Apprasial of Consumer Behaviour - A Case Study of "Café Coffee Day'' With Special Reference To Karnataka State
Apprasial of Consumer Behaviour - A Case Study of "Café Coffee Day'' With Special Reference To Karnataka State
Apprasial of Consumer Behaviour - A Case Study of "Café Coffee Day'' With Special Reference To Karnataka State
HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY: The Study intends to satisfy the following hypothesis
H1 Attitude of the consumer is positively related
H2 The perception of the consumers are certainly influenced on increase in profitability of the company
H3 Buying Behaviour is influenced by young and youth only
H4 Consumer buying behavior has significant influenced on consumer satisfaction.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: The study depends both on primary and secondary data. The primary
data is collected by administering a structured questionnaire to the respondents namely the customers of five
districts of Karnataka. The researcher has drawn 500 as the sample size for this purpose. A convenient
random sampling technique is adopted. The field study was carried out and data were collected through
interviews and administering questionnaires. The researcher is also depending on the secondary data. The
researcher made use of books, magazines, journals and newspapers of national and international repute and
related web sites to collect secondary data. The areas of excellence and improvement will be identified
based on factual information, in light of which recommendations and suggestions will be provided for the
overall improvement of the organization in the future. Chi-Square and ANOVA techniques were applied
whenever necessary to test the hypotheses and interpret the data elicited from the respondents.
LITERATURE REVIEW:
Philip Kotler (1965)2 opined that “all the models so far developed by various scientists should be used in an
integrated manner in order to understand the consumer in general. In his opinion, buying patterns are being
influenced by price, quality, availability, service, style, option and image. Depending on the product
involved, different variables and behavioural mechanisms assume different degrees of importance in
influencing the purchase decision process”
Mahajan (1980)3: In his study on ``inter-regional homogeneity of consumer behaviour in India revealed that
consumer behaviour markedly differ between the rural and urban sectors. It further revealed that inter
regional homogeneity in consumption seems to be realized at best in the case of North India and Central
India”.
Howard and Sheth(1980)4 describes`` consumer satisfaction as a related psychological state to appraise the
reasonableness between what a consumer actually gets and gives. It is also observed that consumer
satisfaction resulted from purchasing and using a certain product, which was made by a consumer to
compare the expected reward and the actual cost of the purchase”.
Holbrook (1982)5 opined that`` variety seeking or exploratory purchase behaviour is to be explained by
experimental or hedonic motives rather than by utilitarian aspects of consumption. Preference towards new
varieties has been identified as a determinant factor in brand switching”.
Peter and Nord (1982)6:said that the strategic emphases, of the behavioural modification theories, for
example, are to devise a set of expanded behaviour modification techniques (e.g., respondent conditioning;
operant conditioning; vicarious learning etc.) that can be used to influence, modify, and control consumer
behaviour.
Coleman (1983)7 examined that Products act as social symbols and are therefore significant of one’s social
class. Social classes are composed of individuals who share similar values, interests, and behaviours. People
within a given social class are approximately equal in terms of their social standing in the community. They
work in roughly similar occupations, and they tend to have similar lifestyles by virtue of their income levels
and common tastes. These people tend to socialize with one another and share many ideas and values
regarding the way life should be lived
TESTING OF HYPOTHESES: The results of the hypotheses are as follows:
H1: Attitude of the consumer is positively related: Attitudes are a major basic construct leading to behaviour.
Attitudes affect and influence the perception of products, brands, people, exposure to and comprehension of
information, choice of friends and so on. As consumers also develops certain attitudes towards products, services,
advertisements, other Medias of communication and choice of retail outlet. Attitudes are inner expression or
feelings that reflect whether a person is favorably or unfavorably. It is observed that attitudes are not directly
observable and hence have to be inferred as what people say or what they do. 36 percent of male and 31.6 percent
of female respondents say attitude and belief on Café Coffee day products are best. 62.9 percent male and 66.2
percent of female respondents opined that products of Café coffee day is better. It is proved that almost majority of
the respondents are positively satisfied with café coffee day products. Most of the respondents have given an above
average ranking to the overall service and experience in the cafes. These values clearly indicate that the hypotheses
are accepted.
H2: The perceptions of the consumers are positively influenced on increase in profitability of the
company: An individual behaviour is often connected to his or her perceptions and may not be based on the
actual or reality. Perception is a mental process, whereby an individual selects objects or products from the
environment, organizes it and then draws significance or meaning from it.93.4 percent of male and 96.1
percent of female respondents influenced in taste, 93 percent of male and 93.4 percent of female respondents
expressed on Brand and 92.6 percent of male and 94.7 percent of female respondents are influenced on
service. 68.4 percent of male and 64.5 percent of female respondents expressed that the products of café
coffee day is better. In the best 13.2 percent of male and 13.6 percent of female supports. In satisfactory
level 18.4 percent male and 21.9 percent of female falls. It can be proved that overall perception of the
respondents is constructive. These standards point out that hypothesis is accepted.
H3: Buying Behaviour is influenced by young and youth only: Buyer Behaviour particularly is the study
of decision making units as they can buy for themselves or others. Thus, buying behaviour particularly
involves collective response of buyers for selecting, evaluating, and deciding and post purchase behaviour.
The buying behavior and purchase decisions are need to be studied thoroughly in order to understand,
predict and analyze critical market variations of a particular product or service.43.7 percent of male and 32.9
percent of female respondents who came forward to participate in the survey are in the age range of 21 to 30
years. 48.9 percent of male and 32 percent of female respondents are students. This shows that students play
a predominant role in cafes.38.6 percent and 36.8 percent of female respondents are the employees seen
more in cafes.CCD also mainly attracts teenagers and business people. It is proved that buying behaviour is
influenced the young age and youth only. The hypothesis is accepted.
H4: Consumer buying behaviour has significant influenced on customer satisfaction:Measuring
customer satisfaction over time is a difficult task. It is very difficult to satisfy the customers as there needs
and wants vary and they differ from one to another. 21.7 percent of male and 26.3 percent of female
respondents expressed that they are satisfied with café coffee day products.19.5 percent of male and 15.4
percent of female respondents say that the quality of café coffee day is satisfied. This shows the respondents
are satisfied in service and quality. It is proved that the respondents are not fully satisfied with the factor of
buying the products of café coffee day. Some factors like price, quality quantity etc also very much matters
for the customers to buy the products and get satisfied. These values clearly indicate that the hypothesis is
not accepted.
SUGGESTIONS: The suggestions are in general to the community and specific for cafes.
CCD mainly attracts teenagers, business meetings but it’s aspire must be to attract everyone
To increase awareness among consumers and to achieve best in business, CCDshould sponsor
Cricket matches or TV shows.
CCD should open luxurious cafes at prominent places of high way to attract high end customers.
CCD should concentrate on the important aspect location that to Right location in highway.
CCD should try to establish itself as “Coffee House of India” by bringing more items according to
Indian taste and try to enter rural India to generate best business in India.
CCD Should focus more and more on quality and service.
CCD should match the trend. “The growth of outlets will be across formats. Lounges are the latest
and recent format introduced by the company, 20 CCD lounges across India; it has to be increased to
compete with the other cafes.
The café must be placed in every possible location where some business can be generated. The best
way to increase business is to locate cafes in educational institutions and corporate campus.
Customers are always into varieties and wide choice so café should make sure to satisfy them with
varieties and best choice.
Good hospitality and Consistent service at all outlets in cafes.
Cafes should have more and more tie-ups.
Café Coffee Day quality of service, ambience, pricing and location, to be very fine which proves
that still Café Coffee Day need to do lot of homework in order to satisfy its customers.
The cafes should reflect on the feed back form of the customers in order to bring lot of changes.
Service by the employees is quite satisfactory but the order process delivery process, need to be
altered.
Conclusion:
Conditions of competition are changing rapidly today and companies that strategize and react to
these changes promptly and quickly are the most successful. Due to technological developments,
physical differences of products have decreased. Differentiation should be made on the meanings
products bear instead of on their physical features. A successful brand differentiation can be possible
by building personality. Thanks to brand personality, consumer sees brand as friend since it provides
him with emotional benefits. Overall, it is argued that the study of consumer behaviour is rapidly
evolving as researchers recognize and implement new techniques and transdisciplinary perspectives
to understand the nature of purchase and consumption behaviour. This wider view attempts to study
consumer behaviour in the light of rapidly evolving lifestyles, values, priorities, and social contexts.
Various theories on consumer research were not tested empirically until the middle twentieth
century. The distinctly practical emphasis awaited development of the field of marketing in the
business curriculum.
REFERENCES:
Alderson, W. (1965) Dynamic Marketing Behavior: A Functionalist Theory of Marketing,
Homewood, Illinois, Richard D. Irwin.
Philip Kotler, “Behavioral Models for Analyzing Buyers,” Journal of Marketing, October 1965,
Vol.29, Issue 4, pp. 37-45.
Vijay Mahajan. 1980. A Note on Procedures for Testing the Quality of a Clustering of a Set of
Objects. Decision Sciences 11, 669-677.A Theory of Buyer Behavior - JA Howard, JN Sheth 196
Holbrook,The experimental aspect ofConsumption Consumer Fantasies feelings.p.81-120 1982.
Michael L. Rothschild (1984) ,"Perspectives on Involvement: Future Directions", in Advances in
Consumer Research Volume 11, eds. Thomas C. Kinnear, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer
Research, Pages: 216-217.
Coleman 1983camping Trailer Prices and Specialized.p133-148 Consumer consumption.
Jean-Noel Kapferer and Gilles Laurent (1985) ,"Consumers' Involvement Profile: New Empirical
Results", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 12, eds. Elizabeth C. Hirschman and
Moris B. Holbrook, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 290-295.
Glukman, L. R., 1986, A consumer approach to branded wines. European Journal of Marketing,
20(6): 21-31.
Engel.LP. Blackwell. R.D. and Milliard.P.W. (1986), Consumer Behavior, 5th ed. Dryden
Press,Chicago. IL.
David M. Andrus, Edward Silver, Dallas E. Johnson, (1986) "status brand management and gift
purchase: a discriminant analysis", Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 3 Iss: 1, pp.5 – 13.
Rout, K.C. 1987. Consumer’s attitude towards advertising. Indian Journal Market. Vol.31 (4):p.10-15.