Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 108 views

    b1 Writing

    Uploaded by

    GERES
    This document outlines assessment criteria for writing at the CEFR B1 level. It evaluates tasks based on three areas: task achievement, grammatical range and accuracy, and lexical range and accuracy. Task achievement is scored from 1.0 to 0.2 based on how well the task's intention, purpose, instructions, effect, outcome and content are achieved. Grammatical structures and accuracy are scored based on their complexity, spelling, word order, punctuation and errors. Lexical range and accuracy are scored based on the range of vocabulary used and how appropriately it is applied. Performance is described for bands between levels to provide descriptors at 0.8 and 0.6 intervals.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    b1 Writing

    Uploaded by

    GERES
    108 views2 pages
    This document outlines assessment criteria for writing at the CEFR B1 level. It evaluates tasks based on three areas: task achievement, grammatical range and accuracy, and lexical range and accuracy. Task achievement is scored from 1.0 to 0.2 based on how well the task's intention, purpose, instructions, effect, outcome and content are achieved. Grammatical structures and accuracy are scored based on their complexity, spelling, word order, punctuation and errors. Lexical range and accuracy are scored based on the range of vocabulary used and how appropriately it is applied. Performance is described for bands between levels to provide descriptors at 0.8 and 0.6 intervals.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document outlines assessment criteria for writing at the CEFR B1 level. It evaluates tasks based on three areas: task achievement, grammatical range and accuracy, and lexical range and accuracy. Task achievement is scored from 1.0 to 0.2 based on how well the task's intention, purpose, instructions, effect, outcome and content are achieved. Grammatical structures and accuracy are scored based on their complexity, spelling, word order, punctuation and errors. Lexical range and accuracy are scored based on the range of vocabulary used and how appropriately it is applied. Performance is described for bands between levels to provide descriptors at 0.8 and 0.6 intervals.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    108 views2 pages

    b1 Writing

    Uploaded by

    GERES
    This document outlines assessment criteria for writing at the CEFR B1 level. It evaluates tasks based on three areas: task achievement, grammatical range and accuracy, and lexical range and accuracy. Task achievement is scored from 1.0 to 0.2 based on how well the task's intention, purpose, instructions, effect, outcome and content are achieved. Grammatical structures and accuracy are scored based on their complexity, spelling, word order, punctuation and errors. Lexical range and accuracy are scored based on the range of vocabulary used and how appropriately it is applied. Performance is described for bands between levels to provide descriptors at 0.8 and 0.6 intervals.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Writing assessment criteria: CEFR B1

    Task Achievement Grammatical Range and Accuracy Lexical Range & Accuracy
    1.0 Task well achieved at a high level Grammatical Structures: Adequate Basic, but adequate range of lexis to
    complete the task, some original lexical
    Intention: Entirely clear Spelling: Adequate
    solutions Lexis used fully appropriately with
    Purpose: Completely followed Word order:Correct with only occasional slips very few occasional misuse
    Punctuation: Used properly throughout
    Instructions: All instructions followed
    Errors: Very few basic errors
    Effect: A positive effect on the reader
    Outcome: Sure to achieve a successful
    outcome
    Content: All relevant details included Some
    original ideas or presentation
    0.8 Performance shares features of bands 2 and Performance shares features of bands 2 and 3 Performance shares features of bands 2
    3 and 3
    0.6 Task achieved, some gaps Grammatical structures: Simple but mostly correct Sufficient range of lexis to complete the task
    Spelling: Mistakes that do not impede Lexis used mostly appropriately with some
    Intention: Clear in most areas Instructions:
    comprehension occasional misuse
    All important ones followed
    Word order: Mostly correct.
    Effect: A generally positive effect on the
    reader. Punctuation: Mostly effective
    Outcome: Likely to achieve a successful Errors: Some, but do not significantly impede
    outcome meaning.
    Content: Many relevant details included
    0.4 Performance shares features of bands 1 and Performance shares features of bands 1 and 2 Performance shares features of bands 1
    2 and 2
    0.2 Task unachieved Grammatical Structures: Very simple with Poor range of lexis to complete the task
    frequent and serious mistakes Lexis used inappropriately in most cases
    Intention: Very unclear.
    Instructions: Most /all not followed Spelling: Very poor
    Effect: negative Word order: Often wrong
    Outcome: Will not achieve a successful Punctuation: Often wrong
    outcome
    Content: Omission, irrelevance.
    0.0 Task unattempted / partially attempted Not Little or no evidence of grammatical knowledge of No relevant lexis organized into sentences,
    enough language to make an assessment simple structures, or under 50 words. or under 50 words.
    (under 50 words).

    Adapted from: http://www.euroexam.com/sites/network/files/file/download/Marking_Criteria/EuroB1WritingScalesLevelDescriptorsE.pdf

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy