MOTIVATION Assignment
MOTIVATION Assignment
It is the way in which urges, drives, desires, aspirations, strivings or needs direct, control or
explains the behavior of human beings. D.E. McFarland
It is a willingness to expand energy to achieve a goal or reward. It is a force that activates
dormant energies and sets in motion the action of the people. It is the function that kindles a
burning passion for action among the human beings of an organisation. C.B. Mamoria
Examples of Motivation in Life
In the work goal context the psychological factors stimulating the people’s behaviour can be -
desire for money
success
recognition
job-satisfaction
team work, etc
One of the most important functions of management is to create willingness amongst the
employees to perform in the best of their abilities. Therefore the role of a leader is to arouse
interest in performance of employees in their jobs. The process of motivation consists of three
stages:-
A felt need or drive
A stimulus in which needs have to be aroused
When needs are satisfied, the satisfaction or accomplishment of goals.
Therefore, we can say that motivation is a psychological phenomenon which means needs and
wants of the individuals have to be tackled by framing an incentive plan.
TYPES OF MOTIVATION
Different types of motivation are frequently described as being either extrinsic or intrinsic:
Extrinsic motivations are those that arise from outside of the individual and often involve
rewards such as trophies, money, social recognition, or praise.
Intrinsic motivations are those that arise from within the individual, such as doing a
complicated crossword puzzle purely for the personal gratification of solving a problem.
Intrinsic Motivation
Intrinsic motivation occurs when we act without any obvious external rewards. We simply
enjoy an activity or see it as an opportunity to explore, learn, and actualize our potentials."
Consider for a moment your motivation for reading this article. If you are reading it because you
have an interest in psychology and simply want to know more about the topic of motivation, then
you are acting based upon intrinsic motivation.
But you might be reading this because you have to learn the information for a class and want to
avoid getting a bad grade. Then you are acting based upon extrinsic motivation.
When was the last time you did something simply for the enjoyment of the activity itself? There
are a number of activities that fall into this category. For instance, you may plant a garden, paint
a picture, play a game, write a story, or read a book. These may or may not produce something or
be rewarded in any way. Instead, we do them because we like to, they make us happy.
o The Power of Internal Satisfaction
When you pursue an activity for the pure enjoyment of it, you are doing so because you are
intrinsically motivated. Your motivations for engaging in the behavior arise entirely from within
rather than out of a desire to gain some type of external rewards such as prizes, money, or
acclaim.
Of course, that isn't to say that intrinsically motivated behaviors do not come with their own
rewards. These rewards involve creating positive emotions within the individual.
Activities can generate such feelings when they give people a sense of meaning like participating
in volunteer or church events. They may also give you a sense of progress when you see that
your work is accomplishing something positive or competence when you learn something new or
become more skilled at a task.
o Impact of Extrinsic Reinforcement
Researchers have discovered that offering external rewards or reinforcements for an already
internally rewarding activity can actually make the activity less intrinsically rewarding. This
phenomenon is known as the overjustification effect. 2
"A person's intrinsic enjoyment of an activity provides sufficient justification for their behavior,"
explains author Richard A. Griggs in his book Psychology: A Concise Introduction. "With the
addition of extrinsic reinforcement, the person may perceive the task as overjustified and then
attempt to understand their true motivation (extrinsic versus intrinsic) for engaging in the
activity."
It is suggested that people are more creative when they are intrinsically motivated.
In work settings, for instance, productivity can be increased by using extrinsic rewards such as a
bonus. However, the actual quality of the work performed is influenced by intrinsic factors. If
you are doing something that you find rewarding, interesting, and challenging, you are more
likely to come up with novel ideas and creative solutions.
o Intrinsic Motivation in Education
Intrinsic motivation is an important topic in education. Teachers and instructional designers
strive to develop learning environments that are intrinsically rewarding. Unfortunately, many
traditional paradigms suggest that most students find learning boring so they must be
extrinsically goaded into educational activities.
In "Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivations for Learning," authors Thomas
Malone and Mark Leeper suggest that this does not need to be the case. They identify several
different ways to make learning environments that are intrinsically rewarding.3
Activities are intrinsically motivating if "people engage in it for its own sake, rather than in order
to receive some external reward or avoid some external punishment." The words fun, interesting,
captivating, enjoyable, and intrinsically motivating are used interchangeably to describe such
activities.
The factors they identify as increasing intrinsic motivation include:
Challenge: People are more motivated when they pursue goals with personal meaning
and when attaining the goal is possible but not necessarily certain. These goals may also
relate to their self-esteem when performance feedback is available.
Control: People want control over themselves and their environments and want to
determine what they pursue.
Cooperation and competition: Intrinsic motivation can be increased in situations where
people gain satisfaction from helping others. It also applies to cases where they are able
to compare their own performance favorably to that of others.
Curiosity: Internal motivation is increased when something in the physical environment
grabs the individual's attention (sensory curiosity). It also occurs when something about
the activity stimulates the person to want to learn more (cognitive curiosity).
Recognition: People enjoy having their accomplishment recognized by others, which can
increase internal motivation.
Organizational image
Employees are the mirrors of any organization. Regular training & development programmes
should be organized to keep employee updated with latest skills. It will have a positive impact on
the employees and the image of the organization will be improved.
High organizational image will contribute towards the brand image of the product and services
the organization is marketing.
Rewarding employees
There will be times when it takes more than just a pat on the back. Try giving simple incentives
when rewarding engaged employees.
It does not have to be monetary rewards all the time; simple things like a week of having a
personal parking spot at the office would be sufficient. Rewarding employees could also be a
part of the company benefits.
Encourage creativity
Creativity does not have to be based on the work that the employees are doing. It could be simple
task like giving ideas on the next company retreat or team building exercises.
Theories of Motivation
Motivation theories can be divided into three categories: content, process, and reinforcement.
Content theories are defined by Callahan et al. (1986:81) as insight such as need, drives and
incentives that cause people to behave in a certain manner such as good working conditions,
and focus on what stimulates individual behaviour. Theories that falls under this category are
Maslow’s need hierarchy, McDelland’s achievement theory, Hertzberg’s two- factor theory and
the Al-derfer ERG theory (Callahan et al. 1986:83).
Maslow’s Theory of Needs – is the most widely known motivational theory, proposed by
Abraham Maslow in 1970. He devised a hierarchy of human needs divided into five levels. The
first level is physical needs, which are basic human needs, such as sunlight, oxygen, and food.
These can be attained at work by an attractive salary, and good working conditions, like a warm
and dry workplace. If this need is attained, another need from the other levels will become
important (Callahan et al. 1986:83). The second level is the need for safety and security i.e. to
be free from physical threat or the deprivation of one’s basic physical needs, including security,
comfort and freedom from fear. This can be attained at work by safe working conditions, health
insurance and reducing the need for redundancy policies (Callahan et al. 1986:83). The third
level is affiliation or social need, which dominates when the two basic levels are fulfilled. In
this stage, the individual will look for meaningful relationship with others, through attraction,
belonging, and affection, and this can be met in the workplace by sports, social clubs and team
work (Buchanan and Huczynski 1991:72).The fourth level is the need for esteem; both self
esteem and the recognition, respect and appreciation of others. This is done at work by regular
positive feedback, promotions etc. The fifth level is self- actualization, where the development
of individual capabilities and potentials are maximized. This can be met through activities such
as challenging new job assignments (Buchanan and Huczynski 1991:73).
Maslow proposes four major arguments with his theory. Firstly, if a need is satisfied, it does not
motivate, so having a well-paid job will not create a need to get another one, unless the
individual seek something else besides money, like personal/career development (Callahan et
al. 1986:83). Secondly, if a certain need is satisfied, another will take its place, not necessarily
in the same order in the hierarchy, such as when the need for creativity replaces safety and
survival (Buchanan and Huczynski 1991:74). Thirdly, as Buchanan and Huczynski (1991:74)
note Individuals have an innate desire to work our way up in the hierarchy of needs pursuing
the satisfaction of our higher order needs. Fourthly, the dissatisfaction of these needs affects
our mental health, so that a poorly paid job can create frustration and stress (Buchanan and
Huczynski 1991:74).
Maslow’s theory had an enormous influence on the field of psychology and the development of
motivation theories that address human needs. However, it has some limitations, as identified by
Buchanan and Huczynski (1991:77-78). Firstly, it is difficult to measure the amount of
satisfaction required to move to the next level, as satisfaction differs between individuals; also,
this subjective concept (satisfaction) is difficult to measure. Secondly, it is unclear whether the
skills required to achieve physiological and safety are acquire or learned behaviours (Buchanan
and Huczynski 1991:77). Thirdly, regarding the dissatisfaction of one’s needs affecting one’s
mental health, each individual may cope with dissatisfaction differently, and if positive
techniques are applied, it may not necessarily affect one’s mental health (Buchanan and
Huczynski 1991:74). The fourth limitation of Maslow’s theory, along with all content theories,
is that they are general and deal with a single behaviour, providing little information about
handling groups of behaviours. Finally, no content theory discusses the reason why an
individual chooses a particular behavior (Locks and Latham 2004).
The second category of motivational theories is process theories, which explain how people
start, direct, maintain, and end a particular type of behaviour. Unlike content theories, they
do not deal with needs only. Callahan et al. (1986:82) explain how these needs interact and
influence one another to produce certain kinds of behaviors. They are composed of equity
theory, expectancy theory and goal-setting theory.
Expectation Theory – was proposed by Victor Vroom in 1964, and relates to how people choose
their actions. He argues that motivation is determined by individual belief about effort and
performance. His first assumption is that behaviour is voluntary. Callahan et al (1986:84)
describe how people are free to choose behaviors suggested by their own expectancy
calculation. Secondly, he assumes that individuals choose behaviors in a rational manner in
order to gain the best outcome (Callahan et al. 1986:84). Thirdly, Vroom’s theory relies on
three different beliefs:
Vroom also used a mathematical equation to explain the relationship between these three
beliefs, whereby E = Expectancy, M = Motivation, S =I Instrumentality and V=Valance;
hence M= S (E * V) (Buchanan and Huczynski 1991:80). He assumes that motivation is the
multiplicative result of all three components, reaching its highest level if the all three component
are high. However, if one of them is zero, the overall result will be zero, meaning no motivation.
This equation has been regarded as a limitation of the model, and the assumption created debate
due to the misinterpretation of the equation’s components.
The major weakness of content and process theories is that they deals with individuals’ internal
motivation system, which is difficult to predict, and will create difficulties when designing
training programmes. Nor do they consider other external factors that may influence the need or
the decision-making process, such as the culture, organizational system and nature of the job
(McKenna 2000:88).
The third category of motivational theories is reinforcement theories, which focus on
individual behaviour. Reinforcement is achieved by means, for example, of recognition in the
company newsletter or promotion, as a reward for behaviour. These theories work on
reinforcement factors that are available in the outer environment, where managers work on
changing and maintaining the environmental condition, unlike the content and process theories
which worked on the individual internal motivation system to obtain the desired behaviour. The
open system, schedules of reinforcement and behaviour modification theories are reinforcement
theories (Callahan et al. 1986:99). Taking the latter as an example, it focuses on analyzing and
measuring observed behaviour in order to bring about change. It recommends:
Most motivational theories relate to the internal and external motivation mechanism, which is
triggered by needs, the decision-making process or environmental factors (Employee Benefits
2004). However, their major drawback is that they address individuals rather than groups, and
do not offer suggestions about how to motivate a group of individuals to attain a goal. Also, they
assume that everybody has the same needs and follows the same decision-making process
(Employee Benefits 2004). Moreover, they fail to explain how the various needs and goals are
chosen by individuals or organizations, or how they are prioritized to obtain the desired outcome
(Locks and Latham 2004).
A further criticism of motivational theories is that it does not consider which factors may affect
the success or failure of the motivation process, overlooking the different variables, such as
culture, norms and social influence (Freedheim et al. 2003). Moreover, these theories do not
discuss the resistance that may occur in practice when a planned changed is implemented for a
group, especially since most change programmes are based on the managers’ perceptions about
the employees’ needs. If this problem is not addressed appropriately, it may affect the change
programme and lead to a waste of time, money, and effort (Locks and Latham 2004).
Finally, the question remains about how the knowledge of different personality traits can fit
into these theories (Locks and Latham 2004).
There are areas of contrast and tension in the existing motivation theories.
Firstly, some approaches are designed to work with the internal/cognitive aspect of the
individual, like the content and process theories, while others concentrate on the individual’s
external context, such as reinforcement theories (Freedheim et al. 2003). This may create
confusion and provoke the question of which approach can maximize performance and when
should it be used.
Secondly, a serious weakness with these theories is that they rely on the self report and self-
perception of the individual, which changes according to circumstances. This may challenge the
reliability of the approach and findings if these theories were tested (Freedheim et al. 2003).
Another problem with some motivation theories, especially those of Maslow and Herzberg, is
that they believe that all individuals are motivated by the same things, such as money, while, in
reality, each individual has different motivators, such as charity workers or those who do not
mind receiving low wages (Employee Benefits 2004).
Furthermore, there is also a problem with expectancy theory. Vroom believes that all human
behaviours are rational but Beck and Seligman (cited in Locks and Latham 2004) concluded that
not all human thoughts and behaviours are logical. They discovered that there are certain
dysfunctional thoughts that affect the decision-making process and people’s choices, such as
perfectionism:
firstly, to develop common ground among these theories, providing a universal interpretation of
them that can be used in different disciplines and cultures. However, there have been several
attempts to link these interpretations together (Steel and Koning 2006).
Secondly, as recommended by Steel and Konig (2006); Locks and Latham (2004) and Carver
and Sutton (2000), the different motivational theories should be integrated to develop a common
language among social, psychological and other disciplines’ scientists to facilitate multi-
disciplinary communication and collaboration and also enable managers to respond effectively to
complex motivational problems.
Thirdly, it is essential to have diagnostic models and theories as suggested by Freedheim et al.
(2003) to facilitate identifying when and where a particular motivational intervention will work,
to aid organizations in directing their resources and efforts.
---------------------------------