The Self and The Person in Contemporary Anthropology
The Self and The Person in Contemporary Anthropology
The Self and The Person in Contemporary Anthropology
Anthropology stemmed from the words Anthropos (human) and Logos (study) which
means the study of people, past, and present. In a general sense, anthropology is
concerned with understanding how
DEGREE
humans evolved and how they differ from one another in relation to culture.
Anthropology is a very dynamic field, and anthropological literature offers several
different definitions of “self”.
1.Cultural Anthropology
Cultural anthropology is the study of human society and culture which describes,
analyzes, interprets and explains social and cultural similarities and differences. It
explores the diversity of the present and the past. Ethnography and ethnology are two
different activities which can study and interpret cultural diversity.
Ethnography requires fieldwork to collect data, often descriptive and specific to
group. On the other hand, ethnology uses data collected by a series of researches,
usually synthetic and comparative.
2.Archeological Anthropology
4.Linguistic Anthropology
Linguistic anthropology studies language in its social and cultural context across
space and over time. Universal features of language are analyzed and association
between language and culture are evaluated.. It also studies how speech changes in
social situations and over time.
Following the subdisciplines, since Anthropology is a very dynamic field which offers
several definitions of the self, this section will tackle the widely acceptable definitions
of “self” in modern anthropology. In the modern anthropological perspective, the self
is characterized in its most general, ordinary and everyday use. According to
Anthropologist and professor, Katherine Ewing(1990), she described the self as the
totality of what an organism is physically, biologically, psychologically, socially, and
culturally.
The definition of Ewing (1990) portrays the “self” as implicitly and explicitly existing
in the mind and is comprised of psychological, biological, and cultural processes. One
of the Neuroscientist Joseph LeDoux (2002) then goes on to conceptualize the implicit
aspect as the one that is not immediately available to the consciousness while the
explicit is the aspect of the self that you are consciously aware
of. This concept followed the famous psychologist Sigmund Freud’s “level of
consciousness. As LaDoux’s concept of the self developed, he then goes to define the
self as “ not static; it is added to and subtracted from by genetic maturation, learning,
forgetting, stress, ageing, and disease.” This is true of both the implicit and explicit
aspects of the self.
This definition of Ewing departs from the narrower definition of self as self-
representation – as culturally shaped constructs of the self that one applies to oneself –
that is current in cultural anthropology today. She asserted that a “self” is illusory
where people construct a series of self-representations that are based on selected
cultural concepts of person and selected ‘chains’ of personal memories. By self-
representation, Ewing meant culturally shaped “self” concepts that one applies to
oneself (Quinn, 2014); “it is the mental entities that are supposed to represent the self”
(Schlichtet,2009). According to Ewing (1990), people from all cultures have been
observed to be able to rapidly project different self-representations, depending on the
context of the situation. The person is unaware of these shifts; however, he/she will
still experience wholeness and continuity despite these shifts.
Does culture has something to do with the self? Culture is a customary behavior and
beliefs that are passed on through enculturation (Kottak, 2008). It defines how
individuals see themselves, how they relate to other people, and how they relate to the
environment. Following the sociology’s concept that the self is a product of society, it
means that self-development is bound to cultural differences.
Csordas (1999) elaborated that the human body is not essential for anthropological
study but the paradigm of embodiment can be explored in the understanding culture
and the self. The body is not an object to be studied in relation to culture, but is to be
considered as the subject of culture, or in other words as the existential ground of
culture. On the other hand, Geertz (1973) described culture as "a system of inherited
conceptions expressed in symbolic forms by means of which men communicate,
perpetuate, and develop their knowledge about and attitudes toward life"
Relationships- Culture influences how you enter into and maintain relationships. For
example, relationships may be seen as voluntary or as duty-based. In Western
societies, it is essential for a person to choose whom to marry while some Eastern
societies still practice arranged marriage.
Personality traits- Culture influences whether (and how) you value traits, like
humility, self-esteem, politeness, assertiveness, and so on, as well as how you
perceive hardship or how you feel about relying on others.
Achievement- Culture influences how you define success and whether you value
certain types of individual and group achievements.