Dental Anxiety Literature Review
Dental Anxiety Literature Review
Dental Anxiety Literature Review
Hibbeler
Brenna Hibbeler
Mrs. McKinney
anxiety, the likelihood of children getting the dental treatment they need is very low. For the
pediatric patients that do get the needed treatment, they tend to grow up having extreme fear and
anxiety in the dental office. Research has been ongoing to try to find any proof of techniques that
can be performed to enhance these patients’ experience. This article focuses of three different
techniques that have been studied and reviewed: eye movement distraction, virtual reality, and
music interventions.
The first study to be discussed is the efficiency of eye movement distraction (EMD) to
reduce anxiety during the administration of local anesthetic for children. This study was done on
228 children, ages 8 to 13 years old, that were divided into two groups, one group having the eye
movement distraction and the other group being the control. The children in the EMD group
were told before the procedure “that if at any point they stop performing EMD, then there are
chances of increase in the pain” (Tirupathi et al., 2017). Eye movement distraction consisted of
the children having their eyes closed and deep breathing while rotating their eyes in alternating
clockwise and counterclockwise directions while counting the rotations on their fingers. The
children from the EMD and control group all expressed their level of discomfort by selecting a
facial expression on the face pain scale. The results concluded that the children in the EMD
group had overall significantly lower face pain scale rates. Therefore, it was concluded from this
study that the EMD distraction method was successful and effective in reducing anxiety with
The second study to be evaluated is the virtual reality distraction method. This study was
done on 76 children, ages 7 to 11 years old. They were treated in two dental visits, one visit with
3
Hibbeler
no distraction methods and one visit with virtual reality. The measurements that were recorded
were objective measurements, heart rate score, and self-administered questionnaires. Only 70
children were evaluated due to the other six children having to drop out of the study for personal
reasons. “Dental pain and anxiety scores were lower during local anesthesia in the VR group”
than they were in the group without distraction (Buldur and Candan, 2020). Therefore, it was
concluded that virtual reality caused a decline in anxiety and pain in local anesthesia, so it can be
Lastly, the third study was focused on music interventions as a distraction method. This
study was done on a total of 60 children, ages 6 to 12 years old. These children were divided in
half into Group A and Group B. Group A was the control group and Group B was the music
group. During an extraction for each child, the music group (Group B) was “allowed to hear
audio presentation throughout the treatment procedure” (Singh et al., 2014). Each child was
allowed to choose their selection of music audio. Anxiety levels of the children were then
measured through Venham's picture test, pulse rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation. Based
on the observations from the study, the pulse rate and blood pressure in the control group was
higher than the music group. It was concluded that the “audio distraction did decrease the anxiety
interventions may work better for certain offices than others. For example, according to the
music intervention article, there have been some studies that conclude that there was no
significant effect of music as a distraction on pediatric patients. On the other hand, other offices
may not have the funds for virtual reality in their office. With the eye movement distraction
method, this intervention is free and easy to teach to the child while chairside. The music
4
Hibbeler
distraction method may work well for select patients and it is efficient because you do not have
to spend money on extra equipment or spend time teaching it to patients. It appears that
develop better distraction methods that work for a larger target group of patients.
5
Hibbeler
References
Buldur B, Candan M. (2020). Does virtual reality affect children’s dental anxiety, pain, and
Singh, D., Samadi, F., Jaiswal, J., & Tripathi, A. M. (2014). Stress Reduction through Audio
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1254
Tirupathi, S., Krishna, N., Rajasekhar, S., & Nuvvula, S. (2019). Eye Movement Distraction: A
New Distraction Technique for Management of Dental Anxiety during Intraoral Local