The Science of Love
The Science of Love
The Science of Love
Helen Fisher of Rutgers University in the States has proposed 3 stages of love – lust, attraction
and attachment. Each stage might be driven by different hormones and chemicals.
Stage 1: Lust
This is the first stage of love and is driven by the sex hormones testosterone and oestrogen – in
both men and women.
Stage 2: Attraction
This is the amazing time when you are truly love-struck and can think of little else.
Scientists think that three main neurotransmitters are involved in this stage;
adrenaline, dopamine and serotonin.
Adrenaline
The initial stages of falling for someone activates your stress response, increasing
your blood levels of adrenalin and cortisol. This has the charming effect that when
you unexpectedly bump into your new love, you start to sweat, your heart races and
your mouth goes dry.
Dopamine
Helen Fisher asked newly ‘love struck’ couples to have their brains
examined and discovered they have high levels of the neurotransmitter
dopamine. This chemical stimulates ‘desire and reward’ by triggering an
intense rush of pleasure. It has the same effect on the brain as taking
cocaine!
Serotonin
And finally, serotonin. One of love's most important chemicals that may explain why when
you’re falling in love, your new lover keeps popping into your thoughts.
Does love change the way you think?
A landmark experiment in Pisa, Italy showed that early love (the attraction phase) really changes
the way you think.
Newly smitten lovers often idealise their partner, magnifying their virtues and explaining away
their flaws says Ellen Berscheid, a leading researcher on the psychology of love.
New couples also exalt the relationship itself. “It's very common to think they have a relationship
that's closer and more special than anyone else's”. Psychologists think we need this rose-tinted
view. It makes us want to stay together to enter the next stage of love – attachment.
Stage 3: Attachment
Attachment is the bond that keeps couples together long enough for them to have and raise
children. Scientists think there might be two major hormones involved in this feeling of
attachment; oxytocin and vasopressin.
Oxytocin also seems to help cement the strong bond between mum and baby and
is released during childbirth. It is also responsible for a mum’s breast
automatically releasing milk at the mere sight or sound of her young baby.
Diane Witt, assistant professor of psychology from New York has showed that if
you block the natural release of oxytocin in sheep and rats, they reject their own
young.
Conversely, injecting oxytocin into female rats who’ve never had sex, caused
them to fawn over another female’s young, nuzzling the pups and protecting
them as if they were their own.
Vasopressin
Vasopressin is another important hormone in the long-term commitment stage and is released
after sex.
Vasopressin (also called anti-diuretic hormone) works with your kidneys to control thirst. Its
potential role in long-term relationships was discovered when scientists looked at the prairie
vole.
Prairie voles indulge in far more sex than is strictly necessary for the purposes of reproduction.
They also – like humans - form fairly stable pair-bonds.
When male prairie voles were given a drug that suppresses the effect of vasopressin, the bond
with their partner deteriorated immediately as they lost their devotion and failed to protect their
partner from new suitors.
And finally … how to fall in love
York psychologist, Professor Arthur Arun, has been studying why people fall in love.
He asked his subjects to carry out the above 3 steps and found that many of his couples felt
deeply attracted after the 34 minute experiment. Two of his subjects later got married.
But that really doesn't paint a fair picture, doesn't it? Just because we can do a bit of reductio ad
absurdum and come up with over-simplified statements that lead us to a desired conclusion,
doesn't mean that it makes sense on the level that we live our lives. "Well, because I'm only
composed of really worthless elements — hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, calcium and adamantium†
— I must not be all that valuable."
Yes, love is an adaptation to bond us to our kind. Those born with stronger bonds worked
together and pooled resources. They out-competed those who didn't bond with their kind. They
increased survival because coordination frequently delivers better results than "going it alone".
That bonding caused those with it to breed more successfully over those who did not and thus
they passed that trait on. In some creatures, the bonding grew and grew as it became an auto-
catalytic mechanism.
Like Birds of Paradise continuously selecting for brighter and brighter plumage, love -- itself --
caused those with it to select those who demonstrated more and more of it. Those with greater
bonding capacity, passed it on, while those without it met with less success. Eventually that
capacity for bonding with its own kind reached the stage where we're at today -- and in English
we label that profound emotional bond, "love". (But mom simply calls it, "Oxytocin" -- she's
such a romantic!).
This misses the gestalt of a thing. "A system of phenomena or integral pattern that forms a
functioning unit in which the whole is more than the sum of its constituent parts." Love may
have been that. Love may be that. But for us, it's so much more. I couldn't care less if I'm a
determinalistic ugly bag of mostly water. . . it still feels real and feels important.
We've grown beyond simple evolutionary pressures. The fortuitous gifts of our evolutionary
history have accumulated into a species in which the total sum of those individual gifts
(emotions, logic, curiosity, creativity, order, chaos, pattern recognition, bravery, etc.) is far
greater than each of them alone. Taken one by one, they'd be very interesting. Crammed
together into one brain, they deliver a creature of extraordinary purpose and value.
†I'm just fucking cool like that?! Oh you don't have a skeleton laced with Adamantium? Pah!
Updated 3 Oct, 2014 • View Upvotes
More Answers Below.
Related Questions
If I consider my brain as a hardware piece of computer, with operating system being the
genes, and my response as sheer chemical reactions, am...
Are there any aspects of the emotion of love that are seriously considered by scientists,
outside of chemical reactions in the brain or a soci...
Is love more than a chemical reaction?
Is love just some chemical reactions in our brain? So why do people put lots of efforts
into it?
How do you know if you are in love? How do you know its not just chemicals in your
brain trying to trick you to reproduce?
So in what sense is it a "trick"? It's the mechanism by which you identify the people whom you
care about the most and who return your care. Clearly, as social animals who rely on deep bonds
of cooperation for survival, we need a way to keep track of the people we trust and care about.
Why would the specific mechanism for doing that matter in the slightest?
Ref:
Oxytocin and Emotional Bonding
Intoxicated by Love
Is It Just a Trick?
Knowing that strong feelings are triggered by brain chemistry can sometimes make people feel
uncomfortable, as if it were all a trick. Are we cold-bloodedly manipulating ourselves into
feeling love for our partners?
Really, this is a problem that crops up whenever we learn more about how our minds and bodies
work. For example, researchers often talk about consciousness and self-awareness being
“illusions” created by the brain. This upsets a lot of people. But when you dig into what they
mean, they are not saying that the way we experience our own existence is false. They’re just
saying that consciousness and self-awareness are constructed by the brain from the output from
other brain systems that are not conscious and self-aware.
It would be more accurate to say that consciousness is a model of your body and your
environment that lets you plan actions and anticipate changes, and that self-awareness is a model
of your own mind that is created by your brain to let you think about yourself and think about
thinking. That’s an interesting and convoluted way of describing it, but it’s also quite a mouthful,
so it’s easier to just call it an illusion, even if that’s misleading for people outside the field.
In the case of ... oxytocin, the important thing to remember is that oxytocin just amplifies
favorable feelings; it doesn’t create them. If you don’t care for someone, cuddling with
them won’t make you love them. In fact, there’s some research that shows that oxytocin
also amplifies dislike, making people who are exposed to an oxytocin nasal spray more
inclined to dislike members of an opposing group.
(emphasis added)
Written 6 Oct, 2014 • View Upvotes
Adriana Heguy, genomics researcher
1.4k Views • Adriana has 300+ answers and 79 endorsements in Evolutionary Biology.
As a biologist, I'm annoyed at the usage of supposedly "cold" biology-based words to belittle or
simplify human emotions or behaviors.
So what if there is a lot of neurochemistry and endocrine function involved in experiencing the
profound emotion of attachment that we call "love"? So what if evolutionary pressures led us to
feel strong attachments to other humans? It's no less extraordinary or complex or powerful
because it has a biological basis, is it?
We fall in love and pair-bond and get bathed in oxytocin because that contributes greatly to the
survival of our children. We fall in love even deeper when we first see our babies, and we all
become Momma Bear at that point (or Papa Bear), don't mess with our cubs! But is that less
extraordinary because evolution favored that type of overwhelmingly strong parent-offspring
bond in mamnmals? Some chemical trick that is!
I personally think the biological complexity of the whole thing, makes it even more
extraordinary and awe inspiring.
Updated 7 Oct, 2014 • View Upvotes • Not for Reproduction
Nick Nuzzo
258 Views • Upvoted by Adriana Heguy, molecular biologist, genomics researcher
Emotions are a lot more complicated than helping to "pass on genes" and the way they work in
the brain is a lot more complicated than a "chemical reaction." Especially something like
"love." It depends on how you define love and it serves many purposes. If you define love as a
passion for something then it serves to give our lives meaning. It gives us a feeling of purpose.
That which we love becomes our life's self-crafted purpose. Love is more than an emotion. It is
essential to our progress as a civilization. Without love, knowledge falls on deaf ears and
thinking does not exist. For thoughts to exist there needs to be motivation and without thoughts
there exists no ideas, no innovation. Love (passion) and knowledge go together like space and
time. Having knowledge without emotion is like building a car without an engine. Emotions are
the impetus of progress!
Now if you define "love" as the emotions felt for another person. It's the same thing. The
passion is just felt for another human being rather than your interests. This kind of love is
different depending on the relationship. It does serve an evolutionary purpose... Reproduction,
protection of kin, altruism, etc, but love goes deeper than that. Fundamentally you are correct,
but the issue with love is a lot more complex than that. Love also drives social progress. It
endures. It's a bond that can last a lifetime and comes from the most primitive parts of our brain,
but our emotions are more complex than most animals and go beyond survival.
Love's purpose is not to just help us survive, it helps us thrive and brings color to our world. It
brings balance. It can do a lot for being "just" a chemical reaction.
I also believe there is an element of mystery to this thing we call "love". Sometimes there
doesn't seem to be any explanation at all for the feeling. And that's the beautiful thing about this
world.. It's mysterious. Without love science would not be beautiful to me.
Written 24 Aug • View Upvotes
Daniel Super, Uncommon Sense and Unconventional Wisdom
334 Views • Daniel has 390+ answers in Evolutionary Biology.
Love is just a word. Words are a collection sounds describing symbols that are associated with
meaning.
The word love in particular is associated with a human emotional experience. There have been
countless words written about the experience of love throughout human history.
The idea that love is a chemical reaction in the brain is a fairly new one. A more precisely
phrased definition than was used to ask this question would probably be the closest thing we
have to describing the literal significance of the world love.
Does that devalue all the words written to describe all the figurative significance to the word
love?
But while you've started stripping the significance and the purpose of love, why stop here?
You could argue that any emotion (hunger, thirst, anger, sadness, fear, ...) is just a trick our
brains pull on us to pass on our genes.
You could argue that our amazement of the beauty of nature and earth is just a trick of our genes
to make us care and protect that same earth so that we maintain an environment in which they
can thrive.
You could argue that 'life', all life forms on earth, past, present and future, including ourselves,
every human being, are just tricks that genes use to maintain themselves, to keep floating around.
Quora User
184 Views
Yes. But it’s not that easy. ’Trick’ implies a plan, but evolution doesn’t have one. Consciousness
leads to a bunch of secondary effects that influence how we perceive circumstances with bearing
on our lives. For passing on genes it has been favorable for us to organize ourselves in units of
two adults with complementary traits. To facilitate this team building, we interact within an
emotional feedback system of supporting thoughts and actions. One particularly interesting
example is the Ben Franklin effect which relates to one having done or completed a favor for
someone is more likely to do another favor for that person than they would be if they had
received a favor from that person. Ye ol’ give and receive, push–pull, live and let live, love and
be loved – the Golden Rule, basically.
Written 12 Mar • View Upvotes
Tony Nguyen
200 Views
Love is an imprecise word that can refer to any relationships that are mutually beneficially in
some way. The chemical trick can't be called love because it is only a part of love, and it isn't one
trick but a number of tricks, and it isn't a trick but is actually a process that isn't well known to
the average person. The processes includes chemicals such as serotonin, oxytocin, nerve growth
factor, cortisol, etc. Certain stimuli-signals activate certain neurons which release certain
chemicals that trigger other certain neurons that alter behaviour. Its purpose isn't to pass on
genes, actually it doesn't have a purpose at all. It just happens to have been effective for our
ancestors and you're anthropomorphizing it by suggesting that it is purposeful like a whole
human. Under different conditions, different processes would arise.
Written 18 Sep, 2014 • View Upvotes
Demi OG, Freshman at AMDA University, Dancer, health enthusiast, gym junkie.
104 Views
LOVE, is NOT chemical. Not at all. Human beings tend to try and accept simple descriptions
and defenitions such as these in order to move along in life with ease and without worry, or in
otherwords, not accept that some things cannot be fully understood and therefore are prone to
complication and thus, behold, the common fear of the unknown. The visible word 'love' is
mainly the result of how we humans have a tendancy to put a title or name for everything we
discover, and usually, after that thing is discovered we humans are able to give an appropriate
description or definition for it. But of course, Love is something we just have not been able to
fully comprehend because our minds cannot fully wrap around the fact that there are many little
details that can alter what we've come to know about love on our own or from others or both. In
any case, I always suggest this to anyone who is having doubts as to whether or not Love is good
or bad or even 'chemical'.... You MUST see LOVE as a living thing, a life within your life that,
just like your normal life, has it's own climaxes, downfalls, and resolutions, just like your normal
life it has endless doors to explore, so much as to if you remain in the 'gray area' the place of 'if I
do nothing than nothing can hurt me'..then you will NEVER GROW into the person you were
ment to be. Always remember that sufffering and pain are inevitable in any life, especially a
Love life, but you have to admit that they are the parts of life that you learn the MOST from, and
once you accept them, everything becomes so much brighter, easier, and less complicated thus
you become the dictator of your emotions and not the other way around because you know
better. It's good to feel emotions fully, but do NOT let them determine your actions, let alone
your whole outlook on life. Explore Love deeply and vastly, because that's how it's meant to be.
Written 21 Sep, 2014
Related Questions
Love: I'm afraid of getting hurt by her. She hurts me again and again, but still I'm
worrying about her and I want to talk to her even though I know...
Love: Could any Bollywood celebrity help me get the girl that I like?
Love: Why do most girls say this line after a break up: "I will be a good friend of yours. I
will help you whenever you want, but for now I need to ...
What chemical can hold a cell pore open so a gene for gene therapy can pass into a cell?
Can computer/brain interfacing, altering genes, and brain implants help cure mental
illness?
Is love magical?
I am just wondering why is Scary to feel LOVE? Cause hurt in the pass, is it a good
reason, i don't know... help please
Five Love Languages: I just read The Five Love Languages and I learned so much. How
can I get my spouse to recognize mine?
Love: What are some great real-life love stories that you have heard?
Love: How do I go forward now that I have messed up?
Love: If you feel happy after talking to someone and want to talk to them 24-7, what
should you do?
Love: I met a guy on an app and fell deeply in love with him. We met and had fun, but he
ended up cheating on me. I know it's my fault for believing...
Love: What are some possible dating sites for the hyper-lateral thinkers in our
generational society, where we can be better understood by those tha...
Is intelligence just the byproduct of a chemical synergy happening in your brain?
Love: Should I let go a person who is angry and doesn't want to talk or should I wait?