LCPC Assessment Form 001-B

(for City/Municipality)
City/Municipal Council for the Protection of Children (C/MCPC)
Functionality Assessment Tool
City/Municipality: _______________________ Region: ___________________________
Province: ______________________________ Assessment Year: __________________

Note: Please put a (✓) check mark on the appropriate box if applicable.

Indicator - ✓ 1.00 ✓ 3.00 ✓ 5.00 ✓

ORGANIZATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY (20%)
C/MCPC Organization C/MCPC is not organized Organized C/MCPC in
accordance with DILG MC
through an EO or Local Ordinance

Child Representation in the No Child Representative in the Child Representative is appointed/ Child Representative is selected Child Representative from
C/MCPC C/MCPC designated through Children’s congress different sectors [inclusivity]

Meetings No quarterly meeting conducted Less than four quarterly meetings Four quarterly meetings Conducted four quarterly
conducted with the ff agenda: conducted with aforementioned meetings with aforementioned
- planning agenda agenda plus two CFLGA meetings
- implementation review
- monitoring and status of action
points from previous meetings

Less than 50% of the issues 50-70% of the issues identified in 71-90% of the issues identified in 91-100% of the issues identified in
identified in the profiling /SitAn the profiling /SitAn discussed and the profiling/ SitAn discussed and the profiling/ SitAn discussed and
discussed and resulted into a resulted into a Resolution/ resulted into a Resolution/ resulted into a Resolution/
Resolution/ Recommendation for Recommendation for Action Recommendation for Action Recommendation for Action
Action

Less than 50% member 50-70% member attendance in all 71-90% member attendance in all 91-100% member attendance in
attendance in all meetings meetings meetings all meetings

Capacity Building No capacity building [plan] for 50-70% of C/MCPC members 71-90% of C/MCPC members 91-100% of C/MCPC members
C/MCPC members trained or received at least 1 trained or received at least 1 trained or received at least 1
capacity development training capacity development training capacity development training

No capacity building [plan] for 50-70% of BCPCs trained or 71-90% of BCPCs trained or 91-100% of BCPCs trained or
lower level LCPC [BCPCs] received at least 1 capacity received at least 1 capacity received at least 1 capacity
development training development training development training

POLICIES AND PLANS FOR CHILDREN (30%)

Database on children No database on children Established consolidated Established consolidated and Established disaggregated
database on children disaggregated database on database with situational analysis
children of children

Local State of Children Report No LSCR LSCR prepared in accordance LSCR delivered in the State of LSCR included in the C/MLGU
(LSCR) with the DILG template (MC 2009- City/Municipal Address (SOCA/ Annual Accomplishment Report
106) SOMA)/ National Children's Month and submitted to higher LCPC
(NCM) [PCPC]

Page 1 of 3
 Indicator - ✓ 1.00 ✓ 3.00 ✓ 5.00 ✓
Local Development Plan for No LDPC LDPC prepared considering (a) LDPC presented and approved by LDPC integrated/ mainstreamed
Children (LDPC) [or midterm other sectoral plans, (b) the Local Sanggunian in the Comprehensive
plan for 3 years] consultation with children, and (c) Development Plan (CDP)
a monitoring and evaluation
(M&E) plan

LDPC % accomplishment Below 50% accomplishment 50-70% accomplishment 71-90% accomplishment 91-100% accomplishment

Annual Work and Financial Plan No AWFPC Prepared AWFPC and approved AWFPC presented/recommended AWFPC integrated in the Local
for Children (AWFPC) by the LCE to the Local Finance Committee Annual Investment Program (AIP)
[budgeted]

AWFPC % accomplishment Below 50% accomplishment 50-70% accomplishment 71-90% accomplishment 91-100% accomplishment

Local Code for Children (LCC) No LCC With exisiting and approved LCC Existing LCC updated in the last LCC implementation is monitored
five years
Child Protection Policy (CPP) No CPP Drafted and approved CPP CPP utilized and monitored within Issuance of Ordinance directing
the LGU concerned private sector/org to
have its own CPP

Formulation of Policy/ No policy/resoulution issuance Prepared at least two P/R/R Presented P/R/R to the Local At least two P/R/R enacted within
Resolution/ Recommendation based on identified need of Sanggunian for approval the term of the C/MCPC
children
Advocacy Actvities No advocacy activity undertaken At least 1 advocacy or At least 2 advocacy or At least 1 advocay activity based
dissemination activitiy related to dissemination activities related to on the issues identified in the
increasing awareness on increasing awareness on available data on children
protection and promotion of protection and promotion of - to detail, issue being addressed,
children’s rights conducted children’s rights conducted target beneficiary, chosen
platform

BUDGET FOR THE C/MCPC (20%)

C/MCPC Budget Allocation below 1% 1% for C/MCPC strengthening Additional budget for the C/MCPC

Budget Utilization Below 50% utilization rate 50-70% utilization rate 71-90% utilization rate 90-100% utilization rate

SERVICE DELIVERY MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT FOR CHILDREN (30%)

Individualized folder of children’s Zero percentage of violation of
cases confidentiality

Referral System in place Functional referral system for

CNSP
Less than 50% of CNSP cases 50-70% of CNSP cases provided 71-90% of CNSP cases provided 91-100% of CNSP cases provided
provided with services/ referred to with services/referred to with services/referred to with services/ referred to
appropriate office appropriate office appropriate office appropriate office

Activated CICL and CAR

Less than 50% of CICL cases 50-70% of CICL cases 71-90% of CICL cases 91-100% of CICL cases
Registry
documented in CICL Registry documented in CICL Registry documented in CICL Registry documented in CICL Registry
Diversion Program No diversion program in-place Less than 50% of diversion 51%-100% Percentage of Zero percentage of reoffending of
proceedings conducted to all successful diversion all successful diversion programs
diversional cases by BCPC

Assessed by:

Name and Position/Designation Name and Position/Designation Name and Position/Designation Name and Position/Designation Name and Position/Designation
Chairperson, R/PIMTF Vice-Chairperson, R/PIMTF Member, R/PIMTF Member, R/PIMTF Member, R/PIMTF
Page 2 of 3
 Indicator - ✓ 1.00 ✓ 3.00 ✓ 5.00 ✓
Date: ____________________

Page 3 of 3