Chernobyl's Case Study

Engineering Ethics - Chernobyl’s Case Study
The Chernobyl disaster was nuclear accident that occurred at Chernobyl Nuclear
Power Plant on April 26, 1986. A nuclear meltdown in one of the reactors caused a fire
that sent a plume of radioactive fallout that eventually spread all over Europe.
Chernobyl nuclear reactor plant, built at the banks of Pripyat river of Ukraine, had four
reactors, each capable of producing 1,000 MWs of electric power.
On the evening of April 25th 1986, a group of engineers, planned an electrical
engineering experiment on the Number 4 Reactor. With their little knowledge on
Nuclear physics, they thought of experimenting how long turbines would spin and
supply power to the main circulating pumps following a loss of main electrical power
supply.
Following is an image of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant.
What Led to the Disaster?

Let us now see what led to the disaster.
The reactor unit 4 was to be shut down for routine maintenance on 25 April 1986. But,
it was decided to take advantage of this shutdown to determine whether, in the event of
a loss of station power, the slowing turbine could provide enough electrical power to
operate the main core cooling water circulating pumps, until the diesel emergency
power supply became operative. The aim of this test was to determine whether
cooling of the core could continue in the event of a loss of power.
Due to the misconception that this experiment belongs to the non-nuclear part of the
power plant, it was carried out without a proper exchange of information between the
testing department and the safety department. Hence the test started with inadequate
safety precautions and the operating personnel were not alerted to the nuclear safety
implications of the electrical test and its potential danger.
The Experiment
According to the test planned, the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) of the
reactor, which provides water for cooling the reactor core, was shut down deliberately.
For the test to be conducted, the reactor has to be stabilized at about 700-1000 MW
prior to shut down, but it fell down to 5000 MW due to some operational phenomenon.
Later, the operator working in the night shift committed an error, by inserting the
reactor control rods so far. This caused the reactor to go into a near-shutdown state,
dropping the power output to around 30 MW.
Since this low power was not sufficient to make the test and will make the reactor
unstable, it was decided to restore the power by extracting the control rods, which
made the power stabilize at 200 MW. This was actually a violation to safety law, due to
the positive void co-efficiency of the reactor. Positive void coefficient is the
increasing number of reactivity in a reactor that changes into steam. The test was
decided to be carried out at this power level.
Actually, the reactors were highly unstable at the low power level, primarily owing to
the control rod design and the positive void coefficient factors that accelerated nuclear
chain reaction and the power output if the reactors lost cooling water.
The following image shows the reactor 4 where the experiment was conducted. This
picture was taken after everything was restored.
At 1:23, on April 26th 1986, the engineers continued with their experiment and shut
down the turbine engine to see if its inertial spinning would power the reactor’s water
pumps. In fact, it did not adequately power the water pumps and without the cooling
water the power level in the reactor got surged.
The water pumps started pumping water at a slower rate and they together with the
entry to the core of slightly warmer feed water, may have caused boiling (void
formation) at the bottom of the core. This, along with xenon burn out, might have
increased the power level at the core. The power level was then increased to 530 MW
and continued to rise. The fuel elements were ruptured and lead to steam generation,
which increased the positive void coefficient resulting in high power output.
The high power output alarmed the engineers who tried to insert all the 200 control
rods, which is a conventional procedure done in order to control the core temperature.
But these rods got blocked half the way, because of their graphite tip design. So,
before the control rods with their five-meter absorbent material, could penetrate the
core, 200 graphite tips simultaneously entered the core which facilitated the reaction to
increase, causing an explosion that blew off the 1,000-ton heavy steel and concrete lid
of the reactor, consequently jamming the control rods, which were halfway down the
reactor. As the channel pipes begin to rupture, mass steam generation occurred as a
result of depressurization of the reactor cooling circuit.
As a result, two explosions were reported. The first one was the initial steam explosion.
Eventually, after two to three seconds, a second explosion took place, which could be
possibly from the build-up of hydrogen due to zirconium-steam reactions.
All the materials such as Fuel, Moderator and Structural materials were ejected,
starting a number of fires and the destroyed core was exposed to the atmosphere. In
the explosion and ensuing fire, more than 50 tons of radioactive material were released
into the atmosphere, where it was carried by air currents. This was 400 times to the
amount of radioactive materials released at the time of Hiroshima bombing.
Fatal Effects of the Disaster
The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant disaster in Ukraine, is the only accident in the
history of commercial nuclear power to cause fatalities from radiation.
There were many fatal effects due to the radiation released. A few of the effects are
listed below −
 Two workers had died. One immediately got burnt to ashes after the accident,
while the other was declared dead at the hospital within few hours of admission.
 28 emergency workers and staff died within 4 months of the accident due to the
thermal burns and the radiation effect on their bodies.
 This accident created 7,000 cases of thyroid cancer.
 Acute radiation syndrome (ARS) was diagnosed in 237 people, who were on-site
and involved in cleaning up
 The land, air and ground water were all contaminated to a great extent.
 The direct and indirect exposure to radiation led to many severe health problems
such as Downs Syndrome, Chromosomal Aberrations, Mutations, Leukemia,
Thyroid Cancer and Congenital Malfunctions, etc.
 A number of plants and animal faced destruction as after-effect.

Chernobyl's Case Study

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chernobyl's Case Study

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chernobyl's Case Study

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Engineering Ethics - Chernobyl’s Case Study

What Led to the Disaster?

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.