1

Marking Scheme
PEPERIKSAAN PERCUBAAN STPM BAHARU NEGERI PAHANG 2019
STPM 2019 Semester 3
Mathematics T Paper 3 (954/3)
Question Scheme Marks
Number
1. (a) a = 44
(1)
(b) 55  1.5  55  31  91 [and 31  1.5  55  31  5 ] M1

Panching
B1

B1

A1

(4)
(c) Gambang : [Q2  Q1  20, Q3  Q2  12 or (Q2  Q1 )  (Q3  Q2 )]   ve B1
(skew )
Panching: [Q2  Q1  8, Q3  Q2  16 or (Q3  Q2 )  (Q2  Q1 )]  +ve B1
(skew )
Justification that is consistent ddB1
(3)
Total 8

2. (a) E = take regular exercise B = always eat breakfast

P( E  B)  P( E | B)  P( B) M1

9 2 6 A1
=  = 0.24 or or
25 3 25
(2)
(b) 2 2 6 M1
P( E  B)    or P( E  | B) or P( B  E ) or P( B  E ' )
3 5 25
62 13 12 32 A1
= = = =
75 25 75 75
13 M1 A1
P( E   B)  1  P( E  B)  or 0.173
75
(4)
(c) 6 2 2 M1
P(E | B)  0.36  0.40  P( E ) or P( E  B)     P( E )  P( B)
25 5 3
So E and B are not statistically independent A1
(2)
[8]
 2

3. (a)
P( X  0)  0.8510 M1

A1
 0.1969 awrt 0.197 (2)

(b) P( X  3)  1  P( X  3) M1

 1  0.6477
A1
 0.3523 awrt 0.352 (2)

(c) n 0.15  5 M1

A1
n  33 or 34 (2)

`No. SCHEME MARKS

4 ( )

( )
[ √ ] [ ]

( )
√

( )
( ) B1 for √
√
M1

√ ( )

A1 for 2.055

or
or
Confidence level, Confidence level,
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) M1

A1
5 marks
 3

`No. MARKS
5(a) ∑ (∑ )
̂
(  ) M1
( )( )
̂ A1
( )
̂ or ( 2.8711 )
2 marks
5(b)
B1
Rejection region : Reject if Z < 1.645 B1
or 
̅ M1 for standard
Test Statistic :
√̂ error

√( ⁄ )
M1 formula
Z = 2.5194 A1
Conclusion : Since Z = 2.5194 < 1.645 , reject M1 compare
There is sufficient evidence at 5% level of significance that A1
counseling has resulted in a reduction in the number of late
comers.
7 marks

`No. SCHEME MARKS

6 The “degree class” is independent of “General Paper
performance’”. B1
The “degree class” is not independent of “General Paper
performance’”.
Degree of freedom : v = ( )( )=2 B1
Reject if or B1

Class of Degree M1
Class I Class II Class III Fail Row Corre
Tota ct
l Row
Gener Grade 6 12 40 Total &
al A or B Column
Paper Total
Grade Others 60

A1
Column 15 50 30 5 100 correct
Total E
 4

New Combined Table ( Observed frequencies )

Class of Degree
Class I Class II Class III and Fail Row
Total
Gener Grade 11 22 7 40
al A or B
Paper Others 4 28 28 60
Grade Colum 15 50 35 100
n Total

New Combined Table ( Expected frequencies )

Class of Degree
Class I Class II Class III and Fail Row
Total
Gener Grade 6 14 40
al A or B
Paper Others 60
Grade
Colum 15 50 35 100
n Total

Observed Expected (  )
Frequency (O) Frequency (E) M1 for 3 correct values for
11 6 4.1667 (  )
22 20 0.2
7 14 3.5
( )
4 9 2.7778 ∑ ,
28 30 0.1333
28 21 2.3333 A1 for
Total = 100 Total = 100

`No. SCHEME MARKS

6 Since = 13.1111 > 9.210 , Reject M1 compare
There is insufficient evidence at 1% level of significance that f the A1
“degree class” is independent of “General Paper
performance’”.
9 marks
 5

7 (a) f(x)

(0), 4, 0.5 B1

0 may be implied by start at y axis

0.5
both patio
B1
must be straight
B1
0 (3) 4 x
(3)
Mode is x = 3
(b)
B1
(1)
1

x
(c) F(x) = t dt (for 0 ≤ x ≤ 3 ) ignore limits for M M1
0 6
1 2 A1
= x must use limit of 0
12
1 31

x
F(x) = 2  t dt;   t dt (for 3 < x ≤ 4) need limit of 3 and variable upper M1;
3 2 0 6
M1
limit; need limit 0 and 3

1 2
= 2x – x –3
4 A1

 0 x0
 1 2
 x 0 x3
 12
F( x)  middle pair B1 ft
2x - 1 x 2 - 3 3<x  4
(d)  4 ends B1
 x4
 1
(7)

F(m) = 0.5 either eq B1

1 2
x =0.5 eq for their 0<x<3 M1A1
12
x = √6 = 2.45 √6 or awrt 2.45 A1
(4)
Total
15
 6

`No. SCHEME MARKS

8(a)
( )
√
B1

( ) M1
√ ( ) Standardization
( )
( )
or 0.0152 A1
3 marks
8(b) Population,

( ) ( )
[ √ ] [ √ ]

Width of confidence interval = 0.04

( ) B1 for 1.96
√
M1
√ ( )
√ or n=( ) ( ) ( )
n = 2304.96 A1
 n = 2305 A1
4 marks
8.(c)
B1
X represents the number of consumers that indicated they like the
new coffee
( ) x = 0,1,2,3,,…12
If is true , then p = 0.6 and ( ) x = 0,1,2,3,…12
Rejection region : Reject if ( ) B1
Test Statistic : Test value , x = 10 B1 for
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

= ( ) ( ) + ( ) ( ) + ( ) ( ) M1 formula
= 0.08344 A1
Conclusion : Since 0.08344 < 0.1 , M1compare
reject A1
There is sufficient evidence at 10% level of significance that the A1
number of consumers who liked the new coffee has increased.
8 marks