESPONDENCE NARA SUITUND

319 G2 INTEL RECORDSOF NARASUWND

319 RECORDSOF THE ARMY ARCHNES-SUtllAND

319 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHNES-SUWD

319 RECORDS OF THE ARMY A R C H N E S S U M O

319 RECORDS OF THE ARMY A R C H N E S - S U M D

319 RECORDS OF THE ARMY A R C H N E W U M D

310 RECORDS OF THE ARMY A R C H M S S U M D

319 2D50 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITUND

310 3053 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITUWD

319 3054 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHMSSUITUND

310 30s RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITUND

310 3056 RECORDSOF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITUWD

319 Jo51 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHMSSUITUND

319 3102 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITUND

319 3102 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITUND

310 31U3 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITUND

319 3114 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITUND

319 3115 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITUND

310 3116 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMS-SUlTWD

319 3117 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITUND

310 3118 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIVES-SUITLAND

319 3119 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITUND

310 3120 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMS-SUITLAND

310 3121 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHMSSUITUND

310 3 m RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHlMSSUlTlUlD

319 3123 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHMSSUITUND

310 3124 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHMS-SUITUND

319 3125 RECORDS OF THE ARMY A R C H M S S U W D

319 3126 RECORDS OF THE ARMY A R C H M S S U I W D

319 3127 RECORDSOF THE ARMY A R C H M S S U W D

319 3128 RECORDS OF THE ARMY A R C H I M S S U I W D

319 312B RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHMSSUITLAND

319 3130 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITUND

319 3131 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHMSSUITUND

319 3132 RECORDSOF THE ARMY ARCHMSSUITUND

310 3133 RECORDSOF THE ARMY A R C H M S - S U I W D

310 3134 RECORDS OF THE ARMY A R C H M S S U I W D

310 3138 RECORDS OF THE ARMY A R C H M S S U I W D

319 3143 RECORDSOF THE ARMY A R C H I M S S U W D

319 3145 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITLAND

319 3146 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITLAND

319 jo51 RECORDS OF THE ARMY ARCHIMSSUITLAND

341 CORRESPONDENCE NARA SUITLAND

341 1 HQ USAF MESSAGES NARA SUITLAND

341 23 1 TOP SECRET MSGS NARA SUITLAND

341 213 1 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND,

341 213 2 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 2l3 3 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 5 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 0 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 7 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 0 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 0 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITUND

341 213 10 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 11 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 12 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 13 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 14 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 16 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 17 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 16 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 19 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 20 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 21 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 22 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 23 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 24 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUlTUND

341 213 25 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUlTLAND

341 2l3 21) OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 27 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUlTLAND

341 213 21) OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 20 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 30 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITUND

341 213 31 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITUND

341 213 32 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 33 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARS SUITUND

341 213 33 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 34 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 35 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 37 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 36 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 39 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 40 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 41 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 42 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 43 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 44 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 45 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 4 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 47 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 48 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 49 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 50 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 51 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 52 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 53 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 54 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUlTUND

341 213 56 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

311 213 58 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUlTLAND

341 213 57 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARA SUITLAND

341 213 58 OFFICE OF DIRECTOR NARASUITUND

341 337 18 HQUSAF RECORDS HARA Dc

341 337 1 OF10 HQUSAF RECORDS NARA Dc
341 337 2 OF18 HQUSAF RECORDS NARA Dc

341 337 3 OF18 HQ USAF RECORDS NARA Dc

341 337 4 0 F 18 HQUSAF RECORDS NARA Dc

341 337 SOFl8 HQUSAF RECORDS NARA Dc

341 337 8OF18 HQUSAF RECORDS NARA Dc

341 337 7 OF 18 HQ USAF RECORDS NARA Dc

341 337 8OF 18 HQ USAF RECORDS NARA Dc

341 337 QOF 18 HQ USAF RECORDS NARA Dc

341 337 10 OF 18 HQ USAF RECORDS NARA Dc

341 337 11 OF 18 HQ USAF RECORDS NARA Dc

341 337 lZOF18 HQ USAF RECORDS NARA Dc

341 337 130F 18 HQ USAF RECORDS NARA DC

341 337 14 OF 18 HQ USAF RECORDS NARA Dc

341 337 1SOF 18 HQ USAF RECORDS NARA Dc

341 337 16 OF 16 HQ USAF RECORDS NARA Dc

341 337 17 OF 18 HQ USAF RECORDS NARA Dc

401 124 1 A.P CRARY PAPERS NARA Dc

RECORDS CENTERS

ACCESSION 1 BOX 1

338780280 1 WHITE SANDS -ARMY

338780261 14 WHITE SANDS -ARMY

338780282 14 WHITE SANDS -ARMY

338-76-0262 4 OF4 WHITE SANDS -ARMY

338-78-0643 20F2 AIR DEFENSE SCHOOL

FT BLISS
341-A-I262 1 BOLLINGMB

341-69A-1262 15 BOLLINGAFB

341-A-1262 30 BOLLINGAFB

341-71A6170 27 PENTAGON

341-71A6170 29 PENTAGON

341-71A6170 30 PENTAGON

341-71A6170 32 PENTAGON

341-71A6170 38 PENTAGON

341-71A6170 67 PENTAGON

342-48A-5049 I WATSON U B S

3424A-5025 1 8TH AF

34249A-5025 1 OF 20 8th AF

342a-5025 10OF 20 8th AF

34249A-5025 11OF 20 8th AF

342-4M-5025 120F 20 8th AF

34249A-5025 130F 20 8th AF

342-4w-5025 140F20' 8th AF

34249A-5025 2 0 F 20 8th AF

342-4ah-5025 3 0 F 20 8th AF

34249A-5025 40F 20 8th AF

34240A-5025 5 0 F 20 8th AF

34249A-5025 BOF 20 8th AF

342-4ah-5025 7 0 F 20 8th AF

342-4M- 8OF 20 8th AF

34249A-5025 9OF 20 mAF

3424Q56004 1 12thAF

342-48c5025 1 OF2 8th AF

34249c4025 20F2 @ AF

342-4805025 1 8thM

3424QD6015 1 OF3 SAC

342-49D6015 20F3 SAC

3424808015 3 SAC

3424855025 1 8th AF

34249E6015 SAC

342-49H-5025 8th AF

342-5&7029 1 10 th AF BROOKS AFB

342-51-7012 HQ BOLLING AFB

342-51-7110 428 MFBU KlRTLAND

AFB
342-51-7111 KlRTLAND AFB

342-51-7112 KlRTLAND AFB

342-51A-5071 BOLLLING FLD COMMAND

342-518-0814 1 BOLLING FLD

342-51C-5071 1 BOLLING FLD

342-52-7m 1 OF8 3151 ELEC GRP WATSON

LABS
34252-7089 20F8 3151 ELEC GRP WATSON
LABS
342-52-7089 30F8 3151 ELEC GRP WATSON
LABS
342-52-7089 40F8 3151 ELEC GRP WATSON
LABS
342-52-7089 5OF8 3151 ELEC ORP WATSON
LABS
342-52-7089 60F8 3151 ELEC GRP WATSON
LABS
342-52-m89 70F8 3151 ELEC GRP WATSON
LABS
342-52-7089 8 3151 ELEC ORP WATSON
LABS
34252-7091 1 WRIGHT PAT

342-52-7098 1 JOINT LONG RANQE

PROV GRD
342-52-7103 1 AIR WEATHER SERV
ADW
342-52-86087 1 OF2 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-52Aa33 23 10TH AF

342-52A-5Qm 1 lo(h AF

34252446117 1 CAMBRIDGE LABS

342eB4003 1OF7 8th AF

34242B4oO3 2OF7 8th AF

342528-4003 3oF7 8th AF

342528-4003 4OF7 8th AF

34252B4003 5ff7 8th AF

342528-4003 Off7 8th AF

342528-4003 7 mAF

34242Mo67 20F2 HQAMC WRIOHTPAT

342mQ-4002 1 ach AF
342-52a-4002 1 8th AF

342-53-7aB 1 OF25 8th AF

342-53-7028 11 OF25 8th AF

342-53-7028 12 OF 25 8th AF

342-53-7028 13 OF 25 8th AF

~2-53-7077 20F6 3088 EXP TEST GP

HOLLOMANAFB
342-53-7077 30F6 3 W O EXP TEST GP
HOLLOMANAFB
342-53-7077 40F8 3088 EXP TEST GP
HOLLOMANAFB
342-53-7077 60F8 3069 EXP GP HAFB
342-53-7070 1 mMSCU(PGP
HOLLOMAN M B
342-53-7108 1 OF2 CONAF MITCHEL FLD

342-53-7108 2 CONAF MITCHEL FLD

342-53A-6074 1 OF2 WRIGHT PAT

342-53A-6074 2 WRIGHT PAT

342-53A-6070 1 OF 18 HQAMC WRIGHT PAT

342-53AaQ70 2 OF 18 HQ AMCWRIM PAT

34253A-6078 3 0 F 18 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-53A-78 4 0 F 18 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-53A6079 1 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-53AaQ79 1 HQ AMC W R l M PAT

342-53A-6079 10 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-53A-79 11 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

34253A-6079 12 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-53AaQ79 3 HQ AMC W R M PAT

342-53Amm 4 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-53A8019 5 HQAMC WRIGHT PAT

34253AaQ79 6 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-53A-mn r HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-534m79 8 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-53AaQ79 9 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-53A8081 1 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-53A-6Q81 2 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-53A8081 2 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

34243A8001 3 HQ AMC W R M PAT

342-53A-6Q81 3 HQ AMC W R M PAT

342-53A4061 4 HQ AMC W R M PAT

342-53A-6087 1 AMC HQ WRIGHT PAT

342- 2 AMC HQ WRIGHT PAT

34253A6087 3 AMC HQ WRlQMl PAT

34253346081 4 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-536-8079 1 HQ AMC W R I M PAT

342-!j3c8079 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-54-E-6128 HQ AMC WRIGHTPAT

342-54-F8128 HQ AM WRIGHT-PAT

3423cF-6128 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-54F4128 HQ AM WRIGHT-PAT

342-54F-6128 HQ AM WRIGHT-PAT

342-54F-6128 4 HQ AM WRIGHT-PAT

342-5406097 1 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

3425486097 2 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-5486097 2 Ha AMC WRIGHT PAT

3425486097 2 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

342-54F-4022 1 lzth AF

342545-4045 9OF48 HQ AMC WRIQHT PAT

34235Asogs 1 HQ AMC WRIQHT PAT

34245Adogs 2 Ha AMC WRIGHT PAT

34245A6099 2 HQ AMC WRIGHT PAT

34258A-6191 1 CAMBRIDGE LABS

34244067 1 AMC HQ WRIQHT PAT

34244002 1 OF3 BWAF

34244002 20F3 AF
!Wth BG ORDERS 509(h BOMB GROUP

MORNING REPORT JULY 1947 509(h BOMB QROUP

MORNING REPORTS JULY 1M7 427AAFBU

HEADQUARTERS, ARMY AIR FORCES
WASHINGTON

U 40.
-. . . $
Appointment Book; Dimy
Lt Gen Hoyt S . Vandenberg
July 7-9 f1947j: M y 7-54 1947 I *
 APPOINTMENTS
i
j
j

I
i
i
i
H
i
I
I
i
1i

No. 845 15

NATIONAL BLANK BOOK COMPANY

Holyoke, ksmchwetb
MADE IN U. S. A.
- 189

JULY 7
I
I
1
- 1 8:OO 4:oo

I.
c
i 8:30 P:30

-I--1
9:OO

9:30
3:OO

3:30
I

11 10:30 4:30

5:OO

1- 1 1 :30 5:30

6:OO

I- -_
12:30
- ~ - - -
I:oo

1:30
I

6:30

7:OO

7:30
 4:30
-
'#

' t

9:30 3:30 - 5

, . .
-- *
5:OO 11

L-

5:30 11

-1:oo--- 6:OO ,
15

18:30

1:oo

1:30 7:30
-1
 r
P:OO
i
I

, ’

3:OO. I r .
I

4:30 t

1 ‘11:30
530

-[ -Tp:30-

7:OO
I
4 1:3O 7:30
’

I
 Julv 5 , 1947

1:oo P.". &turned *on: X i c h i t 8 Falls, Texas.

Julv 7. 1947

F:15 A.X. Arrive bf f i c e .

?:15 X . X . Gen. Raxlings

9:LO A.M. b n . Bcatner w i t h mail.

9:43 A.M. Cclunel Garland on phom with reference t o menorandm f r m Gcneral

Kenmy an h m t o l-ave more groups and fewer people. W h s that approved
Approved t G e x t e n t Fnstructlons given t h a t SAC units be l e a alone
u n t i l September and &.that tbe make a deci8icn as t o approval of
Kenney's orgarbization and hm extensively I t will be used i n t h e
Air Farce. Find out i f Kenney has been advised and l e t me knm.
9:LS A.g. Cclonel h l l m a r thanking General Vandenberg fur n-hct he put on for CIC

9 : 5 C A.Y. Colonel Garland advised that General Hocd had handled the matter of
SAC units anl w a u l d be r i g h t am t o brief Gen. Vandenberg.

9:55 2 . x . Gea Chauncey on phone fPac Pocatello, Idaho t o s t b t e t h a t Gen Camon

doesn't w a n t goody o r Turner in Oeorgia. Doesn't rant Colunbus a t all-
r a t s t o substltue San Karcos. K a n t s t o ccncentrate all expansion in
a U t t l e bunch in Texas and take over fields t h a t belong o t&
/ &bs
Ilke Bmoks and Bergstram. Oeneral Cha=q- rays t h a t it i s possible
we dll have t o @,vc up t h e two In Georgia. Gen Chauncey stated he
advised Gen Cannan tc put his rcants in trriting ard n d t o telephone iu
GET: Chtui?cey f e e l s Gen Cenncri L not too sue of h i u 5 r l f , as two m a t k
ago he wanted t o get out of San Uzrcos and nm he rants It and a l s o
Bmoks & Bergstrar,.
1O:OC k.& rm Hocd ck Col Hobsan -briefing on SAC utits.

1 O : j ~ k . r - W . Zuckert re civilian personnel and l i d t a t i o n s and prsannel

a t LnactiYe i n s t a l l a t i o n s QF L n s t a l l h t i m s whizh we a r e n c t plarnL?g
t c r e t a i n i n our permanent structure.

ll:O5 A.Y. Kr. Robert Gross ar.d 13. Xaher of Lockheed

11?55 A.Y. Gen. Sam An;ierson

12:OU Tc :!iar Council I n absence of h. Spaatz

12:23 3.1'. % t u r n e d and tr.cn tc l m c h
 J u l v 7. 19L7 (Cont'd)

1 : l O F.K. Li.. Hicks of t h e Toronto S t a r , Toronto, Canada on phone

He spoke i n regard t o t h e 'fl:JinZ discs". Chey understend
-
t h e s e discs are a U.S. plane t h a t is s t i l l on t h e secret
l i s t . i3e esked Gen. Ven what he thought they *era and Gen.
i'an Kas q u i t e n o n c m i t t a l . Gen. Van said t h a t so-
X a t i o n s l Guard ).lanes were on duty on t h e i r o w v o l i t i o n
t o search f o r the d i s c s , but t h a t no planes have been put
on duty f r o % Hq, k.1.F.

1:20 P.L:. General T o m y Power

1:LO p.;,:. Cong. Drewry of Va. on Fhone requesting a, B-29 be s e n t t o

Blackstone, Va. for a c e l e b r a t i o n by t h e U F and volunteer
-
f i r e organisations i n t h e v i c i n i t y . Date July 27. hay
be able t o do some r e c r u i t i n g on t h a t day. Gen. Van s a i d h e
r o u l d look i n t o t h e kriatter and advise Lx. Dreviry's office.

1:50 P . J . X r . Leo on phone re a r t i c l e on "Szucersn. Said one had been

found with i n s t r u c t i o n s on it t o g e t i n touch F i t h Colonel
Frank Hackett i n Spokane. Lx. Leo reported t h e mGtter t o
General Schulgen, G-2.
1:2 k.1.:. ti.. Zuckert on phone inforninf: him w i t h reference t o National
G u r d t h a t all plaoes where we heven't scusdron or group
hezdquerters should take t h e i r people away.

1:55 Pi:. t:r. Leo and General L e k y with reference todiscs.

2:03 F.2. Colonel Frank Hackett, Spokane, hashington on phone -
General Van informed Colonel Backett t h a t we hed Eotten a c a l l
fro& t h e Houston Chronicle saying t h a t a f l y i n g d i s c had landed
there with his (Colonel HECkett'E) neme on it. Gen. Van asked
if he h e r ; anything about it. Solonel HEckett s t a t e d t h a t he her;
n o t k i n e a t a l l about it. Gen. V e n t o l d Col. H. thet it t 3 s reported
h e r e t h c t Col. H. said t h a t h i s people h e r all about it and t h e t
5 s t s t e a e n t was coning out fror. 3 k t i n g t o n . Col. H. said, "I
have s a i d nothing". Col. 11. had t h e C-hronicle called and t o l d
t o F e t in touch riith t h e P.b.1.
E e t i n touch with Gen. Trinin&.
- g e t photographic Froof -
end t h n

2220 P.1:. Colonel Bob iiarren, Ellingtan F i e l d , Tex on phone.

Gen. Van inforrced Col. ii'erren that the h'ouston Chronicle had
-
founS a d i s c about 23" i n diameter atxi 5 or ' 6 tbick. It is
s u p ~ o s e dt o have Col. Frank Hackett's name on it. k are most
anxious t o e-ode t h i s thing. I would appreciate it if you would
g e t in touch with t h e Chronicle, ask t h e n where it is, go out
and see t h e thin$ and then c a l l me back. The l i n e of aprroacn is
t h f t r e heve m t h i n g l i k e t h a t , re d o n ' t understand w h e t it is,
but ue a r e leevinc p.3 stone unturned t o be sure. Colonel Larry! .
s c i d it n u l d be e courle of hours b e f o r e he c o d e c s l l bzck.
2:30 P.Y. Tc a i r p c r t t o meet Yr. Symlngton and then t o Ik. %iln@ont8 office.

A:lO P.Y. Returned.

G : ~ O P.M. Genera: I&ay

4:20 P.11. Col, Eazren c a l l e d back re Gen. Vandenberg's d i r e c t i v e t h a t

he m d a m t h e s t o r y about t h e flying discs. Col. TI. finally
l o c a t e d t h e r e p o r t e r vho picked up the story fran another man.
This man U v e s i n Goose Creek. He ncx says that it was e n t i r e l y
a fignent of his lmaginatian a d t h a t he Just made it pp. Col.
K. t a l k e d t o a Mra Evans who I s handling this thing at the
Chronicle -
Depot a t Spokane.
and theg took I t up w i t h sunebody up a t t h e n i r
---- He said t o them t h a t he j u s t made t h e
t h i n g up. Col. Warren s a i d t n a t t h e Chronicle seeaed t o be
satisfied t h a t t h e t h i n g was just a cock and b u l l story.
Col. T. is going t o check with t h e loczl F.B.I. and possibly
d r i v e Over t o see t h e m a n a t Goose Creek. If a+hing hrrther
develops he w i l l ca-.1 Gen. Vandenberg.
4:30 P.?!. -
Yr. Leo on phme Gen. V a n t o l d hi3 t h e above story. A civilian,
Joe S h i p a n , I h o works with Col. Hackett is re:orted t o have t G l a
the C h r d c l i e t o contact Gen. T n i n b g .

5:03 P.u. To s e e Kr. Symington

5:15 P.:!. %-parted far o f f l c e of Cangressmn H o f h .

 July 8. 1947

9:20 AoUe Arrive off ice.

9125 A.M. General Gardner d General Parer - approved restricticns an
f l y i n g due t o gasoline shortage 80 that the Air Force nould be in a
tenable position i f it became necessary t o c u r t a i l civ. gas consumpti~c
-
Gen. LeKay 6r Dr. Bale8 briefing for JRDB meeting.
PRDB Meeting with General IaMay.
-
Returned then t o Mr. S:rmingtcn u i t h reference t o personnel
for tbs President's A i r Board.

Returned.
Colonel Nome m phone who 8tatedSenator Guerney stopped him in
the hall and s a i d thq-were S t a r t i n g hearings at the three million
8iX hundred thousand dollar cut h m g pay.

2:lO P.M. Cien. RawUngs advised Colonel Moore t h a t the cut was akay as we had
reduced the number of people 0 f3ying stat=. Also advised Colonel
Yome t h a t Sen. Ouerney had been sent the l e t t e r of June 20 that
nent t o the rest of the members of the comaittee uith reference t o
n y h g P~;v.

2r30 P.Y. Mr. Chalmers Hall on phone with reference t o a study he is going
to present t o Senator Vandenberg ath reference t o the security
of this cormtqr. Read his plan8 in d e t a i l t o Oen. Vandenberg
and tha General advised him that a l l the thing8 contained in his
-
8tudy were i n the new b i l l QI uniflcatim that It had all the
elements he was plugging for.
3too P.Y. 0tmer.l won on pharo with reference t o the case8 of MaJor John M.
White and Gerald R. J&mm*fcr transfer to t h Air Fmces. A l l
transfers by War Department directian have been cancellad a8 o f
31 Yarch. I n t h e case of Kajor White there will be no broubb in
event PP the merger goes through and recomtuerd this case be held until
then. Johnson was recommended azainst by General Fairchild.
3810 PeM.

3 ~ 2 5P.M. Senator Cob& Lodge 011 the p h a ~rrlth refemnc e t o increased

a p p r q w i a t i m t o call for 70 Q.mp8. (1) W s s the 70 O m p Program
cleured by the Budget or not? Qen Van raid no-were cut dawn to
55 QWU?S. (2) can y'ou have acmeone in your d a c e d t e M
arguinent as t o it should be 70 Graqrr? - Gen Van advised hLm
3:25 p.m. ( Cont'd)
from him -
rants a etatement prepared he can use as c d n ;
not an A i r Force or General Vadenberg
statanen& for the 70 Gmup Rogram instead of 5 5 ,
He wants this I n a daEJ or taro.

3a35 p.m. Briefing & Gen Kauch, Yr* Zuckert, A-3, A-5 on A l a s k a n A i r Base
3:43 p.m. To Office Of Congressman Folverton r l t h b!r. Zuckert on t h e

sr07 p.m.
sub e g t of A b sk y ~ i ;Bases,
Any hez i?TS t be held G
r
*% Pock up n t t e r of s t a r t i n r h e s r i r
e t $ h i s $ession o t. i s c o z u t t e e . , . i give
Returnez h ' c p 8mgressman olve on's office.
TO Kx'.
~ us e 3 zneyier toFor
terted next Keel:.

5:08 pone with reference t o persame1 for the P resident'

Air Board.

5:l2 p.m. Oen. R a w l i n g 8 on t h e box refereace r e q w s t of Senator C a b d Lcdgt

mentSoned above (3:25 porn.)

5:u p.m. To Icr. S y z b g t o n - re personnel for th president's h l r Board.

6:15 p.m. Gen. Klssner cn plane re request of Senator Lodge fur
statement in connection with appropriations. General Alssner
u l l l have t:Ua ready by Nom tornorrar,

6:20 p.m. To licr. 40's o f f i c e and then hane.

 8:30 A.X. Arrive Office.

8:50 A.2. -era1 Chauncey

9:13 A.M. General Staarley r e l e t t e r in cohrlection uith motion picttlre

persmnel. Gen. Van advised it uould not get by Secretary Pattersc
Have to take a reading on exactly h m we can get by u i t h 8 reserve
officers an2 2 regulars and ttill spend t h a t money ~1 them.
( $ ~ , O O O each) Gen. Van advised him t o look i n t o the matter of
reserve o f f i c e r s and that his o f f i c e should write the l e t t e r .

9:17 A.K. General Gardner, General Pwer, CCL Peterson

9:33 A.Y. Cong. Harness of h d . re Capt. Roger Smith 0-74464l who has had
5 y e a r s overseas with B.29'~ a n i i s now an terminal leave. He
uants reassignment -
regular ur otherwise, and is n i l l i n g t o k
placed on foreign senrice. Gen. Van asked t h a t he c0.w uver t o
see llajor Wnite a& ue l ~ o u l dg e t him t h e inforin&ian.
Cong. Harness advised he thmght we were getting the Merger Bill
rcrked out p r e t t y fine.

9 : 3 5 A.K. General b o o l i t t l e an phone. 10 cane in at 10:30.

9:30 A.K. b. Ben Pearse w i t h reference t o two s t o r i e s he i s writing

one a b m t the AnglcAnerican cil Agreement ard the other about
-
CIG.
9r25 A.I.!. Haiag~EEruno Of Nerr York -
Gm. advised he muld l e t h k h o w
as soon as he could w i t h referenze t o an engagenent for week-en2
either 18 J u l v , 3 Jul;l, 1 Auiwst or 8 kuaust.

l l : L 5 X.P. Krs. Emers O f the T;hite House called %jor 'Knite t o advise t h a t
Gen. Vandenberg should be In t h e Fresident's office a t U:15
tomrrm for signing of Air Farce proclunztion.
l 2 : l 5 P bl. Returned fYaC Chief of Staff's office.

12:50 P.?? To Er. S y r i n g t o n

 July- 5 , 19L7 (Cont'd)

Returned from JCS

Tab. ,cylrioston

Retuned

Kr. Leo on phom r e "zhis recruiting matter". Gen. S t r e e t t ' s

office recanmends against tt on the ground that t h a t is a
precedent. &.
small enterprize dorm there and they don't want t o 6et a
Leo fill check hrrther and c a l l back.
Also, Genes1 StreelLhas been comerned in the event of unificatioz
ab& recruitment funds a& wanted gr. Leo to express t o Gen.
VandeRberg his opinion t h a t it ought t o be a g r a d u a l s 5 i f t
if t h e r e w a s not going to be a central recruithent.
General Anderson - General Vaq inf'oxmd Gen. Arderson fhat he
was d e f i n i t e l y against h i s b a t i n g Tlashingtcm a t the present
time end plans to recamerr! t o Gen. Spaatz that it not be dcme.
Pethick and b!r, &mence. ILr. Pethick (Navy), b!r* Lawrence
(President d the R a c t l Q l Y d o r s ) and General fiesentd
t o General X&ay and General Vandenberg problem of their monitary
position *ich was bad and they were a f r d of being refused
cantracts uhich would s e t back t h e J e t rocket motor development
several pars. Genere1 hr$y stated th&t they were t o take it
up w i t h Flright Field and present t h e i r case out there where tb
ccntracts a r e l e t .
 16
Fort Worth Star-Telegram
Photographs of Balloon Debris
[July 9, 19471
 STATEMENT OF WITNESS

Date: 24May94 Place: ,W=iUWOn

w ?I SheridanI doW.Cavin,
USAF. hereby voluntanly and of my
hereby state that Richard L. Weaver was identified to me as a Colonel,
own free will make the following statement without having been subjected
to any coercion, unlawful &ce or unlawful inducement.

&I was a Counterintehgence Corps (CIC) S p e d Agent for the US Army Air Force who was initially assigned to
Roswell AAF followmg my graduation kom CII school at Ft. Holabird, MD,in late June or Early July, 1947.
Shortly after aniving at Roswdl ,New Mexico in that lime h m e I had Occasion to accompany one of my
subordinates,MSGT Bin Rickett, CIC, and Major Jesse Marcel, Intelligence Officer the 509th Bomb Group, to a
ranchland area outside of Roswell to help recover some mated. I think that this request may have come directly
firom Major Marcel. I do not know who may have made the report to him. To the best of my knowledge, the three
of us traveled to the aforementioned ranch land area by oursehres (that is, no other pgsons,civilianor military, were
with us). I believe we had a military jeep that Marcel checked out to make this trip. When we got to this locatiOn we
subsequently located some debris which appead to me to resable bamboo type square sticks one quarter to one
halfinch square, that were v a y bght as well as some sort of metallic re&ctmg mataial that was also very light. I
also vaguely recall some sort of black box (like a weather instrument). The area ofthis debris WBS very small, about
20 feet square, and the material was spread on the ground, but there was no gouge or crater or other obvious sign of
impact. 1 remember recognizing this material as being consistent with a weather balloon. We gathered up some of
this matmbl, which would easily fit into one vehicle. there cuiahly wasn’t alot ofthis matmid, orenought0 make
up crates ofit for multiple airplane Wts. What Marcel did with this m a w at the time was m o w n tome,
although I h o w now &om reading about this incident in numerous books that it was taken to Eighth Air Force
Headquarters in Fort Worth where it was subsequently identified as a weather ballom, which I thought it was all
dong. I have reviewed the pictmes in the 1991 Book by Ran& and Schmitt onthe UFO Crash at Roswdwhereol
Marcel and Ramey are h o l m up this material and it appears to be the same type of material that we picked up from
the m c h land. I did not make a report of this incident to my headquarters since I f& that the r e c o v ~ yof a weather
balloon was not a big deal that did not merit a written report. In the same refaenced book by Randle and Schmitt I
was reputed to have told Rickett ( on Page 63)that we were never there and this incidentnever happened. The book
seems to imply this was in some sort of conspiratorial tone; however it is more likely I told him not to mention it to
ourheadquamrsbecause we had wasted our lime recovering a balloon. I only went to this area once andrecwaed
debris once and to the best of my knowledge there were no other effints to go back there. Ifthere were, they did not
mvohre me. There was no secretive effort or heightened security regardingthis incidentor any unusual expenditure
ofmanpower at the base to deal with it. In fkt, I do not recall theincident bemg mentioned again as bung any
deal and I never even thought about it again until w d after1retiredfram the miMary when I began to be contacted
by UFO researchers. Many of the things I have mentioned to thesepeople have either beentaken out of context,
misrepresented, or just plain made up. I did know both Jesse Marcel and Bin Rickett v a y wdl (bothare now
deceased). I considered them to k good men, however both did tend to exaggerate on occasion. With
regards to claims that we tested this material by hitiing it with sledgehammers without damaging it, I do not recall
any of us doing so. 1 also did not test this material for radioadvity with a Geger counter (or anyttungelse). 1do not
recall attempbng to bum any of this debris but my wife tells me she recalled that Jesse MarceI, his wife and son did
have a small piece that they held over the fire when we had a cdokout. In short, I did help recover some debris near
Roswe&New Mexico in the summer of 1947. I thought at the time and think so now, that this debris was &om a
crashed balloon I am not part of any conspiracy to withhold information from anyone, e i t h the US Government
or the Amuicanpublic. I have never been sworn to any form ofsecrecy by anyom concaning this matter and I
have receivsdauthorization ftom the SeCrrCary of the Air Force to discuss with ColonelWeaver any information of a
ciassified nahm that I may have concuningit. There is no c M e d information that I am withholding. I have never
been threatened by the US Govemment or any of its subdivisions,or by any persons, not to talk about this incident
with anyone, and m fact I have talked to a number of private researchers. is that this whole incident
was no big deal and it certainly did not involve anything extrataratrial.
I
I CONTINUATION SHEET FOR A F FORM 1168 AND 1169 I
/

\ //I/

\
I further state that I have read this entire statement, initialed all p a p s and corrections, and signed this statement, and that it is correct and true as
written.

WITNESSES:
(S&MrUre)

(Address)

-l
I
(Slgnarure)

Subscribed and sworn to before me, a person authorized by law to adminis-

(Address)

I
AF AyRys1170 GPO : 1986 0 - 168-568 'A=cc;;- rAG O'
G, L,----
Interview
Col Richard L.Weaver with Lt Cul.
Shet-idan D. Cavitt, USAF met)
May 24, 1994
 TRANSCRIPT OF INTERVIEW OF SHERDAN CAVITT
(Note: RW = Cot Richard L. Weaver; SC = Sheridan Cavitt; MC = Mary Cavitt)

RW: Today is the 24th of May 1994. I am in I am Colonel Richard L.

Weaver and I am talking to Lt Col Sheridan Cavitt, US Air Force, Retired. Also present in the
room is his wife, Mary. Colonel, you don't mind that I tape record this do you?

SC: Go right ahead.

RW: O.K.thank you. What I would like to ask you is to confirm you were with the Counter
Intelligence Corps (CIC) (at that time of the US Army) in 19471

.the Army Air Corps...right.

SC: Yes..

RW: When did you get transferred to Roswell, Sir?

SC: I went to Roswell after going to the CIC School in Baltimore, Maryland, at Camp
Holabird ...in 1946. I do not remember the month. My wife might. It was in the Fall was it not?

MC: June of 47.

SC: June?

RW: I think on your records you graduated in June of 47.

SC: From Holabiud?

RW: Yeah,Holabird.
SC: 0.K...I told you my dates are slipping my mind.
RW: That's O.K...I have the same problem.
SC: It's hard to remember July 47. I hadn't been there very long.

RW: Did you know a Major Jesse Marcel who was the Intelligence Officer during Roswell at that
time?

SC: Oh yes. I knew Jesse, his wife, and his son. We were very close fiends. We were in the
same building in the CIC office, which was next to the intelligence office. We associated socially
as well as business.
RW: Sir,you were the senior officerand the commander at the detachment there at Roswell?
SC Yes, 1 guess you could say that. I was the only commissioned officer. I had two enlisted
agents "working for me" quote end quote.

RW: Who were the enlisted agents that worked for you?

SC: The senior was a Master Sergeant by the name of Rickett and the young agent, Jack
Williams. I later had some other people working for me after CIC deceased and OSI took over
for the Air Force...the investigative agency.

RW: That actually came, I think, in September when the Air Force first stated. You were one of
the charter members of OSI,as 1 understand?

SC: Yeah,over fiom CIC and OSI;and then I went to OSI school later.

RW: You reported through your chain of command? You didn't report to General Blanchard,
the Base Commander? You reported like we did in OSI through the separate chain of command,
as I understand it; is that right?

SC: Yeah,our parent organization was 700 CIC and I believe that there...they had sort of a
branch up in Colorado at that time, but I think most of our work was sent directly back to Bolling
at that time. I am a little fizzy on that because I wasn't in the organization very long, you know.

RW: OK. General Blanchard was the Base Commander and evexyone else in the 509th basically
reported to him then?

SC: Oh yeah. Colonel Blanchard.

RW: Oh yeah. Excuse me, Colonel Blanchard.
SC: He was the Wmg Commander of the 509th right. I didn't report to anybdy on the base.

RW: Just like in OSI?

SC: Yeah, I associated and coordinated stuffwith Marcei and I had no responsibility to
Blanchard or Marcel.

RW: Do you recall an incident that happened during the early part of July when you were asked
to accompany Major Marcel to go recover some wreckage of anything?

SC: Well, there again I couldn't swear to the dates, but m that time,which must have been July,
we heard that someone had fbund some debris out hot too fk h m Roswell and it looked
suspicious; it was Unidentitied. So, 1- out and I do not recall whether Marcd wcnt with
Rickett and me; I had Rickett with me. We went out to this site. There were no, as I understand,
check points or anything like that (going through guards and that sort of garbage) we went out
there and we found it. It was amall amount oc an1reed, bamboo sticks, reflective sort of
material that would, well at first glance, you would probably think it was aluminum foil,
something of that type. And we gathered up some of it. I don't know whether we even tried to
get all of it. It wasn't scattered; well, what I call, you know, extensively. Like, it didn't go along
the ground and splatter off some here and some there. We gathered up some of it and took it
back to the base and I remember I had turned it over to Marcel. As I say, I do not remember
whether Marcel was there or not on the site. He could have been. We took it back to the
intelligence room.. .in the CIC office.

RW: What did you think it was when you recovered it?
SC: I thought a weather balloon.
RW: O.K. Were you familiar With weather balloons at the time?

SC: I had seen them. I had seen them. As I recall, I am really reaching back, I think they were
equipped with a radio sonde or something like that, that transmitted data fiom, when it got up to
altitude (what altitude I have no idea) and somebody on the ground received it and that way they
got some information on what was happening up there.

RW: O.K.

SC: This is all over my head. When I saw it it was to flimsy to be anything to carry people or
anything of that sort. It never crossed my mind that it could be anything but a radio sonde.

RW: How did you get the report that the material was out there?

SC: That I don't recall. Looking back on it, I imagine somebody called the 509th. The 509th
called Marcel and said tbere is somethiqs over here, wherever. and then...more and more thinking
back on it now he must have k . . I must have been with him.... "lets go out look and see what
the h d ..."

RW: Did youjust make one trip out to the area?

SC: I can't r d ever making more thanjust that one trip.

RW: And you think it was you, Marcel, and Rickett?

SC: Well, I not sure it was Marcel but I know Rickett was...

RW: Rickett was thac? When you got back with this stufFyou turned it over to the Intelligence
mce. whathapparedthal?

SC: Nothing, as hu aa I'm concerned. I don't think I even made a report. Our CIC had gone
by... 700 CIC was tbe CIC Headquartem.
RW: 700 CIC was the Headquarters?

SC: Yes, I don't think I even made a report to them, which I normally would if there was
anything at all unusual.

RW: Do you remember the newspaper? It actually was, I think, July 7, 1947, where this now
famous newspaper says they found a "flying disc" in RosweU? That was actually the Roswell
paper, that was the first one. How about you, Mary,do you remember that at all?

SC: I don't remember it. We took the local paper to get some weather reports.
MC: We were so new there. In fkt,I think I had just been there just maybe just a few days
because I had been up to my sister's wedding and I don't think at that time we might not even
been taking the paper. We heard no...

SC: I don't remember anything in the paper.

MC: We heard nothing. Of course, we didn't associate with people on the base, either
RW: Yeah,I understand.

MC: We were brand new. Jesse and Salazar were best friends. At that...starting about the first
of July on.

RW: Atter you found this, Sir, do you remember any sort unusual activity Occurring? Like a big
military alert, or people going out to the base and large numbers of high security?

SC: No. The reason I wouldn't have been involved in anything like that, ifthere was any activity
like that, I was Counter Intelligence Corps, this didn't have anything to do with counter-
intelligence. It looked to me, somebody lost a weather balloon. I couIdn't care less...tough Iuck.

RW:But when you wcnf out and saw this material, there was no doubt in your mind that it was
some sort of man made material? And, you though at tbe time was a weather Moon, some sort
of balloon?

SC: When I first saw it.

RW: When you said the wreckage wasn't very much, could you, was it as long as your house
here, or just a small little clump?

SC: Maybe as low as this mom is wide.

RW: So, twenty feet maybe?

SC: Some here, some here, some here. No concentration of it. No marks in the ground, dug up,
anything hidden, or anything like that, just out on the territory around the bottom of New Mexico,
just good for growing sheep - they don't eat too well.

RW: Yeah,I don't imagine. They probably have to eat on the sun out there. Do you remember
at the time the article or the photo of General Ramey and Marcel holding up a piece of material?
Have you seen that since that time?

SC: Oh yeah, I have seen it, yeah, but at the time I don't recall seeing anything like that.
RW: In that photo, actually there are four separate photos there, Marcel, I think in two of them,
is holding up material. Does that look like the material that you picked up out in the desert?
Actually it's in this book if you don't mind...

MC: I was going to say that I think it's in there.

SC: I don't remember...Yeah,Yeah, that's.. .
.RW:The first picture is actually with Jesse Marcel and that's General Blanchard and...
SC: I think this was taken at the Headquarters at Carswell.
RW: Yeah,that's right. That's correct.
SC: And I obviously...Marcel took it to Fort Worth. Yeah that's the...

RW: Yeah. That doesn't look l i e they substituted anything fiom what you found?
SC: No,No.

RW: Is this about the extent of the material? I realize you can't see all of it in any of the pictures.
Or was them large...could you fill up an airplane with it?

SC: Oh,good God! You couldn't fill up (unintelligiile) with it. Yeah,I can't tell what those
sticks look like. But, as I recall, to me they look like bamboo or some sort of very small lav type
material ripped out.

RW: Could you break them or bend them, or...

sc: Ididn'ttry.

RW: O.K.
SC: It was someone else's balloon as far as I was concerned. I didn't want to fool around with it.
RW AAer you picked that up and you turned it over to Marcel, did you ever hear anything more
about this7 Did people fiom Washington come and talk to you about it? Did you have to swear
any security oaths or debriefing statements?

SC: I don't remember anybody fiom Washington coming there. It's possible that somebody came
over to talk to Marcel that I didn't even know about. To my knowledge, no. Certainly nobody
fiom Washington. I would have, I think, remembered that. Someone &om the headshed coming
down and talking to me. Certainly, I would have. And I was not sworn into any secrecy ever
about any of this stuff.

RW: So, as far as you are concerned, none of this was ever classified? There was no attempt to,
I use the word, "cover up" this information or to c l w it?

SC: Well let's put it this way: as fiu as I hew, I never heard anyone say, "Don't talk about this
and its hot stuff."I think Marcel, would...I'm sure he would have told me somethmj~.

RW: Would he have? Did he ever say anything to you after this incident occurred until the time
he left? Or, anywhere up until the time he died?

SW:Oh,Rich, dealing with him there in the office or the next office to him so he probably said
something about it. That he had taken it down to Rmey or something. But, nothing that would,
you know,stick in my mind of importance. Do you understand what I mean? If he had said
something like, "I took it to 8th Air Force Headquarters, General Ramey was excited; they were
going to take it to Wright-Pat" (or wherever they allegedly took it). Oh,Fm sure I would have
membered that.

RW: It had been alleged in a number of books, including the one by Randle and Schmitt, that
there were a number of airplam flights back and forth of (254's and 829's going into Wn&t-Pat
and Kirtland, or to Fort Worth. Back and fbrth, loaded up, with very tight searrity, haulii this
wreckage. Do you recall any of that going on?

SC: None.. .Nothing.

RW: And then its indicated (and not diredy quoting ) Some counterintelligencepeople from
Washington or Andrews (as they said in the book) had come out there and apparently done
photographs or crime scene searches or whatever. There was nobody else out there from CIC or
Counter Intelligence Corps &at you hew of? Other than Rickett?

SC: Not to my knowledge. Not to my knowledge. I made a booboo. I said it was 700 C at
Bolling. I believe now that you mentioned Andrcws, it could have been Andrews. But no nobody
came out. Maybe they did, maybe! tbey didn't talk to me. CIC did some crazy things in those
days, shuttling some people around.
RW: But it would have been likely, had you been involved in recovering something kind of
special that t h q would have talked to you?
SC: Yeah, I think they would have asked me, "Cav, what did you see"...right.
RW: Did Rickett ever talk to you about this again?
SC: No ...I don't think so. I don't think so. Right about that time just before OSI was formed and
we all were absorbed into OSI. I think he went on a special undercover job up to ...maybe
somewhere to an Air Force Base up here in Washington.

MC: Fort Lewis, I think he...

SC: Was it Lewis or McChord? I dent remember. Anyway, he went on to an undercover
assignment, and that's what I said about CIC doing some crazy things. They didn't even tell mc. I
was his boss locally and they didn't even tell me that he had gone up. He use to bc a mechanic at
one time, Rick did, in the Air Force; the Air Corps. I think they wanted to...they were having
some trouble with their planes being what they thought were sabotaged and they asked him to go
up there and try out the machine...liike an airplane mechanic, which he could do pretty good.
Outside of that, I don't know of anything that Rick did.

RW: One of the things that was mentioned in this book.. .and I don't know how much you read it,
is that Rickett some time later that Fall apparently went with a scientist by the name of Doctor
LaPaz, and he accompanied him and t h 9 went around to various places. Dr. LaPaz was a well
known person.. .

SC: I knew of him. I never met LaPaz personally, but I knew what he was.
RW: Did Rickett go with him that you recall, accompany him around?
SC: He could have, but it certainly didn't stick to my mind. It wouldn't be for any extended time
I don't think,because we d e d him around the office

MC: The Ricketts were Eriends of ours too; and his wifk and I. I don't member Mack ever
=ying anything.
SC: Mack was his w&.
MC: ...that he was gone for a long time.

SC: He could have, but Rick& would go offthe d e q end every once in a while. He was a
fhntwtic story teller. He worked for an insane asylum up in the Washington DC area. I think his
wifkworked there, also. Hewould sit around and tell some ofthemost Wous, ridiculous
stories about things that happed in this nut howe, so to speak.

RW: Was that St. ELizabeths? That's the big government mental institution.
SC: I don't know. It's in the Washington DC area. I forget since I was there in the Washington
area for awhile but I never did get acquainted with the insane asylum.

RW: It's always best to keep it that way.

SC: No,well I put it again, he might have gone off with LaPaz for a few days, but I can't imagine
what excuse I would have been given as to why he'd be out goofing around with an astronomer.
LaPaz was a well thought of individual in New Mexico and, I imagine, all over the United States.
He had quite a reputation.

RW: He did quite a bit of work for the Air Force, as I found through research.

SC: Contract work or something...Yeah.

RW: But there was nothing that you knew of that he did as a direct result of this incident on the
stuff that you recovered out there?

SC: No. Of course, I could have been held in the dark about it; but as fiu as I know, no.

RW: O.K.I went through and pulled out wherever, in this book UFO Crash at Rowell by
Randle and Schmitt, this is a 1991...I pulled out wherever you were identified. They never
identified you by name except in the credits when they interviewed you, but they always referred
to you as the "Senior CIC man" and "Senior CIC agent". They identified Rickett and Marcel, of
course, by name. There are many things that are in the book that people said that you said or
implied that you said, without directly saying that "Colonel Cavitt told me such and such."

sc: Yeah.
RW: I pulled a couple of these out and just ask you if you can comment on it to set how they
ring with your memory of the incident. "The second fellow we interviewed" (this right 6om the
h n t on page Six) "was au agent in the count&t&gence corps. He accompanied another
intelligence officer on the initid trip to the crash site and we Men wrote a report of the incident
fix his superiors in Washington"...implying that was you, since you wen the senior guy.
SC: I'm just reading this end quote "book." No,No. I assume...I assume when I read this thing
for the first time that they sent me a big deal, you know...

RW: An autographed copy?

SC: An autographed copy and all that. No,I didn't say ail like that.
RW: On the next page, on seven, again referring to you: "A!first this intelligence agent r e f i d
to admit that the event had occurred at all. There had been no newspapa story, no fuss, not even
the recovery of a weather balloon. Mer much prodding, that he was going to admit tbt
something came down and was recovered, and but that was as tiU as he would go. He admits no
personal involvement even though other reliable sources gave him a central role. That kind of
Sums up everything in.. .

SC: No. No. From the very start, when these clowns started hounding me, Randle and Schmitt,
I told they accused me of covering up and having signed a security...

RW: Berlitz and Moore?

MC: Now, you see, he was here at the house. h e heard numerous deals on the radio when I'm
listening at night and all this, all of this, has been...

SC: I told these guys when they first talked to me, I said: "I have taken no security oath. I'm
under no obligation to not tell you anything, because, as far as I was concerned, it wasn't anything
other than a weather balloon." And, I said: "I want you to quit iderring that I am staying silent
under an oath of security." And, finally, I think about two yean, later Randle told me: "Hey,we
believe you." It was getting ridiculous. I was getting so sick and tired of this garbage.

RW: Yeah. I sensed a little of reluctance when I first called up and..."lie, Oh no, here we go
again" type of thing.

SC: I did, really.

MC: He gets so many phone calls. I usually answer the phone and say: "Who's calling please?"
And then, I don't know whether...come and write a book...

SC: You've hear of Mock?

RW: I know who he is, yeah.
SC: He's our chiefdebunker. I lean toward him.

MC: Rich, have you got, read, Randle and Schmitt's latest book?
RW: I've not. I've tried to find it and I haven't been able to find it.
MC: It just came out in April.
SC: They haven't sent me a copy yet. I think they are mad at me.
MC: Didn't they tell us that they found some new information and it wasn't at the spot that...
sc:Right. Right.
RW: Yeah. As I understand it, the new information (and this may not be quite right, since I
ham't read it, this is b y ) is that there was this crash...wbat they caU the crash site,
apparently, where you were at and picked up this material, and then there is another one 120 miles
or so away.

SC: A richochet.

R W : Yeah.Which at one time was on the Plains of San Augustin and now it has apparently in
this new book been changed to a location closer to Roswell. And, that's where these bodies were
supposedly recovered. I think their new research has to do with that aspect of it.

MC: Well we haven't seen it, but I know it came out in April.
RW: O.K.Lets see; also on the same page it said: "The CIC responded to the phone call. Jesse
Marcel was one. "The intelligenceand the CIC responded to the phone call. Jesse Marcel was
one of them. Colonel William Blanchard and the other officer suggested that M a r 4 and CIC
agent accompanied Braze1 to the ranch to see what was there." Brazel, of course, was the farmer
who apparently came in and made the original report.

SC: Yeah. To the best of my recollection, I newer met the rancher, Brazel.
RW:O.K.,because as I go through here you1 see that you're accused, I say "accused"; claimed,
to have been with him on a number of occasionsand basically, it was alleged that the Army Air
Corps had imprisoned him,ifyou will, for about a week and kept him away fiom everybody. Not
that you personally did, but the Army Air Corps in general: "Thetrip to the ranch took the rest of
the afternoon...they were forced to stay in a small cabii with no electricity no running water...the
next morning they headed out into a field weft Brazed had found the debris." So, this would have
been you and whoever else accompanied you.

SC: Totally, made up, or tirbricated, or whatever. I didn'thave any experiences like that of
spending the night out on the ranch.

MC: Eating a can of beans...

RW: Eating beans.. .yeah, that is, in f k t , mentioned in one of tbe.. .

s c : Yeah.

RW: O.K.Now this: "Marcel would later say that the material was like nothing he had ever seen
and the metal was as thin as newsprint and as light as a father. It was flexible but very strong.
He tried to dent it with a sledge hammer but Marcel and the CIC agent tried to bum it but it
would not bum. It was lighter, sbongcrand more fire resistant than any ofthem bad ever seen.
Marcel,dong with the umterintelligaxx agent picked up as much as they could and begun
loading it up in Marcel's convutiile and the counterintelligence agent's Jeep Carryall vehicle with
a rear box." So, apparently, according to Marcd's version of the story (and I don't know when
this was SiVen, sometime after 1978) you hammeredon it and tried to rip it and did other stuff
withitanditwaslikenothingyouhadeverseaL
SC: No.

MC: I remember we were at the Marcel’s house and I can remember Jesse had something had
something on the pad ...and then went out to ...and took it out onto the back porch. And, I
remember that (unintelligible)

RW: Was it some sort of material, metal material or...

MC: And it’s in one of these books and then they...and as little Jesse said, they cemented over
that.. .

RW: Oh yeah...O.K. I remember that.

MC: I can still visualize the stove of where they were and we were out there.
SC: No,he could have had some there at the house.
MC: I honestly do remember that.
RW: O.K. Was it like tinfoil type stuffor do you recall...
MC: I don’t remember.
SC: I remember. He could have had some there at the house and it was,and it looked like a foil
of some sort, and he could have tried to bum that and it didn’t bum very well, I don’t know. I
don’t remember that. I can’t why imagine he’d be beating on it with a hammer for, but it doesn’t
make sense.

RW: One of the other thingsthat Iujustjump to real quick was that you had tested tbe matend
with a Geiger counter. Did you ever have a Geiger counter?

SC: No.

RW: Now that’s not standard OSYCIC issue that I was aware of
SC: Honest to God,no!
RW: h e never seen a Geiger counter rnW&but I didn’t know ifyou knew what one was.
SC: I had never seen one...what CIC would...No,absolutely.

RW: That comes a little f . . . d i d you have a Jeep carryall,was that...?

SC: No.
RW: When you went out to the site, do you remember how you got out there?

SC: I don't. It was a possibility we could have taken a Jeep. Marcel had gotten a Jeep...Marcel
had gotten a Jeep.

RW: Just a regular J a p ?

SC: Yeah.out of the motor pool, but certainly no Carryall.

RW: O.K.Then it said: "After Marcel had gone to Fort Worth and came back Marcel
challenged the ClC man who had remained at the base asking to see (your) report. Marcel was
told that the reprt was now classified and he wasn't authorized to see it and it was on its way to
the Pentagon if he had a problem with that he could take it up with the Pentagon."

SC: Negative.
RW: O.K."Blanchard, who was still at the base...ordered Marcel to accompany the rancher back
to Corona,"' You said you never saw...and then you said you were going to...you never saw the
rancher fiom what you told me previously?

SC: No.

RW: Or dealt with him personally?

SC: I certainly don't remember ever meeting Mr.Brazel or Brazzel, whatever his name was.
RW: O.K.Hen is where they talk about the Geiger counter. You have already said that you
didn't test anythingfbi radioactivity because you didn't b v e anything to test it with.
SC: No.

RW: Oh. Then Marcel said there was a wirelike material that looked like monofilament fishing
line. Do you rccall any of that?

SC: Oh,no. It sort of tickles a little bit of remembrance oc you know, of aII this junk foil, I
would call it, and the sticks and so forth. There probably was some line of some sort there to
hold it together, I guess.

RW: What they...

sc: what was supposed to have banwith that I...
RW: Well when they go with tbat, later on,is that this is where we developed fiber optics fiom.
That this is, was, in fkt,&er optic cable which was, of course, unheard of in 1947.
SC: Yeah.

R W : Yeah. We were still dealing with copper wire. You can bend light with fiber optics, and
that's where we got ...we (the world) got fiber optics fiom that material which we reverse
engineered. That's the implication.

SC: 0.K...I didn't see any of that, but there could have been some wire or nylon or something.
RW.0.K. "Together Marcel and the Counterintelligence agent walked around the entire
perimeter looking at clues. It took them most of the morning to do it because of the size of the
field they started collecting material at the outer edge of the field and moved in toward the
-
center." So, this implies that this was a pretty major undertaking that you and Marcel in order
to examine all of this stufftook a long time because of the volume of the material. This is what I
imply from that.

SC: Wit were true, you know, the size of the rancher's field they are sometimes a section that are
miles square, maybe larger. No.

RW: But there wasn't material all over?

SC: No.
RW: You are ri@. You could walk into New Mexico forever with...

SC: Oh Lord! Ranches are big out and down in New Mexico. No,...I didn't spend any extended
time down there at the site.

RW: O.K. Then, on page 55, it talks about there was discussion that this may have been a foil
parachute fiom a V-2. Were you aware that they were testing, we were testing, V-2's at that time
out of White Sands?
SC: Oh yeah. I went down to a couple of launches. One abort and one launch.
RW: O.K. But there was no doubt in your mind that this was not part of V-2 or any other type
of rocket when you saw the debris in the field?

SC: No. No. I never had any idea that it was anything with the V-2. They told us down at the
V-2site that they weren't shooting them toward Rome& anyway. Ofcourse the sent up a few of
them and they had an awful lot of aborts. They had to detonate them or pull the trigger...shortly
after they got offthe launcb pad because they went a m , shall we say.
RW: Yeah. Apparently one went a v and went into Mexico,too. They already found that
her.
SC. No, I had no idea, no suspicion, that it came fiom Holloman. Holloman is that ...
RW: It was White Sands.
SC: It was White Sands. Holloman base. Alamagordo.
RW: O.K."Marcel would take some of the sample to Fort Worth to show Ram9. In the mean
time, the CIC man would head back to the crash sit with some MP's showing them exactly where
this field was and to round up the rancher. There were now additional questions for him." This
implies that after you came back you took some MP's and went back up there.

SC: I went back down there? No. No.

RW: So you were just there the one original time and you didn't go back with any MP's, the
rancher or anybody else?

SC: No.
RW: O.K. "Marcel would go to Fort Worth and the CIC man would stay behind to lead the clean
up detail at the site another reason t h y send Marcel was the CIC had there own chain of
command that reported to Kirtland in Albuquerque rather than Fort Worth and although
Blanchard outranked the CIC agent (meaning yourself) a phone call to Kirtland could have gotten
his orders overturned." So, this implied that you reported to Kirtland, which I know, of course,
we did later when District 17 was formed.

sc: Yeah,OSI.
-
RW: Yeah,but at that time you didn't necessarily the CIC did not report to Kirtland?
SC: No. No. Kirtland was just another Air Base as Ear as we were concerned down at RosweU.
They weren't part of SAC. They weren't anything to do with us CIC -wise or nothing.

RW: 0.K...Here is where Rick& comesinto the picture, and Rickett makea a nun& of claims
that basically...I don't know ifRickett is still alive or not.

SC: No,Rick is dead now.

RW: O.K.Because I...(Unintelligr'ble)
SC: No,he is dead and I think now maybe his wife might be now. We use to exchange
Christmas cards up uirtil a couple of yean ago when he died. Two or three years ago.

RW: So,he died two or three yean ago? OK. He makes a number of claims that, at least Randle
and Schmitt; and when I say "Randle and Schmitt Fm not trying to pick on them or to imply that
they're doing anything differentthan any of these other people...they just happen to have the most
current stuff on the street.

SC: Trying to write a book.

RW: "Rickett, the Provost Marshal"...wtcume se...page 61. "According to Lewis Rickett, one of
the CIC Agents, he, with the commander of the CIC shop, drove a staff car fiom the motor pool
and returned to the crash site. They were followed by a second car carrying several MP's. An
MP did ask for identification because neither of the counterintelligence men were in uniform." So
this would have been the second trip, which you said you did not take. But, he did apparently go
with you on the first tip?

SC: Rickett?
RW: Rickett...Yeah.
sc: Yeah.
RW: And I assume at that time, just like in OSI,you did not wear d o r m s for the most part?
SC: I didn't even have any uniforms.
RW: Yeah. I know the feeling. For the first eight years in OSI,I think,the only uniform I had
was my mess dress. "But Rickett, the Provost Marshal and the senior intelligence officer walked
into the debris field, examined the -e. Rickett said it looked like mdal and asked ifit was
radioactive"...and you said it wasn't. That was page 62. This is on the, you would have been on
this now second bip again, O K ? oh p a p 63: as they prepared to leave the crash site the CIC
agent told Rickctt: "Youand I were llcytf out here. You and I never saw this. You don't see
any military people or militsry vehicles out here. Rickett agreed saying yeah, we never wen left
the office." Now that's the little quote they have out also in the..

SC: Now what page is that on?

RW: That's on page 63.
SC: 63? No. Now I could have said something M o u s like that after we got back to the
office, &er I was convinced that it was a weather balloon, or some such contraption. I didn't
know, naturally. I could have said &er we got back to the office: "Rickett, this has been a big
boondoggle. I don't even want 700 CIC Headquarters to know we wasted our time on it. Forget
we ewer did it." I mean I could have...

RW: O.K.
SC: said in a facetious way: "Lets make out like it newx existed, because we're wasting our
time." But I didn't say it in such a way that it would be this is so highly classified we won't have
anything to do with it.

RW: O.K. On page 86, it said: "The counterintelligence people came into Roswell on a special
flight fiom Andrews Army Air Field on July 8.". So that, to me, implies that this would have been
your CIC Headquarters also sent some other people out there.

SC: Yeah. Right. That's what it sounds like.

RW: Yeah,but you said you would have known if anybody fiom Washington had come into your
area, sort to speak. More than likely.

SC: Well I certainly hope so. We were secretive and so forth, but I think they would have
touched base with me, since obviously ifthey talked to Marcd he would have probably said
something to begin with, but they would have wanted to know what I knew. No,I...

MC: Of course Jack Williams was there. Jack could have been on some of these...
SC: No Jack was young and sort of scatterbrained, as you well know. And I never died much
on him for anything. He's the type that would read a book while he was on a road trip driving his
car. He'd finish a book while driving...

RW: While he was actually driving?

SC: Ohsure.

RW: Sounds like the people driving on 95 in Washington t h e in the trafEc jam.

MC: There weren'tmany people on the road.

SC: Jack rabbits. No. No disrespect to Jack, but he just wasn't a solid citizen as fhr as Fm
concerned. And ifanybody f3om headquarters CIC came in rm positive they would have checked
in with me.

RW: O.K.The page that's kind of devoted to you, if you will, is on 171 and it said tbat "Schmitt
suggested the possibility that the crash had been a V-2or A-9,(which is one of derivatives of the
V-2,that we were playing with at that time). Schmitt asked if there had ever...ifthqr bad ewer
retrieved anything like that mywhere in New Mexico. Never,he said any rocket g o b off course
would be destroyed by the range officerandthey wouldn't have wanted to riskinjury tocivilisas
on theground. Randle asked ifhe nmembendany talkat all about aflying saucer. He(meaning
you) insisted that nothing at all happed. Tbe former CIC man hadn't heard my nnxunsabout a
crash. All this, including the story sbown on "Unsolved Mysterks", was a bunch of&arbage.
Schmitt and Randall spent two hours with the man, he told them that any reports he wrote in the
normal course of his duty was sent to Washington not 8th Air Force in Fort Worth. He was
attached to the S09th, but his chain of command was d i h t than the 8th Air Force, that's ..."

SC: That's one of the few true stones they had in this book.
RW: "In fact he talked about many things Willingly. He said the ranks of CIC agents were all
know that's the way it was in OSI for years) "It didn't look right to have a
classified at the time" (I
Master Sergeant investigating a Colonel so no one on the base, except for a few clear to know,
had any idea of what he or any of the others were. (Ofcourse, that's the way we did business.)

SC: True.

RW: "He provided names of others who might be able to hdp and he described his llorrrml
unclassified duties at Roswell, but according to him the crash and recovery had never happened.
There was no investigation on the Foster ranch, no mystay flight, and no discovery of alien
bodies, nothing." Now we are getthg to the part were they make you sound like somewhat of a
conspirator. It said, "Randall said he and Schmitt had literally two dozen Witness' to the special
Bights out of Roswell and the special clean up operation on the ranch. Something must have
happened, the CIC man finally conceded, but I don't know what it was. As they left, the CIC man
asked them, if you boys found something that m e d national Security would you keep it to your
self? The former CIC man grins, and said 'very good'." So, somehow, by that remark, I imply
that this was kind of, "I know something that you guys don't and if affects national security so
we're not going to tell you." That's the way that 1 interpret what they wrote. Because,the rest of
ifjust kind of recounts the way we did business, even when I came into OSI twenty years after
that.

sc: You think they're talking about me there, "the former CIC man?"

RW: Y d .
SC: If1 said tbat, I probably said it really memhg that ifthuc guys tiying to make abwk
writing their sensationalbook runinto to somctbingthat d y affected national searrity, I meant
don't put it in a book.

RW: Yeah. OK.

SC: Turn it over to somebody.

RW: But you weren't implying that this incident aEected national Security and you weren't going
talkaboutit?

SC: Oh,no! No way.

RW: OK. I see you have some materials you brought out here. That looks like one of you basic
agent classes. Is that one of yaw besic agent ClaMe8 there?
SC: No,that was the old District Office 17, OSI
RW: Oh. OK.

SC: So this is after. Dr. Mock sent me that. I got it out when Mock sent it to me. This is
Rickett.

RW: OK.

SC: And that is Jack Williams and that's old Cavitt. Down on the lower left.
RW: Oh. OK.

SC: That's me, and these are the two boys that were with me there at Roswell. I have them all
identified and who's no longer with us. This thing that Mock sent me, this picture. It says that
Jack Williams is deceased. No wonder why somebody didn't contact him. I didn't even know he
was dead. We were not fiends. He was a StafF Sergeant, and a good honest kid, I think.

MC: Asmartguy.
SC: What?

MC: Really, he was quite intelligent.

SC: Oh, yeah. He read. Read books while he was on road trips.

RW: Well the names I recogni# h m here that were still: are Doyle Rees and John Stahl.
SC: Doyle is still Jin. I have a letter h m him.
RW: I think he's in the Association ofFormer OSI Agents.
sc: Yeah. fight.
RW: And I am also a member ofthat so I see a lot of that. So, I see a lot of their letters and
&, pictures that tbey send.

MC: We get correspondcllccfiom Doyle. Chris' son d e d him not long ago. He had a hole in
oneonhisu&icthbirthday.

RW: Oh,is tbat right. Was it his first one?

MC: Nice, nice man.

SC: He is a nice man. And a nice family. I don’t know what the date on that is. Letter fiom
Doyle, it says: “When you call the press conference to tell the world, let me know, because I want
to be there.“ So, I just got reams of this stuff fiom books.

RW: Do you mind if1 look through that real quick?

SC: Oh, heavens no. I got it (Unintelligible)
RW: Stanton T.Freidman?
SC: Freidman or whatever.

RW: Yeah,he doesn’t like me a lot. He writes me nasty letters.

SC: He called me a couple of times. I could hear him a little bit, but it wasn’t good enough for
me to try to strain my brain. He apologized a little later. He wrote me back and said sorry we
had a bad telephone connection. On your end!

RW: OK. Here is the stuff about Schigthat I referenced earlier. Asking the GAO to look at
this. Karl Mock...

SC: You know, you can look at any of that. You can have copies. As a matter of fktI don’t
know what I’m going to do with it.

MC: Oh,yoursonswantit.
SC: Oh,I don’t know.

MC: Oh,yes thy do. J a y said last night maybeDad could make afortune out ofbeing ahero.
SC: Wdl, if1 wanted to make a little money I could have imagined a lot of things and cooperated
more.

MC: Well, that’s what Doyle said.

SC: With these authors and so forth I could be given royalties for a long time.
RW: Oh,this was out of the C&&d RC~UES . I don’t remember Seeing this in there. Oh,Karl
Mock wrote this for the Global Reliance.

sc: Have you ever s e a that clipping?

RW: This om on Rickett here?
sc: Yeah.

RW: No, I never saw this.

SC: I don't know what that is fiom.
RW: "But at least one surviving member of the recovery team actually handled the material,
(Unintelligible). Eighty two year old Lewis Rickett. 'Cavitt had been there the day before, but he
wouldn't tell me what was going on until we got there.' With armed troops standing guard
Rickett wandered through the security phalanx and saw metallic debris scattered in an outer circle
with a diameter of 25,30, or 40 fat."
SC: It must have been Rickett sort a flipped of little bit. See this was something that he...an
interview he had shortly before he did, I think.

MC: Well, when they interview Rick he was older and trying to make people remember things
that happened umpteen years ago is pretty hard.

SC: I have probably received an awfirlly lot more than that, Rich, and threw it away. Sarry.

RW: So these people have been pretty much tracking you down on a regular basis then?
SC: Oh,yes! Mary can verifjl that. She said she had been home when she got telephone calls.
MC: I have talked to some of these fellows myself
SC: Yeah,if I'm not here she talks to them. Blabber aways and she gives it right down the line.
"Havethey ever tried to influence you to say that I am lying or holding anything out?"

MC: No. Ijust tdl them that you are tdling the truth.
SC: They don't believe you when you tell the tnrth.
RW: I guess they don't. That's the problem we have with this whole line of inquiry and attempt
to look this. It is very hard to prove the negative. It is hard to prove that something didn't
happen, because you don't document stuffthat doesn't happen.

SC: No, it is pretty hard to, dacult, but a good b a g i d o n can. These boys have it.
MC: ThepicturethatwasintheRoswellpaper, as I said, wehadjust gottenthae so we
probably had to start subad- to it. But nobody passed it araund.

RW: Well let me tell you what's in the official records that we f d so tat. So you Win have
fed.
SC: Please, do.

RW: We did this, as investigators would, logically. We figured, "where would this stuffbe"? So
we went to all the different records. Working for me I have a group of reservists who are
declassification experts. They are excellent researchers. They spend their whole time dealing
with records, so these people know where all this stuff is buried. So, we have been to all the
major record centers. The Archives and nuclear records (ranging h m unclassified to TS nuclear
stuffbecause the 509th was the only nuclear unit in the world at that time. So, some of there
records were TS and still are.) That is because they have never been declassified. Anyway, we
found that there was no airplane crash that could account for this. Just to show you how unsafe it
was to fly at that time, there were six airplane crashes in less than a month in New Mexico alone
in 1947, and that doesn't include the rest of the United States. We were lucky to have six.

SC: Remind me to double back on that. Go ahead with your story and I11 tell you another tittle
Story.

RW: We found no indication of a V-2launch that is not accounted for. There was one scheduled
on the 3rd of July and that was scrubbed. There was no indication that there was some sort of
nuclear accident at that time where we either dropped a weapon or did something stupid, which
we had to consider during that period of time, but there is no indication of any of that happening.
Weather balloon themselves are; (although they have a "return to" type of thing on them)
supposed to crash. I mean,they go up and then sooner or later they're going to come down.
Right? Now what we did find, however (and I not implying what you saw up there), but its a
possibility. There was a project run by New York University, out of HonOman at that time. It
was a balloon experiment that lasted for years. But at the time a portion of it was Top Secret. It
has since then be d e c l d e d . It was called Project Mogul.

SC: Never heard of it.

RW: Mogul was designed to run balloons at very bigh altitudes with extremely sensitive (1coustjc
sensors (what we were looking fbr were nuclear test on the part of the Russians,because we
thought the Russian3 had gottenthe bomb) so you needed high enough and fhr enough So, and at
a constant altitude, we could see...because there were no satellite (Unintelligible) they had a
couple Mogul balloons and several ofthose are unaccounted for during that period of the. They
are very large in the sense that some of them were up to 600 feet long, not one gigantic balloon,
but a series of balloons, because as they went up to altitude some of them broke ofI: and some of
them dropped ballast and they were very sophisticated. They had a lot of tin foil on them and a
lot of different things. Mogul is a possibii. We found a couple of researchers h m New
Mexico that we are in contact with now becausethey kept p h t e fccocdsin some regards. But,
of c o w that was a Top Secret project at the time and we don't know XBlanchard knew about
that or not: (we don't have any indication that he did). And that they used the weather balloon in
an attempt to cover the other balloon which was a chssified project.
SC. Yeah.that is possible. 1 didn't know about that particular thing. I just knew weather
balloons went up and measured. This was my first impression. I didn't know anything else, so
O.K.. that's it, forget it. The thing that disturbed me is why they cannot shoot down this story
about the little bodies and so forth that were allegedly taken to Wright-Pat or some place.

RW: Wright-Pat, right.

SC: And put in a sealed (unintelligible) or so forth. And the only thing, Rick might have gotten
confused about something. You mentioned crashes. We had one there at Roswell. They
practiced this air to air refueling, which was just., I think, getting into real high-tech stuff as far as
I knew.

RW: B-29'~?
SC: Yeah. And they were refbeling them. We had one rather, rather hell! Where the plane that
was being refbeled for some reason or other pitched up when they were either getting to attach
the cord, or the other one came down, which doesn't sound logical, I think it's more apt to have
went up. One or both of those planes crashed. I forget what direction it was up fiom Roswell,
but I went out to that crash at the request of Marcel;maybe Blanchard, and I probably took
Rickett with me. We had bodies all over the place, and it was a sad thing. We r e c o d some
fingers, of course, there was one hell of a big fire after it happened. I collected a bunch of hands,
fingers and so forth, trying to identiQ them. A! the time I thought this was sort of stupid. They
had a list back at the Operation Office. Other than identlfjring body parts so that some guy's wife
would know that she had part of her, used to be, former husband. And I don't remember where
we sent those things for i d d c a t i o n . I ranember going into the office after that trying to get
prints off of these old shriveled up fingers and so forth. What good it would do, I don't know. I
didn't know then, but I WIW wonder if maybe Rick got confirsed that mybe this was some of the
bodies. I doubt it, but it is just a possl'bility. But I don't know why they can't trace down those
bodies.

RW: Well,that is the ultimate part ofthe quote "cover up" that we're involved in. You and I
would probably think as OSI agents ifyou r c c o v e n d a body that is unusual, that would genesate a
whole bunch ofpapawork. We arc a psperwork society. I mean, it may be classified with a
batillion stamps on it, but it would generate a lot of study and things. And we have not been able
to locate one piece of anything to indicate that is so.

SC: It boggles my mind that we would not be able to find anything. The Air Force having the...I
mean we were close knit and it seemed that there had to be a trail and pick up and eventually end
there in that grip, or whatewer they put these bodies in.

RW: But did you cver hear of any talk ofthat type of stuffwhen you were at R o d
SC: Downthere. No.
RW. When did all of this first surface, in your life? M e r you picked up the original stuff and you
went on to your career. When did the UFO part first surface in your life?

SC: You mean this sort of stuW

RW: Yes. Was it with Berlitz and Moore?

SC: Our son sent this book to us.
RW: This is 1980,I think. Yeah 1980.
MC: A lot of that has been debunked by the other two guys.
SC: Well, I don’t remember where Jay got this book.
MC: They bought it, they bought it. And he came by to see us and we had just back fiom fishing
and you had one of your cluster headaches. And I did most of the talking here, because Cav was
having his cluster headaches.

SC: I had another cycle of cluster headaches. Similar to migraine.

RW: I understand those are really painttl.
SC: I am about to come out of it, althoufi I had one last night, and I was awake all night long.
MC: Don’t you think that is it. I never even gave it a thought.
RW: Until Mr.Moore and company showed up, around I980 time fiame?
sc: Yeah.
MC: 16 September 82 tbat hc was hae.
RW: O.K.Now fiom my research (not of AF records, but of popular literature records)
Friedman is the guy who ran into Marcel down in LoUisiana in 1978,becauseFriedman had been
a UFO researcher for years. He ran into Marcel and fiom his interview of Marcel it got Berlitz
and Moore interested, and that’s when Marcel then started talking to all of these different people.
And then it has kind of grown since then.

MC: And thenofcourse, it’s toobadapparedy, you sa little Jessewas about 11. Cavnever
told me arrythiag. He said Ill llcvc~tdl you anythins tben you won’t spread anything. We always
wondered how little Jesse knew SO much To US it should have banb u h . Ne01 (Marcd’s
wik) apparently wa8 not able to give any i n f o d o n a t k Jesse ctisd.
RW:Yeah. The son is mentioned in a number of publication, because he claimed his dad brought
this stuff to his house and they hammered on it and...

MC: Which I remember seeing.

SC: He was a smart little devil, his son.
RW: He is a doctor, I think.
SC: Is he is a PHD type of doctor or a Medical doctor?
RW: Yeah,I though he was a medical doctor.
MC: He is an MD, but his brother was medical type technician.
SC: They were a smart fhily. I always thought Marcel was just a little on the outer scale.

RW: Since you were fiends with both Marcel and Rickett, is there any explanation that they
would (in your mind, since you knew them) tell these stones and get this interest generated?

SC: No.

MC: I wouldn't think purposely, would you darling?

SC: Not purposely, no. I gave you a little insight on Rick, he could sit and tell stories that last
hours.

MC: They were visited by a lot of people, more than we were. Handier to some people, beiig in
Florida where they were. She would Write on cards, so and so has been bere, but I don't think
purposely they would try to make up tales fbr b e i i heroes or glorifjing anything.

RW: Let me ask you officially fbr the record. Did you take any kind of Security oath, promise,
sign anything, or verbally agree to anything not to talk about any ofthis, that occurred $New
MCXiCO?

SC: No. I told you that awhile ago. I'll take an oath on that. I swear.

RW: O.K.Has anybody in the US Government, the Air Force,or anyone connected with the
Government, ever threatened you if you said anything about any of these incidents that something
would hnppen to you, your fiunily or anybody else?

SC: No. Noway.

RW: O.K.
SC: I am telling the truth, and I have told all of these other people the truth. That, I don't know
anymore than what I told them, and I don't know anything about any "little men", or anything. I
am a pretty stupid person, when 1 say "I don't know anything."

RW:Well, I appreciate having to ask you some of these questions, even after you told me that..
SC: I know you have to.
RW: But, we want to do this officially, because as neat as we can tell nobody ever has before.
SC: I certainly wish you good luck. I hope you can convince these people.
RW: Well, it is going to be difficult, because like I say we have nothing other than this one
formerly classified project that was d n g out there at the same time that was even a little bit
"funny", ifyou will...

SC: Yeah. Had I known about that, Rich, at that time I would have probably hooked it up with
that instead of a weather balloon.

RW: But, a balloon is basically a balloo~.Some of them are bigger and some of them are
smaller.

SC: Some do some things, some of them do others.

RW: One of the things that they mentioned, going back to the balloons for a minute, was what
Marcel called "hieroglyphics". It was d u g that was written or printed on some of the
debris. Do you recan any of that?

SC: No. But in reading over some of my other garbage hem, I have seen some hieroglyphics. I
don't think there were any claims that these! were the Roswdl deal. Were there?
RW: uarcdclaims.
sc: Marcelsaysso?
RW: However, the day &er the onghal flying saucer article in the Roswell paper, there was a
follow up article where they interview Braze1 (the rancher), and he descn'bed this stuffalmost
W ar to what you did, almost like b a d wood type of sticks and tin foil type of things. Then he
said some had what rrpperuedtobe W tape with little purple flowers stamped on it.
Appandy at that time, as near aswc can tdl, one ofthe balloonmandbms did use some type
oftape that had some sort offlowmi 011 it. It is possr'ble, I guess, that somebody could mistake...

MC: I think there is a picture in me oftbese...

SC: Well, some of these authors, Mary, you got to remember, they will skip from the Roswell
incident to something that happened someplace else in the United States and they get a little
confbsing. You just read through it. I remember something about some hieroglyphics, not on
that one. I didn’t see anything. I do not remember any writing at all on the thing. But if Marcel
saw something, maybe he did.

RW: Did you know Haut, Lt. Haut? The public affairs guy at the time?
SC: Just vaguely. What was he, base information, or something of that sort?
RW: Yes.
SC: Not close at all. As a matter of fact I couldn’t even describe him. I got a picture with a tall
fellow and I didn’tknow much about him, at all.

RW: Is there anything else that you can recall or l i e to add?

SC: I have beem thinking about it ever since you called, and said you were coming out.
MC: It is a shame that Don Yeager was in the office with Jess.
SC: Yeah. Is he dead now’?
MC: Idon’tknow.

SC: But he won’t know a thing, Mary. He wouldn’t know a thing.

MC: He wouldn’t have known anything with Jesse?

SC: No. No. Jesse didn’t trust Don vay much. I wddn’t want (unintelligiile). He was trying
to keep up, but d d n ’ t . He just wasn’t a reliable sort of individual.

MC: So Jess probably wouldn’thave...

SC: No. No. I don’t even think he even talked to Don about it. There was another Captain in
the Intelligence office at the time who I always thought was a very sharp individual, his name I
don’t remember his fust name...Cad was his first name,Macamer. He ended up as a fill Colonel.

MC: Now we gave Randall their names. We p v e them everything we could think of
SC: Yeah. cI1.imightbedeadnow. Ialwaysthoughthewasaprettysmartindividuai.

MC: Carlwasthelastweknew.
SC: Somewhere up in the North. wasn’t he?

MC: He is our generation. He would have retired.

RW: Did he switch over to the Air Force too, when he...

MC: WhoMacamer?
RW: Yeah.
MC: Oh,yeah. He was in the 8th Air Force.
RW: So when you all just went over to the USAF when it formed in September?
SC: He went right along with the 8th Air Force, becoming USAF. We being OSI,well...
MC: He was always Air Force. He was always Army CIC,or was he?
SC: Who,me?

MC: No. No. Carl.

SC: Carl wasn’t even in the CIC. He was in intelligence. He was just in the intelligence office
there at...He was under Marcel. He was under Blanchard. He was under Ramey. Wasn’t that the
General’s name over at the 8th Air Force,Roger Ramey?

RW: Yeah,that’s right. In fhct, they named a SAC base in Puerto Rim after him.
SC: The things that Ramey and Blanchard used to! Blanchard atme over to the Philippines. I
think he was IG in 1963 or 4 snd I was District Commander ofthe OSI District 42 in the
Philippines. W e h a d a f i w c h u d c s togetheraad...

MC: Do you recall once when we were some place and Roger, and Ramey and I were dinner
partners. I think it was Greece. You were on one of your many trips.

RW: Blanchard was the IG,you’re right.

SC: He and Ramey, I don’t know what he was after the commander of the Eight Air Force,but
he and Blanchard use to have some...(unintelligiile). Oh Lord! I knew these guys pretty wdl.
No. I don’t kmow anything about any crashed space ships. I don’t know anything about any little
men.

MC: I am quite surethat we nenrgave it a thought until that book

RW: 1'11 tell you what, if you can indulge me for a few minutes and let me set up my computer
Do you mind signing a statement. I11 make it very short. (unintelligible).

SC: Sure. Youbet. Yeah.

RW: And we'll just make a kind of quick summary statement if you can bare with my computer
skills here.

SC: I11 prick my finger and sign it in blood.

RW: I don't think we'll require that.

MC: Rich, it always seems f b ~ toy us with all these, if these things happened. How can 30 or
even 3 people keep something a secret?

RW: Well, I would kind of like to know how they did it, because in my real job we handle all the
Special Programs that do keep all the secrets. And we would like to figure out how they do it so
we can duplicate it. Because it is very hard to keep secrets, as you well know.

MC: But you see, I am talking about civilians and other people who were in on these bodies
going to the morgue and all that. (unintelligible) some grave digger from the hneral home or
whatever...

RW: Well, of course, Randle and Schmitt do claim that those people are out there and that they
have interviewed them. They list a whole bunch of them. Now,we're not tryine to go &er them
and undo every interview they had done. That is not our point. In fist, you are the only person
we have gone out and interviewed, because you're always reputedto be the guy... one of the two
or three people that was there picking up the stuff...

MC: And he is the only one that is still living.

RW: Thatisright.
MC: That is what Doyle Rees said on his post card. He said you better keep this going. If
anybody likes publicity as he.. .(unintelligible)

SC: But what he was saying, all of these guards...

RW: He claims that he had intemiewed a number ofthese people and said that they did guard
something and there were a number flights. Now,we have never found the flight records to
substantiate tbat, w I don't know where they b.Ifthey have.

SC: Thecrewchi&ontheairplanethataremakingtheseflights. Thqrwentwithtbem. Flight

EnghCWS?
MC. It will be interesting for you to get Randle and Schmitts last book.

SC. Their latest book? They promised they're going to take it easy on me.
RW: Well, I have tried to find a copy, because, among other things, that have happened, is that
people keep changing the dates of when things happened.

MC: And sites!

RW: Yeah. And that makes it very difficultwhen you are try to track down records. If you are
looking between this period of time and all of a sudden they change the period of time.

MC: Well, when they came here about 14 months ago they sat right there and we became good
fiends down in Sierra Vista and we would tell them everything we know, honestly. We gave
them gobs of names. They sat down and said we have something new, something different.
Something happened at this site and it was not on the same date. So, you could have one of your
researchers get that book, and research that.

SC: You are very well aware of the good guy bad guy approach of when they interrogation.

RW: Ohyes.
SC: Well, I got a perfect example of this with Randle and Schmitt. Randle is the outgoing,
buddy-buddy type and this ScMtt he'd sit over their and he'd took over at me like this (while
Randall is asking me a question), "you lying Cur." Particularly down in Sierra Vista. They just
grated on me.

RW: You probably had done that a time or two yourdf You would know what he was doing.
SC: Not really. Let him type up this deal that I...

RW: Yeah,I don't want to take up all of your time.

MC: We have all day. I11 go down and get a hamburger or...
RW: Ifyou don't mind, ifyou got a plug in over by the table. I need two plug ins to make this
thing work.

sc: Youneedtwo?
RW: One for the computer and one for the power supply.
SC: O.K.
RW, If that is possible. Although the cords are a lot longer than this one, hopehlly

SC: Where would be the best place?

RW: In fact, I can probably...

MC: (unintelligible)

SC: Your cord is not all that long.

RW: (unintelligible)

SC: Is that tape recorder still running?

RW:Yeah,let me shut the tape recorder off. Its about 12:30 here on the 24th.
SC: Well, you're not interrupting anything here.

.RW:O.K. We'll just do this. I11 make it a short one which just kind of summarizes what we
have already talked about.

SC: Good.

END RECORDING
 L t r Watson Labs. Jun 46, subjr Whange in C l a s s . of Wogul,' Item 188-5.1I

1st Ind. TSELT-2/WHD/mch

Hq., Air Idateriel Conmand, Wright Field, Dayton, Ohio. 8 July 1946.

TO: Commanding General, Amy A i r Forccs, Washington 25, D.C.

THRU : (AC/AS-b)
1. To amplify the infomation given i n the basic letter it i s
desired by Electronic Subdivision t h a t the following information and
s c i e n t i f i c data pertaining t o project rWogullf be classified WOP SECRET:"

8. Precise d a t a as t o the exact placement of measuring

instruments.

b. Scientific observations and measurements that have

m i l it a q application.
C. Detailed methods of measuring results.

2. Enginocring preparations f o r the final t e s t t h a t are not in

conflict w i t h the above rill be classified Wmfidential.1'

3. Contractual documents vrill be classified the s m e as the

security classification of the equipments involved. Equipments used in
project lfhlogultlare common t o other systems o r sets that are now class-
i f i e d "Confidential, IfRestricted, or Wnclassified; 11 contractual
documents should be classified accordingly.

4. Authorization is requested t o observe the security class-

i f i c a t i o n s pfoposed herein.

.,
E. OtDONfTELL
Brig. Gen U S .A
Deputy Chief
Engineering Mvision
Basio l t r VIAEC, 9 Sop 47, to CC N C , subj: " R O B Q V O ~ O p t 8 i n Alaska."

1st Ind TSE!LT( "3EL0 ) /JGR /i a

Eq A X , Wrii;ht Field, Dayton, Ohio. 10 Sap5 47

To: Cornanding Cenerel, Army Air Porcos, Fiaah%+an 25, D. C.

ATTNt AC/AS-4

1. The proporsod o p r a t i o n ogtlincd in the b a s i o oorreepondeaca is

concurred in b y this coxian~d.

2. In view of the idgh p r i o r i t y ocrrried by this projeot, requelrt

that nooarsary action bo takon t o have the Alaskan Doperbent p r o v i d e
tho neoelrslry foailitios.

I s / Tom c. Uves
TOLf C. RIVES, Brig Qen, USA
Chief, Yleotronlo Subdivi d o n
Engineering Division

C
0
P
Y
 20
Statement
Athelstan F. Spilhaus
June 3, 1994
 STATEhlEhT OF wTT?jESS
Date: 3 Jun 91 Place. vA
I Atheistan F S p h u s , hereby state that JeEiey Butler, was identified as a Colonel, U S M and Jim
Mchdrew, was identified as a Lieutenant. US.@ on this date at my home and do hereby,
voluntarily and of my own free will. m d e the following statement. This is done without h3ving
been subjected to any coercion, unhwfd d u e n c e or unlawfd inducement.
A%
I was the Director of the Nk'u Balloon Project and also involved with many other sensitive
activities. Until these discussions, I had no indication of what the "Roswell incident" was. I was
involved in numerous unusual activities such as reconstruction of captured Gcnnan rockets,
development of drone planes and the like-such as long range balloons. The A m y Air Force had
seen what the Japanese had done with long range balloons;although not effective as weapons, they
did initiate the long-range balloon research which led to u9c of balloons for the detection and
collection of debris from atomic explosion. Although I was involved m sensitive classified
programs, I completed secrecy agreements for Various projects, and I undemtand that this activity
(Mogul, etc. is now declassified) and I did enforce "need to know". In part, I left NYU because
the administrationwanted to know too much about the various projects I was involved in (the
Bikini test). At one time I was sent by the US govemment to assist the South Africa meterologicd
efforts and I worked numerous other special missions. Even though the war was over the Cold
War had just started and certain things wert sensitive. I recall that it was Col Duffy who brought
me from the Reserves to active duty. It was during this pexiod that I did become involved in a
"UFO case". Some bush pilot had found some pock marks in dry snow in Alaska in 1950. So we
flew up and saw peculiar round holes in the snow. We landed and took dog sleds to the site and
found craters with a hole in the center. We cored one out of the snow and found a center of
frozen conical ice. I began to think of something I had seen in the desert where glass had been
formed simiIarly after a lightening strike (the "horoles"). I took one back to the university in dry
ice and wrote a classified report. We even simulated a small lightning strike over dry snow (just
from the snow blowing over the surface) and came up with conical ice formations. This was the
Stony River Incident and it wasn't a UFO. On the December 1947 balloon project reports the
"service flights" probably refer to the then Top Secwity project M O A T 1 (related to MOGUL)
which was to produce a report to the President when the Russians exploded an atomic device and
were wdy to produce a droppable atomic bomb. We coordinated all the listening posts to
determine what stage the Russians were at. Concerning the Watson Laboratory gear, I don't
remember the specifics of what that gear was. I recommend you check with Charlie Moore for
those details. Many of the projects I just new about in generd-these were sensitive times-it was
somelimes better not to know too much-I knew about the collection of debris with special planes
daily fiom Eilson AFB to the North Pole and back, PTARMIGAN Wts, that lasted through the
50's. Concerning the Japanese balloons, I don't recall any specifics. Nor do I recall whether we
had REWARD tags on all the balloons. I went many times to Alomogordo AAF and White
Sands--not necessarily for balloon flights. I worked on naval activity such as the thermal affects on
SONAR. Concerning actual balloon construction, Wmzen of St Paul Minnesota, in association
with General Mius, did most of the balloons. General Mills also did some balloon projects.
Winzen made the first polyethelene (non-stretchable balloons). Fllght FS, I really did not get into
the details of the individual fights or experiments. The polyethelene material was v e q durable-it
was designed not to burst--you could push a sharp thing through it but it would be difEcult to tear
w
it with vour hands. There was also debris collection on sticky - paper.
_ - Most of the balloon projects
were not concerned mith weather--that's why there weren't radiosondes on all the balloons.- The
"cosmic ray train" was probably just a cosmic ray es
T.. q t on one of our ballons. The balloons
were made ofsections and h3d tape reinforcements but mcall any specifics on the tape material.
Mylar was not called that originaUy--it may have originated as polyethelene. All the poIyetheiene
we use was of a translucent material. Neoprene was used during the ww, generally for
meterological and artillery firing ballons. The artillery radar tracked the balloons with comer
reflectors-this gave the minds aloftto assit the gunners. The radar reflectors were sheets of
reflective m a t e d and they changed over time but I don't recall the details of the changes. On
reviewing Charlie Moore's letter, the acoustic detection relates with the atomic debris collection.
The reflectors were for tracking and was made up of a m e e d paper or fabric. Charlie explains
the flowers-I'd heard about the flowers before, don't remember where-we used whatever we had
in the experimental realm. The targets were throw-aways-we didn't put a tag on them, maybe a
radiosonde, but not a target. Such a train would make gouges (shallow) as it was dragging the
ground. We used meterology as a cover story-it was a natural. It had a purpose beyond the
project-we could use the constant level analysis of the constant pressure (isobaric) MI umstant
altitude to study atmosphcrics mathematically-therefore using it was natural. h e y ' s press
conference-the Air Force position makes sense for the mistake that the PI0 made in his
statements. (All the NYU personnel had left Alomogordo when the "mated" was brought in-
someone stated that it may have been Col Duffy's and therefa sent it to him at Wright Patterson-
-not because it was extraterrestial) It is a logical reason to send it (the debris fiom the desert)
there-not because it was special-Col DufQ was a tine officer and I'm sure he'd recogniZc it. I
was not aware of any association between our balloon projects and the alleged "RosweU incident"
until this interview. I am not part of any conspiracy to withhold infonnation fiom either the US
government or American public. There is no classified informationthat I am withholding related
to this inquiry and I have n e w been threatened by US Government persons concerningnot talking -
about this situation .

SIGNED: Subscribed and swom to before me, a

person authorized to administer oaths
this
3rd day of June 1994
VA

J@m* . COL,
BUTLER, . USAF
WITNESS(s):
 21
Statement, with Hieroglyphic and
Balloon Train Drawings
Charles B. Moore
June 8, 1994
 STATEMENT OF WITNESS

Date: 8 Jun 94 PlaCC: NM

CBd
I, Charles B Moore, hereby state that Je* Butler, was identified as a Colonel, USAF and J
im
McAndrcw, was identified as a Lieu!cnant, USAF on this date at my home and do hereby,
voluntady and of my own frtt wilt, make the foIlowbg statement. This is done without having
been subjected to any coercion, unlawfid influence or unlawfid inducement.
A4
cp A.
I was the Project Engineer for the NYU balloon project during the 1947 time frame. I was not
aware that the project had the name MOGUL until 1992 when 1was contactedby an individual
who was working on some rescar& related to the "Roswell Incident" and the relationship to the
NYU balloon project. Our ody purpose for the NYU group was to devtlop COIlstant 11-
balloons. In the early flights at Alomocgodo, starting in June, 1947, we used radar targets to track
the balloons (not all the balloons had targets). Some of the targets were apparently manufbchmd
by a toy or novelty company. Ed Istvan was the procurement officer and he had contacted some
company that txtruded toothpaste tubes as well as radar chaff. The early balloons were made of
neoprene andmaaufacapedprhnadybythe Dewey Atmy company m CIlmbridgt and the
I<aysam company. Dewcy balloons were dip type and the Kaysam ones were cast m a mold. The
neoprene balloons were susceptible to degrsdation m sunlight turning h m a translucent milky
white to a dark brown. Some of the material would almost look like dadc gray or black Bakes or
ashes after exposure to thc sun for only a few days. The balloon mattrial and radar w e t material
would be scatted aftcrntrpniagto the ddepcnding on the surfkc winds. The balloon
material also had a peculiar acrid odor due to plasticizers and anti-oxidants. Thtre is a recollection
fiom another procuemeat pcrson (F'etcrson) that he had obtained radar reflectom fkom a toy
manufacturer. I have a specific rcwllection of rtinforcisgtape applied to the scams ofthe
reflectors that had some symbols such as arcs, flowers,circles and diamonds. These wen pinkish
m color. To my knowledge, them were no radar reflcctoram New Mexico m 1947 like the ones
we used until the NYUgmup arrivtd nLc Colurnbiagroupwas prhnariryirrvohncdm developing
low frequency microphones for long range dctcdon of explosions. There was intense pr#glm for
these dmlopmcnts, the umstant ahihldt balloons and the microphone gear. I was h h e d in
1945 in China-B~rma-Indiafor the instaflation and maintaining O f WCBthct tquipment in the W ~ T
against Japan. Our subsequent work with the balloons and microphones was highty classified and
we didn't know that there was a project name until 1992. Concaning the make up of the balloon
trahs, we used braided or twistcd nylon lines-thm were no rnmoiilament lines during the 1947
time h e . Some of the balloons m early June carried radar targets for tracking purposes since
we did not have radiosonde with us.Some also CaRicd sonobow for detecting the
pressure waves where we didn't have the Watson Lab microphone gar. An the radiosondes were
covertnd m white painted cardboard; I don't recall the color of the sonobouys lmt I believe they
were covered m metal. On review of the photos m the RanWSchmiabook, the materiallooks
like one of our balloon and target assemblies. The wooden beams were made of a balsa wood that
had been coated m an Ehnm-like glut. The targets had eyelets where the vatious strings were
attached. The 307(B) modcl was more of an aluminum foil materialthan the 307(C)modd,
..
which was more of an ahmmuzcd paper. Thetargctsweuscdappeadmonfragilethanthelater
q 3 d
C R d
modeL I think that Flight #4 was the t&ht that was launched out of h o g o r d o on June 4,1947.
This is based on Dr.Crary's actual diary of the launch and other events. This is also one of those
events where we went to multiple radar targets because we were not having good success with
smgle targets. This flight was with muhiple balloons and targets and may have had a sonobouy
(black box?). The Watson Lab gear was the microphone Csuipmcnt specScaUy for MOGUL.
The idea was proposed in a 1945 letter from Dr EWing (Woods Hole and Columbia) to G ~ I I
Spaatz that we might be able to detect nuclear blasts pressure waves and low fkcqucncy
~

microphones. This was developed fnnn a study of the 1883 Krakatoa cxl~losionwhere the
presswe waves circled the earth sevcn times. Dr Cmy was sent to Ascension island (the
antipodal) to attempt to detect the Croseroads shot for Operation Crossroads on Kilohuea or
Bikini. He didn't get anything. In December, 1946,Dr C m y was sent to Alomogordo to mn the
field stations for MOGUL. There were several ground microphone sites for detecting blasts
(bombs)detonated offthe New Jersey coast. He also initiated activities off B m u d a and Panama.
Dr Cmy and Dr Peoples were the advance people and schlilic monitors for our project. Dr
Peoples told us to use the cover story of meteorology and to enforce the need-to-know-m fact I
had been reluctant to discuss any of this until only a few years ago. Your letter (SAF/AA) is the
5 first official document rvt seen that says this is declassified. Concerning the Japanese balloons,

we did not use any of them for MOGUL. We didn't pattem our work after the Japantst balloons.
We were very secretive of our work, but the .coverstory waa not a detailed developed cover story.
Our new hires were not even aware of the purpose. They thought they werej\Lsthandling
meteorological equipment. Any of the flights that had "tags" would have stated, "Research
Balloon Flight, Request Return to NYU". The "service tlights" for Dr Peoples were specific ones
canying the microphone gear. The radar test flights were not recorded. Them was a lot of
pressure to develop the constant level balloons. The tracking was to be done by the Watson Labs
radar for the V-2 launches, etc. Starting in early June, 1947 the 307(B) targets came from NYU.
We also launched TNT on some of the balloons to simulate airbmts for detection. AU of these
balloons were accounted for. These and the radar test flights had no tags-we did not want these
to be associated with our project and the explosive ones would all be destroyed with pressure
switches. To my knowledge, the NYU group were the only ones using balloons in New Mexico
during this time but others were involved in other activities so debris fiom rockets, aircraft
dropsondes, etc. may have been found throughout this area. Initially we did not coordinate any of
CUT balloon launches with the Civil A ~ M U ~ Administration.
~ C S We had no contact with any of
the Roswell personnel- although C m y or Peoples may have. There were two July 8th press
releases: in the earlier release, Col J D Ryan stated that radar ieflectors were bcing used to track
balloons for wind information. July 8th is the same day the NYU group returned to "U,so we
had no contact with the Roswell personnel when the announcemnt was made concenhg having
found the "discs". When we heard the news back in New York,we joked that they probabv
found one of our balloons. From that time up until about 1980,no one, officially or otherwise
made any contact with me concerning the possible association between MOGUL and the "Roswell
incident"( it was in about 1980 that William Moore contacted me and asked questions about
balloons malung "gouges" in the earth). The July loth Alomorgodo News article shows a
demonstration of some of our multiple balloons and target trains. We had no one there so it was
surprising to see this. It ahhost appears that there was some type of "umbrella c o w story" to
protect our work with MOGUL. c ,4.d
 I can think of no other explanation for Roswell than one of our carty June service flight balloons.
If one of our balloons went down there was no shroud of secrecy about it. We would attempt to
recover the flight gear when possiile, but the reflectors, balloons, and microphone equipment was
expendable. We went to no great effort to r t c o v c ~the quipment and we ccdniy would not
cordon off an area where one of our balloons went down. We would sometimes send out 3-4 men
to recover the equipment if we knew where it went down. The July loth Alomqordo News
report was a good cover-it dots not appear to be a coincidence-I don’t know who may have
initiated it. Trakowski does not recall being involved m a cow story in one of my conversdtiolls
with him. In New Mexico during 1947, all of our balloon operations were launched h m
Al;rmogordoAAF* cpni.
@ fwI am not part of any conspiracy to withhold i n f o d o n h m cithcr the US govenrmcnt or
hexicam public. There is no class&d infixmation that I am withholding related to this inquiry
and I have never becn threatened by US Government persons u m c c m i n g r c h ~ m talking
about this situation .
C R d

SIGNED: SubQaibedand swom to before me, a

peswm a u t h d to administer oaths
this
8thdayofJune 1994
fi rNM

WITNESS(s):

JT S MCAI&X&W, ILT, USAF

 Tape reinforcement o f panel attachment to the balsa wood

!I White paper side of reflective panel

Reflective panel made

o f aluminum-coated paper

B a l s a wood,
approximately
8 mm square I

Cemented 2 Aluminum aide

joint

MY RECOLLECTION OF THE REFLECTOR MATERIAL ATTACHMENT TO THE BALSA WOOD PIECES

ON THE ML-307/AP PILOT BALLOON RADAR TARGETS I N 1947.

AN APPROXIMATE REPRODUCTION OF THE FIGURES PRINTED ON THE TARGET-REINFORCING TAPE

(This is not authoritative since I last saw one o f these targets more than
20 years ago.)

C.R.i&&
C . B . Moore
Augurt 20, 1992
 Three to five sounding balloons.
350 gram size, each inflated
t o about 4 feet in diameter

- Wind

1 Three ML-307 radar targets

Restraining line
(cut and let go free
h (corner re f 1e c t or s)

at launch.)

/
TYPICAL RADAR TARGET FLIGHT TRAIN USED BY THE NYU BALLOON GROUP I N 1947
statement
Albert C.T&ow&
 STATEMENT OF WITNESS

Date: 29 Jun 94 Place: VA

I, Albert C. Trakowslu, hereby state that Jeflkey Butler, was identified as a Colonel, USAF and
Jim McAndrew, was identified as a Lieutenant, USAF on this date at my home and do hereby,
voluntarily and of my own fiee wdl, make the following statement. This is done without having
been subjected to any coercion, unlandd influence or uniawfiil inducement.

I was provided a background on the Air Force efforts related to the GAO audit and it's association
with the "Roswell Incident" and project Mogul. I personally know all the persons that Col Butler
identified to me as having been contacted in this effoa (Spilhaus, Moore,Lstvvan,Fletcher, Ms
Duffy). I have also been contacted by several researchers and writers and discussed project Mogul
and provided some documents to some of them. Robert Todd, rm not sure whether he was a
believer or not. Charles Ziegler was worlung on the history of nuclear weapons detection
capability. He had some lettdpapem that I did not have such as the lettcn, the Gen Spaatz
directed the establishment of project Mogul. Carl Mock apparently wanted to establish the
"incident" of RosweU as a UFO incident. Charlie Moore was primarily responsible for
development of the constant level balloons for lifting the instrument packages. Concerning a cover
story for the project Mogul, there was no planned cover story. I do not recall any documentation
nor any efforts to develop a cover story even though the security for Mogul was of great concern.
Charlie Mmre and Athel Spilhaus used meteorological research as a cover but this was a spur of
the moment effort--it was an obvious answer to a query-there was no documentation for using
meteorology. We never considered a.glanne4cover story; we were concerned with security.

I was the project officersucceeding Col Duf@ in approximately November 1946. My primary
purpose was nuclear weapons and guided missiles detection programs. Previously, I was
appointed as the laboratory chief in the Signal Corps as an Air Force officer in charge of the
Spherics program and later for the development of weather radar. Since my background was in
physics, I took over project Mogul. It was the only Top Secret project at Watson Labs and I was
the Top Secret Control Officer, so I knew the impacts with security associated with the project.
We moved fkom Watson Labs to Cambridge Me which combined became the Air Force
Cambridge Research Center, and I became the Director of the Air Force Geophysics Lab (and
remained so until 1949). Through 1949,I was the director of both MX968 and Mogul. As the
Mogul director, I went to Alamorgordo h y Air Field in early July 1947,to observe the New
York University balloon group. The "Roswell Incident" occurred after we had returned to Red
Bank (Watson lab) NJ. I became aware of this only after Col called me from Wright Field
firom his home. This was just an hfoxmational call, he just wanted to let me know that someone
had come to him with some debris fiom New Mexico and he said, "this sure looked like some of
the stuff that you launched fiom Alamorgordo." Duffy was very familiar with the various
apparatus and materials for the project, so if he said that it was debris fkom the project, l'm sure
that's what it was. He was not concerned with a breach of security for the project.

Concerning the name Maj Pritchard, he may have worked for me but I don't recall him. I have no
knowledge of any counterintelligence. or intelligence persons on the project or associated with my
directorate at Watson or Cambridge Labs. When we took over the project, we were a w m of the
sensitivity of the project-we were aware that we were working in the open-it was a weakness of
security because the activity could be observed. I never observed any of the balloon "trains" but I
did see some of the early reflectors. Some of the reflectors were procured fkom sources out of
n o d channels. Some of the contractors lined up were not quite in concert with typical Signal
Corps practices and procedures. Jack Peterson was very energetic and could make procurement
actions take place. Ed Itsvan, who I believe actually arranged for production for some of the
reflectors, actually went to a tay mandacturer in New York city to get some. It was kind of a
standing joke. I remember that some of the prototype and prtproduction targets had this pink or
purplish tape holding the material to the balsa beam. This tape had flowers and other designs on it.
The reflectors were probably made starting in late 1944 but I do not recall how long the
production run was. I do not recd any other specific attributes but they were geometrically and
structurally simple.

I am not part of any conspiracy to withhold information fkom either the US govenunent or
American public. There is no classified infomation that I am withholding related to this inquiry
and I have never been threatemed by US Government persons concerning refraining fiom talking
about this situation .

SIGNED: Subscn'bed and sworn to before me, a

person authorized to administer oaths

day of June 1994 at , VA

v%Lk BUTLER, COL,USAF
. I
wITNESS(s):

'T S MCANDREW, lLT, USAF

 Transcript from 8 June 94, Interview with
Professor Charles Moore

(A) Professor Charles Moore

Project Engineer - Project Mogul
(Q) Colonel Jeff Butler
(Q) Lieutenant Jim McAndrew
8 June 1994

A: ...
Dr. Spilhaus, who you may have met, was really the
Director of the project.

Q: We talked with him last week. He sends you his

regards. He's a very interesting man to chat with.
A: But I was essentially the project engineer and a
graduate student, whereas he was Director of Research at New York
University at that time.

Q: We have gone through many of the various technical

documents related to Project Mogul and some of the other work
that you and Dr. Spilhaus and others have done with the Constant
Altitude balloon projects. According to Dr. Spilhaus, he said
you would be the technical expert as it related to those types of
projects in terms of the materials involved, the instrumentation,
that sort of thing. Is that a pretty accurate statement?
A: I think that's correct.
Q: What we're really here for is to discuss this that came
out in the newspaper and the General Accounting Office's
investigation of how we deal with records, the acquisition, and
ultimately disposition. There is an allegation that the
Government is involved in a conspiracy and coverup of something
that occurred in 1947, which is the allegation of their being
some sort of flying disk, flying saucer, UFO, what have you.
A: That's correct.
Q: Of course the people who put out things such as this
journal, MUFON, Mutual UFO Network, the books that have been
written by William Moore, and Randall Schmidt, and others, a lot
of the popular television shows, they've just exacerbated the
situation where a lot of things, quotations, some of your
quotations taken out of context. One of the individuals,
Sheridan Cavitt, who at that time was a Counter-Intelligence
Corps officer at [Roswell] Army Airfield who actual11 went out
with Jesse Marcel to recover some material that has b ? e n alleged
to be the results of a UFO which Colonel Cavitt specifically
states looked like a weather balloon to him.
A: I'm aware that he had been there, but I'd understood
that other quotations had been attributed to him.

Q: Yes, sir. As we go through this, I believe I've got a

copy of essentially a statement he made to Colonel Weaver, whom
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 2

you've talked with also. Colonel Weaver talked with Sheridan

Cavitt two weeks ago. So a lot of the statements that have been
attributed to Sheridan Cavitt, he says they're taken out of
context. He refutes a lot of the information that appears in
these various books.
What I'd like to do, even though this is out of a popular
UFO type of magazine, is there are some statements attributed to
individuals concerning the material that was found, supposedly by
Mac Brazel, somewhere northwest of Roswell, New Mexico. They
talk in terms of materials that look like metallic foil, and
specifically that "could not be bent or broken.''
A s we've gone through the various research, what we believe
to be Project Mogul was probably involved in this incident. The
materials that were being used in Mogul included, of course, not
only the polyethylene balloons, but included the neoprene
balloons at some point, the various types of radar reflectors,
the instrumentation that was being used. Is there any type of
material from that project that you can think of that would be
pliable, would be bendable, but could not be torn? Could any of
the polyethylene or the foil-like radar reflectors, could that be
the case?
A: Let me get a picture for you. This is a radar
reflector manufactured in 1953. It's the ML-307C.
Q: Which is a little different from the B model that was
used in 1947?
A: Where this looks like a pine stick, the material on the
ones we had, this was all balsa and somewhat smaller in diameter,
but the configuration, with one exception... This configuration
of corners, these corners were the same thing. Here's a picture
of this sort of target being used in 1948, and you can see we are
launching multiple targets beneath this balloon.
Q: Is this the same type of target as this, or is this the
B model?
A: This is the B model we flew in 1947 and 1948. Those
are pictures of the B model. If you look, faintly along here you
can see a sort of a discoloration, and that's where my memory of
the reinforcing tape was that they talked about. The B models,
as I remember, did not have these three vanes up here. You don't
see particularly any suggestion in other photographs I have, I
don't remember these which would make the thing rotate in flight.
But this, in the B models was more like an aluminum foil
with a heavy laminated paper. So the material they talk about, I
think, was derived from some version of this.

Q: They talk in terms of the material, being able to

crumple it and releasing it, and it would unfold by itself and
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 3

not leave any creases. This material looks like it would almost
be like aluminum foil, would crease and remain creased.
A: It does have this paper laminate, and the paper, I
think, was maybe a bit tougher on the earlier thing. But I have
no explanation for the fact that it couldn't be bent with a
sledge hammer, as one of the people said, and couldn't be...
Q: Burned?
A: I think some of the balsa wood was dipped in something
like Elmer's glue, and as a result had some sort of a glue
coating on it which would make it somewhat resistant to burning.
Q: I know in Colonel Weaver's discussions with Sheridan
Cavitt, they talked about the aspect of burning. He did not
recall burning anything, but then his wife indicated that there
had been one night they'd been out and had a barbecue and had a
few beers and that Jesse Marcel just took a piece and stuck it in
the barbecue and then pulled it back out. So if that's what
they're using to say it wouldn't burn, that's what we consider
typically testing a material for burning or not.
A: I need to say here, you need to qualify everything I
say with the memory of almost 50 years ago. I will say things
that are to the best of my memory, but on the other hand, should
other evidence indicate my memory is faulty, I readily accept
that. So I'll state things to the best of my memory, but...
I have a memory that there was something like Elmer's
glue...
behind.
There was a problem in attaching this t o t h e paper

Q: Going back to the reinforcing tape and things, there

were discussions concerning unusual symbols and almost like
hieroglyphics -- purple, pinkish in nature, that sort of thing.
A: I don't know if I sent Colonel Weaver a copy of the
sketch.
Q: No, we did not see that.
A: Robert Todd, who has been a person very interested in
trying to get to the truth of this, asked me to make a sketch of
what I remember. A couple of years ago, or a year or so ago, I
made this sketch, and this is my memory of what was there,
I do remember every time I prepared one of these targets for
flight, I always wondered why these figures were on the tape.
There was always a question of why they were there, When this
purplish-pink marking on the debris came up, I immediately
remembered this sort of marking. Other people, I have a letter
here from one of my technicians, who says oddly he remembers the
same marking. You, perhaps, have talked to Albert Trakowski.. .
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 4

Q: We have tried to reach Colonel Trakowski, and he has

not returned our calls. We've left messages on his answering
machine, and there's been no response.
A: He may be out of town. I did visit him last October,
and he made the point that... He was our project officer. He
and I served together under Colonel Duffy in the Air Force
Liaison Office in 1943 to... Well, I went overseas in ' 4 4 but
Trakowski stayed and took a commission in the Air Force when it
was offered and was the project officer on Mogul. I have some
paperwork here from General LeMay's files in which after the war
a number of people were to be sent overseas because they had not
had overseas duty. There is a history of Colonel Trakowski.
Perhaps you have it from the Pentagon files already, from the AG
files.
Q: We have some records, yes.
A: Anyway, Albert Trakowski was the Watson Laboratory
project officer on this. When I raised this question to him he
said he had talked to John Peterson, one of Colonel Duffy's
procurement men, and they were joking about these markings on the
tape. I have a letter that I can give you a copy of in which I
quote Trakowski in saying, "What do you expect when you have your
targets made by a toy factory in Manhattan?"
Q: So essentially, the original targets were made by a toy
company?
A: Well, it's either a toy company or a garment
manufacturer in the garment district in Manhattan, or it was by a
novelty company. I talked to Ed Istvan who was another one of
the Air Force liaison office people who stayed in. Istvan lives
in your area. I can give you documentation on these things.
Istvan says that it was some outfit that extruded toothpaste
tubes and he got involved with them because they made radar
chaff. In the early days of this effort, there were a number of
different targets made. I don't have them here, I have them
downstairs, there were a number of different forms the targets
were made. One idea was just the inside of a meteorological
balloon, to put radar chaff and adhere it with glycerine. Just
wet the inside of the balloon with glycerine and then shake in
dipoles cut to the proper half wave length. When the balloons
were inflated, these would be all on the inside, coating the
inside of the balloon. This didn't give nearly the sort of
target that the corner reflector gave.
But anyway, Istvan initially went to New York hunting for a
source of supply and came across a company.
(Pause)
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 5

A: ...
much of which we can copy and make it easier for
you. These are balloon fragments, things that held balloons [up]
after they'd been exposed to the sun.
Q: Is this the neoprene type or the...
A: That's the neoprene type. I have the polyethylene
type.. .
Q: Is this from the ' 4 7 era?
A: That's a balloon probably from the ' 5 0 s . That's a K-
San balloon. The kind of balloons we used then were the
(inaudible) derricks balloons, and that's the way they look after
they've been out in the sun. That's about three weeks' exposure
to sunlight here in New Mexico.
Q: So the polyethylene really is degraded by sunlight.
A: That's neoprene. All that's neoprene.
Q: This almost looks like ashes of paper.
A: That's right. And there's a big point in some of the
recovery that the material was black...
Here is the list of the people who,were assigned under
Colonel Duffy in the Air Force liaison office. Istvan's name
you'll find in there. He ended up being in the Titan program
and, I think, retired as a lieutenant colonel maybe back in the
'70s.
Schneider was the administrative director of our project.
He and I worked together. He was in Maine, and was not really
technically involved. I have letters from him if you're
interested in seeing them. He says he has no memory of this.
A person who was heavily involved in developing this whole
radar thing was Colonel Joe Fletcher. I wrote him a letter
asking for his help and he essentially says he doesn't remember
much.
Q: He's also been hounded by some of these UFO...
A: And by Todd and by me.
Q: So it appears as though you, yourself, have done some
extensive research into this particular incident.
A: Until two years ago, I was quite convinced one of our
polyethylene balloons we didn't recover caused it. Then I got
this newspaper, Todd sent me this, and I immediately saw there's
no way that could be a polyethylene balloon.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 6

Q: W.W. Brazel mentions eyelets which appear in the

reflectors. There's also, on the polyethylene balloons, the
shroud however you had it hooked on there. There's eyelets
around the base. There was a ring at the neck of the balloon and
then there were attach points to that ring, were there not?
A: But there were no eyelets.
Q: I believe there were. I've reviewed the New York
University documents and there's a very clear depiction in one of
them of eyelets.
A: Okay, I was thinking of the later... Here are the NYU
reports, the originals of them.
Q: In one of the configurations they clearly show eyelets
in the drawing.
Q: Going back to Brazel, you state that you think it could
not be one of the polyethylene balloons. He indicates in this
newspaper article that he actually found the debris in mid-June,
however it didn't subsequently come out until July.
A: You're right. That is in one of the polyethylene
balloons, you're correct. I fall back on my plea that my memory
isn't.. .
Q: It comes into depending on what Brazel was speaking
about.
A: There are clearly eyelets here. In fact there's a
little swivel.
He talks about the smoky gray rubber...
Q: Which these samples here, as you say, if they'd only
been out for a short time, a matter of days, smoky gray, that's a
very good description of what they looked like.
A: And when you first retrieve it has a bad odor. And
people talked about there being a burned odor.
We need to talk about these neoprene balloons because they
came in different... There were two manufacturers --
one, Dewey
&I Olney in Cambridge manufactured with a dip process and they had
very much the appearance, if you will, of a condom. They were an
ivory colored jell. The Kaysam company in Patterson made a cast
neoprene emulsion into a mold, and then they inflated the mold.
They had to put a lot of plasticizers so they could take this wet
jell and inflate it and make it into a meteorologic balloon.
This is a Kaysam balloon here, which I think is not a good
candidate.
Q: Kaysam?
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 7

A: A guy named Sam Kay formed a company and it was called

Kaysam. In fact I have, and you're welcome to them...
(Pause)
A: Kaysam balloons because of the way they were made, and
this jell that had to be inflated had this ring, cardboard ring
put in them. That's the neck of a Kaysam balloon, and here are
more modern Kaysam balloons, the sort that are still being flown.

Q: These are just used for the typical meteorological type

balloons.
A: Carry radio (inaudible), that's correct.
Dewey t Olney have gone out of the business and Kaysam
bought them out. Here's a Kaysam balloon that is made by a dip
mold. This is somewhat indicative, I think, of the way one of
those balloons of the type we're using. A s you can see on
exposure just to ordinary light, they discolor. But these are
balloons that were made probably in the '70s. As they change
with plasticizer and anti-oxidants for ozone, they certainly
change in appearance. The balloons we...
I have pictures here, pictures in the hangar. There, as you
can see, these are the ivory colored balloons of the sort we were
flying. This is the balloon you just found the eyelets on in the
hangar. These are pictures from the 1947 era where we're getting
ready to fly the 15 foot H.A. Smith balloon.
Q: The reinforcing tape on these balloons, these
polyethylene balloons, we were told is a type of acetate. It had
none of this symbology, is that correct?
A: None at all.
Q: So the symbology on the tape was only related to the
radar reflectors.
A: That's correct. Here is a later model polyethylene
balloon, and it's a little thinner than the ones we were flying,
but there's a polyethylene balloon.
Q: It looks like polyethylene sheeting that I would use to
cover up...

Q: I've also heard the early balloons described as carrot

bag quality. Material they would use in a carrot bag. Dry
cleaner bags .
Q: Dry cleaner bags. We think of them as being very
fragile, but materials from this time frame have been described
as durable -- something you couldn't tear with your hands.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 8

A: That's about two mil polyethylene here.

Q: Obviously, you could tear this.
A: This was four mil. These balloons that we had...
That's Flight 8. These are the little balloons here that are
seen from the air.
Q: From a B-17?
A: I think this was a C-45. We did, indeed, have B-17's
attached to us, and C-54's. But I think this was trying to chase
Flight 8 down. This was one of the candidate flights that I
thought might have been, until two years ago, I thought might
have been an explanation for what occurred.
Q: Why did you change your mind at that point?
A: Because of that newspaper report right there.
Q: Because of him saying that he actually found the
material in mid-June?
A: No, because he said it was balsa sticks and smoky
rubber and had those curious markings on that. That's a very
vivid memory I have of these markings on the radar targets we
flew.

Q: You said you often wondered why those markings were on

there. Had you ever resolved that for yourself?
A: Only what Albert Trakowski told me, that our friend
John Peterson, the procurement man, was just joking, 'What else
do you expect when you have your targets made by a toy factory?"
Let me go back, if I may. Colonel Duffy was assigned to
extract meteorological-equipment out of the Signal-Corps in 1943.
There was a great argument that went on between the Army Air
Force and the Signal Corps. The Signal Corps didn't want to let
any meteorological equipment out until he thought it was perfect.
At the same time, General Arnold was expanding for a global war,
and was trying to get meteorological equipment all around the
earth. So Colonel Duffy got assigned to expedite the equipment.
A s various of us graduated from the meteorological cadet schools,
he took those of us with engineering backgrounds and assigned us
to bird dog various things within the Signal Corps engineering
laboratories. I got assigned to... I ended up with some
appendicitis and got pulled off of an overseas shipment, and
while I was recovering I got assigned to prepare this manual that
Colonel Duffy, he was unhappy with the rate at which Signal
manuals were coming out so he wanted a loose leaf arrangement to
send things out. So I got assigned to prepare this manual.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 9
,

At the same time, then Captain Fletcher was assigned...

Duffy had heard that weather was giving trouble to radar, so
Colonel Duffy just turned around and said, "Gee, you mean radar
can pick up weather?" And ended up with Captain Fletcher being
assigned t o both convert this for looking at storm clouds and
also t o make wind measurements. There was a big problem, the
Weather Bureau prior to World War I1 determined upper winds
merely by releasing a pilot balloon, following with the
(inaudible), and estimating the rate of rise, and then from the
elevation and azimuth angles and the assumed height after a
certain time, to calculate what the winds were.
Q: Is that the Boford Scale?
A: Well, Boford was Navy, that was the Na vy...
Q: Like taking a Pi Ball reading now.
A: Exactly. It was called a Pi Ball then and it is now.
Colonel Duffy pushed very heavily to get electronic means for
'measuring winds aloft. There were two approaches. One, use a
radar target, and the SCR-584 with which you may be familiar --
the early gun-laying radar. Colonel Duffy talked to the field
artillery that was procuring through the Signal Corps, gun-laying
radar, the SCR-584, which is, that's this radar right here.
Q: We've seen that photo before.
A: This is Spilhaus's book. So Fletcher ended up with a
whole bunch of his own 2nd lieutenants around. There was a Jud
Tibbett from whom I have a photograph showing an earlier model
target, the A Model target. Istvan was one. There are a bunch
of them listed. This listing is for you if you'd like to have
it.
Tibbetts ended up being the big installer of radar and, in
fact, was assigned down to the Tulerosa Range Camp to make wind
measurements for the Trinity shot, the test in 1945. A s far as I
know, that was the first time these targets had been used in New
Mexico. Tibbetts, who until recently lived in Albuquerque, he's
now moved to Scottsdale, Arizona. Tibbetts says that he did not
ever fly this kind of target in New Mexico, which will be of
interest with you when they talk about, that people should have
known what a target looked like.
Q: Right. There were discussions concerning having radar
targets, but supposedly the B Model and subsequent models were
brand new, had never flown anything like that in this area.
A: According to Tibbetts, the A Model had bit aerodynamic
drag. It was a flat plane of aluminum foil and had two triangles
coming down that made a corner reflector. The A Model looked
like... Then across here was that. This is one surface, this is
another surface, and this is yet another, and they were held by
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 10

strings from these four corners. Obviously, trying to take

something that's almost a meter in cross section, a meter on a
side, take it sideways up through, gave a lot of drag, and it
took a lot of lift to make the balloons rise very rapidly.
So instead, somebody came up with this smart idea of this
other arrangement of a corner reflector that had much less drag.
These, according to Tibbetts, weren't distributed until something
like November of 1945. As far as I know, as you will see in the
various correspondence, there were no SCR-584s which were
required to track them, issued to the weather services here in
New Mexico. Obviously, after the Trinity shot, there was no bit
military operation that required wind determination in New
Mexico.
Q: So essentially you'd say there were no radar reflectors
in New Mexico until 1947 until this appeared?
A: That's my opinion.
Q: Was Major Pritchard doing any kind of balloon project?
A: No. He and Dyvad and others were at Watson
Laboratories, I understand from Trakowski that Alamagordo Army
Air Field was about to be closed down as surplus. The people at
Watson Laboratories seized on it and were able to keep it on
active status for two projects --
one, the radar project from
Watson Laboratories that was set to track the V-2 being flown
from the proving ground across the Tulerosa Valley; and Project
Mogul,
I joined the NYU group in January of '47, and while I was
finishing up at Georgia Tech I had talked to my chemical
engineering professors, I'd already been recruited by Duffy and
Spilhaus, and I asked if you wanted to make a balloon of non-
extensible material, what plastic would you use. My professor
named Grubb told me you ought to consider polyethylene. It's a
new plastic just now becoming available. You can heat seal it.
It has a lot of desirable properties.
So as soon as I got to NYU, I began talking to everybody I
could find in Manhattan --
DuPont, all the sales offices,..
Q: We saw your listing.
A: I was concerned with where we could get the plastic and
who we could get to manufacture the balloons. I was in my 2 O o s ,
just a recent graduate. I knew nothing about manufacturing. But
we did try to get a manufacturing company that would fabricate
balloons for us.
During that period we heard of the Navy project that was
going on at General Mills where Jean Get was planning to make a
flight to 100,000 feet. General Mills at that time was making
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 11

balloons out of a Goodyear film called pliofilm. It was a vinyl

chloride that just went to hell when exposed to sunlight. It
really came apart. So I'm very proud that we began pushing them
for polyethylene balloons. With some difficulty we got Otto
Winzen who was the entrepreneur and promoter, working with Get,
and we got him to make these balloons you see here in the design
that was being planned for Project Helios, with the pliofilm
balloons. At the same time we got an entrepreneur who was even
faster acting, and that was this fellow A.J. Smith. A one-man
shop. He would do anything for money. He, indeed, did. With no
great technical background, he made a number of these balloons
for us.
Q: Kind of a garage type of affair where he would sit down
and make them one by one and...
A: I don't know. He got some girls and got some assembly
workers, for a contract from us. Anyway, we got these balloons
going, made visits to Minneapolis t o push General Mills. The
pressure from the Air Force was enormous. There was a similar
problem, of course, in developing microphones that would pick up
low frequency sound waves with Columbia. There was much
enthusiasm, in testing these microphones.
Q: How did you come to join the Army Air Force?
A: When World War I1 broke out I applied for pilot
training, and so did everybody else. Because I was a senior at
Georgia Tech in a chemical engineering course with a fair amount
of thermodynamics and other things, I got diverted into the
meteorological cadet program. I still wanted to be a pilot but I
got diverted into the meteorological cadet program, and the next
class that I could join didn't start until December of ' 4 2 . I
joined up sometime in ' 4 2 . So I went through the meteorological
cadet program and found I was a lousy forecaster, but I did end
up, when Spilhaus came recruiting for people with engineering
background, I got recruited into Colonel Duffy's liaison office.
Q: Was that directly for General Arnold's staff?
A: I was assigned, believe it or not, to Headquarters, Air
Force... I still have the Headquarters Air Force [rondelles]. I
ended up being assigned to Headquarters, Army Air Force. I was a
second lieutenant.
Q: So you got recruited by, at that time, Captain
Spilhaus.
A: Right, and I got sent to the Weather Equipment
Technician School in Spring Lake, New Jersey, essentially Fort
Monmouth. When I finished the training course for radiosonde and
for maintenance of equipment, I was headed for North Africa, and
I had a medical problem. When I got out of the hospital, I was
assigned back to Colonel Duffy. I remained there. I finished
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 12

this manual in '44. I was commissioned in September of '43,

finally, and then finished the school in November, was assigned
to write this manual which was finished in the summer of '44, and
then I got an assignment to China.
Q: With Dr. Spilhaus? -
A: No. I ended up being the weather equipment officer for
CBI and the Spilhaus came over later. At that time the war was
going very much better. Spilhaus and Duffy had a long range
storm detection system, the spheric system, the predecessor of
what's used now for lightning detection, the storm scopes, and
the LLP. If you're familiar with LLP, the lightning location
system.. .
Q: Used by the Weather Service.
A: We have one of the stations here on campus. And we
actually have, if you're interested later on we'll go over and
show you, we have a map of the lightning strokes over the entire
U.S. as they occur. We have a read-out right here in our
laboratory.
Q: So you're doing that work from China?

A: Spilhaus came over with the spherics net, it was

called, and got a station installed in Chianting, China to work,
of course, for the bombing of Japan. So Spilhaus came over I
think the summer of '45 is when he came over. We had the radio
wind, the ra-win, the SCR-658s, we had a number of them that were
being installed. We had one up in Yunan in the communist area;
we had several of them in China for getting good wind
measurements. Spilhaus had been involved in that. I think by
'45 it was clear that things would be over relatively soon. We
thought we'd be back in '48. In any event, he got an assignment
over t o 10th Weather in the summer of ' 4 5 and came over.
Q: At what point did you ever hear the term long range
detection?
A: That's a good question. I didn't know the name Mogul
until Robert Todd told me two years ago. I'd never heard the
name Mogul --
the classification was that high. I knew what we
were doing. When "Helgolandnlwas exploded in April of ' 4 7 , we
had balloons in the air. We launched balloons out of the Watson
Laboratory, actually Eatontown, what had been the Eatontown
Signal Laboratory, but I think it was now Watson Laboratory. In
any event, we launched a string of balloons, even though we
didn't have [constant-level) balloons, we still carried
microphones aloft and a C-54 orbited overhead and followed the
balloons out to sea. I have no idea about the results that they
got
Q: Did you number that balloon flight?
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 13

A: No, we didn't.
Q: Not a letter or a number?
A: Wait a minute. The answer is, I don't know.
Q: If you did give it a letter or a number would it be
on... There are some of these flights that appeared to have no
sequence number and they were talking in terms of being service
flights and the impression that we got was that the service
flights were either test flights just to check the balloons out
or they were the highly classified flights where the information
was not being logged into essentially an unclassified document.
A: You notice that Flight 1 was made from Bethlehem,
Pennsylvania.
Q: The football field there?
A: LeHigh, exactly. That's where we did it, from the
football field. And we did this because a professor at NYU had
just gone to head up the physics department at LeHigh and he
invited us over. His name was Frank, Butler keeps coming to
mind, but I'm not sure that's the right name. Anyway, we went
there and that was for an early, early attempt for Helgoland. I
think the Helgoland explosion got scrubbed, but we had balloons
in the air from this and we were woefully not ready. We had all
sorts of problems. We adopted the balloon technique that a
cosmic ray investigator at NYU, a fellow named Sergei Korf, we
adopted his technique and we had a lot to learn. We got our
hands torn up with nylon line being pulled through it as we
couldn't hold the balloons down in the wind ...
Q: Speaking of nylon line, were these braided type lines
or were they monofilament type lines?
A: Neither.. I think initially we used either parachute
cord, which was braided. I don't remember the details of what we
used, but we rapidly used that the radiosonde cord we used was
not strong enough at all to hold the forces that came, so we went
to what was called lobster twine. We used a lot of lobster twine
that was twisted, a laid line that was used in lobster nets.
Q: Do you recall there ever having been some sort of
monofilament similar to the monofilament fishing line in any of
the projects?
A: I think there was none available at that time. My
memory, the answer is yes, we've used an awful lot of
monofilament and we use it now all the time.

Q: But at that time you don't think it was available?

A: I think it was not available.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 14

Q: The early nylon line, would it have degraded, such as

the balloon material degraded, and maybe fused in the hot sun?
A: I doubt it. If we had any it would have been white,
which would have been a high (inaudible), would not have absorbed
a lot of sunlight.
Q: There were discussions about what appeared to be
unbraided or unstranded fiber type lines. It's been alluded to
that was the precursors to what we use for fiber optics today.
The materials that were found. That's why I asked about the
monofilament line.
A: A lot of what we used early was a linen cord, not
twisted, and it was indeed, a brown, a dull brown color. But
because it was designed just for radiosonde balloons, and we
rapidly exceeded its strength. So very quickly, and I don't know
when, but we very quickly went over to this twisted lobster
twine.
To answer your question, there are three flights that are
missing here --
two, three, and four. I've identified Flight 4.
Flight 4 was a flight we made, and you don't have it there, but
Flight 4 we made in Alamagordo something like June 2nd or 3rd of
1947. The reason I have it identified is I have Albert Crary's
diary. The scientific end of the group was heavily based from
Columbia University. It was Dr. James Peoples who was an
employee of Watson Laboratory, and there was an Albert Crary who
had been a graduate student under Dr. Ewing.
Q: Who later also was an employee of...
A: Who was then an employee of Watson Laboratory. I have
Crary's diary. Here is a translation...
(END OF SIDE)

A: ...Here is the diary starting May 24, '47, and on May

28 he has "B-17 from Watson with Mirs, Hackman, NYU and Alden,
they plan to test fly balloons tomorrow. Other gang with
recording equipment due to leave Watson Laboratories Saturday.
Got everything ready for Hermes Rocket today.''
May 29th. ''Mirs and Hackman got balloon ascension off at
1:00 p.m. today without plane to follow it. Don and Godby out to
Donyo. Bill and I out to E. White Sands to record Hermes."
I've marked the key things here with red, and then I've
given you a page without my red if you have any need for that.
June lst, ''C-47 with Moore, Schneider and others from NYU,
also Irewin, Minton, Olson, NYU men worked on balloons, north
hangar.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 15

June 4th, "Out to Tulerosa Range and fired charges between

0-0 and 0-6" something. "NO balloon flight again on account of
clouds. Flew regular sonobuoy mike with cluster balloons and had
good luck with receiver on ground but poor on plane." I think
that's Flight 4 right there.
Q: So that's June 4th.
A: As to that flight made by Mirs and Hackman earlier, we
have no record of it here in the NYU summary.

Q: If he flew that on June 4th and it carried the

microphones, the radar reflectors, that would have been with a
neoprene type balloon.
A: There were no plastic balloons delivered until the 28th
or 29th of June that year. So everything as evidenced on the
Helgeland flight that we made and the other flight, they were all
meteorological balloons prior to late June.
Q: That would have also had the B Model reflector, this
type of reflector, but the B Model?
A: My memory is that Jim Peoples, because we were being
sent down by B-17 and by air, didn't let us take the radiosonde
receiving equipment which at that time was very heavy. It was
like a 500 pound rack with a receiver, frequency meter, recorder,
etc., and we weren't allowed to use that. Instead, the idea was
that Peoples would provide tracking on the balloons with radar
targets and so on. So this is where I think the radar targets
come in. If you look in these reports you'll find here
statements, radiosonde reception, and you'll see 60 percent with
recorder, 50 percent without recorder, 100 percent without
recorder for June 5th. A hundred percent without recorder.
so I think we tried the radar targets, as I remember, our
contact who was a Captain Larry Dyvad found that they weren't
able to track our flights at all. They had a radar that was
entirely aimed at looking at the missiles. To look at slow
moving balloons with poor signal return was difficult for them.
So we started off with making single target flights. I think we
went to multiple target flights, and still didn't have any
success, so I began putting radiosondes and then just audibly, as
the tones would change, I would log it on a piece of paper. I'd
count the pressure... Are you familiar with radiosondes?
Q: Somewhat.
A: The commutator with the pressure contacts, etc. I
would count contacts and record it and you'll see in some of
these flight reports, there's two different interpretations
possible, depending on what the contact sequence was. An
ordinary radiosonde is very good for something that's going one
way. But for something that's going to go up and float, you can
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 16

have ambiguities. You don't know if it went up or down when you

get the next pressure contact switch. You'll find that sort of
uncertainty in describing the report.
So I'm quite sure that as a result of the failure of the
radar tracking, I went back and started using radiosondes even
though I didn't have the right equipment.
Q: You mentioned a few moments ago the Watson Laboratory
gear, the microphones, and it was also Columbia that was
developing the low frequency microphones. You had all of that
gear on these balloons, is that correct?
A: No, not on all of them. That mention of a sonobuoy
microphone, in the early ...
While the improved low frequency
microphones were being designed and built, we flew on balloons,
believe it or not, sonobouy used to detect submarines. We were
flying sonobuoy microphones on the balloons.
Q: But the material that's been identified as Watson Lab
gear shows up as very generic in all of these reports and things.
That was all part of Mogul also, is that correct?
A: That's correct. I think what happened is because the
Watson Laboratory radar wasn't very successful, I think we made a
number of flights like this. I think I sent a sketch like that
to you. We made a number of flights like that which was an
unorthodox use of radar targets, and it's my opinion that the
thing that caused the debris that was picked up was probably from
a cluster of meteorological balloons carrying a cluster of
targets.
When something like the idea of a cluster balloon was not
only to carry the weight, but was also to keep the target in the
air for a long time. If one balloon burst, we still would have
enough buoyancy for awhile to keep the thing airborne. When it
would come to the ground this would drag along the ground and get
shredded, but this would still be carried downwind until another
balloon would burst, whereupon this one would start getting
shredded. So I think the explanation of why things were over
such a large area was, indeed, because it was a cluster, it was
multiple targets and cluster balloons.
Q: Of course the issue of the large area has been
different in different reports. Different people have stated the
200 yards, Cavitt in his description, described it in terms of
his living room which was not that large.
A: Even a single target, if it came down, wouldn't have
filled a single living room, but a multiple target, begins
dragged sideways and then blown transversally by any later winds,
could have filled a reasonable area.
Q: And left pieces of debris everywhere. Depending on...
 PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 17

A: What the wind did.

The description that Braze1 gives here that everything would
weigh about five pounds when it was all together, is more than
you would have gotten from a single balloon.

Q: Those were measured in terms of 300 to 500 grams or

something like that?
A: Three hundred and fifty only. At that time we didn't
have any bigger balloons than 350 grams, so the balloons would
have been 350 grams.
Q: About one pound.
A: Correct. And the targets are nominally maybe a quarter
of a pound.
Q: Those targets are only four to five ounces?
A: Here was the specification spelled out for it.
Approximate weight, 100 grams. These, as I say, are somewhat
heavier than the ones we had.
Q: You indicated that the balsa wood was coated with some
. sort of glue such as Elmer's glue.
A: That's my memory. It wasn't completely coated. Some
of it was and some of it wasn't.
Q: Some of the balsa wood is fairly dense, as far as being
durable, and one of the descriptions concerning this @@wood-likeol
material was that you couldn't dent it with your fingernail. So
if you have a fairly dense balsa wood coated with a glue, it may
be quite possible that a person would not be able to put their
fingernail in it.
A: That's correct. It's my memory that the reflective
material was more aluminum foil than here. These are second or
third iteration targets, as evidenced by this picture, wherever
that picture is down in here of the 1948 flight. It certainly
looks more aluminum-foil like.

Q: What year were you discharged from active duty?

A: '46.
Q: Before you left active duty, while you were still
working with Duffy and Spilhaus, did they invite you to join the
staff at New York University, or to continue your studies there?
A: I came back from overseas and was assigned to Colonel
Duffy's, he had a little flight detachment assigned to him with a
8-29 and a B-25 and some other aircraft. I ended up being the
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 18

executive officer of a flight detachment at Newark Airport. I

got back from overseas in February of '46, I think. After
getting out of the replacement depot, I got assigned back to
Colonel Duffy and was assigned at Newark. I went on terminal
leave something like July of '46 and went back to Georgia Tech
and finished two quarters. I had two quarters to finish at
Georgia Tech. While I was at Georgia Tech I began working with
a microwave, an anonymous propagation research group that turned
out, oddly enough, was under Colonel Duffy's direction. I didn't
know it. It had nothing to do with my getting deployed there,
but I had a student assistanceship working on that.
I made some report, and my name came back in front of
Colonel Duffy in September, I think, of '46, and I got asked to
come up to his office. I think he was still at Bradley Beach,
Sharp River Hills Hotel there near Belmar, New Jersey. When I
was there, who should come in but Spilhaus. They told me they
had a problem involving balloons and asked if I would be
interested in working with them, and they offered me a graduate
assistanceship at NYU, and I wanted to go to graduate school in
physics, so I was delighted to have that opportunity. That was
either September or October of '46.
Q: So Spilhaus, since he was on the staff there, he
invited you to come to New York University.
A: Yes, he did.
Q: So you went to New York University when?
A: Right after Christmas. January 1, 1947. The program
had already started. I presume you have all the details. I have
a copy of (inaudible) letter to General Spaatz. I presume you
have all of that.
Q: I believe we do, but I'd still like to review it and
make sure it's the same letter.
A: In any event, there was a big push. I guess after
Operation Crossroads the first nuclear test in the Pacific was in
July of '46, and Crary, because of the long range detection
concept, Crary was sent to Ascension Island which is the antipode
for, as close as they could get to the antipode for Bikini, and
failed to detect any signal from Operation Crossroads, from the
nuclear explosion.
Q: You mentioned detection. What drove the aspect of
detection? Was it because of our test?
A: Yes, our test was being used as a signal source. The
question was in order to detect any Soviet test, could we detect
our own tests. So Crary was essentially sent to Ascension to see
if he could detect the nuclear explosion.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 19

Q: He was unsuccessful?
A: He was unsuccessful.

Q: What method did he employ?

A: Low frequency microphones on the ground. Are you
familiar with the Krakatou measurements?
Q: No.
A: In 1883, Krakatou, near Java, made an enormous
explosion and the pressure wave from that went around the world-
seven times, and was picked up and... There was a report, a big
analysis by Lord Railey and others...
Q: A volcanic eruption?
A: Volcanic eruption. Here are the isocomes of the
pressure waves from Krakatou as it went out. From the time it
took the signal to go out and come back, he went to the antipode
which is around Colombia or Venezuela, and came back as a big
spherical wave. It went back and forth around the earth. The
British investigators were able to show that there was a duct up
around the tropopause, and the speed of sound, as I remember, was
something like 310 meters per second instead of the regular 334
that we had at sea level. From that they could deduce the
temperature of the medium in which the sound was propagating and
it was something like minus 25.
Q: How was this detected as a pressure wave in that time
frame?
A: Barograph.
Q: What year?
A: 1883. This is what prompted Ewing.
Q: I'm familiar with barometer-type measurements being
used to measure that pressure wave and the fact that it traversed
the earth, you said seven times.
A: Maurice Ewing had been an oceanographer at Woods Hole
and had found a similar acoustic duct in the ocean. You may be
familiar with what's called Sofar. In 1945 he wrote a letter to
Spaatz suggesting this might be useful in detection of Soviet
activity.
Q: The 1945 letter was kind of the initiative as a means
of detection.
A: That's correct. That caused the Army Air Force to
begin this research.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 20

Q: How did you come in possession of it?

A: Todd. Todd does everything.
Q: Did he say where he got these documents?
A: Freedom of Information, I think.
Q: It looks like National Archives. I believe I have this
letter.
So Ewing was at Woods Hole...
A: And was going to head up the geophysics department at
Columbia. These are subsequent documents of people in the Air
Force considering the desirability of it.
After Crossroads there seemed to be an enormous push to try
to put microphones into the sound channel. During WWII, the
'Signal Corps had laid on them the requirement to develop a
constant level balloon. It had not been very successful. I knew
a bunch of people in the balloon branch.
The reason I got into balloons is that while I was working
on this manual there was a great problem in the winter of ' 4 3
with the supply of gum rubber cut off, meteorological sounding
balloons weren't flying very well. In the summer time, the
balloons would go through the depth of the troposphere, but in
the winter time, the balloons began bursting down at levels of
15,000 feet or so because the neoprene wouldn't stretch at low
temperatures. Somewhere Spilhaus came up with the idea, talked
to somebody in the Weather Bureau, that maybe you ought to heat
the balloons. He told a couple of us second lieutenants, that I
wonder if that would work. We got a blow torch and a mop bucket
and we had a radiosonde, and he was in charge of the Air Force
push on radiosonde technology. I was his leg man on that. We
put a blow torch on a.mop bucket and heated the water to boiling
and flew the balloon. Much to our surprise, the balloon went to
about 60,000 feet.

Q: So it stretched without rupturing.

A: It turns out that neoprene crystallizes and you can
make it back into an amorphus state with high elasticity.
Elasticity changes as a function of the degree of crystallinity.
By heating, we removed that.
In any event, there was a group in Spilhaus's detachment
known as the balloon [boilers]. The Signal Corps, it turned out,
was very unhappy with this idea. They wanted no interest in it
at all, and their manual doesn't use it. But that was my
introduction, that's how I got attached to ballooning, as a
result of doing this simple thing for Spilhaus.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 21

It's of interest, in the Holloman report there's a big talk

about boiling balloons. That's certainly a heritage of the
association from our early balloon boiling days. When you look
at the instructions on the modern balloon, you see that it is
really a physical effect that can be controlled.
Q: You went on board at New York University, and you
immediately set out, as documented in the reports, acquiring the
various materials, [putting out bids], things of this nature. At
that point you were working at New York University under the
direction...
A: Spilhaus was the nominal principal investigator and
director of the project, but he just turned us loose.
Q: So you were the project engineer?
A: I was the project engineer, and Schneider was the
project administrator. We employed a lot of students, a lot of
people that we could, and were a mixture of trying to develop a
constant level balloon and providing service flights for Peoples.
Peoples was entirely our contact.
Q: He would come to New York University?
A: He would go down to Red Bank. He'd call and say he
wanted certain things, can you do it, so we made this flight out
at Lehigh and then we made the Helgoland flight down at Red Bank,
and he wasn't really happy. There were all sorts of constraints
flying balloons in the New York City area even then.

Q: All the problems with air traffic and getting FAA, or

their equivalent at that time, approval, etc.
A: So up in the stratosphere above my level, a decision
was made that we go to Alamagordo, and there would be a big
flight. We had balloons promised, but even ahead of that time
people wanted to test microphones. He had Crary already, about
from December of ' 4 6 , I think Crary went to Alamagordo and ran a
field station and...
Q: That field station was for ballooning in general?
A: For Mogul. It was more than that. Crary was operating
sound-ranging microphones on the ground there. He was having
bombs dropped off the New Jersey coast and trying to pick up the
acoustic signals in New Mexico.
Q: He was having the bombs dropped in New Jersey, off the
coast, and trying to detect them in New Mexico?
A: That's correct.
Q: What technique? Balloon borne?
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 22

A: No. We were the balloonists, This was all ground-

based stuff. There was also an operation in Bermuda. Then later
you'll find...
Q: Crary also initiated that?
A: He was in charge of it. He was running it. They went
and got a whole bunch of 500 pound bombs out of the Earl
Ammunition Depot in New Jersey. Later you'll find that they did
a bunch down in the Canal zone. Then eventually they went to
Alaska.
Q: This was prior to ' 4 7 ?
A: The New Jersey, and I think the Bermuda operation,
you'll find a hint in this diary I gave you, you'll find a hint
about Bermuda and so on in there. He was talking about trying to
measure the sky waves coming in.
If you're interested, we can go extract, there's a paper in
the Journal of Meteorology in something like ' 4 7 .
Q: I believe I have that. Is that the same one?
A: No, this is by Crary.
Q: Crary did quite a few publications for Red Bank and
then for Cambridge Labs.
A: Correct. But you'll find one, I think it's either ' 7 4
or '49. If you want we can go over to our library and make you a
Xerox of it.
Q: .I'm familiar with that one.
A: It's very circumspect as far as classified matter.
Q: So Peoples and Crary had Columbia University
affiliation?
A: Well, Watson. They were derived from Columbia. Both
of them were derived... I think Peoples got his PhD under W i n g
at Columbia, and Crary didn't get his doctorate until later.
Q: You said Crary's ground station was Alamagordo, but he
was actually doing explosions in Alaska, off Bermuda, Panama, the
Jersey coast.
A: In the late '46, early ' 4 7 era, he was in Alamagordo,
in and around Alamagordo. He was very concerned about explosions
off the Jersey coast and I think off Bermuda. The Panama Canal
operation I think was not associated with Alamagordo at that
time.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 23

Here's a nice paper that came through courtesy of Todd. In

'48 there was a big operation in the Pacific for Operation
Sandstone, and we were heavily involved in that. Here's the
Fitzwilliarn... Schneider and J . R . Smith... My chief associate
technically was a fellow named Dick Smith, James Richard Smith,
who unfortunately, died two years ago. Smith and Schneider and
some other of my associates went out on Sandstone to Kwajelin,
Guam, and then Oahu.
Q: I've seen that in publication. I have to acquire it.
A: You can Xerox it.
Q: Moving chronologically, Professor Ewing had affiliation
with Woods Hole, and he was a meteorologist by trade?
A: No, oceanographer. He was a physicist, a geo-
physicist.
Q: What was he doing at Columbia?
A: I think he ended up head of the Department of Geo-
Physics. I don't know the details.
Q: For the AMC contract he was developing ...
A: He, as we, were contractors.
Q: He was developing the acoustical...
A: That's correct.
Q: That acoustical gear, this is a later flight but it's a
fairly good depiction. It-shows payload here, and payload is
mentioned in a lot of the reports without any further
elaboration, what the payload was. That was primarily the low
frequency microphones ...
A: That was their euphemism for...
Q: So as not to be able to talk about what was then a
classified payload.
A: Here are the sort of instruments. A chamber with a
leak in it, and then a method of sensing the pressure inside the
chamber. That affected the frequency of an oscillator that came
to ground. That's the sort of thing that was developed at
Columbia.
Q: Dr. Spilhaus also mentioned about trying to detect
particulate matter.
A: That was another operation. A Tracer lab, have you
come across Charlie Ziegler at Brandeis?
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 24

Q: No.
A: He worked for a Tracer lab and is just bringing out a
book on the early detection system.
Q: That was Project Center. MX-968.

A: There was another one that followed on this to measure

krypton. It was called Grab Bag in our lexicon.

Q: Did you ever hear of the project Bequeath?

A: No. Being a civilian and outside, I was more
knowledgeable, essentially, of the intent and what was required
rather than the project names.
Q: What type of clearance did you hold?
A: At various times I had Top Secret and Q and I don't
remember exactly when I got various clearances. I also had a
clearance with the CIA.
Q: So at this time in New York University you were cleared
but you had no need to know.
A: I knew exactly what we were doing. I knew about
Helgoland. I knew, just being an atmospheric physicist, I knew
about the sound duct channel and I knew what we were doing, but I
just didn't know any of the operational details and I wasn't
concerned with them.
Q: From a security standpoint, did anyone ever discuss
with you, other than the letter that I showed you stating that
this is now unclassified, did anyone ever tell you never to
discuss any of this with anyone?
A: I can't say they did.
Q: It was just a matter of enforcing the need to know what
classified project ...
A: I guess I was aware this was highly classified, and
having been in the military was aware this wasn't something to be
discussed lightly. But no, I can't say that...
Q: The reason I ask the question is there are some
statements made in the various publications and books --
the
popular press, about people being threatened not to talk about
things they had seen or that sort of thing. I just wanted to see
if there had been anything stated to you never to discuss any of
the activities either related to this project or any other
project .
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 25

A: There's a gray area here. I was certainly aware that

what we were doing in Alamagordo was highly classified and was
well aware, and I guess had been perhaps encouraged to have a
suitable cover story to explain what we were doing.
Q: So you were encouraged by whom to have a cover story?
A: Probably by James Peoples, who was our scientific
monitoring... As you may be aware, there is a former colonel,
later General DuBose, who makes a statement that something was a
cover story. When I read this, I was not at all surprised. I
interpreted that as saying someone was covering up on Mogul.
That was my interpretation when I read what was attributable t o
General DuBose. So from his point of view, there were certainly
no threats, but we were aware we weren't supposed to be talking.
Q: So was it Dr. Peoples then who actually actively said
use meteorology as a cover story, or...
A: I don't remember the details, to be truthful...

Q: But it was kind of a natural thing to think of in terms

of meteorology?
A: We were careful around NYU with the various technicians
we hired. We kept our knowledge of what we were doing to
ourselves. It's certainly my memory that we were aware that this
was classified, but we weren't threatened. We were just
instructed that this sort of information was not to be passed
out, even though the technical aspects we understood. So the
answer is yes, we very well understood this was classified; and
second, there was no physical threat or anything like that. We
were instructed not to talk about it, and until Todd told me that
Mogul had been declassified I was very reluctant to say anything
about it.
Q: Anywhere- in the early days were you ever aware of
involvement by General LeMay?
A: Not at all.
Q: Not at your level. How about the [AFOAT-11 study
group?
A: I became involved with them later on Project Grab Bag
and others, and I knew a bunch of people in [AFOAT-11 --Doyle
Northrop ...I knew that, but later ballooning got even more
heavily involved in various classified things.
Q: Where were your duty locations involved with [AFOAT-l]?
A: Probably a t General Mills.
Q: Not ever in Washington?
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 26

A: Oh, yeah. I visited people in Washington.

Q: Just for the record, .Major Marcel later worked at
[AFOAT-11. Do you recognize him at all?
A: Not at all. The people I was involved with were
civilian scientists. If we looked at a list of people at
Northrop, Doyle Northrop sort of sticks in my mind, and there are
other names I've seen related to that. Yeah, I knew that guy,
but I never knew Marcel.
Q: So you went, moving into Mogul, you did go on the June
and July field trips.
A: I ran them.
Q: How many did you go on? All of them?
A: I didn't go to the one in the Pacific. If you look at
the planning on the Project Fitzwilliam, my name was listed as
the person as being there. Then suddenly, I'm not. What
happened, my people got taken away from me and I had to recruit
brand new people to help me fly balloons into Alamagordo during
the April and May 1948 operations. So I had new personnel, and
we went up and down the Rio Grande Valley trying to launch
balloons so they would pass over the ground stations at
Alamagordo.
Q: During that early period, before you had your full
complement of various types of balloons, did you ever use any of
the Japanese balloons? We were given the impression there were
at least a few of the Japanese balloons made available.
A: I got very interested in the Japanese balloons and
communicate, and I have pieces of the Japanese balloon downstairs
if you're interested in seeing a piece of it. And I've got
translations. I met the chief of the Central Meteorological
Office, a Dr. Wadati, and he put me in contact, so I have
extensive files on the Japanese balloons.
Q: But were any of those used as precursors to Mogul or...
A: None whatsoever. That was part of a promotion that...
When I went to General Mills, Winzen who had been the great
entrepreneur, had gotten fired. He'd gotten caught in a
prevarication about whether or not the Navy was going to provide
money. He was replaced by a fellow named Frank Jewitt. Jewitt
recruited me out of graduate school. We really promoted
balloons. That's part of the balloon promotion.
Q: None of the Japanese balloons were actually used as far
as a precursor to Mogul or anything like that.
A: That is absolutely correct.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 27

Q: But you had them available for study, but you didn't
launch them.
A: No, they didn't have any.

Q: In the New York University report it says that you were

provided two Japanese balloons.
A: That's interesting, because I have no memory of them
whatsoever. Spilhaus may have. But I have no memory that I ever
saw them. In the spirit of being given proper scientific credit,
in the paper that you have, the Journal of Meteorology Paper,
we, heavily written by Spilhaus, credited the Japanese with
doing, with their trans-Pacific flights. So what we were doing
certainly was based, came after what they had done, and we didn't
want to take credit away from them. But I'm told that on my own,
completely free from this, I talked with Wadati and others on a
Japanese balloon. I've never seen a Japanese balloon that I know
of, I've never seen the payload, but I do have fragments of the
Mulberry Favor.
Frankly, we did not depend on the Japanese balloons. The
Japanese just preceded us. But we didn't pattern what we were
trying to do on what the Japanese did. After all, they had
opaque balloons, and my belief from the beginning is balloons
ought to be transparent so they don't absorb sunlight so at
sunset you don't have the cooling and the ballasting. So we owe
nothing to the Japanese other than the fact they were ahead of
us.
Q: You went on these field trips. When you left, getting
back to the cover story, you were the project engineer. Did
people come to you and say you need to put something together in
case one of these things falls in somebody's hands?
You didn't.
Did you brief your people, your personnel, when they were
there, that they if should go into town for food or something if
someone says "Why are you there?". ..
A: We were certainly secretive and not talkative, but at
the same time...
Q: In other words, was there a developed cover story where
everyone got together, discussed what you were going to say or
not say concerning the various activities that were going on at
Alamagordo and other locations?
A: That's a good question. I have no memory of such a
thing. I'm just aware that we were under very strong stricture
not to encourage speculation on what we were doing.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 28

Q: So is that pretty much maybe a condition of hiring? I

notice you used a lot of former military people. Did you just
tell them at the outset, #@Thisis a classified project for AMC?Il
Or were they not read on to the project at all?
A: By and large, people thought we were flying balloons
for the Air Force.
Q: As far as they were concerned they were just launching
meteorological balloons?
A: That's correct.

Q: They didn't particularly quiz you about the microphone

you hung in there or...
A: No.

Q: The balloons that you did launch for Project Mogul and
some of the other test balloons, without the actual instrument
packages, did they have reward tags, "Return to New York
University," or "Return to Roswell Army Air Field," or to
Alamagordo Army Air Field or anything like that?
A: The ones that we wanted to get back, which were the
test constant level balloons and the ones that had microphones on
them, by and large, they did have NYU reward tags on them,
Q: Dr. Peoples, whoever was directing you, was there ever
any concern voiced that this is a top secret object we're sending
into the atmosphere and we're not sure where it's going to come
to earth. Did they ever express any problem with that, that
wherever it came down, it came down?
A: I think the argument was that when it came down, it
would be mixed in with our other gear, and it was just part of a
flight that was to be recovered by NYU. He thought nobody would
interpret what those sorts of instruments would be.
Q: So the tags were kind of generic, like a meteorological
tag, say. "This consists of meteorological instruments...11
A: "This is a research balloon flown by New York
University.. .I1

Q: Were you doing other research? When you went to New

Mexico was there another agenda other than the top secret
project?
A: None whatsoever. Our whole life revolved around the
NYU constant level balloon project. We were developing constant
level balloons, and the service flights for Peoples j u s t sort of
got hidden in that.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 29

Q: The service flights were which ones?

A: The ones carrying the microphones.
Q: So specifically that term was used for the microphone
flights from...
A: That's right. You'll notice when you look at this,
that the flights out in the Pacific don't even get mentioned.
There's just no report on the flights in the Pacific, and the
flights in '48 that we made for Sandstone, there are some flight
numbers recorded, but there are no details at all provided.
Q: That was Grab Bag?
A: No, Grab Bag was to grab stratospheric air to measure
the krypton 8 5 . . .
Q: Essentially particulate detection and gaseous.,.
A: That was gaseous. The particulate was, I think we were
less involved in grabbing particulates. There have been
thousands of flights made, and certain people did carry cascade
impactors and other things, but that was a minor part of what we
did, whereas Grab Bag was a very measure effort.
Q: That was in '48?
A: That was more ' 5 0 odd.
Q: Was that Fitzwilliam?
A: No, Fitzwilliam was entirely acoustic detection. Again,
very long range detection. Fitzwilliam was spring of '48. There
were various code names, and thanks to our friend Todd, I've
learned about the code name got termed Black Heart and a whole
bunch of odd names...
Q: Black Heart, Rock Fish. He may be wrong on that part.
He may be right, but.. .
A: I heard Mogul got converted into Rock Fish. But I
heard the detection part of Fitzwilliam ended up being called
Black Heart.
Q: He may be in error on that.
A: As I say, I'd been much more concerned with the
technical aspects than the military operations.
Q: This is one of the technical reports and it's talking
about the various flights, and t h i s is t h e report t h a t lists all
of the numbered flights and it talks about, it says, "Excluded
are the flights made to test,@@ it's technical report number one,
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 30

"Excluded are those two tests' special gear in launches which

were not
A: Right.
Q: So the special gear that's referred to here is the
microphone gear?
A: Yes, sir.
Q: There's another passage that talks about the
intelligence gear. Was that considered also...
A: Did we make such a faux pas as that?
Q: It's in there.
Q: I have the classification letter from July of ' 4 6 . You
might want to review this. Maybe your friend has shown that to
you.
A: No, I've never seen this.
Trakowski argued that even the name Mogul was classified,
and he said it had the same classification as the Manhattan
Project had, which surprises me, because in various reports that
Todd has sent me, such as the monthly progress reports from the
people at later Holloman Air Force Base, Mogul appears in things
that are no higher classification than confidential, but
Trakowski insists that Mogul was super classified.
(END OF SIDE)
Q: This is a copy of the letter you wrote to Colonel
Weaver. One of the things that you talk about in this letter was
that the radar test flights were not reported, which is exactly
what we were discussing a moment ago in your kitchen. Would you
go over again what you just described as far as this particular
test flight that occurred? What we just went through in there.
A: A s I said initially, the essence in trying to develop
constant level balloons, we needed to know what the altitude was.
At the same time, we were under a lot of pressure to carry the
test microphones for the Watson Laboratory and Columbia people.
We got into an operation at Alamagordo in early June of 1947, in
which we were required to make flights in which the tracking of
the flights would be provided by the Watson Laboratory Radar that
was already in place at Alamagordo for tracking the V-2s and
other rockets the Ordnance Corps people were flying over at White
Sands. So we came down to fly balloons in early June, in which
the tracking of the flights was to be done by radar, tracking
corner reflector targets, which I think we brought with us. I
don't have any evidence of this.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 31

Q: So you made your plan in New York to fly

primary research was the acoustical detect...
... Your

A: That's correct.
Q: Secondary was refining the technique of constant level
balloons.
A: And that was on hold until we got the delivery of the
polyethylene balloon that was scheduled for the end of June. So
the first of June we came, really, just for the test flight of
microphones, doing service flights for Watson Laboratories.
Q: To fly the balloons in association with...
A: To fly meteorological balloons, tracked by a Watson Lab
radar on the ML-307B targets that I think we brought with us.
Q: And you launched these balloons in conjunction with V-2
firings?
A: Those went independently. Albert Crary was monitoring
the V-2 firings.

Q: That was with the ground microphones?

A: You're right, I beg your pardon. As you'll find in the
diary, that we launched Flight 8, these cluster balloons, we
launched those at 3:OO o'clock in the morning for a V-2 firing.
You're quite right. I'd forgotten that. We launched those in
the morning, then the rocket got scrubbed while Flight 8 was in
the air, and we were out of plastic balloons that day in early
July -- this is jumping ahead to early July --
and we inflated
meteorological balloons for the delayed firing of the V-2 rocket
on the afternoon of July 3rd, you'll see. Then there was an
accident over at White Sands and the V-2 got scrubbed a second
time. What was Flight 9, we launched Flight 9, as you will see
in here, as a dummy flight, and it probably had radar targets on
it.
Let me just read this. This is Crary's summary for the week
of 3 0 June-5 July 1947. "Balloon tests 7, 8, 9, and 10 off this
week. Test 7 slated for July 1 postponed to July 2nd because
equipment not ready. A hundred tanks with helium obtained from
Amarillo Monday evening. Trakowski went over in a C-54 and
picked them up. Also radiosonde receivers set up by NYU but
sonobuoy not operable. Test 7 at dawn, July 2nd, with Pi Ball.
One hour, first falling with the autolights. Winds were very
light, and balloons up between base and mountains most of the
time. Included a cluster of met balloons, followed by C-54
several hours, and finally landed in mountains near road, south
cloudcroft. Before gear could be recovered, most of it had been
stolen. Station operating in north hangar, Cloudcroft and
Roswell. Shots made repeatedly at Site 4 and picked up goods
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 32

from north hangar and from Cloudcroft for awhile. Nothing from
Roswell.
"On Thursday morning, July 3rd, a cluster of GM plastic
balloons sent up for V-2 recording, but V-2 not fired. No shots
fired. Balloons up for some time."
Q: What is a shot?
A: Explosive on the ground.

Q: You were doing explosives on the ground in New Mexico

too?
A: Crary .
Q: so Crary would give you the signal, he'd say at 0400
I'm going to launch a balloon, and at 0500 I'm going to...
A: No, he wouldn't launch a balloon. I'd launch a
balloon. What Peoples would do is say I want a flight up
tomorrow morning. So the NYU group would get ready to make a
flight, and then Crary would go out with his crew and fire
explosives up and down the Tulerosa Basin while our balloons were
in the air.
Q: So you had multiple explosions on the ground, the V-
2...

A: And explosions on the East Coast.

Q: On the East Coast, Caribbean, and you had those timed
so you knew when those were going to take place and you were
simply waiting for...
A: They had them timed and we balloon types just fit into
the schedule. But the plaster, the timing., bringing.al1 this
together, we knew nothing about. We were just scheduled to fly
balloons.

Q: But you did want to launch early morning for the light
winds.
A: We did want to launch early in the morning for light
wind. We had freedom to tell them what we could do and what we
couldn't do. We actually on this, in addition to everything
else, we actually flew blocks of TNT on free balloons and fired
them while we had other balloons in the air.
Q: Did those have radar targets on them also?
A: Probably.
Q: Were those detonated by...
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 33

A: By a pressure switch.
Q: Were those tracked? Was there some sort of log that
would tell you where those particular balloons were? You
wouldn't want to just release TNT to float anywhere, would you?
A: They wouldn't float. The balloons would just go up
until they burst. And we were on the edge of the restricted
area. So the answer is yes, we did.
1'11 have to get back to this. The radar tracking turned
out to be abysmally poor. I don't know why, but they were
abysmally poor. That's why I got off onto this part of it. And
when you asked me the V-2 question ...
Let me finish this, and then we'll get back to what you
asked.
'@Thursday morning, cluster of GM balloons sent out, V-2 not
fired, no shots fired. Balloons up for some time, no recording.
Pi Ball showed no West winds. Balloons picked up by radar, WS."
I presume that means White Sands. You'll find this hard... and
hunted by somebody's name I couldn't get. It looks like
Maryalls' "C-54, located on Tulerosa Range by air. Out PM with
several NYU men by weapons carrier, but we never located it.
Rocket postponed until 7:30 p.m. Thursday night," which was the
third. "But on last minute before balloon went up, V-2 was
called off on of accident at White Sands. Sent up cluster
balloons with dummy load. Balloon Flight 10 on dawn, July Sth,
had gone out with C-54, again with Moses and Dufeld to hunt for
Flight 8 but not sure was found then."
Then I added a note here, "Flight 8 was never recovered."
"C-54 went to El Paso July 4th and picked up single smith
plastic balloon and GM cluster plastic balloons."
So the answer is yes. We did try to coordinate the balloon
launchings for the V-2 firings, and Crary would also take that as
a time of opportunity to go out on the desert and fire TNT. He
had vast stocks of explosives available to him.

Q: Was that primarily on the White Sands range, or did he

go out into other areas, say Northwest of Roswell? Did he
contract with any of the ranchers to use these locales, other
than the actual missile range itself?
A: I think all the explosions he made were coordinated
with the White Sands Proving Ground people. Alamagordo Airfield,
later Holloman, was just on the fringe of the proving ground at
that time. Crary sent his men to all sorts of places --
over to
Roswell, to Artesia, to Hageman, up and down t h e Pecos River
area. He had a place you'll read about, Fabians, Texas, which
turns out to be just down the Rio Grande from El Paso, maybe 50
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 34

miles. Then he had Don Edmondson went to Silver City frequently.

Then he had some place he called Donna, Las Cruces is in Donna
Anna County, but I don't know where his Donna site was. But I
think he had microphones scattered all around in central New
Mexico and West Texas. But the explosions were all created
either on the White Sands Proving Ground, or there were V-2
rockets, or they were things coming from...
I won't take the time now, but he talks about cruises, which
apparently are, maybe they were cruisers firing off the Jersey
coast.
We got off into this, we were talking about tracking, and we
went down to, in early June, to make service flights which were
to be tracked by radar, and the radar was unsuccessful. It's my
memory that we made a number of flights just to test out the
radar. These would not have had a reward tag on them. These
were throw away flights. Once a target like this comes down from
high altitude or drag, you don't want it back. It's my memory we
didn't want to have anything traced back to us, if we weren't
going to go out and pick it up.
Q: So you just kind of let the material lie wherever it
fell?
A: We shot a balloon into the air and didn't want to do
any more. There are some pictures of our going out to recover
things. On one of the early flights we went out east of Roswell,
and I remember beyond the Bottomless Lakes, going out in oil well
country, picking up one of our flights that had come down. We
aggressively tried to recover our own flights.
Q: So were you directed to that location by aircraft?
A: By the aircraft.
Q: Did they give you a lat and long, landmark?
A: We talked to them by radio. The transmitters on these
microphones were so low powered that, believe it or not, they had
B - 1 7 s just orbiting under our balloons with receivers aboard the
aircraft, and we, of course, would talk to the aircraft, and
they'd tell us when things would come down. So it was a
coordinated operation.
Q: So you had explosions or V-2 going through. So the
aircraft had recording devices. You had the acoustical pickup on
the balloon and the aircraft had the recording device that would
record the sounds.
A: That's correct. Would record the signal from the
balloon.
Q: In what media was it recorded on?
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 35

A: Brush recorders. [Strip charge] recorders feeding out

at high speed. You'll see in here, you'll see the sort of
records.
Q: The graphic representation.
A: The recorders looked like that.
Q: So that was recorded on the aircraft and then...
A: That's correct. As you'll see, they said they had
receivers at Roswell, at Alamagordo, and they had them on the
airplane.
Q: But most of the detection was via the aircraft because
of the low power receivers.
A: Most of the reception, the detection, was really ...
The balloon received the acoustics, and sent it down by radio to
the aircraft. It often didn't work. That was the reason why for
Operation Sandstone in April and May of ' 4 8 , we went up and down
the Rio Grande Valley ...
Here are some of the pictures. There's
a ground cloth for the balloon to be laid out. There's a balloon
being inflated, just getting ready. So we tried to get up wind.
That's a device from White Sands that was picked up around
Carazoso and was reported in to us, and we thought it was one of
ours. So I took a weapons carrier and drove up there. We were
aggressively trying to recover our equipment and that just
happened to be something that was on the ground. The technician
that had been in that group, remember the [Marginal] tape,
Herbert Crow. That's a picture he took when we were aggressively
trying to recover a load. That turned out not to be ours.
Q: What is it, and who did it belong to?
A: It probably was flown on a rocket or by Marcus O'Day
who was the chief scientist at Watson Laboratory. Dr. O'Day.
You'll see, when you read the Duffy thing, where Duffy thinks
maybe there were things that were flown by Dr. O'Day. Anyway,
that just happens to be a picture in the collection of NYU
photographs.
Q: So there were a lot of other people flying balloons or
launching.,.
A: Not balloons. We were the only balloon flyers, That
came down by parachute. But there were a lot of rockets being
flown in the early days there, and a lot of high altitude
aircraft. Duffy says there were dropsondes.

Q: So it could be that some of the material found may not

have been associated with a balloon. It is possible it could
have been some other type of material. But the description that
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 36

Brazel gives the impression that it is the smoky rubber of a

balloon that's been in the sunlight.
A: That's circumstantial. That fits exactly with what
would have been done, and orthodox use of radar targets would not
have produced what he found. But you're quite right, there's
debris that was reported to us that...
Q: ...some sort of cylindrical instrument, though, that's
obviously an instrument package of some sort.
A: It had a plexiglass, it looked like maybe it had a w
sensor. There was some optical equipment under the plexiglass
dome that was shattered...
Q: You're familiar with the popular literature about the
various crash sites. There's one crash site, two crash sites,
three crash sites and all that craziness?
A: Yes.
Q: What I'm thinking is we may have two incidents here,
where they collected your debris from your radar targets, and
then there may have been another something else not related to a
balloon.
A: There could have been other things from White Sands.
This was on the edge of the proving ground. There's a story
behind this, and that is that a rancher, whose land had been
taken from him to form the proving ground, had cattle that were
still on what had been his land. He had found this while he was
looking for his cattle, I can show you on the map if you're
interested. Anyway, he called in to Alamagordo about this. So I
went up to see if it was one of our missing balloons. While we
were there, a range security guard came on the rancher and really
castigated him for breaking the law, coming back onto the range.
So this was really on the range. It would be hard for me to
understand how the sort of operations, which I knew, could have
fallen as far away as these other sites you talk about. This was
really on the northeast corner of the range, just west of the
town of Carazoso.
Q: So that's not too far from here.
A: Here's the northeast corner. [Looking on map] Right
on this road, right about there is where that load there was
found. Here is where the Brazel finding was, just north of this
bend of the road here, and there's Roswell.
Q: You're talking in terms of sites around Corona and in
that vicinity. So it's quite possible that there had been other
types of debris from the proving ground or...
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 37

A: As I say, I find it hard to think that something

While we may have been flying TNT on balloons and being very
...
carefree about it, I really doubt that a thing of any military
significance would have fallen this far away from the proving
ground. It could have, but...
Q: Other than your balloons.
A: Oh yeah, those first flights we didn't even coordinate
with CAA. Peoples was so eager to go get those measurements,
that these were going to be flown from a restricted area and he
didn't worry about it. We later, before the Civil Air Board in
El Paso, but that was two or three months later.
Q: When you went on the field trips, what was the chain of
command at that point when you arrived? Who did you report to?
A: We were somewhat self contained, but we got housing
provided by, I guess Crary was our contact, if you will. Some
way or another, barracks were made available for us to live in at
Alamagordo.
Q: Would anyone at Roswell Army Air Field have known about
your activities, what your purpose was?
A: Not at all. In fact, we went over and tried to get
into the weather station at Roswell and because of the atomic
bomb security of the 509th, as I remember, we couldn't even get
on the base. We drove up in a weapons carrier to the Roswell
Army Air Field, and tried to get on the base because we wanted to
go to the weather station, wanted to see if we could put a
radiosonde receiver there. As I remember we got turned away.
Q: But you ultimately did put a radioson receiver there.
A: In a motel. We just worked out of motels in Roswell.
Q: I thought I saw you had a radioson receiver on Roswell
Army Air Field.
A: Again, forgive my memory, but I do remember being
turned away. But if you can find it, I'd be glad to have my
memory refreshed.
Q: I saw that you had a copy of the 509th Bomb Group
history. In the 509 the Bomb Group history from September I saw
a meeting where Dr. Peoples met with LTC Joe Briley, 830th the
Bomb Squadron Commander, 509th, Air Group Roswell. Do you know
why Dr. Peoples would meet with the squadron commander of a B-29
outfit?
A: Only if he wanted to get in to put a receiver on the
base there. That would be my guess. We had a big operation. We
went back to Alamagordo in September. We had our first 20 foot
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 38

diameter General Mills balloons. We had a very successful set of

balloon launches in Alamagordo in September of ' 4 7 . My only
guess is trying to have a down-wind receiving station.
Q: There are some other names mentioned that I can't
recall.
Q: What about then Colonel Blanchard and General Ramey?
Do you think they may have had any knowledge of what your
ultimate purpose was?
A: I think not. I want to say something about Colonel
J.D. Ryan. He was Chief of Staff of the Air Force later, but
"Dr. Peoples, Murray Hackman, and First Lieutenant Thompson from
Air Material Command, were out at the field to inspect Air
Material Command installations and to confer with LTC Briley."
Well, well. Hackman was one of our radiosonde operators.
There's Colonel John 0 . Ryan right there. That's interesting.
On the morning of this famous press release, July 8th, in
The Roswell Daily Dispatch, there is a statement about a flying
disc being identified, and Colonel J.D. Ryan who is on the staff
of 8th Air Force said that the Air Force was now using radar
targets to measure winds aloft in some stations.
I find that of interest because apparently in reading some
of the various things that happened in General Ramey's office,
apparently someone that afternoon did think this was a radar
target that had been brought in. But the Roswell morning paper
clearly showed that there was a knowledgeable person in Fort
Worth.
Q: Is that in the article, the 8 July article, that Ryan
made the statement?
A: Yes. Maybe not .the article you're talking about.
Q: Is this the one that William Haut...
A: No, this is that morning, not that afternoon. (Pause
to look for clipping) There's Newt Goldenberg, you mentioned him
earlier in one of our conversations. That's one of our altitude
controls.
Here's the morning paper, "Report flying disc found." Down
here is about Colonel J.D. Ryan, and he mentioned the existence
of radar wind measuring equipment in the Air Force. If you want
a copy of that...
Q: Then there's, subsequently, no mention of the radar
targets until General Ramey discusses it on the 9th, talking
about the material being a balloon.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 39

A: On the afternoon of the 8th. It may have been

published on the 9th, but...
Q: You're right. Evening of the 8th. Examination by the
Army revealed last night, a high altitude weather balloon.
General Ramey, Commander, 8th Air Forces, cleared up the mystery.
A: In these pictures here, don't show these flaps. This,
I think, is my step ladder that I used to reach high targets,
when we have these big balloon trains going way up in the air.
Here again, is an unorthodox use of radar targets. We did that,
and as far as I know, other people didn't.
Q: Did you ever use radar targets with the polyethylene
balloons?
A: Yes, sir. In fact somewhere I have a picture where we
flew a missile, we launched a missile for OCR Special Devices
Center in 1949. I have a picture showing the targets up and down
the balloon train there.
Q: Do you remember trying to pin down some of these
flights that could possibly cause this misunderstanding? You
talk about putting a target with the neoprene balloons, but at
that time you also launched them with the polyethylene?
A: This picture I showed you right here. This is a
polyethylene balloon.

Q: So you used a visual by the aircraft to watch the

balloon? It would circle underneath.
A: The aircraft circling underneath were really to pick up
the microphone signals. That was part of the Watson Lab
operation. Our operation, we depended on radiosons and where we
could get radar tracking for tracking air balloons. But the
aircraft operation here was entirely to support Project Mogul.
We didn't consider ourselves Mogul because I didn't even know the
name.
Q: The summary of flights ...
A: That's one of the flights with the mixed
interpretations because of the radiosondes.
Q: In one column it says "tracking percent." Then
sometimes it will say by aircraft.
A: That's true.
Q: So "aircraft observation", was that a visual
observation or an electronic?
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 40

A: That's really saying did we have aircraft on it or not,

and what percentage. Here the B-17 was on it for 40 percent of
the time. Indeed, that was the aircraft tracking for the Mogul
operation.
Q: That was for the electronic data gathering.
A: That's correct.
Q: Not observing the balloon to tell you where it went
down.
A: That's right. Well, we did have the aircraft stay as
long as we could. A s long as we could end up with that very
expensive aircraft chasing an air balloon, we were happy. On the
flight that came down east of Roswell on one of these, Flight 5
or so on came down east of Roswell, the aircraft spotted it on
the ground for us and told us where to go to look for it.
Q: About 17 miles east of Roswell.
A: Then we had another one, Flight ll...
Q: That's the one that appears to come down northwest of
Roswell.
A: Correct.
Q: It appears to have almost come down exactly where
they're talking about.
A: That's right.
Q: That's the one where you provided a depiction to
Colonel Weaver.
Q: No, that's another one.
Q: That's an earlier one, that's right.
A: Where is that old NYU report? (Pause)
Here it is right here. More or less due west of
Walker, Roswell Army Air Field.
Q: Then this graphic conflicts with this graphic, which
shows Number 11 coming down... Is that circle the Roswell
reporting station?
A: That's about right.

Q: Is this .circle a weather reporting station which would

be Roswell?
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 41

A: You're right.
Q: This has it coming down northwest.
A: What's the origin of this?
Q: It's in the back of one of the reports.
A: It looks to me like it may have been out of this
report.
Q: Not every report had this graphic depiction like this
which was number eight.
(Pause to look through documents)
A: With those numbers it wouldn't have been in that first
report because these flights were much later.
Q: Technical Report No. 1.
A: Right. And Flight 58 and 55 aren't going to be in that
early report. They occurred after that report was written.
(Pause)
A: I would say what was in that first report is more
accurate than this. This, I think, occurred after I left NYU.
It's a general summary. Flight 11 was a very important flight.
They got very important data on it --Crary and Peoples.
Q: Spilhaus based his article from Journal of Meteorology
on it.
A: Right, and he wrote a paper in the bulletin. The fact
that the balloon trajectory has this hook in it when it went over
the mountain ridge ...
Q: That's obviously the [ano-cyclonic] winds aloft.
A: Exactly. So he and Bernard Harwitz were very excited
about the fact that the balloon at nominal constant level, had a
change in direction when the air was forced over the mountain
barrier, and they published a special paper on that. So
everybody was happy with this flight.
As soon as that flight was made, that was the 7th, and we
went home on the 8th.
Q: That would be the reason why there would be no one
there in the area who could explain this debris that was brought
in. There were no experts there who dealt with this particular
type of material or radar reflectors.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 42

A: There was really no contact, at that time, as far as I

know, between Peoples and Roswell, and there's no way Roswell,
other than my memory of getting turned away by the MPs at the
gate, there's no way that the people at Roswell would have known
what was going on over at Alamagordo. When we sent people to
Roswell, Hackman worked out of a motel to receive.
So the more puzzling thing in line with what you say comes
from Crary's diary. Here's what Crary's diary says:
ttAlamagordo. Balloon Flight 11A, off at 5:07. Big plastic
balloon with small auxiliary plastics," etc. "Watson Lab and
gear. It '@Followedt1(inaudible) ''receiver until about 11. Picked
up on radiosonde receiver at Roswell then followed. Then came
down. At 10,000 feet, cap should have punctured plastic. Then
it came down near Highway 70, between Roswell and Tulerosa.
'#Second balloon, met balloons with radiosonde up about 6:30.
Third balloon with two and a half pound stick of TNT and cap set
by pressure element set to fire at 35,000 feet, up at 6:20.@@
Q: What day is that again?
A: July 7th.
ttSurfacebombing at Site 4 from 5:45 to 8:45 at 15 minute
intervals. (Inaudible) followed main receiver only three-
quarters of an hour, but followed radiosonde about three hours.
Thirty-five thousand food implosion? off about 6:55. Vivian got
instructions for completing work on Flights 1 to 30 and packed
all records and photo. Sent off TWX regarding Bermuda flight
and wrote up memo on it. Worked with Eileen on April 1st rocket
plotting HD5 HT SST, whatever (that is]."
July 8th. "C-54 off about 10:30 with 23 people, all NYU,
Watson Lab including Vivian, Eileen," and somebody else. I can't
tell. "Lieutenant Thompson, Edmondson, Reynolds and myself left.
Wrote a report on East Coast flights for Peoples."
Here's 9 July, the time this occurred at Alamagordo.
@IWorked today on balloon flight. Studied Watson Lab records of
them briefly and wrote memorandum to Peoples about results. Left
in car this PM later. Flat tire between Roswell and Tulerosa,
and stayed there."
July 10th. "Changed tire and went into Roswell. Bought new
tire. Off to El R h o , Oklahoma today. Stopped in cafe in
Hereford, Texas and met Danny Hard from UGC. Went up to office
and saw Bob Cowden, somebody in charge, and supervisor."
That's the end of it. So there's no hint that Crary was
involved in any coverup such as this clearly is. This is a
coverup right here because they talk about our operations, they
talk about our balloons we thought went to Colorado,and they all
claim it to be part of Pritchard's radar operation.
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 43

Q: But he wasn't launching balloons.

A: He wasn't launching balloons.

Q: So where did they get the equipment to take this

picture? Did you leave equipment behind?
A: This is right outside of the hangar.

Q: Those are your people?

A: It's our equipment and my stepladder.

Q: Did you leave equipment there?

A: Yes. Everything

Q: Because you expected to return.

A: We were just going back...
Q: It looked pretty tricky. How did they know how to do
that?
A: I just don't know anything about the hierarchy above
us. I do know that I worked carefully with a guy named Larry
Dyvad, a pilot, who later became a private pilot, running a fixed
base operation in Alamagordo, and got killed 20 years ago. But I
know I worked with Larry Dyvad whose name you'll see here. I
don't remember Pritchard at all, but Dyvad was my contact with
the radar. I know they didn't have balloons or anything else,
yet they talk about boiling balloons there.
Q: So when you returned in September, did you see that
somebody had tampered with your equipment and used up some of
your balloons?
A: If it did, it didn't ring a bell.
Q: And no one mentioned it to you. No one said hey, look,
we had to do something while you were gone.
A: I think we were just some ignorant, little innocent
graduate student contractors on a military base, and things were
going on that we didn't know anything about.

Q: So no one approached you to say they had used some of

your equipment?
A: Not at all.

Q: This photo that's depicted here n the July 10th

Alamagordo News, this could have been taken during one of your
actual launches versus...
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 44

A: I think not, because they say, the whole article is

this was a demonstration. I would have thought, since Crary was
a senior person and he and Peoples, Peoples was our contact with
the base. But other than Dyvad, we had no real contact with
anyone I remember. I do remember being very disappointed with
the radar.
Q: If this were a demonstration sometime on the 9th or
10th of July, prior to this being published, they talk in terms
here of these radar reflectors. These particular radar
reflectors, as having labels on them. The radar reflectors you
were using, did they have any type of labels talking about being
property of U . S . Army, or Watson Laboratories?
A: None that I know of. We were strongly encouraged not
to mix in the Air Force with what we did. Everything we did had
an NYU label. I may be able to dig back in my file somewhere...
Q: So they may have had an NYU label on it. Even the
service ones.
A: On service, but on radar test flights, there's no way
we would have put a label on.
Q: Those were just shakedown flights. You were just
saying hey, what's going to work best to get the data, so let's
use some of the equipment we have and see what works, so you'd
have someone on the radar and say yeah, this configuration works,
this one doesn't. That's what you were doing. Then later on you
refined your technique ...
A: What we would do is we would put up things and they'd
come back and say it didn't work. So we'd scratch our heads and
do something else. But we were running that end of the balloon
end of the operation. Nobody else was flying balloons around us.
There may have been a radiosonde operation out over White Sands,
but there was not one,.as.far as I know,.at either-Roswell or
Alamagordo. If there had, I would have used them because we were
using standard AMQ-l...
Q: But you did coordinate with Big Spring, Texas.
A: Did we?
Q: It's in the report, saying you guys, when you came back
to New Jersey, you were sending thank you letters to various
organizations that helped you while you were in the field.
Big
Springs, Texas; some other places that you had coordinated with.

A: Thank you.. .
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 45

Q: The New York University reports are very voluminous.

There are three big bound volumes. I have the originals with
your signature.
A: You're making my point, that there probably wasn't any
other nearby radiosonde station for us to receive things. I'd
forgotten all about Big Springs, but I'm sure we made every
effort we could to get radiosonde reception.
Q: Can you think of, just in general, any other
explanation for what became the so-called Roswell incident, other
than what we've discussed here as far as potentially your balloon
project, which at that time was a very secretive project. Is
there any other explanation you can think of?
A: No, and the particulars of this case are sufficiently
nearly unique, that I think no one else had anything that could
have fit into providing these results. No, we were doing
something that was unorthodox, using targets that, as far as I
know, had not been flown before in New Mexico. There's no way
that the rancher could have ever seen one. And there's no way
that either Major Marcel nor General Ramey or General Ramey's
people could have come up with providing a radar to substitute
for the real debris. I think there's a very high likelihood that
the unusual things we were doing provided this debris.
However, all the other stuff that's in, and a lot of the
material, I can't explain bodies or material that can't be
(folded] by a sledge hammer.
Q: Let's dwell on the bodies just for a second here. It
turns out that during this time frame, 1947, 1948, 1949, there
were numerous aircraft accidents, a lot of fatal aircraft
accidents, in this general vicinity. Did you all ever come
across any of those?
A: No, sir.
(END OF SIDE)
Q: There was an accident that took place right out of
Roswell, a B-29, two B-29 accidents that resulted in fatal
crashes. We were wondering if maybe over time people were
beginning to think in terms of those fatal accidents, which
essentially scattered body parts, small parts, over areas, where
people were getting confused with what occurred in those aircraft
accidents with the sensationalism of this UFO story.
A: A s I said in my letter, all of us went back to NYU on
the 8th of July and we heard about that afternoon, and we just
thought it was one of our balloons. All of us that were in that
group have held onto that view for a long time. I do have Crow's
letter here. He apparently joined us for that Operation
Sandstone pickup crew in '48, but he knew that we knew that we
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 46

thought the Roswell incident, so-called, was caused by one of our

balloons.
Q: Did anyone ever mention it to you once you returned?
Did any of the Red Bank folks mention it to you, or even in
passing, or told you that maybe you'd better tighten up your
procedures or anything of that nature, or a memo?
A: I have no memory. I do think that Peoples had the idea
that it was one of our balloons, and it wasn't a matter of
tightening up our procedures, it was just one of our balloons we
couldn't recover. A s you'll see looking at Crary's diary, there
was no frantic effort to recover the earlier flights, even though
they had microphones on them. I read to you one about some
equipment had been stolen by the time we got there. A s you can
see in the diary, there's no record that there was any major
problem.
Q: So even though the equipment was taken, there was no
shroud of secrecy, the MPs didn't come out and close down the
area or anything of this sort.
A: No, not at all.
Q: It was just expected in the normal course of research
Expendable equipment.
.
A: Expendable equipment.
Q: And you had no fear that it was going to be taken by
enemy agents or...
A: No, the biggest fear was the thought of loose talking,
and we just didn't talk about the purpose of this. We certainly
did talk a lot about our balloons, and there was just no security
or no concern. We were flying constant level balloons.
Q: For pressure and temperature ...
A: For meteorological trajectories. A lot of interest in
trajectories.
One thing I should mention is that after I had visited from
William Moore around ' 8 0 or '81, I wrote Ro Peoples and at that
time Jim Peoples was in the Geology Department at the University
of Kansas. I wrote him and got a letter back from Ro Peoples
saying that he had died. So I wrote her back and said there was
considerable interest still in this Roswell incident, and did he
ever get called out... I do know that on occasion he got
involved in classified things and left us. I asked her did he
ever talk to her about anything regarding this debris that had
been recovered. Her letter, which I perhaps can find somewhere,
was the fact that no, he thought that flying saucers were a bunch
of hooey, and he had a very low opinion of people who believed in
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 47

flying saucers. I did get a letter back from Ro to the response

that he had not been, as far as she knew, he had not been
involved in any classified identification of something. That had
occurred to me that things could have gone on that I had no need
to know. I tried to extract that.

Q: So you had no recollection or strong recollection of

him, when you got back to New Jersey, discussing it. It caused a
lot of fuss.
A: I'm really surprised at this newspaper story because
imp licit in this is the idea that someone provided a good cover
for us, and yet Crary's diary doesn't show that he was involved
in it, and I wasn't aware that my contact, Dyvad, was privy
enough to our operations to have carried this out. So this is a
bit of a mystery to me.
Q: What would you speculate, how would someone, just
circumstances, coincidences, or intentional?
A: It's very clear that it was intentional, and there was
a better security operation going on than I appreciated at the
time. That would be my assessment.
Q: So you believe that someone was privy to your
activities...
A: Trakowski was there. I had forgotten, but he reminded
me that he had gone on the C-54 to pick up the helium at
Amarillo. I asked Trakowski had he been involved in
manufacturing a cover story. He kept saying how important Mogul
was, how highly classified it was, and how he was really wheeling
and dealing. He apparently went down to Fort Bliss, to the
commanding general there --
I guess he was a captain at the time
-- and had no trouble talking the general into releasing
something like maybe several hundred 500 pound bombs for this.
At the same time, Trakowski has no memory of a coverup.
Q: He didn't have participation.
A: Whether he was on that C-54 that had 2 3 people on it or
not, I don't know. Crary's list of the people left, there was
only one military type, a Lieutenant Thompson, in what you have
here.

Q: Who did you report to?

A: Peoples.
Q: Then getting back to talking about quarters and things
like that, did you have to go introduce yourself to the
commanding officer at the base, o r . . .
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 48

A: That's the surprising thing. As far as I know we just

never interfaced with the military.
Q: Where were you actually operating from?
A: We operated out of the north area of Alamagordo Army
Air Field. This hangar right here, which was a big wooden
hangar, on the south side of the ramp in the north area.
Q: That was arranged by Peoples?
A: Crary was already resident there when we had arrived.
Q: That's right. He arrived first to establish the ground
stations first.
A: Correct. As you'll see in this, he was already firing
explosive for the GR-6, the various sound-ranging microphones.
Q: Did he have a cover story for those ground explosions
and the microphones?
A: I don't know. There were very few enlisted men on the
airfield. As Trakowski said, it was about to be closed. There
was a motor pool, because in the stuff Todd has dug up, there
were a bunch of weapons carriers being requisitioned. We
certainly had some brand new, good ground transportation that was
just turned over to us. We civilians were driving weapons
carriers to carry helium around, and to go into town to get
meals, etc.
Q: So you operated from Alamagordo Army Air Field. You
did not operate out of White Sands.
A: That is correct.
Q: There is a difference.
A: A very strong schism between the ordnance people across
the valley 50-odd miles at the proving ground, and the skeleton
group at Alamagordo Army Air Field.
Q: So there weren't many people at Alamagordo.
A: Correct. The main people I have a memory of were the
people operating what sticks in my mind as either C-5 or an M-5
radar. I knew the Signal Corps designation, the SCR-584s and
270-s, etc., but this was some new radar that had a bigger dish
on it and was on the north side of the ramp. It would have
been... This is looking toward the south. You can see here,
those are some old abandoned, those were barracks used to handle
air crew during training of World War 11. They were a l l closed
and dusty and we didn't use them. We were in barracks down
somewhere on the main base. But we were just in an enlisted
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 49

men's barracks down on the main base and there was a mess hall
that we ate lunch in, ate our meals. We were up at odd hours, as
you can see, these 3:OO otclock launchings.
Q: Who did Alamagordo report to? You indicated it was
Fort Bliss?
A: No. There was a commanding officer, and I'm not sure
which command he was in, but the people in the north area were
all, if you will, tenants. We didn't use that word, but we were
all associated, one way or another with Watson Labs.
Q: So Trakowski then, his reporting chain was...
A: His reporting chain was Watson Lab to Colonel Duffy.
Q: There was no real interface, Trakowski had no real
interface with the Alamagordo people or anyone else around 8th
Air Force.
A: There were some fancy orders that gave him a position
to talk to the commanding officer and get what he wanted, to
arrange what he wanted on the basis of orders out of Headquarters
Army Air Force.
Q: While you were operating, doing your procedure, did it
take a security monitor type person or security officer to come
by and just say I wanted to see how you were...
A: No interface at all.

Q: You don't remember any strangers poking around or....

A: No, just absolutely nothing. We were just a little
bunch of civilians there on an almost deserted base, doing what
we wanted.
Q: Going back to the orders that you mentioned, were these
some sort of special orders different from what we would
typically see as military orders?
A: Youtll have to talk to Trakowski on it, but my opinion
is that he had orders that came from a fairly high level that
introduced him and let him do what he wanted to. A s the research
changed, he didn't have to go back and get new orders. He was in
the position of doing what Crary and Peoples wanted.
Q: Like Jim and I have blanket orders that say we're
authorized to go anywhere, essentially, in the world; but was
there anything specific in those orders that said provide all
assistance requested ...
A: I suspect so. I too, have had such general orders --
do as someone may deem necessary. In fact I have a copy of my
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 50

1944 orders that say such things here. But you'll have to talk
to Trakowski. My feeling is that he and Peoples provided the
interface to the base and we just weren't bothered. We never saw
anybody in security. There was certainly nobody keeping us
secure. If anything, we were keeping ourselves secure.

Q: These are the pictures taken in General Ramey's office,

8th Air Force Headquarters by a news photographer of the Fort
Worth Star Telearam. It's four pictures that show various people
with some equipment, and I'd just like to know what you believe
that equipment tc be.
A: Joe Fletcher has written your friend Todd, and said
there's no question that's a target. The only question is that
there are people who allege this is a target that's been
substituted for the real debris, and there are also stories where
Marchelle said the picture in which he appears are the real
stuff, etc. That looks very much like our radar targets. And
youtll notice that this does look more aluminum foilish than what
I have here. It's my memory that there was good, bright,
aluminum metal foil, not painted stuff on the targets we were
using. That looks like more than one target to me in the various
pictures. That looks like the stuff we were flying.
Q: I think they talked in terms of being a rawin target in
this book.
A: It's just radio wind. There are two kinds of radio
winds --
the 400 megacycle transmitters tracked by the SCR-658,
the old bed springs; and then the radar wind. Ray Win is the
right way to say it.
Q: So the rawin would be a radar target that most of the
officers and the weather people there would have been associated
with, they would have some knowledge of?
A: Not really. . . A s I say, these came out right at the end
of the war. The warrant officer, I have a letter that he wrote
Todd, I don't know if you've seen it...
(Pause)
Q: We've got this thing narrowed down to just a few
flights. There couldn't have been... Due to your time frame,
when you were there, the rancher went on the record of saying he
picked it up the 14th or the 15th.
A: The 14th.
Q: So it would have to be in the June field trip, early in
June. You had several service flights but you also had, you
called them experimental flights. The experimental flights with
the testing...
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 51

A: The ones in early June were all service flights. In

other words, all flights we were making for Peoples, and we had
some radar test flights.

Q: So to go with the June 14th date, what type of flight

do you think would have...
A: All the balloons launched in that period would have
been meteorological balloons, 350 gram meteorological balloons,
some of them with radar targets just to test the radar out and
some of them, I'd forgotten all about it, but Crary's diary says
we had sonobuoy microphones on some of them. So that black box
that Cavitt had really began to get my attention.

Q: That would not be a radiosonde.

A: That would not be a radiosonde.

Q: What would a radiosonde look like?

A: It would be a white, usually a cardboard or a plastic
box, and the fact that we were involved in radar is because we
weren't allowed to have our radiosonde equipment. We weren't all
set up for that.

Q: You said you didn't bring it with you.

A: We didn't bring the receiver. I have t o correct
myself, we did attach radiosondes to them, to the flights
carrying microphones because there's a statement in this summary
here of radiosonde reception. Radiosonde recording. So I take
that back. Yes, we had radiosonde. But we did fly this one
mentioned here, on June 4th, out to Tulerosa range, no balloon
flight, again, on account of clouds. By that he means none of
their flights. Then 8gFlewregular sonobuoy mike on a cluster of
balloons and had good (inaudible) receiver on ground but poor on
plane.

Q: I notice early on you were going ahead with the Navy

stocked sonobuoy while Professor W i n g was trying to perfect his
technique of the low range frequency microphone.
A: Oh, the low frequency microphone, right. That's
correct.

Q: He was experimenting with both AM and FM, is that your

recollection?
A: In the laboratory, devices for measuring low frequency
acoustic waves were well known, but what he was attempting to do
was to modify these and devise something to be a throw-away
microphone and radio transmitter, so this was to build an
instrument for a certain purpose. He actually had a fGllow named
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 52

Joe Johnston, the electrical engineer at Columbia, whose name

will come up as the person who did these.
Q: But you think in these early service flights you did
have sonobouys?
A: Initially we had sonobouy, according to Crary. We
initially were flying radar targets on the balloons only. Then
by about Flight 5, we'd had sufficient lack of results that we
began putting radiosondes on.
(Pause)
Q: The end report we're going to write is going to be
based on official records, and essentially, transcripts such as
this. So there will be a lot of things, Cavitt's tape, the
transcript will not be part of that. This statement will be.
A: If you remember, there's a note in there from Dave
Atlas to Colonel Duffy, a copy of a letter. Dave mentioned
somewhere or another that Colonel Duffy took him down in the
basement and Colonel Duffy had trunkfulls of documents that were
unclassified. I wonder if it would be possible for you to
contact Mrs. Duffy ...
Q: I was wondering about what she might have.
A: She may have a great deal. Maybe in the Duffy file I
have the address and phone number. I think it's Barrington,
Rhode Island.
(Looking for name and phone number)
A: Here's a letter Todd got having to do with chasing down
modern targets, the people who now make targets, who know nothing
about this earlier affair.
Q: We talked with the Signal Corps up at Fort Monmouth and
that's where we got the copy of the engineering drawing, which is
a copy for you. They said these targets are no longer made.
They have a national stock number and they can be made, butthey
would have to go out and write a new contract for them.
A: This is the C Model. It doesn't show the
reinforcements.
Q: The young lady I talked with at Fort Monmouth indicated
this drawing pre-dated that time frame. June of ' 4 4 .
A: I'll be darned.

Q: I found that unusual when she s a i d that was June of

'44, and I didn't pick up on the designation being printed on the
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 53

side. I thought the B Model was a 1947 vintage and assumed,

wrongly so, that the C Model would have come later.
A: This, then, is really ...
So they didn't change the
numbers. It does show the little swivel there, in '44. Well, as
always, my memory can be improved.
Tibbetts, the radar lieutenant working for Fletcher, said
that when they got these in '44 there was a lot of trouble with
breakage in the air and they had to go back for reinforcement.

Q: That's where maybe the tape came in?

A: He said that's where the tape came in. Because it
certainly doesn't show this. There's just no question in my
memory, bad as it may be, that there was a tape there. That
impelled me to drag out Herbert Crow's letter. While I'm finding
that, here is a communication between Todd and a Warrant Officer
Newton, who identified things in General Ramey's office.
(Pause)
Q: It says a material like mylar. Do you have any
knowledge of when that term came into use? mylar is a
polyethylene, it's a metalized polyethylene.
A: It's not really a polyethylene, it's a polyturpoline ...
Q: I'm not a chemist.
A: It's really quite a different thing. We certainly got
involved with mylar balloons in General Mills around 1950 or
1951.

Q: Nothing that early, though.

A: I think not. It was really quite a new plastic. This
is mylar. A s you can see from the appearance, it's really quite
different than polyethylene. It's non-extensible, where this
really stretches. This scatters light and this doesn't. We have
flown mylar balloons and mylar balloons vacuum coated with
aluminum, but I think we didn't fly any in this era. It would be
my guess that someone is sort of confusing this with later
things. There were a lot of mylar balloons carried on rockets,
and it was called Jim's sphere. Someone named Jim came up with
the idea of increasing the turbulence around a following sphere
by putting a little protuberance, little combs out on it. That
was Jim's sphere. A lot of them were flown to measure winds in
the low ionosphere, flodh on rockets, from White Sands. They
could well have fallen, but to my memory, it would have been
anachronistic, out of times.
Here's a letter to me from Herbert Crow who was one of my
technicians in the 1948 operation. These pictures you saw,
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 54

including that debris, are pictures that he sent to me with that

letter and a subsequent letter. These are pictures taken by
Crow.

Q: When did Alamagordo become Holloman?

A: Probably about September of ' 4 7 .
Q: It says HAFB on the back of the truck.
A: Those pictures were taken during the Sandstone
operation in April of ' 4 8 .

Q: I take it the side arm was for protection against

rattle snakes?
A: Good question.
Q: Some of the popular writers have alleged that certain
persons were turned away by armed guards, etc.
A: Not in our area.
Q: I mean as far as the so-called...
A: Oh, out at the ranch.
 24.
Interview
[Col Jeffrey Butler and 1st Lt James
McAndrew with] Col Albert C.
Trakowski, USAF (Ret)
June 29, 1994
Colonel Albert Trakowski
29 June 1994

Q: We have [concluded] independently from several other researchers the fact that MOGUL
is probably responsible for the so-called Roswell incident... The Air Force position on that is that it was
a misidentified balloon. The balloon was not a weather balloon, but was then a classified project, Project
MOGUL,which has since been declassified.

What we have not found is any documented evidence that there was a planned cover story related
to Project MOGUL.Jim has culled through literally millions of pages in various archives and repositories
trying to find some sort of documented evidence where somebody at some level has stated that a cover
story of weather research or weather-related activities would be used for Project MOGUL,the real purpose
of which was nuclear detection...

(Pause)

A: ...All of that is to say that I know these people, and I know of what their involvement was,
so I can at least give credibility and corroboration to what it was they did and where they fit in the
picture.

There have been several writers who have been interested in this story, and they have been in
touch with me. I have given them a lot of words, and in some cases documents that I had in my personal
files. They were at first a Charles [Robert] Todd, from Ardmore, Pennsylvania, who was writing a story,
and I never quite could determine whether he was on the side of the believers in UFOs or was writing to
refute the believers. That I really was unsure of. One thing, he did appear to be sincere in getting the facts
that surrounded the matter.

Another was a Charles Ziegler, a professor of physics at Brandeis University who was writing a
monograph or perhaps a book on the history of nuclear weapons detection. It figured, of course, that
Project MOGULwould come into view. So he had done a great deal of documentary searching and had
found some documents that I did not have. For example, the original letter from Maurice Ewing to Carl
Spaatz, then Chief of Staff of the Air Force. And some of the original letters of General Spaatz directing
the establishment of Project MOGUL.All of this Charles Ziegler apparently found, and I did not have them
at all.

Another fellow recently came into view, a Carl Pflock from Albuquerque, New Mexico. He
appeared to want to substantiate the existence of the UFO incident as a UFO. I have a tape here, a one-
sided tape, my half of the conversation only, with him. You’re welcome to listen to that.

Charlie Moore has been in it since the beginning. Charlie was not a general project scientist or
engineer on Project MOGUL.His efforts were confined to the development of the constant level balloons
which were the instrument carriers for the devices that we hoped would pick up the sound waves operating
in the sound channel in the stratosphere. The constant level balloon was the lifting mechanism, and Charlie
was the principal in the development of that.

All of these things I have recorded on this tape to Mr. Pflock and also on the tapes that I made
for Ruth Liebowitz, the historian at the Air Force Cambridge Research Center.
COL TRAKOWSKI - 6/29/94 2

Maybe the best thing to do before plowing over all this old ground would be to consider some
specific questions you may have. In the course of that, the history may come out.

Q: Were there any documents, or were there any directions either from yourself or from
someone else up the chain to develop a cover story for MOGUL?

A: Not to my knowledge, no. I have never seen such a document nor have I ever heard of
any effort to develop a cover story for MOGUL.The security of MOGULwas a great concern of mine from
the very beginning, because it was like trying to hide an elephant in an open farmyard-almost ludicrous.

Q: Both Dr. Spilhaus and Professor Moore have indicated that they did use weather research
as essentially a cover story when asked questions about what they were doing.

A: Correct. That we did. I’m aware of that. But it was not a policy. It was, if anything, a
lash-up idea on the spur of the moment. And indeed, it was obvious. I may have been involved in using
such a story myself, but to the best of my recollection there was no official stimulation [sic] or
documentation of doing that. If you find such a document I, indeed, would be surprised.

Q: In the course of the research projects you worked on, in that time frame-the postwar
period-would they give you a cover story on any particular project, even other than this one? Would they
say, this is what you do, say this? Or would they kind of leave it to you, that it was a classified project
and you just didn’t discuss it and you just avoided questions?

A: The latter. I have no recollection of a cover story being used on any project that I was
involved in, nor that a prefabricated cover story existed. No. I never encountered any such thing. We
simply treated the security classification straight and did all we could to adhere to it.

Q: So you, as the project officer, you knew that MOGULwas a Top Secret...

A: Did I know that? There was no way to avoid it. I was the project officer, succeeding
Colonel Duffy, and all that history is in the tapes that I made for Ruth Liebowitz. I came into being as
the project officer on Project MOGULabout November of 1946. I had considerable background in nuclear
weapons detection, using devices that I had developed in the Signal Corps. I was an Air Force officer
assigned to the Signal Corps as part of Colonel Duffy’s office. Much to the chagrin of the Signal Corps
hierarchy, I was appointed a laboratory chief in the Signal Corps for purposes of developing instrumenta-
tion that the Air Force required, and I did that. In connection with that instrumentation, I conceived of an
application of that instrumentation for use in detection of nuclear weapons. We conducted field
experiments which at best were controversial, and at worst showed no positive result.

So my studies took me into the nuclear weapons problem. I had a background in physics-in
nuclear physics and high-energy physics and modem physics-so I had some understanding of what was
going on. I then took over the development of the original weather radar prototypes that the Air Force
required in 1946. I did that in 1946. From that position, I was transferred to Colonel Duffy’s new position
as project officer for Project MOGULin the Air Force, Watson Laboratories. I took up that task, I believe,
around November. Those dates I think are specific in the tapes I made for Ruth Liebowitz- November
of 1946. Colonel Duffy was reassigned to Wright Field, and I was the project officer. I was Top Secret
control officer in addition to other duties, it being the only Top Secret project at Watson Laboratories at
COL TRAKOWSKI - 6/29/94 3

the time, and probably ever. I remained project officer of Project MOGULthrough our move of the
laboratory from Watson Laboratories at Eatontown, New Jersey, to Cambridge, Massachusetts, and
combined my laboratory, which was then known as the Geophysical Research Directorate, with that of
John Marchetti’s Electronics Research Directorate, and these two components made up the Air Force
Cambridge Research Center.

I continued in my position of the Director of the geophysics component until May of 1949, when
I was relieved of the duty at my own request and returned to school at MIT.

Q: Until ’49, were you still on Project MOGUL?

A: Yes, indeed. And Project MX-968.

Q: You were on-site in New Mexico when Charlie Moore was doing most of his work, some
of the early launches out of Alamagordo.

A: Yes. Jim Peoples and I went down to Alamagordo in early July 1947 to assist and observe
the prototype launches being done by Charlie Moore and his crew from New York University.

Q: You said you went in July of ‘47, so you were there only in July. Was that early in July?

A: Yes, it was early in July. Again, I think those dates are in this tape of my conversation
with Mr. Pflock. It was early in July. The Roswell incident occurred after I returned to Watson
Laboratories. I wasn’t involved in it at all. Really, the only thing that I knew about it, after it happened,
was that Colonel Duffy called me on the telephone from Wright Field and gave me a story about a fellow
that had come in from New Mexico, woke him up in the middle of the night, or some such thing, with
a handful of debris, and wanted him, Colonel Duffy, to identify it.

Q: Did he identify who the person was?

A: No, I don’t remember the person at all. I don’t remember who came from New Mexico,
no.

Q: Someone came from New Mexico with this debris?

A: Yes, I believe that’s correct.

Q: They came to his quarters?

A: Yes, at Wright Field, yes. He had quarters on the base at Wright Field.

Q: Was his family there?

A: Yes.

Q: Did he identify the type of debris?

COL TRAKOWSKI - 6/29/94 4

A: He just said it sure looks like some of the stuff you’ve been launching at Alamagordo,
and he described it, and I said yes, I think it is. Certainly Colonel Duffy knew enough about radar targets,
radiosondes, and balloon-borne weather devices. He was intimately familiar with all that apparatus.

Q: What was his position at Wright Field?

A: He was on the staff of General Tom Rives who was Director of the Electronic Subdivision
of the Air Materiel Command, and under whose purview the Watson Laboratories was run.

Q: Why did they bring this debris to Colonel Duffy? Why didn’t they bring it to someone
else?

A: Probably because of questions about who knows about this project put to people at
Alamagordo. I’m not sure. I can’t answer that with any firm knowledge at all.

Q: So you had no idea there was an “incident” until Colonel Duffy called you, and you were
back in Massachusetts at this time?

A: At that time we were at Eatontown, New Jersey. But what you said is correct. I had no
knowledge of the so-called “incident” until Colonel Duffy called me.

Q: Do you recall what day you actually departed Alamagordo?

A: No. No, I don’t. I have a full file of my TDY orders upstairs. Right offhand I can’t tell
you, but I was back in Watson Laboratories for several days before Colonel Duffy called me.

Q: Do you recall there being a Major Pritchard on-site?

A: I remember the name, yes.

Q: Did he work for you at Watson Laboratories?

A: No. He didn’t work for me. I don’t recall him working for me. I only had one major
working for me, and I was a captain. He was a dull fellow... Right offhand I can’t remember.

Q: You were the Chief of the Applied Propagation Subdivision.

A: Yes.

Q: I’ve seen the organizational chart, the way those things go...

A: I was.

Q: You were at the top, and then down below, as a technical adviser, below your name on
the chart, is Major Pritchard.
COL TRAKOWSKI - 6/29/94 5

A: Is that so? I don’t remember. I simply don’t remember. But if the chart says that, I’ll go
along with the chart.

Q: Major W. D. Pritchard. On July 10th in the Alamagordo newspaper, there’s an article

where it shows, it doesn’t say when this was taken, but it says a Major Pritchard and his balloon group
are demonstrating to reporters what these balloons and the various radar reflectors look like. Now, Charlie
Moore took a look at that and said, “I don’t recall there being any other balloon group in New Mexico
or in that area at the same time we were there.”

A: I think Charlie’s right. I don’t recall any either.

Q: So we were trying to figure out whether Major Pritchard was maybe a counterintelligence-
type person or whether he was there reviewing the security procedures, or maybe he was there for
promulgating the cover story of weather balloon and weather research so that MOGULwould not come out
in the open. The article in the paper talks about the use of reflectors for tracking purposes-the radar
reflectors for tracking purposes-but it never comes out talking about MOGULand the instrumentation that
you all were using for nuclear detection or the tests that were being conducted.

A: Could Major Pritchard have been attached to or some way connected with the base
weather station at Alamagordo?

Q: Well, sir, we don’t know, but he is identified in that newspaper article as being a public
information officer. When we traced that name back to your organization, we thought he may have been
essentially undercover himself. We don’t know if that’s the same person, even though it’s the same name.

A: I’m afraid I can’t offer any positive knowledge here.

Q: Were you associated with any counterintelligence people in Watson Labs or...

A: Not to my knowledge. If some were around, they were spoofing me because I didn’t know
it.

Q: Were there any other types of intelligence persons on your staff or the staff of Watson
Laboratories?

A: Not to my knowledge.

Q: So the only people you had were actually civilian researchers...

A: And a few military officers, yes.

Q: Signal Corps and Army Air Force?

A: All the officers that I had on my staff were Air Force. I had no Signal Corps people at
all.
COL TRAKOWSKI - 6/29/94 6

Q: A few more names came off that news article where they’re displaying the balloon
launch-Maj. W. D. Pritchard, Maj. C. W. Mangum, Lieutenant Siegal, and a Capt. L. H. Dyvad.

A: None of those names are in my memory, firm in my memory, at all.

Q: You were aware of the previous Colonel Duffy’s predecessor, Major Crane...

A: I never met Richard [Robert] Crane. I knew him only by the path of debris he left behind.
I never met him.

Q: When you took over, was there any worry about security on the project, that security was
possibly a problem, or that there was a problem or that there could be a potential problem that might
warrant scrutiny by Air Force intelligence or security people?

A: We were aware of the delicacy of security on the project, and the reason was obvious. You
could not conduct field operations of the size that we had to without somebody asking questions. Anybody
with a pair of 8x50 binoculars on the side of the mountain could look down and see what was going on,
and that, of course, would prompt questions. We were aware of all that, and we didn’t really know what
to do about it except to go on doing our job and taking care of things as they occurred. But we were
aware of the sensitivity and of the weakness of security in Project MOGUL.Not from the people in the
project, not disclosure by them, but simply the obvious activity that could be observed.

You can’t fill a balloon that’s give-or-take 60 feet high without somebody seeing it.

Q: When you were at Alamagordo and some of the various balloons were being launched,
what was the largest array that you saw out there?

A: You mean payload?

Q: No, the entire assembly. The balloons, payloads, reflectors...

A: I didn’t observe any of the reflectors, and if I did, they were so commonplace that it
wouldn’t have stuck in my memory. The neoprene balloons bearing reflectors were just common
occurrences. I wouldn’t have lodged any of those observations in memory because they were just too
common.

Q: Charlie Moore has indicated that some of the balloons they tried during the early
experiments were the relatively new types of reflectors that probably had never been used in New Mexico
before, the M307B model, and that Ed Istvan had gone to several essentially toy manufacturers, to try to
get some of these reflectors made.

A: That’s correct. I don’t know [about] that Ed Istvan... Ed Istvan got out of line. Charlie may
have told you this, and I don’t mean to tell tales about Ed, but Ed was a very...indeed, every man on
Colonel Duffy’s staff was very energetic. It was the Signal Corps’ responsibility to procure those targets;
it was not the responsibility of our and Colonel Duffy’s office. However, to accelerate the activity of the
Signal Corps and spur them to action, our Air Force officers in Colonel Duffy’s office were literally on
the backs of the Signal Corps people who did the job, and oftentimes did things they shouldn’t have and
COL TRAKOWSKI - 6/29/94 7

were out of channel, so to speak. It was on such an occasion that Ed Istvan acted to line up contractors
for these targets. He got into a considerable amount of, shall we say, controversy with the Signal Corps
because he was out of line.

Q: Do you recall any of the contractors he may have worked with?

A: No, I don’t remember them by name. They were not within my purview at the time. As
I have told others, including Mr. Pflock, we had an outstanding expeditor on our staff, on Colonel Duffy’s
staff, by the name of John E. Peterson. Jack Peterson was a major at the time. He was a prewar graduate
of Harvard Business School, and he knew business operations inside and out. Again, he was an extremely
energetic fellow. He was very, very valuable and successful at breaking loose stuck contracts and stuck
production and things that weren’t moving as fast as they should. During the war that was very important.

Jack monitored the procurement of these radar targets, and I believe Ed Istvan either worked for
or alongside Jack Peterson, and I remember when they finally ... Now this was all not under my purview,
but I worked in the same building with them, and I knew Jack very well, he was a very good friend and
we talked and joked with each other a lot. I remember so clearly when the contractor for these targets was
selected, and Jack thought it was the biggest joke in the world that they had to go to a toy manufacturer
to make these radar targets. Then it was even a bigger joke when it turned out that because of wartime
scarcities of materials, the tape that they used to assemble these targets, the reflecting material on the balsa
frames, was some kind of a pinkish purple tape with a heart and flower design on it. This was, again, a
big flap.

Q: Did you ever see any of those?

A: Yeah, I saw some of them. Not in connection with my work, but they were around the
office. The prototypes were around the office, and the first production runs were there.

Q: So you would say it’s a limited number of a few runs maybe.

A: I have no idea how many hundreds were made, or even thousands. But like everything
else that goes into production, the contractors have a limited production to begin with until they work out
the bugs, and then they go full blower in the high production.

Q: Do you remember a rough span of times when you saw these: when you saw the first one,
and when you saw the last?

A: It was probably 1944 or 1945. It was probably late in 1944 when the first ones were
produced.

Q: Where did you see those? What part of the country?

A: Right there at Signal Corps. We were all working at that time, and John Peterson had his
offices at the Toms River Signal Laboratory, which was actually located on the jurisdictional lines between
Sea Girt and Springlake, New Jersey. It was an old night club that the Signal Corps had rented for the
purposes of doing remote experimentation.
COL TRAKOWSKI - 6/29/94 8

Q: The Sea Girt Inn?

A: Exactly. That’s where John had his office, and I was there for a time doing work on
developing the operational procedures of the SCR-658, the radio direction of wind- meteorological data.
Rawinsonde-I did most all the work on developing how to use that instrument, and it was done there
at the Sea Girt Inn.

Q: Do you recall any other physical attributes about the radar reflectors, the balsa wood?
Charlie Moore indicated that the material had been coated in something like Elmer’s glue which made it
much more durable. Do you recall anything like that?

A: No, I don’t. I didn’t concern myself with that except as an observation to the side. The
radar targets were geometrically elementary. There were three intersecting planes: X, Y, and Z. Their
geometry was such, as you well know, that any incident wave would be reflected exactly, precisely, in
the direction from which it came. So they were simple. I don’t recall any of the details of how they were
made, what what the materials were, what coatings were used, or anything. At the time it wasn’t within
the range of my job.

Q: Did Colonel Duffy inform you officially? When he said he called you, was this like an
official.. .

A: No. It was just an informative call. There wasn’t any official transmission of knowledge
nor expected action to result from it.

Q: Did Colonel Duffy consider this to be some sort of security violation?

A: No. Not to my knowledge, no. It was part of doing business.

Q: So he wasn’t particularly upset, and he didn’t require a formal explanation.

A: No.

Q: So that’s the first you were aware, when he called you. None of your technicians had
mentioned it to you?

A: No. Not to my knowledge.

Q: Did you have any interaction with the people at Eighth Air Force such as General Ramey
or anyone else who may have been at Roswell Army Air Field?

A: No. I don’t recall any interaction with them, no.

Q: What about Dr. Crary or Dr. Peoples? Do you know if they had interaction with the
[Eighth Air Force] folks?

A: I don’t recall any, no.

COL TRAKOWSKI - 6/29/94 9

Q: At some point in Project MOGULdid you utilize equipment based at Roswell Army Air
Field?

A: No, we had our own aircraft based at Fort Dix, New Jersey.

Q: Did you ever have a rawinsonde receiver at Roswell?

A: Not to my memory. No. We may have, but the specifics on that, I don’t recall,

Q: Can you think of any reason why Dr. Peoples would meet with one of the bomb squadron
commanders at Roswell in September of 1947?

A: Probably to arrange air drops of bombs as signal sources for testing the MOGULsound
receivers. We had a fellow who was assigned to the electronics test squadron at Fort Dix by the name of
Duff, Eugene Duff, an ordnance expert, and he may have been involved in arranging for bombs to be
exploded in the air as sound signal sources for testing the MOGULreceivers.

Q: Did you also procure aircraft from Middletown, Pennsylvania?

A: Yes. I believe our electronic squadron was moved from Fort Dix to Middletown-to
Olmstead Air Force Base. When that was, I can’t exactly pinpoint, but it was probably some time in 1947.
Gene Duff, our ordnance man, was a part of that group. I don’t know whether Gene Duff still lives or not,
but he is a name that you might look into. Eugene Duff.

Q: Has anyone asked you to explain what happened at Roswell? In your opinion, what
happened?

A: Until these recent inquiries, I don’t recall anyone asking me to explain. I don’t recall it
ever coming up for me to answer in connection with the MOGULtests. I don’t recall that. You know,
things happen every day, and you treat crises from moment to moment as though they were so much
cordwood. They aren’t all worthy of memory. But I don’t recall it.

Q: Other than our conversation here today, has anyone ever discussed with you not talking
about MOGUL?It’s essentially declassified-it is no longer a classified project-but has anyone in the
government-the Air Force, the Army, the Department of Energy, or anyone else-ever said don’t discuss
this?

A: Absolutely not. No such thing.

Q: What we’re trying to do is make sure we are open to the General Accounting Office and
to the American public as a whole when we publish our reports. So to all the people we’ve discussed this
with, we want to make absolutely certain that someone has not come to them and said, you’re going to
get in the cover story. We want this to be as open as possible and get this thing resolved once and for all.
There are going to be those individuals-as you have stated, the true believers-who may not accept what
we have to say, but we just want to try to get everything out in the open.
COL TRAKOWSKI - 6/29/94 10

A: It’s about 45 years since all of this happened. Even at the time, as I mentioned a moment
ago, one gets very busy in a project of this sort, and you treat rather large events as they come; you give
them action, and then you go on to the next. All of these events don’t stay in memory.

Q: We understand that you’ve been contacted by various people such as Mr. Pflock and Mr.
Todd, and we do appreciate your spending some time with us in this endeavor. We think it’s very valuable
for people who were actually on the scene to provide their accounts of what occurred. It is valuable to
us, and we do appreciate that.

A: I wish I could be of more help on this thing. Apparently, things like this die very hard.
(Laughter)

Q: Did you ever hear of any intelligence people getting involved in this thing? Colonel Duffy
mentioned that some of the people at AMC maybe wanted...

A: No, I don’t. Certainly no intelligence people... Certainly I was not involved with any
intelligence people in this matter. If I was, I don’t recall it. Colonel Duffy and the group at Wright Field
protected me greatly, I know that. They never said it, but I know they did because they left me free to
do the project. And if anything would interfere with getting the project done as quickly as possible, they
would try to steer that away from me. I know they did. Again, they never said it, but their actions were
obvious.

(Pause)

A: ...I was assigned for about two months to MOAT-1. Then Colonel Benjamin Holtzman,
later General Holtzman, pulled me out of MOAT-1 and sent me to Baltimore because the Air Research
and Development Command had just been organized, and I arrived on the scene while they were still
trying to find chairs and desks. We worked in the old Sun newspaper building in downtown Baltimore.

Q: They had intelligence personnel there, didn’t they?

A: They may have. I’m not aware of that. Then after I left the headquarters of ARDC in
Baltimore, I spent four years at the Air Force Research and Development Command Office in Brussels,
Belgium. Following that, I spent more than three years on the Air Staff in the Pentagon.

Q: What year did you retire?

A: On my birthday in 1963. I then went into industry, and I worked for EG&G, a high-
technology company based near Boston, and I became a Vice President of one of their subsidiaries. I
became the project manager and developer of the National Space Science Data Center at Goddard, in
Greenbelt, Maryland. I built that and set it up.

Then when the EPA, the Environmental Protection Agency, was formed in December of 1970,
I was invited to join the newly formed EPA, and I did. I accepted the position. I went into the EPA as
a Deputy Assistant Administrator in the Office of Research and Development. Then in 1973 and 1974 I
served as Assistant Administrator for Research and Development in the EPA, the position from which I
retired in 1982.
COL TRAKOWSKI - 6/29/94 11

Q: Did you have interaction with Spilhaus in your civil service career?

A: No. Oh, I met with him. Spilly was a consultant, and even in his advancing age he was
still an enormous source of ideas. If you brought him into a meeting as a consultant, surely somewhere
along the line he would offer an idea that was useful. So he found a lot of contact throughout many
organizations, particularly in those related to geophysics...meteorology, geology. I know he worked with
the U.S. Geological Survey, a very, very fine organization, and with NOAA. Those are two that I know
he continued relationships with. But I had very little contact with him.

Spilly was a very intimidating character. I lived with him for awhile.

Q: Were you involved in his exploits in North Africa, out there in the desert with him?

A: No. Nor in China.

Q: He had quite some stories about some of his past exploits.

A: No matter where he went, he gathered stories.

 25,
Drawing
Cluster Flight No, 2
 TRAIN FOR CLUSTER FLIGHT N Q 2
To Be FLOW"L\T ~IIMLIWIY,
.,,
*IMMIVLVINIA

3CILI.i err-.
ALL
U.
c..,n.rr
Lo",.-
- l''-Is'8
r
I" = 0"

TOP

I
Ar.c*ut. -3
(R.in/orc.d)

,'
aA
1'

0Cutoff 5 uib r r l i n g
0: 4&!
 28
Museums Contacted
 27 MAY 94
MFR
SUBJECT; OTHER CONTACTS ON BALLOON ACTIVITY OR AVIATION
MISHAPS THAT MAY BE RELATED TO THE "ROSWELL INCIDENT"

The following organizations and individuals have been contacted during the period 23-
27 May, concerning information on balloon activity and types of balIoons being used
for various purposes in New Mexico during 1947.

a) US Army Signal Corps Museum, Ft Gordon GA

Mr Ted Wise, Director, DSN 780-2818
''no actual balloons but will take a look for photographs, or descriptions, etc.
ref Mogul"
Ms Carol Stokes, Historian

b) US Army Communications and Electronics Command Museum, Ft Monmouth NJ

Ms Mindy Rosewitz, Curator, DSN 992-2440
"no examples or photos of balloons but did find a mechanical drawing (9 Jun
44) for an Air Pilot Balloon radar reflector" for which a copy was provided
Mr Richard Bingham, Command Historian, DSN 992- 1675
Ms Ruth Fiomartto DSN 992-5781
c) Westinghouse Electronics History Museum, Baltimore MD
Mr Robert Dwitzbe, President
"no balloon activity or balloon-borne electronics packages in the 1940's;
Westinghouse became involved in balloon "TCOM" and dirigibles in the 50s and
60s; we have no reference to Project MOGUL"
Ms Betsy xxxxxxxxxx

d) Sperry Hagley Museum

Ms Gail Dietrzyk, Curator, (304) 658-2400 ext 330
no contact as of 3 1 May--no information as to the manufacturer of the instrument
packages associated with MOGUL

e) AF/SE
Lt Col Lineberger, 3-7280
AAZ requested information related to B-29 and/or B-50 accidents in New
Mexico in 1947 and 1948--response:B-29 crashed on T/O from Albuquerque in Jan
1947 and a B-29 crashed on T/O from Walker AAF (Roswell) in Aug 1948; both had
multiple fatalities; no refueling mishaps between B-29 and B-50 in 1947/48
On 26 May A M requested information on all B-29 mishaps in the "New
Mexico" area (ie, NM and surrounding states) for the period 1947-50; information to
include specific date, crash location and number of fatalities: Lt Col Lineberger said
they were on microfilm, that all mishaps were filed chronologically and that there
were 7,000 mishap files; a manual review will take at least 60 days; I requested an
update in two weeks and a followup after the first year's entries had been reviewed

f) Smithsonian Air and Space Museum 20 May 94

Mr Tom Crouch, Aeronautics Curator, (202) 357-2515/3133
"no examples of 1947 vintage balloons; have photographs but are taken at
such a distance that no details of the balloon construction are evident; recommend
 contacting Mr James Rand (Jim) of Winzen Balloons, Sioux Falls, SD; Jim Rand is
the President and his office is at 12061 Network Blvd, Suite 200, San Antonio TX
78249 (512) 690-3400
Requested Lt Col Hachida at AIA to attempt to contact Mr Rand and
determine if he had any information relative to the construction of these early
balloons

g) Center for Military History, 14th St NW Washington DC

Dr Bennett, Curator
Dr Drea
Ms Hannah Zeidlik, Archivist (202) 504-5416
"no records of Project Mogul; recommend checking with DOE historian or the
US Army Military Institute"
h) Dr Benjamin Cooling, DOE Historian (301) 903-543 1
Dr Marie Hallion (202) 586-5238 @ Forrestal Bldg
"the AEC collection from the 1947-late 50s era has been transferred to
NARA; might check the 'Military Liaison Committee' (MLC), the military
organization associated with AEC during that time; recommend discussing this with
the AEC POC at NARA, Mr Jimmy Rush (30 1) 7 13-7250; check to see if there are
any references to AEC people/correspondence with the MLC

i) US Army Military History Institute, Carlisle Barracks PA

Mr John Slonaker, Librarian DSN 242-3611

Jeffrey Butler, Col, USAF

 I

L
 30
Statement
Irving Newton
July 21,1994
 DATE TIME LOCATION (BldglRWm N O ) AND UNIT TAKING STATEMENT REPEAT (If Known)
INSTALLATION
2 1 J u l 94 /@3D AFOSI Detachment 401 AFOSI Detachment 409 I OFFENSE
RandolDh AFB TX I COMPLAINT

NAME (Ldlf. r i m . Miuule ~rlrfldlJ SSN STATUSlGRADE

I NEWTON, IRVING USAF(RET) 0-4

LOCAL ADDRESS (Include Z I P CoaeJ DATE AND PLACE OF BIRTH (If RWurndJ

DUTY:
PERMANENT ADDRESS OR HOME OF RECORD (Include ZIP Code) MILITARY ORGANlZATlONlEMPLOYER DEROS

Same as Above USAF Retired N/A

SPONSOR INFORMATION(Njme. Grade, SSN, O ~ J n I 2 J t I O n .Duty Phone)

NIA
SECTION 111. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT O F OFFENSES A N 0 5TH AMENDMENT/ARTlCLE 3t RIGHTS ADVISEMENT (Suspect Only)

1. I have been advised that Iam suspected of the following offenses:

fi /
,

by (Rank and Full Name) who identified himselfherself as a /

(SP, special agent. etc.) and advised me that I have the following rights according to the 5th Amendment of the US Con
Uniform Code of Military Justice (suspect initials on l i n e next to eachstatement).
/
-a. Ihave the right to remain silent. that is to say nothing at all. /
-b. Any statement Imake, oral or written, may be used as evidence against me in a trial or in non-judicial, or administrativc
proceedings.

-c. Ihave the right to consult with a lawyer.

-d. Ihave the right to have a lawyer present during this interview.
- e. Imay obtain a civilian lawyer of my own choice
/
- 1. Imay request a lawyer any time during this interview.

- 9. If Idecide to answer questions with or without

- h. MILITARY ONLY: If Iwant a military

- i. CIVILIANS ONLY: If Icannot afford a me by civilian authorities.

- not wish to make a statement or answer any questions.

- not make any statement or answer any questions until Italk to a lawyer.

/
3. Ifully understan y rights and that my signature alone does not constitute an admission of guilt.

/
I/’ (Signature of SuspectJ

PREVIOUS EDITIONS A M OBSOLE T t

(Signature of Witnessllnterviewerj

rAF Form 1168, JUN 91 Page 1 %

p
ra
g
e:
 PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
s
4 u r t i o R i w t o u s c 8013. u u c 3101. a n d ~ o
9397
PRlNClPAl PURPOSES: Used ro record information and details of criminal activity which may require investigative acfion by commanaers. supervisor,
iecurity polrce. AFOSI special agents, etc Used to prow& information to the appropriate indivrduals within DOD organizations who ensure thaf
Proper legal and admininrative artion is taken
ROUTINE USES: information may be disclosed to local. county, state and federal law enforcement or invenigatory authorities for mvenigarion .rnd
DOSSible criminal prosecution or civil coun anion InfOrmdriOn extracted from this form may be used in other related criminal andlor civil proceedings
DlSClOSURE IS VOLUNTARY. SSN is used to posirively identify the individual making the natement and as a conduit to check past criminal actwit)
records
tECTION I V STATEMENT

THIS PAGE USED FOR SIGNATURE ONLY. TEXT OF STATEMENT BEGINS ON PAGE 3

I"I hereby volunt

inducement. Isw&
ily and of my o w n free will make this Statement without having k e n subjected t o any coercion. unlawful influence. or unlawful
. it is true-t-
(%affirm) Ihave read this statement. initialed all pages and c o ~ i o n sand t o the best of my knowledge."

ISubscribed and sworn t o before mrrrama authorized bv law t o administer oaths. this
n 2 1st dav of J u l v 19 96

M I I O N VI. INSTRUCTIONSFOR CONTINUATION PAGEfS)

Use plain bond paper (both sides optional). At the top t i ht of each e, print or type: .(Lair Name ofmdividudl making rhe Statement) on (Datcj '*
At the bottom of each page, print or type: 'Page- 010- Pages . !he individual must initial the top and bottom entries and sign hisher name at
the bottom of each page.
AF Form 1168, JUN 91 IREVERSE) 'Ud. acmmm( Pfhnngomca to81 - 21141140159 P a g e c 3Pages
+A
I was asked to provide this statement, by Lt. Col. Joseph V. Rogan who advised
me, he was assisting in an investigation at the behest of the Secretary of the
Air Force, for the GAO, to look into facts concerning what has become to be known
, as "The Roswell Incident''.dc<
4 , A s I recall it was July 1941, I was then a Warrant Officer with seven years
/

service. I was the only weather forecaster on duty in the Fort Worth base weather
and flight service center. The base weather covered only the base the flight
service center covered most of the southwest states. I received a call from some
one in General Ramey's office who asked that I go to the General's office. I
informed him that I was the only forecaster on duty and could not leave. Several
minutes later General Ramey Himself called and said "qet your ass over here If
you don't have a car take the first one with a key". -sCt, .
&,, ,I was met at the General's office by a Lt Col or Col who told me that some one
had found a flying saucer in New Mexico and they had it in the General's Office.
And that a flight had been set up to send it to Wright Patterson AFB OH., but
the General suspicioned that it might be meteorological equipment or something
of that nature and wanted it examined by qualified meteorological personnel.
The Col and I walked into the General's office where this supposed flying
saucer was lying all over the floor. As soon as I aw it, I giggled and asked
R

fA.
if that was the flying saucer. I was told it was.
L
Several people were in the room when I went in, among them, General Ramey,
&a couple of press people, a Major, I learned to be Major Marcel and some other
folks. Someone introduced Major Marcel as the person who found this material.
I told them that this was a balloon and a RAWIN target. I believed this because
I had seen many of these before. They were normally launched by a special crew
and followed by a ground radar unit. They provided a higher altitude winds
aloft. We did not use them at Fort Worth. However, I was familiar with them
because we used them and their products on various projects in which I was
involved. These were used mostly on special projects and overseas. The balloon
was made out of a rubber type expandable material and when launched was about
six to eight feet across. When the balloons got to altitude they expanded to
twenty feet or more. The target was used for radar reflections and I believe each
leg of the target was approximately 48 inches. It resembled a child's Jack (like
a child's ball and jacks set) with a metallic material between the legs. The legs

2%
L.
were made of material appearing to be like balsa wood kite sticks but much
tougher.
While I was examining the debris, Major Marcel was picking up pieces of the
-target sticks and trying to convince me that some notations on the sticks were
alien writings. There were figures on the sticks lavender or pink in color,
appeared to be weather faded markings,with no rhyme or reason. He did not
,convince me these were alien writings..&$ .
&,I was convinced\at the time that this was a balloon with a RAWIN target and
.remain convinced.& .
+,$J remember hearing $he General tell someone to cancel the flight the flight
$0 Wright Patterson. +A,
JZ54Jhile in the offilce several pictures were taken of Major Marcel, General Ramey,
yself and others.&,
5
I 'I

,..I was dismissed'and went to my office to resume my normal duties.d'.

fiDuring the ensuing years I have been interviewed by many authors, I have been
quoted and misquoted. The facts remain as indicated above. I was not influenced
during the original interview, nor today, to provide anything but what I know
to be true, that is, the material I saw in General Ramey's office was the
remains of a balloon and a RAWIN target.
&, Page three of three
Photographs
ML-307CIAP Device with Vintage
 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON OC 20330-1 0 0 0

OFFICB OF THE CECRETARY

JUL 2 7 i994

MEMORANDUM FOR SAF/AAZ

ATTENTION: Colonel Richard L. Weaver
FROM: SAFIAAZD
1720 Air Force Pentagon
Washington, DC 20330-1720

SUBJECT: Report of Findings on Balloon Research

The following report is submitted in support of findings developed as a result of research

efforts conducted at your request in support of the General Accounting Office (GAO) audit that
focused on obtaining information relative to the so-called 'Roswell Incident.'

Previously you were separately provided a liqt of the locations and records searched in
regard to that endeavor. This is in addition to other materials and briefings previously provided.
The focus of this paper is to concentrate on those findings developed regarding balloon operations
that were taking place in New Mexjco during the time fiame in question.

The following was compiled fiom records reviews and in some case, interviews with
participants. Where appropriate, copies of the source documents used are provided as
attachments. In the case of interviews or other references that are attached to the main report,
these will be reflected in the footnotes, but not attached here.

&4id,ik
THE ROSWELL INCIDENT

On July 7, 1947, W.W. (Mac) Brazel, a rancher from approximately 75 miles

northwest of Roswell, NM, contacted the local sheriff and reported that sbme
metallic debris had come to rest on the ranch on which he worked near the town
of Corona, NM. This was during the "UFO Wave of 1947," and he told the sheriff
that he thought this debris may be part of a "flying disc."' The sheriff contaqted
Roswell (Army Air Field) AAF, which in turn sent intelligence officer, Maj Jesse
Marcel, and two Counterintelligence Corps Agents, Capt Sheridan Cavitt and
MSgt Lewis Rickett, to evaluate the debris. The officers collected a portion of the
material and brought it back to Roswell AAF on the evening of July 7.' !The
following day, the Public Information Officereleased a statement saying that the
Army Air Forces had recovered a flying disc. This press release was provided to
local newspapers who sent it out to wire services. Meanwhile, Brig Gen Roger
Ramey, Eighth Air Force Commander, ordered that the debris be flown to Eighth
Air Force Headquarters at Fort Worth AAF, TX, for his personal inspection. U on
viewing the debris, he and his staff recognized parts which looked similar o a
weather balloon. He then summoned the base weather officer, who identified'the
P
debris as the remnants of a weather balloon and its attached metallic radar target.3
General Ramey then invited the local press to view and take photographs of 1 the
materials and he declared the episode to be a misunderstanding (Atch 1).

The above summarizes the previously reported information of what happened on

July 7 and 8,1947. Before now, however, a larger portion of the story was neiver
told. Recent research indicates that the debris recovered from the ranch on July
7, 1947, was a weather balloon-but it was not being used strictly for weai/her
purposes; its real purpose was to carry classified payloads for a Top Secret US
Army Air Forces project. The project's classified code name was MOGUL.

The current investigation discovered that an experimental balloon project was

being conducted at nearby Alamogordo Army Airfield (now Holloman AFB, NM)
during the summer of 1947.4 An examination of unclassified technical and
progress reports prepared by the balloon project revealed that a highly classified
program, Project MOGULwas the ultimate reason for the balloon experiments.
Project MOGULwas classified Top Secret and carried a priority level of lA.5 It is
Project MOGULthat provides the ultimate explunation for the "Roswell Incident."

1. Roswell Daily Record, Jul 9, 1947, p. 1.

2. Intvw, Col Richard L. Weaver with Lt Col Sheridan Cavitt, USAF (Ret), May 24, 1994,
3. Intvw, Lt Col JosephV. Rogan with Irving Newton, Jul21, 1994.
4. Ltr, Lt Col Edward A. Doty to Mr David Bushnell, Mar 3, 1959.
5. Ltr, Brig Gen E. ODonnell, Deputy Chief, Engineering Division, HQ AMC, to Commanding
General, USAAF,subj: Change in Classification of MOGUL, Item 188-5, Jul8,1946.
PROJECT MOGUL
Project MOGUL was first conceived by Dr. Maurice Ewing of Columbia University,
NY, and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, MA. Dr. Ewing had conducted
considerable research for the Navy during World War 11, studying, among other
things, the "sound channel" in the ocean. He proved that explosions could be
heard thousands of miles away with underwater microphones placed at a
predetermined depth within the sound channel. He theorized that since sound
waves generated by explosions could be carried by currents deep within the
ocean, they might be similarly transmitted within a sound channel in the upper
atmosphere. The military application of this theory was the long-range detection
of sound waves generated by Soviet nuclear detonations and the acoustical
signatures of ballistic missiles as they traversed the upper atmosphere. He
presented his theory to General Carl Spaatz, Chief of Staff of the Army Air
Forces, in the fall of 1945.6The project was approved, and research was begun by
the scientific research agency of the US Army Air Forces (USAAF), the Air
Materiel Command (AMC), early in 1946, The project was assigned to HQ AMC,
Engineering Division, Electronics Subdivision, which in turn assigned the project
to AMC's Watson Laboratories, Engineering Division, Applied Propagation
Subdivision, located in Red Bank, NJ.

SCOPE

Project MOGULinitially focused on three areas of technology: (1)an expendable

microphone, capable of detecting, at long range, low-frequency sound transmis-
sions generated by explosions and missiles; (2) a means of telemetering these
sounds to a ground or airborne receiver; and (3) a system from which to suspend
the microphone and telemetering device in the upper atmosphere for an extended
period of time. To meet these criteria, contracts were awarded by AMC to
Columbia University (AMC contract no. W28-099-ac-82) for the acoustical
equipment, and to New York University (NYU) for the development of constant-
level balloons (AMC contract no. W28-099-ac- 241). After the initial contracts
were awarded, Project MOGULbranched out into many areas related to the
geophysical properties of the upper atmosphere, including radiowave propaga-
tion, radar propagation, ionospheric physics, solar physics, terrestrial magnetism,
meteorological physics, and weather forecasting. Considerable resources were
devoted to Project MOGULwhich included numerous bomber and transport
aircraft and two oceangoing vessels. At one point the staff, exclusive of contrac-
tors, numbered over 100 persons. To accommodate this sensitive, high-priority
project, facilities of the secluded Oakhurst Field Station of Watson Laboratories
were used. Balloon operations associated with Project Mogul were conducted at
various locations throughout the United States and the Pacific, the latter in
reference to acoustical detection research associated with the Sandstone atomic
tests at Entiwetok Atoll in April and May 194€L7

6. Rprt, Maurice Ewing for General Carl Spaatz, "Long Range Sound Transmission in the
Atmosphere," n.d.
7. Rprt, HQ Fitzwilliam Fwd, "Sonic Balloon Test Kwajalein," May 17,1948 (hereafter "Sonic
By December 1948, serious concerns had arisen regarding the feasibility of the
project as first conceived. Even though the principle on which the project was
based was determined to be sound, questions concerning cost, security, and
practicality were discussed that ultimately led to the disbandment of the praject,
and Project MOGULas first conceived was never put into operational luse.
However, MOGULdid serve as the foundation for a comprehensive program in
geophysical research from which the USAF and the scientific community have
benefited to the present time. These benefits included constant-level balloon
technology, first developed by NYU for Project MOGUL.

WATSON LABORATORIES

The organizational structure of Watson Laboratories Applied Propagdtion

Subdivision, which was established primarily for MOGUL, as it appeared in
January 1947, is shown in Attachment 2. Over the course of the project, M ~ G U L
had three military project officers, or "chiefs": Maj Robert T. Crane, splring
1946-July 1946; Col Marcellus Duffy, August 1946-January, 1947; and Capt Albert
C. Trakowski, January 1947-May 1949. Major Crane had been personally
recommended by Dr. Ewing, originator of the project, but by June of 1947, M ~ G U L
had not met the expectations of HQ USAAF, and Colonel Duffy replaced Major
Crane.* Colonel Duffy was a respected, highly capable career Army Air Farces
officer. During World War 11, Colonel Duffy had reported directly to General Hap
Arnold, Chief of Staff USAAF, as the Army Air Forces Liaison Officer to the US
Army Signal Corps, with primary duties for securing meteorological equipment
from the Army for use by the USAAF. Colonel Duffy had a reputatioq for
accomplishing difficult assignments by getting the most out of his per8on-
nel-exactly what was desired by HQ USAAF to solve the numerous admini$tra-
tive and personnel problems that had arisen in Project MOGULunder Major
Crane. In a short period, Colonel Duffy was able to make the necessary cofrec-
tions and was reassigned to become the Assistant Chief, Electronics Plans Section,
Electronics Subdivision, HQ AMC, at Wright Field, OH. Colonel Duffy lalso
continued to monitor "the upper air research program" (i.e., Project M o G ~in)
addition to his duties as the Assistant Chief of the Electronics Plans Se~tion.~
The
primary scientist for MOGULwas Dr. James Peoples, assisted by Albert P. Caary,
the Field Operations Director. Both scientists had previous associations with Dr.
Ewing: Dr. Peoples at Columbia, and A.P. Crary at Woods Hole. Both s c i e ~ s t s
were assigned to MOGULfor the entire length of the project.

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY "BALLOON GROUP"

From September 30, 1946, until December 31, 1950, the Research Division offthe
College of Engineering of NYU conducted research under contract for the AKmy

Balloon Test Kwajalejn").

8. Memo, Brig Gen Tom C. Rives, Chief, Electronic Subdivision, Engineering Division, W C ,
to Maj Gen Curtis LeMay, subj: Relief of Major Crane as Project Officer MOGULand TORRID,Jun
18, 1946.
9. Memo, Maj Gen Curtis E. LeMay, Deputy Chief of Air Staff for Research and Develop
to Maj Gen L.C. Craigie, Chief Engineering Division, AMC, Apr 16, 1947.
Air Forces, in conjunction with Project The NYU "balloon group" was
to develop and fly constant-level balloons while simultaneously developing
telemetering equipment to transmit data obtained in the upper atmosphere."
Group members launched, tracked, and recorded data only in regard to constant-
level balloon flight and telemetering of information. They did not have access to
observations and measurements that had military applications. MOGUL,in other
words, was conducted as a compartmented, classified project in which partici-
pants knew only what they needed to know, and no more. Due to the compart-
mentation, balloon flights made by NYU were divided into two categories,
"research and "service."12Research flights tested balloon controls and telemeter-
ing systems and were fully reported in the unclassified NYU reports.l3A total of
110 research flights were flown during the contract. Service flights were flown at
the direction of Watson Laboratory personnel, but the military purpose was Top
Secret. These flights carried classified equipment, which could not be fully
reported in the unclassified NYU documents. Further evidence of the exclusion
of classified information from the reports is the lack of data for balloons flown in
association with the Sandstone nuclear tests held in April and May of 1948.14In
recent interviews with former NYU personnel, Dr. Athelstan F. Spilhaus, NYU
Director of Research, and Professor Charles B. Moore, NYU Constant-Level
Balloon Project Engineer, stated that they were never informed of the classified
name, MOGUL,nor did they ever have access to the scientific data that was
obtained by the USAAF as a result of their efforts. In response to inquiries,
professional or casual, project personnel simply said that they were engaged in
balloon re~earch.'~

The first balloon launches associated with Project M O G were ~ carried out at
several locations on the east coast of the United States.16However, unfavorable
winds, conflicts with commercial air traffic, and the need to gather data on the V-
2 flights currently being conducted at White Sands Proving Ground, NM, led the
NYU group to conduct further tests from Alamogordo AAF.17 The NYU group
would make three "field trips" during the summer of 1947 for test and evaluation,
labeling them Alamogordo I, 11, and 111. The majority of the balloon flights over
the next four years originated from Alamogordo AAF.

10. Research Division, College of Engineering, NYU, Technical Report No. 93.03, Constant Level
Balloons, Final Report, Mar 1, 1951 (hereafter NYU, Final Report), p. 3.
11. Research Division, College of Engineering, NMJ, Technical Report 93-02, Constant Level
Balloons,
Sect 1, General, Nov 15, 1949, p. 5.
12. NYU, Final Report, p. 13.
13. Research Division, College of Engineering, NYU, Technical Report No. 1, Constant Level
Balloon, Apr 1, 1948, Table VII, "Summary of NYU Constant-Level Balloon Flights" (hereafter
NYU, Technical Report No. 1, Table VII); ibid., Technical Report No. 93.02, Constant Level Balloons,
Sect 3, S u m m a y of Flights.
14. "Sonic Balloon Test Kwajalein."
15. Athelstan F. Spilhaus, C.S. Schneider, C.B. Moore, "Controlled-AltitudeFree Balloons,"
Journal of Meteorology, 5 (Aug 1948): 130-137.
16. NYU, Technical Report No. 1, Table VII.
17. Research Division, College of Engineering, NYU, Progress Report No. 6, Constant Level
Balloon, Sect 11, June 1947 (hereafter Progress Report No. 6, Sect 11), p. 4.
New York University, in accordance with contractual requirements, produced
monthly progress reports, technical reports, and final reports detailing the various
aspects of the balloon and telemetering research. In addition, Crary mainmined
a detailed journal of his work throughout his professional career to include the
summer of 1947. The following discussion is based on these two documentls and
interviews with Moore, who was present on all three of the Alamogorda field
trips, and, with Trakowski, who was present at the Alamogordo 11 and 114 field
trips.

NOTE: Technical Report No. 1, Table VII, ”Summary of NYU ConstantlLevel

Balloon Flights,” and Technical Report No. 93.02, Constant Level Balloons, Section
3, “Summary of Flights,” do not fully account for all balloons flown duriqg the
initial stages of the contract to include the Alamogordo I field trip. Absent1from
the reports are service flight nos. 2,3, and 4. Flight no. 2 was flown on April 18,
1947, at Bethlehem, PA, in an attempt to obtain acoustical data from the explosion
of 5,000 tons of TNT by the British on the German island of Helgoland.’* , W U
flight no. 3 was flown on May 29, followed by NYU flight no. 4 on June 4., Both
launched from Alamogordo AAF.

ALAMOGORDO I (May 28, 1947-June 7,1947)

The first NYU ”field trip” departed Olmstead Field, Middletown, PA, by C-47 for
Alamogordo AAF on May 31, 1947, arriving on June 1, 1947.” Present ov this
flight was C.B. Moore, NYU Project Engineer, Charles S. Schneider, NYU Project
Director, and other supporting staff members from both NYU and Watson
Laboratories. A.P. Crary, along with other personnel from Watson Laborqtory,
were already present in Alamogordo, but they did not conduct any bqlloon
operations. During this time, Crary and several technicians detonated gnound
explosives, or ”shots,” for sound-wave generation purposes, on the nearby White
Sands Proving Ground. These detonations were monitored by ground-based GR3
and GR8 sound ranging equipment at locations in New Mexico and West Tqxas.20
On May 28, the advance party of the balloon group arrived by B-l7.’l On May
29, the advance team made the first launch for Project MOGULfrom Alamogordo
(NYU flight no. 3). The equipment carried on this flight was identified as
essentially the same as that carried on NYU flight no. 2 (Atch 3 ).” NYU flight no.
4 was launched on June 4, with a configuration the same as on flight nos. 2 and
3. Crary’s diary indicated that flight no. 4 consisted of a “cluster of (meteorologi-
cal) balloons” and a ”regular sonobuoy.”UPresumably, flight no. 3 was config-
ured the same.

18. Research Division, College of Engineering, NYU, Special Report No. 1, Constant Level l+dloon,
May 1947 (hereafter NYU, Special Report No. I ) , p. 27.
19. Personal journal of Albert P. Crary, p. 13.
20. Ibid., pp. 4-16.
21. Ibid., p. 13.
22. NYU, Progress Report No. 6, Sect 11, p. 5.
23. Crary personal journal, p. 12.
The objective of this trip, so far as NYU was concerned, was to perfect the
handling of large flight trains of meteorological balloons and to evaluate the
operations of altitude controlling and telemetering devices." Already established
before the trips to Alamogordo was that the use of the standard, 350-gram
meteorological balloons, constructed of neoprene, was, at best, a "stop gap"
method of achieving constant-level flight.25Balloons most suitable for this type of
work were made of polyethylene, a very thin, translucent plastic. These balloons,
however, had just been developed, and, although the NYU group had contracted
for some of them, the balloons had not been received until after the group
departed for Alamogordo.26For Watson Laboratory scientists Peoples and Crary,
the purpose of this trip was to experiment with different types of equipment to
collect and transmit sound waves in the upper atmosphere. Therefore, just as the
"balloon group" was using meteorological balloons as a stopgap method in
attaining constant-level flight, the Watson Laboratory scientists utilized an
AN/CRT-1A Sonabuoy while awaiting the delivery of acoustical equipment
specifically designed for Project MOGUL.'^ The NYU personnel developing the
telemetering equipment experimented with components of the sonabuoy, which
was cylindrical, nearly 3 feet long and 4 3/4 inches wide, and weighing 13
pounds (Atch 4). The sonabuoy contained both the acoustical pickups, known as
hydrophones, and the means of telemetering the sounds by use of a FM transmit-
ter, the T-1B /CRT-1.

Soon after arriving at Alamogordo AAF,a problem developed. Dr Peoples, Project

Scientist, decided not to bring the radiosonde recorder (an AN/FMQl weighing
approximately 500 pounds), due to the weight and space limitations of the B-17
aircraft originally scheduled to transport the equipment from Olmstead Field.
Radiosondes were a widely used and accurate method of tracking weather
balloons consisting of a transmitter, which was carried aloft by the balloon, and
a ground-based receiver/ recorder. Radiosondes, along with aircraft, were to be
the primary method to track the Project MOGULballoons.28Dr. Peoples, however,
believed that the radar currently in place at Alamogordo for tracking V-2 firings
would be sufficient for tracking the balloons trains. However, this radar did not
work well and often lost contact with the balloon while it was still within visual
range. Accordingly, Moore, the project engineer, experimented with an "unortho-
dox" method, in the absence of a radiosonde recorder. He tried to track the
balloons using multiple radar targetsz9A radar target was a multisided object,
which, in appearance, resembles a box kite constructed of balsa wood and
metallicized paper (Atch 5). Moore and his technicians conducted test flights,
attempting to obtain a better radar return by attaching additional targets. They

24. Research Division, College of Engineering, NYU, Progress Report No. 7, Constant Level
Balloon, Sect II, Jul 1947 (hereafter NYU, Progress Reporf No. 7, Sect 11), p. 5.
25. NYU, Special Reporf No. I, p. 26.
26. NYU, Progress Report No. 7, Sect 11, p. 6.
27. Research Division, College of Engineering, NYU, Progress Report No. 4, Radio Transmitting,
Receiving and Recording System for Constant Level Balloon, Sect I, Apr 2, 1947, p. 1.
28. Intvw, Col Jeffrey Butler and 1st Lt JamesMcAndrew with Professor Charles B. Moore,
Jun 8,1994.
29. Moore intvw, Jm 8,1994.
received satisfactory results when the number of targets was increased to betyeen
3 and 5.30Interestingly, during July of 1948, a similar test would be made at
Alamogordo AAF by another ~rganization.~~ This test confirmed Moore's Geory
that when targets were increased to at least three, satisfactory returns were
received by the radar. This procedure, according to Moore, was employe@on
flight nos. 3 and 4, but it was only marginally successful. This prompted Moore
and his associates to configure the two remaining flights of Alamogordo I, flights
#5 and #6, with radiosonde transmitters.

For these two final flights, Moore devised a method of manually determbing
azimuth and elevation, in the absence of a radisonde recorder, by counting caicks
as pressure-sensitive contacts closed. NYU Technical Report No. 1 shows 1 two
"interpretations" of the data which confirm that manual calculations were ysed.
In regard to flight no. 5, it appears there was a typographical error in Techpical
Report No. 1, Table VII, for the time of launch which is erroneously listed as 1517
MST, contrary to figures 32 and 33 in Technical Report No.1 and Crary's diary
(Atch 6). The correct time of launch for flight no. 5 appears to be 0516 MST. With
the launching of flight no. 6 at approximately 0530 on June 7, the NYU group
departed Alamogordo via a B-17 for Newark AAF, NJ. NYU flight nos. 1 4 are
summarized below:

SUMMARY OF FLIGHTS 1-6

Flight no. Date Launch Site Configuration Landing Site

1 4/3/47 Bethlehem, PA See NYU Tech. Report Sandy Hook, NJ
No.I, Table VII
2 4/18/47 Bethlehem, PA See Appendix NYU Unknown
Special Report No. 1

3 5/29/47 Alamogordo, NM Same as flight no. 2* Unknown

4 6/4/47 Alamogordo, NM Same as flight no. 2* Unknown

5 6/5/47 Alamogordo, NM See NYU Tech. Report East of Roswell, NM

No. I, Table VII

6 6/7/47 Alamogordo, NM See NYU Tech. Report South of Hjghrolls, NM

No. 1, Table VII

* Depictions of flight nos. 3 and 4 are not provided in the NYU reports. According to NYU Progress Report
No. 6, Section 11, p. 5, the equipment to be used for the Alamogordo field trip in June was consistent with
the depiction of flight no. .2. This information also concurred with Crary's partial description of flight no. 4
in his diary.

Note: An attempt to launch a balloon-train assembly which would have been NYU flight no. 3 was #made
on May 8,1947, but due to strong winds, restraining lines failed before the acoustical payload was attached.
Since the launch was unsuccessful, no flight number was assigned.

30. %id.
31. Rprt, Holloman AFB, "Progress Summary Report on U.S.A.F. Guided Missile Test
Activities," Vol 1, Aug 1, 1948.
ALAMOGORDO I1 (June 27,1947-July 8,1947)

On the morning of June 28,1947, personnel from NYU and Watson Laboratories
arrived at Alamogordo AAF to resume balloon flights. Present during this field
trip were Dr. Peoples, A.P. Crary, Captain Trakowski, C.B. Moore, and Charles
Schneider. The objective during this trip was to experiment with the newly
developed polyethylene balloons which replaced the neoprene meteorological
balloons used on the previous field trip. Also tested was an improved aluminum
ballast reservoir that had been developed to replace the plastic tubes used during
the June field trip.32Another improvement that resulted from the experiences in
June was the presence of a radiosonde receiver/recorder for improved balloon
tracking and plotting. This eliminated the need for radar ”corner reflectors” on
the balloon train since radar was not to be used as a primary method of tracking
the flights. This is confirmed by Technical Report No. 1, Table VII, ”Radiosonde
Reception %,” which indicates the use of the radiosonde recorder on all flights
except for no. 7. Flight no. 7 was not recorded by radiosonde because the
equipment was not operable.33Also Figures 36,39,42, and 44 in Technical Report
No. 1, corresponding to the July flights, do not depict corner reflectors. All-
numbered flights (except for no. 9) flown during the July field trip were summa-
rized in NYU Technical Report No 1, Table VII. Flight no. 9 appeared to have
been launched on July 3.34On July 8, their work completed, 23 members of the
combined NYU and Watson Laboratory group boarded a C-54 aircraft at 1030 AM
and returned to the east coast.%

Based on the above, it appeared likely that the debris found by the rancher and
was subsequently identified as a ”flying disc” by personnel from Roswell AAF
was, with a great degree of certainty, MOGULflight no. 4, launched on June 4,
1947. This conclusion was based on the following:

1. Descriptions of the debris provided by Brazel, Cavitt, Crary’s diary, and the
photos of the material displayed in General Ramey’s office. These materials were
consistent with the components of a MOGULservice flight, with neoprene
balloons, parchment parachutes, plastic ballast tubes, corner reflectors, a sona-
buoy, and a black electronics box that housed the pressure cutoff switch (Atch 3).

2. According to Brazel’s July 8 statement, the debris was recovered on June 14,
obviously eliminating any balloons launched in July.

3. Only two flights launched in June were unaccounted for, i.e., flight nos. 3 and
4. Flight no. 3, most likely would not have had the ”unorthodox” configuration
of corner reflectors devised by Moore, who did not arrive until June 1, three days
after flight no. 3 was launched.

32. NYU, Progress Report No. 7, Sect 11, p. 5.

33. Crary personal journal, p. 15.
34. Ibid.
35. Ibid., p. 16.
On July 7, as the NYU group members were winding down their work and
preparing to return to New York City, a train of events began to unfold at
Roswell AAF, 60 miles away. Roswell AAF was home of the 509th Bomb Group
of the Strategic Air Command's Eighth Air Force, the only unit in the world
capable of delivering nuclear weapons. It now appears that the debris from
MOGULflight no. 4 had come 'to earth on the plains east of the Sacramento
Mountains, about 70 miles from the launch point at Alamogordo AAF (Atch 7).
The fact it descended there was not unusual. Over the course of Project ~ . ~ ~ o G u L ,
several balloons had landed and been recovered from that area. In fact, in August
1947, the NYLJ group had to receive special permission from the Civil Aerorjautics
Administration to continue to launch balloons from Alamogordo AAFl since
"balloons have been descending outside of the area [White Sands Pltoving
Ground] in the vicinity of Roswell, New According to the sole living
participant in the recovery, Sheridan Cavitt, he, Major Marcel, and MSgt Nilliam
Rickett gathered some of the material, which appeared to resemble "bamboo type
square sticks, one quarter to one half inch square," that was "very light"-rdlect-
ing material-and a "black box, like a weather instrument." Cavitt believeld this
material to be consistent with what he knew to be a weather balloon. This debris,
would soon become, for a short time, the focus of national and even worldwide
attention when it was thought to be a "flying disc."

On July 8, the same day that the NYLJ/Watson Laboratory group departed
Alamogordo, the Public Information Office of Roswell AAF announced the
recovery of a "flying disc" and that it would be flown to Fort Worth AAF for
further examination. How could experienced military personnel have conficlsed a
weather balloon for a "flying disc"? The answer was this was not an ordinary
"weather balloon." Typical weather balloons employed a single, 350-gram
neoprene balloon and a radiosonde for measuring temperature, atmospheric
pressure, and humidity, housed in a cardboard box. If it was to be tracked by
radar for wind-speed measurement, a single corner reflector was added (Atch 8).
The balloon that was found on the Foster Ranch consisted of as many as 2p 350-
gram balloons spaced at 20 foot intervals, several radar targets (3 to 5), plastic
ballast tubes, parchment parachutes, a black "cutoff" box containing portions of
a weather instrument, and a sonabuoy (Atch 3). After striking the ground, the
radar reflectors, constructed of very light materials for minimum weight, would
tear and break apart, spreading out over a large area when pulled across the
ground by balloons that still possessed some buoyancy. It should a4so be
understood that the term "flying disc" was not at this time synonymou$ with
"space ship," It denoted a disc-shaped flying object of unknown (or suspected
Soviet) origin.

Before the announcement was made, the "disc" was flown to Fort WorthlAAF,
at the direction of Brig Gen Roger Ramey, Commander, Eighth Air Force. General
Ramey personally inspected the "disc," became skeptical, and summoned the base

36. NYU, Technical Report No. 1, Table VII, p. 43.

weather officer, Warrant Officer Irving Newton, to make an identification.
Newton positively identified the debris as the remnants of a balloon and RAWIN
target.37With this identification, the incident officially closed.

THE ”COVER STORY”

From research, it appears that the wreckage displayed on July 8 consisted of
unclassified components of a MOGULballoon assembly. Possibly withheld, if it
was indeed recovered, was the AN/CRT-1 Sonabuoy, which could have compro-
mised Project MOGUL.Although the Sonabuoy was not itself classified, its
association with a balloon would have exposed a specific military purpose, an
obvious violation of project classification guidelines (Atch 9). A device described
in ”crashed disc” publications as “a giant thermos jug” was allegedly transported
from Fort Worth AAF to Wright Field.38This description is consistent with the
appearance of an AN/CRT-1 Sonabuoy such as was used on flight no. 4 (Atch
4). At some point General Ramey decided to forward the material to Wright Field,
home of AMC, the appropriate agency to identify one of its own research devices
or a device of unknown origin. If the debris was determined to be from an
unknown source, the AMC, T-2, Intelligence or Analysis Division, would conduct
scientific and/or intelligence analysis in an attempt to discover its origin. But
since the balloons, reflectors, and Sonabuoy were from an AMC research project,
the debris was forwarded to the appropriate division or subdivision, in this case
the Electronics Subdivision of the Engineering Division. There, it was identified
by Colonel Duffy, under whose purview Project MOGUL operated. Colonel Duffy,
a former project officer of MOGULwith specific directions to ”continue to monitor
upper air programs,” was the appropriate headquarters officer to make an
identification, which he apparently did. According to Captain (now Colonel)
Trakowski, the officer who succeeded Colonel Duffy as project officer on MOGUL,
after returning from the Alamogordo I1 field trip, Colonel Duffy contacted him
by phone at Warson Laboratories and informed him that the ”stuff you’ve been
launching at Alamogordo,” had been sent to him for identification. He described
the debris to Captain Trakowski, and Trakowski agreed that it was part of his
project (MOGUL).39

Another occurrence sometimes said to ”prove” that General Ramey was part of
a cover story is that portions of the debris were flown to Andrews AAF, MD.
Andrews would have been a probable location to send the debris since it had
components of weather observation equipment. Andrews AAF was headquarters
of the Army Air Forces Weather Service. It is also interesting to note that the
commanding general of the Weather Service, Brig Gen Donald N. Yates, was
quoted in wire service newspaper articles on July 9, providing his opinion of the

37. Rawin is short for radar wind, a technique in which a single comer reflector is towed aloft
by a single neoprene balloon to measure wind speed by radar.
38. Kevin Randall and Donald Schmitt, UFO Crush at Roswell (New York, 1991), p. 103.
39. Intvw, Col Jeffrey Butler and 1st Lt James McAndrew with Col Albert C. Trakowski, USAF
(Ret), Jun 29, 1994, p. 4.
incident. Additionally, in 1949, General Yates received a full briefing of the
projects, including constant-level balloons, that made up Project MOGUL.^' While
crashed disc proponents claim that General Ramey ordered a ”colonel caurier”
to transport portions of the debris in a briefcase handcuffed to his wrist ior the
inspection of his superior, Maj Gen Clement McMullen, Deputy Commander of
Strategic Air Command, it is more likely that any forwarding of such debris was
another attempt to identify the research agency to which it belonged. If it did go
to General McMullen, it would not have been difficult for him to have obtained
the opinion of the Weather Service, since SAC and the Weather Service were
located in the same building (no. 1535) at Andrews AAF.

”HIEROGLYPHICS”

One of the most puzzling aspects of the reports that a ”UFO” crashed near
Corona in 1947 were the later descriptions of “hieroglyphic-like” characters by
seemingly reliable, firsthand witnesses. Research has revealed that the debris
found on the ranch and displayed in General Ramey’s officeprobably did have
strange characters. These, however, were not hieroglyphics, but figures printed
on the pinkish-purple tape used to construct the radar targets used by the NYU
group.

The witnesses have recalled small pink/purple “flowers” that appeared1to be

some sort of writing that couldn’t be deciphered. These figures were printed on
tape that sealed the seams of the of the radar target. The radar targets, sometimes
called corner reflectors, had been manufactured during or shortly after World
War 11, and due to shortages, the manufacturer, a toy company, used whatever
resources were available. This toy company used plastic tape with pink/purple
flowers and geometric designs in the construction of its toys and, in a time of
shortage, used it on the government contract for the corner reflectors. A depiction
of these figures, as described by C.B. Moore, is shown in Attachment 10. 1

Allegations have also been made that the debris displayed to the press on July 8
and subsequently photographed was not the original wreckage; i.e., a switah had
occurred sometime after the debris left Roswell AAF. However, statements made
by Moore and Trakowski attested that the corner reflectors they launched during
that period had the same flowers and figures that were later reported by Marcel,
Cavitt, and Braze1 as being on the debris found on the Foster ranch in Corona. In
fact, Trakowski distinctly remembered the figures on the tape because, when the
targets first were produced, much fanfare was made over the use of a toy
manufacturer for production. He related that a fellow USAAF officer, John E.
Peterson, monitored the procurement of the targets and ”thought it was the
biggest joke in the world that they had to go to a toy manufacturer” to make the
radar targets and an “even a bigger joke when . . . the reflecting material on the
balsa frames was some kind of a pinkish purple tape with hearts and flpwers

40. Rprt, Cambridge Field Sta, AMC, “Review of Air Materiel Command Geophysical
Activities by Brigadier General D.N. Yates, and Staff, of the Air Weather Service,” Feb lot 1949.
designs on it.”41Furthermore, the Fort Worth Army Airfield Weather Officer,
Irving Newton, who was called in to identify the wreckage, also remembers the
purple/pink marks. Newton stated that when he was called to General Ramey’s
office he remembers meeting Marcel, who attempted to convince him that the
wreckage on the floor of the office was a crashed ”flying disc.” Newton, having
seen many weather balloons and targets, positively identified the debris as a
weather device.42In short, descriptions of the wreckage found on the ranch near
Corona and of the wreckage displayed in General Ramey’s office are entirely
consistent with each other.

THE REAL COVER STORY

On July 10, 1947, a newspaper article appeared in the Alarnogordo Daily News
displaying for the press the devices, neoprene balloons, and corner reflectors
which had been misidentified as the ”flying disc” two days earlier at Roswell
AAF (Atch 11).The photographs and accompanying article quoted Maj Wilbur
D. Pritchard, a Watson Laboratory Project Officer (not assigned to MOGUL)
stationed at Alamogordo AAF. This article appeared to have been an attempt to
deflect attention from the Top Secret MOGULproject by publicly displaying a
portion of the equipment and offering misleading information. If there was a
”cover story” involved in this incident, it is this article, not the actions or
statements of Ramey.

The article in the Alarnogordo Daily News stated that the balloons and radar targets
had been used for the last fifteen months for the training of long-range radar
personnel and the gathering of meteorological data. The article lists four offi-
cers-Maj W.D. Pritchard, Lieut S.W. Seigel, Capt L.H. Dyvad, and Maj C.W.
Mangum-as being involved with the balloon project, which was false. Moore
and Trakowski could not recall any of the officers in the photograph, with the
exception of Dyvad, whom Moore identified as a pilot who coordinated radar
activitiesa Additionally, some of the details discussed (balloon sighting in
Colorado, tracking by I3-17s, recovery of equipment, launching balloons at 5-6
AM, and balloon altitudes of 30,00040,000 feet) relate directly to the NYU balloon
project, indicating that the four officers had detailed knowledge of MOGUL.^
Moore’s unorthodox technique of employing several balloons and several radar
targets was shown in one of the photographs. Other techniques unique to Moore,

41. Trakowski intvw, Jun 29, 1994.

42.Newton intvw, Ju121,1994.
43. Moore intvw, Tun 8,1994.
44.NYU, Technical Report No. 1, Table VII.
including the boiling of balloons before launch (which he personally developed
during World War 11) and a stepladder used to launch balloons, could not all
have coincidentally been used by other organization^.^^

The details may have been provided to the radar officers by Crary, Project MOGUL
Field Operations Director, who did not depart by C-54 with the rest of the
NYU/Watson Laboratory group on July 8, but who later left by car on July 9, the
day the staged launch took place. Additionally, three of Crary’s staff, Don
Reynolds, Sol Oliva, and Bill Edmonston, resided permanently in Alamogordo.
It was apparent from Crary’s diary that he had worked very closely with Major
Pritchard and reported to him on occasion (twelve documented meetings from
December 1946-April 1947). One instance, on April 7,1947, Crary gave Pdtchard
a ”progress report for MOGUL project to date,” indicating that Major Pritchard had
access to MOGULinf~rmation.~~ Another statement which appeared to confirm a
cover story appeared in the caption below the balloon picture and described a
typewritten tag stapled to the target identifying it as having come from Alamo-
gordo AAF. Moore believed this not to be true because any equipment fodnd was
not to be associated with the WSAAF, only with NYU; therefore flights carried
”return to” tags identifying NYU as the responsible agency.47

CONCLUSION
Many of the claims surrounding the events of July 1947 could be neither proved
nor disproved. Attempts were not made to investigate every allegation, but rather
to start with what was known and work toward the unknown. To complicate the
situation, events described here took place nearly 50 years ago and were highly
classified. This Top Secret project appeared to have utilized the conkept of
compartmentalization very well. Interviews with individuals and review of
documents of organizations revealed that the ultimate objective of the dork, or
even the name of the project, in many instances was not known. It was unlikely,
therefore, that personnel from Roswell AAF, even though they possessed the
appropriate clearances, would have known about project MOGUL.In fact, when
the NYU/AMC group returned to Alamogordo in September, their first trip since
the ”incident” occurred, one of the first activities of the project scientists, Peoples
and Crary, who were accompanied by Major Pritchard and Captain Dyvad, was
to brief the commanding officer of Alamogordo AAF and the 509th Bomb Group
Operations Officer, Lt Col Joseph Briley, on MOGUL.48

45. Moore intvw, Jun 8, 1994.

46. Crary personal journal, p. 10.
47. Moore intvw, Jun 8,1994; Research Division, College of Engineering, NYU, Technicd Report
No. 93.02, Constanf Level Balloons, Sect 2, Operations, Jan31, 1949, pp. 36-38.
48. Combined Hist, 509th Bomb Grp and Roswell AAF, Sep 1-30,1947, p. 79; Untrhscribed
journal of Albert P. Crary, p. 64.
When the civilians and personnel from Roswell AAF (Marcel, Cavitt, and Rickett)
“stumbled” upon the highly classified project and collected the debris, no one at
Roswell had a ”need to know” about information concerning MOGUL..This fact,
along with the initial misidentification and subsequent rumors that the “capture”
of a ”flying disc” occurred, ultimately left many people with unanswered
questions that have endured to this day.

JAMES McANDREW, 1st Lt, USAFR

Declassification and Review Officer
SAF/AAZD

Attachments:
1. 4 Photographs of Balloon Debris
2. Organizational Chart-Watson Laboratories
3. Drawing-New York University Flight No. 2
4. 2 Depictions of AN/CRT-1 Sonabuoy
5. Drawing of Corner Reflector
6 . New York University Technical Report No. 1, Table VII
7. Map of New Mexico
8. Typical Employment of Weather Balloon and Corner Reflector
9. Project MOGULClassification Letter
10. Drawing of “Hieroglyphics” by Prof. C.B. Moore
11. Alamogordo Daily News Article
 Same as
Weaver Attachment 16
 Same as
Weaver Attachment 25
I-
/Receiver

Hydrophone Support

E. R. S.0.
 Same as
Weaver Attachment 29
 See also
Weaver Attachment 27
P..
im 11
-
I I I I I ..HI.*

91

I I I I I I
I I I I I .-I
 See
Map of New Mexico
in
Photograph Section
ML-307( ‘)/AP
 Included in
Weaver Attachment 19
Charles B. Moore
 Included in
Weaver Attachment 2 1
 i
Akamogordo Hews
“Fantasy of “Flyhg Disc’ 16
Explaid Here: News Men Watsh
b Y
July 10,1947
Roswell Daily Record
“Harassed Rancher Who Located
‘Saucer’ Sorry He Told About It”
[July 9, 19471
I

1I Harassed’ Rancher
who Located
II
‘‘Saucer’ Sorry HS Told About It
W.W.Bra!&. 48, Lincoln county they came upon a large area of :odd not reconstruct it at all. have welghed maybe five pounds.
rancher living 30 miles south east bright wreckage made up on rub- r h e y tried to make a kiteout of it.Thefe wm no dgn of any metal
of Corona. today told his story of ber strips, tinfoil, a rather tough but could not do that and could Ln the area which might have
finding what the army at first paper and sticks. not find any way to put it back been used for an engine and no
described as a flying disk, but At the time Brazel was in a together so that it would fit. 5ign of any propellers of any klnd.
the publicity which attended hls to get his round made and Then Major Marcell btought It although a t least one paper fin
find caused him to add that if lie not pay much attention to to Roswell and that wad the last had been glued onto some of the
ever found anything else short of he did remark about what he ’heard of it until h e story tinfoil.
a bomb he sure wasn’t going to seen and on J u l y 4 he. his broke that he had foun a flying There were no words to be found
spy anything about It. wife, Vernon and p daughter Bet- disk. anywhere on the instrument. al-
j Brazel was brought here late ~
Brazel said that he did not see though there Were letters on +me
ty, age 14, went back to the spot
’ yesterday by W. E. Whitmore, of and gathered up quite a bit of the It fall from the sky and did not of the parts. Considerable scotch
:radio station KGF’L,had his pic- debris. see i t before I t was tom UP. so tape and some tepe with flowers
‘ t u r e taken and gave an interview The next day he first heard he did not know the size or shape printed upon it had been used in
to the Record.and Jason Kellahin. about the flying disks. and he it might have been. but he thought the construction.
‘sent here from the Albuquerque wondered if what he had found it might have been’ about as large No. strlngs or wire were to be
‘bureau of the -Associated Press to might be the. remnants of one Eb a table top. The balloon which found but there were some eye-
mver the story: The plcture he of these. held i t up, if that ww how it lets in the paper to fndlcate that
uosed for was sent out over AP MonClay he came to town to sell worked, must have bden about 12 some sort of attachment may have
telephoto wtre bending machine some wool and while here he went feet long, he felt, measuring the been used.
swcially set up in the Record to see sheriff George Wflcdx and distance by the size of the room Brazel said that he had pre-
office by R. 0. Adalr. hp wire “whispered k i n d a confidential in which he sat. The rubber was viously found two weather obser-
chief sent here from Albuquerque like” that he might have found a smoky gray in color and scattered vation balloons on $he ranch, but
for the sole purpose of getting out flying disk. t over an area .about 200 yards in that what he found this time did
cture and that of sheriff Wilcox got in touch with the diameter..‘ not in any way redemble eithei
Geo
h’s ge Wilcox. to whom Brazel
9‘ ’ Fkswell Army Air Meld and Maj. When the .debris w8s ;gathered of these.
onginally gave the‘dnformation of Jesse”A. MatCel and a man in UP the tinfoil, paper. pe. and “I am .sure what I found was
his find. Pwn c€oaies p2cxXnpanled; hlm sticks w& a bundle ut three not a n y , weather observation
Brazel related that on June 14 home. where they picked UP the feet long ‘and 7.or 8 inches thick, balloon.” he said. “But if I find
he and an 8-gear old son. Vernon rest of the pieces of the “disk“ while the! rubber mqde !a bundle anything ek,bestdes a bomb theg
were about 7 or 8 miles from the and went to his home to try b about 18 or 20 Inches long and are going to Have a hard timt
ranch house of the J. B. Foster reconstruct it. about 8 Inches thick. ID all, he getting me tp say snything aboul
ranch, whlch he operates, when According to Brazel they simply estimated, the en- Ipt would It.”
 Same as
Weaver Attachment 18
Interview
Lt Col Joseph V. Rogan with Irving
Newton
 Same as
Weaver Attachment 30
Letter
Lt Col Edward A. Doty to Mr David
Bushnell
Pear !4r. Buahncllr

There was a conthuitJ of organisation h m tbe earliest boltom

nuod .
actidties up to the prmmat. 'Ihe name changed but the gxvup eaa-
The r d u rrwvah a o t l v i t l e r , the hambee roaket atrorphario
i n r s r t l g a t l ~urd the balloon a o t i r l t l e ~were apooaarcd o r i q i r r p u J
EXWARD A. DOTX
Lt camel, USAF
 5
Letter
Brig Gen E. O’Donnell to
Commanding General, USAAF
Subj: Change in Classification of
MOGUL,Item 188-5
July 8, 1946
 Included in
Weaver Attachment 19
 1.

L'nder a c m t r o c t s i t h She 3 ~ r e a uof Ehlss, AO hirtne

proveU t h a t :hem 13 n aca~ad channel in t h e ocean W l t P its
a x i s at a benth of' rbozt 4000 fo e t . Conf1rw:ni: n n m d l c t l o n
mde by trio v r l t o r , a f'mr oound bcmb f i r e d at t h f s depth
bna teen beard r t a d:at;ance of 2330 !ailes, u s i n g b hpzropbone
at. t h e same depth as a receiver. WLS range enornusly
exCe9dG anythine Sefore ac:*.:eved, and is pos81ble prlmnrily
because t h e 3o::rco end the roce:ve? ore placed at the most
advanta&eour depth. Ths slcnal strongtk Lndlcates t h a t
f a r dre&ter mn2as c?;1 3% obtainsd mitho:& change of e q x i n t e n t .
A t P t y p l c a l place :n the oCeBn, the s p e d nf
sound a t t t t e surface is 5001 f t / s o c . It ciecreoses t o 48- ft/creo
at, a depttr or 4000 f e e t , m i then hcraaeen t o 5065 ft/eeo
et o d e p t h of 16,200 f e e t . TbSs 8ltuotlon isdescribed a8
a sound channel w 2 t b f t a axle n t 4 0 0 0 f e e t , because cll sownd
rays are deflected downward a t points above tfie axis and uward
at o o l n t a below f t . Cotailed c a l ~ ~ l a t l oof
n the be..?dlng of
tho ray oath8 due t o p!w8u\,'rw and teape?a?3ra shms that ~ $ 1
ro s leaving 8 sound 8ource on the Rxla In directions r i t h i n
1 2 of the noyftontal a m refmated back and forth ecrons the
8x28 and e8a tnrrel u n l h l t e d dlatoncss w l t h m t c o n t a c t d$h'
ourface or bottort, hence t h e 10- mnges. A similar c8lculatlon
for n S a n d 80tfrcs SOU? & h ' a . 6 L . r f 8 C 6 #hoWS thrt d l myS m ) t
be r e f l o a t e d a t strrfsce sad bottom mny tlrnoa i n the course
of a fer hrndreb i1iic8, hsnaa ths l l m l t t m d range of detecelqm
oi ordinam t b l l a r sxplosionu, and the oauumnce of s k i p
d istonca8
'phs round froa an explosion at the a x i s of ttu rrducd
channel has a d u n t t o n of &bout 12 aeaondr per thotitend miles
of travel, e?d an uarnlrtakable p t t e m of a gradual building
up to r o u l m u m laten8lty r l t h 0 very rharp o u t - o f f . 'Phls
l a a t feature is of greet lmportanoe beoerrae I t p m l t r r o c q r o t e
trlansulation w i t h Y network of tiwee llstonlng atatlonr,
the mte of t.rnwrirrion being nbout one d l a per rooond.
t Refemnae 1)
 In September, 1964, it ocmirred to me that there
1s c. s l a i l ~ rsound channel in the atmosphere with the a x i s
a t a height of nbwJt 45,000 f e e t , and that, w i t h source and
r e c e i v c r u l s c e d a t t h l s h e i g h t , we d e b t exceed the accepted
ranees a 8 enormously IU we had In the ocean. Ln cJther wor(l6,
I t w i g h t be ccssib?.e t o detect souzd half rag n r o m d the world.

The fundamant8l data on this subject PS revaaled_durlng

a hurried search of t h e literature (mostly brior t o 1930). &Bow
t h a t , for P tv3lc.l 18YgO exc3losion, there is a c d i b l l i t p f r o m
0 to 25 males on9 f r o m 90 t o 125 ~ l l e 8 ,with Y zone of silence
f r o m 25 t o 90 ailec. The accepted exblnnotlon of the t o t a l
collection of t h e s e d a t a i s that the speed of sounb deareases
f r o m nboiit 1090 ft/sec at the eurfaca to about 970 ft/sec a t
about 45,000 f e e t , a z 3 tkcn i m r c a z e s to abo:it 1155 ft/sec
at about 130,000 I"aet. ( R e f e r e x e 2 )
T h u s there It n z m n 3 channel ?n the atnosohors
w i t h i t s a x i s at P 5:eigbt of a k o ~ t45,000 feot, and if' 3 0 t h
souncl soiirco and Toceivor are l o s a t e 9 a: thls helgbt, \oe
m y B X ~ C : e x t r = o d i a a q =zgez snd a l l the o t h e r rissftrl
Dhcnozriena whlcb have beex founil in t h e s a m d chanael i n
the ocem This means tfiat t h e 31fnfkl8 rill have tighly
c h r r w t e r l s t i ~ldentifylnc features an3 that t h e y will p e r m i t
aceuxte trtan~ulatlan.

The mrrxlmula reme for 8onto 8ic;mlllng in the

ataarsphsrla sound chamel w i l l dopen3 primarily on the
absorption coefficient, which I8 the rate a t rhlch the
acourticel energy is oonverted into heat by friatlannl losses.
bollorhg Rayhigh (Reforonce 3, p. 316), it may be calculated
that- the dirtence at 8bloh sound of frequency 50 cycles per
reaond would ba reduced in lntOo8itp by the faator 7 . 5 by
the effeat of f r l o t i o n alone l a about 24,000 n l l e s a t sea l e v e l ,
and .bout 45500 miles a t 45,000 feet. A 8 them distances
are inversely proportional t o the square of the fmquency,
they rould be one hundrod t h e 8 greater for sounds of frequency
5 arcle@ per second, r b i u h hare often >,sen observed when
largo oxplorionr were studied.
 3.

It i s lmposslble t o Eake r e a l l y d e t a i l e d calculotlo~s

aT the aoxlmam ra-e without better i n f o m a t l o r . about temperature
and sound velocity In l o c ~ t i o n sfrom 45,OCO to 90,000 feet,
for I t l a there that the greatest f r i c t i o n a l IosscLo #ill o c p ~ r .
Rowever’, j t :P oafe t o n r d l o t that a bomt c o c t u l n i f i c a few
?onnds of TYT o m he heard from 4 0 0 0 t o 5900 m11.as. The
chance t 5 a t it could be heard to the farthoat noin% on earth
is north consldarntlon.

I t is ny belief ttst a large rocket or j e t oropul-

aior! motor pa.ssln_c the a x i z of the scund chnnnel would a l s o
be detecteble by lleteclzzg at soreral tboiisand mlles, and
s u b j e c t tc? location by trianszlation if hear3 bjr tkree sultlably
chosen s t a t i o n s . In time of‘ way t h i s trlangulcition could
locate tho launchir& s i t e s of ths enemp, and Ih *peace t i m e
i t is soncclvable t h a t ca:totly ckossn 3lsten:rig sEet:ons
could monitor t*m a s t l r e w o r l c ~to d e t e c t knd locate m y
unusual rocket or ;et ?ropr;lsZon o x p e r l m n t s , tkQR &nimizl(ng
the danger 01- strrcrlse a5tackz zit: s c c p e t weapons.

The most promislw t p t b ol‘ li6tening c t o t i o n

accord- to ny present knowledge rould~nokeu80 elther of
tho higher mountains of the mrld or of free balloon8 to
8.h adoquat. h016ht. It ¶ 8 unknown P t prreant by how f a 3
the fecolver rro7 ba removed from the preferred heieht w i t h
prohibitive 8 8 C r % f $ C O o f 60ulkl a b n n e l p h o s r t i e s .
i n the 8obs8rlne sound cbomal we have hed f a i r l y $aod
rt
Ilcnrer P,
recaotlon w i t h the hyUrophone a t 2CcO f e e t when tbe nxia Or
the chowel -8s a t 4000 feet. Hence, i t icr not beyond
ma80n that t S e taller mountminb mlght wovide scff iclsnt
o l t i t u b o of t b U J l e 1 V O S .
9sall str8torphem lmlloon8, provided r i t h radio
moan8 for trcrrramlrrlon of sound i a p u l r e r t o 8 reosiolng ,
rtrtioa either f l x a d or mobile, p r a h b l y provide the - 8 t
rea411y *vail*ble llstsalne mrraa&aent.
* E7
 HEADQUARTERS FITZEILLIAM FORWARD
c/o Commander, Task Group 7.2
APO 187, c/o Postmaster
San Francisco, Calif,
1'7 h!ayi 1948
$ONIC BALLOON TEST. K V A J A U I N

Inclosure G t o FITZWILLIAM FORN

' ARD Report

The Vatson Laboratories of A i r hkteriel Cmmand arranged f o r one (1)

of i t s sonic balloon teams t o p a r t i c i p a t e i n the FITZViILLIAbr: projeat a s a
mobile team t o operate i n the Central Pacific, a t KPIAJAMIN, GUAM 4nd HICKAM
FIEID, HAYiAII, i n t h a t order, changing location f a r each of t h e t h e e (3)
explosions.
The purpose of t h i s exploratory t e s t was a s follows: f i r s t , $0 deter-
mine i f an atomic explosion's compressional waves a r e generated i n the sound
channel e x i s t i n g between 50,000 and 70,000 feet (such waves would qonceivably
t r a v e l uninpeded f o r long distances i n t h i s channel without touching t h e
e a r t h ' s surface); second, t o determine whether a sound pick-up uni$ suspended
from a f l o e ting balloon could d e t e c t compressional waves (possibly undetected
by similar sound u n i t s a t the e a r t h ' s eurface) by v i r t c e of the deereased
background noise i n the high-level sound channel,
B a l l o o n s were made of high grade p l a s t i c , were of tear-drop slpape, and
were twenty-five (25) f e e t a t t h e i r large& sea-level diameter. Tlhe s o n i c
unit was a combination microphone-transmitter which was suspended rom the
i
balloon and picked up sound wave8, transmitting them t o a ground d r e c t i o n a l
antenna connected t o a radiosonde receiver (standard SCR 658 a i r weather
radio receiver). The transmitted sound impulses were recorded on Po (2)
Esterline-Angus recorders.
J. d r i b b l e constructed of a f i v e (5) gallon t i n incorporating 41 metered
j e t t o allow a predetermined s p i l l a g e r a t e of high grade keroaeaetethylene-
glycol mixture was attached t o t h e balloon. This was designed t o pounteroct
t h e helium gas seepage thru the surface -3res of the p l a s t i c ballopn. T h i s
metered loss of b a l l a s t and controlled the r i s i n g rate of the ballioon a t 500
t o 600 f e e t a minute,
Crcund sonic equipnent consisted of World P;ar I1 sound ranging devices
u t i l i z e d t o pick up s m d waves from an explosion traveling along the e a r t h ' s
curf n ce,

A radio receiver was used t o obtain exploaion time notificatilon code

signals from the ENNFTOK r a d i o station.

The balloon launching s i t e had t o have a dmn-wind clearance of about

1000 f e e t t o lay out tho 300 f e e t r i s e r s and cables t o which were ,attach&
t h e microphone-transmitter and d r i b b l e r units. Also t h e s i t e had t o be
sheltered from the wind t o prevent damge t o the balloon while It W(LB being
i n f l a t e d . A t KWAJALEIN a wind-break was constructed through the courtesy of
t h e island commander, Captain Vest, USN. A t a predetermined time, the balloon
was i n f l a t e d with a fixed amount of helium gas t o r a i s e it t o an a l t i t u d e of
from 50,000 t o 60,000 f e e t where it f l o a t e d a t a constant level. The balloon
was cautiously Launched and guided u n t i l it cleared all ground obstacles.
E l e c t r i c a l power f o r the microphone-transmitter was provided through wet-cell
b a t t e r i e s , especially constructed t o prevent freezing. The balloon was tracked
v i s u a l l y bj use of theodolites. Prior t o the a c t u a l test on KlAAJALEIN on X-day
(15 April 1948) two (2) p r a c t i c e runs were made t o minimize chance ofhilt1re
and t o improve operating techniques.
The transportation requirement was f o r a i r Ilft t o transport the team of
s i x (6) s c i e n t i s t s and twelve (12) thousand pounds of equipnent from B E W ,
!UPb.J E E Y t o KWAJALEIN, GUAM, HAWAII and then back t o BEIMAR, NE3i JERSEY. The
Air Materiel Cm.and provided three (3) aircraft, a C-54, a B-29, and a B-17,
and crews, under the d i r e c t i o n of Captain Stanley C. Lewis, from t h e 4 l 4 9 t h
AFBU, MIDDLETC", PENKSYLVANIA. The C-54 was a l s o u t i l i z e d i n carrying
Tracerlab p e r ~ o n n e land equipment t o KTIAJALEIN and GUAM. Maintenance a s s i s t -
ance was afforded by the local base and t a c t i c a l organizations.
The mobile team personnel was assembled and p r t i a l l y t r a i n e d a t Eatson
Laboratories. The team arrived a t KYIAJALEW 31 March 1948; departed f o r
NCRTH FIELD, GUAM, on 16 April 1948; for HICKAM FIEfD on 3 May 1948. and was
scheduled t o depart f r m HAWAII f o r i t s home s t a t i o n on 2 plus one (1)day.

The balloon team and aircraft crew personnel were a6 follma:

BALLOON TEAM:
.
D r . Albert P. Crary
Mr. Charles S Schneider
Mr. John IF. Alden
rQr clearance
rQn clearance
"Pn clearance
Physicist
Meteorological Engineer
Rpdio Engineer
h5r. John A. Maulden "P clearance Radio Reppirman
Mr. Murry Hackman "Pr clearance Meteorological Engineer
M .
r James Smith "Pn clearance Meteorological Engineer
B-%9 CRGW
Captain Stanley C. L e w i s P i l o t ( F l i g h t Commander)
1st Lieutenant Randall S. Kane Co-Pilot
1st i i e u t e n a n t Wm. L. Adame Navigator
M/Sergeant IA. L. Halllday Engineer
M/Sergeant R. A. Kabaste Radio Operator
T/Sergeant R. A. Cox Ase't Radio Operator
T/Sergeant L. D. Moon Ass' t Engineer

< W E
Captain John P. Clmry Pilot
1st Lieutenant Richard Meeher Co-Pilot
1st Lieutenant Chas. A. Lamana Navigator
SISergeant James Brau Engineer
S/Sergeant L. H. Campbell Radio Operator
Sergeant George L. Pratwell A s s ' t Engineer
 B-17 CKEY
1st Lieutenant b o n B. Dubell Pilot
1st Lieutenant Thomas F. C a r r o l l c 0-Pi l o t
1st Lieutenant John Frlertzen Navigator
Sergeant !t;. R. Hice Engineer

Time n o t F t i c a t i o n s i g n a l s were required and provided i n order t o Pfford

s u f f i c i e n t t i n e t o make necessary launching preparations, and t o p o s i t i o n the
balloons j u s t a few minutes p r i o r t c the predetermined a r r i v a l of the explo-
sion sound nave. Headquarters F1TZT:IUIAIA FCFSiAHD furnished AR?ACAS 3-1 and
3-2 b; o f f i c e r courier. The team experienced no d i f f i c u l t y i n obtaining the
time s i g n a l s .
Reports required of t h e team were a b r i e f statement a s t c p o s i t i v e o r
negative r e s u l t s of the t e s t s , and n o t i f i c a t i o n of team moveme:it t o i t ' s
s e v e r o l loco tions. Reports of r e s u l t s were made t o Headquarters FITnILLIAM
FCRYiARD and t o AFXS71-1.

Results of the KWAJALEIN t e s t were a s follows: balloon-borne equipment

r e s u l t s were p o s i t i v e and ground e q u i w e n t r e s u l t s were questionable. An
accurate f i n a l a n a l y s i s and evaluation r e p o r t r i l l be submitted upon Dr.
Crary' s r e t u r n t o 'C;atson Laboratories, including an accurate detenninatior. of
results.

Due t o time l i m i t a t i c n and pending a thorough evaluation of r e s u l t s , the

following recomcendations, of necessity, shculd be considered tentatrtte:

1. Before departing f o r f i e l d locations, P survey should be cade t o

determine t h e b e s t balloon launching sites, giving d u e consideration t o
s h e l t e r from high v e l o c i t y and gusty winds, and s u f f i c i e n t c l e a r space t o
lay-out shroud l i n e s and c o n t r o l cables t h u s a f f o r d i n g clenr possage of t h e
instruments which are suspended about one hundred (100) f e e t below t h e balloon.

2. Thnt an SCR 658, radiosonde r e c e i v e r be included i n the team e q u i p

ment l i s t . For these tests, a r e c e i v e r had t o be borrowed from the a i r
weather s t a t i o n a t each location. T h i s presented a problem because each s t r -
t i o n had only one (1) r e c e i v e r and i t was needed by the s t a t i o n personnel f o r
ii?per a i r sounding operations. This necessitated s e l e c t i n g the b e s t possible
launching s i t e adjacent t o t h e weather s t r on. Also, t h i s precluded s e l e c t i o n
of' a t i t o n i t h o u t a weather s t a t i o n .

-3-
TSELT

MEIIoIRANDIRd FOR: Major Oeneral Curtis LeJJag

SUBJECT: Relief of Major R. T. Crane as Project Officer for

MWUL and TORREI

1, In conpllanco ~ i General
~ h S ~ a a t a ' directive, I contacted
Dr. Me Bring at Colurnbia 'Jniversity on 15 June 1946 and d i 8 C ~ ~ 8 8 d
tho proposed reUef of Major R, 'f. Crane as project o f f i c e r on
projects XOGUL and TORMD.

2. Dr. W n g was excoedingly pleasant and agreed to the r e l i e f

of mjor Crane, asking only that it be done in such a way as t o
cause a8 l i t t l e eolbarraeslnent t o q of the parti08 connerned.aa
possible. I advised him that the matter ifould be handled d l p l o m a t i c a ~ .

3. I then discussed with 3r. m n g the subject of a successor

t o Major Crane and suggested t o hin that Colonel Mercellue D u f Q , a
Regular A m y officer and ire==qualified on met8orological research
and development work, might be mado available for this duty. Dr. Ening
advised tht he believed t h a t he could work m l l with Colonel D uf
e
Ff he i s assigned t o t h i s work. It was further agroed that a8 croon a8
a project o f f i c e r i s finally selected, a conferance would be held w i t h
Dr. IMng and the now progect o f f i c e r and Colonel Wler and Colonel
Waul in o d o r that thore rill be a clear underatanding a8 to the
obdectives to be accompurihed.
 9
Memo
Maj Gen Curtis E. LeMay to Maj Gen
L.C. Craigie
April 16, 1947
CUBTI3 s. byII
MnJor O s n e d , U. S.
bputy Chief of Air Strif for
Reeeamh and Dsreloplnnt
 &lone1 Qscar&Jaier. 0-16096

Retention: I n d e f i n i t e . No known renlacament i n t h e A M .

D u t i e i : Chief, Rlectronio P l a n r Sodtion, E l e c f r o n i a Subdivision.
Thls o f f i c e r should be r e t a i n e d in h i s n r e r e n t a r s i p e n t due t o the
background of knowledge an$ experienae whiah h e h a 8 with r e f e r e n c e t o
e l e c t r o n i c r e s e a r c h and develoDment a8 well as meteorological reaenrah
pnd develonment and t h e ph7ricr of t h e upper air. Oolonel b i e r ha0
c o m l e t e d n l l requirements f o r a Ph. D. dexree from t h e C a l i f o r n i a
I n s t i t u t e o f Tochnoloey excent f o r s i x monthe resldencf. During t h e
n s r i o d 1 PebnzRry 1945 t o 1 Jnnunry 1946, Oolonel Mder had been
Commnding Offioer of Watson L a b o r a t o r i e s in char(e o f r e r e a r a h and
develonment of ground radar, r a d i o and e l e c t r o n i a r nquipment D e a a l i a r
t o t h e Army A i r r o r o e r , previous t o whiah Lo w a i i n aomand of
v a r i o u e S i g n a l Oorpr l a b o r n t o r i e s . Furthermore, he ha8 oomDlete
t e c h n i c a l knowledge and andsrotandln& of t h e w o l e o t e being a a r r i e d
on by \:;'Atson Lrtboretoriee and Cambridge Yield StRtion, which can only
be achieved by y e a r r of a c t i v e p e r t i ~ l p e t i o nin t h e a c t u a l r e s e a r a h
and deTelOQEI0nt of t h a t p a r t i o u l a r type of e l e a t r o n i c eround equipment.

Iietention: I n d e f i n i t e . Ho known replacement I n t h e Mb.

Duties; A s s i t a n t Chief, P l e a t r o n l c Plans Soction, E l e c t r o n i c
Subdivision. T h l s o f f i c e r has an e x t e n s i v e background and knowledge
i n meteorological and e l e c t r o n i c reaeorch and d e v e l a m s n t . He i r a
g r a d U t e of M.I.P. in meteorology. Golone1 h f f p w b l~i n i r o n Off'iaer
from the Commanding Oenoral, M F , t o t h e Chief Signal Officer f o t duty
in connection with meteorolo(riaa1 equipment f o r t h e n e r i o d 1942-1946.
During t h i a Deriod he s e t up W rsquirementr, r t a n d a r d s and t r a i n i n g
programs for weather equipment and p e r s o n a l l y followed t h i r equipment
from t h e l a b o r r i t o r i e s t o i t s i n t r o d u c t i o n i n a l l combat t h e a t e r s .
From Seotember 1946 t o January 1947, Colonel Duff7 WAI i n charge of
aoblisd nropagation of c o m r s s s i o n d and magnetic wavee a t Watron
Laboratories. A t t h e p r e s e n t time, Colonel Duff7 la monitoring t h e
tinnor A i r r e s e a r c h program f o r t h e M? In a d d i t i o n t o h i e d u t i e r as
A s s i n t a n t Chief o f t h e R l n c t r o n l o Plane Section. With t h e A i r Pome
competing a g a i n s t o t h e r r e t v i a e r in t h e upper a i r reeearoh p r o g k a ,
guided rniaeilem and a e t e o r o l o g i u a l r e r e a r o h , a c o m e t e n t , p r a c t i c a l
and t h e o r e t i c a l o f f i c e r is oonsidered e s s e n t i a l i n t h e P l a n r Seation,
f l e c t r o n i c SUbditiriOn.

Oolonel b l n h L. W ~ ~ a r l 0-22329
l

Retention: I n d e f i n i t e . Ho known replaoement i n t h e MIC.

D u t i e l r Chief of Onerations f o r Power P l a n t Laboratory. In t h i r
c a p n c i t y he is r e r p o n s i b l e d i r e o t l y t o t h e Laboratory Chiaf f o r tho
nlanninrr m d execution of t h e e n t i r e engine development progrm.
S D a c i f i c a l l y , he r e s ~ o n r l b l of o r rUpO?Vi8iOn Of t h e R o t a t i n g &gin0
BrRnch and t h e Bon-Rotating Engine Branah. In o r d e r t o s u o c e s s f u l l y
execute h i s r e e p o n s i b i l i t i e e , Oolonel Wasrell mrt aoordirurte end
approve t h e i n i t i a t i o n o f all rero~rahand development p r o j e o t q for
-2-
 Technical Report No. 93.03

C3NSTAET LEVEL BALLOONS

FINAL REPORT

Constant Level Balloon Project

New York University

Prepared i n Accordance with provisions of Contract

W28-099-ac-213, between
Watson Laboratories, Red Bank, New Jersey
and
New Pork University

The research renorted i n t h i s dociiment has been made possible

thronsh support and sponsorship extended by the Geophysical
Research Mrectorate of t h e Cambridge Research Laboratortes,
.
L%, U. S A i r Force, under Contract No. W28-099-ac-2bl.
It is prrblished f o r technical information only and does not
.
represent recommendations o r conchisions of t h e sponsoring
agency

Prepared by: , Project Director

F W d
Approved by: Harold K. Work,
Director of the Research Division

College of Engineering
New York University
1March 1951
New Pork 53, New Hork
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page Number

A . Introduction and Statement of Problem.................. 1

B . Constant Altitude Balloon Systems ...................... 3
C . Telemeterlng Balloon Systems......................
from 7
D . Lalurching Se.lces..................................... 13
E . Meteorological ................................ 19
A.n.yQi8

F . Flights Utilizing the Constant Level Balloon

System ................................................. 21
(Contract AF 19(122).4s) .........................
Ugh Altitude Balloon Trajectory Study
21

28(099)-10).........................
High Neutron Intensity Study
(Contract AF 22

........................................ 24
L i s t of Flights

.ferences ............................................. 27
 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Figure Nm.ber Page Number

1. Pressiire Displacement Switch for Ballast O a n t r o l 4
2. Ballast Control Circuit 5
3. Constarlt Level Balloon Flight Using Ballast Control 6
1,. FM-1 Transmitter 8
5. FM-2 Transmitter 8
6 . AM=l Transmitter 10
7. AM-2 Transmitter 12
8. Balloon Flight Using Fixed Ballast Flow 13
11
.
9 . Balloon Flight Withoiit Ballast
10 Fliqht Train, Service Flight
11. I n f l a t i o n of a 20 f t . P l a s t i c Balloon
11,
15
1 2 . F l i g h t Termination Switch 17
13 Balloon Rip Assembly 18
1J.l. Rip Assembly Cannon 19
15 Vwo Level" Stepped Flight 23
ABSTRACT
Sytems of constant altitride balloons have been designed, developed,
tested and used i n various types of atmospheric research* After
irwestigation and t e s t i n g of several methods, a system comprising
of a p l a s t i c fixed-volume balloon, e l e c t r i c a l l y operated control
instrumenkation, and l i q u i d b a l l a s t was developed.
This system has been used on several s e r i e s of f l i g h t s for carry-
ing instruments a t constant altitudes, studying d n d s over long
periods a t the 200 mb level, and investigation of neutron maxima.
Balloon launchings were carried out a t various sites i n the United
S t a t e s by members of t h e project i n coordination with representatives
of t h e sponsoring agency. Meteorological analysis of conditions
over selected s t a t i o n s i n the Western Hemisphere as requested by
the sponsor was carried out by members of the Department of
Meteorology of New York University.
A. Introduction and Statement o f Problem

Contract W-28-099-ac-211 between Watson Laboratories AMC was

entered i n t o on 1 November 1946 t o be carried ovt from 30
September 1946 t o 1 October 1948.
Services t o be finmished were as follows:
Research, investigation and engineering services i n
connection with obtaining and furnishing experimental
data on pressure and temperature i n the ripper atomosphere,
t o involve the following:
a. The securing of constant l e v e l balloons under the
f ollating conditions :

(1) I n i t i a l l y a s i x t o e i g h t hour minimum t i m e

f o r the balloon i n air; eventually a forty-
eight hour time f o r balloon i n air,

(2) The a l t i t u d e to be attained by t h e balloon

will be 10 t o 20 lan, adjustable a t 2 lan
intervals.

(3) Maintain elevation within 500 meters and the

ikequency of o s c i l l a t i o n to be svch t h a t it
will not i n t e r f e r e w i t h operation of balloon
borne radio equipment,
 2.

b. The construction by the contractor of an experimental a i r

borne radio and associated air borne or ground receiving
eqJipment which w i l l transmit and receive information from
a mchanical movement introduced i n t o the radio c i r c u i t .
The weight of the pick up device and any required powr
supply t o be carried i n the balloon w i l l not be Over 2 lbs.
C. The contractor w i l l f l y the balloons, track them, and c o l l e c t
t h e data on pressure and temperature t o be transmitted as
the balloon goes up and a t periodic i n t e r v a l s a t f l i g h t
altitude. These i n t e r v a l s to be determined by consulta-
tion, The accuracy is t o be comparable t o t h a t of the
standard Amy Radiosonde.
do Interpretation of Feteomlogical data i n connection with
project.
Five copies .of reports of design and development phases were t o
be delivered a t monthly intervals. Results of meteorological
studies were t o be transmitted as completed t o the sponsoring
agency for use of A i r Force s c i e n t i f i c personnel.
On 27 February 1948, Modification #1 revised the 11117133er of copies
of reports t o be furnished t o 25. Modification #2, of 2 April
194.8, added t h e requirement of "Research Investigation, and
mgineering ser~dcesleading t o t h e deternination of the dependance
of t h e propagation of sound on atmospheric conditions", t o the
contract. Contract fvnds were increased t o cover t h i s additional
requirement.
Under Modiflcstion #3 of 23 A p r i l 1948,it was agreed that a
separate f i n a l report on t e l e m t e r i n g f r o m Balloon Systems would
be completed and transfitted to t h e sponsor. The time of performance
was extended t o 1 February 1949 and contract funds increased t o
cover t h e increased period o f performance by Modification #4 t o
t h e contract on 29 September 1948.

On 28 October, 1948, the rider of reports required was increased

t o f i f t y ( 5 0 ) and the place f o r f i n a l inspection and acceptance
charged t o Cambridge Field Station, AMC by Modification #5. Modifica-
t i o n #6 changed the allotment f o r funds t o be used on the project.
The period of performance of the project was extended to 50 Xarch
1949, by Modification #7 of 26 January 1949.
Modification #3 of 8 April 1949, modified the requirement t o t h a t
of maintenance of one trained person i n the f i e l d t o carry out
balloon launching and tracking services i n conjunction with A i r
Force s c i e n t i f i c personnel. Funds were increased to extend t h e
 3.

period of performance t o 15 March 1 9 9 , A final report on

development and testing of constant altitude balloon systems
was t o be aubdtted to the A i r Force. Modification 19 d s e d
the delivery address for reports.

Modification #lo of 1May 1950, increased contract funds to

continue f i e l d service and meteorological analysis work t o 1s
June 1950.
Modification #11subsequently extended the period of performance
t o the termihation date of 31 December 1950 and Increased funds
accordingly.
B. Constant Altitude Balloon Sgstemr
Development of a system t o maintain balloons a t constant al-
titudes f o r long periods of time was completed on 15 March 1949.
This development has been completely reported i n nTechnical
Report 93.0211(1) by this Research Mvision under "Section 1,
General"
Essentially the system as dewloped a t New York University con-
sists of a constant volume-balloon of t h i n polyethylene which,
when f i l l e d with hydrogen or helim, furnishes the lift f o r the
system. (Because of t h e increased safety t o personnel and equip-
.
ment, use of helium is t o be recommended) The balloon is in-
flated with enough gas t o balance the weight of the suspended
equipnent, plus a certain amount of nfree l i f t " which w i l l cause
the system t o abeend. When the balloon nears floating altitude
and becombs f u l l , the gas comprising the "free l i f t " all.be
expelled through an open appendix a t t h e bottom of the balloon.
The system is then a t equilibrium a t an altitude fixed by the
balloon volume. The ratio of molecular weights of the Xfting
gas and air, density of t h e surrounding air, and the t o t a l balloon
load are as follows:

h i s s t a t e of equilibrium is broken, however, by changes i n any

of t h e above variables. Basically, losses of l i f t due t o leakage
and diffusion of gas, and changes of temperature o$ t h e l i f t i n g
gas cause a change from eqailibrium conditions.
Any variations causing an increase i n a l t i t u d e will result merely
i n a valving of gas from the fixed voltrme balloon and a s l i g h t
increase in altitude. Changes i n t h e reverse direction, however,
 4.

must be compensated f o r by decreasing t h e load on t h e system

t o prevent descent t o t h e g r a n d .
This decrease of load is c a r r i e d out by dropping l i q u i d b a l l a s t
a8 demanded by a pressure activated ballast control switch.
This suitah completes a c i r c u i t through a r e l a y operated
ballast valve whenever the balloon system descends t o a region
of pressure greater than t h a t of i t s selected f l o a t i n g a l t i t u d e .
Ballast is thus dropped and the system returned t o f l o a t i n g
altitude.

On mghts made on another project since the termination of t h e

developnent phase of t h i s project, the b a l l a s t control system
was standardized t o include a pressure displacement switch and
an e l e c t r i c a l l y operated b a l l a s t valve. The displacement switch
(Fig. 1 ) consists of a standard temperature compensated
aneroid c e l l and pen arm from a-radiosonde modulator

Fig. 1
Pressure Displacement Switch f o r Ballast Control
 5.

(Type E prefer red)^ a r ota t i ng commutator of two segments,

an insulator and a conductor; a six v o l t 1 rpm motor; and
a shelf f o r t h e pen arm. I n d i b r a t b n , the aneroid c e l l is
moved across the base by mans of a screw which allowa selec-
t i o n of various a l t i t u d e s f o r control.
I n i t i a l l y the pen arm rides on the shelf during ascent so
t h a t the circuit t o t h e valve remains open until the balloon
approaches f loating altitude. Several thousand feet before
ascent i s completed the pen arm falls off the shelf closing
the ballast c i r c u i t (Fig. 2) and causing ballast flow during
t h e f i n a l period of ascent. When the balloon reaches control

DI S PL A C EM E N T SWITCH

VALVE 6V. BATTERY

BALLAST CONTROL C1RCUIT

Fig. 2
Ballast Control Circuit
 6.

altitudd the pen passes t o the insid-ator portion of the

commutator and ballast flow ceases. Whenever the balloon
system subsequently descends p a s t control altitude, ballast
i s made t o flow, maintaining the balloon a l t i t u d e a t control
level. This system has been used successfidly on over twenty
constant l e v e l flights maintaintng altitude t o close limits
f o r periods up t o 60 hours. An example of a flight made
with t h i s control ia shown as F i g . 3 .

-. -*...

. . --- .--.

Fig. 3
Constant Level Balloon F l i g h t 'Jsirg b i l a s t Control
 7.

A review of t h i s systen by members of t h e Universitystaff

has b e published i n 'ITransactions of the American Geophysical
Union(i2y1! Earlier work on t h i s development has been reported
by members of t h i s Research Division innTechnical Report 93.0d3)
and i n the "Joi~rnalof the American Meteorological Societyn(b).

A manual f o r those i n t e r e s t e d i n making use of balloon s~rstruar,

of our Technical Report 93.02l1(1) .

of t h i s type has also been published as 'ISection 31, Operations"
This r e p o r t consists of a
disciission of instrumentation f o r balloon systems, t echniques
forlaunching and tradbng, and telemetering from balloons as
developed and t e s t e d a t New Pork University.

C. Telemterinp: From Balloon Systems

The second requirement of t h i s project was the,investigation,
development, and t e s t i n g of balloon borne telemetering systems
The development was completed i n June of 1948 and a f i n a l report(7)
.
of work accomplished and recommendations made t o the sponsor a t
that t i m e .

Rjo m s of transmitter Iynits were suggested as a means of

accomplishing t h e telemetering of data from a balloon t o ground
s t a t i o n receivers. A high freqyiency sysbm, making ase of line-of-
s i g h t transmission allows f o r accurate positioning of the balloon
system from two ground stat:ons. The line-of-sight characteristic,
however, limits the range of t h i s type transmitter, and ranges
i n excess of 250 miles are not t o be expected with a balloon
system f l o a t i n g a t 40,000 f t .
Three l i n e of s i g h t transmitters were designed f o r use i n
balloon work. The f i r s t , the F'M-1, was designed t o operate a t
72 mc, using a conventional reactance tube modulator. Several
stages were included t o d e l i v e r 1 watt output a t the design
frequency. The u n i t was m i t e complicated and the P e p i r e d
input Dower large due t o t h e requirement f o r several stages
t o transmit a t the high frequency. Fig. h i s a schematic of
the FM-1 transmitter.

In order t o Overcome this limitation of FM sets, a two tube

transmitter was developed (Fig 5 ) Variation i n vacuum tube
resistance is used t o modulate the o s c i l l a t o r p l a t e voltage of
a self-excited o s c i l l a t o r i n accordance with the audio signal.
T h i s provides t h e freqirency modulation desired. I n order t o
mainta'n a s t a b l e center frequency and render the o s c i l l a t o r

.
insensitive t o changes in snpply voltage, a neon tube voltage
regulator was included
 0.

cYg. 4
FM-1 Transmitter

Fig. 5
FM-2 Tranadtter
 9.

Output of the o s c i l l a t o r is both amplitude and frequency modulated,

the amplitude modulation being limited by a c l a s s W" RF amplifier.
This u n i t weighed six ovnces, was fed by a p l a t e voltage of 270
v o l t s u i t h a filament drain of 4CXhna. a t 1.5 volts. The oatput
was one w a t t a t frequencies from 25 t o looxnc.

Before procurement of a receiver with automatic freqnency control

an attempt was made to develop a crystal controlled o s c i l l a t o r t o
overcome the freqnency d r i f t inherent i n FM systems. This work
was abandoned when t h e controlled receiver was obtained. The
c r y s t a l control unit which was developed required extreme care i n
tuning i n order t h a t modulation be l i n e a r ,
A miniature power amplifier, nsing one dual triode as a pimh-pull
amplifier was constnicted f o r use a t 2 5 t o lOOmc with any of the
above mentioned transndtters. The antennae f o r these transmitters
was a half-wave v e r t i c a l dipole.
The receiver found s a t i s f a c t o r y f o r these systems WPB t h e R-2A/ARR-3
Sonobuoy receiver. This iyit employs Automatic frequency control
-
and w i l l t o l e r a t e a d r i f t .3smc before retuning i s required,
When SCR-658 radio direction finding equipment became available
work on these transmitters was abandoned and a 4OOmc transmitter
used. This system allows f o r accurate positioning of the balloon
systems by use of crossed asemuths from several receiving stations.
A transmitter using pulse time modulation was designed f o r use
with this receiving equipment. The advantages here a r e high
peak power with r e l a t i v e l y low input power (and thus a high
signal t o noise r a t i o ) and simultaneous transmission of several
d a t a channels a t one frequency, This project was abandoned
before tests could be completed due t o a modification of project
recp irements, but preliminary r e s u l t s indicated t h a t t h i s -tern
woiild be advantageous i n AM o r FM transmission. This system makes
use of short duration pulses ( .5 micro second) a t a r e p e t i t i o n
rate of approximately 10 kc.
For long range transmission of information an amplitude-modulated
transmitter was developed. (Fig. 6) This unit, the ml, i s c r y s t a l
controlled, emplo-g a 3Ab miniattrre tube i n a Herce o s c i l l a t o r
c i r c u i t as t h e c r y s t a l o s c i l l a t o r . This c i r c u i t does n o t require
an LC tank c i r c u i t and eliminates the tuning of t h i s addi
stage. The RF amplifier is a 3A5 miniature dual triode tu
The u n i t was designed t o give 1.5 w a t t output with a 270 vo
p l a t e siipply and can be used with 380 v o l t s t o give 3 w a t t oi2tput.
 10 .

fig. 6
AM01 T r a n s d t t e r

Frequency ranges from 1.5 t o 9mc can be employed with the AM-1.
The modulation of the AM-1 is effected by use of a t r i o d e modulator
(2-3AS) tubes) connected i n s e r i e s with the p l a t e supply o f a c l a s s
"Ctt KF amplifier. Variation of th? p l a t e supply voltage of t h e
RF amplifier caused by change i n tube resistance gives amplitude
modulation l i n e a r with p l a t e voltage of the anplifier. By use

.
of t h i s system modulation from DC t o several hundred cycles i s
obtained

The receiver f o r this transmitter was a Hatmnerlund SP 400X w i t h

several modifications. I n order t o increase t h e signal t o noise
r a t f o a c r y s t a l f i l t e r was introduced i n t o the IF amplifier
circuit t o narrow the handwidth. Bandwidth was also reduced by
decreasing the coefficient of uoupling between the primary and
secondary of the IF transformem. By thi8 reduction of bandwidth
t o 3kc a 3 microvolt signal produced a 15.5 D3 signal t0 noise
ratio, where a t 16 kc bandwidth only 7 DB was obtained.
I n order t o obtain accurate reproductSon of the amplitude of the
audio frequencv the AVC c i r c u i t was modiFied by adding a f h e d
bias t o the AVC diode of the receiver. T h i s flattened the character-
i s t i c of the AVC circnit and no change in amplitude of recorded
audio signal was detected over a six hour f l i g h t using a constant
amplitude audio signal f r o m the tranmitter. The signal was
tapped off a t the output of the second detector of the receiver
and fed t o a Brush BL 90s AC a q l i f i e r f o r moording. The recorder
used was a Brush BL-202 double channel oscillograph. A qu8rter
wave vertical receiving antennae was employed w i t h a counter poise
ground, The transmitting antennae was a vertical half wave dipole.
In order t o use the AM-1 f o r tranadssion of infornation from
pmssure and temperature sensors a relaxation oscillator circuit
-
uaa incorporated i n the s374tesn. (dotted section Fig. 6). This
oscillator used one half of one of the 3A5 modulator tubes and
produced a blocking rate appmxinately proportional to tesistance
of the sensor i n s t m t s This information could be superimposed
on the r e p l a r moddated signal and tre0 types of information could
be transmitted simultmeo~~sly; one as a~amplitude and frequency
change of the basic signal, the other a8 a frequency of pulses
superimposed on the basic signal.
The AM-1 has been used i n balloon Oontrol reaearch 50 transmit
information on preeeure, teraperatnre and ballast requirements.
It w a s also employed t o give ormstion on Neutron intensities
ih another Air. Force p r o j e c t 8 In order t o obtain infomatian
on balloon position on a wind studs project the aM-1 was wed
a1 a beacon t o be "homed i n " on by the radio compass of aimraft(6).
A system of diversity reception was conaidered for use with a
dual chamel AM-1 transmitter i n order t o increase r s l i a b i l i w
despite atmosphric noise. In the dual channel u n i t a common
modmlator was connected t o two separate crgstal oscillators and
RF amplifiers. In preltminary t e s t a two receiver and recording
Unit8 Wm Used.
O

For short range balloon f l i g h t s the AM-lwas modified f o r uae

with subminiature and acorn type tubes. In this, the AM-2, two
2327 tubes in parallel pmvide excitation f o r the type 958A RF
amplifier. A c i r c u i t diagram of this unit is shown a s Fig, 7.
 Fig. 7
AM-2 Transmitter

In addition t o radio direction finding with the ~ ~ € 6 and 5 8 beacon

transmission Kith radio campass, sqveral other methods of balloon
positioning were evaluated. Radar positioning was successful
only if a t a r g e t was attached to the balloon t r a i n , Generally,
the -es possible w i t h radar are not as great as those possible
by radio direction findiqg. For direction finding on the low
frequency AM transmitter some value was found i n use of loop
antennae. Accuracy of this method i s between and 2 degrees
and is generally hindered by sky wave reflection,
A pulse time modulated transponder beacon a t high frequencies
was found t o be advantageous f o r obtaining accurate s l a n t range
to the balloon. Preliminary investigation of use of Doppler
e f f e c t f o r positioning indicated that t h i s method is not feasible
due t o d i f f i c u l t y i n measuring the low freqriency differences
involved.
D. Launching SeMces
h r h g the cour8e of the pPo3ect balloon f l i g h t s were s p l i t into
two general classifications, (a] research and (b) service.
Rerearch flights were made t o t e s t balloon controls and telemet@r=
i n g systems developed under the contract. A f'ull report o
research flights has been mads %nnTbohnical Report 93.02 f l ,p
Section L I I , S\namsrg of FLightsn
Service f l i g h t s were carried arb by New York University personnel
in conjunction with technical personnel fromthe sponsoring agemcy
t o test geophysical e q u i p a t developed i n Air Force laboratories.
The requirements for these flights ware launching and t f i c k b g
of b a 0 0 n S t o float at specified altitudets for short periods of
time (6 t o 8 hours). Because of this s h o e flight duration,
simplified plastic balloon system8 were used. Balloons mm
maintained aloft by ose of constant flxed ballast flow, or bal&st
was excluded entirely from the aystem. A typical flight using
constant ballast flow a t a rate slightly exceeding leakage ldsses
i s a h m as Fig. 8.

Tlrr-YsT
NYU BALLOON PROJECT FLIGHT 82
Barograph Record Of G.M. 20' Plasttc Balloon With
534 gm/hr Fixed Ballast Leak
R L L C A U D AT ALAYOO0RDqN.Y- 0811 YST, 10 AVO 1*4e
DIIQCNDCD A T ROSWLLL,UY- IOW YST, I0 AUS m 4 S
DURATION- IIt brB

Fig. 8
Balloon Flight Using Fixed Ballast Flow
F i g * 9 i s a t y p i c a l f l f g h t with no ballwt. The f l i g h t train for
them f l i g h t s i s shown as Fig..lo.

Time- MS.T
NYU BALLOON PROJECT FLIGHT 71
Barograph Record Of GM 20 Ft.,Plastrc Balloon Showing
Balloon Performance When No Ballast Was Dropped
RELEAILD AT ALAYOOORDO N.Y, L O 4 t Y8T-• JULY, I940
RECOVERED AT VALENTINE TEXA8, 10 JULY, I940
EITIYATED DURATION 10 HOURS
fig. 9
Balloon Flight Without Ballast
1

GM20'BdPcn-

7).

+a
h
f

Payload
1

-
h
f
Poyload

Ftg. 10
Flight Train, S e d c e Flight
With lig..v weight payloads, balloon systemof t h i s type can be
laxinched by two o r three experienced balloon men. The launching
is carried out i n a manner similar t o h t explained i n Section 11,
Operations, of llTechnical Report 93.02 tl7 i n that the balloon
i s i n f l a t e d i n t h e lee s i d e of a building or wind screen, ( o r i n
an a i r c r s f t hangar i f one is available, o r i n t h e open when winds
a r e l i g h t ) w i t h t h e eqiiipment t r a i n l a i d out downwind of the balloon,
The amount of gas l i f t is equal t o balloon weight plus apg-oximately
10%t o cause ascent a t 800 t o lOCOft. min. picture of i n f l a t i o n
of a 20 ft. diameter plastic balloon I s shown as Fig, 11.

?.Em 11
Inflation of a 20 ft. P l a s t i c B a l l ~ ~ ; l
 16.

The following i s a l i s t of equipment needed f o r laimching of

a single f l i g h t of this type:
( a ) hiinching Equipanent :

1 ea .set i n s t ~ i c t i o n s perat at ions Manual)

2 ea. e l l i p t i c a l shot bags (each f i l l e d with loo# of shot)
1 ea. LO1 1 6 1 Ground Cloth
b ea. sheets po1yethylene,.00ln t o rO0411, 4' x h1
1 ea. gas talc manifold with pressure gages and valve
1ea. rubber hose, 1" I.D.,lOI long with diffuser
1 ea. rubber tubing 1/2n \>ore, 1/81, wall, 8' long
1 ea. solution balance
1 ea. inflation nozale, -196 for rubber balloons
1ea. t o o l k i t complete with 2 sheath knives, 501 cloth
measuring tape, bras8 wire, 1"Mystic tape, v o l t ohmmeter,
pliers, screwdrivers, inflation tools, flashlights, crescent
wrenches, soldering iron, compass, 2 open-end wrenches,
1 4 / 8 n x l-l/hn openings, 14" pipe wrench, spanner f o r
helium tank valves, etc.
1ea. theodolite ML-247 with tripod ML-78 (optional)
1 ea. recorder, brush oscillograph o r other with amplifier.
1 ea. SCR-658 radio direction finder
1 ea. chronometer

(b) n i g h t Eqtiipnent:
2 t o 5 tanks helivm
1 ea. balloon
2 ea. r o l l s acetate fiber scotch tape
1 ea. appendix stiffeners ( i f appendix is t o be used)
5os# t e s t nylon line
7% t e s t linen twine
2 ea. 350 gram balloon HL-13U (for wind sock)
5 t o 10 toggles o r hooks
1 ea. radio transmitter
1 ea. pressure sensor (and temperature if desired)
Payload inqtrumentation
1 ea. banner, 39 x 61 ,
Data sheets
Yeight sheets
Reward t a g s (EnrJlish, Spanish or other language)
(c) Termination Eq\iipnant
1 ea, flight tennihation switch
l e a . s e t r i p rigging
2 ear cannons
2 ea. squibs (treated for high altitude)
 17

(d) Fixed Rate Ballast Equipment :(optional)

1 ea. o r i f i c e spinnerette, t o give proper b a l l a s t flow
1 gallon b a l l a s t , compass f l u i d AN-C-UC,
1 ea. b a l l a s t reservoir (1gallon capacity)
1 ea. f i l t e r 3' diameter, 325 x 325, phosphor bronae mesh
6 inches tubing (Tygon) 3/16n bore
Tracking of these f l i g h t s was maintained by use of an SCR 658 radio
receiver with a 400mc transmitter telemetering information from
t h e balloon system. Information received through t h e telernetering
c i r c u i t can be recorded on a standard weather s t a t i o n recorder,
a recording oscilloscope of t h e Brush Development type o r by any
other convenient means.
Altitude of the service f l i g h t s was determined by use of a modified
radiosonde modulator, an olland cycl modul3tor (see p.68 ,
Section
f
I, General, Technical Report 93.02(1 ), o r by computation from
knowledye of th3weight of the balloon system and volume. of the
balloon
In order t o keep balloon systems from f l o a t i n g i n the a i r lanes,
a f l i g h t terminJtion switch was incliided i n the c i r c u i t . This
switch i s a radiosonde modiiL.ator modified so that a l l contacts
above 25,000 f t . a r e disconnected from the c i r c u i t . The pen arm
r i d e s on a shelf diwing ascent t o about 30,000 f t . and then f d l s
t o the commutator (See Fig. 1 2 ) .

Fig. 1 2
F l i g h t Termination Switch
 18.

When the system again descends t o 25,000, the pen arm comes i n t o
contact with the commutator contact and an e l e c t r i c a l c i r c u i t i s
closed through a squib i n the load line. The load l i n e is cut
and the load on the system falls six t o eight f e e t before being
caught by a snpplenentary load line. During t h i s fall a r i p
l i n e pulls a hole one foot long i n the side of t h e balloon and
t h e system descends using t h e p a r t i a l l y i n f l a t e d balloon t o hold
the rate of descent t o approximately 1200 fl/minute. This system
has been w e d successfully i n over 100 f l i g h t s .
A drawing of t h e r i p assembly i s shown as Mrs. 13. The cannon and
squib t o c u t the load l i n e are shown as Ftig. .lk.
 19

NYLON LINE

LEID BULLET
ALUMINUM3 7

Fig. 1L
Rip Assembly Cannon

I n al1,llS service f l i g h t s were made imder t h i s contract from

variom government i n s t a l l a t i o n s throughovt the country. A
summary of these f l i c h t s is l i s t e d i n Table I (see end of t e x t ) .

E. Meteorological Analysis
As one phase of t h i s project, New York University agreed t o prepare
analyses of winds and temperatures i n the troposphere f o r dates and
l o c a l a t i e s specified by Watson Laboratories.
The v e r t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n of temperatirre from the ground up t o
heights of about 1s lan a t the time of any p a r t i c u l a r experiment
was estimated from t h e routine radiosonde ascents which were
nearest i n respect t o both time and space, t o the s i t e of the
experiment. If t h e time of the experiment was within three hours
of one of the twice-daily, standard hours of radiosonde observa-
tion, t h e temperature d i s t r i b v t i o n given by such observation was
assumed to' have existed (within t h e limits of e r r o r i n t h e method
of measurement) a t t h e t i m e of the experiment. If t h e time differ-
ence was greater than three hours, a l i n e a r interpolation was made
between radiosonde observations preceding and following the time
of the experiment. Interpolation i n space was accomplished
Ordinarily by assmning a l i n e a r horizontal variation of temperature,
 20 .

.
However, when weather conditions indicated a markedly dis-
continvoiis v a r i a t i o n of temperature (i.e a “front ) , appropriate
ff

subjective modification of the objective l i n e a r interpolation

technique was applied.
The v e r t i c a l distribution of w i n d was determined mainly from
direct observations (pilot-balloon and radio wind-sounding
measurements) of free-air winds a t weather s t a t i o n s i n the area
of each experiment. However, actual measirrements of winds i n
the upper h a l f of the troposphere often are scarce or completely
lacking, and it was frequently necessary t o make use of an
i n d i r e c t method of estimating the wind a t elevations greater than
5 lan. Charts of t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of atmospheric pressure(a8
given by radiosonde observations) a t selected l e v e l s between
5 km and 1s km were constnlcted, and t h e wind direction and
speeds at these levels were computed from t h e well-known geostrophic
wind equation, which r e l a t e s the wind t o the horizontal distribu-
t i o n of pressure.
For-the experiments carried out off the e a s t coast of the U.5.A.
between 1 August 1946 and 1August 1947, it seemed f e a s i b l e to
show the d i s t r i b u t i o n s of both temperature and wind i n v e r t i c a l
cruss-section. This was due t o the f a c t t h a t these experiment8
were made, and t h e reslilts of same recorded, within a f a i r l y
narrow band centered close t o a l i n e between Lakehurst, N. J.,
and Nantucket, Mass., a t which points radiosonde and upper-wind
observations are taken regularly. However, v e r t i c a l cross-sections
of temperature and wind were abandoned as a method of representa-
t i o n of t h e distr5bution pertaining t o a l l subsequent experiments.
There werb several reasons f o r t h i s decision. In the first place,
the sites and character of l a t e r experiments d i d not f i t into t h e
e x i s t i n g weather-obserring network i n a manner favorable t o cross-
sectional representation. I n t h e second place, experience brought
about the conclnsion t h a t the horizontal gradient of temperature
is usually so amall that,within the a r s a encompassed by an experiment,
the difference i n temperature a t a given l e v e l between points a t
t h e ends of a cross-section 58 no greater than t h e average e r r o r
of the radiosonde measurements. Thirdly, it was soon realized t h a t
the v a r i a b i l i t y of t h e wind i n space and time i s such that an individual
pilot-balloon o r rawinsonde ascent is not representative of the
average v e r t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n of velocity during the i n t e r v a l
occupied by a single experiment. Furthermore, as mentioned above,
the wind a t high l e v e l s i n the troposphere often had to be in-
ferred by i n d i r e c t means. Since t h e t r u e wind usually deviates
somewhat from t h e t h e o r e t i c a l geostrophic wind (the l a t t e r being
derived imder c e r t a i n simplifying assrvnptions) and since the
geometry of the pressure f i e l d is subject t o some uncertainty
Owing t o inaccuracies i n the radiosonde observations, it became
apparent that t h e assignment of a single velocity value a t any
 .
given point i n a cross-section through the atmosphere was
misleading

I n order t o avoid the suggestion of greater precision than was

warranted b y a t h e charaoter of t h e information available, it
w a s decided, during t h e autumn of 19b7 t o present the meteorological
diagnoses i n a d i f f e r e n t form. Since t h a t time, graphs ( i n l i e u

+-
of cross-sections) have been constructed t o show t h e v e r t i c a l
distributions of t h e estimated ran es, that i s t o say, t h e estimated
extremes of tanperature and win on t h e whole o r over a p a r t of
the area involved i n each experiment.
Since August, 1950, the principal task has been t h e preparation
of diagnoses of conditions existing dwing experiments being con-
ducted regularly i n eastern Colorado, western Nebraska and western
Kansas by the Industrial Research I n s t i t u t e of the University of
Denver. The design of these experiments necessitates a p a r t i c u l a r l y
careful study of the available weather data and the exercise of
a considerable amount of synoptic meteorological judgment i n the
preparation of t h e wind and temperature diagnoses.
F. F l i g h t s Utilizing the Constant Level Balloon System

After completion of the balloon control and telemetering development

phases of the projec't, t h e balloon systems wwre u t i l i z e d under
Contracts -4F 19(122)-45 and AF 28(099)-10, between t h i s University
and the A i r Force Cambridge Research Laboratories. A brief review
of these projects i s as follows:
1. (Contract AF 19(122)-45)
Under the terms of t h i s contract the Research Division wa8
commissioned t o launch and track constant l e v e l balloon
systems i n order t o study xind conditions a t the 200 n;b
level of the atmosphere. Flights were t o remain a f l o a t
u n t i l they hsd traveled approximately lo00 miles.
In order t o track t h e balloon systems, the A M 4 trans-
mitter was operated a t 1746 kc, using the radio compass
from an a i r c r a f t t o "home in" on t h e balloon and position
it a t specified time intervals. Information on pressure
a l t i t u d e , b a l l a s t flow data and balloon, free air and
transmitter battery pack temperatures was transmitted
throvgh t h e AM-1 t o receivers moiinted i n the aircraft
and recorded on bmsh recorders f o r analysis a t New
Pork University.
A t o t a l o f 2 2 f l i g h t s (two of which crossed t h e Atlantic
Ocean and were recovered i n Norway and Algeria) were
 22.

made on this project. A complete report of these f l i g h t s

and the (
121.01" b-r t h i s Research Division .
uipment med i s included i n llTechnical Report
87
2. High Neiitron I n t e n s i t v Stady (Contract AF 28 (099)-10)

In conjunction with a stiidy t o determine the a l t i t u d e of

maximum ~ e t i t r o ndensity a modification was made on the
Consta-it A1 t i t v d e balloon system developed under t h i s
contract. I n order t o study neiitron densities a t two
d i f f e r e n t a l t i t u d e s Kith t h e same set of instruments,
it was desirable t o carry these instnimenb throligh
a nstepped f l i g h t " . The balloon system i n this case
was t o ascwd t o a selected a l t i t u d e (say 45,000 f t . )
f l o a t there f o r one hour and then ascend t o a higher
a l t i t u d e ( f o r example 65,000 f t . ) t o f l o a t f o r another
honr before descending,

The advantages of t h i s type f l i g h t f o r Cosmic Ray s t d i e s

are t h a t a given a l t i t u d e maybe sanpled f o r a long
enough period of time t o obtain s t a t i s t i c a l l y v a l i d
results, and snch s t a t i s t i c a l sampling can be made
a t several l e v e l s uithont the necessity of releasing
another balloon system and other set of neutron sensing
instruments, By proper design of equipment a f a i r l y
wide range of a l t i t u d e s can be sampled witd llaltitude
steps" of almost any desired size.

The s t e p e f f e c t is attained by releaoe of a f a i r l y

l a r g e amount of b a l l a s t a t a f a s t r a t e set off by a
pre-set clock timer o r a radio release activated by
a transmitter on t h e ground. The amount of b a l l a s t
t o be released i s determined f r o m the standard a l t i t u d e -
volvme load relationships w e d f o r constant-level balloon
f l i g h t . A s a part of the f i n s l b a l l a s t release, the
b a l l a s t tank and i t s controls may be dropped from t h e
system.

If t h e l e v e l positions of t h e f l i g h t must be controlled

t o f i n e limits, o r i f they must be of long duration
(more than two hours) it .is necessary to employ constant-
l e v e l b a l l a s t control over these portions of the f l i g h t .
However, i f the l e v e l portions of t h e f l i g h t are t o be
i n t h e neighborhood of 1 hovr duration, b a l l a s t control
during these floating period- can be elimin3ted, making
iise of the inherent s t 2 b i l i t g of the p l a s t i c balloon
systems f o r short range constant l e v e l f l i g h t s . It is
t h i s l a t t e r method which was used by t h e New York University
group i n the study of Neutron Xaxima.
 23

I n this study four f l i g h t s were rnade t o st?idy conditions

a t a l t l t n d e s of L5,OOO and 60,000 f t . A clock timer
was s e t t o cause release of ballast a f t e r t h e system
had f l o a t e d a t the laser l e v e l f o r one hour. After
b a l l a s t was expended t h e timer caused release of the
b a l l a s t tank t o further reduce the load on the systems.
A t y p i c a l f l i g h t of t h i s series is shown as Ftg. 15.
Further detailc on this stud ave been given i n reports
on "Neutron Intenpity Study ftbf by this Research Division.

TIME AFTER RELEASE - HOURS

Fig. 15
"Two Level" Stepned Flight
 24

Release A l t i tilde
Flight
No. -
Date Point i n ft. RecuverJr

PIIKF-1 5/13/48 Maxwell Field, Ala. 60,oOO

n -2 5/14./48 I1
n
ll
n
11
55,OOo
n -3 5/14/48 I1 did not reach Tyler,
altitude Ala
11 11 11
-4 5/1L/48 55,000

7/23/48 Eglin AFB, Fla. 45,000

11 11 11
8/23/48 45,000
8/24/48 ll 11
Il
ll
Il
45,ooo
N
8/25/48 45,000
8/25/48 n 11 11
45,000
N N
8/26/49 N
45,000
n n 11
45,000
8/30/48
ll n 11
45,000
8/31/48 n 11
ll
9/2/48 45,000
n
9/2/48 11 11
45,000
9/8/48 n n n 45,000
11 N 11
9/10/49 45,000
n 11 11
45,000
9/13/48 n
9/29/48 11 11
45,m0
9/30/Ls n 11 I1
45,000
1111/48 ll 11 N
45,000
n
11/4/48 ll 11
45,000
ll/4/48 ll 11 11
45,0~
11/8/48 n n ll
45,000 300 261 N 860 291 W
N 11
ll/8/48 11
45,000
11/9/48 I1 11 11
45, OOo
11/15/48 n 11 11
45, OOo
11/15/&8 11 11 N
45,~0
11/16/48 ll 11 n
n
45, OOo
11/17/48 n 11
45,000
11/18/48 11 I1 11 45,000 1 2 mL.W.,Fitsgerald
Ga.3:30 P.M. 11/18h8
11/18/48 N 11 It
45,000
N 11
12/1/48 11
45,000
11 n ' n
12/9/48 45,OOO
12/11/48 11 11 11 60,000
12/12/48 11 11 N 62,000
II
12/14/48 11 11
65,000
12/16/48 n 11 11
65,000
12/17/48 n 11 11
65,000
11 It Test
1/13/49 I(

n
1/13/49 I1
11 11
50, mo
1/14/49 11 11
50,000
n
1/15/49 If ll
50,000
1/28/49 11 11 n No release
 Release Altitgde
Date Point tn ft.
1/2 8/49 Eglin AFB, na. @,OOo
1/28/49 McDill AFB,Fla. 50, OOo
2/16&9 Avon Park, Fla. 48,000
2/17/49 11 n n 50,OOO
2/18/49 I1 II n 48,000
2/21/49 II n 0
55, OOo
2/22/h9 I1 n n 50,000
2/22/49 11 n n 40,000
2/23/49 I1 n n 42,000
2/23/49 n n 11
Equipment
failure
2/24/49 n I1 n 50, OOo
n n n
3/2/49
n n
45, OOo
3/3/49 11
Instrument
failure
3/3/49 11 n n 50, OOo
3/4/49 11 n n
50,OOO
6/7/49 Clovis AFB,
n
NoMe
n
45, OOO
6/10/49 11
45,000
6/l0/49 n n
I1
n n n
45, OOo
6/1h/49 45,000 Graham, Texas
6/14/49 I1 It It
45,000
6/16/49 11 n n 50,000
6/23/49 n 11 11
50,000
n
6/23/49
n
It
n
It
5 5 , ~
7/19/49 11
50,000 Portale's, N.M.
7/21/49 I1 11 11
50,000
7 /21/49 11 11 11
50,OOo
9W 4 9 n 11 11
50,000 Marlow, Okla.
10/6/49 11 n 11
50,000 La Mont, Okla.
11/18/49 It 11 11
50, 000 Frankel City, Texas
11 11 It
=/30/49 50,OOO
12/2/49 It n 11
50,000
n
12/6/49 Boonville, Mias.
.
11 11
50,000
12/8/49 11 I1 11
50,OOo ,
Fort Doiiglas Ark

1/23/50
1/31/50
Vance AFB, Okla.
n It 11
50,OOO
50,000
Centralia, I11
Nevada, Moo
.
2/2/50 II n 11
So, 000 Moore's H i l l , Ind.
n n
.
11
2/9/50 50,000 Shcridan, Ky.
2/9/50 It n II
50,000 P t H i l l f ord,

2/9/50
2/14/50
n
11
It
I1
II
I1
50,000
50,000
Nova Scotia, Can.
Jonesboro, Me
Perkins, akla.
.
2/14/50 11 11 11
50,OOo Winchester,
Ontario, Can.
 26.

Flight Release
-
NO -
Date. Point Recovery

EN-9 2117150 Vance AFB, Okla. WaShbUn, Mo*

" -10 3/3/50 N ll n

KN-1
11 -2
-3
4/25/50
5/12/50
5/26/50
Sedalia AFB, &%.
n
11
n
ti
II

n
Booneville , Mo
Warrensburg, Moo
.
" -4 5/26/50 11 11
n
11
n
Concordia, Moo
n -5 Hi. 6/2/50 ll
n
Wapella, Ill.
-5 Lo. 6/2/50 11
n
11
n
n -6 Hi. 6/20/50 11 Ashtabula, Dhio
-6 Lo. n 11 N
n 6/20/50
-7 Lo. 7/11/50 11 I1 11 Springdale , Ark.
' -7 Hi. 7/11/50 I1 n 11

n-8 7/14/50 11 11 It Loysville, Pa.

-9 7/24/50 11 N I1 California, *Yo
11 11 11
-10 8/3l/50
1) -11 9/14/50 N 11 n Shelbyville , Tenn
' -12 9/14/50 I1

n
I1
n
11
ti
La Monte, Mo.
n -13 9/22/50
n -14 9/28 150 N N I1 Lolcisianna, Moo
-15 10/5?50 ll n n
n -16 10/l0/50 n 11 11

-17 10/12/50 n n 11 Marshall, Moo

-18
-19
10/17/SO
10/26/50
n
n
n
it
it
n . Dickson, Tenn .
I n addition service f l i g h t s were made from Watson Laboratories,AMC
E a t o n t m , N.J., f o r t e s t i n g of items of geophysical equipment during
the coim8e of the project.
Dnring June, 1949, service f l i g h t s were made from Luke AFB,
Arizona, simultaneovsly with those made from Clovis AFB, New Aexico.
 REFERENCES

1. Research Division, College of Engineering, New Pork University,

-
Technical Report 93.02, Constant
Section I General
rations
Level Balloons
Constant-Level Bdloons
= November, 19bg
-
JP~UW, 1949
? v y of Flights = July, 1949
2, Murray, W. D.; Schneider, C. S.; Smith, J . R. = Developrasnt and
. -
U t i l i z a t i o n of Constant Level Balloons
American Geophysical Union", Dec 1950.
"Transa&ions of the

3. Research Division, College of Engineering, New York University,

-
Technical Report #l,Constant Level Balloon Project #93 April, 1948.

4. Spilhaus, A. F.3 Schneider, C. S.; Moore, C. B.

Altitude Free Balloon8 - -
Controlled
nJournal of Meteorology" -948.
5. Research Division, College of Wgineering, New York University,
Determination of Neutron Maximum a t High Altitudes -
Progress
Reports and Technical Report #U8.5, March,1949 t o March, 1950.
6 . Research Division, College of Engineering, New York University,
Technical Report 121.05
June, 1950.
- High Altitude Balloon Trajectory Studz,
7. Research Division,. College of Engineering, New York University,
Final Report 93.17, Radio Transmitter, Receiver and Recording
Systems f o r Constant Level Balloons -
June, 1948.
 11
New York University
Constant Level Balloons
Section 1, General
November 15, 1949
 Technical Report No. 93.02

CONSTANT LEVEL BALLxlaS

Section 1

GENERAL

Constant Level Balloon Project

New'York U n i v e r s i t y

Prepared i n accordmoe w i t h provisions of c o n t r a c t

W28-099-a~-241, between
Wation Laboratories, Red Bsnk, N e w J e r s e y
and
New York University

The research reported i n t h i s document has been made possible

through support and sponsorship extended by t h e Geophysical
Research D i r e c t o r a t e of t h e Gambridge F i e l d S t a t i o n , AMC,
U. S. A i r Force, under Contract No. W28-099-ao-241. It is
published f o r t e c h n i c a l information only and does n o t repre-
s e n t recommendations or conclusions o f t h e sponsoring agency.

Prepared by: James R. Smith

and
BIilliam D. Murray

Approved by :

Dr. Harold K. Work

Director of t h e Research Division

College of Engineering
New York University
15 November 1949
New York 53, New York
 TBBLE OF CONTENTS

Pane Number

I . Introduotion ............................................... 5

Contract Requirements
Project F a c i l i t i e s
....................................
....................................... 5
6

.
11 P r i n c i p l e s of Balloon C.mt r o l .............................. 6

.
I11 Methods of Attack .......................................... 8

Rubber Balloons ..........................................

......................................... 8
P l a s t i o Balloons
Internal-Pressure Balloons ..............................
.......................................
9
14
A l t i t u d e Controls
F l i g h t Simulation .......................................
F l i g h t Ternination Gear .................................
16
25
29

IV . Equations and The oret ica 1 C on s i d e r a t ions

..............
............................................
F l o a t i n g A l t i t u d e and A l t i t u d e S e n s i t i v i t y 30
Rate of Rise
Superheat and i t s Effect6 ...............................
....................................
33
34
Adiabatic Lapse Rate
Diffusion and Leakage of L i f t i n g Gas ....................
...........
38
40

A General Equation of Motion ............................

bursting Pressure and Appendix Considerations 47
56

V . Telemetering .............................................. 62

Information Transmitted .................................

....................................... 62
Transmitters Used
............................
..........................................
Receivers and Recorders Used
63
65
Batteries Used
Radio Directhon-Finding
Radar and Optical Tracking
.................................
..............................
65
56
67

VI . Instrumentation ........................................... 67

A l t i t u d e Determination ..................................
................................ 67
Temperature Measurements
Ballast Metering ........................................ 74
76

VII . Conclusions ............................................... 79

1. INTRODUCTION

A. Contract Requh-ement8
On November 1, 1946 the Research Division of the College of
Engineering of New York University entered i n t o Contract
W28-099-ac-241 with Watson Laboratories of t h e A i r Materiel
Command. Under this c o n t r a c t the University was commissioned
t o design, develop and f l y constant-level balloons t o c a r r y
instruments t o a l t i t u d e s from 10 t o 20 kilometers, adjustable
a t 2-kilometer intervals.
The following performance was specified:

1, Altitude t o be maintained within 500 meters.

2. Duration of constant level f l i g h t t o be i n i t i a l l y
6 t o 8 hours minimum, eventually 48 hours.

3. The accuraey of pressure observation t o be comparable

t o t h a t obtainable with the standard Army radiosonde
e3-5 mb).

In a d d i t i o n t o t h i s balloon performance it w a s desired t h a t :

4. A balloon-borne t r a n s m i t t e r be developed f o r telemetering

of information from the balloon t o s u i t a b l e ground re-
ceivers.

5. Positioning of balloon during f l i g h t be determined by

ground tracking such a s radar o r r a d i o direction-finding
o r theodolite.

6.
preted .
Appropriate meteorological data be collected and i n t e r -

Following the f i r s t year of work the contract w a s renewed f o r

a 1-year period, and i n addition t o t h e provisions of the
o r i g i n a l contract it u 8 s agreed t h a t a t o t a l of 100 t e s t f l i g h t s
would be launahed by the University.

In September, 1948 a second renewal of the contract was eft’ected.

With t h i s renewal, whioh expires i n March, 1949, it is ex-
pected that the development of equipment w i l l be concluded.
Further extensions are under consideration whereby h’ew York Uni-
v e r s i t y w i l l supply standardized f l i g h t p a r and f1i;ht ser-
v i c e personnel f o r routine t e s t f l i g h t s .

-5=
 B. Projeot F a o i l i t i e s

To meet the requimnents of the contraot, a researoh group

was b u i l t up and the following f a o i l i t i e r w m made a v a i l a b l e :

1. Administrative section.

2. Engineering'personnel were assigned t o one or more of the

following groups:

( a ) Balloon section
(b) Performance oontrol section
( c ) T e l e m t e r i n g section
(d) Analysis section (including meteorological and per-
formance data a n a l y s i s )

3. A small machine shop was provided t o manufaoture experi-

mental models of equipment which was flown.

4. A f i e l d crew f o r launching, tracking and recovery of

balloons was established.

Work-shop, laboratory, o f f f c e and storage space was pro-

vided by N e w York University (Figures 1 and 2). Field work
was l a r g e l y conducted a t Army bases and A i r Forces i n s t a l l a -
tions. A t one time the number of full-time employees reached
26 with 17 part-time men on the s t a f f a t t h a t t i m e . Most in-
dividuals were c a l l e d upon t o work i n several departments
depending upon the urgency of f i e l d work, equipment preparation
or development work.

.
I1 PRIhTC IPLES OF BALLOON CONTROL

Following preliminary investigations, i x o d i s t i n c t p r i n c i p l e s of

achieving constanbpressure a l t i t u d e f o r f r e e balloons were studied
i n d e t a i l . The f i r s t of these i s the maintenance of t h e balloon
a t f l o a t i n g l e v e l by the use of a servo-mechanism or other con-
t r o l which cause8 the supported load t o vary with the buoyancy of
the balloon. The second p r i n c i p l e embodies t h e use of a non-
extensible balloon capable of withstanding a high i n t e r n a l pressure.
With a fixed volume and a given load, such balloons remain a t a
oonstant pressure level as long a s t h e i n t e r n a l pressure of the
b a l l o m i s equal t o or g r e a t e r than t h a t of the a i r a t f l o a t i n g
level. A surplus of buoyancy causes 8up8r-pressure, b u t when t h e
gas i s oooled r e l a t i v e t o the a i r environment such a surplus i s
needed t o prevent excessive reductions i n balloon pressure. When-
ever the balloon's i n t e r n a l pressure becomes less than t h a t of the
air, it f a l l s t o earth. Such a balloon was used by the Japanese
for the f i r e bombing of the w e s t e r n United S t a t e s during World War 11.

-6-
To use the f i r s t of these, p r i n c i p l e s it i s possible t o main-
t a i n a condition of buoyanoy by a t l e a s t the following two me-
thods: ( 1 ) dropping a part of the load, as b a l l a s t , t o match the
l o s s of l i f t i n g gas which occurs a s a r e s u l t of d i f f u s i o n and
leakagej ( 2 ) replacement of t h e l i f t i n g gas by evaporation from a
r e s e r v o i r of l i q u i f i e d helium o r hydrogen. O f these two methods,
b a l l a s t dropping i s most s a t i s f a c t o r y from the consideration of
s i m p l i c i t y of c o n t r o l and s a f e t y of personnel. mile the use of
l i q u i d helium i s t h e o r e t i c a l l y more e f f i c i e n t , the amount and com-
p l e x i t y of c o n t r o l equipment adds much t o the c o s t and a l s o the
weight of air-borne equipment.

The development of non-elastic balloons which oan withstand high

i n t e r n a l pressure was investigated. TWO designs which compr6-
mise extreme c o s t (required f o r balloons of high i n t e r n a l pressure)
with small w a l l strength, hence small super pressure, were tested.

A t f i r s t , attempts w e r e made t o c o n t r o l balloon performance by using

buoyancy-load balance techniques with e l a s t i c balloons, b u t t h e
d i f f i c u l t i e s which w e r e experienced r e s u l t e d i n the development of
a t h i r d p r i n c i p l e of operation combining a non-extensible balloon
with a system of c o n t r o l s which can be applied e i t h e r t o a freely
expanding balloon o r t o a balloon of fixed volume.

ikE'IIFiODS OF ATTACK

The work on the development of controlled-altitude balloons may be

divided i n t o t h r e e phases, each one i d e n t i f i e d by the type of bal-
loon which was used. Concurrent with the balloon development was
the design and t e s t i n g of c o n t r o l equipment required t o maintain
the balloon a t s p e c i f i c a l t i t u d e s . Some of the equipment i n s t r u -
mentation wa s used on more than one kind of balloon, b u t in general
the problems and methods of a t t a c k a r e i d e n t i f i e d with one of the
three types of balloons.

A. Rubber Balloons

Following t h e example of Clarke and Korff, assemblies of neo-

prene rubber balloons were f i r s t considered. Using these
f r e e l y expanding balloons it w a s necessary t o balance the load
t o be l i f t e d with the buoyancy given by a n i n t e g r a l number
of balloons. One o r more accessory balloons were attached t o
the essembly t o provide l i f t i n g force t o c a r r y the t r a i n a l o f t .
With the gear at a predetermined a l t i t u d e , the l i f t i n g bal-
loons w e r e c u t loose from the t r a i n by a pressure-activated
switch,leaving the equipment a t f l o a t i n g l e v e l , more or less
e x a c t l y balanced. Since there i s no inherent s t a b i l i t y i n an
extensible balloon, any e x i s t i n g unbelance w i l l cause t h e
t r a i n t o rise o r f a l l i n d e f i n i t e l y u n t i l the balloon reaches

-8-
 i t s b u r s t i n g diameter, the gear strikes the ground, o r c o r r e c t i v e
aotion i s taken. Even i f the extremely c r i t i c a l balance is inl;ially
achieved, t h e r e w i l l be unbalance occasioned by (1) bursting of
balloons due t o d e t e r i o r a t i o n in t h e sunlight, ( 2 ) d i f f u s i o n of
l i f t i n g gas from the balloons, (3) l o s s o r gain of buoyanoy &en
temperature inside the balloon changes with respect to the ambient
a i r temperature. This w i l l r e s u l t i n i t i a l l y from r a d i a t i v e d i f -
ferences, and a f t e r an amount of difference (superheat) has been
established, changes in v e n t i l a t i o n w i l l cause changes in buoyancy.

Two methods of attaching the payload t o the c l u s t e r s of rubber bal-

loons w e r e t r i e d . In the f i r s t of these (Figure 3) a long load
l i n e was used,md s h o r t l i n e s l e d f r o m it t o the individual bal-
loons. "he length of such a r r a y s was a s mueh as 800 feet, and
t h i s rite made them d i f f i c u l t t o launch. The s i n g l e load r i n g
array, seen i n Figure 4, proved t o be much easier t o handle and
i s recommended for c l u s t e r launchings. During ascent each of the
balloons i n suoh an a r r a y r i d e separated from each other and no rub-
bing or chafing has been observed.

The controls which were associated with t h i s balloon system were

crude and, i n general, ineffective. They included (1) c u t t i n g o f f
balloons a s the buoyancy became excessive and a p r e s e t a l t i t u d e
extreme was passed, and ( 2 ) releasing part of t h e lead i n the form
of s o l i d o r l i q u i d b a l l a s t whenever descent occurred. The sensi-
t i v i t y of these e l a s t i c balloons makes it d i f f i c u l t t o control
t h e i r a l t i t u d e with any system of oontrols, and as c o n t r o l s were
developed it mas found more p r a c t i c a l t o change from f r e e l y ex-
panding balloon8 t o non-extensible c e l l s n o t made of neoprene. The
tendency of neoprene t o decay within a few hours when exposed t o
sunlight was the most cogent argument a g a i n s t doing more work on
a l t i t u d e oontrols t o be used with such a system.

B. P l a s t i o Balloons

The next attempts t o control t h e a l t i t u d e of a balloon vehicle were

made using non-oxtensible p l a s t i c c e l l s , w i t h an open bottom t o pre-
vent rupture when expansion of the l i f t i n g gas i s excessive. With
a fixed mpximum volume, such a system has inherent v e r t i c a l insta-
b i l i t y i n only one direction. When f u l l , there is- 8. pressure a l t i -
t u d e above which a given load w i l l n o t be carried. The i n s t a b i l i t y
of such a system i s found only when an unbalanced downward force
e x i s t s . The development of controls and films f o r balloon material
proceeded concurrently , but the choice o f a . non-extensible p l a s t i c
film was made before the system of control was perfected.

The properties which were given most conslaeration i n the seleotion

of f a b r i c include (1) a v a i l a b i l i t y and c o s t , ( 2 ) ease of fabrica-
t i o n and (3) s a t i s f a c t o r y chemical and physical properties. Pri-
 TRANSMITTER

BALLAST
CONTROLS

Figures 3 and 4.
w
Typical rubber balloon arrays.
TRANSMITTER

BALLAST
CONTROLS

marily on the cost basis, an extruded f i l m of plastic was found t o

be superior to fabrics such as s i l k or nylon with the various
coatings.

-10-
 The physical and chemical properties needed in a balloon material
are: (1) ahemioal s t a b i l i t y , ( 2 ) low permeability, (3) high t e n s i l e
strength, (4) law b r i t t l e temperature, (5) high t e a r resistanoe,
( 6 ) high transparenoy t o heat radiation and (7) l i g h t weight.

In Table 1 the p r o p r i e s of 7 p l a s t i c s and 2 coated materials are

.
given. From this data polyethylene and saran appear to be the most
Suitable Pi l m s
Table 1

I
,ow Temper- perme- Tensile !Tear Re= Ease of Stability t c
p r i c r t u r e Prop- a b i l i t y Strength sistance Fabr ioa- Gltraviolet
.erties tion
_ _

olye thylenc Good LOW f Good Good Good

Fair High
i!Poor Fair Fair
i
Good High /Low Good Good

Very poor Medium /Good Good Good

Pinglite
Believed High !Good Cannot Good
good ! be fabri-

Iir
c(?ted

thocellu- Good Low Good Good

Poor Poor Fair Good Poor

Neoprene Fair Fair pair

Butyl Good Fair toad
rubber

Having decided upon the proper fabric t o be used, an e f f o r t -15

made t o i n t e r e s t a number of companies in the fabrication and
production of balloons. The f i r s t supplier of balloons a d o of
.polyethylene was Harold A. Smith, Ino., Mamaroneck, NJrw York.
In these balloons, 4 and 8 mil sheets were heat sealed t o form
a spherical c e l l open a t the bottom. Load attachment tabs were
s e t i n t o the f a b r i c and loading l i n e s ran from these tab8 t o a
load ring. This method of supporting the load proved t o be M-
sati sfactory.

-11-
 Subs6quently, other oompanies 'produced balloons of one type o r
another f o r us3 the t o t a l n w r and of balloons purchased
is given in Table 2.

Table 2
* P l a s t i o Balloons
!
!Film Type, Thiokness, Special Unit No. Delivered
'COmpanY
I
'Diameter, Shape
9
' Features Cost , t o m b
harold A. Smith,Ihc. . O M polyethylene Prototype #150.00 4
3-ft.diam. ,spherical!
I
n n n .mpolyethylene ~ a r vperme- '
15-ft .diam., spheri- I a b i l i t y I 530.00 5
1 cal
I
: n n N .004 polyethylene LOW perme- 530.00 5
!
I
15-ft0diam.,spheri-
cal
ability i
I
! %

!
4 I

:General Mills Inc. 1 .OOl polyethylene St r e ssed 20.00 26

;'l-ft.diarn.,tear- tape type I
I drop seam
i
n N (1 i .001 polyethylene Stressed 125.OO 175
I 20-ft.diam. ,tear- tape type
drop seam

n n n .001 polyethylene Stressed 15

30-ft.diam.,tear- tape type
drop seam
N n ll
.001 polyethylene 5
?O-ft.diam.,tear-
drop

;The Goodyar Tire & .OM polyethylene Stressed i75 0 0 0 10

+tubber Company,hc. 2O-ft.diam., egg- tape type
I F1-t seam and lcrrr
I p e r n a b il it
PinGen ResearQJnc
i
. .015 polyethylene
20-ft.diam. ,tear-
Low perme-
ability
115000 20
!
!,- 0 - .. 0 - - -
drop
0 0

Non-P1asti.o Bal
I
- 0 0 0 -
I

I
!

Dewey and Almy Chem- 5-2000 neoprene

'
125.OO 3 1
i c a l Co. I balloon with nylon aternal
shroud of 15-ft, re 8 sure
diam. ,spherical
f i
Seyfang Laboratcries Neoprene-coated Internal i50.00 10
nylon 22.5-ft. pressure
dian.,spherical
Teardrop shaped polyethylene balloons were produced by General
Mills Ino. and Wbcen Research, Inc., both of Minneapolis,
Minnesota. The General Mills c e l l s were supplied i n f o u r sizes
with t h e diameters of 7, 20, 30 and 70 f e e t t o c a r r y loads t o
varying a l t i t u d e s . A 20-foot b a l l o m i s shorn i n Figure 5.

Figure 5 . 20f-Diameter, teardrop polyethylene balloon.

In all of these, f i l m i s .OOIR polyethylene, butt-welded with
fiber tape l a i d along the s e a m t o reinforce the s e a l , and t o carry

-13-
 and d i s t r i b u t e the load. These t d p 8 , which converge t o the
load ring a t the bottom, a c t u a l l y rupport the load (Figure 6).
An open bottom permits the esoape of exoess l i f t i n g gas and thus
prevents rupture.

BALLOON

\APPENDIX /'

Figure 6 . Appendix d e t a i l , polyethylene balloon.

0x1 the Winten balloons, which a r e made from .015" polyethylene,
a l l but two of the balloons were made w i t h similar f i b e r tape re-
inforcementsi these two were produced without tapes and both of
them have been flown with no evidences of unsatisfactory perfor-
mance.
The eggplant shaped balloon produced by The Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company, Inc. has been flown with satisfaction, but the exact
amount of diffusion, which is expected t o be l o w from this balloan,
i r not yet ham.
C. Internal-Pressure Balloons

From a theoretical standpoint the most s a t i s f a c t o r y means of keeping

a balloon a t constant pressure-altitude i s t o use a non-oxtensiblo

-14-
o e l l with very l a w diffusicm through t h e walls and one capable
of maintaining super-pressure in excess of t h a t l o s t with re-
ductions of gas temperature. Such a balloon could be sealed
off completely or a pressure-activated valve could be used t o
permit efflux of the gas when the bursting pressure i s approached.
The neoprene-coated nylon balloon b u i l t by Seyfang Laboratories
(Figure 7) has been used with a valve set t o prevent rupturing.

Figure 7. Neo rene-coated n lon balloon,

two-kirds i n f l a te%.
The f a b r i c has been coated w i t h a metallic paint t o minimize
the e f f e c t s of radiatior,. However., the values of superheat ob-
tained by the gas when the balloon is i n the sun have been of
the order of 30OC. The amount of buoyancy l o s t when c i r c u l a t i o n
 or sunset c u t s off the superheat i s so l a r g e t h a t it i s n o t possible
t o c a r r y enough b a l l a s t t o s u s t a i n the system under these condi-
tions. On the other hand, the l o s s of buoyancy through a sealed-off
Seyfang balloon a t 4100 feet MSL is of the orQer of SO grams per
hour which i s s i g n i f i c a n t l y less than t h e l o s s expected from a 20-
foot, 1 m i l polyethylene c e l l i n f l i g h t oonditions. ( W i t h t h e appendix
aperture sealed,.such a c e l l shows a l o s s of lift of about 40 grams
per hour when one-fifth i n f l a t e d a t sea l e v e l ) .

One other type of b a l l o m which has been used a s a super-pressure

balloon i s t h e neoprene 52000 balloon of Dewey and Almy, surrounded
by nylon c l o t h shroud. The rubber balloon normally would expand
u n t i l it reached bursting diameter, b u t when enshrouded, it i s
l i m i t e d t o the volume of t h e shroud. The d i f f i c u l t i e s i n launohing
and f l y i n g t h i s balloon a r e n o t unusually g r e a t , b u t on each of the
several t e s t s which have been made t o date improper handling has
been a possible cause of the e a r l y rupture of the balloon. It i s
believed, however, t h a t such a balloon is n o t e s p e c i a l l y s u i t a b l e
fa-long f l i g h t s because of the d e t e r i o r a t i o n which occurs in t h e
neoprene i n the presence of sunlight. Perhaps a shroud of material
which would filter out the u l t r a v i o l e t rays would p r o t e c t and
lengthen the l i f e of such a balloon.

Despite the sucoess of t h e Japanese s i l k o r rice-paper balloons,

which were constructed on a super-pressure principle, it i s n o t be-
lieved p r a c t i c a l a t t h i s t i m e t o develop a balloon of such strength
t h a t it would successfully withstand and r e t a i n pressure increases
corresponding to t h e temperature changes from n i g h t t o day a s the
superheat of absorbed sunlight i s gained. The super-pressure w i t h
a neoprene-coated nylon balloon, f o r example , would be approximaay
0.6 p s i . That such a balloon could be b u i l t i s unquestioned. The
c o s t of production, huwever, appears a t t h i s time t o be unwarranted.

D. Altitude Controls

Beginning with the a r r a y s of rubber balloons which were f i r s t used,

various systems of dropping b a l l a s t , both s o l i d and l i q u i d , have
been attempted with the aim of e x a c t l y compensating f o r the l o s s of
buoyancy which i s occasioned a s the l i f t i n g gas d i f f u s e s o r leaks
through the balloon. On the e a r l y rubber balloons only rough incre-
mental b a l l a s t dropping w a s emwyed. A t t h a t t i m e it was decided n o t
t o use sand a s b a l l a s t since most sand contains some water which
may freeze lrhile a l o f t . Further, it i s e a s i e r t o c o n t r o l the f l o w
of a l i q u i d b a l l a s t than it i s t o control sand p a r t i c l e s . In t h e
investigations f o r a s u i t a b l e l i q u i d b a l l a s t the petroleum product
known commercially a s Mobil Aero compass f l u i d was f i n a l l y s e t t l e d
upon. These investigations included t e s t s of cloud point, f r e e z i n g
point, and a l s o density and v i s c o s i t y over a large range of tempera-
tures. The compass f l u i d is e s p e c i a l l y s u i t a b l e f o r b a l l a s t work

-16-
in high alti.tudes, since it freeces below -8OaC and w i l l flow
r e a d i l y a t low temperatures. Also, t h i s f l u i d w i l l absorb only
a very s l i g h t amount of water which might freeze a l o f t .

Basically t h r e e d i f f e r e n t p r i n c i p l e s have been used in the c o n t r o l

of b a l l a s t flow. The f i r s t of these i s calculated constant flow;

.
the second i s displacement-enitch control; and the t h i r d i s r a t e -
of -a scent mi t c h control

(1) Constant Flow

In the simplest of the control systems, l i q u i d b a l l a s t i s allowed
t o flow continuously through an o r i f i c e (Figure 8 ) a t a pre-
determined rate. This rate i s s e t t o s l i g h t l y exceed the ex-

Figure 8. Orifice f o r fixed-rate b a l l a s t flow.

pected l o s s of l i f t of the balloon due t o leakage and diffu-

sion. If t h i s method i s successfully used, the balloon stays
f u l l because the gas r e m i n i n g i n it has less load t o support.
Therefore, the balloon w i l l rise slowly as b a l l a s t i s dropped,
maintaining equilibrium between t h e buoyancy and the load. In
the General M i l l s ZO-foot balloon, f o r example, d i f f u s i o n l o s s e s
are about 200 grams per hour at a l t i t u d e s near 40,000 f e e t . The
balloon a t i t s c e i l i n g of 40,000 f e e t with a 26-kilogram pay-
load rises about 700 f e e t w i t h each kilogram of b a l l a s t dropped.
This means t h a t such a balloon using t h i s constant-flow type
control w i l l f l o a t a t a "adling" which rises a t the r a t e of
about 140 f e e t per hour. Constant f l o w was f i r s t obtained by
use of t h e manual b a l l a s t valve shown i n Figure 9. Due t o
exoessive d o g g i n g of t h i s valve, caused by i t s a n n u l a r r i n g
opening, gate-type valves were t e s t e d , and f i n a l l y the use of

-17-
 .
simple o r i f i c e s of various sizes replaaed Obe manual ballarrt
valve

Figure 9. Manual b a l l a s t valve.

( 2 ) Displacement Switch

The displaaement principle in b a l l a s t control has been used i n

two d i f f e r e n t t y p e s of valves. The f i r s t of these, called the
"automatic b a l l a s t valve," used a needle valve,controlling
b a l l a s t flow by an aneroid capsule t o which t h e needle was at=
tached (Figure 10). The aneroid oapsule was open t o the a t -
mosphere on ascent; a s the balloon began t o descend t o a regian
of higher pressure, a minimum pressure switch was used t o seal
off the capsule and f u r t h e r descent caused b a l l a s t flow. (For
d e t a i l s aee Teahnical Report No. 1, Constant Level Ballocm
Projeat, Research Division, Colle e of Engineering, New York
University, New York, N.Y.j 1948.

There a r e three undesirable features of t h i s s y s t e m . Greateat

is t h e e f f e c t of temperature changes on the a i r sealed in the
capmle. Seal-off pressure a o t s a s a datum plane. Any in-
orease from t h i s pressure causes compression of the aneroid,
and b a l l a s t flows proportionally t o the difference from seal-
off pres,sure. Huwever, with changes of temperature of the
entrapped a i r , the activation pressure of the valve changes,
the f l o a t i n g level is thus ahso a function of temperature of
the gas i n the aneroid.

-18-
 Ballast Valve Seat
Ballast Valv
Foce -Ballost
Tube
Outlet

Tension Sprin Stem. Volve Closed

Open Ballast p. f o r c e On Stem.

Aneroid capsule
by seoling a t des
altitude. Descent
seollng Olt. cause
old to contract. o ension Springs to
ballost valve. lose Seolrng Volve

oid S e a l m g VOlVe
pressure of aneroid
S t r i n g holds valve
open until severed
by squib.

Figure 10. Automatic b a l l a s t valve.

The second undeeirable f e a t u r e of t h e automatic b a l l a s t valve

system i s the l a g induced by the use of a minimum pressure
m i t c h t o s e a l off the aneroid capsule. This i s i n addition
t o the l a g of the aneroid i t s e l f . If a mercury snitch i s used,
the d i f f e r e n t i a l between minimum and seal-off pressure i s about
8 millibars; w i t h a less dense l i q u i d , the operation w i l l s t i l l
require about a 2-millibar difference. If the sealing i s done
by a fixed pressure switch, it i s then necessary t o p r e d i a t the
a l t i t u d e t o which the balloon w i l l rise. Failure t o reach
t h i s height would leave t h e aneroid open and useless. Deliberate
under-estimation of the c e i l i n g causes a r e l a t i v e l y lorgperiod
of wncontrolled slow descent before oontrol begins.
The t h i r d unwanted f e a t u r e is t h e w a s t e of b a l l a s t which flows
during both descent and ascent of a balloon whenever it i s
below the seal-off elevation. Since the balloon i s no longer
"heavy" when i t s downward motion has been a r r e s t e d , flow
during the r e t u r n t o the datum plane i r needless and indeed

-19-
w i l l cause an overshoot, hence t h e m e c e S S B r y exhaust of some
l i f t i n g gas,

The e f f e c t s of temperature on the aneroid capsule of the auto-

matic b a l l a s t valving system r m e e l i m i n a t e d by t h e use of a
b a l l a s t switch which uses a vacuum-sealed aneroid, set t o per-
n i t b a l l a s t flow through a valve whenever the balloon i s below
a given pressure a l t i t u d e . In t h i s system the minimum pressure
switch and the lag caused by i t s useare eliminated. This d i s -
placement-switch control has t h e disadvantage t h a t the f l o w
which i t permits is not proportional t o the displacement of t h e
balloon below a datum plane b u t is constant through t h e valve.
Normally t h i s f l o w i s large t o p e r m i t rapid r e s t o r a t i o n o f equi-
librium. A second disadvantage i s the requirement of b a t t e r i e s
t o supply power t o the e l e c t r i c a l l y operated valve. However,
the advantage of eliminating the temperature e f f e c t s on the

.
aneroid compensate f o r these two comparatively minor disadvan-
tage s

In p r a c t i c e , the displacement switch has consisted of a modified,

radiosonde modulator i n which the standard commutator i s re-
placed by a s p e c i a l bar which i s an i n s u l e t o r above a c e r t a i n
point and a conductor a t lower levels (higher pressures). Yihen
the aneroid pen arm i s on t h e conducting section of the commu-
t a t o r , a r e l a y opens the b a l l a s t valve. To prevent excessive
f l o w on ascent, the pen arm rides on 81: insulsted shelf above
most of the contact segment of the commutator (Figure 11).

Figure 11. Pressure d i s p l a c e m n t switch.

-20-
The pen drops off the shelf a t a safe distanoe beluw the ex-
pected pressure altitude and b a l l a s t then flows u n t i l t h e
pressure pen reaches the i n s u l a t i n g seotion of the oommutator.
In order t o prevent the overshoot mentioned a s one undesirable
f e a t u r e of the automatio b a l l a s t system, the high pressure
end of t h e i n s u l a t o r may oorrespond t o the expected maximum
altitude of the balloon, any loss of l i f t due t o impurities
or esoape of l i f t i n g gas w i l l cause the balloon t o level off a t
a c e i l i n g within the ballast-dropping range. Continued b a l l a s t
dropping w i l l r e s u l t in the rPse of the balloon. Thus, a n over-
estimation of the c e i l i n g i s not as o r i t i e a l as i n the case of
the previous system.

Rate-of -Asoent Switch

W i t-h the displacament-switoh oontrol j u s t deseribed there re-

main the problems of b a l l a s t w a s t e and balloon o s c i l l a t i o n re-
s u l t i n g f r o m discharge of b a l l a s t during rises of the balloon
after a descent has been cheoked. To eliminate t h i s , a ballast-
c o n t r o l m i t c h a c t i n g on the r a t e of rise of t h e balloon i s
put in series w i t h t h e displacement -itch t o close the b a l l a s t
flow c i r c u i t only when t h e balloon i s coming duwn or f l o a t i n g
below pressure a l t i t u d e . When it i s r i s i n g , no b a l l a s t flow is
permitted. This nrate-switchn i s seen in Figure 12.

Figure 12. Rate-of-ascent snitch.

-21-
4 g l a s s f l a s k i s open t o atmorpheric pressure through a fine
o a p i l l a r y tube. With m r i o u s rates of change of pressure,
various d i f f e r e n t i a l pressures e x i s t between t h e a i r in the
f l a s k and the outside air. This pressure difference c o n t r o l s
t h e l e v e l of l i q u i d i n a manometer m i t o h , f i l l e d with =% hydro-
ohloric acid. When the i n t e r n a l pressure i s 0.2 mb more than
t h e ambient pretssure, t h e switch opens and b a l l a s t flow i s stopped
even though the balloon may be below the f l o a t i n level. (The
switch i s set so t h a t a rate of ohange o f .1 mbAinute a c t i n g
f o r t h r e e o r more minutes w i l l open the switch.) By thus re-
s t r i c t i n g flow when the balloon i s r i s i n g , balloon o s c i l l a t i o n s
a r e minimized and b a l l a s t i s conserved. A sketch of t h i s opera-
t i o n i s shown a s Figure 13.

Eollort Flow Eollart Flow

I
I
fino
__c I

Figure 13. Height-time ourve, showing

b a l l a s t control action.

Since the rate switch i s much more d e l i a a b than the displace-

ment switch, safety considerations have caused t h e combined con-
t r o l t o be supplemented by a pure displacement switch control.
In t h i s , the ccnducting segment of the pressure modulator i s
divided, and only a limited pressure height range ( s e t f o r de-
s i r e d f l o a t i n g l e v e l ) i s controlled by both switches i n s e r i e s .
If the r a t e switch i s damaged a t launching (by s p i l l i n g some of
i t s e l e c t r o l y t e , f o r instance) o r i n f l i g h t (perhaps by evap-
oration of the e l e c t r o l y t e ) and t h e balloon descends, simple
displacement control becomes e f f e c t when the high pressure
(lower a l t i t u d e ) segment of the conductor i s touohed by t h e pres-

-22-
bur6 pen. The suitoh o i r o u i t i s seen in Figure 14.

-.\! \.
Is‘La W,

Figure 15 i s a t h e o r e t i c a l height-time curve, showing when

b a l l a s t would be dropped using such a control and the re=
s u l t i n g balloon behavior. During ascent the pressure pen is
kept o f f the commutator bar until Point l w h e r e it f a l l s on-
t o the low-altitude conducting segment. (The shelf has been
set so t h a t the pen w i l l f a l l onto the low-altitude segment in
order t h a t a b a l l a s t signal w i l l be received f o r a shortperiod
of t i m e , indioating t h a t the system is working properly. The
balloon rises and b a l l a s t flows u n t i l the pressure pen reaches
Point 2, the beginning of the region vYhereboth switches i n
series c o n t r o l the b a l l a s t . As long as the balloon continues
t o rise, no flow occurs. Should the maximum a l t i t u d e be above
the control l e v e l , no b a l l a s t w i l l f l o w u n t i l t h e balloon de-
scends t o t h a t point. Then, with both controls o F r a t i n g , M l a s t
w i l l flow only on the descending and f l o a t i n g portions of the
f l i g h t below c o c t r o l level. A second course i s i l l u s t r a t e d ,
wherein the rate-switch has f a i l e d . There the balloon de-
scends t o Point Z and o s c i l l a t e s about t h i s l e v e l , a s a r e s u l t

-23-
 of displacement switch a c t i o n s alone.

IF LCVELINO OFF TOO LOW, nien

BALLAST RATE PUSHES BALLOON
INTO CONTROL ALTITUOE.

IF LEVELING OFF TOO HIGH

T N O 9ALLAST UNTIL THIS T I L E

V @
@
TOP LOW ALT. COMMUTATOR
BOTT. HIGH ALT. COMM

Figure 15. Theoretical height-time curve.

( 4 ) Rate-of-Descent Switch

I t may a t t i m e s be desirable t o control a balloon merely bya

switch aotivated a t any given rate of descent. This could be
acc ompli shed merely b.fi "mversing" the r a te-of -a scent switch
This type of control would prove t o be q u i t e d i f f i c u l t , huwever,
.
f o r a constant level f l i g h t . One f l i g h t , No. 97, was made
using a type of rate-of-.descent switch a s shown ih Figure 16. In

I
Position whtl

apillory
Tube

SOI

Figure 16. Rate-of-descent switch.

-24-
 t h i s switch a c i r c u i t i s closed when the rate of descent ex-
ceeds 1/5 mb/minute, allowing b a l l a s t t o flow. '% record of
F l i g h t 97 i n d i c a t e s that good control was obtained f o r a four-
hour period using t h i s switch. However, the instrument i s 8 0

.
d e l i c a t e and susceptible t o temperature e f f e c t s t h a t i t s uso i s
n o t advised

E. F l i g h t Simulation

To make laboratory t e s t s on the control equipment j u s t described, a

flight-simulation chamber has been b u i l t combining a b e l l j a r and a
temperature chamber. A drawing of the temperature chamber designed
and b u i l t a t New York University i s shown i n Figure 17. ( I n v e s t i -

Figure 17. Temperature oontrol ohamber.

gation of commercially sold chambers showed t h a t the c o s t of pur-

chasing a temperature chamber of the size desirsd would be pro-
h i b i t i v e . ) F i r s t designs c a l l e d f o r the use of a freon r e f r i g e r a t i n g
system; however, use of dry i c e as a coolant proved t o be more ad-
vantageotis. This chamber, with i t s automatic control, can hold
temperatures a s high as +100oF and a s l o w a s -900F within $ f o r a
period of several hours. Dry i c e consumption a t -600F i s approxi-
mately 150 pounds f o r a 24-hour period.

I t i s possible, using a b e l l j a r for flight-similitude s t u d i e s ,

t o arrange switches so t h a t the vacuum pump i s t u r n e d o f f and on a t

-25-
th8 same time t h a t b a l l a s t i s normally required i n f l i g h t . This
system simulates the e f f e c t of' r i s i n g and f a l l i n g i n t h e atmosphere
and i n d i c a t e s the e f f e c t i v e n e s s of the c o n t r o l s which have been applied.

In order t o simulate f l i g h t , it i s necessary t h a t three conditions

be minixfined within t h e system. The f i r s t i s t h a t a l e a k of a i r
i n t o the b e l l j a r i s permitted a t a rate of pressure increase which
has been observed during balloon descent. A l a r g e l a g chamber i s
eonnected i n t o the b e l l j a r t o supply the second condition which
is a delay s i m i l a r t o t h a t inherent i n the c o n t r o l a c t i o n on an a c t u a l
balloon f l i g h t . I t is-necessary t o properly a d j u s t t h e volume of
such a l a g chamber t o obtain the desired magnitude of c o n t r o l action.

A third requirement i s t h a t t h e response of t h e vacuum pump must

correspond t o t h a t response which has been observed when a balloon
system drops b a l l a s t . I n order t o measure t h i s , the c o n t r o l me-
ohanism has been allowed n o t only t o switch the vacuum pump on -.and
off b u t a l s o t o a c t u a t e the standard ballast-flow equipment. l'his
system may be adjusted so that the amount of pressure change which
a s i n g l e period of p m p h g produces a c c u r a t e l y represents the amount
of b a l l a s t thrown off during f l i g h t .

The barogram shown i n Figure 18 i s en example o f such a t e s t . On

t h i s t e s t the rate-of-ascent b a l l a s t switch was added t o the displace-

2 0 0 10 I2
Hours
Fliaht Similitude Record Of Pressure
A- Displacement Switch
Operating.
6- Displ.8 Rate Of Ascent
Switches Operating.

Figure 18. Sample barograph record.

ment switch a f t e r t h e l a t t e r had operated f o r a period of s i x hours.

The combination of the two i s seen t o have e f f e c t e d a reduction i n

-26-
 the amplftude and frequenoy of o s c i l l a t i o n s induced by the servo
system. In f a c t , under the influence of both controls, o s c i l l a t i o n
i s almost undetectable.

A s a comequence of such t e s t s , it i s possible t o p r e d i c t the type,

size and. frequency of o s c i l l a t i o n s which the servo-control equip-
ment w i l l introduce i n t o the balloon f l i g h t . This i s e s p e c i a l l y
s i g n i f i c a n t since it i s known from f l i g h t s on which no control equip-
ment w a s included t h a t o s c i l l a t i o n s do occur n a t u r a l l y within the
atmosphere, apparently as a r e s u l t of v e r t i c a l c e l l u l a r convection
currents. By 'mowledge of the frequezlcy o f o s c i l l a t i o n caused by
a given control system it i s possible t o analyze o s c i l l a t i o n s and de-
termine which are caused by control and which a r e atnospheric. The
wiring diagram of the flight-similitude system i s . s h m i n Figure 19.

I
NOTES
0 Sigma Relay Type 5F
@ Rate Switch - ED 48-115
@ Heavy Duty Relay, Guardian Series 200dpst
@ Ballast Solenoid Valve- E D 4 9 - 2
@ Displacement Swrtch- ED 48-107
@ Auto Syphon
@) Counter
6 Pump Motor
Figure 19. Wiring diagram, flight-similitude system.

-27-
The v ~ c u u msystem is shown i n Figure 20.

MANOMETER
I

Cnrumrr VALVE

Figure 20. Physical l a y o u t , f l i g h t - s i m i l i t u d e system.

This equipment has been used i n t e s t i n g instruments t o be flown

and a l s o equipment which i s used i n t h e launching and p r e p a r a t i o n
before r e l e a s e . For e x m p l e , t h e Du Pont 564 squibs, which have
been used in conjunction w i t h t h e f l i g h t - t e r m i n a t i o n switches and
also f o r severing launching l i n e s , were t e s t e d i n t h i s chamber and
found t o f a i l when subjected simultaneously t o c o l d temperature
( - 5 0 % ) and l o w p r e s s u r e s (10 m i l l i b a r s ) although t e s t s s t e i t h e r
low temperature o r low p r e s s u r e s alone produced no f a i l u r e s . As a
r e s u l t o f t h e s e t e s t s , a new squib, t h e 559, has been Froduced
b y Du Pont and i s used i n c u r r e n t f l i g h t s . Other equipment
which has been t e s t e d i n t h e b e l l j a r and the c o l d chamber i n c l u d e s

.
the Lange barographs and t h e Olland-cycle pressure-neasuring in-
strumen t s

-2s-
F. F l i g h t Termination Gear

The r a t e of descent when controlled balloons a r e f a l l i n g a f t e r

exhausting a l l b a l l a s t i s sometimes as slow as 50 f e e t per minute.
This means t h a t several hours might be required t o f a l l through
the lanes of a i r c r a f t t r a f f i o , inoreasing considerably the hazard
t o a i r c r a . f t (admittedly very small). To minimize t h i s p o s s i b i l i t y ,
u n i t s have been added t o t h e f l i g h t t r a i n t o cause a rapid descent
a f t e r the balloon system has descended t o some c r i t i c a l value, say
20,000 feet. One such destruction system, using a flight-termination
switch, i s shown i n Figure 21. I t c o n s i s t s of a pressure-activated
switch, triggered on descent only, an explosive charge used t o sever

OF 100" TEST
BAAIOEONYLON
WItu 2' S L A C I C

2 w O O Fi,rnis
ml 6 TWe IN TnEuR UWES.
m
&€HALF Ot'R4ltO tuLLcCn
ACTS AS I rs OWN PAR?CWJTL

Figure 21. F l i g h t termination equipment.

the main load l i n e , a r i p l i n e attached to the balloon near the

equator and a snub l i n e which takes up the s t r a i n a f t e r the load
has f a l l e n a fem f e e t .

-29-
 When t h e c o n t a c t i s made, the load l i n e i s c u t and the e n t i r e
weight o f t h e dependent equipment i s used t o p u l l o u t a s e c t i o n of
the balloon w a l l . Through t h i s rupture, the l i f t i n g gas can 8s-
cape, and the balloon descends, using the upper portion a s a para-
chute. The r a t e of descent has been observed to vary from 600 t o
1500 f e e t per minute when t h i s system i s employed.

For some s p e c i a l a p p l i c a t i o n s it has beer, d e s i r a b l e t o cause the

balloon t a descend a f t e r some predetermined time, instead of waiting
f o r the descent t o a i r t r a f f i c lanes. In these cases, a clockwork
switch has been used instead of the pressure-activation u n i t . When
dmks a r e used they a r e kept f r e e o f l u b r i c a n t s which w i l l freeze.
The b e s t r e s u l t s have been obtained from t h e use of a Darv Corning
Silicone (DC 701) d i l u t e d with 3% kerosene. If t h i s i s n o t
available, it i s b e t t e r t o send up a clock without any lubrication.
Given r e l a t i v e l y loose mechanism (a cheap alarm clock) the d i f f e r -
e n t i a l expansion of p a r t s which i s encountered a t l o w temperatures
i s a p t t o cause less trouble than does the congealing of standard
lubricants.

N. EQUATIbS AND "iORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Development of a controlled a l t i t u d e balloon has led t o i n v e s t i g a t i o n
of many t h e o r e t i c a l considerations applicable both d i r e c t l y and in-
d i r e c t l y t o the description of v a r i a b l e s encountered i n balloon control.
Some of these r e l a t i o n s h i p s have been derived d i r e c t l y fro m standard
hydrodynamic or thermodynamic principles; others come from an empirical
study of r e s u l t s of laboratory t e s t s and a c t u a l balloon f l i g h t s . I n
t h i s section we w i l l investigate these t h e o r e t i c a l considerations and
endeavor t o c o r r e l a t e them with a c t u a l f l i g h t r e s u l t s . A more simple
investigation of the equations necessary f o r the launching and tracking
of a controlled a l t i t u d e balloon i s contained in P a r t I1 of t h i s r e p o r t ,
"Operations ."
We s h a l l f i r s t consider the r e l a t i o n s h i p s which a i d i n evaluating the
elementary c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of non-extensible balloon f l i g h t and t h o s e
which a r e helpful i n carrying out i n f l a t i o n and launching operations
of such balloons. Next, we s h a l l discuss more complex considerations
involved i n balloon f l i g h t s .

A. Floating Altitude and A l t i t u d e S e n s i t i v i t y

To deternine the a l t i t u d e a t which a non-extensible balloon w i l l

f l o a t we must consider the weight of t h e balloon system, t h e volume
of the belloon, and the d e n s i t i e s of the l i f t i n gas and the
air. [If the l i f t i n g gas i s 98$ helium (molecufar weight
4.50 lb./lb. mol), the l i f t of a u n i t of gas w i l l be 24.4 lb./lb. mol.
Similarly, i f 98$ hydrogen were t h e l i f t i n g gas, the l i f t would be
26.6 lb./lb. mol.3 By using these three b a s i c parameters, we can
obtain an expression f o r the molar volume a t which the balloon w i l l
float:

-30-
 (1) &fv = Balloon Volume x Gas L i f t
Gross Load

[It maybe noted from t h i s equation t h a t a balloon can f l o a t a t

molar volumes less than t h a t computed f o r maximum balloon volume
(i.e., when it i s n o t f u l l ) . However, under these conditions the
balloon would be i n n e u t r a l equilibrium, since any v e r t i c a l force
would cause it t o r i s e or f a l l u n t i l a force i n t h e opposite direc-
t i o n stopped it. This i s a l s o the case with f l o a t i n g extensible
ballocms.3

To convert from molar volume t o equivalent a l t i t u d e we m u s t know

the pressure-temperature d i 6 t r i b u t i o n of the atmosphere i n which
the balloon w i l l f l o a t . Since it is d i f f i e u l t t o obtain an
accurate d i s t r i b u t i o n f o r each f l i g h t , the atmospheric model a s
drawn up by NACA standards has been used. In general the error
obtained i n using the KACA standard i s not g r e a t , but i f greater
refinement i s desired, data obtained f r o m averaged radiosonde ob-
servations over a given launching s i t e can be used.

From such knowledge of the d i s t r i b u t i o n of pressure and temperature,

we may p l o t a curve of molar volume VS. n l t i t u d e by use of the
following equation:

By use of such a p l o t we e a s i l y f i n d the f l o e t i n g a l t i t u d e of a

f u l l non-extecsible balloon by use of equation (1) t o find molar
volume, and then of the p l o t of equation ( 2 ) to f i n d a l t i t u d e .

The two equations have been combined anr! graphed i n the form of
an a l t i t u d e vsI gross load c h a r t with helium 6 s the l i f t i n g gas
f o r various balloon s i z e s and verious release s i t e s i n the
nOperations" section of t h i s technical report ( P a r t 11, page 108).

For the NACA standard atmosphere we may derive an eqiJation for a l t i -

tude s e n s i t i v i t y by u s e of t h e molar volume-altitude relationship.
This i s most e a s i l y done by p l o t t i n g molar volume VS. e l t i t u d e on
semi-logarithmic paper, since the curve of molar volume VS. a l t i t u d e
from 40,000 t o 105,000 f e e t (where a cofistant lapse r a t e of zero
i s assumed) i s approximately a s t r a i g h t l i n e on semi-log paper.
The general form of t h e equation f o r t h i s portion of the atmosphere
i s y = aebe where y i s the molar volume and z the a l t i t u d e .

It i s possibls t o determine empirically the constants a and b.

For example, using the molar volume a t 50,000 f e e t , we find from

*359 ft3 = Molar volume of a i r a t standard conditions (273OK, 1 atm. pressure)

-3 1-
the equation 2500 ft.3/lb0.mol = ae50b where 50 i s t h e expression
f o r a l t i t u d e i n thousands of f e e t . Similarly, a t 70,000 f e e t
6450 = ae70b, and by solving t o eliminate a , we find 2.58 = e2ob
o r 20b I.95, and the constant b i s equal t o .0475. Thus, t h e
equation may be w r i t t e n :
a e .04?5 E
(3) Y =

y m s o r i g i n a l l y defined a s the molar volume, equal ( f o r 98% helium)

to:

Balloon Volume x 24.4

Gross Load
- -KW
K .0475 L
turn,
~n w'"' , where z i s the expression f o r a l t i t u d e
i n thousands of feet. Fran this r e l a t i o n s h i p , we may solve f o r
W, the gross load.

W = -K e -.0475
. t
a

(5) I n ( p ) = -.0475 2

or :

D i f f e r e n t i a t i n g with respect t o W:

(7) where W i s gross load i n lb.

We see t h a t the value of' the constant a i s unimportant here, and

the expression i s independent of balloon volume, a s long a s it
does not vary with time, Included i s t h e assumption t h a t over a
s h o r t period of tiw buoyancy of l i f t i r g g a s does not change.

Thus, we have an expression f o r A , the a l t i t u d e s e n s i t i v i t y , which

i s v a l i d between 40,000 and 105,000 f e e t , S i n i l a r l y , i t i s possible
t o evaluate a l t i t u d e s e n s i t i v i t y f o r o e r a t i o n between 0 and 30,000
f e e t . A i n t h i s range i s equal t o 31sgoo f t * / l b *
Pi
A p l o t of a l t i t u d e s e n s i t i v i t y a g a i n s t load i s shown on page 109
of the "Operations" section (Part I1 of t h i s technical reporQ.

-32-
 We may use t h i s equation t o approximate the r i s e o f a f u l l balloon
system when controlled by overcompensated constant b a l l a s t flow:

where c i s the balloon c e i l i n g , t i s time, and W i s t o t a l weight

of the balloon system.

B. Rate of Rise

The equation o f Clarke and Korfft

has been used t o obtain the r e l a t i o n s h i p between r a t e of r i s e and

free lift br excess buoyancy) f o r a balloon system of any given
weight. For p r a c t i c a l use, the equation has been modified t o :

(2)
F '12 where F i s free l i f t i n pounds
dt
= 1486 and G i s gross l i f t i n pounds.

Although t h i s equation was derived f o r use w i t h extensible spherical

balloons, it p r e d i c t s c l o s e l y the performance of non-extensible
balloons while they a r e r i s i n t o f l o a t i n g level. An average value
f o r t h e constant i n e q u a t i o n , 2) f r o m actual f l i g h t s i s 1600 ft./min(lb.)ll6

The deviatioh from t h i s relationship, evidenced i n severd f l i g h t s ,

may be due t o several v a r i a t i o n s from t h e assumptions upon which
the equation i s based. This deviation has i n general been an in-
crease of rate of rise of from 0 t o 25% a t higher a l t i t u d e s .

To explain t h i s increase, l e t us f i r s t investigate the changes

which may occur i n the f r e e l i f t . If any gas leaves the balloon
because of leakage through t h e balloon o r t h e appendix, the free
l i f t w i l l be reduced and the rate of rise w i l l decrease ( a s it
does a f t e r the balloon is f u l l and "levels off"). !%erefore, t h i s
v a r i a t i o n may be ruled out whenamsidering rise before t h e balloon
becomes f u l l .

Free l i f t w i l l vary with changes of temperature of the l i f t i n g gas

with respect t o the f r e e - a i r temperature. A change of t h i s s o r t can
be caused b i aoquisition of superheat of the l i f t i n g gas, o r by
temperaturd decrease o r inorease caused by adiabatic expansion or
campression of the lifting gas. (These i t e m s w i l l be discussed l a t e r
i n t h i s report.) Actual temperature measurements during r i s i n g
portions of f l i g h t s indicate t h a t t h e r e i s no appreciable tempera-

-33-
 t u r e difference between t h e l i f t i n g gas and f r e e a i r . Evidently
the e f f e c t of v e n t i l a t i o n a s the balloon moves through the a i r
oauses the l i f t i n g gas t o remain a t a temperature approximating
that of the a i r , and the increase of l i f t due t o temperature
v a r i a t i o n i s small i n magnitude.

Since changes i n the value of f r e e l i f t appear incapable of! causing

any appreciable increase i n rate of rise, other possible v a r i a t i o n s
such a s a change of the drag, o r f l u i d f r i c t i o n , e f f e c t must be
considered.

The equation of Korff i s based upon the assumption t h a t t h e e f f e c t

of t h e change i n Reynolds number and the change in s i z e are of equal
magnitude, b u t i n opposite directions. Therefore, these v a r i a b l e s
are eliminated t o obtain the simple e n g i m e r i n g formula of Korff.
With a non-extensible balloon, however, t h e change of drag e f f e c t
i s probably less than the e f f e c t of change of Reynolds number. There-
f o r e , it i s l i k e l y t h a t t h e rate of rise would increase with a l t i -
tude. The change i n drag e f f e c t may be r e a l i z e d by a decrease of
r e l a t i v e size of t h e flabby, u n f i l l e d portion of the balloon. Thus
there w i l l be a decrease of the drag caused by f l o w of a i r p a s t t h i s
flabby portion as t h e shape of the balloon changes; t h e r e s u l t till
be an increase i n the rate of r i s e of t h e system.

C. &zDerheat and Its E f f e c t s

The e f f e c t of the heating of l i f t i n g gas by the sun's r a y s has long

been of i n t e r e s t t o those using balloons f o r atmospherio investigation.
In cosmic-ray studies using f r e e l y extensible balloons, t h i s heating
e f f e c t w a s used t o advartage i n extenrling t h e length of f l i g h t s .
These f l i g h t s were often released a t n i g h t using the h e a t aOded a t
sunrise t o replenish l i f t l o s t during the n i g h t by d i f f u s i o n and
leakage.

In constant-level balloon work, using non-extensible balloons, the

effect of superheat of t h e l i f t i n g gas is more o f t e n a disadvantage
than an advantage. The disturbance of the f l i g h t i s not g r e a t when
the gas acquires t h i s superheat b u t may be d i s a s t r o u s when t h e super-
heat i s l o s t . I t is a t t h i s t i n e t h a t a 1sr.p amount of b a l l a s t i s
required t o keep the balloon system a f l o a t .

Let us investigate the e f f e c t s of gain and l o s s of superheat on a

f u l l , non-oxtensible balloon. Pie s h a l l t r y t o explain these
e f f e c t s i n terms of percentage l o s s o r gain of l i f t of t h e balloon
system by use of simplPfied engineering formulas. F i r s t , t h e
genera 1 formulas t

(1) L i f t : L = , where
vb = ballocm volume

d,, dg = d e n s i t y of a i r and l i f t i r g gas, respectively

-34-
 (2) Density:
d = -P
RT
pressure, s p e c i f i c gas constant, and
p' R'T = temperature of the a i r o r l i f t i n g gas

(3) Let:.

A t any two positions:

Investigating the gair. of superheat, since there i s no change of

volume V 1 = V2 and:

Assume now t h a t the balloon c a r r i e s no i n t e r n a l pressure and t h a t

the differecce i n l i f t does not cause the balloon system t o pass
through any appreciable atmospheric pressure difference ( i n the
case where the balloon i s f l o a t i n g a t 40,000 f t . MSL a change of
1000 ft.. would be only 9 mb, o r a 5% change).

The ref ore :

Pa, = Pa,= Pg, = Po2= P
Assume also t h a t i n i t i a l l y the a i r and l i f t i n g gas are a t the

temperature change .
same tezperature and t h a t the a i r passes through no appreciable
Then :

Then, making use of our two assumptions and s u b s t i t u t i n g equation

( 2 ) i n t o equation (4), we have:

and :
 (5)
AL
-: L ( AT2 2
T )
L, I-B Tg2

or, f o r small temperature differences, we have:

With increasing temperatures, there w i l l be an unbalance i n t h e

d i r e c t i o n of g r e a t e r a l t i t u d e . While climbing t o a g r e a t e r a l t i -
tude the bslloon w i l l valve gas and come t o equilibrium a t a new
level. Thus the e f f e c t of gain of superheat with a f u l l non-
extensible balloon w i l l be a s l i g h t 'increase of a l t i t u d e .

Investigating the case ojhere an i n i t i a l amount of s u p r h e a + i s

lost:

and since the balloon volume w i l l decrease with cooling of t h e

l i f t i n g gas:

v, = v, 2% (assuming constant p)
TgI
Therefore, again making use of the assumptions t h a t :

and :

Combining equation (2) and equation ( 7 ) , we have:

-36-
 Then t

(9)

or f o r small tempemture differences:

t h e negative sign indicating a l o s s of l i f t .

From t h i s equation we m y approximate the amount of b a l l a s t re-

quired t o compensate for the l o s s of superheat of the l i f t i n g .gas.
It i s apparent, then, t h a t the amount of superheat gained o r l o s t
by a balloon's gals i s of extreme importance t o the control of the
f'. ight

reflecting fabric .
For this reason a transparent film has a definite advantage over a
For example, aluminum-coated fabric balloons
f l o a t i n g a t 40,000 f e e t have exhibited l i f t i n g gas superheat i n
t h e neighborhood of 4OoC.* Polyethylene balloons, on t h e other
hand, show superheat of approximately l0W under the same conditions.

Asrruming a t o t a l weight of 30 kilograms i n the balloon system, with

helium a s the l i f t i n g gas ( 8 S ), the following compensation
a t sunset, o r when superheat i s l o s t , w i l l be necessary:

Aluminized f a b r i c :

4&
L = ' ( 2500
4oo) = 18.7%
Polyethylene 1

*This w i l l explsin the r a p i d descent of f l i g h t w i t h fabrio balloons and

will show the need for high 'rates of b a l l a s t flow a t sunset w i t h poly-
ethylene balloon f l i g h t s (see Part 111, "6umrmary of n i g h t s , " of t h i r
report).

-37-
 This r e l a t i o n s h i p between l o s s of l i f t and l o s s of superheat i a
substantiated by a n a l y s i s of F l i g h t 94. From the r a t e of descent
the unbalance (using the equation of Clarke and Korff, see page 3 3 )
i s in t h e neighborhood of 5 kilograms. Although there wtas no
temperature measurement on t h i s f l i g h t , a previous f l i g h t of
t h i s type indicated a superheat of approximately 40%. By equation
(lo), with a gross load of 52 kg., the unbalance caused by l o s s
of a l l of t h i s superheat would be 9.7 kg. It i s believed t h a t
v e n t i l a t i o n past the balloor, during a low v e l o c i t y descent before
operation of the b a l l s s t mechanism caused l o s s of superheat. Since
t h i s l o s s caused g r e a t e r descent, and thus more v e n t i l a t i o n , super-
heat was l o s t . An enormous r a t e of b a l l a s t f l o w would have been
required t o check descent.

D. Adiabatic Lapse Rate

One of the causes of temperature difference between t h e l i f t i n g gas

and f r e e a i r during r i s e o r descent of balloon systems is the
difference i n lapse r a t e s of s i r end the l i f t i n g gas. The adiabatic
l s p s e r a t e i s t h a t temperature change caused by a d i a b a t i c ex-
pansion o r compression of a gas during ascent o r descent through a
given vertic8.l distance. The a c t u a l lapse r a t e of the l i f t i n g gas
i s t h e adiabatic lapse r a t e plus the e f f e c t s of conduction and
radiation. The a d i a b a t i c lapse r a t e i s defined as:

where t
A = 2.39 X lo-* COWerg
s p e c i f i c heat a t constant pressure
Cp =

~*
= acceleration caused by g r a v i t y

the metric system f o r helium, (

~n 1.25 )*
CP = O / m

LR = - 980%2.39 X 10-s
. 1.25 = - l.87*C/ km
or :

The adiebatic lapse r e t e f o r Fir, ( Cp = 0.239- col ):

OC /gm

LR I
- 980x239 1 - - 9.8 o c / km
or : 0.239

LR - 2.98°C/,000 f +

-38-
The a c t u a l atmospheric d i s t r i b u t i o n , however, does not i n d i c a t e an
a d i a b a t i c lapse rate f o r a i r but r a t h e r a lapse r a t e which v a r i e s
with a l t i t u d e . For t h e troposphere the lapse rate of t h e atmosphere
averages -1.98OC/1000 f t . It may be shown then t h a t i n the tropo-
sphere a r i s i n g balloon w i l l g e t warm with respect t o the a i r

1.98 -
(neglecting v e n t i l a t i o n and radiation effects) a t a r a t e of
=
-57 1.41OC/1000 f t . In the tropopause the lapse rate of
the atmosphere i s zero. Thus the l i f t i n g gas ( i f helium) w i l l
0001 r e l a t i v e t o t h e a i r a t a rate of .57'%/1000 ft.

Similarly, in t h e stratosphere, t h e l i f t i n g gas w i l l cool r e l a t i v e

t o t h e a i r a t a rate of 2.24 + .57 =
2.81°C/1000 f t . This e f f e c t
i s p l o t t e d a s Figure 22.

Figure 22. Lapse rate of a i r and helium.

Here, below p o i n t A, the l i f t i n g gas w i l l be warmer than the a i r .
Above point A, the l i f t i n g gas w i l l be cooler than 'the s i r . The
e f f e c t of t h i s temperature difference on the l i f t (as shown i n the
previous section) i s approximately A I L
A L = L T (1-6)
Thus, as a balloon system passes through point A, it w i l l have l e s s
lift than a t release. This e f f e c t has been observed on several
f l i g h t s , *ere a balloon system slowed down during ascent through
a Qmpera ture inversion

Since the e f f e c t of the sun i n heating the l i f t i n g gas decreases

the e f f e c t of d i f f e r e n t lapse rates, the e f f e c t i s not as noticeable
during the day as a t night. A t night the balloon system may pass
through an inversion, lose i t s lift, and remain a t an a l t i t u d e much
below i t s estimated f l o a t i n g a l t i t u d e u n t i l warmed by the sun's rays
a t sunrise.

-39-
 This e f f e c t add8 t o the s t a b i l i t y of stratospheric balloon Plightr.
If a system in equilibrium in t h e r t r 8 t o 8 p b m w e r e t o 1080 l i f t
and descend, the compression of the gas would caure an increase
of the lifting gas temperature r e l a t i v e t o t h e air tampmature,
causing a decrease i n unbalance.

Similarly, an i n i t i a l unbalance oausing rise of the system would

cause r e l a t i v e cooling of the l i f t i n g gas and thus again decrease
the unbalance. Hence, the r a t e of rise or descent i n the s t r a t o -
sphere n i l l b limited by the rate of heat exchange due t o con-
duction md radiation, which w i l l counteract t h i s e f f e c t of
adiabatic heating or cooling.

Empirioal evidence indicates t h a t there i s a great deal more

s t a b i l i t y i n a stratospheric balloon system than i n a similar
s y s t e m floating i n the troposphere. This "adiabatic s t a b i l i t y " i s
a principal reason f o r b e t t e r performance of stratoclphere f l i g h t s .

E. Diffusion and Leakage of Lifting Gas

The l i f t i n g gas of a balloon can be l o s t by:

leakage through small holes i n the f a b r i c or filmi

solution, migration and evaporation thmugh f a b r i c o r f i l m ;
t r u e molecular diffusion through openings, such as the
appendix opening.

(1) Leakage

Volumetric flow,Q,of a gas through any given opening i n t h e

balloon surface may be evaluated a s a function of the area of

.
the opening, A; the pressure head causing the flow, k a n d a GO-
e f f i c i e n t of leakage, Cd

(1) Q = C d A m where g i s the acceleration

due t o gravity

It would be d i f f i c u l t t o evaluate the amount and area of hole8

i n the balloon surface. Let us, then, aompare the rate of
leakage a t any given a l t i t u d e with leakage a t seh level, r a t h e r
than attempting t o evaluate the leakage a t a given a l t i t u d e .

F i r s t we s h a l l compare the rate of leakage of a f u l l balloon

a t any given a l t i t u d e w i t h leakage of a f u l l balloon a t sea
level. L e t us assume t h a t the area o f any opening i n t h e sur-
face of the balloon does not vary w i t h a l t i t u d e and that the
c o e f f i c i e n t of leakage i s constant. Thus:

where h is pressure head in

f e e t of l i f t i n g gas

-40-
However :

h .= X 144

where Ap i s the pressure difference a c r o s s the opening ( p s i )

i s density o f l i f t i n g gas (1b./fte3). Combining equa-
and equation (3):

(4)

The pressure difference across any given opening can be eval-

uated i.n terms of: height above a known point, of z e r o pressure
difference; rate of pressure change with a l t i t u d e of the at-
mosphere (which, f o r aiy small section of a l t i t u d e i s asstuned
t o be constant); and re’zio of the d e m i t i e s of a i r and the
l i f t i n g gas. Since the pressure d i f f e r e n c e across the appendix
opening i s zero t h i s i s oiir reference point f o r evaluating
height. Figure 23 s h w s this pressure r e l a t i o n s h i p i n graphic
f om.

Figure 23. Pressure d i f f e r e n a s aoross balloon.

-41-
 This r e l a t i o n s h i p i s expressed as:

(5)

M
where B' M g & b are molecular weights of l i f t i n g
gas ma a i r , 9espectively.

Since, f o r a f u l l balloon, AZ i s aonstant a t any a l t i t u d e , and

B ( f o r our discussion) i s a constant:

(6) QoC

The mass rate of flow i s equal t o the d e n s i t y of the l i f t i n g

gas multiplied by the v o l m e t r i c r a t e of flow:

(7) L = Qdp -,/(a)

dr air dg

Since the number of openings w i l l not change with a l t i t u d e ,

equation (7) expresses the r e l q t i o n s h i p f o r mass r a t e of flow
from e f u l l balloon f o r any a l t i t u d e . The leakage a t any
a l t i t u d e maybe expressed as a function of leskage a t sea
level :

A s an example, l e t u s compere t h e leakage rates of a l i f t i n g gan

t h o u g h a f u l l balloon a t 888 l e v e l , a t 40,000 f e e t and a t
100,000 feet.

1
40,000 1 188
112 218R

P
00,000
I& l % l

-42-
Compring rate of leakage a t 40,000 f e e t with leakage a t
sea levels

.27,.188.288 = 0.243
LO 112 1013 218

Comparing r a t e of leakage a t 100,000 f e e t with leakage at sea

level :

!berefore, if leakage of a f u l l balloon a t sea l e v e l i r s known,

it i s possible t o compute t h e o r e t i c a l leakage a t any a l t i t u d e .
However, if it i s n o t possible t o completely i n f l a t e e. balloon
on the ground i n order t o make a sea l e v e l t e a t ( i f l i f t would
be great enough t o rupture balloon o r load l i n e s ) , a method of
comparing f u l l balloon leakage with p a r t i a l l y f u l l ballcon
leakage must be found,

Let u8 assume t h a t it i s possible t o obtain results of a

leakage t e s t f o r a balloon i n f l a t e d t o a volume
loon volume. Again s t a r t i n g with equation (1):
x of f u l l b a l -

V!e see t h R t i n t h i s 08ce the t o t a l area of openings, A i s not

constant but 4-s a function of volume, Therefore, we have:

We have shown t h a t :

Since we a r e comparing p e r t i a l l y i n f l a t e d balloon l e a b g e a t

ir, t h e above expression i s A s

t r a t e d in Figure 24.
.
sea level with f u l l Iwlloon leakage a t sea l e v e l the variable
"his i s graphically i l l u s -

-43-
 FULL BALLOON

Figure 24. Comparison of ressure head across

p a r t i a l l y and f u l l y i n f l a t e d balloons.

Thus, the relationship i s :

Since the d e n s i t y of the l i f t i n g gas i s constant, we may then

express mass leakage as:

And then, t o compare leakage of a f u l l balloon with leakage of

a balloon full:
X

-44-
Example: If a 20-foot diameter balloon 1
f u l l were t e s t e d a t
10
sea level and found t o have a leakage r a t e of 50 the&.
leakage rate of a f u l l 20-foot balloon a t sea l e v e l would be:

The leakage of a f u l l 70-foot diameter balloon a t sea l e v e l in

this case would be:

Values f o r leakage a t several d i f f e r e n t a l t i t u d e s f o r 20-foot

and 70-fOOt diameter ballcons, .assuming a leakage of 50 gm/hr.
f o r a 20-foot balloon 1
f u l l a t sea l e v e l a r e :
10

ltitude I
(mL) 0 I 40,000 f t . 1100,000 f t
I

r. I 83.2 gm/h r.1

. 15 gm/h r.

70-ft. diam. r.

Another consideratian is t h a t r e l a t i o n s h i p expressed by the

k i n e t i c theory of gases regarding gases a t low pressures. The
k i n e t i c theory s t a t e s t h a t there i s a molecular type of flow
across a thin diaphragm through openings whose dimensions a r e
of the order of t h e length of the mean f r e e path of the mole-
c u l e s involved. Mass f l o w of the gas i s then:

where :

Ap J is the pressure difference across the f i l m

A = area of the opening
dg = a e n s i t y of the gas i n question

This relationship, however, becomes v a l i d only a t extremely

low pressures, and when considering balloon systems a t nornral
f l o a t i n g l e v e l s t h e more common fluid-flow r e l a t i o n s h i p w i l l
c o n t r o l the r a t e of l o s s of lift through openings i n the f i l m .
I t would be of l i t t l e use then t o investigate f u r t h e r the leak-
age of gas through openings by means of the relationships i n =
volved in the k i n e t i c theory.

-45-
( 2 ) Solution, Migration and Evaporation through Film

A very s l i g h t amount of l i f t i s l o s t through s o l u t i o n of t h e

gas i n t o the balloon film, migration through t h e film and evapora-
t i o n i n t o t h e atmosphere. The r a t e of t h i s type of d i f f u s i o n
i s a func;tion of the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the l i f t i n g gas and
the p a r t i a l pressure involved. Since the l i f t i n g gas is
assumed t o be very nearly pure, t h e p a r t i a l pressure is merely
the pressure of the atmosphere i n which the balloon is f l o a t i n g .
This method of d i f f u s i o n need n o t be considered when ex-
amining the loss of a balloon's l i f t i n g gas since it is o f a
l o w enough v a l u e t o be i n s i g n i f i c a n t as compared with the l o s s
of gas by leakage through openings i n t h e film.

Tests have indicated t h a t t h i s type of d i f f u s i o n through .001"

polyethylene has 8 value of approximately 4 liters/meter2/day.
A t sea l e v e l t h i s i s equivalent t o 5.32 gm/hr. f o r a 20-foot
diameter balloon. A t 40,000 feet B L the value would be
approximately 1 g&r.

(3) Diffusion through Appendix

W e have seen t h a t there i s no pressure difference a c r o s s t h e

open appendix of the balloon during f l o a t i n g . Therefore, the
l o s s of l i f t i n g gas through t h i s appendix (except when the
balloon i s r i s i n g and gas is being valved out of t h e appendix)
can be only by t r u e intermolecular d i f f u s i o n of the gas i n t o
the atmosphere and a i r i n t o the l i f t i n g gas. The expression
f o r l o s s of l i f t i n g gas by d i f f u s i o n i s s i m i l a r i n form t o t h e
expression for t r a n s f e r o f h e a t through a given distance by
c ond uc t ion :

where :
-
dN -- time rate of t r a n s f e r of molecules of gas
dt across the area dydx i n direction)

D= a c o e f f i c i e n t of diffusion, dependent upon

v i s c o s i t y and d e r s i t y of the gas involved ( b C 1 )
d
--dN
dz
v a r i a t i o n of molecular concentration c i t h
variation in directionz

dydx = the d i f f e r e n t i a l term f o r a r e a ,

Then, since a molecule of l i f t i n g gas has a given weizht, we may

state that:

-46-
 where K i s a constant.

We may state the r e l a t i o n s h i p (13) i n terms of r a t e of trans-

f e r and area of the opening, assuming dbl t o be constant across
the opening: d2

where t

8. mass t r a n s f e r of l i f t i n g gas

k =v a r i a t i o n of concentration of l i f t i n g gas
dz i n d i r e c t i o n *
A = area of opening

In order, then, t o determine the r a t e of loss of l i f t i n g gas

by d i f f u s i o n through the open appendix we must:

( a ) determine the r e l a t i o n s h i p between the c o e f f i c i e n t of

d i f f u s i o q D, and a l t i t u d e (or pressure and temperature)

(b) determine the l o s s of l i f t by diffusion through the appendix

a t any convenient a l t i t u d e (i.8. a t t h e ground)

(0) derive a r e l a t i o n s h i p between l o s s a t t h e ground and loss

a t any a l t i t u d e .

However, determination of v a l i d r e l a t i o n s h i p s t o f i n d d i f f u -
sion through the appendix opening would require l a r g e scale
laboratory t e s t i n g and then tedious derivation of mathematical
equations, a study i n research i n i t s e l f . It was deemed more
p r a c t i c a l t o reduce o r eliminate t h i s type of loss o f , l i f t
by reduction of the area of the opening by use of a r e l i e f
valve system a s explained i n Part I1 of t h i s report, “Operations,”
ppm 8-14.

F. Bursting Pressure end Appendix Considerations

Bursting pressure of a balloon can be computed from the equation:

(1) Ap=F f o r f a i l u r e of the f a b r i c or f i l m ,

where :

-47-
 Ap L b u r s t i n g pressure ( p s i )

sf = maximum allowable t e n s i l e s t r e s s of f a b r i a
o r f i l m (psi) ( f o r safety S f t 1 / 2 S ax
*ere maximum s t r e e s i n tension!
t = thickness of f a b r i c or f i l m (in.)

0= balloon diameter ( i n , )

ort

f o r f a i l u r e of seams

where :

Ss:maximum
( l b ./in .allowable t e n s i l e strength of
)
seams

D r b a l l o o n diameter (in.)

In general, a balloon should be manufactured so t h a t any f a i l u r e

should occur f i r s t i n the f a b r i c o r f i l m and thus the t e n s i l e

.
stress of t h i s f a b r i c or f i l m w i l l be t h e f a c t o r i n determining b u r s t t n g
pressure
Since the non-extensible balloons used i n constant-level work by
the W.Y.U. group have been of the open-appendix type, b u r s t i n g
due t o excessive super-pressure has not been a problem. Strength
of the balloon must be considered, however, from the standpoints
of back pressure induced during rise of a f u l l balloon and pressure
d i s t r i b u t i o n of the l i f t i n g gas i t s e l f i n s i d e of t h e balloon.

(1) Pressure Distribution of L i f tine Gas

It was shown i n the previous section t h a t the pressure d i f f -
erence across any portion of the balloon surface may be equated:

(3)

A p l o t of A p a g a i n s t At would then be a s t r a i g h t lir-e a t

any given a l t i t u d e . Maximum allowable balloon pressure-
equation (l)--.my be p l o t t e d as a function of AS , rather
than diameter f o r any given horizontal plane of t h e balloon
surfaoe, z LTsine t h i s relatiorxhip, c u t t i n g any horizontal
plane t - 2 a c r o s s t h e balloon (Figure 25), t h e d i a m e t e r of the

-48-
balloon a t any point t may be expressed as:

(4)
Therefore, maximum allowable balloon pressure a t any plane I-I
w i l l be :

(5)

Equation ( 5 ) may be p l o t t e d i n terms of bursting 'pressure and AE

f o r any given d i a m e t e r balloon. A s t r a i g h t l i n e through the
o r i g i n and tangent t o the p l o t of Equation ( 5 ) w i l l indicate
the maximum allowable(dp/df) (I-B) f o r any given diameter bal-
m
loan. Comparlng the maximm allawable (dp/&),, with a c h a r t
of a l t i t u d e VS. pressure i n the atmosphere w i l l indicate t h e
minimum a l t i t u d e a t which the balloon can be allowed t o be f u l l .
From an altitude-buoyancy t a b l e f o r any given diameter balloon,
the maximum allowable buoyancy, o r maximum allmiable gas in-
f l a t i o n can be obbined.

Figure 26 i s a p l o t of equations (3) and (5) f o r .001" poly-

ethylene ( S 900 p s i b a l l.oons of 20', 30' and 70'
diameters. f ' 2
I I I

F i g . 25. F i g . 26.
Relationship d b , for balloon. Graph of equations ( 3 ) and (5).

-49-
by (1-B) we have the maximum al lowable :
.
We see that the maximum allowable (dp/dr), (I-B) for a 30' dianstel;
.001" t h i c k polyethylene balloon i s 256x10-3 pSi/ft Dividing

This i s comparable t o an a l t i t u d e of 18,300 f t . o r a gross

buoyancy of 450 lb., the maximum allowable i n f l e t i o n of a 30'
diameter, #001" t h i c k polyethylene balloon f r o r t h e stand-
point of pressure d i s t r i b u t i o n .

In order t o determine mathematically the point of f a i l u r e due

t o pressure d i s t r i b u t i o n we may um equati0r.s (3) and (5) and
thei r derivet ivea :

a t the point of tangency of these curves ( T i n Figure 26):

in equation ( 5 ) , making 2
sSrt. K
and i n equation (3), makiag
(dp/dZ),(I-B) = m , the slope of the l i n e A p t = A t .m
we, have :

and t

d i f f e r e n t i a t i n g w i t h respect t o 2 :

-50-
 Since at T, (-), dp
(dJs

ard, sime r r t T, Apts= Apta

Then :

For the example above,

Then :
D z 30', Sf= 9, t = .001in. , B = -*, = 0.138
(helium)

(%)air -- a.2'
16 4 900.
2 I psi/ ft

8 0,298 psi / ft
= 20.55 m b / f t
This is comparable to en a l t i t u d e of approxifietely 18,200 f t .
Thus the raxixum a l l o m b l e buoyancy f o r a 30' dis.meter, .001"
thick polyethylene bslloor. f i l l e d with helium is 440 lb.

( 2) A ppendix-Cpen i n g C a n rideration 8

As an opec-apperdix , constent-volume ballcon ascends the

l i f t i n g gas m i l l expecd due t o the decrease i n the pressure

-61-
 of the surrounding atmosphere. Upon r e a c h i n g t h e a l t i t u d e a t
which it i s f u l l it w i l l s t i l l have an u n b a l a m e i n t h e
d i r e c t i o n of ircrease of a l t i t u d e due t o t h e excess buoyency
causillg a s c e n t . This unbalance i s g r a d u a l l y decreased a s t h o
b a l l o o n rises ( w i t h a f i x e d volime) i n t o less derse a i r . Mean-
w h i l e e x c e s s g a s p r e s s u r e is r e l i e v e d by v a l v i n g g a s through
the & p p n d i X u n t i l t h e b a l l o o n system is i n a c o n d i t i o n of
e q u i l i b r i u n . The p o r t i c n of t h e a s c e n t a f t e r t h e b a l l o o n h e s
become f L l l i s known a s t h e " l e v e l i n g - o f f " p e r i o d .

The l i f t i n g gas which i s valved o u t through t h e appendix w i l l

c a u s e a "back p r e s s u r e " i n s i d e o f t h e b a l l o o n which r u s t be
t r a n s f e r r e d t o t h e b a l l o o n f a b r i c o r f i l m . In o t h e r words,
t h e r e m u s t be a p r e s s u r e d i f f e r e r m e a c r o s s t h e appendix opening
d u r i n g t h i s p e r i o d t o f o r c e t h e e x c e s s l i f t i n g gas o u t of t h e
b a l l o o n . Let u s enalyze t h i s back p r e s s u r e b y t h e method used
by Picard. Using t h e r u l e s of sEbsonic a e r c d y n a n i c s , P i c a r d
s u g g e s t s t h a t a i r a t s e a level e s c a p i n g a t 1333 f t / s e c . pro-
duces a beck p r e s s u r e of 1 atmosphere and t h a t back p r e s s u r e
induced i s p r o p o r t i o n a l t o t h e square of escape v e l o c i t y of
t h e gas and i n v e r s e l y p r o p o r t i o n a l t o t h e d e n s i t y of t h e g a s
escaping. Volume of gas l o s t i n a s c e n t through 1 f o o t i s ,
w i t h i n a reasonbble degree of accuracy:

-
AV
AZ
: volume l o s t p e r f o o t of a s c e n t ( f t . 3 / f t . )

v = b e l l o o n volume ( f t . 2 )
p = p r e s s u r e of f r e e a i r ( p s i )
-
dp
dP
= p r e s s u r e change w i t h i n c r e a s e of z (Psi f t )
T = t e m p e r e t u r e of a i r (OC abs.)

AT t change i n a i r tempereture d u r i n g rise (OC)

For a s c e n t i n t h e troposphere t h i s r e l s t i o n s h i p w i l l reduce t o :

(7) AV:
- V lf3
AZ 27,800 FT

The v e l o c i t y of escape o f gas, then:

V t - dr
. V I
dt 27,eoo' A,
v t v e l o c i t y o f e s c a p e of l i f t i n g gas (ft./sec.)
 -
*
dr f ascent v e l o c i t y of balloon (ft./sec.)
dt
t volume of gas l o s t per f o o t of esceEt ( f t . 3 / f t 0 )

A, : area of appendix opening ( f t . 2 )

The beck pressure caused by t h i s velocity:

Ap = back pressure induced ( p s i )

v = v e l o c i t y of eacape o f gas (ft./sec.)

dg = density of l i f t i n g gas a t a l t i t u d e
of balloon (lb./ft.3)

430 = der-sity of a i r a t sea l e v e l (1b./fto3)

14.7 = pressure of a i r a t sea l e v e l (psi)

1333 = escape v e l o c i t y of a i r t o produce back pressure

of 1 atmosphere at. sea l e v e l ( f t / S e C )

or, combining equation (€3) srd ( 9 ) :

A8 an example, l e t us find the back pressure induced i n a 20'

diameter balloon w i t h a 1' diameter opening ascendtng s t

helium @ 30,000 f t o = M.m.

800 ft./minute, as it becmes f u l l a t 30,000 f t . (density of
0.138dao )

I t is t o be noted t h a t equation ( 5 ) can be e.rrived a t by ?ore

sirrple reconstruction of the stendard equation f o r f l u i d flow:

-53-
 9 = t h e a c c e l e r a t i o n of g r a v i t y (ft./sec .2)

Ad = area .of t h e opening ( f t . 2 )

h = head of f l u i d c a u s i n g f l o w (ft.)

SlT!C6 I44Ap , we have:

h:
dg
(1%)

where dg i s d e n s i t y of t h e l i f t i n g g a s (lb./ft.3).

From e q u a t i o n ( 7 ) we have:

therefore :

Conparing e q u a t i o n s ( 1 0 ) and 43) we see th8.t i f t h e e q u a t i o n s are

equal :
I L
14.7
2889 C$ 1333'dao
If we l e t c d = .975 , a r e a s o n a b l e v a l u e f o r t h e r e h t i v e l y
low v e l o c i t y flow of g a s through t h e appendix, we have:

Therefore, t h e e q u a t i o n s ( 1 0 ) and (13) a r e e q u a l and i n t e r -

changeable.

I t may be noted from e q u a t i o n s (10) and ( 1 3 ) t h a t f o r a n y given

b a l l o o n , appendix a r e a and balloor-i volume are f i x e d , and the
related v a r i a b l e s Rre l i f t i n g gas d e n s i t y , r a t e of r i s b , and
a l l o w a b l e bpck p r e s s u r e . For any g i v e n a l l o w a b l e back p r e s s u r e
greater r a t e s of r i s e a r e a l l o w a b l e a t h i g h e r a l t i t u d e s (where
d q i s lower).
Or.& 8 f l o a t i n g a l t i t u d e h a s been decided upon or it has been
decided t o c a r r y @ given load a s p a r t of t h e b a l l o o n system, we
can f i n d B maxixrum a l l o w a b l e r a t e o f r i s e . We must cor.sider

-54-
the pressure d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e l i f t i n g gas and the i n t e r n a l
back pressure due t o valving gas. To f i n d m a x i m u m r a t e s of
ascent f o r various balloons would n e c e s s i t a t e a complicated
s e r i e s of t r i a l and e r r o r solution. In general, it has been
more p r a c t i c a l t o deternine a maxinzum rate of rise f o r normal
operating conditions f o r any giver, size balloon by finding the
maximum a l l d b l e r a t e f o r t h e balloon r i s i n g t o i t s lowest
normal operating l e v e l (i.e., we w i l l find the maximum allowable
rate f o r the worst normal operating conditions and consider
it a maximum f o r all normal operating conditions. )

L e t us take the case of a 20-foot diameter polyethylene balloon

of .OOlW thickness. Lowest normal f l o a t i n g a l t i t u d e i s 20,000 f t .
B L . L e t us assume t h e t t h e balloon w i l l be f u l l and begin
valvinf gas a t 15,000 f t . MSL. Assume the appendix diameter
t o be foot. Using equation (1) t o f i n d maximum allowable
i n t e r n a l pressure and assuming the c r i t i c a l x-y plane t o be t h a t
o f maximum diameter A Z = D / 2 , we have:

(Here we have introduced a f a c t o r of s a f e t y by saying sf 900/2 f

instead of 900 p s i , t h e ultimate strength i n tension of poly-

ethylene .) Pressure d i s t r i b u t i o n :

* PD/2
= AZ $ (1-8) = 2 .3.38 .IO'4-.862 = .00291 psi
Allowable back pressure :

A pbp = A poll - A = . 0 0 4 6 psi

Maximum r a t e of rise using equation (13)s

= 100.7 ftisec
= 6000 ft/min

It i s evident from t h i s c a l c u l a t i o n t h a t the r a t e of r i s e of t h e

20-ft. diameter polyethylene balloon is not a c r i t i c a l f a c t o r
in b u r s t i n g unless the open appendix becomes snarled ar.6 gas i s
not allowed t o escape.

Rate o f rise and appendix openings a r e important from the stand-

point of balloon design. For operationel reasons it i s important
t o have a rapid r a t e of r i s e . In order t o make nost e f f i c i e n t
use ,of x e i g h t , t h e balloon f i l m should be t h i n . As mentioned

-55-
 i n the preceding section on diffusion snd leakage t h e appendix
opening should be small. I t can be seen t h a t as we make one
of our conditions b e t t e r , we m u s t s a c r i f i c e a t l e a s t one of
the others. Therefore , balloons must be designed compromising
rate of rise, balloon thickness, and appendix opening. Methods
of decreasing the eppendix opening, except during the valving
of l i f t i n g . g a s , a r e discussed in other sections of t h i s tech-
c i c a l report. In general t h e y c o n s i s t of means of applying
a d e l i c a t e r e l i e f valve, capable of opening t o a lerge area
with a p p l i c a t i o n of o n l y slight i L t e m a 1 pressure, and a l s o
closing t i g h t upon release of t h i s i n t e r n a l pressure.

G. dr General Eqaat!,cn of Motion

If we c o l l e c t and r e l a t e the variables i n c i d e n t a l t o balloon f l i g h t ,

we may form a general equation o f motion. This i s most e a s i l y ex-
pressed i n terms of forces a c t i n g upon the balloon syster.. Ne may
equate en a c c e l e r a t i o n term plus a drag or f r i c t i o n term a g a i n s t F
term t o include a l l other forces:

moft + n ( D t f = CP

This i s a d i f f e r e n t i a l equation of a type comon i n mechanical v i -

b r a t i o n problems, End solution f o r t h e v a r i a b l e L would not be
d i f f i c u l t if r e l a t i o n s h i p s of the m n y v a r i a b l e s included in the
t h e terms n and EF were simple. However, the complexit of t h e
balloon system introduces many terms as p e r t s of n and 3 F .
We shall f i r s t state the more complex form o f equation (1) above
and then attempt to explain tb v a r i a b l e s included i n each p a r t of
the equation. A s w i l l be shown, it i s extremely d i f f i c u l t t o f i n d
a complete sol*>tion of the equation since m n y of t h e v a r i a b l e s
a r e i n themselves extremely complex and a t t h i s time incapable of
acaurate solution. Therefore, our discussion w i l l be more of a
q u a l i t a t i v e r a t h e r than a q u a n t i t a t i v e nature.

The general force equation is:

The force due trp acceleration FA = If*

where: 0
W = weight of the balloon system

0 : a c c e l e r a t i o n of gravity

s'0 : acceleration of the balloon system (An

acceleration i n the d i r e c t i o n of greater
a l t i t u d e i s copsidered positive.)

-56-
The force due t o f r i c t i o n or drag = c~ 25 (This assumes
that t h e r e is no v e r t i c a l motion of the a i r i n which t h e balloon
system i s floating. W e shall l a t e r consider tb case where an
atmospheric force is causing v e r t i c a l motion of the a i r . )
mere-:

P = mass density of the a i r surrounding the

balloon system

A = projected area of t h e balloon on 8 plene

perpendicular t o the r e l a t i v e v e l o c i t y

v e r t i c a l v e l o c i t y of t h e balloon system
(Velocity in the d i r e c t i o n of g r e a t e r a l t i t u d e
i s considered positive.)

a c o e f f i c i e n t of drag, dependent on Reynolds

number DidP whe re :
NR =
P
d = diameter of sphere ( f t . )
p = mss density of surrounding
f l u i d lb. s ~ c . ~
(
ft.4
1
= v i s c o s i t y of surrounding f l u i d

A p l o t of drag c o e f f i c i e n t aga izst %?yDOld8 nunber f o r 8 sphere i s

shown in Eigure 27.

Figure 27. Drag c o e f f i c i e n t vs. Reynolds Number, for sphere.

-57-
If a balloon i s teardrop i n shape r a t h e r than s p h e r i c a l , the curve
would be modified so t h a t the value of CD, f o r a given Reynolds
number would be lower. I n t h i s case t h e sudden drop i n c,
as Reynolds number increases (the change from viscous t o turbulent
flow) would occur a t a lower Reynolds number.

We have thus far in our discussion assumed t h a t t h e r e i s no v e r t i -

the cuardinate t .
c a l motion of t h e a i r surrounding the balloon system r e l a t i v e t o
However, this is not n e c e s s a r i l y t h e case
under actual. conditions. In many instances v e r t i c a l a i r movement i s
found i n t h e atmosphere. Therefore, we must introduce a term t o
allaw f o r t h i s v e r t i c a l a i r muvemnt. In equation ( 2 ) t h i s term
was indicated a s 2FA , t h e e x t e r n a l atmospheric force.
We may consider t h i s v e r t i c a l a i r movment. i n terms of a velocity 0s.
Then t h e v e r t i c a l v e l o c i t y of the balloon system r e l a t i v e t o the
a i r surrounding the system w i l l be t h e difference between the velo-
c i t y of t h e balloon r e l a t i v e t o the absolute a l t i t u d e DZ and the
v e l o c i t y of t h e surrounding a i r r e l a t i v e t o the absolute a l t i t u d e
This may b e equated a s Dp- 06 , where Da and 05 are both con-
sidered p o s i t i v e i n t h e d i r e c t i o n of increase of a l t i t u d e .

The t o t a l force due t o the drag, o r f r i c t i o n w i l l be:

U e ,.
where the o t a t i o n s a r e t h o s e used previously, exqept that now
NR
= The r e l a t i o n s h i p between N, and C o w i l l be those
used previously.
The force due t o buoyancy of the l i f t i n g gas Fe = vb ( ' % - p i )
where :

Vb = balloon volume ( f t e 3 )
density of t h e a i r and l i f t i n g gas, respectively
(lb./ft.3)
This term my a l s o be s t a t e d as:
where :
F P Vb ( ,d
- A)
R ~ T ~

pressure of a i r and l i f t i n g gas

pa, 40 ::

RO' Rg
= s p e c i f i c gas constant of a i r and l i f t i n g gas

Ta,*g = temperature of a i r and l i f t i n g gas

The changes t h a t w i l l take place i n t h i s expression a r e those due
t o a temperature difference between t h e l i f t i n g gas and the free
a i r , change i n volume of t h e balloon due t o l o s s of l i f t i n g gas,
ohange of t h e gas constant o f t h e l i f t i n g gas due t o d i l u t i o n with
a i r , and ( i n t h e case of a balloon t h a t w i l l hold a n i n t e r n a l pressure)
pressure difference between l i f t i n g gas and surrounding a i r .
Temperature e f f e c t s were discussed previously i n this report.
Those discussions on superheat end adiabatic temperature change
w i l l apply t o the general equation. In general, temperature of

.
the free a i r and l i f t i n g gas can be measured t o a f a i r degree of
accuracy

Balloon volume a t any t i m e i s a function of o r i g i n a l f u l l balloon

volume p l u s the summation of a l l the changes i n volume due t o pres-
sure and temperature changes and loss of l i f t i n g gas. I t w i l l
a l s o be affected b y l o s s o r gain of a i r b y the balloon through
diffusion and intake of air through t h e appendix. The non-
extensible balloon w i l l have a maximum volume and thus any changes
tending t o increase the gas volume t o a value greater than t h e
balloon volume w i l l r e s u l t i n a valvicg of t h e excess l i f t i n g gas
i n t o the a i r , o r ( i n the case o f a balloon which w i l l c a r r y in-
ternal pressure) a pressure increase of the l i f t i n g gas.

It is f o r t h i s reason t h a t a non-extensible balloon i s said to be

i n a s t a t e of s t a b l e equilibrium i n a d i r e c t i o n of g r e a t e r a l t i -
tude when it i s f u l l . Ecnvever, i n a d i r e c t i o n of l e s s e r a l t i t u d e ,
and w i t h the case of a p e r t i a l l y f u l l f l o a t i n g balloon, the system
i s i n a s t a t e of neutral equilibrium.

Composition of the l i f t i n g gas w i l l change due t o contarninetion of

the l i f t i n g gas by the e n t r y ’ o f s i r i n t o the balloon, e i t k e r by t h e
flow of a i r thmugh t h o appendix opening o r by d i f f u s i o n of s i r i n t o
the balloon. We may then modify our tenn f o r density of t h e l i f t i n g
gas t o include a term f o r t h e pure gas and a term f o r the contaminating
a i r . Using t h e method of p a r t i a l volumes, we msy equate t h e density
of the l i f t i n g gas a t any t i m e by:

where :

ps = pressure of the l i f t i n g gas

o t o t a l l i f t i n g gas volume
‘b
= volume of pure l i f t i n g gas in balloon
vP
Vo = volume of a i r i n balloon
crpecific gas constant of pure l i f t i n g gas
Rg =
R, = s p e c i f i c gas constant of a i r

Then, c a l l i n g *:
“b
Xp and aV
b’
0
Xg (here we see t h a t since

Pg= +(*+$)
P

-59-
The equation f o r t h e force due t o buoyancy w i l l then become:

F@ ' b' [a-%(%+%)I

If t h e balloon i s of the type t h a t w i l l c a r r y no i n t e r n a l pressure
, and we may state t h a t :
pg

'8 = 'b
Discussions of t h e contamination of the l i f t i n g gas a r e included under
the section on "Diffusion and Leakage o f L i f t i n g Gas" of t h i s report.

The f o r c e due to t h e weight of the system F w r W The weight

of t h e balloon system a t any time i s a function of the o r i g i n a l
weight of t h e system p l u s t h e change of weight of the system. This
change i n t h e weight of the system i s caused by t h e l o s s of b a l l a s t
and t h e weight of t h e system a t any t i m e ( t ):

where :

wo t.
t h e o r i g i n a l weight of' t h e system

E A wb
tso
= the sum of a l l the l o s s e s o f b a l k s t from
time a t w h i c h w s WX, u n t i l the time t
+
The value of the term CAwbdepends on the type of b a l l a s t control.
i-0
With no b a l l a s t :

and W t = W,
If a constant b a l l a s t f l m i s used:

where I tso
= -
dW
d t t
dW t rate o f b a l l a s t flow

t = elapsed t i m e from t = O to t: t
If a p r a c t i c a l fixed opening type or D a l l a s t control i s used:
c

where:
t = time

h s head of b a l l a s t above openifig

v i s c o s i t y Of ' b a l l a s t f l u i d
pb s

decsity of b a l l a s t fluid
pb t

A = area of opening

-60-
The b a l l a s t Plow a t any t i m e , t r

so t h a t : t
EAWb ./C,pb
to. A dt
0

where:
is a c o e f f i c i e n t of discharge, dependent
C, upon Reynolds number of the flow through
the opening

I n t h i s equation o n l y e and A a r e constants ( i f temperature

effeot on t h e opening A i s negleoted), Pb is dependent upon tempera-
ture of the f l u i d and h i s dependent upon t h e shape of the vessel
oontaining the f l u i d and time t.
If ballast Pluw i s controlled by atmospherio pressumr
, w i t h a fixed valve opening
(open-or=closed valve)

where ' p * b represents the time wher, abOSFheriC pressure is

g r e a t e r than t h e pressure of control. Here, again,
d t= C cpb AJ20h
&

d ( 3 r e l a t i o n s h i p between rate of flow and

press@e difference ( P - pc ) where p >pc
dAP

If we include a r a t e of pressure change control o r a r a t e of a s c e r t

control such t h a t t h e r e is no b a l l a s t flow i f rate of pressure
change i s less t h
than some value r
(af)e
-(.& o r r a t e of ascent i s greater
,we impose t h condition f o r b a l l a s t flow i n
the above two oases t h a t f o r flow t o oocur p > q , and dp

dt
We might a l s o have a control tht w i l l open or c l o s e a valve on
rate of pressure change suoh t h a t :

-61-
 t
where &> dt (&) i s the time during which pressure change of
the a i r surro&gd?g t h e balloon i s g r e a t e r than a design value
of pressure change causing b a l l a s t flow.

The general equation, then, i n d i c a t e s t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p s between

the v a r i a b l e s involved i n balloon f l i g h t . The discussions i n
t h i s section o f t h e report, "Equati on8 and Theoretical Considerations,"
attempt t o q u a l i t a t i w l y organize the r e l a t i o n s h i p s between these
v a r i a b l e s i n order t h t a complete o v e r a l l p i c t u r e of t h e aspects
of balloon f l i g h t can b e formulated.

It should be stressed t h a t the t h e o r e t i c a l r e l a t i o n s h i p s a s s t a t e d

here do n o t lend themselves t o simple i n s e r t i o n i n t o an o v e r a l l
equation which i s e a s i l y solved. Rather, solutions .of maryof the
v a r i a b l e s a r e i n themselves complex. A t t h i s t i m e it appears im-
p r a c t i c a l t o delve too deeply i n t o such matters a s "the v a r i a t i o n
of diffusion and leakage through various types of balloons under
d i f f e r e n t conditions' or "a study i n t h e change of c o e f f i c i e n t of
drag on a balloon system a t a l l points during i t s f l i g h t . " It
has been rrore p r a c t i c a l t o generally s t a t e the r e l a t i o n s h i p s i n
unsolved form and concentrate the experimental portion of t h e re-
search problem on such m . t t e r s 8 s actual development o f balloon
controls.

V. TELEMETERING

A. Information Transmitted

The need for a balloon-borne t r a n s m i t t e r and some system of ground

receiving and recording was recognized e a r l y i n the work of t h e pro-
j e c t . The primary objectiire of such telemetering was t o c o l l e c t
data t o evaluate the a l t i t u d e c o n t r o l s applied t o the balloon sys-
tem. Pressure, perhaps the most ixrportant data, was measured by
t h e use of radiosonde-type aneroid capsules. A discussion of t h e
pressure modulators used i s given i n the following section.

A second use of air-borne t r a n s m i t t e r s was t o provide a beaoon f o r

radio direction-finding. With proper equipment a balloon-borne
t r a n s m i t t e r can provide a signal t o guide an a i r c r a f t , homing w i t h
a radio compass, or provide a position "fix' by the crossed azi-
muths of ground receiving s t a t i o n s .

In addition t o these two very important functions of a l t i t u d e

d e t e m i n a t i o n and positioning, telemetering systems were used t o
d e t e c t and transmit temperature data and b a l l a s t f l o w data. The
equipment used f o r these purposes i s described below.

-62-
B. Transmitters Used

(1) 72-Megacycle Radiosonde Trantmitter (T-43)

The standard T-49 transmitter of the Army Weather Service was

f i r s t used i n p r o j e c t work, with a modified commutator bar
tmitching s p e c i a l l y coded r e s i s t o r s i n t o the c i r c u i t . as the
balloon passed from one c r i t i c a l pressure t o another. The
operating c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h i s t r a n s m i t t e r may be found i n
the following publications: T.B. Sig. 165, T.M. 11-2403,
T.M. 11-2404 and the Weather Equipment Technician' s Manual.

The defects which were encountered i n the use of t h i s t r a m -

mitter were p r i n c i p a l l y (1) r e l a t i v e l y short range and ( 2 )
unfitness for direction-finding using available equipment.
Our experience has beer. t h a t reception from t h e T-49 trans-
mitter by standard equipment i s n o t much above 80 miles under
good conditions. Nhen f l i g h t s were made which traveled many

.
t i m e s this distances, t h e inadequacy of t h i s t r a n s m i t t e r was
c l e a r l y demonstrated

The problem of direction-finding i s o f major importance when

attempts a r e made t o position m d t r a c k the balLoon and i t s
equipment t r a i n . Since no standard d i r e c t i o n a l receivep equip-
ment i s available f o r t h i s use with the T-49, t h i s transmitter
i s of limited value.

( 2) 400-Megacycle F'M Transmitter (T-69)

The T-49 transmitter was abandoned i n favor o f the T-69 400-mc

system as soon as ground receiving equipment f o r the l a t t e r was
available. By using t h e d i r e c t i o n a l receiving s e t SCR-658
with the T-69 transmitter, the problem of direction-finding
and positioning w a s attacked. A second adventage enjoyed by
t h i s system i s the improved range a t t a i n a b l e .

Our experience has been t h a t an SCR-658 set i n good condition

can receive a signal up t o a range of 150 miles, providing
t h a t the line-of-sight tmnsmitter i s high enough t o preclude
blocking by intervening t e r r a i n . The use of two or more sets
t o increase the area of a tracking n e t i s discussed under
"Radio Direction-Finding" below.

The operating c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the T-69 system and the SCR-658

may be found in these publications: T.B. Sig. 165, T.M. 11-1158A.

Pressure indicators were obtained, as with t h e T-49, by use of

the modified commutator bar switching s p e c i a l l y coded r e s i s t o r s
i n t o the c i r c u i t a s t h e balloon passed from one fixed pressure
t o a n o t h e r . A few special t e s t s were made of a chronometric
system of pressure modulation. For a complete discussion
of pressure modulation methods, see Section VI, A.

-63 -
(3) Low-Frequency Transmitter (AM-1)

A low-frequency t r a n s m i t t e r developed by t h e E l e c t r i c a l Zng-

ineering Department of New York University was adapted t o re=
place o r supplement t h e T-49 and T-69 transmitters. The
c a r r i e r frequencies used have been i n the region 1 mc t o
3 mc. The schematic of t h i s set i s s h m i n Figure 28, as
operated a t 3135 kc. “he output i s tipproximately 2 w a t t s ,
and a t y p i c a l air-to-ground range i s 300 miles, although
reception of more than 450 m i l e s has been a t t a i n e d by both
groiad and air-borne receivers.
3-35 M M C

I
I

Figure 28, Schematic diagram, AM-1 transmitter.

Information i s introduced i n a mariner s i n i l a r t o t h a t employed

i n conventional radiosonde transmitters: r e s i s t a n c e s a r e
switched i n t o the blocking-oscillator g r i d c i r c u i t . In t h e
case of pressure o r ballast-count, fixed r e s i s t o r s causing

.
d i s t i n c t blocking frequencies a r e used; f o r tenperature, t h e
switch introduces the tkermistor r e s i s t a n c e s
 When t h i s transmitter operates ah a lower frequency, say
1746 kc, the standard a i r c r a f t radio compass can be used t o
f i n d the direction t o the transmitter. No s u i t a b l e standard
equipment f o r ground direction-finding has been a v a i l a b l e t o
t h e project.

C. Receivers and Recorders Used

For t h e T-49 and T-69 radiosonde t r a n s m i t t e r s , standard ground-

s t a t i o n equipmentwas used t o receive and record the signal. An
appropriate receiver (National 110 f o r the T-49 and SCR-658 f o r the
T-69) feeds the signal through a frequency meter and i n t o a Friez
recorder, model AN/F'hfQ-l(). With t h i s system, frequencies between
10 and 200 cycles per second can be recorded.

When the Olland-Cycle pressure modulctor i s used, (see Section VI,

A , 3 ) with law-frequency pulses indicating the completion of the pres-
sure or reference c i r c u i t , a recorder made by the Brush Development
Co. (Model SL 212) replaces t h e F r i e z recorder and frequency meter.
N i t h the AM-1 t r a n s m i t t e r , the usual ground receiver has been the
Hammarlund Super-Pro Xodel SP-400-X. For a i r c r a f t operation, an
a i r c r a f t radio compass such a s k#/ARbT-P i s used.

D. Batteries Used

To extend t h e l i f e of the b a t t e r i e s used with the T-49 and T-68

t r a n s m i t t e r s , experimental packs were developed using both dry
and w e t c e l l s . A t y p i c a l "12-hour" dry-cell pack f o r the T-69
was composed o f :

B supply: 135V--1 ea. ESOFL (especially assembled f o r R.Y.V.

by Burgess Battery Co.) o r 6 ea. Burgess
XX30 i n series--parallel

A supply: 6V--1 ea. Burgess 2F4 o r 2 ea. F4H i n parallel

C b i a s supply: 45V t a p of B9OFL or XX30 assembly

With an AX-1 transmitter, t h e input power required i s a s follows:

"En supply, 270 v o l t s a t about 300 nilliamperes; r a i n "A" supply,
14 v o l t s a t 600 milliemperes; and a separate "A" supply f o r the
power amplifier, 1-iv o l t s a t 200 milliemperes. The b a t t e r y pack
includes 8 Burgess XX45 or Eveready 467 i n series--parallel$
2 Burgess 4FH b a t t e r i e s i n p a r a l l e l : and one 4FH, respectively,
This pack l a s t s about 20 hours i n f l i g h t . Also ircluded i n t h e
b a t t e r y container were b a t t e r i e s f o r a u x i l i a r y functions such as
Olland-Cycle or program -switch motors , ballast-control r e l a y s ,
and bring-down mechanisms.

The problem of operating a t cold temperature w a s given much consid-

eration. Special cold temperature b a t t e r i e s were t r i e d with in-
s u f f i c i e n t difference i n performance t o j u s t i f y the added expense
and d i f f i c u l t y of procurement. In addition, it was f e l t . t h a t
 mass-production methods and q u a l i t y oontrol associated with stan-
dard dry b a t t e r i e s gave g r e a t e r assurance of s a t i s f a c t o r y pa rformance.

Subsequent measurements made of the temperature inside t h e t r a n s -

m i t t e r b a t t e r y pack showed t h a t the tsmperature can be maintained
above -10% if the transmitter and b a t t e r i e s are housed i n a box
insulated with o n e t o two-inch walls of Styrofoam. This i n s u l a t i o n
i s e f f e c t i v e even through long nighttime periods when no s o l a r
heating i s added.

One type o f b a t t e r y t e s t e d i n f l i g h t was a l i g h t - m i g h t w e t c e l l

(Burgess Type AM) of the "dunk" type, (magnesium t silver chloride).
These c e l l s were vacuum-packed t o provide i n d e f i n i t e s h e l f - l i f e .
Activated by immersion i n water j u s t before r e l e a s e , they were ex-
pected t o produce a constant voltage over a p e r i o d of 6 hours t o
overcome cold temperature e f f e c t s . Those u n i t s used proved t o be
r a t h e r unsatisfactory and subject t o e r r a t i c behavior. F'urther-
more the c o s t of t h e c e l l s was very great compared with ordinary
cells.

E. Radio Direction-Finding

For ground s t a t i o n s , when the balloon-borne t r a n s m i t t e r i s a T-69,

t h e SCR-658 RDF s e t has been used. With such a s e t the radio sig-
n a l can be picked up a t distances up t o 150 miles and good szimuth
bearing may be obtained (accurate t o less than one degree). Although
t h e elevation angle may be obtained w i t h equal accuracy when f r e e
from d i s t o r t i o n , angles of less than 13 degrees a r e usually affected
by ground reflectior? t o such an e x t e n t a s to render them valueless.

To extend the range over which such sets were e f f e c t i v e , two or more
usually were used, positioned elong the expected t r a c k of t h e balloon
a t i n t e r v a l s of about 100 miles. With two sets giving crossed a z i -
muth "fixes" the position mqy be dstermined. If t h e elevation
angle i s above 13 degrees, it is possible t o f i x the belloon with one
SCR-658 (assuning the pressure a l t i t u d e i s lcrown).

For d e t a i l s of the maintemnce and use of the SCR-658, see War De-
partment publication T.K. ll-1158A.

When a i r c r a f t a r e used t o follow and position the balloon, t h e use

of a radio-compass i s found t o be f e a s i b l e , using the AX-1 t r e c s -
m i t t e r a t a frequency t h a t i s within t h e l i m i t s of t h e compass re-
ceiver. By homing on the signal end f l y i n g along the indicated
bearing u n t i l the oompass needle reverses, the balloon% p o s i t i o n
may be f o n d from i n i t i a l distances of up t o 500 miles. h'o appre-
c i a b l e cone of s i l e n c e has been obsemed i n recent f l i g h t s which
used a transmitter operating a t 1746 kc.

Radio compass equipentAX/A€i??-7, is described in U. S. A. A. F.

publication T. 0. 68-10.

-66-
F. Radar and Optical Tracking

Because of thei'r l i m i t e d range, ground r a d a r sets and theodolites

were only of minor value i n tracking balloons. Sets such as t h e
SCR-584, the SPM-1, and MPS-6 a r e suggested when the balloon i s
expected t o remein within the 60 t o 80 m i l e range.

A. A l t i t u d e Determination

To provide accurate, sensitive and readable records of the pressure

( a l t i t u d e ) encountered by the balloon, various systems have been,
t r i e d . A modified radiosonde-type aneroid pressure capsule (Signal
Corps LIL 310-/) has been the basic secsing element, but t h r e e
d i f f e r e n t s y s t e m of modulation of the radio signal as a function
of pressure have been used.

(1) Standard Diamond-Hinman Radiosonde Pressure Modulator

Seen i n Figure 2 9 , the standard Diamond-Einman radiosonde system

provided f i r s t pressure sensor used. As the pen a m i s pushed

r
I
I
1I

I
L

Figure 29. Sohematic diagram, Diamond-Binman

radio sonde system.
across t h e commutator by. the aneroid capsule, it f a l l s on
a l t e r n a t i n g insule t o r s and conductors attached t o t h r e e c i r c u i t s .

-67-
 By knowing t h e a l t i t u d e of r e l e a s e and counting the number of
switches from conductor t o i n s u l a t o r , the p o s i t i o n along the
the commutator i s known. This i n turn i s c a l i b r a t e d t o give
pressure values, from which the a l t i t u d e may be computed.

This system was not s u i t a b l e f o r f l o a t i n g balloons because

(1) only 70 t o 90 d i s c r e t e contacts are provided t o cover the
e n t i r e atmospheric pressure range; t h i s means t h a t the b e s t
r e a d a b i l i t y obtainable with t h i s system i s about 210 m i l l i b a r s ,
( 2 ) When the balloon o s c i l l a t e s about a f l o a t i n g l e v e l , the fre-
quent changes f r o m one contact t o another give ambiguous readings,
since the nmber o f d i s c r e t e r e s i s t a n c e s used i s limited.

.
For c i r c u i t d e t a i l s of t h i s unit, see T.B.
Weather Equipment Techniciar?s bfanual
Sig. 165 and the

( 2 ) Specially Coded Radiosonde Modulators

To remove the ambiguity of a l t i t u d e s reported by the system

above, e x t r a r e s i s t a n c e s were introduced i n t o the c i r c u i t s
of those contacts near the f l o a t i n g l e v e l ; thus, each contact
gives a d i s t i n c t i v e frequency and each pressure ( a l t i t u d e )
can be c l e a r l y distinguished.

In t h i s system, there s t i l l re,mins t h e l a c k of r e s o l u t i o n or

s e m i t i v i t y inherent i n t h e moduletor w i t h 70 t o 90 contacts.

( 3 ) Olland-Cycle Eodulator

To improve the s e n s i t i v i t y of the pressure measurements, an

Olland-Cycle (chronometric) pressure modulator m s developed.
Seer. i n Figure 30, the modulator contains a standard Signal

Figure 30, Olland-Cycle p-essure modulator.

-68-
Corps &310/ radiosonde aneroid unit, a metal h e l i x on a
rotating cylinder of insulating material, and a 6-volt e l e c t r i o
motor which rotates t h e cylinder.

There a r e two contacting pens which ride on the cylinder and

complete the modulator c i r c u i t of the transmitter when they
touch the helix. One pen i s fixed in position aRd makes a oon-
t a o t a t the same time i n each revolution of the helix. This
contact is used as a reference point f o r measuring the speed
of rotation of the cylinder. The time t h a t the second pen (whioh
is linked d i r e c t l y t o the aneroid o e l l ) makes contact with the
s p i r a l , is dependent on the cylinder speed and on the pen
position which is determined by the pressure. By an evaluation
chart, the atmospheric pressure can be determined a s a function
of the r e l a t i v e position of the pressure contact a s compared t o
the reference, thus eliminating a l l rotation e f f e c t s except short-
term motor speed fluctuatiom.

The operation of' t h i s unit i r deroribed i n d e t a i l I n Sootion

11, nOperationr,n of this report, pager 64-63.

Some of the u n i t s f l m have been made i n the shops o f - t h e

project, w>ile others have been c o m e r c i a l l y supplied. The
following specifications have been s e t up f o r performance of
the Olland-Cycle t

Pressure range: 1050 t o 5 mb.

Temperature range: +30OC t o -30%
Accuraoyr f0.2 mb.
Readability; t0.1 mb.

A number of tests have been made on the accuracy of the Olland-

Cycle modulator. The tests were of two types. The f i r s t m s
made runninz the unit a t room temperature while the pressure
remained constant. In the second, the pressure was varied from
surface pressure t o about 20 millibars several times a t d i f f -
erent temperatures. In t e s t s of the f i r s t type, the maximum
variation of pressure f o r a given contact pen position was
1.3 millibars i n a s e r i e s of 182 revolutions.

The most comprehensive tests of this .type wem made with two
Olland-Cycles i n the same b e l l j a r ruolning f o r three hours and
ten minutes. Due t o differenoes in speed of revolution, d i f f e r -
e n t numbers of revolutions were recorded in the time interval,
138 being made by instrument lo. b 4 1 6 and 181 by lnrtrumsnt No.
B-501. No. L-416 was made i n the shop8 of the Researoh Divl-
sion and urod a Brallrford 6-volt ( 1 rpm nominal speed) motor,
hard-rubber oylindetr w i t h 8 turns per lneh of .010" niokel w i r e
on a 3" a l d n u n p l a t e base. No. B-SO1 rras nmde by Brallsford
and Co. t o Balloon Projetot speoiflcatlonr. It' had the i m e
6-volt motor, a paper bare bakelite cylinder w i t h 8 turns per
inch of .010" n i o b l wlre and was mounted on a 1/16" sheet
aluminum frame.
The following s t a t i s t i c s f o r a given pressure (1001.8 a i l i i b a r s )
were computed:
N.Y.V. Shop Model Brailsford Model
L-416 B-501

on the mean 12.5% 34 %

within 0.1% of mean 25 % 50 %
" 0.2% I1 11 41 .5% 70.5%
0.3% fl 62.5% 85.5%
0.4$ 75 p 91 %
0.5% " 95 es", 100 p

Other conclusions arrived a t as a r e s u l t of this t e s t w e r e :

( a ) Since changes of speed of t h e motors did n o t occur simul-

taneously i n the two instruments, the speed changes probably
a r e n o t due t o s l i g h t changes i n pressure o r temperature.

(b) S e n s i t i v i t y varied from 0.1 t o 0.9 m i l l i b a r s .

( c ) S e n s i t i v i t y increased with increase of r a t e of pressure change.

It was recommended a s a r e s u l t of these t e s t s t h a t the records

of f l i g h t s when t h e balloon i s f l o a t i n g be read t o t h e n e a r e s t
two-tenths of a percent of a cycle,or approximately ho-+,enths
of a m i l l i b a r , f o r high accuracy. Yrhen using the instruments
manufactured by Brnilsford and Co., s a t i s f a c t o r y accuracy w i l l
be a t t a i n e d , i f neaessary, when t h e record i s read t o t h e
n e a r e s t one-tenth of a percent of a cycle.

In the second group of t e s t s the pressure w a s reduced slowly

t o about 20 m i l l i b a r s and increased t o sea-level pressure a t
d i f f e r e n t temperatures.

The most comprehensive s e r i e s of c a l i b r a t i o n s rres made with t h e

f i r s t instrument made by Brailsford and Co. Two runs were made
a t room temperature ( n O C ) , one a t -1c)oc, one a t -30 t o 37OC
and one a t -56 t o -62%. On the l a s t t e s t a t t h e lowest tempera-
t u r e , t h e u n i t w a s found t o be completely unreliable. The
cause of f a i l u r e was t h e e r r a t i c motor operation a t extremely
l o w temperatures. This had been observed previously during
f l i g h t s when t h e Olland-Cycle wns not thermally insulated.

The other curves w e r e p l o t t e d on a single c h a r t i n order t o

study t h e i r spread (see Figure 31). The envelope of curves
thus obtained showed no regular temperature e f f e c t over t h e
range a2Z°C t o -37%. In general, t h e envelope was less than
10 m i l l i b a r s wide although a t some higher pressures it was a s
much a s 12 m i l l i b a r s w i d e . The curpee a t low pressures f e l l
c l o s e s t together and 91181'8 a l l within 3 t o 4 m i l l i b a r s a p a r t
between 50 and 150 m i l l i b a r s and 6 m i l l i b a r s apart between
150 t o 200 millibars.

-70-
 ,380:.. .. . ... .._._.
.+-
. . ! . . I .

1330 -
--f+-j -:1 -10.C
- 35. c
205 215 225 980 990 I000

Figure 31. Tests of Olland-Cycle perfom.ance.

Hysteresis a t any one temperature was the worst serious cause

of the width of the envelope of curves. However, t h i s
e r r o r was minimized by the smoothness of the r o t a t i n g cylinder
and the continuous motion of the cylinder under the eontact
pen, Probably t h e necessary looseness of the bearings and
the joining t o the motor gear t r a i n had a g r e a t deal t o do w i t h
the spread betnreen d i f f e r e n t c a l i b r a t i o n s .

The maximum v a r i a t i o n of any one ce.libration curve from the

mean was about f 3 m i l l i b a r s .

The following recommendations are made f o r the use o f the

Olland-Cycle modulator :
(a) The modulator should be mounted inside the b a t t e r y box and
insulated so as t o keep i t s temperature above -3OoC.

(b) Durine; the rapid-rising portion of the f l i g h t the accuracy

of the data weirrants reading only t o t h e nearest one percent
of a cycle, o r about one m i l l i b a r of preseure.

Tests on the s e n s i t i v i t y of Olland-Cycle modulators indi-

cate t h a t although the accuracy i s l i m i t e d as indieated
above, small variations may be detected w i t h the r e s u l t
that it i s v a l i d t o read t h e pressure record t o the n e a r e s t
tenth of one percent of one revolution.

-71 -
When the Olland-Cycle principle was o r i g i n a l l y adopted, both
clocks and e l e c t r i c motors were considered f o r the power supply.
*In addition t o the tendency of clocks t o stop a t cold tempera-
t u r e s due t o freezing of lubricants and unequal expansion of the
parts, the movement of %he clocknork in discrete steps l i m i t s
the accuracy of sampling. For these reasons, e l e c t r i c motors
are preferred.
The motor now i n u1e has been b u i l t t o meet the following spe-
cificationst

(a) 6 t o 7.5 v o l t operation.

(b) 1 RFM
' gear t r a i n .
(0) 20 t o 40 milliamperes drain.
(d) Speed change a t low temperature t o be no more than 2%.

(0) Constancy of speed during any single revolution not t o

deviate by more than 0.3%.

To check the performance of these motors a t cold. temperatures,

a s e r i e s of testawas run on the motors now i n use with the
average case seen in Figure 32. The l o s s in RPM was more than

Figure 32. Speed tests of Olland-Cycle motors,

desired, but the motors continued t o operate a t a steady r a t e .

As long as the speed of revolution does not vary markedly with-
in a single revolution, the e r r o r is not ser-ious. In e a r l y
f l i g h t s made a t prolonged cold tenperature, e r r a t i c performar-ce

-72-
 of the motor-driven u n i t s was observed; c u r r e n t p r a c t i c e i s
t o provide adequate temperature insulation.

(4) Barograph

As a secondary pressure u n i t , a clock-driven barograph has been

included on many f l i g h t s . ! h e instrument ( s h m i n Figure 33)

Figure 33. Smoked drum barogreph.

w i l l provide up t o 40 hours of pressure data i f recovered.

About 70% of a l l those u n i t s flown t o date have been recovered.
The performame s p e c i f i c a t i o n s a r e a s follows:

(a) Rotation: one revolution every 12 hours

( b ) Duration: 36 hours running t i m e

( c ) Pressure range: 500 t o 5 mb.

(d) Accuracy: 25 mb.

(8) Readability: 1.0 mb. or approximately - 2 2 mm on the drum

(f) Weight: lo00 grams

(g) Time accuracy: 1%

(h) Temperature compensation between 30% and -70%

Instruments have been b u i l t by Lange Laboratories t o meet

these requirements ( t h e time accuracy figure i s questionable&

-73-
 A desoriptlon of the use of t h i s barograph i s given i n Part 11,
ttOperations," of this report.

B. Temperature Measurement

To i n t e r p r e t some of t h e observed balloon behavior, a knowledge

of t h e temperature of t h e gas and t h e outside a i r t e m p r a t w e was
required. The evaluation of "superheat" e f f e c t s was acoomplished
primerily by exposing a conventional radiosonde thermistor i n s i d e
t h e balloon with a c o n t r o l thermistor measuring the free-air tampera-
ture. Similarly, a thermistor was sometimes i n s t a l l e d i n s i d e t h e
battery-pack housing t o measure t h e temperature of the b a t t e r i e s .

While t h i s system was i n use it was general p r a c t i c e t o use t h e

standard government service thermistors ML 376/AM (brown) and
ML, 395/FMQ-l (white). The white elements were needed when the ex-
ternal temperature was measured, since no adequate p r o t e c t i o n from
t h e sun was available. blS0, at f l o a t i n g level there i s no venti-
l a t i o n t o be had since t h e balloon i s s t a t i o n a r y with respect t o
the a i r .
TRe r e s i s t a n c e of the thermistors was switched i n t o the g r i d c i r c u i t
of the blocking o s c i l l a t o r of the AM-1 t r a n s m i t t e r , and by compari-
son with p r e - f l i e h t e a l i b r a t i o n s the audio frequency transmitted
could be i n t e r p r e t e d in terms of temperature. To record t h e s i p a l
after it was received, a fast-speed Brush Co. Oscillograph Model EL212
i s used. (Due t o t h e frequency response of the Brush recording
system, the c i r c u i t was arranged t o give lower frequencies than a
standard radiosonde f o r the same temperature range.) A sample c d i -
b r a t i o n chart, i s shown i n ,Figure 34.

Figure 34. Saxple c e l i b r a t i o n c h e r t f o r

temperature measurements.

-74-
The temperature data obtained was of considerable value , e s p e c i a l l y
t o determine the e f f e c t of i n s u l e t i o n of the b a t t e r y pack. I t w a s
found on mast f l i g h t s where reasonable thermal i n s u l a t i o n was applied
t h a t the temperature of the pack remained above O°C a f t e r several
hours of exposure a t nighttime. The extreme observed was -0OOC.
Daytime f l i g h t s had the added advantage of heating from the sun.
The temperature of the l i f t i n g gas a t the ground was o r d i n a r i l y
found t o be somewhat below t h e temperature of t h e a i r . This i s due
to the extreme oooling encountered i n the expansion of the compressed
gas as it was f e d from t h e tanks i n t o the balloon. During the r i s i n g
period, i n daytime, the gas gained h e a t , since i t cools a d i a b a t i c a l l y
less r a p i d l y than does a i r (also less than the nomal tropos h e r i c
li
l a p s e r a t e ) ; a t the f l o a t i n g l e v e l a d i f f e r e n t i a l of about 10 C
was common. A t y p i c a l telrperature t r a c e i s shown i n Figure 35.

To permit the transmission of both temperature and pressure data by

one radio channel, a p s i r of programming switches hbve been de-
signed and f l i g h t tested. The f i r s t is the temperature switch (Figure 36).

Figure 36. Temperature programming w i t c h .

-75-
 which switches four elements i n t o the t r a n s m i t t e r c i r c u i t i n turn.
Recently a motor making f i v e revolutions per minute was used so
t h a t each temperature i s transmitted f o r three eeconds. The four
elements a r e t h e free-air temperature, t h e gas temperature, b a t t e r y -
pack temperature and a reference signal. This switch is supple-
mented by a master program switch which a l t e r m t e l y places the
temperature switch and t h e pressure modulator i n t o the t r a n s m i t t e r
c i r c u i t . The present arrangement i s t o permit t h e temperature data
t o be transmitted f o r about one minute i n every f i f t e e n . In t h i s
way represent8tive temperature sampling may be obtained, w i t h o u t
m a t e r i a l l y destroying the continuity o f t h e pressure and b a l l a s t
data.

A second system of' determining temperature makes use of the smoked

drum of the barograph. By adding a temperature-activated pen, this
u n i t makes a record of the temperature encountered. Since it i e not
the f r e e - a i r temperature nor the temperature of t h e l i f t i n g gas but
rather the temperature of t h e barograph i t s e l f , the data obtained
has been of l i t t l e value. Following the development of s u i t a b l e
temperature telemetering apparatus, t h i s method was n o t used.

C. Ballast M e t e r i n .
I t is often very desirable t o knownbther o r not b a l l a s t c o n t r o l
equipment i s operating properly during f l i g h t tests. For this
purpose, two systems of b a l l a s t metering have been devised. I t i s
possible (1) t o record on an instrument which is balloon-borne o r
( 2 ) t o d e t e c t and telemeter information t o the ground concerning
b a l l a s t flow.

Figure 37 shows t h e automatio siphon which has been used i n t h e AM-1

transmitter c i r c u i t f o r the telelnetering of such i n f o r m t i o n . A
s e r i e s of pulses of f i x e d frequency is transmitted whenever the
contact arm of the automatic siphon i s f i l l e d above a c r i t i o a l
level. The electrolyte used i e non-misoible with the b a l l a 8 t and
rises and f a l l s i n proportion t o the rise and f a l l of the main arm
of the siphon. This main arm empties when approximately 3.5 g r a m
of b a l l a s t have been allowed t o flow i n t o it. A 8 a consequence of
t h i s i n t e r m i t t b t f i l l i n g and emptying of t h e l i n e s of the siphon,
an i n t e r m i t t e n t signal of fixed frequency i s transmitted whenever
b a l l a s t i a flowing steadily. It is important t h a t an e l e c t r o l y t e
be used wliich w i l l n o t freeze a t low atmospheric temperatures and
w i l l n o t b o i l a t the l o w pressures enoountered. A f t e r a series of
tests it was dscided t h a t a 24% rolution of hydroahlorio a c i d be
used f o r a l t i t u d e s up t o 85,000 feet. I t i s neoessary t o use
platinum w i r e f o r th6 contact points.

I n order t o record in f l i g h t the functioning of t h e b a l l a s t c o n t r o l

system a b a l l a s t recording mechanism has been developed i n oon-
junction with the Lange Laboratories of Lexington, Kentucky. This

-76-
 Figure 37. Automatio siphon.

instrument has been added as e part of the baro-thennograph. A

cutaway sketch of t h i 8 ballast-reoording instrument is shom as
Figure 38.

Figure 38. Ballast-reoording meter.

-77-
Operation of the instrument may be described 8 s f o l l m s t 'he
instrument i s inserted in the load l i n e j u s t above the b a l l a r t
assembly by attaching the load l i n e t o the upper ring (A) and the
rigging from the b a l l a s t assembly t o the lower ring (B). A oanti-
lever spring (F) is s e t i n t o an adjustable base (K), which may be
adjusted f o r various empty ballast-asrembly weights by ohangfng the
s e t t i n g of the adjusting screw (L). The lower r i n g i s attached
t o the oantilever spring, but oan be adjusted f o r d i f f e r e n t b a l l a r t
w e i g h t s by s l i d i n g along the spring (from G t o 01, f o r instance).
For l i g h t b a l l a s t weights the lower ring i s moved away from the
base (K) ( t o the r i g h t on the diagram), and f o r heavy b a l l a s t weight8
i t is moved toward the base. Adjustments are made on the adjurting
screw (L) and the lower ring (G) before each f l i g h t according
t o the weights of' the b a l l a s t assembly and the b a l l a s t .

The cantilever spring is attaohed t o the connecting bar (E) a t (H).

Thus the deflection of the lower r i n g i s transferred through the
cantilever spring t o t h e conneoting bar and then t o the pen arm
( C ) , which is pivoted about a fixed point (D). me defleotion is
recorded by the pen on a rotating moked drum (B). In order t o
prevent the pen from going off the drum, an adjustable r t o p i r set
a t (J).
The u n i t should be calibrated f o r maximUrn load (pen rm a t C ),
a medium load (pen arm a t C ) and minimum lord (pen arm a t C z j before
each f l i g h t . A traoe of b a l l a s t function w i l l rtart a t the t o p of
the drum and a s b a l l a r t i s discarded w i l l f a l l toward th e bottom
of the drum. By measuring the deflection a t any t i m e and oomparing
with the calibration, the amount of b a l l a s t l e f t i n the a88embly
a t any t i m e can be determined. Since t h i s instrument i s a part
of the baro-thermograph, the t r a o e obtained upon recovery w i l l c o n t a b
information concerning a l t i t u d e , temperature, and b a l l a s t functioning
over the complete f l i g h t . After proper correction f o r time d i s -
placement of the three pens has been made, t h e three type8 of in-
formation can be correlated t o give a f a i r l y complete picture of
the balloon f l i g h t , including reasons f o r various types of motion.

It i s expected t h a t t h i s insltrument rill be ejrtremely valuable in

determining b a l l a s t control operation over a long period of' time,
especially a f t e r the balloon system i s out of radio reception range.
It also w i l l give information t h a t could not be obtained if there
were any f a i l u r e of the automatic siphon meter or the transmitter
during launching o r f l i g h t . The chief drawbaok of the instrument
i s t h a t information i s dependent on recovery.

A t the time of writing of t h i s report the instruxwnt has n o t been

f l i g h t tested. Preliminary laboratory t e s t s indiaate t h a t the in-
strument: w i l l l i v e up t o the high expectations placed upon it.
Since the instrument aotually records the t e n s i l e force in the load
l i n e during f l i g h t , it may a180 be valuable i n analysis of the re-
celeration foroes induced during periods of balloon o s c i l l a t i o n
in the atmosphere.

-70-
VII. CONCLUSIONS

Contiider8blO experimental work has been done in omjunction w i t h the

study of balloons and controls. The desoription of operating pro-
cedures and the use of specially developed equipment i s inoluded in
Part I1 of t h i s report, "Operations," (bound separately).
A summary of the results of f l i g h t s made t o t e s t equipment and oontrolr
i s given i n Part 111, "Sunumry of Flightr." A t t h i s t h e t h e use of
thin polyethylene balloons with pressure-activated b a l l a s t controls
has been demonstrated effeotively t o meet the contract requirements.
Tests made on another contract have found controls oonsistently active
over 24 hours with an average pressure constancy of f 2 mb. a t 200 mb.
Even greater b a l l a s t efficiency has been found a t higher alkitudes
using the same pressure-activated controls.

-79-
 Teohnioal Report lo, 93.02

CONSTANT LEVEL BALLoOi?S

Section 3

SUMMARY OF FLIGHTS

Constant Level Balloon Project

New York University

Prepared in Aocordance w i t h provisions of Contract

P128-099-ac-241, betnrean
Watson Laboratories, Red Bank, New Jersey
and
New York University

The research reported in this document has been made possible

through support and s p o ~ s o r s h i pextended by t h e Geophysical
Research Directorate of the Cambridge Field Station, N ,
U. S, A i r Force, under Contract No. W28-099 ac-241. It i s
published f o r technical information only and does not repre-
sent recommendations or conclusions of' the sponsoring agency.

Prepared by: >- T. %&

James R. Smith

Dr. Harold K. Work

Director of the Research Division

College of Engineering
New York University
15 July 1949
New York 63, New York
 Table of Contents

Page Number

I. Introduction a a... . . 5

&amber 5. .. . .. . . . 6

. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .
7. 0 0 0 0 . * * 0 . 0 8
10. .lo
11. 0 012
12. *14
15-16. 0 0 016
17.. 017
20. 016
23. a 018
29-39. 019
41.
43-51.
52.
..... . 0 0

0
020
022
*24
54. a 0 26
55. 028
56. 0 0 26
58. 0 30
60. 0 a 026
63. a 032
68-72.
73.
74.
.. . . .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . 0

0 0
033
034
35
75. 0 0 0 036
780
79.
80.
0 . ...... ...
0 0 0

0
0.38
39
040
81. 042
82. 043
85. 0 0 0 044
86. 045
88. 0 0 046
89.
90.
92.
.. .... ....... 0 a
047
04.8
*50
93.
94. .. . . ... ..0
0 0 0

0
52
53
96.
97..
98.
. .......... .
a
0
0

0
054
055
56
302. -58
103-111. 060
104. a 63
106. 0 . 0 0 0 064
110. 66
 Introduotion

In November, 1946 the Researoh Division of the College of Engineering

of New York University contraoted w i t h Watson Laboratories, A X , t o devalop
and f l y oonstant-level instrument-carqdng balloans. This is the t h i r d p a r t
of the final report on the work accomplished and describes the experimental
balloon f l i g h t s which were made.
In reviewing the f l i g h t s a number of analytioal comments may be made.
In most f l i g h t s one objeotive was the maintenance of the balloon a t a constant
pressure level f o r as long as possible. On maay flightq balloon behavior
'(01s affeoted by i n e t r m e n t a l oontrols of one kind o r another while on so-
f l i g h t s no c o n t r o b a t a l l were used.

Balloms of varying sizes and of d i f f e r e n t principles of construction

have been launched singly, in tandem and i n olusters. On some, temperatures
were measured and on others the f l i g h t peth was an obJect of special study.
To explain c e r t a i n observed f l i g h t data a careful analysis of atmospheric
a t a b i l i t y has been made, while other f l i g h t s have special significance be-
cause they demonstrate the e f f e c t of superheat on the l i f t i n g gas or same
other feature of analytical importanoe.

Since over 100 f l i g h t s have been made, it i s d i f f i c u l t t o tabulate the

important r e s u l t s obtained on each specific f l i g h t . To present the data
whioh has been collected each s i p i f i c a n t f l i g h t i s presented chronologically,
Kith drawings and details where necessary, and a sununary of the . f l i g h t
results i s given.
To render t h i s information useful, an index has been prepared with re-
ference made to f l i g h t s which show typioal o r important results in each
category.
F l i g h t 6: Released from blamogordo, New ybxioo, 0617 mT, June 5, 1947
Reoovered a t R 0 8 w l 1 , 'blew b x i o o

In t h i r f l i g h t , a 66-pound load war l i f t e d w i t h a l i n e a r array of 28

35O-gram rubber balloons. By attaohing the balloons a t 20-foot interval8
along the load line, a t o t a l length of about 600 feet was required. The
train 1 8 &own in Figure 1. For a l t i t u d e oontrol, three l i f t i n g balloon8

%
-LIfTER BALLOONS

-- LIFTER cu I-OFF, K T S AT 35000'

(I

TOTAL L E N G T H Of BALLOON T R A I N s&S*

(LESS L I F T E R S )

Jao+TEST NYLON LINE

WANDtRCJDED LOBSTtR TWINE

@SnUNO ZOO* TCf NYLON

CANNON T 3 C U T OFFLAUNCWINC L I N C I .
SILK PARACMUTC

7 Z M A ' J l O S O N D t W I T H HEAL. f DUTY

B A T T E R I E S 4YD ~ S O R D I N A T T ~ ~ U P ~ I D I T ~ '
n7CSdTOa
P A Y L A D (l5b W T )

--BALLOON TO B U R N 0;F A T 45CG'l

--R*LLO)N TO B U R N G r f A T 4 ? 0 0 1 )
H HAL^ F L L C D a x L o o m ~0uu111.t
OFFAT
4I(,rJO1

- 1 1 PO N T P R E SSURL f i l l K H F?R3 W! JWh!

\NDMLIASr
SANDB~LLWT1117 D L A S T I C ~ U B ~ S , T O T AOF
593)j- 13ALLAST,DROP°CD i t 1 THE FOLLOWING
INCREvf N T S '
L

SO0 - A . M 1 0 0 0 '
300:- A f 2 1 0 ) 0 '
T O O c A T 27,U
700 ATZ&OOO
Too?? A T ZJOOO
70%- A T ZkOW ( 2
T W AT I9Qoff (21
PLASTIC RESfRJOlR ANB DRl8BLLR S E T A T
- - 34000' -

Figure 1: Train, F l i g h t 5
were out free a t 35,000 feet, and the remaining load was weighted t o balanoe
a t t h a t point. As a preoaution against over-buoyanoy, three more balloon8

-6-
wre t o be freed a t 40,000, 42,000 and 45,000 feet. The use of sand b a l l a s t ,
t o be dropped in increments upon descent t o a l t i t u d e s below 31,000 f e e t ,
war supplemented by an e a r l y model of the automatio b a l l a s t valve set t o ex-
pend l i q u i d b a l l a 8 t a t 34,000 feet.
From the height-time o u m of the f l i g h t (Figure 2 ) , it w i l l be 4een that
the maximum a l t i t u d e reached was much above the predicted 35,000 feet. A180

HEIGHT-TIME CURVE

W O O N OURS1

Figure 2

the rate of rise w a s g r e a t e r than expected. Both o f these evidences of ex-

cess buoyanoy a m a t t r i b u t e d t o superheating of the balloon by sunshine.
The r e a l height is somewhat i n doubt because the conventional radiosonde baro-
switch (Army type ML-3lO/)was used, and the pressure signal which w a s trans-
a i t t e d was ambiguous a t some points.

On t h i s f l i g h t theodolite readings were taken u n t i l the balloon m s 90

miles away f r o m release point a f t e r 260 minutes of f l i g h t . In addition,
v i s u a l observations were taken from a B-17 a i r c r a f t which c i r c l e d t h e bal-
loon f o r most of the f l i g h t .

-7-
Plight 7: Released from Alamogordo, HOW Ibxioo, 0509 MST, July 2, 1947
Deroended ati Cloudoroft, N e w lbxioo

Using a aluster array (Figure 3) of 13 3SOigram rubber balloons and

four larger l i f t i n g balloons, a S3-pomd load was aarried a l o f t on thi8 Plight.
A t 55,000 fee< the desired floating l e v e l , the l i f t e r balloons were out free.

745mc Radiosonde.Hecrv7 duty

Bottcrias in blarK b o r c r w i o p p d
polyethy lano.

Bauaat baro5WltCh.
8auast dropper assembly, I6ALumtnum
tuber of gronuldtad lead dropped b
doreoat p m r s h svikh i n k f&wi

800ym- 25800'
2009- am' 400~rn-29,OOd
-
200gn 32,OGQ' 6 0 0 9m - 28.0 00'
6OOgm
bOO9m-
- 23200'
2.4~00'
S O O p - 34 000' 6009m-2J400' 100oon,- e3#,eoo'
moop- 23,100'
1600rm 22,500'

Figure 3: Train, Flight 7

When the train began t o desoend below 34,000 f e e t , lead shot wa8 dropped in
increments t o maintain buoganoy.

-8-
 lhir altitude-oantral rystem operated well enough t o produoe a height-
time ourve (Figure 4) w i t h one dssoent oheobd by b a l l a s t dropping. Too
muoh weight war l o s t %nthis 8otian, and the t r a i n role u n t i l ROIW of the
balloon8 were burst. Submquent desoent was not oheoked.

From t h i s f l i g h t it appear8 t h a t the inherent i n s t a b i l i t y of f r e e l y ex-

tensible balloons is so great t h a t no simple oontrol w i l l oause %em t o
remain a t one pressure level.

Traoking f o r the e n t i r e f l i g h t period wa8 aooomplished w i t h a C-54

airoraft. Two theodolite 8Dations were operated, one a t the launohing
site and one a t Wafford Lookout, a fire tower about 20 miles northeast of
the release point.

-9-
F l i g h t 10: Relearalilrom Alunogordo, IOU
Ysxioo, 0501 MST, J u l y 5, 1947
Not rooovered

Thia f l i g h t war the f i r s t t o use a large p l a s t i o balloon as the l i f t i n g

vehiole. 'he 0011was spherioal, 15 feet in diameter, and the walls were
.008" polyethylene heat se8led 8 t the m a m i (made by Harold A. Smith, Ino.).
l l ~ ea l t i t u d e aontrol was an automrtio b a l l a s t valve, pressure-triggered to
throw off liquid b a l l a s t . Th. e q u i p n t t r a i n umd on t h i s f l i g h t i s shown
in Figure 5.

6' dia.-.008Dth~cKpo1yrlhyl.a.
&Noon. H. A.5mi t h I n 6
Reinforced blow-out p a h h b k
opened by Tima-clock.
Bridtc 01 9 nylon linas, each Isor
t e s t , 18'long,sewrd too. thimbk
and attached to rein forcad patchos
at a t t o r n a h seams.

745mc. Radlorondr wlth 2d.d

fed ontenna.Hewv duty kLLrc.
in block borcs,plmn*n.no
.
w r a ppc d

Ptortic betlaat Roaarvoir w t h

3pOO 9r ballcut.

Figure S r Train, Flight 10

The balloon rose to about 16,000 f e e t MSL and dropped baok to 9000 feet
MBL where-it "floated" f o r at l e a s t 4 hours, a t which time radiosonde re-
oepticm failed. I t is believed t h a t the autamatio b a l l a s t valve sealed off

-10-
proporly a t 12,000 feet, b u t the a i r entr8pped in i f 8 aneroid war h e a k d
and oauaed the o p n t i n g level t o be a t the lower value. lhia would
oorrerpond t o a r u p r h e a f of 30% above a e air fernpenturn.

Later f l i g h t 8 ahowed that the type of load a-tkohawnt used on thir

balloun -8 unmtirfaotoryt hcnnrsr, nifh proper rigging, 00118 of .008"
thiokners were good vshioler a # they nrually shmod vary low diffurion 8nd
gar leakage.

Hear the end of the reeorded data, the height-tim ourve r h m r largo
o r o i l l a t i o n s about a pmrsure plane (Figure 6). %wee faotorr rihioh probably

Figure 6

contributed t o t h i s i n s t a b i l i t y were:(l) the turbulent motion of the heated

a i r over the desert, ( 2 ) the changer i n temperature of a i r in the aneroid
valve a s intermittent clouds shut off the sun, and (3) the overoompenratim
caused by the valve-oontrolled b a l l a s t flow.

On t h i s f l i g h t the f i r s t "destruction d w i o e " war used for the purpose

of b&ging down the balloon a f t e r a f i x e d time t o prevent exoessive inter-
ference in a i r - t r a f f i o lanes. This partioular model war a clook-driven
device whioh f a i l e d t o operafe, probably beoause of low temperatures oauring
unequal oontraction within the movement. I t s a a t i m was t o o o n s i r t of de-
tonating an inflammable oompound taped t o the balloon, rupturing itsside and
permitting a rapid emape of the l i f t i n g gar.

-11-
F l i g h t 11: MlOe80d from Alamogordo, New Uxico, 0508 MST, July 7, 1947
I& rooovered
On this flight a 16-foot, .008" w a l l , polyethylene balloon w a i oombined
w i t h a O l U S t W of s i x small plarti-o 00118 ( Q d o o t diamehr, .001" wall) t o
lift total load of 35 pounds a8 high as possible (Figure 7). The small

Figure 7: Train, Flight 11

o q l l r did not r i s e as f a s t as the large balloonj consequently,three of them
were inverted and f i l l e d with air.

W i t h t h i s l o s s of l i f t , the a l t i t u d e reached was only about 17,000 f e e t

MSL, and the automatic b a l l a s t valve ( s e t t o operate a t 45,000 f e e t ) m s n o t
aotivated. This f l i g h t demonstrated the need for a minimum-pressure swilnh

-12-
t o a o t i v a t e the b a l l a s t valve. A f i x e d b a l l a s t leak of about 400 gram8
per hour was oaused' by a defeotive valve f i t t i n g and this wad s u f f i d n t
t o maintain the balloon a t n e a r l y oonstant level u n t i l a l l the b a l l a s t war
exhausted. Following this experienae, the use of a p r e s e t fixod l e a k -8
employed on many f l i g h t s .

The very unstable "floating" seen on F l i g h t 10, when the automatie

b a l l a s t valve aontrolled the f l i g h t , i s n o t found on this f l i g h t where the
vehiole used only a fixed-leak oontrol, This eliminates both the over-
oompensation and t h e serious e f f e o t r of temperature ohanges on the aneroid
oapsule, whioh are found when the automatic b a l l a s t valve is used.

The t r a j e o t o r y of this balloon (Figure 8) shows a very i n t e r e s t i n g de-

formation a t the t r a n s i t of the Sacramento Mountains. Ihe anti-cyolonia

Figure 8

ourvature over the e a s t e r n slope suggests that the a i r stream a t the f l o a t i n g

level was d i s t r i b u t e d by the t e r r a i n , and the deformation predioted by dgnrrsrio
theory may thus be given a physioal i l l u s t r a t i o n . The t r a j e o t o r y u a s de-
termined by a i r o r a f t and theodolite observation.

Another s t r i k i n g feature of the flight i s the disagreement between t h e

a o t u a l f l i g h t path and the t r a j e o t o r y whioh might have been estimated from
routine upper-wind reports. Reports from b l Paso, R o m l l , Albuquerque and
White Sands were used f o r comparison with the observed trajeotory. Except
f o r Vfhite Sands, none of these s t a t i o n s reported any wind from the WSW a t or
n e a r the f l o a t i n g l e v e l during the 12-hour period OQVered by the flight. A t
White Sands a very shalluw durrent was deteoted moving i n the d i r e o t i o n h d i o a t e d
by the balloon f l i g h t , This c l e a r l y demonstrates the non-representiveness of
the ordinary p i l o t balloon observation.

-13-
Flight 12s Released from Lakehurst, Ben Jersey, 0714 EST, August 5, 1947
Reowered a t Sarpnur, Delaware

Thir flight MU the f i r s t w e of ~ e v o r a lnew items. The balloon was the

f i r s t .OQ1" polyethylene c e l l flown; a 397 m(T-69) transmitter was flown,
with radio dirsotiun-finding o q u i p n t used t o track the balloon3 a 3 ma
(AM-1) t r a n d t t e r nas t e s t e d for the first time and the first model of a
miniaum-pms8ure snitoh was provided t o aotivate the automatic ballart valve.
The e q u i p n t train for t h i s flight is illustrated in Figure 9.

I
Figure 9: Train, Flight 12

Measummentr in the hangar prior to -lease indicated that lift losses

from leakage and diffusionwere about 200 grams per hour, and in addition
t o the automtBtiC b a l l a s t valve system, a fkOd-flW needle Val- -8 6et
t o diroharge b a l l a s t s l i g h t l y b 8 X O O S 8 O f the expoCed l O S 8 . Both EyStsoa6
f a i l e d t o keep the balloon afloat, and (L rlor deroent from i t 8 maximum alti-
tude of 14,000 f e e t MSL rerulted. 'Ihe expeoted a l t i t u d e of 38,000 f e e t
uar not reached, and t h i s i s believed t o be due t o mixing of the a i r with
the l i f t i n g gas during rising. The bottom of the balloon WSLE open with
no proteoting s k i r t or valve t o keep o u t a i r . Since the thin fabrio would
rupture w i t h an internal pressure of 0.017 psi, some form of s k i r t or ex-
ternal appendix was suggested f o r future f l i g h t s .
Fbdio reoeption w i t h the 3 mo transmitter was exoellent and f a r sur-
passed the performance of e i t h e r the 72 ma o r 394 mc t r a n m i t t e r s which were
also floun.

Because of the low elevation angle of the t r a n d t t e r , the single SCR-658

radio direction-finding equipmntwas not of muoh use f o r positioning,
Tracking by a i r c r a f t was satisfactory throughout the f l i g h t .
Flight8 13, 14, 15, 16 and 20: Mado in September, 1947, they had as their
pr5mary purpose the t e s t i n g of extarnal balloon appendices t o prevent ex-
cessive d i l u t i o n of the l i f t i n g gas with a i r .

Q1 three of these f l i g h t s the loose polyethylene tubes twisted shut during

%he balloons' asoent and caused the c e l l t o b u r s t at3 it beoams f u l l , "he
unsatisfactory models t r i e d are seen in Figure 10, as well as the skirt

Figure 10

stiffened with external battens which was developed on Flight 20'and used
s w c e s s f u l l y thereafter.

On most of these f l i & t s , radio diraction-finding equipment (SCR-658)

was used, as w e l l a s theodolite and a i r c r a f t f o r tracking and positioning
the balloons, A system of air reconnairsance and ground recovery ~ R L Sde-
veloped using a radio-equipped jeep t o move cross-country a t .the direction
of the a i r o r a f t obsemer. Several s a t i s f a c t o r y recovery missions =re made
on these and l a t e r flights using this technique.

-16-
F l i g h t 17: Released from Alamogordo, New h x i c o , 1647 YIST, September 9, 1947
Reawered a t Croft, Kansas

On t h i s f l i g h t the f i r s t balloon nrade of .004n polyethylene was lamahed.

Ihe a l t i t u d e controls were a fixed-flow needle valve o r i f i a e riet t o leak
a t 100 grams per hour and an automatia b a l l a s t ralw aativated by a minimma-
pressure switch.

This f l i g h t reached f l o a t i n g level shortly before sunset, and the

balloon took on superheat whiah was l o s t when the 8un went dome !his
cooling necessitated the rapid disbharge of b a l l a r t C nuint8in buoyanoy.
The operation of t h e automatic b a l l a s t valve a t this t i m e was s a t i s f a c t o r y
and restored the balloon t o a f l o a t i n g l’evel within one hour. Following
restoration a satisfactory f l o a t i n g prlrformanae was indiaated f o r as long
a s radio contact was maintained (Figure 11). Ihe need for a balloon-borne

. . . . .

Figure 11%Height-time curve, Flight 1 7

barograph was demonstrated by t h i s flight.whioh traveled more than 500

milee from the release point.

-17-
F l i g h t 258 Released fran Alamogordo, New h x i c o , 0918 MST, September 12, 1947
Not recovered

A 5-2000 neoprene balloon was enoased with a nylon shroud and rovided
with a mlw to permit gas t o escape after a small superpressure (+. of 1"
water) was exceeded. The balloon in its shroud i s shown in Figum 12.

Figure 12: Neoprene balloan encased in B nylon shroud

If a "superpressure" balloon is used, much l e s l b a l l a s t i s required since,
during minor o s c i l l a t i o n s , the reduction of buoyancy w i l l n o t cause the bal-
loan t o descend as long as the remaining buoyancy i s equal t o or greater than
the load rrupported.

This balloon, and three similar ones (Flights 38, 66, 871, f a i l e d t o achieve
any constancy of a l t i t u d e . A l l four f a i l e d during the rising period or soon
a f b r the shroud became full. (The balloons were heated p r i o r t o release
t o romtom e l a s t i o i t y . )
F l i g h t 8 29 through 39: They were made from Almogordo, New Mexico during
aovember and December, 1947 t o test b a l l a s t oontrols and to develop a
launching technique s a t i s f a o t o r y f o r high winds. !he period of data re-
aaption b y radio was too s h o r t i n a l l of these flights t o permit much eralw-
t i o n of the a l t i t u d e controls. On three flights (33, 36 and 39) a Ferguscnm
mateoroyaph was added t o the train t o reaord f l i g h t pressure; of 11 balloons
released, only theme three wre n o t recovered.

On seven fliats the pressure signals reoeived by radiosonde were l o s t

while the balloon was s t i l l r i s i n g ; F l i g h t 38 was a shrouded neoprene
balloon which b u r s t as it became f u l l s and F l i g h t 39 was a polyethylene
balloonwhioh b u r s t a t o r near i t s c e i l i n g f o l l d n g a very rapid rise.

.
(-is was the first balloon t o b u r s t using a s h o r t e x t e r n a l appendix w i t h
stiffeners )

On the .other k r o f l i g h t s (30 and 35) a very s h o r t period of l e v e l f l i g h t

was recorded before the balloon-borne radio transmitter passed out of range.

Besides these two, several other .Wl" polyethylene balloons probably

were maintained a t constant o r near-constant l e v e l s f o r several hours, as
oan be seen from their p o i n t s of recovery (Figure 13). One balloon was
seen descending 18 hours a f t e r release.

Figure 13

On F l i g h t s 29 through 33 only a fixed b a l l a s t l e a k w a s used, set f o r

f l o w s of from 300 t o 600 grams per hour. Other f l l g h b r used automatic
b a l l a s t controls. Although these fixed leaks seernee: t o be s u f f i c i e n t t o keep
t h e balloons a l o f t , there was no c I e a r evidenoe as t o what amount would be
needed f o r most e f f i c i e n t operation. "he need f o r a system of b a l l a s t
metering was indicated i n t h i s series of f l i g h t s .

-19-
Flight 41s Beleaeed from Indimtown Gap Military Reservation, Pennsylvania,
0956 EST, February 16, 1948
Not roo overed

The balloon was of .001" polyethylene and had a fixed-leak b a l l a s t

control set t o provide a oonstant flow of 650 grams per hour. I h e principle
o b j e o t i w of t h i s f l i g h t was t o test a i r o r a f t reception from a balloon-
borne transmitter. Using RDF equipment, two B-17 planes ware able t o re-
oeive oloar signals from the tranrmitter a t leaat 150 dies away *om
it and w r e able t o home in oh the signal by using the radio compass. There
was a questionable tone of about a 15-mile radius beneath the balloon,
and it is probable that this represented a cone of silence from the v e r t i -
oal antenna. The balloon was near 40,000 feet With the planes a t about
10,000 feet.

On later f l i g h t s , using a frequenoy of 1746 ko, reaeption range nas ex-

tended t o over 400 miles and no oone of silence was encounter6d. By flying
along the bearing indicated by the oompess u n t i l it abruptly reverses,
the position of the balloon may be determined. Visual observations oonfirmed
the presence of the balloon overhead.

On service flights made from t h i s same base during this week, two new
pieoes of f l i g h t gear were added to the t r a i n . Zhe f i r s t of the88 was a
010th parachute, mounted upside down i n the l i n e t o senre as a drag, acting
against Bxcessive rates of r i s e . When mounted above the cloth identification

.
banner, thi8ohnte also act8 t o minimize sway and l a t e r a l o s c i l l a t i o n of the
equipment
The second u n i t was a new type of hestructioa devioe--a pressure-activated
mechanism by which a large hole i s ripped i n the balloon upon descent i n t o
the lanes of' a i r t r a f f i c . In this device (Figure 14) the equipment is per-
m i t t e d t o f a l l f r e e l y f o r a few feet,jerking a length of l i n e through the
b a l l o m side. After t h i s fill, the equipment again is oarried by t h e main
load l i n e , and the ruptured balloon a c t s 8 s a parachute t o lower the gear
t o the ground a t about 1000 f e e t per minute.

-20-
Figure 14: Rip-out line in place cm balloon

-21-
F1ie;bt 45 t h r o u e 51: In A p r i l , 1948 a n m b e r of flights were made using
ml"polyethylene balloons and fixed-leak ballast cantrole. Only four
of these flights were recovered. The landing points of these are shuwn in

Figure 15

L i t t l e is knm p o s i t i v e l y about the f l o a t i n g l e v e l s since radiosonde

data was n o t obtained on most f l i g h t s , and no barographs were a v a i l a b l e .
Three reoeiving s t a t i o n s a t Alsmogordo, R o m l l and Carlsbad, New Mexioo were
used t o p o s i t i o n t h e balloon with r a d i o direction-finding equipment. By
assuming a f l o a t i n g level corresponding t o the load, s e v e d f l i g h t p a t t e r n s
.
were derived. No a i r c r a f t tracking w a s provided t o check these oamputed
t r a j e ot o r i e 8

-22-
 Ch these f l i g h t 8 fixed ballart leaks of from 260 t o 600 gnmr per hour
were used. The80 lerks u'ero protided through rouud o r i f i o e r rather than
through needle wl-8 whioh had been in use previously. '&is bnpromment
reduoed the p o s r i b i l i t y of ologging.

On F l i g h t 43 the first model of UI 011-d-oyole presruro modulator was

41- w i t h a modified T-69 (400 mo) radioronde transmitter. The r e s u l t 8
obtained on this flight were not sati8faotory, but l a t e r t e s t proved
8UOO088fUl.

The train seen h Figure 16 i s t y p i o a l of those flown during this period.

Note the presenoe of the devioe t o r i p the balloon when dewending i n t o
air lanes and l h u s speed up i t r f a l l .

Payload - f

7
Fbmchute . - b

B
01

Banner

ckifice Ballast

F l i g h t 16: Train, typical OF those flown i n April, 1948

-23-
F l i g h t 52: Released from Alamogordo, N e w b x i c o , 0958 MST, A p r i l 23, 1948
Recovered a t Galseburg, Kansas

On t h i s f l i g h t a .001" polyethylene balloon c a r r i e d the f i r s t model of

the Lange Barograph and an improved Olland-cycle pressure modulator t o give
improved radiosonde pressure data. !he signal from the radiosonde was l o s t
soon after t h e release, b u t the barograph was recovered and the a l t i t u d e
record is shown in Figure 17. I t w i l l be seen t h a t the balloon rose h> a

HqgMbme G y v e
I
fLt GHT 52
Released at AIarnogordoNM. i
April=-iw 0350 M.S.T
Recovered at Galesbug,,Kons.
, I!

Figure 17
pressure such that the barograph pen passed off the chart, and several hours
of f l i g h t were n o t recorded. The slowly r i s i n g c e i l i n g seen here was the
firstlong-period confirmation of the expected behavior of a balloon con-
t r o l l e d by a constant b a l l a s t 1081. The flow i n .this case was s e t f o r about
250 grams per hour, and the a l t i t u d e change was about 400 f e e t per hour.
This rise of "ceiling" i s somewhat l a r g e r than predicted and heightened
the i n t e r e s t i n obtaining temperature measuroments 80 t h a t the buoyancy be-
havior could be more exactly determined.

-24-
 Three other p o i n t s of interest may be seen on this barotmoer (1) The
two vary pronounced step e f f e o t s found on the r i s i n g portion of t h e f l i g h t
a t about 625 mb and 480 mb oorrespmd t o r t a b l e layers 5n t h e atmosphere a s
8een from the El Paso radiosonde rounding taken at 0800 MST (Figure 18).

Figurq 18

(2) The clock of the barograph stopped after being exposed about 10 hours
a t cold temperature. (3) During the f l o a t i n g p e r i o d many small o s c i l l a -
t i o n s are seen on the pressure record. Beglecting superheat changes, there
is no v a r i a t i o n i n the foroes of the balloon system exoept the constantly
decreasing weight of ballast and the monotonio l o s s of l i f t i n g gas, and
these o s o i l l a t i o n s must, theliefore, be a t t r i b u t e d t o some f o m i n the atmosphere.

-25-
F l i g h t s 54, 56 and 60: On these three flights, made in April and May, 1948,
fixed-leak b a l l a s t losses were used to keep a .001" polyethylene balloon
a l o f t , but no barograph reoord of pressure is available, From the descent
points (Figure 19) and the radiosonde d a b whioh waa reoeived it i s believed
that the ballast flows of about 300 grams per hour were adequate,

Figure 19
On both Flights 56 and 60 a very l i g h t load was l i f t e d , a;nd the f l o a t i n g
l e v e l i n each case was over 60,000 f e e t MSL. L i g h t winds w e r e encountered
in both cases, and a reversal from Westerlies t o E a s t e r l i e s was experienced

-26-
 piith a r e l a t i v e l y s l i g h t change in
near the f l o a t i n g level on F l i g h t 60.
elevation, the balloon passed from Westerlies (below) t o E a s t e r l i e s (above)
with the r e s u l t t h a t the balloon wfis still v i s i b l e from the launching s i t e
(Alamogordo, New Mexico) a t sunset, 14; hours a f t e r released. The f i n d e r
reported seeing the balloon desoend 35 hours a f t e r release.
Sinae the ballast fluwing t o maintain buoyancy would have been exhausted
in only 5 hours, this f l i g h t provide4 the f i r s t evidence t h a t such a bal-
loon i n the stratosphere maintains buo-pncy much longer than a t lower levels.
The two f a c t o r s which contribute t o t h i s are the heat added t o the helium
by a d i a b a t i c compression when descending and the aimirdrPled d i f f u s i o n of
l i f t i n g gas a t a l o w pressure.

On F l i g h t s 56 and 60, a three-station network w a s s e t up t o receive

pressure signals on radio d i r e c tion-finding (SCR-658) equipment. In
addition, theodolites were used for s e v e r a l b u r s in each case,

-2 7-
Flight 55: Released f r m Alamogordo, New b x i o o , 1907 MST, h y 3, 1948
Recovered a t Kortheast, Pennsylvania

On this f l i g h t r a barograph m a flown, and a s a t i s f a o t o r y Olland-oycls

pressure modulator was a l s o used f o r over 5 hours t o give height data. The
length of t i m e of signalmaeption i s significant, s h o e the b a t t e r y box
of t h e t r a n s m i t t e r was n o t insulated, and there was no h e a t t o be gained
from the sun during this nighttime f l i g h t . The .001" polyethylene balloon
was obsemed descending 22 hours l a t e r after t r a v e l i c g m 0 - q than 1500 miles.

me a l t i t u d e oontrol used on t h i s f l i g h t was an automatic b a l l a s t valve,

activated by a minimum-pressure m i t o h , and as evidenced by the barogram
in F'igure 20 (12-hour r o t a t i o n ) , the balloon maintained i t s a l t i t u d e f o r over

Time-MST
NYU BALLOON PROJECT FLIGHT 55
Barograph Record Of G.M. 20 Ft. Balloon With
Automatic Ballast Valve
RELEASED AT ALAMOGORDO, N.M., 1907 MST- 3 MAY, 1948
RECOVERED AT NORTHEAST, PA., 4 MAY, 1948
DURATION 23 HOURS

Figure 20
15 hours before beginning i t s acoelerating desoent. On t h i s f l i g h t re-
cord, marked o s c i l l a t i o n s are observed a t three points. Despite the presence
of automatic b a l l a s t oontrols which might cause o s c i l l a t o r y motion, these
r i s e s and f a l l s must be a t t r i b u t e d t o atmospheric disturbances s h o e the
magnitude of the f o r c e s required t o produce suoh accelerations i s f a r
g r e a t e r than any which could be supplied by the control equipment.

-28-
 A oheclc against the t r a j e c t o r y and end point of the balloon P l i & t was
made by a group of graduate students of mbtsorologY a t New York University.
By constmcting constanbpressure maps from the appropriate radiosonde data,
the expected t r a j e c t o r y was computed assuming t h e balloon would move with
the geostrophic wind. The r e s u l t 8 of this comparison (Figure 21) show t h a t
the balloon tends t o move aorosr the isobars tonard lower pressure.

Figure 2 1

-29-
Flight 58: Released from blamogordo, New Mexico, 2033 MST, May 10, 1948
Reoovered a t Val D'Or, Quebec

A .001" polyethylene balloon was the vehiole on t h i s f l i g h t oarrying a

barograph as w e l l a s an e a r l y model of the Olland-oyole pressure modulator.
!his f l i g h t was released a t night with a fixed b a l l a s t flow of about 300
rams p r hour expeoted t o keep the balloon a f l o a t . &om the barogram
tFigure 22) (12-hour r o t a t i o n ) it appears t h a t the o r i f t o e d i d n o t permit
s u f f i c i e n t ( i f any) f l o w t o maintain buoyanoy during the f i r s t several
hours (perhaps the o r i f i o e was clogged or frozen). After a dement t o about
33,000 feet at 8Ulri-ea f l o a t i n g level was maintained with 4 kilograms of
b a l l a s t available. Ihe f u l l flow rats could not have been maintained much
more thaa the 11 hours during whioh the balloon w a s a t t h i s pressure.

Time- M.S.T
NYU BALLOON PROJECT FLIGHT 58
Barograph Record Of G.M. 20 ft. Plastic Balloon With
300 gm/hr Fixed Ballast Leak
-
RELEASED AT ALAMOGORDO, N.M. 2033 MST, 10 MAY, 1948
RECOVERED AT VAL D'OR, QUEBEC, CANADA-24 MAY.1948
ESTIMATED DURATION- 2 4 1/2 h a .

Figure 22
On t h i s f l i g h t , o s c i l l a t i o n s 5.n t h e pressure reoord were seen. With
no control system which could cause such behavior, they must be a t t r i b u t e d
t o atmospheric motion.

The descent point was compared with t h a t expected from analyses of the
pressure f i e l d . The r e s u l t s of a number of suoh analyses are shom i n

-30-
Figure 23. A s on Flight 55, the balloon appears t o have moved aoross the
isobars , toward lower pressure.

Radio direction-finding tracking (SCR-658) was used during the f i r s t

367 minutes of t h i s f l i g h t . This was made possible by a strong output
from the b a t t e r y , indicating that no harmful e f f e o t s were experienced i n
the cold atmosphers despite the absence of solar radiation. The need f o r
measurements of' the temperature of fhe b a t t e r i e s was suggested by t h i s
f 1i gh t

-51-
F l i g h t 63s Releared from Alamogordo, New k x i c o , 1116 l@T, lday 13, 1948
Desoended a t Alamogordo, New Mexiao

On t h i s f l i g h t a Seyfang h b o r a t o r i o r balloon, made of neoprene-ooaMd

nylon, was flown w i t h a mil- in the appendix r o t t o open after an i n t e r n a l
prersure of 0.02 p6i was b u i l t up. On an e a r l i e r f l i g h t ( 5 9 ) ruah a bal-
loon ms flown with no valve but an appendix held d o s e d w i t h a rubber
bands it ruptured upon bsooming f u l l .

B o a a constant ballast-flow o r i f i o e and an autoanatio b a l l a s t oontrol

u o f d used t o keep this balloon buoyant. In addition to the b a l l a s t , a
surplur of buoyancy might have been aoquired when. 8uper~ressurewar b u i l t
up inside the 0011. Despite these controls, the ballom began t o desaend
aftor a short period of floating, and i t s descent w a ~not cheeked (Figure 24).

Figure 24

An analysis of the aaaeleratian whioh oould be gained f r o m a l o s s of super-

heat indioated t h a t i f the coated f a b r i c had absorbed radiation and gained
SOoC Over the outside a i r , the superheat thus obtained would be so g r e a t
t h a t i t s suhsequent rapid 1088 (as by v e n t i l a t i o n ) could not be aompenssted
for even w i t h the brrllart fluwing a t f u l l rate. To improve the analysis
of balloon flights, a measure of the temperature difference between l i f t i n g
gas and air temperature nns suggested.
F l i a t s 68 through 72: In July, 1948 this s e r i e s of f l i g h t s was made without
b a l l a s t oontrols t o determine the naturalbuoyanoy of the General Millr, Inc.
20-foot .001" polyethylene balloons. O f f i v e such f l i g h t s , only two good
barograph reoords wure obtained, one daytime f l i g h t (70) and one night f l i g h t
(71). I n both cases a nearly constant level was maintained for about four
hours a t t h e highest a l t i t u d e reached.
On the barogram of Flight 70 (Figure 26) a motion of a r r e s t e d descent may
be noticed, preoeded and followed by a nearly oonstant fall. !he cause of
this step is not apparent, although a check has been made of the atmospheric
struoture of t h a t day.

- - -
Time- MS.7:

NYU BALLOON PROJECT FLIGHT 70

Showing 20' General Mills Balloon
Psrforman.ce When No Ballast Was
Dropped
aEuAsm AT woLLoy*n AFD.ILY-JULY ~ s 4 0
OSSS YST- RECOVERED AT KEllT,TEXAS

Figure 25

On Flight 71 marked o s c i l l a t i o n s are seen a t the floe-ting l e v e l and a l s o

during the descent portion of the barogram (Figure 26). Clearly these must
represent atmospherio motions since no controls of any s o r t were i n use.
There is no reason t o believe t h a t rapid changes i n superheat occured, sinoe
the floating level was far above the oloud level. Also the f l i g h t was made
a t night and no sunshine was encountered.

Time- M.S.T.
NYU BALLOON PROJECT FLIGHT 71
Barograph Record Of GM 20 F I Plastic Balloon Showing
Balloon Performance When No Ballast Was Dropped.
RELEASED AT ALAYOQORDO N U , 204L Y S T L S JULY, 1.48
RECOVERED A T VALENTINE TEXAS, 10 JULY. lS4a
ESTIYATED DURATION 10 HOURS

Figure 26

-33-
Flight 7s: Releamd fran Almogordo, New b x i c o , 1948 MST, J u l y 14, 1948
R e o m r e d a t Linooln National Forest, New Mexico

The obdootivu of *is nighttime f l i g h t was t o determine whether a

fixod b a l l a 6 t leak of 100 grams per hour would sustain a 20-f0ot, .O0lm
polye4&ylena balloon a t f l o a t i n g levels near 50,OOO f e e t . From t h e Olland-
oyclo prouswe reoord (Figure 27) it appears that l o s s of buoyancy due to

Figure 27

diffusion and leakage i s more than this. Indeed, the balloon w i t h t h i s

b a l l a s t f l o w d i d not remain a t a l t i t u d e as long a s e i t h e r Flight 70 and
71 which were without a l t i t u d e controls.

-34-
F l i g h t 74: Released from Aleogordo, New Nexico, 1040 MST, J u l y 19, 1948
Not r e t overed

!This mas a test of a single 7-foot balloon made of .OOln polyethylene,

carrying a 4-kilograrr! payload. Onepart of the load was the f i r s t model
of hn automatic b a l l a s t siphon used t o d e t e c t and telemeter the amount of
b a l l a s t being discharged through an automatic b a l l a s t valve.

The balloon flew a t 7000 feet MSL across a heated desert area and i n t o
a moun);ain p a s whose elevation was about 6000 f e e t PSL. During the f i r s t
two hours i t s behavior was reported by radio, and the accompanying t i m e -
height curve (Figure 28) shows haw the b a l l a s t valve operated successfully

Figure 28

t o s u s t a i n the balloon. During t h i s turbulent f l i g h t about 200 grams of

b a l l a s t were expendod per hour, but t h e pronounced orographic and convective
currents probably necessitated more oontrol than would be required i n a
more s t a b l e e.tmosph8re

The very useful information about b a l l a s t flow was reported c l e a r l y , and

the p r i n c i p l e of the auto-8iphon was used repeatedly on l a t e r f l i g h t s . Small
v a r i a t i o n s are seen in t h e pressure a t which t h e b a l l a s t flow began. Since
the balloon was f l o a t i n g below the base of clouds, t h i s represents the changes
of a c t i v a t i o n pressure which resulted fro m changes of superheat of the a i r
entrapped i n the aneroid.

-35-
F l i g h t 75: Released from Alamogordo, New Fsxico, 1010 HST, J u l y 20, 1948
Recovered a t H o l l i s t e r , C a l i f o r n i a

In order to reach higher a l t i t u d e s than was possible when 20-foot p l a s t i c

balloons were used, 8 'IO-fOOt, .001" polyethylene c e l l was fluwn on F l i g h t
75. To determine the duration of buoyancy of this type of balloon no con-
t r o l s were used. Despite this, the balloon remained a l o f t f o r more than 60
hours and successfully withstood t h e l o s s of superheat occasioned by a t
l e a s t two sunsets. From the height-time curve of t h i s f l i g h t (Figure 29)
the very rmrlced e f f e c t of superheat is apparent.

f U Y l T 'IS-MROORAPII REGORD.
td aY BALLOON-NO GONTMKI)
Shommg Nduml Strklty Of

-JULY 2 JULY 2-
T I ME-MST
Figure 29

The record of the barograph was n o t complete since the clock stopped each
n i g h t ( c l e a r l y recording the lowest elevation reached, however) and ran
down completely a f t e r 56 hours.

Since the small e x t e r n a l appendix with cardbosrd s t i f f e n e r s WEIS not

s u i t a b l e f o r the large balloon, a new design with aluminum formed s t i f f e n e r s
(Figure $0) w a s Used. This type of appendix c l o s e r worked w e l l on l a t e r
f l i g h t s , and it is l i k e l y t h a t the long duration of t h i s f l i g h t may be a t t r i -
buted i n part t o s a t i s f a c t o r y closing o f f of t h e aperture. In addition t o

-36-
aarintenance of the purity of the l i f t i n g gas, this balloon f l o a t e d in a
region of very low prossure, thus reducing the l o s s of buoyanoy by diffu-
rion.

t
BATTENS OF . 0 3 2 " - 1 7 S T OR 24ST ALUMINUM,
EOQES
__ - COVEREO WITH YYSTIK TAPE. 3 BATTENS
I t O * APART BENT IN F I E L D TO F O R M LIOHT
CLOSURE Ob APPENDIX.

Figure 30: Aluminum battens f o r balloon appendix

A third f a c t o r contributing t o the long f l i g h t was t h e heat gained by

a d i a b a t i c compres8ion of the helium during descent. In the temperature in-
version of the stratosphere t h i s adiabatic heating would add t o the buoyancy
by superheating the l i f t i n g gas.

From t h i s f l i g h t it becomes apparent t h a t the control required t o maintain

buoyancy a t high l e v e l s is much smaller than that a t low levels. On the next
day, before Flight 75 had ended, a second 70-foot balloon was flam with
standard automatic b a l l a s t controls, and this flight mas never recovered. Pre-
s ~ l a b l ythe marked e a s t e r l y flow then observed above 60,000 f e e t c a r r i e d this
second f l i g h t into the Pacific Ocean.

Radar, RDF and theodolite were used t o t r a c k the balloon.

F l i g h t 78: Released from Alamogordo, New Mexico, 2038 MST, J u l y 22, 1948
Not recovered

T h i s f l i g h t was t h e f i r s t t o be made w i t h (white) thermistors exposed in-

s i d e the .OOln polyethylene balloon, i n s i d e the b a t t e r y box and exposed t o
the a i r , The f l i g h t was a t n i g h t and the balloon temperature was colder than
the a i r temperature by about 5% during the s h o r t period of th.e t h a t t h e
temperature valubs w e r e telemetered. The standard SCR-658 reoeiver and
F r i e t radiosonde ground s t a t i o n w e r e used t o record t h i s d a t a which was trans-
mitted by a T-69 radiosonde. A New York University AH-1 t r a n s m i t t e r was
uaed t o send ouf pressure data.

An automatic b a l l a s t valve, a c t i v a t e d by a mercury minimum-pressure switch,

was used t o c o n t r o l b a l l a s t flow b u t the cold temperature presumably caused
the mercury t o freeze and no b a l l a s t f l o w was evidenced. (A ballast-metering
siphon was part of the equipment,)

On subsequent f l i g h t s , the minimm-pressure switch used en e l e c t r o l i t e

which can withstand the cold nighttime temperatures of t h e upper a i r .

since a f t e r f o u r hours of f1ie;ht the temperature remained above 10%

was the f i r s t measurement obtained on the cooling of b a t t e r i e g and indicated
.
The evidence of the t h e r n i s t o r i n the b a t t e r y box i s v e r y encouraging,
This

that no speoial cold t e q m r a t u r e b e t t e r i e s w e r e needed i f i n s u l a t i o n i s care-

f d l y made. The tenperature data and the height-tine cume of F l i g h t 78 a r e
ehuwn i n Figure 81.

Figure 31

-30-
F l i g h t 79: Released from AlmOgOrdO, N ~ wMexico, 1614 MST, J u l y 25, 1948
Recovered a t AlEUnOgOrdO, New Mexico

T h i s was the t h i r d a t t e n p t t o use a coated nylon balloon, sealed off with

a valve i n t h e bottom. From Figure 32, the h e i g h t t i m e curve, it m y be seen

Figure 32
t h a t t h i s balloon did n o t remain a l o f t very long b u t t h a t a high degree of
superheat w a s generated in t h e l i f t i n g gas, despite t h e aluminum coating
of the balloon.

The automatic b a l l a s t controls included i n t h e f l i g h t equipment were in-

operativqand as soon as the balloon l o s t i t s i n i t i a l excess buoyancy (corre-
sponding t o the super-pressure maintained behind the safety valve) it de-
scended. From the speed of the descent it w a s computed t h a t an a c c e l e r a t i n g
force equal t o 5% of the gross load (52 kg) was a c t i n g t o bring the balloon
d m . This force w a s i n turn derived from the l o s s of l i f t encountered when
over YOOC of superheat w a s l o s t by v e n t i l a t i o n .
Flight 80: Released a t Alamogordo, New Mexico, 1126 MST, J u l y 24, 1948
Recovered a t . Rihcon, Eew Mexico

On t h i s f l i g h t an automatic b a l l a s t valve aativated by a minilM;lm-pressure

m i t o h was used t o support a .001", 20-foot polyethylene balloon. From the
height-time curve (Figure 33) it may be seen t h a t the balloon remained a t i t s
maxhum height f o r tuo hours, then began t o dewend slowly. A b a l l a s t laster
was in use, and no b a l l a s t flow was recorded u n t i l the balloon descended t o
about 30,000 f e e t . I t i s l i k e l y t h a t the mercury minimum-pressure w i t o h was
Frozen a t the higher levels, or that the squib whioh the switeh oontrolled
f a i l e d t o detonate u n t i l a higher pressure was reached.

Figure 33

Follawing the activation of the aneroid capsule of the automatic b a l k s t

valve, S a l l a s t was released i n four separate blocks. W i t h each f l a w of
b a l l a s t except the f o w t ! , the balloon was returned t o t h e seal-off pressure
of the aneroid w i t h no change i n t h i s pressure (321 mb=28,500feet). The
fourth ballast-flow period lasted u n t i l the balloon had r i s e n t o 330 mb(30,OOO
feetland b a l l a s t c u t off there. Since the sun had s e t between the third and
fourth ballast-flow periods, this rise i n "oeiling" is a t t r i b u t e d to the
cooling of the a i r entrapped in the aneroid of the .automatic b a l l a s t valve.
This decrease of' pressure of 21 mb corresponds t o a l o s s of 8% of superheat.
In each of the f o u r periods of b a l l a s t flow, there was enough unnecessary
b a l l a s t l o s t t o cause an overshoot en the balloon returned t o i t s f l o a t i n g
level. This exoess b a l l a s t was that used during the period when the balloon
had begun t o rise b u t was s t i l l below a c t i v a t i o n a l t i t u d e of the automatia
b a l l a s t valve. The i n e f f i c i e n t use of b a l l a s t was one of the major objections
t o such a control systen.

On t?.?isf l i g h t the b a l l a s t load of 3 kilograms was exhausted in only

three hours, indicating a large loss of gas f r o m t h i s p a r t i c u l a r balloon.
It is believed t h a t the large i n i t i a l a c c e l e r a t i o n provided b y t h e rapid de-
scent of the balloon caused t h e r e s t o r i n g foree, and t h e subsequent over-
shoot, t o be very large, and the high b a l l a s t flow i s probably much g r e a t e r
than was the l o s s of buoyancy on t h i s f l i g h t .

-41-
F l i g h t 81: Released from Alamogordo, New Nexico, 0548 B T , August 6, 1948
Not reo.overed
The balloon flown on this f l i g h t was made of .W4" polyethylene, and it
was eggplant shape about 20 f e e t in diameter and 25 f e e t long,. The f'irst of
i t s kind, this balloon was made by Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc.
Only a short period of r a d i o reception was obtained, b u t during t h i s t i m e
the balloon rose with predicted speed (500 f e e t per minute) nearly t o i t s
predicted a l t i t u d e (40,000 f e e t ) and f l o a t e d within 1500 f e e t of the 37,000-
f o o t level. Figure 34 is the height-time curve f o r t h i s f l i g h t .

50

40
2
-Kl
30

20
i$ FLIGHT 81
Released at Alamogordo,NM.
-
Aug.6,1948 0548 M.S.T.
OUAND CYCLE DATA
3 OOOOYEM eMuoNwTH
10 I

Figure 34

Since the balloon d i d n o t descend far enough below i t s maximum a l t i t u d e

t o a c t i v a t e the minimum-pressure switch and the automatic b a l l a s t valve, no
b a l l a s t flow data was telemetered wnile the balloon was within the radio
range. This indioates a very low r a t e of gas l o s s through t h e walls of this
balloon.

42-
F l i s h t 82: Released from Alamogordo, New Xexico, 0515 ItIIST, August 10, 1948
Reoovered a t R o m l l , New ullexico

This f l i g h t was made with a 2O-foot, .001" polyethylene balloon carrying

a load t o 54,000 feet and sustained by a fixed-leak orifice control, ex-
pending b a l l a s t a t abcut 525 grams per hour. With 4500 grams of b a l l a s t aboard
the balloon should have been increasingly buoyant f o r 8j$ hours a f t e r release.
From t h e barogram (Figure 35) it may be seen that the " w i l i n g " did rise, a t

0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 140
1500 1600 I700
limo-MST
NYU BALLOON PROJECT FLIGHT 8 2
Barograph Record Of G.M. 20' Plastic Balloon With
5 3 4 gm/hr Fixed Balldst Leak
R E L E A S E D AT ALAMOGORDO, N.M.- 0511 MST, 10 AUG 1948
DESCENDED A T ROSWELL,N.M.- 1630 MST, 10 A 0 8 1948
DURATION- Ilt hrr
Figure 35

a r a t e of 700 f e e t per hour (525 gram of' b a l l a s t was l o s t each hour), l o r

about 7; hours, and then generally accelerating descent was experienced.

On t h i s f l i g h t , radio reception was maintained ?'or the e n t i r e air-borne

period of 11 hours. Flight 82 i s a good example of f l i g h t using a single
fixed-leak o r i f i c e f o r a l t i t u d e control b . ~b a l l a s t dropping.

-43-
F l i g h t 85: Released at Alamogordo, New h x i c o , 1542 MST, August 17, 1948
Not recovered

The o b j e o t i v e of this f l i g h t was t o o a r r y a standard radiosonde t o a

high level; there it was t o be r e l e a s e d on a parachute and, a t the moment
of release, t h e b a t t e r i e s f o r the t r a n s m i t t e r were t o be a c t i v a t e d . To
aocomplieh this a pressure-triggered switch was rigged on a .001", 20-foot
polyethylene balloon. Below t h e b a r o m i t c h a standard T-69 radiosonde was
8upported w i t h a parachute s t u f f e d i n t o a c a s e also har,ging from t h e p a r e n t
b a l l o o n (Figure 36). Two plugs were set t o keep t h e t r a n s m i t t e r c i r c u i t

1 t- B A R O S W I T C W
I
CLOTH SACK

~~~

Figure 36: Equipment t r a i n , F l i g h t 85

open until the b a r o m i t c h f i r e d t h e "cannon" whicn severed the supporting line.

Then t h e c i r c u i t plugs were t o be pulled from t h e i r s t o p s , and t h e parachute
was t o be p u l l e d from i t s sock, supporting the radiosor.de on its descent.

The r a i l u r e of t h i s system t o act may be a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e use o r a squib

t o f i r e t h e l i n e - c u t t e r cannon. Subsequent tests a t laver levels (where t h e
squibs work b e t t e r ) were made w i t h a s a t i s f a c t o r y r e l e a s e and a c t i v a t i o n of
the "dropsonde."

-44-
F l i g h t 86: Released from Alamogordo, N e w b x i c o , 0941 MST, August 1 9 , 1948
Recovered a t Valmont, New Mexico

This was t h e fourth f l i g h t made w i t h a s i n g l e , 7-foot, .OOl" polyethylene

balloon (Figure Y7), aarrying a l i g h t l o a d t o relaCively low a l t i t u d e s .

Figure 37: 7-Foot polyethylene b a l l o m

On Flight 74, the automatic b a l l a s t meter showed t h a t a b a l l a s t f l a w of ZOO

grams per hour was required by an automatic b a l l a s t valve on such a balloon.
F l i & t 84 was launched i n August, 1948 with a low-altitude barograph and no
a l t i t u d e c o n t r o l s t o a s c e r t a i n how long such a balloon would s t a y up, Using
radar and h e l i c o p t e r t h a t balloon was tracked for nearly 2 hours a t an a l t i t u d e
of 12,500 feet wit)? a load of 3 kilograms. I t was s t i l l f l o a t i n g when l o s t .

On Flight 86, a fixed b a l l a s t leak was used, s e t a t 170 grams per hour.
After an e a r l y r a i l u r e of the radiosonde t r a n s m i t t e r , t h i s balloon WRS f o l l o m d
with a plane; a f l o a t i n g l e v e l of about 14,500 feet was maintained f o r 4 hours,
with a r i s e of " w i l i n g " of about 1200 f e e t per hour.

This balloon w a s observed during descent and was s t i l l distended, indicating

t h a t the l i f t i n g gas had been replaced by a i r both before and during descent.

-45-
F l i g h t 88: Released from Alamogordo, Hew Mexieo, 1241 MST, August 25, 1948
Reoovered a t Lovington, Texa1

This f l i g h t was planned t o measure the diffusion and leakage of l i f t i n g

gas through a ZO-foot, .001" polyethylene balloon a t 40,000 f e e t . A fixed-
leak o r i f i c e was s e t t o flow a t 100 grams per hour, and an automatic b a l l a s t
valve w a 1 inoluded t o supply more b a l l a s t a s demanded. This automatic valve
brake on release, and the flow of 100 gram8 per hour was n o t s u f f i o i e n t t o
keep the balloon and equipment up.
Temperature d a b on this f l i g h t -8 obtained from thermistors inside the
balloon, inside the b a t t e r y and i n the free a i r . These data and the height-
time curve a r e shown in Figure 38. During the period rrom 1400 t o 1530 when

Figure 38

the balloon was slowly descending, the temperature of the gas increased with
respect t o the f r e e a i r temperature, and a d i f f e r e n t i a l of 15% was recorded
a t 1530. With subsequent, more rapid descent, t h i s d i f f e r e n t i a l was reduced,
presumably by v e n t i l a t i o n . The b a t t e r - box temperature remained above lOOC
a f t e r four hours a l o f t .

-46-
F l i g h t 89: Released from Alamogordo, Xew Mexico, 1005 MST, August 26, 1948
N ot rec overed
On t h i s f l i g h t a .001*, 20-foot polyethylene balloon was used t o carry
a b a l l a s t meter t o about 45,000 f e e t t o detennine the b a l l a s t requirements
a t t h a t a l t i t u d e , using an automatic b a l l a s t valve. No record of b a l l a s t
flow was telemetered during t h i s f l i g h t , b u t it i s n o t known whether t h e
b a l l a s t meter was inoperative o r t h e ballast valve i t s e l f failed-possibly
due t o f a i l u r e of a squib t o detonate a t the combined l o w pressure and cold
temperatures a l o f t .

From the height-time curve, Figure 39, it w i l l be noted t h a t the balloon

was i n a near f l o a t i n g condition f o r about f i v e hours a f t e r m a c h i n g i t s maxi-
mum a l t i t u d e . ‘ b e t o t a l w e i g h t a v a i l a b l e on t h i s f l i g h t was 2 kg, so a l o s s
of 400 grams per hour would have been required i f the b a l l a s t was used
during t h i s period.

From F l i g h t s 70 and 71 we know t h a t a balloon has remined f o r about four

hours a t s l i g h t l y higher a l t i t u d e s with no b a l l a s t f l a w t o support it; F l i g h t
89, therefore, i s not n e c e s s a r i l y an example of the action of t h e automati0
b a l l a s t valve control.

-47-
Flight 9 0 3 Released from Alamogordo, Hew hbxico, 1502 MST, August 27, 1948
Recovered a t R o m l l , Kew Xexico

The .OOln, 2Q-foot polyethylene balloon used on t h i s f l i g h t was released

i n mid-afternoon to provide a t e s t of the sunset e f f e c t on a b a l l o m supported
by the automatio b a l l a s t valve.

From the height-time curve, Figure 40, it may be seen t h a t the balloon
had attained a f l o a t i n g a l t i t u d e shortly before the sunset and t h a t the
action of the automatic b a l l a s t valve was s u f f i c i e n t t o restore the buoyanoy

Figure 40
and cause t h e balloon toagain reach a f l o a t i n g condition. The difference be-
tween t h e two f l o a t i n g k e l s may be explained b:r a donsideration of t h e auto-
matic b a l l a s t valve and t h e minimum-pressure mriteh which was used t o s e a l
off i t s aneroid capsule. Since the balloon had not f a l l e n f a r enough t o permit
the switch t o seal off the valve before sunset, this action was accomplished

-48-
during the sunset descent (caused when the superheated helium l o s t the SUII*E
heating effeot). A f u r t h e r descent of 5 nib (500 feet a t this l e v e l ) was re=
quimd t o start the f l o w of b a l l a s t . By this tirne, the balloon had l o s t
oonsiderable l i f t and in exchange had acquired a downward velocity of about
120 f e e t per minute. To check t h i s descent a b a l l a s t rlowwas required for
about 40 minute8. During the next hour the balloon wa6 buoyant and climbing
back t o the seal-off pressure of t h e automatic b a l l a s t valve. %‘he i n e f f i -
oiency of t h i s valve system i s demonstrated by the b a l l a s t which was l o s t
after the balloon had regained i t s buoyancy and had begun t o rise. More
b a l l a s t was wasted then m e required t o check the descent. Indeed, the
e n t i r e 3000 grams available m a expended a t t h i s time, acaording t o t h e evi-
dence of the b a l l a s t meter.
On this f l i g h t there was no apparent change i n the activation pressure of
the automatic b a l l a s t aneroid between the times when b a l l a s t flow began and
ended. This indicates t h a t t h e er;trapped a i r had not experienoed any aigni-
f i c a n t temperature change during t h e two hours of b a l l a s t operation.

-43-
F l i g h t 92: Released from Alamogordo, New Mexioo, 0911 MST, August 31, 1948
Reoovered a t Ft. Stockton, Texas

On this f l i g h t an automatic b a l l a s t valve (with b a l l a s t meter) was used

t o support a 20-f'oot, .001" polyethylene balloon. The automatic b a l l a s t valve
operated properly f o r about six hours, and 3000 grams of b a l l a s t was ex=
hausted soon a f t e r sunset. In t h i s case (Figure 41) t h e f l o a t i n g level of the

T Y - r p

Figure 41

balloon was n o t seriously affected b y sunset as was t h e case i n F l i g h t 90,

since the balloon had already descended to t h e a b t i v a t i o n l e v e l of the auto-
metic b a l l a s t valve. This deecer-t followed about three hours of r e l a t i v e l y
stable f l i g h t during which t i m e no b a l l a s t was released. "he 5000-foot de-
scent represents t h e delay i n operation caused by the a c t i v a t i o n of' t h e aneroid
oapsule by a minimum-pressure swilxh, added t o t h e l a g of t h e aneroid i t s e l f .
Following the i n i t i a l a c t i v a t i o n a t about 38,500 f e e t , small o s c i l l a t i o n s were
introduced i n t o the f l i g h t p a t t e r n by the action of the automatic b a l l a s t valve.

F l i g h t 92 provides a good example of the c o n t r o l of a balloon's a l t i t u d e

by the use of a pressure-set automatic b a l l a s t valve. In such a f l i g h t there
i s no tendency t o r i s e t o higher and higher levels. The a d u l t e r a t i o n of the
l i f t i n g gas w i t h tlir reduces the buoyancy of the balloon, and through the
ballest-valve control, the load i s diminished t o the same extent so t h a t
equilibrium i s maintained a t the a c t i v a t i o n pressure of the automatic b8.llaSt
valve's aneroid. In t h i s f l i g h t the a l t i t u d e constancy achieved was the b e s t
of a l l f l i g h t s made t o date. For seven hours and 35 minutes t h i s balloon was
held within 1000 f e e t a t 38,000 feet MSL. (At this a l t i t u d e 1000 feet corresponds
t o a pressure difference of 10 millibars.)

-50-
 !l%e runret effect resulted in a rise of about SO0 f e e t (5 mb) in
the f l o a t i n g level o f the balloon a t 1850 MST. lhis seems t o be due t o a
ohange in the effeotive seal-off pressure of the aneroid capsule of the auto-
rmtio ballast valve which was t h e tonsequence of a decrease in the temperature
of the trapped a i r inside. The rise in a l t i t u d e experienoed oorresponds t o
a deorease of temperature of about 6OC, the superheat of the aneroid, which
was l o s t a t sunset. ! M s valve may be oompared with the 30% found on
Flight 10. On the e a r l i e r f l i g h t a blaok valve was used while tx~ this f l i g h t
the equipment was polished aluminum, with a highly refleotive surface.
Flight 93: Released from Alamogordo, New h x i c o , 0712 MST, September 1, 1948
Recovered a t Neuva6 Carae Grandes, Chihuahua, Mexico
This daytime f l i g h t w i t h a 2O-foot, .00lW polyethylene balloon went up
rith defective b a l l a s t control63 oonsequently the f l i g h t ' 6 main value is in
ohowing the natural s t a b i l i t y of such a balloon without any a l t i t u d e con-
t r o l l 6 As with Flight 88, which went t o about the same height (40,000 f e e t ) ,
this balloon remained a t a near-floating level f o r l e s s than two hours
(Figure 42). I t is i n t e r e s t i n g t o compare this duration at 40,000 f e e t with
the four-hour duration a t 50,000 f e e t shown on Flight 70 and 71. Probabl?
the effect of reduced pressure on diffusion of t h e l i f t i n g gas is a major
f a a t o r contributing t o the longer f l o a t i n g period a t t h e lower pressure.

tylIQ1

Figure 42

-52-
F l i g h t 94: Released from Alamogordo, N e w Mexico, 1208 MST, September 3, 1948
Reoovered A t V i l l a kbumada, Chihuahua, Mexico

On this f l i g h t , a fourth attempt was made t o s u s t a i n a Seyfang, neoprene-

ooated nylon balloon. On F l i g h t 79, a previous Seyfang f l i g h t , no b a l l a s t
equipment had been in operation, and 80 a omoful reoord of b a l l a s t flow on
F l i g h t 94 was desired. This was provided by a b a l l a s t m e t e r . I n a d d i t i o n t o
this and the barograph and Olland. pressure-measuring instrument8, a thenno-
graph wns a l r o part of the equipment t r a i n .

The height-time curve (Figure 43) shows t h a t the i n i t i a l buoyancy sur-

plus of this balloon (for the most p a r t due t o superpressure held behind

I
1
a / \

Figure 43
the safety valve) was reduced by d i f f u s i o n so t h a t a f t e r one hour of f l o a t i n g
it began t o descend a t an accelerating r a t e . A f t e r f a l l i n g about 2000 feet,
the automatic b a l l a s t valve began t o operate, and b a l l a s t was discharged a t
the rate o f 20 grams per minute. During the descent, huwever, t h e strong
superheat which the balloon had acquired was reduced by v e n t i l a t i o n .

The adiabatio lapse r a t e of helium is 2OC per kilometer, whereas a i r in

the troposphere warms up aSout 6% w i t h each kilomster of desoent. Thia
means t h a t ~5theaoh kilometer of f a l l , t h e l i f t i n g gas was cooled relative
t o the a i r by an additional 4OC. The combination of i n e r t i a , l o s s of super-
h e a t through v e n t i l a t i o n , and adiabatio cooling of the gas a s it was com-
pressed, proved too g r e a t f o r t h e l i m i t e d f l o w of b a l l a s t through the auta-
matic yalve, and the balloon f e l l unchecked t o the ground.

From F l i g h t 79, it was cetermined t h a t superheat of nearly 40% i s b u i l t

up when Seyfang balloons are flown i n the sunshine. If this were l o s t , the
buoyanoy of the balloon would be reduced by one-sixth, and no s a t i s f a c t o r y
control could be achieved by b a a l a s t droppicg.

-53-
Flight 96% Released from Alamogordo, New Mexico, 0733 MST, September 8 , 1948
Not reo ove red

On Flight 96 a .O0lw, 20-foot polyethylene balloon was used t o carry a

b a l l a s t meter t o abbut 45,000 f e e t t o determine the flow required a t t h a t
a l t i t u d e using an automatic b a l l a s t valve. xo record of b a l l a s t f l o w was
talemetered during this f l i g h t , but it i s not huwn whether the meter was
inoperative, or the v a l w itself failed--possibly due t o f a i l u r e of a squib
t o detonate a t the oombined low pressure and eold temperature a l o f t .

From the height-time eurve, Figure 44, it w i l l be noted t h a t the balloon

was in a near-floating eonditfon f o r about four hours when the transmitter

Figure 44

signal gave out. There i s no way of t e l l i n g whether the constant-level

f l i g h t obtained m s due t o the natural buoyancy of the balloon o r the action
o f the automatic b a l l a s t valve.

-54-
Flight 97: Released from Blamogordo, New b x i o o , 0856 MST, September 10, 1948
Recovered a t Duncan, Oklahoma

On this f l i g h t a .001", 20-foot polyethylene balloon was used t o t e s t a

new type of b a l l a s t .control. In this system, b a l l a s t flow was excited a t any
altitude if the balloon desoended a t a r a t e equal t o o r greater than 1 m i l l i -
bar i n f i v e minutes.

!Che buoyancy record and the Olland-oyole pressure data obtained from t h i s
f l i g h t show a disagreement of &bout 10,000 f e e t (Figure 45). No explanation
has been provided f o r t h i s differenoe and the following evidence has been
eonsidered. The predicted f l o e t i n e level was about 45,000 f e e t , i n agreement
with the Olland-cycle radiosonde data. On the other hand, the balloon rose
extremely slowly and may have taken i n a i r t o d i l u t e the l i f t i n g gas. In t h i s
event, the f l o a t i n g level night e a s i l y have been reduced by 10,000 f e e t .

Figure 45
Once a t the floeting level, however, the balloon was maintained within
1000 f e e t ( o r 1200 f e e t ) of a constant level f o r over four hours. This in-
dicated that the control system was i n operation since previous f l i g h t s
(88 and 93) a t this a l t i t u d e descended a f t e r about two hours of f l i e h t w i t h -
out b a l l a s t .

-56-
F l i g h t 98: Released f r o m Red Bank, New Jersey, 0948 EST, October 28, 1948
Not recovered

On F l i g h t 98 a 20-foot, .0Oln polyethylene balloon was used t o test

radio reception usfng a new model of t h e Olland-cycle modulator and a T-69
radiosonde transmitter Three receiving s t a t i o n s were used, w i t h e l e v a t i o n
and azimuth angles a8 w e l l as t h e pressure a l t i t u d e recorded by RDF (SCR-658)
equipment. 2he t r a j e c t o r y of this f l i g h t (Figure 46), reconstruoted from t h e
data received a t the Bound s t a t i o n , i n d i c a t e s t h a t the balloon was more than

Figure 46

175 m i l e s *om t h e Nantuoket s t a t i o n a t t h e time the s i g n a l w i s f i r s t re-

ceived. 'his reception i s much g r e a t e r than may be expected from most

-56-
SCR-658 ground setswhen the 2-69 transmitter is used. I h e signals obtained
were not very strong, and there was only an interrupted record of the pressure
h e i o t . From the height-time curve (Figure 47) it w i l l be seen t h a t a three-
t o four-hour period of f l o a t i n g was recorded, a t an a l t i t u d e near 60,000 f e e t
MSL. This i s i n good agreement with the results obtained from e a r l i e r flight8
( 7 0 and 71) a t this level when no control apparatus was included.

m (LST.)

Figure 47

-57-
F l i g h t 102: Released Prom Red Bank, New Jersey, 1023 EST, December 9, 1948
Not recovered

Flight 102 was the f i r s t test given t o a 30-foot, .001" polyethylene bal-
loon manufactured by General Mills, Inc.; with t h i s balloon a 30-kilogram pay-
load was s w c e s s f u l l y l i f t e d t o 58,000 f e e t . A oornbination rate-of-asoent
switch and displaoement switoh was used t o control b a l l a s t flow, but no record
of b a l l a s t was made since the b a l l a s t meter was broken a t launching.

F l i g h t d a t a was received by three ground s t a t i o n s , and the signal from the

AM-1 transmitter (with about 10 pounds of b a t t e r i e s ) was received f o r about
400 miles. This was a good t e s t of the distance t o which a signal may be
transmitted by the AM-1 (M .Y .U) transmitter under daytime conditions. The
t r a j e c t o r y of t h i s f l i g h t i s Figure 48.

- . . __ -i

~RAJECTORV
RELCASLD AT
- F L I ~ H101
RID
T
BANK, N i
DEc. 9 - 1 9 4 R - 1323EST
-
-. - -

Figure 48

In the height-time ourve (Figure 49) it is i n t e r e s t i n g t o note the cieecent

which began shortly before sunset. There i s reason t o b e l i e v e t h a t this
f a l l wa8 being checked by b a l l a s t flow. The normal descent after a balloon

-58-
begins Do f a l l i s aocelersting, while on t h i s f l i g h t aoceleration i s evident.
With a loss of l O O C superheat, and a l i m i t e d flow (900 gram8 per hours), it
would require two hours of flow t o restore the buoyancy of the balloon.
This i s a demonstration that more rapid compensation i s required.

rm

Figure 49

-59-
Flight 103 through 111: These f l i g h t s m r e released in January and February,

controls (displacement snitoh and rate-of-ascent switch) .

1949 from Alamogordo, Nem blexico t o test the aotion of the oombined b a l l a s t
Receiving u n i t s
were rtationed a t Alamogordo; a t Miami, Oklahoma and a t h 8 h v i l 1 0 , Tennessee;
a i r o r a f t were used both te reoeive t h e signal and a l s o t o tmok and poeiticm
the balloon by the use of the radio compass.

For the f i r s t t i m e on these f l i g h t s , a program w i t c h w a s used t o permit

a single t r a n d t f e r t o t n n d t three temperature signals as w l l as brllast-
flow d a t a and pressure informatian. By interrupting the pressure and ballast
d r t a f o r short intern18 of temperature data, a l l of t h i s information was
telenwtered with the AH-1 (N.Y.U.) frmsmitter.

A i r o r a f t roooption of 5uO miles was reported on these Plights, b u t ground

reception was limited t o about 250 miles, perhaps due t o mountains surrounding
the receiving station.

No significant data was obtained on four of these f l i g h t s , and on two

more the principal objective of the f l i g h t was defeated by the excessive gas
loss from the balloons.
From the height-tine oumes of Flights 103 and 107 (Figures 5D and 52)
may be seen t h a t even w i t h constaot b a l l a s t flow ( a t 2400 grams per hour)

r I I I

TIME-MET

Figure 50

-60-
 Figure 51

the balloon continued to descend. In both cases the token b a l l a s t f l o w on

the ascent portion of t h e f l i g h t indicates that the controls were operative,
but there was no t e s t of e f f i c i e n c y since on-off' operation was never per-
mitted.

The temperature data of these f l i g h t s i s in generally good agreement with

t h a t seen e a r l i e r with the balloon gas being warmed by the sun to acquire
a superheat of 100 t o 20W.

-61-
Flight 106: Released from Alamogordo, New Mexico, 1015 W T , hbruary4,1949
Recovered a t Mountain View, Oklahoma

On Flight 103 a B-17 airplane w a s used t o follow the balloon, homing in

on the signal from the AM=l transmitter w i t h the radio compass. I h e r e were
fen clouds over the f i r s t section of the balloon's path, and v e r y exact
positioning was obtainable. The compass needle reversed almost immediately,
and no cone of silence was found when the plane passed beneath the balloon.
Ihe f i x e s indicated on the t r a j e c t o r y (Figure 62) show how exactly t he path
of the balloon may be determined when tracked in such a manner.

-i I
I

Figure 52

-62-
Plight 104: Released from Alamogordo, New bbxioo, 1123 MST, Feburary 5, 1949
Recovered a t Hale Center, Tsxsr
On this f l i g h t a r8b)lrire floating level u ~ achiewd
r by the dropping of
weight from the U)-foot, .001' polyethylene balloon. From the height-time
aurve (Figure 53) a e 01- from 36,000 foot YISL to 47,000 MSL can be seen.
A time d o c k war mod te a t a r t the rapid flow of ballart after about one hour
a t the f k 6 t 10-1. FOllOWhg a 0 O-Urti- O f 811 b r l h s t , the ballast
reremoir i t 8 0 l f mi releared t o caure the final rire of the balloon.
By the w e of' thir tootmiquo. afmosfierio runpling of my kind may be
conducted w i t h two or more 1evels rampled on 8inglo f l i g h t . Hitfiout using
any control to mep the balloon conrtantly a t a given altitudo for a long
t h e , the sampling rfeps & o d d not be expeated to be muoh longer than one
hour apieoe .

Figure 53
Flight 106: Released fran Alamogordo, New b x i o o , 0657 MST, February 8 , 1949
Roomered a t Ellemore, Kansas

=is was the f i r s t f l i g h t t o o l e a r l y demonstrate the efficien& aotion

of a ooabination b a l l a r t control--displaoement d t o h and rate-of-asoent
mitoh-en a 20-foot, .001" polyethylene balloon. From the height-tine oxarm
and ballast-flow reoord (Figure 54), it w i l l be seen t h a t the b a l l a s t oon-
t r o l war operating a t 41,000 f e e t MSL during the period of r a d i o reoeption
from Alamogordo, Nan Mexioo. By the t i m e the seoond reoeiving s t a t i o n pioked
up the signal, a l l of the b a l l a s t had been exhausted and the balloon was
f i l l i n g . On this f l i g h t a high l o s s of l i f t i n g gas oaused the t o t a l b a l l a s t
load of 600 grants t o be exhausted in l e s s than five hours. (Average used in
first two hours ma 1700 grams per hour.)

I
II I 1 I I
4

DALLAST fLOW-SUCr

- I
FLIGHT 106
Rrlrarrd at Alamo9ordqN.M.
Fob.8.1949- 0651 YST
O~LAI QYOLC DATA
I

IIyL-ylt

Figure 54

The dement point of t h i s balloon was compared with t h a t predioted f r a n a

study of .the atmospheric pressure patterns a t f l o a t i n g level. Assuming geo-
strophio flow, member8 of a graduate o l a s s in meteorology a t Nem York

-64
uniwrsity oomputed the points of desoent men in Figure 5s. As i n the oases
of Flights 55 and 58, t h e balloon appears to have moved aoross the isobar8
toward lower pressure.

L
Figure 55

-65-
Flight 1101 Released frcnn Alamogordo, New Mexico, 0649 W T , February 11, 1949
Rboovered a t Kershaw, South Carolina

This f l i g h t had a s i t s main objeotives the t e s t i n g of a Winten Research

Inc. .OOISw, -foot polyethylene balloon, and f u r t h e r t e s t i n g of the oonibina-
t i o n b a l l a s t control-=displacement switch and rate-of-ascent switoh. Following
the i n i t i a l ascent of this f l i g h t , a slaw descent resulted from l o s s of
l i f t i n g gas. Three hours were required f o r a descent of 2000 f e e t t o the
pressure where b a l l a s t flow was begun. 'his and the general f l i g h t pattern
indioate the s a t i s f a c t o r y nature of this Winzen Researoh Ino. balloon. A f t e r
b a l l a s t ~ l t a r t e d ,the valve stuck and a constant flow a t 1800 grams per hour
followed. The r i s i n g c e i l i n g seen i n Figure 56 is the typical flight
pattern f o r a balloon whose l o a d is being s t e a d i l y decreased a t a rate in
exoess of the l o s s of buoyanoy.

Figure 56

On t h i s f l i g h t a l l three of the receiving s t a t i o n s positioned along the

expected path were able t o moeive and moord t h e pressure and b a l b e t s i p
nal. lo temperature equipment was flown.
 A omparison of the point of desoent predicted from geortrophio flow
and that a o f u a l l y observed nas made by members of a graduate o l a s s of
meteorology a t New York University (Figure 57). Using M a i r p l a n e f i x

Figure 57

made during the f l i g h t the aotual t r a j e o t o r y seems to have oeen w e l l t o the

north of the "oenter of gravity" of predioted points of desoent, and %he
aotual f l i g h t path we~soonsiderably longer than t h a t predioted. Since the
pressure p a t t e r n at the eastern end of t h e f l i g h t was antioyolonic, this
seems t o be i n aooordanoe w i t h the idea of super-geostrophic f l m associated
with antioyolonic systems. As i n a l l the earlier cases where such a study

.
was made, t h e balloon apparently moved across the isobars toward lower
pressure

-67-
 -
Index

( A l l references are t o f l i g h t numberr. The number of the f l i g h t on which a

p a r t i o u l a r instrurment or prinoiple w a q f i r s t demonstrated i s underlined.
For example, airborne radio d i r e c t i o n finding was f i r s t used on F l i g h t 41.)

Adiabatio temperature changes, 60, 75, B a l l a s t requfcsmentr (oonf'd.)

94 with .OO8., l S t 4 i w b r polyBthyAene
b a l l o m , 11
Airborne radio ;irectian4'inding, 41, with Seyfatqg k l l o c m , 94
103, 110
Balloon8
A i r o r a f t traoking, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13- f l r g h t s using other than polyethylene
20, 86, 103 neoprene-ooatad nylon (Seyfang) ,
A i r flow 59, 63, 79, 94
deformation o f , over mountaln rubEr, 5, 7
range, 11 shrouded rubber (Dewey and A W ) ,
geostrophio , compared w i t h balloon 23 38, 66, 87
b - a j e c t o r i e s , 55, 58, 106, 110 f l i,e+us ing polyethylene
.00lW,7'-diameter, 74
Altitude s e n s i t i v i t y , 52, 02, 86, 110 .001" ,20' -diameter,m
.00lW,70'-diameter, %
Appendices (external) on p o l p t h y l e n e .00lW,3Ot-diamster, 102
b a l l 0 on 8 .004" ,2O'-diameter, 1 7
f i r s t use o f , 13
need for, demoii&ated, 12
.008" ,15'-di~meter ,-
s t i f f e n e d w i t h cardboad, 20, 39 Barograph
-
s t i f f e n e d with m s t a l , PS longest record a f , 75
need for-, demonstrated, 17, 29, 3 0 , 32
Arrays of rubber balloon8 use of (Fergusson), 33, 35, 39
cluster, 7
linear, 5
use of new model (Lange), 52 -
Buoyancy
Atmospherio o s c i l l a t i o n s , 10, 52, 55, ohmgee i n , due t o sunset, 75, 90
68, 63, 71 natural
SeyPang b a l l o m s i n p e troposphere, 79
Automatio ballast valve 7 'diameter polye thy>ene balloons
effect of superheat on, 10, 74, 80, i n the troposphere, 86
92 20t-diameter polyethylene balloons
f i r s t activated by minimum-pressure in the stratofiphere, 60, 96
m i t e h , 12 2 O t - d i ~ t e rpolyethylene balloons
first use oP;5 i n the troposphere, 70, 71, 88,
sunset e f f e c t Tn, 80, 90, 92 93, 98
t y p i c a l f l i g h t with, 92 70 9 -d iamb ter polye thylene ba 11oons
i n the stratosphere, 75

M l l a s t meter
need for, demonstrated, 29-39 Combination control ( r a t e of ascent b a l l a s t
UEO of, 74, 78, 80, 86, 89, 90, 92 twitch with displacement switch)
94, 96;'lOZ f i r s t use of, 102
t y p i c a l f l i g h t x t k , 106
B a l l a s t requiremen t o
w i t h .001", 7*-diametsc p l y - Ccmtrols
othylens b8lhOn8, 74 f i r s t use of
with .001", 80'-dirmater poly-
ethylene ballOOn8, 54, 66, 60, -
automatic b a l l a s t valve, 5

80, 92, 106

68
Controls, f i r s t use of (oont’d.)
fixed needle-valve b a l l a s t leak&
fixed o r i f i o e b a l l a s t leak, g
-
minimum-pressure m i t o h with auto-
math ballast valve, 12
rate-of-asoent b a l l a s t Z t e h , 97 (3eosbpphio a i r flow, aompared w i t h
r a t e - o f a s c e n t b a l l a s t awitoh balloon t r a j e c t o r i e s , 55, 58, 106, 110
oombined w i t h dirplaoement
-
m i t c h , 102
ruperpressure, 23
lifter balloons, 7 Lange barograph
r o l i d balla8t. 5, 7 f i r s t use of, 52
superpresssure, g, 38, 59, 6S, 66, longest reoord of, 75
79, 87, 94
t y p i o a l flight w i t h Lifter balloons fox a l t i t u d e oontrol, 5, 7
a u t o m t i a b a l l r o t ~ 8 1 ~ QZ 0,
fixed b a l l a s t leak, 82
rate-of-asoent b a l l a s t r r i t e h
oaaabined w i t h d i s p l a o e m t
dtoh,
-
Moteorograph, Fergusson, 33, SS, 39

Minimum-presssure switch
failures due t o freecing of, 78, 80
f i r s t use of, 12
Deformation of a i r flow over mountain need f o r , damonstrafed, 11
range, 11
Destruotion devioe
f i r s t use of , 10
first use of nZi design ( r i -out -
Olland-ayola pX’O88W modulator, uee of,
43, 52, 55, 58, 75, 97, 98
p r i n c i p l e ) , 4l, (Fig. 167
Osoillationm in the atmosphere, lo., 52,
65, 58, 63, 71
Derrey and Almy, rhrouded rubber
balloons, 23, 38, 66, 87

b ’ O p 8 ~ d 0 , 85
Polyethylene b a l l oons
7*-dirmster, 2, 76, 84, 86
30cdi.meter, 102
Easterly winds a t high 1evel8, 60, 75 15*-diameter,
n,
2Oc-diamster,
70*-diamCer, -
17

Fixed-leak b a l l a s t control Pnt s sum-measuring i n s t r r a ~ e n t s

f i r s t use of, 11 barograph,
t y p i c a l flight’-i;ith, 82 Ian@ barograph, 62
Olland-ayolr moduKtor, 2, 52, 55, 58,
F l i g h t patterns, typioal 73, 97, 98
with polyethylene balloons and
automatia balla8t-vcLlVO oontrol , Prograra suitah, use of, 10s
92
with polyethylene balloani and a u t o
nvrtio ballsrt-valve aontrol
thru a ~ u n s e t , 90, 92 Radar t r a o k b g , 75, 86
with polyethylene balloons and
fixed f l W Of b a l l a s t , 82 Radio direotion-finding
airborne, 2, 103, 110
Badio direotim-finding (oont'd.) *king (oont'd.)
SCR-658, 12, 15-20, 56, 58, 60, 75, thedoliM, 7, 11, 13-20, 56, 60,
78, 81, 98 7s

Rate of rise, exoessive, 15, 14, 16,39 lWect=ies, 11, 55, 58, 103, 106, 110

Rubber balloons, 5, 7 Trananitters

5 - (-1)
f i r s t use of, 12
longest reoeptGn distance with, 1 0 2
Seyf'ang, neoprene-coated nylon bal-
longest reception t b rpith, 92
-
loons, 59, 63, 79, 94 397 m~ (T-69)
f l r s t use of, 12,
Solid b a l l a s t f o r a l t i t u d e control, longest r e o s p t G distanoe with, 82
longest reoeption ti- with, 82
5, 7

Stepwise p a t t e r n of f l o a t i n g , 104 Typical f l i g h t patterns, F l i g h t patternrr,

typical
Sunset o f f ect
on automatio b a l l a s t valve, 80, 90,
92
on buoyancy, 5, 75, 90
Superheat
e f f e c t on automatic b a l l a s t valve,
10, 74, 80, 92
e f f e c t on buoyancy, 75, 79
e f f e c t on Seyfangballoon, E, 65,
79, 94

Superpressure balloons
Dewey and Almg, shrouded rubber,
23, 58, 66, 87
Se-ng, neoprene-coated nylon,
-
59, 65, 79, 94

Temperature measurements, need f o r

shown, 58, 63, 73, 78, 88, 103,
106, 107

-
Theodolite observation, 5, 7, 11, 13-
20, 56, 60, 75

Traoking
a i r c r a f t , 5, 7, 11, 1 2 , 13-20, 86,
103
radar, 86, 75
radio direction-finding
airborne, 41, 103, 110
SCR-658, 1Z;- 13-20, 56, 58, 60,
7 5 , 78, 81, 98
 TECHNICAL REPORT No* 1

Balloon Group, Constant Level Balloon Proj e o t

New York University

Covering t h e period #ov. 1, 1946 t o Jan. 1, 1948

CONSTANT LEVEL BALLOON

Research Division, Project No. 93

Prepared i n Accordance with Provisions o f Contraqt

W28-099-ac-241, between
Watson Laboratories, Red Bank, New Jersey
and
New York University

Prepared by: Charles B . Moore, James R . Smith, and

Seymour Goldstein

Approved by: larles S. Schneider, Project Director

and
Prof. Athelstan F . Spilhaus
Director of Research

Research Division, College o f Engineering, New York University.

A p r i l 1 , 1948

N e w York 63, New York

 Page

Section 1 . Introduction t o Problem ................................. 1

Section 2 . Method of Attaok ............................... o . o o o o o o . 1

A . Balloons.. .......................................... 1
B . A l t i t u d e Controls ................................... 6

. C A l t i t u d e I)L)te.i.tion ....................... o.ooooo10

. D Horizontal P o s i t i o n Dete.ination ................... 13

. E Flight Termination Control .......................... 14

Seotim 3 . Theoretical Relationships and .............. 15

. A bltitude-Density Relationships ...................... 15

B. Load-Diameter-Maximum A l t i t u d e Relationships ........ 16

C. Balloon Diameter-Weight h l a t i o n s h i p s ............... 18

D. Rate of .se ....................................... *18

E. Ballast .quir.ents ................................ 19

F . Internal P.ssure ................................... 20

Section.&Flight Teohniques ......................................... 22

A . Inflation ........................................... 22

B . .lease ............................................. 23
C . o.or.y ............................................ 26

Seotion 5 . ni&t S
ay
.f .......................................... 26

Section 6 . Current Objecti.08 ...................................... 32

Section 7 . Appendix

.1 F l i g h t Summary Data ................................. 36

.2 Correspondence ....................................... 37

.3 F l i g h t forms and t a b l e s ........................... *.47

Seotion 8 . Referenoe Notes ......................................... 61

 L i s t of Figurer
Following Page

Fig 1 .. P l a s t i o Balloon for Constant Level Bslloon Projeot ........ 4

?ig .. 2 Thin. t e a r d r o p . polyethylene balloon..............^...... S

Fig .. 3 General Mills tnenty-foot balloon ......................... 5

Fig .. 4 Ten-fcct appendix attaohed t o a General M i l l s balloon ..... 5

Fig .. 5 Two-foot appendix. stiffened. shown on a General M i l l s

balloon ................................................... 6

Fig 6 .. ...............
General M i l l s twenty-foot balloon i n f l i g h t 5

Fig .. 7 Idealized time-altitude ourves far vardous balloon

oontrol se
t.. ........................................... 7

Fig .. 8 ......................................
Manual b a l l a s t valve 7

Fig .. 9 Components of Manual B a l l a s t r e l e a s e assembly............. 7

Fig . . ...........................
10 Manual b a l l a s t r e l e a s e assembly 7

Fig . . ...................................
11 Automatie b a l l a s t ~ a l v e 7

Fig . . 1 2 Automatio b a l l a s t valve. showing loaded diaphragm ......... 7

Fig . . 13 Automatic b a l l a s t valve ................................... 7

. .
Fig 14 Minimum Prersure 6.it.h ................................... 8

. .
Fig 16 B a l l a s t r e s e r v o i r ......................................... 10

Fig . 16. B a l l a s t relemse asaembly .................................. 10

Fig . 17. Compbte b a l l e r t r e l e a s e ................

assembly......... 10

Fig . 18 Coverage of probable balloon paths w i t h four-station .

SCR-668 n e t ............................................... 12

Fig . 19 Buoyanoy VI . altitude

for various diameter balloonr

(helium) .................................................. 17

Fig . 20 Buoyandy VIBO a l t i t u d e for .various diameter balloons

(hydrogen) ................................................ 17
Fig . . 21 Caloulated n e t lift f o r Gemorb1 Mills Ino., balloons ...... 18
 L i s t of Figures (oont'd)
Following Page

Fig. 22. Polyethylene balloon .ights .......................... 18

Fig. 23 Balloon weights f o r various f a b r i o weight8 ............ 18

Fig 24 Free l i f t o f balloons 7s . ................

r a t e of rise 19

Fig 26 0 General M i l l a twenty-foot balloon billowing i n a 6-

h o t *rindom ........................................... 23

Fig 26 ............................. 23
Heavy e l l i p t i o a l s h o t bag

Fig . 27 Aluminum *oennonw i n p o s i t i o n......................... 24

Fig 28 Plan view o f balloon launahing layout ................. 26

Fig . 29 Balloon shapes during 1aunch.g ....................... 26

Fig 30 General M i l l s trrenty-foot balloon in . .. .

Plight 26

APPENDIX I

Fie 31 Train Assembly. f l i g h t 5. (meteorologioal o l u s t e r ) .... 36

Fig 32 0 Trajectory. f l i g h t 5 .................................. 36

Fig . Rb Height-time curve. f l i g h t 5 ........................... 36
Fig . 34 Trajeotory. P l i g h t 6 .................................. 36

Fig 35 0 Height-time ourve. f l i g h t 6 ........................... 56

Fig 36 . Train assembly. f l i g h t 7. (meteorologioal o l u s t e r ) ..... 36

Fig . . 37 Trajeotory. f l i g h t 7 .................................. 36

........................36
Fig

Fig

Fig
38

39

40
0 Train .
Height-time curve. flight 7.0.

ssembly. f l i g h t 8. (General Mills C l u s t e r )

Trejsotory. f l i g h t 8 ..................................
..... 36

36

Fig 41 ...........................36
H e i g h t - t i m e curve. f l i g h t 8

Fig 4% Train assembly. f l i g h t 10 ............................. 56

Fig 43 0 Height-time ourve . ..........................

f l i g h t 10 36
Fig 44 Train assembly. flight 11. ............................ 36
Fig 45 T r a j e c t o r y and height-time curve. P l i g h t 11 ........... 56

..
0

Fig 48 Train a8sembly. f l i g h t 1 2 ............................. 56

F i-r 47 0 H e i g h t - t h o ourve. P l i g h t 12 ........................... 36
 L i s t of Figures (cont'd)

Po llowing Page

Fig;. 48. .... 36

Height-time aurves. f l i g h t s 13. 14. 16. and 23

Fig. 49 Height-time curve. f l i g h t 15 ...................... 36

Fig 50 . Height-time curve. f l i g h t ...................... 36

20

Fig . 51 Eeight-time curve. f l i g h t ...................... 36

24

Fig . 52 . Height-time curve . f l i g h t ...................... 36

27

F i g . 63 . Height-time curvg, f l i g h t s 30 end 32 .......... 36

29.

Fig 54 0 Height-time CurvUS. f l i g h t s 33. 34. 35 and 36 ...... 36

Fig 55 . Height-time ourve8, f l i g h t s 37. 36 and 39 .......... 36

Fig 56 . Trs2ectory. f l i g h t 17............................. 36

Fig . 57 0 Height-time curve. f l i g h t 17 ...................... 36
 List o f Table8

-
Pegs

1. Prcpertier of F'abrior ured for bRllcOn nmnufacture. .......... 3

IV. Buoymcy per Pound Mol o f Gas....o.........em.............e..16

VII. Summary of Flight Datae......e.............o......e.~..mo.m..Append~ I

Following
Page 36
 'ZE BULOON PROJECT TECHNICAL REPORT

Section 1. Introduction t o Problem

On 1 November 1946, t h e Research Division of t h e College of

Engineering of New York University entered into Contract No. W28-099-ac-241

with Watson Laboratories, A i r U t e r i e l Command. Under t h i s contract, the

University was commissioned t o design, develop and f l y constant-level

balloons t o c a r r y instruments t o a l t i t u d e s from 10 t o 20 km, adjustable a t

2 Inn intervals.

The following performance was specified:

a. Altitude s h a l l be maintained within 500 meters

b. Duration of constant-level f l i g h t t o be i n i t i a l l y 6 t o 8 hours

minimum; eventually 48 hours

C. The accuracy of pressure observations shall be comparable t o t h a t

-
obiAiinable with t h e standard Army radiosonde (' 3 t o 5 mb)

Monthly r e p o r t s have been submitted t o describe t h e progress of the

project, h m v e r , much data and d e t a i l s of technical nature were given only

i n a q u a l i t a t i v e way. It i s intended t o c o l l e c t these data i n t h i s technical

r e p o r t and t o review a t the same t i m e the t o t a l achievement of t h i s phase of

t h e project.

Section 2. Method of Attack

~ ~

A. Balloons

A survey was made of previous attempts t o produce a constant-level

1
balloon; such as, t h e experiments by Meisinger with rnanned balloons, the

shrouded meteorological balloon developed by Dewey and Almy2, the Japanese

balloon bombs3, and the c l u s t e r s of meteorological balloons which have been

4
used i n cosmic r a y investigations by Compton, Korff and others

-1-
Fran t h i s survey and a study of a e r o s t a t i c s ,
10, 16, 16
it appeared t h a t
a non-extensible balloon i s highly desirable due t o t h e v e r t i c a l s t a b i l i t y

exhibited when such a balloon i s f u l l of t h e l i f t i n g gas: A non-extensible

balloon with'no diffusion or leakage through the walls, which could withstand

a high i n t e r n a l pressure, would automatically remain a t t h e density where

t h e buoyancy of t h e f u l l bal-loon equaled the load. In practice, control

devices a r e needed t o o f f s e t t h e lealcage and diffusion of t h e l i f t i n g gas

and t o correct f o r the motion of the balloon due t o d i u r n a l changes of

t h e b a l l o o n f s temperature and t o correct f o r v e r t i c a l wind currents i n t h e

atmosphere. It was decided t o use a p l a s t i o aa the balloon f a b r i c , since

available p l a s t i o s have s u i t a b l e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , and are a l s o r e l a t i v e l y

inexpensive a s compared t o coated f a b r i c s .

The desirable properties t o be considered i n t h e selection of a

p l a s t i c balloon material a r e s

a. Ease of f a b r i c a t i o n

b. High t e a r resistance

C. Light weight

d. High t e n s i l e strength

e. Chemical s t a b i l i t y

f . Low permeability

g. Low b r i t t l e temperature
h. H i g h transparency t o h e a t radietion

Table I i s apuditative-characteristics catalog of the film and

f a b r i c s investigated. The data i n the table a r e presented as approxinations

because of the g r e a t varietions of a given property with choice of samples

and t e s t methods. From t h i s study, polyethylene, nylon, saran, and neoprene

- 2 -
eoated nylon ieem t o be most generally satisractory. Eighteen p l a s t i c s

and balloon fabrioation ccrnpanies were contacted in an attempt t o secure

fabrioator 8 .

Table I

Ease of
LOW Temp. Permea- Tensile Tear Fabrica- Stability t o
Fabrio Properties b i l i t y strength Resistance tion Ultraviolet

Polyethylene Good Medium Lcm Good Good Good

Saran Fair LOW High Poor mix Fair

Good LOW High LOW Good Good

Vinyl i t e Very paor Medium Medium Good Good Good

Teflon Believed LOW High Good Cannot be Good

good fadrioated

Ethocellulose Good Very LOW mir Good Good

high

P l i o f ilm Poor Hi& Poor Fair Good Poor

Nylon or s i l k
fabric coated
with:
1, Neoprene Fair LOW High Fair Fki ir FBir
2. Butyl
rubber GoOd
8 . Folyethylene
4. Saran
zhnknown
Unhown
-
LOW

-0
High Fair Fair Good

-3 -
 Table XI shows the balloons which have begn purchased from those
manufacturers who expressed an i n t e r e e t in t h e problem.

Table I1

Film type, thickness, Special Unit Delivered

Company diameter, shape Features -Cost t o date

H a A. Smith a 0 0 4 Polyethylene Proto- $150 .OO 4

Coatings, Inca 3 feet diameter .type
spherical

H a A. Smith .008 Polyethylene LOU $530 .OO 5

Coatings, Inc. 15 f e e t diameter Permeability
spheric a 1

H i A a Smith
Coatings, Inca
.004 € o1ye t h ylene
15 feet diameter
Low $530 .OO
Permeability
5

spher ic al

General Mills,Inc. .001 Polyethylene Stressed $20.00 25

Teardrop .
7 f e e t diameter tape type
seam

General Mills,Inc. .001 Polyethylene Stressed $125.00 47

Teardrop .
20 f e e t diameter tape type
seam

DsrsYkAlmy A spherical nylon #339.00 2

Chemioal 00. c l o t h shroud around
a neoprene balloon.

Table I1 i s based upon f i n a l o r modified orders i n those caees where

t h e rapid progress of flight technique rendered c e r t a i n f e a k r e s obsolete

before the balloons on order were delivered.

Figure 1 shows t h e spherical balloon as o r i g i n a l l y d e s i p e d . This

type of balloon was made of .OW and .008 inch, heat-sealed, polyethylene.

I t had several good c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , such as very low leakage, but t h e method

of load attachment furnished by H.A. Smith, Inc., was not satisfactory. Of

the six balloons of t h k s type which were used, two ripped f r e e from the shroud
l i n e s during launching.

- 4 -
 5 p h e r i c a / dalfoon
I 5 'Diame ter.

.9 e y e l e t s in r e i n f o r c e d
s e a m s for a t t a c h i n g bridle
to b a / / o o n at 30*
'"f
be OUI baNoor's e p u a t 01.

Ealloon w i t h riyfiny

_-I B l u n c r
of flat Film
cemenkd t o g e t h e r t o
m ake sphere.

P L A S T I C BALLOON
foR CONSTANTLCVLLBA,LLOONP R O J E C T AT NYU
A P R I L 27, 1947
SCILt : 1'- 3'0''

FIG.I
 Figures 2 and 3 show t h e tear-drop c e l l of t h e streerred tape

design developed by General M i l l s , Inc. The film i s .001 inch polyethylene,

butt-welded, with scotch tape l a i d along the seem t o r e i n f o r c e t h e seal and

t o c a r r y and d i s t r i b u t e t h e load. These s t r i p s , which converge t o the load

r i n g a t t h e bottom, a c t u a l l y support t h e load.

The overloading of a Osneral M i l l 8 20-foot balloon on Flight 1 2 a t

Lakehurst kept t h e lmer end of tb balloon open during ascent. !he

c e i l i n g was g r e a t l y reduced by the r e s u l t i n g d i l u t i o n of t h e helium with

air. On l a t e r f l i g h t s an unsuccessful attempt t o minimize t h i s mixing

was made, using a 10-foot external appendix passing through the shroud

lines. This appendix fouled i n t h e rigging and t w i s t e d completely shut,

causing the balloon t o burst a t pressure-altitude. A modificationwith

a 10-foot appendix outside the shroud l i n e s a l s o f a i l e d i n a c t u a l f l i g h t .

Figure 4 shows t h i s appendix construction on a General M 11s balloon which

is being i n f l a t e d . The f i n a l s t y l e i s shown i n Figures 5 and 6. It con-

s i s t s of a 2-foot external appendix s t i f f e n e d with cardboard battens.

This i s taped on t h e outside of the load ring. It serves as a one-way

valve which excludes a i r during ascent but allows the e x t r a h e l i u m t o

valve f r e e l y when t h e balloon i s f u l l . No e x t e r n a l appendix can b e used

whenever the r a t e of r i s e exceeds 600 f e e t per minute. For optimum balloon

performance, it has been determined that: 1) t h e equipment load f o r t h e

Gemral Mills 20-foot balloon should be held tinder 30 pounds; 2 ) r a t e o f

r i s e should be less than 900 f e e t per minute; and 3) f o r maximum a l t i t u d e s

an e x t e r n a l appendix i s needed; hence the l i m i t i n g r a t e of rise is about

600 f e e t per minute i n t h i s case.

Several experimental flights have been made using shrouded Dewey

and Almy neoprene balloons, a s well as small and large experimental c e l l s i n

- 5 -
 Figure 2
Teardrop, .001" polyethylene
b a l l o o n , 20 f o o t i n diameter,
designed by General Mills, Inc.
 Figure 3
Twenty ft. b a l l o o n , showing
burn-out p e t c h in place.
 Figure 5
Two f o o t appendix, s t i f f e n e d , shown on a General
Kills ballon. The swollen i n f l a t i o n tube i n d i c a t e s
t h a t the balloon is being f i l l e d .
 Figure 6
General X i l l s 20 f o o t balloon i n
flight w i t h 2 f o o t s t i f f e n e d appendix.
various c l u s t e r arrangements. N o n e of thecie have been t o o s a t i s f a c t o r y

but further i n v e s t i g a t i o n r i l l be made i n t h e f i e l d of shrouded or ooated

films .
B. Altitude Controls

Given a balloon capable of carrying t h e instruments t o a desired

a l t i t u d e (the t h e o r y and computations involved a r e discussed in Seotion 3),

t h e r e remains the problem of maintaining t h e c e l l a t a constant level. The

buoyancy of a gas-filled c e l l w i l l deorease as the gas leaks or d i f f u s e s

through t h e balloon w a l l . To hold an absolutely o m s t a n t a l t i t u d e , the

volume of l i f t i n g gas entrapped must be maintained i n an atmosphere of

unvarying horizontal density, with no change i n t h e t o t a l weight supported

by t h e balloon and with no f l u c t u a t i o n s of t h e temperature of t h e gas with

respect t o t h e a i r . The b e s t approximation t o these conditions may possibly

be achieved through the use of l i q u i f i e d hydrogen, which would be permitted

t o evaporate a t a r a t e i n excess of gas leakage. The weight of equipment

required t o control this evaporation r a t e appears t o be prohibitive. Liquid

hydrogen, also, i s not safe t o handle.

Two p r a c t i c a l methods of keeping a balloon a t nominally constant

a l t i t u d e have been devised, both using the l i q u i d b a l l a s t dropping technique.

(Solid b a l l a s t , such a s sand, does not f l o w well a n d i s l i a b l e t o absorb

moisture which w i l l freeze a t t h e temperatures experienced at high a l t i t u d e s .

Although a few preliminary f l i g h t s m r e made with desiccated sand, a highly

refined water-free kerosene-type petroleum product,compass fluid,was found

t o be more s a t i s f a c t o r y ) ,

In t h e simpler control system, b a l l a s t i s dropped a t a pre-determined

r a t e , aimed t o s l i g h t l y exceed t h e l o s s of l i f t of the balloon due t o leakage

and diffusion. If t h i s method is successfully used, t h e balloon stays f u l l

because the remaining gas i n the balloon has less load t o supporti therefore,

- 6 -
the balloon can rise elorvly u n t i l the b a l l o m i s again f u l l and the

equilibriwn i s again reached between t h e buoyancy and t h e load. In tb

General Mills 20-foot balloon, for example, diffusion losses equal about

300 grams per houri t h e balloon a t i t s c e i l i n g of 50,000 f e e t , with a

30-pound Fayload, r i s e a about 900 f e e t w i t h each kilogram of b a l l a s t

dropped. This means that a balloon, using t h e simple ballast-dropping

technique, w i l l f l o a t a t a ceiling.which r i s e s a t the rate of about 360

feet per hour. An i d d a l i t e d f l i g h t of this type i s shown in the Bolid

curve of Fig. 7., neglecting t h e o s c i l l a t i o n shown a t sunset.

The "manual b a l l a s t valve" which was developed f o r t h i s simple

oontrol system i s shuwn i n Fig. 8 , This valve can be adjusted prior t o

balloon release t o allcrw any predetermined f l a w of compass f l u i d up t o

2000 grams per hour. The f i l t e r housing and b a l l a s t reservoir used

w i t h t h i s valve are shown i n Figures 9 and 10. This method i s good where

1 ) a slowly r i s i n g c e i l i n g oan be t o l e r a t e d , and 2 ) the f l i g h t does n o t

have t o go through a sunset while at i t s ceiling.

For eoonomy of b a l l a s t , hence longer f l i g h t duration, it i s desirable

to keep the constant f l a w as close as possible t o +he t o t a l l o s s of buoyancy

r e s u l t i n g from diffusion and leakage. This means t h a t whenever rapid l o s s

of buoyancy oocurs, due t o changes i n solar radiation, the manual b a l l a s t

valve alone w i l l not sustain t h e b a l l o o n . When the balloon is suddenly

ooolsd, due t o sunset or clouds c u t t i n g off ingolation (loss of superheat),

the heavy loss w i l l s t a r t the balloon downward and only a rapid expenditure

of b a l l a s t w i l l check i t s f a l l and restore i t s s t a b i l i t y .

The second type of b a l l a s t dropping control has been devised to

operate on a demand basis, &en such a descent occurs. This control i s
called the automatic b a l l a s t valve. Figures 11, 12 and 13 show the ap-

pearance and desigp of this pressure-actuated needle ~ 8 1 ~ 8 .

- 7 -
 . . -_ .- - .
--
I-

.-..
I
, I

LOCAL TIME
 NEEDLE

AIR VENT-\

BALLAST DISCHARGE
TUBE
’
MANUAL BALLAST VALVE

FIG. 8
 Figure 9
Fixed rate, manually operated
ballast release assembly.
li I 1

I/I
 BALLAST INLET TUBE
MOUNTING HOLE
FOR SAFETY SWITCH

NEEDLE VALVE
(BALLAST COff TROr)

9 DIAPHRAGM
DEPRESSOR
(FOR GROUND CHECK)

DIAPHRAGM
BALLAST NORUALL Y OP€N TO
DISCHARGE TUBE A TMOSPMERE
-SEALED AT M A X
A1 T I W D € )

DIAPHRAGM SEAL-0FF RESTRAINING CORD

MECHANISM-

SQUIB
(F/R€O AT MAXIMUM
PROTECTIVE CAP
A L T/TUD€)

CANNON

FIG. 13

AUTOMATIC BALLAST VALC E

M CIU - 1 9 JANUARY f948 - PfNCUS

 When the atmospheric pressure outside t h e diaphragm increaser t o

5 mb. above t h e i n t e r n a l pmssure, compass f l u i d w i l l be discharged a t

t h e r a t e of 160 grams per minute under a 1-foot head. When theautomatic

b a l l a s t valve i s completely open (at 6.5 mb. pressure d i f f e r e n t i a l ) , 300

grams per minute w i l l flow.

The automatically operated needle valve is held d o s e d by a loaded

diaphragm u n t i l the balloon reaches a l t i t u d e . This diaphragn is open t o

t h e atmosphere u n t i l t h e balloon descends from the minimum atmospheric

pessure attained. A t t h a t t h e , an e l e c t r i o a l contact i s nade, f i r i n g

a squib which s e a l s the diaphragm mechanically from any f u r t h e r access t o

the external a i r . Thereafter, t h e capsule contains a volume of air which

has been trapped a t the pressure and temperature e x i s t i n g e t t h e t i m e of

operation of t h e sealing mitch. 'When t h e ambient pressure increases t o

the point where t h e entrapped a i r i s compressed below t h i s o r i g i n a l volume,

t h e diaphragm w i l l withdraw the b a l l a s t control needle valve allowing

b a l l a s t discharge t o occurr

Figure 1 4 shaws t h e m i n i m u m pllessure switch which makes the e l e c t r i c a l

contact a t the t i m e of seal-off. I t consists of a t r p p p e d volume of air that

i s allowed t o escape through a mercury pool a s lang a s t h e outside pressure

i s decreasing. A8 soon 88 the e x t e r i o r pressure increases, mercury i s

drewn i n t o t h e tube making t h e seal off contact between two electrodes.

Ihe dimensions of the air chamber and c a p i l l a r y tubing a r e chosen so

t h a t during operation t h e change i n t h e volume of the a i r would be less than

one one-thousendth of t h e originel volume, f i e distance between the two

electrodes (one under mercury, the other within the c a p i l l a r y tubing) was

influenced by considerations of safety and s e n s i t i v i t y - If the distance i s

l e s s than 6 mu., shaking during launching i s l i k e l y t o move the mercury

- 8 -
/;*

/NYU BALLOON PROJECT

M)NJMUM Fkmc5SURE S w r C H
(MERCURIALI
s u f f i c i e n t l y t o oatme a short between the electrodes, f i r i n g t h e squib

prematurely. If t h e distance i s f o o large, however, t h e r e N ill be too

great a height difference between the t h e of minimum pressure and t h e

time the eleatrodes a r e shorted. For instance, a spacing of 10 mm. would

delay the f i r i n g o f the squib u n t i l t h e pressure reached 13.3 mb. above

the minimum pressure. At an a l t i t u d e of 50,000 f e e t , the equivalent height

(standard atmosphere) would be about 2300 feet. It is obvious t h a t f o r high

l e v e l flights, a less dense md lower freezing e l e c t r o l y t e f o r the minimum

pressure switch will be needed t o obtain the desired s e n s i t i v i t y of 2000

feet.

By adding the pressure-activated automatic b a l l a s t valve t o t h e

manual b a l l a s t valve, the complete pattern of the s o l i d curfe i n Figure 7
may be achieved ideally. A t sunset t h e rapid cooling o m s e s descent which
cannot be compensated f o r by the manual b a l l a s t valve. As soon as the seal-

off pressure of the autaanatic b a l l a s t valve i s exceeded by the atmospheric

pressure, b a l l a s t f l o w i s begun, which r e s t o r e s %he balloon t o i t s ceiling.

The dashed curve i n Figure 7 shows t h e action of a balloon when the

automatic b a l l a s t valve alone i s used f o r control purposes. In this case

the balloon w i l l s i r & slowly from i t s ceXling (where f u l l buoyancy j u s t

equals t h e load) t o t h e level where the e.utomtic b a l l a s t valve drops

b a l l a s t a t a r a t e equal t o the diffusion (the f l o o r ) . I t w i l l be noted

t h a t a flighk which i s controlled i n this manner is l e s s wasteful of

b a l l a s t and r e s u l t s i n a correspondingly longer f l i g h t . 1he "floor"

determined by this valve varies diurnally a s tb temperature (hence pressure)

of the a i r entrapped i n t h e diaphragn i s affected by s o l a r radiation. 'I%s

amplitude of t h i s diurnal o s c i l l a t i o n may be as much a s 6000 f e e t , the night

level being higher than the day level.

- 9 -
 To reduce t h e e f f e c t of varying f l u i d heads and a correspcmding
v a r i a t i o n i n valve c a l i b r a t i o n , a b a l l a s t reservoir mounting was devised

t o l i m i t the head values. This b a l l a s t reservoir, a f t e r several modifica-

tions, consists of a spun aluminum tank w i t h f i l t e r , mounted on 18-inch

legs. It i s shown i n Figure 15. The l e g s serve a s supports for the o t h e r

control u n i t s and a head of a t least one f o o t i s provided by tubing t o the

1 1
automatic b a l l a s t valve. lhe capacity of t h e reservoir i s approximately

f i v e gallons. Figures 16 and 17 show t h e complete b a l l a s t releaee assembly.

Che other system of a l t i t u d e control may be mentioned. This i s t h e

method used by Korff and others4 t o roughly approximate constant l e v e l

flights f o r cosmic r a y investi8ations. A numberd meteorological balloons

are i n f l a t e d u n t i l they fill j u s t support the f l i g h t load. A few other balloons

a r e added t o the t r a i n t o give a f r e e lift appropriate f o r t h e d e s i r e d r a t e

of r i s e (see Computations, Section 3). A t some time a f t e r r e l e a s e these

"lifter" balloons b u r s t due t o over-inflaticm, or a r e released by a pressure

or time-activated mechanism. If t h e o r i g i n a l balance was c o r r e c t , and the

e f f e c t s of superheat and d i f f u s i o n canoe1 each other, t h e d u s t e r of c e l l s

may f l o a t . when one or more of the balloons breaks, or leaks excessively,

t h e t r a i n w i l l descend. Although this method was used i n e a r l y e x p e r i m n t a l

f l i g h t s it proved t o be useful only a s 8 stop-gap method of carrying gear

a l o f t f o r t e s t purposes. No modification of t h i s basic technique seems l i k e l y

t o produce even a consistant f l i g h t p a t t e r n due t o the uncertainty of properties

and behavior of these inherently unstable balloons.

C. Altitude Determination

In order t o evaluate t h e performance of t h e basic control

apparatus, an investigation of pressure-measuring e q E i p e n t and telemetering

gear has been made. T124 problems of measuring upper-air conditions i n general
VENT-

BALLAST RESERVOIR

FIG. 15
 RIGGING
LINE

MINIM
PRESSURE

BALLAST RELEASE ASSEMBLY

FIG. 16
my d i f f e r markedly from t h e problems of surface measurement. For example;
f o r any instrumemt used on a f l o a t i n g balloon, some consideration must be

given t o the e f f e c t of s o l a r r a d i a t i o n on i t s behavior. As mentioned i n

the discussion of the automatic b a l l a s t valve, this e f f e c t i s e s p e c i a l l y

important i n the a c t i o n of any aneroid or other capsule which i s not com-

p l e t e l y temperature compensated . Since the f l o a t i n g balloon w i l l remain

within one parcel of a i r , r i s i n g and f a l l i n g and moving sidewise a s the

a i r does, temperature extremes w i l l r e s u l t from r a d i a t i o n e f f e c t s and lack

9
of ventilation. W e investigator has estimated t h a t the temperatures t o

be experienced by such a body range from -6OOC a f t e r a night of radiation

t o a maximum of &O°C in d i r e c t sunlight. Two ways of p a r t i a l l y circum-

venting the undesirable r e s u l t s of t h i s f e a t u r e are:

1. Temperature compensation of t h e pressure capsule f o r some pre-set

5
pressure. %is canpensation i s only complete a t one pressure.

2. A second method of reducing i n s o l a t i o n e f f e c t s i s t h e use of

highly r e f l e c t i v e shields.

The melhods of height detsrmination used so f a r a r e not completely

satisfactory. Pressure-heights have been obtained by 72 mc. and 397 mc.

radiosonde transmitters with long-life b a t t e r y packs. D i f f i c u l t i e s have

been experienced i n a l l long f l i g h t s due t o :

1. Signals being l o s t due t o excessive range or t o power f a i l u r e .

2. Vhen t h e balloon begins t o f l o a t and height o s c i l l a t i o n s r e s u l t

from the action of t h e automatic b a l l a s t valve, it i s impossible

t o i d e n t i f y t h e radiosonde contact (hence t h e pressure) using the

conventional b a r o m i t c h of the Diamond-Hinman type radiosonde.

These steps are now being taken t o improve height measurements:

1, The addition t o the S l i g h t ttah o f a light-weight barograph,

 This could provide up t o 40 hours of pressure-time data i f

recovered. A t present, about 60 percent of the f l i g h t s have

been recovered.

2. The adoption of a time-interval or Olland-cycle radiosonde

system f o r telemetering pressure data.

3. Expansion of the network of ground tracking s t a t i o n s equipped

with SCR-658 d i r e c t i o n finding sets t o increase reception of

data telemetered. Figure 18 shows the area t o t h e e a s t of

Alamogordo, New b x i c o , and t h e probable boundaries of f l i g h t

path6 following release from t h e Alamogordo Army A i r Base.

Table I11 shows t h e prevailing wind data on which these probable

boundaries are based. Also shown i n Figure 18 are the desirable

l o c a t i o n s f o r SCR-658 s e t s and the overlap of reception ranges

which could be expected, using s t a t i o n s a t Alamogordo, Roswell,

New Mexico; Hobbs, E.b?ex; and Big Springs, Texas.

TABLE 1x1

AVERbGE WIND INTENSITIES IN BFAUFORT SCAU

AND 1 IM> DIHECTIOItS AT ELEVATIONS TO 10,000
METERS FOR KOVENBER AND, DECEMBER 1944 AND 1945

NOVEMBER

-
Year Surface 1,500 M 3,000 bl 5,000 !b

E l Paso 1944 M-3 NE-1 Visv-5 w-7

1945 musw-a wa\--
Roswell 1944
N-3
S-1 m-l w-4
5
--
w-7
1945 S-3 Wi-1 WNW-5 w-7
Albuquerque 1944 SE-3 -- w -3 W-6
1945
1944
N-3
SSW-4
--
w-4
WNW-5
wsvi-5
W-8
N-7
Amar i l l 0
1945 W-4 m--
4 W-6 IW-9
Big Spring 1944 --
--
wsv-4 v w- 4 vi-7

Abilene
1945
1944 --
m-3
--
W-6
--
wr%-7
--
--
--
-0 I-

1945

- -
12
 DECEMBER

-
Year Surface 1,500 M 3,000 M 5,000 M 10,000 M

E l Paso 1944 N-3 NNE-1 w-2 NW-1

1945 NNE-3 w-3 mJ110-6 W"J-6
s-1
Rome11 1944
1945 SSE-3
hW-3
m-2
m-4
WNW-5
"i-6
WNBY-8 --
Albuquerque 1944 N-3 wNw-4 WETW6- w-10
1945 N-3 -0
NW-6 m-a WNW-9
Amarillo 1944 Nw-4 Nw-4 7"-6 WNW-6 OPNW-8
1945 m-3 w-2 m-5 PJNW-9
Big Spring 1944 -.I
Nw-4 "-5 WJW-6
1945 wsw-3 W-6 m - 7

D. Trackine: Devices: Horizontal

The f l i g h t s made i n the e a r l y part of t h i s program w e r e tracked

o p t i c a l l y with theodolites. Coupled with the height data, theodolite

readings provide a f a i r l y r e l i a b l e horizontal locus of t h e balloon. However,

even i n t h e c l e a r a i r of New %xico, t h i s method i s useful f o r not more than

100 miles and, unless accurate height data a r e available, theodolite s t a t i o n s

provide useful data f o r not mbre than 40 miles.

A i r c r a f t o b s e m t i o n s have been used with some success when the c e i l i n g

of the balloon i s not t o o great. It is expected t h a t an inverted AN/AR-13

radar, mounted atop a B-17, w i l l g r e a t l y augment t h e horizontal tracking

and w i l l be of some value i n determbing height.

The most useful equipment f o r determining horizontal movement of t h e

balloons has been t h e SCR-658 radio direotion finding set. Long a f t e r the

v e r t i c a l angles registered by t h i s gear are questionable (due t o r e f l e c t i o n s

off intervening t e r r a i n ) , the horizontal angles a r e useable. Used in s e t s

of two or more, o r coupled with height data, f k e s e observations give good

positianr with distances up t o 150 miles. Mgure 18 shows the ccmerage a

network of four of these s e t s would prcmide. In contrast t o t h e theodolites

and a i r c r a f t observations, these instruments are p e r f e c t l y operative when

- 13 -
t h e balloon i s not v i s i b l e due t o haze, cloud cover, etc. Ground radar

has been used, .rrhen available, w i t h f a i r r e s u l t s , p a r t i c u l a r l y when radar

t a r g e t s are added t o the f l i g h t t r a i n .

E. F l i g h t Termination Control

Due t o the size and weight of the balloons and t h e f l i g h t gear,

t h e C i v i l Aeronautics Authority w a s advised o f t he t e s t i n g program. At a

meeting i n New York an 20 March 1947, t h e M e w York A i r Space Sub-Cormnittee

prescribed a procedure which w a s designed t o minimize the hazard t o a i r

traffic. Similarly, the Fort north Sub-Cammittde established a procedure

f o r f l i g h t s made within tfie Fort korth Kegion of t h e CAB. Pertinent cor-

respondence with t h e CM is included i n t h e Appendix, P a r t 2. Owing t o

the s l z e of these c e l l s , a very slow r a t e of descent should be expected

a f t e r a l l b a l l a s t has been expended and the f l i g h t control devices have

ceased t o operate. Thus a l a r g e balloon and several heavy pieces of

equipment might take a n hour o r more t o descend through the l e v e l s of

a i r travel. Despite t h e extreme improbability of midair c o l l i s i o n , it i s

obviously desirable t o take a l l possible precautions against such mishap

and current f l i g h t s have t h e following safeguards: (1) F l i g h t s a r e released

on days when cloud c m e r i s forecast to be l i g h t , thus permitting v i s u a l

contact. ( 2 ) Notices t o airmen are t o be issued i f the balloon i s descending

within designated regions of dense a i r t r a f f i c . ( 3 ) To reduce t h e t i m e

involved in a f i n a l descent, a special device called the "blowout patch"

has beenctleveloped. This i s an i g n i t i n g squib which i s fastened t o t h e

side of t h e c e l l , on t h e equator. Sealed in with t h e squib, which i s f i r e d

e l e c t r i c a l l y when t h e c e l l descends below 20,000 feet, i s a quantity of

gunpowder and magnesium. When t h e squib is f i r e d , the incendiary patch

blows out, allowing a rapid escape of gas through the opening. Since t h e

- 14 -
patch is on the equator, the c e l l does not collapse but serves a s a

parachute t o prevent extremely rapid f a l l and damage t o the instruments.

Figure 3 s h m s this patch i n position on a balloon. Due t o p r e m t u r e

f i r i n g s , a t i m e switch hes been b u i l t i n t o t h e c i r c u i t t o prevent misfiring

in launching. A r i p device w i l l be developed t o replace the incendiary on

a l l future flights.

Section 3 . 'Iheoretioal Relationships and Computations

A. A 1t itude-Density Relationships

An investigation i n t o t h e relationship between d e n s i t y o f t h e

atmosphere and a l t i t u d e , with the seasonal and geographical variations

experienced,was made. ' b e basic data, mean aerological soundings, were

taken from the Konthly Weather Review, 19436 . 'Ihese basic data consisted

of observed temperatures, pressures, and humidities f o r a l t i t u d e s from t h e

surface up t o the bursting height of balloons, normally 50,000 t o 60,000

feet. For a l t i t u d e above t h i s height, the highest. reported temperatures

f o r the s t a t i o n s under consideration were used and the pressure data were

taken f o r the remaining a l t i t u d e s up t o 100,000 f e e t , from the E.A.C.A.

Standard Atmosphere
7
.
Density was expressed inversely i n terms of pound molar volumes,

a s t h i s r e l a t e s volume i n cubic f e e t t o buoyancies of gases of varying

purity, using fundamental data. Using t h e simple gas laws, the molar

volume o f dry a i r a t each a l t i t u d e was computed i n t h e following manner:

Given: (1) The pound m o l a r volume of any gas a t standard

conditionsS559 f t . 3

- 15 -
 ( 2 ) From the mean sounding data a t 49,200 f t . (15 km.)

m e r Lakehurst, N.J. (Jan; 1943).

Temperature =-59,5OC .
Pressure = 120 mb.
Temperature Pressure
Molar volUrmf3 X (observed) x ( standard)
(standard) Temperature Pre ssure
(standard) (observed)

= Molar volume a t observed conditions.

359 273.2 0 59.5 x l(XLE.3 2370 rt,3
273.2

This i s the mean pound molar volume a t 15 km f o r Jan. 1943 over

Lakehurst, N. J. This volume data was computed f o r l e v e l s up t o 100,000

f t . over several s t a t i o n s and m y be found i n Appendix 3, plotted on the

l e f t hand side of f i g u r e s 19 and 20.

B. Load-Diameter Maximum Altitude RelationshiDs

Molar volume is r e l a t e d t o buoyanoy i n the following fashion.

Using 98% hydrogen of molecular weight, 2L11 lb./mol. and d r y a i r of

moleoular weight 28.76 lb./mol., a buoyancy equal t o the difference,

26.65 lb/mol. (See Table IV) i s available whenever one pound molecular
weight of hydrogen displaces one pound molecular weight of dry a i r under

the same conditions o f temperature and pressure.

Buoyancy per Pound-Idol .

Helium (98%) 24.6 #/=#mol , o r
11.1 kg/#mol

Hydrogen ( 9 % ) 26.€#/#mol, 01'

1 2 b 1 kg/#mol

- 16. -
 The number of mOl8 in a balloon volume may be r e a d i l y computed

by dividing the a i r density, expressed i n molar volume, a t a given

a l t i t u d e i n t o t h e balloon volume. %hel i f t of t h e gas f i l l i n g the

balloon a t any a l t i t u d e i s then equal t o t h e number of mols multiplied

by t h e buoyancy per mol. For example: To f i n d the l i f t of t h e gas i n

a completely i n f l a t e d (hydrogen f i l l e d ) balloon of 20-foot diameter,

a t an a l t i t u d e where the pound molar volume i s 1000 f t O 3(This i s equivalent

t o about 30,000 f t . ) :

Volume of a 20-foot diameter sphere = 4190 ft3 .

Number of mols in sphere a t this a l t i t u d e I
-
4190 t 4.19 mole

-
1000

Buoyancy I 4.19 mols x 26.65 #buoyancy/mol 111.7 # l i f t given by

the gas a t 30,000 f e e t .

In one step, t h i s becomes:

Gross L i f t b a l l o o n D (Balloon Volume) x (Difference i n molecular weights - of

a i r and l i f t i n g gas)
Molar Volume a t a given a l t i t u d e

Conversely, the maximum a l t i t u d e t o which a given size balloon w i l l

c a r r y i t s e l f a n d a specified load can be determined, a s a molar volume, which

may be evaluated frm. a graph of a l t i t u d e versus molar volume. Such graphs,

computed a s i n Part A of t h i s Section, a r e given i n Figures 1 9 and 20, a t

the l e f t hand edge.

Hydrogen and helium l i f t s were computed f o r various molar volumes

f o r spheres o f l i f t i n g gas with diameters from 7.5 t o 75 f e e t . Figures 1 9

and 20 were plotted using t h e values computed. To use these f i g u r e s t o

determine the maximum a l t i t u d e of a lballoon with a specified pay load, enter

the t a b l e with required buoyancy (balloon weight plus payload). Go v e r t i c a l l y

t o the diagonal l i n e representing t h e balloon's size, and then read horizontally

on t h e l e f t hand edge, either the molar volume or t h e equivalent a l t i t u d e aver

- 17 -
-I
sample s t a t i o n s . Figure 21 shows the calculated n e t l i f t of t h e General

K i l l s balloons.

C. Balloon Diameter-Weight %lationships

To f a c i l i t a t e design discussions, c h a r t s have been drawn up

r e l a t i n g t h e approximate weight of a balloon t o i t s s i z e and the u n i t

weight of t h e balloon f a b r i c . A t e n percent increase i s added t o the

weight over t h a t determined from the surface area t o account f o r seams

and shroud l i n e s . Figures 22 and 23 a r e these Charts.

D. Bate of Rise

It i s important t h a t the rate of rise of a balloon be n e i t h e r

t o o f a s t nor t o o slow. For example, i f a General h i l l s ' 20-foot balloon

r i s e s f a s t e r than 900 f e e t per minute, there i s danger o f rupturing t h e

balloon when pressure a l t i t u d e i s reached. On the other hand, i f r a t e s

of rase under 400 f e e t per minute a r e chosen, since t h e f r e e l i f t w i l l

be q u i t e low, there i s danger of: 1 ) a slight error i n i n f l a t i o n r e s u l t i n g

i n the balloon's being unable t o lift t h e equipment, or 2) with a wind much

i n excass of the r a t e of r i s e , t h e up-wind release f a i l i n g due t o the

dragging of t h e equipment p r i o r t o i t s being l i f t e d by the balloon.

To compute t h e f r e e l i f t neoessary f o r a given r a t e of r i s e , t h e

4
equation developed by Korff i s used. This equation i s :

where F L f r e e l i f t i n grams

V z r a t e of r i s e i n f e e t per minute

G z gross lift i n grams

For our purposes, we w i s h t o f i n d F and have modified t h e equation

t o reads
- 18 -
 =

where G
(A)
I
(0 ) '
gross l o a d
(Approximate)

A c h a r t , Figure 24, has beendrawn up, based on t h i s equation, expressing free

l i f t a s a peroentage of g r o s s load, allowing t h e r a t e of r i s e t o be approximately

predetermined .
E . Ballast Requirement s

The amount of b a l l a a t which must be dropped through the m n u a l

b a l l a s t valve t o keep the balloon a t i t a c e i l i n g , can be approximately

determined by t h e following measurements: a b a l l o o n of similar s i z e and

c o n s t r u c t i o n i s i n f l a t e d and i t s l o s s of l i f t with t i m e is measured w i t h

c o r r e c t i o n f o r v a r i a t i o n of temperature. "his i n f l a t i o n i s n o t complete,

b u t i s of the same magnitude a s t h a t of a b a l l o o n ready f o r r e l e a s e ,

approximately 14% of f u l l i n f l a t i o n i n t h e case of a Gmeral Mills balloon.

The l o s s of l i f t per hour, m u l t i p l i e d b y a f a c t o r representing t h e i n c r e a s e

of t h e s u r f a c e which r e s u l t s from t o t a l i n f l a t i o n , i s t h u s obtained. This

f a c t o r i s the r e c i p r o c a l of t h e f r a c t i o n of i n f l a t i o n r a i s e d t o t h e two-thirds

power f o r a s p h e r i c a l balloon, and i s appraximately t h e same f o r the tear-drop

shaped General M i l l s balloons.

F i e l d experience h a s shown t h a t b a l l a s t l e a k pre-set t o s l i g h t l y exceed

t h e computed l o s s of lift i s i n s u f f i c i e n t . A b a l l a s t l e a k of double the

computed l o s s of l i f t h a s u s u a l l y been adequate. I t i s b e l i e v e d t h a t increased

l i q u i d v i s c o s i t y and valve c l o s u r e caused by the 'colder temperatures of the

high atnosphere are responsible f o r t h e need f o r t h i s higher b a l l a s t s e t t i n g .

An i n v e s t i g a t i o n i n t o temperature e f f e c t s on the b a l l a s t release systems has

been started.

Ihe amount of b a l l a s t which must be r e l e a s e d e t sunset t o compensate

f o r t h e l o s s of superheat, may be computed a s f o l l u w r ;

- 19 -
 AGI G x A 2x (1 + K) K
T
where AG t loss of lift

G D gross load (balloon weight p l u s

equipment l o a d )

AT mean temperature d i f f e r e n c e i n
l i f t i n g gas b e f o r e and a f t e r sunset

T P free a i r temperature

K = s p e c i f i c g r a v i t y of l i f t i n g gas,

relative t o air

The s p e c i f i c g r a v i t y of 9% helium, d i l u t e d w i t h a i r , and w i t h

r e s p e c t t o a i r , i s 0.157. I t may b e noted t h a t with a lower s p e c i f i c

g r a v i t y of a gas, lower b a l l a s t c o r r e c t i o n s are required. Hydrogen, f o r

example, r e q u i r e s half the b a l l a s t which helium r e q u i r e s f o r the same

temperature d i f f e r e n t i a l . A t high a l t i t u d e s , a d i f f e r e n c e of 4OoC may

be expected i n the temperature o f the l i f t i n g helium from day t o night.

This would correspond t o a l o s s of lift a t sunset, on a General Mills 20-

foot balloon, of about 550 grams.

F. I n t e r n a l Pressure

The maximum i n t e r n a l pressure which can be held w i t h i n a

s p h e r i c a l c o n t a i n e r i s given by Timoshenko8 :

P t =u x t
r
where Su i s t h e u l t i m a t e s t r e n g t h of t h e m a t e r i a l

i n tension, t i s thickness of t h e m a t e r i a l and r i s t h e r a d i u s of the s p h e r i c a l

shape. Applying t h i s equation t o a polyethylene f i l m , such a s used i n t h e

General b l i l l s 20-foot b a l l o o n s , Su a t room temperature = 1900 psi., t = 0.001",

and r = 10 ft., giving t h e maximum pressure, P s 0.032 p s i . This pressure is'

equivalent t o about 1.1 inches of water, or 2.5 mb. This small b u r s t i n g pres-

sure n e c e s s i t a t e s proper i n f l a t i o n and load values t o prevent t h e balloon's

- - 20
bursting a t pressure a l t i t u d e .

A s e r i e s of forms which have been used t o f a c i l i t a t e computations

have been d r a m up. ‘hey are included i n Appendix 3, together w i t h a t a b l e

of a l t i t u d e s based on the N.A.C.A. Standard Atmosphere‘, and other useful

reference t a b l e 8 .

WLE V
Glossary

Equipment load: Weight of a l l equipment, rigging, and b a l l a s t hung from

the balloon shrouds not including balloon or i t s i n t e g r a l

parts.

Gross load: Load on the gas a t release (Balloon plus equipment load weight).

Free l i f t : Net l i f t of t h e balloon with the equipment load attached.

Gross lift: L i f t of a l l of t h e gas i n t h e balloon a t release (Equals weight

of the balloon, equipment load plus t h e f r e e l i f t ) .

Balloon i n f l a t i o n : Gas i n f l a t i o n t o be given the balloon i n terms of

i n i t i a l l i f t of the balloon (equals weight of equip-

ment load plus f r e e l i f t plus allowance f o r gas

losses before launching).

Floor: The locus of a l t i t u d e s a t which a balloon w i l l f l o a t when l i f t

losses are exactly compenscrted f o r on a demand b a s i s by b a l l a s t

dropping. In practice, t h i s i s determined b y t h e operation of

t h e automatic b a l l a s t release and i s some a l t i t u d e below t h e oeiling.

Ceiling: “he locus of pressure a l t i t u d e s a t which a non-extensible balloon

w i l l f l o a t when gas losses a r e s l i g h t l y over-compensated f o r by

b a l l a s t losses.

Pressure Altitude: Ihe a l t i t u d e a t which a non-extensible balloon becomes

f u l l y inflated.

- 21 -
Pressure Height: The height above mean sea l e v e l a s determined froea

pressure measurements used i n t h i s work with the

N.A.C.A. Standard Atmosphere.

Section 4. n i g h t Techniques

The general techniques of preparing and launching controlled a l t i t u d e

balloons are patterned a f t e r those of the smaller radiosonde balloons. The

treatment of large, manned balloons has been studied, however, and information

of considerable value has been gleaned; a s from t h e Rational Geographic Sooiet;y

11,12
reports of t h e f l i g h t s of Explorer I and Explorer I1 , and from the book
13, 14,
by Upson and Chandler”. Fran these and o t h e r studies and f r m o r i g i n a l

experimentation with General M i l l s advice, a s a t i s f a c t o r y technique of handling

controlled-altitude balloons has been developed.

A. Inflation

The l i f t i n g gas used for these large balloons has been helium.

The choice of gas w a s made on s a f e t y considerations. Hydrogen, however,

has several advantages over telium. It w i l l l i f t 9$ more than helium and,

due t o i t s lower s p e c i f i c gravity, requires b u t 5Oyo of t h e b a l l a s t release

t h a t helium r e q u i r e s t o correot f o r disappearance of superheat a t sunset.

H e l i u m , on t h e other hand, leaks and d i f f u s e s a t a r a t e b u t 7% t h a t of

hydrogen. However, f o r long f l i g h t s , hydrogen would probably have more

over-all economy of b a l l a s t .

I n f l a t i o n has been made through a law-pressure, diffusing manifold,

feeding from a nmber of helium tanks simultaneously t o t h e balloon. The

smaller balloons h8.m been i n f l a t e d inside a,hangar, permitting very exact

weigh-off of the balloon’s f r e e l i f t , thus predetermining t h e r a t e of rise

f a i r l y well. The p l a s t i c balloons l a r g e r than 15 f e e t i n diameter have

generally been i n f l a t e d out-of-doors, a8 no hangar large enough for interior

- -22
 M l a t i o n has been available,

The 20-foot General Mills balloons are i n f l a t e d through a tube

i n suah a fashion t h a t the gas c o l l e c t s i n a bubble a t the t o p of the

balloon. Ihe tube is inserted by the manufacturer and i s shown i n Figure 5 .

If this bubble i s r e s t r i c t e d , the wind cannot catch and make a s a i l of it.

(See figure % f o r t h e r a i l e f f e c t . ) The actual technique of i n f l a t i o n i s a s

follows I

In actual i n f l a t i o n t h e balloon i s spread out on a ground c l o t h

which c w e r s the launohing t a b l e and a balanoe. The balloon is

arranged so the upper 18 f e e t projeots beyond the balance. Two

heavy (80#) e l l i p t i c a l shot bags {see i i g u r e 26) a r e covered w i t h

polyethylene and plaaed on top of the balloon on e i t h e r side of the

i n f l a t i o n tube. The platform is then made t o balance. The l m r

end of the balloon i s weighed and t b n stretched out again d o n wind,

held down with sand bags and polyethylene s t r i p s . A weight equal t o

the weight of t h e lawer half of the balloon, plus the equipment weight

and the desired free l i f t i s placed on the balance. Inflation i s

s t a r t e d , taking care t o get a l l twists out of the i n f l a t i o n tube

before allowing f u l l gas flow. When t h e balance beam f a l l s , in-

f l a t i o n i s complete (care must be exercised t o guard against under-

i n f l a t i o n due t o wind moving t h e balloon on the balance). The in-

f l a t i a n tube is c a r e f u l l y removed, and the helium truck i s moved c l e a r .

A l l personnel are now positioned f o r release.

B. Release

During the e a r l y portion of the experiniental period, f l i g h t s of

meteorological balloons i n c l u s t e r s were launched. The f i r s t f l i g h t s were

made with balloons hitched one above another along a single strong load line.
 I

Figure 25
General Mills 20 f o o t b a l l o o n
b i l l o w i n g in a five k n o t wind.
c
#
co0
- n
4
a 5
$2

. 0

J
W
With these and subsequent rigging l i n e s the following technique was used:

on a l l l i n e s a strength t e s t was made and a s a f e t y f a c t o r of a t l e a s t t e n

t o one was demanded. Most of t h e l i n e s used are of braided o r woven nylon,

ohosen f o r i t s l o w weight-strength r a t i o . To f a c i l i t a t e handling of tfie

l i n e s e p e n t s each length i s prepared with a small hook on e i t h e r end. The

knots employed are double c a r r i o k bends.

The t o t a l length of the e a r l y t r a i n s reached as much as e i g h t hundred

feet, making them extremely d i f f i c u l t t o release. A system of r e s t r a i n i n g

t h e load l i n e was evolved with two winches paying out r e s t r a i n i n g l i n e s

while balloons and equipment were added t o the load l i n e . In t h i s way t h e

p u l l of t h e balloons themselves and t h e much g r e a t e r s t r a i n caused by even

l i g h t winds was held by winches. When the f i n a l piece of equipment was

c l e a r of t h e ground (wwhen the entire f l i g h t l i n e was under tension with

t h e lowest element being held back) a gunpowder squib was e l e c t r i c a l l y f i r e d

t o sever the r e s t r a i n i n g l i n e s near the bottom of t h e balloon. Figure 27

shows t h e aluminum "cannon" holding t h e gunpowder, the two winch l i n e s and

a l i g h t l i n e used t o p u l l the r e s t r a i n i n g l i n e s away from t h e load l i n e a f t e r

firing. The load l i n e has not yet been attaohed i n Figure 27, but w i l l be

fixed j u s t above t h e "cannonn.

When t h e r e s t r a i n i n g l i n e i s severed, there i s danger of a pendulm

swing of t h e t r a i n causing the l m r components t o be dashed i n t o t h e ground.

To avoid t h i s action, the lowest piece of equipment i s usually held by a

member of t h e crew on t h e back of a truck. By driving downwind f a s t e r than

t h e surfacu wind speed, t h e p u l l of t h e balloon can be reeolved i n t o only a

v e r t i c a l component and t h e equipnent may be s a f e l y released when the truck

g e t s under the balloon.

W i t h l a t e r p l a s t i c c e l l f l i g h t s , t h i s method of launching was a l s o

used i n cases of l i g h t wind. Ithen wind6 o f about 5 knots are endowntered,

- 24 ..
 Figure 27
Aluminum "cannon" and launching
l i n e s used t o r e s t r a i n balloon while
load i s being a t t a c h e d .
the t o t a l rtrain on rigging lines and even on t h e balloon i t s e l f becomes

exeet~sive. With the t h i n polyethylene f i l m of .the General Mills' balloons,

sueh a wind foroe oauses the balloon f i r s t t o billow, s a i l - l i k e , a s i h Figure

25, then t o tear.

To eliminate surfaoe f a i l u r e s on days when the wind i s not calm, t h e

following release teehnique is employed: The e q u i p m e n t t r a i n i s l a i d out

p a r a l l e l t o the wind direction, with the balloon i n t h e lee of a l a r g e build-

ing and the other components stretched out downwind. The c e n t r a l portion of

the balloon rests on a platform balance and t h e lower portion r e s t s on a

sloping e l e v e w f o o t t a b l e whose t o p i s l e v e l w i t h ths platform and whose

bottom r e s t s upon t h e ground. The upper portion of the balloon usually

l i e s on another t a b l e , l e v e l with t h e platform. Except f o r t h i s upper

portion, t h e balloon i s held down on .the s e a l e s and sloping t a b l e by bags

of sand and lead shot. In addition, one sand bag i s fastened t o the lead

thimble of the balloon by a short line which i s kept eaut during i n f l a t i o n .

This layout i s shown i n Figure 28.

When t h e balloon i s i n f l a t e d , it i s held downat t h e weighing-off

scales by the s h o t bags. Personnel requirea f o r t h e launching consist of two

men a t the hold-down shot bags (who l i f t t h e bags a t t h e release signal), ond

man near the l a r g e sand bag (who c u t s t h e l i n e t o the load thimble when the

balloon r i s e s above him), one man a t each piece o f s e n s i t i v e equipment on t h e

t r a i n ( t o support and protect the e q u i p e n t u n t i l it i s airborne), one man

a t t h e lower end of the hold down line (who f i r e s the oannon severing t h e

l a s t l i n e wher, t h e gear i s a l l s a f e l y l i f t e d ) .

If each operation is performed *en t h e balloon i s d i r e c t l y overhead

and i f t h e t r a i n has been accurately l a i d out downwind, t h e e n t i r e t r a i n is

sent o f f w i t h a minimum of o s c i l l a t i o n of t h e load. Figure 2 9 shaws successive

positions of the balloon and gear during release.

- 25 -
\
 ! h i s method of release is 8 development of t h e upwind release used in

radiosonde f l i g h t s i n the U.S. Weather Bureau, with refinements f i r s t used

by General K i l l s Aeronautical &search Laboratories and necessitated by the

l a r g e r balloon s i z e and the number of ccnnponents on each f l i g h t .

Using t h i s method, successful releases were made a t klamogordo i n

winds o f 20 miles per hour with gusts up t o 30 miles per how.

c. Rscmery

Muoh additional information on the behavior o f t h e t r a i n oompanents

can be gained i f they a r e recovered. Two methods of recoveryare einployedr

1) reward t a g s and 2 ) recuvery by the balloon crew tracking the f l i g h t .

Reward tags attached t o several componerts have encouraged the finders

t o protect t h e equipment and report it6 location. lIhe tag and associated

questionnaire are included i n Appendix 3. Total recovery of f l i g h t s t o date

is about 60$ of those released.

when t h e location of the balloon i s h u w n by visual observation from

an airplane, or t h e landing area is indiuated by direc.tion-Pinding gear,

recovery is attempted by truck by t h e ballooncrew or the crew a t one of the

downwind stations. Several successful recoveries have been made of f l i g h t s

of r e l a t i v e l y short range. It was found i n e a r l i e r attempts that t h e balloan

equipment was e d i f f i c u l t t a r g e t both i n the a i r and on t h e ground. Con-

sequently a colored cheesecloth banner ( 6 by 12 f t . , stiffened top and bottom)

was added t o the t r a i n . It a l s o i s a convenient marker for theodolite stadia

measurements. A banner may be seen i n Figure 30.0 White banners seem t o be

the most gene r a l l y useful.

Section 5. Flight Sunnoary

A sununary of pertinent information on all f l i g h t s made t o date i s

included in Appendix 1 as table VII. Also shown bhere are flight t r a i n

- 26.-
 Figure 30
General Mills 20 f o o t b a l l o o n
in f l i g h t , showing banner a n d o t h e r
f l i g h t t r a i n components.
diagrams, time-height curves, t r a j e c t o r i e s and photographs of signi-

f i o a n t f l i g h t s , grouped by f l i g h t numbers. The f l i g h t numbering system

ha6 been revised since i t s inception and now only those f l i g h t s i n which

an attempt was made t o control t h e a l t i t u d e o f t h e balloon are inoluded

i n the suimnary. Excluded are f l i g h t s made t o test speoial gear and

launahings which were n o t successful.

F l i g h t s A, B, 1, 5, 6 and 7 a l l made use of meteorological balloons

i n various arrangements and oombinations. Each f l i g h t included one or

more " l i f t i n g balloons" which were t o be released from t h e t r a i n when

the desired a l t i t u d e was reached, t h e other balloons then t h e o r e t i c a l l y

supporting the load a t the constant a l t i t u d e .

Figures 31 and 36 show the tw methods used t o group t h e balloons

i n clusters. Figure 31 shows the linear a r r a y borrowed from o o m i c ray

flight techniques; f i g u r e 36 shows t h e modified "Helios Cluster" i n v h i c h

l i n e s from the balloons a r e joined a t a c e n t r a l r i n g a t t h e top of ths

load line.

The Helios c l u s t e r was by f a r t h e easier t o handle because of t h e

eimpler rigging ar,d the reduced launching s t r a i n s .

P l i g h t 7 was the only one of this group i n which anything approach-

ing a o o n t r o l b d a l t i t u d e was attained. !be previous f l i g h t s f a i l e d t o

l e v e l off when t h e l i f t i n g balloons broke loose. In flights 1, 5 alld 6,

where b a l l a s t dropping devfces were included, t h e b a l l a s t e i t h e r did not

drop, o r the dropping did not.have the desired effect. In f l i g h t 7,

however, t h e c l u s t e r rose till the l i f t e r s were cut o f f , descended u n t i l

sufficient b a l l a s t was dropped t o cause the c l u s t e r t o r i s e t o a s t i l l

higher a l t i t u d e . There several balloons burst, r e s u l t i n g i n a f i n a l

descent, The time-height curve f o r t h i s flight i s shown as figure 38.

- 27 -
 lhis f l i g h t pattern represents the b e s t approximation t o constant

l e v e l f l i g h t t h a t we have obtained with meteorological c l u s t e r s .

F l i g h t s 8 and 11 each employed more than one polyethylene balloon

in an attempt t o reach higher a l t i t u d e than possible with t h e single

balloons then available. Figure 39, 40, 41, 44 and 45 s h m t h e type

and arrangement of balloons and t h e i r f l i g h t behavior. In both f l i g h t s ,

the maximun a l t i t u d e was not high enough t o cause a c t i v a t i o n of the

a u t m t i o b a l l a s t valve. Consequently, there was rro compensation f o r

diffusion other than the steady leakage of b a l l a s t through the imperfect

seating of the valve. In f l i g h t 8 , a f t e r one hour, t h i s leak was not

sufficient t o maintain a constant a l t i t u d e , so the f l i g h t terminated.

However, i n f l i g h t 11, constant a l t i t u d e lvas maintained a t 16,000 f t .

-+ 1500 f e e t f o r 7 hours u n t i l a l l of the b a l l a s t was expended.

Flight 10, i n contrast t o f l i g h t s 8 and 11, d i d reach an a l t i t u d e

a t which the automatic b a l l a s t control was actuated, r e s u l t i n g i n a

f l i g h t of perhaps more than 26 hours. Althou& the maximum a l t i t u d e

reached by t h i s heavy spherical c e l l was 15,000 f e e t , the b a l l a s t control

was e f f e c t i v e a t a level of 5000 f e e t . The expected difference between

a c t i v a t i o n l e v e l and operation l e v e l was probably exceeded because of the

temperature e f f e c t of the a i r entrapped i n t h e pressure capsule.

Figure 42 shows t h e t r a i n , and figure 43 shows the time-altitude

curve f o r the 512 minutes of radiosonde data.

The o s c i l l a t i o n s around 9000 f e e t during t h e l a s t t w o hours of

data may be a t t r i b u t e d t o the changing buoyancy of t h e balloon a s cloud

masses i n t e r m i t t e n t l y shielded it from the sun's rays. An unconfirmed

report was received t o the e f f e c t t h a t t h i s balloon was s t i l l f l o a t i n g

26 hours l a t e r over Pueblo, Colorado.

 Flight 1 2 was designed t o overcane t h e d i f f i c u l t i e s enoountered

i n f l i g h t s 8 and 11, and, by the use of a t h i n tear-drop balloon (General

l f i l l s balloon) t o c a m the load t o a higher a l t i t u d e than f l i g h t 10.

To guarantee a predetermined constant b a l l a s t flow, the mnual b a l l a s t

valve was added t o the f l i g h t t r a i n . The minimum pressure d t o h

replaced the fixed pressure switch t o a c t i v a t e t h e alltomatic b a l l a s t

valve, whether o r not a predetermined aotivation a l t i t u d e was reached.

Figure 46 shows the t r a i n ; figure 47 shows the time-altitude curve, vhich

exhibits a marked departure from the ideal. The minimum pressure m i t o h

f a i l e d t o operate o r operated near surface pressure, e f f e c t i v e l y preventing

the operation of the automatic b a l l a s t valve. The manual b a l l a s t valve did

not provide s u f f i c i e n t f l o w t o prevent the gradual desoent of t h e balloon.

Finally, the heavy load necessitated almost complete i n f l a t i o n of the

balloon a t the surface. % i s distention permitted continual mixing of

a i r through t h e open bottom of t h e balloon. Instead of reaching the pre-

calculated 38,000 f e e t maximum a l t i t u d e , this f l i g h t had a peak of 14,000

f e e t from which it slowly descended. Since the blowout patch was s e t t o

a c t upor descent t o 20,000 f e e t , it a l s o f a i l e d t o operate.

Five of t h e succeeding f l i g h t s (nos. 13, 14, 15, 16 and 20) had as

a prime objective the development of a s a t i s f a c t o r y appendix t o overoome

the l o s s of buoyancy due t o mixing during launching and asoent. The types

cocsidered have beer, discussed i n Section 11, Part A of t h i s report and

the ( t w o f o o t ) appendix stiffened with battens, which was f i n a l l y evolved,

i s shown i n figure 5. Figures 48, 49 and 50 ghow the time-altitude o w e s

f o r these f l i g h t s . Either short f l i g h t or limited radio reoeptian curtailed

the t r a j e c t o r y data.

In f l i g h t 19, t h e danger t o perscnnel of the blowout patch was

- 29 -
dramatically demonstrated by i t s f i r i n g 30 oeconds a f t e r release. Launching

shooks caused the b a r o m i t c h pen-arm t o f a l l off it8 s h e l f , completing contact

prematurely. In l a t e r f l i g h t s , a time delay switch was placed i n s e r i e s with

the b a r o m i t c h t o prevent a recurrence of t h i s action.

F l i g h t s 21, 22, 24, 26 and 27, although carrying a l t i t u d e control

devices, were flown t o t e s t gear f o r associated projects. Either no pressure

reporting gear was c a r r i e d o r t h e data f r m modified gear proved unreliable.

Her,ce few performance data c h a r t s a r e presented.

Flight 21, using a late-model General ifills 20 f o o t t h i n c e l l and

an automatic b a l l a s t valve, is l m m t o have l a s t e d f o r ten hours, descending

a t Marietta, Oklahoma.

n i g h t 22, included an e a r l i e r model General k i l l s balloon with a

high r a t e of gas leakage, and an automatic b a l l a s t valve. The b a l l a s t control

kept the balloon a l o f t , but f o r only s i x hours.

Flight 24, including an automatic b a l l a s t valve, i s believed t o have

maintained constant l e v e l ,
- 1,000 f e e t , f o r 122 minutes. It stayed a l o f t

f o r a t l e a s t 3& hours, when transmission ceased. The time-altitude curve

i s shown i n f i g u r e 51.

F l i g n t 2 7 employed a fixed r a t e of leak r a t h e r than an automatic

b a l l a s t valve. The nanual control d i d n o t provide s u f f i c i e n t b a l l a s t flow,

accounting f o r the time-altitude curve shovrn i n f i g u r e 52.

Flights 29 through 37 and f l i g h t 39 were undertaken t o t e s t the

downwinc? launching procedure, t o t r y f o r highor constant l e v e l a l t i t u d e s ,

and t o determine t h e f e a s i b i l i t y of using t h e General % i l l s thin c e l l s f o r

frequent service f l i g h t s . Flights 37 and 39 b u r s t early. ' h e former was

released during a rainstorm and balloon f a i l u r e occured a t the seams.

- 30 -
 Flight 29, with a manual b a l l a s t vfdve, was released j u s t before

suuset on 22 November. I t was observed descending 50 miles n o r t h o f

Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 14 hour8 l a t e r . %e average w i n d was 130 mph.

Radio receiption wa8 f o r 69 minuter.

Of t h e other reoent f l i g h t s , s a t i s f a c t o r y radio p e r f o m n o e was

enjoyed only on f l i g h t 36. Before any more f l i g h t s a r e made, a b e t t e r

transmitter an& b a t t e r y pack w i l l be needed. Even on t h i s f l i g h t t h e

signal was l o s t a f t e r 135 minutes, due t o excessive range. Ihe l a s t

plotted p o s i t i o n was northeast of -

1
, 1II.M. This f l i g h t w a s recovered

from Burlington, Iuwa.

Tlme-height curves of this s e r i e s a r e included i n f i g u r e s 53, 54

and 5 5 . Despite t h e l i m i t e d data, sorne r e s u l t s can be detennined. For

example, f l i g h t 32 is believed t o have f l o a t e d f o r a t l e a s t 7G minutes

within 1,000 feet of a constant l e v e l above 40,000 fe et MSL.

F l i g h t 35 also exhibited 32 minutes of constant-level f l i g h t before

the radio signal wa8 l o s t . From t h e remarkable distances t h a t some of

the otners traveled (See f l i g h t susmary Table YI, Appendix I ) it i s almost

c e r t a i n that they f l o a t e d f o r long periods.

These f l i g h t s included a simple-filter manual b a l l a s t valve assembly

(Figure 9) designed t o reduce equipment weight and cost. %e performance

of t h i s equipment j u s t i f i e s i t s continued use f o r r e l a t i v e l y s h o r t f l i g h t s .

Comiderable d i f f i c u l t y was experienoed with the type of f i l t e r used.

Experiments a r e now being conducted t o improve the f i l t e r .

Because of limited data received from e a r l i e r f l i g h t s , mcdified

Fergusson meteorographs were added to the equipment t r a i n on f l i g h t s 33,

35 and 39. As o f J a n u a r y l , 1948 none of these instruments have been

recovered.
 F l i g h t 17, using a fifteen-foot balloon of ,004 Polyethylene i s

worthy of s p e c i a l consideration. I h e t h i c h e s s of this type of c e l l

eliminates much of t h e prdblem of appendix design sinoe more i n t e r n a l

pressure can be WithStOoda Despite this f a c t o r , and the low permeability

of t h e f a b r i c , balloons of this type a r e too heavy and c o s t l y t o be used

f o r high a l t i t u d e f l i g h t s .
I h e trajec.tory and time-altitude curve of t h i s f l i g h t are shown

in figure 56 and 57. This controlled-altitude f l i g h t demonstrates t h a t

t h e automatic b a l l a s t valve combined with a fixed leak, w i l l successfully

maintain constant a l t i t u d e through a sunset. !he balloon f l o a t e d a t 29,000

-
feet + 500 f e e t f o r a t l e a s t three hours, a f t e r which t h e excessive range

prevented f u r t h e r radio reception. Here again the necessity of a barograph

was demonstrated as the balloon was recovered from P r a t t , Kansas, 530 miles

away. Two f l i g h t s , 23 and 38, were made using the shrouded Dewey and Alrny

5-2000 Neoprene balloon. Both of t h e s e f l i g h t s were f a i l u r e s . F l i g h t 23

(see f i g u r e 48) a t t a i n e d a maximum a l t i t u d e a t 50,700 feet and began t o

descend immediately. Flight 38 (see f i g u r e 55) was observed from a B-25,

and t h e balloon was seen t o b u r s t within t h e shroud.

Seotion 6. Current Objectives

fn order t o meet the requirements f o r future f l i g h t s , improvement

must be made i n three phases:

1, Performanoe data f o r t o o many f l i g h t s have beer. e i t h e r uncertain

o r of too short duraticn. Before more f l i g h t s are undertaken,

a l t i t u d e a e a s u r h g instruments must be improved and increased.

To t h i s eni, four s p e c i f i c improvements a r e being urdortaken:

Am To supplement t h e pressure data received by r d d i o , a

lightweight barograph will be added t o those f l i g h t

t r a i n s i n the future when f l i @ t s of more t h ~ : ia fow

hours ' duration a r e a t tempted,

- 32 -
B. The improvement of radio t r a n s m i t t e r gear; it is
planned t o u t i l i z e the three megacycle transmitter

developed' i n the E l e c t r i c a l Engineering l a b o r a t o r i e s

at Eew York University. In previous tests, t h i s has

provided c l e a r e r reception and a h g e r range for

comparable weight than e i t h e r the 72 megacycle o r

397 megacycle units previously used. To provide

d i r e c t i o n finding, 397 megacycle c a r r i e r signal w i l l

a l s o be transmitted which w i l l be tracked by SCR-658

sets. I t i s a l s o hoped t h a t a b e t t e r l i g h t weight

b a t t e r y pack can be developed f o r airborne use.

C. The O l l a n d cycle time-interval method of presssure

measuring and data presentation i s being adapted,

w i t h the folluwing advantages anticipated:

(1) The d i r e c t i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of pressure data

in terms o f the time i n t e r v a l eliminates t h e ambiguities

inherent i n counting pressure contacts i n the Diamond-

Hinman system. used i n conjunction with the Brush re-

corder operating a t medium speed, and with four turns

on a h e l i x r o t a t i n g once a minute, the pressure read-

a b i l i t y of this system w i l l b e b e t t e r than one millibar.

( 2 ) Under noisy conditions the recorded data obtained

w i t h t h i s system w i l l be more readable than the audio

signal now being employed. When only pressure data i s

being transmitted, t h i s system can b more economical

of power than i s a system of modulated audio frequencies.

(3) In cases where data ot'her than pressure i s also

t o be transmitted on the same radio channel, the pressure

- 33 -
 signals may be arranged so a s t o consume a very

small portion of transmission t i m e .

D. The duration of r a d i o reception and of positioning data

may be g r e a t l y extended by appropriately equipped a i r c r a f t .

It i s intended t o u t i l i z e a B-17 with topmounted radar t o

search above t h e plane f o r tracking. Depending upon the

noise-level encountered, it may be possible t o acquire

pressure data with a receiver in t h e plane. It may be

necessary t o provide a t l e a s t two a i r c r a f t for continuous

reception over long periods.

2. It is very desirable t h a t t h e simplified light-weight b a l l a s t

control system for f l i g h t s of less than 24 hours' duration be

perfected. The elaborate b a l l a s t assembly w i t h the automatic

b a l l a s t valve w i l l n o t be needed f o r the many contemplated

f l i g h t s which w i l l be made with a useful l i f e of less than

e i g h t hours. A lower-capacity r e s e r v o i r with manual b a l l a s t

valve and f i l t e r provides a light-weight, inexpensive unit.

Tests a r e now being conducted t o f i n d t h e best design f o r these

c omponent8 .

3. In order t o f l o a t a balloon a t a pre-selected maximum a l t i t u d e

it is necessary t o supplement the variation-of -balla s t with a new

height control system.

A. W i t h a given balloon, and given t o t a l load, it i s

possible t o forecast t h e maximum height. (See Section

I11 f o r t h e computation.) If various n a x i m u n heights

are desired, t h i s maximum height may be varied by

varying the t o t a l load, or varying the bouyancy of

%he balloon through v a r i a t i o n i n balloon volume.

- -
34
 The method used heretofore i s v a r i a t i o n of balloon

load through changes i n t h e amount o f b a l l a s t used.

However, there a r e upper and lower limits on t h e

amount of b a l l a s t t h a t can be used, due t o the

strength l i m i t a t i o n s af the fabric. Also, the "height

s e n s i t i v i t y " ~ that i s , the r a t i o of change i n a l t i t u d e

t o change i n load, i s n o t g r e a t enough t o provide s u i t -

able choice of heights.

B. Another a t t a c k i s t o e f f e c t a change of volume by

making openings below the equator o f t h e balloon.

The volume of gas contained i n t h e balloon envelope

is then obviously limited.

C. If t h i s method of height oontrol proves t o be un-

s a t i s f a c t o r y , s t i l l other control mechanisms w i l l be

sought .
The three objectives, with t h e i r indioated subdivisions, w i l l be

pursued t o b e t t e r e f f e o t control of t h e balloon a l t i t u d e . A parallel

pursuit w i l l be the investigation of other balloon t y p e s and sizes, i n

addition t o t h e s a t i s f a c t o r y General N i l l s Polyethylene models now in

use. Thus, plans f o r t h e future include both the development o f control

devioes currently under t e s t and also a.broad, general study of the basio

components of constant-level balloon t r a i n s f r o m t h e t h e o r e t i c a l a s w e l l

as the operational viewpoint.

- -35
 APPENDIX 1

............
Train Assembly. f l i g h t 8. ( m t e o r o l o g i o a l o l u s t e t ) Fig . 31

..........................................
Trs,jeotory. f l i g h t 5 Pig . 32

Height-tim ourve. ...................................

flight 6 Fig . 33

..........................................
Trajectory. f l i g h t 6 Fig . 34

Height-tim o~me. ..................................

f l i g h t 6. Fig . 36

............
Train assembly. f l i g h t 7. (meteorological c l u s t e r ) Fig . 36
..........................................
Trajectory. f l i g h t 7 Fig . 37

Height-time ourve. f l i g h t 7................................... Fig . 38

.............
Train assembly. f l i g h t 8 . (General H i l l s C l u s t e r ) Fig . 39

Trajeatory. f l i g h t 8. .........................................F i g . 40
Height-time curve. f l i g h t 8 ................................... . Fig 41

Train assembly. f l i g h t 10 ..................................... . Fig 42

..................................Fig . 48
Height-time aurve. f l i g h t 10

Train assembly. f l i g h t .....................................Fig . 44

11

Trajectory and height-time eurve. f l i g h t 11................... F i g . 45

Train nsrembly. f l i g h t 1 2 ..................................... Fig . 46

Height t i m e curve. f l i g h t 1 2 .................................. Fig . 47

Height-time aurve8. f l i g h t s 13. 14. 16. and 25 ................ Fi3 48.

Height-ti- ourve. f l i g h t 15.................................. Fig . 49

Height-time ourve. f l i g h t 20 .................................. Fig . 50

Height-time cum?. f l i g h t 24 .................................. Fig . 51

Height-time ourve. f l i g h t 27 .................................. Flg . 52

Height-time curves. f l i g h t s 29. 30 and 32 ...................... Fig . 53

Height-time ourves. f l i g h t s 33. 34. 35 and 36 ................. Fig . 54

Height-time CUICPOS. f l i g h t s 37. 38 ~d .....................

39 Fig . 56

Trajeotory. f l i g h t 17 ......................................... Fig . 56

Height-time ourve. f l i g h t 17 .................................. F i g . 57

0
0
m
 11 l t e r asrembLy-4 batI,oona
i n f l a t e d to 3000grn.lift.

i f t e r cut-off at SS,OOO'.

12ecl. balloons inflated to 9009".

l i f t , 4 e s . balloons I nfLated
0 2100fjrn.ll~t.

P a y l o a d in p l c t u r e frame m o u n t
and t ransmrtt c r . (h3 *wt.)

I 74x5 mc Rad losonde. Heavy duty

Batteries in bLacK boxes w r a p p e d in
poLy e t h y Len e.

3009m-3-4,ooo' 400cjm-29,700' 80Qgm-25800' NYu BALLOON PROJECT

2 0 0 g m - 33,000' 40Oyrn-29,OOO' 800grn -25,200'
2OOgrr - 32,000' 6ODgrn-28,000' S O O y m - 24,500'
3 0 0 g m - 3 I, 000' 6 O 0 9 m-2J4OD' IOOOgm - 23,800' FLIGHT 7
400gm -00,500' 6009m-26,bOOl IOOOgm- a J I O o ' Dotc:
16 OOgm 22,500' 7-2-47 €0-48-44 1
0
0
x
 10 E a c h - C o n i c a l G e n e r a l htlb
Balloons, ,001" polye k hy lc nc,7'long

' I

Pay load a n d T r a n s m t k t e r

FI G.39

74.5me.- Radta sonde,&

M a d " Lo. t 0 r, 26 End fed

t 1
Plastic B d a s IReservoir and
Dribbler, 5,000grn.oF ballast.
P + 7-F3-47
I
+ I
ED-48-40J
 15' dia.-.008" thicK polyethylene
Balloon. H. A.Smi th Inc.
R e i n f o r c e d blow -out patch to be
o p e n e d by T i m e -clock.
Bridle of 9 n y l o n lines, each I501
t e s t , 13' Long, served t o a t h i m blc
and a t t a c h e d to reinforced patches
at a l t e r n a t e s e a m s .

PQyLoQdin p i c t u r e frame m o u n t ,
and p a y l o a d t r ~ n $ m t t t c r

FI G.42

&
745rnc. Radiosonde wlth 2dend
fed a n t e n n a Heavy duty batterie
in blacK boxes, polvethvlene
wrapped.
Plastic b ~ l L a 5 tR e s e r v o i r with
3pOO gr ballast.
P r e s s u r e operated ballcast valve
(Dribbler) a c t u a t e d by 3 0 t h c o n t Q c t INYU BALLOON PROJECT
of radiosonde baroswl t t h.
F L I G H T I0
Date 7-5-471 E D 4 8 4 2
MUFFEL ESSER C9. N. Y
 I5'Dia.- 008''thrcK palye thylene

t
P
ft
Balloon. H.A.Smith I n c . w i t h reinforcec
blowout patches t o v e n t y a s w h e n
fired by 6/5.

Baro-Swi t c h s e t to d e f l a t e large
Bcrlloon ahoutd train descend t o IOjOOO'.

6 each.-Gene raLRl1t.s Bal~oons,200cuf~

-00IUp o l y e t h y Lene.

50'

1,3
10'
Payload in picture -frame mountinq,

I-
7 0'

/ A
Fl G.44
tea.- Underinftated metro BaUoons
for Stodra measurements, 240' from

74.5mc Radiosonde wtttl2O'end

Fed Antenna.Black battery box
wrapped in polyethylene.
P 20'
ce n ter of s m a l l balloon to ce n te r
OF 15'b~t100n.

3 IN YU BALLOON PROJECT
Plastic ballast Reservoir contains
Dribbler to have been actuated
3000gnr bdlast I FLIGHT I I A
by 45 th c o n t a c t on radrobonde. I"""
1
7-7-47 I ED-48-41
I -
 . .

.. ... .-

-----
I *

. *
,
j
.
.
1'

L. ....... -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ...... . . . . . ... ..

2O'di~.G.M. . 0 0 f p o ~ y e t h i l c n c batloo
with i n c e n d i a r y patch on e q u a t o r
f o r rapid descent bebw 20,OOO'(44od)

2" steel nn5 for lounchtny ~ i n c s

Heavily reenforced baroswltch f i r e s
J ondescent t o 460mb.Uses2ca. 4 5 v o l t
b a t t e r i e s in paratlet. BLQ&box, l o a x b
, covered wiuI pLtastlc sheeting.
7'69, R a w i n J o n d c ((397mc),Heavy d u
bottery pack, stan dard n?odulator,
no v e n t i l a t i n g duct,whrte tcmpera-
tu r e ele ment, 25ordlncLte humidity.

' Hittrnan's t r a n s m i t t e r w/pressurc fton

standard modulptor. 3.135MC (149'
antenna through ringson 160Foot p a r a
c h u t e shroud). Held taut b y 6oz.Leac
wt. at b o t t o m .

Estimated L e n g t h o v e r a l l : 257'

T-49-745MC Radiosonde, e n d Fed

antennp,standard m o d u l a t o r , no venti-
Latin duct, white t e m p t ra t u re element,'
1
2s or i n a t e humidity,quib In ballcut valve
Fired b y 8 power supply of radiosonde.
HEAVY DUTY BATTERY PACK B a l l ~ s treservoir wlth Kollrnc~sn
J balLast v a l v e P L U S F i x e d rate
LcaK f r o m adjustable needCc volva
set t o over-compensate d ~ f f u s t o nby 10%

M i n i m u m pressure s w l t c h a c t u a t e s 4
ballast vaLve w h e n battoon descends
15mb from maximum p r e s ~ u r e , 2 e a c h
FI G.46
c
used i n para LleL.
INYU BALLOON PROJET

Date 8-5-47 E 0-48-43

 1 ! r-1- -I { I I *--
I l l !
, I
. . I

4 ,
j .I I +

1 ,I , , .
' i
I
,

.s:
, . . . . ,
Q
I l I
 15.9 ky

TZ.: 28.0 ky .
.
ad Iu. 141W.
.I-1 rllut
c..l
==-F ad

I I adi...d.
t T
MmtI.
m1ut "-
1.u. u.41,

115 mi".

3.1 y

230 d~

lor
-
1.o.

5.0 t g

-
 S U Y Y A ~ Y0 1 1111

16.1
U

14.1
kg

31

16.5
3s kI

I I I I I I I
.
i
Ii i
PP I
++
?
:
: I la

n
2.
A M

n
I
"
a.
" I
I

. I Y
I r
f 1;
1
f
I
I
I
I 8
r( "
 APPENDIX 2

C or re spond ence

Page
1. Abstract from: A i r Coordinating Cormnittee, New York Sub-
o o m i t t e e on Airspace, Rules of t h e A i r and A i r Traffic Control.
Subject: Approval t o release free balloons from Allentown, Pa. and
.............................N........J
Lakehurst,
8~...~oe....~o.~~....
2, L e t t e r t o t h e Secretary, New York Subcamittee on Airspace.
Subject: Request f o r i n t e r p r e t a t i o n of agreement on conditions of
r e l e a s e of free balloons from Allentown, Pa. and Lakehurst, N.J........41

3. Reply from t h e Secretary, New York Subcommittee on Airspace.

Subject: Same as above........................42

4.
Airspace Subcommittee .
Extract from: A i r Coordinating Committee, Fort Worth Regional

Subject: Obstructions t o a i r ~ v i g a t i o n . . . ........................... .43

5. Memorandum from t h e Chairman, Fort Worth Regional Airspace Sub-

caannitte.

Sands Danger Area... ..................................................

Subject: Procedure f o r Release of free balloons in the White
.45
 COPY

Abstract from :

AIR COORDINATING CW.ITTEE

NEW YORK SUBCOMMITTEE ON AIRSPACE
IIUBS OF M E AIR AND AIR TRAFFIC COKTROL
385 Madison Avsnue
New York 17, N. Y.

20 March 1947

8 . Y. Meeting No. 1 2

1. The S e c r e t a r y of t h e Subconunittee presented a request from t h e War

Department member i n behalf of New York U n i v e r s i t y f o r approval t o release free
balloons from A l l e n t O W n , Pa. and Lakehurst, hr. J.

DTSCUSSICb'

2. The subject p r o j e c t i s broken dawn i n t o two phases a s described below:

A. FiiASE I.

(1) 'Ihe type balloor. t o be used i n this phase of t h e

p r o j e c t w i l l be 6 f t . i n diameter, hydrogen f i l l e d ,
encompassed b y a nylon shroud with black and white
panels 24" wide. Radio instruments weighing approxi-
mately 3 l b s . w i l l be suspended approximately 50 f t .
below t h e balloon and equipped with parachute device
so t h a t upon s e p a r a t i o n from t h e balloon, the a t t a c h e d
equipment w i l l f l o a t down t m r d s t h e e a r t h r a t h e r
than beccune a f r e e l y f a l l i n g body.

(2) It i s a n t i o i p a t e d t h a t t w o f l i g h t s w i l l be required i n
t h i s phase of operation, t h e r e l e a s e t o be made during
weather conditions i n which t h e sky i s free of clouds
and t h e v i s i b i l i t y a t l e a s t t h r e e miles a t all a l t i t u d e s
up t o 20,000 feet., w i t h i n a f o u r h o u r c r u i s i n g r a d i u s
from Allentown, Pa.

(3) The balloon, during t h s e e flights, shall be convoyed

by s u i t a b l e a i r c r a f t t o maintain air-ground communica-
t i o n s on t h e balloon t r a j e c t o r y and equipped t o e f f e c t
d e s t r u c t i o n of t h e balloon a t t h e termination of f o u r
hours f l i g h t o r a t such t i m e t h a t the balloon may
become hazardous e i t h e r t o a i r c r a f t f l i g h t operations
o r t h e persons o r property of others on the surface.

(4) New York University w i l l f i l e a Notice t o Airmen a t

l e a s t tnrelve (12) hours i n advance of balloon r e l e a s e
and a second n o t i c e w i l l be f i l e d a t t h e time of r e l e a s e
with t h e Allentown, Pa. Airways Camnunications S t a t i o n .
 The type b a l l o m t o be used i n this phase of the project
w i l l be a 15 t o 40 ft. diameter p l a s t i c balloon, bydrogen
f i l l e d . RBdio e q u i p e n t weighing approximately 25 lbs.,
w i l l be suspended approximately 100 f t . below the
balloon. Ilhe balloon w i l l be towed t o high a l t i t u d e .
l e v e l s (above 20,000 f e e t ) by three a u x i l l i a r y l i f t i n g
balloons fastened together with a 4 lb. weight. A l l
equipment attached t o the balloon w i l l b e equipped with
parachute device so t h a t upon separatior, from the balloon,
the attached equipment w i l l f l o a t down towards the earth
r a t h e r than become a f r e e l y f a l l i n g body. Upon a t t a i n i n g
t h e desired a l t i t u d e , t h e a u x i l l i a r y l i f t i n g balloons
w i l l be released from t h e main balloon.

It i s anticipated t h a t a maximum of t e n f l i g h t s w i l l be
required i n t h i s phase of operation, 2 t o 5 releases t o
be made from Allentown, Pa. and 2 t o 5 releases t a b e
made from Lakehurst, N. J. Release w i l l be made during
weather conditions i n which the sky i s f r e e of clouds
and the v i s i b i l i t y a t least three miles a t a l l a l t i t u d e s
up t o 20,000 feet.

zhe range of' f l i g h t during this phase of operation w i l l

be between 30,000 and 60,000 f e e t . A period of s i x hours
w i l l be the maximum duration o f f l i g h t .

New York University w i l l provide an operator f o r tracking

of the balloon during period of f l i g h t and w i l l furnish
information on i t s position t o the N.Y. A i r Waffio
Control Center during period o f f l i g h t .

N e w York University w i l l f i l e a Notice t o Airmen a t

least twelve (12) hours i n advance of balloon release and
a second notioe w i l l be f i l e d a t time of release with
e i t h e r t h e Allentown, Pa. or Lakehurst, N.J. Comunica-
t i o n s Stations.

Destruction of t h e balloon w i l l be predetermined t o be

effected over water where hazards are not present. Aerial
convoy w i l l not be effected during this phase of operation
inasmuch as balloon f l i g h t s w i l l b e conducted i n excess
of 20,000 feet.

3 . The War Department member requests t h a t balloon operations along

the l i n e s of Phaae I1 be presented t o t h e Washington Subccrmrmittee for
clearance w i t h a l l other Regional Airspace Subcommittees, i n consideration
of War Department plans t o continue the Phase I1 type of operation from
White Sands, New Mexico, upon completion of t h e 1 2 proposed releases
described herein. The type of balloon releases proposed out o f v%ite Sands,
I?. ldex., w i l l involve f l i g h t through other regions.
RECOMbEXDED ACTION
4. That the release of free balloons by N e w York University a8
-
described above in Paragraph 2-A (Phase I ) , Subparagraphs (1) (4) inolusive,
be approved.
~ N e w York University as
5 . That the release of free b a l l 0 0 1 ~by

.
desoribed above in Paragraph 2-B (Phare 11), Subparagraphs (1)
inolusive, be approved
- (6)

6. That the h s h i n g t m dirspaoe Suboommittee present t h e Phase

I1 operation t o other Regional Airspaoe Suboonmrittees for clearance, i n
vier of War Department plans t o continue the Phase 11 type of operation
from white Sands, New Mexiao.
 April 17, 1947

Y r . C. J. Stock, Secretary
New York Subcommittee on A i r Space
385 Madison Avenue
New York 17, N. Y.

Reference: Eiew York Meeting No. 1 2 Subject No. 26, K m York Case #156

m a r Sir:

Reoeipt of t h e minutes of t h e above meeting a r e achuwledged with thanks.

However, on reading them, a discrepanoy was noted. We believe the weather
conditions agreed upon f o r f i a s e 2 operations were not a cloudless sky, but
no o i i l i n g under 20,000 f t .

Fie r e a l i z e t h a t t h e r e might b e oocasions when the clouds present would

not c o n s t i t u t e a oeiling. Yet, due t o chaotic or unstable sky conditions,
our balloons might be considered a n unseen hazard t o a i r c r a f t .

I t i s therefore requested that we be permitted t o f l y these r a p i d l y

r i s i n g , high a l t i t u d e balloons after obtaining clearanoe on day8
when there a r e no more than scattered clouds i n t h i n layers up t o
20,000 f t . and v i s i b i l i t y g r e a t e r than three miles.

This i s an important point, as the phenomena whichwe hope t o measure

i s n o t a f’requent one and our chances t o i n v e s t i g a t e t h e remote phenomena
a r e markedly reduced if we have t o w a i t for cloudless skies axd t h e phenomena
t o coincide.

This would have been brought t o your attenltion e a r l i e r . However, we are

unable, u n t i l yesterday, t o confirm our impressions with the representatives
of t h e Army A i r Forces who were present a t the meeting.

Yours very t r u l y ,

C, S. Schneider
Research A a s i s t a n t
css : p
 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
C I V I L SRCXlAUTICS ADMINXSTRATION

386 Madison Avo.

N e w York 17, N. Y.

New York University

college of 'kgineering
Research Divi si on
Wiver s i t y bights
NmvYork 53, B. Y.

Attention: Mr . s o Schneider, Researoh h i s t a n t

b a r Mr. Sohneidert

This i s i n reply t o your l d t e r of April 17th.

It i s t r u e that a t N.Y. Airspace Subcumnittee Meeting#l2, we advised

you t h a t t h e Phase I1 operations would be r e s t r i c t e d t o weather oonditions
i n which the sky was c l e a r sf clouds below 20,000 f e e t and 43s v i s i b i l i t y
a t l e a s t three miles a t a l l a l t i t u d e s up t o and inoluding 20,000 f t . Homer,
it was indicated t h a t tBese conditions were subjeot t o concurrence and approval
by the Washington Airspace Subcornnittee.

In order t o expedite final approval of t h i s case, coordination was effected

w i t h the Washington Airspaoe S u b c d t t e e immediately subsequent t o our
Meeting #12. It was revealed as a r e e u l t of such coordination that the
Washington Committee f e l t tbt the oeiling r e s t r i c t i o n m s inadequate i n
the i n t e r e s t s of a i r safety and required t h a t a cloudless ally condition be
specified

This information was relayed t o t h e members of the N.Y. Airspaoe Subconunittee

and they i n turn concurred w i t h this eunendpent in t b e i n t e r e s t of a i r safety.
The minutes of N e w York Meeting #12 were amended aocordingly.

YOWE very t r u l y ,

C. J. Stoek
secretary, N. Y. Airspace Subcommittee
 A I R COORDINATING CObfMITTEE
FORT WORTEI H?,GIOMAL AIRSPACE SUBCOMMITTEE
P. 0. BOX 1689
FORT WORTH 1, TEXAS

August 21, 1947

Meeting No. 30

Tinre: August 21, 1947 - 1O:OO a.m. t o 1:30 p.m.

Place I Regional Office, CAA, Ft. Worth, T e x a s

Member s Re sent t L. C. E l l i o t t , Chairman

Lt. Col. Hall F. Smith, bar Dept. Member
Major Williams, War Dept. Alternate Member
Perry Hodgden, CAB Member
Commander Jmes Douglas Arbes, Navy D e p t . Uenber
Tracy Walsh, ATA Coordinator

Secretary: Paul 8. Boatman

EXTRACT 'COPY

SUBJECT PAGE NUbBER

111. OBSTRUCTICMS M AIR NAVXGATION

- YOFX UNlX3RSITY - IZELEASE

A. WHITE SANDS, NEW MEXICO, PROVmG GROUND
-
OF FREE U L O O N S CASE #111 ...................*.....*.
NEW
3

PROBLEM

1. Ihe Secretary of t h e Subconunittee presented a r e q t s s t received from the

N e w Ymk University through the hpartment of Cammeroe Member f o r approval of re-
l e a s e s of free balloons a t the White Sand8 Proving Ground i n Phase I1 operation
a s outlined i n New York Subcommittee Meeting No. 12, dated March 20, 1947.

DISCUSS ION

2. It was f i r s t thought t h a t balloons would ascend and descend within the

confines of the White Sands presently assigned danger area elnd t h a t no f u r t h e r
authorizaticm would be required; however the Subcommittee was advised by the
University t h a t balloons have been descending outside o f t h e area i n t h e v i c i n i t y
of Rosnell, New Mexico. It, therefore, appeared t h a t t h e r e was a c e r t a i n amount
of hazard t o a i r c r a f t encountered i n the descent of t h i s equipment.

3. The Subcommittee did not have f u l l information on t h e number of releases

anticipated and other pertinent d e t a i l s ; however it appeared the chances of e o l l i s i m
of a i r c r a f t with t h i s equipment was very remote and due t o the f a c t prevailing wind8
i n t h i s area would o r d i n a r i l y c a r r y t h e equipment eastward, which would tend t o c a r r y
it away fram heavy travelled already established c i v i l a i m y s , t h a t t h i s a c t i v i t y
might not be too objectionable.
 4. The Department of Commerce Kember s t a t e d t h a t he f e l t it may be necessary
t o e f f e c t some coordination with a i r t r a f f i c in the l o c a l E l Paso area but t h a t due
t o t h e meager information available, t h i s could not be determined without a discussion
of methods and procedures with the people who were a c t u a l l y going t o do the work.

5. Thw War Department bmber s t a t e d t h a t he f e l t it desirable to s t i p u l a t e

t h a t l o c a l ooordination should be effected with t h e Commanding O f f i o e r a t Biggs
Field.

(NmEt h t a meeting held i n E l Paso, Texas, on August 27, 1947, between

representatives of t h e CM and the New York University, procedures
s a t i s f a c t o r y t o the Comeroe Member and t h e Commanding " f f i c e r a t
B i a s Field were established).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
6. That release of f r e e bailoons by the New York University within the
oonfines of the P J h i t e Sands Proving area be approved provided *at:

(a) Looal ooordination be effected t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n of t h e

Department of Commerce Member and the Commanding Officer a t
Biggs Field t o assure a l l precautions are taken to prevent
c o l l i s i o n of a i r o r a f t with t h i s airborne equipment.
 -
COPY
AIR COORDINATING COMMITTEE
FORT WORlW Z G I O W AIRSPACE SURCOMMITTEE
Pe 0. BQX 1689
FORT WOR3H 1, TEXAS

September 2, 1947

&!EMORA EDUM

To: L. C. E l l i o t t
Chairman, Ft. Worth Wgional Airspace S u b o d t t e e

L t . Col. Hall F. Smith, War Dept. Member, Ft. Worth

Regional Airspace S u b o m i t t e e

FROM: Secretary, Ft. Worth Regional Airspace Subcommittee

SUBJECT: Procedure f o r Release of Free Balloons i n t h e White Sands Danger

Area

The w r i t e r m s t with M r . James R. Smith of New York University and L t . V. D.

Thompson of Alamogordo M F , a t E l Paso, Texas, on August 27 t o discuss procedures
t o be followed during the descent of free balloons released within the White Sands
Danger Area.

Mr. Smith advised t h a t he had m e t with the Commar?ding Officer a t Biggs Field who
had s t a t e d he desired no f u r t h e r coordination other t h a r what the C i v i l Aeronautics
Administration might require and t h a t he would w r i t e a l e t t e r t o M r . Smith t o t h i s
e f f e c t . Vr. Smith will forward t h i s t o the Chairman of t h e Subcommittee f o r the
rec or do

Mr. Smith outliped t h e i r program, which c o n s i s t s f o r t h e most p a r t of t e s t i n g

various types of balloons. Their program %.ill probably be of 5 f l i g h t s per month
f o r t h e next 6 months, the f i r s t f l i g h t t o b e released on Sept. 6, weather per-
mitting. Weather minimums were agreed on a s not more then 4/10 of the s k y covered
o r forecasted t o be covered within t h e expected descent a r e a (60 m i l e radius).

Balloons a r e tracked by VHF DF s t a t i o n s a t Alamogordo and Rome11 f o r the present

plus an a i r c r a f t . When t h e balloofi descends t o 20,000 feet, if not i n t h e clear,
positions will be given every h o u r o r so and will be put out a s notams on Schedule
"A" from the Rome11 MF. lhis w i l l serve t o advise the Army F i e l d s , the a i r l i n e s ,
and some i t i n e r a r - t t r a f f i c . In any case i f t h e balloofi i s outside t h e assigned
danger area, notams w i l l be issued whenthe balloons descend below 15,000 f e e t .

"he balloons a r e f o r the most p a r t 15 f e e t i n diameter and p l a s t i c . Suspended

from t h e balloon i s a 100 f o o t one thousand pound t e s t nylon l i n e whioh c a r r i e s
the airborne equipment. Releases a r e usually made a t dawn and. the f l i @ t t e r m i n a t e s
i n an average of 8 hours time; it may be f r m 6 t o 1 2 hours duration.

It i s believed t h e notam procedure w i l l serve t o advise p i l o t s of t h i s . a c t i v i t y

e f f e c t i v e l y enough t o provide t h e desired amount of caution. It i s understood
the a i r l i n e s have some instrument flights through this area a t 20,000 feet; hon-
ever these are for the most part a t night and t o t h e north of the expeoted balloon
traok.

/a/ Paul H. Boatman

PAUL H . B O A W
Seoretary, Ft. Worth Regional Airspaae
Suboomittee

C
0
P
Y
 APPENDIX 3

Flight Forms and Tables

Pase
1 . Pressure i n Standard A.osphere ............................. 48

2 . of spheres ...............................................
Mathematical tables for diameters. volumes. and surfaces
.*.50

3 . .........
Table of basio data f o r computation of molar volume 51

4 . Data for molar volume-altitude graph ........................ 53

5 . Notice t o finaer (one oopy i n Spanish. one in English) ......

54

6 . Questionnaire ............................................... 55

7 . Preflight data sheets and canputation forms ................. 56

 PRESSURE IN SWTDARI) ATLlosPHERE

(Accurate t o ,001 mm of Hq, .0001 in. of Hg and .002 of m i l l i b a r )

Thermal Layer Isothermal Layer

ft.per ft per
A1 titude Fre s sure (fi1
(nb) A l t i t u d s
(feet)
-5 ,000
(EWI XQ) (In. Hq)* (mb)- J
ee
907 .SO9 35.7404 1210.312 35,332,
-4,000 876.533 34.5091 1168.615 36,000 170.375 6.7077 227.148
-3 ,000 846.130 33.3121 1128.081 37,000 162.430 6.3949 216.556
-2,000 816.582 32.1488 1088.686 !38,000 154.854 6.0966 206.455
-1,000 787.879 31.0168 1050.419 39,000 147.632 5.8123 196.826
0 760.000 29.9212 1013.250 27 40 ,OCO 140.747 5.5412 187.647 110
1,000 732 -923 28 -8552 977.150 41,000 134.183 5.2828 178.896
2 ,000 706.634 27,8202 942.101 42,000 127.925 5.0364 170.553
3 ,000 681.114 26.8155 938.077 43,000 121.959 4.8015 162.599
4,000 656.344 25.8403 875.053 44 ,O W 116.271 4.5776 155.015

5,000 632.308 24.8940 843.008 31 45,000 110.848 4.3641 147.785 140

6 ,000 608.991 23.9760 811.921 46 ,000 105.678 4,1605 140.892
7,000 586.375 23.0956 781.769 47,000 100.7.50 3.9665 134.322
8,000 564.444 22.2222 752.530 43 ,000 96.051 3.7815 128.057
9,000 543.180 21.3850 724.180 49 ,000 91.571 3.6052 122.085

10,000 522.571 20.5736 696.704 36 50 ,000 87 ..301 3.4370 116.392 175

11,000 502.600 19.7874 670.078 51,000 83.229 3.2767 110.963
12,000 483.251 19.0256 644.282 52 ,000 79.348 3.1239 105.789
13,000 464.511 18.2878 619.297 53,000 75.647 2.9782 100.854
14,000 446.362 17.5733 595 .lo0 54 ,000 72.119 2.~~9 3 96.151

15,000 428.793 16.8816 571.677 43 55,000 68,755 2.7069 91.666 22 5

16 ,000 411.786 16.2120 549.003 56,000 65.549 2.5807 87.391
17,000 395.332 15.5642 527.066 67,000 62.492 2.4603 83.316
18,000 379.412 14.9375 505.84i 58,000 59.577 2.3455 79.429
19,000 364.01% 14.3314 485.317 59,000 56.799 2.2362 75.726

20,000 349.132 13.7453 465.471 50 60 ,000 54.150 2.1319 72.194 285

21,000 334.742 13.1788 446.286 61 ,000 51.624 2.0324 68.826
22 ,000 320.836 12.6313 427.746 62 ,000 49.217 1.9377 65.617
23 ,090 307.403 12.1025 409.837 63,000 46,921 1.8473 62.556
24 ,000 294.429 11.5917 302.540 6%,000 44,733 1.7611 59.639

25,000 2 8 1 . ~ ~ 0 1 11m a 4 375.837 60 65,030 42.647 1.6730 56.858 3 60

26,000 269.808 10.6223 359.714 66,0@0 40.658 1.6007 54.206
27,000 258.140 10.1630 344.158 67 ,000 38.762 1.5261 51.678
28 ,000 246.883 9.7198 329.150 68 ,000 .36.954 1.4549 49.268
29 ,000 236.027 9.2924 314.677 69,000 35.230 1.3870 46.969

30 ,000 225.561 8*m03 300.723 72 70 ,000 33,557 1.3223 44.779 455

31,000 215.473 8 .&a32 287.274 71,000 32,021 1.2607 42.691
32,000 205.754 8 .LOO5 274.316 72,000 30,528 1.2019 4C. 701
33 ,000 196.394 7.7320 261.837 73 ,000 29,iCG 1.1456 38.802
34 ,000 187.381 7.3772 249.821 74 ,000 27.746 1.0924 36.992
35,000 178.705 7.0355 238.254 75 ,000

* I;ercury column a t oo C.
86
76,000
77,000
26,452
25.219
24,013
1,0414
.9929
,9466
.
35 ,266
33 623
32,055
580
 PRESSURE IN STANDARD ATMOSPHERE

(Accthte t o .001 mm of Hq, .0001 in. of Hg and ,002 of millibar)

Isothermal Layer
Ft. ner
A 1titude Pressure (ni )
‘ m j {mmHq)c ( in .Hq )c (& 1
78,000 22,921 -9024 30.559
79,000 21.852 08603 2S.134

80,000 20.833 .8202 27,775 735

81,000 19.862 07820 26.480
82,000 18.935 .7455 25.245
83,000 18.052 .7107 24.067
a4,ooo 17.210 .5776 22.945

85,000 16.408 .6460 21.876 935

86,000 15.642 .a58 20.854
87,000 14.913 ,5871 19.882
88,000 14.217 .5597 18.954
89,000 13.554 -5336 18.071

90,ooO 12,922 .5087 17.228 1190

91,000 12.319 .485Q 16.424
92,000 11.745 ,4624 15.659
93,000 11.197 .4408 14.925
94,000 10.675 .4203 14.232

95,000 10.177 .4007 13.568 1510

96 ,000 9.702 ,3820 12.935
97,000 9.250 .3642 12.332
98,000 8.819 ,3472‘ 11.758
99,000 8 -407 .3310 11.208

100,000 8,015 .3156 10.686 1920

Vdum Vdums Vd- \durn Vdum
8urf.a Diu Vdum
- _&rf.rr
_ - -- -
0 . m 8 I812 I9 6 W IA 594
--
.m1. 8 8103 m m im XY 1436 71 611.75 9m.n 210 71 41 36086.9 m1.01
.ooo1: 9 4708 21 647% IW 532 1511 I0 637.91 wm.n 2161.75 P 37423.3 5410.(0
.mia 10 I635 2 2m 210 031 1% n Mo 51 9743.w m.11 42 3wv2.3 5541.76
iao n 683.49 Imu.3 m.m t’ IoIW.3 5674.50
.om 10 rn n7 m za~m3
.mW! I1 64m 24 85041 7.32 in I767 I4 706.85 ImoL.0 219o.n 43 4162V.7 m.a
.mru 12 4426 25 967x 243 7 0 18% 9a 730.61 1m.v m2.a H 43098.9 S9U.U
.me11 I3 2719 W loMl 255 711 IW 81 754.76 10889.2 2375.81 44 MW.2 (ou.12
an5 69 IF).3II lllM.9 2419.~1 H 46110.0 6221.13
.0116! I4 1371 m w431 268082
.OlW 15 om 294646l m
846 2144 66 (M.24 IIe&O 2463.01 45 Wll2.9 Ly1.n
,0212i I5 9789 30679% mom w6n 829.1)I II(M.7 2547.19
.OW61 em .o 6lO3.M
16 9570 31 919M M 576 2352 w 855 29: mo.8 n51 .A 46 M . 9 w.60
2 U 61 MI.41: I2442.6 25V6.72 tl 5ZM5.0 6792.W
.01511 17 9741 33 Irn 321 555
.MM! I 9 0312 n 471s 335 9% lRIU (07.91! IWm.0 mk2.1 47 ns1.I m.n
.orw m tzm 35 78461 350 770 w60 M.815 I3I(u.I 26w.83 16115.0 m.21
.ow: 21 ma0 37 1m %6 019 EO6 16 wt.lll 1W2.0 2733.97 48 i7905.8 7m.n
nm 15 9m.m 13m6.7 wm.50 H $9734.2 7389.81
.Wll! 724493 M M M I703
.1m n 6735 39 8711 397829 lo53 u 1017.873 14137.1 m.43 49 ilao.8 7m.s
.Irnl~ 24 9115 41 ZUY 114 403 1182 63 lOk6.3U Iu(3.5 2874.71 5s Urn.8 7ln.Y
.m 16 n 3 9 42 71824 0 1 431 1315 7.3 1075.ZM 14855.V 2973.46 50 W . 8 7853.I
M I 4S llM.463 15224.2 m.57 H i7432.v ~1l.M
.m 2 m N W 6116 44 17861 w 920
.3m 2 1o5m 29 0153 45 66350 166 871 in1 16 I134.II4 1559&5 3019.07 51 W55.8
,43143 2 76116 30 4658 ~171.1
J4 47 172% 485 102 in5 m 1164.I11 15978.9 m67.96 H flll8.7 ma
9
‘4 31 %39 4870692 Yym lM.7 41 1191 5m 1m.5 3117.24 52 f16u.I w4.m
.5m 3 I4159 n33 66 IZZS.416 1~58.3 3166.92 H r5766.3 W.01
.m 311656 4 31 1103 50 26544 17.3 598
,74151 397m7 $6 36 7511 53 45612 543 479 IIM m Iu6.636 17157.3 3216.W 13 ‘1151.7 w4.n
.wa1 4 430013 >4 40 1913 56 74497 %I 858 I347 83 lZM.248 17562.5 3267.41 mm.8 3m.m
% 43 M62 60 13200 w739 1510m I 320.213 17974.1 3318.30 Y U447.8 8160.88
I .a 4 mn 55 47 7129 63 617m bob I30 k.77 VI 1352.651 IW2.l 3169.55 55 u759.3 P331.31
1,1838 5 4llM % 51 aooC 67 m)17 bm 036
I 3612 5 91917 56 1150 70 M212 bX 46k IMIM IM5.44I 18816.1 nzi.19 55 Dll3.6
I ,5553 64918 6066w m 4 29 W.31
1: 74 66185 WI 4m 1418,624 I9247 4 347s n H R5II.I I676 M
mi 71 1451.200 1w.9 35n.65 56 11952.2 m2.m
1.7671 65 4497 78 53975 696909 ,387 36 l(a6.168 1011.9 1m.47 54 w37.2 m.7
I9974 m a 82 51582 no 9%
2 2w 71 7663 llb m 7 145 514 ,575 n 15m.m IDIA.1 3631 .Y 57 6966.7 W.0
2.1161 81 3om go 762’p 770 MI ,767 51 1551 m3 11036.8 m.m I4 9wo.9 w . 9
rw 11 lrn 430 IlroO.8 3739 m 58 12160 w.3
2.8062 87 I136 95 03310 l96 3w ,165 I3 16u.%9 54 4325 1751.3
3 tin 91 189.2 W *I87 m 5s
3 4515 995409 01 UW. 849 3w am u 1661.WI u4a.3 3848.45 n 7136 m5.v
38082 M I71 M 43m )76 797 m62 1693 2% u1n.z m.19 H 029) 122.0
595 19 1734 941 lU29.0 wrl.50 m 109) m.7
4.1888 I3 097 13 wn m m PI4 37 in2.053 Ml.1 1185.30 w 594 a.0
45939 m 314 I7 8587 )6t512
5 0243 n 832 U 71H U2 65 mn M9 5% b526521.8 1lm.M bI w.47 m
5.4808 35 6% n 6762 III n 166 78 847.451 f761 I .6 k417.llb 54 lA3 ml
100 10 885.739 m 9 1536.46 4 m 076
19Ml 43 793 32 nu IM 34 VM n 924.120 W . 0 1656.62 H nx m
6.4751 12 2 e 37 8861 118 m
7.0144 b l 031 41 i?d7 w 21 181 72 961.49 I1059 3 I778 36 63 W24 u6D
7.5626 m 144 48 4992 161 11 429 I2 W2.96 w 3 lpol .67 loLI 668
- - 681 97 M2.P 13510.3 m.54 UH 7m 860
939 M 13.07 um.7 il52.W H m
- - - - W-.
 Basic Data for Camputation of Molar Volume

January 1943 (Mean Sounding)

A1tit ude TOXIIP Pre8SUZ-a Kolar
(W (W VOluy3
7 (OC)
-ft.

1.620
(Surfaoe) + 3.8 838 449
2 3 04 800 463
2.5 .6 752 486

3 0 2.6 706 522

4 0 8.3 622 567
5 -14.6 546 631
6 -21 02 477 704
7 -28 03 416 786

8 -35.7 332 8 72

9 -43 00 312 983

10 -49 7 . 269 1140

11 -54.7 230 1250

12 -57.2 197 1450

13 -58.1 168 1690

14 -60 2 143 1990

15 -61 6 122 2320

16 -63.0 104 2700

17 -64.3 88 3170

18 -65 01 75 3700

F'HOESTM, ARIZONA

20 -63 I 54 0
5410
 Basio Data for Computation of Molar Volume

(Mean Souuding)
August 1943
Altitude Temp. -0 8B U T 0 Humidity Molar
(a) (OC) 0 $ Volye
Pt.
1 620
(Surfaoe) 25 02 838 44 480
2 23 03 809 39 492

2 06 20.4 758 42 617

3 16.6 716 48 641

4 808 634 66 694

5 1.1 562 79 662

6 - 6.6 495 72' 715

7 -11.0 436 66 803

8 -17.1 382 46 895

9 -24.2 3.73 45 980

10 -31.6 290 - 1110

11 -39.4 251 0
1250

12 -47.0 217 0
1390

13 - 64.7 186 - 1660

14 -61.6 158 - 1780

15 -66 4 134 - 2060

16 -69 8 114 - 2460
17 -70 00 96 - 2830

20 -58.1 4960
 Data f o r Molar Volume-Altitude Graph

Altitude, ft. Molar Volum, fta' Altitude, f t a Molar volume, f t a 3

5 #OO0 420 60,W 2200

10,000 490 55,000 2850

15,000 590 60,000 3700

20 ,000 680 65,000 4 900

25,000 820 70,000 6200

30,000 980 75,000 7800

35,000 1230 80,000 10,000

40,000 1410 85,000 12,600

45,000 1750 90,000 15,900

95 # 000 20,200

100,000 25,600

This data assumes a oonstant temperature (-60°C) above 65,000 f i e ,

and below t h a t a l t i t u d e is based on representative pressures and temperatures

taken from Washington, Albuquerque, Pittsburgh and Lakehurst soundings.

Individual variations f'rom season t o season, and from s t a t i o n t o

s t a t i o n may be noted i n the graphs a t the l e f t of Mgures 19 and 20. These

variatians a r e a t most about .lo$.
 Remuneracfon

Le materia ha volado con e s t e glob0 desde l a New York

University para hacer investigacionos meteorologicas..
Se de,sea que e s t a materia se vuelva para e s t u d i a r l e
nuevament 8.

Con e s t e motivo, se dara una remunsracion de

dolares norteamericanos y una suma proporcional para
deoolver todos 10s aparatos en b u m estado. Para r e c i b i r
instrucciones de embarque, canuniqusnse con l a persona
siguieqte pot t e l e g r a f o , gastos pagados por 01 r e c i p i e n t e ,
refirLendo a 1 numero del g l o b 0

CUIDADO'!
PELIGRO DE F'LAblA, HAY KEROSEI!' EN EL TANQUE.

C.S. Schneider
Rosearch Division
Now York University
University Heights
Bronx 53, Y e

-
NOTICE

This i s special weather equipnent sent a l o f t on research

by Kew York Univeraity. It i s important t h a t t h e equip-
ment be recovered.. The f i n d e r i s reques'ted t o protect
t h e equipnent from damage or t h e f t , and t o telegraph c o l l e c t
t o : Mr.. C. S-. Schneider, Few York University, l 8 l s t St, &
University aeights, Vrest Ball,, Pew York City, U.S.A, Phone:
LUdlow 4-0700, Extension 63 or 27. REFER TO FLIGHT #

A d o l l a r ($ ) reward and reasonable reimbursement

f o r reoaverjl expenses w i l l be paid f t the above $instructions
are followed before September 19480
KEEP AVAY FROL FEm. 'EEm IS ECEROSEFE IF? THE ' W K .
 CUESTICNARIO

Tenga l a bondad de conteatar l o s i g u b n t a y enviarlonols para que

podamos mandarle a Ud. l a remuneracim.

1, En que fecha y a que hora se descubrio e l globo?

2. Donde se descubrio? Indique l a d i s t a n c i a y diroao2cm

aproximada del pueblo mas aeroar,Q que se encuentra en el
mapa d e l s i t i o de descubrimiento.

3. Se observo b a j a r ? Cuando?

4. Se bajo despacio o se cayo rapidamente?

Please answer t h i s and send to us so t h a t we may pay you t h e

reward.

1. On what date and a t what hour w a s the balloon disaovered?

2. Yvhere was it cfiscavored? (Approximate d i s t a n c e and d i r e o t i p n

from n e a r e s t tuwn on map?)

3. Was it obsrrved descending? If so, when?

4. Di,d it f l o a t down slowly o r f a l l rapidly?

 YiEIGHT SIEET Page 1.

F1 ight N 0 . Date _I_-

Tine

. .
Burnout Patch and Wires. *
F-

Shrouds . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . --
Total Ralloon F?’eight -
.
Launakiine, Remant . b

1 s t Unit. Serial Yo.

description --

Line length -
2nd Unit. Serial ?o.

Line

3d Unit Serial No. --. ’

description .- -
Line lenrth

4th Unit Serial No.

description ..- -.-

Line length I

Banner description

-
I-

Ballast assembly description

Eallast . . . . .
. . .
b

Total Equipment Weight. . .

Gross Load . . . . . . . . 9
F1ight h? 0 . - ..
.
Time

Desired Rate of Rise . . ,ft ./min .

Gross Load . m

Assumed Gross L i f t (Gross Load 4 10%)G

G 2/3
___I.'

Free L i f t

Equipment height . .
Desired Ballom Inflation Free Lift + Equipnent Total grams

Allowance for Leakage 8 ,,dhrJ . _.hrs. waiting

.
n

Actual Balloon Inflation . 0 . . . t n

Balloon ~oiume. CU. ft.

Gas Lift/mol . * . . ,
Helium 11.1
Xydrogen 12.0
kg/mol
k&ol
Molar Volume :Balloon volume x gas lif't/mol
gross' l o a d
CU. ft.

Xaximum Altitude . 0 . f t , m.s.1.

Altitude Sensitivity . - ft ./kg.

 Page 3.
B A U S T C OMPUTA TIObTS

F l i gh t No. Date

Time

Surface Balloon Diffusion

(measured)
( e s th a t e d )
. bl+

Percent Inflation . . .
Full Ealloon Diffusion: Surface Difkxsim x

Ballast Leak (12% F’u11 Balloon Difhrsitm) .

Automatic Ballast Valve Calibration

Estimated Ballast Duration. . 0 .

 New York University 4.
Research Division
Balloon Froject

Sup?lemntary Information for Flight No.

Release: Site date time
c .

Encoded Sounding Data:

.-1-3

Encoded Upper ' ~ i n d s

.---- I

Release lieather

-.- -
In-F1 ight Hcurly E ea the r

- -
Train Sketch in Folder F i l m s S e n t Cut --
List Flight Iiecords in Folder:

Renarks

Checked
 Page 5

Transmitter Perfor’rnanae f o r Flight Fo. .

Release : Date Time Site , 0

Transmitter Type and Serial No.

Batteries: Type and Number - ..
..
open Circuit Voltages :

Voltages Under Load :

Bception a t Station #l

Reception a t Station #2

Reception a t Station #I

Critique
 REFERENCES

1. Meiringer, C. L. "Constant Elevation Free-balloon Flights from Fort

Omaha," Monthly Weather &vim, Vol. 47, pp. 535-538, 1919.

2. "Progress in Developing a Constant-Level Balloon", Report by Dewey and

Almy Chemical Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 15, 1944.

3. "'Analysis of Japanese Weather Service", A i r Vteather Service !Ibchnical

Report 45-1, Langley Field, Virginia, May, 1946,

4. Clarke, E.T., Korff, S.A., "The Radiosonde: The Stratosphere Laboratory",

Journal of t h e Franklin I n s t i t u t e , Vol. 232, No. 3, September, and No. 4,

October, 1941,

5, Middleton, W.G.K. , Meteorological hstruments, Toronto, Canada, 1941, p. 46.

6. "Aerological Observations", Monthly Weather Review, Vole 71, pp. 202-3, 1943.

7. Brombacher, W. G., "Altitude-Pressure Tables Based on the United S t a t e s

Standard Atmosphere", Report No. 638, National Advisory Committee f o r

Aeronautics, Washington, D. C. September, 1935.

8. Timoshenko, MacCullough, Elements of Strength of Materials, Vol. 1, p. 51.

9. Lange, K. O., Unpublished Report, Lexington, Kentucky, 1947.

10. Warner, E. P., Aerostatics, The Roland B e s s New York, 1926.

11. "The National Geographic Society - "U.S. Andy A i r Corps Stratosphere F l i g h t

of 1934 i n t h e Balloon 'Explorer'", Contributed Technical Papers of t h e

National Geographic Society, Washington, 1935.

12. The Eational Geographic Society - "U.S. A m y A i r Corps Stratosphere A i g h t

i n t h e Balloon 'Explorer I I * t t ,Contributed Technical Papers of t h e National

Ge ogr aphic .S oc i et y , Wa shington, 1936 .

- 61 -
13. Lugeon, Jean, "Le Poste Aerologique de l a S t a t i o n Centrale de

Meteorologie a Payerne e t les n o u r e l l e s methodes r u i s s e s de

-
radiosondage", E x t r a i t des Amales de la S t a t i o n Centrale s u i s s e d e

Neteorologie, 1941j Zurich, 1942

14. Lugeon, Jean, ''Quelques Innmations aux Methodes Suisses de Radiosondage ,"

Tirage a p a r t des Annales de la S t a t i o n Centrale Suisse de Meteoro-

logic, 1942, Zurich, 1943.

15. Upson, R., Chandler, C. Free and Captive Balloons, I h e b l a n d Press

Co., New York 1926.

16. Prandtl, L., T i e t j e n s , O.G., Fundamentals of Hydro-and Aeromechanics,

t h e Maple Press CO., York, Pa.

 JOURNAL
OF

METEOROLOGY

VOLUME 5, 1948

P u b l i r h o d b i m o n t h l y by tho

AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY

130 JOURNAL OF METEOROLOGY VOLUmE 5

CONTROLLED-ALTITUDE FREE BALLOONS

By Athelstan F. Spilhaus, C. S. Schneider, and C. B. Moore
College of Engineering, New York University
(Manuscript received 4 December 1947)

ABSTRACT
The results of a n experimental program to develop balloons with associated control devices, which will
float at constant pressure in the atmosphere, are given.
Newly developed plastic balloons and automatic ballast equipment are dexribed. Examples of successful
controlledaltitude flights are shown, together with a preliminary analysis of their trajectories.
The constant-level balloon may provide data not obtainable from an ordinary pilot-balloon network.
Future possibilities and plans for its use are indicated.

1. Purpose in the meteorological aspects of this, using a manned

balloon. In the investigation of cosmic rays, as for
Drift bottles have been used for many years in the
example, by Clarke and Korff (1941), clusters of
study of Ocean currents and have provided interesting
ordinary meteorological balloons, 350-gram or 700-
data. In meteorology, no corresponding device has
gram size, numbering anywhere from twenty to nearly
been available. I t is evident, however, that a balloon
seventy, were utilized. No altitude-control devices
.which is free to move with the air currents, and yet
were used; the balloons were merely given different
whose altitude can be controlled, has many important
amounts of inflation. Thus the whole train ascended
applications in meteorology, as well as in other fields,
to an altitude where certain of the more highly inflated
where i t may be desired to keep instruments a t alti-
balloons burst until the remainder just balanced the
tude for considerable lengths of time. An example is in
load ; thereafter, the assembly descended slowly due
the investigation of cosmic rays; here, clusters of
to loss of lift by the diffusion of gas. The only provision
ordinary extensible meteorological balloons have been
for having the system regain altitude if i t descended
used, but the constancy of altitude obtained is not
too low was by arranging the launching before dawn,
sufficient for many meteorological applications. The
so that after the bursting of the first balloon and the
purpok of the present investigation' was to develop
subsequent descent, superheating of the balloons by
a balloon with a control system which would fly a t a
the rising sun would cause the whole assembly to rise
predetermined constant level for periods of many
again, thereby increasing the duration of the flight.
hours. Such a balloon has wider application than the
The system does not have sufficient control for many
Ocean drift bottle, because, whereas the latter is
purposes.
limited to surface (or near surface) currents, controlled
The much-publicized use of balloons by the Japanese
free balloons may be set to drift at any pressure
in the last war represents an attempt which must be
elevation desired, or along other thermodynamically
considered highly suecessful from the point of view of
defined surfaces, as long as the element defining the
the length of time which the balloons stayed in the air.
surface changes in a monotone fashion in the vertical.
Here the objective was not to obtain any critical
In addition to the uses for maintaining 'instruments
altitude control, but rather to insure that the balloons
a t high elevations, there are numerous potential appli-
remained floating. The Japanese nonextensible bal-
cations of these balloons. Direct measurements of air
loons were of two types. One type was of heavy paper,
trajectories and of lateral diffusion become possible.
coated t o minimize diffusion, of spherical shape, about
The balloons may also be used as vehicles to convey
25 t o 30 f t in diameter, and containing about 19,000
and drop radiosondes over ocean areas. One problem
cubic feet of gas. A solid-ballast control system was
in this application is t o obtain an absolute altitude
utilized and gas was valved a t a low internal pressure
tie-in point, as i t will be difficult t o identify the point
(about two inches of water) to prevent the balloons
at which the radiosonde reaches the sea surface.
from rupturing due to the increase of the internal
pressure by altitude fluctuations or radiation changes.
2. Earlier attempts
Such a valve tends to conserve the lifting gas but acts
There have been numerous attempts for various as a safety device to prevent damage of the envelope
purposes to get a balloon or group of balloons to stay due t o too great an internal pressure.
at a fairly constant altitude. Meisinger was interested The solid-ballast system was complex; approxi-
mately 900 pounds of sand was used on each balloon,
1 Sponsored by, and in cooperation with the Watson Laboral
tories of the Air Materiel Command. distributed in thirty-six bags. The dropping of ballast
AUGUST 1948 A T H E L S T A N F . S P I L H r Z U S , C . S . S C H N E I D E R , A N D C . B . M O O R E 131

was controlled by a baroswitch arrangement which properties are: (a) low brittle temperature, (b) IOW
dropped a bag by igniting a fuse when the altitude fell permeability, (c) high tensile strength, (d) high tear
below any one of four different levels between 25,000 resistance, (e) chemical stability, (f) high radiation
and SO00 ft. In addition, a delay mechanism consisting transmission or reflection. Polyethylene soon recom-
of a two-minute fuse was arranged between successive mended itself for use, with its brittle temperature of
switches so that after ballast was dropped, tw6 minutes below -8OF. I t is apparently unaffected by ultraviolet
would be allowed for the balloon to regain its altitude; and ozone. The permeability through one mil of thick-
if i t did not regain in this time another bag of ballast ness and one square meter of area for 24 hours is ten
would be dropped. The system was inefficient because liters for hydrogen and seven liters for helium, at
if any one of the thirty-six fuse arrangements failed, normal atmospheric temperature and pressure.
no more ballast was dropped.
The second type of Japanese balloon was similar,
in general, but slightly larger; it was made of oiled
silk and therefore would stand a greater internal
pressure (approximately six inches of water). T h e
higher the internal pressure that the balloon can
stand, the less gas need be valved under conditions of
superheating or altitude fluctuations. The Japanese
released many balloons of these types from their
islands and estimated five to seven per cent of those
released reached the west coast of this country. The
balloons floated between the surface and 30,000 f t
above sea level; those which reached the west coast
must have remained aloft from four to ten days. While
the altitude maintained was not constant, these bal-
loons were highly successful for the time they remained
in the air.
An attempt in this country was made in 1943 by the
Dewey and Almy Company, to obtain constant-level
balloons which would float at altitudes up to 15;OOO
ft. An ordinary 350-gram meteorological balloon was
used but its volume was controlled by a nonextensible
shroud around it. With this method a flight at about
SO00 f t was obtained at fairly constant altitude for
about an hour and a half.
FIG.1 . Polyethylene balloon, 20-ft diameter.
3. Design of controlled-altitude balloons
Polyethylene is also relatively easy to fabricate. I t
As a result of the Japanese and other expeiiments, has an ultimate tensile strength of 1,900 pounds per
the use of a nonextensible envelope for the balloons square inch at 25C, which, in a 15-ft balloon made out
was indicated. If a perfectly nonextensible balloon of four-mil fabric, represents a working pressure of
could be built with no diffusion through the walls, and about 2.3 inches of water. The tensile strength at the
which could withstand a high internal pressure, it temperatures at which the balloon flies at high altitude
would automatically stay at a constant density where may be more than three times the value quoted above.
the buoyancy of the full balloon equaled the load. In Fig. 1 shows a polyethylene balloon2 flown success-
practice, control devices are needed to offset the leak- fully in Flight 26 described below. Another film in-
age and diffusion of gas, to compensate for vertical vestigated is Saran, which has ten times the tensile
currents in the atmosphere, to correct for the motion
strength of polyethylene-three times the strength
of the balloon due to diurnal changes of the balloon’s
across the seams. Saran has a higher transparency and
temperature, and to compensate for the valving of gas
one-thirtieth the permeability of polyethylene. T h e
which is necessary to prevent rupture of the envelope.
effective brittle temperature of Saran for this work is
I t was decided to use a plastic as the balloon fabric,
not known reliably.
as some modern plastics are quite transparent to radia-
B. Ballast valve.-The altitude control is an auto-
tion, strong, easily fabricated, and relatively inexpen-
matic ballast-dropping device3 consisting essentially of
sive as compared with coated fabrics.
A. Choice of plastics.-In the selection of a plastic * Made by General Mills, Inc.
* Made by Kollsman Instrument Division of Square D Com-
material of which to make the balloons, the desirable pany.
 MULUST INLET TUBE rcstraining cord and allows a needle valve to seal off
' A
the diaphragm from any further access to the air
M E E M VALVE (fig. 2). 'The capsule then contains a volume of air
which has been trapped a t the existing pressure and
temperature, a t the time of operation of the sealing
switch. Thereafter the aneroid will withdraw the
ballast-control needle valve when the ambient pressure
increases to the point where the entrapped air is com-
pressed below this volume.
Fig. 4 shows the minimum pressure switch which
makes the electrical contact a t the time of seal-off. I t
consists of a trapped volume of air that is allowed to
escape through a mercury pool as long as the outside
pressure is decreasing. As soon as the exterior pressure
increases once more, however, mercury is drawn into
the tube, making the seal-off contact between two
electrodes.
FIG.2. .\titomatic ballast valve.
4. Height determination
a diaphragm-operated needle valve which jettisons Up to the present time, the standard radiosonde has
liquid ballast whenever the balloon is below the alti- been used in order to determine the altitude a t which
tude a t which the control is actuated. This is shown in the balloon is flying. This permits a regular radiosonde
fig. 2. The ballast reservoir (fig. 3), in general, can
ascent t o be obtained during the period that the bal-
hold 15 kilograms of the liquid ballast-usually com-
loon is rising. Thereafter, as the balloon remains a t
pass fluid, a highly refined kerosene-type petroleum
approximately the same altitude, i t becomes somewhat
product. When the atmospheric pressure outside the
difficult to identify the radiosonde contact, but utiliz-
diaphragm is 5 millibars above the internal pressure,
ing both the temperature and pressure indication, this
160 grams of ballast per minute flow under a one-foot
is possible. A special radiosonde modulator of the
head. When the automatic ballast valve is wide open, Olland type has been designed (fig. 5). The pressure
which is after 6.5 millibars increase over the internal
pressure, 300 grams per minute flow. These values may f
be compared with a diffusion loss of lift of the order
of magnitude of 10 grams per hour from the thicker
15-ft balloon described below. Quite positive altitude
control can be obtained.
Efforts are made to cause the static rate of leakage,
i.e., the leakage which proceeds when the automatic
ballast valve is closed, to exceed slightly the rate of
loss of lift due to the diffusion of the lifting gas from
the balloon. To facilitate setting the fixed leak, a
manually operated ballast valve, consisting of a leak
adjustable by means of a fine needle valve, is added to
the ballast-release a ~ s e m b l y . ~
C. Minimum pressure switch.-Obviously, the auto-
matic ballast valve must not be in operation while the
balloon is rising, as this would be a waste of ballast.
Therefore the automatically operated needle valve is PRESSURE Wl

closed until the balloon reaches altitude. This is ac- BATTERY eox
complished by having the loaded diaphragm of the
altitude control open to the atmosphere until the
balloon descends from a minimum pressure. .At this
time, an electrical contact is made and a squib6 cuts a
Since this manuscript was written, the procedure has been
simplified. Only a simple fixed leak is used for daytime flights. AUTOMATIC"
BALLAST VALVE
\ 'kB A W S T VALVE
The automatic ballast valve is used alone for flights through DISCHARGE TUBE
sunset or sunrise.
'A small electrically detonated charge. FIG.3. Ballast-release assembly.
AUGUST 1948 ATHELSTAN F . SPILH.-ZUS, C . S . S C H S E I D E R , A S D C . €3. MOORE 133

capsule and linkage is of conventional design but in only. Some of these flights were relatively successful
place of the commutator bar, a motor driven helix is as a beginning method but the dropping of discrete
employed. This system permits the determination of quantities of sand caused too great fluctuation of alti-
tude and therefore was abandoned later. The first
successful flight stayed at 51,000 ft, plus or minus 100
ft, .for 38 minutes; another remained between 30,000
and 40,000 ft for 147 minutes. The latter shows the
same characteristic time-altitude curve as the cosmic-
ray clusters, although its altitude control is superior.
I t is not believed that much improved altitude control
can be obtained, utilizing ordinary meteorological bal-
loons. Flight termination was usually due to deteriora-
tion of the balloon caused by the sun.
In the first flight utilizing plastic balloons, a cluster
of ten seven-foot diameter balloonse was used. The
load on the cluster was 16.5 kilograms. -An altitude
control was used. Unfortunately, the maximum alti-
tude reached was not as high as the predetermined
altitude which was selected to seal the diaphragm of
the automatic ballast valve. .is a result, the cluster
rose to ceiling and stayed at this altitude for a short
while. Diffusion and leakage of helium produced a loss
of lift at the rate of 125 feet per minute.
FIG.4. Minimum pressure switch (mercurial). The next flight was made with a single pol?-ethylene
balloon, 15 ft in diameter. T o insure sealing-off, the
pressure data without knowledge of the history of con- ballast-release diaphragm was set to operate at an
tact sequence or of the ascent or descent of the balloon. altitude of 12,000 f t , considerably below the calculated
as is required in the conventional radiosonde. ceiling of the balloon. After a dawn release the balloon
continued to ascend to 15,100 f t where it leveled off,
5. Tracking of the balloon then slowly descended to 9000 ft due to diffusion
The balloons that have been flown by the writers losses. At this altitude the ballast release began to
usually have been tracked by theodolites. Airplanes operate and thereafter the balloon maintained its
have also been used, to extend the observations. These altitude within f 1 3 0 0 f t for a period of 43 hours before
two methods require the balloon to be visible and not the radio signal was lost. However, in the first two
obscured by cloud cover. When available, ground hours of this period, before the convection currents
radar has been used in tracking the balloons, with Made by General Mills, Inc.
good results.
A series of SCR 658 radio direction-finders is also 1
used, arranged in a net along the expected trajectory ,
,SUITABLE
of the balloon. In addition, aircraft equipped with LIGHT WEIGHT
HOUSING TO
inverted search radar have been employed to extend
the tracking net. v! ’ ~ INSTRUMENT
DURING FLIGHT

6. Flight results iITIONED

BY ATMOSPHERIC
While the characteristics of various plastics were PRESSURE ACTING
ON CAPSULES
being investigated, four preliminary flights were made
with clusters of ordinary meteorological balloons, from tc- HELIX
16 to 26 in number, to which two to four towing
balloons were attached. The towing balloons were cut
free by a baroswitch at a predetermined altitude. The
remainder of the balloons were inflated so that they
exactly balanced the load hung from the cluster. To ~-- i n
PLUG - .UAVE
.. ..-
offset diffusion, sand was dropped from an arrange- MOTOR
CONNECTIONS WIRED
DRIVING HELIX AT
ment of tubes, 9 to 16 in number, each containing ABOUT 2 RPM
TO EACH CONTACT ARM,
TO HELIX AND
about 200 to 1500 grams of sand ballast. This ballast
was dropped by a baroswitch mechanism on descent
134 J O U R N A L OF METEOROLOGY VOLUME 5

from the desert set in, the balloon maintained an alti- The theodolite lost the balloon in clouds earlier and
tude of 9200 f 150 f t . the airplane observer never succeeded in seeing it, so
An explanation as to why the ballast release func- the balloon may have remained for a considerably
tioned at 9OOO f t , although i t was set to operate a t longer period at this altitude. Eleven hours after be-
12,000 ft, is plain from the following data. The air in ginning the ascent, the balloon was reported to have
the diaphragm was sealed off on the dawn ascent a t been seen over Albuquerque, New Mexico, and about
12,000 ft, where the pressure was 657 mb and the 26 hours later a report was made from Pueblo,
temperature 9C. However, by the time the balloon Colorado, which seemed to indicate that the balloon
passed through this level during the slow descent, the was still in the air a t that time. The meteorological
instrument temperature was 19C. This means that situation and wind data for that area at the time of
the pressure of the air trapped inside the diaphragm flight support the contention that the latter observa-
was higher than it was at time of seal-off. tions were of the same balloon.
For the ballast valve to function, the balloon had to The next flight consisted of an assembly of various
descend to a pressure which would be greater by about balloons, as follows:
3 mb than the pressure of the trapped air a t its now
higher temperature. Of course, there was little ventila- One 15-ft diameter 0.008-inch polyethylene balloon,
tion past the instrument, and therefore the instrument Six 7-ft diameter General Mills 0.001-inch poly-
temperature was about 25C above the ambient tem- thene balloons,
perature after the sun had risen. Two 350-gm meteorological balloons for stadia
The automatic ballast valve operates when the measurements.
volume inside the sealed diaphragm becomes slightly
The single balloon had a measured diffusion loss of
less than the volume a t seal-off. Denoting the altitude
lift of 4 grams per hour. The General Mills balloons
a t which it can operate by the subscript h, the pressure
were observed to lose lift a t the rate of about 100
divided by the temperature a t this altitude will equal
grams per hour per balloon.
the pressure at the seal-off altitude divided by the
Three of the 7-ft balloons were inverted and deflated
trapped-air temperature a t the time of seal-off; in
shortly after launching, due to differences in the rates
this case
of rise of the various balloons in the cluster. Therefore,
p , = 657 mb
the altitude reached was not high enough to effect
T , = 9C = 282A
seal-off. ( I t is for this reason that the minimum pres-
Th = 3 9 c = 312A,
sure switch was developed for use in later flights.)
where the subscript s refers to seal-off. Thus the pres- Fig. 9 shows the elevation and plan views of the
sure a t altitude h is given by track of this flight. The train leveled off a t 16,500 ft.
The diffusion loss of lift of the remaining balloons wa;
Ph = P8Tt,/T8= 727 mb.
approximately 300 grams per hour. The ballast valve
This pressure, at which ballast release will begin, cor- used had an unusually high rate of static leakage
responds to an altitude of 9000 ft, which is the ob- which had been measured before release and found to
served altitude maintained by the balloon for nearly be 310 grams per hour. Thus fortuitously, t h e loss of
43 hours, until the radiosonde tracking signal was lost. lift was compensated by ballast leakage. This nearly
AUGUST1948 A T H E L S T A N F . S P I L H A U S , C . S . S C H N E I D E R , A N D C . B . M O O R E 135

valving is undesirable and may, in part, be minimized

by use of a restraining safety valve set in the appendix,
which will allow some slight pressure to be carried in
the balloon, preventing gas loss a t the peaks of minor
oscillations but still valving gas before the balloon
ruptures due to too great an internal pressure.
In this system of control, the automatic valve is not
sealed off until the balloon starts a descent due to
cooling or other changes in lift, as when night falls.
Upon descent the valve is activated and starts drop-
ping ballast ‘immediately; this continues until the
balloon is no longer losing lift a t a rate greater than
the diffusion losses. The balloon will then rise above
its former ceiling to a height determined by the weight
of ballast dropped, and remain there as long as there
is ballast to compensate for lift losses. Flight 17, repro-
duced in fig. 7, used a low-leakage balloon and is an
I actual case of ceiling control. I t may be compared with
the idealized time-altitude curves in fig. 6.
FIG. 7. Height-time curve of balloon Flight 17. Released at In the second system of control the static rate of
Alamogordo, New Mexico, on 9 September 1947 at 1647 MST
(105th meridian). Recovered near Pratt, Kansas, 530 miles leakage is less than the diffusion loss of lift. In this
distant. case the balloon will descend to the floor, where the
automatic control operates and the balloon floats a t
constant leakage held the balloon at 16,800 f 700 f t
an equilibrium altitude where the rate of ballast re-
for 7 hours. The duration of the flight was 91 hours.
lease exactly balances the rate of loss of lift. Floor
When the original 2700-gram ballast was expended, control conserves ballast, since only that needed for
the balloon descended rapidly. Even had the auto- altitude control is released. However, the altitude of
matic ballast valve been functioning, the constancy of the floor varies diurnally as the temperature of the
altitude would have been the same. This seems to indi-
entrapped air in the automatic ballast valve is affected
cate that only a minimum of automatic control is
by solar radiation. Two methods are being investigated
needed, provided that diffusion losses are slightly to circumvent this undesirable feature. One is to
overcompensated by a constant ballast leak.
Other flights also indicate the importance of a check N o r
valve in the balloon appendix to prevent dilution of
the lifting gas with air. If this is not done, the altitude
reached is far under the theoretical altitude deter-
mined by the displacement and gross load.

7. Control systems
Two systems of control are possible with the equip-
ment as described. The balloon is controlled between
an upper level (ceiling), where the full balloon buoy- W E
ancy just equals the load, and a lower level (floor),
below which the automatic ballast valve operates.
Schematic curves for these two systems of control are
shown in fig. 6.
In the first system of control the rate of static ballast
leakage is greater than the diffusion loss of lift, and
the balloon will stay at the ceiling. If it is displaced
above the ceiling the buoyancy is insufficient t o bal-
ance the load and i t will descend again. Provided the S
rate of ballast discharge is greater than the rate of lift FIG. 8. Wind vectors at 16,000 feet for El Pas0 (EO), Albu-
by loss of gas this ceiling will slowly rise by valving of querque (ABj, and Roswell (THJ), at 03h, 09” and l S h (MST)on
7 July 1947, in connection with balloon Flight 11, mean motion
gas, and as gas is lost by diffusion. The less the amount of which is shown by the balloon vector. Cross-hatched sector
of gas the lower the pressure (higher ceiling) must be contains all wind vectors at these three stations for the three
observation hours and for the three levels, 14,000, 16,000, and
for the gas to fully distend the envelope. Unnecessary 18,000 feet.
1.36 J 0 I* 12 S .IL 0 F ,\I E T E 0 R 0 L 0 G Y VOLUME5

temperat iirc-conil,cns,\tc tlw tlinphragni, the other to by these stations. Over El Paso, the wind direction
insulate and sliicltl the valve from radiation. a t 16,000 ft (the approximate average altitude of the
Using the ceiling-control system, flights of less than balloon during the greater part of the flight) was
24 hours not passing through sunset, ma>- be held a t approximately SW a t 03h, ESE a t 09h, and ESE a t
ceiling by use of a nonestensible b;illoon and a simple lSh. Over Roswell, the apparent average wind direction
fixed rate of leak to over-compensate diffusion losses. a t 16,000 ft was S during this period. Over Albuquerque,
The constancy of level will be better the lower the which was considerably farther from the path of the
diffusion and the lower, therefore, the rate of rise of balloon than the other two stations, the wind direction
the ceiling. The automatic control is needed for flights a t 16,000f t was variable between WSW and SSE during
lasting through a period in which day changes to night. the interval from 03h to lSh. In contrast with these
observations is the fact that the constant-level balloon
8. Preliminary trajectory analysis of two constant- floated in an essentially steady WSW current between
level balloon flights, 7 July 1947' 06h and 09h.
In fig. 8 the wind observations a t 16,000 f t have been
The most striking feature of the constant-level bal-
plotted for El Paso, Roswell, and 4lbuquerque for 03h,
loon flight (Flight 11, fig. 9) originating at A\lamogordo
09h, and lSh. The wind directions a t 14,000 ft, 16,000
.Ammy ;\ir Base a t 0Sh08" MST8 on 7 July 1947 is the
ft, and 18,000 ft (only the intermediate level is shown
disagreement between the actual trajectory and the
in the figure) are all contained in the 150-degree sector
trajectory that might have been estimated from routine
between directions 90" and 240"; yet the mean motion
upper-wind reports. In this connection the observations
of the balloon (approximately 265') between 0Sh48"
from the Weather Bureau stations a t El Paso, Roswell,
and 13hll" falls entirely outside this sector.
and -4lbuquerque have been examined, since the path
-4n indication that this local WSW current was of
of the balloon was contained within the triangle formed
small depth is given by a special upper-wind observa-
The authors are indebted to Prof. G. Emmons for contributing tion made a t White Sands at about 13h. The observa-
the major part of this section.
* Mountain Standard Time-105th meridian civil time. All tion in question recorded a wind direction of 250" at
further time references will be tacitly MST. 16,000 f t , which is in excellent agreement with the first

0
Rorrw

"'I Rorwe
AAF

Trajectory
Scale 0 ,' '? fM2esJ

FIG.9. Height-distance curve and planned trajectory of balloon Flight 11. Released at Alamogordo, New Mexico,
7 July 1947, at 0508 MST. (Numerals on curves indicate minutes after release.)
 AUGUST1948 A T H E L S T A N F . S P I L H A U S , C . S . S C H N E I D E R , . A N D C . B . M O O R E 137

part of the trajectory of the constant-level balloon. ing effect of the mountain barrier is apparent. This,
The interesting fact about the White Sands observa- however, is to be expected, as the altitude of the bal-
tion is that at all but one of the other reported altitudes loon above the mountain top is three times that of
between the ground and 20,000 ft, the wind directions Flight 11, where this anticyclonic deformation of the
were from either the N E or S E quadrants. trajectory was observed. ‘The balloon was ultimately
The trajectory of the balloon curved slightly anti- recovered from Croft, Kansas, a distance of 530 miles
cyclonically over the eastern slopes of the Sacramento from the release point; on the basis of the observed
Mountains. This characteristic is suggestive of the wind speeds a 12-hour flight duration is estimated.
well-known deforming effect of a mountain range on
an air current directed toward the axis of the range. 9. Conclusion
In this case, however, the validity of invoking the
aforementioned effect to explain the anticyclonic cur- Within the coming year it is hoped that a number
c.vature, when the wind at levels below the mountain of meteorological investigations may be attempted,
summits appears to have been blowing approximately utilizing constant-level balloons. Release of three or
parallel to the range, depends on assuming that the air more from a single point to float at the same level,
currents parallel to the range themselves constitute a release a t a number of points to obtain a synoptic
barrier deforming a higher current blowing in a differ- presentation of the trajectories in a chosen level, and
ent direction across the mountains. The sharp cyclonic the dropping of radiosondes from balloons are some of
bend that occurred after the balloon had come over the operations to be attempted. Efforts will be made
relatively flat country occurred at the time that the to simplify the arrangement so that a constant-level
balloon began its final descent and is due to the fact flight may be made in a routine fashion and at no
that the course of the balloon turned toward the north greater cost than the ordinary radiosonde flight.
as a result of descent to levels where the wind had
maintained a southerly direction throughout the day. REFERENCE
I t is of interest to compare this flight with Flight 1 7 Clarke, E. T., and S. .I.Korff, 1941: The radiosonde: the strato-
(fig. 10). I t may be observed on fig. 10 that no deform- sohere laboratory. -7. Franklin Znst., 232, 217-355.

FIG.10. Height-distance curve and planned trajectory of balloon Flight 17. Released at Alamogordo, New hlesiro, 9 Sepicmber
1947, at 1647 MSI‘. First 125 minutes only are shown. (Numerals on curves indicate minutes after release.)
 15
New York University
Progress Report No. 6
Constant Level Balloon
Section I1
June 1947
 sumnJ&
Dlririon, Project Eo. 93
~.sumh
 Delafing aotlon in
Goodyear’ a quotation
for bdlloorm.

. .
 Obtain Eavy cleararro
General M i l l s u-
loom look good for
our work.

0 Hew flights a t Alum- Set up t r i p to Al-

u
5110117 s.lu
gordo, P.M., where lover gordo for Hay 29.
I winds can be found.

5h3/67 Paul Gody of Kollrmvn InotruPPent Div. New dribbler design.

Sollwran I n s t n w n t Squnrs D Co.
C.B. M o o n W u F S t , LoI.~NoYo
Vulcan Proofing Coo Teeting of balloon Vulcan p r o o f i a g vould
Brooklyn, k Y . fabric8 and f i l m s . make tests.

5&/k7 Dr. Peopler, Hersrsr Vatson Laboratories, F i n a l arrangements for

A.H.Mearo, John Red Bank, #.J. Uamogordo t r i p .
Alden, Charlea
Irelad, C .SoSohneidor,
C.B. Mo&m
 A ooafensm v.8 held on Xay 1 a t Himmapolis v l t h Mr,
0 , 0 , rimon of O e n e n l n i l l a concerning tho manufacture of
balloon# by b n s d W r for thi8 project. A t the present tlnm
%hi8carpapq cannot supply ua with balloona until Navy clearance
i r obtained, hat it i s hoped that amngemnta can k comploted
in tha near futur,, Tha type of b s l 1 0 0 ~manufaotured Oneml
m 8 60- to k m u a t s d b tho med8 Of this pr0jeCt0

-4-
ondrd than kfom# duo to tho hiring of mom personnel. Tho
joint laboratory am3 offico uhich this pmjeot s h m s Vith
.rrother ir highly inadoquak for rix men of thoirr and e l m a
of oum - 8 total of 17 man In 8 spa- 8ppm-t.ly l5xl5 foot,

Until p l a a t i a hlloort. can be obtained, v. w i l l continw

to ?ly oltuterr of ~ ~ e k o r o l o g l c ab la l l o o ~ .

0. 4pp.mtus and lhuim*

only rubrtmtial chary i n eqafpwnt duriw tho
p r i o d oorored t h i n -part, o t b r than general strengthoni~q
of -4 llnor, l r th. 8ddition of 8 xmv main ~ l ballast
d dropping
drrioo to tha oquigunt tnin of tho f l i g h t 8 to k d o 8t W g o r d o ,
 It IS k l l e v d tht vith present aquipment tho W ~ O I ~ O )
Bew X~X~CO area
, l r tho m8t auitablo available for launching
ppfporeu, slat30 calm virdr are conrlstently present a t dawn) a d
thore are a mhhm of Clod8 to impair g ~ o obrenation
d of tho
blloonr i n flight.

-6-
 See also
Weaver Attachment 25
 Covering Period from January 1, 1947
t o April 30, 1947

CONSTANT LEVEL BALLOON

Research Division, Project No. 93

Premred i n Accordance with Provisions of Contract

lw’28-099ac-;iW, between
Watson LaborBtories, Red Bank, New Jersey
ard
New York University

Assistant Project Director

rb--u-&zs
1 L-LL-L. -.
Approved by: J-
Renato Contini
Acting Director of Research

Research Division
College of Engineering
May, 1947
 A prelbhary survey bas nmde of the problerc. Speci-
fications were drawn up f o r the equipment needed and mrinu-
facturers were contacted t o constnact experimental balloons
and altitude controls.

A balloon c r e w was assembled.

k l l l e awaiting delivery on the NXU designed equit;ment,

clusters of meteorological baUoons have been flown for experi-
ence and as a stop-gap rmthod of carxying a payload bo altitude.
In addition, two salvaged, racing-tm, man-carxying balloons
of 35,000 cubic foot s i z e have been procured and are being pre-
pared for flight. Two 19,W cubic foot Ja-xmese balloons ham
been mado availahlo bg the Navy.

Preliminary calculations bnve been made on balloon

tuoyaaaiea and families o f curves plotting altitude VS. lift
for various balloon 8iLbs bavb been prepared for planning and
flight -SOB*

Cfvfl Aeronautics Authority has given clearance for

flight of large balloons form Lakehurst, New Jersey, and Bethlebm,
Pennsylvania, w i t h certain mstrictiom .

-1-
 FEPORT

I. The personnel workbe on t h i s project consists of the follot;ir,s

full-time employees:

-
rme -
Duties Qua1i f icat ions

Charles 8 . Szhneider Asst. Pro j . Direc%or Former weather equipmect

o f f i c e r , Army Air Forces
doing similar bark durqn;:
tbe war. Elec. Engineering,
Brooklyn Polytechzic & ?nnr
Charles B. Moore Jr. Research Eugineer Former weat be r equipment
officer, Amy Air Forces
doing similar work during
the b a r . Graduate of
Georgia School of Technolo=
in Chemical Engineering.
Richard Hassard Chief of Flight Detail Former Signal Corpos Officer,
E3ec. Ebgineering at YYU.
Murry HaclanaLl In chmge of the Former weather e q u i w n t
Electronic b a t h e r Technician, Degree in
Equimt. Mathematics and Statistics
City College of Xew Pork.
I n addition t o the above W - t i m e employees, the following
part-time pemonael are now working on the project:

-
Name -
Dut its Qualifications

Henry Ramnrenzind Computations & Equip- Undergraduate Elec.

m n t Construction Engineering Student.
Ralph Norroll Ruipmnt Construction Undergraduate Admin.
&@.neerIng Student.
James Smith Wather Obeener sled Formaer Weather Observer
DraFtsmarr in drngr and Undergraduate
Engineering Student.
Uilliam lber Mschinist Undergraduate Engineering
studat.

-2-
 The f o l l o b i n p personnel -re h b e d but later resigned:

Duties gualif icatlons

Robert 'iisnieff % p i p = n t Construction UndergraduatF Pbysicist
Student .
Robert Ferris Equipment Construction Undergraduate P b s lcs
Student
Fred k r k e r &-Uipmen t Construction Undergraduate Aeronautics
Engineering Student.

11. T h e following admhistrative action bas been taken in connection

wi'th this controct:

Personnel

1. The assi@unent of Charles S , Scbneider to act as Assis-ant

Project Dk8ctOr.
2. The smploymsnt of Char1es.B. Moore Jr. of Georgia Tech. as
a Research Assistant with d u t i e s as Ebgineer.

3. Murry Hackman was engaged t o "Wse charge of the Electronic

weather e q u i p n t due to his past experience as a weather equipment

technician and as an instructor of the M F classes in the maintenance of

radiosonde receptor AN/EMQ-l aad radio directional finder SCR-658 at

Chanute F i e l d , Illinois.

4 . Richard Bassard, a former S i G a l Corps Officer was hired

because of his general how$edge of electrical and radio circuits to
handle the construction of special flight e q u i p n t .

Eauirn#nt

5. As l?ewXork University did not possess all tbe necessarg

equipnt 8 list oi oquipm3nt wa6 pepared and sutmitted to tb

Gooemmat with tihe m p s t that this equipent be loaned or furnished

-3-
b? $he g o v e r m n t . To c e t e m:t of t n i s e.,ui;acnt x.5 cetn recfri:Ci

I.:X k e exct.,:io;l o f tne d I / E b i q - l , 5CIi-6?3 cnd ;he ?ref= brichtec

bc',lcings Eeece3. f o r s i f i c e erd s t o r - gc s+ce.

6. The l i s t of e%ui?ment t&t t;;ls submittsC t o t h c governnect

consisteci o f the m j o r i t e n s t h s t v e r e necessary. fiowever, k c r ' i j e

mdny mall htnt t ool s a 1 5 rrciio ?arts cnd other equi:;aent were x e 6 s d
f w r i o c i c z l l y a -Mtty cesh f m a of 2100 LTS set GJJ t o fccilitxte

?urchcse o:* sm11 items. 4. further request i?Es been sutnitted. t o the

Chancellor of the University reLues5ing thLt t h i s S e t t y C L S ~be

incre&ae~to $200 &nG that B t r a v e l furxi of GlCO be estbolisnec.

Eousiry
7. The e x i s t i = i n f i a t i o n chelt,or a t the school f m the
Met,eorologicel Ge-=rtment's use wes not sdequste t o hmxile the lzrge

d i e n e t e r 2 l a s t i c balloons thE.t we ?lan t o use. Therefore G recuest

wzcc submittee =kqproved by the Contracting Officer fcr the con-

s t r u c t i o n of a 27 ft. cube inflEtion shelter on the cmi~pusof Rew

Tork University. D u e t o r e s t r i c t i o n s placed on us by the Air 3y.ce

Subcormittee of the C i v i l Aeronautics Authority, Xew York gffice,

it has since been decided not t o erect this inflation shelter in the
New Pork & m e , but d e r t o use existing f a c i l i t i e s a t Lakehurst,

New 3ersep o r OLnsteac Field, Ylddletown, New Jersey.

Sub-Contmcts

8. Permission was secured from the Contr-cting Officer of the

Fatson Laboretories t o plsce two sub-contr&cts. One was for thz fabri-
c a t i o n of p l c s t i c balloons axxi was placed with Harold PI. Szith Inc.,
of 'Xm=ro=ck, New York.. This s u b e o n t r e c t amount& t o $7,565. The
second sub-contrcct was glace6 w i t h KoUsmen Instrument Civision of
Square D Incorporated st Elmhurst, Long Island, New Pork. This

sub-contrzct was f o r tne construction of model a l t i t M e controls

a d timounted t o $7,446.
Correspondence written during t h i s period i s as follows:

Date of
Corres-
pondence Address Abstract Answer

11/7/16 Plax Corp Forwarding P.0.#5983 3 o t furnished.

Hartford, Conn. & Requesting price
A t t : Ya. G r i f f i t h quotation aad delivery
schedule f o r 4 d i f f .
thicknesses of 36" wide
polyethylene sheet
(.001" .00225" .004"
snd .008".

11/7/46 Visking Corp. Request t o know w h a t

Chicago, Ill. maxfmtrm d d t h Poly-
Mr. Cahn ethylene could be
supplied in, a d
w h a t the cost and
delivery d a t e would
be.

12/4/46 Visking Corp. Advising i n t e r e s t i n 72" circumference

Chicago, Ill. securing 300 f t . of 72" Polythylene tube
Em B e C
w circumference poly- could be furnished.
ethylene tubing re- Reqwst t o know
quest information on quantity and thick-
thickness and price. ness ,002 mil thick
$1.4O/lb. estimate
and would need 19
lbs .
E/l.O/& Dewey & Almy Chem. Co. Acknowledging receipt None required.
Cambridge, Mass. of material used by
A t t : Mr. Langley V. Isom Mr. Isom i n his con-
s t a n t l e v e l balloon
work, Also advising
that order for single
and double neck 1000
gram balloons had been
placed.

- 5 -
12/16/46 Celanese Celluloid Corp. Advising this company Advising they 60
180 Xadison
_-
Lvonue of our desire t o fabri- slot believe ethyl
New York, A. X. cate 2 balloon fron plcts- cellulose would
t i c f i h ani our inter- work secondly that
e s t i n ethyl cellulose they do not mke
as a possible 2 l a s t i c film only 3Dlding
film t o be used f o r zmder -co l i t e r t -
this construction. Ee- t-me w a i l a b l e .
quest t h a t l i t e r a t u r e
be sup2lied showing
low temperature char-
acteristics, tensile
strength, etc.

12/17/46 Nixon Nitrogen Vorks Same request made of Advising they o n l y

Nixon, New Jersey t h i s company as with make m l d i n g
Celanese Celluloid powder.
Corp.

12/17/L6 ? l a x Corp. Advising t h a t E. L. None required.

Hartford, Conn. Cournard Co., re-
k t t : Xr. G r i f f i t h commended by Plsx,
haa declined the
c o n t r m t f o r fabri-
cation of balloons.
That Unexcelled Chem.
Corp. of New Bruns-
wick hed agreed t o
t h i s fabrication aad
sup2lied the necessary
shipping eddress f o r
the polyethylene.
12/17/46 Dewey & filmy Chem. Co.
Cambridge, Piass
A t t : M r . Isom
. Acknowledging receipt
of single and double
Advising that nub
must be cut with
neck balloons. Double s c i s s o r s i n order
neck balloons were t o get double neck.
received with a single
neck plus a nub on the
top of the balloon.
Request t o know
whether shiTment was
i n e r r o r ard i f so
whet J i s p o s i t i o n t o
be mde.

12/17/46 Dow Chem. Co. Same reqtlest made of Not received.

Miclland, Mich. t h i s compzny es that
made with Celctnese
Celluloid Corp.

- 6 -
12/24/46 Unexcelled Chem. Corp. Advising $he ?lax Cor?. Advising t b t .OOZ
Harold. X . Smith had been supplied with mil thickness t o o
h i s ship7ing cduress thin. Suggested
and ~ l s oresuesting emeavorinq t o
his technical advice obthin 72" wicith
on t'ne f e L s a b i l i t y of in .a06 nil.
using z 72" w i 2 e strip
of Solyethylene, E mil.
thickness that Visking
C o q . of Chicago could
supply

1/3/47 HarolC? A. Smith Acknowledge r e c e i p t of New quotation

l e t t e r of December 26th furnished.
containing estimated
c o s t of f a b r i c a t i o n of
balloon. advising that
the bid could not be
accepted on a c o s t p l u s
basis. ReGuesting tbt
t h e i r Quote bd resub-
mitted.

Advising t b t fabri-
1/3/47 Visking Corp.
,
Chicago I11 .
A t t : J. I;. Lane
cation of balloons a t
a 2 mil. thickness
Advising t h a t
they o n l y have
.004 and .006
polyethylene f i l m would 1 5 18" f l a t width.
be extremely d i f f i c u l t The 3611 wicth
t o headle. hequest request could be
made that information made but p i c e
be supslied on a 72"
circumference film 4-6
mils in thickness.
bitive .
would be p o h i -

1/8/47 Watson Laboratories Advising need of radio- Advising p a r t ship-

Red Bank, N. J. s o d e receptor SCR658 ment would be made
M r . A. H. Hears by NYU plus power units Feb. 13th.
and technical publi-
cations.

1/8/47 Vatson Laboretories Returning l i s t of Advising government

Red Bank, N. J. equi2ment t o the records cnaged ~ n d
Mr. A, H. Mears governmjnt loaned o r that catalogues
government furnished w i l l be sent d e r
with request t h a t separcte cover.
c e r t a i n corrections,
additions an3 deletions
be maae.

- 7 -
1/34/47 Bland Chzrnas Inc. Requesting t o know Advising that they
Yonkers, B. P. w h e t b r this compzny could not a s s i s t
would consider fabri- us i n fabrication,
cation o f 15 f t . d i a -
meter S l a s t i c balloon.

1/21/47 Shellmar.Projects Corp. Request that they quote Advising plant

M t . Vernon, Ohio on delivery and cost of could not cope w i t h
fabrication of 19 ea.15 poblem a t t h i s
f t . hplloons. Five t o time.
be fabricated from Saran
(Type M.00225" thick a&
5 fron polyethylene made
from PM-1.004t1 thick.

1/21/47 M l p r i n t Inc. Same request as l e t t e r Verbally informed.

Milwaukee, Wisc. t o Shellmar 1/21/47. Not interested.
h. P a u l B. Hultkrans

1/21/47 Rowe Packaging Co. Ltd. Same request as l e t t e r Wish t o make model
Toronto, Canada t o Shellmar 1/21/47. and submit same be-
fore quoting. Neve:
heard m h i
n g.

1/21/47 Western Products Inc. Same request as l e t t e r Acknowledged re-

Newark, Ohio t o Shellmar 1/21/L7. c e i p t of l e t t e r
and advising quot-
a t i o n would follow,
Did not arrive.

1/23/47 Kennedy Car L i n e r & Same request as l e t t e r Verbally informed.

Bag Co., Inc. t o Shellmar 1/21/47. Not inkerested.
Shelbycrille, Illdo

1/23/47 Unexcelled Che& C o q . Request for quote on New quotation

Harold A. Smith 15-15 f t . diameter bal- furnished.
loons and 6-3 f t . dia-
meter balloons t o be
fabricated from various
thicknesses o f Saran
and Polyethylene.

1/23/47 Watson Laboratories Advising that t o o l None required.

Red Bank, N. J. equipment TE-5OA was
Mr. A. H. Mears short a 6 n r u l e r a pr.
of tweezers, and 8
socket wrench, No
request f o r replacement
f o r these items made.

- 8 -
 Kollsman Instrument Co Reqdest f o r quotation Quotation supplied.
Elmhurst, i. I. of 3 ea. of the follow-
A t t ; T a u l souay ing c.ltitude control
equipment:
1. Motor switched
modulators.
2. Elec. controlled
dribblers.
.
3 ivkch. controlleO
dribblers

2/3/47 Contracting Officer Forwarding quote from Not approved.

Watson Laboratories Unexcelled & requesting
Red Bank, New J e r s e y approvsl.

2/7/47 Watson Laboratories Requestin& permission Perinission granted.

Red Bank, New J e r s e y t o build a 27 cubic foot
k t t : Xr. D. Rigney i n f l a t i o n shelter.

2/13/47 C o n t r a c t i G Off i c e r F o r w a d i x g quotation Permission graated

Watson Lab0ra t o r i e s received from Kollsman t o place subcontrac-
Red Bank,, New Jersey Instrument Co. f o r the
necessary control de-
vices for the constant
l e v e l balloon.

2/11/47 Patterson Bros. Advising t h a t one Ungar Replacement mde.

New York City e l e c t r i c soldering pencil
A t t : M r . H. Carey is being returned under
separate cover as it was
received i n unushble con-
d i t i o n . Request f o r re-
placement mde. Quotation
enclosed .
2/18/47 Contracting Officer Requesting p e r d s s i o n toPermission withheld.
Watson Laboratories place subcontrzct with
Red Bank, N. J. Unexcelled Chem. Corp.
for t h e f a b r i c a t i o n of
lxlloons .
;/;c~/47 General ?+lills Request thzt cquotation Declining t o quote
Minneapolis, M i n n . be su?-plied Tor the u n t i l a f t e r confer-
M r , 0. C. Winzen f a b r i c a t i o n of 15-15 i't. ence with P P U
d i m t e r k l l o o n s an6 representatives.
6-3 f t . diameter bzlloons
made of various thick-
ne 3so s o f >olyethylene
and Saran.

-9-
2/24/47 Blaru? Charms Co. Inc. Sane request a s l e t t a r 30 reply received.
New York C i t y t o General Ailis i/iL;/IIC7.

2/24/47 Leonard i.' Brb Sane request LS l e t t e r ;Jotation s u p l i e c i

Gooayedr Tire & Lubber t o General Aills 15 h p i l 1947.
Akron, Ohio 2/24/47. .~
NO znswer received.
3/6/47 liatson LLboratories F o n m r d i n g copy of
Red Bank, 11. 2 . l e t t e r of rekuest t h a t
Mr. arophy ,hd been sent t o i*.
H. A. Smith f o r t h e
f a b r i c a t i o n of balloons.

3/7/47 Contracting Officer Advising t h a t UnexcelledPermission granted.

Watson Laboratories Chem. Corp. did not wish
Red Bank, R. J. t o proceed with t h e con-
tract and that instead
H. A . Smith of Xamero-
neck, N. Y. was w i l l i n g
t o umiertake the f a b r i -
cation. Guotation from
Mr. Smith enclosed. Ee-
quest that a p r o v a l be
granted.

3/7/47 Godyear Tire & Rubber Request a quote on t h e Quotation supplied

Akron, Ohio f a b r i c e t i o n of 5 ea. 15 April 1947.
Mr. L. M. Hmb balloons' made from
Nylon covered with
s u i t a b l e neoprene and
5 ea. balloons made
f r o m f o r t i s a n covered
i n a similar fashion.
Advising t h a t any
recommendations con-
cerning balloon f a b r i c s
would be appreciiited.

3/7/47 Seyfang Laboratories Same request as l e t t e r Advised i n t e r e s t .

1300 Mediterranean Ave
A t l m t i c City, 14. J.
. t o General Wills 2/24. Ask f o r conference.

3/7/47 Unexcelled Chern. Corp. Requesting t h s t poly- Ho a c t i o n taken.

New Brunswick, TI. J . ethylene f i h t h a t ha3
been shippea t o them
from P l z x Corp. be
returned t o 3YU.
3/7/47 ~ 1 s . x Corp. Request tniit shi2ping sa- Xo answer required
Hartford, Corn. d r e s s f o r 2olyethylene
3r. k. E. h e s film be changed from
Unexcelled Chem. COT.,
New Brunswick, N.J. t o
.,
H. A. Smith, 490 Bleecker
Ave Xamaroneck, 11 .Yo
- 10 -
3/19/47 Unexcelled Chem. Corp. Cumfirming tslephone Film shis?ed.
New Ehnswick, 3 . J. conversp-tion i n which Quotation su??liee.
A t t : Ilr. Tegen authorization WES given
t o s h i ? polyethylene
f i l a t o YYU a m ecvis-
ing once again of cor-
r e c t S:ii??iq r,&dreas.

trequestix Juote snc! Chotation su?$ie~.

aelivery a a t e on f i b r e
screws I* long, f i l l i -
s t e r heai and 8-32
thread.

3/24/47 General i.iills Acknowledge l e t t e r of Asked for con-

Minneapolis, ILIinn. 3/11 and advising that ference in April.
M r . 0. C. Winzen our r e p r e s e n b t i v e s
would be pleased t o
discuss construc%ion
d e t a i l s of thc balloons.

3/2L/L? I*. R. S. bssard Advising him of 2ossibi- iIassard employed.

5 Hollywood Ave. l i t y of full-time posi-
Tuckahoe, N. Y. t i o n i n Research Div.
of IiYU. Requesting
t h a t he mke cppointiaent
for interview.
3/25/47 I*. George E. Weidner Requesting ? e m i s s i o n Invited t o v i s i t
Engineer Board for MU representztives Mr. Weidner.
Barrage Balloon Branch t o v i s i t with him t o
Ft. delvoir, Va. discuss constant level
balloons and s a f e t y
valves and control
devices.

3/27/47 H. A. Smith Requesting quote an Supplied

Mamaroneck, N. Y. valves.

3/29/47 H. A . Smith Request for Guote on Not received.

Namaroneck, li. Y. balloons fabricated
from nylon and f o r t i -
san film coated with
butyl rubber.

3/29/47 Seyfange LaborLtories Requesting quote on Received.

1303 Xediterranean Ave. 3 s e t s of stzibe-iizer
.
v
Atlantic City, ii. J fins.
3/31/47 J. R. Gamin Requesting y m t e f o r the Acknowledged.
Douglas Leigh Sky 50,000 CU. ft. balloons Asked for d e f i n i t e
Advertising Co. tkt this company re- express ion of
Lakehurst, N. J. ceivea fron sur$us. interest.

3/31/L7 Seyfang Laboratories Requesting m o t e on one Furnished.

1300 ?iediterrznean Lve. to f i v e each 15 f t .
a t l a n t i c City, 24. J. dianeter balloons mzde
of 3 02;. s i l k cloth
coated with neoprene
and 2 each 3 f t . aia-
meter balloons mule
f r o m t h e same material.

4/1/47 Mr. J. aoyle Requesting quote on Euote furnished on

A i r Cruisers Inc. 25-15 f t . diameter nylon f a b r i c coated
Clifton, N. J. balloons and 10-3 ft. with butyl rubber.
diameter balloons made Interested but want
from polyethylene .004t1 cost p l u s basis.
polyethylene .308lt
saran .00225a o
f o r t i s a n f a b r i c coated
with butyl rubber and
from nylon film.
4/1/47 Molded Latex Products Identical l e t t e r as Furnished.
Inc. above request t o A i r
Paterson, N. J. Cruisers Inc.

4/8/47 WfRE Requesting p i c e and

H. J. Brailsford & delivery date of 3
Co. Inc. v o l t price type relays.
Rye, I?. Y.
1/8/47 Capt. Albert C. Trakowski Forwarding minutes of None required.
Watson Laboratoriee
Red Bank, N. J. Nee t ing .
A i r Space Sub-Cosmittee

4/8/47 General idills Acknowledging receipt April date set.

i4inneapolis, l.Iinn. of March 31st l e t t e r
:Mr. (3. C. Winzen and notifying this
company that o u r re-
presentatives would
be pleRsed t o cone a t
t h e i r conveaience.

4/10/47 L I Z R e q w s t i G t o knou Answered.

H. G. Brailsford how relays ordered
Rye, 3. P. were sliisped.

4/10/47 WIFE Requesting permission Given.

Lehigh Gniversity t o make balloon re-
Bethlehem, Pa. l e a s e from Lehigh Uni-
_Prof. Frank I4yers v e r s i t y on 1 5 April.

- 12 -
 Requesting t o know Date Given.
4/1Q/t7 WIRE
whether A2ril 17th
Yeyfmg Laboratories
1300 i-iediterrznean Lve. o r 13th would be
Atlantic City, 13, J. satisfactory 50 Xr.
Frank C. Seyfang t o
meet N U represents-
tives t o i n q e c t
d0,OOO CU, f t . and
2-35,000 CU. f t . i n
Heightstown, 11. J.

4/11/47 WIHE Advising that single None needed.

D-Jr c?e Almy neck "00 gram balloons
Canbridge, Mass. shoula be furnished on
-%. 7, L. Dawbmn our order 148-48.

4/14/47 WIRE Advising blyu represen- F'urnisned.

Frank Seyfang t a t i v e could not keep
Seyfong Laboratories engagement for April
Atlantic City, N. 3. 17th t o inspect balloons
and requesting that
next be 8 t sdtable
b t e bs furnished.

4/15/47 WIRE Advising M U s t i l l Satisfactory

13r. Barney Frank interested i n pur-
27 Rochdale Ave. chase of balloons.
Roosevelt City, N. J. Requesting t h a t in-
spection .Ate be
changed from 17 hpr.
t o 23 kpr.

4/17/47 UIHE Advising tiae of None needed.

Lehigh University arrival a t Lehigh to
Bethlehem, Pa. release balloons.

4/17/47 3. Y. Sub-Committee on Advising t h a t dis- Request refused.

A i r Space crepancies observed In
385 &,dison h e . , NYC minutes of CAA m e t i n g
A t t : C. J, Stock and requesting t h a t
conditions for m r e
suitable f l i g h t s be
granted.

4/21/47 WIRE Advising t h s t EYU

General M i l l s representatives would
HiIm&$iS, xinn. aake d e f i n i t e date
Mr. G. C. Winzen for errival l a t e r i n
week.
4/21/47 iinm Confirming d a t e of None neeaed.
Barney Frank Apr. 2j f o r d a t e
27 Rochdale 6ve. - _ inspection of bl-
?bosevelt City, u. J . loons.

4/21/A7 jeyfzng Lhbomtories Confirming .zzte of 23 ansuere6.

Ltlrintic City, ii. J. mr. f o r date in-
sljtction of btilloons.

4/i3/47 XollsmEn Instrument CffiPgiK d e t z i l s i n Sone rze2ea.

Division a l t i t u b e control
80-08 45th t?venue purchase or?.er.
Elmhurst, L. I.

4/29/47 "IFE Advisiw t h a t 2 - Acknowledged.

Seyfang Laboratories 35,030 CU. f t . bal-
Atlantic City, 3. J. loons were purcksed
from Barney Frank
and t h a t t h e s e b.1-
loons were being
shis?ec t o h i x f o r
re?air.

4/23/47 Barney 'Frank Advising t h a t Univer- Acknowledged.

i 7 Rochdale Ave. Sits Tqould bw 2 -
Roosevelt City, 5 . J. 35,000 CU. f t . balloons
and that t h s s e balloons
should be shi2ped t o
Seyfang LLboratories .

-11-
 also held :

Peoole Preseni DisCU8sed C onc1us i o ns

Dr. J. Peoples, C. Uatson Laboratories Government Yurni shed

Irelcnd, b. Rlgrwy, Red Dunk, N. J. equi,irtwnt .
Capt. Srakowski,
H n c h n , Moore,
I Schneider

N. Brophy, Dr. J. Watson Laboratories Placcment of sub- HYU should v i s i t

Peopler, Cayt . Hed Bonk, 11:. J. coritrclcts for k l l o o n s Goodyear before
Trckawski, D. higney, with 11. A. Smith, Inc. u l n c i n i ; contritc t.
Schneider, +ioore
L t . Comdr. Harrison, Lakehurst Naval Air Jap klloons:. Jn? bhlloon-.3 \rcr'e
Dr. Poo,)les, Scbneider, Station s v s i l k b l e f'or
Moore, Hackman Lakahurst, 14. J. p o j ec t u r c.
J. Sturteirant, L. Ibrb, Goodyear Tire & hubbr Fabrication of
Schmider, Moore co. 1urE;e balloon:,
Akron, flhio

Dr. Peoples, D. kidney, Watson Lnboratories P1;icelnent of sub-

Moore, Schneider Red Eknk, 14. J. crintrLrct; f'oj b&loow
r . n i tdtitucle contxols.

r3r. Hagen, Dr. Prsndor- Molded Laatox A w e i t prty;:rh t i o n i~f

gr;st, Moore Puterson, ii. J . h quott::.
 L t . Gunther, Comdr. Lakehurst A i r Naval Use of Ltikohurdt ws Lhkehurst would be
Harrison, C. I r e l t d , S t t i t ion a lnunchiw site. a v a i l e b l e t o Lt tscm.
Moore Lakehurst, 14. J.

F. Seyrang, Mrs. F. Atlantic City, N. J. F a b r i c a t i o n of large A quobation bould

Seyfang, Noore, Seyfang Luborutories t* 1loo nci . be px.1:+x.red.
Schneider

Dr. Peoples, D. Higney, Watson Liboratories 1st ClucLar F l i g h t YrupHrc f o r k c o i x l

Moore, Schneidor Red &A&, li. J. E'liGht

R. Brophy, Mr. Cambridge New York Univorsity Contract bdministrztion Housing tioiild be
H. Contlni, M. G i m n i n i 9ruv i4ed by :;ov t .
Schneidtjr, Wore
P. Goucly, €4oore K o l l s m n Instrument Co. k l l b s t valve construc- Chtne;c inldetcils.
Elmhurst, L. 1. tion.

During the period covered bg t h i n r e p o r t , Mwssre. Moore and Schneider mde r e p i t 4 t r i p s t o

Kollsnran InetnaPent Co. and diecussed the f a b r i c a t i o n of the modulators und other e q u i p e n t t h c t Kollsnuin

was designing for our use. These meetings nave not been considered conferences but i'or the b e n c f ' i t of t h i s

re$ort t h e dtlly) Individuals were always present, Messrs. Schneider and Moore of New York Universitx and
Paul Goudy, Engineer fo r K o l l s m n Instrument Co. The m a t e r i a l discussed \:us methods of imjroving t h o con-

struction of the moduletors e d other scpipnemt.

the following ?,hc ses:

Phcse I. The desigring of E b l l o o n a m of a l t i t u d e cantrold t o be

used. a s t e n h t i v e solutions t o the mhin problem.

i. The contmting of plastic filru fkbric&$ors t o o b t t i n severti

sources of supply f o r large non-extensible b d l o o n s . To dote, one sub-

contrict ;?ES beer let for 1: f t . d i s m t e r ~ ~ ~ O O C S .

3. Tie cofitrctirg of m i n z t f u e n t con?any whici, wvild corstruct

the a l t i k r i e control devices. A subcofitraci; nss alro Leer. l e t f o r

a l t i t d e controls .
4. The designing of a lcrgc belloon i n f l a t i o n s h e l t e r iis 'I. Y. -g .

t h e government u n t i l tcrininction of contmct.

5. The repairing and testing of the rdiosondc receptor i2 De-xrt-

ment of Xeteorology for preliminary f l i g h t s >erdifig t i c z.rrivE.1 of
Goverment-locned ec-\;ri-gnent.

6. The peliminmy flights with c i u s t e r s ;;f Xeteorologicel b 1 1 3 o c ~

as s t o p g a p metboas t o attempt coristent level k l l o o n fli&ts while

awaitin& t i e delivery of ii. Y o C. desi,aed e%d.?ment.

7. Tbe =king of ?relimiraq- c d c u k t i o n s anc? rec-drements on

constent level balloon e r f ormince.
2.. S x c i fi c Problems .
Yet t o be cieterzined i s the r e b t i v e mrits of mrio-us k l l o o o

- 17 -
 %striction 00 the ?reject is tine Civil Aeronsukics i t t i nori t y

requireant that b l l o o n fli;,;hts be mbde mlr on C;&;?s t h z are clorrcless

u? to Z0,OCO LPeet. This is difficult t o m e t i n She z & s t m n hit&

States but a3pars les3 2 i f f i c i i t i n the New Xe:dco ere&.

The pertinent abstrsct from rcinuteo of tha meting k i t h the Air

Space S u M a m i t t e e of C U 0017 S u c h 19L7 &re included i n the q p e d i x .

- 18 -
6. ;+thoas o f a t t a c k

(1) .qfter B survey of s.v;:ileble i i t e r a t u r e i n Ferostztics €rid

a f t e r conferences w i t h V & . I ~ O U S bslloon r?anu?&c t u r c r s tIlci zuf,horities i t

is believed that Cis '&sic jroblen c? AyzintEiniIqthe 15 lk. cf g a y l o ~ d

e t constant s l t i t u u e czn best be 3 0 1 ~ ~by4 u s i q E. non-extezsible b l l o o n

arrl a device o?era.tea by ?ressure which drops btillast xhenever the

balloon descends below a preset e l t i t u 6 e .

The specifications f o r the e q u i p e n t Eire ;;LSfollows:

The balloon should be of l a r g e known volume, l i g h t i n weight,

non-extensible, e i t h e r transparent o r hisnly r e f l e c t i v e t o

solar radiation. Rigging shoulci be used t o u i s t r i b u t e the

load evenly sbout the balloon.

A s a f e t y valve should. be usea t o h o l i the i n f l a t i o n zppenriix

of the - k l l o o n normally closed (as m y hydrogen l o s t aecreses

the time clossible a t nominal const2rit a l t i t u d e ) . The valve

would a c t 8s a safety vent i f the balloon shoulc! rise apprecihbly

above the a l t i t u d e where it is fully i n f l a t e c , 8s there is danger
of rupturing the envelose unless the excess oressure i s relieved.

The s a f e t y valve shoulc! be s e t t o release 3ressu-e before t'ne

l i m i t of the working s t r e s s o f fhe b l l o o n f t b r i c i s reached.

I f the e r a c t volume of the k l l o o n i s known and the sir d e n s i t y

vs. altitucie rslg,tionship ie Zetamined on the ?r;t~ of Zlight,

i t is possible t o compute the t o t e l l i f t of the ges i n the

k l l o o n z t cny a l t i t u a e . 3y adjusting the sross load t o be

supported by the gas t o equal the t o t a l l i f t zt the ciesired

a l t i t u d e of f l i g h t , the balloon w i l l level o f f c t the d e e d

- 19 -
 altitude as it has no f u r t h e r buoyancy. This a l t i t u d e s t a b i l i t y

exists o d y ES long as the balloon i s i n t h e fully inflated o r

"taut" s t s t e . Once t h e k l l o o n stcrt:: bscending (due t o l o s s

of hydrogen by ciiffusion o r by othe r loss) i G beconies flsbby and

i s no longer stable. I t w i l l continue descerding u n t i l corrective

a c t i o n i s taken o r u n t i l it reaches t h e earth.

The altitude c o n t r o l is t o be used i s the ballrrst valve. When

c o r r e c t l y s e t it w i l l determine the lower limit of .the balloon's o s c i l l a t i o n

as it would r e l e a s e a f r e e flowing l i q u i d ballast from a r e s e r v o i r whenever

the balloon descencis 2 s n o r t Gistance below 6 preset altitude.

To t e s t t h i s t e n t s t i v e s o l u t i o n t o t h e k s i c problem, i n t e r -

mediate s i z e s of balloon ,lade of suitable f a b r i c o r f i l m s are needed i n

a d d i t i o n t o t h e e l t i t u d e controls,

Ealloo ns

Balloon manufzcturers and f a b r i c a t o r s of p l e s t i c films were

contacted. t o l o c a t e a s u i t a b l e balloon material. The following materiels

were suggested:

Material Advantsge s Disadvantspes Disuoaition

P l a s t i c Film

Polyethylene Good law t e a p e r a t w e Low t e n s i l e strength, 10 ea. 1 5 f t .

properties (Gen.iJlills Milky-translucent , balloons being
desir5s t o fabricate Medium pemeability. f a b r i c a t e d from
Picard' s balloons it.
from t h i s ) ,

Saran Transparent, l o w Tecrrs e m i l y , f a i r 5 large b ~ l l o o n s

?ermeabilitly, high low tempereture p o - being fabricated.
t e n s i l e strength. p e r t i e s (?), weak a t
seam i f heat sealed.
Nylon Good low t e q e r a t u r e l o t availz-ble, 10%- Awaiting sample.
properties, easily t e a r resistance (?)
fabricated, strong.
Easily fhbricated. VeFJ FOOT low Discarcied.
Vinylite
i-lmost trsnsparent . temperatwe ?ro-
perties.

Teflon Strong Can not be fhbriczted. Discaxded.

Ethocel Easily fabricated. Very high Discctrded.

Good low temperature pemability.
characteristics.

Pliof ilm Easily fabricated. Poor ultra v i o l e t

properties, poor low
Discarded .
tempertitme properties.

Coated Fabrics
Heavy, expensive Awaiting
Nylon coated
with
neoprene
fabricated .
Strong, e a s i l y
opaque, nylon
cloth has r e l a t i v e
Investigation.

butyl rubber high elongtition.

polyethylene
saran
Fortesin (regener- Awaiting
ated celulose Investigation.
myon) 'coated

moprens
butyl rubber
polyethylene
saran
S i l k coated Awaiting
with Imre stigation.
neoprene
butyl rubber

As a result of t h i s preliminary study a sub-contrrict w a s

given t o h'. A . Smith, Coatings Inc. of N.%maroneck, Xew York, t o fabrichte

bslloons with the following specifications for t e s t purFoses:

- 21 -
 3 f o o t dipmeter balloons, no ettschments exceoting an i n f l a t i o n
tube o r a p p e ~ i xm d e of the bclloon f i l m rbout 10 inches long
cncil.4I1 & m e t e r .
2 eech mde f r o @ lolyethylene PM-1 f i l u .0O4lt t h i c k
2 esch mae from Polyethylene PM-1 f i l m .~308~lt h i c k
2 ectch made from Saran type M film .'30Z.251f t h i c k

15 f o o t Cimeter bsllooos with i n f l s t i o n tube 4" i n dismeter and

12'' long, clso neens f o r e t t a c n i w rigging l i n e s supporting a
i 5 - p o d load t o bottom of bidloon &nd merns f o r a t t a c h i n g aux-
i l i a r y l i f t i n g balloons t o top of bs-lloon. If possible, b d l o o n
should be capable of withstmding i n t e r n a l pressure equivalent
t o 2H water.
5 each a a e from Polyethylene PM-1 film .0OL+lt t h i c k
5 each maae from Polyethylene PM-1 film .CO8lt t h i c k
5 each ruade from Saran Type i"ll fliEm -00225" t h i c k
(1) The balloon film should be treated before or a f t e r mandccture
i n such 3 way es t o seal all ?inholeso

(2) A patching k i t should be furnished f o r use of the balloon

f l i g h t personnel.

( 3 ) It is d e s i r e d that e i t h e r the volume of t h e 1 5 f o o t balloons

be know,, t o within 10 t o L O cubic feet xhen f u l l y i n f l e t e d o r that t h e volume,

though unknown, be nearly t h e same f o r each of the balloons of t h i s s i z e

( d i f f e r e n c e s i n volume should not e&eed 21% of the total volume of a mean

balloon).
Delivery was made 20 A p r i l 1 9 4 7 on the f i r s t 3 f o o t balloons, two

15 f o o t balloons are expectea by t h e end of ihy.

I n an attempt t o interest another manufa.cturer i n t h e problem,

the following companies were contzcted.

Conmany Type of ComDam Interested? Disoosition

Dobeclanan Go.
500 F i f t h kvenue, h i P l a s t i c s & Packaging NO None

Kennedy Car Liner & Bag

Cor, Shelbyville, I d . P b s t i c s & Packfiging No None

- 22 -
Plextron Inc. Beach Balls No None
55 Tremnt Ave., BPT 57
CuPage P l z s t i c s Co. Beach Balls NO Hone
;.75 F i f t h kve ., LWC
Shellmar 2roducts Im. PlE.stics B P a c h g i n g XO None
E&re Stete Eldg., 1JYC

M i l l p i n t Inc. P l a s t i c s & Peckaging No None

Elilwaukee 1, Visconsin

CeLanese P l a s t i c s Corp. P l a s t i c s & Packeging No None

180 Madison Ave., NYC

E. L. Cournand Co. P l a s t i c s 3c Packaging No None

2835 9 t h Ave., NPC
Blend Charms Co. Toys, Beach Balls NO
a Ashburton bve,Yonkers
Western Products Inc. P l a s t i c s &Packaging No None
Newark, Ohio
Rowe Packaging Coo P l a s t i c s &Packaging No
26 Queens St. E.
Toronto 1, Ontario
Canada

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Blimps & Balloons Pes Awaiting f i n a l

Co., Akron 16, Ohio decision.

Molded Latex Products Balloons (Meteorological) Not None

Inc., 27 Kentucky Ave. very.
Paterson 3, N. J.

Air Cruisers Inc. Balloons (Meteorological) Yes Awaiting final

Clifton, N, J. decision,

General P U l s Inc. Awaiting v i s i t .

1837 Pierce S t . N.E.
Minneapolis 13 idinn. ,
B a r r q e Ceptive & Awaiting f i n a l
Seyfang Laboratories
1300 Xediterranean kve
k t l e n t i c City, N. J.
. Other Balloons
Y6S
decision.

Dewey & B l m y Company Meteorologicel a s l l o o n s No None

Cambridge 40, i-hss.

- 23 -
 On completion of the survey of b a l l o o n & e t e r i a l sother orders
trill be !A&cec for e q e r i m e n t a l intemciii!t e 'm.iloons.

As soon LS EL s e r i e s of zuccessful f l i g h t s a r e obteined, it is

?lamed t o p o c u r e k l l o o n s of zbout 8 tines the displacement of t h e inter-

ue2iLte s i z e f o r t e s t s as the model t o solve the problelo. These l a r g e r

balloons woul6 be about 30 f e e t i n dietmeter.

d l t i t u c e Control

Mr. Goudy of the Kollsman Instrument Division of Square D Corpora-

t i o n w a s contactedto determine the f e a s i b i l i t y of:

(1) An ccc-arzte pressure-actueted l i q u i d b a l l a s t drogping device,

(2) A motor-switched moduletor f o r the standsre A m y radiosonde

AN/SEIT-l. The stendard pressure-switched modulator uoulc! be of l i t t l e

value indetermining the height of the constant l e v e l h l l o o n s f t e r it

leveled off on a constant Gressure surface.

On 8 subcontrcct Kollsman uxiertook t o build a p e s s u r e actuated

"dribbler" o r ballast dropping device as follows:

Mechanically Controlled Dribbler

To consist of a diaphragm opemted needle valve which w i l l allow

no flow for a 2 mb. increase i n pressure on the diaphragm over pressure

of which diaphmgn is sealed but w i l l allow s. flow of 40 grms/minute

under 1 foot of lead f o r a 5 mb. increase i n pressure. Petroleum b a l l a s t

with a density of about .775 d c c i s t o be used.

Diaphragm t o be open t o the atmosphere u n t i l i t i s sealed o f f

by the radiosonde 2ressure switch a t a preset s l t i t u d e ,

- 24 -
 An e l e c t r i c a l l y operated needle q l v e was incluaed i n t h e order,
hcuever it i s t o be caccelled a s tine mecnanical valve ap?ears more feasible

t o the manufzcturer.
AS the motor switched. rooauritor was hlready ir. e x z e r i m n t a l

s t a t e of aanufecmre f o r the Signal Corps and Evans S i g E l LLborstories

en order was placed f o r 3 of them with these characteristics:

To have a motor-driven commutator t o contain 4 contacts a l t e r n a t e l y

switching two d i f f e r e n t temperatures, p-essure and a refereme. Rate of

switching will complete one cycle per minute. To report gressure accurately
between150 2nd 500 mb. with a 2ressure r e s i s t o r t o be of such a valve that

with a l a r g e x d i o s o d e frec-juemy v a r i a t i o n f o r a snall change i n pressure.

To have En adjustable contact variable betk-een L50 m b and 400 mb

with a factory adjustment of 300 mb. When %he pressure arm reached t h i s

contact, a. squib w i l l c u t a thread that holds the t a l k s t Siaphragm open.

The f i r s t mechanical d r i b b l e r vas received on 20 A p r i l 1947 ana i s

undergoing nodification and t e s t s before being flown on Cluster F l i g h t $2.

If it is successful, an order f o r improved. models will be $aced.

Another method maintaining a balloon z t colzstznt a l t i t u d e

is by replenishing the hydrogen i n the non-extensible envelope as it i s

valved o r 2 s it d i f f u s e s . This might be accom~lishedby m e of liquid
hydrogen but not by use o f chemicals due t o t h e i r great weight r e l a t i v e

t o the small volume of hydrogen generated. The l i q u i d hycirogen method

i s being investigated with a long range view. It does not seem too
feasible, however, due t o the d i f f i c u l t i e s o f keeping the r e t e of eva-

Torztion of t h e l i q u i d hydrogen low a t the high a l t i t u d e s , without ex-

tensive and heavy guarci glasks of 1Quid air.

- 25 -
 A t h i r d nethod o f holding the equipment st a nominal constant

a l t i t u d e i s t o fly a c l u s t e r of stznciard meteorological balloons eauipped

with ballast c r o g i n g devices andt a aevice f o r releasing l i f t i n g balloons

should t h e c l u s t e r depart from the a l t i t u d e limits desired. T h i s me+,hoci

i s inherently unstable, a s there a r e no proportiom1 r e s t o r i n g forces which

will a c t on t h e flabby, f r e e l y extensible meteorological balloons. The
success of t h i s procedure depends on very c a r e f u l balancing of the load
against the variable l i f t of the balloons.

This cluster method is of use a d i n t e r e s t only as a stopgap

method of l i f t i n g the Army equipment t o a l t i t u d e now, and has been t h e

method used while awaiting delivery of t h e non-extensible p l a s t i c balloons.

I11 d) e. A f l i g h t was made on 3 April 1947 using t h i s method. A

c l u s t e r o f 12 balloons meteorological carrying a r a a i o s o d e , a 15 lb.

d v load and a s e r i e s of b a l l a s t dropping devices was released from

the foof;ball fie16 a t Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa. The t r a i n was

t o be towed t o 30,000 ft. by 2 l i f t i n g balloons which would then be

cut loose. The weight of the equipment was adjusted t o equal the l i f t

of the balloons and presumably t h e t r a i n should have f l o a t e d a f t e r the

towing bcdloons were cut o f f . Actually, due t o lack of experience i n

the a i f f i c u l t y of handling long balloon t r a i n s , a u x i l i a r y rigging lines

were needed t o take up launching s t r e s s e s . These lines fouled the main

f l y i n g l i n e and the b a l l a s t which w a s t o be dropped on parechutes. As a

result, t h e b a l l o o n t r e i n w e n t t o 50,COO f t . where the tow balloons worked

themselves f r e e . The r e m a i ~ n gt r e i n t h e r e u p o n descended as f a s t as it

had climbed (1,000 f t . p e r minute), landing i n the ocean near Sandy Hook,

- 26 -
N. J, The f l i g h t was of value i n t r e i n i x g persocnel, establishing a

net f o r reception of the 74 megacyle raaiosoncie data, and i n obtaining

f a m i l i a r i t y with the type of ogeration 7eculiar t o sll large balloon f l i g h t s .

The a c t u a l layout of the t r a i n used is sketched in the alssendix.

U s i n g the lessons learned on the dummy f l i g h t , improved equipment

w a s built f o r a f l i g h t with a payload. Release was attempted on 18 April,

Due t o the high w i d a t 0830 EST, the time of release, and due t o mal-
functioning of the A r m y receiver in the plane t h a t was t o follow the balloons,

release was not mde, The already-inflated balloons were cut free and the
equipment was brought back t o New Pork University. It i s expected that t h i s
equipment w i l l be flown about d Xay. A description of t h e final flight

equipment will be given i n the resrt for May. A sketch of the layout
of equipment built for the second c l u s t e r f l i g h t i s given in the appePdix,
As this is a s t o p g a p method using modified s t a d a r d components, no
detailed report is being prepared on the equipment. Preliminary a l t i t u d e
controls used i n both f l i g h t s consist of standard radiosonde modulators

ML-310 which have had leads taken off of the desired contacts of the
commutator. The modulator thus acts as a pressure actuated control that
releases b a l l a s t o r balloons. In t h e first f l i g h t small radiosonde relays
were used t o close c i r c u i t s t o burn off cans f i l l e d with ballast, In the
improved, second f l i g h t , a nest of p l a s t i c tubes were filled with dried

sand, The bottom of t h e tube was covered w i t h paper and a DuPont type S64
Squib was placed on the paper d e r the s a d . On f i r i n g the squib, a hole
is torn i n the paper, permitting the sand t o t r i c k l e out. This method

permits dropping of mre ballast ax3 y e t , i n smaller increments, I n the

- 27 -
s4cord c l u s t e r f l i g h t , p o v i s i o n w a s a l s o made t o release balloons i f the
t r a i n rose above 40,000 f t . The flying l i n e i n the s e c o d t r a i n was

approximately 500 f t . long.

This c l u s t e r f l i g h t i s tedious t o prepare znd d i f f i c u l t t o

launch, and is a greater hazard t o t i i r c r a f t than t i e p l a s t i c balloons

w i l l be because of the great length of the c l u s t e r train.

111 e) Apparatus and Ea,uipment.

A detailed explanation i s not given on the equipment of the

Cluster Flight. However, a layout sketch is bnclosed i n the appendix.

An im2ortant piece of new apparatus for t h i s project i s the b a l l a s t

valve or dribbler, a photograph and drawings o f which appears i n the

appendix. It consists of a special diaphragm which o s r a t e s a needle

valve. Normally the valve is closed a s the diaphragm is open t o the a i r

before the balloon reaches the desired a l t i t u d e . This ailows the

pressure inside the diaphragm t o be the same as the outside pressure.

The diaphragm is sealed e l e c t r i c a l l y by the baroswitch of the f l i g h t

radiosoade when the balloon t r a i n passes a predetemined altitude.

Vhenever the b d l o o n t r a i n cescends below t h i s preset a l t i t u d e , the

increase of 2ressure on the sealed diaphragm causes t h e needle valve to

be opened. The greater the excess i n pressure on the diaphragm the more

b a l l a s t tnere is released through the vclve. Thus E~ proportional restoring

force i s q p l i e d t o the train. The b a l l a s t tkt is t o be used i s a

petroleum cut biliw from 300" t o ~ O O OwF i t a density of about -78 ad

a minimum change of v i s c o s i t y with temperature. Two d i f f e r e n t type

fluids that may meet this specification are the A m y type compass fluid

- 28 -
ard a S i n c l a i r paint solvent. T h e b a l l a s t valve or dribbler e s s e n t i a l l y

perform tne same f u m t i o n as the Japanese nltit-&e control on tae ballosn

bomb3 yet it is simpler ctnd ?emits use of a l i q a i d bcllest f a r better control.

Another ?iece of tc?_;li_smentt h r t is under construction by Kollsman

Instrument CompzLny is a mtor-switched rsdiosoncie modulztor. It presents

pressure data t o the radiosonde transmitter as a variable resistsnce. The

meteorological data is programmed by a samll Brailsford Electric motor. This
modulator will ?rovicie tne contact t h a t s e a l s o f f the diaphragm i n the
ballast valve. A complebdiscussion of this equipment will be furnished
upon i t s delivery.
Sketches of balloon a d rigging of the balloon t o be used on t o

the main problem a r e given in the appenciijc and a r e self-exglmatory.

Commtations
A chart showirg the r e l a t i o n between altitucie, gross l i f t , and

balloon size has been fourxi Ecessary.

Data f o r it was computed u s i q mean aerological soundings as
reported i n the Monthly Weather review for 1943.
A chemical term, molar volume (in cubic f e e t ) m s used as a term

r e l a t i n g the sourding date. with buoyancies of the balloons a t various

altit-,xies.

Using the sirngle gas h w s , the aolar voluzle o f dry e i r was

compute5 thus:

I. (1) iqolar volume of any gas a t stamarci conditions is 359 f t .

(2) From Monthly bieathr Xeview Jan. 1943, the nehn sounding
datz a t 1 5 km f o r Lakehurst, N. 3 . is: Temperature -57.5OC

Pressure 120 mb.

- 29 -
 359 27302- 59 X m C 5370 f t . 3 (the mean mlar volume
L73.i 120
a t 15 -hn for Jan.1943 over Lakehurst,X.J.)

This volume data was computed For a l l lovels given. Data was

"borrowed" from otner s t a t i o n s i n the saae l a t i t u d e t o piece out the 20

km soundings as needed.
I1 L i f t s were computed for various molor volumes f o r balloons

between 7.5 and 75 feet diameter i n t h e following manner:

Given

p u r i t y of Hydrogen 99.7%
impurity as oxygen 003%
computed moleculer w t . 2.11 #1 no1
Molecular weight of dry a i r 9 s computed from d a t . re.sorted at
10 km. i n EiaIribook of Chemistry and Physics.
28.764 #1 mol
To f i n d the lift of a 20fDballoon E ? t an a l t i t u d e where the
molar volume i s 1090 ft.3:
Volme 20 f t . D Balloon = 4190 f t W 3
~ i f t / ~ l ~ o o n B a l l oVoonl m e X(Difference i n molecular wpts.of air#hPn
Molar Volume a t Q given a l t i t u d e
or
Total L i f t of gas i n #/Balloon = f t W 3 / ~ l l o oxn ( #/moll
ft . 3 , 1 ~ 1
f o r the 20 foot di-ter balloon:

Lift = w90(2.8*76- '*") = 111.7# lift from a 20 foot diameter

1.000 sphere of hydrogen a t an altitude
where the ml&rvolume i s 1000 ftO3.

The l i f t s were plotted against noler volume for each s i z e

balloon. T h e a l t i t u d e s corresponding t o various molar volumes f o r

Lekehurst and Blbuquerque i n January and in August 1343 rzs computed

above were plotted on tb l e f t margin of tne chart.

The family of curves w a s plotted on l o g 2aper an6 is incllrded

i n the appendix with t3e basic sounding d a b .

- 30 -
I11 g) Conclusions m d Recomendations.

I t i s believed t h a t a k l l o o n can be kept a t n o n i x 1 constant

z l t i t u d e between 10 a& 20 km, f o r s i x hours using a non-extensible

envelope v i t h the zddition of a b a l l a . s t valve t o kee,] the ' x l l o c n Eear

its r e s s u r e a l t i t u d e . The flying of a W l o o n thus ecl_ui;sed is o u r

main objective. The work to date has been primarily ?reparstory but it

is believed that p l a s t i c balloons can be flown i n the early summer with a

payload.

Additional work space i s urgently needed at New Pork University

if s i g n i f i c a n t work i s t o come from t n i s group.

It i s believed t i t the i d e a l launching a r e e f o r b d l o o n s of

t h i s type is Lehigh University, Bethlehem, l a . as long as t h i s i s feasible,

For l a r g e balloons it i s believed t h a t t b e Navy peo2le a t Lakehurst can

best f a c i l i t a t e the launching. C a l m w i n d s a r e e s s e n t i a l for a c t u a l launching.

Future Work

General f i l l s is making l a r g e balloons from lightweight films

tbt would meet our specifications with t h e exception that they cannot
take any i n t e r n a l pressure. It i s believed that t h e i r balloons snould be
investigated as General Xills appear to be the best source of sapply f o r

l a r g e balloons. An order w i l l be placed with them r?.s soon 2 s they furnish

2 quotation.

As a s t o p g a p device before these might a r r i v e it is planned t o

f l y two 35,000 cu.ft. rgcing ty-ge 6 s well 2s t h e 2 Japanese belloons from

nakehurst, 11. J. carrying pyloeas w i t h heavy 2uty power sup?lies for the

radio transmitters.

In t h e mezntime, improved c l u s t e r s of m t e o r o l o g i c z l balloons

will be flown until larger balloons are available.

- 31 -
 C O P Y

k bs t r e c t from:

AIR COOFDIM$TING COMZITTEE

NEW YORK SUBC0E;ZTTEE G b AIFSPACE
RILES OF T L Y E AIR /.LEI BIF. TRAFFIC CONTROL
385 Madison Avenue
Hew York, 17, 3 . P.

2J.Y. Xeeting No. 12 20 ;\larch 1947

1. "he Secretary of the Subcoxmittee presented a request from the

War Department member i n behalf of New York University f o r approval t o
release f r e e balloons from Allentown, ?a. anit Lekehurst, I?. J.

DISCUSSION

2. The subject project i s broken down i n t o two 3hases as described

below:

A. PfinSE I.
The type k l l o o n t o be used i n t h i s phase of the
project w i l l be 6 f t . i n diameter, hycirogen f i l l e d ,
encompassed by a nylong shroud with black 2nd white
p.nels 24" wide. Radio instruments weighing approxi-
mately 3 l b s . w i l l be suspencied ap?roximately 50 f t .
below the balloon ard equipped with parzciiuw device
so that upon separation from the balloon, t i e sttached
equipment will f l o a t riown towads the e a r t h rather
than become a f r e e l y f a l l i n g body.
It is anticipated t h a t two f l i g h t s will be required i n
t h i s phase of operation, t h e release to be made during
weather conditions i n which the 3 k y i s f r e e of clouds
and the v i s i b i l i t y a t l e a s t three miles a t a l l a l t i t u i e s
up t o 20,000 feet., within a four hour cruising radius
from Allentown, ?a.

The balloon, during these f l i g h t s , shall be convoyed

by suitable a i r c r a f t t o m i n t a i n air-c;rour!i connnunice-
t i o n s on the balloon t r a j e c t o r y and eq-ilipDed t o e f f e c t
destruction of the balloon a t the terminazion of f o u r
hours f l i g h t o r a t such time t h a t the balloon may
become hazerdous e i t h e r t o a i r c r a f t f l i g h t ogerations
o r the -Dersons o r oroperty or" others on the surface.

3ew York Universitzr w i l l f i l e e Botice t o hirmen a t

l e a s t twelve (1;) hours i n eavEme 2f b a l l o o n release
a m e second notice w i l l be f i l e d zt the time of release
with the Allentown, Pa. Airnays Comunications Station.

- 32 -
 The type balloon t o be used i n this phese of %he project
w i l l be a 15 t o 40 f t . a i s n e t e r :llftstic b l l o o n , hydrogen
f i l l a i . liadio eqtlipnent weighing opproxhztely 25 l b s . ,
w i l l be sus?ended ap?roxim;Ltely 100 f t . below the
balloon. The balloon w i l l be towed t o high z l t i t u a e
l e v e l s (above ~ 0 , 3 0 0 f e e t ) by three awi11i:ry l i f t i n g
balloons fastenec together with c. 4 lb. weight. All
equigment clttached to the ballocn will be esuip2ed with
parachute device so that u ~ o nseparation frsa the balloon,
the attached equipment w i l l f l o a t down towards the e a r t h
r a t n c r t k n become a f r e e l y f a l l i n g body. &on a t t a i n i n g
the desired a l t i t u d e , t h e a u x i l l i a r y l i f t i n g balloons
wife be released *om t h e rnain balloon.

It is anticipated that a maximm of t e n f l i g h t s will be

required i n t h i s Thase of operetion, 2 t o 5 releases t o
be made from Allentown, Pa. and 2 t o 5 releases t o be
made from Lakehurst, N. J. Release w i l l be mde during
weather conditions i n w h i c h the sky is f r e e of clouds
a d the v i s i b i l i t y a t l e a s t three miles at till a l t i t u d e s
up t o 2C1,000 f e e t .

The range of flight during t h i s phase of operation w i l l

bebetween 3O,OOO and 60,000 f e e t . A period of six hours
w i l l be the maximum duration of f l i g h t .

New York University w i l l provide an operator f o r tracking

of the balloon during 7eriod of f l i g h t and w i l l furnished
information on i t s p o s i t i o n t o the 3. Y. Air TrLffic
Control Center during period of f l i g h t .

New Pork University w i l l f i l e a Notice t o Airmen a t least

twelve (12) hours i n advance of balloon release and a
second notice w i l l be f i l e d a t time of release with
e i t h e r the Allentown, Pa. or Laltehurst, N. 3. Communica-
t i o n s Stations.

Destruction of the balloon w i l l be predetmnined t o be

effected over water where hazards a r e not p e s e n t . Aerial
convoy xi11 not be ei'fected durir4 t h i s 2hzse of operation
inasnuch a s balloon f l i g h t s will be conductec i n excess
of 20,000 f e e t .

3. The War Department member requests t h a t balloon operations along

the l i n e s of P h s e I1 be presentea t o the Vashington Subcommittee f o r
clearance with a11 other Regional Airspace Subcommittees, in consideration
of Var Department $ans t o continue the Phase I1 type of oper-= t i o n from
'Jhite S a n k , i k w Xexico, u?on com9letion of the 12 2roposed releases
described herein. The t n e o f balloon releases Troposed out of White
S a d s , N. Mex., w i l l involve flight through other regions.

- 33 -
 4. That t h e release of f r e e balloons by Qew York 3niversity as
-
described above i n Parsrgrqh 2 4 (Phase I ) , Subparsgraghs (1) ( 4 ) inclu-
sive, be ewroved..

5. T h a the releese of f r e e balloons by lTew York University es

, -
described above i n Pars:graph 2-B (Phrse 11) Zubparegra?ns (1) ( 6 )
inclusive, be asproved.

6. T h a t the Washington Airspace Subcommittee present the Phase

I1 operation t o other Regional Airspace Subcommittees for clearance, i n
v i e w of War Department plans t o continue the Phase I1 type of operation
from White Sands, Kew Mexico.

- 34 -
 2 e a. / OOOgm. Ba//oonr on
5iny/e 3 O'Ny/on L /n e .
50009ms. L i f t e a c h .
A N individual b a l l o o n s on
siny/e / 5 ' N y / o n l i n e s and
t i e d o d o M a i n L i n e at
2 0' / h t e r v a / s .
Parachute *f
Ascent C u t o f f */
AC ts a t 2 8 3 m h

F/y/ny /inc From Cutoff *I t o

P a r a c h u t e * 2 it b r a i d e d f o r
added s t r c n j t h .
/ O epra//y spaced bo//oonr
in b r e a k .
T h e r e is a d i s t a n c e O F S'between
e a c h piece o f epuipmcnt, e x c e p t
Parachute *2 t h e 2 O ' b e t w c c n bti//*ons on t h e
M a i n F/yinf L i n e .

Descent Cutoff *f
T h e l 2 ba//oons on t h e braided
A c t s at 4 7 2 m d s .
/in. a r e s a e h 3 5 0 j m . ba//oonr
P a r a c h u t e *.3 w i t h CL / / f t o f / s 5 0 y m s . a e c h .

Parachute *s

Dummy Pay foa d

/S/bs.

D e s c e n t C u t o f f '''2
A c t s a t 3IOmbs.

Parachute * 6
BALLOON TRAINFOR
CLUSTER FLIGHTNo.1
6 E T H L E HEM, P E N N A .
gescmt Cutoff c3
A c t s at 338 mbs.

Parachute *I
Q 3 A P R I L 47.
 S p h e r i c a l Ba//oon
/I‘Diameter.

~9 e y e l e t s in r e f n f o r c e d

to b a / / o o n at 30’

E a l l o o n cuith riyginy

PLASTIC BALLOON
FOR C O N S T A N T LLvL L B A L L O O N P R O J E C T A T NYU
A P R I L 2 7 , 1947
SCALL : I”= 3‘0”
N 0 n - A rsnslbh

B r i d l e c o n s i s t i n g o f 9 ny/Orr
l i n e s , e a c h I J O ~ ~ . S ~ 13
, feet
/my> s a r v c d t o y e t b a r a t a
t b i m b /c.
S a F c t y VaIHe

Radiosonde

B a i / a r t Reservoir

P r e s3 u r e -Ope r n ted Do !/a 5 t Va Iv a

P R O F O S L G . A . ~ S E M B L YOF
TRAIN
FOR CONSTANT L c v r i BALLOON
 JANUARY 43 AWU3T 43 .-

Alt.FtL Temp. OC press mb Humidity$ Molar Vol. ft.3 Tern*.% Press mb H d d i t d llolar Vol.ft3 Alt.Ft.

65,617 -58 53 5WO - 64 56 65,617

62,336 - -- -- -- -- 62,336
212*o
59,055 -- -- -- - 61.2 79 59,055
337.2
55,774 - -- -- - 64.2 94 55,774
33J.6
52,493 - - _- - 65.6 110 52,493
213s7 337 b .
49 212 -59.5 120 2370 - 64.1 130 49,;12
215.8 333 7
45,931 -57.4 UO 2050 - 60.7 153 45 , ~ 3 1
216.3
1 42,651 -56 9 164 1.808 56.9
-3d9.1, 179 L2,65l
w 217.2 304 0
9 39,370 -56.0 192 1506 - 51.2 209 39,370
I 318.0
36,089 -54.1 224 1339 45.3
-311.2 243 36,089

32,808 -51 .O %62 1130 - 33.;: 2d2. 32,308

C
28 p 527 -45 s . 304 995 30.4
-303 325 L.5 ,527
296.0
26,247 -3s 08 352 $86 - 23.8 374 26,147
1 290.0
22,966 -32.1 408 788 17.0 428 ,966
248.2
-293.1
19,685 -25.0 469 705 - 1-:.1 488 19,63 5
254.3 276.9
16,409 -18.9 536 632 - 3.9 555 16,4W
13,123 -13.0 611 566 1.5 629 13,1~:3
9,843 8.5 6% 507 6.4 n 1. 9,853
8,202 6.4 742 178 9.0 756 6,LO2
--
6,561 4.5 791 453 1 L.9 dUi 0,561
4,921 843 427 15.O d5i 4,921
13.6 2,&f:l
--- 3.2
3,281
s95
9i! 9% 903
1,640 21.7 Y!bb 3 ,vLO
0 1013 359 il.5 0
-- 211...507
1uo:3
 - JANUARY 43 ,a hUGUS'l' 43 -
Alt.Ft. Tem:, .OC Press mb Humidity% Molar Vol. f t . Tcm;, "C
. Prcsv m b HuriiLiity; ibiolnr Vol.ft.3 Alr,.kt

65,617 -63 54 5410 -58.1

Y -_ -- --
62,336
59,035 45.1 75 3701 -
55,774 -64.3 88 3170 -70.0

52,493 -63.O 104 2700 -69.8

49 212
, -61.6 122 2320 -66.4
45,932 -60.2 143 1990 -61.5

I 47,651 -54.1 168 1690 -54.7

F-
0 39,370 -57.2 197 US0 -47.0
1

36,089 -54.7 230 1250 -39 4 .

32 808 -49.7 269 1110 -31.6
29 1 527 4 3 00 312 983 2
a+ .
26,247 -35.7 362 872 -17.1
22,966 -28.3 416 756 -11.0

19,685 -21.2 477 704 - 5.6

16,404 6 546 631 1.1
13,123 622 567 3.8
9,843 2.6 706 522 16.6
---148.3
8,202 .6 752 486 50,lC
6 562 3.4 800 463 23.3
0 3.8 838 -449 k5.2
 Fiscd kenort As of Aoril ?;>t’r, 19L7

Total amount eqended

b a i l c b l e Balance

Total
 1
1946
4 p r i l 2 Yues D B I l e f t Caracas Fan Am bus 9 pm. . h i v e d 1:iami 10 pm on Pan .Am,
tl-xoq-h customs and c a w h t 1 am I-ational A i r l i n e s plane f o r !Te:mrk
.tpril ,Ted Arri:eci Kewark 730 am and took a i r l i n e tus t o I Z C . 3 l e f t f o r Providence
9 am, 7 a l l e d up %ring but he was i n Chicago - due back tomorrow. L e f t on 1040 s l e e p e r
f o r Tankon t o n i g h t .
?Dril 7at it home. Over t o Cqdensburg t o cee Steve t h i s pm
bril 7 Zun. Left :anton on 805 s l e e p e r . Jaw Tob F o s t e r '31, also on xay t o INC
A D r i l e !'OF. Arrived NYC 730 am. Up t o Columbia UPi-rersity t o s e e EVinF: 130 pm. -'yckoff
2nd Do..e on way t o Los Angeles py plane t h i s zm. Crane and !:orrison i n a l s o from iiatson
Labs. !er?t back t o Red Bank v i t h them i n A ' T S c a r t o Cfficer'E Club near :/atson Lab.
?race, : orricon and I l4er.t LD tonight t o cee 2einnegle at o f f i c e . Yet C i f f o r d who has
c?O' s e a rescue boat t h i s p r o j e c t i e planning t o use. Stayed a t G f f i c e r ' s Zlub tonight
4 p r i l 9 "ces. A t "atson Labs all day. 'lent through a l l processes necessaxy f o r employ-
ment urder S i v i l Ser-:ice. 'rasrant G f f i c e r G i f f o r d t r a n s f e r r e d t o IKiBL-4 today, EcCurdy
already i n and s t a t e d work. "alked with .Reinnagle and Gallo r e Columbia c o n t r a c t .
C i f f o r d l e f t pm f o r Washington, F a j o r Crane f o r Camp 3 i x and l o r r i s o n f o r NYC. Reinnagle
and I went down t o CO t h i s pm t o meet group from Cornell extension a t Euffalo - Aeronaut-
i c a l research wantifig t o Fet c o n t r a c t s . 3 a y e d a t Kolly P i t c h e r Yotel i n Red Fank tonight
4 1 x 5 1 10 'led Thecked out of ."oily F i t c h e r !!otel and caught 730 am t r a i n out of Red Bank t o
KYC. Checked ir! a t Hotel Yebster and then up t o Enings a t Columbia University. M r Gallo
of Vatson Labs i n a t 10 am and we went over c o n t r a c t questions regarding Watson Lab contract
with Columbia u n t i l 1 PP?. Went over a l l p a s t s of work with Doc from 2 t o 530 pm. John
'?wing i n from Missouri.
aril 11 Thurs. Worked on r o q h o u t l i n e of 2 l i n F i e l d and SOFAR p r o j e c t Am. Up t o s e e
7wing at Zolumbia PI". 90c and I went over c o n t r a c t with '!atson Lab & Columbia t o n i g h t .
':aught 1205 s l e e p e r t o Boston.
A p r i l 12 F r i . Arrived Woods Hole about 11. Joe 'dorzel went over a l l sound transmission
work a t I H O I t h i s pm.
A p r i l 13 S a t . Talked with Columbus I s e l i n t h i s Am regarding :fatson Lab work and needs.
Crane and C i f f o r d up pn: and Joe and I went up t o l a b with them.
A p r i l 14 Sun. Down t o l a b t h i s am with Joe looking f o r G9A f i l e s . J i m Peoples over about
noon f o r awhile. Joe and I went g o l f i n g pm. Took 600 pm t r a i n t o Boston and 1230 s l e e p e r
t o NYC. Up t o Boston with L t Frank Ryder with Navy and !$HOI
A p r i l 15 Kon. Contacted Doc Ewing i n XYC and rode down t o Red Bank with him. Talked over
instrumentation of upper atmosphere i n v e s t i g a t i o n s . Gut t o Oakhurst t h i s pm. Conference
with Col. Cole and Col. Grough r e P r o j e c t 188-5 and regarding microseisms. Doc and I went
back t o Folly P i t c h e r Hotel in Red Bank t o n i g h t .
A p r i l 16 Tues. Rode out t o Watson Labs with Ewing. Went over t o Evans L a b s with Haxry Davis
'latson Lab navigation man, and saw newly developed ranging apparatus and t a l k e d t o L t
Rydetor? re Spherics, l o c a t i o n of l i g h t n i n g and thunderstorm d a t a c o l l e c t e d during p a s t
few years. Saw Tol, Duffy of Yeteorological Division AAF and back t o :p!atson Labs, Doc went
on through t o FNC. Vent over program with Dove and Crane t h i s pm. Back t o l a b tonight with
Crane and G i f f o r d , discussing P r o j e c t 185-7-1. Back t o Kyrtle Hotel a t 1045 pm.
A D r i l 17 'ded. Rode o u t t o Watson Labs with McCurdy. Vorked with F a j o r Crane on r e p o r t
r e g a r d h g underwater work, Eglin F i e l d and deep water. Took t h i s i n t o Zolonal Cole t h i s
pm. Acceptance probable. Got room in prixrate house i n Red Bank. ;oved out of "olly F i t c h e r
Hotel.
April 18 T h d . 2 a x h t bus out t o !*/atson Lab. Col Cole up t h i s am and advised w i t i n g new
2ost Expenditure f o r and r e v i s i n g t h e R . & R . E a j o r Crane l e f t about noon f o r t r i p
P h i l a and -Joods Hole. Pade arrangements t o meet him i n hYC ;!onday. -?'rote out new R & R
and Zost Sxpenditure ready t o take t o Col Cole.
A D r i l 1 9 , F r i . Talked over work with Dove and we wrote up 2nd EO covering all ocean work.
Talked t o Ewing on phone t h i s am. Dove and I went down t o see Col Cole and then wrote up
rew SC f o r deep water work. Saw Hincke? regaxding t h i s ED and A f o r F processed t h i s pm
and ready t o c o out t o '!right Field.
.
A D r i l 20 C a f , 7 a w h t 710 t r a i n t o NYC, cashed check a t Chase N a t l Bank, t a l k e d t o Swing on
phone. Eack t o Red Bank about 4 pm.
A D r i l 22 Yon. A t 'rJatson Labs t h i s am. Got f i n a l physical exams. Down t o Supply t o see P a j o r
!;orris srith Reinnagle re g e t t i n g equipment out t h a t came from WCI without paper coverage.
Got traiel order back and a u t h o r i t y t o use it, Caught 342 pm out of 9ed Sank and arrived
 1946 2
i n Xewark about 430. 3eser.iations t o Dayton on S p i r i t of S t . Louis had been cancelled.
7 a l l e d 'ratson Labs. Go* roomette on S p i r i t about 530. Called P r s %wing i n N Y C . L e f t
'-ewarlc o r 2 p i r i t of ?t Louis a t 620 pm.
&xi127 TueS. Arrived I)ayton, Ohio about 8 y a m . T r i e d t o g e t r e t u r n t i c k e t f o r t o n i g h t
but coach c a r only open. Took bus out t o 'iright F i e l d , 3ldg 28. Saw Plr Drexler and turned
over 2 of t h e A f o r P t o hix. Tolone1 Yaier on leave. !#lent down t o 'lolonel Winter's o f f i c e
ar.2 fourd !Jajor Crane t h e r e , T ' e talked t o Colonel :/inters regarding t h e need f o r planes
and about new EO on extended long ranges of t h e 189-7-1 program which he approved and
marked u:, t o I-? c1. zent OR f o r hieher a3proYral. Vent over with Crape 8: saw Colonel Lind
gard i n t h e plane assignment divisior. and t a l k e d about planes. Had lunch with him and then
xect back t o talk t o 7olocel ?aton regaxcling planes t o 189-9-1. Vent over t o look a t C-97,
converted E-29 f o r t r a x s p o r t . 2ack t o Bldg 28 & t a l k e d with General Rives. Request f o r
Dlanes q r r e d upon and 3-29 v i l l be a v a i l a b l e near t h e 1st of June. leg-7-1 required by
X-res. A f o r P s i n k e x l e r ' s o f f i c e not y e t signed. - w i l l be s e n t on t o IJatson Labs later.
Crane had r e s e r v a t i o n s for me on t h e S p i r i t of S t Louis and w e l e f t Dayton a t 8 pm.
A D r i l 24 'ired. Discussed with B a n e p o s s i b i l i t i e s of g e t t i n g sound through t h e ground p a r t
of t h e ocean sound channel and about t h e p o s s i b i l i t i e s of a balloon such as Piccards.
Arrived i n EVC about 1030. Zalled !?atson Labs and then w e took a taxi up t o Ewing's o f f i c e
a t Zolumbia. After Ewing 1-2 c l a s s w e discussed p l a n s f o r 188-5 and 189-7-1, both Eglin
F i e l d and long range channel program. L e f t Swings o f f i c e about 6. Crane r e g i s t e r e d a t Hotel
Lexington and I caught 740 out of Penn S t a t i o n and axrived a t Red B a n k at 845 pm
A p r i l 25 Thurs. Up t o Watson Labs, Worked over n o t e s of conference with Ewing yesterday.
Yrote up both traveR blanks and s e n t them down t o Travel Order Section. Talked with-PdLmer
about :IQ t r a v e l f o r m . 'frote up l e t t e r t o Wright F i e l d requesting use of second crash boat.
-,*roteF@R f o r Fark 2 hydrophone. Talked t o L t . Hungerford regarding request of t h i s .
Stepanoff, new p h y s i c i s t f o r 'dIERL i n t h i s pm. Crane l e f t f o r 'dright F i e l d t o n i g h t .
April 26 7 r i . Up t o -Tatson Labs. '!ent over purchases already applied f o r with Reinnagle.
Yyckoff i n t h i s am. Kccurdy i n pm f o r r a d i o p a r t s . Went back t o Oakhurst with McCurdy
t h i s PY
A p r i l 27 S a t . L e f t Red B a n k about 730 AF with HcCurdy i n h i s car. Drove through N J a t
TRenton & down t o Philadelphia. Yac l e f t me o f f a t Olney a t subway s t a t i o n . Contacted
Yarion a t Bankers S e c u r i t y and went by t r a i n with h e r t o Newton, Pa a t 100 PM
Xith P l a g g s .
. Stayed

Apr 28 Sun. Vayne & Kaxion drove me over t o Trenton, N J & I caught 1030 am t r a i n i n t o NYC.
Yent up t o Ewings about 1215. Joe Woreel t h e r e & H i l l y Barbour. They l e f t f o r Woods Hole
about 2 PK. I caught 5% t r a i n out of Penn S t a t i o n t o Red Bank, N J
Auril 29 Non. Up t o Watson Labs. Checked over at l i b r a r y t o have some p e r i o d i c a l s obtained.
Went over water work with Kccurdy regarding what is needed i n way of purchases,lWent over
t o Oahhurst with Roke, new engineer, former L t . Commander i n Navy. Talked t o Charlie
I r e l a n d regarding Eglin F i e l d work.
A D r i l 30, T u ~ U . p t o Oakhurst. Went over equipment t h a t would be l e f t t h e r e and what we
might do when r e s t of people gone t o Whitesands with Wyckoff. Wyckoff and I took car t o
Matsom Labs t o conference srith Col Duffy of Weather Bureau, Capt Kellogg and Col Gault.
Discussed weather problems - on eqpt? and S658s & aerography neede i n coming work. Discussed
equipment with NcCurdy pm and t r i e d t o f i n d where demolition cable could be l o c a t e d ,
Yay 1 -led. Up t o Yatson Labs. Talked with Stepanoff and 'riyckoff regarding work t o be done
while crew was recording ' h i t e Sands i n New Fexbco. Commander Navy a r r i v e d about 1130 am
and w e held a conference - G a u l t , Compton?, Dove Crane, Yyckoff, Hungerfield, Yaux and
nyself regarding Navy p a r t i c i p a t i o n with us i n Crossroads. Captain Kellogg of Sleather
Ser-rice over pm and t a l k e d with Crane and I regarding 6$s, airgraphs, e t c . Got t r a v e l
orders e t c t o Columbia tonorrow. 'Jyckoff and about 11 o t h e r s leaving f o r White Sands by
plane tombrrow morning. Up t o l a b tonight with Crane.
Yay 2 Thursday. L e f t Red Bank on 8 am t r a i n , o f f at Elizabeth and took f e r r y t o NYC.
Up t o GCC and then up t o Docs. Too l a t e f o r t a l k with Rellogg but i n time f o r conference
with Zwing, Lane of Columbia, Gallo, Bradford, Dove and Crane of !-[atson Labs. Conference
went over c o n t r a c t s with Columbia and VL. Crane and I t a l k e d t o Dove f o r s h o r t time after
dinner. Caught 1130 s l e e p e r t o Boston tonight.
Yay 7 ?ri. Arrived !Joods Hole 1045 am . Vent over t o Falmouth with Dorothy. Up t o l a b pm
x i t h Joe :i, Talked t o Jim Peoples r e h i s a m p l i f i e r and l e v e l recorder. 3ump and K i t over
-Saw Columbus FY.
 1946 3
Kay 4 S a t . Up a t Y X G I t h i s am. Out with John Esring t a k i n g bottom s h o t s i n water. Vorked
with Joe on h i s boat t h i s pm. Cver t o Jim and Rowes t o n i g h t and t o Euzzards Pay bowling,
I'ay 5 Sun. L'p t o :ilIOI about 11. ',!er.t over deep water equipment with Joe :*lorzel and J i m
Peoples. J i m and I caught 600 pm t r a i n t o Eoston t o n i g h t , g o t 1130 pm O w l t o YYC
Yay 6 Yon. Caught 625 t r a i n o u t of Penn S t a t i o n t o Red Bank. Arrived Red Bank 730 and caught
bus out t o ';ratson Labs. Checkec! at l i b r a r y f o r caps?militar$nfo. Called up ?:orris of Supply
and wrote supply r e q u e s t . Stepanoff i n f m Oakhurst. ;?rote up weekly r e p o r t t o Xatson Labs
f o r 189-7-1. Arranged t r u c k t o take fathometer t o I"!yack, Y.Y. f o r 104' boat and bring back
microbaregraph from Zolumkia. -tent out t o Oakhurst and saw riooke who is working on.-flux-
meter, and got fathometer WB-1 ready t o send t o l!yack. Yent over l i s t of p a r t s needed
189-7-1 with Peoples. Feoyles signed i n a t 'Tatson Labs today. Capt Kellogg i n from Evans
Labs re how they can help- rough draft of l e t t e r o f request t o be w r i t t e n by Col Craul.
Got t r a v e l orders t o N Y C tomorrow and t o Nyack.
Yay 7 Tues. Jim Peoples and I caught 608 t r a i n out of Red Bank and arri-red Swing's o f f i c e
about 850 am. Zonference a t Ewing's o f f i c e G a l l o , Bradley, Crane, Peoples and I from Wabson
Labs, Lane and Ewing of Columbia and I s e l i n and KcCrory? of WHO1 regarding 189-7-1 contract
of 'a01 with Columbia. Conference later I s e l i n , Crane, ,!Wing, Peoples and myself regarding
t e c h n i c a l procedure and plan f o r A t l a n t i s , Anton Dohrn and two boats of !.!atson Lab f o r
summer and next winter. Crane, Peoples and I l e f t about 240 pm f o r Nyack, NY i n Army car.
Arrived i n Nyack at P e t e r s o n ' s Shipbuilding Co, new 104' boat P778 docked about t h e same
tima. Vent over a l l changes and a d d i t i o n s t o t h e boat with Gifford and made plans f o r con-
version t o our needs. L e f t Nyack about 6. J i m Peoples and I caught 740 t r a i n out of Penn
S t a t i o n and a r r i v e d i q Red Bank 9 pm.
Yay 9 Xed. Jim Peoples and I went up t o Watson Labs t h i s am
 196 1
?ec 2 Yon. Cakhurst. :old .rave h i t about midnight - temperature down t o 15' - strong
wind. S t a r t e d preparations f o r Alamogordo t r i p ; g e t t i n g itubicon drums and ealvanometers
ready.
3ec rues. Cakhurst. 'alorlred on ?ubicor, 6rw.s and palianoneters f o r Alanogordo t r i p -
Stepanoff on Awust 9 d a t a - ':i:.ian working up Bruise t a b u l a t i o n s . Cliva s e t t i n g up new
7R3 f o r Alamogordo. Got oscillograph operating w i t h 3 T-21 microphones,
3ec 4 ?ed. Oakhurst. Set up 20 s e c Pal-ros w.5 operated f o r s e v e r a l h o u r s . I n with PcCurdy
t o s a f e t y neeting, 'T. Zhantz s e t up liubicon i n dark box and took s e v e r a l records with
1 s e c galv. flade up l i s t f o r Alamogordo.
ilec C T h u r s Cakhurst. .iorked on r e l a y s f o r s e t u p a t Alamogordo. YcCurdy A h i s group on
"-21 operations, Yoodruff and Chantz Fettir?g motors , e t c ready f o r t r i p . '!ent ouer
xork at Cakhurst with i - r i a n .
3ec 6 F r i . Oakhurst. 'iorked on equipment f o r Alanopordo. Left at EOOE, caught 135 t o
Y e w York City. Contacted C a r l Gerdes and Zd Schempf a t United Geophysical o f f i c e . Curtin
a l s o i n NY o f f i c e , Went out t o eat with C a r l and Ed and discussed future work. They have
job open f o r me i n A l a s k a and a l s o l a t e r p o s s i b i l i t i e s i n Turkey. Yd caught plane out
about 745. Left on 1215 t o n i g h t f o r Asbury Park.
Dec 7 S a t . T*!ent t o Oakhurst 10 - 3. Yoody and F h i l t h e r e g e t t i n g ready f o r Alamogordo.
Peoples up f o r awhile pm.
Dec 8 Sun. Slorked about 7 - 8 hours a t Oakhurst. Chantz and Peoples t h m e - getting realys,
e t c ready f o r Alamogordo. Went over a l l t h e o r e t i c a l work on f l i g h t s , e t c with Peoples.
Dec 9 Mon. Oakhurst. Finished g e t t i n g a l l equipment ready f o r Alamogordo. Chantz, Woody and I
went t o Watson Labs. Got checks and t r a v e l orders, A l l equipment loaded on trucks and taken
t o Idatson l a t e pn. Talked t o Colonel Duffy a while about f u t u r e plans.
3ecl0 Tues. Woody, Chantz and I l e f t Cakhurst i n staff c a r about 9 am. Arrived at Fewark
a i r p o r t 10. C-54 i n from Yiddletown about 11, bringing E a l l and Oakes from Wright Field.
Loaded up a l l equipmert on C-54 and l e f t Newark about 145 pm. L e w i s , p i l o t i Clowry, co-
p i l o t , Arrived Oklahoma City about 945 pm EST. Got rooms a t A i r Base Hotel. Went i n t o Okla-
homa City f o r dinner t o n i g h t .
Dec 11 Yed. Oklahoma City. Vaited f o r weather t o l i f t . Unable t o leave i n time t o reach
Alamogordo before dark. A t Air B a s e h o t e l t o n i g h t . Equipment from Johns Hopkins Unicersity
transferred t o MCGUL plane, including warhead of 'r-2. 4 s c i e n t i s t s & crew, including Del-
gano? . Called Jimmie a t Fairview, Okla.
Dec 12 Thurs. L e f t Oklahoma City i n C - 9 a t 0800 CST. Arrived at Alamogordo about 11 RXT.
V e t Kajor P r i t c h a r d at air base. S-54 unloaded warhead m a t e r i a l first then all HOCUL eqpt
which went t o North Hanger. Vent over t o P r i c h a r d ' s o f f i c e , met Kajor !!quire? and t a l k e d
over prospects of sercps. Woody and P h i l worked on equipment pm. Went up i n 6 3 with Sgt
Kack looking over country of proposed sites. WAC corporal launched at 4 pm. Worked on
equipment tonight. Staying at BOQ.
3ec 13 Fri.Woody and I l e f t Alamogordo A i r B a s e i n weapon carrier and scouted out area south
of White Sands and Turoro Lake. Got l o s t on ordnance map w e had. Located Tower and K s t a t i o n
;Jent t o Proving Ground. Saw Karsh and Kajor G r a n t and g o t good l o c a t i o n s and one of good
maps. Left Proving Grounds about 2 and went up w e s t s i d e of sand area t o s i t e 143.
Arrived t h e r e a t 4 but over very rough roads. Back t o Alamogordo A i r Base at 620. Chantz i n
Alamogordo working on T-21s, BST and Brush equipment.
3 e c 14 S a t . '*rent out IIwy 70 t h i s am toward Froving Grounds. Turned o f f a t l h i t e Sands Rat'l
Konument and drove t o end of 9 mile road i n park, about h a l f i n white sand a r e a . Found loc-
a t i o n f o r #2 s i t e which is about 30 miles north and a l i t t l e e a s t of launching s i t e . Back t o
A i r B a s e at noon. Went out north looking f o r S i t e 3. T r i e d t o g e t through Ordnance Gate but
needed key. '\rent back and around by Alamogordo and Tulaxosa but couldn't g e t i n t h e r e . Back
t o base, got key from Provost F a r s h a l and went out t o Ordnance Gate. Found it d i d not lead
i n right Cane back t o Yorth Hanger and took road out from t h e r e , f i n a l l y landing a t
bombing a r e a about 35 m i from base. Left a l l Rubicon equipmept t h e r e . Pack a t Ease 645
Dec 1 5 Sun. Got all G R 3 recording u n i t s and went up t o s i t e 3. S e t up both Rubicon i n t e n t
and G R 3 i n small building. Got recordings on both. Back through Tularosa and Alamogordo.
Dec 16 Yon. Signal Corps people, Ilr Kane and D r Crenshaw i n t h i s am. They are planning t o
measure tine i n t e r v a l betueen b u r s t s of meteorites a t 60, 70, SO seconds a f t e r launching.
'Jent over our plan$ with them. Packed eqpt f o r S i t e Z2 i n Vhite Sands. 'Ihantz and I stayed
s e t t i n g up apparatus and '0:oody went back for equipment f o r S i t e #1. Left S i t e 2 about 3 pm
and went t o s i t e 1. S e t up equipment t h e r e . Finished about 7. To Alamogordo f o r dinner,
 1946 2
3ec 17 Tues. Cot Chantz a. Jeep t o use on S t a t i o n 3. ?!ent o u t t o $3 r a d e f i n a l checks -
Ihar.tz s t a y e d t h e r e . '.?oodruff and I went t o S t a t i o n 1 and made f i n d l checks t h e r e . '.ioodruff
? r o w m e t o 3 t a t i o n 2 and then xent kack t o 1. -!-2 r o c k e t xent up a t about lOl5.'Got ?n 3rush
r e c o r d i n g - 1 trace & Eubicon a t 2. -;ooaruff g o t EST 6: Rubicor: a t 1 -though had i n t e r f e r -
ence w i t h o t h e r group. Chantz p o t GR 3 & Rubicon r e c o r d a t $3. Back t o L1OQ about 12. Rub-
icor. ? ?ST
i r e c o r d i n g s n o t y e t developed.
~ Z C 14 ',!ad,Chantz and I w e n t o u t t o S t a 3 and g o t a l l equipment t o g e t h e r and back t o camp
about 1 - went i n borrowed weapon c a r r i e r , ;.;oodj and Jeff Towler took o t h e r xeapon c a r r i e r
a r d c o l l e c t e d a l l equipmert from S i t e s 1 and 2. Packed a l l equipnent a t F o r t h hanger and
loaded. i t i n t o t r u c k , xhich w a s t h e r put on p l a n e . Got d a t a f r o n J-2 f i r i n g s from F r i t c h a r d ' r
o f f i c e . L e f t 4lamogordo about 730 pm i n C - 9 and. x e n t t o El Faso F i g g s F i e l d .
& 19 T h u z . Went down t o 91 Faso t h i s morning and t h e n a c r o s s t o J u a r e z . Sack t o 3 i g g s
3 e l d about 230 pm. 2 - 9 l e f t 51 Paso 400 prr, , landed i n F a t t e r s o n F i e l d , Dayton, Chio 1 1 0 ~ ~ ~
Dec 70 99. Left Dayton about 9 am & a r r i v e d i r Clmsted F i e l d n e a r I I a r r i s b u r g , Pa about
noon. It C a r r o l l and Clomy drove u s down t o P a RR s t a t i o n . Got 150 o u t o f H a r r i s b u r g and
a r r i v e d i n Newark 6 pm. Taught t r a i n t o -4sbury Park.
Dec 21 S a t . Chante went down t o 0 a k h u r s t . a n d developed 3 Rubicon r e c o r d i n g s from 'Vhite Sands
m-ci ?ST r e c o r d i n g a t S i t e ? 1. S i t e :'tl r e c o r d i r g poor, p o s s i b l y KC. Looked over r e c o r d i n g s
o b t a i n e d a t CIakhurst on bonbing r u n of 19 Dec.
Dec 22 Sun. Cut t o P e o p l e s t h i s evening i n Karlsboro.
3 e c 23 Fon. Oakhurst. !forked on Alamogordo and F l i g h t 13. H a d f l i g h t # 14 t h i s pm. - 24
bombs s t a r t i n g a t 2 pm. R a n GR-3, 3 r u s h and Rubicon at lab. Woodruff went o u t t o Faxmingdall
with van and Rubicon but r e s u l t s NG. No s h o t s appaxent on r e c o r d i n g s .
Dec 24 Tues. O a k h u r s t . Closed down about 113. Vorked on F l i g h t # 14 and work from NYU.
3 t a r t e d Stepanoff on e x t e n s i o n of Aug 8 f l i g h t , I n t o ITYC PF: and caught 10145 s l e e p e r t o N?X
i3ec 28 S a t . Cold NE winds and storms a l l day. Unable t o g e t r o a d s c l e a r e d o u t . Cancelled
r e s e r v a t i o n s f o r t h i s evening t o NYC.
Dec 29 Sun. Caught 805 s l e e p e r t o NYC t h i s evening.
3ec 30 Yon.Arrived NYC about 915 am - caught 1040 o u t of Penn S t a , a r r i v e d Asbury Park
about 1 pm. Tiorked on Alamogordo r e s u l t s . Went o v e r work with YcCurdy who proposed new
t y p e i n s t r u m e n t and wants a u t h o r i t y t o go ahead w i t h i t .
Dec 31 Tues. Oakhurst. F l i g h t 9 15 t h i s morning a t 1040 - 1105. '!Joody went o u t t o Faxmingdal
and r e c o r d e d on Rubicon drum. Recorded a l s o on Rubicon drum "-9- S r u s h and GR3-T-8. S e t up
sonobuoy 1000 f t f nest o f T-8-0. Times Square t o n i g h t .
194.7
Jan 1 Wed Asbury Park. Snowstorm pm
Jan 2 Thurs. Oakhurst. Worked with V'on f i l i g h t s 12,. 13 and,part of 14. Got Alamogordo
r e s u l t s t o g e t h e r , Conference t h i s pm with Colonel Duffy and showed him my r e s u l t s with
S B A e ~ ~ , f ~ d O ~ ~ h , ? ~ on h t s~ 1~4 w
~ ~F l~i g ~ andw 15 i tandh s t a r t e d NYU d a t a of S e p t 12.
S t e p a n o f f on extension of August 9 results. Conference pm: D r . Ewing, S p i l h a u s , D r Ference
of Evans, 3 u f f y . Discussed !bans progr&n a n d ' a i r ' y l i z h t and Alaomgordo r e s u l t s . Made arr-
angements f o r c o o p e r a t i o n with Evans i n coming tests.
Jan 4 S a t . A t Oakhurst about 3 hours. F i n i s h e d g e t t i n g v e l o c i t i e s f o r S e p t 17 f l i g h t and
s t a r t e d work on d a t a o f Oct 4 c r u i s e .
Jan 6 Yon. Oakhurst. Yinished : . d o c i t y d a t a f o r Oct 4 and. Oct 16 from NYU m e t e o r o l o g i c a l
s t u d i e s . Stepanoff f i n i s h e d Xug 9 d a t a and s t a r t e d on i?1 o f S e p t 12. Yoved i n t o new build-
i n g n e x t t o T-8-0 today.
Jan 7 Tues. Oakhurst. 'rivian worked up r a y p a t h s , time and distance f o r Vel #2 of S e p t 12.
S t a r t e d on .4ug 8 da%at o g e t S t e p a n o f f ' s f i g u r e s t o g e t h e r f o r s t u d y above 15 kms. Vent
s c o u t i n g f o r l o c a t i o n of sono buoy west o f Oakhurst A r m about 3000 f t . Chante and Woodruff
on c a l i b r a t i o n of Alamogordo i n s t r u m e n t s and f i x i n g up o f equipment f o r f i e l d uses.
Jan 8 'iied. Oakhurst. ?forked on Aug 8 c r u i s e , making f i n a l c a l c u l a t i o n s f o r sky wave. .' on
're1 $13, S e p t 12 c r u i s e . :ioody and I went over t o h i g h ridge 2900 f t west o f Cakhurst with
sonobuoy which worked i n t o GR3.
J J . Oakhurst. Yorked on sky ware d a t a . Vivian and S t e p a n o f f on S e p t 12 r a y p a t h s .
F l i g h t I16 at 1200 t o 1220 pm. No n o t i c e a b l e r e s u l t s . Used sonobuoy at 160' h i l l back of
labs.
Jan 10 F r i , 0 a k h u r s t . I n t o I a t s o n Labs at 9 t o t a k e s u p e r v i s o r ' s t e s t . Trakoiqski, Peoples am
I went t o :amp Evans and d i s c u s s e d r e s u l t s of ''2 r o c k e t r e c o r d i n g s i n f o r m a l l y . F l i g h t 217
t h i s FF? 1600 t o 1620. '.?orked on s k y w a v e i t a
 194-7 3
Jar 11 Eat. Oakhurst. Vorked OT! sky wave d a t a of Auf C r e w up cur-,-es f o r lower and upper
z t r a t o s p h e r e . Regung? brought i n c a l c u l a t o r from : i r i g h t ? i e l d .
T ~ 12
. 3 u r . C a X i u r s t . .'orked on s k y :raws .lug F t h and F t h . Got o u t l e t t e r t o Gutenberg
D e r t s i n i n F t o t h o s e two days.
.Tar.13 !:on. Oakhurst. ' d o r k i k on sky '*rave curies. X a d e p1m.s f o r Xlamogordo t h i s Thursday
Jar. 14 T u e s . Cakhurst. C a l i b r a t e d i n s t r u m e n t s 12-21 t o t a k e t o Alarrogorso. Raining
Tar 1'; :led. Oakhurst. S t a r t e d w r i t e p of "-2 r o c k e t vork. 3r O'Day i n from 'datson and lie
- e r t o;er '-2 r o c k e t p r o p a m with him. "inished c a l i b r a t i o n of "21s on GR P. "ivian f i n -
i:hed sky wave curves. Jorked on Dec 31 L'oods Hole r e c o r d i n g s .
?an 16 Thurs. Oakhurst. A l l equipmer.t f o r Alamogordo packed and loa6ed on t r u c k pn. 'viorked
. i t h 'i-Jiar; on sky wares of . 4 9~t h a r d 9 t h .
:a? 17 35. Cakhurst. Zonfsrence w i t h 7 a p t s Lewis, 3 0 w r y and Duff of Clmstead Y i e l d and
: CrCT a t 1230 r e g a r d i n g bombs, f u t m e f l i g h t s , e t c . Yathenateciar; fror?. Kernan's group
- t a r + e d work t h i s noon - f o r tsro weeks. - working w i t h 'rivian. Yoodruff and Chantz went
up t o N e w a r k u i t h equipment and loaded on P-47. Vent up at 2 pm by staff car. P-47 l e f t
:'exark 733 pm, l a n d e d a t P a t t e r s o n f o r f u e l , landed a t T i n k e r F i e l d , Okla C i t y 120 am.
Stayed t h e r e o v e r n i g h t , Officers Manjak and Layden.
Jan 19 Eat. Left Oklahoma C i t y about noon and went as far as Amarillo. S t a y & 'at Amarillo -
a t S l i n t o n !!otel
J a n 19 Sun L e f t Amarillo about 1130 CST - arriy-ed Alamogordo 1230 pm RMST. Unloaded equip-
pent o f f p l a n e and p u t i n n o r t h hanger. Unpacked G R - ~ s , T-21 galvanometers. 3 T-21s and 2
galvanometers broken. R e p a i r i n g t o n i g h t
J a n 20 !'on .L\~amogordo. Tested o u t T-21s a t n o r t h hanger with GR-8s. Loaded up a l l equipment
-3 and Flubicon drum and went o u t t.0 A 1 tower. S e t up house a l o n g road' about 3/4 m i
s o u t h e a s t of t h e tower. Ran o u t 3 1000' l i n e s f o r t h e a t 120° r a d i i . S e t up d a r k room
t e n t and 2 g a l v I N broken suspensions. Worked on t i m i n g c i r c u i t s , T-21s and g a l v a t
.llamo;rordo A i r B a s e .
Jan 21 Tues Alamogordo. T r i e d o u t more T-21s u i t h GR-8. All OK b u t one. S e t o u t S i t e 2 near
Huy 70, p&3 marker 'Dona'. Laid o u t lOOO'cables, s e t up Rubicon. Went o u t t o end of Doppler
l i n e t o s t a t i o n G b u t could n o t f i n d C G S marker 'Town'. Went back along l i n e toward block-
house & s e t up s i t e X1, c a b l e s and Rubicon drum a t i n t e r s e c t i o n of G l i n e and 0 l i n e .
S i t e s now s e t up 6, 13, 19 m i from blockhouse, a l l about 2 m i east o f N l i n e from boundary?
site
Jan 22 :fed Alamogordo. Made rounds o f a l l 3 s i t e s . S e t up L&N a t S i t e #3, & surveyed t o
tower. Took T-21s and GR-8s t o S i t e s 1 and 2 and s e t them up ready t o o p e r a t e . Took
Rubicon r e c o r d i n g s at S i t e 1 and 3 t o check galvanometers.
Jan 2 3 Thus. Alamogordo. Left air base about 9 0 0 ~ r L B o m b i n gpostponed from 11 am t o 3 pm.
?ent o u t t o S i t e 3, surveyed t o tower. Got GR-3 r e c o r d i n g s . L e f t Chantz at S i t e 3 and went
t o S i t e 2. Uoody l e f t S i t e 2 and went t o s i t e 1. Bombing delayed by 15-30 minute i n t e r v a l s
from 3 pm t o 519 pm. Got good recordings a t S i t e 2 . Both o t h e r s t a t i o n s l o s t t o t r i a n g -
u l a t i o n a c c ' t r a d i o communication though Woody had GR-8 o p e r a t i n g b u t without d i r e c t i o n a l
instrumnets.
Jan 24 F r i . Alamogordo. Checked with Major P r i t c h a r d at b a s e . L e f t about 830 and picked up
a l l equipment frorr. 3 sites. Surveyed S i t e #2 and made rough survey o f S i t e #l
Jan 25 S a t . Alamogordo. S o r t e d o u t a l l equipment a t n o r t h hanger. L e f t GR3, Rubicons and
Sprcngnethers. Packed up CR8's and o t h e r equip3ent and loaded i n C-47. % - r o l l and Short
i n C-47 from 1"iddletowr.. ready t o 1ea:e tomorrow. Worked on S i t e 2 r e c o r d i n g s pm. g o t
azimnths and a n g l e s o f a s c e n t f o r 2 main e x p l o s i o n s . Have h i g h a n g l e o f a s c e n t .
Jan 26 Sun. L e f t Alamogordo about e3O an i n C-47, L t Sherry o f Alamogordo p i l o t . Landed
a t S c o t t F i e l d , 3 t Louis f o r g a s eZ eats, and t h e n t o r a t t e r s o n F i e l d , Eayton, Chio where
;re s t a y e d o-Jernight acct bad weather e a s t of P i t t s b u r g .
Jan 27 !:on. L e f t P a t t e r s o n F i e l d about 930 am, a r r i v e d i n Mewaxk n e a r noon. Chantz and
Joodruff l e f t by t r a i n . I went t o Cakhurst with t r u c k and equipment.Arrived about 330 pm.
Feoples going t o . .Vashington tomorrow t o V-2 p a n e l meeting with Trakonski.
Jan 28 Tues. Oakhurst. Norked up diagrams f o r a z i n u t h and o f f s e t d i s t a n c e s , a l s o a n g l e of
descent from S i t e 2 , Alamogordo. Went over r e c o r d i n g , g o t about 20 r e c o r d i n g s on first
p a r t b u t only 2 on down p a r t .
Jan 29 Wed. Oakhurst. Worked on l a t t e r p a r t o f 'J-2 r e c o r d i n g of Alamogordo. Got 2 recording:
b e s i d e s 2 l a r g e o n e s , b u t very poor. Worked up p o s s i b l e t r a j e c t o r y of 1'-2 r o c k e t . 'dorked
up fuiure program f o r Alamogordo - Chantz & O l i v a l e a v i n g about 10 February for semi-
me-- a r e n t work t h e r e . Ye are p a s s i n g up Feb 6 r o c k e t b u t s t a x t i n g on d e f i n i t e program
foffowing t h a t .
 1947 4
Jan 30 Thurr. F l o t t e d up angle of azimuth a g a i n s t angle of descent f o r '-2 recordings.
S e t a s i d e t h i s w6rk f o r bombing runs. Vorked on F l i g h t 18 with 'ivian. S t a r t e d Eileen
on c a l c u l a t i o n s with A u g F! and 3 d a t a , reworking c a l c u l a t i o n s doe before. Zhecked picks
on F l i g h t 19 - they appear t o be sky waves though angle of descent i s not r e g u l a r .
J a n 31 F r i Oakhurst. Vorked with Eileen on A u g 8 c a l c u l a t i o n s . Finished up f o r both d i r e c t
and reflectec! p o s s i b i l i t i e s . Vent over p l i g h t 19 records. Found t h a t a l l of t h e s e are sky
wa--es.
Eeb 1 S a t . L e f t A.F. for P h i l l y on 940 bus, a r r i v e d at !:=ions a p t about 1. -t:ayne back fron:
work about 5. After dinner w e went out t o Newtown and stayed overnight.
Feb 2 Sun. Drove up t o S p a r t a I I J with 1:arion and ilayne. Saw Dorothy, Joe and family. Nelson
Eteenland 82 family l i v i n g t h e r e with them. Saw ',!orzels pm. Ed Douglas i n t o n i g h t f o r f e x
ir.inutes. Joe took me Over t o Dover A? caught t r a i n , then 1120 out of Fenn S t a t i o n ,
t'ewark. Arrived AP about 1230
?eb 3 Eon O a k h u r s t . Peoples i n Vashington regarding balloon ascention i n June. Fade plans
f o r f l i g h t 20 which w a s made t h i s pm 2300 t o 2320 i n conjunction with instruments i n blimp.
Route j u s t south of e a s t , no r e s u l t s . Vorked on sky waves from F l i g h t s 18-19.
Feb 4-56, Tues, Wed, Thurs. Oakhurst. Checked over a l l sky wave p i c k s on F l i g h t s 19 - 19.
Vent over Loran d a t a and p l o t t e d up t o g e t accurate plane speed. P l o t t e d T - X curve using
t h e s e f i g u r e s . Worked up Oakhurst c o r r c e t i o n s f o r e l e v a t i o n s and r e p l o t t e d a l l values f o r
velocity - -
F l i g h t s 18 19. Received Gutenberg l e t t e r i n which he had worked out A u g 8,9
data. Went over t h i s method and worked over t h a e d a t a a g a h . Unique s o l u t i o n not obtainable,
Went over p o s s i b l e experiments i n 'Helios' balloon June with Peoples.
Feb 7 Fri Oakhurst. Worked on 23, 24 Jan T-X curves. V f i l e s 23,24 Jan forms, s t a r t e d on
NYU d a t a . Eileen worked on least squares-\'a , then on Gutenberg's method applied t o Aug 9
data.
Feb 8 S a t Oakhurst. Worked on '1-2 rocket information 23 Jan. Used meteorological informatior
f o r 2 explosions. T r i e d t o get 0 at height of ekplosions but seems t o o low.
Feb 9 Sun Asbury Park - worked on c a l c u l a t i o n s of f l i g h t s , setup? and c a l c u l a t i o n s f o r
rockets.
Feb 10 Yon Oakhurst. Worked over Alamogordo R a d a r Hueco s t a t i o n s f o r 23 Jan 1947 records
and made p l o t of V-2 r o c k e t D - II using a l l radar d a t a . :?ent over a l l equipment t o go t o
Alamogordo. Fade p l a n s f o r departure Thurs. S e t up 8 sec g a l v In T-9. 'Jivian checked
v e l o c i t y from caps with temperatures and continued on O c t 22-23, F l i g h t s 12-13, Cruises,
LWU d a t a . Eileen i n pm - worked on formulas of-seismih r e f r a c t i o n using s t r a i g h t l i n e f o r
l i n e - Aug 8 - 9. Finished t h i s and went back t o least square s o l u t i o n s of Jan 2 3 -24 data.
Feb li Tues Cakhurst. F l i g h t 21 scheduled f o r 8 t o n i g h t postponed u n t i l tomorrow. Worked on
Oct 22 d a t a with sky naves t o Highland Lights. Went over a l l records. Have 2? consecutive
s h o t s t o H.L. Ollva l e f t by t r a i n t o n i g h t for Alamogordo. '* L :I
Feb 12 Wed Oakhurst. Vivian & Eileen worked on temperatures and winds Oct 22 & 23 and worked
up ray paths f_orsky waves t o Highland Lights. A l l equipment f o r Alamogordo assembled and
loaded on t r u c k s f o r Watson Labs t h i s pm. F l i g h t 21 a t midnight t o n i g h t . McCurdy, Chantz,
Woodruff, Ball, Horn?, Rigny present. Dropped 20 bombs 1200 t o 1237. No s i g n a l s received,
e i t h e r sky o r d i r e c t waves.
Feb 13 Thurs. Got s p e c i a l instruments f o r 1 cycle from McCurdy t h i s 0 . Drove up t o Newark
i n staff car- Chantz & myself. Loaded B-25 t h i s pm but could not g e t a l l equiprent on - l e f t
5 r e e l s and box of equipment ? . L e f t Newark about 330, stopped i n Mddletown, Pa -
Clmsted F i e l d f o r 1 1/2 hrs t o eat and gas plane, then l e f t and landed a t Godman F i e l d out- L
s i d e F o r t Knox, L o u i s v i l l e , Ky. Stayed at Officers Club t o n i g h t .
Teb 14 P r i Left Louisvilleabout 930 am. Stopped at Tinker F i e l d , Ok City f o r eats and r e f u e l
then t o Alamogordo. Arrived Alamogordo 430 pm - contacted Watson Lab and g o t t r u c k . Unloaded
a l l e q u i p e n t from E-25 & took p a r t of it t o F!orth hanger. 2-25 crew:Lt T'osher, L t Alberts,
Sgt ? Oliva a r r i v e d dlamo. by t r a i n t h i s arp
Feb 15 S a t . roved eqpt from north hanger a c r o s s runway t o stowage building. Checked T-21s on
GR 5, Checked galvanometers, e t c
Feb 16 Sun Alamogordo.Out t o Tower and Dona s i t e s & surveyed i n instrument l o c a t i o n s - 5 t o
be s t a t i o n ( e d ) i n shape. R a n out f i e l d wire a t Dona s t a t i o n .
Feb 17 Eon Alamogordo. Vent out t o Tower s i t e and s e t up Springnether and G R 3 equipment.
Rubicon 500 f t from GR3. Took trial recordings on both equipments
 1N4-7 5
not come s o g o t r i d e i n t o Army base. P h i l i n l a t e r . 'rery windy f o r recordine.
Feb 19 'red. Alamorgordo. Got r a d i o s from 'datrus of Signal Zorps and got t r i p t i c k e t s f m
tomorrow. Rap t e s t r w o r d s on Qubicon a t both z i t e s and checked e.1erythit-f r e a d j f o r
tomorrow
Peb 20 Thurs. Alamogordo. C u t e a r l y t o s t a t i o n at Tower. Left P h i l o f f t h e r e and went over
t o 9ona S i t e . Rocket delayed from 10 t o 1119. Poth s t a t i o n s g o t good recordings except
1 97-1;s on both !K. ':'orked on GR8 records t o n i g h t .
veb 21 F r i . Alamogordo. 'lent t o Yhite Sands Proving Grounds with F r i t c h a r d , Yagnir?, S o l
ti P h i l t h i s mom.inc f o r '1-2 c r i t i q u e s , 0930 t o 1100. Canister from rocket unpacked? about
40 miles up and f i r a l l y found t h i s pm between %1 Faso and Alanogordo. ?!o t r a n s p o r t a t i o r
back t o N J y e t . !s?orked OP CR-3 records today
?eb 22 Xlamocordo. 'iorked on d a t a a l l day today. Correlated between t h e Tower and Dona
s i t e s f o r se-reral sources. 'forked t o t a l t r a v e l times f o r a s c e r t s both 3ora and Tower and
g o t average , r e l o c i t i e s up t o about 65 kms, -relocity i n c r e a s e s from about 40 kms up t o
6 0 . Average v e l o c i t y at 65 kms i s about 320 meters p e r s e c .
Feb 23 Sun. Worked on d e t a i l i n g record from GR3. Added more and made T-D move up t o
75 kms, giving v e l o c i t y of about 420 m/sec at top.Phi1 and S a l went out and picked up equip-
ment - T-791s and GR8 and checked all pickups.
Teb 24 Yon. Alamogordo. Vaited f o r a i r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n today but none a v a i l a b l e and may not
be any u n t i l Thurs a t latest. Worked on V-2 recordings, frequency and c h a r a c t e r i s t i c anal-
y s i s - T-3. S a l and P h i l out t o S i t e at Dona and recorded WAC Corporal at 1400. Got some
waves&, about 7 ,minutes after it had l e f t groynd. , . , , I ,?a - '
Feb 25 Tues, Alamogordo. Uent out t o Tower S i t e , surveyed iik, took down s h e l t e r . T O Dona
S i t e , s e t up G R 3 i n s h e l t e r , surveyed i n #6, went t o launching s i t e , about 2 -3 miles NW
launching area. P h i l went i n t o 'JSPS and got permission, S a l and I sur-reyed 1 s i t e f o r use
with WAC Corporal.
Feb 26 Ved. Alamogordo. Yorked on G R 8 records of 20 Feb 5'-2 rocket. This am P h i l and S a l s e t
up Sounding? s i t e f o r tomorrow's W.A.C. I l e f t 7 pq - C-47 Hoffman,,Kissinger: P i l o t , co-
p i l o t . a r r i v e d i n Newark 9am.
Feb 27 Thurs. Arrived,Newark 9 am. Lewis, Duff,Kosher a r e q u e s t ? i n from Kiddletown - on
way t o 'at o conference and I rode i n with them. Zonference r e f u t u r e missions. Conference
PM Trakowski, Peoples, Rying & myself regarding f u t u r e operations
Feb 28 F r i . O a k h u r s t . Ewing i n from NYC. J e n t over Alamogordo r e s u l t s with Ewing, Peoples
and Trakowski. Out t o Peoples t o p i g h t
Parch 1 S a t u r d q . Asbury Park
March 2 S w Oakhurst. worked on c a l c u l a t i o n s f o r wind t r a n s l a t i o n s .
.
M a c h 3 Monday. Oakhurst Postponed Alamogordp,,tzJpl q$il, tomorrow., ge?&IPg.$~q#)er
ment for Alamogordo. Thompson going a l s o t o get information on bombing runs? -re,
equip-
Worked
on c a l c u l a t i o n s .from y-2 ..I_ il I 8 a ? k *
Kaxch 4 Tuesday. Thompson and I left' staff car adout 930, axrived at Newark 1040. Loaded up
B-25 with equipment and l e f t about 1230. Sgopped at Middletown and,picked u p ~ a q i o .Stopped
a t S c o t t F i e l d &: Tinker F i e l d f o r gas. Arrived a t Alamogordo 2 am. C r e w 9-25:Hoffman,
DeTurk, Hancock
rYarch 6 .Thursday. Alamogordo. Snowing - rocket f l i g h t c a l l e d o f f u n t i l tomorrow. Chantz
I out t o Tower S i t e and brought i n b a t t e r i e s . S a l and I checked low frequency equipment and
went out t o Tularosa s i t e with it t h i s pm. Ready t o use on 1 s e c g a l v on Rubicon drum
I 3'arch 5 l d e d n e s w Alamogordo. Shantz, Thompson and myself out to Tulerosa s i t e and surv-
eyed out X s e t u p and r a n out wires. Back about 2. Oliva working on check of T21s. ',iorked
on r a d i o and T21s u n t i l t o n i g h t
E a c h 7 ,Friday. Alamogordo. A t 8 a m F r i t c h a r d g o t word r o c k e t would go o f f between 10%
and 1200. P h i l and SaJ went out t o Dona and Launching S i t e s with weapon c a r r i e r . Hoffman,
DeTurk and Thompson out with them i n staff c a r . I took Jeep and went out t o Tularosa s i t e .
Rocket o f f a t , l l 2 3 . Got recording on G R 8 but not time f o r Rubicon record. P h i l and 3 a l g o t
OK secords from t h e i r s i t e s . Thompson reported on bombing s i t e s f o r runs and met and t a l k e d
with Ordnance Officer. L e f t Alamogordo 545 pm , B-25 with Hoffman, DeTurck. r o t o r t r o u b l e
on way and reached? Tinker F i e l d 1200 with cylinder broken.
Y a c h 8 S a t . Hoffman wired Alamogordo and caught P I a n j a k & Schneider (Pb)? before leaving
f o r Florida. They changed t h e i r r o u t e and landed a t Tinker F i e l d , O.C. 535. Trouble with
t h e i r o i l gauge and t h e t r o u b l e not r e p a i r e d u n t i l 10 am. Left Tinker " i e l d 10 and landed
at P a t t e r s o n . O f f from p a t t e r s o n t o Clmsted, Clmsted at 9pm. I stayed t h e r e overnight.
 1947 6
”a&9 “un. L e f t Olmsted 0934 am - (24’7, Manjak and Schneider and landed a t Newark 1120
Thompson and I took t r a i n t o Asbury Park from Pa s t a t i o n . I n Asbury Park 3 pm
Farch 10 Mon Oakhurst. Vivian and I worked on F l i g h t 25, P a r t s 1 and 2. S t a r t e d Eileen
on V-2 r o c k e t aecordings.
March 11 Tues Oakhurst. Vivian and I worked on F l i g h t s 25, 24. F l i g h t 26 o f f today, P a r t
1 a t 9, p a r t 2 at 2 pm. Good r e s u l t s ! Eileen on V2 rocket M a r c h 7, Dona S i t e .
March 12 Wed Oakhurst. Vivian and I worked on records - F l i g h t 26, and started F l i g h t 23.
Eileen worked on Dona s i t e , V-2. Thompson and I went over Alamogordo plans.
March 13 i7hurs Oakhurst. Worked with Vivian some on F l i g h t 23 and 22. Worked on Tularosa
s i t e of V2 - 7 March. Eileen worked on Launching S i t e , V-2. F l i g h t 27 today -
a t 12 noon
and a t 4 pm. Probably last of f l i g h t s .
March 14 F’ri Oakhurst. Vivian worked on i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of r e t u r n s , lasL435 c r u i s e s . gave
good sky waves. Trakowski, Peoples and myselfmote up r e p o r t f o r General Reves on o v e r a l l
program t o be hand c a r r i e d by Thompson t o Washington. Eileen worked on V-2 records, #21
March 1 5 S a t Oakhurst. Worked up survey o f Launching Area and Tuleroso sites & p l o t t e d a l l
s i t e s on air map. Worked on V 2 r o c k e t March 7 records.
M a r c h 16 Sun Oakhuret, Worked- on formula f o r s h d c o r r e c t i o n u n t i l 2 pa - went over t o
McCurdys tonight.
March 17 Mon 0akhurst.Vivian p l o t t e d up all l a s t sky waves. Worked on eqpt list f o r Alamo-
gordo. Worked on formulas for wind c o r r e c t i o n .
YgFch 18 T w O a k h u r s t . Worked with V. Checked through a l l March 13 records.:.Worked on
Woods Hole recordings pap. Elleen working on V-2 r o c k e t s .
March 19 Wed O a k h m t . Reviewed F U g h t &A t r y i n g t o get some azimuths from Oakhurst but
r e c o r d s very poor. Reviewed r e c o r d s of,Jam 23-d and started on s t r a t o s p h e r e c a l c u l a t i o n s .
E i l e e n working on c o r r e c t i o n s Jan 20 V2 r o c k e t from meteorological d a t a . Baten? i n from
F l o r i d a F i e l d S t a t i o n , ready t o go t o Alamogordo next Tuesday.
March20 Thursday, Oakhurst , Went over f i n a l c a l c u l a t i o n s for s t r a t o s p h e r e d a t a using
s e i a i b methods, of Jan 2 3 data with Vivian. Got V=325 at 3 kms. Studied azimuths on t h a t
d a t a and g o t w = 10 m/sec coming from south on June 23rd. Worked with Eileen on rocket
Jan 2Othcorrecting f o r met d a t a and p l o t t i n g f i n a l H a g a i n s t X i n kms from surface for
up d a t a .
March 21 Friday Oakhurst. Worked on Alamogordo p l a n s - Lewis & Clowry over t h i s pm and we
went over a l l f u t u r e p l a n s including bombing f o r Alamogordo. Worked on r o c k e t d a t a with
Eileen and on f l i g h t data with YI &$?panoff on r a y p a t h s of Dec 13
arch 22 Saturday Oalchurst. Went over a l l V 2 r o c k e t data. Studied azimuth -
elevation
L a p h s & s t u d i e d WAC Corporal o f 3 M a r c h . Caught 534 t r a i n from Asbury Park -
lob5
sleeper o u t of NYC
ylarch 2 3 Sunday. A t home. Arrived Canton about,,9. &eft, en sleepey tonight about 8 pm
M a r c h 24 Monday. Arrived NYC about 7. A t 0930 went u p - t o Math Dqpartment at NYU Washington -
Square. Met Mr Bennett of UL. Found t h a t Dr. Courant would n o t be i n u n t i l late and decided
n o t t o wait but caught 1040 t r a i n t o Asbury Park. Went over shipment ready for Alamogordo
and over work for Vivian and Eileen. Packing tonight.
March 25 Tuesday Truck at Oakhurst at 9 with scales - a l l equipment weighed -
about 3 9 W
t o t a l including TORRID. Edmonton, Reynolds, Thompson, P o r t e r , Godbie? and I l e f t about 10
and went through t o M i t c h e l l F i e l d i n staff car. B-17, C a r r o l l , p i l o t -- co-pilot. L e f t
Mitnhel F i e l d about 3 pm. High l e v e l winds - -
went southern r o u t e stayed at M a x w e l l F i e l d
Alabama t o n i g h t . Thompson stayed behind waiting for B-45
March 26 Wednesday. Left M a x w e l l F i e l d , AlLabout 9 and landed i n Alamorgoro 3 pa
March 27 Thursday Alamogordo. P h i l , Reynilds and I went o u t t o Tower s i t e , took i n a l l wires,
P u l l e d down t e n t and Rubicon equipment and took i t over t o new s i t e w e s t of Lake Lucero.
Strung o u t wire, surveyed i n site dc set up Rubicon t e n t . S a l , Edmonson, Godbie?, P o r t e r
weighing i n equipment i n Alamogordo air base,
F i l c h 28 Fridav. Alamogordo. Went o u t with Godlers, P o r t e r t o White Sands west of air base.
Located s i t e and surveyed it, put up s h e l t e r and set up GR3. P h i l and Reynolds went up t p
Tularosa s i t e , S a l and Edmondson worked on GR8 and low frequency equipment. Thompson i n
with B-45 from Newaxk.
March 29 S a t Alamogordo
Jllarch 30 Sun Alamogordo. P h i l and I went out t o Dona s i t e and picked up some equipment and
then o u t t o Lucero s i t e . S e t up Rubicon and took a record. T r i e d t o get through t o Tularosa
s i t e west of White Sands but couldnt find road.
 1947 7
#arch 31 Monday. Alamogordo. Chantz, B i l l Godbee and Ace went out t o E. White Sands and
Tularosa s i t e s t o make f i n a l setups. S a l , Edmondson, Peoples and I went out t o Dona s i t e
t h i s pm and moved t e n t and Rubicon t o #3 p o s i t i o n and s e t up low frequency apparatus
April 1 Tues -12 Rocket #22 went o f f a t 1310 t h i s pm. Chantz and Don a t Tularosa, Godbee
and P e o p l e s a t East White Sands, S a l and Edmondson at Dona, P o r t e r and I a t Lucero. A l l
4 s t a t i o n s g o t good recordings though low frequency instrument at Dona d i d not work out.
A p r i l 2 Wed. Peoples, F a j o r Magnur?, Thompson and myself went over t o L t Co1,McKenson’s
o f f i c e t h i s a m regarding bombing p n s s There are many d i f f i c u l t i e s with t h e bombing here,
mostly t h a t s o many new groups have moved i n and are s e t t i n g up on t h e northern? range.
Thompson and I went o v e r t o see Fajor Mitchell t h i s pm regarding same matter. Vrote memo
regarding proposed work t o take t o CO tomoxrow. Peoples l e f t on B-17 today. Don and B i l l G
went t o Dona and Launching Area s i t e s am and g o t a l l loose wires. Don and B i l l E went t o
E a s t White Sands and Tularosa pm and g o t inventory and brought back Rubicon and t e n t from
Tularosa. Worked on E a s t Vhite Sands record. V2 made 85 peaks - down course. P o r t e r worked
on c a l c u l a t i o n s pm. S a J and Edmondson took complete inventory and t h i s pm worked on low
frequency equipment.
April 3 Thurs. Oliva and Edmondkon on low frequency equipment. A l l T-21s changed over t o
Stds. Edmonton and B i l l G went out t o Lucero and Dona, g o t inventory and brought back
t e n t from Lucero.
A p r i l 4 F ’ r i , Reynolds and I went out t o Osurso? Range and l o c a t e d PB1 bombing range. S e t
up wires and d i d surveying. Chantz and P o r t e r on computations April 1
April 5 S a t Alamogordo.
April 6 Sun. Checked clocks. Cleaned out hanger and emptied t r a s h out a t E a s t White Sands
A p r i l 7 Mon Talked t o P r i t c h a r d r e 3rd c q f o r tomorrow. Gave him memo of progress r e p o r t
f o r MOGUL p r o j e c t t o d a t e , t a l k e d t o L t Dyer of S i g n a l Corps regarding f o r tomorrow
f i r i n g . Chante and B i l l went out t o Tularosa and g o t t h a t s i t e ready. A l l equipment checked
f o r tomorrow. Edmondston and Reynolds ran drum recording of McCurdy low frequency equip-
ment a t base. P o r t e r and I worked on amplitudes and frequencys of a l l recordings A p r i l 1
f i r i n g and s t a r t e d c a l c u l a t i o n s . Olive worked on c a l i b r a t i o n of GR8 r e c o r d e r a t t e n u a t i o n ,
Got 3rd v e h i c l e and a l l t r i p t i c k e t s f o r tomorrow.
A p r i l 8 Tues. Ace and I went out 7 am t o Osaxco s i t e . Arrived 9 and s e t up r a d i o and T-21s.
Rocket due a t 11, delayed u n t i l 1710. Very windy then, a l l settings at 8. R a n 3 r o l l s but
nothing came i n . Chantz a t Tulerosa alone - Godbee and Reynolds a t E a s t !Jhite Sands - Oliva
and Edmonston a t Dona - all s i t e s windy but 3 c l o s e s t ones g o t some s i g n a l s .
April 9 Wed. Worked on yesterday’s records. Made p i c k s on Dona, E a s t White Sands and Tularos,
Found nothing on Oscuro s i t e recordings. Don and B i l l G went out t o E a s t White Sands s i t e
and took recordings with pistonphone t o g e t GR3 a t t e n u a t i o n c a l i k a t i o n . Sal Olive l e f t t h i s
pm f o r San Diego. IJrote l e t t e r s t o Vivian and Jim p t o n i g h t .
April 10 Thurs. Ace and P h i l worked on rocket recordings. - azimuths vs e l e v a t i o n angles.
Don..and I went out t o Tulaaxosa Range and checked bombing s i t e s - bombing range j u s t north
of Bange Camp and another s i t e between t h a t and o u r Tularosa s i t e . Triangulated i n with
Tularoas Peak, e t c . Thompson l e f t i n 45 f o r E a s t . Godbee and Edmondson went with him.
April 11 F r i . Don and I went out p a s t Tularosa S i t e looking f o r bombing sites. Went back
t o A i r t o Ground Range and t o a i r s t r i p . Chantz and P o r t e r working on c a l c u l a t i o n s V2 23
and T-21 c a l i b r a t i o n s .
April 12 Sat.. Alamogordo A i r Base
April 13 Sun. Yorked on formula f o r t r i a n g u l a t i o n without using compass - Alamogordo A i r B a s
April 14 P?n%I P o r t e r , Chantz and I worked on G R 3 and G R 8 c a l i b r a t i o n curves f o r frequency
and a t t e n u a t i o n settings. Don worked around equipment - Don, Ace and B i l l g o t apartments
at a i r base, W o t e l e t t e r s t o Vivian and E i l e e n t o n i g h t .
April 15 TuzAlamogordo. B-29 a r r i v e d today - L t B a l l , McCurdy, Woodruff and MOGUL pers-
onnel - 41493: Lewis, Wolk, Burnhoff, Adams, Duff .Worked some on instrument c a l i b r a t i o n s ,
L e w i s , B a l l and I checked with Major P r i t c h a r d , then t o Major M i t c h e l l ’ s o f f i c e regarding
bombing sites. M i t c h e l l said CO had turned down bombing from a i r , but we could have surface
charges along Tularosa road. Vent up i n AT-6, l i g h t plane with Capt Runcraft and looked over
area west of Tularosa as far as t h e mountains, where bombing s i t e s are t o be l o c a t e d .
16 Wed. Alamogordo. Chantz and Reynolds out t o E a s t White Sands and Tularosa sites
t o check G R 3 equipment f o r tomorrow. P o r t e r and McCurdy working on low frequency equipment
f o r ‘!2 tomorrow. !Joodruff, B a l l , Work and I went out t o Dona s i t e then t o Launching Area
s i t e . Strung out wires and l e f t equipment f o r tomorrow’s firing. McCurdy working t o n i g h t
on low freq. O l i v a i n from San Diego t h i s pm
 197 8
A p r i l 17 Thurs. ‘I2 f i r i n g it24 scheduled f o r 11 am. Chantz - P o r t e r at Tulerosa Range;
Reynolds - Woodruff a t East White Sands, Woodruff with low frequency equipment f o r 1
t r a c e GR3;01i*.ra - Kabassa?, r a d i o operator on P-29 at Dona S i t e , B i l l 2dmonston a r r i v e d
by c a r from F l o r i d a about 11 and went out t o Dona -- Captain Lewis and myself at Launching
Area s i t e , 9-2 postponed from 11 t o 1610. 9 explesives supposed t o go o f f , SCEL, only 1
worked. Tularosa s i t e - had bad instruments - had 3 working but i n l i n e ; E a s t White Sands
- one s h o r t r o l l , then paper jammed; Dona S i t e OK; Launching Area s i t e - OK for f i r s t 2
rolls, paper jammed on t h i r d r o l l . KcCurdy set up low frequency i n hanger, north s i d e , and
on Rubicon drum but recordings questionable - as SCEL r a d i o t r a n s m i t t e r i n t e r f e r e d .
A p r i l 18 Fri. B-29 took off f o r Middletown and Newark about 730 from Alamogordo with a l l
personnel t h a t came down with i t . Wrote Peoples a l e t t e r regarding s p l i t - u p of equipment
s o t h a t bombing runs could be continued on E a s t Coast. Plans a r e t o have Edmonston, Rey-
nolds here with 2 sets and t a k e Oliva, Chantz w 2 s i t e s f o r t h e E a s t . Set up equipments -
Sprengnether & L&N galvanometers f o r Helgoland experiment & run equipment 1030 t o 3 pm.
Checked over a l l recordings. Oliva and Reynolds out t o Dona and brought i n a l l equipment
except wire.
A p r i l 19 S a t , I n t o E l Paso with B i l l E t h i s am. Got r e s e r v a t i o n s t o Houston next weekend.
A p r i l 20 Sun. Worked on p l a n s f o r bombing runs and V2 monitoring.
A p r i l 21 Yon. Alamogordo A i r Base. B i l l Edmonston and I went out t o Tularosa Range and
checked 2 bombing targets, and l o c a t e d t h i r d bombing s i t e 7-8 miles west of Al, neax a l k a l i
f l a t s . Chantz and P o r t e r worked on c a l c u l a t i o n s ‘I2 -#24. S a l worked on equipment. Don
o f f today.
A p r i l 22 Tues. Alamogordo. Reynolds - Oliva out t o E a s t White Sands. Brought G R 3 t h e r e i n
f o r overhaul. Worked up c a l i b r a t i o n of GR 8. Got curves f o r s e t t i n g s of 8 and f o r changes
i n a t t e n u a t i o n . Talked t o S t . James, Ordnance Supply, r e 5OO# bombs. Wire from Peoples -
Godbee ready t o come back - plane ready t o come down t h i s week. Sent r e t u r n wire t o hold
plane o f f u n t i l after 1 Yay.
A p r i l 23 Wed, Alamogordo. B i l l E. and I l e f t A i r B a s e at 0930 and drove t o Roswell. Scouted
out area between Roswell and Donali? but a l l i r r i g a t e d farm lands. F i n a l l y back with find-
ing s u i t a b l e s i t e , 129 miles from A i r E a s e t o Roswell. Chantz went Tularosa range G R 3 back,
Oliva and Reynolds checking G R 3 i n base, Datn?on c a l c u l a t i o n s A p r i l 1 rocket
A p r i l 24 Thurs. P h i l and Ace working on V-2 recordings A p r i l 1 and 8 g e t t i n g and
amplitudes. S a l and Don on GR3, B i l l E. on clock checks. Saw P r i t c h a r d about Roswell t r i p s ,
bombing. Saw Post Engineers and Major Mitchell.
A p r i l 25 F‘ri. S a l and I went t o Motor Pool and g o t our d r i v i n g l i c e n s e s . Worked up sunshots
f o r Tower and Dona s i t e s , OK within 10 minutes. B i l l E and P h i l g o t timbers from scrap p i l e
and went out on Tularosa Bombing Range t o b u i l d s h e l t e r s . S a l and Don working on GR3. L e f t
A i r B a s e 130 and l e f t Alamogordo 3 pm. Got room i n E l Paso at Hotel McCoy.
A D r i l 26 S a t . L e f t E l Paso on Continental A i r Lines about 09-33, iient by way of Hobbs, Mid-
land, Odessa, San Angelo t o San Antonio. Waited t h e r e about 2 hrs and caught Eastern A i r
L i n e s out t o Houston. G o t i n about 0630, tnok bus t o Houston and taxi t o see Donnie.
A p r i l 27 Sun. Houston with Donnie and family
A p r i l 28 Mon. Down t o Sohio Geophysical o f f i c e with Donnie and Roy Bennett. Went up t o
Abbott and S t a n s e l l about a cax. Caught bus out t o a i r f i e l d 1020 and caught Eastern A i r
Lines t o San Antonio, and Continental A i r Lines t o E l Paso. Arrived E l Paso 730 and caught
t r a i n t o Alamogordo, then bus t o A i r Base. Chantz, Oliva and B i l l E. checked over UNs,
g o t d r i v i n g l i c e n s e s and worked on c a l i b r z t i o n curves.
A p r i l 29 Tues. Alamogordo A i r Base. Delayed t r i p t o S i l v e r City t o t a l k over Signal Corps
Communication with Peoples, B a l l t h i s PM. Went o u t with Don t o E a s t White Sands t o s e t up
GR3 and g e t it working. L t Thompson i n pm. L t Stevens i n on vacation t r i p . Sal and B i l l E
g o t low frequency equipment t o g e t h e r and ran t e s t with it a t hanger. P o s s i b i l i t y rocket
w i l l not be f i r e d u n t i l Monday acct weather
April 3 Wed. Alamogordo. P h i l and Don out t o East White Sands and Tulaxose s i t e s t o g e t
equipment ready f o r t e s t tomorrow. Set up Rubicon at Tularosa. S a l and B i l l E. went t o Dona
and Launching Area s i t e s t o s e t up equipment. A l l mikes g o t out ready f o r f i r i n g .
May 1 Thurs. Out at 2 a m . Put up equipment f o r low frequency run a t t h e north hanger, Out
t o s t a t i o n s i n f i e l d - Thompson with P h i l at Tularosa - Don and Ace t o E a s t White Sands,
Sal and B i l l E. t o Dona and I went t o Launching Area s i t e . Rocket misfired a t 0 9 0 0 9 and
all equipment of Signal Corps ‘explosions’ l o s t . Picked up equipment from Dona, Launching
Area and East White Sands t h i s pm. C-47 i n t h i s pm: Dubell, Mosher and D u f f . Duff brought
i n 2 100# bombs with some TNT charges. B i l l Godbee i n from R.B.
 1947 9
Fay 2 Friday. Alamogordo. Assembled apparatus t o go back t o Watson Labs. P h i l and B i l l
Godbee out t o Tularosa and picked up a l l G R 3 equipment. Duff, Mosher, Dubell and I went
out t o Tularosa Bombing S i t e f 2 and shot o f f 2 loo# bombs, using t h e TNT blocks alongside.
A l l went off OK. Duff got box caps f o r use. M i l l cancel %O# bomb order and use j u s t TNT
blocks i f p o s s i b l e . A l l equipment loaded on plane t h i s pm.
Yay 3-4 S a t , Sun. L e f t Alamogordo about 9 am, Chantz, P o r t e r and myself, 2 Signal Corps
men along. Stopped a t E l Paso and went over t o Juarez f o r pm. L e f t E l Paso about 8 pm.
Landed i n S c o t t F i e l d about 4 and found weather bad i n E a s t . Stayed at BCQ u n t i l 10. L e f t
about 11 and axrived i n Middletown, Olmsted F i e l d , about 6. Weather bad i n Newark. Stayed
i n Olmsted F i e l d BOQ
Yay 5 Ifon. L e f t Olmsted F i e l d at 7 am. In Newark about 8. Trucks i n about 11. Loaded equip-
ment and s e n t t o Oakhurst. Arrived Qakhurst about 230. Chantz l e f t for F‘renchtown f m Newark
Yay 6 Tues. Oakhurst. Worked with Vivian and Elleen on t h e i r c a l c u l a t i o n s . Eileen working
on s e v e r a l ? Feb 20 rocket and Vivian on last f l i g h t s from Oakhurst.
Fay 7 Wed Oakhurst. Conference am - D r Delassos? and Leonard from UCLA. Went over T-21
c a l i b r a t i o n they had - a l s o t h e r e s u l t s from Alamogordo. Conference pm with Mr--- from
AMC Wright F i e l d . F l i g h t scheduled f o r tomorrow, balloons with instruments going up a t
Sethlehem - B-17 following balloons with recording equipment and B-29 dropping bombs east-
ward from A t l a n t i c City.
PBV 8 Thurs. Oakhurst. Scheduled balloon f l i g h t t h i s morning at 730. Mears and men from
NYU a t Bethlehem with balloons. Trouble with winds and instruments d i d not go up. Peoples,
Moulton over t o Middletom with recording equipment on B-17 following balloons, H a d no
t r o u b l e following them. B-29 s t a r t e d dropping bombs near Atlantic City about 8. Trouble
with oil leak i n a motor and B-29 had t o j e t t i s o n t h e bombs and r e t u r n . Recorded a t O a k -
h u r s t with Brush and CR3. Working today with Eileen on Feb 20 rocket - f i n a l ave v e l o c i t y
data
Flay 9 F r i Oakhurst. Yorked on c a l c u l a t i o n s - bombing runs and ’42 t e s t s Feb 20. Took s l e e p e r
out of NYC f o r Canton t o n i g h t .
Nay 10 S a t , Canton. Steve and Esther up from Syracuse f o r weekend.
May 11 Sun. A t home. Took s l e e p e r out of Canton f o r NYC
May 12 Fon. Arrived NYC and caught 094.0 out t o Asbury P a r k - then t o Oakhuxst. Saw M r W o n s
of NYU t h i s pm regarding f u t u r e f l i g h t s both here and i n Alamogordo.
May 13 Tues. Chantz and I went down t o Cape May today with staff car and d r i v e r . Located
s u i t a b l e s i t e f o r bomb recordings on road between Cape May Court House and Goshen. Surveyed
out 5 pickup l o c a t i o n s and took s o l a r observations. Back i n AP about 0800 pm
Pay 14 Wed - Finished checking up with Chantz and Oliva i n regard t o bombing runs on east
coast. Run scheduled f o r 9 and 12 on Friday. Packed up a l l equipment from computing o f f i c e
t o go t o Alamogordo. Checked transit and rod t o go t o Alamogordo. J a p p e t t ? , new computer,
i n today. S t a r t e d him out on work Stepanoff w a s doing.
May 1 5 Thurs Oakes, Stevens?, Oliva and myself t o F o r t Dix t h i s am e a r l y . Loaded up C-fjl)
when it a r r i v e d , with 229 boxes of TNT, about 12,000#. Caxroll - p i l o t and Hoffman- c o p i l o t .
Mears, Vivian and Eileen a r r i v e d l a t e r a n d w e took o f f Fort Dix about 1130, EDST. Arrived i n
F o r t Worth about 9 EDST. O f f again t o Big Springs, Texas, h e r e forced t o s t o p account of
weather conditions. Stayed overnight at Hotel Supples,
May 16 F r i C - 9 a r r i v e d at Alamogordo from Big Spring about 930 WST. A l l TNT unloaded and
put i n dump. Vivian and Eileen g o t rooms a t g i r l s dorm, Mears and I a t BOQ 25. Went over
f u t u r e program with Edmondson, Reynolds and Godbee. Vivian and Eileen i n o f f i c e t h i s pm.
Have o f f i c e i n Watson Lab B l d g . Checked out ready t o go t o S i l v e r City Monday. Got car ready
and gas f o r car. Checked transit and made from f i e l d wire chain f o r 125 meters. Mears and
Thompson down t o c r i t i q u e at White Sands and t o see Capt Smith of Weather Service,
Fay 17 S t a . Alamogordo. ‘Jivian, Eileen and I worked on Kay l 5 rocket data. P l o t t e d up azim-
uth angle a g a i n s t e l e v a t i o n angle f o r Dona and White Sands s t a t i o n s . P l o t t e d azimuth against
time f o r Dona s i t e .
May 18 Sun. Alaomgordo. Worked on Dona record, May 15 rocket. Checked through picks - p l o t t e
e l e v a t i o n angle a g a i n s t time, c a l c u l a t e d e l e v a t i o n and d i s t a n c e from bombing s i t e using
s t r a i g h t l i n e plane between launching s i t e and p o i n t of impacj,.
May 19 Mon Reynolds and I l e f t about 0745 i n weapon carrier f o r S i l v e r City. Arrived a t
G i l e s National Forest S t a t i o n about 1230. Got permission for s i t e t h e r e and went d o n g
v a l l e y 16 miles, then back 5 and l o c a t e d s i t e . Surveyed l o c a t i o n , dug h o l e s and strung wire.
Back t o ranger s t a t i o n and located ourselves on range map. L e f t Bayard about 630 pm. Back
a t Alamogordo about 1045 pm. Edmondson and Godbee out t o record WAC Corporal at Dona s i t e
 197 10
but I t w a s postponed u n t i l Thursday.
Kay 20 Tues. Edmondson and I l e f t about 0845 i n weapon carrier f o r Roswell. Arrived a t
Hagerman about 12. Yent across Pecos R and found s i t e . Surveyed i n l o c a t i o n s , dug holes
and s t r u n g wires. ;.lent over t o Roswell Army A i r F i e l d , f i l l e d up with gas. Checked for room
for B i l l f o r Wed and Thurs. Back t o Alamogordo about 730 pm. Godbee and Reynolds loaded up
one weapon carrier, ready t o leave tomorrow. -1ivian working on weather d a t a t o send back
t o Watson. Eileen working on March 7 azimuth - e l e v a t i o n p l o t s and checking picks.
Pay 21 Wed. Reynolds and Godbee l e f t about 800 I n loaded weapon caxrier. Stopped at g a t e
by SC L t and had t o unload on motor pool weapon carrier a c c ' t bad t i r e s and heavy load on
o t h e r one. L e f t about noon f o r S i l v e r City. Bill Edmondson picked up G R 8 and l e f t for Ros-
x e l l in weapon c a r r i e r SC about noon. Got dL1 equipment together f o r shooting tomorrow.
Jorked with V and E t h i s pm. Eileen f i n i s h e d checking o r i g i n a l d a t a 7 March and s t a r t e d
checking A p r i l 1 azimuths and e l e v a t i o n angles. 7 f i n i s h e d azimuths d i r e c t waves and s t a r t e d
extension of weather d a t a t o 288, 18 kms f m sky wave d a t a .
Way 22 Thurs. Thompson and I out a t 0730 t o Ordnance dump. S g t Rand met us t h e r e and let us
i n area. Picked up 17 boxes of TNT. Shot 1000 at S i t e 1, 1100 at S i t e 3, 1200 at S i t e 3 and
1300 at S i t e 1 again. Thompson l e f t f o r E l Paso t o meet h i s family, i n from Corpus C h r i s t i .
Worked a l i t t l e i n o f f i c e PM. Called up S i l v e r C i t y and Roswell t o n i g h t , changed schedule
of tomorrow from 1100 last one t o 1115. Checked AAF clocks over telephone.
P!ay 23 F r i . Went o u t at 0530 and g o t sgt Rand. W e went out t o ammunition dump, picked up
16 boxes of TNT. Sgt Rand t o f i e l d with me. Shot 0800 S i t e 1, 0900 S i t e 2, 1000 S i t e 3
and 1115 S i t e 1. Worked on t h e o r e t i c a l c a l c u l a t i o n s pm. B i l l E i n from Roswell about 5 and
and Reynolds & Godbee i n about 800
Kay 24 S a t . Went over with Codbee and unloaded h i s t r u c k , hung h i s recordings t o dry. Went
over G R 8 r e c o r d s t o o but d i d n ' t see any s i g n a l s t h e r e . GR3 from S i l v e r City has some good
sky waves.
Fay 25 Sun. T r i e d t o g e t i n t o E l Paso t o c a t c h t r a i n t o Houston but Alamogordo t r a i n too
late t o make connections. Back t o Alamogordo A i r B a s e .
May 26 Mon. Worked on T e s t s 1 and 2 r e c o r d s today, No s i g n a l s from Roswell - some thunder
on 2 s h o t s . 5 sky waves from S i l v e r City. Vivian worked o n r e c o r d s . Eileen on thunder
recordings. Godbee worked am, Bill and Don o f f today.
Kay 27 Tues. Worked with V on tests 1 and 2, E back on r o c k e t of A p r i l 1. Bill Codbee and
Don out t o Dona and set up G R 3 f o r Thursday f i r i n g .
Yay 28 Wed. B-17 i n from Watson with Mears, Hackman, NYU and Alden. They plan t o f l y t e s t
balloon tomorrow. Other gang with recording equipment, due t o l e a v e Watson S a t . Got every-
t h i n g ready f o r HERMES r o c k e t tnmorrow, Dona & White Sands. Finished t h e o r e t i c a l calcul-
a t i o n s o f T-X s o l u t i o n of sky waves.
May 29 Thurs. Mears and Hackman g o t balloon ascension o f f about 1 PM today with B-17 plane
t o follow it. Don and Godbee o u t t o Dona, B i l l and I t o E a s t White Sands t o record HERMES.
S e t j f o r 11OO,am, postponed repeatedly, f i n a l l y f i r e d at 0730 PM. Rocket o f f course, landed
near Juarez, Mexfco.
May 30 F'ri. Memorial Day. Got 330 bus o u t of Alamogordo, 10% t r a i n o u t of E l Paso t o Housto
May 31 S a t . Arrived Houston 715, went up t o bank 900, then t o Abbott - S t a n s e l l and picked
up c a r - '42 Chrysler. Went up t o Sohio and t a l k e d t o Donnie and Roy Bennett f o r an hour.
Left Houston about 1145, stayed overnight p a s t P o s t , Texas.
June 1 Sun. L e f t 0400, a r r i v e d i n Alamogordo about 0930 - 800 miles t o base from Houston.
C-47 with Moore, Schneider and o t h e r s from NYU. Also I r e l a n d , Minton, Olsen. NYU men
worked on balloons today i n north hanger.
June 2 Mon. Changed shooting p l a n s t o coordinate with balloon f l i g h t s . Balloon a l l ready
t o go. Receiver i n plane and r e c e i v e r on ground. Edmondson with G R 8 t o Roswell pm, Godbee
and Reynolds with G R 3 t o S i l v e r City. Vivian working on amplitudes of f l i g h t s - Eileen on
April 7 r o c k e t .
J w 3 Tues. Up at 0230 am ready t o f l y balloon but abandoned due t o cloudy s k i e s . I went
out t o Tularosa Range and f i r e d charges from 6 on t o 12, missed 530 s h o t - t r o u b l e g e t t i n g
ordnance man.
J Q 4~ Wed. Out t o Tularosa Range and fired charges between 00 and 06 t h i s am. No balloon
f l i g h t s again on account of clouds. Flew r e g u l a r sono buoy up i n cluster of balloons and
had good luck on r e c e i v e r on ground but poor on plane. Out with Thompson pm. Shot charges
from 1800 t o 2400.
June 3 Thurs, Up at 4 t o shoot 2 charges f o r balloon f l i g h t . Whole assembly of constant-
a l t i t u d e balloons set up at 0500. F i r e d charges at 0537 and 0552, then soon buzzed by plane
 1947 11
t o r e t u r n . Receiver at plane d i d not work at a l l . Ground r e c e i v e r worked f o r a s h o r t
time but d i d not r e c e i v e explosions. B-17 and most of personnel out t o Roswell - recovered
equipment some 25 m i e a s t of Roswell. Out at 10 t h i s morning, g o t ThT and went out t o
range. Fired s h o t s 12 t o 18 every hour. Last of bombing t e s t s t h i s week.
June 6 F r i . NYU personnel g e t t i n g ready f o r f l i g h t tomorrow. Conference about noon, H a c k m a n
with radiosonde, Olsen and Godbee with r e c e i v e r t o Roswell - a l s o Smith on t h e o d o l i t e .
Regular equipment i n plane.Edmundson and Reynolds t o operate equipment at l a b s - r e c e i v e r
with GR8. Worked on adopting G R 8 t h i s pm and t h i s evening. F i r e d some s h o t s pm a t s i t e
but no t r a n s m i t t e r f o r sonobuoy. This pm put EcCurdy low frequency a m p l i f i e r i n c i r c u i t
before G R 8 and have p l e n t y of s i g n a l .
Jmne 7 S a t . Balloon f l i g h t o f f about 530. Dribbler? broken on t a k e o f f . Balloon w a s t o
6 0 , 0 0 0 ' * , broke l e f t balloons then t r a i n came down somewhere i n mountains. Zecordings a t
north hanger, and at Roswell b u t plane d i d not r e c e i v e . Shot a t 6, 630, 7 , 739, 8 and 830
a t s i t e #4. Plane out t o f i n d balloons but no luck. A l l NYU personnel and John Adden o f f
on B-17 - Lewis, Gallagher. Went over t o Alamogordo with I r e l a n d , Minton, Olsen and Mears
but no t r a i n today - making r e s e r v a t i o n s f o r tomorrow.
June 8. Sun. Rancher, S i d West, found balloon t r a i n 25 m i south of High R o l l s i n mountains.
Contacted him and made arragements t o recover equipment Monday. Got a l l recordings of
balloon f l i g h t s . Took Treland, Mears, Winton, Olsen t o Alamogordo t o catch t r a i n t h i s pm
June 9 Mon. B i l l Godbee and Don Reynolds went out t o S i d West's ranch south of High R o l l s
and broughtback recovered balloons- clock, 2 radiosondes, sonobuoy and microphone and lower
p a r t of d r i b b l e r . B i l l Edmondson cleaning up hanger and s o r t i n g out equipment of NYU. Worked
today on balloon records (GR8) from north hanger, No d e f i n i t e s i g n a l s obtained. Took inv-
entory MRs.
June 10 Tues. B i l l G , B i l l E and Don worked on equipment, r e p a i r i n g GR8, T21 mikes, etc.
Getting ready f o r r o c k e t Thursday. Worked on G R 8 recordings from Hagerman, T e s t s 3,4,5,6.
No s i g n a l s obtained. Worked on balloon t e s t s from Roswell - no s i g n a l s . V on G i l a R tests
3,4,5,6, Eileen on V2 amplitudes.
June 11 Wed. B i l l Godbee and I went out t o Tuleresa Range and l o c a t e d S i t e Q5 f o r bombing,
24 m i N of S i t e #3 - roads bad. Laid o u t wire f o r shooting, Don and B i l l E g e t t i n g ready
f o r rocket. Checked Rubicon records, all 3 s i t e s .
June 12 Thurs. A l l r o c k e t s postponed btil J u l y 3 r o c k e t of S.C.E.L. B i l l E, Don, B i l l G
went down t o E l Paso and then SE along Rio Grande. Located-listenine s i t e south of C l i n t ,
Texas and layed out wires and dug holes. Worked on bombing f l i g h t s from Oakhurst.
June 13 F r i . Men off today. '*' worked on tests 3,4,5,6 Tularosa bombing. E 0rr.V-2 rocket
amplitudes. I p l o t t e d T-X a l l sky waves and started reviewing March 11 and 17 records.
June 14 Sat. B i l l E and family, Don R and family, V , E and I t o Carlsbad.
June 15 Sun. Through C a r l s b a d Caverns and back t o Alamogordo.
June 16 Mon. Ken o f f today. Worked on eastern shore c r u i s e s , p l o t t i n g T-X corrected t o 68
kms & worked on apparent v e l o c i t i e s and differences i n azimuth.
June 17 Tues. Men l e f t f o r S i l v e r City and Febrero? n e a r E l Paso f o r bombing tests. Worked
on Cruises.
June 18 Wed. T e s t 7 of Tularosa Bombing Program, Shots at 7, 930 and 1230. Men c a l l e d i n
from f i e l d t o eheck clocks. Weather poor - r a i n i n g a t all sites. E on V2 r o c k e t s , V Cruises.
June 19 Thurs. T e s t 8 of Tularosa bombing program, s h o t s a t 1600, 1830, 2100 , 2400.
Weather poor - r a i n y at Alamogordo.
June 20 F r i F i n i s h of T e s t 8. Shots a t 0000 and 0230, S i t e s 1,3,5. Men back today. Godbee,
Reynolds a t S i l v e r City g o t all s h o t s , Edmondson at E l Paso g o t 1 possibly 2. Looked over
a l l Fabens records today. E on weather data, r o c k e t f i r i n g s , V on Tests 3,4,7 and F l i g h t s .
June 21 S a t Worked on G R 8 records from Fabens - c a l c u l a t e d azimuth and e l e v a t i o n angles -
Fabens recordings and some of S i l v e r City.
June 22 Sun. On t r i p with V & E - San Cruzes, Hot Springs, Carizzo
Week of Jan 23-28 Alamogordo A i r Base. Men worked on-equipment f o r sound ranging Monday
and made arrangements f o r o f f base t r a n s p o r t a t i o n , had t o g e t some from B a s e Motor Pool;
R i l l G , Don R l e f t am f o r G i l a Valley and B i l l E went t o Fabens. Tests 9, 10 Wednesday 25
and Thurs, hi 26-27. Test 9: 7-10-13-16-18 S i t e s 1-3-5-3-1. Wen$ out with Sgt Rand.
Contacted by telephone Wed n i g h t and Thursday. Shot 10 Thurs, Fri at 18-21-00-03-05. Out
with Sgt Rand again. Men i n hi pm. Good r e s u l t s from w e s t , but poor or nothing from Fabers.
Looked over some o f Fabens records S a t . V worked on T e s t s 7-8 g e t t i n g all d a t a , including
amplitudes, then worked on F l i g h t s 1-27, Got met data for all f l i g h t s up t o 18 kms except
Oct ones. Found one whole minute e r r o r i n t i m i n g on 24A f l i g h t which now checks with o t h e r s
 1W7 12
i n #arch. Y on new weather c a l c u l a t i o n s 20 Feb. Found adding wind d i r e c t l y t o v e l o c i t y
from temp Fi-Tes a c c u r a t e enough r e s u l t s . <hanged 20 Feb rocket and p l o t t e d up a l t i t u d e s
a g a i n s t s i g n a l Strength - shows nothing s i g n i f i c a n t & s t a r t e d on 1 A p r i l rocket. Have a l l
4 s t a t i o n azimuths about f i n i s h e d . P h i l Chantz and Wiggett i n by t r a i n Friday n i g h t . They
brought in records of F l i g h t s 28, 29 and 30 on east coast - 1 of Y a y and 2 i n June. 'dent
over records Saturday and i d e n t i f i e d s i g n a l s of 28 -29. Balloon expedition personnel arr-
ived Saturday evening - Peoples, Trakowski, Keaxs, I r e l a n d , Olsen, Youlton, Alden from MIS
and F'oore, Schneider, Hackman, Smith, Hazzard, 2 o t h e r s and a L t Smith from Navy NYU.
29 J u n e (Sun) NYU personnel and some of Watson Lab men working today with equipment i n
north hanger, Went t o Ruidoso with Wears, Trakowski, Godbee, V & E
Week of 30 June - 5 J u l v '47 Alamogordo. 'Jivian worked on T e s t s 9 and 10, f i n i s h i n g a l l
upward d a t a on G R 3 recordings. Eileen worked on 1 A p r i l r o c k e t , g e t t i n g s i g n a l s t r e n g t h s

?
vs a l t i t u d e ( c o r r e c t e d f o r weather d a t a ) and started o i h e c a l c u l a t i o n s t o g e t time of
s i g n a l f o r c o r r e l a t i o n purposes. Appears l i k e l y t h a t s rength of s i g n a l is dependent on
s t a t i o n f a c t o r s r a t h e r than anything about rocket.
Balloon tests? 7, 8, 9 , and 10 o f f t h i s week. T e s t 7, s l a t e d f o r 1 July postponed u n t i l
2 J u l y as equipment w a s not ready. 100 tanks H e l i u m obtained from Amarillo Monday evening.
Also radiosonde r e c e i v e r s s e t up by NYU personnel Konday but were not operable. T e s t 7
a t dawn on July 2 with p i b a l 1 h r first following with thgQd1it.e. Whds were very l i g h t
and balloons up between A a i r base and mountains most of t i m e . Included c l u s t e r of met
balloons. Follnwed by C-*?
f
f o r s e v e r a l hours & f i n a l l y lande n mountains near road t o
Cloudcroft. Before gear could be recovered, most of it had be qktolen. S t a t i o n s operating
at north hanger, Cloudcroft and R O s w e l l . Shots made unfortunately at S i t e iff4 and picked up
good from north hanger and from Cloudcroft f o r awhile. Nothing from Roswell. On Thursday
morning 3 J u l y , a c l u s t e r of GM p l a s t i c balloons s e n t up f o r V 2 recording but '12 w a s not
f i r e d . No s h o t s f i r e d . Balloons up f o r some time. No recordings from Roswell as p i b a l showed
no W winds. Balloons picked up by r a d a r W L and hunted by Nanjak C-45. Located on Tularosa
Range by air. Out pm with s e v e r a l Nyu by weapon carrier but we never l o c a t e d it. Rocket
postponed u n t i l 730 Thursday n i g h t but a t last minute before balloon went up,,Y2 was c a l l e d
o f f on account of a c c i d e n t at White Sands.Ssnt up c l u s t e r balloons with dummy load. Balloon
f l i g h t #10 a t dawn on J u l y 5 t h . H a d gone out i n C-45 again with Moser and Dubell t o hunt
f o r balloon from F l i g h t 8 but not since? we found them. C - 9 went t o E l Paso b d picked up
s i n g l e Smith p l a s t i c balloon and GM cluster p l a s t i c balloons. F l i g h t 10 with s i n g l e
p l a s t i c followed from Alamogordo and Cloudcroft. Shot 8 s h o t s from S i t e 4. Picked up most
and l o s t s i g n a l a t 845. Balloons ? more than 6 hrs although time clock had been put i n
t o bring them down after 5 hrs. ? were picked up by ? C&5 as first f l i g h t out w a s
delayed. Had special balloon a t 7 with explosice charge which went o f f a t 35,000 f t and at
745 but by t h a t time t h e r e c e i v e r had l o s t t h e signal. Followed by radiosonde series u n t i l
a f t e r 1300. Cloudcroft o f f at 8 and doubtful about s i g n a l s received.
Peoples and Trakowski up 4 J u l y with Dr. O'Day of CFS t o Alamo Tower ---- ? S o l a r Obser-
vatory t h e SCEL s t a t i o n , Schneider up with O'Day t o check use 8s NYU s t a t i o n .
Alamoggrdo crew helped-get helium, and d i d ground shooting o f 2 July. Out J u l y 3 a t Dona
and Launching sites a t 2 pm and later a t n i g h t .
Finished i d e n t i f i c a t i o n on F l i g h t s 28, 29 and 30 on east c o a s t and made p l a n s f o r Bermuda
flights.
Unable t o leave f o r home on 3 J u l y as w a s planned and wired Donnie first p a r t of week
if he could change h i s schedule and go home f o l l o e i n g week. Got wire back t h a t he had
decided not t o make t h e t r i p .
J m W o r k e d a t o f f i c e on f l i g h t s and rocket data. S t a r t e d on p l a n s f o r speech 17 J u l y
meeting NYU - Getting ready f o r F l i g h t 11. Plans are t o put up Smith balloon with GM ?
p l a s t i c s + simple met balloon sonobuoy + balloon bomb.
July 7 (Mon) Alamogordo. Balloon F l i g h t 11 A off a t 0 9 3 . B i g p l a s t i c with s m a l l a u x i l i a r y
plastics. W L gear - radiosonde and d r i b b l e r . Followed with t h e o d o l i t e and r e c e i v e r u n t i l
about 11. Picked up on radiosonde r e c e i v e r a t Roswell and followed thkn.Finally came down
( a t 10,000 ' cap should have punctured p l a s t i c ) near Hwy 70 between Roswell and Tularosa.
Second balloon - met balloons with r a d i o sonde up about 630. Third balloon with 2 rk2 #
s t i c k TNTand caps s e t by p r e s s u r e element t o f i r e at 35,000' up a t 0630. Surface bombing
a t S i t e 4 from 9 5 t o 845 at 15 min i n t e r v a l s , Ireland followed main receiveq6nly about
3/4 hr but followed r a d i o sonde about 3 hrs. 35,000' explosion o f f about 655.
Vivian g o t a l l i n s t r u c t i o n s f o r completing work on F l i g h t s 1-30 and picked a l l records
and f i l e d . Sent o f f TWX r e Bermuda F l i g h t and wrote up memo on it. Worked with Eileen on
 1947 13
April 1 rocket p l o t t i n g H-SS, H-T, SS-T.
July 8(Tues) Alamogordo. C-5L) o f f about 1030 with 23 people - a l l N U , WL including I , E ,
Godbee. L t Thompson, Edmondson, Reynolds and myself l e f t . Vote up r e p o r t on E a s t Coast
F l i g h t s f o r Peoples.
July 9(Wed) Alamogordo. Worked today on balloon f l i g h t s . Studied !*L records of them b r i e f l y
and wrote a memorandum t o Peoples about r e s u l t s . L e f t i n c a r t h i s PP? late. F l a t t i r e between
Roswell and Tularosa and stayed t h e r e .
July 10 Thurs. Changed t i r e and went i n t o Roswell. Bowht new t i r e . On t o E l Reno, Okla
today. Stopped i n cafe i n Hereford, Texas and m e t Dannie Harns from UGC. Went up t o o f f i c e
and s a w Bob Cowder?, PC and Gene Conant, supervisor.
July 11 F r i . -om E l Rosa t o Cherokee, Got note a t Cherokee t h a t Jimmie was at Tonkawa and
went over t h e r e , Stayed.tonight with J & family.
July 12 S a t . J i m , P a t , Vanessa along with m e on gay home. Got t o D o o l i t t l e , Ark t o n i g h t .

&
J u l 1 Sun t o cabins i n Ohio j u s t out of S p r i n g f i e l d .
To cabins near Geneva, N.Y.
J u l 15 Tues. Stopped a t Syracuse. Got home about @3O. Marion & h e r baby t h e r e .
* J 17 18 A t home. D r e w i n 4 o r 5 loads of hay but land very w e t and r a i n s i n t e r -
mittently.
July 19 S a t . Marion and I l e f t i n Chrysler f o r Woods Hole t o see Dorothy & family. Through
Albany, S p r i n g f i e l d , Providence. 463 miles 12 hours. Doc Ewing on A t l a n t i c c r u i s e . Worzel
working on g r a v i t y a t sea. Saw Geo Woollard and t h e Ryders. Woollard a f t e r Guggenheim
fellowship f o r next year - p o s i t i o n s a t WHOI and Princeton are ? very s a t i s f a c t o r y .
July 20 Sun. Saw men working with Woreel a t WHOI, P o l l a k , went over t o Vine's new house, s a w
K i t and Bump a t t h e i r house, then out t o Ewings, saw Midge & c h i l d r e n , Anne,.and Mikey.
July 21 Kon. Went down t o !4H0l9 €k~rs~Pollak, Bumpus, Worthington. Up 3rd f l o o r and saw Emmons
of NYU, who is f i n i s h i n g up some r e s e a r c h work t h e r e under Ray Montgomery. Talked with Col-
umbus I s e l i n f o r s h o r t time. Saw G i l Oakley. Marion & I l e f t about 11 am. Went through
Providence, Hartford. Crossed r i v e r a t Hudson. Met r a i n last p a r t of t r i p , not home u n t i l
130. Jim & family spent weekend with Steve and Esther i n Syracuse.
J u l y 22,23,24 A t home, Drew i n a l i t t l e more hay from l o t i n f r o n t of barn but s t i l l rai n -
ing q u i t e o f t e n . Jimmie & family took Thursday PM t r a i n t o Syracuse t o catch tomorrow's
plane t o Wichita, K a n s a s .
July 25, 26,27 A t hzme. Steve and Esther came up S a t n i g h t . Marion and I went t o Watertown
t o pick them up at bus s t a t i o n at midnight. They l e f t a g a i n Sun pm on bus from Canton, Chas
Crary up from Canton Sunday PM
J u l y 28,29,30,31,Aug 1. A t home. Chrysle t o Canton, change plugs, r e l i n e wheels - Rained
hard first p a r t of week then clear. Got i n l o t s i n back of barn, n o r t h of road and f r o n t of
house.
AUR 2 S a t . Marion - Bunny and I l e f t 1230 PM, a r r i v e d Marcellus about 5 PM. A t e dinner with
Steve and Esther, l e f t Marcellus 730 PM. Through Binghamton, Scranton, Stroudsburg, Easton.
Arrived i n Mewtown about 245 am.
Aug 3 Sun. I n Newton with Flaggs f o r dinner. L e f t Newtown about 5 PM. Arrived Jersey Coast.
Got room on Hwy 35 near White B i t e Shop.
A u g 4 Mon. Up t o Oakhurst. Ment over developments t o d a t e with J i m Peoples. Out t o lunch with
L t B a l l . This PM Chantz and I surveyed t o Sonobuoy s i t e .
Aug 5 Tues. Oakhurst. Worked on Aberdeen r e s u l t s - 2 failures - 1 direct wave. - Worked on
Bermuda run # 2 - Oakhurst and s t a r t e d Bermuda #2 C.M.C.H., Peoples on vacation s t a r t i n g
today.
Aun 6 , 7, 8 W#ed, Thurs, F r i . Oakhurst. Worked on Cruises 1 -28 with Vivian and Epstein.
Checked over a l l recordings of Bermuda #2,.Eii&ht 32. Got sonobuoy survey c a l c u l a t e d and
worked up r e s u l t s of F l i g h t 25 B which depended on sonobuoy s i g n a l . S t a r t e d Epstein on wea-
t h e r d a t a which Wiggett is working on. Wrote l e t t e r t o Emmons with remaining work t o be
done t h e r e . Conference Wed pm with Clowry, C a r r o l l , Dubell, Bernhoff of Olmsted regarding
Bermuda and Alamogordo plans. M r Nears put up balloons with equipment on here at Oakhurst.
Reynolds and Edmondson i n and working around l a b . Worked some with Eileen on rockets.
Aug 9,lO Asbury Park
Aug 11, 12,13,14,15,16 Oakhurst. Wrote memo regarding Alaskan work and had copies typed up.
Worked most of week on rockets. P l o t t e d a l t i t u d e against time of o r i g i n f o r April 1, 8
r o c k e t s but d i d not g e t i d e n t i c a l graphs. T r i e d t o vary d i s t a n c e t o o b t a i n s i m i l i a r curves
b u t t h i s w a s not p o s s i b l e . Made p l o t s of time vs SS and a l t i t u d e vs SS i n e f f o r t t o corn-
elate signals between s t a t i o n s . Correlated f a i r l y good on 1 April but poor on 8 April.
 Covering 2erlsd from June 1, 1947 to
June 31, 1947

Section Ix

Reserirch h v i s i o n , ?roje c t 140. 93

Prepared in Accordanae dth Provisions of Contrcct

W&O99 ac-241, betme-
Watson ktmratorier, Red Aaw Jarsay
and
New Ycrk Unirersitr
The foUoring m e n rere hired8
Culli f i cation

hrion, Navigator, Cr(ift- dorms B-17 hdu

4 ,
-. . Navigator. h d -
graduate Y e o h m i d
hglneerilq S t d a l t .
Dato o f
Corm+
pndeaat Addreas

6/16/47 Hr. I.Yo Coojxtr Sgecification of

959 Rhittier AVO* .largo balloon s a t
Akron 2, Ohio and a;:,ointaent
requerted to die-
cuss manufaaturo

6 '19.'47 None required.

6/l.9/47 Roquert for add%-

t l o n a l Army
r-thrr equipent

S,.'ZS/47

6/25/47 0rd.r to .odlrp co.pued mith.

dribblo mounting
and tat. o f flow.

6/24/47 Raq\r08t 7 f o o t
balloonr h6ro
m e a n 8 o f attach-
ing 8hroud line8
to 8 a r q load.
6/26./4t O d o r to rbip re-
rrinin( ?-toot
W o o n o to I
5
E
4
C. 1. GENERU, WRK ACCOHPLJSHED

Field test8 vere canducted at Alumgordo A- f i r Base d u r h g

the mat of Jurrs 1, wing cluster8 of nmteorological balloorm.
The primary object of those t e s t a waa to perfeot h~lrdlFngand
launching technique6 far l u g . flight8 u x i to check the open-
tion o f tho various altltuie controlling devices developed for
this projeot. A t the same tire, the teatr afforded the oppor-
tunity to any a l o f t paylordr o f Yatson Laboratories equip-
mnt. In general, while the f l i g h t 8 were ~ c e s s f u in l the
rense of carrying Vatson Laboratory gear a l o f t for an extended
period of tiaw, d i f f i c u l t l o r .ad n r t e r i e l failurea encountered
nerved t0 erphralre the u ~ a t i e f a o t o r ychancterirtic8 of
.eteorologicrJ. balloon clauters. A technical report under
preparation w i l l contain discusrion of the f l i g h t r .

l f t e r the retun f m n U r o g o r d o , t h remainder of the month

n a occupied with prepamtiom for a second field t r l p to
Alslvogardo A m y Alr Base for torts to be coaducted in July.
TwenQ-fivm reven-foot Uaeter 1 m i l . thick plyethylear,
U o o a m were received iron General Willr. Om each fifteen-
foot dlaseter 8 ril. thick polyethylene balloons war received
fmEH* A * SIlith, I=.
I n 8erer.l cam8 rqPib8 used f o r a l t i t u i e control failed t o
f i r e a t extremely hlgh d t i t u d e r . It is beUeved that plbc-
ing a W l load OB b a t t e r i e r may help keep cello w a r m enough
to prodaae the a6cessary v o l k g e d high altitude on futuro
flightre

d. METHODS OF ATTACK
Field tests k t Almmgordo indicated that a Helioa-type cluster
fr much superior to a long cosmic-ray type f l y i q line i n case
of fabrication, hlldliag and launching when it i a necessary to
use clusters. Therefore, thb type of cluster where t h e balloons
are d l a t the amme level, w i l l be used on all future multiple
m o o n nightre
Large plastic brllooas have b e n obtainsd a d will be flown
a t Alnmogordo d e t h e t e r t r t o be conducted in J a e

The &n sand ballarbdroppbg darico v.6 Improved a6 a result

oi experlmntr a t Alwgordo constructing the b r l l a r t tuber
of aluinum rather tbn plastic, and by wing stmnger paper
dirphraw am tb f n n g i b l o rupport far the ballast,
f, COEWSIOISS lllD BHXWEBDATIOBS
Opinion has bob. rtrengthexmd tb.t cluatera of meteorological
balloons v l l l mver be 0 m t l s f ~ o t o r ymothod of achieving con-
0- .Ititado far long period flights. V a r i o u r factor8 whiah
vnigh against tb amcerr of such f l l g h t r area tb inherent
Tmticril I n s t a b i l i t y of extenriblo h l l o o r u j the rapid deterc
iontion of nsoprem d e r the . r a p of the sun (avenge 6 hour
l.We)j the complex r o t of h l l l r t a d l i f t i n g equipwnt re-
qulredj a 0 d a U o .Ild i r d e t e r m l ~ t oeffect8 of superheatj
.nd the difficult)r of.hunohinq a long t r a i n asrembly, 0v.p
m3er tb beat c d i t i o m .
 tracking of h l l o o n r i n f l l g h t . Aerial observation of tho
balloons &mat4a s r i r t e interpretation of performance data.
Better radio trrnsnission o f data l a meded f r o m the balloon.

XY.
P l a s t i c balloons ham been obtained from both General Hills and
8. A * Salth, Inc. and vill bs flown on the mxt field t r i p to
Alwgordo In July. ~ m n g e r e n t sham been completed t o obtain
a, large a supply ar i r 116ce11m.r~ of these balloons a d t e s t a
vill be conducted frequently to perfect a technique o f maintain-
iag a balloon a t nolLnrl constant altitude.
 19
New York University
Progress Report No. 4
Radio Transmitting Receiving and
Recording System for Constant
Level Balloon
[Section I]
April 2, 1947
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
NEW Y O R K UNIVERSITY

REPORT BY THE
ENGINEERING RESEARCH DIVISION
Itorearoh Divirion, ?roj.ct la. OS

. .
.. ~. .. .

.. - ..... ..
.,

. ,
. . I
T i .
.
,
. %
loao

1.
 ? -?
.A

.3,:
 20
Interview
Col Jeffrey Butler and 1st Lt James
McAndrew with Professor Charles
B. Moore
June 8, 1994
 Same as
Weaver Attachment 23
 21
Report [Selected Pages]
Holloman AFB
“Progress Summary Report on
U.S.A.F. Guided Missile Test
Activities”
August 1, 1948
VOL.l 1AUG.’48 NO10
copy’) :,r!
 H O L L O M A N A I R FORCE BASE
Alamogordo, New Mexico

P R O G R E S S SUMMARY R E P O R T
on
U. S. A . F

G U I D E D MISSILE TEST ACTIVITIES

Compiled by: R e v i e w e d by:

8%%i--;
Major., U S A F ,
L t . Colonel. U S A F
P i r e c t a o r o f Technical Deputy f o r O p e r a t i o n s
I n f o r m a t i on D i v i s i on and Projects

Approved by;

FAUL
F. HELMICK,
Colonel, U S A
Commanding
:;.-..-+&+.?'
- ,.
--

S-E-C-WE-T
'.. ...
Vnl I 1 A u g u s t 1948 ..- No. 1.rl

* 55
.q ' - wy---" m
copy

5
' .
This document contains information a f f e c t i n g t h e Nations1 Defense of t h e United S t a t e 8
w i t h i n the meaning of t h e Ea ionage Act, 60, U. 9. C. 1 and =.Its t r u s m i s a i o n o r t h e
revelation of i t s contents f n sny manner t o sn unsuthorfaed person i s prohibited by law.
 radar s t a t i o n was not troybled by t h i s phenomenon due t o i t s an-
tenna d i r e c t i v i t y and elevation o r i e n t a t i o n of 60 degrees. It is
believed t h a t t h e Intermediate loss of s ig n a l by th e radar s t a t i o n
l o normal because of elevation p a t t e r n lobing produced by ground-
r e f l e c t i o n i n t e r fe r e n c e which is i n i t i a t e d by secondary antenna
lobe transmission, Since t h i s condition exists i n t h e transmit-
t i n g pattern, it a f f e c t s both t h e radar s t a t i o n and I t s remote re-
ceiving s t a t i o n , Current e f f o r t is concentrated on improvement
of photography and antenna o r i e n t a t i o n i n preparation f o r addition-
al tests.
b. Wcki nn Pro-iecb:
(1) Radar Tracking S e t A N m -
S6 A l e t t e r was received from Watson
-
Laboratories authorizing changes and modifications o f th e range
c i r c u i t s necessary f o r conditions as encountered a t t h i s location,
The f o r e p a r t of J u l y was spent i n achieving these betterments,
and i n t h e i n s t a l l a t i o n and o rie n tatio n of an Y-2 o p t i c a l trac k er
t o be used I n conjunction with the MPS-6 and as a trac k in g aid.
Experimental tracking of t h r e e balloons furnished and flown by t h e
Atmospheric Group was performed for th e dual purpose of checking
.the signal r e t u r n o f t h e radar with various r e f l e c t i n g t a r g e t s ,
and for precise p o s i t i o n data of t h e balloon equipment f o r use by
the Atmosphe*c Group. On 19 July, a 130 f o o t balloon carrying no
radar r e f l e c t o r wa8 tracked, Radar contact was made a t a range of
about 38 y a r d s with s i g n a l r e t u r n being above s atu ra tio n on th e
acopes of the U S - 6 , TracMng was a U t O M t i C in Azimuth and Ele-
vation and aided I n range, Signal r e t u r n remained above satura-
t i o n u n t i l a range of 71( yarde was read, a t which p o in t g ra s s ap-
peared on the scopes and s ig n al t o noise (iperaged about 4 t o 1
out t o a range of 23K yards where too frequent radar losses neces-
s i t a t e d t h a t automatio tracking be abandoned, This balloon was then
tracked manually t o a maximum range of 2% yarde.
On 20 July 1948, a weather balloon carrying one kite type r e f l e c t o r
was flown and tracked. Contact was made a t a range of 3K yards,
and signal r e t u r n was above s a tu ra tio n a t a l l times u n t i l a range
of 1OK was exceeded and gra s s showed only oocaslonally out t o
34,360 yarde. This balloon was obscured by clouds a t a range of
33K yards, but tracking was continuous I n automatic Azimuth and
Elevation throughout its $light, and the mfutlmum range read was
31$ yardso
On 21 July, a 130 f o o t balloon, i d e n t i c a l with th e one flown on
19 July except for t h re e k i t e r e f l e c t o r s being carried, '1988 flown
and tracked, Radar contact was made a t a range of 1,510 yards.
Grass f i r s t appeared on scopes a t a range of 24,5K yards, and sig-
nal was above s a t u r a t i o n t o 30K yards, Tracking was continuous
and automatic throughout th e f l i g h t , and a maximum range of 12l.K
yards was reached.

26
Permission t o use t h e MPS-6 i n t r a c k i n g f u r t h e r V-2 m i s s i l e s having
been received, p l a n s were formulated f o r operation i n conjunction
with t h e missile scheduled t o be f i r e d Thursday, 22 July and post-
poned u n t i l Honday, 26 July a t 1100. Plans contemplated t h a t t h e
crew on t h e Y-2 O p t i c a l Tracker would t r a c k v i s u a l l y a t all times
during t h e f l i g h t with t h e i r e l e v a t i o n and azimuth readings repeated
on t h e antenna. The UrpS-6 antenna was i n i t i a l l y positioned i n azi-
muth on t h e c a l c u l a t e d bearing t o t h e launcher and r a i s e d slightly
above t h e horizon i n e l e v a t i o n , with t h e correct range gated on t h e
scopes and with a v e l o c i t y of about 300 HPH s e t i n t h e aided range
motor and t h e motor i n i t i a l l y stopped. It was f u r t h e r planned t h a t
when t a r g e t echo would bloom on t h e scopes, t h e echo should be
t r u e d up i n Azimuth, Elevation, and Range; and antenna c o n t r o l would
be thrown t o automatic with range followed manually u n t i l speed of
t h e missile approximated t h e 300 W H at3 set on the motors, a t which
time t h e video motor would be a c t i v a t e d and range t r a c k i n g thrown
t o "Aided." It was planned t o throw antenna c o n t r o l t o t h e 16-2
.
Tracker o n l y i f t a r g e t f a i l e d t o show or i f extended nlossn subse-
q u e n t l y occurred

During t h e half-hour period p r i o r t o t h e take-off, several random

a i r c r a f t were noted i n t h e v i c i n i t y of t h e launcher; and a t X-5
minutes, one low f l y i n g a h c r a f t was observed on the scopes a t a
range beyond t h e launcher d i r e c t l y i n l i n e with it and f l y i n g i n
toward8 t h e launcher.
Timing s i g n a l s and t h e zero s i g n a l were received, and a t about
X p l u s 2 seconds t h e t a r g e t "bloomed" on t h e J Scopes a t t h e cal-
c u l a t e d range t o t h e launcher (62,800 yards). T h i s p i p went almost
i n s t a n t l y t o far beyond s a t u r a t i o n , and all grass disappeared from
t h e scopes. The Azimuth and Elevation, and Range c o n t r o l s were ccn-
t c r e d on t h e t a r g e t , and antenna c o n t r o l was thrown t o automatic.
Range s t a r t e d t o slowly i n c r e a s e as d i d e l e v a t i o n with azimuth being
s t a t i o n a r y . The echo remained beyond s a t u r a t i o n f o r about two sec-
onds after automatic c o n t r o l was thrown i n , a t which time grass ap-
peared on t h e scope8 and t h e s i g n a l f e l l r a p i d l y t o zero and t h e an-
tenna whirled o f f t a r g e t a t about X p l u s 6 seconds. Upon r e t u r n i n g
antenna t o p o s i t i o n manually, a s t r o n g t a r g e t appeared a t a range
o f about 2K yards o u t s i d e ;the range g a t e , and b e l i e v i n g t h i s t o be
t h e r o c k e t , t h i s p i p was trued up and antenna locked i n llAutomaticll
and t h i s t a r g e t was tracked f o r a period of a b o u t 1 0 seconds or
u n t i l it was noted t h a t range wa9 decreasing and e l e v a t i o n was s t a -
tionary at t h e horizon while t h e M-2 Elevation repeater showed t h e
o p t i c a l t r a c k e r t o be looking a t approximately 9 degrees. Realiz-
i n & t h a t t h e t a r g e t being followed was t h e aircraft noticed before
take-off, antenna c o n t r o l was t r a n s f e r r e d t o t h e o p t i c a l t r a c k e r
and l e f t i n i t s c o n t r o l u n t i l t h e Y-2 crew l o s t t h e missile. During
t h i s time, no t a r g e t was v i s i b l e a t any time and no f u r t h e r r a d a r
c o n t a c t was made with t h e missile. However, s l i g h t l y before t h e
missile I n p a c t was heard, a cluster of small echoes were found a t a

27
 22
Interview
[Col Jeffrey Butler and 1st Lt James
McAndrew with] Col Albert
Trakowski, USAF (Ret)
June 29, 1994
 Same as
Weaver Attachment 24
T.

Project x i e n t i s c s : 3r. l, A. i'eopie:3, ;r., i)r. i4omm

Hsskell

Su;rrmkIy c f In-Labzrztory i , o r k :
When i s r g e explosions iiav: u x u r r e i t , it l a 8 been observed t h a t tke soma was
heard locally, say up to 25 miles, m l a l s a a t distances of locl to 200 miles, but
t h a t nothing was t eard r , t intermediate d i s t a n c e s . This phenomenmcan only be
explained by assurcZnq t h a t the sound is r e f r a c t e d into the atmosphere over t h e in-
t e p d i z t e observers and then is bent back down t o the ,=re d i a t a n t areas. For this
t o occur tho velocity of propagation must first decrease with altitude and then
increase again t o a value a t least as larys aa grourid velocity. This is due t o a
decrease of temrerature up to the tropopause followed by an incrsase in temperature
above t h a t level. Kinds also heve an appreciable a f f e c t which can be determined
from asgametrical propaqation.
Up to about 1946 most d a t a on t h i s phenomenon had been obtained by taking
polls after accidental explosions had occurred. Zones of a u d i b i l i t y were mapped out
and ?enerd conclusions then drawn. Very l i t t l e systematic work was done i n which
accurate travel t f . e s and other factors uere obtaiced. Beginning in 1316 a t these
laboratories, a systematic study of these propazatron an<malies were started. Sound-
ransing d e t e c t o r s ware s e t up in arrays, so t h i t the J i r e c t i o n and t,h of e r r i v a l
of compressional waves could be determined. Bxplosionr were set off bn Or near the 8
:round a t ranges varying fro.., 25 t o 200 miles. Data has been taken which tiha resulted
in the i n d i r e c t determi.n&A.a o f the teupernture ( s o d vdiocity) bbPuPkllre 0s the
abosphere up t o the strakosFb&rie lefr81; +st?y+\ prp*sa\i*-w+ f'+F$t,. s\rldi$d
fff.t$9 &r$dy, Coqsk!, Xh&ae&sba &i&: €&eke: is l i t t l e , o r nol r e g b r -diuplall .
qr(Pfat+bn, 'ahd t&F' s d d CtKnudl 'JtichLfon' i n ' t h e tem&aVuh' s t h e t u r e d s t s . . 'High
Level kinds ar; shown to be g e n e r d l y easterl?. Additional tesCs have been made i n
New !,fexico t o d e t e r d m the d i u r n a l and anoual variations of t h e t e q m a t u r e s t r u c t u r e
at tt&t l a t i t u d e . Some accurate observations'of uind velocity a r e indicated by -
cibbervations taken d o n g h north-south line as well is an east-west line, d i n t e r
& F a t i o n s h i t e been t&eh h the v i c i n i t y of Fairbanks, Alaska for h f o r . & t on bt
dery Jdgh l a t i t p d C y . Obse;vaft@m haye been taken near the Prnana Carial. Zcne f d r
d i d i o n e l information i n trdficsi

The sounds produced By rockets iaunched a t ALai,iogoxJdo have been recorded d t h

asousti:: d e t e c t o r arrays located 3n t h e groind ne&r the rocket trajectoryb Frcu data
gathared i n t h i s n i a e r , SOI:LO indic:tixis of apper air t u p r i t u r e and .uirlds Lsve been
obtained and much :no:e accurate ddterminLtions could bs ;trade if ths rocket trajectories
Were mor" accurately knoivn,

i
 v
Additional d e t a i h of t h e ,.mosp,eric t e a p e r a t u r e end wind s t r u c t u r e can
'

be obtained by placing aicrophones near t h e tropopause where t h e v e l o c i t y of s o m c

is a t a m i n h u m . To our .howledge, no one h a s e v e r t r i e d such sn e x p e r h e n t , tfid
i n ordsr t o do t h i s new equipment had t o ~ t developed, : since wind produces sbrong
noisz M any mfcrophone i t wcs obvious t i z t t h e d e t e c t o r s could not be used on a n
a i r c r a f t , It HCS f u r t h e r believed t h a t the noise l e v e i of ;n instrument laced un
a constant l e v e l balloon ivouid be f a r S d o w t n s t generally observea on ,ro.ma
e q u i p e n t , Dott, t s a t i s f a c t o r y coristant l e v a 1 balloon. :nd a l i g h t aaigiit .dcrophone
and t e l s m t e r ' h g s y s t e u I;; s been deveioFed i n thls laboratory.

Bcsic a c o u s t i c p r o p a p t i o n infomct5.on is new 'oeinq a c c u n u k t e c fron

e q u f p e n t s lsunched a t ;p,iin F i e i d FloriCa. 'The sound for t h e s e exF!erLnznts is
ootcinzd f r o n high a1t:tude (TC,LbI, t o Z j , c i i Z feet;: 'Cofficb u r s t s . . 5 u f f i c i e n t d a k
have Rot y t ixen obtained to i a s t i f y c c q i e t e a n d p i s , but it, can be state2 t h h t
observed r e s u l t s qenerally a g r e e nttt. p r e d i c t i m s 5asaG upon theory.

Obser*Jationsof t h e t r a v e i t i & s 01'miles frai &fi exFlGSive source has

yisided s considerable moimt. of iata 3n tne t m r e r e t u r e and x.lnd strucclrre of the
st.r.c?sr;?r e UF t o altitude ef' a b o x 5:: :a!IbO,Ci=C ?oetj .
The i n t s r p r e t a t i ~ nof the
d a t a ?:as so f3r been oesei an ,pozietricai xc4.e theory, a d leads t o a erariation of
proFay6tion v o l o c f t y iritt a l t i t a d e nt,ich Ls t r ~reasonable 6.7reenen.t w i t h o t h e r
l i n e s of evidence. Thsre are, howecer, seve.-d observed facts which c&ot be ex-
plained on t h e basis of the e1e;dentary P,ec.?letrieal rag theory, and r e q u i r e a more
complete ulaiysis in ter:r.s of ; J i . e tiieorg. Tney are: --(l) ttia "zones of silence",
tht t f o l h w i c c o r d h z Lo $ O L i e t Y i ? & i ray theory f'roin tflz i n i t i a l d e w e a s e of v e l o c i t y
w i t h a l t i t u d e , which do not havt sharply defined boundaries; ( 2 ) t h e same ag.Fhrent
m g l a of a.-rival i s cftsr. observed aver a considerable range o f d i s t a n c e from the
source, Nkiweas on t.ha ray t i r e o q b ziveri a ; l s of a r r i v a i was a s s o c i a t e d with one
p a r t i c u i i r distance onijr; ( 3 ) a5 1 L q e disthnces, the t o t 6 1 d u r a t i o n of the s i g u l s r e c e i ,
i s very iitucii Greater tk,? can be ex!lained by ray theory, a d t h e c h a r a c t e r of t a d
s i g n a i . r e c e i v e d is t n e t cf E Lon- t r a i n of waves af varyin< &nplitude.;na frequency r h t h .
a limited number of well defined t r a n s i e n t ~ , u l s e s . .

I r e l i d n a r y s t u d i e s indicLte t h a t bll of these facts may be explained

q u a l a t a t i v e l y by more c o q i l e t e weve t h e o r e t i c a l a n a l y s i s of tkie d i f f r a c t i o n of nave
e n e r ' j i n t o t h e regions ttict are zones of s i l e n c e in t h d alementiry ray tt&ory, a d I'urtti.
work, aimed a t quantztivs t r e a h e n t is i n irosress. Until bn analysis of ti& ichd has
been carried through, ona c m not feel too roucrr c m f i d e n c e in attarnpts ULt hkve been
made t o iise 1- d i s t a n c e sonic and microbaremetric wave propagation d k t a t o Jeauuce
atnos- e r i c temizraturzs a t l e v e l s above the second inversion.
I n a d d i t i o n t o the t h e o r e t i c a l a p roach t o t h i s probleiu, cansider;t 3n is
beins qiven t o the use of sdrface weves on sh:~lo,vweter a s a .uodsl 01' wavd pro-
paqation i n t h e atm0sF.h rd. Tka v e l o c i t y of s u r f a c e waves whose m v e l e n j t h i s gre;lter
then t h e depth ot' t h e water i s a function of t h e depth, so that the v a r i a t i o n 01 v d o c i t y
w i t h c l t i t u d e i n t h e ztmos-h<re ciin be s h u l a t e d an a t h i n sheet of watar by s u i t a b l e
c o n t o u r i n * of t h e bottom. Surface t e n s i o n and v i s o s i t y s a t a t a lower lii~tof eoout
4 cm. t o t h e wave l e n s t h s t h h t can bs used i n such a model. M t h s water t a b l e adout
four feat wide s i m l ; tins t h e at!bosFhsre up t o 50 km. a f o u r c m t h a t e r wave l e n g t h
aotlld r e y r e s e n t a wave lenqth i n t h e ataospti re of about 1 mile, o r i: period of ebout f i v t
seconds.
 -Complenent: 1-y Contrslc-t s : .-

a. Colunbis University
No. L28-099-ac-32
b. Universitjy of C a l i f o r n i a i t Los kn5eles
No, X2R-0j.i-ac-228

.. .
i;
I

e i ~ i k i r e i d p e n S of donstcil~Ldvei. jei.idohs
i ~ o ~ t.i.tl<.i
.. .. ... .
E'&j&.t &&.tisi:. a;
D r ; j&;ies i e o r i e s , ifr:
&-&-a, ry-. & :. ~ - ~ ~ .q.Grki.
& ~ ~ & + ~
. -
. ,,. - -. . . .,._ '. .
,-.. ; ;
.1++&4
.:a , h 1' 1 ;I :

.-Re.
_I

. $e,+Scpeqt Q< .9 C:o++ant;' .J~+$F j+S & . firbt

<he needs+', F o u . s t i a w $ e a 5ie. ,$ound;tnl*:p j y r a & . .&?-
this .bellson is,ao,w & fi&ki$aA; .ib&.$h$s p o s h : ,.CooJ a'.,i
Im oeder "tcb de.velQp-th.is. b&oon ,.several. spec@,- de-&e?. hav.:
h OLLsnd ' c . c I e pr'essurs' indic&btor, ficcuzake 4,a :bettep ctl~gn.$
l?a$: +&n- 'deWl$ped.. i A k i e t k z ha$ kied I comstrycted-uiikh : w U
do* b p q n $ i€q 'ffL$$hI.qZtk=r $F t M n & >of by 'pks&re act;ivated juedhankans.
k: I&%+d 'l2.0~'clq"trp3,kv~4ye .>as:'Feg'
%:!$ !f)icktd :gi<es. dch,+@t. Ploy ?OX * ' +,
t m l l q s t , -saterial proportional to: Dresswe :cljcnge; * > o t h e r 4+.qssl)rii?g
' .-.
a Zelemeterfng 'device t o i n d i c a t e the rate or" b a l l a s t flowi-mlnimb Bailast;..;;
'

flow, dn!rncz pi-essurs switchss, harcgrzphs, and balloon t r a c k i n g r a d i o tr&ris=" la-.: r

m i t t e r s which C E 5e ~ Ficked up by an a i r c r a f t r a d i o co.npass a t a range of 100
miles o r more. h s e n s s t i v e inteiygrating v e r t i c a l anernoueter is now be.hs develop-
ed which will a i d in t h e i n t a r p r e t a t i o n of atrnosydieric o s c i l l b t i o n s .

A thorough i n v e s t i g e t i o n of bPlloon materials. and f a b r i c e t i o n methods has

been conducted, 2nd balloons have.been desisnad s u i t a b l e f o r use with the
h a l i s t i n g inechanislns develored. Launching and o p z r a t i o n s l techniques have been
developed which permit t h e launching of b a l l o o n s in n i n d s up t o 20 p r hour.
Good m n t r o l of a s c e n t rate and c e i l i n 2 a l t i t u d e h a s been obtained. Constant l e v e l
f l i q h t s of s e v e r a l hours duration are now r o u t i n a and f l i z h t s l a s t i n g up t o 5
hours irith p r e s s u r e v a r i a t i o n s not .,rester t h e n m e o r tro iuilabars havd been
obtainsd. S i m p l i f i e d control which o r e r a t e sa t i s f a c t o - i l g during the day o r n i g h t
a r e not zdquate when sur.set o c c x s dur.in.r: e. f1ir;h.t. A systsin f o r s a i n t : i n i n g
cor,stant l e v e l t h r u sunset h:s d a i devissd zfid t e s t e d a b e l l jar, but in z c t u a l
f l i 3 h t t e s t s have not y e t keen ii!zdt?. Teilipr; tar-. .;Lez.sure.it<ntsLave bezn rnade
both i n s i d z and c u t s i d e of balloons t o show ths a r ' f c c t s of suFer-hzat.
Ts;!:yerc.t,ure ;r.ersure..izt;t,r Live tilv k t m ..mi2 i n instru.::mt and b a t t z r y c a s e s
dui-in :; i'li ;ht. :.lei zura:aznts t c sk0r.i t h e ac",ilal c h a r a c t a r i s t L c s cf c c n t r o l devices
h v e becn . 1 ; a d r,ti b z l l o o n s ir, f l i g h t &mi s L u l s t e d b. t h e 1abor;tory. This

3
includes rate of ballast expenditure, diffusion, leakaqe, end s t a b i l i t y of con-
trol.
by-product infor,mtion of bportance to xieteorolosy or balloon f l y i n g
techniques includes the following : Observation, measureaent m a theoreticay
analysis o f hi:h altitude at:nosghiric oscillatioris has been accosplished.
These o s c i l l a t i o n s are s e v e r a l A l i b a r s in a q l i t u d e ( a s indichted on balloon
baragraph traces) and the Ferioci or" ascillstion v i r i e s between 4 a a 10 minutes.
Air c~asst r z . j e c t o r i ~ sil;ive been XaL-ured over r\sr,qes up t c , about 4OG m i l e s E2d
Lave beer: iz.2i::ated by t h e r e ' 3 o w ~ :q:'~ ?Oar up t o 2,o(xj miles from the launching
point. r.Suiti.Jn.1 field t w r : '3:i .zi: ,!:ELSF t r z j s c t o r i e s are now being mad.
 Technical Report No. 93.02

CONSTART LEVEL BALLOONS

Section 2

OPERATIUNS

Constant Level Balloon Project

New York University

Prepared i n Accordance w i t h provisions of Contract

W28-099-ac-241, betmen
Watson Laboratories, Red Bank, New J e r s e y
and
New York University

The research reported i n this document has been made possible

through support and sponsorship extended by the Geophysical
Research Directorate of the Cambridge Field Station, A N ,
U. S. A i r Force, under Contract No. W28-099 ac-241. It is
published f o r technical information only and does n o t repre-
sent recommendations or conclusions of the sponsoring agency.

Prepared by: Charles B. Moore, Project Engineer

and
James R. Smith, Project Meteorologist

J
Professor E. 8 . Kemler
Acting Director o f the Research Division

College of Engineering
N e w York University
31 January 1949
New York 53, ETew York
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page Number
I. Introduction ....................... 7

Purpose of Manual . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
P r i n c i p l e s of A l t i t u d e C o n t r o l
7
7
I1 . General M i l l s 20-Foot Balloons ............. 7

Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Load L i m i t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

111. Equipment Train . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. 14

Lines and Rigging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

A l t i t u d e C o n t r o l Equipment
F l i g h t Termination Gear
Accessory F l i g h t Equipment
.
rn 16
20
27
Tracking and Recording I n s t r u m e n t s 27
F l i g h t Tools and Equipment 29
IV . Pre-Flight Coaputations ............... 29

Lifting Gas and Rate of Rise

. . . . .. . . . . . . . .
. 29
Length of Balloon Bubble
Expected A l t i t u d e
B a l l a s t Requirements
. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 33
33

. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..........
36
Altitude Sensitivity 36
Forms and Records 36

V . Balloon I n f l a t i o n .................. 36

P r e p a r a t i o n of Balloon . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 36

I n f l a t i o n Techniques ...............
Use of Shot Bags and R e l e a s i n g Device 39
39

V’I . Balloon Launching .................. 47

VII . Tracking and A l t i t u d e Determination ......... 51

SCR-658 . .. .. .. .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...........
P o s i t i o n i n g Equipment
-62
52

. . . . . . . . .. ... ............. ... ... ............ .. ..

Theodolite 52
A i r c r a f t Radio Compass 53
Radar 53
A l t i t u d e Determination 53
Olland Cycle P r e s s u r e Measuring h s t r v m e n t 54
Codesonde
Barograph
.. .. ....... .. .. .. ......... .. .. .. ...... . . 64 64

-3 .
 Page Number

VIII . Analysis ........................ 71

IX . General Mills ..7 30. 70-Foot Balloons

and .. . 71

Glossary ........................ 79

Appendix I.Equipment
List Flight Forms . . . . . .81
and

I1 .
Appendix
.................
Tables and C h a r t s f o r 20-Foot Balloon
Flights 91

-4-
 LIST OF ILLUS TRATIOKS

F i g u r e Number Page h’mber

1 .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. ..
General Mills 20-foot b a l l o o n 09
2
3 .. . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Balloon appendix s t i f f e n e d w i t h cardboard b a t t e n s
D e t a i l drawing f o r b a l l o o n b a t t e n s
11
12
4
5 . C a r r i c k bend knot ....................
Balloon appendix w i t h s p r i n g bow s t i f f e n e r

.. .. .. .. .. ..
13
15
6
7
0

. . . .
D e t a i l drawing of f i x e d r a t e b a l l a s t assembly
. .
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 21
D e t a i l drawing of o r i f i c e assembly
17
18
8
9
10
..
0 D e t a i l drawing of f i l t e r
Ballast control c i r c u i t
. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. ....
B a l l a s t r e s e r v o i r assembly
19

22
11
12
13 0
.
0

. .. .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

Detail drawing of f l i g h t t e r n i n a t i o n r i p r i g g i n g
D e t a i l drawing of f l i c h t t e r n i n a t i o n switch
D e t a i l drawing of l i n e c u t t e r cannon
23
24
25
14 e
15 e D e t a i l drawing of banner . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Schematic drawing of l i n e c u t t e r cannon 26
28

. . . . .. .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

1 6s Typical s e r v i c e f l i g h t t r a i n (complete) 30
17s
18 .. Typical s e r v i c e f l i g h t t r a i n ( s i m p l e )
Typical r e s e a r c h f l i g h t t r a i n
31
32
19
20 . Sample warning and reward t a g s . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Sample c a l i b r a t i o n curve f o r helium gage 34
37
21
22 .
0 Sample reward n o t i c e and q u e s t i o n n a i r e

.
D e t a i l drawing of e l l i p t i c a l s h o t bag .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 38
40
23 m
24 0
Detail drawing of sand and s h o t bag
Launching p l a t f o r m w i t h erms open . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. 41
42

.. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
25 0 Launching p l a t f o r m w i t h b a l l o o n f i x e d i n p l a c e 43
26 0 Five t a n k helium manifold 45
27 0
. D e t a i l drawing of d i f f u s e r 46

.. .. .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
28 D e t a i l drawing of Y-shaped wind s c r e e n 48
29 0 Plan view o f b a l l o o n launching l a y o u t 49
30 a Balloon shapes d u r i n g launching 50
31 a Olland c y c l e p r e s s u r e modulator 55
32 s
33 .. . . . . . . . . . .. ...
Sample record of Olland c y c l e p r e s s u r e modulator s i g n a l
Olland c y c l e t e s t o s c i l l a t o r c i r c u i t
58
59

. . .. .. .. .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ......
34 C a l i b r a t i o n curve f o r Olland c y c l e p r e s s u r e modulator 60
35 Lange barograph-thernograph 65
36 s Sample barograph r e c o r d 67

. . . .. .. .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ........................

37 C o r r e c t i o n curve f o r Lange barograph 70
38 s Sample height-time curve 72
39 a Sample t r a j e c t o r y 73
40
41
General Xills 7-foot b a l l o o n
General Y i l l s 7O-fOOt b a l l o o n being i n f l a t e d .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 74
76
42
43 0 Detail drawing of helium h e a t e r .............
General Mills 70-foot b a l l o o n being launched 77
78

-5-
 OPERATIONS MANUAL

I . IIV TRODUC TION

A. Purpose of m n u a l

This manual i s designed t o serve as a guide i n t h e prepar-

a t i o n , launching, and tracking operations of constant-
l e v e l balloons. In the body of this manual, most of the
discussion a p p l i e s speoif'ically t o the 20-foot diameter
balloon developed by General M i l l s , Inc. In Seotion IX,
a b r i e f description i s given of the other sizes of balloons
used f o r constant-level f l i g h t . The manual i s based upon
the experiences and investigations of the Constant L e v e l
Balloon Project, Research Division of t h e College of Engineer-
ing, New Park University. The c h a r t s and t a b l e s which were
developed t o use f o r t h i s work a r e included i n Appendix I1
of the manual.
B. Principles of A l t i t u d e Control

For constant-level work, non-extensible balloons a r e used

f o r t h r e e reasons:

(1) With a given weight of equipment, it i s possible t o

determine before t h e release of the balloon, the
maximum a l t i t u d e which w i l l be a t t a i n e d .

(2) Without speoial control equipment, i t i s possible

t o maintain a nearly constant a l t i t u d e f o r periods
from one t o s i x houre, depending upon atmospheric
conditions and f l o a t i n g level. Generally, it i s
not possible t o extend such f l i g h t s through a sun-
set.

(3) By adding a l t i t u d e control equipment, it i s possible

t o maintain the balloon a t various nearly constant,
predetermined l e v e l s f o r periods of much more than
s i x hours regardless of the time of day.

11. GENERAL MILLS 20-FOOT BALLOONS

A. Description

General Mills, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minnesota, has de-

veloped a s e r i e s of non-extensible, p l a s t i c balloons.
These balloons a r e tear-drop i n shape, made from extruded
polyethylene sheet, 0.001" thick. Cells a r e currently
produced.with a diameter of 7, 20, 30 and 70 feet. The
 volume of t h e 20-foot c e l l i s about 4300 cubic f e e t and
i t s uninflated length i s 38 f e e t . I t i s made up of 20
goras, h e a t sealed together i n a b u t t weld. Along the
seams thus formed, a s p e c i a l a c e t a t e - f i b e r scotch type
tape (Minnesota Mining and Mfg. CO.,) i s l a i d t o reinforce
the weld and t o c a r r y and d i s t r i b u t e the load. These
tapes converge t o an appendix r i n g a t the balloon bottom,
t o which t h e load harness i s attached. By using this
s t r e s s e d tape design, much l a r g e r loads may be c a r r i e d than
the t h i n polyethylene alone eould hold. To exclude
a i r entering through the bottom, which i s l e f t open, an
e x t e r n a l s k i r t o r appendix i s added.

Figure 1 8hms a 20-foot balloon ready t o be released,

with an e x t e r n a l appendix in position. A s the b a l l o m
rises, the l i f t i n g gas i n s i d e w i l l expand u n t i l t h e balloon
is f u l l , whereupon the excess gas which was needed to
make the balloon rise w i l l be valved out. The f u l l bal-
loon w i l l then f l o a t a t a l e v e l where the buoyancy j u s t
balances the load. I t w i l l remain there u n t i l buoyancy
i s l o s t by d i f f u s i o n of the l i f t i n g gas, o r by cooling,
a s a t sunset.

Neglecting minor e f f e c t s , the amount of gas which i s needed

t o j u s t balance t h e load a t the maximum o r f l o a t i n g e l e -
vation would a l s o j u s t balance the load a t any lower l e v e l ,
including the surface, a l b u g h t h e balloon would be l e s s
than completely f u l l a t such a lower level.

B. Load L i m i t s

For a given l i f t i n g gas, the a l t i t u d e t o which a balloon

w i l l r i s e i s determined p r i n c i p a l l y by the l o a d it bears.
Yjith a 20-foot General M i l l s balloon, using helium, a
payload of 40 pounds w i l l reach approximately 46,000
f e e t and an 18-pound load w i l l go t o about 58,000 f e e t .
Although the manufacturers recommend keeping the payload
between 18 and 40 pounds, no trouble has been foulid i n
launching loads o f a s much a s 70 pounds (37,000.feet) o r
as small as 4 pounds (67,000 f e e t ) .

C. Appendices

For highest a l t i t u d e s and smallest sunset e f f e c t s on a bel-

loon, it i s necessary t o keep a i r from d i l u t i n g t h e helium.
To accomplish t h i s , a check valve i s required i n order
t h a t helium may be valved when the balloon i s f u l l , y e t
a i r n o t be permitted t o e n t e r a t any time. An appendix,
consisting of a tube of balloon material, whose length i s
about 2 t o 2& times i t s diameter i s used f o r t h i s purpose,
and i s supplied as p a r t of the General Mills balloon.
 Figure 1
General Mills 20 f o o t b a l l o o n in f l i g h t w i t h 2
f o o t appendix, s t i f f e n e d w i t h cardboard b a t t e n s .

-9-
S t i f f e n e r s a r e added so t h a t the appendix w i l l n o t f o u l
i n the rigging. W i t h a fouledqpendix the helium oannot
be valved, and the balloon after beooming f u l l a t i t s
o e i l i n g w i l l burst. These s t i f f e n e r s aretaped t o the
outside of the appendix j u s t before i n f l a t i o n .

The various appendix t y p e s which have been used &re given

in the following t a b l e t
Appendix Data

Appendix Stiffeners E f f e c t on E f f e c t on
Type A 1ti tude Desoent
Attained

None None Ceiling i s Balloon remains

10,000 t o 20,000 f u l l a t a l l times
f e e t lower than after ceiling is
computed. reaohed by taking
on a i r , Greatly

.
oomplicatss o m -
trol

Standard 3 oorrugated Computed Balloon remains

aardboard oe i l i n g s f u l l a t a l l times
b a t t e n s , 2&" attained. after oeiling i s
by 15" reached by taking
on a i r . Greetly
oomplioates cm-
trol.
Standard 4 aluminum Computed mil- A i r exohded
b a t t e n s 15 x ing, a t t a i n e d i f during any
& x .030" balloon does descent f a i r l y
24 ST n o t b u r s t due well.
t o restriction
on appendix.

Flattened Metal spring Not y e t f l i g h t Not y e t f l i g h t

Tube bow t o hold tested. S i m i l i - tested. Simili-
appendix f l a t , tude tests in- tude t e s t s in-
like pressed dioate computed d i o a t e almost
trousers ce il ing would complete ex0 lu-
be reached w i t h afon of air.
no b u r s t s due
t o appendix a t
1000-3t/min r a t e
of r i s e .

Figures 2, 3, and 4 show the various appendices described

i n the above t a b l e .

-10-
 Figure 2
W o f o o t appendix, s t i f f e n e d with cerd-
board b a t t e n s , shown on a General Nills
b a l l o o n . The swollen i n f l a t i o n tube
i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e b a l l o o n is b e i n g f i l l e d .

-11-
.
+
A P P R O %\
. 3 IN.
1
T A P E D€ D G E S J
( M Y S T ~TAPE)
K
~ .- *...
ENT I N FIELOTo FORML I G H T I
LOSURE: OF APPENDIX
..
6ATfENS FOR G . M
 Figure 4
Two f o o t appendix, s h a v i n g
metal s p r i n g bow i n p o s i t i o n .
-13-
 Since the back pressure forcing the helium out of a
f u l l balloon h e n it i s r i s i n g is 4 times a s g r e a t a t
1000 feet per minute as a t SO0 f e e t per minute, t h e r a t e
of rise i s o r i t i c a l when an appendix i s used. I t has
been found necessary t o l i m i t the r a t e of rise t o 700
f e e t per minute t o prevent bursting a t c e i l i n g when using
General M i l l s 20-foot balloons w i t h standard appendix.
It i s believed, from laboratory t e s t s , t h a t use of the
spring bow s t i f f e n e r s on the new appendix w i l l permit r a t e s
of rise up t o 1000 f e e t per minute. F l u t t e r i n the bal-
loon f a b r i o while r i s i n g is a p t t o cause f a i l u r e due t o
ripping a t speeds of more than 1000 f e e t per minute. A
20-foot General M i l l s balloon w i l l b u r s t with an i n t e r n a l
pressure of 0.014 psi., which i s about 1 mb., equivalent
t o a 200-foot r i s e a t c e i l i n g with a closed appendix.

111. EQUIPMEIBT TRAIM

A. Lines and Rigging

Following rigging f a i l u r e s e a r l y i n the t e s t i n g program,
c a r e f u l study was given t o the l i n e s and rigging methods
used t o a t t a c h f l i g h t instrument6 t o the balloon. For
s a f e t y i n launching, a f a c t o r of 10 t o 1 is used on a l l
loads. Thus, i f a 40-pound load i s t o be l i f t e d , it i s
n o t safe t o use l e s s than a 400-pound t e s t e d l i n e . The
l i n e strength should be determined independently i f
possible, since the a c t u a l breaking point of l i n e s runs
between 50 and 70% of the manufacturer's rated strength.

Braided or woven nylon is recommended f o r a l l rigging.

A stranded o r l a i d l i n e i s subject t o untwisting i n f l i g h t ,
twirling the suspended instruments and reducing l i n e
strength. The nylon material i s weather r e s i s t a n t t o a
high degree and tends t o s t r e t c h under shock r a t h e r than t o
snap. For some purposes it may be desirable t o use a l i n e
of constant length, i n which case the nylon may be pre-
stretched. Only a f e w o f the common k n o t s are useful
i n w i n g nylon. Bowlines and square k n o t s have been found
t o s l i p and a r e hard t o untie. The c a r r i c k bend, sham
i n Figure 4 i s recommended. In addition t o t h i s , a s a f e t y
knot i s made i n the loose end, and the e n t i r e t i e secured
by a f i n a l taping. For convenience i n assembly, the indivi-
dual pieces o f l i n e and equipment a r e rigged with harness
snaps a t each end. This permits u n i t replacements or re-
moval a t t h e l a s t minute w i t h (L minimum of delay. For
extremely light-weight rigging, wooden toggles and loops
i n the nylon may be used instead o f the heavier metal
snaps.

-14-
1

.1

Figure 5

Carrick Bend

-15-
B. Altitude Control Equipment

F l i g h t s of 20-foot General M i l l s balloons, using no con-

t r o l equipment, have been s e n t t o a l t i t u d e s o f about
50,000 f e e t . After reaching maximum a l t i t u d e , the balloons
a l l e x h i b i t a tendency to f l o a t then descend a t an in-
creasing r a t e f o r periods of from 2 t o 6 hours. In s t a b l e
l a y e r s of a i r such as the stratosphere the descent of a
b a l l a o l l i s retarded by the helium, on compression, g e t t i n g
warmer than t h e surrounding a i r . This r e s u l t s i n much longer
duration f l i g h t s rsquifing no external c o n t r o l though,
s t r i c t l y speaking, the a l t i t u d e is not constant. This
concept i s i n good general agreement with the observed
data; balloons have remained i n a semi-floating s t a t e
much longer b p t o 30 hours) when i n the stratospheric

.
inversion than when i n l e s s s t a b l e lower atmospheric
layers

When it is desired to maintain a balloon a t constant

l e v e l for a guaranteed period of time i n excess of two
hours, a b a l l a s t system of a l t i t u d e control should be
added t o the f l i g h t gem. The level a t which the bal-
loon i s t o f l o a t must be t h e maximum e l t i t u d e t o which
it can c a r r y the payload. To compensate f o r l o s s i n buoy-
ancy occasioned by loss o f l i f t i n g gas through diffusion
and leakage, a continual lightening of the load i s re-
quired. To e f f e c t t h i s i n a simple fashion, l i q u i d b a l l a s t
i s permittted t o f l o w through an o r i f i c e a t a predetemined
r a t e which exceeds the expected l o s s of lift. (See Section
IV, D) The reservoir and b a l l a s t assembly which has
been developed f o r t h i s use i s shown i n Figure 6. A de-
t a i l sketch of the o r i f i c e i n i t s mounting i s shown as
Figure 7, and Figure 8 shows a s u i t a b l e f i l t e r which
must be used t o protect the o r i f i c e from clogging. The
liquid b a l l a s t must (1) n o t freeze, but flow well a t
cold temperature (-80°C); ( 2 ) n o t absorb water, which
would freeze; and (3) be r e l a t i v e l y inexpensive. A re-

. m-C
cornended liquid i s Aeromobil Compass Fluid, made by
Socony-Vacuum Co. (Air Force Spec -116) .
There a r e t h r e e possible objections t o the use o f t h i s
simple control system. F i r s t , a continued lessening of
the t o t a l weight on the balloon--with no change i n volume--
must r e s u l t in a constantly r i s i n g ceiling. For a 20-
f o o t balloon B t 45,000 f e e t , this change i s app-oximately
1000 f e e t with each kilogram of b a l l a s t dropped ( see Sec-
t i o n N, E). Second, only a prefixed b a l l a s t flow i s
permitted, and excessive l o s s of l i f t , es might come when
the gas i s colled at sunset (when the balloon loses superheat;',

-16-
 8 SDIA, BRASS RING
ILVER SOLDERED

:L
'6 ,032 WALL. NOTE-
A L L JOINTS S I L V E R
T W O BRACES- 6" SOLDERED.
U S E 3" C O N E T Y P E
F I L T E R W I T H 325.
325 WIRE C L O T H
ORIFICE ATTACHED
WITH i' 1.D. TYGON
SEE E D 4 8 - ? S
O R I f l C E 4 F I L T E RNOT
A S S E M B L E DO N
R E S E R V O ~UNTIL
R
R E A Q YFoa F L I G H T

' WEIGHT APPRO%. 5756H. COMPLETE

R A T E B A L L A S T RESERVOIR
i L E S SB A L L A S T . iowNBY: LHM E048-79AI
-17-
 I JRUG
AY DISCHARGE
PLUGGED
UNTIL READY FOR FUGH
MONELOR N I C K E L
ORIFICE
SPINNERETTE +
D TYGON /
~UBING
/
SOFTSOLDERED \
ATTACHED
WITH WIRE -'L
v," BRASS Tue~
B~LLAST
RESERVOIR
NOTE NYU BALLOON PROJECT
S P I U N E R E T T E ORIFICE MFD. BV J. B i S H O P
Co,, MALVERN P A, . ORIFICE ASSEMBLY
IH IuA" I
8-25-48 ED40-75P
 SECTION
A-A

A
SOFTSOLDERED
y/ - I-

CUT lg AND
ONEEND
FLARE

S C A L EI : I
NOTE
W I R E M E S HF R O MN E W A R K W I R E C L O T H
CO., T v V l L L E b W E A V E C O D E P Y A ,
EQUIVALENT,
JN - ---
 w i l l cause the b a l l o o n t o descend. Third, as a consequence
of t h e p r e v i o u s l i m i t a t i o n , t h e maximum f l o a t i n g p e r i o d
of. a b a l l o o n w i t h t h i a c o n t r o l system i s 24 h o u r s , achieved
when launching i s a t s u n s e t .

Pihen any o r a l l of t h e above o b j e c t i o n s p r o h i b i t the

u s e of t h i s simple c o n t r o l system, more complex b a l l a s t
dropping d e v i c e s may be used. Figure 9 shows i n schematic
form the servo o r demand type c o n t r o l which h a s been used
t o maintain balloons a t a constant pressure level, w i t h
h i g h b a l l a s t e f f i c i e n c y and w i t h o u t harmful sunset effects.
Figure 10 i s t h e b a l l a s t r e s e r v o i r assembly which i s used
w i t h t h i s type c o n t r o l . A more d e t a i l e d d i s c u s s i o n of
t h i s servo-control i s given i n Techncial Report #umber 2
of the Balloon P r o j e c t , New York U n i v e r s i t y .

C. F l i g h t . Termination Gear

When a b a l l o o n l o s e s buoyancy b y the l o s s of l i f t i n g gas,

it s i n k s slowly t o e a r t h . To p r e v e n t t h e b a l l o o n from
remaining i n a i r p l a n e t r a f f i c l a n e s f o r a long p e r i o d
of time, a f l i g h t t e r m i n a t i o n device i s added t o t h e
equipment train. This d e v i c e , shown i n Figure 11, con-
s i s t s of a pressure-aotuated switch and r i g g i n g t o t e a r
a l a r g e h o l e i n t h e b a l l o o n when it descends t o some
predetermined h e i g h t . A p r e s s u r e pen i s h e l d above
i t s commutator b y a s h o r t s h e l f (see Figure 1 2 ) . After
p a s s i n g a n a l t i t u d e oorresponding t o t h e end o f the shelf,
t h e pen f a l l s o n t o the commutator. Upor, subsequent
d e s c e n t t o 20,000 f e e t , it c l o s e s a n e l e c t r i c a l c i r o u i t .
When t h i s c i r c u i t i s c l o s e d , a squib i s d e t o n a t e d i n an
aluminum "cannon" (see F i g u r e s 13 and 1 4 ) d r i v i n g a p e l l e t
through t h e main load l i n e . As t h e l i n e i s severed,
the weight of t h e load i s suddenly t a k e n by a r i p l i n e
which extends n e a r l y t a u t (about 2 f e e t s l a c k ) up t h e
s i d e of t h e b a l l o o n t o a p o i n t a b o u t 10 f e e t below t h e
b a l l o o n crown. A t t h i s p o i n t , two small holes a b o u t
18" a p a r t have been made, and the r i p l i n e i s passed from
t h e o u t s i d e i n t o the b a l l o o n through t h e t o p h o l e , t h e n
down the i n s i d e and o u t t h e bottom hole. Both h o l e s are
s e c u r e l y taped w i t h p c e t a t e f i b e r tape. About 6 i n c h e s
of s l a c k l i n e i s l e f t i n s i d e t h e balloon. Pihen t h e main
l i n e i s c u t , a l a r g e h o l e i s made i n t h e f a b r i c by this
r i p l i n e as i t p u l l s o u t of t h e balloon. A f t e r the in-
struments have f a l l e n a b o u t 10 f e e t and t h e r i p i s made,
t h e y are caught up by a snub l i n e and t h e load i s a g a i n
taken t o the load r i n g . The r u p t u r e d b a l l o o n t h e n a c t s
a s a parachute f o r t h e l o a d , descencling a t a b o u t 1000
t o 1500 f e e t p e r r i n u t e .

-20-
 4
' C O M M U f AT OR. .ANEROIDBELLOWS

SOLENOID

6\/
NOTES:
~ A T TP A C K I N T s A N s M I T T L R Box
FIG. 9
S I G M A S E N S I T I V E TYPE5 F R E L A Y - C O I L .- _-._
-................... ..... ....... .-__ :,_ I.#.

:
. . .._. . . . . . . .
: I ; : ; ' . ,
RE51STANCf-t6000 OHMS ,!
f. :.: ' .. . .
.,
. . , . _: < : ' .. _ I

..an. .............. .*... . .- .....

_.; .... .-,.. ..... . _ . -
D I S P L A C E M E NSTW I T C H - E 0 4 8 - ( 0 7
RATE S W I T C H - El) 48-115 BALLAST C O N T R O L
$
l,.*
SOLENOIO V A L V E -€048-110 C I R....,-C U .I .T. . . . . . .
..................
i : . ': ': LHM
USE BPH-6 \J L I T H I U MC H L O R I D EB A T T E R I E S ( B U R G E S S ) i
*.. . . 5 8 A. -*..a-
. . 1 \ - 1 2 - 4._ 1 .€.D48-114
E
F _ .
I L SOF D I S P L A C E M E N -T Sw. _
SE_.E.- E D 4-8- -- - 1* -2- --6 d - - L . - ,
_____ - O RD E .- - -
_- T A
 Figure 10
Ballast reservoir assembly
showing component parts
-22-
PENARMIS ON SHELF UNTIL BALLOON RISES ABOVE ----------------------- I

25,000 FT. WHERE IT FALLS ON TO THE COMMUTATOR. TO SQUl8 CANNON

__t
WHENTHE BALLOON DESCENDS THE h ARM RIDES
DOWN ON COMMUTATOR UNDER THE SHELF, CLOSING THE
CIRCUITAT 20,000 FT-
/
I!- CLOSES ON DESCENT TO
+CIRCUIT
20000' STANDARD
ATMOSPHERE

L O C KW A S H E R
P1
DETAIL
LINKAGE
BOTTOM NUTS

I' W I R ELEADS- NY U BALLOON PROJECT

TRANDID WIRE ~ERMlNATlONSWITCH
FLIGHT
L-rE
I* NOTE:M.FD BY KOLLSMAN 7-27-48 ED48-70A
1
I DETAIL0
h)
cn
I

NOTES:
FOR U S E WITH:-
I. Du P o N T 5 - 6 4 SQUIB
2 , 5 0 0 * TEST PARACHUT
 To B A R O S W I T C HC ~ R C U I T

NOTES
FORC A N N O ND G T A I L S SEE E 0 4 8 - I I I A
USE K N O T S A B O V E AND
BELOW CANNON
S Q U I B - D U P O N TS - 6 4

-26-
D. Accessory F l i g h t Equipment

On most f l i g h t s , three pieces of equipment are added

t o the t r a i n for special purposes. These are: (1) a
banner, (2) a drag parachute, and (3) s a f e t y weights.

The banner i s a red o r yellow cheesecloth rectangle,

3 x 6 or 6 x 12 feet, with aluminum spreaders a t top
and bottom. Shown i n Figure 15, the banner i s t i e d
t a u t t o the load l i n e , and serves t o reduce sidewise
swaying as the balloon riees. Due t o the b r i g h t color,
it i s useful i n locating the balloon a f t e r being grounded
and a c t s a s a warning t o a i r c r a f t during descent and
ascent. If thodolite s t a d i a determinations are being
made, the banner can be used a8 one of t h e checkpoints
on the t r a i n .

The drag parachute i s inserted i n t o the t r a i n above the

banner i n inverted position and serves t o retard the
ascending balloon somewhat, thus reducing the probability
of bursting due t o excessive rates of rise.

To c o r r e c t a too slaw r a t e of rise, (which may r e s u l t

from under i n f l a t i o n due t o gage errors, f r e e z i n g of
valves, or excessive adiabatic cooling of the gas during
i n f l a t i o n ) tuo small bags of sand o r shot are added t o
the bottom of the r e s t r a i n i n g l i n e . If it appears t h a t
the balloon i s n o t r i s i n g with the desired v e l o c i t y a s
it picks up the equipment, one or both of these s a f e t y
weights a r e c u t free. The weight of each bag i s equal
t o t h e desired f r e e l i f t , so t h a t i f the computed free
l i f t i s n o t available, t h i s l i f t may be supplied. Prior
t o the adoption of t h i s practice, it was necessary t o s a c r i -
f i c e equipment or the balloon in such cases.

E. Tracking and Reoording Instruments

Depending upon the nature of the f l i g h t , the weather condi-

tions, and the equipment available. gear m y be added t o
the f l i g h t t r a i n t o a i d i n horizontal position determination
and a l t i t u d e measurement. The discussion of s u i t a b l e
equipment f o r such work i s given i n Section V I I . In general,
the equipment added may be e i t h e r m d i o t r a n s m i t t e r s o r
gear of other assorted types. Each u n i t is rigged sep-
a r a t e l y , with hooks a t each end of the l i n e segment.
Prior t o the i n f l a t i o n of the balloon a thorough oheck
of a l l such equipment, especially radio gear, i s made.
I t is necessary t o have spare equipment t e s t e d , calibrated,
and assembled for l a s t minute replacement i f f a i l u r e is
detected a t t h i s time.

-27-
 HOOK
LIGHTWEIGHT
A/
c)

RIGGING 1 I" M NIMUMHEM

AL. TUB\NG I NOTE:

TAPEDAT BOTH DRILLNo HOLESI N
THEE 6 l N G
\
SIZES:

A I B
3' 3' YELLOW
6' 6 ' RED FIG.I 5
6' 12' NYU BALLOON PROJECT
3' 6'

- - IDate:
I
5-1 9-48 I ED 48 -5 6
I

-28-
 P o s i t i o n of r e c o r d i n g and r a d i o i n s t r u m e n t s i n t h e f l i g h t
t r a i n i s i n some c a s e s d i c t a t e d by t h e size and shape of
antennae o r o t h e r s p e c i a l p a r t . I n g e n e r a l t h i s type of
gear is n o t placed below the a l t i t u d e c o n t r o l equipment
because of p o s s i b l e damage which might r e s u l t from
b a l l a s t b e i n g dropped upon them. Typical t r a i n s are shown
i n F i g u r e s 16, 17, and 18.

F. F l i g h t Tools and Equipment

A l i s t of t o o l s end equipment and f a c i l i t i e s which should

b e provided f o r any launching s i t e i s given i n Appendix 11.

N o PRE-FLIGHT COfJlWTATIOhTS

A. L i f t i n g Gas and Rate of Rise

When t h e equipment f o r a f l i g h t i s i n r e a d i n e s s and t h e

i n f l a t i o n procedure i s t o be begun, t h e t o t a l w e i g h t t o
be l i f t e d must be determined. A weight s h e e t (shown i n
Appendix I ) is f i l l e d i n , w i t h t h e f i n a l weight of each
p i e c e of g e a r w i t h i t s r i g g i n g . I n t h i s work t h e w e i g h t s
o f the equipment are measured i n grams and kilograms f o r
e a s e of computation. The g r o s s l o a d r e p o r t e d should be
a c c u r a t e t o t h e n e a r e s t 200 grams. The amount of l i f t i n g
g a s t o be used must be o a r e f u l l y f i g u r e d t o p r e v e n t in-
c o r r e c t i n f l a t i o n which might r e s u l t e i t h e r i n t h e b a l -
loon f a i l i n g t o rise, o r perhaps rising t o o f a s t and rup-
t u r i n g a t i t s c e i l i n g . After t h e t o t a l weight t o be
l i f t e d i s found, a percentage of t h i s t o t a l i s added t o
provide f o r l i f t i n g t h e l o a d a t some s p e c i f i e d rate.
With a g i v e n e x c e s s of buoyarcy, a b a l l o o n w i l l l i f t i t s
load a t an a l m o s t c o n s t a n t p r e d i c t a b l e speed. (The r a t e
o f r i s e w i l l i n c r e a s e by about 25% a t h i g h e r a l t i t u d e s ,
due t o t h e changes i n b a l l o o n ahape and d e c r e a s e of a i r
d e n s i t y . ) Graph 1 of Appendix I1 shows the r e l a t i o n s h i p
between the f r e e l i f t and the r a t e of r i s e , w i t h free
l i f t e x p r e s s e d a s a percentage of t h e t o t a l o r g r o s s l o a d
(which i n c l u d e s the w e i g h t of t h e b a l l o o n i t s e l f ) . For
exanple, if a g r o s s load of 10.0 kilograms i s t o be l i f t e d
a t a d e s i r e d a s c e n t rate of 600 f e e t per minute, 9.2%
of the g r o s s load should b e added, g i v i n g a g r o s s lift
of 10.0 t .920 (I 10.920 kilograms. (The r a t e of r i s e
should n o t exceed 700 feet p e r minute i f a s t a n d a r d appen-
d i x i s used.)

It should be noted t h a t t h i s graph, d e r i v e d from e q u a t i o n s

f o r s p h e r i c a l balloons, a p p l i e s a l s o t o the tear-drop c e l l s

.
of General h i l l s , ICC., w i t h o u t r e g a r d f o r t h e balloon
diamter

-29-
 i
I
j
!
i

I
i
I

i
!

A
,
I
:
I
i

I
1 30'
!
i

I
! i+L I - L A U N C H I-N G
i
I REMNANT
i FIG.16
j
of?1 F I L E
Ass
G,M. 20' BALLOON
G.M. 2 0 2 500 gm D R A 6 C H U T E S
3 0 0 '1 BANNER
W 2 0 0 0 '1 PAYLOAD
4500 )) BALLOON
7300 CROSS LOAD

PAR A C H V T E
ML- I 3 2

P A Y L O AI

NOTE:
Use
D

t-l
- - - low r a t e 3 04 vrse (5004t
p e r min) to p r e v e n t b a l l o o n
f ailore d u r i n g ascent. i
All vigcjing 500 l b . t e 9 t N y l o n . 1i
FIG.17
I
1NYUBAU00N PROJECT1
PROPOSEDPLIGHT TRAINS F O R i
SERVICE FLIGHTS(QIflPLf GCAR) i

-31-
 I

I A P P R O X ,WEIGHT
~:(GMs)
BALLOON 4 200
BA R ~ G R L I P H I500
FLIGHTTERM.Swr:
WITH BATT. I000
ALL L I N E 400
ANTENMA 860
B A L L A S TA s s v
RIP RIGGING
+ RAUSMITTER 17000
BALLAST 5000
B A N N E RA u a
D R A S CHUTE 4 5 0
BAROGRAPH 4 FLIGHT T
SAO FETTA E v u i l -4 To
Y LW T S . - 30410
T E R M I N A T ISO
WNI
F R E EL I F T

I
D R A GC H U T E

H O L DD O W N L I N E
RESERVolR WITH LOOP

5oLENolcl V R L V E SAFETY wE16HTS

SERVO CONTROLS
A M- I T ri A N - S M \ T T E
WITHPRESSURE --ci
MOOULATOR,~EMR 4

-/
PROBRAM SWITCHES INSIDE
FIG. I8
ANTENNA . . . . . . ,.- ~.... .... . . .
P R O P O S E OF L I G N T TRAINS
i .-...I I.

i
1
,.
.
FO.R
> . c
R E S E A.."-.
...... . . . . . . . . . .
R C., H
. . . .F
..L.,I.-G. .H T .S I, 1 _,
. . . LHM
I

-32-
 When the t o t a l quantity of gas needed has been computed,
the lift requirement may be expressed i n terms of the
pressure of a number of cylinder8 of gas. It i s n o t
possible t o assume t h a t each tank of gas w i l l give t h e
ram amount of l i f t , nor i s it possible t o use a gage
which has n o t been experimentally c a l i b r a t e d t o r e l a t e
l i f t t o pressure. For c a l i b r a t i o n of a gage it i s s u f f i -
d e n t tlb valve gas from an observed equilibrium tempera-
t u r e and pressure in a cylinder i n t o a rubber balloon
azd then measure the t o t a l l i f t i n g capacity of the gas
from the tank. Check point8 rhould be made with tanks
under varying amounts of pres8ure. Figure 19 shows a
sample gage olrlibration worked up for varying temperatures
assuming the simple gas law

This l a w applies t o within 91%. Note: Do not use Graph 6

without checking c a l i b r a t i o n of gage t o be used. Ordi-
narily a whole number of f u l l tanks of gas w i l l n o t
exaotly supply the desired lift,which should be figured
with n o t more than one-tenth f u l l tank tolerance i n ex-
oess (permit no under i n f l a t i o n ) . I t is thus necessary
t o prepare parti-full tanks and by combining f u l l and
p a r t i a l l y f u l l cylinders g e t the required t o t a l . I t i s
necessary t o allow the cylinders t o a t t a i n equilibrium

.
temperature after valving them before taking f i n a l pressure
readings

B. Length of Balloon Bubble

The volume of gas required f o r a given balloon may be ex-

pressed as the length of an uninflated bubble a t the crown
of the balloon. Graph 2 of Appendix I1 gives the relation-
8hip between bubble length and r e s u l t a n t i n f l a t e d volume,
using gross l i f t a s an expression of volume. It w i l l be
noted t h a t when the elevation o f the launching site is
markedly d i f f e r e n t from sea l e v e l , a s h i f t i n this curve
is needed t o accomodate varying d e n s i t i e s of the atmosphere.
The i n f l a t i o n of t h i s bubble, which i s pinched off by
launching equipment or ahot bags, w i l l s e w 8 a s a good
aheck of the f i n a l amount of gas i n the balloon, thus
warning i f the balloon i s underinflated.

C. Expected Altitude

To p r e d i c t the a l t i t u d e t o which a balloon w i l l r i s e it

i s necessary t o know the volume of the balloon, the t o t a l

-33-
weight of e q u i p e n t and balloon, t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of
density i n the atmosphere and the buoyancy o f the l i f t i n g
gas. Assuming t h a t the l i f t i n g gas i s helium, GraFh 3
i n Appendix I1 summarizes the r e l a t i o n s h i p between gross
load and f l o a t i n g l e v e l f o r balloons of several diameters.
To use t h i s graph t o find the f l o a t i n g l e v e l of a balloon
of given s i t e and load, e n t e r w i t h the required buoyancy
(equal t o the gross load). Go v e r t i c a l l y t o the diagonal
l i n e corresponding t o the balloon s i z e and then horizontally
t o the extreme left-hand edge and read t h e a l t i t u d e . The
volume of the balloon is related t o density by t h e use
of the molar volume i n t h i s chart. Assuming observed
pressure and temperature d i s t r i b u t i o n s over selected
s t a t i o n s and the N. A. C. A. standard atmosphere, the
molar volume i s given a s well as the a l t i t u d e s . Table 1
of Appendix11 gives the N. A. C. A. Standard Atmosphere
r e l a t i n g pressure with a l t i t u d e , and Table 2 gives the
v a r i a t i o n of temperature with a l t i t u d e . For l o c a l condi-
t i o n s more exact measurements may be made using the
temperature and pressure d i s t r i b u t i o n indicated by a
sounding r a t h e r than the standard. To do t h i s , it is
necessary t o compute the molar volume from this r e l a t i o n s h i p

T
molar volumez= 359 f t O 3 x t x 1013.3 mb
2 73 OC *z
Example: Find the molar volume a t 30,000 f e e t MSL where
the reported temperature i s -30°C, and the reported
pressure i s 300 mb.

molar V O ~ U = ~ 359~ f t~O 3x~ (273-30fl

, ~ ~ x ~1013 mb. 1080 fi3
. 273% 300 mb.
T h i s is the volume of a pound mol of any gas a t those condi-
tions.

By p l o t t i n g several points of t h i s curve of' molar volume

versus a l t i t u d e , it i s possible t o locate very exactly the
a l t i t u d e which corresponds t o the molar volume t o which
the balloon w i l l go (found from Graph 3 o r a s follows),
This density or molar volume t o which a balloon w i l l r i s e
is given by the following formula:

Molar volume =Balloon v o l m e Gas Lift/mol

Gross load
Gas lift/mol = 11.1 kg/mol (using Helium)

-35-
 D. Ballast Requiremsnts

For a 20-foot General M i l l s b a l l o o n , a flow of b a l l a s t

of a t l e a s t 200 grams per hour i s needed t o keep t h e b a l -
loon a l o f t . Flaw of the compass f l u i d used wries
(through a sharp-edged o r i f i c e ) with the head, o r vertical
d i s t a n c e between the free s u r f a c e of the l i q u i d and the
o r i f i c e . It is not a f f e c t e d by t h e temperature o r pressure,
so long as the r e s e r v o i r i s properly vented.

Flow also varies with the s i t e and shape of the o r i f i c e .

Using round s p i n n e r e t t a o r i f i c e s , t h e flow of v a r i o u s heads
has been computed and i s s h o m i n Table 3, Appendix 11.
From a knowledge of the minimum head t o be expected (de-
pending on t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n of t h e b a l l a s t r e s e r v o i r and
i t s connection t o t h e o r i f i c e ) , the d e s i r e d rate of flow
can be obtained by proper s e l e o t i o n of o r i f i c e size. While
200 grams per hour h a s been used s u c c e s s f u l l y for t h e
u s u a l f l o a t i n g a l t i t u d e s of the General M i l l s 20-foot c e l l o ,
this f i g u r e should be considered as an a b r o l u t e minimum.
.4 s h o r t period check of t h e flow r a t e through each b a l l a s t
assembly p r i o r t o f l i g h t i s recommended.

E. A l t i t u d e S e n s i t i v i t y
The a l t i t u d e gained by a b a l l o o n when i t s load i s re-
duced by one kilogram i s c a l l e d i t s a l t i t u d e sensitivitJr.
This amount is a f f e c t e d by the d e n s i t y o f t h e atmosphere
a t the f l o a t i n g level3 f o r 20-foot balloons between
40,000 and 53,000 f e e t , it i s roughly 1000 f e e t p e r k i l o -
gram of weight l o s t . This weight i s normally l o s t by
b a l l a s t dropping, The a l t i t u d e s e n s i t i v i t y and the b a l l a s t
drop c o n t r o l the rate of rise o f t h e m i l i n g . Graph 4,
Appendix I1 g i v e s more e x a c t v a l u e s f o r t h i s f i g u r o a t
various altitudes.

F. Forms and Records

For t h e purpose of making standard p r e - f l i g h t computations,
a s e r i e s of computation s h e e t s have been drawn up. These
are shown i n Appendix.1. Reward t a g s a t t a c h e d t o components
of the f l i g h t t r a i n have encouraged t h e f i n d e r s t o p r o t e c t
t h e equipment and r e p o r t i t s l o c a t i o n f o r recovery. The
t a g s , q u e s t i o n n a i r e s , and the warning n o t i c e s which are
used on a p p r o p r i a t e gear where squibs or a c i d are used are
shown i n Figures 20 and 21.

V. BAUL’CBJ INFLATION

A. Preparation of Balloon

From the moment the p r o t e c t i v e packing of t h e balloon i s

removed, g r e a t c a r e must be exercised t o prevent t e a r s

-36-
 DANGER!
ACID!
EMPTY T H I S ON GROUND
BEFORE HANDLING ,

DANGER!
FIRE!
CUT THESE WIRES
BEFORE HANDLING

REWARD NOnCE
Thir ir rpecial weather equipment oent aloft on research by New York University.
It ir important that the equipment be recovered. T h e finder u requated to protect
the equipment from damage or theft. and to telegraph collect to: Mr.C. S. Schneider.
New York University. 181rt St. h University Heights, Box 12. New York City,
L.S.A. Phone: LUdlow 3-6310. REFER TO FLIGHT #-
-dollar ($ ) reward and reasonable reimburrcmm t for ro-
covery upenacr will be paid if the above instructions are followed before Sep-
tember 1949.

KEEP AWAY FROM FIRE. THERE IS KEROSENE IN THE TANK.

Figure 20
Sample warning and reward tags
-37-
 QUESTIONWIRE

Please answer this and send t o us so t h a t we may pay you the

reward.

1. On what date and a t what hour w a s the balloon diacoveredt

2. Where was it discovered? (Approximate distance and d i r e c t i m

from n e a r e s t town on map?)

3. Was it observed descending? If so, a t what t i m e ?

4, Did it f l o a t down slowly o r f a l l rapidly?

5, How much kerosene was there in the tank?

Remuneraoion

La materia ha volado con este globo desde l a Nueva York

University para hacer investigaciones meteorologicas.

.
Se desea qua e s t a material se vuelva para e s t u d i a r l e
nuevament

Con e s t e motivo, se dara una remuneracion de

dolares norteamerioanos y una s u m proportional para
devolver todoa 10s apartos en buen eatado. Pare r e o i b i r
instruociones de embarque, comuniquense con l a persona '
siguiente por telegrafo, gasOor pagados par el recipiente,
r e f i r r i e n d o a1 numero d e l globo 0

CIJIMDO!
PELIGRO LIE FLAMA, HAY UROSEF EN EL WNQUE.

C. S. Sohneider
Research Division
New York University
University Heights
Bronx 53, New York

Figure 21
Sample Spanish reward n o t i c e and English questionnaire.

'36
 and pin holes from being made i n the fabric. For example,
the film i s so e a s i l y injured t h a t it is not safe t o l a y
a folded-up balloon on a bare table-top or other hard
surface on which sandor s p l i n t e r s might be found. For
t h i s reason a clean ground c l o t h of canvas should always
be used for the lay-out of the balloon. Once the balloon
has been l a i d out on t h e ground c l o t h , it i s made ready
f o r i n f l a t i o n and the r i p l i n e of the flight-termination
gear is i n s e r b d i n t o the c e l l (see S e c t i o n Q C ) .

B. Uge of Shot Bags and Releasing Device

While the balloon i s being i n f l a w d it is necessary t o

hold it i n position. Under conditions of calm wind, th%
may be accomplished by simple fastening heavy weights t o
the loading r i n g and allowing the e n t i r e balloon envelope
t o rise f r e e l y above i t s anchor.
Since only l o t o 2% of the balloon i s f u l l a t the surface
when the i n f l a t i o n i s complete, it i s possible t o r e s t r i c t
the volume f i l l e d and so c u t down the area exposed t o
the wind on days which are n o t calm. I h e volume required
can be expressed as the length of t h e bubble collected
a t the head or t o p of the balloon. Having determined the
desired length (see Section IV, B), the remainder of t h e
balloon may be held down on the grcund c l o t h by weighted
bags wrapped in protective sheets o f polyethylene (see
Figures 22 and 23). E l l i p t i c a l s h o t bags, weighing 100
pouuds,are used t o hold the base of the bubble t o be in-
f l a t e d . Twenty-pound sand bags are used t o keep the
appendix closed t o prevent f i l l i n g of t h e balloon with a i r
and t o r e s t r i c t t h e uninflated f o l d s of the balloon. A
more elaborate system of holding the gas i n the upper section
of the bubble makes use of the General M i l l s relemsing de-
vice shown i n Figures 24 and 25. Mounted on wheels, t h i s
mechanism is r o l l e d i n t o position with the head of the
balloon lyYng across the platform. The protective r o l l e r
arms lock i n t o position holding the bubble u n t i l launching.
This devic6 i s used with large loads when shot bags might
r o l l or s l i d e off the balloon. As the arms open outward
as well a s upward when the locking pins ere removed, it is
necessary t o position the platform with the arms opening
away from t h e bubble.

C. I n f l a t i o n Techniques

When the balloon i s manufactured, a polyethylene i n f l a t i o n

tube about 4" i n diameter is inserted. !his tube extends
from a few feet outside t h e appendix t o near the top of

-39-
 LIFTING OFHEAVY
HANDLES
k R A C HUTE WEBBING, STICHED
I

HEAVY DUTYPARTITION OR
TESSPACED ALONG LENGTH
OF MINORAxis TO HOLD SHAPE

I-..-
FIG.2 2 -_----
N Y U-- BALLOON PROJECT
EuPncAL SHOT BAG I
 I
co
dc
I
Figure 24
General Mills launching platform f o r large balloons.
I
s-
CA
I

Figure 25

Launching platform with balloon f i x e d i n p l a c e

f o r inflation.
the balloon and permits gas t o be introduced i n t o the
top of the c e l l f i r s t . As the balloon i s l a i d out and
shotbags a r e positioned, t h i s tube must be kept clear.
A t the point where the bubble i s pinched off the f o l d s
of t h e balloon a r e c a r e f u l l y divided; the i n f l a t i o n tube
i s made a s f r e e as possible with only one l a y e r of poly-
ethylene above and one below it. The tube i s then pulled
up above and between t h e arms of t h e r e l e a s i n g device o r
the heavy shot bags, and the remainder of the f a b r i c i s
pinned down so t h a t no s h i f t i n g w i l l permit premature re-
lease.

Depending upon the load t o be l i f t e d and the r a t e of rise

desired, a pre-computed amount of helium i s f e d i n t o the
balloon ( s e e Section IV, A ) . This amount i s determined
by noting the equilibrium pressure and temperature of
t h e gas i n each cylinder. A manifold i s used t o feed the
gas from the tanks t o t h e i n f l a t i o n tube i n the balloon.
Shown i n Figures 26 and 27 this manifold system c o n s i s t s
of an a d j u s t a b l e number of f l e x i b l e p i g t a i l s leading i n t o
a main l i n e of heavy copper tubing. This main l i n e and
the f i t t i n g s a r e capable of d h s t a n d i n g the f u l l tank
pressure o f about 2500 f e e t psi. Two pressure gages a r e
included i n the main l i n e and it i s thus possible t o make
last-minute checks of the amount of gas (pressure) in
each tank. (Due t o variable gage-oalibrations, it has
been found necessary t o e s t a b l i a h t h e lift-pressure. r a t i o
of each gage before using i t . ) In the main l i n e of the
manifold, two valves control the gas f l o w . The i n f l a t i o n
tube i s often i n i t i a l l y t w i s t e d when t h e balloon i s f i r s t
l a i d out, A small amount o f gas a t very l o w pressure
should be valved i n t o t h e tube t o strengthen it. I n addi-
t i o n to the f i n e valve control required f o r t h i s pre-
liminary gas feed, it i s a l s o nedessary f o r a manifold
valve t o permit high gas f l o w from the tanks even when
t h e pressure i s g r e a t l y reduced. For this, the coarse
globe valve i s used.

Once the tube has been chedmd, i n f l a t i o n should proceed

as rapidly a s possible. The balloon i s outdoors and so
subject t o buffeting by the wind. The l i m i t i n g f a c t o r
of s p e d of i n f l a t i o n i s the v i b r a t i o n of the f a b r i c
near the open end of the i c f l a t i o n tube.

A s a r e s u l t o f the extreme cooling o f the rapidly expanding

gas, the manifold and t h e tank valve generally become
coated with f r o s t . Too rapid cooling may a c t u a l l y cause
the valve t o freeze shut.

-44-
c-- I

Figure 26
Fivs Tarik Helium a n i f o l d
 1'' 1.D. R U 0 6 E R H O S E
FROM MAN~FOLD
ATTACHED HERE
BRASS
Tve~
I
~ A L L O O N \HPLATION TUBE
TAPEDA R O U N D D I F F U S E R
1:2
SCALE I NYU BALLOON PROJECT
I 2 DIFFUSER
TYPE
loATE 8-25-48 lED48-76A
 The e f f e c t of t h i s cooling i s evidenced i n the l i f t i n g
power of the gas. Ifhen a rapidly f i l l e d balloon i s launched
immediately a f t e r i n f l a t i o n , it has less l i f t than de-
s i r e d and may even be "heavy" rather than buoyant. 20°C
cooling w i l l make balloon 1% heavier. This may be 25%
of free l i f t . In the i n f l a t i o n of the 70-foot balloons
where more gas i s used, and the cooling effe& i s more
often harmful, a heating u n i t i s added t o the i n f l a t i o n
equipment. The gas passes from the manifold through a
c o i l which is c e n t r a l l y warmed by a blow torch and on i n t o
the i n f l a t i o f : tube. The gas should a r r i v e i n balloon no
more than 20 C cooler than *he a i r .

VI . BALLOON LAUNCHING
When the balloon i n f l a t i o n i s complete, the i n f l a t i o n tube
i s removed from t h e balloon as gently as possible. There
i s a p t t o be constriotion a t the point where the bubble i s
formed by the launching arms or the shot bags. If the tube
does s t i c k a t t h i s p o i n t g r e a t oar8 m u s t be given t o freeing
without ripping the balloon.

Should the balloon be torn i n t h i s or any other manner, it

may be possible t o patch the f a b r i c and salvage the f l i g h t .
The acetate-fiber scotch tap, used t o a t t a c h the batten i s
used f o r patching. Transverse t a p e s are Paid across the t e a r
and the e n t i r e region i s covered with a matting of tape.

When the i n f l a t i o n tube is freed and t h e restrained bubble

i s ready f o r launching, the lower portion of it i s l a i d out
down wind, as i s a l l of the gear on the load l i n e . The in-
f l a t i o n i s generally done i n the l e e o f the hangar o r "Y"=
shaped wind screen (see Figures 28 and 29) with the bubble
a s close t o the wall a s possible. I t i s imperative t h a t t h e
wind d i r e c t i o n be noted pljDr t o launching and t h a t the equip-
ment be d i r e c t l y downwind from the head of the bubble. I t i s
strongly recommended t h a t a standard meteorological rubber
balloon be i n f l a t e d and tethered on a 150-foot l i n e near the
point of release t o serve as a wind indicator. This balloon
i s much more e f f e c t i v e than a standard wind vane.

A l l pieces of equipment and a l l on-lookers must be removed

from the immediate v i c i n i t y t o prevent accidental entanglement
of the load l i n e when the balloon begins t o rise. Each piece
of d e l i c a t e gear t o be carried a l o f t should be cradled by
one man. A s a signal given by the f l i g n t d i r e c t o r ( a f t e r
checking t o see everyone is ready and t h a t the balloon w i l l
go i n the desired d i r e c t i o n ) , the bubble i s released (see
Figure 30). If "launching arms" are used, t h i s i s not
- Witco
PREVAILING
DIRECTION P U L L E Y S To
U ~ E HOIST
C A N V A SS C R E E N .
ANEMOMETER AND
WIND V A N E
b
 m.
N

-4 9-
 A-

-50-
 d i f f i c u l t , b u t i f t h e two e l l i p t i c a l shot bags a r e em-
ployed, they must be l i f t e d simultaneously upward and
outward away from the balloon. As the c e l l rises, each
piece o f gear must be cradled by i t s bearer alluwing it
t o be l i f t e d v e r t i c a l l y when the balloon passes overhead.
In many instances where the wind d i r e c t i o n is pot constant
a t the surface o r changes as the balloon goes upward, and
exact downwind positioning of launching personnel w i l l be
d i f f i c u l t . I t is often necessary f o r these men t o run t o
one side o r forward or backward t o g e t d i r e c t l y beneath
the balloon. In cases o f extreme wind speed, it has been
found neoessary t o load t h e lower pieces of e q u i p e n t on t o
a truck bed before release of balloon and launch it by
driving underneath the balloon.

It i s possible t o ostirnata the space required t o launch a

t r a i n of given length i f the wind speed i s known. By using
the computed f i g u r e f o r r a t e of r i s e , the length of time re-
quired t o l i f t the e n t i r e t r a i n i s found. The distance
the bubble w i l l t r a v e l during this time i s proportionate t o
the wind speed. For example, if a t r a i n 250 f e e t long is
launched w i t h the rate of rise a t 500 f e e t per minute, a
bubble w i l l move downwind a t 660 f e e t i f the wind i s 15
m i l e s per hour (22 f e e t per second), and the man a t the end
of the equipment t r a i n must cover 410 f e e t i n 30 seconds
carrying the gear with him.

The use of a r e s t r a i n i n g l i n e attached t o the load l i n e above

any heavy gear o r d e l i c a t e gear is recommended. A loop i n
t h i s r e s t r a i n i n g l i n e i s attached t o a winch mounted on a
t r a c k a few hundred f e e t downwind of the lowest pieoe of
gear, or i s held by a well-gloved man. The s a f e t y weights
are attached near the end o f t h i s l i n e . The balloon tends
t o p u l l tihe gear i n beneath i t s e l f i n calm or l i g h t winds,
and may p u l l sidewise if the t r a i n alignment is not p e r f e c t l y
downwind; the r e s t r a i n i n g l i n e withstands t h i s pull. Thus
tethered, the b*lloon i s forced t o come overhead of the equip-
ment bearers, and they are able t o launch with less d i f f i -
c u l t y and danger of equipment damage. If the apparent ascent
rate i s too slow, t h e r e s t r a i n i n g l i n e is c u t between the
.safety weights and the other pieces of e q u i p e c t . If' t h e r a t e
of rise appears t o be high enough, the r e s t r a i n i n g l i n e i s
severed below the safety weights and they r i s e , completing
the launching.

VII. TRACKING AND ALTITUDE DETERMINATION

Following release, it i s o f t e n necessary t o know the position
of t h e balloon and i t s height as long a s possible. Several
methods of position and height determination have been found
useful. Advantages and l i m i t a t i o n s of each system are given.

-51-
A. Positioning E q u i p a n t

(1) SCR-658

The r a d i o d i r e a t i o n finding s e t SCR-658 has been

found t o be the most useful unit t o t r a c k a balloon-
borne transmitter, within i t s limited range. If
the set i s in good condition and the t r a n s m i t t e r
signal is good, it i s possible t o receive from a
t r a n s m i t t e r whiqh is 150 miles array a t an a l t i t u d e
of 50,000 feet. A t t h i s distanoe, the elevation
angle i s usually n o t high enough t o be r e l i a b l e ,
sinoe below angles of 130, ground r e f l e c t i o n of sig-
n a l s makes them n e a r l y meaningless. The azimuth
angle and the elevation angle, when above 157 are
aocurate t o about 0 . 5 O . It i s thus necessary t o
use two such sets on about a 100-mile base l i n e
t o give a position fix. If the elevation of the
balloon i s determined independently, and the eleva-
t i o n angle i s above 1 3 O , it i s possible t o l o c a t e
the balloon-borne t r a n s m i t t e r with one SCR-658.

The i n s t a l l a t i o n and maintenance of SCR-658 requires

the servioes of a speoially trained man, while the
operation prooedure may be made by r e l a t i v e l y un-
s k i l l e d personnel, w i t h l i m i t e d training. For
d e t a i l 8 of the use of the SCR-658, see War Department
publioation TMl1-1158A.

(2) Theodolite

The meteorological theodplite i s useful on daytime

f l i g h t s when s k i e s a r e c l e a r f o r ranges up t o 100
miles. If radio datawe available t o give height,
the additional information obtained from t h i s in-
strument--elevation and azimuth angle-*ill completely
f i x the balloon's p o s i t i o n in three dimensions.
When pressure data a r e h a r m , two theodolites
with a base l i n e several m i l s s i n length w i l l also
uniquely looate t h e balloon. A t h i r d method, l e s s
accurate b u t s t i l l useful, i s the method of s t a d i a
measurements. By c a r e f u l l y measuring, p r i o r t o
release, the distance between two d i s t i n c t i v e portions
of the t r a i n and then noting the arfgular distance
subtended duririg f l i g h t by these instruments, the & t i -
tude and hence a l l coordinates of the balloon may be
determined.

Regular and frequent checks must be made of the s a a l e

adjustments of the instruments and of the base p l a t e

-52-
 l e v e l s when the instrument i s located out of doors.
For d e t a i l s of the use and care of theodolites,
see e i t h e r the War Drrpartment publication TM-11-
423 or the U. S. Weather Bureau Circular "0".

(3) A i r c r a f t Radio Compass

I t has been found f e a s i b l e t o determine the posi-

t i o n of the balloon by following the signal from a
balloon-borne transmitter, using an a i r c r a f t radio
compass a s receiving unit. In t h i s way it is possible
t o f l y along a path coward the balloon,.usually a t
a much lower a l t i t u d e , and, by noting the plane's
position where the compass reading i s reversed, the
position of the transmitter i s found. The main dis-
advantage of using t h i s system i s t h a t a i r c r a f t i s
needed, b u t there i s no other method which w i l l so
readily position the balloon over g r e a t distances
and periods of time. W t h t h i s system, the l i m i t
of transmission time i s a function of the weight of
transmitter b a t t e r i e s which can be carried rather
than distance. I t i s possible t o power a trans-
m i t t e r t o supply 2 watts, f o r about 15 hours, using
15 pounds ( 7 kilograms) of b a t t e r i e s . Longer periods
of transmission may be achieved by i n t e r m i t t e n t opera-
t i o n of the transmitters o r use of heavier b a t t e r i e s .

(4) Radar

If ground radar is available, accurate positioning

over a limited range can be made. It i s helpful
b u t n o t s t r i c t l y required t o add radar t a r g e t s
(corner r e f l e c t o r s ) t o the f l i g h t t r a i n f o r such
tracking. Using radar, the elevation angle, azimuth
angle and s l a n t distance out are obtained, giving
a complete f i x on the balloon with one set. The
maximum distance t o which appropriate s e t s can reach
i s about 65 miles; such s e t s a r e the SCR-584, the
SPM-1 and the WS-6. With good. o r i e n t a t i o n and l e v e l i n g
such sets have an accuracy of 1.00 and about 500 f e e t
of slant range. Because of the limited range, radar
sets are not generally useful. Attempts t o use
radar mounted atop a i r c r a f t f o r a e r i a l observation
have been abandoned i n favor of the radio oompass.

B. Altitude Determination

In e a r l y attempts t o u t i l i z e standard radiosonde

pressure modulators they were found t o be unsatisfactory.
The Diamond-Einman system of counting signal changes

-53-
i s n o t useful when the changes occur a t a n e a r l y con-
s t a n t a l t i t u d e due t o the w i d t h of the s t e p s and the am-
b i g u i t y of d i r e c t i o n of v e r t i c a l motion. Two pressure
measuring systems have been found s a t i s f a c t o r y f o r use
i n constant-level work and are discussed below. For a
discussion of the radio t r a n s m i t t e r s which have been
used ( t h e standard T-69 and .the Mnr AM-l), see Techni-
c a l Report No. 2, Balloon Project, New York University
Re search Division.

(1) Olland Cycle Pressure Measuring Instrument

This instrument, shuwn i n Figure 31, i s used in

balloon flights a s the primary pressure measuring
unit, a s i t w i l l continuously measure pressure
without ambiguity. It modulates the transmitted
radio signal a t intervals whose timing i s determined
by t h e pressure of the a i r a t the balloon's position.

As presently designed, t h e modulator contains a

standard Signal Corps ML-SlOE radiosonde aneroid
unit, a r o t a t i n g cyclinder of i n s u l a t i n g material
w i t h a m e t a l h e l i x wound around the cylinder, and a
6-volt e l e c t r i c motor which r o t a t e s the cylinder.

There a r e two contacting pens which r i d e on the cy-

l i n d e r and conduct e l e c t r i c a l c u r r e n t when they
touch the helix. One pen is f i x e d 3.n p o s i t i o n and
makes a contact a t the same time i n each revolution
of the helix. This contact i s used as a reference
point f o r measuring t h e speed of r o t a t i o n of the
cylinder. The t i m e t h a t the second one, which i s
linked d i r e c t l y t o the aneroid c e l l , makes c o n t a c t
w i t h t h e s p i r a l , i s dependent on the oylinder speeed
and on t h e pen position which i s determined by the
pressure. By an evaluation c h a r t , the atmospheric
pressure can be determined as a function of t h e
r e l a t i v e position of the pressure contact as compared
t o the reference thus eliminating a l l r o t a t i m e f f e c t s
but short t e r m motor speed fluctuations.

Preparation of the modulator f o r f l i g h t coneists of

t h e following steps:

(a) Test the motor operation. When a 6-volt battery

i s i n s e r t e d in the motor c i r c u i t w i t h the proper
p o l a r i t y , the motor should run smoothly a t ane
revolution per 60 t o 80 seconds. Noisy opera-
t i o n i s probably a sign of d i r t y o r corroded

-54-
 I

Figure 31
Olland Cya le Pressure Modulator

-55-
gears o r pour alignment of the r o t a t i n g cy-
linder. The motor gears may be cleaned w i t h
carbon t e t r a c h l o r i d e and a small clean brush.
If the trouble i s due t o misalignment, the in-
strument should not be used since t h i s will
a f f e c t the r o t a t i o n a t a non-uniform r a t e and
thus destroy the e n t i r e accuracy of the record.

Calibrate the instrument. The following equip-

ment i s required f o r the c a l i b r a t i o n : '

vaouum pump
Bell j a r
Base p l a t e w i t h a t lest 4 e l e c t r i c a l leads
Manometer
Tape recorder
The vaouum pump should be capable of evacuating
the b e l l j a r t o a pressure lower than t h a t t o
be reached by the balloon i n f l i g h t . A pressure
o f ten m i l l i b a r s , corresponding t o about
100,000 f e e t elevation i s usually a good minimum.

Four w i r e s a r e necessary t o conduct the six

v o l t s t o the motor and t o transmit the reference
and pressure signals. The wires must pass out
of the b e l l j a r through an a i r - t i g h t s e a l i n
the base p l a t e . The base p l a t e a l s o needs a
tube leading t o the manometer and a tube t o t h e
vacuum pump. It i s advisable t o use two sepa-
r a t e tubes r a t h e r than placing the manometer
lead i n t h e same l i n e a s the pump lead i n order
t o obtain t h e pressure i n the b e l l j a r rather
than t h a t i n the pumping l i n e .

In operation the negative l i n e of t h e b a t t e r y

leads i s used as the ground connection of the
output signal.

A tape recorder such a s the Brush Development

Co. model BL-902 oscillograph and amplifier
BL-905, i s needed t o record the signal both
during c a l i b r a t i o n and during the balloon Plight.
The Brush recorder i s used a.t present and t h e
discussion of the operation w i l l be made i n terms
of t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h i s instrument. When
using the slow speed of the recorder, which
feeds the paper a t t h e r a t e of 30 centimeters
per minute, the distance between successive re-
ference marks w i l l be 30 t o 40 centimeters de-

-56-
pending upon the speed of r o t a t i o n of the rno-
dulator motor. !he pressure signal appears
a t any point along the record between o r over-
lapping the references depending upon the pressure,
A sample record of this s o r t i s shown in Figure 32.
The Olland cycle a c t s as a switching u n i t f o r the
t e s t o s c i l l a t o r (see Figure 33) whose d p e l i s fed
i n t o the Brush amplifier and f i n a l l y t o t h e recorder,
By adjusting the resistors i n the t e s t c i r c u i t ,
the frequency of o s c i l l a t i o n may be adjusted. Since
within the usual range, the frequency of o s c i l l a t i o n
is approximately a d d i t i v e when the two signals w e r -
lap, the suggested frequencies a r e about 4 cycles per
second f o r pressure and 8 cycles per second f o r refer.
ence. When overlapping signals a r e being recorded
the frequency w i l l be about 1 2 cycles per second
which i s e a s i l y recognizable on the record.

"he o d i b r a t i o n of the modulator u n i t should be

in s t e p s of 25 t o 30 m i l l i b a r s i n order t o have
a t l e a s t three points within each turn of the
helix,

Evaluation of the record i s accomplished with

the aid of a nomogram divided i n t o 100 equal
parts. The record i s l a i d on t h e nomogram with
the leading edge of the f i r s t reference on the
zero l i n e and the leading edge of the second
reference on the 100th l i n e . The position of
the leading edge of the pressure signal i s then
read t o the nearest t h i r d of a division on the
nomogram. If one complete turn of the s p i r a l
represents 75 m i l l i b a r s , it i s thus possible
t o read the pressure to an accuracy of one-

.
three-hundreth of 75 or about one-quarter m i l l i -
bar

In evaluating the record the tape should be kept

p a r a l l e l t o the horizontal l i n e s on the nomogram

.
o r perpendicular t o the zero l i n e i n order t o
avoid e r r o r s i n i r t e r p r e t a t i o n

"he t o t a l motion of the pen arm of the modulator

i s normally 1 2 t o 14 turns of the s p i r a l . ?herefore,
there w i l l be the same number of points a t which
the pressure and reference s i g n e l s overlap. The
c a l i b r a t i o n curve (Figure 3 4 ) i s drawn t o show
pressure from zero t o surface pressure (about

-57-
-5%-
I ,
 1020 m i l l i b a r s ) against. percentage of the turns
as read on the nomogram. The lowest pressure
reading is numbered as read and succeeding
pressurea are plotted in a continuous ascending
s e r i e s . When the pressure reading reached the
f i r s t overlap on the reference, it i s c a l l e d
100 percent; the second overlap i s 200 percent
and so on u n t i l the l a s t overlap which may be
1200 or 1300 percent.

(0) Pack the modulator and i n s e r t it inside the

transmitter box. The modulator should be pro-
tected from extreme cold sinee the motor opera-
t i o n becomes e r r a t i c when t h e temperature reached
300 t o 40% below dero. A box or paper cover
over the modulator w i l l keep p a r t i c l e s of in-
sulation and d i r t from the moving parts.

(d) When the e n t i r e assembly has been made and in-

f l a t i o n of the balloon i s about t o begin, the
transmitter and motor should be turned on and
reception of the signal tested. If any serious
trouble appears, the modulator should be re-
placed by another c a l i b r a t e d modulator since
any work on the instrument w i l l probably change
the c a l i b r a t i o n .

During the f l i g h t , r a d i o s t a t i c and noise w i l l

appear on t h e Brush record a s pips which may re-
semble the transmitted signals and with increasing
distance or weakening transmitter the noise w i l l
f i n a l l y completely obscure t h e pressure record.
Careful tuning of the receiver w i l l prolong
the record as long a s possible. When tuning
the reoeiver, the s e n s i t i v i t y control of t h e
Brush amplifier should be turned t o the l e a s t sen-
s i t i v e position since any sudden change i n the
t*ming may throw the pen off i t s supports and
damage i t s g l a s s t i p .

When the f l i g h t reception i s completed the re-

cord i s evaluated exactly as i n the evaluatian
of the c a l i b r a t i o n record-using the same nomo-
gram. However, since the instrument i s subjected
t o d i f f e r e n t atmospheric conditions, the motor
speed may vary suddenly, giving f a l s e values f o r
the pressure. These values may be detected by
c a r e f u l l y observing the rate of r o t a t i o n of the
motor, which i s measurable by the distance be-
tween the reference marks. If there i s a sudden

-61-
change i n motor speed of f i v e percent or more
from the preceding r o t a t i o n , the pressure value
should be rejected. A slaw, continuous ahange
i n s p e d from minute t o minute may be negleoted
since it i s probably a uniform change through-
out t h e r o t a t i o n period. The motor speed w i l l
decrease during t h e f l i g h t , as a result. of the
low temperatures and the drop i n b a t t e r y voltage.
This of i t s e l f does not decrease the value of
the record, as long as the speed does not nhange
suddenly.

Olland-Cycle Pressure Element S p e c i f i c s t i o n s

(1) Pressure range : 1050 t o 5 mb.

( 2 ) Desired accuracy: Surface to 300 mb f5 mb.

300 mb t o 50 mb 22 mb.
50 mb t o 5 mb less than f2 mb, *1 mb if
possible

Highest accuracy and r e a d a b i l i t y desired

on l o w pressure end. Temperature compensa-
t i o n , as required t o meet pressure accuracy
requirements f o r temperature, range t3Oo
t o -70% o r equivalent for medium and high
a l t i t u d e f l i g h t s . Mean operating tempera-
t u r e required more than OOC,

(3) Helix:

C linder-made of insulating material w i t h

P--
ow temperature c o e f f i c i e n t .
.
Diameter 3/4 inch t o 1 inoh, length 2 3
inch

S iral--made of nickel or other m s t a l which

ag- n o t corrode i n t h e atmosphere, .010
oes
inch o r less i n diameter,
Eight t u r n s per inch on cylinder.

Check-pointe--Six points located betmeen

turns of s p i r a l , s t a r t i n g- with 9th turn,
60 degrees apart.
Made of the same material as the s p i r a l .

signal .
In the e l e o t r i c a l c i r c u i t of the pressure

Suggested shape 1/16 inch diameter, round

pin, f l u s h with surface of helix.

-6 2-
 General-Helix mounted i n a r i g i d frame t o
prevent lengthwise movement o r springing
out through bending of a frame.
Joined t o motor drive by a pin through both
drive s h a f t and h e l i x shaft.
When r o t a t i n g a t about 1 rpm duration of
signals n o t over 3 t o 4 seconds.
Surfaoe of h e l i x t o be polished withrouge
or orocus cloth.
Loading edge of t h e metal s p i r a l w i l l be
t r u e and smooth t o within .0005 inoh.

(4) Motor:

6 t o 7.5 v o l t s
1 rpm gear t r a i n
20 t o 40 milliemperes drain
Constant speed-change o f speed during any
single revolution n o t more than 0.3%
Speed change a t low temperature not more
than &so$

( 5 ) Mounting of Unit:

Mounting i n such manner t h a t temperature

ohangee and s t r e s s e s w i l l n o t change the
r e l a t i v e positions of the aneroid and the
helix. This may be done by mounting a l l
elements on a m e t a l p l a t e o r by mounting
a l l p a r t s in a frame supported ona single
pedestal.
Mount u n i t i n an e a s i l y opened, s t i f f single
thickness oardboard or p l a s t i c box t o pro-
t e a t it from other units i n f l i g h t t r a i n s .

External terminal s t r i p with f o u r terminals

connected t o ground, motor, reference, and
pressure.

Total weight not over SO0 grams.

Overall dimension not over 5 x 5 x 4 inohes.

To be mounted i n transmitter, where insula-

t i o n w i l l prevent oooling below O°C within
6 hours a t a i r temperature of -40° t o -5OOC.

-63-
(2) Codesonde
The modified radiosonde b u i l t by Brailsford and Co.,
Rye, N e w York,called the codesonde,has been found
valuable when knowledge of small v a r i a t i o n s i n the
height of the balloon i s not required. Using t h i s
system, a radio transmitter i s modulated by a Morse
oode signal which i s a M o t i o n of pressure (and
temperature i f desired). This system i s useful for
Cracking a balloon with aircraft since no recording
equipment i s neoesrary f o r data i n t e r p e r l a t i o n .

Eaoh combination of d o t s o r dashes may be i d e n t i f i e d

by ear, and with a o a l i b r a t i o n o h a r t , the pressure
which corresponds t o the balloon's height may be
thus determined by anyone who oan read Morse code
w i t h a s u i t a b l e r a d i o receiver. The advantages of
using this system f o r a balloon whioh i s to be followed
by a i r c r a f t include the f a c t t h a t it i s neaessary t o
receive only one complete code group tooompletely
i d e n t i f y the pressure l e v e l of the balloon. I t i s
thus possible t o i n t e r r u p t the period of reception
without permanently losing the a l t i t u d e record. It
i s expected that a balloon t r a n s m i t t e r which can be
f o l l o w e d w i t h an a i r c r a f t radio oompass will be used
iF. conjunction w i t h this pre8sure modulator, giving
three-dimensional position data.

(3) Barograph

Many balloon f l i g h t s pass out of the range of even

a network of receiving s t a t i o n s . When it is n o t
possible, because of weather or other considerations ,
t o follow the balloon w i t h a i r c r a f t , a clock-driven
meteorograph may be added t o the f l i g h t t r a i n t o re-
cord data, such a8 pressure and temperature. I t is
necessary t o recover the balloon equipment t o evaluate
this s o r t of record. With inland release points,
it has been possible to r e o w e r about 75% of a l l
f 1i g h t 8 .

The model U-48 Lange barograph, shown i n Figure 95,

i s designed t o give ti record of atmospheric pressure
and the temperature of the barograph 08se. In order
t o obtain a maximum spread of t h e pressure record
in t h e range a t which the data i s most useful, the
linkages a r e arranged so t h e t recording begins a t
about 500 m i l l i b a r s o r around 19,000 f e e t , and may
be continued as high as the balloon rises. The

-64-
1

-65-
tampemture recording i s oonfined t o the lower
2 inchos of the drum so as t o i n t e r f e r e a s l i t t l e a s
porsible with the pressure record when t h e balloon
float8 abovo 30,000 f e e t .

Rocording i s accomplished by three pens which scratch

c8rbon from a smoked aluminum f o i l . This method
eliminates the need f o r l i q u i d ink and a p p l i e s a
minimum of pressure t o the recording drum.

The recording drum r o t a t e s once i n twelve hours.

Therefore, i f a f l i g h t l a s t s over twelve hours, the
traoe w i l l overlap. Such a record i s shown i n
Figure 36. The cloak rune for 36 t o 40 hours on
one winding.

Preparation of the barograph f o r use on a balloon

recension requires the following:

(a) Plaoe an aluminum f o i l about 10 inches long by

3 3/4", .002" thick on the drum. Care should
be taken t o have the overlapping edge of the
f o i l face i n the d i r e c t i o n of r o t a t i o n of the
drum so t h a t the s t y l u s s l i d e s off the edge in-
stead of catching and t e a r i n g t h e f o i l . A few
drops of rubber cement along each edge of t h e
f o i l are s u f f i c i e n t t o f a s t e n the f o i l t o t h e drum
and w i l l not i n t e r f e r e with removal of t h e f o i l
after rebevery of t h e barograph.

(b) Wind the clock. "he clock should not be wound

t i g h t l y since a t t h e low temperatures encountered
in the upper atmosphere the olock spring may
snap. However, i f the clock i s wound an hour
or so before release, i t w i l l be s u f f i c i e n t l y
relaxed by the time the l o w temperatures a r e
reached.

) Check pressure of the marking pens. Too much

pressure o f t h e pens on the drum will introduce
an e r r o r due t o the f r i c t i o n a l lag. When the
drum i s removed from t h e clock mechanism, and the
pen l i f t e r released, the s t y l u s points shouzd
touch t h e clook housing l i g h t l y .

(d) Smoke the drum. A w r y thin, fine-grained oarbon

f i l m should be deposited on the aluminum f o i l .
The b e s t r e s u l t w i l l be obtained by use of a
b r i g h t yellow gas flame, although a kerosene flame
gives a s a t i s f a c t o r y coating. Solid o r l i q u i d

-66-
-67-
 fuels usually give a coating wbich i s too coarse
grained and heavy. In smoking the drum a long
rod i s used a s a r o t a t i n g axis. The drum i s ro-
t a t e d r a p i d l y i n the flame 8 0 a s t o prevent
overheating and oxidizing of the f o i l . The car-
bon should n o t be so t h i c k as t o obscure the
metallic appearance of the aluminum f o i l .

(6) Calibrate the barograph for pressure. The in-

strument is placed i n a b e l l j a r and the a i r
evaauated. The pressure i s kept constant a t a
number o f pressures so t h a t a s the d r m turns a
step, record i s made on the-ked f o i l . Pressure
recording s t a r t s a t about 500 m i l l i b a r s so the
f i r s t l e v e l i n t h e c a l i b r a t i o n should be a t t h a t
value. A t each level the pressure should be kept
constant f o r three t o five minutes i n order t o
obtain a measurable line. Great care and consid-
erable p r a c t i s e a r e required t o control t h e valves
of the vaouum system so t h a t t h e pressure does
n o t ohange noticeably during each step.
153
The pressure step6 a t which the barograph i s c a l i -
brated may be e i t h e r a t regular pressure i n t e r v a l s
or a t the pressure values corresponding t o regular
height i n t e r v a l s according t o t h e standard a t -
mosphere figures. The recommended s t e p s are
l i s t e d below. If the balloon is n o t expected t o
go t o the higher a l t i t u d e s , the c a l i b r a t i o n may
be stopped a t correspondingly higher pressures.

Pressures Standard Atanosphere Heights

500 mb 466 mb corresponding t o 20,OOOft.
400 mb 300 mb I' 30;000ft.
300 mb 188.5 mb " 40,000 f t .
200 mb 117 mb " 50,000ft.
150 mb 72.8 mb " 60,000ft.
100 mb 45.3 mb 'I 70,000 f t .
50 mb 28.2 mb 80,000ft.
10 mb 17.5 mb It 90,000ft.
10.9 mb I' 100,000 f t .

The temperature c a l i b r a t i o n may be made by recording

two widely spaced temperatures, such as room tem-
perature and the temperature of dry i c e (-78OC).
This c e l i b r a t i o n w i l l be approximately a s t r a i g h t
l i n e and, therefore, two points are s u f f i c i e n t
t o p l o t the ourve.

-68-
 Immediately before the balloon release, when
the clock i s wound and the pens lowered against
the drum, the pressure and temperature pens
should be tapped l i g h t l y so as t o make short
marks and the t i m e noted.
men the barograph i s recovered the smoked f o i l
should be treated t o preserve the record. A
solution of c l e a r shellae d i l u t e d with about ten
times i t s volume of alcohol may be used. "he
drum i s immersed i n the shellao and allowed to
dry thoroughly before f u r t h e r handling.

(f) Evaluation of the reoord. I n evaluating, the re-

cord heights of s i g n i f i c a n t points a r e measured
v e r t i c a l l y from the reference l i n e . The pres-
sure c a l i b r a t i o n s t e p s a r e measured f i r s t and p l o t b d
on graph paper, v e r t i c a l distance versus pressure
o r a l t i t u d e . Each s i g n i f i c a n t point on the
f l i g h t t r a c e i s then measured and the corresponding
a l t i t u d e determined from the c a l i b r a t i o n w r v e .
The same procedure i t 3 followed in evaluating the
temperature record, measuring from the reference
line.

The curvature of the record due t o the motion

of the pens must be corrected f o r . Since the tem-

time correo t i o n may be neglected .

perature record covers a s h o r t v e r t i c a l range, the
Corrections
f o r curvature of t h e pressure record m y be read
d i r e c t l y from Figure 37, which gives the correction
in inches a s a function of the distanoe of the
point i n question from t h e center of the record.

The f i n a l time oorrection i s made t o c o r r e l a t e

the temperature and pressure records. This may
be done by measuring the horizontal distance be-
tween the temperature and pressure marks as made
before release and correcting t h i s amount f o r
v e r t i c a l position. The r o t a t i o n of the drum
i s once i n 1 2 hours and, %herefore, the time-distance
r e l a t i o n may be computed by noting the t o t a l
length of reoord obtained i n one revolution.

-69-
 Mean Tune Scale
Correction Curve
FOR LANGE U-48 BAROGRAPHS
C 48- 26A
----o CENTER
LINE
FIG.37
V I I I. lwALYS IS

During and following the f l i g h t it i s customary t o analyze the

behavior of the balloon. Two curves are usually drawn when
data i s available f o r t h e i r preparation. %e f i r s t of these
is a time-height curve nhioh gives the a l t i t u d e of the balloon
a t a l l t i m e s with respect t o sea level. On t h i s curve a l s o
it i s customary t o p l o t w e temperature data and b a l l a s t f l o w
data when such has been recorded. In some cases it has been
found useful t o p l o t a p r o f i l e of the t e r r a i n over which the
balloon i s passing. The second diagram usually prepared i s
the t r a j e c t o r y of the balloon, and again it may be prepared
with r e s p e c t t o the t e r r a i n over which the balloon was passing.
That is t o say, it i s plotted on an a i r c r a f t map of the area,
with positions and heights plotted every ten minutes. Fig-
ures 38 and 39 show sample pIQ*s.

IX. GENERAL MILLS 7 0 , 300, AND 70-FOOT BALLOmS

The a l t i t u d e s reached and loads which may be c a r r i e d by the
General Mills balloons other than the 20-foot c e l l a r e shown
in Table 4, Appendix 11. Graph 3, Appendix I1 may be used
f o r interpolation of t h e tabulated values t o give the re-
l a t i o n s h i p between f l o a t i n g a l t i t u d e and gross load, and Graph 4
s h m s the a l t i t u d e s e n s i t i v i t y a t various heights. I t has
been assumed t h a t helium i s the l i f t i n g gas. Graph 1, A p
pendix I1 i s useable f o r a l l of these balloons t o determine
the amount of free l i f t which i s needed t o give a desired r a t e
of rise.

To launch a 7-foot balloon, it i s n o t necessary t o u t i l i z e

the elaborate technique of the l a r g e r balloons. A can of sand
is made t o weigh the same amount a s the required gross l i f t
(equipment weight plus free l i f t ) , and attached t o the load
ring. I n f l a t i o n from a single tank may be made ins% any
building with r e l a t i v e l y large doors and when the balloon j u s t
l i f t s the i n f l a t i o n weights it may be attached t o the e q u i p
ment l i n e , carried outdoors and released. I n l i g h t winds the
equipment may be released w i t h a hand-over-hand paying o u t of
the l i n e . If there i s too much wind f o r t h i s method, the
equipment i s l a i d out downwind and the balloon released so a s
t o pass over the pieces of gear and pick t h e m up while r i s i n g .

A 7-foot balloon being i n f l a t e d is seen i n Figure 40. The

appendix which i s shown i s made of a f l a t t e n e d 2-foot length
of i n f l a t i o n tube, from a 20-foot balloon, without s t i f f e n e r s .
Suoh a balloon has been sustained with a fixed b a l l a s t leak

-71-
\ ’
Figure 38
-73-
 Figure 40
General Mills 7 foot
balloon being inflated.

-74-
of 170 grams per hour. A balloon of t h i s type with no alti-
tude control stayed a l o f t f o r inore than two hour8 and a f k r
reaching c e i l i n g , the a l t i t u d e did not vary by more thur
1500 f e e t while the balloon w a s within range of tho obroning
station

The preparation and launching teohniques dimuramd f o r tho

20-foot balloon apply a l s o t o the 30-foot c e l l . No firthor
discussion is required f a r the 30-foot balloon.

The 70-fOOt balloon seen i n F i g u r e s 41 and 42 i s launched i n

the same manner as the 20-foot c e l l . A much l a r g e r amount
of gas i s required and since it is valved rapidly i n t o t h e
balloon, it has been found necessary t o pass the gas through
a heating c o i l t o prevent it from reaching the balloon so
a d i a b a t i c a l l y cooled a s t o be incapable of l i f t i n g the
load. This heater i s s h m i n Figure 43. Due t o the large
lift and area exposed t o the wind a t launching, the largo
c e l l may be dangerous i f personnel attempt t o hold t h o gear
or a c t a s anchors. If possible, al,l gear should be l a i d o u t
downwind t o be picked up from t h e ground by the balloon. The
anchor should be a winch mounted on a truck which can move
around t h e balloon so a s t o be downwind a t launching.

Since the a l t i t u d e s where the 70-foot balloons normally f l o a t

a r e high in the stratosphere, the n a t u r a l s t a b i l i t y of the bal-
loon i n the temperature inversion keeps these c e l l s up f o r
a long period of time without b a l l a s t o r other controls. One
such f l i g h t f e l l slowly during a period of 75 hour8 and was
s t i l l above 65,000 f e e t w h e n the barograph record 8nd.d.

-7 5-
 Figure 41
Inflation of 70 foot diameter
General Mills balloon.
 Figure 42
General Mills 70 foot balloon
being launched in a 5 kr.ot wind.

-77-
 GLOSSARY

Altitude S e n s i t i v i t y : The a l t i t u d e gained by a balloon when i t s

load i s reduced by one kilogram.

Balloon I n f l a t i o n : Gas i n f l a t i o n t o be given the balloon in

terms of i n i t i a l l i f t of the balloon
(equals weight of equipment load plus free
lift plus allowance f o r gas losses before
launching).

Ceiling: The locus of pressure a l t i t u d e s a t which a

non-extensible balloon w i l l f l o a t when gas
losses are s l i g h t l y over-compensated f o r
by b a l l a s t losses.

Equipment Load : Weight of a l l equipment, rigging, and' b a l l a s t

hung from the balloon shrouds n o t including
balloon or i t s i n t e g r a l p a r t s .

Floor : The locus of a l t i t u d e s a t which a balloon w i l l

f l o a t when l i f t losses are exactly compensated
f o r on a demand b a s i s by b a l l a s t dropping.
In practice, this i s determined by t h e opera-
t i o n of the automatic b a l l a s t release and
is some a l t i t u d e below the ceiling.

Free L i f t : N e t lift of the balloon with the equipment

load attached.

Gross L i f t : L i f t of a l l of the gas in t h e balloon a t re-

l e a s e (equals weight of t h e balloon, equip-
ment load plus the f r e e l i f t ) .

Gross Load: Load on the gas a t release (balloon plus

equipment load weight).

Pressure Altitude: The a l t i t u d e a t which a non-extensible bal-

loon becomes f u l l y i n f l a t e d .

Pressure Height: The height above mean sea l e v e l as determined

from pressure measurements used i n t h i s work
with the N. A. C. A. Standard Atmosphere.

-79-
 Appendix I

Table Number Page hTumber

Table 1: Equipment List ............... 83

Table 2: Flight Forms ................ 86

-81-
 Table 1

B4SIC EQUIPMENT FOR FIELD TRIPS

UUNCHING OF 20' BALLOONS
WITH SIMPLE CONTROL GEAR

NYU Balloon Pro-

j e c t Drawing No. or
GROUND E Q U I m T : Figure No. in Opera-
t i o n s Manual
1 ea. S e t i n s t r u c t i o n s (Operations Manual)

2 ea. E l l i p t i c a l s h o t bags (each f i l l e d with

100 # of shot) ED-48-62

2 ea. 40 # Sand bags ED-48-1 2 2A

4 ea. 40 # Sand bags

1 88. 40' x 6' Ground Cloth

4 ea. Sheets polyethylene, .001" t o

..004", 4' x 4'

1 ea. 5 Tank manifold w i t h pressure gages

and valve Figure 26

l e a . Rubber hose, 1" I.D., 10' long

1 ea. Gas d i f f u s e r ED-48-76A

2 ea. Rubber tubing &" bore, 1/8" w a l l ,

8' long

2 ea. Hose clamps, aeroseal, l$" I.D.

3 ea. Hose ends f o r helium tanks ED-4 8-8 0

1 ea. Box white chalk

1 ea. Solution balance Fisher #2-100

1 ea. I n f l a t i o n nozzle, ML-196

3 ea. Weems p l o t t e r s

1 ea. S e t a i r c r a f t maps of area

1 e a c Tool k i t complete w i t h 2 sheath h i v e s ,

50' c l o t h measuring t a p e , 'orass w i r e , 1" Mystic
t a p e , v o l t ohmmeter, p l i e r s , 8CreWdriVbr6, infla-
t i o n tools, f l a s h l i g h t s , crescent wrenches,

-83-
 RYU Balloon Pro-
j e o t Drawing No. or
Figure No. i n Opera-
t i o n s Manual

(Tool k i t oont'd.) soldering iron,

compass, 2 open-end wrenches 1-1/8"
x 1-1/4" openings, 14" pipe wrench,
spanner for helium tank v a l v e s

2 ea. Theodolite ML-247 with t r i p o d ML-78

2 88. Recorder, Brush o s c i l l o g r a p h or

other
2 ea. Standby power units

2 88. SCR-658 Radio d i r e o t i o n f i n d e r

or
2 ea. Hanmterlund Super-Pro r e c e i v e r
2 ea. Kytoon w i t h spare b l a d d e r s
f o r antenna support
2 ea. C a p t h e balloon, Dewey 6t 41my 8 4

4 ea. Chronometers

4 ea. C l i p boards

2 ea. Complete s e t of oommunication equip-

ment
Telephone account

Wind screen, 30' x 20', Y-shaped,

equipped w i t h flood lights and
anemometer ED-49-3

FLIGHT 'GEAR:

2 t o 5 Tanks helium

1 88. General M i l l s 20' balloon (or other

balloon t o be used) p l u s spare

24 0%. R o l l s a c e t a t e f i b e r sootch tape

3 8%. Appendix s t i f f e n e r s ( i f appendix i s

t o be used) ED-4 8 -95A
l e a . 200' 500 # W s t nylon l i n e

1 ea. 100' 75 # ~ s l i nt e n t n i n e

2 ea. 350 Gram balloon ML-13lA (for wind

sock)

5 t o 10 b g g l e r o r hooks

-84-
 Mm Balloon Pro-
j e c t Dmwing No. o r
Figure No. in Opera-
tions Manual

2 ea. Parachutes ML-132

1 ea. Banner, 3' x 6' ED-48-56

4 ea. Data sheets

4 ea. Weight sheets

4 ea. Reward t a g s b g l i s h , Spanish or other

language ) Figure 21

2 ea. "Danger Fire" t a g s Figure 20

2 ea. Other Danger tags a s required

If F l i g h t Termination gear i s t o be used:

1 ea. F l i g h t termination w i t c h ED48-7QA

1 ea. S e t r i p r i g g i n g ED-48-68A

2 sa. Cannons ED-49-5

2 ea. Squibs Du Pont S-64 ( t r e a t e d for

high a l t i t u d e )

If f i x e d rate b a l l a s t release is €0 be used:

1 ea. Orifice s i n n e r e t t e , t o g i v e b a l l a s t
f l o w of 250 &r (.008" D.) ED-48-75A

1 Gallon b a l l a s t , compass f l u i d AX-C-116

1 ea. B a l l a s t r e s e r v o i r (1 gallon aapaoity) ED-48-79A

1 88. F i l t e r 3" diameter, 325 x 325, phosphor

bronze mesh ED-48-54A

4 f e e t Tubing ("ygon) 4" bore

6 inches Tubing (Tygon) 3/16" bore

Metal beakers o r rimleps 1 q t . t i n oans

Metal funnel
 Table 2
VJEIGET SHEET

Flight No. Date

Timb_ll_
Balloon Manufacturer Weight
Number
Appendix or valve

Shrouds . . . . .
Total Balloon Weight . . . . . . .. .
Launching Remnant . . ....
Line Length .. . . . . . 0 .

1st Enit. Serial No.

de sari@ ion
Line length

2nd Unit. Serial No.

description

Line length

3d Unit. Serial KO.

description . c

Line length

4th Unit. Serial Po. 7

description

Drag chute

Banner description

Ballast assembly - description

-
Ballast. . . .. .. .. . .
.
.
GrossLoad.. .,
Total Equipnent 'uieight
0 0
+

* 6 * b

-06-
.
a

e . . b .
a
 RATE OF RISE Ah'D :.AXIB,2l!I ALTITUDE COI..')"UTATIOKS

F1 i g h t Xo . Date

T ime

MUOON IHFLAT ION

Desired Rctc of R i s e . . . . f t ./mino

Gross Load . 0 . gram

Free L i f t - from Rise c h e r t grams

Free L i f t 202/3 grams

412
Equipment Weight grams

Desired Balloon I n f l c t i o n = Free Lift Equipment T o t a l grams

Allowance f o r Leakage .
hrs .itin& grams

Actual balloon l i f t . 0 . 0 a a .... I1

AActual gross l i f t (Balloon lift & balloon wt,) . . . .. lt

Number H e l i u m tanks required a t kg l i f t / f u l l tank . 0 . tonks

Length ,balloon above shot bag . . . . . . . . feet

Balloon Volume . . . . . . . . CU. f t .

Gas Lift/mol . . . . . . .. Relium 11.1

Hydrogen 12.0
kg/mol
kg/mol

I>?oIRr~ o l u m o - Balloon volume x gas lift/mol

gross load
cu ft.
Maximum A l t i t u d e . . . . . . f t . m.s.1.

Altitude Sensitivity . . . . . . ft

-87-
 BALJAST COEFUTATIOSFLIGHT #

e setahsa~treedd
Balloon Surface Diffusion l m 1 gm/hr. b/o I n f l a t i o n 4 0

- balloon surface d i f f u s i o n
F u l l balloon surface d i f f u s i o n
(o/o I n f l a t i o n ) 2/3 &.
Estimated f u l l Balloon c e i l i n
Ceiling Pr.
diffusion - F. B. Surface Diffusion
X
Surfhco ~ r . , g r h*

Description of Ballast Unit: (components, serial nos. Uimonsions)

Amount of B a l l a s t &ma

I n i t i a l f l a w , maximum head gm,/min

F!ximum f l o w , mximum head gm ./mino

Amount of b a l l a e t
Estimatad B a l l a s t duration
~ Z -baTloon'
X o d l l h g x f f usion hrs.
Size Orifice used in. Waiting tirne beforc r e l e a s e , , min.

Size Limiting Orifice used in,

Size f i l t e r used in.

I n i t i a l Head t o valve or o r i f i c o in.

Final n tt I? tt
int
 Few York University
Re search Division
Balloon E'roject

Supplementarj Information for Flight No.

Release : Site date . 7

time

Enooded Sounding Data:

*-.- . ---. -. -
Encoded Upper Winds

Re lease Weather
.. - - . . ...

- --*-

In-Flight Hourly Weather

Train Sketch b- Folder F i l m s Sent O3t

L i s t Flight Iieoords in Folder:

Checked by

-89-
Transmitter ierformance f o r Flight No,

Release : Dete Time Site

I.

Transmitter Type and Serial No.

Batteries: Type and Number

Open Circuit V V

Voltages Under Load:

Description of Fressurs Gnit

De s cr i p t ion o f S pe c ie. 1 Equipment

Reception a t S t a t i o n #2

Reception at Station #3

Critique

-90-
 Appendix I1

Table Number Face ITumber

Table 1: N ....
A C A .......
Pressure.Altitude 96

Table 2: ...
N..A C A .....
Temperature-Altitude 103

Table 3: Ballast Flow . . . . .......... 104

Table 4; Balloon Data ............... 105

Graph Number

Graph 1: .
Free L i f t vs Rate of Rise ........ 106

Graph 2: Gross L i f t vs . Bubble Length ....... 107

Graph 3: Buoyanoy VLI .Altitude .......... 108

Graph 4: . ....
Gross Load vs Altitude S e n s i t i v i t y 109

-91-
 PRESSURE AND TEMPFAA!Wm

'ME X .A .C J. STANDARD A'JMOSPHEEIE

Deoember 1948

Prepred by

Irwin B r i l l
Researoh Assistant

Balloon Project
Researoh Division
Kew York University

Under Contraot W28-099-ao-241 with

Watson Laboratories, A.M.C., U.S. A i r Foroes

-93-
Souroe pressure from suriaae ( 0 f e e t ) t o rifi,OOO feet:
taken from National Advisory Committee for
Aeronautics Report #538, and corrected as
noted below.
Pressure from 65,000 f e e t t o 169,538 feet:
taken from National Advisory Committee f o r
Aeronautics Report #1200,
Temperatures a t 1000-foot i n t e r v a l s , taken
rrom National Advisa- Committee for
Aeronautics Reports #S38 and 1200.

Geopotential
Assumptions for pressure corrections:
0 feet t o 30,000 f e e t based upon assumed
constant a e o ~ o t e n t i a l .
90,000 f e e t t o 65,000 f e e t corrected for
geopotential, by approximate correction
factors. (Taken from extrapolated aume
of difference i n f e e t , from 65,000 t o
100,000 f e e t between N.A.C.A. t a b l e #538
1200 (correqted) .
uncorrectedf and N.A.C.A. Technical Note

‘ ~ 3 5 , 0 0 0f e e t t o 163,588 f e e t , corrected for

geopotent i a l by B a t ionax Advisory Committee
for Aeronautics, Note #1200,

Aocuracs Surfsce t o 30,000 f e e t = 15 f e e t , assuming:

constant geopotent i e l ,
30,000 reet t o 65,000 f e e t 30 f e e t
65,000 f e e t t o 100,000 f e e t * 50 reet
~ O O , O O O f e e t t o 120,900 reet f 100 f e e t
120,000 f e e t t o 195,000 feet f 150 feet
135,000 f e e t t o 163,538 reet f 250 rest

-95-
 Table 1

-PRESSURE; (MB) VERSUS HEIGHT ( FEMl)

MB ALTO DIFo
-015 -47 27 969 1228 28 922 2593 29 878 4002 31
,014 -20 27 968 1256 28 921 2622 29 8 74 4033 51
L013.25 0 27 967 1284 28 920 2651 29 073 4064 31
LO13 7 27 966 1312 28 919 2680 29 8 72 4095 31
LO12 34 27 965 1340 28 918 2709 29 871 4126 31
Loll 61 27 964 1368 28 917 2738 29 870 4 157 31
t 010 88 27 963 1396 28 916 2767 29 069 4 188 31
LO09 115 27 962 1424 28 915 2796 29 8 68 4219 31
1008 142 27 961 1452 28 914 2825 29 867 4250 31
LO07 169 27 960 1481 29 913 2854 29 806 4281 31
1006 198 27 959 1510 29 912 2883 39 865 4 312 31
LOO5 223 27 958 1539 29 911 2912 29 8A 4 4343 31
LO04 2 50 27 957 1568 29 910 2942 30 863 4374 31
Loo3 2 77 27 956 lS97 29 909 2972 30 052 4405 31
1002 3 04 27 955 1626 29 908 3002 30 861 4486 31
LOO1 3 32 28 954 1655 29 907 3032 30 8n0 A46 7 31
LO00 360 28 953 1684 29 906 3052 30 8 59 4498 31
9 99 388 28 952 1713 29 905 3092 30 858 4529 31
998 4 16 28 951 1742 29 904 3122 30 8 57 4560 31
997 444 28 950 1761 29 903 3152 30 856 4 591 31
996 4 72 20 949 1790 29 902 3182 90 8 55 4622 31
995 5 00 28 948 1029 29 901 3212 30 8 54 4653 31
994 528 28 947 1858 29 900 3242 ?O 8 53 4 684 31
993 5 56 28 946 1807 29 899 3272 30 852 4715 31
992 5 84 28 945 1916 29 898 3302 30 8 51 4746 31
991 6 12 28 944 1945 29 897 3332 30 8 FO 4777 31
990 640 28 943 1974 29 895 3962 30 8A9 4808 31
989 6 68 28 942 2003 29 895 3392 30 048 A 840 32
988 6 96 28 941 2032 29 894 3482 30 847 A872 32
987 7 24 28 940 2061 29 893 3452 30 84 6 4 904 32
986 7 52 28 939 2090 29 892 3482 80 845 4936 32
985 780 28 938 2129 29 891 3512 30 8A4 4 968 32
984 8 08 28 937 2158 29 890 3542 30 843 5000 32
983 836 28 936 2187 29 ee9 3572 30 842 5032 32
982 8 64 28 935 2216 29 880 3602 w 8 41 5064 32
981 8 92 28 934 2245 29 087 3632 30 840 5096 32
980 920 28 933 2274 29 8e6 3662 33 839 5 128 32
979 948 28 932 2303 29 885 3692 30 838 5160 32
978 976 28 931 3332 29 884 3723 31 837 P 192 32
977 1OOA 20 930 2361 29 883 3'754 31 886 5224 32
9 76 1032 28 929 2390 29 882 3785 31 835 5256 32
975 1060 28 928 2419 29 881 3816 31 834 5288 32
994 1088 2.8 921 2448 20 880 3847 31 833 5220 32
973 1116 28 926 2477 29 879 3878 31 832 5352 32
972 1144 28 925 2506 29 078 3909 31 831 5384 32
971 1172 28 924 2535 29 877 3940 31 830 5416 32
970 1200 28 923 2564 29 876 3971 31 829 54.4 8 32

-96-
MB ALTO DIF. -
MB ALTO --
DIF. MB ALTO DIFo -
hdB ALTO DIF,
828 5 480 32 7 8 1 7026 34 734 8648 35 687 10358 37
827 5 512 32 780 7060 34 733 8683 35 586 10395 37
826 5544 32 779 7094 34 732 8718 35 6 85 10433 38
82 5 5 576 32 778 7128 34 731 8754 36 684 10471 38
824 5608 32 777 7162 34 730 8790 36 683 10509 38
823 5640 32 776 7196 34 729 8826 36 682 10547 38
822 5672 32 775 7230 34 728 8062 36 681 10585 38
821 5704 32 774 7264 34 727 8898 36 680 10623 38
820 5736 32 773 72 98 34 726 8934 36 679 10661 38
819 5 768 32 7 72 7332 34 725 8970 36 678 10699 38
818 5800 32 771 7366 34 724 9006 36 677 10737 38
817 5833 33 770 7400 34 723 9042 36 674 10775 38
816 586 6 33 769 7434 34 722 9078 36 675 10813 38
815 5909 33 768 7468 34 721 9114 36 674 10851 38
814 5932 33 767 7502 34 720 9150 36 673 10889 38
813 5965 33 766 7536 34 719 9186 36 672 10927 38
812 5998 33 765 7570 34 718 9222 36 67 1 1096s 38
811 6031 33 764 7604 34 717 9258 36 670 11003 38
810 6064 33 763 7638 34 716 9294 36 569 11041 38
809 a097 33 762 7672 34 715 9330 36 668 11079 38
808 6130 33 761 7706 34 714 9366 36 667 11117 38
807 5163 33 760 7740 34 713 9402 36 twa 11155 38
806 6196 33 759 7774 34 712 9438 36 66s 11193 38
805 6229 33 758 7808 34 711 9474 36 604 11231 38
804 A262 33 757 7843 35 710 9510 36 663 11270 39
803 6295 33 756 7878 35 709 9546 36 662 11309 39
802 6328 33 755 7913 35 708 9502 36 661 11348 39
801 $361 33 754 7948 35 707 9618 36 660 11387 39
800 6394 33 753 7983 35 706 9655 37 659 11426 39
799 6427 33 752 8018 35 705 9592 37 A 58 11465 39
798 6460 33 7 5 1 8053 35 704 9729 37 657 11504 39
797 a493 33 750 8088 35 703 97176 37 6F6 11543 39
796 6526 33 749 8123 35 702 9803 37 656 11582 39
795 6559 33 748 8158 35 701 9840 37 554 11621 39
794 6592 33 747 8193 35 700 9877 37 = 53 11660 39
793 6625 33 746 8228 35 699 9914 37 652 11699 39
792 6R58 33 745 8263 35 A98 9951 37 651 11738 39
791 6691 33 744 8298 35 697 9988 37 650 11777 39
790 a 724 33 743 8333 35 A96 10025 37 649 11816 39
789 6757 33 742 8368 35 695 10062 37 648 11855 39
788 6790 33 741 8403 35 694 10099 37 A47 11894 39
787 6823 33 740 8438 35 693 10136 37 646 11933 39
786 6856 33 739 8473 35 692 10173 37 645 11972 39
785 6890 33 738 8508 35 691 10210 37 A44 12011 39
784 d 924 34 737 8 543 35 690 10247 37 643 12051 40
703 6958 34 736 8578 35 689 10284 37 642 12091 40
7132 6 992 34 735 8613 35 688 10321 37 641 12131 40

-97-
-* ALTO DIF. ALT DIF
A ALT 0
-
DIF MB ALTO DD,
6 40 12171 40 5 92 14130 42 543 16270 45 494 18574 49
639 12211 40 591 14172 42 542 19315 4.2 493 18623 49
6 38 12251 40 590 14214 42 54 1 19360 45 492 18672 49
637 12291 40 589 142536 42 SAO lR405 45 491 18721 49
636 12331 40 588 14298 42 539 16451 45 490 18770 49
635 12371 40 507 14341 43 538 16497 46 489 18819 49
634 12411 40 5 86 14384 43 537 16543 46 488 18868 49
633 12451 40 585 14427 43 53a 1AF89 I 487 18917 49
632 12491 40 584 144 70 43 535 16635 .*d 486 18966 49
631 12531 40 583 14513 43 534 16681 46 A85 19015 49
630 12571 40 5 82 14556 43 533 15727 46 484 19065 50
629 12611 40 581 14599 43 532 16773 46 483 19115 50
628 12651 40 589 14642 43 531 16819 46 A82 19105 50
627 12691 40 579 14685 43 530 16865 46 481 19215 50
626 12731 40 578 14728 43 52 9 16911 46 480 19265 50
625 12771 40 577 14771 43 528 16957 46 479 19315 50
624 12811 40 576 14814 43 F(27 17003 4R 478 19365 50
623 12851 40 575 14857 43 926 17049 46 477 19415 50
622 12891 40 574 14900 43 52 5 17095 46 476 19465 50
621 12931 40 573 14943 43 524 17141 46 475 19515 50
620 12971 40 5 72 14986 43 523 17188 47 474 19565 50
6 19 13012 40 571 15029 43 522 17235 47 473 19616 51
6 18 13053 41 5 70 15072 43 521 F7282 47 472 19667 51
617 13094 41 569 15115 43 520 17329 47 471 19118 51
616 13135 41 568 15158 43 519 1737fi 47 470 19769 51
615 13176' 41 567 15202 44 ti18 17423 47 469 19820 51
614 13217 41 566 15246 44 517 17470 47 4fi8 19871 51
6 13 13258 41 565 15290 44 5iF; 17517 47 467 19922 51
612 13299 41 564 15334 44 515 17564 47 466 19973 51
611 18340 41 5K3 15378 44 514 17611 47 445 20024 51
610 13381 41 562 15422 44 513 17R58 47 464 20075 51
609 13422 41 561 15466 44 FU? 17705 47 463 20127 52
608 13463 41 560 15510 44 5 1 1 17752 47 462 20179 52
607 13504 41 z 59 15554 44 510 17800 48 461 20231 52
6 06 13545 41 558 15598 44 609 17848 48 460 20283 52
605 13586 41 557 15642 44 508 17896 48 459 20335 52
6 04 13627 41 556 15686 44 501 17944 48 458 20387 52
603 13668 41. 555 15730 45 506 17992 48 457 20439 52
602 13710 42 554 15775 45 505 1 8 O A O A13 456 20491 52
6 01 13752 42 553 15820 45 504 18088 40 455 20543 52
So0 13794 41t 5 52 15865 45 5 03 lf3136 At3 454 20595 52
599 i383a 42 551 15910 45 502 18184 48 453 206347 52
598 13878 42 550 1595s 45 501 18232 48 452 20699 52
597 13920 4E 54 9 16000 45 500 18280 40 4 5 1 20751 52
596 13962 42 548 16045 45 499 18329 49 450 20803 52
595 14004 42 547 16090 45 498 18378 49 449 20856 53
5 94 14046 42 546 16135 45 497 18427 49 448 20909 53
593 14088 42 54 5 16180 45 496 18476 49 447 20962 53
544 16225 45 495 18525 49 446 21015 53
 -
DIF. -MB ALT -
DIF. MB ALTO DIF.

445 20543 53 3 97 23741 58 349 26684 64 3 0 1 29989 74

444 21122 54 396 23799 58 348 26748 64 300 30061 74
443 21176 54 395 23857 58 347 26812 A4 299 30139 76
442 21230 54 394 23915 58 34 6 26878 66 288 30217 76
441 21284 54 393 23973 58 345 26944 66 297 30295 76
440 21338 54 392 24031 58 344 27010 66 296 30373 76
439 21392 54 391 24090 60 343 27076 66 295 30451 76
438 21446 54 390 24150 60 342 27142 66 294 30529 78
437 21500 54 389 24210 60 341 27208 66 293 30607 78
436 21554 54 388 24270 60 3 40 27274 A6 292 30685 78
435 21608 54 387 24330 60 33s 27340 66 2 9 1 30763 78
434 21662 54 386 24390 60 338 27406 66 290 30841 78
433 21716 54 385 244-50 60 337 27472 66 289 30919 78
432 21770 54 384 24510 60 336 27538 66 288 30977 78
431 21824 54 383 24570 A0 335 27604 66 287 81075 78
430 21878 54 382 24030 .60 334 27670 66 286 31153 78
429 21932 54 381 24690 60 333 27738 68 285 31231 78
428 21986 54 380 24750 60 332 27806 68 284 31809 78
427 22040 54 379 24810 SO 331 27874 68 283 31387 78
426 22095 55 378 24870 60 330 27942 68 282 31465 78
425 22151 56 377 24930 60 32 9 28010 68 281 31544 80
424 22207 56 376 24990 60 328 28078 G8 280 31624 80
423 22263 56 375 25050 60 327 28146 68 279 31704 80
422 22319 56 374 25113, 62 326 28214 68 278 31784 80
421 22375 56 373 2 5 174 52 32 5 28282 68 277 31864 80
420 22431 56 372 25235 62 324 28350 68 276 3L944 80
419 22487 515 371 25298 A2 323 28418 68 275 32024 80
418 22543 56 970 25360 62 322 28487 69 274 32104 80
417 22599 56 369 25422 62 321 28557 70 273 32184 80
416 22655 56 368 25484 62 320 28627 70 272 32264 80
415 22711 56 367 25546 62 319 28697 70 271 32344 80
414 22767 56 366 25608 62 318 28767 70 270 32424 80
413 22823 56 365 25670 62 317 28837 70 269 32504 80
412 22879 56 364 25732 62 316 28909 72 2G0 32584 80
411 22935 56 363 25794 62 315 28981 72 267 32264 80
410 22991 56 362 25856 62 314 29093 72 266 32744 80
409 23047 56 361 25918 62 313 29125 72 26F; 32824 80
408 23103 5s 2160 25980 62 312 29197 79 264 32904 80
407 23161 58 359 26044 64 311 29269 73 263 72984 80
406 23219 58 358 26108 A4 3x0 29341 72 262 32064 80
405 23277 58 357 26172 64 309 29A13 72 261 83144 80
404 23335 58 356 26236 64 308 29485 72 260 33226 82
403 23393 58 355 26900 A4 307 29557 74 259 33308 82
402 23451 58 354 26364 A4 306 291529 74 258 33390 82
401 23509 58 353 26428 A4 305 29701 74 257 33472 82
400 23567 58 352 26492 a4 304 29773 74 2% 33554 82
399 23625 50 351 26556 A4 303 29045 74 255 33638 84
398 23683 58 350 26E20 64 302 29917 74 254 33722 84

-99-
-
MB ALTO DIF. - .-
MB ALT DfF.
2 53 33806 84 204 38338 102 155 44110 136 106 52099 196
2 52 33890 84 203 38440 102 154 44245 136 105 52299 200
251 33974 04 202 38544 104 153 44382 136 104 52499 200
250 34060 86 201 38648 104 152 44520 138 103 52701 204
249 34146 86 200 38762 104 151 44fi60 140 102 52905 204
248 34232 86 199 38858 106 150 A4800 140 100 53316 208
247 34318 86 198 38964 106 149 44940 140 A MB= 3 0
246 34404 86 197 39070 106 148 45081 142 99.50 53421 105
245 34490 86 196 39178 108 147 45225 144 99.00 5352n 105
244 34576 86 199 39286 108 146 45369 144 98.50 53631 105
243 34662 86 194 39394 108 145 45513 144 98.00 53741 110
242 34749 00 193 39502 108 144 45657 144 97.90 53851 110
241 34837 00 192 39612 110 143 45804 146 97.00 53961 110
240 34925 88 191 39721 110 142 45952 148 96.50 54071 110
239 35013 88 190 39832 112 141 46100 148 96.00 54181 110
238 35101 88 189 39944 112 140 46240 148 95.50 54291 110
237 35189 88 188 40056 112 139 463400 150 95.00 54401 110
236 35277 88 187 40168 112 138 46552 152 94.50 54511 110
235 35367 90 186 40280 112 l a 7 46704 152 94.00 54621 110
234 35457 90 185 40392 112 136 4 6 8 F A 152 93.50 54733 115
233 35547 90 184 40506 116 135 47012 156 93.00 54848 3.15
232 35637 90 183 40622 116 134 47168 I56 92.F.O 54963 115
231 35727 90 182 40738 iia 133 4 7324 156 92.00 55078 115
230 35819 90 181 40854 116 132 47484 iao 91.50 55433 115
229 35911 92 180 40970 116 131 41944 160 90.00 55548 115
228 36003 92 179 41086 116 130 4 '1804 160 89.50 55653 115
227 34095 92 178 41202 118 129 47968 164 89.00 55770 120
226 36187 92 177 41821 120 128 48132 164 88.50 55890 120
225 36281 94 176 41441 120 127 48295 la4 8R.00 56010 120
224 39375 94 175 41551 120 12 6 484A4 168 87.50 56130 120
223 36469 94 174 41681 120 125 A0632 168 87.00 56250 120
222 36563 94 173 41801 120 124 48800 168 86.50 56370 120
221 35658 98 172 41921 120 123 489639 172 85.00 56491 120
220 36754 96 171 42044 124 122 49141 172 85.50 5 ~ m
125
a19 36850 96 170 42168 le4 121 49313 172 85.00 56741 125
218 36948 96 169 42292 124 120 49488 176 84.50 56866 125
217 37042 96 168 42416 124 119 49664 176 84.00 56991 125
216 37130 98 I!%?42541 128 118 49840 176 83.50 57116 125
215 37236 98 166 42669 128 117 5 0018 180 83.00 57241 125
214 37334 98 165 42797 128 116 50198 180 82.50 57366 125
213 37432 98 1a4 a2925 128 115 SO381 184 82.00 57495 130
212 37530 98 163 43053 128 114 50565 184 81.50 57625 130
211 37530 100 162 43181 128 113 50752 188 e1.00 57755 130
210 37730 100 161 43311 132 112 50940 188 80.50 57885 130
209 37830 100 160 43443 132 111 51129 190 80.00 58015 130
208 37930 100 159 43575 132 110 51321 192 79.50 58145 130
207 38032 100 158 43707 132 109 51513 192 79.00 58279 135
206 38134 102 157 43839 132 108 51707 196 78.50 58414 135
205 38236 102 156 43974 134 107 51903 198 78.00 58549 135

-100-
 MB ALT. -
DIF. ME ALT. -
DIF
77.50 58684 153 52.50 66884 200 27.50 80502 880 20.60 86606 102
77.00 58819 135 52.00 67086 205 27.00 80892 390 20.50 86708 102
74.50 58959 140 51.50 57291 205 26.50 81284 400 20.40 86812 104
76.00 59099 140 51.00 $7499 210 26.00 81684 410 20.30 86916 104
75.50 59239 140 50.50 67709 210 25.50 82090 420 20.20 87020 104
75.00 59379 140 50.00 67922 215 A P = .l& 20.10 87124 104
74.50 59519 140 49.50 '68137 215 25.00 8253.0 84 20.00 87228 104
'74.00 59659 140 49.00 68352 215 24.90 82596 86 19.90 87334 106
73.50 59799 140 48,50 68567 215 24.80 82682 86 19.80 87440 106
73.00 59943 145 48.00 68782 215 24.70 82768 86 19,70 87546 106
72.50 60068 145 47.50 68997 220 24.60 82854 86 19.60 87654 108
72.00 60233 145 47.00 69207 220 24.50 82940 86 19.50 87762 108
71.50 60378 145 46.50 69432 225 24,40 83026 86 19.40 87870 108
71.00 60527 150 46.00 69669 230 24.30 83112 86 19.30 87978 108
70.50 60677 150 45.50 69899 230 24,20 83200 88 19.20 28088 110
70.00 60827 150 45.00 70132 235 24.10 83288 88 19.10 88198 110
69.50 60977 150 44.50 70367 240 24.00 83376 88 19.00 88308 110
69.00 61131 155 44.00 70607 240 23.90 83464 88 18.90 88418 110
68.50 61286 155 43.50 70048 245 23.80 83552 88 18.80 88532 114
68.00 61441 155 43.00 71093 245 23.70 83640 88 18.70 88646 114
6'1.50 61596 155 42.50 71338 250 23.60 83730 90 18.60 88760 114
67.00 61751 155 42.00 71585 250 23.50 83820 90 163.50 88874 114
66.50 61908 160 41.50 7l835 255 23.40 83910 90 18.40 88988 114
66.00 62068 160 41.00 72087 255 23.30 84000 90 18.30 89102 114
65.50 62228 160 40.50 72346 260 23.20 84092 92 18.80 89216 114
65.00 62388 160 40.00 72508 265 23.10 84184 92 18.10 89330 114
64.50 62551 165 39.50 72873 270 23.00 84276 92 18.00 89448 118
64.00 62716 165 39.00 73141 270 22.90 843R8 92 17.90 89566 118
63.50 (52881 165 38.50 73411 275 22.80 84462 94 17.80 89684 118
63.00 63047 170 38.00 73585 275 22.70 84556 94 17,70 89802 118
62.50 63217 170 37.50 73966 280 22.50 84650 94 17.(rO 89920 118
62.00 63387 170 37.00 74243 285 22,50 84744 94 l'l.!!o 90039 118
61.50 63557 170 36.50 74531 290 22,40 84838 94 17.40 90160 122
61.00 63727 170 36.00 74823 295 22.30 84932 9A 17.30 90282 122
60.50 63899 175 35.50 75120 300 22.20 84028 96 17.20 90404 122
60.00 64074 175 35.00 75420 305 22.10 84124 96 17.10 90526 122
59.50 64249 175 34.50 75725 310 22.00 85220 96 17.00 90648 122
59.00 54429 180 34.00 76032 310 21.90 85316 96 16.90 90774 126
58.50 64509 180 33.50 76344 315 21.80 85412 96 1p.eo 90900 126
58.00 64789 180 33.00 76660 320 21.70 85508 96 16.70 91026 126
57,50 64970 185 32.50 76980 325 21.60 85606 98 1P.60 91152 126
57.00 65155 185 32.00 77304 330 21.50 85704 98 16.50 91278 126
56,50 65340 185 31.50 77634 335 21.40 85802 98 16.40 91408 130
56.00 65525 190 31.00 77972 340 21.30 85900 98 lC.30 91538 130
55.50 65715 190 30.50 78314 350 21.20 86000 100 16.20 91668 130
55.00 65905 190 30.00 78664 360 21.10 85100 100 16.10 91798 130
54,50 66095 195 29.50 79022 360 21.00 86200 100 16.00 91928 130
54.00 66290 195 29.00 79382 365 20,90 86300 100 155.90 92064 136
53.50 66485 200 28.50 79748 370 20.80 86402 102 15,eO 92200 156
53.00 66684 200 28.00 80122 380 20.70 86504 no2 15.70 92336 136

-101-
MB ALT. DIF. AdB ALTO DIF.. MB ALT. DIF.
15.60 92472 136 10.60 100534 198 5.60 114578 452
15.80 92608 136 10.50 100832 198 5.50 115010 432
15.40 92744 136 10.40 101030 198 5.40 115442 432
15.30 92886 142 10.30 101240 210 5.30 115874 432
15.20 93028 142 10.20 101450 210 5.20 116338 464
15.10 93170 142 10.10 101660 210 5.10 lle802 464
15.00 93312 142 10.00 101870 210 5.00 117266 464
14.90 93454 142 9.90 102080 210 4.90 117730 464
14.80 93596 142 9.80 102304 224 4.80 118194 464
14.70 93738 142 9.70 102528 224 4.70 118724 530
14.60 93880 142 9.80 102752 224 4.60 119254 530
14.50 94022 142 9.50 102976 224 4.60 119784 530
14.40 94164 142 9.40 103200 224 4.40 120352 568
14.30 94306 142 9.30 103424 224 4.30 120920 568
14.20 94454 148 9.20 103648 224 4.20 121488 568
14.10 94602 140 9.10 103872 224 4.10 1220565 568
14.00 94750 148 9.00 104096 224 4.00 122695 640
13.90 94898 148 8.90 104342 246 3.90 13,3336 640
13.80 95046 148 8.80 104588 246 3.80 123979 640
13.70 95200 154 8.70 104834 246 3.70 124672 696
13.60 98360 160 8.60 105080 245 3.60 126368 696
13.50 95520 160 8.50 105326 246 3.50 $26064 696
13.40 95680 160 8.40 105572 246 3.40 126858 794
13.30 95840 160 8.30 105818 246 3.30 127652 794
13.20 96000 160 8.20 106064 246 3.20 128464 812
13.10 96160 160 8.10 106339 275 3.10 129276 812
13.00 96320 160 8.00 106614 275 3.00 180088 812
12.90 96480 160 7.90 106889 275 2.90 131032 944
12.80 96648 188 7.80 107164 275 2.80 131976 944
12.70 96816 168 7.70 107439 275 2.70 132984 1008
12.60 96984 168 7.60 107714 275 2.60 133992 1008
12.50 97152 168 7.50 107989 275 2.50 135074 1082
12.40 97320 168 7.40 108296: 307 2.40 136156 1082
12.30 97498 178 7.30 108603 307 2.30 137438 1282
12.20 97676 178 7.20 108910 307 2.20 138720 1282
12.10 97854 178 7.10 109217 307 2.10 140002 1282
12.00 98032 $78 7.00 109524 307 2.00 141462 1460
11.90 98210 170 6.90 109831 307 1.90 142922 1460
11.80 98388 178 6.80 110138 307 1.80 144382 1460
11.70 98566 178 6.70 110482 344 1.70 146182 1800
11.60 98744 178 6.60 110828 346 1.60 148062 1880
11.50 98922 178 6.50 111174 346 1.50 150040 1978
11.40 99100 178 6.40 111520 346 1.40 152176 2136
11.30 99288 188 6.30 111866 346 1.30 154984 2208
11.20 99476 188 6.20 112246 380 1.20 156792 2408
11.10 99664 188 6.10 112626 380 1.10 160040 3248
11.00 99852 188 6.00 113006 380 l.0C 153538 9498
10.90 100040 188 5.90 113386 380
10.80 lOOe38 198 5.80 113766 380
10.70 ,100436 198 5.70 114146 380

-102-
 Table 2

TEMPERATURE IN N.A.C.A. STANDARD ATHOSpB19RE

0 15 96,000 -55
1,000 13 48,000 -55 97,000 -55
2,000 11 49,000 -55 90,000 -55
3,000 9.1 50,000 -55 99,000 -55
4,000 7.1 51,000 -55 100,000 -55
5,000 5.1 52,000 -55 102,000 -55
6,000 3m1 53,000 -55 104,000 -55
-ss
7,000
8,000 -- 2.8
1.1
0.8
54,000
55,000 -55
104,987
106,000
-55
-52.9
9,000
10,000 -- 4.8
56,000
57,000 --55
-55
55
108,000
110,000
-48.5
-43,9
.
11,000
12,000
13,000
--100..88
6.8 58,000
59,000
60,000
-55
-55
112,000
114,000
116,000
-39 5
-35.0
-30.6
14,000 -12.7 61,000 -55 118,000 -26.1
15,000 -14 7 62,000 -35 120,000 -21.6
16,000 -16,7 63,000 -55 122,000 -17m1

--+
17,000 018.7 64,000 -55 124,000 -12.7
18,000 -20,7 65,000 -55 126,000 8.2
i9,oeo -22.6 66,000 -55 la8,000 3,7
20,000 024 6 67,000 -5F 130,000 ,72
++
21,000 -26.6 @43,000 -55 132,000 5m2
22,000 -28.6 69,000 -55 134,000 9.7
23,000 -30.6 70,000 -55 136,000 +14.2
i18 ,6
24,000
25,000
26,000
-32.5
-34.5
-36.5
71,000
72,000
73,000
-55
-55
-55
158,000
140,000
142,000
+23 1
+27.6
.
27,000 -38.5 74,000 -55 144,000 +32.1
28,000 -40.5 75,000 -55 146,000 +so. 5
29,000 -42.5 76,000 -55 148,000 +41.0
30,000 -44,4 77,000 -55 150,000 445.5
31,000 -46.4 78,000 -55 152,000 +50.0
32,000 -48,4 79,000 -55 154,000 +54.4
33,000 -50.4 80,000 -55 15~,000 +58.9
34,000
35,000
35,332
-52.4
-54 3
-55
. 81,000
82,000
83,000
-55
-55
-55
lr;S,OOO
1ri0,000
162,000
+63.4
t67.8
+V2,3
36,000 -55 84,000 -55 164,000 4.76.8
37,000 -55 85,000 -55
38,000 -55 86,000 -55
89,000 -55 87,000 -55
40,000 -55 88,000 -55
41,000 -55 89,000 -55
42,000 -55 90,000 -55
43,000 -55 91,000 -55
44,000 -55 92,000 -55
45,000 -55 93,000 -55
46,000 -55 94,000 -55
47,000 -55 95,000 -55
 Table 3

Table of flows in &r0 from "Spinnerette Orificer"

dia.
( i n ioohes) a t 24 Hd.
Q ( a p a l ) in
at 22 Hd.
&.
a t 20" Hd. I at 18" €Id.

003 35 33 05 32 30.5

0004 62.8 60 57 54.5

.005 97.5 93.5 8808 8405

*006 141 194 128 122

.007 192 184 175 166

e008 251 241 229 217

.009 317 So3 28 9 274

0010 392 375 358 540

.011 4v4 453 433 410

.012 564 540 515 488

i)
Q1
3,= (G)

-104-
 Table 4

General Mills Actual Balloon Estimated Groa Altitude

Yominal Diameter Volume Weight Load L i m i t Range
ft. 0U.f t. kg kg ft.

7 200 0.6 1.5 t o 5 38,000 to

0

20 4300 3.8 to . 7 t o 36 68,000 t o

5 00 37,000

30 12,700 8.9 12 t o 60 82,000 to

50,000

70 m,ooo 41 t o 54 50 t o 175 110,000 t l

84 ,000
-

-105-
-106-
’. . , .-

-107 -
-108-
 3

Greph 4

-10 9-
Note: On f l i g h t s made in February, 1949, spring
bcnr appendix c l o s e r s were used s u c c e s s f u l l y w i t h

rates o f rise exceeding 1000 f e e t per minute. Of

those described on page 10, t h i s type of appendix

s t i f f e n e r i s now recommended.
 25
Combined History [Selected Pages]
509th Bomb Group and Roswell
A m y Airfield
September 1947
 . . . :..^.'''-' ,-... . ... .*.. ,.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..-' ;'., '..< ~

:q:,L
2 .
~ ,
,
,..,
. . . . .
1

-
... . . . . . . . . ..-I

.... - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

i
1

!
i

1SLPTLMBLR 1947 THROUGH

30SLPTEMBliR 1947

i
!
!
I

i-. . __ ........ -_- --

.... +&a%--
I.

:-. Crx L l .i'&,

:.;; * . ~ , ~ - . _.._
... ..
,
.' .
-1

*.-
. . . . . . . . ,,. h
 3 Septesber 1947 - IColoml n
P e l h a ' Jl. ' d a s f o r d , Eighth A i r E'orcc Air
n s p e c t o r t s 9€fice and Lt. Colonel Zohn A. Roberts,
B s s i s A a h C"hj.ef of S t s f , a r r i v e d for general
f w i l & z a t i o n xiti? various z c t i v i t i e s OT, t h e f i e l d
as p z r k i n s t o t h e i r respective Sobs.

3 S;epts&er !.9b7 - Jr.,

201. John 2. Xyzn, A-3; L t . Colonel C d v i n t'l. F i b ,
Lt. Coionel &rl V. E k s t r a d , LLColonel 3ay C.
i$1ton, Lhjor Leroy S. English, Captain Floyd R.
Creasman, CaTtLn Jams X. Erzicy, a l l frcn &crdquarters.
Eic'nth A i r Force, a r r i v e d here f o r a confereoce and
i w p c c t i n g and c o o r d i r a t i o n ;vith various s e c t i o n s on
the base. Lt. C O l O r ? e l S Haman and Ord a r r i v e d from
Albnrquerque f o r t h e conference.

& Sc74rxker 14h7 - Tucson.

The above-rimed group departed f o z Forth ;7orth and

J S e p t e ~ b e r 1$&7 - LU..Lsmence A. Cezson, Sr., E a s o n r e p r e s e n k t i v e

from ~ z Antonio,
n called on Colonel alznchzrd.

10 September 19117 - from .-v-

Lr. r'eoples, iIir.!kcban and F i r s t Lieutenant llompson
A i r iGte;.ial Coma& a r r i v e d on the f i e l d to
i n s p e c t Air ieterial Conmnnd instzllaticrs znd to
confer w i t h L t . Colonel Ertley.

il SeFtenker 15h7 - saptaia J. P. b r g a n , from Headquarters Eighth hir

Force, ;72s here t o confer with the &@.neering Gfficer,
C2ptain ?etei-son, i n r q a r d t o tho 2e-icer boot on
C-Slr a i r c r d t .

12 Ser:ten%er 19117 - Inspection

n
terrr;s
a s e activities,
from this Base impacted vzrious
orgcmizations, a& i c s t d l a t i o n s .

1s SeTtenbcr 19k7 - parade

Troops from Roswell A m y kL+ieJ.d tiarched i n a
i n t h e city of Hoswell a t 1030 f o r t h e benefit
of tfidCh-lvez County ikrnorial Youth Center.

15 Se?ter&er. 1$k7 - .4ir

A neetin& of S-1, 5-2, S-3, S-h, DCC, Executive,
Insyector, !idjutaEt and Cor.mz3hding Qfficers of
t h e 393rd, 8 3 0 t h ~and. 715th 30mb sqcadrcns was held
in tifie Control Zoom t o &scus..j t h e rocrganization.

79
 33
‘‘Mensuration Working Paper,” with
Photo and Drawing
Febmary 15, 1994
 Mensuration Working Paper

TARGET NAVE ROSWELI, N . M X .

-
IMACF. ID. 26JI.X-91
FWST(UTA) NEGENV. #2026. NEG #1 DATE R&TL'RITI,
IMAGERY A\AL\ST LT, M C A , ~ R E W DIVISIOPi DOD PI'o'E 703-693-2013
I H A C E H Y SCILSTIST PIIO\E

'COWPAIUTOR N/A HWLREHEhTS IIOLKS STEREO

I MEKSURATION RESULTS: I
PHOTOGRAPH AND CAMERA MFORMATION:
GROUND PHOTOGRAPHS- FWST(UTA)NEG. ENV. #2026, NEG #1- #4. TAKEN JULY 8,1947.
CAMERA TYPE- SPEED GRAPHIC ( 4" X 5" FORMAT)
NOMJNAL FOCAL LENGTHS- 127mm,135mm and 1SOmm(M0ST COMMON).

THE FOCAL LENGTH CALCULATED FOR THE CAMERA USED TO TAKE PHOTOGRAPH NEG # I rs EQUAL TO
121mm.

ASSUMPTIONS:

BROWN WRAPPING PAPER ON FLOOR UNDER OBJECT OF MTEREST IS ASSUMED To HAVE A WIDTH OF 35.5 f 3".
RADIATOR ON LEFT SIDE OF THE PHOTOGRAPH IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A TOTAL HEIGHT OF 28 f 2".

MEASUREMENTS:

STICK MEASUREMENTS:
LENGTH WIDTH
ID. 0 (N 0 (N
A 0.7 27.6" 0.01 0.4"
B 0.6 23.6" 0.01 0.4"
C 0.9 35.4" 0.02 0.8"
D 0.5 19.7" - -
E 0.5 19.7" 0.02 0.8"
F 0.4 15.7" 0.01 0.4"
C 0.4 15.7" 0.01 0.4"
H 0.6 23.6 -
- -
I

BASE BOARD 0.1 3.9"

NOTE: THE ACCURACYSTATEMENT IS 10% OF THE REPORTED LENGTHS AND WIDTHS.

PACENO. 1 o f 1
 I9
;a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PHOTOGRAPH SECTION
General Carl A. Spaatz, Commanding General, U.S. Army Air Forces,
1947. Gen Spaatz was the Chief of Staff, United States Air Force,
1947-1948. A review of his personal and official documents, including
highly classified daily briefings for the summer of 1947, do not in any way
suggest that U.S. Army Air Forces recovered a flying saucer or its alien
occupants. US.Air Force Photo.
Lt. Gen. Hoyt S. Vandenberg, Deputy Commander, U.S. Army Air Forces, 1947.
General Vandenberg served as Chief of Staff, United States Air Force 1947-1953. He
is alleged to have directed the recovery of a flying saucer at Roswell Army Air Field
on July 8, 1947. A review of his official daily activities calendar revealed his
knowledge of a reported flying saucer recovery on July 7 in Texas, an incident that he
later determined to be a hoax. Records do not support the claim that he had any similar
involvement on July 8, as charged by crashed saucer conspiracy theorists (see Atch 15).
US.Air Force Photo.
General Nathan F. Twining, Commanding General, Air Mat6riel
Command, 1947. General Twining was Chief of Staff, United States Air
Force, 1953-1957. UFO theorists allege that General Twining altered his
plans unexpectedly in July 1947 to go to New Mexico to oversee the
recovery of a flying saucer. However, records indicate that Twining went
to New Mexico in July 1947, along with several other general officers, to
attend the Nuclear Bomb Commanders Course. He received orders to
attend this course more than a month before the alleged “incident”
occurred (see Atch 14). U.S.Air Force Photo.
Maj. Gen. Curtis E. LeMay (Zefi) and Brig. Gen. Roger M. Ramey are
shown here while serving in Kharagpur, India, during World War II. u.S.
Air Force Photo.

General Curtis E. LeMay was Deputy Chief of Air Staff for Research
and Development, U.S. Army Air Forces, in 1947, and later Chief of Staff,
United States Air Force, 1961-1965. As Deputy Chief of Air Staff for
Research and Development, LeMay had a strong influence on the high-
priority Project MOGUL(see Apps 8 and 9). He also maintained close
associations throughout his career with former subordinates from World
War 11 bombing campaigns, including Brig. Gen. Roger M. Ramey and
Col. William H. Blanchard.

Brig. Gen, Roger M. Ramey was the Commanding General, Eighth Air
Force, in 1947. He is alleged to have participated in the cover-up of the
recovery of an extraterrestrial vehicle by substituting debris from an
ordinary weather balloon for that of an alien spacecraft. In fact, General
Ramey displayed the original debris recovered from the ranch, which came
from a MOGULballoon train. Ramey withheld only the components that
would have compromised the highly sensitive project (see Atch 16).
Col. William H. Blanchard, Commander 509th Bomb Group, 1947, and
later, Vice Chief of Staff, United States Air Force, 1965-1966. As
commander of Roswell Army Airfield and the 509th Bomb Group,
Blanchard is alleged to have secretly directed the recovery of a flying
saucer while pretending to be on leave. Records indicate that Blanchard
was on leave, departing Roswell on July 8 and returning on July 23, 1947
(see Atch 11). US.Air Force Photo.
Maj. Gen. Clements McMullen, Deputy Chief of Staff, Strategic Air
Command, 1947. General McMullen is alleged to have directed General
Ramey to cover up the recovery of an extraterrestrial craft and crew. After
an extensive search, the “Command Correspondence” file for the period
was located. This file contained privileged and classified information of the
highest order between McMullen and Ramey-it contained no information
to support the outrageous claim.
Brig. Gen. Donald N. Yates, Chief, Air Weather Service, 1947, and later,
Deputy Director of Defense for Research and Engineering. Crashed saucer
theorists contend Yates participated in a conspiracy by confirming the
weather balloon explanation for the mysterious debris. They also contend
that the debris recovered by the rancher was transported to Andrews AAF,
MD (near Washington, DC), to be examined by high government officials
including the President. In reality, Andrews AAF was the home of the
Army Air Forces Air Weather Service and would be a probable location
for debris, which contained components of weather equipment, to be iden-
tified. US.Air Force Photo.
 Project MOGUL Field
Operations Director Al-
bert P. Crary main-
tained a journal of his
professional activities
including Project MO-
GUL research in the
summer of 1947. Por-
tions of his journal pro-
vided details necessary
to reconstruct events not
available from published
MOGULreports (see App
17). In addition to his
work for the Air Force,
this world-enowned sci-
entist is credited with
significant contributions
to the study of Polar
regions; a research ten-
ter at McMurdo Station,
Antarctica was recently
named in his honor.

Albert P. Crary (left) and technician

Phil Chantz taking a break during
Project MOGULoperations at White
Sands Proving Ground, NM, July
1947.
 Dr. W. Maurice Ew-
ing, preeminent geo-
physicist and oceanogra-
pher. It was Ewing who
first conceptualized the
military significance of
the atmospheric sound
channel. His proposal,
made directly to the
Commanding General
U.S. Army Air Forces,
General Carl Spaatz,
was well received and
resulted in the initiation
of Project MOGUL(see
App 6). Photo Courtesy of
Woods Hole Oceanographic
Institution.

The distinguished scientists Albert P.

Crary (left) and Dr. W. Maurice
Ewing collaborated at various scien-
tific research institutions throughout
their careers, in addition to perform-
ing their work for the U.S. Air Force.
In the course of their collaborations,
these men had affiliations with
Lehigh University, Columbia Univer-
sity, and Woods Hole Oceanographic
Institution.
Dr. Athelstan F. Spilhaus (left) and Col. Marcellus
Duffy appear here serving as members of HQ USAAF
Liaison Group to the U.S. Army Signal Corps, Saipan, in
1944. Photo Courtesy of Mrs. Emily D u f i .

Dr. Athelstan F. Spilhaus, Director of Research at New

York University, oversaw but had no direct involvement
in the activities of the NYU Balloon Group or the alleged
incident. He did, however, serve on various high-level
panels which set military and national policy, including
the USAF Scientific Advisory Board (1953-1957). When
asked, for the purpose of this report-and released from
any security oaths he may have taken-if he ever had
knowledge of a recovery of an extraterrestrial vehicle or
its occupants by the U.S. Government, his unqualified
response was “no.”

Col. Marcellus Duffy, a highly capable scientific

research officer, was a MOGULproject officer. Maj. Gen.
Curtis LeMay, Deputy Chief of Air Staff for Research
and Development, turned to Colonel Duffy to make
adjustments to MOGULafter the project’s progress was
determined to be inadequate (see App 8).
 Capt. Albert C. Trakowski
who succeeded Colonel Duffy as
MOGUL Project Officer, con-
firmed in a recent interview that
the debris mistaken for part of a
flying saucer was flown to
Wright Field (now Wright-Pat-
terson AFB) OH, not for scien-
tific analysis as alleged by UFO
theorists, but for Colonel Duf-
fy’s personal identification. Photo
Courtesy of Col. Albert Trakowski.

MOGULProject Scientist Dr.

James Peoples. Peoples’s deci-
sion not to bring the radiosonde
tracking equipment for the
NYU field trip in June 1947
prompted Project Engineer C.B.
Moore to attach additional ra-
dar targets to the MOGULbal-
loon trains. The targets, seldom
used in the continental United
States, were recovered by the
rancher and mistaken to be part
of a flying saucer.
Charles B. Moore, NYU Constant-Level Balloon Project Engineer. Moore pio-
neered the use of polyethylene balloons for upper atmospheric research. He
launched NYU flight No. 4 on June 4, 1947, which was the balloon train most
likely to have caused what is known today as the “Roswell Incident.” Moore is
presently Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Physics at New Mexico Institute of
Mining and Technology, Soccoro, NM. Photo Courtesy of C.B. Moore.
Sitting in the back of the truck (left) is a U.S. Army GR-3 Sound Ranging Set,
normally used by field artillery observation units but adapted for use in Project
MOGUL.The set was employed for the MOGUL operations at White Sands Proving
Ground in July 1947. The detonation, or “shot” (right), of 500 pounds of TNT
was monitored at White Sands Proving Ground, NM, in July 1947, by Project
MOGULballoon and ground-based sensors. Photo Collection of Alberr P. Crary.

This modified PT boat that was assigned to Project MOGULis

shown here off Block Island, RI. Col. Marcellus Duffy eliminated
it and several others from the project when Headquarters U.S.
Army Air Forces expressed concerns over the progress of MOGUL
under the previous project officer. Photo collection of Albert P. Crary.
Launch of Project MOGULneoprene balloons, Alamogordo AAF,
NM, June 1947. While awaiting the experimental polyethylene
balloons, NYU engineers utilized long trains of the smaller neoprene
balloons as a stopgap method of placing their acoustic sensors in the
upper atmosphere. These balloon trains consisted of a variety of
equipment and measured more than 600 feet long (see Atch 25). Photo
Collection of Albert P. Crary.

Standard 350-gram meteorological weather balloons in the North

Hangar at Alamogordo AAF for use by Project MOGULin June
1947. Although the balloons themselves were common, the remainder
of the equipment on the MOGULtrains was experimental or had been
recently placed in service (see Atch 25). It would not be unusual for
individuals uninvolved in the development of these devices not to
recognize them. Photo Courtesy of C.B. Moore.
A New York University launch crew prepares a MOGULballoon train for flight
(Holloman AFB,NM, 1948). The three ML-307C/AP corner reflectors (left) are
of the type that W.W. “Mac” Braze1 recovered on a ranch near Corona, NM, in
June 1947.

C.B. Moore, New York University Constant Level Balloon Project Engineer
(left and standing), adjusts an ANFMQ-1 radiosonde receivedrecorder. The
absence of this equipment on the first NYU field trip in June 1947 (it was left
behind in New York due to space limitations of the B-17 aircraft) prompted
Moore to attach additional ML-307CIAP corner reflectors to MOGULflights. The
addition of the oddly constructed reflectors, intended to enhance radar returns,
contributed to the confusion when Mogul Flight No. 4 returned to earth and was
mistaken for a part of a flying saucer. Moore (right and reaching down) prepares
experimental Project MOGULmicrophones for launch (Holloman AFE3 , Alamogor-
do, NM, July 1948).
This 15-foot polyethylene balloon (left)
and 70-foot polyethylene balloon (above)
are. representative of the type used exten-
sively by Project MOGUL.It is this variety
of balloon that caused many UFO sightings
due to their flat, spherical appearance
when viewed from the ground.
A blimp hangar at Lakehurst Naval Air Station, NJ (left), contains a Project MOGULballoon
during its preparation for flight. Lying on the desert floor near Roswell, NM, in July 1948
(right) is a Project MOGULballoon. Due to the prevailing westerlies, MOGULballoons often
descended in the vicinity of Roswell after launch from Alamogordo. The unpredictability and
hazards to aircraft presented by the balloons prompted the Civil Aviation Administration (now
the Federal Aviation Administration) to conduct a hearing addressing safety concerns of balloons
landing in the Roswell area (see App 13, p p . 43-44).
Also used during Project MOGULwere balloons developed by Seyfang Laboratories, the
inventors of the first Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade balloons. These balloons were easily
mistaken for flying saucers due to their shape and metallic exterior coating.
Project MOGULballoon train components (above) can be compared with the debris recovered
from the Foster ranch and shown at Forth Worth Army Airfield with Maj. Jesse Marcel. Crashed
saucer theorists allege that the debris depicted with Major Marcel is not the original debris
collected from the Foster ranch. A switch is alleged to have taken place after the material arrived
from Roswell AAF. However, detailed analysis and interviews with individuals who viewed and
handled the debris verify it to be completely consistent with the materials launched by Project
MOGULand subsequently recovered at the Foster ranch.
Eiffel Tower
PARIS
1056ft

Washington
WASHINGTON, D.C.

555ft

Statue
of Liberty
NEW YORK HARBOR
0