D 6729 - 01 - Rdy3mjk
D 6729 - 01 - Rdy3mjk
D 6729 - 01 - Rdy3mjk
Designation: D 6729 – 01
1. Scope boiling cuts such as those derived from fluid catalytic cracking
1.1 This test method covers the determination of individual (FCC) are analyzed, and the total olefin content may not be
hydrocarbon components of spark-ignition engine fuels and accurate.
their mixtures containing oxygenate blends (MTBE, ETBE, 1.4.1 Total olefins in the samples may be obtained or
ethanol, and so forth) with boiling ranges up to 225°C. Other confirmed, or both, if necessary, by Test Method D 1319
light liquid hydrocarbon mixtures typically encountered in (volume %) or other test methods, such as those based on
petroleum refining operations, such as blending stocks (naph- multidimensional PONA type of instruments.
thas, reformates, alkylates, and so forth) may also be analyzed; 1.5 If water is or is suspected of being present, its concen-
however, statistical data was obtained only with blended tration may be determined, if desired, by the use of Test
spark-ignition engine fuels. Method D 1744, or equivalent. Other compounds containing
1.2 Based on the cooperative study results, individual com- oxygen, sulfur, nitrogen, and so forth, may also be present, and
ponent concentrations and precision are determined in the may co-elute with the hydrocarbons. If determination of these
range of 0.01 to approximately 30 mass %. The procedure may specific compounds is required, it is recommended that test
be applicable to higher and lower concentrations for the methods for these specific materials be used, such as Test
individual components; however, the user must verify the Methods D 4815 and D 5599 for oxygenates, and D 5623 for
accuracy if the procedure is used for components with concen- sulfur compounds, or equivalent.
trations outside the specified ranges. 1.6 Annex A1 of this test method compares results of the
1.3 The test method also determines methanol, ethanol, test procedure with other test methods for selected compo-
t-butanol, methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE), ethyl t-butyl ether nents, including olefins, and several group types for several
(ETBE), t-amyl methyl ether (TAME) in spark ignition engine interlaboratory cooperative study samples. Although benzene,
fuels in the concentration range of 1 to 30 mass %. However, toluene, and several oxygenates are determined, when doubtful
the cooperative study data provided sufficient statistical data as to the analytical results of these components, confirmatory
for MTBE only. analyses can be obtained by using specific test methods.
1.4 Although a majority of the individual hydrocarbons 1.7 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the
present are determined, some co-elution of compounds is standard. The values given in parentheses are provided for
encountered. If this test method is utilized to estimate bulk information purposes only.
hydrocarbon group-type composition (PONA) the user of such 1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the
data should be cautioned that some error will be encountered safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
due to co-elution and a lack of identification of all components responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
present. Samples containing significant amounts of olefinic or priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
naphthenic (for example, virgin naphthas), or both, constitu- bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
ents above n-octane may reflect significant errors in PONA 2. Referenced Documents
type groupings. Based on the gasoline samples in the inter-
laboratory cooperative study, this procedure is applicable to 2.1 ASTM Standards:
samples containing less than 25 mass % of olefins. However, D 1319 Test Method for Hydrocarbon Types in Liquid
some interfering coelution with the olefins above C7 is pos- Petroleum Products by Fluorescent Indicator Adsorption2
sible, particularly if blending components or their higher D 1744 Test Method for Determination of Water in Liquid
Petroleum Products by Karl Fisher Reagent3
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D02 on
Petroleum Products and Lubricantsand is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
2
D02.04 on Hydrocarbon Analysis. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 05.01.
3
Current edition approved Nov. 10, 2001. Published January 2002. Discontinued; see 1999 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 05.01.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1
D 6729
D 4815 Test Method for Determination of MTBE, ETBE, 6.2 Inlet—a capillary split/splitless inlet system operated in
TAME, DIPE, t-Amyl Alcohol and C1 to C4 Alcohols in the split mode is recommended. It must be operated in its linear
Gasoline by Gas Chromatography4 range. Refer to 8.4 to determine the proper split ratio.
D 5599 Test Method for Determination of Oxygenates in 6.2.1 Carrier Gas Pneumatic Control—Constant carrier gas
Gasoline by Gas Chromatography and Oxygen Selective pressure control was used by all cooperative study participants.
Flame Ionization Detection4 This may be either direct pressure to the inlet (injector) or by
D 5623 Test Method for Sulfur Compounds in Light Petro- using a total flow/back pressure system.
leum Liquids by Gas Chromatography and Sulfur Selec- 6.2.2 Pneumatic Operation of the Chromatograph—The
tive Detection4 use of constant pressure was the mode of operating the gas
E 355 Practice for Gas Chromatography Terms and Rela- chromatography used by the participants in the interlaboratory
tionships5 cooperative study. Other carrier gas control methods such as
constant flow (pressure programming) may be used, but this
3. Terminology may change the chromatography elution pattern unless the
3.1 Definitions—This test method makes reference to many temperature programming profile is also adjusted to compen-
common gas chromatographic procedures, terms, and relation- sate for the flow differences.
ships. Detailed definitions can be found in Practice E 355. 6.2.3 Temperature Control—The injector operated in the
split mode shall be heated by a separate heating zone and
4. Summary of Test Method heated to temperatures of 200 to 275°C.
4.1 Representative samples of the petroleum liquid are 6.3 Column, a fused silica capillary column, 100 m in length
introduced into a gas chromatograph equipped with an open by 0.25 mm inside diameter, coated with a 0.5 mm film of
tubular (capillary) column coated with the specified stationary bonded dimethylpolysiloxane. The column must meet the
phase. Helium carrier gas transports the vaporized sample resolution requirements expressed in 8.3. Columns from two
through the column, in which it is partitioned into individual different commercial sources were used in the interlaboratory
components which are sensed with a flame ionization detector cooperative study.
as they elute from the end of the column. The detector signal 6.4 Data System, a computer based chromatography data
is recorded digitally by way of an integrator or integrating system capable of accurately and repeatedly measuring the
computer. Each eluting component is identified by comparing retention time and areas of eluting peaks. The system shall be
its retention time to that established by analyzing reference able to acquire data at a rate of at least 10 Hz. Although it is not
standards or samples under identical conditions. The concen- mandatory, a data system which calculates column resolution
tration of each component in mass % is determined by (R) is extremely useful as it will replace the need to carry out
normalization of the peak areas after correction of selected the manual calculations which must be performed as listed in
components with detector response factors. The unknown 8.3.
components are reported individually and as a summary total. 6.4.1 Electronic Integrators, shall be capable of storing up
to 400 components in the peak table and shall be able to
5. Significance and Use acquire the data at 10 Hz or faster speeds. They shall be
capable of integrating peaks having peak widths at half height
5.1 Knowledge of the specified individual component com-
which are 1.0s wide. The integrator must be capable of
position (speciation) of gasoline fuels and blending stocks is
displaying the integration mode of partially resolved peaks. In
useful for refinery quality control and product specification.
addition, these integrators should be able to download a
Process control and product specification compliance for many
commonly readable format of data (that is, ASCII) to a
individual hydrocarbons may be determined through the use of
computer in order to facilitate data processing.
this test method.
6.5 Sample Introduction—Sample introduction by way of a
6. Apparatus valve, automatic injection device, robotic arm or other auto-
matic means is highly recommended. An automatic sample
6.1 Gas Chromatograph, a gas chromatograph equipped introduction device is essential to the reproducibility of the
with cryogenic column oven cooling and capable of producing analysis. Manual injections are not recommended. All of the
repeatable oven ramps from 0° to at least 300°C is required. reproducibility data reported by this test method for the
The following features are useful during the sample analysis samples analyzed were gathered using automatic injection
phase: electronic flow readout, electronic sample split-ratio devices.
readout, and electronic pneumatic control of flow. Though their 6.6 Flame Ionization Detector (FID)—The gas chromato-
use is not required, careful review of this test method will graph should possess a FID having a sensitivity of 0.005
demonstrate the usefulness of a gas chromatograph equipped coulombs/g for n-butane. The linear dynamic range of the
with these features. These features will replace the need to detector should be 106 or better. The detector is heated to
carry out the manual calculations that must be performed as 300°C.
listed in 8.1 and 8.2.
7. Reagents and Materials
7.1 Calibrating Standard Mixture—A spark ignition engine
4
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 05.03. fuel standard of known composition and concentration by mass
5
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 14.02. can be used. In order to corroborate the identification of the
2
D 6729
sample, a typical chromatogram (Fig. 1) was obtained from 7.2 Gas Chromatograph Gases—All of the following gases
reference sample ARC96OX.6 shall have a purity of 99.999 % (V/V) or greater.
NOTE 1—Warning: Gases are compressed. Some are flammable and all
gases are under high pressure.
6
Reference spark ignition sample No. ARC 960X obtained from the Alberta
Research Council, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Other samples are available from
7.2.1 Helium—The test data was developed with helium as
suppliers. the carrier gas. It is possible that other carrier gases may be
3
D 6729
used for this test method. At this time, no data is available from 8. Instrument Check Out Prior to Analysis
this test method with other carrier gases.
8.1 Setting:
7.2.2 Air, Hydrogen and Make-up Gas (Helium or Nitro-
gen), shall have a purity of 99.999 % (V/V) or greater.
4
D 6729
8.1.1 Linear Gas Velocity—If the gas chromatograph is linear velocity of 25 to 26 cm/s. This is equivalent to retention
equipped with an electronic flow readout device, set the flow to times of methane at 0°C ranging from 6.5 to 6.8 min.
1.8 mL/min. This is achieved by setting the carrier gas flow 8.1.2 If the gas chromatograph is not equipped with an
rate by injection of methane or natural gas at 35°C. Ensure that electronic flow readout device, calculate the linear gas velocity
the retention time is 7.00 6 0.05 min. This corresponds to a in cm/s using Eq 1.
5
D 6729
column length ~cm! split ratio to a sample split of 200:1. If the gas chromatograph
linear gas velocity 5 V 5 retention time of methane~s! (1)
is not equipped with an electronic split-ratio readout device,
8.1.3 The typical retention times for methane and linear gas one must first calculate column flow rate and then proceed to
velocity for helium are 6.5 to 6.8 and 24 to 26 cm/s, calculating split ratio using Eq 2 and 3.
respectively.
~60 p r2! L~Tref! 2~Pi – Po!
8.2 Setting the Split Ratio—If the gas chromatograph is column flow rate 5 F 5 (2)
~T!3~Pref!~Pi2 – Po2!µ
equipped with an electronic split-ratio readout device, set the
6
D 6729
7
D 6729
8
D 6729
9
D 6729
split vent flow 1 F TABLE 2 Resolution Performance Requirements
split ratio 5 S 5 F (3)
Component Minimum Concentration of Each
Pair Resolution Component, W/W
8.2.1 The column flow rate is calculated by the use of Eq 2.
Benzene 1.0 0.5 %–0.5 %
Use the results obtained from Eq 3 to adjust the split flow until
1-Methyl-cyclopentene
a split flow of approximately 200:1 is achieved. m-Xylene 0.4 2.0 %–2.0 %
8.3 Evaluation of Column Performance: p-Xylene
n-Tridecane 1.0 0.5 %–0.5 %
8.3.1 Prior to using the column described in Table 1, 1-Methylnaphthalene
measure the resolution of the column under the conditions of
Table 2. Check that the resolution for the following pairs of
components is obtained using Eq 4 to calculate the resolution
of a pair of components: 8.3.3 Subtract the baseline from a sample chromatogram
and verify that the residual signal at the beginning of the
~tR2 – tR1!2 chromatogram does not differ from the end of the chromato-
R5 (4)
1.699 ~Wh1 1 Wh2! gram by more than 2 %.
where: 8.4 Evaluation of Splitter Linearity—Using the reference
R = resolution, gasoline sample, inject this sample according to the schedule
tR2 = retention time of the first member of the pair, listed in Table 3.
tR1 = retention time of the second member of the pair, 8.4.1 Select from the chromatogram about 10 to 15 compo-
Wh1 = peak width at half height of the first member of the nents, which have concentrations in the range of .01 to 30
pair, and weight %. Tabulate for each split ratio the concentrations of the
Wh2 = peak width at half height of the second member of 10 to 15 components. Verify that for each component selected,
the pair. its concentration does not vary by more than 3 %.
8.3.1.1 Column resolution should be checked frequently by
examining the resolution of these compounds. 9. Procedure
8.3.2 Evaluation of the Baseline—Carry out a blank base- 9.1 Set the operating conditions of the gas chromatograph as
line run utilizing no solvent injection, by setting the GC in shown in Table 1. These conditions will elute all components
accordance with the conditions of Table 1. up to and including pentadecane (nC15).
TABLE 1 Chromatographic Operating Conditions, Column Requirements and Data Acquisition Requirements
Chromatographic Conditions Requirements
Injector settings
Injector temperature, °C 250
Split ratio 175:1 - 275:1
Liner deactivated glass
Injection volume, µL 0.2–0.5
Detector settings
FID detector temperature, °CA 300–350
Gas flows
Hydrogen, mL/minB 30–40
Air, mL/min 300–450
Nitrogen make up, mL/min 30
Column oven settings
Initial temperature, °C 0
Initial time, min 15
1st ramp rate, °C/min 1
Final temperature, °C 50
Final time, min 0
2nd ramp rate, °C/min 2
Final temperature, °C 130
Final time, min 0
3rd ramp rate, °C/min 4
Final temperature, °C 270
Final time, minC 0
Column Requirements
Length, m 100
Inside diameter, mm 0.25
Liquid phase 100 % dimethylpolysiloxane
Film thickness, µ 0.5
Pressure, psig 40–50
Flow, mL/min 1.7–2.0
Linear gas velocity, cm/s 24.5
Data acquisition, Hz 10–20
Total analysis time, min 140–150
A
Set to 25–50°C above the highest column temperature.
B
Values to be set as recommended by instrument manufacturer.
C
Final temperature or time may be adjusted to ensure complete elution of the sample components.
10
D 6729
TABLE 3 Injection Schedule 10. Data Analysis
Injection Volume, Injection Temperature,
Split Ratio
µL °C 10.1 Compound Identification—Prepare a table listing all of
100:1 0.1 250
the retention times of the components in the sample. Compare
200:1 0.5 250 the retention time of each peak with that of the reference
300:1 1.0 250 gasoline. Pay particular attention to the fact that columns can
be overloaded, and peaks can shift in retention time. Observe
the peak pattern so that proper identification is made by
comparison with the reference material.
9.2 All of the parameters in Table 1 can be marginally 10.2 Consistency in peak identification can be achieved by
changed to optimize for sample types and optimize for char- using software (data handling software, spreadsheet software,
acteristics of each gas chromatographic system. The final and so forth). Alternatively, a retention index system can be
boiling point of samples should not exceed nC15 and the used.
column resolution (R) performance requirements listed in
Table 2 should not be compromised.
9.3 Obtain a representative sample following the guidelines
~R1!i 5 100n 1 100 F log ~Ti! – log ~Tn!
log ~TN! – log ~Tn! G (5)
NOTE—The response factor of the predominant compound will be used for the analyte and this analyte will be used for the calculations.
Peak Number Predominant Coeluting
(from Annex A1) Compound Compound(s)
164 3,3-dimethylpentane 5-methyl-1-hexene
186 2-methylhexane C7-olefin
278 2,5-dimethylhexane C8-olefin
286 3,3-dimethylhexane C8-olefin
304 toluene 2,3,3-trimethylpentaneB
324 1,1,2-trimethylcyclopentane C7-triolefin
326 C8-diolefin C8-paraffin
492 4-methyloctane C9-olefin
796 1,2,3,4-tetramethylbenzene C11-aromatic
A
This is not an exhaustive list. Due to the possibility of coeluting peaks in other areas, the user is cautioned in the interpretation of the data.
B
In most alkylated gasolines, a split may occur between toluene and 233 TMC5.
11
D 6729
TABLE 5 Response Factors of Oxygenated Compounds
Relative Response Factors
Analytes
RRF C7= 1.000 RRF CH4= 1.000
Methanol 2.996 2.672
Ethanol 2.087 1.862
t-Butanol (TBA) 1.302 1.161
Methyl-t-butyl ether (MTBE) 1.577 1.407
Ethyl-t-butyl ether (ETBE) 1.407 1.255
t-Amyl methyl ether (TAME) 1.356 1.210
12
D 6729
ANNEXES
(Mandatory Information)
A1.1 Table A1.1 presents the component retention times A1.4 The precision statement for the olefins and cyclopar-
and properties. affins is determined by taking the square root of the value
determined in the summary; multiply by the coefficient (rcoef)
A1.2 Table A1.2 represents the repeatability and reproduc- for repeatability and the coefficient (Rcoef) for the reproduc-
ibility precision estimates prepared by statisticians of CS94 in
ibility.
accordance with RR: D02-1007. The analyte qualification
Name rmin rcoef rmax Rmin Rcoef Rmax Cmin Cmax
process for precision statements is outlined as follows: Cycloparaffins 0.0726 0.08 0.098 0.286 0.384 0.586 2 10
A1.2.1 For each analyte to qualify for a precision statement, Olefins 0.1555 0.18 0.21 0.382 0.555 1.012 2 25
it must be present in at least six samples, and detected by at
least six laboratories, at least once, in accordance with RR: A1.5 The precision for the aromatics does not depend on
D02-1007 requirements. level and is stated below in weight %.
A1.2.2 The (repeatability standard deviation)/mean value Name rmin r% rmax Rmin R% Rmax Cmin Cmax
Aromatics 0.8549 0.98 1.155 2.151 2.706 3.651 15 50
for each analyte/sample combination must be less than or equal
to 0.1, in accordance with LOQ requirements which, while not
A1.6 The summaries for the paraffins, isoparaffins,
a standard, is what CS94 is recommending.
C2benzene and oxygenates follow the same procedure that was
A1.3 Summary for Oxygenates: Warning—The statistical used for the analytes. The statistics for the grouping are shown
data could be done on the oxygenates but there was not an in Table A1.3 as an indication of reproducibility and repeat-
equal number of all oxygenates in the round robin. MTBE was ability of reporting the results as a group summary. However,
the largest contributor to the statistical results. The number of there is a possibility that significant error could occur due to
samples that contained each oxygenate is as follows: co-elution of peaks, the presence of significant amounts of
Oxygenate No. of Approximate olefinic or naphthenic constituents, or both, above octane and
Type Samples Concentration Range
Ethanol 2 1 %, and 12 %
the percent unknown in the sample. If more accurate summary
t-butanol 2 .20 %, and 1.0 % results are needed that are not covered by the above precision
MTBE 6 1, 2, 4, 4, 8 and 16 % statement, for some or all of the above families of components,
ETBE 1 0.50 %
TAME 1 15.00 % please consider another ASTM test method.
NOTE 1—The names used are from several other tables and changes have been made where the GCMS did not agree with the peak name or its retention
time.
NOTE 2—n-propanol will coelute with 3M-1-C5=.
NOTE 3—MTBE will coelute with 23DN-1C4=.
NOTE 4—MSBE will coelute with 1-hexene.
NOTE 5—ETBE will coelute with 23DM-13C4= =.
NOTE 6—isobutanol will coelute with 44DM-1-c5=.
NOTE 7—233TM pentane will coelute with toluene when the ratio with toluene is greater than 5.0:1.
NOTE 8—The coeluting olefins in Notes 2-6 will usually be below 1000 ppm.
NOTE 9—In some instances the chemical group is known, but the chemical structure is not known (for example, C6-olefin; the position of the double
bond is not known).
NOTE 10—Relative response factors for six of the major oxygenated compounds have been determined by using the average results from seven
laboratories analyzing six samples in duplicate. These same samples were used to determine linearity of methanol, ethanol, t-butanol, MTBE, ETBE and
TAME from a concentration level ranging from 1 mass % up to 30 mass %.
Peak No. New Name Retention Time Molecular Mass, MWt Theoretical Mass, Rf, (C1)
1 Methane 6.74 16.04 1.000
2 Ethene 7.10 28.05 0.874
3 Ethane 7.21 30.07 0.937
4 Propene 7.41 42.05 0.874
5 Propane 7.87 44.11 0.916
6 Isobutane 8.26 58.12 0.906
7 Methanol 8.64 32.03 2.672
8 Isobutene 8.95 56.11 0.874
9 1-butene 8.99 56.11 0.874
10 1,3-butadiene 9.17 54.09 0.843
12 N-butane 9.28 58.12 0.906
14 Trans-2-butene 9.70 56.11 0.874
13
D 6729
14
D 6729
15
D 6729
16
D 6729
17
D 6729
18
D 6729
19
D 6729
20
D 6729
TABLE A1.2 Repeatability and Reproducibility of IHA Determinations
IHA/
GC/MS No. for RR IHA No. abbreviated rmin rest rmax Rmin Rest Rmax Cmin Cmax
Name
A
6 6 iC4 9.8 1.4 17.7 24.9 30.7 37.3 0.04 2.86
A
9 9 1C4= 10.4 16.7 25.1 28 36 45.4 0.01 0.14
A
11 12 nC4 10 12 14.2 27.1 31.7 36.6 0.92 8.51
A
12 14 t2C4= 12.1 15.7 19.8 28.2 36.8 47.1 0.03 0.31
A
14 18 c2C4= 14.2 15.4 16.7 25.2 31.1 37.9 0.03 0.29
A
20 24 3M1C4= 7.3 9.6 12.3 17.2 19.9 22.7 0.02 0.11
A
22 26 iC5 4.6 5.4 6.3 13.4 15.5 17.9 2.39 12.09
A
26 32 1C5= 5.9 7.5 9.4 17 20.6 24.7 0.06 0.4
A
28 36 2M1C4= 4.4 6.3 8.6 14.5 17.5 20.9 0.14 0.8
A
30 38 nC5 4.2 6.2 8.7 13.9 16.1 18.5 1 5.18
A
34 42 t2C5= 4.1 6.3 9.1 13 17.3 22.6 0.27 1.08
A
38 46 c2C5= 5.2 7.7 11 14.4 18.3 22.9 0.15 0.59
A
40 50 2M2C4= 3.9 6.2 9.2 15.2 18.1 21.4 0.44 1.78
A
42 52 t13C5=,= 4.5 10.2 19.6 22.1 31.1 42.2 0.01 0.05
A
52 62 222DMC4 2.9 3.7 4.7 9.8 12.9 16.6 0.07 2.16
A
54 64 cyC5= 4.6 9 15.5 15.6 20.3 25.9 0.07 0.25
A
56 66 4M1C5= 11.2 14.8 19 22.6 31.8 43.2 0.02 0.1
A
58 68 3M1C5= 8.3 12.1 17 37.1 50.5 66.8 0.04 0.12
A
62 72 cyC5 2.5 4.7 7.7 11.8 13.4 15.1 0.07 0.69
A
64 74 23DMC4 1.7 2.7 3.9 8.6 9.8 11.1 0.53 1.91
A
66 76 MTBE 1.9 3.2 5 9.1 12.3 16.2 0.12 15.73
A
70 80 c4M2C5= 5.1 7.1 9.7 27.4 43.7 65.4 0.02 0.09
A
74 82 2MC5 2.2 2.9 3.8 9.3 11 12.9 1.03 5.62
A
76 84 t4M2C5= 4.9 6.3 7.9 16.9 20.2 23.9 0.05 0.26
A
80 88 3MC5 2 2.7 3.5 7.7 9.1 10.7 0.58 3.25
A
84 92 2M1C5= 3.6 5.1 7 9.6 12.5 16.1 0.09 0.45
A
86 94 1C6= 3.9 6.4 9.9 15.1 19.9 25.7 0.04 0.26
A
96 104 nC6 2.5 4.6 7.7 11 13.3 15.8 0.25 3.23
A
98 106 c3C6= 4.4 6.5 9.1 12.5 16.3 20.9 0.08 0.48
A
102 110 t3C6=+C6=,= 2.9 5.2 8.4 9.4 12.4 15.9 0.17 0.93
A
103 112 2M2C5= 2.7 4.7 7.4 9.9 12 14.4 0.15 0.77
A
104 114 3McyC5= 7.8 11.3 15.9 22.7 25.2 28 0.02 0.11
A
105 116 t3M2C5= 4.3 6.9 10.2 10.1 12.5 15.4 0.1 0.48
A
106 118 c2C6= 4.1 6.7 10.2 14.3 17.4 21 0.07 0.4
A
109 122 c3M2C5= 3.1 4.5 6.4 9.1 10.5 12.1 0.14 0.75
A
112 128 McyC5 2.4 3.3 4.4 9.1 10.1 11.1 0.36 2.34
A
116 138 24DMC5 1.8 2.7 3.9 8 10.1 12.4 0.2 1.93
A
118 142 223TMC4 0.5 4.1 14.3 20.9 35.2 54.8 0.01 0.06
A
124 150 C7=,= 0 3.1 16.6 11.3 19.1 29.9 0.01 0.04
A
128 154 methyl- 5.5 9.1 14.1 14.9 20.3 26.8 0.01 0.03
enecyC5
A
130 156 Benzene 2.6 4.7 7.8 11.5 13.8 16.5 0.15 1.86
A
131 158 1McyC5= 4.3 6.3 8.9 18.5 24.1 30.7 0.17 0.92
A
133 162 c2M3C6= 0 1.2 6.8 17 29.1 45.9 0.01 0.06
A
134 164 33DMC5+5M1C6= 2.3 3.9 6.2 8.5 14.8 23.6 0.02 0.22
A
136 166 cyC6 3.3 4.4 5.7 11.3 12.8 14.5 0.04 0.87
A
138 168 t2M3C6= 4.2 8.4 14.7 84.2 103.2 124.8 0.02 0.32
A
146 176 t2e3m1C4= 3.2 5.7 9.1 20.8 29.6 40.8 0.02 0.19
A
148 178 4M1C6= 0.1 2.4 11.5 16.8 29.3 46.6 0.01 0.05
A
154 184 4M2C6= 3 4.5 6.4 15.9 18.7 21.8 0.03 0.29
A
156 186 2MC6+C7= 1.4 2.1 3 6.2 7.7 9.5 1.09 3.54
A
160 190 cyC6= 3.9 7.2 12.1 30.1 45.4 65.2 0.02 0.13
A
166 198 3MC6 1.3 2 2.8 8.5 9.9 11.5 0.36 2.38
A
172 204 t13DMcyC5 1.7 2.4 3.3 10.5 11.3 12.2 0.12 0.6
A
174 206 c13DMcyC5 1.9 2.7 3.6 9.8 10.7 11.6 0.09 0.49
A
176 208 t12DMcyC5 2.2 3.2 4.3 7.6 9.1 10.8 0.05 0.46
A
180 210 3EC5 2.8 4.8 7.6 10 13.4 17.6 0.02 0.21
21
D 6729
22
D 6729
23
D 6729
TABLE A1.3 Group Summaries for the Gasolines Run in the 1996 ASTM Interlaboratory Cooperative Study
Name rmin rest rmax Rmin Rest Rmax Cmin Cmax
Paraffin 0.0562 0.0646 0.08 0.125 0.186 0.373 1 20
Isoparaffin 0.0209 0.024 0.03 0.047 0.065 0.102 20 65
C2Benzene 0.0334 0.0384 0.05 0.057 0.073 0.102 3 20
Oxygenates 0.0418 0.0491 0.06 0.104 0.141 0.221 3 20
A2.1 This information is presented in Tables A2.1-A2.7 and and toluene among the indicated methods are well within the
Figs. A2.1-A2.13. reproducibilities of the methods. The sample numbers refer to
the interlaboratoy cooperative study samples. It should be
A2.2 Tables A2.2-A2.7 show comparisons between this test noted that the interlaboratory cooperative study samples in-
method and other methods for several compound types. Mul-
cluded only spark ignition fuels and different results may be
tidimensional PIONA is included since it tends to give reason-
obtained with pure blending components.
able peak compound type groupings for total olefins, total
paraffins, and total naphthenes. The differences for benzene
NOTE—All RRF relative to N-C7= 1.000; this also applies to the cooperative study.
Laboratory Laboratory Laboratory Laboratory Laboratory Laboratory Laboratory Average Standard % Standard
No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6 No. 7 RRF Deviation Deviation
Methanol 2.921 2.957 2.903 2.795 3.085 3.391 2.923 2.996 .194 6.465
Ethanol 1.997 2.043 2.003 2.057 2.138 2.354 2.014 2.087 .127 6.1
t-butanol 1.274 1.282 1.329 1.305 1.297 1.429 1.2 1.302 .069 5.281
MTBE 1.508 1.523 1.552 1.791 1.508 1.658 1.498 1.577 .109 6.932
ETBE 1.352 1.349 1.406 1.543 1.369 1.509 1.319 1.407 .086 6.108
TAME 1.308 1.323 1.342 1.451 1.336 1.471 1.264 1.356 .076 5.593
24
D 6729
TABLE A2.2 Benzene
Benzene (weight %)
Sample
D 5580 D 6729
2 1.52 1.61
6 1.05 1.12
8 1.10 1.16
10 1.13 1.18
13 0.14 0.16
14 0.62 0.70
Average 0.93 0.99
25
D 6729
TABLE A2.6 Total Oxygenates
Total Oxygenates (weight %)
Sample
PIONAA Procedure B
2B 15.3 16.1
6B 7.0 8.1
8B 4.2 4.5
10C >8 10.0
13B 20.5 19.9
14B 2.8 3.2
Average N/A 10.3
A
Multidimensional PIONA.
B
Major oxygenate = MTBE.
C
Major oxygenate = Ethanol.
26
D 6729
27
D 6729
28
D 6729
29
D 6729
30
D 6729
31
D 6729
32
D 6729
33
D 6729
34
D 6729
35
D 6729
APPENDIX
(Nonmandatory Information)
X1. BIBLIOGRAPHY
X1.1 The following publications on DHA analyses may be X1.1.5 Di Sanzo, F. P. and Giarrocco, V. G., “Analysis of
useful as background and are recommended to the user of these Pressurized Gasoline-Range Liquid Hydrocarbon Samples by
test procedures: Capillary Column and PIONA Analyzer Gas Chromatogra-
X1.1.1 Johansen, N.G. and Ettre, L.S., “Retention Index phy,” Journal of Chromatographic Science, Vol 26, June 1988,
Values of Hydrocarbons on Open Tubular Columns Coated pp 258-266
with Methyl Silicone Liquid Phases,” Chromatographia, Vol 5, X1.1.6 Durand, J. P., Beboluene, J. J. and Ducrozet, A.,
No. 10, Oct 1982 “Detailed Characterization of Petroleum Products with Capil-
X1.1.2 Johansen, N.G., Ettre, L.S., and Miller, R.L., “Quan- lary GC Analyzers,” Analusis, 23, 1995, pp 481-483
titative Analysis of Hydrocarbons by Structural Group Type in X1.1.7 Canadian General Standards Board: CAN/CGSB
Gasolines and Distillates. Part 1,” Journal of Chromatography,
-3.0, No.14.3-94, “Test Method for Individual Hydrocarbon
256, 1983, pp. 393-417
Component Analysis (IHA) in Spark Ignition Engine Fuels by
X1.1.3 Kopp, V.R., Bones, C.J., Doerr, D.G., Ho, S.P., and
Gas Chromatography”
Schubert, A.J., “Heavy Hydrocarbon/Volatility Study: Fuel
Blending and Analysis for the Auto/Oil Air Quality Improve- X1.1.8 French Standard NF N07-086, December 1995,
ment Research Program,” SAE Paper No. 930143, March 1993 “Determination of Hydrocarbon Type Contents in Motor Gaso-
X1.1.4 Schubert, A.J. and Johansen, N.J., “Cooperative lines from Detailed Analysis Capillary Gas Chromatography”
Study to Evaluate a Standard Test Method for the Speciation of
Gasolines by Capillary Gas Chromatography,” SAE Paper No.
930144, March 1993
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org).
36