Estimation of Power and Delay of CMOS Phase Detector and Phase-Frequency Detector

Using Nano Dimensional MOS Transistor

Abstract
In this paper the design of phase detector circuit using nano dimensional transistor has been
presented . which are mainly used in phase locked loops (PLL) is for clock generation and clock
recovery in microprocessor, networking, communication systems, and frequency synthesizers. Phase
locked-loops (PLLs) are commonly used to generate well-timed on-chip clocks in high- performance
digital systems. Modern wireless communication systems employ Phase Locked Loop (PLL) mainly
for synchronization, clock synthesis, skew and jitter reduction. Because of the increase in the speed
of the circuit operation, there is a need of a PLL circuit with faster locking ability. Many present
communication systems operate in the GHz frequency range. Hence there is a necessity of a PLL
which must operate in the GHz range with less lock time. PLL is a mixed signal circuit as its
architecture involves both digital and analog signal processing units.The conventional circuit of
phase-frequency detection has been realized and presented. The circuit schematics are simulated with
the help of Tanner SPICE software. The power dissipation, transistor delay, product of power and
delay of the phase detector circuit has been estimated. Power and speed performance analysis is
carried out varying the value of VDD in the range 1.2 V - 5V and aspect ratio of PMOS to NMOS
from 1 to 5 . Moreover , the power, gate delay and PDP of the phase-frequency detector has been
designed .The results are pleasing context to the design of Very Large Scale Integrated (VLSI) circuit
having high speed and low power dissipation.

i
Table of Contents
Abstract.......................................................................................................................................................... i

Table of Figures............................................................................................................................................. ii

List of Tables................................................................................................................................................. iii

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

............................................................................................................................................................................1

1.1 Motivation........................................................................................................................................... 2

1.2 Organization of Thesis................................................................................................................. 3

CHAPTER 2

PHASE LOCKED LOOP.................................................................................................................................... 5

2.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 6

2.2 PLL Architecture.................................................................................................................................. 7

2.2.1 Phase Frequency Detector............................................................................................................ 8

2.2.2 Charge Pump and Loop Filter.........................................................................................................9

2.2.3 Voltage Controlled Oscillator........................................................................................................10

2.2.4 Frequency Divider..........................................................................................................................12

2.3 Types of PLL...................................................................................................................................... 13

2.4 Terms in PLL...................................................................................................................................... 13

2.4.1 Lock in Range.................................................................................................................................13

2.4.2 Capture Range................................................................................................................................13

2.4.3 Pull in Time.....................................................................................................................................14

2.4.4 Bandwidth of PLL...........................................................................................................................14

2.5 Noises in PLL...................................................................................................................................... 14

2.5.1 Phase Noise.....................................................................................................................................14

2.5.2 Jitter 14
 2.5.3 Spur 15

2.5.4 Charge Pump Leakage Current.....................................................................................................15

2.6 Applications of PLL............................................................................................................................ 15

CHAPTER 3

CONVEX OPTIMIZATION OF VCO IN PLL.............................................................................................18

3.1 What is an optimization technique?.................................................................................................. 19

3.2 Types of circuit optimization method................................................................................................ 19

3.2.1 Classical Optimization Methods....................................................................................................19

3.2.2 Knowledge-Based Methods............................................................................................................20

3.2.3 Global Optimization Methods........................................................................................................20

3.2.4 Convex Optimization and Geometric Programming Methods......................................................21

3.3 Geometric programming and convex optimization...........................................................................21

3.3.1 Advantages......................................................................................................................................23

3.3.2 Disadvantages.................................................................................................................................23

3.4 Optimization of the VCO circuit......................................................................................................... 23

CHAPTER 4

DESIGN AND SYNTHESIS OF PLL............................................................................................................... 25

4.1 Design Environment.......................................................................................................................... 26

4.2 Design Procedure.............................................................................................................................. 26

4.2.1 VCO Design....................................................................................................................................26

4.2.2 Design of Phase Locked Loop........................................................................................................28

4.3 Design Specifications and Parameters............................................................................................... 29

4.3.1 VCO Design Specification..............................................................................................................29

4.3.2 VCO Design Parameters................................................................................................................29

4.3.3 PLL Design Parameters.................................................................................................................30

CHAPTER 5
SIMULATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSION..................................................................................................... 31

5.1 Phase Frequency Detector................................................................................................................ 32

5.2 Charge Pump and Loop Filter............................................................................................................ 34

5.3 Voltage Controlled Oscillator............................................................................................................. 35

5.3.1 Result using traditional method......................................................................................................35

5.3.2 Result using convex optimization method.......................................................................................38

5.4 Frequency Divider............................................................................................................................. 41

5.5 Phase Locked Loop............................................................................................................................ 42

CHAPTER 6

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK.............................................................................................................. 46

Conclusion and Future Work................................................................................................................... 47

References.................................................................................................................................................. 48
 Table of Figures
Figure2.1 Basic block diagram of a PLL...........................................................................................................6
Figure2.2 Architecture of a PLL........................................................................................................................7
Figure2.3 Block diagram of a traditional PFD circuit............................................................................8
Figure2.4 Schematic diagram of the charge pump circuit with loop filter......................................................9
Figure2.5 Simplified view of a current starved VCO.....................................................................................10
Figure2.6 Circuit diagram of a current starved VCO......................................................................................11
Figure2.7 Schematic of a simple DFF based divide by 2 frequency divider circuit.....................................12
Figure2.8 Illustration of lock and capture range.............................................................................................13
Figure2.9 Output current pulses from charge pump in the lock state............................................................15
Figure3.1 Convex functions on an interval [26].............................................................................................22
Figure5.1 Circuit diagram of a pass transistor based DFF PFD.....................................................................32
Figure5.2 Simulation result of PFD when Fin rising edge leads Fref rising edge.....................................33
Figure5.3 Simulation result of PFD when Fref rising edge leads Fin rising edge.....................................33
Figure5.4 Simulation result for loop filter with PFD when Fref clock edge leads Fin clock edge..................34
Figure5.5 Simulation result for loop filter with PFD when Fin clock edge leads Fref clock edge..................35
Figure5.6 Output signal of the VCO at a control voltage of VDD/2................................................................35
Figure5.7 VCO characteristics curve...............................................................................................................37
Figure5.8 Phase noise plot of VCO for schematic level.................................................................................37
Figure5.9 Layout of the 5 stage current starved VCO....................................................................................37
Figure5.10 Simulation results of scaling ratio and corresponding delay.......................................................38
Figure5.11 Ccomparisons of control voltage versus oscillating frequency characteristics of the CSVCO
circuit................................................................................................................................................................40
Figure5.12 Circuit diagram of a pass transistor based DFF frequency divider circuit..................................41
Figure5.13 Simulation result of the divide by 2 circuits.................................................................................41
Figure5.14 Variation of the control voltage w.r.t. time..................................................................................42
Figure5.15 Layout of the PLL circuit..............................................................................................................43
Figure5.16 Different signals of PLL in lock state for schematic level...........................................................43
Figure5.17 Different signals of PLL in lock state for post layout level simulation......................................44
Figure5.18 Phase noise variation of PLL w.r.t. offset frequency for schematic level simulation................44
Figure5.19 Phase noise variation of PLL w.r.t. offset frequency for post layout level simulation..............45

v
 List of Tables
Table 1 VCO design specifications..................................................................................................................29
Table 2 List of design parameters of the CSVCO circuit................................................................................29
Table 3 PLL design specifications and parameters..........................................................................................30
Table 4 Oscillating frequency of the VCO output signal for different control voltage..................................36
Table 5 Comparison of schematic and post layout level simulation results...................................................38
Table 6 Size of the transistors of CSVCO circuit after optimization..............................................................39
Table 7 Performance comparison of CSVCO designed using traditional method and convex optimization
.............................................................................................................................................................. 40
Table 8 Performance comparison of PLL circuit.............................................................................................45
CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1
 1.1 Motivation

Phase locked loop (PLL) [1-3] is the heart of the many modern electronics as well as

communication system. Recently plenty of the researches have conducted on the design of phase

locked loop (PLL) circuit and still research is going on this topic. Most of the researches have

conducted to realize a higher lock range PLL with lesser lock time [4] and have tolerable phase

noise. The most versatile application of the phase locked loops (PLL) is for clock generation and

clock recovery in microprocessor, networking, communication systems, and frequency

synthesizers. Phase locked-loops (PLLs) are commonly used to generate well-timed on-chip clocks

in high-performance digital systems. Modern wireless communication systems employ Phase

Locked Loop (PLL) mainly for synchronization, clock synthesis, skew and jitter reduction [5].

Phase locked loops find wide application in several modern applications mostly in advance

communication and instrumentation systems. PLL being a mixed signal circuit involves design

challenge at high frequency.

Since its inspection in early 1930s, where it was used in the synchronization of the

horizontal and vertical scans of television, it has come to an advanced form of integrated

circuit (IC). Today found uses in many other applications. The first PLL ICs were available

around 1965; it was built using purely analog component. Recent advances in integrated

circuit design techniques have led to the development of high performance PLL which has

become more economical and reliable. Now a whole PLL circuit can be integrated as a part of a

larger circuit on a single chip.

There are mainly five blocks in a PLL. These are phase frequency detector (PFD), charge

pump (CP), low pass loop filter (LPF), voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) and frequency

divider. Presently almost all communication and electronics devices operate at a higher
frequency, so for that purpose we need a faster locking PLL. So there are a lot of challenges in

designing the mentioned different blocks of the PLL to operate at a higher frequency. And these

challenges motivated me towards this research topic. In this work mainly the faster locking of the

PLL is concentrated by properly choosing the circuit architectures and parameters. The

optimization of the VCO circuit is also carried out in this work to get a better frequency

precision.

1.2 Organization of Thesis

Before going into the details of the PLL, the motivation behind this work is mentioned in the

Chapter 1 of the thesis. Chapter 2 briefly describes the whole PLL system. An introduction to the

PLL circuit is mentioned in the section 2.1. Section 2.2 contains the detail architecture of the

whole PLL system. Different types of PLLs are mentioned in the section 2.3. Section 2.4

explains the basic terms used in the PLL system while the consecutive sections give the details

about the noise and application of the PLL.

Chapter 3 builds the concepts of optimization. Definition of optimization technique and

different circuit optimization techniques are presented in section 3.1 and 3.2 respectively. Section

3.3 gives the brief outline of t h e concept of geometric programming and convex optimization.

The optimization of the CSVCO circuit is explained in section 3.4.

The design and synthesis of the PLL is described in Chapter 4. The different design

environments used in this work is mentioned in the section 4.1. The adopted design procedure is

explained in section 4.2. Section 4.3 gives the design specifications and parameters of the work.

The simulation results of the different circuits used in the PLL are depicted in the different

sections of the Chapter 5. The performance of the CSVCO designed using convex optimization is

compared with that of the traditional method in section 5.3. Section 5.5 gives the different
simulation results of the PLL and its performance comparison between schematic and post layout

level. At last Chapter 6 provides the conclusion that inferred from the work.
 CHAPTER 2

PHASE LOCKED LOOP

2.1 Introduction
A PLL is a closed-loop feedback system that sets fixed phase relationship between its output

clock phase and the phase of a reference clock. A PLL is capable of tracking the phase changes

that falls in this bandwidth of the PLL. A PLL also multiplies a low-frequency reference clock

CKref to produce a high-frequency clock CKout this is known as clock synthesis.

A PLL has a negative feedback control system circuit. The main objective of a PLL is to

generate a signal in which the phase is the same as the phase of a reference signal. This is

achieved after many iterations of comparison of the reference and feedback signals. In this lock

mode the phase of the reference and feedback signal is zero. After this, the PLL continues to

compare the two signals but since they are in lock mode, the PLL output is constant.

The basic block diagram of the PLL is shown in the Figure 2.1. In general a PLL consists of five

main blocks:

1. Phase Detector or Phase Frequency Detector (PD or PFD)

2. Charge Pump (CP)

3. Low Pass Filter (LPF)

4. Voltage Controlled Oscillator (VCO)

5. Divide by N Counter

Figure2.1 Basic block diagram of a PLL

 The “Phase frequency Detector” (PFD) is one of the main parts in PLL circuits. It compares

the phase and frequency difference between the reference clock and the feedback clock.

Depending upon the phase and frequency deviation, it generates two output signals “UP” and

“DOWN”. The “Charge Pump” (CP) circuit is used in the PLL to combine both the outputs of

the PFD and give a single output. The output of the CP circuit is fed to a “Low Pass Filter”

(LPF) to generate a DC control voltage. The phase and frequency of the “Voltage Controlled

Oscillator” (VCO) output depends on the generated DC control voltage. If the PFD generates an

“UP” signal, the error voltage at the output of LPF increases which in turn increase the VCO

output signal frequency. On the contrary, if a “DOWN” signal is generated, the VCO output

signal frequency decreases. The output of the VCO is then fed back to the PFD in order to

recalculate the phase difference, and then we can create closed loop frequency control system.

2.2 PLL Architecture

The architecture of a charge-pump PLL is shown in Figure 2.2. A PLL comprises of

several components. They are (1) phase or phase frequency detector, (2) charge pump, (3) loop

filter, (4) voltage-controlled oscillator, and (5) frequency divider. The functioning of each

block is briefly explained below.

Figure2.2 Architecture of a PLL

2.2.1 Phase Frequency Detector

The “Phase frequency Detector” (PFD) is one of the main part in PLL circuits. It compares the

phase and frequency difference between the reference clock and the feedback clock. Depending

upon the phase and frequency deviation, it generates two output signals “UP” and “DOWN”.

Figure 2.3 shows a traditional PFD circuit.

Figure2.3 Block diagram of a traditional PFD circuit

If there is a phase difference between the two signals, it will generate “UP” or “DOWN”

synchronized signals. When the reference clock rising edge leads the feedback input clock

rising edge “UP” signal goes high while keeping “DOWN” signal low. On the other hand if the

feedback input clock rising edge leads the reference clock rising edge “DOWN” signal goes

high and “UP” signal goes low. Fast phase and frequency acquisition PFDs [6-7] are generally

preferred over traditional PFD.

2.2.2 Charge Pump and Loop Filter
Charge pump circuit is an important block of the whole PLL system. It converts the phase or

frequency difference information into a voltage, used to tune the VCO. Charge pump circuit is

used to combine both the outputs of the PFD and give a single output which is fed to the input of

the filter. Charge pump circuit gives a constant current of value I PDI which should be insensitive

to the supply voltage variation [8]. The amplitude of the current always remains same but the

polarity changes which depend on the value of the “UP” and “DOWN” signal. The schematic

diagram of the charge pump circuit with loop filter is shown in the Figure 2.4.

Figure2.4 Schematic diagram of the charge pump circuit with loop filter

When the UP signal goes high M2 transistor turns ON while M1 is OFF and the output current

is IPDI with a positive polarity. When the down signal becomes high M1 transistor turns ON while

M2 is OFF and the output current is IPDI with a negative polarity. The charge pump

output current [3] is given by

IPUMP— (IPUMP)
IPDI = × A0
4n
2IPUMP
= 4n × A0
IPUMP
= 2n × A0

= KPDI × A0 (1)
 PUMP
Where KPDI = I 2n
(amps/radian) (2)

The passive low pass loop filter is used to convert back the charge pump current into the

voltage. The filter should be as compact as possible [9].The output voltage of the loop filter

controls the oscillation frequency of the VCO. The loop filter voltage will increase if F ref rising

edge leads Fin rising edge and will decrease if F in rising edge leads Fref rising edge. If the PLL is in

locked state it maintains a constant value.

The VCO input voltage is given by

Vinvco = KF × IPDI (3)

Where KF is the gain of the loop filter.

2.2.3 Voltage Controlled Oscillator

An oscillator is an autonomous system which generates a periodic output without any input.

The most popular type of the VCO circuit is the current starved voltage controlled oscillator

(CSVCO). Here the number of inverter stages is fixed with 5. The simplified view of a single stage

current starved oscillator is shown in the Figure 2.5.

Figure2.5 Simplified view of a current starved VCO

10
 Transistors M2 and M3 operate as an inverter while M1 and M4 operate as current sources.

The current sources, Ml and M4, limit the current available to the inverter, M2 and M3; in other

words, the inverter is starved for current. The desired center frequency of the designed circuit is

1GHz with a supply of 1.8V. The CSVCO is designed both in usual manner as mentioned in [3],

[10, 11]. The general circuit diagram of the current starved voltage controlled oscillator is shown

in the Figure 2.6.

Figure2.6 Circuit diagram of a current starved VCO

To determine the design equations for the CSVCO, consider the simplified view of VCO in

Figure 2.5. The total capacitance on the drains of M2 and M3 is given by

Ctot = 5 Cos(LpWp + LnWn) (4)

2

The time it takes to charge Ctot from zero to VSP with the constant current ID4 is given by

SP
t1 = V × Ctot (5)
ID4
While the time it takes to discharge Ctot from VDD to VSP is given by
VDD–VSP
t1 = × Ctot (6)
I D1

If we set ID4 = ID1 = ID then the sum of t1 and t2 is given by

DD
t1 + t2 = V × Ctot (7)
ID

The oscillation frequency of CSVCO for N number of stage is

focc = N(t 1+t ID (8)

1 2) = NCtotVDD

DD
This is equal to fcenter when Vinvco = V
(9)
2

The gain of the VCO is given by

fN a x –
K
VCO = fNin
Hz/ (10)
VNax – V
VNin

2.2.4 Frequency Divider

The output of the VCO is fed back to the input of PFD through the frequency divider circuit. The

frequency divider in the PLL circuit forms a closed loop. It scales down the frequency of the VCO

output signal. A simple D flip flop (DFF) acts as a frequency divider circuit. The schematic of a

simple DFF based divide by 2 frequency divider circuit is shown in the Figure 2.7.

Figure2.7 Schematic of a simple DFF based divide by 2 frequency divider circuit

2.3 Types of PLL
There are mainly 4 types of PLL are available. They are

1. Liner PLL

2. Digital PLL

3. All Digital PLL

4. Soft PLL

2.4 Terms in PLL

2.4.1 Lock in Range

Once the PLL is in lock state what is the range of frequencies for which it can keep itself locked

is called as lock in range. This is also called as tracking range or holding range.

2.4.2 Capture Range

When the PLL is initially not in lock, what frequency range can make PLL lock is called as

capture range. This is also known as acquisition range. This is directly proportional to the LPF

bandwidth. Reduction in the loop filter bandwidth thus improves the rejection of the out of

band signals, but at the same time the capture range decreases, pull in time becomes larger

and phase margin becomes poor.

The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open th e file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it
again.

Figure2.8 Illustration of lock and capture range

2.4.3 Pull in Time
The total time taken by the PLL to capture the signal (or to establish the lock) is called as Pull

in Time of PLL. It is also called as Acquisition Time of PLL.

2.4.4 Bandwidth of PLL

Bandwidth is the frequency at which the PLL begins to lose the lock with reference.

2.5 Noises in PLL

The output of the practical system deviates from the desired response. This is because of the

imperfections and noises in the system. The supply noise also affects the output noise of the PLL

system [12]. There are mainly 4 types of noises. They are explained below.

2.5.1 Phase Noise

The phase fluctuation due to the random frequency variation of a signal is called as phase noise.

This is mostly affected by oscillator’s frequency stability. The main sources of the phase noise in

PLL are oscillator noise [12-15], PFD and frequency divider circuit. The main components of the

phase noise are thermal and flicker noise.

2.5.2 Jitter
A jitter is the short term-term variations of a signal with respect to its ideal position in time [16-

19]. This problem negatively impacts the data transmission quality. Jitter and phase noise are

closely related and can be computed one from another [18]. Deviation from the ideal position

can occur on either leading edge or trailing edge of signal. Jitter may be induced and coupled onto

a clock signal from several different sources and is not uniform over all frequencies. Excessive

jitter can increase bit error rate (BER) of communication signal [19]. In digital system Jitter leads

to violation in time margins, causing circuits to behave improperly.

2.5.3 Spur
Non-desired frequency content not related to the frequency of oscillation and its harmonics is

called as “Spur”. There are mainly two types of spur. They are reference spur and fractional spur.

Reference spur comes into picture in an integer PLL while fractional spur plays a major role in

fractional PLL. When the PLL is in lock state the phase and frequency inputs to the PFD are

essentially equal. There should not be any error output from the PFD. Since this can create

problem, so the PFD is designed such that, in the locked state the current pulses from the CP will

have a very narrow width as shown in the Figure 2.9. Because of this the input control voltage of

the VCO is modulated by the reference signal and thus produces “Reference Spur” [20].

Figure2.9 Output current pulses from charge pump in the lock state

2.5.4 Charge Pump Leakage Current

When the CP output from the synthesizer is programmed to the high impedance state, in practice

there should not be any current flow. But in practical some leakage current flows in the circuit and

this is known as “charge pump leakage current” [20].

2.6 Applications of PLL

The demand of the PLL circuit increases day by day because of its wide application in the area of

electronics, communication and instrumentation. The recent applications of the PLL circuits are

in memories, microprocessors, hard disk drive electronics, RF and wireless transceivers, clock
recovery circuits on microcontroller boards and optical fiber receivers. Some of the PLL

applications are mentioned below.

1. Frequency Synthesis

A frequency synthesizer is an electronic system for generating a range of frequencies from

a single fixed time base or oscillator.

2. Clock Generation

Many electronic systems include processors of various sorts that operate at hundreds of

megahertz. Typically, the clocks supplied to these processors come from clock generator PLLs,

which multiply a lower-frequency reference clock (usually 50 or 100 MHz) up to the operating

frequency of the processor. The multiplication factor can be quite large in cases where the

operating frequency is multiple GHz and the reference crystal is just tens or hundreds of

megahertz.

3. Carrier Recovery (Clock Recovery)

Some data streams, especially high-speed serial data streams (such as the raw stream of data

from the magnetic head of a disk drive), are sent without an accompanying clock. The

receiver generates a clock from an approximate frequency reference, and then phase-aligns to

the transitions in the data stream with a PLL. This process is referred to as clock recovery.

4. Skew Reduction

This is one of the very popular and earliest uses of PLL. Suppose synchronous pair of data

and clock lines enter a large digital chip. Since clock typically drives a large number of

transistors and logic interconnects, it is first applied to large buffer. Thus, the clock distributed

on chip may suffer from substantial skew with respect to data. This is an undesirable effect

which reduces the timing budget for on-chip operations.

5. Jitter and Noise Reduction

One desirable property of all PLLs is that the reference and feedback clock edges be

brought into very close alignment. The average difference in time between the phases of the

two signals when the PLL has achieved lock is called the static phase offset. The variance

between these phases is called tracking jitter. Ideally, the static phase offset should be zero,

and the tracking jitter should be as low as possible.

 CHAPTER 3

CONVEX OPTIMIZATION
OF VCO IN PLL
3.1 What is an optimization technique?
Optimization technique is nothing but the finding of the action that optimizes i.e. minimizes or

maximizes the result of the objective function. Optimization technique is applied to the circuits

aiming at finding out the optimized circuit design parameter to achieve either the best

performance or the desired performance. Optimization techniques are a set of most powerful

tools that are used in efficiently handling the design resources and there by achieve the best

result. Mainly optimization techniques are applied to the circuit for the selection of the

component values, devices sizes, and value of the voltage or current source.

3.2 Types of circuit optimization method

There are mainly four types of circuit optimization methods exist. They are

1. Classical optimization

2. Knowledge based optimization

3. Global optimization method

4. Convex optimization and geometric programming

3.2.1 Classical Optimization Methods:

In case of analog circuit CAD, classical optimization methods [21], such as steepest descent,

sequential quadratic programming, and Lagrange multiplier methods are mainly used. These

methods are used with more complicated circuit models, including even full SPICE simulations

in each iteration. This method can handle a wide variety of problem. For this there is a need of a

set of performance measures and computation of one or more derivatives. The main disadvantage

of the classical optimization methods is that the global optimal solution is not possible. This

method fails to find a feasible design even one exist. This method gives only the local minima

instead of global solution. Since many different initial designs are considered to get the global

optimization, the method becomes slower. Because of the human intervention (to give “good”
initial designs), the method becomes less automated. The classical methods become slow if

complex models are used.

3.2.2 Knowledge-Based Methods:

Knowledge-based and expert-systems methods such as genetic algorithm or evolution systems,

systems based on Fuzzy logic, and heuristics-based systems have also been widely used in

analog circuit CAD [21]. In case of knowledge based methods, there are few limitations on the

types of problems, specifications, and performance measures that are to be considered. These

methods do not require the computation of the derivatives. This is not possible to find a global

optimal design solution using these methods. The final design is decided on the basis of the

initial design chosen and the algorithm parameters. The disadvantage of the knowledge based

methods is that they simply fail to find a feasible solution even when one may exist. There is a

need of human intervention during the design and the training process.

3.2.3 Global Optimization Methods:

Global optimization methods such as branch and bound and simulated annealing are also used in

analog circuit design [21]. These methods are guaranteed to find the global optimal design

solution. The global optimal design is determined by the branch and bound methods

unambiguously. In each iteration, a suboptimal feasible design and also a lower bound on the

achievable performance is maintained by this method. This enables the algorithm to terminate non-

heuristically, i.e., with complete confidence that the global design has been found within a given

tolerance. The branch and bound method is extremely slow, with computation growing

exponentially with problem size. The trapping in a locally optimal design can be avoided by

using simulated annealing (SA). This method can compute the global optimal solution but not

guaranteed. Since there is no real-time lower bound is available, so termination is heuristic. This

20
method can also handle a wide variety of performance indices and objects. The main advantage

of SA is that it handles the continuous variables and discrete variables problems efficiently and

reduces the chances of getting a non-globally optimal design. The only problem with this method

is that it is very slow and can not guarantee a global optimal solution.

3.2.4 Convex Optimization and Geometric Programming Methods:

Geometric programming methods are special optimization problems in which the objective and

constraint functions are all convex [22-24]. Convex optimization technique can solve the

problems having a large number of variables and constraints very efficiently [22]. The main

advantage of this method for which people generally adopt is that the method gives the global

solution. Infeasibility is unambiguously detected. Since a lower bound on the achievable

performance is given, so the method uses a completely non- heuristic stopping criterion.

3.3 Geometric programming and convex optimization

Geometric programming is a special type of optimization technique in which all the objective

must be convex. Before applying this technique it has to confirm that whether the given problem

is convex optimization problem or not. Convex optimization problem means the problem of

minimizing a convex function subject to convex inequality constraints and linear equality

constraints. In IC integration convex optimization and geometric programming has become a

more efficient computational tool for optimization purpose. This method has an ability to handle

thousands of variables and constraints and solve efficiently. The main advantage of convex

optimization technique is that it gives the global optimized value and the robust design. The fact

that geometric programs can be solved very efficiently has a number of practical consequences.

For example, the method can be used to simultaneously optimize the design of a large number of

circuits in a single large mixed-mode integrated circuit. The designs of the individual circuits are
coupled by constraints on total power and area, and by various parameters that affect the circuit

coupling such as input capacitance, output resistance, etc. Convex optimization is used to find out

the optimized value of these parameter and sizing of the devices in the circuit [25]. Another

application is to use the efficiency to obtain robust designs i.e., designs that are guaranteed to

meet a set of specifications over a variety of processes or technology parameter values. This is

done by simply replicating the specifications with a (possibly large) number of representative

process parameters, which is practical only because geometric programs with thousands of

constraints are readily solved. A real valued function f(x) defined on an interval (space) is

called convex if

f(tx1 + (1 — t)x2) ≤ tf(x1) + (1 — t)f(x2) (11)

For every t, 0 € t € 1 and x1 G x2

In the Figure 3.1 function f(x) is represented as a convex function on an interval.

Figure3.1 Convex functions on an interval [26]

The convex optimization problem is in the form of minimize fO (x)

Subjected to fi(x) ≤ 1 , i=1, 2, 3…, m

gi(x) = 1 , i=1, 2, 3…, p

 xi Σ 1 , i=1, 2, 3…, n

Where fi(x) is a posynomial function

gi(x) is a monomial function

Let x1, x2 … … xn be n real positive variables. We can denote the vector (xi, xi … … . xi) of

these variables asx. A function f is called a posynomial function of x if it has the form
fi(x1, x2 … … xn) = ∑t Ckxα1k xα2k … . . xαnk (12)
k=1 1 2 n

Where Cj ≤ 0 and αij c R. The coefficients Cj must be nonnegative but the exponents αij can be

any real numbers including negative or fractional. When there is exactly one nonzero term in

the sum i.e. t = 1 and C1 Σ 0, we call f is a monomial function.

3.3.1 Advantages:

 Handle thousands of variables and constraints and solve efficiently.

 Global optimization can be obtained.

3.3.2 Disadvantages:

 Strictly limited to types of problems, performance specification and objectives that can be

handled.

3.4 Optimization of the VCO circuit

In my earlier design of the VCO circuit, the sizes of all the five inverter stages are same. Now

the convex optimization technique is applied to find out the optimal scaling ratio of the different

inverter stages to get the optimal design with a better performance. There are 5 inverter stages

and the design has to give a delay of 100ps. The load capacitance of the VCO circuit is 65 fF. All

these design constraints are formulated and applied to the convex optimization technique. Mainly

optimization techniques are applied for selection of component values and transistor sizing.
 In this work I have used the geometric programming technique to find out the optimized

scaling ratio of the different stages in CSVCO to meet the desired center frequency with lesser

deviation. Let xi is the scaling ration of the ith stage, CL is the load capacitance, and D is the total

delay of the inverter stages then optimization problem is in the form of

Minimize sum (xi )

Subjected to CL ≤ CLNas

D ≤ DNas

Where CLNas and DNas are required design parameters and has a constant value.
 CHAPTER 4

DESIGN AND SYNTHESIS

OF PLL
4.1 Design Environment

The schematic level design entry of the circuits is carried out in the CADENCE Virtuoso Analog

Design Environment. The layout of the PLL is designed in Virtuoso XL using GPDK090 library.

In order to analyze the performances, these circuits are simulated in the Spectre simulator of

CADENCE tool. Different performance indices such as phase noise, power consumption and

lock time are measured in this environment. Transient, parametric sweep and phase noise

analyses are carried out in this work to find out the performances of the circuit. The optimization

of the current starved VCO circuit, the scale factor for transistor sizing is found out using the

MATLAB environment.

4.2 Design Procedure

4.2.1 VCO Design

Since VCO is the heart of the whole PLL system, it should be designed in a proper manner. The

design steps for the current starved VCO are as follows.

Step 1

Find the value of the propagation delay for each stage of the inverter in the VCO circuit using the

following equation.

vp= 1 Nf (13)

Where vp = vphS= vpSh= half of the propagation delay time of the inverter

N= no of inverter stages

f= required center frequency of oscillation

Step 2

Find the (W/L) ratio for the transistors in the different inverter stages using the equation in

below.
dd–VT,n)
(W/L) n = Cload
( 2VT,n
+ ln (4(V — 1)) (14)
cphlµnCox(Vdd–VT,n) Vdd–VT,n Vdd

(W/ ) 2|VT,p| 4(Vdd–|VT,p|)

Cload
L p = ( + ln ( — 1)) (15)
cplhµpCox(Vdd–|VT,p|) Vdd–|VT,p| Vdd

Step 3

After finding the (W/L) ratio, find the values for W and L.

Step 4

Find the value of the total capacitance form the expression

Ctot = 52Cos(LpWp + LnWn) (16)

Where Cos is the oxide capacitance

Lp, Wp,Ln,Wn is the width and length of the PMOS and NMOS transistors in the inverter stages.

Step 5

Calculate the value of drain current for the center frequency which is given by

IDcenter = NCtotVddf (17)

Step 6

Find the (W/L) ratio for the current starving transistors in the circuit from the drain current

expression which is represented as

(W/ ) n 2×IDcenter (18)
L = (
2

µnCox Vgc–VT,n)

Similarly (W/L) p = 2.5 × (W/L) n (19)

4.2.2 Design of Phase Locked Loop

The value of the charge pump current and the component parameters of the loop filter play a

major role in the design of the phase locked loop circuit. The value of the lock time mainly

depends upon these parameters. So while designing the circuit proper care should be taken in

calculating these parameters. For the given values of reference(F ref) and output frequency(F out)

as well as the lock in range, the following steps to be carried out in designing the filter circuit.

Step 1

Find the value of the divider circuit to be used which is given by

F
out
n =Fref (20)

Step 2

Find the value of the natural frequency (mn) from the lock in range as given below

lock in range = 2 × £ × mn (21)

Step 3

Find the value of the charge pump gain (KPDI) from the charge pump current used in the circuit

which is given by
IpuNp
KPDI = (Amps/radian) (22)
2n

Step 4

Find the value of the gain of the VCO ( Kvco) circuit from the characteristics curve using the

following expression.

f
N ax
Kvco = fN
– (Hz/V) (23)
in
VNax –
VNin
Step 5

Find the values of the loop filter component parameters using the following expressions.
 C1=
KPDI×Kvco
(24)
Nmn2

C 1
C2 = 1O (25)

2£
R = mnC1 (26)

4.3 Design Specifications and Parameters

4.3.1 VCO Design Specification

The current starved VCO design specifications are mentioned in the following table.

Table 1 VCO design specifications

Parameter Value

Center frequency 1GHz

No. of inverter stage 5

Inverter delay 100ps

Load capacitance 65fF

Supply voltage 1.8V

4.3.2 VCO Design Parameters

Table 2 List of design parameters of the CSVCO circuit

Parameter Value

Width of Current starved PMOS(WPCS) 2.33µ m

Width of Current Starved NMOS(WnCS) 140nm

Width of PMOS in Inverter(W P) 2.44µ m

Width of NMOS in Inverter(Wn) 150nm

LPCS = LnCS = LP = Ln = L 100nm

4.3.3 PLL Design Parameters
The whole PLL system design specifications and parameters are shown in the Table 3.

Table 3 PLL design specifications and parameters

Parameter Value

Reference frequency((Fref) 500 MHz

output frequency(Fout) 1 GHz

Lock in range 100 MHz

Supply voltage 1.8 V

Divider circuit By 2

Charge pump current(IpuNp ) 600 µA

Capacitor (C1) 15 pF

Capacitor (C2) 1.5 pF

Resistor (R) 1.384 KΩ

30
 CHAPTER 5

SIMULATION RESULTS
AND DISCUSSION
5.1 Phase Frequency Detector
The Pass Transistor DFF PFD circuit is shown in Figure 5.1. The PFD is same as to a dynamic

two-phase master-slave pass-transistor flip-flop. The clock skew is minimized by using single

edge clocks. In this design synchronous reset is used for master while asynchronous reset is used

for slave. i.e., the reset is allowed only when the slave latch is transparent. The operating range

of the design is increased with the help of synchronous resetting and also the power consumption

is reduced compared to the traditional PFD. If the master latch is reset while it is transparent,

then there will be significant short-circuit current will produce, resulting in more power. The

output of the PFD when Fref signal rising edge leads Fin signal rising edge and vice versa is

shown in the Figure 5.2 and Figure 5.3 respectively.

Figure5.1 Circuit diagram of a pass transistor based DFF PFD

Figure5.2 Simulation result of PFD when Fin rising edge leads Fref rising edge

Figure5.3 Simulation result of PFD when Fref rising edge leads Fin rising edge
5.2 Charge Pump and Loop Filter
When the reference signal clock edge leads the feedback clock edge, the UP signal of the PFD

goes high. So to make both the clock have rising edge at the same time the VCO output signal

frequency has to be increased. For this purpose an increase in control voltage is needed from the

output of charge pump and loop filter circuit. The simulation result which is shown in the Figure

5.4 below gives an increase in the control voltage at the output of the loop filter circuit. From the

Figure 5.4 it’s clear that the control voltage increases for a period during which the UP signal of

the PFD remains high. In the other case a decrease in the control voltage is produced at the

output of the filter circuit which is shown in the Figure 5.5. When the rising of feedback signal

leads the reference signal rising edge the control voltage decreases for the period during which

the DOWN signal of the PFD remains high.

Figure5.4 Simulation result for loop filter with PFD when F ref clock edge leads Fin clock edge
 Figure5.5 Simulation result for loop filter with PFD when F in clock edge leads Fref clock edge

5.3 Voltage Controlled Oscillator

5.3.1 Result using traditional method

The heart of the PLL circuit is the voltage controlled oscillator. The circuit is designed to give a

center frequency of oscillation of 1 GHz. The frequency of oscillation of the output signal for the

different input control voltage is mentioned in the Table 4. The center frequency of oscillation at

an input control voltage of V DD/2 is 1.012 GHz. The output signal of the VCO at a control voltage

of VDD/2 is shown in the Figure 5.6.

Figure5.6 Output signal of the VCO at a control voltage of VDD/2

 Table 4 Oscillating frequency of the VCO output signal for different control voltage

Control Voltage Frequency of Control Voltage Frequency of

(VC)(in volt) Oscillation (f) (in Oscillation
MHz) 0.926 1051.851
0.103 24.415 0.977 1128.02
0.154 50.929 1.03 1200.67
0.206 91.05 1.08 1271.818
0.257 139.32 1.13 1338.398
0.309 188.179 1.18 1401.32
0.36 234.277 1.23 1460.798
0.411 282.125 1.29 1517.121
0.463 342.256 1.34 1570.371
0.514 412.889 1.39 1620.798
0.566 489.48 1.44 1668.416
0.617 569.178 1.49 1713.913
0.669 650.037 1.54 1757.073
0.720 731.72 1.59 1798.081
0.771 812.946 1.65 1836.986
0.823 893.63 1.7 1873.865
0.874 973.461 1.75 1909.109
1.8 1943.021

The VCO characteristics curve is shown in the Figure 5.7. The X-axis of the curve represents

the input control voltage while the Y-axis represents the corresponding frequency of oscillation.

The gain of the CSVCO circuit is 1.531 GHz/V. The phase noise of the VCO in the schematic

level is found to be -82.87 dBc/Hz. The phase noise plot for schematic level is shown in the

Figure 5.8. The layout of the 5 stage current starved VCO is shown in the Figure 5.9. The

schematic and post layout level simulation results are compared in the Table 5.
 Characterstics Curve of VCO
2000

1900

1800

1700

1600

1500
Frequencyof Oscillation (in MHz)

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8
Control Voltage (in Volt)

Figure5.7 VCO characteristics curve

Figure5.8 Phase noise plot of VCO for schematic level

Figure5.9 Layout of the 5 stage current starved VCO

 Table 5 Comparison of schematic and post layout level simulation results

Parameter Schematic Result Post-Layout

Result
Frequency(f) 1.012 GHz 1.00256 GHz

Frequency 12 MHz 2.56 MHz

Deviation(∆f)
Power(P) 432.456 µ W 480.63 µ W

Phase Noise -82.7 dBc/Hz -84.88 dBc/Hz

@1MHz offset

5.3.2 Result using convex optimization method

Using convex optimization method the scaling ratio is found out to satisfy the center frequency

of oscillation (i.e. delay of the circuit) from the MATLAB environment. The scaling ratio for

different stages of the inverter in the VCO is 1,1,1,1 and 1.4058. The scaling ratio result is shown

in the Figure 5.10.

Figure5.10 Simulation results of scaling ratio and corresponding delay

Now the transistor sizes are modified according to the scaling ratio. Since the scaling factor of

all the stages are 1 except 5th stage, so the transistor sizing of the 5th stage has only changed to

get the better frequency precision. The sizes of the transistors of CSVCO optimized using
convex optimization technique are listed out in the Table 6. Before optimization the centre

frequency of the oscillation is found out 1.012GHz. And after applying the convex optimization

and geometric programming to this circuit, the centre frequency of oscillation is 1000.0457MHz.

So the frequency deviation from its centre frequency is reduced to .00457% from 1.2%. The

performance of CSVCO for both traditional and geometric programming is compared in the

Table 7. The comparison of control voltage versus oscillating frequency characteristics of the

CSVCO circuit is shown in the Figure 5.11.

Table 6 Size of the transistors of CSVCO circuit after optimization

Stage Parameter value

1 WPCS 2.33µm
WnCS 140nm
WP 2.44µm
Wn 150nm
2 WPCS 2.33µm
WnCS 140nm
WP 2.44µm
Wn 150nm
3 WPCS 2.33µm
WnCS 140nm
WP 2.44µm
Wn 150nm
4 WPCS 2.33µm
WnCS 140nm
WP 2.44µm
Wn 150nm
5 WPCS 3.28µm
WnCS 195nm
WP 3.435µm
Wn 215nm
Table 7 Performance comparison of CSVCO designed using traditional method and convex
optimization

Factor CSVCO using CSVCO using convex

traditional optimization method
method
Frequency(f) 1.012GHz 1.0000457GHz
Frequency 12MHz 45.7KHz
Deviation(∆f)
Power(P) 432.456µ W 539.65µ W
Phase Noise @1MHz -82.7 -82.6
offset dBc/Hz dBc/Hz
KVCO 1.531GHz/V 1.5926GHz/V

2000
Traditional Method
1800 Geometric Prog Method

1600
Oscillating Frequency in MHz

1400

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
VCO Control Voltage in Volt

Figure5.11 Ccomparisons of control voltage versus oscillating frequency characteristics of the

CSVCO circuit

40
5.4 Frequency Divider
The circuit diagram of a pass transistor based DFF frequency divider circuit is shown in the

Figure 5.12. The circuit divides the frequency by a factor of 2. The simulation result of the divide

by 2 circuits is shown in the Figure 5.13

Figure5.12 Circuit diagram of a pass transistor based DFF frequency divider circuit

Figure5.13 Simulation result of the divide by 2 circuits

5.5 Phase Locked Loop
The output of the charge pump and loop filter circuit i.e. the control voltage will maintain a

constant value when the references signal and feedback signal are in lock. The control voltage of

PLL for the schematic level is shown in the Figure 5.14. From the Figure 5.14 it’s clear that the

control maintains the constant value of 0.9 V at time 280.6 ns. So the lock time of PLL is

280.6 ns.

Figure5.14 Variation of the control voltage w.r.t. time

The layout of the PLL is shown in the Figure 5.15. The most of the area of the PLL is

consumed by the resistor and capacitor used in the filter network. Different signals like UP,

DOWN, Control Voltage, reference signal and feedback input signal of the PLL in the lock state

are shown in the Figure 5.16 and Figure 5.17 for schematic level and post layout level

respectively. From the Figure 5.16 and 5.17 it’s clear that when the control voltage is constant, the

reference signal and the feedback input signal are almost similar as their phase and frequency are

approximately same.
 Figure5.15 Layout of the PLL circuit

Figure5.16 Different signals of PLL in lock state for schematic level

 Figure5.17 Different signals of PLL in lock state for post layout level simulation

The phase noise analysis of the PLL is carried out both in the schematic as well as in the post

layout level. The phase noise is found to be -86.21 dBc/Hz and -101.7 dBc/Hz in schematic and

post layout level respectively. The phase noise variation of the PLL both in schematic and post

layout level simulation are shown in the Figure 5.18 and 5.19 respectively.

Figure5.18 Phase noise variation of PLL w.r.t. offset frequency for schematic level simulation
 Figure5.19 Phase noise variation of PLL w.r.t. offset frequency for post layout level simulation

The performance comparison of the PLL both in schematic and post layout level simulation are
mentioned in the Table 8.
Table 8 Performance comparison of PLL circuit
 CHAPTER 6

CONCLUSION AND
FUTURE WORK
Conclusion and Future Work
1. In this work a PLL with a better lock time is presented. The lock time of the PLL is found

to be 280.6 ns.

2. The PLL circuit consumes a power of 11.9 mW from a 1.8 V D.C. supply

3. The lock time of the PLL mainly depends upon the type of PFD architecture used and the

parameters of the charge pump and loop filter. So by properly choosing the PFD

architecture and adjusting the charge pump current and the loop filter component values a

better lock time can be achieved.

4. The centre frequency of oscillation of the VCO depends upon the sizing of the transistors.

The frequency deviation from the desired value can be reduced by properly choosing the

transistor sizes.

5. By applying the convex optimization technique with frequency of oscillation as the main

objective function, the deviation of oscillation frequency is minimized to 0.00457% from

1.2%.

6. Here the convex technique is used to find out the transistor sizing to meet only the

desired frequency specification. The other constraints like area, power and phase noise

can also be applied.

References

[1] R.E. Best, “Phase Locked Loops Design, Simulation and Applications,” McGraw-Hill

Publication, 5th Edition, 2003.

[2] Dan H. Wolaver, “Phase Locked Loop Circuit Design,” Prentice Hall Publication, 1991.

[3] R.J.Baker, H.W.Li, and D.E.Boyce, “CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation,” IEEE

Press Series on Microelectronic Systems, 2002.

[4] S. M. Shahruz, “Novel phase-locked loops with enhanced locking capabilities,” Journal of

Sound and Vibration, Vol. 241, Issue 3, 29 March 2001, Pages 513-523.

[5] B. Razavi, “Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits,” Tata McGraw Hill Edition,2002

[6] M.Mansuri, D.Liu, and C.K.Yang, “Fast Frequency Acquisition Phase Frequency Detector

for GSamples/s Phase Locked Loops,” IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuit, Vol. 37, No. 10,

Oct., 2002.

[7] Youngshin Woo, Young Min Jang and Man Young Sung, “Phase-locked loop with dual

phase frequency detectors for high-frequency operation and fast acquisition,”

Microelectronics Journal, Vol. 33, Issue 3, March 2002, Pages 245-252.

[8] Quan Sun, Yonguang Zhang, Christine Hu-Guo, Kimmo Jaaskelainen and Yann Hu, “A fully

integrated CMOS voltage regulator for supply-noise-insensitive charge pump PLL design,”

Microelectronics Journal, Vol. 41, Issue 4, April 2010, Pages 240-246

[9] S.J.Li, and H.H.Hsieh,” A 10 GHz Phase-Locked Loop with a Compact Low-Pass Filter in

0.18 µm CMOS Technology”, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, VOL. 19,

NO. 10, OCTOBER 2009

[10] H.Janardhan, and M.F.Wagdy “Design of a 1GHz Digital PLL Using 0.18 µm CMOS

Technology,” IEEE Proc. of the Third International Conference on Information Technology,

2006.

[11] S.M.Kang, and Y.Leblebici, “CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits: Analysis and Design,”

McGraw-Hill Publication, 3rd Edition, 2003.

[12] A. Arakali, S. Gondi, and P. K.Hanumolu, “Analysis and Design Techniques for Supply-

Noise Mitigation in Phase-Locked Loops”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—I:

Regular Papers, Vol. 57, No. 11, Nov. 2010.

[13] T.H. Lee and A. Hajimiri, “Oscillator Phase Noise: a Tutorial,” IEEE Journal of Solid-

State Circuits, vol. 35, March 2000, pp. 326 – 336.

[14] B. Razavi “A Study of Phase Noise in CMOS Oscillators”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State

Circuits, Vol. 31, No. 3, March 1996.

[15] A.Mehrotra, “Noise Analysis of Phase-Locked Loops”, IEEE Tran. On Circuits and

Systems-I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, Vol. 49, No. 9, Sept. 2002.

[16] A.Hajimiri, S.Limotyrakis, and T.H.Lee, “Jitter and Phase Noise in Ring Oscillators”,

IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 34, No. 6, March 1999.

[17] Martin John Burbidge and J. Tijou, “Towards generic charge-pump phase-locked loop,

jitter estimation techniques using indirect on chip methods,” Integration, the VLSI Journal,

Volume 40, Issue 2, February 2007, Pages 133-14.

[18] Alper Demir, “Computing Timing Jitter From Phase Noise Spectra for Oscillators and

Phase-Locked Loops with White and 1/f Noise”, IEEE Tran. On Circuits and Systems-I:

Regular Papers, Vol. 53, No. 9, Sept. 2006.

[19] X.Gao, Eric A.M.Klumperink, Paul F.J.Geraedts, and B.Nauta, “Jitter Analysis and a

Benchmarking Figure-of-Merit for Phase-Locked Loops”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits

and Systems-II: Express Briefs, Vol. 56, No. 2, Feb. 2009.

[20] M. Curtin and P. O’Brien, “Phase locked Loops for High Frequency Receivers and

Transmitters”, Analog Dialogue, VOL 33.3,1999.

[21] M.D.M.Hershenson,T.H.Lee and S.P.Boyd,“Optimal Design of CMOS Op-Amp via

Geometric Programming,” IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuit, Vol. 37, No. 10, Oct., 2002.

[22] H. Hindi,”A Tutorial on Convex Optimization”, Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto,

California

[23] S.P.Boyd,S.J.Kim,D.D.Patil, and M.A.Horowitz, “ Digital Circuit Optimization via

Geometric Programming”, Operations Research, VOL. 53, NO.6,pp.892-932,Nov.2005.

[24] D.Ghai,S.P.Mohanty, and E. Kougianos, “ Design of Parasitic and Process Variation

Aware Nano-CMOS RF Circuits: A VCO Case Study”, IEEE Tran. On Very Large Scale

Integration (VLSI) Systems, Vol. 17, No. 9, Sep., 2009.

[25] P. C. Maulik, L. R. Carley, and D. J. Allstot, “Sizing of cell-level analog circuits using

constrained optimization techniques,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 28, pp. 233–

241, Mar. 1993.

50
 List of Publications
Conference:
1. B.P.Panda, P.K.Rout, D.P.Acharya, and G.Panda “Analysis and Design of 1GHz PLL

for Fast Phase and Frequency Acquisition”Proc. of International Conference on

Electronic System, India”, pp 212-215, Jan 2011.

2. B.P.Panda, P.K.Rout, D.P.Acharya, and G.Panda “Design of a Novel Current Starved

VCO via Constrained Geometric Programming “Proc. of International Symposium on

Devices MEMS Intelligent Systems and Communication”, pp 224-228, Sikkim, India,

April, 2011.

Journal:
1. B.P.Panda, P.K.Rout, D.P.Acharya, and G.Panda “Analysis and Design of 1GHz PLL

for Fast Phase and Frequency Acquisition” International Journal of Signals and

Imaging Systems Engineering, May, 2011(In Press).

2. B.P.Panda, P.K.Rout, D.P.Acharya, and G.Panda “Design of a Novel Current Starved

VCO via Constrained Geometric Programming” International Journal of Computer

Application”, April, 2011. (In Press)