Case Study Metafora Qms La Sss 15-07-2020.
Case Study Metafora Qms La Sss 15-07-2020.
Case Study Metafora Qms La Sss 15-07-2020.
©This document is property of IRClass System & Solutions Pvt. Ltd. ……07/2020
Shree swami Samarth
Revision
Document Issue Retention time
Document Category Responsibility Status
Number Status (years)
Yes/no
1 Master list of Document Nominated
Until next revision
Control Representative
1 Master list of Document Nominated Until next revision
Change Request Representative
3 Mission Statement MD Until next revision
P a g e 2 | 120
ISO9001:2015 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - Records & Formats
Metform-02 3 External & Internal Issues Nominated Representative 3 years
1 Quality management
Metform-04 Nominated Representative 3 years
system and its processes
1 10
Metform-08 Change Register Nominated Representative
years
Metform-08 1 Change Risk Register Nominated Representative 6 years
1 Quality Objective Of QMS
Metform-09 Nominated Representative 3 years
processes
Metform-11 4 Competency of Staff Nominated Representative 1 years
3 TRAINING Record - 20
Metform-12 WORKMEN Nominated Representative
years
2 Project -DOCUMENT
Metform-13 Nominated Representative 3 years
CONTROL PANEL
3 Design and Development 2 years
Metform-14 Nominated Representative
Planning
Metform-15 2 Process Development Nominated Representative 1 years
P a g e 3 | 120
ISO9001:2015 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - Records & Formats
2 Supplier Corrective Action Nominated 2 years
Metform-21
Format Representative
3 Customer Satisfaction Nominated 3 Years
Metform-22
Survey Form Representative
3 Internal Audit Report Nominated 3 Years
Metform-23
Representative
3 Internal Audit Corrective Nominated 3 Years
Metform-24
Action Plan Representative
Internal Audit Plan Nominated 2 years
Metform-25
Representative
2 Competency For Internal Nominated 2 years
Metform-26
Auditor Representative
3 Management Review Nominated 2 years
Metaform-27
Representative
1 Improvement LOG Nominated 2 years
Metaform-28
Representative
2 Corrective Action Plan Nominated 2 years
Metaform-29
Representative
3 Improvement Report Nominated 2 years
Metaform-30
Representative
P a g e 4 | 120
Master Document Change Request Form – metform01 – Issue 1
SECTION A – INITIATOR
Department: Ext:
Change Request
Signed: Date:
Signed: Date:
Issue: Date:
P a g e 5 | 120
Managing Director’s Statement and Mission – metform02 Issue No.7
METAFORA is a logistics solutions provider in goods, chemical and passenger services. The
business is based in New Delhi,India.
India is well placed geographically to act as the gateway to China, the Asian continents and
Australia. There are good aviation links to America and the Middle East. Our company growth
strategy is linked heavily with the construction, petro-chemical and mining markets within
differing jurisdictions.
Our fiscal growth plan requires the business to grow with a projected Turnover from 220m
MYR to 300m MYR within two years.
To achieve this growth external and internal issues are analysed and acted upon, in the next
two years’ horizon.
Long term horizon for the organization is aggregate transport services, CNG operated buses,
less fuel consumption, more green fuel, improved road conditions in Western & Southern
part has increased potential of more long driving hours, then organization is thinking to run
all the trucks for 24 hours, with shift change duty for the drivers, this will give drivers better
family and social life. Company also wants to enter into Air-CARGO handling business in the
long term horizon.
The global perspective of the business demands that we not only comply but exceed the
requirements of national laws. In addition, the business will maintain its’ growth whilst
complying with national laws. Whilst an excellent work ethic is to be expected from our
employees. Customer satisfaction, Right first time delivery, are some of the order of the day.
Our Human Resources Department with be active and instrumental in achieving this goal.
Our reputation for leadership in Logistics services is such that we must be seen to occupy
centre stage amidst our competitors and be perceived as such by our valued customers.
P a g e 6 | 120
Context of Metafora
METAFORA determines external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and its strategic
direction and affect its ability to achieve the intended result(s) of its quality management system through SWOT
analysis. These are monitored continuously and are reviewed in every MRM.
Strength Weakness
1. Visionary and progressive management 7. Infrastructure
2. 2. Satisfying all regulatory requirements 8. Technology
3. 3. Young and motivated workforce 9. Retention of Drivers and Cleaners.
4. 4. Strong Customer centric approach 10. Social well-being of the drivers
5. 5. Good career growth. 11. Knowledge level of drivers and
6. 6. Reputed Clients Cleaners
12. Educational background of drivers.
13. Language barrier while transporting
from various states.
Opportunities Threats
1. Adoption of new technology. 1. High level of competition
2. CNG/LNG Conversion 2. Rail transport cheaper and railways are
3. more aggressive.
3. Changing regulatory and statutory
requirements
4. Aggregate Transport Services
P a g e 7 | 120
Strategic Direction
INTERESTED PARTIES
Customer On time services, Quality Services, ZERO
Accidents, ZERO incidences. Refer 4.1
above
Drivers Social Life
Statutory Compliance to Road Safety Rules
bodies
TAI Fare business, ethical business
Employees Stability, Organizational Growth, Career
growth
Competition Fare practices
NGO Road Safety Rules, Social security to
drivers,
Passengers Safety
Management Efficiency, profit per trip/route
P a g e 8 | 120
External & Internal Issues Format # metform-02
A B C D E F G H I J K l J
SL STRATEGIC DIRECTION SCALE EXTERNAL FACTOR Se pro Risk # Internal Sev proba Risk # Final Opportunities
( 3 year horizon) IMPA ve bab erit bility risk
CT ON rit ility y Num
EXIST
y ber
EINCE
(C
+G+K
)
Stringent 5 2 10 Customer Satisfaction level 5 2 10 24 Increase Customer
regulatory norms satisfaction,
Technological 5 4 20 Behaviour of Transport Staff 4 3 12 36 Behaviour, psychological,
Want to achieve 1’th ranking on changes social mapping of the staff
the scale of tonnage from current Excellent Road 5 5 25 Delivery performance 5 5 25 54 Improve On Time Delivery
1
ranking of 18 in condition performance
Goods Transport Rail transport offers 5 3 15 Quality of Service 5 5 25 44 Improve Service quality.
cheaper options.
Aggregate truck 4 4 16 Brand image of the Orgnization 5 5 25 45 Promotion of brand, more
4 business corporate clients,
2 TAI’s guidelines for 3 3 9 Repeat business from existing 5 3 15 28 Increase business avenues,
ethical business clients venture into other transport
operation business.
Want to achieve 6’th ranking on
NGOs requirements 4 3 12 Customer complaints 5 4 20 36 Knowledge and training to
the scale of tonnage from current
workmen
ranking of 26 in
Stringent Emission 5 2 10 Claim settlement 5 5 25 29 Upkeep o f vehicles, Quality
Tanker Transport
norms of Oil & Fuel
Insurance Cost 5 5 25 Agility 4 4 16 45 More flexibility. Adoption to
their frequent changes
Fluctuations in Fuel 5 5 25 Lower mileages of vehicles per 5 2 10 35 Improve fleet, new
prices litre of fuel generation fleet
3 Improve Profit after tax 5
Spares parts cost 4 4 16 Ageing fleet 4 4 16 37 Improve efficiency
NGOs requirements 4 3 12 Cost of Maintaince 4 5 20 37
P a g e 9 | 120
External & Internal Issues Format # metform-02
A B C D E F G H I J K l J
SL STRATEGIC DIRECTION SCA EXTERNAL FACTOR Se pro Risk # Internal Sev proba Risk # Final risk Opportunities
( 3 year horizon) LE ve bab erit bility Number
IMPA rit ility y ( C +G+K)
CT
ON y
EXIST
EINCE
4 Social status and knowledge of 4 Less skilled drivers 3 3 9 Low educational and social 4 4 16 29 Driver Academy
the drivers and cleaners and cleaners status of workmen
5 To increase turnover to 5 Competition 5 4 20 20 Low cost solutions to
480millions presence and new customers
entries into this
segment
GPS enabled trucks, 4 3 12 17 Adoption of new
technology.
P a g e 10 | 120
Interested parties- Format # metform-03
A B C D E F G H I
SL Interested NEEDS AND Impact on business if Severity probability Risk RISK MITIGATION Opportunities
parities EXPECTATIONS OF needs and expectation #
INTRESTED PARTIRIES are not met
1 Customer TIMELY DELIVERY OF CUSTOMER 5 3 15 Reduce customer IMPROVE ON TIME
MATERIAL with service DISSATIFCATION, complaints. DELIVERY.
quality LOSS OF REPAT MONITERING OF
BUSINESS CUSTOMER
SATISFCATION
2 Low cost of Loss of business 5 4 20 Reduce cost of Switch over to CNG
transportation transportation, wherever possible
Kilometres/litre of fuel
3 Suppliers Business assurance Impact on customer 4 3 12 Supplier management
And timely payment timely delivery
4 Drivers and Salary Delivery, customer 5 4 20 Device model to
Cleaners Social well being satisfaction. reduce working
More time to take hours of sdrivers.
care of family
P a g e 11 | 120
Scope:
Company METAFORA was established in the year 1994 and basic purpose was to provide professional transport
services for carrying goods and chemicals and passengers. We have fleet of 30 trucks of various tonnages and
fleet of 20 buses and 10 dedicated chemical / oil carrying truck-tankers. We have customers in all the industries
such as automobile, chemical manufacturers, and we provide passenger bus services to various renowned
corporate houses.
In determining the scope, the METAFORA establishes the boundaries of the quality management system by
considering such issues as:
— the infrastructure of the organization; We have fleet of 30 trucks of various tonnages and fleet of 20 buses
and 10 dedicated chemical / oil carrying truck-tankers.
— the organization’s different sites and activities; Head Office and Logistics routes
— centralized or externally provided functions, activities, processes, products and services. : Maintenance of
Vehicles is outsourced activity.
All requirements of ISO 9001 are considered applicable except Product Design and Development Clauses, as we
do not carry out any design and development activity. Excluding Design & Development clause does not affect
customer satisfaction or requirements.
In determining the application of requirements of ISO 9001, METAFORA considered each individual requirement,
and not just decide that a whole clause is not applicable. At times, some of the requirements may be applicable
in a clause, or all of the requirements within a clause may, or may not, be applicable. Service design is
responsibility of METAFORA.
The scope is maintained as documented information. The scope includes project Charter of the products and
services covered.
We, at Metafora had set up offices in all the province of country, all activities at Head Quarter are replicated in
the province office.
As Metafora, are established orgnization, we have excellent control over our supplier and subcontractors hence
clause 8.4 is not applicable and not considered in the study.
As we are not anyway in possession of any customer property clause # 8.5.3 is not applicable.
Our logistics head office is in northern province and handles all activities and control them from the central
place. Now for audit purpose one ample office can be selected, these people are extremely busy, so they are
excluded from the scope. We want all offices to be appeared on the ISO9001:2015 certificate.
P a g e 12 | 120
Scope: “providing logistics services to national and international market”
• Opportunities:
Skill/Competence
Communication • Performance can be further enhanced Negotiations skill
Infrastructure
Amendment of Purchase
Safe, Damage-free and
Order from Customer.
Customer Complaints PROCESS : MARKETING on time delivery of
shipment
Customer Feedback
Repeat Business from
existing customers.
• Risks:
• Wrong Communication
Procedure for the
• changing expectations of the customers
Methods to be followed
Performance
handling customer • On time delivery
• Customer complaints
enquiries & • Service quality
• Procedure not followed/Not
amendments • Damage free
understood/By-passed
Procedure handling delivery
• Poor Performance/Performance not met
customer complaints. • No Competence
• Technological advances
Procedure for the data issues
analysis • Competence of marketing Personnel •
• Availability of good Drivers
• Aggregate Truck Business
Format # metform-04
P a g e 13 | 120
Communication Equipment
Spare Parts for the Vehicle • Opportunities:
Skill/Competence
Infrastructure
Periodic Maintenance • Performance can be further enhanced
Driving Skill
Tool kit in the vehicle • Cleanliness of Vehicles
Vehicle maintenance
Medical kit • Attire of Vehicle staff
knowledge
Fire fighting equipment. • Continual improvements to improve
efficiency.
Customer order.
PROCESS :
process
Traffic Rules
Transportation of the good Transportation & on time delivery of
shipment
and Passengers
Customer modification Logistics
• Risks:
• Wrong Communication
Methods to be followed
Performance
Procedure for the handling • Customer complaints
customer enquiries & • Procedure not followed/Not understood/By-
• On time delivery
amendments passed
• Service quality
Procedure handling • Poor Performance/Performance not met
• Damage free delivery
customer complaints. • absentees
• No Competence issues
Procedure for the data • Competence of Driver and Cleaners
analysis • Violation of traffic Rules
•
• Alcohol/Drug Addiction
• Long haul /no holidays
Format # metform-04
Communication Equipment
Spare Parts for the Vehicle • Opportunities:
Skill/Competence
Infrastructure
process
Compliant book No repeat work for the
Spare parts avaiability Vehicle Maintenance same vehicle.
• Risks:
Procedure for • On time delivery
• Wrong Communication
Methods to be
passed
customer complaints. • No Competence issues
• Poor Performance/Performance not met
Procedure for the data • Maintenance
• absentees
analysis Cost/Vehicle
• Competence of mechanics
•
Format # metform-04
P a g e 14 | 120
Communication Equipment
Spare Parts for the Vehicle • Opportunities:
Skill/Competence
Infrastructure
Periodic Maintenance • Internal Performance Data Goal Setting
Tool kit in the vehicle • Reduce Breakdown Leadership
Medical kit • Aggregate Truck business Business goals integration
Fire fighting equipment. • Improve efficiency.
Calibration of equipment • Reduce operating cost
Fixture for Vehicle maint.
External Factors and Market
Input to the process
Data.
process
Competition Data
Improved quality
Report from Transport
Association Business Planning Customer satsifaction
Technological changes.
Vision, Mission and objectives
• Risks:
Performan
• Fuel prices
Methods to be
ce
• Apex court verdicts
Goal deployment across the industries.
• Electric Cars
• Cost optimization.
• Environment Norms
• Changing Central Motor Vehicle Rules
•
Format # metform-04
• Opportunities:
1. Trainers competency
Skill/Competence
• Competence of Drivers, Cleaners and
Infrastructure
Training needs
PROCESS: Perform Output from the
Input to the
process
• Wrong Communication
Procedure effectiveness investment
followed
ance
Format # metform-04
P a g e 15 | 120
Leadership
QUALITY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES Format # metform-0
Top Management has created the following Quality Policy for METAFORA:
Company METAFORA meets or exceeds each of our customers’ requirements, providing Services and
customer service of the highest quality at a reduced cost.
We will maintain a quality management system and will continually improve its effectiveness to meet the
requirements of the ISO 9001:2015 standard.
This Quality Policy is appropriate for the purposes and context of METAFORA and supports its strategic
direction.
CFT of Managers reviews the Quality Policy for continuing suitability in Management Review quarterly.
The Quality Policy and Quality Objectives are communicated, understood and applied within METAFORA by
several means, including:
1. posting of the Quality Policy and Quality Objectives throughout the site
2. periodic meetings, such as weekly DMI Meetings and monthly “Birthday” Meetings, at which the
Quality Policy and Quality Objectives are discussed, and for which attendance is recorded. Along with
the results, discussion about the employee’s contributions and implications of not conforming to QMS
requirements are discussed.
• internal audits inquire of auditee and witnesses their understanding of the Quality Policy and Quality
Objectives
• The Quality Policy and Quality Objectives are made available to interested parties by posting on company
web sites.
P a g e 16 | 120
• Top Management assures that Quality Objectives are established and understood throughout METAFORA,
as appropriate, including those that support Service quality requirements.
• “Company METAFORA was established in the year 1994 and basic purpose was to provide professional
transport services for carrying goods, chemicals and passengers. We have fleet of 30 trucks of various
tonnages and fleet of 20 buses and 10 dedicated chemical / oil carrying truck-tankers. We have customers
in all the industries such as automobile, chemical manufacturers, and we provide passengers bus services
to various renowned corporate houses. These buses are used to ply on the routes decided by the company
for pick and drop of their employees. We are member of Transport Association of Asia (TAS) as per TAS’s
expectation, we need to collaborate on educational level of drivers, and more thrust on the safety of
passengers and goods which we are carrying. It also states that all members shall abide by latest version
CENTRAL MOTORE VEHCILES RULES.
• Initially we, at METAFORA started its business from Western province. Now we are operating in Western
and southern province. We have three vertical within it, they are as follows, Transport of goods by road,
transport of Chemicals by road, bus services for the employees of corporate companies. Performance of the
company is very good and it has cross the turnover of 300 Million last years.
• Transport of Goods-: Our Company provides the vehicles to various clients, who manufacture bulk material.
• Transport of Oil and chemicals: under this scope our clients, use our vehicles to transport their material
from one place to another. We get a call from the customer for placing vehicles, they also provide
information such as destination, and tonnage etc. based on that we place vehicles.
• Since last one-year number of calls received from the customers are coming down. We enquire the same
with customers, they say other transport providers offer them less transport cost per KM, also they take
guarantee to reach Southern province within 3 days, and our drivers usually take more than 5 days. More
than that our customers say wherever they hire truck from competitors it can be tracked because of GPS
enabled devices fitted in the every vehicle. In the 6’Th, 9’Th and 10’Th month of the year we have also got
fine from our customers because of late delivery of consignments. Company has not only lost some
customers but has also lost chunk of the money because of this. We are not able to provide the low cost
services as diesel consumption of vehicles are more and we get mileage around 1.5km/litters average, our
competitions vehicles gives more than 3km/litres, Drivers availability and their education level is another
issue in our Orgnization. We take drivers as & when required basis, our competition has pool of the drivers
and work on the 8 hrs. basis. Out drivers are out for 10~12 days in a months. Our fleet is old and as per
government norms need to be scrapped in next 2~5 years. Last month few of our vehicles got detained by
the police authority, because of the pollution issue. In Southern province, we had an opportunity to provide
transport services to one the new clients, but en-route to this destination goes through lot of small villages
and NGOs are protesting the tanker movement through their village because of chemical spillage issue. 6
month back because of driver’s mis-judgment and language barrier one tanker met with an accident and
chemicals it was carrying spilled on the paddy field. Drivers and cleaners both were not able to apply the
knowledge to contain the spillage of the chemical. Spill containing kit was provided by the client, but not
utilised by the drivers and cleaners.
• Another loss factor to the company is “theft” cases, sometimes drivers’ park trucks outside the city, and
these vehicles then susceptible for the theft. If such case occurs our client does not hesitate to deduct the
money from our earnings.
• Our competition on the other hand; has the buses on running on CNG/PNG operated vehicles, So they also
get government subsidy for such PNG/CNG fitted vehicles.
• For passenger bus services, we have yearly contract with 10 corporate houses. We pick and drop their
employees as per the route fixed by the orgnization. Here challenges are different. All employees are
travelling in a bus are aware of the road safety rules, honking, traffic signal rules, speed limit within the city,
punctuality of our bus services. We receive few complaints about the driver’s discipline regarding the traffic
P a g e 17 | 120
rules. Client expect 5KM/litre consumption for each bus, if we achieve this it 5km/litre, they give us
incentive, we are getting such incentive for almost all routes, there are opportunities to convert diesel into
CNG.
• Long term horizon for the organization is aggregate transport services, CNG operated buses, less fuel
consumption, more green fuel, improved road conditions in Western & Southern part has increased
potential of more long driving hours, then organization is thinking to run all the trucks for 24 hours, with
shift change duty for the drivers, this will give drivers better family and social life. Company also wants to
enter into Air-CARGO handling business in the long term horizon.
P a g e 18 | 120
Roles, Responsibilities & Authorities
Managing 1. Business growth To take decision in accordance
Director 2. Entrepreneur Risk Management with the business.
3. Quality Management System
Recruitment of the personnel
4. Achievement Business goals
5. Provision of resources
To supersede the decision taken
6. Chair management review by the other functional heads.
7. Direct and Motivate the team
8. Link business into process approach
LOGISITCS 1. Create policies or procedures for logistics activities. Reporting to Managing Director
HEAD 2. Recommend optimal transportation modes, routing, equipment, or frequency. Recruitment of personnel in the
3. Develop risk management programs to ensure continuity of supply in emergency scenarios.
department
4. Direct inbound or outbound logistics operations, such as transportation or warehouse activities, safety
performance, or logistics quality management.
5. Design models for use in evaluating logistics programs or services.
6. Analyze all aspects of corporate logistics to determine the most cost-effective or efficient means of
transporting products or supplies.
7. Communicate freight transportation information to customers or suppliers, using transportation
management, electronic logistics marketplace, or electronic freight information systems, to improve
efficiency, speed, or quality of transportation services.
8. Direct distribution center operation to ensure achievement of cost, productivity, accuracy, or timeliness
objectives.
9. Review global, national, or regional transportation or logistics reports for ways to improve efficiency or
minimize the environmental impact of logistics activities.
10. Ensure carrier compliance with company policies or procedures for product transit or delivery.
11. Participate in carrier management processes, such as selection, qualification, or performance
evaluation.
12. Train shipping department personnel in roles or responsibilities.
13. Establish or monitor specific supply chain-based performance measurement systems.
P a g e 19 | 120
Head Customer satisfaction
Marketing Customer complaint handling
New business
Ensure sales target
Ensure smooth operation
Participate in the management review
Head Timely procurement
procurement Quality procurement
Meet purchase target
Cost saving measures
New supplier identification
New material identification
Smooth operation
Participate in the management review
Head Workshop Achieve objectives
Upkeep vehicles
Upkeep Vehicles
Maintain workshop activities
Manage consumption of items
P a g e 20 | 120
Organogram
Director
Logisitcs manager- Logistics Manager Logisitcs Manager Manager Manager Assistant New
Marketing Training Assitiant
Truck Trasnport Bus Tranport Tanker Services Procurement Workshop Technologies
manager
Truck & Bus
Purchase Executive
Truck Drivers Bus Drivers Tanker Drivers Workmen Back office support
Spare parts
Marketing Assitiant
Route Tracker
P a g e 21 | 120
Organogram Format # metform-06
Business New Order & Customer Logistics Purchase of Effectiveness of QMS TRAINING & UPKEEP OF
Role Planning Order Execution, satisfaction Material HUMAN VEHICLES
/Customer RESOURCE
Complaints
Top management A F F F F F F F
Marketing Manager A A
Logistics F F A
Workshop- Vehicle C F A
Maintenance
Purchase & Stores A
Orgnization QMS Manager A
HRD A
P a g e 22 | 120
Planning
Risk Assessment & Action Plan & Risk Management procedure – MT/MR/01, Rev-01. Date: 01/jan/2017 Revision 0.0;
Approved by : Managing Director
INTRODUCTION
PROCESS
Risks will be identified as early as possible in the activities so as to minimize their impact. The steps for accomplishing this are outlined in the following sections. The department
heads serves as the Risk Manager..
RISK IDENTIFICATION
Risk identification will involve the Cross Functional Team, appropriate stakeholders, and also includes an evaluation of business environmental factors, organizational culture,
values and this applies to boundaries and scope of QMS.
A Risk Register to be generated and updated as needed and will be stored electronically in the digital data bank at <Server File /QMS>.
RISK ANALYSIS
All risks identified will be assessed to identify the range of possible outcomes of activities in METAFORA’s business. Qualification to be followed to determine which risks are
the top risks to pursue and respond to and which risks can be ignored.
Quantitative Risk Analysis
The probability and impact of occurrence for each identified risk will be assessed by the project manager, with input from the project team using the following approach:
Probability
• 5 – Greater than <70%> probability of occurrence
P a g e 23 | 120
• 3 – Between <30%> and <70%> probability of occurrence
• 1– Below <30%> probability of occurrence
Impact
• 5– Risk that has the potential to greatly impact business cost, schedule or performance 5
3
Impact
• 3 – Risk that has the potential to slightly impact business cost, schedule or performance
1
• 1 – Risk that has relatively little impact business cost, schedule or performance 1 3 5
Probability
Risks that fall within the >15 and >5 (ZONE YELLOW) zones will have risk response planning which may include both a risk mitigation and a risk
contingency plan.
For each risk that need to be mitigated, the department heads identifies ways to prevent the risk from occurring or reduce its impact or probability of occurring. This may
include prototyping, adding tasks to the modify process, adding resources, etc.
For each major risk that is to be mitigated or that is accepted, a course of action to be outlined for the event that the risk does materialize in order to minimize its impact.
P a g e 24 | 120
APPENDIX A: REFERENCES
[Insert the name, version number, description, and physical location of any documents referenced in this document. Add rows to the table as necessary.]
The following table summarizes the documents referenced in this document.
P a g e 25 | 120
RISK REGISTER-HRD
What Would be the Impact on REMAINI
WHAT COULD GO Severit Occurren WHO WILL &
ACTIVITY Customer Process, Business and Risk WHAT CAN BE DONE TO MITIGATE NG RISK
WRONG y ce WHEN?
Service Output LEVEL
Procedure for Transportation &
Training NO SKILL Customer complaint 5 1 5 Head Logisitcs 5
Logistics Procedure/Metafora/MKT/01
customer dissatisfaction anf loss of
Training inadequate training 5 5 25 Skill matrix HRD 5
business
breakdown, delays, customer
Recruitment Wrong Placement 5 1 5 Maintenance of vehicles Workshop 5
dissatisfaction
Format # metform-07
RISK REGISTER - Logistics
What Would be the Impact
REMAINING
WHAT COULD GO on Customer Process, WHAT CAN BE DONE TO WHO WILL
ACTIVITY Severity Occurrence Risk RISK
WRONG Business and Service MITIGATE & WHEN?
LEVEL
Output
Procedure for Transportation &
Receipt of Input from Wrong input from Wrong Delivery ,late Head
5 1 5 Logistics 5
marketing marketing delivery Logistics
Procedure/Metafora/MKT/01
Receipt of Input from customer dissatisfaction and
Unskilled drivers 5 5 25 Skill matrix HRD 5
marketing loss of business
Vehicles not
Vehicles breakdown 5 1 5 Maintenance of vehicles Workshop 5
roadworthy
miscommunications , delays Management
service provision Inadequate procedure 5 1 5 Procedure in place 5
internal and external representative
Customer complain procedure in
Customer complaint loss of business 5 1 5 marketing 5
place
Format # metform-07
P a g e 26 | 120
RISK REGISTER-WORKSHOP
Vehicles not
Vehicles breakdown 5 1 5 Maintenance of vehicles Workshop 5
roadworthy
P a g e 27 | 120
RISK REGISTER - MARKETING
REMA
What Would be the Impact
INING
WHAT COULD GO on Customer Process, Occurr WHAT CAN BE DONE TO WHO WILL &
ACTIVITY Severity Risk RISK
WRONG Business and Service ence MITIGATE WHEN?
LEVE
Output
L
Will lead to wrong delivery, late Procedure for Contract Review and
Review Marketing
Incomplete review delivery and customer 5 1 5 Feasibility Study 5
Requirements Assistants
dissatisfaction ultimately Procedure/Metafora/MKT/01
Will lead to wrong delivery, late Procedure for Contract Review and
Review Not resolving Marketing
delivery and customer 5 1 5 Feasibility Study 5
Requirements inconsistencies Assistants
dissatisfaction ultimately Procedure/Metafora/MKT/01
Procedure for Contract Review and
Quotation Not ascertaining pertinent
Loss of business 5 1 5 Feasibility Study Marketing Head 5
preparation information
Procedure/Metafora/MKT/01
Terms & conditions will not be Procedure for Contract Review and
Quotation Not receiving the Quote
understood and leading to 5 1 5 Feasibility Study Marketing Head 5
preparation from the customers
customer dissatisfaction Procedure/Metafora/MKT/01
Inadequate input description of product to
requirements, and because deliver, destination and
Customer Input marketing Assistant did not customer requirements will not 5 2 10 Competent persons Marketing Head 5
get full information from understand leading to
the customer miscommunication
Legal requirement for the
land of origin & destination
Customer Input and transit not understood Detention of vehicles, 5 1 5 Updation of legal register register Marketing Head 5
and studied by the
personnel of Marketing
CONTRACT Training not included for
miscommunication 5 1 5 Skilled and Competent drivers Marketing Head 5
REVIEW drivers and cleaners
CONTRACT Marketing
Wrong communication will add customer end delay 5 2 10 training 5
REVIEW Assistants
P a g e 28 | 120
RISK REGISTER - PROCUREMENT
What Would be the REMAI
WHO
Impact on Customer Sever Occurre Ris WHAT CAN BE DONE TO NING
ACTIVITY WHAT COULD GO WRONG WILL &
Process, Business and ity nce k MITIGATE RISK
WHEN?
Service Output LEVEL
Will lead to wrong Procureme
Review Procedure for Procurement
Incomplete review delivery, late delivery from 5 1 5 nt 5
Requirements Procedure/Metafora/procure/01
supplier Procedure
Will lead to wrong Procureme
Review Procedure for Procurement
Not resolving inconsistencies delivery, late delivery and 5 1 5 nt 5
Requirements Procedure/Metafora/procure/01
input material delay Procedure
Procureme
Quotation Procedure for Procurement
Not ascertaining pertinent information Vendor dissatisfaction 5 1 5 nt 5
preparation Procedure/Metafora/procure/01
Procedure
delayed payment to
Quotation Procedure for Procurement Marketing
Delay In sending the quote supplier and delay in input 5 1 5 5
preparation Procedure/Metafora/procure/01 Head
material
P a g e 29 | 120
Title: MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE PROCEDURE
Procedure # : MT/MR/02 Page: 1 of 5
Reviewed: 01/10/2017 ; Effective: 01/10/2017
Metafora Preparer: Reviewed: Owner:
3. DEFINITIONS
3.1. Change – A change in the technology, Transportation of new chemicals, or a change in the procedures of
operating the process and related equipment, or in the organization of the department that can affect Quality
safety, the environment, quality, or efficiency.
3.1.1 Technology changes –Introduction of new chemicals for transportation, Technological changes
3.1.3 Procedural changes – include standard operating procedures, emergency procedures, safe work
procedures, temporary operating procedures, maintenance/inspection procedures, temporary operating
procedures, maintenance/inspection procedures or development of a new procedure for new equipment
installations.
Note that for changes that are procedural clarifications, formatting and/or procedure grammar corrections
ONLY, each process owner can optionally use a document control method of their choice to review and track
these changes.
3.1.5 Temporary change – planned for a limited duration; such as, a trial or evaluation or by-pass of a safety
system for maintenance. Planned operation of a process outside its normal operating range or transfer of a
product from its normal process train to another.
3.1.6 Emergency change – immediate actions used to avoid; or control a spontaneous emergency situation.
3.1.7 Facility change – includes buildings, utilities, containers, process/emergency equipment location and other
areas.
3.1.8 Procurement Initiated Changes - This includes changes in suppliers, equipment specification changes
(materials of construction, pump seal type changes, pressure/electrical ratings differences, etc.), modes of
delivery, etc. The Procurement Department is responsible for communicating the change with other
departments prior to the change being implemented.
P a g e 30 | 120
Title: MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE PROCEDURE
Procedure # : MT/MR/02 Page: 2 of 5
Reviewed: 01/10/2017 ; Effective: 01/10/2017
Metafora Preparer: Reviewed: Owner:
3.2 Change Administrator - Person responsible to close out the change and ensure changes meet requirements.
The individual assigned to a particular change, responsible for coordinating all aspects of the change. The Change
Coordinator ensures that each component of the MOC is adequately addressed, maintains appropriate
documentation, obtains necessary approvals and training sign-offs prior to the change, and tracks all related
action items to completion.
The Change Coordinator is also responsible for ensuring that the cut-off date and time are accurate and that
affected employees are notified upon actual implementation date of the change. Change Coordinators must be
knowledgeable in the requirements of this procedure, META/PROCESS/01.
4. PROCEDURE
4.1. The BD Software shall be used to review and document all changes.
4.2. The approval process for changes must be followed and documented using the database.
4.3. Exceptions:
4.3.1. Emergency type changes can be verbally authorized (approved) by supervision and then, documented,
reviewed and formally approved after the situation has stabilized. An “Emergency Change” form is available and
can be printed out from the BD Software.
4.3.2 Replacement-in-Kind
4.3.3. A minor change is made to a Standard or Procedure that does not affect the contents (i.e. updates to
phone numbers).
4.4 MOC ORIGINATION: INITIATING A CHANGE Any person can initiate or recommend that a change be made.
Minimal information, specifically, a description of the proposed change, the technical basis of the proposed
change, expected impact on the safety and health of the employees affected by the proposed change, and the
duration of the change should be provided.
The MOC Initiator and the Change Administrator are responsible for implementing the entire MOC procedure.
4.4.2 The Initiator or Change Administrator evaluates the proposed change and identifies information that must
be collected for the particular change.
4.4.3 Initiator assigns the Change Administrator and describes the change; the justification for the change, if
temporary sets the expiration date and submits the MOC to the Approver.
P a g e 31 | 120
Title: MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE PROCEDURE
Procedure # : MT/MR/02 Page: 3 of 5
Reviewed: 01/10/2017 ; Effective: 01/10/2017
Metafora Preparer: Reviewed: Owner:
4.4.5 To assist with the evaluation for addition and use of new chemical transportation;
Management of Change (MOC) is required to be completed for all capital projects. For non-capital projects, it
should also be determined in the initial review, based on the impact of the change, whether additional technical
or specialized reviews (HAZOP, Environmental, Occupational Safety and Industrial Hygiene, Legal, Customer
Notification, etc.) are necessary to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed change.
4.5.1 The following information should be evaluated during the Initial Review:
4.5.4 Whether modifications to written procedures are required (including time limit for temporary changes).
4.5.6 Review of relevant Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) to verify proposed change does not violate existing
safeguards or create a potential hazard.
4.5.7 A risk level assessment is used to determine the potential impact of the change on Quality Safety and
health. A risk assessment is used for all MOC’s including capital projects. Documentation of the Initial Review
should be maintained with the MOC. If a formal meeting is held, minutes from this meeting can document the
topics discussed, the decisions reached and the names of the reviewers
4.5.8 The Approver then either “Approves” to proceed with the change, “Denies” the change, or puts the change
on “Hold” due to a concern. If the Approver has a concern the “Concern Page” is completed detailing the concern
and responsible person is assigned. If the concern is satisfied the Approver approves to proceed.
All stakeholders are asked to identify risk. This helps to improve acceptance of an initiative as everyone is given
an opportunity to express all the things that can go wrong. Sophisticated entities may also identify risks by
looking at databases of issues that occurred with similar programs, strategies or projects.
P a g e 32 | 120
Title: MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE PROCEDURE
Procedure # : MT/MR/02 Page: 4 of 5
Reviewed: 01/10/2017 ; Effective: 01/10/2017
Metafora Preparer: Reviewed: Owner:
Categories HIGH Impact of business VERY MINOR Impact of business NEGLIGIBLE Impact of business
HIGH Impact on Profit VERY MINOR Impact on Profit NEGLIGIBLE Impact on Profit
HIGH Impact on Customer VERY MINOR Impact on Customer NEGLIGIBLE Impact on Customer
HIGH Loss of property VERY MINOR Loss of property NEGLIGIBLE Loss of property
HIGH Impact on personal VERY MINOR Impact on personal NEGLIGIBLE Impact on personal
safety safety safety
Severity 5 3 1
Occurrence 5 3 1
Treatment
Risk treatment options include acceptance, mitigation, transfer, sharing and avoidance. When a risk is
mitigated or shared the probability and impact typically need to be re-evaluated.
CHANGE What SEVERITY Likelihood Risk Treatment SEVERITY Likelihood Risk
way it acceptance,
can go mitigation,
wrong? transfer, sharing
and avoidance
Secondary Risk
Evaluation of risks caused by treatments. For example, avoiding or mitigating a risk can result in new risks.
Residual Risk
Calculating the probability and impact of remaining risk after treatment. For example, the risk that remains
after mitigation including secondary risk.
RESPONSIBILITIES
5.1. All employees have the responsibility to:
5.1.1. Recognize a change before initiating
5.1.2. Initiate the MOC, per this policy
5.1.3. Assist in making changes
5.1.4. Participate in training
5.1.5. Provide input in maintaining a safe working environment
5.3. Operations/ Service Manager/Change Unit Approver - has the overall responsibility to:
5.3.1. Approves the initial request of the change, helps identify is customer notification is required and specifies
if and what technical approval is necessary.
5.3.2. Solicit employees’ participation by getting their input on changes
5.3.3. Determines if Technical Review is required and assigns Technical Reviewers.
5.3.4. Ensure all items on the MOC checklists have been completed as required, prior to implementation of the
change
5.3.5. Give final approval to implement the change
5.3.6. Ensure affected personnel are trained in the MOC requirements and changes
P a g e 34 | 120
MOC Administrator - has the responsibility to:
5.4.1. Manage the Operating, Applications and or Research Unit’s overall MOC program
5.4.2. Establish KPI’s to ensure MOC’s are being initiated, completed and closed in a timely manner.
5.4.3 Works with the MOC Coordinator to make sure the MOC is closed out in a timely manner.
Change Register
SL What was the Change Owner Department Cut-off date of
implementation
1 Customer changes the plant location from Marketing January -20xx
Southern part, now new location is towards
east of other existing location; this change
is because of new port development
2 Refrigerated Truck/Van service to be started Project October -20xx
in the METAFORA
3 Metafora has adopted” truck on rail Logistics/marketing June-20xx
“services to cut the travel distance by 10hrs.
4 5 buses are converted into hybrid fuel PNG Workshop March-20xx
and Diesel
5 New team of drivers and cleaners recruited HR April-20xx
for handling refrigerated vans.
6 Company is procuring Two buses from BUS Procurement April-20xx
manufacturer with EPS- Electronic Power
Steering.
8 All trucks and Tankers to be fitted with GPS Projects May-20xx
device to track real time positioning
9 SAP based ERP software to be used and HRD Aug-20xx
company to be made paperless
Format # metform-08
P a g e 35 | 120
1) Change Risk Register related to Refrigerated Truck/Van service to be started in the METAFORA:
1. Till Oct-xx we at METAFORA were not into Refrigerated Vans, we decided to enter into this market segment. Project team has done feasibility study & Risk analysis as
follows.
2. We started the delivery of perishable cargo through our refrigerated vans, following is the data for last six month of delivery records;
a. Although all vehicles are brand new, drivers were unable to maintained the temperature in the cargo hold area and cargo got damaged.
b. Vehicles refrigeration section not able to hold the temperature, new technology drivers not trained, maintenance people were also not able to understand the
new technology.
c. Maintaince of refrigerated vans was outsourced as Annual Maintenance Contract with Manufacture was higher, this cost was not considered while project, later
on it was decided to higher a agency to perform maintenance activity. Our workshop people got trained under this external service provider.
d. It was assumed that our workshop people got trained under the service provider, we terminated the service contract with the agency.
e. Now our workmen not able to maintain the refrigerated vans.
Change RISK REGISTER – Project …reviewed after six month of business.
REMA
What Would be the Impact
INING
WHAT COULD GO on Customer Process, Occurr WHAT CAN BE DONE TO WHO WILL &
ACTIVITY Severity Risk RISK
WRONG Business and Service ence MITIGATE WHEN?
LEVE
Output
L
Entering into
Finance is taken from bank.
logistics of Loss making proposal, no Loss of profit, impact on the
3 1 3 Two Customers insisted us to enter into Project Head 1
refrigerated van business business
this segement
segment
Vehicle breakdown,
Vehicle upkeep Loss of Cargo leading to penalty 1 1 1 No such incidences in the past ----- 1
Refrigeration does not work
Format # metform-09
P a g e 36 | 120
2) Change Risk Register- New east coast logistics service
Customer had asked to delivered the material to east coast, rather than west coast. As new port had started and customer manufacturing unit is near to eastern port. Below is risk
analysis done pertaining to the east coast operation. This risk analysis is done prior to start of the business. Once operation was started we did not get time to review the risk
register and context of the orgnization in view of this external changes. Following points are encountered since last six month with respect to delivery to eastern coast.
1. On time delivery failure – out of 149 assignments 78 assignments were late; reason being A) bad road condition- 23 assignments got late. B) Social unrest in particular
pocket. There is no alternative route to this. Marketing department risk analysis says everything okay, hence project accepted. C) Language barrier between drivers and
local citizens during voyage reflected in the re-routing. D) Political unrest in the area leading to late delivery.
2. Quality issues related to consignment – When vehicles pass through tribal areas some groups damage and loot the cargo.
3. Safety of drivers – Safety is concern as there two occasions; drivers hold hostage later on released by intervention of local political parties.
Change RISK REGISTER - MARKETING
REMA
What Would be the Impact
INING
WHAT COULD GO on Customer Process, Occurr WHAT CAN BE DONE TO WHO WILL &
ACTIVITY Severity Risk RISK
WRONG Business and Service ence MITIGATE WHEN?
LEVE
Output
L
Development of
Will lead to wrong delivery, late
new eastern port Marketing
Communication delivery and customer 1 1 1 No control required is low 1
for customer- Assistants
dissatisfaction ultimately
AUTOZARA
Late delivery, because of
road condition, passage of Late delivery and customer
Delivery 2 2 4 Will advise driver to negotiate Logistics 2
road goes through social dissatisfaction ultimately
unrest, agitation area
Less quantity delivered Driver has to manage the things salary
Quality service because of theft, looting Loss of business 2 2 4 will be deducted if less quantity is Logistics 5
etc. delivered
Format # metform-09
P a g e 37 | 120
3) Change Risk Register- 5 buses are converted into hybrid fuel PNG and Diesel
Following points are encountered since last six months with respect to delivery to eastern coast.
1) On time delivery failure – leakage of LNG after Maintaince performed by the workshop – 5 Incidences in six months time.
2) Drivers could not able to handle the leakage emergency – 1 incidences
3) Safety of passengers– no communication was given to passengers about the change.
Change RISK REGISTER - Workshop
REMA
What Would be the Impact
INING
WHAT COULD GO on Customer Process, Occurr WHAT CAN BE DONE TO WHO WILL &
ACTIVITY Severity Risk RISK
WRONG Business and Service ence MITIGATE WHEN?
LEVE
Output
L
Conversion of
Will lead to safety incidences
buses into hybrid
Communication and penalty and could loss to 2 1 2 No control required is as risk is low Workshop head 1
fuel PNG and
business
Diesel
Handling of
Late attendance of all
maintenance Break down of vehicles 2 2 4 Will send 2’nd vehicles Workshop 2
pannsenger in their factories
hybrid vehicles
Format # metform-09
4) Change Risk Register- New drivers recruited for refrigerated vans operation
Change RISK REGISTER - HR
REMA
What Would be the Impact
INING
WHAT COULD GO on Customer Process, Occurr WHAT CAN BE DONE TO WHO WILL &
ACTIVITY Severity Risk RISK
WRONG Business and Service ence MITIGATE WHEN?
LEVE
Output
L
No training, No clear
Training to new No training required if driving experience
understanding of Loss of business 2 1 2 HR deaprtment 1
drivers is 10 years.
refrigerated vans
Effectiveness of
No skilled acquired Loss of business 2 2 4 Retraining HR deaprtment 2
training
Format # metform-09
P a g e 38 | 120
Quality Objective of QMS processes- Format metform-10
Tanker Average of % of fill by weight
Month Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15
Target 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Actual 99 99 100 98 100 99 99 100 99 100 100 100
P a g e 39 | 120
Tanker Customer Complaint in numbers
month Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15
target 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Actual 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1
P a g e 40 | 120
Truck Deviations from schedule instances
month Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15
target 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Actual 22 12 32 12 10 9 7 16 19 32 12 11
P a g e 41 | 120
BUS Deviations from schedule %
month Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15
target 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Actual 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.9 1 0.95 1 2 2 3 3 4
P a g e 42 | 120
Support
Category Drivers_
Category A
1. Clean driving license
2. Over five years’ experience
3. Capable of handling all types of vehicles
4. Has not caused serious accidents and if any he was not at fault
5. Should go for advanced driving courses once in every three years.
6. Capable of driving all the vehicles including new vehicles
7. Corporate client should be handled by Category A.
_ Category B
1. Clean driving license
2. Over two years driving experience
3. Capable of handling some types of vehicles in Class E
4. Has caused some accidents and in one way or the other was not responsible for them.
5. Should go for a refresher driving course once per year.
6. Can handle sponsors and some visitors.
7. Should not handle new vehicles.
_ Category C
1. With license but have not driven regularly for at least two years.
2. Should not drive vehicles unaccompanied by a person in category A or B.
3. Should not carry more than one person (Co-driver) in the vehicles
4. Should not handle new vehicles
5. Should not handle by corporates
P a g e 43 | 120
• Self-awareness training
• Economic driving
P a g e 44 | 120
Title: Competency of Staff
Metafora Procedure # : MT/MR/03
Reviewed: 01/12/2015 ; Effective: 01/12/2015
Designation Educational Experience Basic Skills including behaviour Additional Skill if any
Market analysis, Trend in Market, Placement of the
Bulk Cargo, Liquid Cargo and
Master in Marketing 10 years in Logistics product, Customer relations,
Head Marketing Refrigerated items
Legal requirements, Logistic documentation
10 Years’ experience in Bulk Cargo, Liquid Cargo and
Head Logistics Degree; Operation in Logistics Man management, logistics capabilities
operations and logistics Refrigerated items
15 Years’ experience in New technologies such as Speed
Problem Solving, Efficient repairs of the vehicles,
Head Workshop Degree in Automobile Engineering Automobile Workshop Governing Unit, ABS, E-Power
Man Management, Quality management System
Management Steering
15 Years’ experience in Procurement of Engineering Items, Negotiations
Head Procurement Degree in Mechanical Engineering Inventory Management Diploma
operations and logistics skills
Planning and Scheduling of vehicles, Customer Bulk Cargo, Liquid Cargo and
Logistics Assistant Graduate, Operation in Logistics 3 years of Experience
relations, Problem solving Refrigerated items
Negations Skills, Customer relationship
Marketing Executive Graduate, MBA 3 years
management
Workshop Supervisor Diploma in Engineering 3 years Planning of Service, manpower management
Procurement Assistant Diploma in Engineering 3 years Negotiations, procurement Procedure
Procedure reading, Measurement Technique,
Worker ( In Workshop) Technical Trade in Automobile 5 Years’ experience Operation of workshop machineries and
Equipments
5 years Heavy Duty driving
Driver 12’th Class Following the procedure New Gadgets such as GPS
Experience
Format # metform-11
P a g e 45 | 120
COMPETENCY MATRIX -
Designation Educational Experience Basic Skills including behaviour Internal Auditor Additional Skill if any
Danny Automobile Engineering 14 years in Logistics Market analysis, Customer Yes Refrigerated items
Head marketing Graduate relations,
Legal requirements, Logistic
Hari Mechanical Engineer 12 years’ Experience in Logistic Logistics capabilities Yes Not available
Head Logistics
SHIVA Degree in Automobile 18Years’ experience in Automobile Okay Yes Okey
Head Workshop Engineering Workshop Management
Victor B.E. Mechanical 15 Years’ experience in operations Okay Yes Okey
Head Procurement and logistics
Daniel Commerce Graduate 5 years Okay Yes Not required
Logistics Assistant
Ahmed Commerce Graduate, MBA 3 years Okay Yes Not required
Marketing Executive
Babu B.E. Mechanical 2 years Okay Yes Not available
Workshop Supervisor
Srichakra B.E. Mechanical 2 years Okey Yes Not available
Procurement Assistant
SKILL MATRIX
Worker Workshop Fault Finding Timely Completion of assigned Operation of Basic testing Pollution Norms and New Techniques Repair of
procedure job equipment testing equipment Refrigerated
vehicles
Peter X X X X X X Not achieved
SHYAM X X X X X X Not achieved
Suresh X X X X X X Not achieved
Ram X X X X X X Not achieved
Bhīma X X X X X X Not achieved
Ramesh X X X X X X Not achieved
Format # metform-11
P a g e 46 | 120
Driver TRANSPORATION TYPE Central Motor Traffic Discipline Behavioural Customer Satisfaction Category of Driver
Vehicle Rules
Truck Bus Tankers C
Vivek X X X X X C
Mahesh X X X X X C
Sultan X X X X X C
Phillips X X X X X C
Jatin X X X X X C
Rakesh X X X X X C
Pintu X X X X X C
Hari X X X X X C
Baji X X X X X C
Format # metform-11
P a g e 47 | 120
TRAINING Record - WORKMEN
Mahesh
Ramesh
SHYAM
Phillips
Rakesh
Suresh
Bhīma
Sultan
Vivek
Peter
Pintu
Jatin
Ram
Hari
Baji
X X X X X X X X X
Self-awareness training
X X X X X X X X X
First aid training
X X X X X X X X X
HIV/AIDS awareness (in high risk
environments)
X X X X X X X X X
Tiredness and fatigue
management
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
New Technologies in
Transportation
X X X X X X
Workshop technologies
X X X X X X
Testing Equipments in vehicle
workshop
Format # metform-12
P a g e 48 | 120
Control of Documents and Records Procedure
MT/MR/03
Description Name / Title Signature Date
Prepared by Management Representative
Approved by Managing Director
1. PURPOSE
2. SCOPE
P a g e 49 | 120
3. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
Term Definition
Controlled Copy A copy of the current issue of procedures/manual/forms issued formally and subjected to the distribution control of this procedure
Official Documents Documents established such as policies, procedure manual, objective, process manual and plan (originated within Metafora)
Electronic Document Soft-copy of a document
External Document Document originated by an external party (outside of Metafora)
Record Data that provides evidence of conformity to the established process
4. RESPONSIBILITIES
Owner Responsibility
5. PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION
All the employees shall use the forms and read documents from the Metafora Network since the latest version of the documents are kept on the Shared Drive (i.e. Metafora Portal).
Hard copies of the manuals or documents are limited only for individual use. Printing of the manuals or documents should be limited and based on imperative need only. Any hard
copies obtained will not be classified or considered as ‘controlled’ documents, except for master copies.
A register of the controlled copies of the manuals shall be maintained by each Department in a Controlled Copies Register.
All documents within Metafora should be controlled through the version number and effective date mentioned at the header of each page of the procedure / process manuals.
The manuals / documents are controlled and the MR & appointed quality representative from each Department shall be the only persons authorized to edit them in whole or in part.
P a g e 50 | 120
5.3. Document Effective Date & Version Control
The ‘effective dates’ shall be allocated to each controlled document according to the date of the approval obtained.
All controlled documents are to contain a version number which commences at 1.0.
An updated version of any controlled document will automatically increase the current version by ‘.1’ (i.e. version 1.0 is updated to version 1.1).
Updates to any controlled documents should be briefly described in the ‘Change Log’.
Any document with a date older than the latest or different version number should be considered as obsolete and Uncontrolled Copy.
Any obsolete or outdated documents are removed from the Intranet / Shared Drive to prevent improper or unintended use of them.
The contents of the ‘controlled’ manuals or documents should not be modified/written-on (ink or pencil) for any reason. Any type of modification will classify the document(s)
obsolete.
a. Describe your organization’s document referencing and numbering system by detailing all protocols and abbreviations for internal and external recipients including:
a. Company Name Codes
b. Organizational Units and Sub Units Codes
c. Document Types and Abbreviations for each ex. Procedure (P), Policy (PO), Manual, Form, Template, etc.
b. Document Serial Number: The document serial number will consist of three (3) digits which are set according to its relevant sequential order maintained by the MR in the
Controlled Copies Register; in exception of records which consists of five (5) digits (see section 5.5). All documents shall be maintained in the Controlled Copies Register for
Internal Documents and therefore shall be allocated a reference number only by the MR.
c. Documents Referencing Sequence: In cases for controlled documents, the document reference structure will be as follows:
General Documentation: MT/MR/03
In cases where the document is a Letter or Memo, i.e. record, by also using the codes in the tables mentioned previously, the reference structure will be as follows:
P a g e 51 | 120
d. In cases where the document is a Contract or Purchase Requisitions / Petty Cash, by also using the codes in the tables mentioned previously, the reference structure will be as
follows:
5.6. Control of Records
a. The process owner (concerned organizational unit) shall be responsible for ensuring that all records are maintained in proper manner, retrievable and accessible to the
concerned persons and protected from damage or loss.
b. Describe your organization’s procedure for the storage and filing of hard copy and electronic records. Describe any record management systems that may be used and how to
use them as well as refer to any user manuals or procedures that may detail this further
c. The records are retained for the appropriate retention period as mentioned in the relevant procedure.
5.7. Standards / External Origin Documents
a. It is advisable that all external origin documents required for the Departments work or stated in the contracts agreements with external parties (such as; national and
international standards like ISO 9000, etc.) are made available on the Intranet / Shared Drive (i.e. Metafora Portal) for the concerned personnel. The MR, in coordination with
concerned Departments, ensures the validity of such document and that it has the latest issue/revision. If a standard is obsolete and retained for reference, it shall be removed
from the Shared Drive Network and all relevant parties are informed.
b. External documents are retained by the concerned Department in the Controlled Copy Register for External Documents.
Where documentation is held in an electronic format/media, safe and proper procedure shall be considered, such procedure should include but is not limited to the following:
a. Limited access rights for personnel to the master files and documents (i.e. PDF Format), except for the MR and any authorized parties.
Any changes required to the QMS documents of Metafora should be discussed with the MR and if the change is acceptable, the change becomes effective and appears in the next
issue of the related document. The original document shall be saved with the Controlled Copies Register for reference.
The following table describes further procedural tasks for managing development and changes of the documents:
P a g e 52 | 120
Task No. Description Owner Form / Document
1 When an employee considers a need for a new document / form or change to an existing manual to Department Head/ Document Change request
improve the quality of work/service, the employee will review the suggested change with his/her line Document Controller Form
manager and the assigned document controller. If endorsed, the ‘document change request form’
should be completed and then submitted to the MR.
2 The MR would then discuss the project Charter of the suggested amendment with relevant parties to MR
assess the impact of the amendment on other functions within the Metafora.
3 If the request is accepted, the concerned Departments will update any relevant change whereas the MR MR
will ensure the project Charter of the change are reflected in the concerned documents / forms /
document. The final updated version of the document or manual is then approved by the concerned
Director.
Note: Changes to forms can be approved at the section-head level.
4 Upon re-issuing any documents / forms, the revision number and date are updated by the MR and a MR
formal approval must then be obtained by the relevant parties on the hard-copy document.
5 The Department Document Controller will archive the approved/signed version as the Master copy. The Document Controller Controlled Copies Register
Controlled Copies Register is updated accordingly. The old versions of the master copies are marked as
“Obsolete” and filed by the QR with a copy of the revised pages in the Master File.
6 The MR has to inform all concerned individuals of the amendments via email or internal memo. The MR MR Email / internal memo
shall also ensure that all new or revised documents are saved on the Intranet / Shared Drive and available
to the concerned individuals in protected format such as PDF files. Appropriate backup shall be
maintained in any format (diskettes, Metafora Network) every month at least.
P a g e 53 | 120
Resources
METAFORA provides the resources necessary for the establishment, implementation, maintenance and
continual improvement of the quality management system, and for its effective operation.
In determining the resources that need to be provided, the METAFORA considers the current capabilities of its
internal resources (e.g. people, capability of equipment, organizational knowledge) and any constraints (e.g.
budget, number of resources, schedule).
During the determination of resources, the METAFORA considers an analysis of costs versus benefits for the
provision of these resources, using risk-based thinking. A decision is then be made on the resources needed,
including those to be sourced externally, and the necessary actions taken to ensure the resources needed are
provided.
Communication
METAFORA determines the internal and external communications relevant to the quality
Management system, including:
a) On what it will communicate;
b) When to communicate;
c) With whom to communicate;
d) How to communicate;
e) Who communicates?
P a g e 54 | 120
Operations
Integrated Logistics Support Plan for:
Refrigerated Trucks/Vans
Version: MF/Project/2017-01
Form MF/Project/Mgmt./01-Rev-00
Project -DOCUMENT CONTROL PANEL
File Name: Refrigerated Trucks/Vans
Name Date
Reviewed By:
Modified By:
Format # metform-13
Overview
The Project charter will serve as a working document for those activities responsible for the planning,
management, and execution of the new project or major modification in existing infrastructure. It consist of
development; system integration and testing; and production phases,
Scope
Project charter contains a brief description of the system characteristics and management plans to
demonstrate that the new system, when installed and operated, will satisfy all supportability requirements
and criteria
Updating Procedures
Project charter is developed to support all planned project phases, including concept development and
production. At a minimum, the Project Document needs to be updated:
General Information
System / Equipment Description
This section provides a description of the ITS project system and equipment.
General Management
The project team should accomplish the project tasks for the project in accordance with the contract. This
management plan relates to the development, system integration and testing, and production phases.
Operational phases are addressed in Section 3.8 of this appendix.
The Metafora functional organization will implement the project program and associated tasks. To achieve the
fully integrated logistics program, the Project manager, generally Head Logistics will interface directly with the
other members of the Metafora in defining system architecture, software if any, hardware, visual systems, and
testing.
PROJECT CHARTER Team
This section describes the project management team and highlights their areas of specialties in the logistics
and management arenas.
Subcontractor Management
The project manager has overall responsibility for all subcontract management processes. For the
development and production phase, the project manager delegates matters of a contractual nature to the
Procurement manager to manage. Formal contractual documentation, including a contract and a
subcontractor data requirements list is imposed on team members and subcontractors.
Vendor Selection
1. product cost;
2. reliability and
3. maintainability and
4. reparability,
5. vendor maturity/stability;
6. Repair and service life support capabilities.
Project Charter
Project Charter Objectives
The PROJECT CHARTER is directed toward providing an integrated quality support system and resources for the
customer. Objectives tailored to the project should be included in this section.
• Maintenance planning
• Manpower and personnel
• Supply support
• Support and test equipment
• Training and training equipment
• Technical data
• Computer resource support
• Packaging handling, storage, and transportation requirements
• Facilities
• Standardization and interoperability
• Hardware/software integration
Maintenance Planning
The maintenance planning effort is an integral part of the logistics support analysis effort. The maintenance
plan will be a working document and issued as an incremental report based on available data from the logistics
support analysis database. This data will be reviewed during logistics reviews. The planning effort should be
highlighted here and should include discussion of the:
The results of the maintenance planning dictate the skill levels and personnel requirements for operational
support for the fielded system. Hardware/Software integration, human factors engineering, and safety
requirements are an integral part in determining the manpower and personnel requirements. Personnel
required for installation, checkout, operation, handling, and sustaining maintenance of the system and its
associated test and support equipment should be identified, trained, and available prior to any field testing.
Supply Support
This element includes all spares, repair parts, consumables, special supplies, and related inventories needed to
support prime mission-oriented equipment; software; testing and support equipment; transportation and
handling equipment; training equipment; and facilities.
Provide forecasts of initial provisioning and replenishment spare requirements to support the product life
cycle. Consumable and repair spare lists should also be included.
The system should be designed to minimize or eliminate the need for special tools and test equipment. Any
special tools and test equipment requirements should be identified and/or any analysis planned should be
highlighted. The requirements and approach for calibration of support and test equipment should be
identified.
This section should discuss the development of a training package to include training equipment requirements
during the development phase of the project, and provide descriptions of the necessary courses and
equipment to conduct the training to support the operation and maintenance. Course schedules should be
included and should coincide with the installation and activation of the system.
Technical Data
Technical data will be developed to support prime equipment; support and test equipment; transportation and
handling equipment; training equipment; and facilities. The technical data package should be discussed and
should include:
Include packaging and handling of spare and repair parts sufficient to accommodate shelf life requirements
and vendor repair and restock. The determination of packaging requirements by the provisioning process
should be discussed. This section should include discussions of:
• Packaging requirements
• Transportation requirements
• Storage requirements
Facilities’ planning is integrated as part of the PROJECT CHARTER planning effort. It should include:
• All facility design and activation activities that will occur during the development and production phases
• Detailed facility requirements
• Flow chart/schedule outlining for ensuring the facility meets specifications
• Installation planning data should be provided to the logistics engineers for the assessment of life-cycle
cost impacts related to support facilities.
• Power requirements, cabling diagrams, physical layouts, and accessibility for maintenance will be
essential inputs to the project database and maintainability task analyses.
Standardization is the process by which the project uses common doctrine, procedures, systems, equipment,
and supplies to sustain their resources. Interoperability is the ability of several systems to work together and
to provide and accept common supplies and services. How the project will handle these two topics should be
discussed in this section.
Human factors engineers are responsible for optimizing the man/machine interface for the system. Input to
the logistics analysis process is achieved by way of the various types of analyses performed by the
hardware/software integration staff, and through interactions with training and development activities. This
discipline acts on concerns of logistics engineers regarding operability or anthropometric issues that impact
maintenance and other supportability elements, and should be included in this section.
Manpower
This section should address the use of techniques proven on similar projects to predict and track capabilities
for meeting the required manpower constraints. Describe the use of the workload analysis results, data
collection techniques that include interviews with user experts. Also describe the use of existing data as input
to determine total operator; maintainer; command and control; and support personnel requirements.
Personnel
Identification of the personnel responsible for the operation and support of the system is paramount to
successful development.
Describe how the personnel requirements analysis will be performed in conjunction with the logistics analysis,
and focus on identifying the skills needed to operate, maintain, and support the system.
Training
The training needs analysis will be used to determine specific training requirements. This section should focus
on three primary areas:
Life-Cycle Costs
Emphasis on minimizing life-cycle costs has become, and will continue to be, a major factor in our process for
designing new equipment; selection of commercially available equipment; support and maintenance concepts;
training; and other pertinent aspects of the project.
The life-cycle costs activity is cross-coupled to system design and, particularly, the R&M predictions. The goals
for the development phase for life-cycle costs that should be discussed in this section are:
• Determination of cost drivers in acquisition, operation, and support
• Identification of risk areas relative to life-cycle costs
• Early identification of system design problems
• Determination of the optimum logistics support program
Level-of-Repair Analysis
The level-of-repair analysis model is a mathematical analysis model that determines whether it is more
economical to repair an item when it project Charter or to scrap the item. The function is to determine the
optimal maintenance concept for the system. This section should describe how the level-of-repair analysis will
be accomplished.
The supply support objectives for the system, which should be discussed here, are:
Related Plans
This section should include a short description of other project plans that are directly or indirectly related to
PROJECT CHARTER planning and implementation of goals and objectives.
Table 1: Title
Figure 1: Title
User Definitions DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY
Version Approved Created/
Description of Change(s)
Number Date Modified By
Design and Development Planning- For Refrigerated Van Project- Format # metform-14
Project Implementation Sheet: Project Design
Date Cleared by Management after Techno-Commercial feasibility: _05.02.2017__ Cleared by: MANAGING DIRECTOR
Customer Voice:
1. Requirement needed for : transportation of perishable item to airport @249 Kms
2. Tentative annual requirement of part: 600MT cargo
3. Material : perishable item with shelf life 9 days max.
4. Identification: project identification by “refvan”
5. Packaging: As per approved packaging standard by customer.
6. Special Characteristics: Temp of cargo hold area of refrigerated van -5 to -8degrees Celsius.
7. Lesson from previous project : NIL
8. Logistics Cost: As per standard table
Review Date: 04.02.2017 Review period: Delayed _01__ days / on time
All requirements of customer are understood, need to invest into this project. Finance from banker.
Review remarks:
1. Programme as per Timing Plan: __delayed by a month_________________________________________
2. All inputs captured: __YES_________________________________________________________
3. Is any customer input needed / given: __NO__________________________________________
4. Special instruction / noting to Cross Functional team -CFT: ___NIL___________________________________________
Reviewed by: ________Head project___________
Stage 2: Process development Format # metform-15
Process Flow Chart of _refvan/01____ Date: _09.02.2017___________ Designed by: Project Team___________
Approved by: __Managing Director____________________________
Process Validation:
Vehicle Transportation Process Parameter : Desired Product output
Refrigerated Van 10Ton : 3 Number need to be purchased.
Route mapping for the Transportation: In consultation with Cusotmer
Transportation Process Quality, Reliability, Maintainability, Measurability Data
Logistic Route : L1 at Customer end: ____________ L2 at Airport @ 249 Kms ______________L3 handling over to the Agent.
Quality On time delivery, no deterioration of cargo, Temp shall be between 0 to -5degrees Celsius.
Reliability On time devlivery with quality for 12 months then only additional business, penalty applicable if not met
Maintainability: Vehicles shall always be kept in order so that breakdown shall be zero
Measurability OTD , No incidences of cargo damaged or deterioration
Vehicles Verification by Project team Internal: Inspection sheet no._IS/Metafora/01__ Date: 01.06.2017___ Result: OK
First Cargo dispatch report : first dispatch was done on 01-07-2017 reached within 10 hrs, as vehicle interprovincial permit not sought before the dispatch: Responsibility by Project
manager.
Remarks: _____________________________________________________________________
Review Date: 05/07/2017 Review period: Project Delayed __77 days / on time
Review remarks:
1. Programme as per APQP Timing Plan: _NO delayed by 77 days______________
2. All inputs captured: ____YES_____________________________________
3. Special instruction / noting to CFT: __NIL____________________________________________
_ Tyre Pressure
o Visual check for adequate tyre pressure
o Un-even wearing of tyres
_ Tools
o Ensure that all tools as shown in the logbook are in place and any
missing tools reported in writing before using the vehicle.
_ Cleanliness
o The organization's vehicles must be kept in a clean condition both
inside and outside.
_ Noise
o Any foreign noises must be identified and reported immediately.
_ Dents
o All new dents on vehicles should be reported to the Head of
department in writing and copied to the (AM) or (FM) or (TM)o General
condition of the vehicle checked and all discrepancies noted.
_ Dents
Safety Equipments _
List of Equipments in the workshop_- Format # metform-18
Inspection shelter & pit Minimum Spares Schedule for PERIODIC inspection…..Months………..>
Quantity Available M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12
All external providers are in evaluated on monthly basis on the following parameter
1. On time delivery
2. Quality of service
3. Behaviour of the transport staff
4. Customer concerns
5. Line stoppage/.delay of the customer because of suppliers’ services
Selection,
The primary goal of “supplier qualification screening” is to reduce the likelihood of supplier non-
performance, such as late delivery, non-delivery, or delivery of non-conforming (faulty) goods.
A secondary goal is simply to ensure that the supplier will be a responsible and responsive
partner in the day-to-day business relationship with the buyer.
Supplier qualification screening involves many aspects, which are outlined below.
1. Reference checks.
2. Financial stability-
3. Surge capacity availability.
4. QMS system at supplier end such as ISO 9001
5. Ability to meet needs and expectations
6. monitoring of performance, and
7. re-evaluation
Purchase order issued to the entire supplier following terms and conditions are ensured in the
purchasing documents.
3. Any specific procedure that need to be followed as part of METAFORA or our customers
Website www.start.co.zen
Able to handle the refrigerated van, dry cargo and bulk carrier.
Does the business operate as a Limited Liability, Partnership, Sole Trader, Incorporation, Other?
Please specify:
2.5
Sole trader.
2.6 5million
2.7 What is the combined value of orders received over the last 12 months? 3.9 million
2.8 Can you provide us with the contact project Charter of 3 other
companies with whom you have similar sized contracts and X
nature? If Yes, please state:
Company
Address Phone Nos.
Name
3.9 Control of records (process cards, test results, etc.). How long do you retain quality records?
POINT OF CONTACT
Company Quality Representative
Name: Title:
Email: Phone:
Sales/Customer Service
Technical
Accounts
Name: Title:
Email: Phone:
Supplier Corrective Action Plan
A] Problem Statement: Poor Deliver performance from last three months; for refrigerated
C] Root Cause Analysis: (Attach separate sheet for problem solving technique used to arrive at Root cause (s).
One of our workmen was sick, so he could not able to attend the unit, we deployed another person to complete the
job work of METAFORA
Inform to the new employee how to do the job Informed to new employee
New workman will arrive in next month New workman will arrive in next month
Document Document
1 NIL 3
2 4
A] Problem Statement: Quality of the perishable items transported through refrigerated van found deteriorated
C] Root Cause Analysis: (Attach separate sheet for problem solving technique used to arrive at Root cause (s).
Driver was new could not able to understand the quality related requirements of cargo hold area.
Language issue, does not understand English numbers which was being displayed on the temperature meter
Inform to the new employee how to do the job Informed to new employee
regular workman will arrive in next month Regular workman will arrive in next month
Document Document
1 NIL 3
2 4
Shipping consolidation and load/trip planning is the planning of the physical loads for placement
in a transport unit (truck trailer, sea freight container, ULD, etc. depending on the mode of
transport). This type of planning assigns shipments (goods) to a transport mode, taking into
account constraints like pickup and delivery time windows and allowed combination of goods.
Trip planning is used to define the most efficient trip, based on geographical maps and plans.
Combining both load and trip planning is necessary to create the most efficient transportation
trip. Load design means to plan how the goods will be stored in the container (three dimensional).
Design is done based on criteria such as sequence of loading and unloading and stackability of
the products. This process can include load design for pallets using alternative stacking patterns
driven by product, customer and transport unit data/constraints. Route planning is based on the
created trip. The actual route is determined by customer delivery requirements, carrier network
design and more granular information depending on the type of transport being used.
In case the planner’s own equipment is used to execute the actual shipment, the planning process
needs to allocate loads appropriate to the equipment and schedule the correct operating
personnel to the equipment and routes. Constraints that typically can be taken into account are
operating hours, the current location of personnel, equipment and the condition of the transport
equipment. Carrier selection can include transport mode selection and the selection of the actual
carrier. In its most basic form the planner assigns a transport mode and/or carrier to the
shipment. Decision rules might be used that simplify the selection criteria, such as having an
approved carrier for each mode or lane. It is also possible that carrier
Selection is supported by tendering of loads amongst contract carriers or via public tendering on
the web. Execution The Execution phase begins when work processes are initiated in accordance
with the execution plans and ends when the shipment is completed or cancelled.
The execution of the operations includes movement of goods, cargo handling, document
handling, monitoring and control of operations and goods, supporting effective coordination and
accomplishment of the whole transport chain. This may include transport and terminal
operations managed by several logistics service providers (LSPs). This phase also deals with
detection and management of deviations. Order entry and consolidation is the registration,
validation and management of orders. The exact content differs considerably depending on the
user role; shippers, LSPs or carriers. For a shipper it is the key to register the relation between the
customer order and the transportation/orders/deliveries that are being created as part of the
fulfilment process.
A logistics service provider typically receives transportation orders from customers, either by
phone, fax, email or electronically. Depending on the activities being outsourced and the IT
solutions used, LSPs and carriers might only get a transportation order, possibly with a reference
to a client customer order. When dispatching the carriers internal execution resources need to
be informed. Confirmation may need to be obtained, especially when subcontracted carriers are
used. At this point additional information, such as vehicle identification and operator information
might be part of the confirmation. The process used to record order status information related
to the pick-up/collection and delivery of shipments is sometimes called the visibility or track and
trace process. This process is used to monitor the execution of transportation and logistics
services for every order. Information captured during this process can be used for financial
settlement later. Global logistic execution/customs and transport documentation generation
processes support international transportation with trade compliance information for import and
export. These processes provide compliance information about rules and regulations and support
printing of specific import/export documents.
METAFORA Customer Satisfaction Survey format
Dear Valued customer, In order to evaluate our performance and to further improve our services, we would
appreciate if you could spend a sometime of your time to answer the below questions and give us your valuable inpu
Thank you.
SECTION-A
1) 2) What Services METAFORA do you use? :
Goods Transport Tanker Services Passenger Services
3) Do you hire other companies for the same services?
Yes No
4) How you rate METAFORA services in comparison with competition?
Superior Better At par Below
SECTION-B
Rate us on 1 to 5 scale; Excellent=5, poor =1, Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Poor
Does Metafora provide services in a safe, secure and timely YES
manner.
Metafora established a good working relationship with clients YES
Customer Charter
1) Company name : Diamond Logistics
2) Contact person: Peterson – marketing
3) Designation:Head
4) Telephone:
5) E-mail:perterson@diamond.net
Date 11/12/2017
Format # metform-22
METAFORA Customer Satisfaction Survey format
Dear Valued customer, In order to evaluate our performance and to further improve our services, we would
appreciate if you could spend a sometime of your time to answer the below questions and give us your valuable inpu
Thank you.
SECTION-A
5) 6) What Services METAFORA do you use? :
Goods Transport Tanker Services Passenger Services
7) Do you hire other companies for the same services?
Yes No
8) How you rate METAFORA services in comparison with competition?
Superior Better At par Below
SECTION-B
Rate us on 1 to 5 scale; Excellent=5, poor =1, Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Poor
Does Metafora provide services in a safe, secure and timely YES
manner.
Metafora established a good working relationship with clients yes
Customer Charter
6) Company name : FOUR SEQUARE Logistics
7) Contact person: DAVID JAMES – LOGISITCS
8) Designation: Head
9) Telephone:
10) E-mail:davidjames@foursequre.zen
Date 11/12/2017
Format # metform-22
METAFORA Customer Satisfaction Survey format
Dear Valued customer, In order to evaluate our performance and to further improve our services, we would
appreciate if you could spend a sometime of your time to answer the below questions and give us your valuable inpu
Thank you.
SECTION-A
9) 10) What Services METAFORA do you use? :
Goods Transport Tanker Services Passenger Services
11) Do you hire other companies for the same services?
Yes No
12) How you rate METAFORA services in comparison with competition?
Superior Better At par Below
SECTION-B
Rate us on 1 to 5 scale; Excellent=5, poor =1, Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Poor
Does Metafora provide services in a safe, secure and timely YES
manner.
Metafora established a good working relationship with clients YES
Customer Charter
11) Company name : Kings Logistics
12) Contact person: Peterson – marketing
13) Designation:Head
14) Telephone:
15) E-mail:perterson@diamond.net Date 11/12/2017
Format # metform-22
METAFORA Customer Satisfaction Survey format
Dear Valued customer, In order to evaluate our performance and to further improve our services, we would
appreciate if you could spend a sometime of your time to answer the below questions and give us your valuable inpu
Thank you.
SECTION-A
13) 14) What Services METAFORA do you use? :
Goods Transport Tanker Services Passenger Services
15) Do you hire other companies for the same services?
Yes No
16) How you rate METAFORA services in comparison with competition?
Superior Better At par Below
SECTION-B
Rate us on 1 to 5 scale; Excellent=5, poor =1, Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Poor
Does Metafora provide services in a safe, secure and timely YES
manner.
Metafora established a good working relationship with clients YES
We have not hired single vehicles from you in the calendar year -2017.
Customer Charter
16) Company name : NORTHGATE Logistics
17) Contact person: MALKAM GOMES – LOGISITCS
18) Designation: Head
19) Telephone:
20) E-mail:malkamg@northgate.zen
Date 11/12/2017
Format # metform-22
8.5 Transport service provision
Introduction
Fleet management is the function that oversees, coordinates and facilitates various transport and transport
related activities. For the purpose of this document it will cover vehicles involved in the movement of goods;
the management of light vehicle fleets used in the transportation of people and light cargo; possibly
motorbikes and other equipment such as generators and warehouse handling equipment. Fleet management
underpins and supports transport related activities through the management of the assets that are used.
Effective fleet management aims at reducing and minimizing overall costs through maximum, cost effective
utilization of resources such as vehicles, fuel, spare parts, etc.
The administration and financial management of fleet is very organisational specific. It largely depends on
donor requirements and organisational policies. For example, in some organizations vehicles are restricted to
specific projects and others utilize vehicle pools to serve multiple projects. Driving policies can vary from a
strict reliance on a dedicated driver from the organization, to using staff to drive the vehicles. The
administrative policies of the individual organization will dictate which approach will be utilized. This results in
the custodian of the fleet management function to be very much dependant on organizational policies and
structures.
Policy
A vehicle policy will provide specific guidelines for the management and use of vehicles and other mobile
assets. Policies are designed to facilitate and encourage accountability, monitoring of usage and costs, provide
internal control and to serve as a management tool for better decision
A basic vehicle policy would have the following inclusions amongst others:
1. Introduction
2. Purpose
3. Scope
4. Objectives
5. Planning, approval and budget process
6. Procurement
7. Approved types for vehicles
8. Ordering of vehicles process
9. Assignment of vehicles
10. Personal use of vehicles by staff
11. Management of vehicles:
12. Control of fuel, maintenance/repairs of vehicles
13. Vehicle insurance scheme
14. Vehicle replacement
15. Sale of vehicles
16. Guidelines for drivers:
17. Assignment of Motorcycles
18. Security
19. Environment
20. Reports
21. Revisions
22. Conclusion
Identifying needs
Identification of fleet needs is dependent on the nature of emergency and operations, and the size and area of
operation - urban operations could utilise smaller trucks whereas remote field operation may require larger
four-wheel drive vehicles for extreme terrain. Vehicle selection criteria are guided by:
The general criteria for selection of a vehicle should be in conformity with the standard recommended
vehicles.
The standard tender process is adopted for vehicles, as for all other goods and services, bulk items and items
bought on a regular basis. In some cases, the process may result in outsourcing of some aspects of the vehicle
management or leasing of vehicles (See Procurement topic).
For small daily purchases such as filters etc, petty cash/float may be used by the fleet manager.
Insurance
Careful consideration should be given to the form of insurance selected for the vehicles belonging to the
organisation. The minimum legal requirements must always be complied with; this is usually at least third
party cover.
To ensure compliance with the vehicle insurance requirements, all personnel using operation vehicles under
the responsibility of the organisation must be fully conversant with accident and incident reporting procedures
for vehicles and personal injury.
Personnel requirements: the insurance cover for personnel will depend on the type of policy the organisation
takes to cover its vehicles: third party, third party fire and theft, comprehensive or liability insurance.
Rent or outsource: insurance coverage for leased or outsourced vehicles will be dependent upon what the
organisation negotiates with the service provider. The organisation will either adopt the service providers
insurance as-is or adopt it with amendments. An alternative is to completely outsource the fleet management,
but again the type of insurance will be dependent upon what is negotiated with the service provider.
Outsourcing
The nature of the contract is dependent on the ownership status which could be:
an external company is contracted to supply and manage the vehicles;
an external company supplies the vehicles but the management remains with the organisation; and the
vehicles are owned by the organisation and an external company undertakes the management of the fleet.
The preferred options are dependent on the organisations approved procurement or sourcing policies and
operational needs. Contracting, sourcing and leasing are done in strict adherence with the organisations
approved procurement policy. (See Agreement for leased transport fleet sample and refer also to the
Procurement section)
In emergency situations outsourcing and external leasing are common practices. In a rapid on-set emergency,
it takes time to ship-in or purchase vehicles for use in the response. Organisations are sometimes left with the
option of outsourcing or leasing vehicles or trucks from the local market. In the initial days of the emergency,
this can prove to be an expensive option. In emergency situations, there are usually very many organisations
and very few assets. The high demand may cause price increases.
Vehicle Management
The location of the vehicle management function within organizations’ structures varies from organisation to
organisation. The management may be located within administration, transport function or have an
independent fleet manager. For the purpose of the Logistics Operations Guide the manager will be referred to
as the fleet manager (FM).
Vehicles are expensive but critical to an organisations' operation. They facilitate the movement of personnel
and the delivery of relief supplies to beneficiaries. Vehicle management is also one of the aspects of supply
management that can be easily abused if not properly managed. If properly managed this aspect would
ensure:
the driver records all fuel and maintenance costs in the log book or fuel request and purchase voucher,
indicating the reading on the odometer at the time of the expense;
fuel can be purchased from a central petrol station and a receipt issued. Where there is no appointed petrol
station, the vehicle fuel request form is completed and approved before funds are released for fuelling. Should
the driver have to purchase fuel from their own funds or petty cash, the amount spent on the purchase will be
reimbursed;
no unauthorized staff members are allowed to drive the organizations vehicles. Vehicles will be assigned at the
discretion of the approving officer; and
all new staff (those who have a driving license but have not driven for a specified period), will not be allowed
to drive the organisation's vehicles unless accompanied by a qualified driver or have been re-tested by the
registered automobile association and authorized to drive.
1. distances travelled;
2. destinations reached;
3. distance travelled by vehicle showing official and private mileage;
4. fuel consumption;
5. repair and maintenance per vehicle;
6. rate of consumption of spare parts; and
7. servicing planned and completed.
The reports can be produced on a weekly, monthly or bi-monthly basis, depending on the needs of the
organisation. Weekly reports may comprise a summary weekly refuelling by vehicle – which may highlight any
exceptions to targets set per vehicle, whereas monthly reports may comprise:
Vehicles are regularly maintained for optimum performance, and kept in good repair. In emergency situations
the Logistician is sometimes tasked with the responsibility of managing the vehicle fleet. To streamline vehicle
management the FM should put in place a simple process. Such a process could entail the following:
Maintenance Options
"In house maintenance" – performed using the facilities and staff of the organisation.
Whichever mix is selected, it must be preventative and must be under the control of a competent manager; if
it is not, the condition of the vehicles may quickly decline and running costs may increase.
Maintenance Planning
Whichever maintenance options is followed, vehicle maintenance schedules must be drawn up together with,
and published by the Fleet Manager as part of the vehicle planning.
All members of the management team must make a commitment to respecting the scheduled dates for
maintenance.
A master vehicle inspection and servicing schedule should be drawn up for one year – a wall chart is
recommended. This chart can also be used to show road tax renewal, annual inspection dates, etc.
Preventative maintenance
This is done on a ongoing basis. This type of maintenance addresses the basic things that could cause a
problem in vehicles if they are not properly maintained. The Logistician or FM develops an inspection check-list
to be used by all drivers as a guide.
Each day, the first driver to use a vehicle will inspect the vehicle using the check-list.
Routine maintenance
This type of maintenance is done on a monthly basis. It may cover the following:
the vehicle supervisor should periodically organise a test drive each vehicle and report on its condition and
also ensure that normal/regular service has been done for all vehicles;
In emergency situations, in the absence of local facilities, the organisation would have to undertake its own
maintenance and ensure that:
Based on the organization's needs, the criteria for selection of the right garage is set with the input of the
Logistics officer and the FM, keeping in mind the organisations approved procurement procedures. For
example the minimum requirements may include:
Should the organisation decide to manage its vehicle maintenance in-house, certain fast moving spares are
recommended for stocking. This reduces vehicle down-time.
The number of vehicles owned by the organisation will determine the purchase of these parts and equipment.
Maintenance Documentation
Vehicle maintenance summary: whoever maintains the vehicles must make a detailed written servicing record
report, listing the work done, parts and fluids used and costs incurred on each job. The FM must keep this on
the individual vehicle file.
Workshop job cards: when the written order is received, the workshop raises a workshop ‘job card’ for each
vehicle entering for inspection, service or defect rectification. Work should not be carried out without a job
card; each card should include the following information:
Some organisations manage their own routine minor repairs and vehicle service workshops. Some basic health
and safety measures for workshops would be:
2. SCOPE
2.1 All areas of the Management Systems, established by the organization in accordance with
the requirement of ISO- 9001: 2015.
4. DEFINITION
QMS : Quality Management System
NC : Nonconformance / Nonconformity
OFI : Opportunity for improvement
The audit objective is to assess the Performance of Quality Management System (QMS)
with regard to:
a. Adequacy & conformance of the system against the requirements of ISO 9001:
2015.
b. Conformance to the QMS requirements established by METAFORA,
c. Effectiveness of implementation
d. Compliance to the Statutory, Regulatory
6.4.1 At the end of the audit session, the auditor shall prepare the audit report summarizing
the non-conformances detected and / or Opportunities for Improvement (OFI) observed
in Format # metaform-23 & Internal Audit Corrective Action Plan, Format # metaform-
24
4.5 Nonconformance & Corrective Action guidelines
6.4.2 For every Non Conformance detected, an appropriate correction is required to be taken
by the management responsible for the area being audited without undue delay in order
to eliminate the nonconformity.
6.4.3 The concerned Auditee upon receipt of Non Conformance cum Corrective Action Report
Format # metaform-24, shall fill up proposed corrective and/or preventive action(s) with
target completion dates after identifying the Root cause. The auditee shall ensure that
action is initiated without undue delay to eliminate the detected nonconformities and
their causes.
6.4.4 Corrective actions shall be appropriate to the effects of the nonconformities
encountered. (However, if the nonconformity is due to accidental, occasional or
insignificant deviation from the requirements, a simple ‘fix’ should be sufficient & in such
cases, detailed analysis may be skipped.)
6.4.5 On the Target Dates for closing of Non Conformity, the concerned auditor shall conduct
follow up review and record his findings. The Non conformance may be closed, upgraded,
downgraded or may not be cleared depending on the evaluation of the effectiveness of
action taken by the auditee.
6.4.6 If the NC cannot be closed on the target date due to insufficient or ineffective Corrective
Action(s), fresh follow up & verification plan shall be proposed, documented and adhered
to by the auditor.
6.4.7 An ‘Opportunity for Improvement’ (OFI) is recorded for the items where the system is
working well, but there may be another way to make it more effective and/or efficient.
Neither Root Cause nor a Verification Plan is required.
6.4.8 The recipient of an OFI is to analyze it and determine if it is feasible/practical/appropriate
and a value added effort. Depending upon the analysis results, the OFI is either accepted
or rejected. If accepted, an Action Plan shall be developed and the results documented.
6.4.9 Horizontal Deployment of the corrective action, if required, shall be initiated by IMS Cell
as detailed in Format # metaform-24
4.6 Reporting of Results
6.6.1 Results of the audit, including Non-Conformances, shall be reported to MR without undue
delay.
6.6.2 A summary report, comprising of NCs & other significant findings from all the areas
audited in respect of the relevant audit plan, shall be prepared & shall be submitted to
the Top Management for review.
4.7 Data Analysis
Appropriate data and trend analysis to demonstrate the suitability and effectiveness of
the Internal Auditing process shall be done by IMS Cell to explore possibilities of continual
improvement.
METAFORA Internal Audit Report- Process: Marketing
AUDITOR - HARI C NC remark
4.1 Understanding the organization and its context. x
4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties. X
4.3 Determining the scope of the QMS. X
4.4 The QMS and its processes. X
5.1 Leadership and commitment. X
5.2 Quality policy.
5.3 Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities.
6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities. X
6.2 Quality objectives and planning to achieve them. X
6.3 Planning of changes X
7.1 Resources. X
7.2 Competence. X
7.3 Awareness. X
7.4 Communication. X
7.5 Documented information. X
8.1 Operational planning and control.
8.2 Determination of requirements for products and services. X
8.3 Design and development of products and services.
8.4 Control of externally provided products and services.
8.5 Production and service provision.
8.6 Release of products and services.
8.7 Control of nonconforming process outputs, products and services.
9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation. X
9.2 Internal audit.
9.3 Management review. X
10.1 General.
10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action. X
10.3 Continual improvement. X
Format # metform-23
C= Conformity; NC= Nonconformity and Remark= Additional column for comments, if any.
Please issue NC on separate sheet.
METAFORA Internal Audit Report- Process: Top Management
AUDITOR - DANNY C NC remark
4.1 Understanding the organization and its context. X
4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties. X
4.3 Determining the scope of the QMS. X
4.4 The QMS and its processes. X
5.1 Leadership and commitment. X
5.2 Quality policy. X
5.3 Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities. X
6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities. X
6.2 Quality objectives and planning to achieve them.
6.3 Planning of changes
7.1 Resources. X
7.2 Competence.
7.3 Awareness.
7.4 Communication.
7.5 Documented information.
8.1 Operational planning and control.
8.2 Determination of requirements for products and services.
8.3 Design and development of products and services.
8.4 Control of externally provided products and services.
8.5 Production and service provision.
8.6 Release of products and services.
8.7 Control of nonconforming process outputs, products and services.
9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation.
9.2 Internal audit.
9.3 Management review. X
10.1 General.
10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action.
10.3 Continual improvement. X
Format # metform-23
C= Conformity; NC= Nonconformity and Remark= Additional column for comments, if any.
Please issue NC on separate sheet.
METAFORA Internal Audit Report- Process: LOGISTICS
AUDITOR - DANNY C NC remark
4.1 Understanding the organization and its context. X
4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties. X
4.3 Determining the scope of the QMS. X
4.4 The QMS and its processes. X
5.1 Leadership and commitment. X
5.2 Quality policy. X
5.3 Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities. X
6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities. X
6.2 Quality objectives and planning to achieve them. X
6.3 Planning of changes X
7.1 Resources. X
7.2 Competence. X
7.3 Awareness. X
7.4 Communication. X
7.5 Documented information. X
8.1 Operational planning and control.
8.2 Determination of requirements for products and services.
8.3 Design and development of products and services.
8.4 Control of externally provided products and services.
8.5 Production and service provision. X
8.6 Release of products and services. X
8.7 Control of nonconforming process outputs, products and services.
9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation. X
9.2 Internal audit.
9.3 Management review. X
10.1 General.
10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action. X
10.3 Continual improvement. X
Format # metform-23
C= Conformity; NC= Nonconformity and Remark= Additional column for comments, if any.
Please issue NC on separate sheet.
METAFORA Internal Audit Report- Process: Procurement
AUDITOR - HARI C NC remark
4.1 Understanding the organization and its context. X
4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties. X
4.3 Determining the scope of the QMS. X
4.4 The QMS and its processes. X
5.1 Leadership and commitment. X
5.2 Quality policy.
5.3 Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities. X
6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities. X
6.2 Quality objectives and planning to achieve them. X
6.3 Planning of changes X
7.1 Resources.
7.2 Competence. X
7.3 Awareness. X
7.4 Communication. X
7.5 Documented information.
8.1 Operational planning and control.
8.2 Determination of requirements for products and services.
8.3 Design and development of products and services.
8.4 Control of externally provided products and services. X
8.5 Production and service provision.
8.6 Release of products and services.
8.7 Control of nonconforming process outputs, products and services.
9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation. X
9.2 Internal audit.
9.3 Management review. X
10.1 General.
10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action. X
10.3 Continual improvement. X
Format # metform-23
C= Conformity; NC= Nonconformity and Remark= Additional column for comments, if any.
Please issue NC on separate sheet.
METAFORA Internal Audit Report- Process: Workshop
AUDITOR - SRICHKRA C NC remark
4.1 Understanding the organization and its context. X
4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties. X
4.3 Determining the scope of the QMS. X
4.4 The QMS and its processes. X
5.1 Leadership and commitment. X
5.2 Quality policy.
5.3 Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities. X
6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities. X
6.2 Quality objectives and planning to achieve them. X
6.3 Planning of changes X
7.1 Resources.
7.2 Competence. X
7.3 Awareness. X
7.4 Communication. X
7.5 Documented information.
8.1 Operational planning and control.
8.2 Determination of requirements for products and services.
8.3 Design and development of products and services.
8.4 Control of externally provided products and services. X
8.5 Production and service provision. X
8.6 Release of products and services.
8.7 Control of nonconforming process outputs, products and services.
9.1 Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation. X
9.2 Internal audit.
9.3 Management review. X
10.1 General.
10.2 Nonconformity and corrective action. X
10.3 Continual improvement. X
Format # metform-23
C= Conformity; NC= Nonconformity and Remark= Additional column for comments, if any.
Please issue NC on separate sheet.
Internal Audit Corrective Action Plan
A] Problem Statement: COMPETENCE FOR REFRIGERATED VAN MAINTINACE AND SERVICE NOT MAINTAINED.
C] Root Cause Analysis: (Attach separate sheet for problem solving technique used to arrive at Root cause (s).
THIS IS NEW PROJECT IT WAS HANDLED BY PROJECT, ROOT CAUSE INTERNAL COMMUNICATION AND ADEQUATE
REVIEW OF NEW PROJECTS IN CROSS FUNCTIONAL REVIEW
AWAITING FROM PROJECT DEPARTMENT TO SKILL AWAITING FROM PROJECT DEPARTMENT TO SKILL
DEVELOPEMENT DEVELOPMENT
Document Document
1 NIL 3
2 4
A] Problem Statement: EQUIPMENT FOR SERVICING FOR REFRIGERATED VAN NOT AVAIABLE IN WORKSHOP.
C] Root Cause Analysis: (Attach separate sheet for problem solving technique used to arrive at Root cause (s).
THIS IS NEW PROJECT IT WAS HANDLED BY PROJECT, ROOT CAUSE INTERNAL COMMUNICATION AND ADEQUATE
REVIEW OF NEW PROJECTS IN CROSS FUNCTIONAL REVIEW
AWAITING FROM PROJECT DEPARTMENT TO SERVICE AWAITING FROM PROJECT DEPARTMENT TO SERVICE
DEVELOPEMENT DEVELOPMENT
Document Document
1 NIL 3
2 4
A] Problem Statement:
Signature of management representative not available on the copy of the Quality Manual.
C] Root Cause Analysis: (Attach separate sheet for problem solving technique used to arrive at Root cause (s).
Document Document
1 NIL 3
2 4
A] Problem Statement: There is no upkeep in the workshop, all over material is lying, shop floor of workshop
was oily, lot of scarp is there on the shop floor.
C] Root Cause Analysis: (Attach separate sheet for problem solving technique used to arrive at Root cause (s).
Document Document
1 NIL 3
2 4
A] Problem Statement:
There are repetitive breakdowns repeated from the refrigerated vans. No corrective action taken
C] Root Cause Analysis: (Attach separate sheet for problem solving technique used to arrive at Root cause (s).
Situation will be alright after 6 months Situation will be okay after six month
Document Document
1 NIL 3
2 4
Date of Review:
In attendance:
NAME TITLE
Vikram S.
Danny Head marketing
Hari Head Logistics
ITEM 1: Review of the Quality Policy for current adequacy, and the need for changes to it. Review
the Quality Policy to ensure it still represents the company’s goals.
Input : Reviewed the quality policy. Also reviewed external and internal issues interested
parties and their needs and expectation.
Management representative told the Chair that we align our policy towards risk based
thinking by addition of word “risk” in the policy.
ITEM 4: Review of resources needed to maintain and improve the effectiveness of the company
and its quality management system. Discuss resource needs for each of the following points.
ITEM 5: Review of the effectiveness of training and training programs in place. Include opportunities
for improvement for training.
Very less training were conducted and undertaken as lot of logistic related issues where there.
There was busy schedule in the logistics
No separate funds for the trainings.
ITEM 6: Review of suppliers. Discuss issues regarding suppliers of critical materials, hardware or software.
Review supplier performance and any quality or delivery issues. Review open supplier corrective action notices
issued since last meeting. Note any trends for individual suppliers. Indicate changes of supplier status or
restrictions.
ITEM 9: Discuss customer feedback, customer satisfaction survey results and complaints not
already discussed as part of the CAR system review.
1. Customer complaint are reviwed
2. Customer satisfaction also reviwed
ITEM 10: Discuss the overall performance of the quality system, any changes to the company that
may affect the quality system, or vice-versa. Include opportunities for improvement.
Found satisfactory.
ITEM 11: Note other recommendations for improvement to the company’s products, services,
and/or QMS.
GPS
ERP software for office
Refrigerated truck operations.
ITEM 12. Note follow-up activities from prior Management Review issues.
NIL
ITEM 13. Set date for next Management Review:
ITEM 14. ITEMS FOR FOLLOW-UP AT NEXT MEETING: Read through the entire minutes above and
copy any items that need to be looked at again, or followed up on, at the next meeting.
ITEM 15. Risk & opportunity in context of Business environment and Interested parties :
6 Southern manufacturing co. Property Damaged at Feb-XX Driver’s Behaviour Refer CAP
customer premises,
speeding vehicle hit the
cooling tower
7 Miami Corporation Late Delivery August-xx Route Issue Refer CAP
Format # metform-28
Corrective Action Plan
Consignment was delayed as driver took different root Informed all driver to strictly follow the route design by the
logistics department .
C] Root Cause Analysis: (Attach separate sheet for problem solving technique used to arrive at Root cause (s).
Informed to driver Informed all driver to strictly follow the route design by the
logistics department .
Document Document
1 NIL 3
2 4
Date:
Customer Name Miami Corporation Sept-xx ;August-xx ,
METAFORA
July-xx;
theft issue.
D] Proposed Corrective Action/(s) (PCA) E] Corrective Action implemented / Initiated:
The seal of container found opened at customer end 1. Driver’s training, this 3’rd incidence.
2. Salary deducted for the concern driver and
There were two keys required to open the container, one cleaner.
key is with driver and other key dispatched with same 3. Customer has debited the proportionate invoice
vehicle in a sealed container. amount for 2 LED TV sets, which were short
receipt at customer end.
Sealed contained was found tampered. 4. Digital lock proposal turn down because of
technology involvement.
E] Changes made in the Documents / systems (kindly attach the proof)
Document Document
1 NIL 3
2 4
C] Root Cause Analysis: (Attach separate sheet for problem solving technique used to arrive at Root cause (s).
theft issue.
Driver had taken a different route. 1. Driver had taken a different route.
2. He wanted to complete the trip fast.
He wanted to complete the trip fast.
3. He was unable to understand the sign.
He was unable to understand the sign.
Document Document
1 NIL 3
2 4
A] Problem Statement: Crew did not followed the safety instruction while driving the vehicle inside the plant
C] Root Cause Analysis: (Attach separate sheet for problem solving technique used to arrive at Root cause (s).
theft issue.
Document Document
1 NIL 3
2 4
A] Problem Statement: Crew did not followed the safety instruction while driving the vehicle inside the plant
C] Root Cause Analysis: (Attach separate sheet for problem solving technique used to arrive at Root cause (s).
theft issue.
Document Document
1 NIL 3
2 4
A] Problem Statement: Property Damaged at customer premises, speeding vehicle hit the cooling tower
C] Root Cause Analysis: (Attach separate sheet for problem solving technique used to arrive at Root cause (s).
Driver ignored the safety warnings and speed up the vehicle, went beyond 20km/hrs speed, hit the cooling tower. This
was straight road.
Late break application because of poor breaking 1. Driver did not fill in the checklist
performance. 2. Instructed to fill in the daily checklist and submit it
to METAFORA workshop on the after completing
Vehicle not maintained /service in last 3 months
the consignment.
Daily checklist of driver found empty.
Document Document
1 NIL 3
2 4
Before : (Include pictures, diagrams, etc.) After (Include pictures, diagrams, etc.)
Quality
Benefits : Cost Delivery Efficiency Waste Safety
Energy Moral Other
Before : (Include pictures, diagrams, etc.) After (Include pictures, diagrams, etc.)
Quality
Benefits : Cost Delivery Efficiency Waste Safety
Energy Moral Other
Improved Moral
Before : (Include pictures, diagrams, etc.) After (Include pictures, diagrams, etc.)
Quality
Benefits : Cost Delivery Efficiency Waste Safety
Energy Moral Other
Improved Moral