Contemporary World GE3-Module 3 Contemporary World GE3-Module 3
Contemporary World GE3-Module 3 Contemporary World GE3-Module 3
Contemporary World GE3-Module 3 Contemporary World GE3-Module 3
COLLEGE DEPARTMENT
A.Y. 2020-2021, First Semester
Prepared by:
HAZEL P. JAOS, LPT
LEARNING OUTCOMES
MOTIVATION PHASE
The products that we consume and use—foods, clothing, and gadgets—are part of
our way of life. Globalization allows for a worldwide exchange of these commodities and
exposure to different cultures as well.
1. Divide the class into six groups. Each group will be assigned to any one of the
following products being sold in the Philippines. The group shall choose a specific
foreign brand of the product assigned to them.
a. coffee d. hamburger
c. laptop f. shoes
2. List down the main ingredients or raw materials in manufacturing the chosen
product. Identify the corresponding country from which each ingredient or raw material
came from.
3. Identify the countries involved in the manufacturing of the chosen product. Indicate
the corresponding service the country does for the product (e.g., Costa Rica - planting
of coffee beans).
4. Aside from the Philippines, list other countries in which the product is being sold.
5. Cite the kinds of technology that made the creation of the product " possible.
Consider communications and transportation.
6. Write one to three statements about the creation of the product. Share your
statement with your groupmates and indicate whether you agree or disagree with their
statements.
PRESENTATION PHASE
Introduction
The United Nations (UN) tried to address the different problems in the world. Their efforts
were guided by the eight Millennium Development Goals, which they created in the 1990s.
Among these eight goals, the eradication of extreme poverty and hunger, ranked as the first.
The other seven goals include: achieving universal primary education, promoting gender
equality and women empowerment, reducing child mortality, improving maternal health,
combating diseases like HIV/AIDS and malaria, ensuring environmental sustainability, and
having a global partnership for development (United Nations, 2015). The UN tried to achieve
them by the year 2015.
Why is extreme poverty falling? The answer to this is really complicated. A set of factors
like better access to education, humanitarian, aid, and the policies of international organizations
like the UN have made a difference. However, the greatest contributor is economic globalization.
The world's economies have become more interconnected and free trade has driven the growth
of many developing economies.
According to the United Nations (as cited in Shangquan, 2000), “Economic globalization
refers to the increasing interdependence of world economies as a result of the growing scale of
cross-border trade of commodities and services, flow of international capital, and wide and rapid
spread of technologies. It reflects the continuing expansion and mutual integration of market
frontiers, and is an irreversible trend for the economic development in the whole world at the
turn of the millennium." (p. 1)
There are two different types of economies associated with economic globalization-
protectionism and trade liberalization. Protectionism means “a policy of systematic
government intervention in foreign trade with the objective of encouraging domestic production.
This encouragement involves giving preferential treatment to domestic producers and
discriminating against foreign competitors” (McAleese, 2007 as cited in Ritzer, 2015, p. 1169).
Trade protectionism usually comes in the form of quotas and tariffs. Tariffs are required fees
on imports or exports. For instance, a pen that costs $1.00 in Country A and in Country B, it
would be given five-dollar tariff. The pen would become $6 in Country B. This policy was
practiced during the mercantilist era, from sixteenth to seventeenth centuries until the early years
of the Industrial Revolution (Chorev, 2007). The Great Depression of 1929 marked the peak of
protectionism. Until today, protectionism exists in the world economy despite the growth of trade
liberalization. Countries such as China, Japan, and the United States are being accused of
practicing protectionism (Ritzer, 2015).
There are some significant downsides to globalize trade and perhaps the strongest
argument against economic globalization is its lack of sustainability or the degree to which
the earth’s resources can be used for our needs, even in the future. Specifically, the
development of our world today by using the earth’s resources and the preservation of such
sources for the future is called sustainable development.
In other words, development has to be ensured in and for the future generations. One
significant global response or approach to economic globalization is that of sustainable
development, which seeks to chart a middle path between economic growth and a sustainable
environment (Borghesi and Vercelli, 2008). The relationship between globalization and
sustainability is multi¬ dimensional—it involves economic, political, and technological
aspects.
The continuous production of the world’s natural resources, such as water and fossil
fuel allows humanity to discover and innovate many things. We were able to utilize energy,
Environmental Degradation
Food Security
The demand for food will be 60% greater than it is today and the challenge of food
security requires the world to feed 9 billion people by 2050 (Breene, 2016). Global food
security means delivering sufficient food to the entire world population. It is, therefore, a
priority of all countries, whether developed or less developed. The security of food also means
the sustainability of society such as population growth, climate change, water scarcity, and
agriculture.
But perhaps the closest aspect of human life associated with food security is the
environment. The challenges to food security can be traced to the protection of the
environment. A major environmental problem is the destruction of natural habitats, particularly
through deforestation (Diamond, 2006). Industrial fishing has contributed to a significant
destruction of marine life and ecosystems (Coldburg, 2008). Biodiversity and usable farmland
have also declined at a rapid pace.
Pollution through toxic chemicals has had a long-term impact on the environment.
The use of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) has led to significant industrial pollution
(Dinham, 2007). Greenhouse gases, gases that trap sunlight and heat in the earth’s
atmosphere, contribute greatly to global warming. In turn, this process causes the melting of
land-based and glacial ice with potentially catastrophic effects (Revkin, 2008), the possibility
of substantial flooding, a reduction in the alkalinity of the oceans, and destruction of existing
ecosystems. Ultimately, global warming poses a threat to the global supply of food as well as
to human health (Brown, 2007). Furthermore, population growth and its attendant increase in
consumption intensify ecological problems. The global flow of dangerous debris is another
major concern, with electronic waste often dumped in developing countries.
There are different models and agenda pushed by different organizations to address
the issue of global food security. One of this is through sustainability. The United Nations has
set ending hunger, achieving food security and improved nutrition, and promoting sustainable
agriculture as the second of its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for the year 2030.
The World Economic Forum (2010) also addressed this issue through the New Vision for
Agriculture (NVA) in 2009 wherein public-private partnerships were established. It has
mobilized over $10 billion that reached smallholder farmers. The Forum's initiatives were
GE 3 – THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD – MODULE 1 Page 7
The Swedish statistician Hans Rosling once said, “The 1 to 2 billion poorest in the
world who don’t have food for the day suffer from the worst disease, globalization deficiency.
The way globalization is occurring could be much better, but the worst thing is not being part
of it.”
Economic and trade globalization is the result of companies trying to outmaneuver their
competitors. While you search for the cheapest place to buy shoes, companies search for the
cheapest place to make those shoes. They find the cheapest sources of leather, dye, rubber,
and of course, labor. The result is that labor-intensive products like shoes are often produced
in countries with the lowest wages and the weakest regulations. This process creates winners
and losers. The winners include corporations and their stockholders who earn more profit.
They also include consumers who get products at a cheaper price. The losers are high
wageworkers who used to make those shoes. Their jobs moved overseas. But what about
the low wage foreign workers? Are they winning or losing? A lot of workers are thrown into
hazardous working conditions but it is also true that many workers in developing countries
are at least making more money. These jobs pay above average wages. People want these
jobs and although the pay would be unacceptable in developed countries, they are often the
best alternative.
The multiplier effect means an increase in one economic activity can lead to an
increase in other economic activities. For instance, investing in local businesses will lead to
more jobs and more income. According to the economist Paul Krugman (as cited in The New
York Times, July 8, 2013), “The Bangladeshi apparel industry is going to consist of what we
would consider sweatshops or it won’t exist at all. And Bangladesh, in particular, really needs
its apparel industry. It’s pretty much the only thing keeping its economy afloat.”
Globalization and inequality are closely related. We can see how different nations are
divided between the North and the South, developed and less developed, and the core and
the periphery. These differences mainly reflect one key aspect of inequality in the
contemporary world—global economic inequality. There are two main types of economic
inequality: wealth inequality and income inequality. Wealth refers to the net worth of a country.
It takes into account all the assets of a nation—may they be natural, physical, and human—
less the liabilities. In other words, wealth is the abundance of resources in a specific country.
This means that wealth inequality speaks about distribution of assets. However, there is no
widely recognized, monetary measure that sums up. these assets (Economist, 2012).
Although it is the Industrial Revolution that allowed a significant inequality in the past,
economic globalization and international trade are the forces responsible in today’s global
income inequality. Many economists believe that the world’s poorest people gained
something from globalization. The rich, on the other hand, earned a lot more. Harvard
economist Richard Freeman (2011) noted, “The triumph of globalization and market
capitalism has improved living standards for billions while concentrating billions among the
few” (as presented in OECD Policy Forum, Paris, May 2). In other words, the poor are doing
a little better and the rich are becoming richer due to global capitalism.
You probably heard of “First World Problems.” When someone cracks the screen on
their phone or gets the wrong order at the coffee shop, and then goes on to their social media
accounts, you might see their complaints with a hashtag “First World Problems.” What are
the implications of talking about countries as First or Third? Where did these terms come
from? These terms are outdated and inaccurate ways of talking about global stratification.
How then are we going to talk about global stratification?
Let us begin by deconstructing the idea of the First, Second, and Third World hierarchy
by looking at their origins and their implications. The terms date back to the Cold War, when
Western policymakers began talking about the world as three distinct political and economic
blocs (Tomlinson, 2003). Western capitalist countries were labeled as the “First World.” The
Soviet Union and its allies were termed the “Second World.” Everyone else was grouped into
“Third World.” After the Cold War ended, the category of Second World countries became
null and void, but somehow the terms “First World” and “Third World” stuck around in the
public consciousness. Third World countries, which started as just a vague catchall term for
non-alliance countries, came to be associated with impoverished states, while the First World
was associated with rich, industrialized countries.
A new and simpler classification, North-South, was created as Second World countries
joined either the First World or the Third World. First World countries, such as the United
States, Canada, Western Europe, and developed parts of Asia are regarded as the “Global
North,” while the “Global South” includes the Caribbean, Latin America, South America,
Africa, and parts of Asia. These countries were used to be called the Third World during the
Cold War (Reuveny & Thompson, 2007). By noting that countries are south of 30 degrees
north latitude, they are able to say that these areas share common problems and issues
having to do with economy and politics. The terms “Global North” and Global South are a way
for countries in the South to make a stand about the common issues, problems, and even
causes in order to have equality all throughout the world.
These distinctions point largely to racial inequality, specifically between the Black and
the White. According to Ritzer (2015), “At the global level, whites are disproportionately in the
dominant North, while blacks are primarily in the south, although this is changing with South-
to-North migration” (p. 266). In other words, the differences between the Global North and the
Global South are shaped by migration and globalization. Nevertheless, the economic
differences between the wealthy Global North and poor Global South “have always
possessed a racial character” (Winant, 2001, p. 131).
Although cities are major beneficiaries of globalization, Bauman (2003) claimed that
they are also the most severely affected by global problems. Therefore, the city faces peculiar
political problems, wherein it is often fruitlessly seeking to deal locally with global problems
and “local politics has become hopelessly overloaded” (p. 102).
Activity 2 Analysis
1. Do you think that the Philippines is harmed as other countries transfer their activities to
us through outsourcing?
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
2. In what ways do international organizations help our country’s economy?
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
3. Does the position of rich countries as giants in the economic chain threaten the status
of less developed countries in the global market?
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
Activity 3 Abstraction
2. Examine the gap between rural and urban areas across the globe. How is that gap
affected by globalization?
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
3. What do you think is the impact of urbanization and the rise of global city on the
agricultural sector?
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
This is a debate activity which intends to show the stance of the students regarding
economic globalization. Argue based on this statement: "Global free trade has done more
harm than good.”
ASSESSMENT PHASE
See Schoology.
REFERENCE:
Aldama, P. (2018). The contemporary world. Manila, Philippines: Rex Book Store.
Photos: Freepik