0% found this document useful (0 votes)
42 views3 pages

D. Class Notes of Topology-I, Semester-I, Unit-I

(1) The document presents the proof of Zorn's lemma which states that either there is an injection from set X to set Y or vice versa. (2) It defines a partial ordered set (S, ≤) of injections between subsets of X and Y and uses Zorn's lemma to show it has a maximal element, proving the lemma. (3) It also shows that Zorn's lemma implies the Hausdorff maximality principle, which guarantees every partially ordered set of chains has a maximal element.

Uploaded by

Sahil Sharma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
42 views3 pages

D. Class Notes of Topology-I, Semester-I, Unit-I

(1) The document presents the proof of Zorn's lemma which states that either there is an injection from set X to set Y or vice versa. (2) It defines a partial ordered set (S, ≤) of injections between subsets of X and Y and uses Zorn's lemma to show it has a maximal element, proving the lemma. (3) It also shows that Zorn's lemma implies the Hausdorff maximality principle, which guarantees every partially ordered set of chains has a maximal element.

Uploaded by

Sahil Sharma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Class Notes On Topology-I(PSMATC-104)

Semester-I, 2021
Unit-I
Dr. Anu Kumari Khanna
Department of Mathematics,
University of Jammu,Jammu,
J & K, India.

March 3, 2021

Application of Zorn’s lemma: Let X and Y be any two non-empty sets. Then either
there is an injection from X to Y or there is an injection from Y to X.

Proof: Let S = {(A, f ) : A ⊆ X and f : A → Y is an injection}.

Claim: S =
6 φ.

Since X and Y are non-empty sets, there exists x ∈ X and y ∈ Y.

Let A = {x} and f : A → Y defined by f (x) = y. Clearly, (A, f ) ∈ S and so S =


6 φ.

Now for (A, f ), (B, g) ∈ S, we define a relation ≤ as:

(A, f ) ≤ (B, g) iff A ⊆ B and f (x) = g(x), ∀x ∈ A.

We shall show that (S, ≤) is a partial ordered set.


(i) ≤ is reflexive: Let (A, f ) ∈ S. Then A ⊆ A and f (x) = f (x) ∀x ∈ A
=⇒ (A, f ) ≤ (A, f )
So, ≤ is reflexive.

(ii) ≤ is antisymmetric: Let (A, f ), (B, g) ∈ S such that (A, f ) ≤ (B, g), and
(B, g) ≤ (A, f ),
=⇒ A ⊆ B and f (x) = g(x), ∀x ∈ A
and B ⊆ A and g(x) = f (x), ∀x ∈ B.
=⇒ A = B and f (x) = g(x), ∀x ∈ A = B.
=⇒ (A, f ) = (B, g)
Therefore, ≤ is antisymmetric.
(D.O.M/ ∗ 2021)

1
(iii) ≤ is transitive: Let (A, f ), (B, g), (C, h) ∈ S such that (A, f ) ≤ (B, g), and
(B, g) ≤ (C, h)
=⇒ A ⊆ B and f (x) = g(x), ∀x ∈ A
and B ⊆ C and g(x) = h(x), ∀x ∈ B.
=⇒ A ⊆ C and f (x) = h(x), ∀x ∈ A
=⇒ (A, f ) ≤ (C, h)
Therefore, ≤ is transitive.

This proves that (S, ≤) is a partial ordered set.

Next, let A = {(Ai , fi ) : i ∈ ∆} be a chain in (S, ≤). We shall show that A has an upper
bound in (S, ≤).

For, let A = ∪i∈∆ Ai . Then A ⊆ X. Define a mapping, f : A → Y by f (x) = fi (x), if x ∈ Ai

f is well defined: Let x ∈ A be such that x ∈ Ai and x ∈ Aj for i 6= j. To show that f is


well defined map, we have to show that fi (x) = fj (x).
Since (Ai , fi ), (Aj , fj ) ∈ A and A is a chain in (S, ≤), we have either (Ai , fi ), ≤ (Aj , fj ) or
(Aj , fj ) ≤ (Ai , fi )
Suppose (Ai , fi ) ≤ (Aj , fj ). This means that Ai ⊆ Aj and fi (y) = fj (y) ∀y ∈ Ai .
Clearly, fi (x) = fj (x) and so, f is well defined.

0 0
f is one-one: Suppose x, x ∈ A be such that f (x) = f (x ). Since A = ∪i∈∆ Ai , there exists
0
i, j ∈ ∆ such that x ∈ Ai and x ∈ Aj .
Also, since (Ai , fi ), (Aj , fj ) ∈ A and A is a chain in (S, ≤), we have either (Ai , fi ), ≤ (Aj , fj ) or
(Aj , fj ) ≤ (Ai , fi )
Suppose (Ai , fi ) ≤ (Aj , fj ). This means that Ai ⊆ Aj and fi (y) = fj (y) ∀y ∈ Ai .
Now x ∈ Ai =⇒ f (x) = fi (x).
0 0 0
Again, x ∈ Aj =⇒ f (x ) = fj (x ).
0 0
Now fj (x) = fi (x) = f (x) = f (x ) = fj (x ).
0 0
=⇒ fj (x) = fj (x ) =⇒ x = x .
Therefore, f : A → Y is injective and so (A, f ) ∈ S.

Also, it is easy to see that (Ai , fi ) ≤ (A, f ), ∀i ∈ ∆, so (A, f ) is an upper bound of A in


(S, ≤).
0 0
Thus by the Zorn’s lemma, (S, ≤) has a maximal element, say (A , f ).

Now we have two cases:


0 0 0 0
Case(i): If A = X, then f : A → Y ; i.e f : X → Y is an injective map.
0 0
Case(ii): If A 6= X, then ∃ x0 ∈ X such that x0 ∈
/A.
0 0
We first show that f : A → Y is an onto map.

(D.O.M/ ∗ 2021)

2
0 0 0
For this, suppose f is not an onto map. Then f (A ) ( Y and so ∃ y0 ∈ Y such that
0 0
y0 ∈
/ f (A ).
00 0 0 00
Let A = A ∪ {x0 }. Then A ( A
00 00
Define f : A → Y by
 0 0
00 f (x) if x ∈ A
f (x) =
y0 if x = x0 .

00 00 00 00
Clearly, f : A → Y is an injection and so (A , f ) ∈ (S, ≤).
0 0 00 00 0 0 00 00 0 0 00 00
Also, it is clear that (A , f ) ≤ (A , f ) and (A , f ) 6= (A , f ); i.e (A , f ) < (A , f ), Which
0 0
contradicts the maximality of (A , f ) in (S, ≤).
0 0 0 0
This proves that f : A → Y is an onto map. Thus f : A → Y is a bijective map.
0 −1
Clearly, g = (f ) : Y → A is a bijective map and so g : Y → X is an injective map.
This completes the proof.


Theorem: Prove that Zorn’s lemma implies Hausdorff maximality principle.

Proof: Let (X, ≤) be a partially ordered set and let (C, ⊆) be the partially ordered set of
chains in X. We have to show that (C, ⊆) has a maximal element.

Let A = {Ai : i ∈ ∆} be a chain in C and let A = ∪i∈∆ Ai .

We claim that A is a chain in (X, ≤).


For this, let x, y ∈ A
=⇒ x, y ∈ ∪i∈∆ Ai
=⇒ x ∈ Ai , y ∈ Aj , for some i, j ∈ ∆.
Since Ai , Aj ∈ A and A is a chain in (C, ⊆), we have either Ai ⊆ Aj or Aj ⊆ Ai
Suppose Ai ⊆ Aj . Then x, y ∈ Aj . But Aj itself is a chain in (X, ≤). So either x ≤ y or y ≤ x.
This shows that A is a chain in (X, ≤). i.e A ∈ C.

Also, Ai ⊆ A, ∀i ∈ ∆, =⇒ A is an upper bound of A.

Thus every chain in (C, ⊆) has an upper bound and so by Zorn’s lemma, (C, ⊆) has a maxi-
mal element.

Hence Zorn’s lemma implies Hausdorff maximality principle.




(D.O.M/ ∗ 2021)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy