100% found this document useful (4 votes)
2K views

Writing Assessment Criteria: CEFR A1

This document outlines assessment criteria for writing at CEFR level A1. It is divided into three categories: Task Achievement, Grammatical Range & Accuracy, and Lexical Range & Accuracy. Each category is scored from 0 to 1, with descriptors provided for performance at 0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.2, and 0 levels. The descriptors specify the grammatical structures, spelling, word order, errors, range of lexis, and other factors expected at each performance level for a writing sample at CEFR level A1.

Uploaded by

GERES
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (4 votes)
2K views

Writing Assessment Criteria: CEFR A1

This document outlines assessment criteria for writing at CEFR level A1. It is divided into three categories: Task Achievement, Grammatical Range & Accuracy, and Lexical Range & Accuracy. Each category is scored from 0 to 1, with descriptors provided for performance at 0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.2, and 0 levels. The descriptors specify the grammatical structures, spelling, word order, errors, range of lexis, and other factors expected at each performance level for a writing sample at CEFR level A1.

Uploaded by

GERES
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Writing assessment criteria: CEFR A1

Task Achievement Grammatical Range and Accuracy Lexical Range & Accuracy
1.0 Task well achieved Grammatical Structures: Very simple but Range: Sufficient range of lexis to complete
mostly correct the task
Intention: Generally clear
Spelling: Some mistakes that do not impede Errors: Very simple lexis used mostly
Purpose: Achieved
comprehension appropriately with some misuse.
Instructions: All instructions followed
Word order: Mostly correct
Content: Most relevant details included
Errors: Some, but do not significantly impede
Effect: A positive effect on the reader meaning,

0.8 Performance shares features of bands 2 and 3 Performance shares features of bands 2 and 3 Performance shares features of bands 2
and 3
0.6 Task achieved, some gaps Grammatical structures: Suitable for the level. Range: A narrow repertoire but adequate to
Uses some very simple structures correctly, but complete the task.
Intention: Clear in most areas
still systematically makes basic mistakes
Errors: Errors are frequent but do not
Purpose. Achieved Spelling: Adequate, mistakes do not impede
impede meaning.
comprehension.
Instructions: Most important ones followed
Word order: Mostly correct, mistakes don’t
Content: Relevant details included impede comprehension.
Effect: A generally positive effect on the Errors: Frequent mistakes even in very simple
reader. sentences – tends to mix up tenses and forget to
mark agreement; nevertheless, it is usually clear
what he/she is trying to say.
0.4 Performance shares features of bands 1 and 2 Performance shares features of bands 1 and 2 Performance shares features of bands 1
and 2
0.2 Task entirely unachieved Grammatical Structures: Very simple, many Range: Very narrow
mistakes.
Intention: Very unclear. Errors: Too many, they impede meaning
Spelling: Very poor, mistakes impede
Purpose: Not achieved
comprehension.
Instructions: /Most / all not followed
Word order: Mostly incorrect.
Content: Omission, irrelevance.
Effect: negative effect on the reader Errors: Many, they impede meaning.
0.0 Task unattempted / partially attempted Not Little or no evidence of grammatical knowledge No relevant lexis organized into sentences,
enough language to make an assessment of simple structures, or under 10 words. or under 10 words
(under 10 words).
Adapted from: http://www.euroexam.com/sites/network/files/file/download/Marking_Criteria/EuroA1WritingScalesLevelDescriptorsE.pdf

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy