Program Implementation Review
Program Implementation Review
I. SUMMARY
1. Overall assessment
Provide an overview of whether the program is successful or not in terms
of the extent of program achievements and the performance of program
management.
2. Lessons learnt
Provide a summary of what have to be done differently to rectify the
shortcomings of the programs under review and to improve the
delivery/implementation of future programs
3. Follow-up actions
Provide a high-level action plan to implement the recommendations.
II. BACKGROUND
1. Program background
State the key points for implementing the program under review, its
objectives, expected outcomes and deliverables, and the key
stakeholders involved.
2. Review objectives and scope of assessment
State what the PIR aimed to accomplish and the program areas
examined in the review.
3. Formation of review team
State the review team composition.
NAME ROLES IN THE REVIEW RELATIONSHIP WITH THE
TEAM PROGRAM
Name of the team member State the role in the review State the relationship with the
team, e.g., review team program under review, for
leader, review team member, example, original program,
etc. team member, independent
third party, etc.
4. Review methodology
Describe the review methodology, including the performance measures
used to evaluate program performance. Describe the data collection
approach.
The review team can use the following table to summarize the review methodology.
PROGRAM OUTCOMES PERFORMANCE DATA COLLECTION
MEASURES APPROACH
State the program outcomes Short description of the State the data collection
to be measured performance measures used method
2. Program management
Describe the program management performance.
ASPECTS EXPECTED ACTUAL REASONS FOR
PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE DEVIATIONS
Scope State the deliverables State the actual Explain the reasons
expected outputs delivered for deviations
Cost/budget State the expected State the actual Explain the reasons
program expenditure program expenditure for deviations
and staff resources and staff resources
required used
Time State the expected State the actual Explain the reasons
program completion program completion for deviations
date (including for the date (including for the
key milestones) key milestones)
Quality State the expected State the actual Explain the reasons
quality standards quality standards for deviations
V. ANNEX
1. GAP ANALYSIS
A. Identify the current state
Know where you are at the present time. Be clear as to what is
being described and what is not. This will avoid scope creep and
keep your analysis focused. Then comes collecting contextual
information. That means collecting qualitative information, such as
what are your team processes/action plans and methodologies.
B. Identify where you want to go
a. Mark the point(s) in the future that you’re aiming for. Think about
where that should be, what’s not happening that needs to happen,
what could be happening that hasn’t before or has changed, and
what needs to happen to get there.
C. Identify the Gaps
a. Ask yourself questions that are applicable to your program and
answer them honestly.
D. Bridge the Gap
a. Devise a way to close the gap.
b. Follow the guidelines of basing all improvements on the information
you discovered when you identified the gap.
c. Consider the cost of implementation for each solution that you come
up with; you might not have the capital or capacity to achieve it.
d. Figure out the date at which the gap will be closed. If you don’t have
a deadline, it will get overlooked or ignored.
(NOTE: It’s important not to try and close too many gaps at once. If you put too much stress on
any program, it’s going to break.)
Strengths Weaknesses
Internal
Identify internal strengths Identify internal weaknesses
Opportunities Threats
External
Identify external opportunities Identify external threats
P
POLITICAL
E
ECONOMIC
S
SOCIAL
T
TECHNOLOGICAL
L
LEGAL
E
ENVIRONMENTAL
C. DISCUSSION
Discuss how to manage the SWOT results and PESTEL factors with the
highest impact which are the biggest threat to achieving our strategy in
your program.