A Comprehensive Review On Small Satellite Microgrids

This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been
fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3175093, IEEE
Transactions on Power Electronics
IEEE POWER ELECTRONICS REGULAR PAPER/LETTER/CORRESPONDENCE
A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite

Microgrids
Mohammad Yaqoob, Student Member, IEEE, Abderezak Lashab Member, IEEE, Juan C. Vasquez Senior Member,
IEEE, Josep M. Guerrero, Fellow, IEEE, Marcos E. Orchard, and Angelina D. Bintoudi, Student Member, IEEE
Abstract The Small Satellite (SmallSat) industry has recorded

incredible growth recently. Within this class, among Mini-, Micro- I. INTRODUCTION
, and Nanosatellites, the Cube Satellite (CubeSat) is primed for an
explosion of growth. These satellites are fascinating for remote The Small Satellite (SmallSat), i.e., mini, micro, nano,
sensing, earth observation, and scientific applications. pico, and femto satellites industry in recent years has geared up
Remarkable attention from the space operators makes it valuable and is in the state of continuous growth. Because of the recent
because of its low cost, cubic shape, less manufacturing time, progress and developments in SmallSat subsystem technologies
lightweight, and modular structure. Among the various i.e. integrated circuits (ICs), digital signal processing (DSP),
subsystems comprising the SmallSat, the Electrical Power System microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), additive built-up,
(EPS) is the most crucial one because unreliable power supply to accessibility of affordable and innovative Commercial-Off-
the rest is most of the time detrimental to the mission. The EPS is
formed by electrical sources, storage units, and loads, all
The-Shelf (COTS) technologies, smaller mass, volume, least
interconnected via different power converters, the operation of development time, and cheaper cost have been achieved [1],
which must be closely orchestrated to accomplish efficient use of [2]. Future roadmaps for NanoSat applications include the
photovoltaic power, optimal battery management, and resilient creation of constellations of such satellites to form space-based
power delivery. At the same time, the EPS design must address a telecommunication networking exploited for mobile
series of challenges such as size restrictions, high power density, communications and global internet coverage [3]-[6].
harsh space environments (e.g., atomic oxygen, radiation, and Therefore, an ignition to the NanoSat market is expected in the
extreme temperatures) which significantly impact the EPS upcoming years. The increased growth of interest for the
electrical and electronic equipment. In terms of power systems, a NanoSats, has also been boosted by the incremental rise of a
SmallSat EPS can be considered a space microgrid owing
coordination and control of distributed generation (DG), storage
particular kind of NanoSats, the CubeSats. CubeSat has gained
and loads in a small-scale electrical network. From this point of the attention of diverse vendors and consumers like
view, this paper reviews and explores SmallSat microgrid’s governments, educational scientists, and commercial
research developments, energy transfer and architectures, organizations, since 2003 when the first satellite was launched
converter topologies, latest technologies, main challenges, and [7]. The CubeSat took its name due to the cubic shape of its
some potential solutions which will enable building a more robust, main building block, which is a unit (U) weighing 1.33 Kg, one
resilient, and efficient EPS. The research gaps and future liter of volume, and 10 x 10 x 10 cm dimensions [8]. CubeSats
developments are underlined before the paper is concluded. are extendable for higher payload demands, via the addition of
multiple cubic units, as shown in Table I. It is noteworthy that,
Index Terms battery technologies, CubeSat, converter topologies,
EPS, NanoSat, microgrid, PV technologies, SmallSat, switches.
though Nanosats can weigh from 1 kg up to 10 kg of mass, as
shown in Table II, CubeSats, though classified within the
NanoSat class, are not restricted within this range (e.g. the
heaviest reported CubeSat is comprised of 27U and weights
This work was supported by VILLUM FONDEN under the VILLUM
Investigator Grant (no. 25920): Center for Research on Microgrids 40kg) [3]. To address this high interest, a specific standard for
(CROM); www.crom.et.aau.dk. M. Yaqoob was funded by Balochistan CubeSats a project was started in 1999 by California
University of Engineering and Technology Khuzdar, Pakistan. Polytechnic State University and Stanford University in the
M. Yaqoob, A. Lashab, J. C. Vasquez, and J. M. Guerrero are with the USA as a collaborative effort [9]. Though CubeSats are mainly
Center for Research on Microgrids (CROM), Department of Energy
Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg 9220, Denmark. (e-mail: considered an educational tool for the students [10], their
mya@et.aau.dk; abl@et.aau.dk; juq@et.aau.dk; joz@et.aau.dk) applications are not limited to this, since CubeSats have been
M. Yaqoob also with the Electrical Engineering Department,
Balochistan University of Engineering and Technology Khuzdar, Khuzdar TABLE I
89100, Pakistan. CUBESAT CLASSIFICATION ACCORDING TO MASS AND
M. E. Orchard is with the Department of Electrical and Computer VOLUME [11].
Engineering, University of Chile, Santiago 1058, Chile (e-mail;
morchard@u.uchile.cl). CubeSat Max Mass (kg) Max Volume
Angelina D. Bintoudi is with the Department of Electrical & Computer Specifications (cm)
Engineering Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTh), Thessaloniki 1U 1.33 10×10×10
54636, Greece and also the Information Technologies Institute (ITI) of the
2U 2.66 10×10×20
Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Thessaloniki,
3U 4.00 10×10×30
57001, Greece (e-mail; abintou@ece.auth.gr, bintoudi@iti.gr)
Correspondence: joz@et.aau.dk; Tel.: (+45)-2037-8262 6U 8.00 10×20×30
12U 16.00 20×20×30
0885-8993 (c) 2021 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Jorge Morales-Saldana. Downloaded on May 15,2022 at 20:33:37 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TPEL.2022.3175093, IEEE
TABLE II communication aspects. Sweeting et al. [25] have presented a

SPACECRAFT CLASSIFICATION ACCORDING TO MASS AND broad overview of SmallSats evaluation, applications,
MANUFACTURING COST [12]. capabilities, and future technology trends.
In terms of EPS, the available recent research is underlined
Type Mass (kg) Manufacturing
Cost (US $) in the following works. Timothy et al. [26] have presented a
Large-satellite >1000 0.1-2 B modular EPS for SmallSats, discussed operational aspects,
Medium-satellite 500 - 1000 50-100 M control issues, and encouraging future work regarding the EPS
Mini-satellite 100 - 500 10-50 M design. Johnston-Lemke et al. [27] have given the concept of a
Micro-satellite 10 - 100 02-10 M modular, scalable, and highly efficient EPS, which is
Nano-satellite 1 - 10 0.2-02 M
Pico-satellite 0.1 - 1 20-200 K
deployable to the satellites for the power demand spans of 1W
Femto-satellite <0.1 0.1-20 K to 1kW requirements. Khan et al. [28] have proposed a
comprehensive design and control methodology for SmallSats
deployed to serve several Earth observations, astronomical, and EPS where, a method is specified for sizing key elements of the
communications applications where short revisit times or even EPS i.e., photovoltaic (PV) array and battery. The proposed
continuous monitoring is required [13], [14]. design takes into account the irradiance forecasting, the PV
Nanosats are mostly designed to be placed in Low Earth Orbit array geometry, the PV cell characteristics, round trip
(LEO) for several types of missions [15]. These satellites are efficiency, and state-of-charge (SOC) of the battery. Edpuganti
required to perform several complex tasks in education, et al. [29] have presented a review article on conventional and
scientific research, space exploration, Earth observation, space emerging CubeSats EPS architectures. The EPS architectures
weather, high-resolution imagery, ship tracking, airplane are identified and grouped into 17 categories based on the PV
tracking, etc. [16]-[18], while maintaining the cost low. panels interfacing, conversion stages, and DC-bus regulation.
However, the harsh radiation environment, size limitations, In addition, based on a qualitative comparison the merits and
high power density requirement, and low-cost components demerits of the different EPS architectures are illustrated. On
(especially COTS) make their design challenging. the other hand, Yost et al. [30] have presented a report on state-
The Electrical Power System (EPS) is one of the critical of-the-art SmallSat EPS technologies that offer valuable insight
components in all satellites generally. This claim is backed up into the major EPS components available from different
by the reliability analysis performed in [19], and [20], which commercial manufacturers. To address the EPS subsystem
reveals that in earlier stages (in prior 4-weeks of launch) the holistically, Bintoudi et al. [31], has proposed its
EPS leads to the second most fatal failures, while after the characterization as a microgrid. More specifically, an
preliminary 4-weeks period, it leads to the most fatal failures. introduction to the space microgrids has been addressed by
While EPS failures result 25% of all spacecraft failures. The Lashab et al. [32], where the authors presented an overview on
SmallSat EPS on the other hand is a small-scale remote EPS for satellite-based microgrids, the energy generation,
electrical network which operate in islanded mode and is Energy Storage System (ESS), and an insight on protection
regarded as a space microgrid. Microgrids are assembly of schemes, followed by the sizing guidelines. However, this work
distributed generation (DG), autonomous distribution is limited and does not cover EPS energy transfer systems, EPS
networks, storage units, and loads that work in a controlled and architectures, recent technological advancements, design, and
coordinated way [21] [22]. However, the small satellites are operation challenges of SmallSat EPS. Therefore, even though
mostly custom-built with commercial-off-the-shelf there are individual pieces of work regarding various topics of
components. Where, the EPS may be the most scalable of the the EPS of a SmallSat (architectures, topology, converters,
subsystems yet demand high reliability, efficiency, and controllers, etc.), to the best knowledge of the authors, no
resiliency to sustain and supply full power during the mission. review papers are offering a system level and a comprehensive
Compared to the terrestrial, space microgrid are compact, literature review regarding the latest developments on the most
redundant and demand high design and testing requirements. critical aspects of SmallSat EPS.
Therefore, significant research is placed on the robust design of To that end, this paper treats the SmallSat EPS as a whole,
the EPS. Though the SmallSat research fields have attracted a from the perspective of an isolated microgrid, to provide a
significant portion of the already published research, it is comprehensive review of several different perspectives of the
noteworthy that only a handful of review papers exist regarding EPS. More specifically, this paper reviews the EPS topologies,
a satellite’s EPS in general. This fact is contradicting the the state-of-the-art regarding converter topologies, PV array,
criticality and importance of the EPS. It should be noted and electrochemical battery technologies used in SmallSats.
however that some general research review publications handle The inclusive structure of the SmallSat which has been
the topic of SmallSats subsystems holistically. Kopacz et al. reviewed is described in Fig. 1. Moreover, the most unique
[23] presented an overview of SmallSats, where, a feature of this review paper is the detailed analysis of realistic
comprehensive review of the latest missions is presented, technologies and converter topologies, which are applied in the
especially focusing on NanoSat launch history, classification, latest and modern actual SmallSat projects. This paper is
origin, and utilization. Davoli et al. [24] surveyed different organized as follows. Section II is an overview of the SmallSat
aspects of CubeSats, including mission goals, structure, and EPS structure, architectures, and important energy transfer
hardware components, focusing mostly on network and methods. Regarding power generation, distribution, and
Fig. 1. An inclusive structure of the SmallSat, important subsystem including energy generation module, storage module and converter topologies.
management the latest non-isolated and isolated converter operations. The paper is concluded with a brief discussion
architectures, switches, and suitable protocols are described in regarding future directions in Section VII.
Section III. Section IV includes an overview of the latest
developments in space-qualified solar cells, panels along with II. ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEM AND ARCHITECTURES
the PV architecture for SamallSat applications. The state-of- The EPS is essentially the lifeline of the other subsystems in
the-art power storage and different battery technologies any satellite which incorporates the power generation, energy
available for SmallSats are discussed, followed by the battery storage, power distribution, and management system (PDMS),
charge regulation in Section V. Section VI is a discussion of the including the loads. The EPS comprises approximately one-
challenges and some potential solutions in EPS design and third of the total satellite mass [30]. The prime function of the
EPS is to maintain continuous power supply to the satellite bus TABLE III
during its mission life, including adequate power even during POWER CONSUMPTION OF DIFFERENT SUBSYSTEMS AND
the eclipse when no power is generated from solar panels and PAYLOADS FOR SOME NANOSATS.
protection under fault conditions. The EPS manages the power
Subsystem Power Sizing (W)
input from the solar panels, charges/discharge onboard Nano Refer Total
batteries, and distributes the electrical power to the subsystem CA
Satellites ence ADCS OBDH COM Pow
M
elements of the satellite at their required voltage levels. er
Additionally, the monitoring, operation status, and health of the NanoSat [39] 0.375 0.2 1.9 0.24 2.71
EPS subcomponents are communicated to the onboard ISRASAT1 [40] 1.22 1.7 1.87 0.5 4.66
SuryaSat [41] 3 0.04 0.48 0.50 4.02
computer [33], [34]. Indicatively, the power budgets for some ESTCube1 [42] 1.29 0.3 6.2 4.48 12.2
SmallSats subsystems are given in Table III. As mentioned, the NanoSat [43] 0.375 0.412 3.13 0.5 4.17
spacecraft EPS can be regarded as a microgrid, since it is the CubeSat [44] 1.23 0.38 1.26 0.3 3.17
composition of modular dc-dc micro-converters, distributed 3Cat- [45] 2.5 3.2 15.1 10.5 31.0
3/MOTS
energy resources, and several loads [31], [32], [35]. The block
diagram of a comprehensive EPS with the two basic
architectures is shown in Fig. 2 (a) and (b).
Depending on the exploitation mode of the solar power, two
well-known topologies are derived: the Direct Energy Transfer
(DET) and the Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT)
architectures, shown in Fig. 2 (a) and (b) respectively. The DET
architecture operates at a fixed voltage point on the I-V
characteristics, distributes the necessary power to the loads in a
regulated or unregulated form, and shunts unnecessary power.
This conversion method is simple yet. DET architectures are
mostly encountered in applications with power budgets less
than 100W [36]. However, the PV I-V curve is a direct function
of the solar cell temperature, irradiation, and degradation
(a)
therefore, DET architectures are not exploiting the full potential
of the harvested solar power by the solar arrays. To overcome
this limitation, the MPPT-based architecture is proposed [37],
which essentially forces the solar array output voltage to be
always set at the value which results in the maximum power
transfer from the array to the aggregated load, regardless of the
solar cell temperature and degradation degree. MPPT
architectures demand at a minimum one dedicated dc-dc
converter in series with the PV array to drive the PV cell
operating voltage and it demands at a minimum 4-7% of the
solar array nominal output power to operate [36].
The main DC power bus can either be regulated or
unregulated to dispatch power to the loads. In the case of an
unregulated topology, the main bus follows the battery voltage,
(b)
while regulated bus architectures demand the usage of dc-dc
converters to achieve full regulation of the main bus voltage. In Fig. 2. The two basic architectures of EPS (a) DET solar power conversion
Fig. 2 (a) and (b), both DET and MPPT topologies are shown and (b) MPPT solar power conversion topologies with unregulated buses.
with unregulated bus voltages which can be regulated with the
addition of dc-dc regulators illustrated by dashed lines. A
assurance [46]. Moreover, tasks are formulated based on the
comparison of the peak power tracking EPS architectures in
number of duties, task priority, the maximum and minimum
[38], demonstrate that EPS architecture with series connected
duration of the task, and execution time [47].
MPPT converters and unregulated dc-bus has greater reliability,
lower component count, good battery life, and the highest
III. POWER DISTRIBUTION AND MANAGEMENT
efficiency for all operating modes.
In terms of EPS sizing, the SmallSat power budget is defined The Power Distribution and Management Subsystem
according to the worst-case scenario which is the simultaneous (PDMS) of the EPS distributes the flow of the power pertaining
operation of the loads and not according to the installed load dc-dc converters at different distribution levels to regulate,
capacity. Therefore, task scheduling strategies in SmallSats can control the generated power, and supply power to various
be strongly related to energy harvesting from PV, optimal analog and digital loads [48], [49]. The PDMS component
power management, efficiency, and quality-of-service blocks are bus regulators, battery charge/discharge dc-dc
converters, various switches for EPS branches, loads and,

batteries, the respective converter digital controllers, sensors
circuitry, and point-of-load (POL) dc-dc converters. However,
the embedded designers face challenges in design that operate
in space is the limited pool of components that were designed
to operate in this environment. Resulting, EPS failure at the
early stage of the deployment or during the mission. To
withstand the effects of radiation semiconductors that operate
in space need to be 'hardened'. The available semiconductors
are not exactly leading edge or 'state-of-the-art' and there is not
a huge portfolio of components to choose from. The space
version components tend to be very expensive, on the other
hand. Therefore, the cost has been limited by using properly
selected COTS devices, while reliability has been achieved by
design diversity and through redundancy.
A. DC-DC Converters
Fig. 3. The Distributed Power Architecture - DiPA.
SmallSat dc-dc converters are core building blocks of the
EPS that ensure reliable and efficient power delivery. The
converter design must be able to maintain constant output
voltage regardless of input disturbances, while power quality
must be high so that sensitive onboard equipment operates
seamlessly. At the converter power stage, the switching devices
are mostly high-efficiency field-effect transistors (FETs) due to
small gate charge, on-state resistance, and less complicated
drive circuit, which can more efficiently switch at higher
frequencies [50]-[52]. Most of the typical voltages required for
the CubeSat onboard equipment are in the range of 3 to 6 volts.
The EPS is highly segmented, each segment of which is usually
supplied through a dedicated buck or boost dc-dc converter and
necessary switching gear [53]. These subsections are well
fragmented to overcome the noises and ripple creeping since
the nature of the loads can be RF, analog, or digital [54].
Depending on system architecture, isolation and voltage
regulation are required at different stages of power conversion.
Moreover, for interfacing low voltage renewable sources, (a)
galvanically isolated dc-dc converters are the best suitable
solutions [55]. Regarding distribution in modern satellites, two
basic design approaches prevail: distributed power architecture
(DiPA) and decentralized power architecture (DePA) [56]. The
DiPA approach is very popular for ensuring dynamic, efficient,
and reliable system performance. This approach uses an
isolated DC-DC converter and multiple POL converters, as
shown in Fig. 3. An isolated converter called an intermediate
bus converter (IBC), supplies an intermediate fully regulated,
semi-regulated, or simply unregulated voltage to the subsequent
non-isolated voltage regulators, namely the POL converters.
The IBC is usually physically distanced from the main digital
devices board, due to mechanical considerations and cooling.
However, every POL converter is mounted on a board near the
corresponding loads to minimize the parasitic impedances.
Overcoming the disadvantages of the greater number of
conversion stages and losses in DiPA, the DePA has been
proposed [56]. As shown in Fig. 4 (a) and (b), there are two (b)
main variations of DePA: in the first one (Fig. 4a), a single
isolated converter with multiple outputs followed by several Fig. 4. The Decentralized Power Architecture - DePA, (a) single input
with multiple outputs, (b) multiple isolated converters.
load switches, is responsible for the power distribution to the
Converter Topologies
Non-isolated Isolated
Active-clamp- Magnetic
Buck Boost Buck-Boost Fly-back Half-bridge
forward Feed-back
Differentially Single B3R Bi-directional

B2R Bi-directional
connected Inductor 2- Buck-Buck- Interleaved
Buck-boost Weinberg
Two-buck half-bridge boost
Common- 2- I/P,
Switch-near- Ripple- Interleaved 2- O/P
Conventional 2-inductor damping 2-
ground cancellation Interleaved
inductor
Fig. 5. State-of-the-art converter topologies reviewed and categories for space mission applications in this paper.
loads, providing a fully regulated voltage level 1V, 1.5V, 2.5V,

3.3V, 5V, etc., while in the second one (Fig. 4b) several
independent isolated converters are operated for the provision PV1 L1
of different outputs of fully regulated voltages required for the + M1
+
operation of the satellite loads. This architecture is D1
Cin1 C1 -
advantageous due to its lower losses and lighter weight, E1
-
compared to DiPA where power is lost in each conversion step.
The high reliability requirements in the design of EPS for
space applications is hard to quantify relatively applying COTS PV2
+
components. Space converters deal with many constraints suck D2
Cin2 C2
as, electromagnetic interface (EMI) compatibility, vacuum
E2
environment, radiation affects, shock and vibrations. - M2
Additionally, the reduced mass, high efficiency, and provision
of high-power quality are strictly required. These stringent L2
requirements have narrowed down the choices to conventional
converter topologies due to their inherent simplicity and the Fig. 6. Differentially connected two-buck converters topology.
minimum number of components [57], [58]. To overcome these simplicity and therefore greater reliability, and fewer number of
barriers selection of radiation hardened components, their components, and consequently dry mass [59]. Nevertheless, the
mechanical dimensions and thermal analysis to withstand in extreme duty cycle operation of conventional converters leads
vacuum environment must be considered. Selection of the to high voltage and current stress, hence, it suffers from reduced
converter topologies to withstand and support radiation effects controllability and extreme losses [60]. These converters are
is significantly considered. usually used in Nano and CubeSat applications at different
Converters can be classified into different categories based stages for conversion and regulations of power.
on the configurations and types of components used. Various 1) Buck-derived converter topologies: A new converter for
factors are considered to form these categories, such as single- common-mode noise reduction is introduced in [61] as
stage and multi-stage power processing, inductor or illustrated in Fig. 6. The common-mode noise reduction
transformer-based configurations, and types of switches. The architecture interfaces the PV panels to the power bus of the
converter clusters are shown in Fig. 5. satellite with minimum leakage currents avoiding unpredicted
ground bouncing conditions. While ground bounce in high
B. Overview of the Non-isolated DC-DC Converters. density digital circuits is a delay in reaching ground in a
This section focuses on the performance analysis of different transistor after a signal transition. The ground bounce can
non-isolated dc- converters dc for space applications. The main produce transients with amplitudes of volts; most often
benefits of the converters covered in this subsection are design changing magnetic flux is the cause. The proposed converter
M1 IL Io L1 D L2
Ibat
Fuse 1 L IPV Io
+ +
Vbat Vo +
Co
M2 - + +
- Cin M Ct Co RL Vo
- -
Half-bridge 1 -
M1
Fuse 2
(a)
M2
IPV L1 L2 L3 Io
D
Half-bridge 2
+
+
Fig.7. The load-side redundant buck converters topology. +
Cin M Ct Co - RL Vo
connects two buck-derived converters differentially ensuring -
zero common mode current in the ground which makes the -
converter safe at slight ground bouncing, improves the
converter electromagnetic compatibility (EMC), and negates
the parasitic effects at normal operation. In this converter, two (b)
inductors are cumulatively coupled at the output stage for
reduction of phase current ripple while increasing the efficiency
by reducing the component count of the EPS. The coupled
inductors offer a moderate transient handling capability and
more power density [62]. For the CubeSat application, the load-
side redundant buck converter topology has been proposed in
[63], as shown in Fig. 7. This converter consists of two
independent half-bridge switching modules and a common
inductor. The half-bridge module and inductor are connected
through a fuse for over-current protection. In the fault
conditions, the redundant module activates based on the
designed fault diagnostic system. However, the feasibility of (c)
redundant components in smaller satellites needs some special
efforts due to the restricted satellite weight and volume.
2) Boost-derived converter topologies: The low output
voltage of the PV with a parallel-connected structure makes it
very high demanding to achieve high efficiency, low cost, and
high-step-up dc-dc conversion [64]. In satellite applications
where the bus voltage is greater than the solar array one, for the
implementation of MPPT a boost power converter is applied.
Garcia et al. [65] have compared and analyzed some boost-
based topologies for space applications that use a 100V voltage
bus, as shown in Fig. 8 (a) to (f). These boost dc-dc converters (d)
are: conventional, boost converter with a switch near-ground
topology, two inductor boost converter, boost converter with
ripple cancellation, common damping two-inductor, and
interleaved boost. Depending on the satellite’s requirements in
terms of operational voltage range, the capability of power
handling, operational voltage, conduction emission, and solar
array output impedance the topologies are designed and
optimized. The analysis has been carried out from the viewpoint
of the control loop bandwidth, mass, and power losses. From
these topologies, the conventional boost topology requires
fewer components and therefore it is characterized by high (e)
La1 D1 Lb1
D5 L2
D2 D3
M1 Ct1 L1 + +
C2 - R2 VO2
IPV Io D1 -
+ M1 M2
La2 D2 Lb2 D6
+
+ RL + - M3 D
Cin Co Vo
M2 - D4 M4 + +
Ct2 - C1 - R1 Vo1
- VB -
Fig. 9. Two input, multi-output Interleaved dc-dc boost converter.

(f)
Fig. 8. The boost dc-dc converter topologies, (a) conventional, (b) boost IBatt
converter with a switch near ground, (c) two inductor boost converter, (d) Cob
boost converter with ripple cancellation, (e) common damping two- L1 L3 Cn2
inductor, and (f) interleaved. Batt
D2
TABLE IV
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT BOOST CONVERTER IPV M1 M3 Io
TOPOLOGIES
Ct1 Ct2
+ D3
Converter Reliability Bandwidth Mass
topology (Hz) (gr) + RL +
Cin M2 Co Vo
(a) High 300 207.8 - -
(b) High 300 287.1 D1
(c) Medium 300 336.1 - L2 L4
(d) High 400 161.6
(e) High 30 e3 336.1
(f) High 600 161.3
Fig.11 High 100e3 Unkn. Fig. 10. Circuit diagram of B2R topology.
reliability. However, it leads to high power losses due to its without requiring any battery operation, in the second mode, the
reverse recovery diode. Table IV gives a comparison based on loads are supplied directly from the battery power, while in the
reliability, mass, bandwidth frequency, and input current ripple. third operation mode, the converter supplies the loads through
Moreover, the bandwidth efficiency of (d) and (e) is better the combined operation of the PV and the battery. One of the
compared to other given topologies. In SmallSat applications prominent features is the converter battery base is grounded
(a), (b), and (c) looks feasible with a good trade-off between avoiding the noise of battery damage, hence, increasing the
reliability, efficiency, and the component count of the battery's useful life. Therefore, this topology is characterized by
topologies. For the switch near-ground topology shown in Fig. reduced size, low losses, and high efficiency.
8 (b), the implementation of the driving circuit is easier 3) Buck-boost based converter topologies: The converters
compared to the rest of the same category given the fact that the described here can step up or down the input voltage to a
power transistor is grounded. In addition, this converter regulated output voltage level and they support bi-directional
topology combined with a DET EPS architecture offers good power flow, enabling the fully controlled charge and discharge
efficiency [65]. Furthermore, the two-inductor boost converter of the onboard batteries, based on the monitored state of the
in Fig. 8 (c) has the merit of operating at continuous conduction charge (SOC) [68]. A high-efficiency step-up and step down-
mode (CCM) and therefore, this converter requires a small conversion with the buck-boost regulator (B2R) is presented in
output capacitor to achieve reduced output current ripple. [69], which is shown in Fig. 10. The use of the converter has
Another effective solution to step-up the voltage level is the been applied in DET architectures of unregulated or regulated
interleaved structure, which improves transient response, bus voltages with the battery directly connected to the main dc
decreases output current ripple, and can reduce the passive bus. In case the MPP architecture is selected, the usage of B2R
component size [66]. Gorji et al. [67] presented an interleaved assists towards maintaining the main bus voltage close to the
dc-dc boost converter with two input/multi-output capabilities MPP solar array voltage level, a fact that ensures better
for spacecraft applications represented in Fig. 9. The main task performance, as shown in the practical application of such
of this converter is MPPT power supply, bus voltage regulation, configurations in SmallSat [70]. This is an advantage that is not
and battery charge control. The proposed converter replaces offered by a single buck or a single boost converter alone. B2R
three separated converters through the usage of one compact topology has been improved in [70]. A multi-port dc-dc
circuit and operates in three different operation modes. In the converter is drawn by merging two inductors, a topology known
first operation mode, the loads are supplied directly by the PV as buck-buck-boost regulator (B3R). All the discussed
IBatt
L1 Cn2
Batt
D2
IPV L3 Io
M1 M3
Ct
+ D3
+ RL +
Cin M2 Co Vo
- -
-
L2 D1 Fig. 13. Improved Weinberg topology for bi-directional power flow.
VLK1
+ - + VLo-
Io LK1 Ipri Isec Do1 Lo iLo
Fig. 11. Circuit diagram of B3R topology. + + +
LM Vpri Vsec Do2 Co Ro Vo
L1 MH1 MH2 MH3 La2 + Vaux -
- - -
IBatt IL1 IBuss LK3 Iaux
L2 C1 C2 + VDS2 -
Vin + VCL-
IL2 IDS2 M2
VBatt L3 + RL + CL +
CBatt CBus VBus M12 VDS12
- - -
IL3
+ DCL +
ML1 ML2 ML3 Vcb Cb M11
VDS1
- -
Fig. 12. A new proposed interleaved PWM bi-directional converter.

Fig. 14. A new ACF topology with a continuous current waveform.
operations of B2R are performed by B3R topology, including efficiency. This topology adds the diode and switches to realize
step-up, step-down of the solar array power to the battery level, the function of the bidirectional power flow, as shown in Fig.
and step-down battery power to the regulated bus level. Thus, 13. This topology works on two modes, buck, and boost modes,
this topology gives mass and cost savings as compared to B2R, achieving thus bi-directional power flow and consequently
since the passive, and protection components are reused for PV higher energy density within a smaller mass.
array and battery regulations as appears in Fig. 11.
Conventional bi-directional converters are very challenging C. Isolated Converter Topologies
at extreme duty cycle operation, which is required to bridge the Specific satellite digital loads operate at higher currents (5
high voltage gap between battery cells and the main dc bus. to 10A or more) while demanding a low voltage supply, which
Additionally, the battery's low voltage side increases current should be characterized by minimized ripple and fluctuations.
stress on the converter which is associated with more losses. In Although, before the final load voltage, multiple stages of
SmallSat applications, a bi-directional interleaved PWM power conversion are accomplished. Regulation and isolation
converter with high voltage-conversion and current balancing are required to be implemented [56]. In the past decade,
ability is proposed in [71]. This converter is derived from the isolated converters are widely employed in various formats in
conventional interleaved PWM three-phase converter by SmallSat applications. In addition, instead of using multiple
adding two additional capacitors C1 and C2 as given in Fig. 12. converters working independently, one multi-port converter can
Thus, by adding the capacitors the voltage conversion ratio is be used instead, offering several advantages, such as fewer
tripled at a given duty cycle, which relieves the stresses on the conversion stages and a smaller number of components,
switches, and inductor current is balanced by the added however, at the cost of reliability given that it can be proven a
capacitors. This procedure contributes to efficient power Single Point of Failure (SPoF).
conversion for a single-cell battery SmallSat EPS. This 1) Single-input single-output (SISO) converter topologies:
converter operates at step-up and step-down at charge and The conventional active-clamp-forward (ACF) converter
discharge of the battery, respectively. However, analysis is topology is comparatively due to its less component count,
performed based on ideal circuit elements with large capacitors, simple structure, and regarding its switch voltage stress, the
and parasitic components are not considered. Finally, in [72] a good clamping competence, is a good candidate for SmallSat
new bidirectional converter is proposed, being an improved applications. However, the high switching stress, large di/dt,
Weinberg topology. A conventional buck circuit is placed on and pulsating input current are the drawbacks in this converter
one side and a Weinberg boost topology circuit on the other [73]. To overcome the disadvantages, a new ACF, shown in
side. It has a simple structure, high power density, and Fig. 14, with a continuous current waveform is proposed in
D1
D3A L3 +
+ C1 RL1 VO1
D3B C3 RL3 VO3 -
-
D2
L2 +
D2A LMP C2 RL2 VO2
+ -
D2B C2 RL2 VO2 Vin
LMP -
Vin
M
D2
M +
D1A L1 C3 RL3 VO3
+ -
D1B C1 RL1 VO1
-
Fig. 16. Multi-output low drop-out fly back converter.

Fig. 15. Multi-output magnetic feedback forward converter.
TABLE V
ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATION OF MULTI-OUTPUT MAGNETIC
[58]. In the presented topology, two series-connected switches FEED-BACK AND FLY-BACK CONVERTER.
are utilized for relieving the stress on the main switch of the
converter. For the turn-off time, a clamping circuit and a turn- Converter I/P O/P Load Current O/P Voltage
off delay are applied to prevent an imbalance switch voltage. Topology Voltage (Io) (Vo)
Range 1 2 3 1 2 3
The voltage stress of both the switches are always clamped to
Magnetic
VCL and Vin respectively. Thus, the low voltage stress on the feedback 18 to 50V 4A 0.67A 0.67A 5V 15V 15V
switches and low drain to source resistance results in a
converter with high power density and reliability. Fly back 24 to 42V 5A 0.1A 0.3A 5 V 12.5V 15V
2) Single-input, multi-output (SIMO) converter topologies: converter
A decentralized multi-output magnetic feedback forward
converter for space applications is demonstrated in [74]. This IPV
converter is a galvanically isolated topology, with a magnetic Rs C2+ M2
-
feedback system implemented instead of the classic + MR2
optocoupler feedback, which is sensitive to radiation and - Vo +
Ib Lm Lo Co
temperature fluctuations. The magnetic feedback and PWM
- Rb M3 RL MR1
controller are insensitive to the radiation effects and are in +
general insensitive to temperature deviations, increasing thus + C1 M1
Batt - -
reliability [75]. This converter has simpler circuitry compared
to other multi-output converters and is more efficient because
of the self-resonant reset mechanism. Compared to some Fig. 17. Half-bridge three-port modified converter topology.
popular converter topologies such as half-bridge, full-bridge,
and push-pull, the flyback multi-output converter is usually TABLE VI
selected in SmallSat given the fact that it’s less complex. This A COMPARISON OF INTEGRATED MULTI-PORT AND
CONVENTIONAL MULTI-CONVERTER.
transformer-based converter enhances the topology with
multiple output channels, with some minor additional Differences Integrated Conventional Multi-
circuitries [74]. The decentralized multi-output magnetic Multi-port converter
feedback forward converter is shown in Fig. 15. Control design complex simple
Another like the previous SIMO converter is presented in Control input multi single
Number of components less more
[76], as given in Fig. 16. This converter is a low drop-out (LDO)
Mass low high
fly-back converter for the spacecraft power subsystem. This Conversion stages one more
converter topology is implemented for the high-power auxiliary Control loop decoupling required not necessary
output of the converter based on strict voltage regulations. Communication no yes
Multiple outputs can be generated with some additional circuits
since energy is stored in the transformer before transferring to mass compared to the independent port converters. Besides,
the converter output. Through the transformer’s turn ratio, the there are no communication requirements, and the centralized
output voltages can be selected. Both converters are compared control system enhances the dynamic performance of the
in Table V, in terms of electrical input and output, switching converter. Qian et al. [77], [78] present the power and control
frequency, and efficiency. strategy of an integrated three-port converter for satellite
3) Multi-input multi-output (MIMO) converter topologies: applications as shown in Fig. 17. Table VI gives a comparative
Integrated multi-port converters have fewer conversion stages, overview between conventional and three-port converters. The
fewer component count, and switching devices. As a result, a three ports correspond to the solar input, the battery, and an
multi-port converter is compact, more reliable, and has a lower isolated output port. During the illumination period, the
TABLE VII
A SUMMARY OF THE REVIEWED CONVERTER STRUCTURES FOR SPACECRAFT APPLICATIONS.
No. No. Passive SW

DC-DC
Semiconductors Elements frequency Efficiency
Converter Reference Figure No. Main Features
kHz (%)
Topologies Switch Diode Inductors Caps
[61] Fig. 6 2 2 2 4 400 97 • Physical electrical
[63] Fig. 7 2 0 1 1 Unkn. Unkn. connections.
[65] Fig.8 (a-f) 4 7 2 2 100 >96 • Normally, Simple
Non- [67] Fig. 9 3 3 4 6 100 96 structures with low
isolated [69] Fig. 10 3 3 3 3 100 96 build-up cost and light
[70] Fig. 11 weight.
[71], [72] Fig. 12, 13 • Suitable for medium and
low power levels.
• Précised magnetically
coupled design.
[58] Fig. 14 3 3 7 3 300 <95 • Liberty of multiple
Isolated [74] Fig. 15 1 6 8 3 500 >75 output design with
[76] Fig. 16 1 3 5 3 200 86 positive or negative
[77], [78] Fig. 17 5 1 5 4 100 >90 voltages.
• Reduced EMI and noise
hitches.
[69] Fig. 10 • Two way power flow.
[70] Fig. 11 • Required a complex
Bi- [71] Fig. 12 6 0 3 4 100 90 control and switch drive
directional [72] Fig. 13 3 2 4 2 50 >95 circuit.
• Capable for regenerative
applications
[61] Fig. 6
[63] Fig. 7 • Single way power flow
[65] Fig.8 (a-f) 1 1 2 2 130 97 • Control and modulation
Fig. 8 (a) 1 1 2 2 130 <97 is simple
Uni- Fig. 8 (b) 1 1 2 2 130 <97 • Lower cost and simple
directional Fig. 8 (c) structure compared to
[67], [58] Fig. 9, 14 bidirectional
[74], [76] Fig. 15, 16
[77], [78] Fig. 17
[65] Fig.8 (a-b) • Constant input current

Fig. 8 (f) 2 2 4 3 130 <97 with low ripples
Current-fed [71], [72] Fig. 12, 13 • In-built boost
[76], [67] Fig.16, 9 characteristics
• Low dynamic response
[61] Fig. 6
[63] Fig. 7
[65] Fig. 8 (c) 1 1 3 4 130 97 • High input current
Fig. 8 (d) 1 1 2 2 130 <97 ripples
Voltage-fed Fig. 8 (e) • In-built buck
[69], [70] Fig. 10, 11 characteristics
[74], [76] Fig. 15, 16 • Fast dynamic response
[77], [78] Fig. 17
converter operates at MPPT, while the battery is being charged topologies for spacecraft applications are summarized in Table
and the loads receive fully regulated power. The three circuit VII.
stages are based on the half-bridge converter control which
operates on modified PWM with a constant switching cycle and D. Converter Switches
results in two independent control variables d1, and d2 duty While previously silicon-based switching technologies (Si)
cycles for operating switches M1 and sM2 respectively, which dominated the space industry, by mid 2010s gallium nitride
tightly regulates two ports of the converter, whereas the third (GaN) switches have dominated over the Si ones. GaN devices
port offers balance to the circuit. However, the control design are radiation tolerant, and sustainable for the high-temperature
is more complicated and demands more modeling efforts as space environment. Additionally, these devices offer higher
compared to classic two-port converters. Further analysis and efficiencies with lower cost, mass, and volume, therefore
operation of the circuit are reported in [79], [80]. For more achieving higher power densities. The radiation tolerance of
insights, the main features of the reviewed dc-dc converter this switching device is due to the high bandgap energy of 3.4
eV for GaN [50], [81], [82]. Additionally, enhancement-mode

GaN (eGaN) transistors are more suitable for high-efficiency
converter designs due to on-state resistance, output capacitance,
and small gate charge [50]. The soft-switching capability of
GaN transistors along with their improved output power density
under resonant operation has been evaluated in [83], [84]. In
these papers, the benefit of replacing Si-MOSFET with eGaN-
FET has been experimentally demonstrated for a POL printed
circuit board (PCB). The GaN FETs with low parasitic
packaging need a low parasitic PCB layout for the device
capability utilization. Based on this assessment, an optimal
layout with eGaN FETs is suggested to attain the best
performance and this design has offered a 10% decrease in total
(a)
power loss, 40% reduction in high-frequency loop inductance,
and 35% voltage overshoot minimization, compared to the
classical PCB scheme [84]. In comparison to the traditional
radiation-hardened switches, GaN technology offers significant
cost reduction, high switching frequency with smaller
component packages, and introduces fewer losses [85].
IV. ENERGY GENERATION

The available energy sources in space are naturally of solar
or nuclear origin. In recent years, a massive surge in the use of
PV cells has been seen in satellites regardless of their size, with
a total ~85% of all SmallSat spacecraft using solemnly solar
panels as the primary power-generating source [86]. The solar
cells used in space applications, compared to the terrestrial (b)
ones, harvest energy from a broader spectrum of solar
irradiation [87]. More specifically, space-qualified solar cells Fig. 18. Standard sunlight spectrum for (a) terrestrial and (b) space solar
cells.
are designed for the spectrum AM0 (ASTM E-490), with an
integrated power density of 1366.1 W/m2 [88], while terrestrial
cells correspond to the direct and global spectrums AM1.5D
and AM1.5G (ASTM G-173) respectively, with the
corresponding integrated power densities of 900 W/m2 and
1000 W/m2. For reference, the terrestrial and LEO spectra are
given in Fig. 18 (a) and (b). It is therefore evident, that there is
increased potential for elevated solar energy harvesting and,
that different technique is necessary for space-qualified solar
cells. The power generating components are selected from the
available COT components available from different producers.
However, power generation-related failure is the major among
the other EPS elements, in which cell, solar array, cell
interconnection, array mechanical failures, and darkening of Fig. 19. NanoSat solar panel “NanoPower P110” [Courtesy GOMSpace].
solar reflectors or glass has been reported [89]. Some cell
degradation and failure are due to unexpected radiation-induced generation branches to escape from the overall failure of the
degradation caused by energetic solar flare and others are due panel.
to manufacturing defects. But, since the solar array is sized for
the end-of-life power, a large enough margin is added in the A. Space-qualified Solar cells
design to mitigate the impact of degradation. Conventionally, The more all-electric satellites are expanding, the need for
two solar cells are serially wired in the CubeSat solar panel with electric propulsions will keep significantly increasing the
no redundancy in case of solar string failure which can cause a power/energy budgets, a fact that will impact significantly and
serious threat due to loss of electric energy from one solar panel. directly the solar panel design in terms of sizing and power
To address the reliability in the case of solar string failure or density. Therefore, the increase in the number of solar panels
following switched power regulator failure a redundant significantly raises the overall mission cost in terms of mass and
architecture is proposed in [90]. In the proposed architecture a volume, thus high efficiency, small size, and lightweight solar
greater number of the cells are applied for advanced panels are desired. An example of which is shown in Fig. 19.
interconnection in a single panel to form independent power There are various types of solar cells with different efficiencies.
Fig. 20. Space solar cell technologies and their efficiencies [91], [92].
TABLE VIII.
SPACE VERSION SOLAR PANELS WITH THEIR EFFICIENCIES
AND PRAGMATIC SOLAR CELLS.
Applied Solar
Manufacturer Name of Panels Efficiency
Cells
COBRA
SoleAero SolAero ZTJ 29.5%
COBRA-1U
AzureSpace Fig. 21. Design layers of 3-J Ge/GaAs/InGaP solar cells.

Solar Panel (0.5- 29.6%
3G30C
12U)
Spectrolab
Clyde Space Deployable Solar
XTJ
29.5% Some available space solar cell technologies for SmallSat
Panel
Spectrolab applications are shown in Fig. 20. More specifically, recent
(1U, 3U) 28.3% studies have demonstrated that MJSCs under concentrated
UTJ
sunlight reach energy conversion efficiencies of 44.4% for 3-
HAWK SolAero XTJ 29.5- Junctions (3-J) and 46.1% for 4-junction (4-J) [94], [95].
MMA
eHAWK & Prime 30.7% Regarding SmallSat missions, mostly 3-j solar cells are used,
however, in the past 5 years, 4-j cells are growing fast in
AzurSpace
applications [92]. The prevalent 3-j commercial COTS space-
GomSpace NanoPower 3G30A 29.6%
qualified PV cell technologies designated for SmallSats are
summarized and listed in Table VIII, as to their reported
Endurosat Solar Panel
CESI Solar
29.5%
efficiencies and solar cell types [96]-[104].
cells CTJ30
AzureSpace
B. Design and Construction of Multi-junction Solar Cells
Solar Panel
DHV (5×5 cm, 1U, 3U,
3G30C
29.6%
The MJSC are manufactured by the combination of several
custom)
Advance layers of gallium arsenide (GaAs), indium gallium phosphate
(InGaP), and germanium (Ge) or Si to capture the largest
SolAero XTJ possible spectrum of sunlight. The architecture of the 3-J solar
Prime 30.7% cell is shown in Fig. 21, which highlights the design layers of
SolAero XTJ 29.5%
SpectroLab Space Solar Panel the 3-J Ge/GaAs/InGaP solar cell. Such cells are easier to
SolAero UTJ 28.3%
manufacture compared to other higher-order MJSC which
SolAero ITJ 26.8%
achieve better performance [105]. Moreover, this solar cell is
super radiation tolerant and owes a higher cell MPP voltage
In terrestrial applications, the most common solar cells are Si- (VMPP). The 3-J solar cell consists of three p-n junctions
based, which can reach up to ~20% conversion rates. However, arranged one on top of another, connected via tunnel junctions
such cells perform even worse when in orbit, not only due to for the addition of sub-voltages and maintaining the overall
their inherent low conversion rates but most importantly polarity of the device. For a single-junction GaAs, the nominal
because they experience severe efficiency degradation over cell voltage is 0.89V and the temperature coefficient is 2 mV/°C
time deriving from the radiation environment. Thus, Si solar at VMPP [106]. In addition, the radiation response of the cell
cells are not preferred for modern satellite applications. To is controlled by the most radiation-sensitive sub-cell
overcome the limitations of Si-cells, multi-junction solar cells photocurrent [107]. The conversion efficiency of the 3-J solar
(MJSC) have been developed for space applications. MJSCs are cell has been steadily improved to approximately more than
well over 10% more efficient compared to Si-based ones [93]. 30% at the beginning of life (BOL) [108]. The base layers of
Fig. 22. Wavelength spectrum covered by the base layers of the structure.
the PV cell cover a wavelength spectrum which is shown in Fig.

22, at an Air-Mass Zero (AM0) illumination and a temperature
of 28°C.
Recent research has suggested a new cell architecture called Fig. 23. Equivalent circuit of a 3-J PV cell.
Inverted Metamorphic Multi-Junction (IMM). IMM cells are
lighter in terms of mass and are more efficient compared to 3-J
cells [109], [110]. Yamaguchi H. et al. [109], [111] proposed
space solar sheets with inverted 3-J cells. The authors carried
out detailed reliability tests, which eventually lead to the I-V
characteristic improvement of IMM-3J space solar sheets.
Another 3-j film type solar sheet has been proposed in [109],
which poses 10% higher efficiency than previous
Ge/GaAs/InGaP 3-J solar cells and is lighter in weight. A
comprehensive reliability test for the space environment has
been conducted including a successful thermal cycling test,
which has shown sensible performance in outdoor field testing.
C. Electrical Circuit Model of Multi-junction Solar Cell

Theoretically, an ideal solar cell could be modeled as a Fig. 24. I-V curve for three sub-cells and their sum.
current source in anti-parallel with a diode. A direct current is
where 𝐼𝐼 is the current of sub-cells, 𝑖𝑖 is the number of sub-cells,
generated with solar radiation, and it accordingly varies when
(top: 𝑖𝑖 =1), (medium: 𝑖𝑖 =2), (bottom: 𝑖𝑖 =3). 𝐼𝐼𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 is the sub-cell
the cell is subjected to light. Τhe improvement in the model
photocurrent, 𝐼𝐼𝑠𝑠 is the sub-cell inverse saturation current of the
embraces the effects of shunt and series resistors [112]. The
diode, a is symbolize Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature
Ge/GaAs/InGaP 3-J solar cells can be modeled as the circuit in
of the sub-cell, K is the electron charge, and q is the diode
Fig. 23 where each sub-cell is representing a single independent
ideality factor, V is the total voltage across the cell, 𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠 and 𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠ℎ
solar cell. The three equivalent solar cells are arranged in a way
are series and shunt resistances [115].
that enables them to be shrinking the gaps and be connected in
The sum of the voltages of all sub-cells is equal to the total
series from top to bottom. The electrical performance (I-V
voltage of the cell as follows:
diagram) of 3-J solar cells can be derived from the three sub-
cells and the sum of total cells, which is shown in Fig. 24. While
V = ∑ i =1V i
3
each sub-cell possesses the same current because all sub-cells (2)
are connected in series [113], [114]. Similarly, 4-J cells can be
modeled as a four-level equivalent circuit. The total current is limited to the sub-cell that generates the
The representation of the mathematical expression of the minimum, from the three cells connected in a series
current generated by each sub-cell is given as follows: configuration which can be expressed as:
 q⋅( vi + I Rs )  (v i + I i R i )
i i i
I = min( I i ) (3)
i i
I= I − I sh  e a ⋅K ⋅T − 1 −
i s
(1)
PV
  i
Rsh For the I-V model of the panels, as the shunt current Ish is
 
minimum, shunt resistance Rsh may be neglected [116].
Series LOAD
Switching
Regulator
Vsa
+ Relay
D (t)
Duty ratio
controller
-
BATT
Charge
Peak Power
Current
Isa Tracker
Controller
Ich
Fig. 25. An architecture of PPT for a mission with wide solar and
temperature variations.
D. The Maximum Power Point Tracking Fig. 26. Energy densities of different batteries for nano satellite
applications.
In MPPT architectures, a switch-mode converter is placed in
series with the solar array to dynamically regulate the array (rechargeable) and are the main storage devices required for the
output impedance to match the loads. The majority of the mission life. The secondary batteries according to their
SmallSats utilize MPPT architecture [38]. It manipulates either volumetric and specific energy densities for nano satellite
the operating current or voltage of the solar array and drives the applications are shown in Fig. 26. Another, vital step in any
operating point of the solar array by controlling the operation satellite design is the correct sizing and right selection of the
of the switching converter between the rest of PDMS and the battery type, capacity, and technology which are made
solar array. The MPP calculation depends on the number of according to each mission’s requirements. The most prominent
parameters such as relative positioning to the Sun, PV cell type, aspect in sizing and right selection is the mission lifetime, the
operating temperature, and total solar irradiation [117], [118]. power/energy budgets, and the operating temperature range
The block diagram of MPPT architecture is shown in Fig. 25. along with the available thermal management strategy [124].
There are several MPPT calculation techniques, to name a few Moreover, the space extreme conditions need intense design
perturb and observe (P&O), constant voltage, artificial neural and component selection strategies because batteries are
networks, and incremental conductance (INC), each chemical reaction-based energy releasing devices and operating
characterized by different accuracy degrees and complexity environmental conditions affect their performance. In some
[119]. P&O algorithm is mostly used in LEO SmallSats due to missions the temperatures fluctuate from -20 to -100°C which
its easy implementation, low complexity, and accurate tracking greatly affect the rate of charge and discharge. Also, thermal
of MPP [120]. However, it suffers from plenty of drawbacks runaway can occur if a battery gets too hot [125].Thus it must
such as steady-state oscillation around the maximum power be made certain that the batteries can function at these
[121], therefore there are several efforts i.e., incremental temperatures where batteries need to undergo intense testing
perturbation and observation (IP&O), the optimal P&O towards under several different conditions to be approved for use. Also,
improving it, without compensating them completely [122]. to protect batteries from the extreme fluctuations of space,
heaters are added throughout the battery’s cells to regulate their
V. ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM IN SMALLSAT temperature.
To maintain the continuous operation of the satellite under
eclipse and peak load periods, all SmallSat require an energy A. State-of-the-art Battery Technologies
storage system (ESS) that includes batteries. Cell is the A survey made in [126] reveals that for nano-satellite
elementary unit of the battery and multiple cells are series, applications batteries used are 4% Lithium-Chloride (Li-Cl),
parallel, or both combined as a battery pack. The onboard 12% Lithium-polymer (Li-po), 16% Nickel-Cadmium (Ni-Cd),
batteries are differentiated based on their usage as the primary and 2% other chemistries. While the rest of 66% Li-ion batteries
and secondary batteries: the primary batteries (e.g., pyro have been applied. The Li-Cl is one of the highest energy
batteries) are not rechargeable; they are used for short mission content carrier batteries however, the high energy capability
requirements (approximately from a single day to a week), after makes it very sensitive from the designing point of view [127].
usage they are disposed-off [123]. On the other hand, the Previously, battery technologies including nickel-hydrogen
secondary batteries are rechargeable and are an essential, (Ni-H2) have been employed in different space missions [128].
permanent part of the EPS. In this review, we focus only on the The Ni-Cd up to the 1990s was a good solution for LEO space
secondary batteries, which are for long period applications applications due to their high reliability and long-life cycle,
TABLE IX
THE COMMERCIAL OF-THE-SHELF BATTERY TECHNOLOGIES AVAILABLE FOR SMALL SATELLITE APPLICATIONS.
Energy Density
Manufacturer Product Name Cells Used
(Whkg-1)
Sony, MoliCell, LG,

ABSL COTS 18650 Li-ion Battery 90 – 243
Sanyo, Samsung
Rechargeable Space
EaglePicher Li-ion 105
EaglePicher Battery (LP-33330)
NanoPower BP4
GomSpace GomSpace NanoPower Li-ion 1432- 154
NanoPower BPX
Vectronic Li-ion Battery Block VLB-X SAFT Li-ion Unkn.
Blue Canyon Technologies BCT Battery Li-ion or LiFePo4 Unkn.
Canon BP-930s four 18650 Li-ion cells 132
AAC Clyde 40Whr CubeSat Battery Clyde Space Li-Polymer 119
while Ni–H2 battery was the choice for flights requiring high ranges [135]. SC could be used as the sole energy storage
charge rates, varied operating temperatures, and resiliency to system for CubeSat that overcomes some of the disadvantages
disturbances [129]. However, Ni-Cd battery has a relatively low of Li-ion batteries like limited lifetime, high cost, and stable
energy density while Ni-H2 holds a reduced cycle. Striving to temperature requirements [136]. However, the low energy
overcome the drawbacks, Li-ion technology has emerged, and density of SC makes it limited as main energy storage system.
it has several benefits such as a long-life cycle, low self- Therefore, a hybrid energy storage system of SC and Li-ion
discharge rate, improved working life, and no memory effect. offer the advantages of each technology for the challenging
The li-ion cells are extensively applied in CubeSats because of mission requirements. Chin et al. [137], have proven an
their right size, tolerance in the space environment (±1000C). onboard Li-ion battery and SC technologies, a hybrid ESS in
These cells are available Cylindrical 18650 in an improved 2U CubeSat flight. The primary and secondary phases of the
form of 3500-3600 mAh, an average voltage of 3.6 V, and 50g mission have been completed. The results have shown an
of weight. The energy density of 18650 cells is 762 Wh/l and excellent agreement between the two technologies and the
252 Wh/kg [123]. Moreover, Li-ion batteries have low volume performance characteristics in different conditions. The ground
and mass and are available in a variety of forms [130]. The test results have sufficiently met, particularly concerning the
available cells are 65mm in length and 18mm diameters bearing percent of capacity contributions between the Li-ion cell and
efficiency of up to 97% at BOL [131], [132]. Another similar the SC. A feasibility study in [138], demonstrates that the
battery technology is polymer Li-ion (Li-Po) which is available supercapacitors can qualify in a radiation environment, high
in a pouch instead of a cylinder, which gives freedom to develop cycles life (>100K), testing and launching process for small
lighter and thin cell designs for achieving advanced specific satellite applications. The characterization of different battery
energy. Therefore, Li-Po cells are suitable for high power and technologies suitable for SmallSat applications is examined in
energy SmallSat applications; however, they are exposed to [139] which has reported procedures and results of several
temperature and external mechanical destruction of the space environmental-related tests of performance degradations for Li-
environment for their thin cell casings [133]. This problem has Po cells.
been solved by wrapping each cell in a thin copper layer and
soldering the copper substrate to the battery cells with the B. Battery Charge Regulator
power conditioning board [134]. Generally, a Li-ion cell has a The battery charge regulator is responsible for harnessing
larger capacity, but Li-Po has a gravimetric energy capacity of solar power to sufficiently charge the battery cells. The battery
1.2 to 1.6 times larger and only 17% volume of Li-ion. Some charging system interfaces the battery and solar panels. It is a
available latest battery technologies for SmallSat applications programmable buck-boost converter and can operate in the
are presented in Table IX [30]. Supercapacitors (SC) or constant voltage or current mode depending on the battery state.
ultracapacitors can be considered an alternative ESS for small Though, modern battery technologies are characterized by
satellites because of their high-power density, long improved Wh efficiency and extraordinary power density.
charge/discharge life, and operation in wider temperature However, batteries including Li-ion or Li-Po are not tolerant to
Integrated LOAD
EPS architecture, low power, low mass, and size constraints.
Controller/ Whereas the space-capable and reliable systems require greater
SOLAR Charger resources of power, volume, and mass [142]. While COTS
ARRAY
+ components are used in the design of the SmallSats, which are
primarily not dedicated to the space weather. Typically, the
C BATT COTS components better perform than space rated parts but
lacking the harsh environments survivability [143]. On the
- BATT other hand, military version aerospace and avionics electronic
Current components are crafted to sustain space radiation, vacuum,
Sensor
vibration, and extreme temperatures encountered in the upper
atmosphere and at the lift-off process. The extreme
SA Current
Sensor temperatures at the surface of the spacecraft fluctuate up to
±1000C at LEO [13], which shortens the life span of the casual
electronic components but also mangles the usual operational
Fig. 27. Integrated battery charger and array controller. functionality of the satellite. According to the standard in [144],
for SmallSat extreme temperatures (i.e., hot, and cold cases)
overcharging. An integrated array controller battery charger is
and rate of change of temperatures, testing in a vacuum is
proposed for SmallSat in [140], which can be seen in Fig. 27.
mandatory. Eight thermal cycles shall be performed between
The circuit is placed between array bus and battery/load,
maximum and minimum temperature limits. However, the
ducking a direct contact of bus voltage and the battery voltage
temperature is not the only factor, but cosmic rays also pose an
to clamp. With this approach, the battery charging with
additional challenge which is a constant bombardment of the
available power or fully powering the bus is possible, which on
highly energetic particles carrying energy ions with the
the other hand results in more efficiency in battery charging
capability to energies electronic components of the spacecraft,
[141]. The control function is carried out by a single PWM
resulting in damages and malfunctioning. The satellites orbiting
system, where a current control boost converter is used to feed
low altitudes are more vulnerable to these radiations [145].
the solar array power to the load and after processing, to the
There are two types of effects to the satellite electronics from
battery. The control functionalities are accomplished by
the radiations: single event effects (SEEs) and total ionizing
varying the duty cycle with the current of the battery as a
dose (TID). SEE, is an instantaneous failure mechanism
controlled variable. Moreover, the array voltage is linearly
expressed in terms of a random failure rate and TID is a long-
varied across different power generating points to support the
term failure mechanism that is rated by mean time to failure.
variations in power requirements. The integrated controller
Also, there is less structural mass shielding the electronics, but
efficiently charges the battery with constant current to the
the TID radiation effect can be reduced and the tolerance to this
setpoint and protects the battery by turning off to zero
radiation is improved with thinner oxides and finer IC
thereafter. This is performed by controlling the converter duty
geometries [146]. The vacuum of outer space produces
cycle. For implementation, a PWM controller in conjunction
whiskers. Whiskers are spider-web-thin conductive filaments
with an analog-based two-loop control scheme is applied.
that grow on cadmium, zinc, and metal surfaces of the tin. Tin
In the first loop known as, Battery Charge Controller (BCR)
seems to be more likely to grow over time whiskers in a
loop, the charge reference signal is compared with battery
vacuum, providing a short circuit path between metal-plated
current by the integrated controller and generates a control
surfaces [147]. However, many dedicated SmallSats of this
signal to control the duty cycle of the converter. The current
category are offering an incredible job to explore space
controlled boost converter with an additional outer voltage loop
environments, which will enable building more robust and
is involved in this scheme to cut the overcharging current of the
reliable systems [148]. In addition, at the time of left-off
battery. In the second loop, the detected output battery voltage
vibration is the sudden application of 9.2 million pounds of
is compared with the set battery charge reference voltage. The
thrust to the satellite [146]. There have been many reasons cited
voltage loop senses the set voltage, and the battery charge
for the high failure rate of SmallSat, such as ambitious
current is minimized to zero indicating the required SOC.
technology infusion and the lack of testing, possibly related to
Similarly, the battery current reference point is pulled down to
low budgets in the hobbyist and academic sectors. The
zero by the battery voltage loop active pull-down.
electronic components used must be designed and tested to
withstand the shocks, vacuum, required temperature, and
VI. THE CHALLENGES AND POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS IN EPS
radiation hardened. The Small Spacecraft Systems Virtual
DESIGN AND OPERATIONS
Institute NASA in [143], presents state-of-the-art small
Recently, the SmallSat missions have been transformed to spacecraft technologies for EPS applications. Although,
commercial ventures instead of academic and experimental potential and less expensive fabrication tools, and testing
projects changing the prospect of specifications and reliability facilities for vacuum and high-thermal gradient are reported in
of the CubeSat. The specific orbits have been extended to larger [149]. Moreover, the analysis of thermal, degradation and
and mission lifetimes have been extended from months to years. management for the EPS equipment are very important in the
The main challenge in SmallSat design is the requirement of design process.
highly reliable and capable components, efficient and simple
A. Thermal and Degradation Analysis of Solar Cell VII. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
When exposed to this radiating environment, the This paper has reviewed in a holistic manner, the state-of-
semiconductors and mainly, the solar cell electrical the-art developments from origin to classification and
performance degrades. This effect is very dangerous and can utilization of SmallSat EPS, an overview of recent research and
lead to mission failures. Hence, the radiation response of the advances in SmallSat is presented aiming to highlight the
solar cells employed in the spacecraft is extremely important current attention from academia and industry. For the LEO
for mission life prediction. For the prediction of the degradation satellite bus regulation, battery rapid charge-discharge
level of the solar cells particularly some electrical parameters, regulations, and subsystem distributions different converter
e.g., open-circuit voltage, short circuit current, and the topologies are available, some of the important topologies have
maximum power reaction in the radiation environment are been comprehensively reviewed i.e., non-isolated, isolated, uni-
necessary to be identified. Xin et al. [150] and Sato et al. [151] directional, bi-directional, current-fed, and voltage-fed
have presented performance evaluation and prediction of topologies are analyzed in this paper. For bus regulation, some
InGaP/GaAs/Ge 3-J solar cells under the irradiation important converter topologies are provided to give an
environment. By calculating the open-circuit voltage and the insightful understanding of SmallSat power bus regulation.
short-circuit current, the degradation curves show an accuracy Additionally, for the switching applications of SmallSat
of 5%, which is a good agreement with experimental data. For converters and regulators and load ON/OFF switches some up
satellite applications, Meng et al. [152] have presented a to date GaN converter switches are investigated and compared
degradation model of the orbiting current for GaInP/GaAs/Ge with classical Si-based switches, which shows high efficiency
3-J solar cells. The performance parameter, which is crucial for for SmallSat applications. Moreover, state-of-the-art solar
describing the degradation of a solar cell model, is the output power generation technologies have been discussed with the
current. To model the variation tendency of the output current, focus on the solar cells and panels available for SmallSat
a mathematical model is established. The results of the applied applications. For power generation various types of PV
degradation model for lifetime prediction of 3-J solar cells technologies are surveyed, standard design layer of the 3-J solar
contribute to the life expectancy of the cells for space cell and PV circuit model is presented in this paper, including
applications. On the other hand, high temperatures extremely commercially available space solar cells, panels, and their
degrade the performance of the solar cell. To obtain better characteristics. Although, state-of-the-art space version solar
performance, passive treatment method such as back surface panels with pragmatic solar cells are illustrated which offer
coatings and paint is applied [153]. Furthermore, the solar array excellent candidates for future missions with high conversion
backside thermal surface treatment showed temperature efficiencies. The state-of-the-art battery technologies are
reduction to a great extent, increasing the efficiency of the solar reviewed and analyzed, with recent developments for the
cells broadly. Some thermal analysis, control, and the design of SmallSat application, where characterization of different
small satellites are reported respectively in [154] [155]. battery technologies is carried out, and various commercially
available battery chemistries are examined. Additionally, the
B. Electronic Equipment and Battery Management main SmallSat design challenges and some potential solutions
The design of the satellite must be validated with all are addressed. This paper presents a clear picture for the
contemplations of the environmental conditions from launch to selection of state-of-the-art architectures, converter topologies,
operation in orbit. The satellite is designed to sustain in the Solar cells, and battery technologies that result in building a
permissible temperature range and space vacuum atmosphere. more reliable, efficient, and robust EPS for SmallSat
To ensure the satellite functionality and survivability in space applications. Future challenges and prospective are summarized
harsh weather for the mission lifetime span, suitable thermal as follows:
management and design are mandatory to keep all the onboard • Application of state-of-the-art technologies in the design,
equipment to their acceptable scaled temperatures. There are modeling, and architectures of electrical power systems for
two thermal control techniques excessively discussed, active CubeSats will result in a sufficiently reliable and robust
and passive but the latter one is referred to as the best solutions EPS.
for NanoSats and CubeSats [156]. Passive thermal control • Most of the small satellite consists of subsystem COTS
generally relies on multi-layer insulations to shield the components that are modular. These components are to be
spacecraft from the incident heat fluxes of the space planned depending on configuration and application
environment. These multi-layers are coatings and surface requirements. For individual constraints, optimized
finishes, heat sinks, and thermal insulations. Surface finishes modular components are needed to meet the strict space
are applied on both the exterior and interior surfaces of the requirements in terms of generated power, volume, and
NanoSats and CubeSat. To obtain acquired emissivity and mass.
absorptivity two or more layers are combined and applied • In future assessments for small spacecraft applications, the
[157]. Excessive cooling can damage and degrade the battery 4-junction GaAs solar cells have emerged with more
module. For active control, a major technique is the application efficiency and reliability. Another advanced solar cell is
of a thin film heater. The heaters are resistors and are part of the IMM, which is lighter in weight and is a more efficient
closed-loop system of the controller and sensors. solar cell. Thus, 4-junction GaAs and IMM solar cells are
recommended for CubeSat analysis.
• In recent literature Li-ion battery technologies are mainly [22] C. Marnay, S. Chatzivasileiadis, C. Abbey, R. Iravani, G. Joos, P.
Lombardi, P. Mancarella and J. von Appen, "Microgrid evolution
focused on the design, for the future perspective, Li-po, LI- roadmap," in 2015 international symposium on smart electric
Cl and SC technologies can be more critically analyzed for distribution systems and technologies (EDST), 2015, pp. 139-144.
SmallSat applications due to their flexibility, less volume, [23] J.R. Kopacz, R. Herschitz and J. Roney, "Small satellites an overview
and the high energy density compared to Li-ion. and assessment," Acta Astronaut. 2020.
[24] F. Davoli, C. Kourogiorgas, M. Marchese, A. Panagopoulos and F.
Patrone, "Small satellites and CubeSats: Survey of structures,
REFERENCES architectures, and protocols," International Journal of Satellite
Communications and Networking, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 343-359 2019.
[1] S. Gao, Y. Rahmat-Samii, R.E. Hodges and X. Yang, "Advanced [25] M. Sweeting, "Modern small satellites-changing the economics of
antennas for small satellites," Proc IEEE, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 391-403 space," Proc IEEE, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 343-361 2018.
2018. [26] T.M. Lim, A.M. Cramer, J.E. Lumpp and S.A. Rawashdeh, "A modular
[2] M. Chan, J. Bultitude, D. Faber, D. Hawes and O. Fab, "Productization electrical power system architecture for small spacecraft," IEEE
of CubeSat rendezvous and docking solutions," 2019. Trans.Aerospace Electron.Syst., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1832-1849 2018.
[3] T. Pultarova and C. Henry, "OneWeb weighing 2,000 more satellites," [27] B. Johnston-Lemke, N. Orr, G. Bonin and R. Zee, "Modular power
SpaceNews.com.SpaceNews, vol. 24 2017. system: Enabling scalable missions for the 1w to 1kw range," 2013.
[4] P.B. De Selding, "Google-backed global broadband venture secures [28] O. Khan, M. El Moursi, H. Zeineldin, V. Khadkikar and M. Al Hosani,
spectrum for satellite network," Spacenews, May, vol. 30, pp. 2014 2014. "Comprehensive design and control methodology for DC-powered
[5] J. Brodkin, "With latency as low as 25ms, SpaceX to launch broadband satellite electrical subsystem based on PV and battery," IET Renewable
satellites in 2019," Ars Technica, May 2017. Power Generation, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 2202-2210 2020.
[6] S.E. Holdings, "LLC,“SpaceX ka-band NGSO constellation FCC filing [29] A. Edpuganti, V. Khadkikar, M.S. Elmoursi, H. Zeineldin, N. Alsayari
SAT-LOA-20161115-00118,”," 2018. and K. Al Hosani, "A comprehensive review on CubeSat electrical power
[7] ISISPACE. [Online]. available: https://www.isispace.nl/cubesat- system architectures," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 2021.
information/#1606143530492-b3857346-f861. [30] B.D. Yost, D.J. Mayer, C.D. Burkhard, S.V. Weston and J.L. Fishman,
[8] T. Wekerle, J.B. Pessoa Filho, Costa, Luís Eduardo Vergueiro Loures da "Small spacecraft systems virtual institute's federated databases and state
and L.G. Trabasso, "Status and trends of smallsats and their launch of the art of small spacecraft technology report," 2018.
vehicles—An up-to-date review," Journal of Aerospace Technology and [31] A.D. Bintoudi, C. Timplalexis, G. Mendes, J.M. Guerrero and C.
Management, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 269-286 2017. Demoulias, "Design of Space Microgrid for Manned Lunar Base:
[9] C. Poly, "CubeSat design specification (CDS) rev 13," Cal Poly SLO Spinning-in Terrestrial Technologies," in 2019 European Space Power
2015. Conference (ESPC), pp. 1-8.
[10] C.E. Gonzalez, C.J. Rojas, A. Bergel and M.A. Diaz, "An architecture- [32] A. Lashab, M. Yaqoob, Y. Terriche, J.C. Vasquez and J.M. Guerrero,
tracking approach to evaluate a modular and extensible flight software "Space microgrids: New concepts on electric power systems for
for CubeSat nanosatellites," IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 126409-126429 satellites," IEEE Electrification Magazine, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 8-19 2020.
2019. [33] J. Bester, B.B. Groenewald and R. Wilkinson, "Electrical power system
[11] CubeSat. (accessed: 08 April). California Polytechnic State University, for a 3U CubeSat nanosatellite incorporating peak power tracking with
"CubeSat," [online], URL: https://static1. dual redundant contro," 2012.
squarespace.com/static/5418c831e4b0fa4ecac1bacd/t/56e9b62337013 [34] E. Mostacciuolo, L. Iannelli, S. Sagnelli, F. Vasca, R. Luisi and V.
b6c063a655a/1458157095454/cds_rev13_final2.pdf [Online]. Stanzione, "Modeling and power management of a LEO small satellite
[12] P. Bugryniec, "Cubesat: The need for more power to realise electrical power system," in 2018 European Control Conference (ECC),
telecommunications," final report of mini project, University of Sheffield 2018, pp. 2738-2743.
2016. [35] M. Yaqoob, M. Nasir, J.C. Vasquez and J.M. Guerrero, "Self-directed
[13] A. Poghosyan and A. Golkar, "CubeSat evolution: Analyzing CubeSat Energy Management System for an Islanded Cube Satellite Nanogrid,"
capabilities for conducting science missions," Prog.Aerospace Sci., vol. in 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2020, pp. 1-7.
88, pp. 59-83 2017. [36] M.R. Patel, Spacecraft power systems, CRC press, 2004.
[14] A. Camps, "Nanosatellites and applications to commercial and scientific [37] J. Bouwmeester and J. Guo, "Survey of worldwide pico-and nanosatellite
missions," in Satellites Missions and Technologies for Geosciences, missions, distributions and subsystem technology," Acta Astronaut., vol.
Anonymous : IntechOpen, 2019. 67, no. 7-8, pp. 854-862 2010.
[15] L. Alminde, J. Christiansen, K. Kaas Laursen, A. Midtgaard, M. Bisgard, [38] A. Edpuganti, V. Khadkikar, H. Zeineldin, M.S. El Moursi and M. Al
M. Jensen, B. Gosvig, A. Birklykke, P. Koch and Y. Le Moullec, Hosani, "Comparison of peak power tracking based electric power
"Gomx-1: A nano-satellite mission to demonstrate improved situational system architectures for CubeSats," IEEE Trans.Ind.Appl., vol. 57, no.
awareness for air traffic control," 2012. 3, pp. 2758-2768 2021.
[16] J. King, J. Kolbeck, J.S. Kang, M. Sanders and M. Keidar, "Nano-Sat [39] A. Aoudeche, X. Zhao and K.D. Kerrouche, "Design of a high
Scale Electric Propulsion for Attitude Control-Performance Analysis," performance electrical power system for an earth observation nano-
in 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2019, pp. 1-10. satellite," in Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on
[17] A. Pukniel, V. Coverstone, R. Burton and D. Carroll, "The dynamics and Electronics and Electrical Engineering Technology, 2018, pp. 140-146.
control of the CubeSail mission: A solar sailing demonstration," [40] M. Mirghani, M.B. Omar and H. Mahmoud, "Design and
Advances in Space Research, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 1902-1910 2011. implementation of electrical power system for ISRA1 cube satellite,"
[18] P. Thirion, "Design and implementation of on-board electrical power International Journal of Applied Sciences and Current Research 2016.
supply of student nanosatellite oufti-1 of university of liège," University [41] A.H. Sulistya, W. Hasbi and R. Muhida, "Design and Implementation of
of Liège 2009. Effective Electrical Power System for Surya Satellite-1," in IOP
[19] M. Langer and J. Bouwmeester, "Reliability of cubesats-statistical data, Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, pp. 012059.
developers' beliefs and the way forward," 2016. [42] M. Pajusalu, E. Ilbis, T. Ilves, M. Veske, J. Kalde, H. Lillmaa, R.
[20] S.Y. Kim, J. Castet and J.H. Saleh, "Spacecraft electrical power Rantsus, M. Pelakauskas, A. Leitu and K. Voormansik, "Design and pre-
subsystem: Failure behavior, reliability, and multi-state failure flight testing of the electrical power system for the ESTCube-1
analyses," Reliab.Eng.Syst.Saf., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 55-65 2012. nanosatellite," Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, vol.
[21] T.L. Vandoorn, J.C. Vasquez, J. De Kooning, J.M. Guerrero and L. 63, no. 2, pp. 232 2014.
Vandevelde, "Microgrids: Hierarchical control and an overview of the [43] M.C. Mahdi, J.S. Jaafer and A.S. Abd, "Design and implementation of
control and reserve management strategies," IEEE industrial electronics an effective electrical power system for nano-satellite," 2014.
magazine, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 42-55 2013. [44] J. Lee, E. Kim and K.G. Shin, "Design and management of satellite
power systems," in 2013 IEEE 34th Real-Time Systems Symposium,
2013, pp. 97-106.

[45] J. Castellví, A. Camps, J. Corbera and R. Alamús, "3Cat-3/MOTS [65] O. Garcia, P. Alou, J.A. Oliver, D. Diaz, D. Meneses, J.A. Cobos, A.
nanosatellite mission for optical multispectral and GNSS-R earth Soto, E. Lapena and J. Rancano, "Comparison of boost-based MPPT
observation: Concept and analysis," Sensors, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 140 2018. topologies for space applications," IEEE Trans.Aerospace
[46] M.C. Mahdi, "Orbit design and simulation for kufasat nanosatellite," Electron.Syst., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 1091-1107 2013.
Artificial Satellites, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 157-168 2015. [66] K. Hwu and Y.T. Yau, "An interleaved AC–DC converter based on
[47] C.A. Rigo, L.O. Seman, E. Camponogara, E. Morsch Filho and E.A. current tracking," IEEE Trans.Ind.Electron., vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1456-
Bezerra, "Task scheduling for optimal power management and quality- 1463 2008.
of-service assurance in CubeSats," Acta Astronaut., vol. 179, pp. 550- [67] J.G. Gorji, K. Abbaszadeh and F. Bagheroskouei, "A New Two-input
560 2021. And Multi-output Interleaved DC_DC Boost Converter For Satellites
[48] B. Stevanovic, G. Salinas, P. Alou, J.A. Oliver, M. Vasic and J.A. Cobos, Power system," in 2019 10th International Power Electronics, Drive
"No title," Low Power Distribution Module for Space Applications: Systems and Technologies Conference (PEDSTC), 2019, pp. 236-241.
Analysis and Comparison of Different Architectures and DC/DC [68] O.C. Onar, J. Kobayashi, D.C. Erb and A. Khaligh, "A bidirectional
Topologies 2016. high-power-quality grid interface with a novel bidirectional noninverted
[49] K.R. Skup, P. Grudziński, P. Orleański and W. Nowosielski, "A digital buck–boost converter for PHEVs," IEEE transactions on vehicular
controller for satellite medium power DC/DC converters," in 2013 18th technology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 2018-2032 2012.
International Conference on Methods & Models in Automation & [69] O. Mourra, A. Fernandez and F. Tonicello, "Buck boost regulator (B 2
Robotics (MMAR), 2013, pp. 566-571. R) for spacecraft solar array power conversion," in 2010 Twenty-Fifth
[50] M. D'Antonio, C. Shi, B. Wu and A. Khaligh, "Design and optimization Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition
of a solar power conversion system for space applications," IEEE (APEC), 2010, pp. 1313-1319.
Trans.Ind.Appl., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 2310-2319 2019. [70] O. Mourra, A. Fernandez, F. Tonicello and S. Landstroem, "Multiple
[51] R.R. Gopi and S. Sreejith, "Converter topologies in photovoltaic port DC DC converter for spacecraft power conditioning unit," in 2012
applications–A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Twenty-Seventh Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference
vol. 94, pp. 1-14 2018. and Exposition (APEC), 2012, pp. 1278-1285.
[52] M. Forouzesh, Y.P. Siwakoti, S.A. Gorji, F. Blaabjerg and B. Lehman, [71] M. Uno, M. Inoue, Y. Sato and H. Nagata, "Bidirectional interleaved
"Step-up DC–DC converters: A comprehensive review of voltage- PWM converter with high voltage-conversion ratio and automatic
boosting techniques, topologies, and applications," IEEE transactions on current balancing capability for single-cell battery power system in small
power electronics, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 9143-9178 2017. scientific satellites," energies, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2702 2018.
[53] S. Oprea, C. Radoi, A. Florescu, A. Savu and A. Lita, "Power [72] H. Qunhai, Y. Jingyuan, W. Lixin and W. Tongzhen, "Research on a new
architectures and power conditioning unit for very small satellites," in bidirectional DC-DC topology for space applications," in 2017 12th
Energy Harvesting and Energy Efficiency, Anonymous : Springer, 2017, IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA),
pp. 491-539. 2017, pp. 1686-1690.
[54] A. Ali, S.A. Khan, M.U. Khan, H. Ali, M. Rizwan Mughal and J. Praks, [73] F. Belloni, P.G. Maranesi and M. Riva, "DC/DC converter for the
"Design of modular power management and attitude control subsystems international space station," IEEE Trans.Aerospace Electron.Syst., vol.
for a microsatellite," International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 46, no. 2, pp. 623-634 2010.
vol. 2018. [74] P.K. Rampelli, R. Deekshit, D.S. Reddy, B.K. Singh, V. Chippalkatti and
[55] A. Chub, D. Vinnikov, F. Blaabjerg and F.Z. Peng, "A review of T. Kanthimathinathan, "Multiple-output magnetic feedback forward
galvanically isolated impedance-source DC–DC converters," IEEE converter with discrete PWM for space application," in 2012 IEEE
Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 2808-2828 2015. International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy
[56] Manuel Padial Pérez. (April 8,). "Secondary Power Distribution In Systems (PEDES), 2012, pp. 1-6.
Satellites" [date retrieved August 17, 2020]. [Online]. available: [75] L. Ou and D. Curtis, "Magnetic feedback ranks high in military
https://www.doeeet.com/content/eee-components/draft-secondary- converters-magnetic coupling techniques offer more reliable and greater
power-distribution-in-satellites/. radiation hardness than optical coupling in military/aerospace dc-dc
[57] B. Hoang, S. White, B. Spence and S. Kiefer, "Commercialization of converter," Power Electronics Technology, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 14-19
Deployable Space Systems' roll-out solar array (ROSA) technology for 2005.
Space Systems Loral (SSL) solar arrays," in 2016 IEEE Aerospace [76] K. Deepa, T. Deepti and V. Kumar, "New multi-output switching
Conference, 2016, pp. 1-12. converter with low drop out post regulator," in 2013 International
[58] N. Lee, J. Lee, Y. Cheon, S. Han and G. Moon, "A high-power-density Conference on Emerging Trends in Communication, Control, Signal
converter with a continuous input current waveform for satellite power Processing and Computing Applications (C2SPCA), 2013, pp. 1-6.
applications," IEEE Trans.Ind.Electron., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 1024-1035 [77] Z. Qian, O. Abdel-Rahman, H. Al-Atrash and I. Batarseh, "Modeling and
2019. control of three-port DC/DC converter interface for satellite
[59] P.C. Adell, A.F. Witulski, R.D. Schrimpf, F. Baronti, W.T. Holman and applications," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 25, no. 3,
K.F. Galloway, "Digital control for radiation-hardened switching pp. 637-649 2009.
converters in space," IEEE Trans.Aerospace Electron.Syst., vol. 46, no. [78] Z. Qian, O. Abdel-Rahman, K. Zhang, H. Hu, J. Shen and I. Batarseh,
2, pp. 761-770 2010. "Design and analysis of three-port DC/DC converters for satellite
[60] K. Yao, M. Ye, M. Xu and F.C. Lee, "Tapped-inductor buck converter platform power system," in 2011 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and
for high-step-down DC-DC conversion," IEEE Transactions on Power Exposition, 2011, pp. 1454-1460.
Electronics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 775-780 2005. [79] H. Mao, J. Abu-Qahouq, S. Luo and I. Batarseh, "Zero-voltage-
[61] J. Faujdar, D.K. Gautam and V. Verma, "A New Converter for Common switching half-bridge DC-DC converter with modified PWM control
Mode Noise Reduction for EPS of a Nano satellite," in 2020 IEEE First method," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp.
International Conference on Smart Technologies for Power, Energy and 947-958 2004.
Control (STPEC), 2020, pp. 1-6. [80] H. Al-Atrash, F. Tian and I. Batarseh, "Tri-modal half-bridge converter
[62] P. Wong, P. Xu, P. Yang and F.C. Lee, "Performance improvements of topology for three-port interface," IEEE Transactions on Power
interleaving VRMs with coupling inductors," IEEE Transactions on Electronics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 341-345 2007.
Power Electronics, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 499-507 2001. [81] C. Abbate, A. Sanseverino, S. Fiore, F. Iannuzzo, A. Paccagnella, M.
[63] A. Edpuganti, V. Khadkikar, M.S. Elmoursi, H. Zeineldin and M. Al Citterio, F. Velardi, F. Rampazzo, M. Riva and S. Latorre, "Radiation
Hosani, "A Novel EPS Architecture for 1U/2U Cubesats with Enhanced performance of new semiconductor power devices for the LHC
Fault-Tolerant Capability," in 2020 IEEE Industry Applications Society experiment upgrades," PoS, pp. 007 2013.
Annual Meeting, 2020, pp. 1-6. [82] J. Muraro, G. Nicolas, S. Forestier, S. Rochette, O. Vendier, D. Langrez,
[64] W. Li and X. He, "Review of nonisolated high-step-up DC/DC J. Cazaux and M. Feudale, "GaN for space application: Almost ready for
converters in photovoltaic grid-connected applications," IEEE flight," International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies,
Trans.Ind.Electron., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1239-1250 2010. vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 121-133 2010.

[83] D. Reusch and J. Strydom, "Understanding the effect of PCB layout on [105] M. Stan, B. Cho, B. Guzie, G. Smith, P. Sharps and T. Varghese, "Air
circuit performance in a high-frequency gallium-nitride-based point of Force ManTech qualification of the 30% class GaInP2/Ga (In) As/Ge
load converter," IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 29, no. solar cell to the AIAA S-111 standard: results and recommendations," in
4, pp. 2008-2015 2013. 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2010, pp. 2625.
[84] D. Reusch and J. Strydom, "Evaluation of gallium nitride transistors in [106] C. Clark and A. Lopez, "Power system challenges for small satellite
high frequency resonant and soft-switching DC–DC converters," IEEE missions," in Proceedings of the 2006 Small Satellites, Systems and
Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 5151-5158 2014. Services Symposium, D. Danesy, Ed. The Netherlands: ESA, 2006.
[85] T. Cook, "No title," Gallium Nitride Converters for Spacecraft [107] N. Fatemi, J. Lyons and M. Eskenazi, "Qualification and production of
Applications 2020. Emcore ZTJ solar panels for space missions," in 2013 IEEE 39th
[86] S. Weston, C.S. Miller, J.E. Ingersoll, B.D. Yost, E. Agasid, R. Burton, Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2013, pp. 2793-2796.
R. Carlino, G. Defouw, A.D. Perez and A.G. Karacalioglu, "State of the [108] S. Pandey, "Ge/GaAs/InGaP triple-junction solar cells for space
art: Small spacecraft technology," 2018. exploration,".
[87] F. Kasten and A.T. Young, "Revised optical air mass tables and [109] T. Takamoto, H. Washio and H. Juso, "Application of
approximation formula," Appl.Opt., vol. 28, no. 22, pp. 4735-4738 1989. InGaP/GaAs/InGaAs triple junction solar cells to space use and
[88] Standard Solar Spectra. Standard Solar Spectra [Online]. available: concentrator photovoltaic," in 2014 IEEE 40th Photovoltaic Specialist
https://www.pveducation.org/pvcdrom/appendices/standard-solar- Conference (PVSC), 2014, pp. 1.
spectra. [110] M. Alia-Novobilski. Advanced multi-junction solar cells deliver high
[89] G.A. Landis, S.G. Bailey and R. Tischler, "Causes of power-related efficiency, reduced costs for space” Advanced-multi-junction-solar-
satellite failures," in 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic cells-high. html https://phys.org/news/2018-01 [Online].
Energy Conference, 2006, pp. 1943-1945. [111] H. Yamaguchi, R. Ijichi, Y. Suzuki, S. Ooka, K. Shimada, N. Takahashi,
[90] I. Vertat and A. Vobornik, "Efficient and reliable solar panels for small H. Washio, K. Nakamura, T. Takamoto and M. Imaizumi, "Development
CubeSat picosatellites," International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2014 of space solar sheet with inverted triple-junction cells," in 2015 IEEE
2014. 42nd Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), 2015, pp. 1-5.
[91] S. Weston, C.S. Miller, J.E. Ingersoll, B.D. Yost, E. Agasid, R. Burton, [112] J.A. Gow and C.D. Manning, "Development of a photovoltaic array
R. Carlino, G. Defouw, A.D. Perez and A.G. Karacalioglu, "State of the model for use in power-electronics simulation studies," IEE
art: Small spacecraft technology," 2018. Proceedings-Electric Power Applications, vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 193-200
[92] Z4J Space Solar Cell 4-Junction Solar Cell for Space Applications 1999.
[Online] Available: https://solaerotech.com/wp- [113] S. Chtita, Y. Chaibi, A. Derouich and J. Belkadid, "Modeling and
content/uploads/2019/04/Z4J-Datasheet-April-2019-10.pdf [Online]. Simulation of a Photovoltaic Panel Based on a Triple Junction Cells for
[93] R. Cariou, J. Benick, P. Beutel, N. Razek, C. Flötgen, M. Hermle, D. a Nanosatellite," in 2018 International Symposium on Advanced
Lackner, S.W. Glunz, A.W. Bett and M. Wimplinger, "Monolithic two- Electrical and Communication Technologies (ISAECT), 2018, pp. 1-6.
terminal III–V//si triple-junction solar cells with 30.2% efficiency under [114] Y. Chaibi, M. Salhi, A. El-Jouni and A. Essadki, "A new method to
1-sun AM1. 5G," IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 367- extract the equivalent circuit parameters of a photovoltaic panel," Solar
373 2016. Energy, vol. 163, pp. 376-386 2018.
[94] N. Miyashita, Y. He, T. Agui, H. Juso, T. Takamoto and Y. Okada, [115] J.A. Ramos-Hernanz, J.J. Campayo, E. Zulueta, O. Barambones, P.
"Inverted lattice-matched triple junction solar cells with 1.0 eV Eguía and I. Zamora, "Obtaining the characteristics curves of a photocell
GaInNAsSb subcell by MOCVD/MBE hybrid growth," IEEE Journal of by different methods," in International Conference on Renewable
Photovoltaics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 666-672 2019. Energies and Power Quality, 2013, pp. 1-6.
[95] F. Dimroth, T.N. Tibbits, M. Niemeyer, F. Predan, P. Beutel, C. Karcher, [116] A. Zekry, A. Shaker and M. Salem, "Solar cells and arrays: Principles,
E. Oliva, G. Siefer, D. Lackner and P. Fuß-Kailuweit, "Four-junction analysis, and design advances in renewable energies and power
wafer-bonded concentrator solar cells," IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, technologies," 2018.
vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 343-349 2015. [117] Y. Chen, Y. Lai, W. Lu and A. Lin, "Design and implementation of high
[96] C. Yeh, J. Liu, C. Wu, K. Wu and J. Juang, "Estimation of online power reliability electrical power system for 2U NutSat," IEEE
behavior in PHOENIX’s electrical power subsystem,". Trans.Aerospace Electron.Syst., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 614-622 2020.
[97] Emcore Corporation Solar Cells for Space Applications. [Online] [118] R. Darbali-Zamora, N. Cobo-Yepes, J.E. Salazar-Duque, E.I. Ortiz-
Available: http://emcore.com/news-releases/news-release- Rivera and A.A. Rincon-Charris, "Buck Converter and SEPIC Based
details/emcore-corporation-delivers-1-millionth-solar-cell-space Electronic Power Supply Design with MPPT and Voltage Regulation for
[Online]. Small Satellite Applications," in 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist
[98] W. Guter, F. Dunzer, L. Ebel, K. Hillerich, W. Köstler, T. Kubera, M. Conference (PVSC), 2017, pp. 2963-2968.
Meusel, B. Postels and C. Wächter, "Space solar cells–3g30 and next [119] T. Esram and P.L. Chapman, "Comparison of photovoltaic array
generation radiation hard products," in E3S Web of Conferences, 2017, maximum power point tracking techniques," IEEE Trans.Energy
pp. 03005. Convers., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 439-449 2007.
[99] Azurspace state-of-the-art solar cells [Online] Available: [120] P.S. Padma, A. Radhika and V.T. Deepika, "MPPT and SEPIC based
http://www.azurspace.com/index.php/en/products/products- controller development for energy utilisation in cubesats," in 2012
space/space-solar-cells [Online]. Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON), 2012, pp. 143-148.
[100] SolAero space solar cells / coverglass interconnected cells (cic) [Online] [121] D.K. Sharma and G. Purohit, "Advanced perturbation and observation
Available: https://solaerotech.com/products/space-solar-cells- (P&O) based maximum power point tracking (MPPT) of a solar photo-
coverglass-interconnected-cells-cic/ [Online]. voltaic system," in 2012 IEEE 5th India International Conference on
[101] C. Fetzer, B. Jun, K. Edmondson, S. Khemthong, K. Rouhani, R. Power Electronics (IICPE), 2012, pp. 1-5.
Cravens, R. Bardfield and M. Gillanders, "Production ready 30% [122] N. Femia, G. Petrone, G. Spagnuolo and M. Vitelli, "Optimization of
efficient triple junction space solar cells," in 2008 33rd IEEE perturb and observe maximum power point tracking method," IEEE
Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2008, pp. 1-4. transactions on power electronics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 963-973 2005.
[102] D.C. Law, X.Q. Liu, J.C. Boisvert, E.M. Redher, C.M. Fetzer, S. [123] V. Knap, L.K. Vestergaard and D. Stroe, "A review of battery technology
Mesropian, R.R. King, K.M. Edmondson, B. Jun and R.L. Woo, "Recent in CubeSats and small satellite solutions," Energies, vol. 13, no. 16, pp.
progress of Spectrolab high-efficiency space solar cells," in 2012 38th 4097 2020.
IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2012, pp. 3146. [124] B. Abdi, A. Alimardani, R. Ghasemi and S. Mirtalaei, "Energy storage
[103] Spectrolab space qualified solar cells. [Online] Available: selection for leo satellites," International Journal of Machine Learning
https://www.spectrolab.com/photovoltaics.html [Online]. and Computing, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 287 2013.
[104] P.T. Chiu, D.C. Law, C.M. Fetzer, M. Haddad, S. Mesropian, R. [125] Loren Grush. (Aug 17,). NASA is prepared if a battery ever explodes in
Cravens, P.H. Hebert, J.H. Ermer and J.P. Krogen, "Qualification of 32% space [Online]. available:
BOL and 28% EOL Efficient XTE Solar Cells," in 2019 IEEE 46th https://www.theverge.com/2018/8/17/17681422/nasa-lithium-ion-
Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2019, pp. 1506-1509. batteries-thermal-runaway-human-spaceflight.

[126] J. Bouwmeester and J. Guo, "Survey of worldwide pico-and nanosatellite [148] I. Fajardo, A.A. Lidtke, S.A. Bendoukha, J. Gonzalez-Llorente, R.
missions, distributions and subsystem technology," Acta Astronaut., vol. Rodríguez, R. Morales, D. Faizullin, M. Matsuoka, N. Urakami and R.
67, no. 7-8, pp. 854-862 2010. Kawauchi, "Design, implementation, and operation of a small satellite
[127] S.C. Levy and P. Bro, Battery hazards and accident prevention, Springer mission to explore the space weather effects in LEO," Aerospace, vol. 6,
Science & Business Media, 1994. no. 10, pp. 108 2019.
[128] K.B. Chin, E.J. Brandon, R.V. Bugga, M.C. Smart, S.C. Jones, F.C. [149] M.A. Diaz, J.C. Zagal, C. Falcon, M. Stepanova, J.A. Valdivia, M.
Krause, W.C. West and G.G. Bolotin, "Energy storage technologies for Martinez-Ledesma, J. Diaz-Pena, F.R. Jaramillo, N. Romanova and E.
small satellite applications," Proc IEEE, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 419-428 Pacheco, "New opportunities offered by cubesats for space research in
2018. latin america: The SUCHAI project case," Advances in Space Research,
[129] C.S. Clark, A.D. Hill and M. Day, "Commercial nickel cadmium vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 2134-2147 2016.
batteries for space use: a proven alternative for LEO satellite power [150] G. Xin, F. Zhan-Zu, C. Xin-Yu, Y. Sheng-Sheng and Z. Lei,
storage," in Proceedings of the Fifth European Space Power Conference "Performance evaluation and prediction of single-junction and triple-
(ESPC), 1998, pp. 715. junction GaAs solar cells induced by electron and proton irradiations,"
[130] B.T. Schneidegger, "Performance characterization of high energy IEEE Trans.Nucl.Sci., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1838-1842 2014.
commercial lithium-ion cells," 2010. [151] S. Sato, H. Miyamoto, M. Imaizumi, K. Shimazaki, C. Morioka, K.
[131] V. McLaren, C. Clark, E. Simon and B. Hendel, "Lithium ion polymer Kawano and T. Ohshima, "Degradation modeling of InGaP/GaAs/ge
cell for small satellites," in Proceedings of the NASA Battery Workshop, triple-junction solar cells irradiated with various-energy protons," Solar
2008. Energy Mater.Solar Cells, vol. 93, no. 6-7, pp. 768-773 2009.
[132] C. Yeh, S. Wu, T. Huang, Y. Tsai, J. Juang and K. Wu, "Certification of [152] J. Meng, J. Feng, Q. Sun, Z. Pan and T. Liu, "Degradation model of the
Lithium-ion Cells with Electrical Power Subsystem for CubeSat," in 7th orbiting current for GaInP/GaAs/ge triple-junction solar cells used on
Nano-Satellite Symposium and the 4th UNISEC-Global Meeting, 2016. satellite," Solar Energy, vol. 122, pp. 464-471 2015.
[133] M. Uno, K. Ogawa, Y. Takeda, Y. Sone, K. Tanaka, M. Mita and H. [153] H.K. Kim and C.Y. Han, "Analytical and numerical approaches of a solar
Saito, "Development and on-orbit operation of lithium-ion pouch battery array thermal analysis in a low-earth orbit satellite," Advances in space
for small scientific satellite “REIMEI”," J.Power Sources, vol. 196, no. research, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1427-1439 2010.
20, pp. 8755-8763 2011. [154] K.B. Narayana and V.V. Reddy, "Thermal design and performance of
[134] R. Nader, M. Uriguen, S. Drouet and G. Nader Drouet, "High Energy HAMSAT," Acta Astronaut., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 7-16 2007.
Density Battery Array for CubeSat Missions," in Proceedings of the 67th [155] M. Lee, D. Kim and Y. Chang, "Thermal analyses and verification for
International Astronautical Congress, Guadalajara, Mexico, 2016, pp. HAUSAT-2 small satellite," Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences,
26-30. vol. 23, pp. 39-54 2006.
[135] M. Alkali, M.Y. Edries, A.R. Khan, H. Masui and M. Cho, "Design [156] S. Sanchez-Sanjuan, J. Gonzalez-Llorente and R. Hurtado-Velasco,
considerations and ground testing of electric double-layer capacitors as "Comparison of the incident solar energy and battery storage in a 3U
energy storage components for nanosatellites," Journal of small CubeSat satellite for different orientation scenarios," Journal of
satellites, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 387-405 2015. Aerospace Technology and Management, vol. 8, pp. 91-102 2016.
[136] T. Aburouk, S. Kim, H. Masui and M. Cho, "Design, fabrication, and [157] S. Corpino, M. Caldera, F. Nichele, M. Masoero and N. Viola, "Thermal
testing of an electrical double-layer capacitor-based 1U CubeSat design and analysis of a nanosatellite in low earth orbit," Acta Astronaut.,
electrical power system," J.Small Satell., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 701-717 2018. vol. 115, pp. 247-261 2015.
[137] K.B. Chin, G.S. Bolotin, M.C. Smart, S. Katz, J.A. Flynn, N.K. Palmer,
E.J. Brandon and W.C. West, "Flight demonstration of a hybrid
battery/supercapacitor energy storage system in an earth orbiting BIOGRAPHY
CubeSat," IEEE Aerosp.Electron.Syst.Mag., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 24-36
2021. Mohammad Yaqoob received the B.S degree
[138] J. Gonzalez-Llorente, A.A. Lidtke, K. Hatanaka, L. Limam, I. Fajardo in electrical engineering from Balochistan
and K. Okuyama, "In-orbit feasibility demonstration of supercapacitors University of Engineering and Technology
for space applications," Acta Astronaut., vol. 174, pp. 294-305 2020. Khuzdar (BUETK), Pakistan in 2006 and the M.S
[139] N. Navarathinam, R. Lee and H. Chesser, "Characterization of lithium-
degree in telecommunication engineering from
polymer batteries for CubeSat applications," Acta Astronaut., vol. 68, no.
Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), Bangkok
11-12, pp. 1752-1760 2011.
Thailand in the year 2012. Currently, he is a Ph.D.
[140] C.S. Madhusudhana, J.K. Kishore and M. Koka, "Implementation of
integrated array controller and battery charger for small satellites,". student working on design, control, and power
[141] C.S. Madhusudhana and J.K. Kishore, "Performance metrics for management of small satellite microgrids in the
evaluating spacecraft Power Control and Management (PCM)," in 2013 Center for Research on Microgrids (CROM),
International Conference on Power, Energy and Control (ICPEC), 2013, Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg
pp. 484-488. University, Denmark. He has been the principal investigator of PNSS-1
[142] D. Homan and Q. Young, "The challenges of developing an operational (Pakistan National Student Satellite) Electrical Power System (EPS) at
nanosatellite," 2008. Balochistan University of Engineering and Technology Khuzdar where he is
[143] Small Spacecraft Systems Virtual Institute. (October). State-of-the-Art affiliated since 2007. From 2007 to 2013 he was a Lecturer where he tutored
Small Spacecraft Technology [Online]. available: several courses and supervised projects to the undergraduate students. From
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20210021263/downloads/2021_SOA 2013 onwards he was an Assistant Professor at the same University, and he has
_final_508_updated.pdf. also worked on the key administrative position of the Director, Quality
[144] E. ESA, "Tailored ecss engineering standards for in-orbit demonstration Enhancement Cell (QEC) for two years (2017-2018) in the same Institution.
cubesat projects," ESA, ESTEC: Noordwijk, The Netherlands 2016.
[145] NASA Education. Understanding Space Radiation [Online]. available:
https://go.nasa.gov/2A474ER.
[146] C. Leonard, "Challenges for electronic circuits in space applications," Abderezak Lashab (S’13-M’19) received the
Analog Devices, Inc.Available online: baccalaureate in 2007 with “honor”, ranked as the
https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/tech-
First in the high school Cheikh Ibrahim Bayoud,
articles/Challenges-for-Electronic-Circuits-in-Space-Applications.pdf
Constantine, Algeria. He received the bachelor’s
(accessed on 1 July 2018).
and master’s degrees in electrical engineering in
[147] Scott Thornton. Tin whiskers: What happens when they spontaneously
erupt? [Online]. available: https://www.microcontrollertips.com/when- 2010 and 2012, respectively, from Université des
tin-whiskers-spontaneously-erupt-faq/. Frères Mentouri Constantine 1, Constantine,
Algeria. He received the Ph.D. degree on

developing and investigating new converter topologies and control methods of microgrids applied to nanosatellites and closed ecological systems. Prof.
photovoltaic systems with and without storage in 2019 from the Department of sGuerrero is an Associate Editor for a number of IEEE TRANSACTIONS. He
Energy Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark. He is currently a has published more than 800 journal papers in the fields of microgrids and
Postdoctoral Researcher with the same university. renewable energy systems, which are cited more than 80,000 times. During
From the year 2013 to 2014, he served as an engineer in High Tech Systems eight consecutive years, from 2014 to 2021, he was awarded by Clarivate
(HTS). From 2014 to 2016, he was a Lecturer Assistant in the Université des Analytics (former Thomson Reuters) as Highly Cited Researcher with 55 highly
Frères Mentouri Constantine 1, where he helped in teaching several electrical cited papers. In 2021, he received the IEEE Bimal Bose Award for Industrial
engineering courses for undergraduate students. He was a Visiting Researcher Electronics Applications in Energy Systems, for his pioneering contributions to
at the Chair of Power Electronics, Kiel University, Germany from April to July renewable energy based microgrids.
2019. His current research interests include power electronics topologies,
modeling, and control for photovoltaic systems with and without storage.
He also serves as a Reviewer in the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON
INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER Marcos E. Orchard (M’06) Marcos E.
ELECTRONICS, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL Orchard is Professor with the Department of
INFORMATICS, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, Electrical Engineering at Universidad de Chile
IET Power Electronics, IET Electronics Letters, and several IEEE conferences. and Associate Researcher at the Advanced
Center for Electrical and Electronic Engineering
(UTFSM). He received the Ph.D. and M.S.
degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering
from The Georgia Institute of Technology,
JUAN C. VASQUEZ (Senior Member, Atlanta, GA, USA, in 2005 and 2007
IEEE) received the Ph.D. degree in automatic respectively. He has authored and co-authored
control, robotics, and computer vision from more than 100 papers on diverse topics,
Barcelona Tech-UPC, Spain, in 2009. In 2019, including the design and implementation of
he became a Full Professor with the Department failure prognostic algorithms, statistical process monitoring and system
of Energy Technology, Aalborg University, identification. His research work at the Georgia Institute of Technology was the
Denmark. He was a Visiting Scholar with the foundation of novel real-time failure prognosis approaches based on particle
Center of Power Electronics Systems (CPES), filtering algorithms. His current research interests include the study of
Virginia Tech, and theoretical aspects related to the implementation of real-time failure prognosis
a Visiting Professor at Ritsumeikan University, algorithms, with applications to battery management systems, electromobility,
Japan. He is currently the Vice Director of the mining industry, and finance.
Center for Research on Microgrids (see Dr. Orchard is a Fellow of the Prognostic and Health Management Society.
crom.et.aau.dk). He has published more than
500 journal articles in the _eld of microgrids, which in total are cited more than
30,000 times. His current research interests include operation, advanced
hierarchical and cooperative control, optimization, and energy management Angelina Bintoudi received the Diploma
applied to distributed generation in AC/DC microgrids, maritime microgrids,
Degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering
advanced metering infrastructures, and the integration of the Internet of Things
from the Faculty of Technology of Aristotle
and energy internet into the smart grid. He is also an Associate Editor of IET
University of Thessaloniki in July 2013. From
Power Electronics, the IEEE SYSTEM JOURNAL, and a Guest Editor of a
Special Issue in the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL July 2014 until June 2015, she worked in an
INFORMATICS ON ENERGY INTERNET. Since 2017, Thomson Reuters Italian private company as designer of power
awarded Prof. Vasquez as Highly Cited Researcher. He was a recipient of the supplies and power processing units for
Young Investigator Award, in 2019. aerospace applications, under projects of the
European Space Agency.
Since October 2015, she has been a PhD
candidate in the Electrical Machines & Power
Josep M. Guerrero (S’01-M’04-SM’08- Electronics Laboratory of the Department of Electrical Energy of the School of
FM’15) received the B.Sc. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Aristotle University of Thessaloniki,
telecommunications engineering, the M.Sc. Greece. Her dissertation topic is the design and control of space microgrids.
degree in electronics engineering, and the Ph.D. Angelina is employed in the Informatics and Technology Institute (I.T.I.) of
degree in power electronics from the Technical the Centre for Research and Technology - Hellas (CE.R.T.H.) since June 2017.
University of Catalonia, Barcelona, in 1997, She has participated as a senior engineer in more than six H2020 projects, three
2000 and 2003, respectively. Nowadays he is of which she has technically managed.
working towards the M.Sc. Degree in Her research interests include Space Microgrids, Stand-alone power
Psychobiology and Cognitive Neuroscience at systems, AC and DC microgrids, Optimization, Multi-Agent Systems. She has
the Autonomous University of Barcelona. been serving as a Reviewer in several IEEE, IET and Elsevier Journals.
Since 2011, he has been a Full Professor with
AAU Energy, Aalborg University, Denmark,
where he is responsible for the Microgrid
Research Program. From 2019, he became a Villum Investigator by The Villum
Fonden, which supports the Center for Research on Microgrids (CROM) at
Aalborg University, being Prof. Guerrero the founder and Director of the same
center (www.crom.et.aau.dk).
His research interests is oriented to different microgrid frameworks in
applications like microgrid clusters, IoT-based and digital twin, maritime
microgrids for electrical ships, vessels, ferries and seaports, and space
J. M. Guerrero is with the Villum Center for Research on Microgrids J. M. Guerrero was supported by VILLUM FONDEN under the VILLUM
(CROM), AAU Energy, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg East, Denmark Investigator Grant (no. 25920): Center for Research on Microgrids
(Tel: +45 2037 8262; Fax: +45 9815 1411; e-mail: joz@energy.aau.dk). (CROM); www.crom.et.aau.dk

A Comprehensive Review On Small Satellite Microgrids

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Comprehensive Review On Small Satellite Microgrids

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Comprehensive Review On Small Satellite Microgrids

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been

IEEE POWER ELECTRONICS REGULAR PAPER/LETTER/CORRESPONDENCE