Choice-Based Conjoint (CBC) Analysis

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

CONJOINT ANALYSIS

A form of statistical analysis that firms use in market research to understand how customers value
different components or features of their product or services

Essentially, conjoint analysis is a way of measuring the value that customers place on a product’s
features. It typically works via a survey

TYPES OF CONJOINT ANALYSIS

1. Choice-Based Conjoint (CBC) Analysis: This is one of the most common forms of conjoint
analysis and is used to identify how a respondent values combinations of features.

2. Adaptive Conjoint Analysis (ACA): This form of analysis customizes each respondent's
survey experience based on their answers to early questions. It’s often leveraged in
studies where several features or attributes are being evaluated to streamline the
process and extract the most valuable insights from each respondent.
3. Full-Profile Conjoint Analysis: This form of analysis presents the respondent with a series
of full product descriptions and asks them to select the one they’d be most inclined to
buy.
4. MaxDiff Conjoint Analysis: This form of analysis presents multiple options to the
respondent, which they’re asked to organize on a scale of “best” to “worst”

(or “most likely to buy” to “least likely to buy”).


The type of conjoint analysis a company uses is determined by the goals driving its analysis (i.e.,
what does it hope to learn?) and, potentially, the type of product or service being evaluated.
It’s possible to combine multiple conjoint analysis types into “hybrid models” to take advantage
of the benefits of each.
DELPHI METHOD

Also known as the estimate-talk-estimate (ETE), is a systematic and qualitative method of forecasting by
collecting opinions from a group pf experts through several rounds of questions.

A qualitative method of forecasting where experts answer several rounds of questionnaires

DELPHI METHOD PROCESS

1. Identify the issue and objective


It is important to define the issue you are trying to solve and what you want to achieve using the
delphi method
2. Choose a group of experts and a facilitator
Experts can be individual who are internal or external to the organization. While the facilitator
should take a neutral position
3. Round 1 questionnaire
Facilitator provodes 1st questionnaire for the experts which is usually open-ended as its allows
experts to brainstorm their ideas. Facilitator collects all the answer and hands out a summary
report. Experts identity remain anonymous
4. Round 2 questionnaire
Analyze the answer from the first round , identify similarities and irrelevant content. Pwede
magbago yung sagot ng mga experts or hindi. After, facilitator hands out a 2 nd summary report
5. Round 3 questionnaire
Same process continue the rounds or may stop here kapag nakuha na nila yung consensus bet
expert

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy