Scribd
Upload
103 views2 pages

Department of Education: School-In Service Training On Project Gate (Gifted and Talented Education) JUNE 2, 2006

The document is an evaluation tool for a school-in-service training on gifted and talented education provided by the Department of Education in the Philippines. It contains sections for participants to rate sessions, speakers, program objectives and content, and administrative arrangements. Participants are asked to provide benefits gained, learning from simulations, and suggestions to improve future programs.

Uploaded by

Eva G. Agarra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
103 views2 pages

Department of Education: School-In Service Training On Project Gate (Gifted and Talented Education) JUNE 2, 2006

The document is an evaluation tool for a school-in-service training on gifted and talented education provided by the Department of Education in the Philippines. It contains sections for participants to rate sessions, speakers, program objectives and content, and administrative arrangements. Participants are asked to provide benefits gained, learning from simulations, and suggestions to improve future programs.

Uploaded by

Eva G. Agarra
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
REGIONAL OFFICE V
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF NAGA CITY

SCHOOL-IN SERVICE TRAINING ON PROJECT GATE (GIFTED AND TALENTED


EDUCATION)
JUNE 2, 2006

TRAINING EVALUATION TOOL

Name: ________________________________ School/Office __________________________


District: _______________________________ Position/Designation ____________________
Date of Evaluation: _____________________ Gender: Male ________ Female _________

A. On Sessions and Resource Speakers/Facilitators

4= Strongly Agree| 3=Agree| 2=Disagree| 1=Strongly Disagree


Strongly Strongly
Agree Disagree
Relevant Items Agree Disagree
(3) (2)
(4) (1)
1. The sessions started on time.
2. The sessions ended on time.
3. The topics were relevant to my area of work.
4. The learning objectives of the sessions were
met.
5. The sessions were relevant to what I might be
expected.
6. The time allotted for the sessions were
sufficient for me to absorb or accomplish
outputs.
7. The organization and sequence of topics
facilitated my learning.
8. The facilitator/speakers stimulated my
interest in the subject matter.
9. The speakers/facilitators demonstrate
mastery of topic.
10. The speakers/facilitators encouraged
participation.
11. The speakers/facilitators explained the topics
in an understandable level/in a clear and
effective manner.
12. The speakers/facilitators answered questions
clearly and completely.
13. The facilitators’ skills on the use of delivery
support materials (the use of slide decks)
aided my learning.
14. The participants were able to demonstrate
their learning.
15. The speakers/facilitators demonstrated a

1
positive attitude.

B. On Program Objectives, Content and Result*


4= Strongly Agree| 3=Agree| 2=Disagree| 1=Strongly Disagree
Strongly Strongly
Agree Disagree
Relevant Items Agree Disagree
(3) (2)
(4) (1)
1. Program objectives were fully achieved.
2. Program content was sufficient to meet the
objectives.
3. The pacing and duration of the program
were just right.
4. The program content introduced new and
relevant ideas that are useful for personal,
interpersonal, and organizational
advancement.
5. This program is highly recommended to
others.

C. On Administrative Arrangements*
4= Strongly Agree| 3=Agree| 2=Disagree| 1=Strongly Disagree
Strongly Strongly
Agree Disagree
Relevant Items Agree Disagree
(3) (2)
(4) (1)
1. Program was well prepared and managed.
2. The registration process was organized and
systematic.
3. Relevant information (registration,
Weblink, sessions, etc.) were available and
accessible.
4. The members of the secretariat were
efficient, response-able, and courteous in
answering concerns via email/phone call.

Cite the benefits you gained from the program. Please suggest module(s) or topic(s) to be included
in the future trainings: *

________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
Cite your important learning on the simulation of the different online platforms discussed: *

Suggestion(s) on how to further improve the management of the program: *

________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy