Left Invariant Vector Fields of A Class of Top Spaces: N. Ebrahimi

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Left invariant vector fields of a class of top spaces

N. Ebrahimi

Abstract. The notion of top space as a generalization of Lie group is


defined in [1] and the case with finite number of identities was studied in [2,
3, 4]. In this paper we investigate top spaces whose right/left translations
are diffeomorphisms. These top spaces - called right/left top spaces may
have an infinite number of identities. A characterization of right top spaces
is given in Section 2, where we prove that left/right invariant vector fields
of this kind of top spaces form a Lie algebra, whose dimension is equal
to the rank of the left shift mapping lg , for any g from the top space.
In Section 3, a relation between the Lie algebra of a top space and the
Lie algebra of a spatial class of Lie groups is presented. In Section 4 the
quotient space of right top spaces and the generalized action of a top space
on a manifold are defined and discussed.

M.S.C. 2010: 22A15, 22E60.


Key words: top space; Lie group; left invariant vector field; Lie algebra; Rees matrix.

1 Introduction
Lie groups were initially introduced as a tool to solve or simplify ordinary and partial
differential equations, and found numerous applications in Physics. The notion of
top space as a generalization of Lie group was considered in [1]. We recall first its
definition.

Definition 1.1. A top space T is a smooth manifold admitting an operation called


multiplication, subject to the following set of rules:

• (xy)z = x(yz) for all x, y, z ∈ T ;


• for each x ∈ T there exists a unique z ∈ T such that xz = zx = x (we denote z
by e(x));
• for each x ∈ T there exists y ∈ T such that xy = yx = e(x) (we denote y by
x−1 );
• the mapping m1 : T → T is defined by m1 (x) = x−1 and the mapping m2 :
T × T → T is defined by m2 (x, y) = xy are smooth maps;
• e(xy) = e(x)e(y) for all x, y ∈ T .

Applied Sciences, Vol.14, 2012, pp.


37-44.
c Balkan Society of Geometers, Geometry Balkan Press 2012.
°
38 N. Ebrahimi

We denote the left translation and the right translation associated to an element
g ∈ T , the maps lg : T → T and rg : T → T , respectively defined by

lg (p) = gp; rg (p) = pg, ∀p ∈ T.

A vector field X on a top space T is called a left invariant vector field if (lg )∗ (X(p)) =
X(lg (p)), where p, g ∈ T . Right invariant vector fields are similarly defined by sub-
stituting rg with lg .
Note that left and right translations in Lie groups are diffeomprphisms, while top
spaces don’t generally have this property. Suppose that T is a top space such that
T t = T , for some t ∈ T , where T t = {gt : g ∈ T }. The following theorem implies that
rt is a diffeomorphism for all t ∈ T . In particular, re(t) = id, for all t ∈ T .
f , then T t = T g, where t, g ∈ T . In particular,
Theorem 1.1. [1] If T t ∩ T g 6= ¡
T t = T e(t).
Definition 1.2. A top space T is called a right (left) top space if T t = T (tT = T ),
for some t ∈ T .
There exist right(left) top spaces with an infinite number of identities.
Example 1.3. [1] The n- dimensional torus T n = Rn /Zn with the product

((a1 , a2 , ..., an ) + Zn , (b1 , b2 , ..., bn ) + Zn ) = (a1 + b1 , a2 + b2 , ..., an−1 + bn−1 , an ) + Zn

is a top space. We have e((a1 , a2 , ..., an ) + Zn ) = (0, 0, ..., 0, an ) + Zn , and hence T n


has an infinite number of identities. Moreover, T n a = T n for all a ∈ T n .
Example 1.4. Suppose that G is a Lie group and that two smooth manifolds Λ
and I are given. If p : I × Λ → G is a smooth mapping, then Λ × G × I with the
product (λ, g, i)(λ1 , g1 , i1 ) = (λ, gp(i, λ1 )g1 , i1 ) is a top space, which is called Rees
matrix top space, and which is denoted by M (G, I, Λ, p) [1]. Suppose that I is an
one point set; then Λ × G × I ' Λ × G is a right top space, which we call right
Rees matrix, denoted by M (G, Λ, p). Further, we have e((λ, g)) = (λ, p(λ)−1 ) and
consequently card(e(Λ × G)) = card(Λ).

2 Lie algebra of right top spaces


It was proved that the set of left invariant vector fields of a top space T with a finite
number of identities form a Lie algebra [1]. The following theorem shows that the
same statement holds for right top spaces. Its proof is similar to the one from [5,
Proposition 3.7].
Theorem 2.1. The set of left invariant vector fields on the right top space T is a Lie
algebra under the Lie bracket operation.
Proof. We only need to show that a left invariant vector field is smooth. Let X be a
left invariant vector field and fix t ∈ T . X is determined by X(e(t)), since T e(t) = T .
If f ∈ C ∞ (T ) then

(2.1) Xf (g) = Xf (ge(t)) = (lg )∗ X(e(t))f = X(e(t))(f ◦ lg ).


Left invariant vector fields of a class of top spaces 39

Let Y be a smooth vector field on T such that Y (e(t)) = X(e(t)). We define the
following smooth functions on T :

i1e(t) : T → T × T, i1e(t) (h) = (h, e(t))


i2g : T → T × T, i2g (h) = (g, h).

We note that (0, Y ) is a smooth vector field on T × T . Consequently [(0, Y )(f ◦ m2 )] ◦


i1e(t) is a smooth function. Then we have

[(0, Y )(f ◦ m2 )] ◦ i1e(t) (g) = (0, Y )(g, e(t))(f ◦ m2 )


= 0(g)(f ◦ m2 ◦ i1e(t) ) + Y (e(t))(f ◦ m2 ◦ i2g )
= X(e(t))(f ◦ m2 ◦ i2g ) = X(e(t))(f ◦ lg ).

Hence (2.1) implies that Xf is a smooth function, and consequently X is smooth. ¤

Theorem 2.2. Let T be a right top space. Then:

• rank(lt ) is constant for all t ∈ T ;


• rank(lt ) =rank(lt0 ) for all t, t0 ∈ T .

Proof. Suppose that rank(lt ) = k at g and rank(lt0 ) = k 0 at g 0 . Let Xi (g), i = 1, 2, ..., k


be independent tangent vectors such that their images under (lt )∗ remain indepen-
dent.P We note that (lp )∗ Xi (g), i = 1, 2, ..., Pk, for all p ∈ T are Pindependent, since
if
P a i (lp )∗ (X i (g)) = 0 and then (ltp−1 ) ∗ a i (lp )∗ (X i (g)) = ai (lte(p) )∗ Xi (g) =
ai (lt )∗ Xi (g) = 0, and consequently aP i = 0 for i = 1, 2, ..., k. Hence (lg 0 g −1P )∗ Xi (g) ∈
T
P g 0 (T ), i = 1, ..., k, are independent. If a i (lt 0 )∗ ((lg 0 g −1 )∗ Xi (g)) = 0, then ai (ltt0−1 )∗ (lt0 )∗ ((lg0 g−1 )∗ Xi (g)) =
ai (ltg0 g−1 )∗ Xi (g) = 0, and consequently ai = 0 for i = 1, 2, ..., k. Therefore we have
k ≤ k 0 . In a similar way it can be proved that k 0 ≤ k. Hence k = k 0 . ¤

Theorem 2.3. Let T be a right top space with its Lie algebra τ . Then dim(τ ) =
rank(le(t) ), for all t ∈ T .

Proof. Let α : τ → Te(t) (T ) be the map defined by α(X) = X(e(t)), for some t ∈ T .
We show that α is an one to one homorphism of Lie algebras and that img(α) =
img((le(t) )∗ ). But α is injective, for if α(X) = α(Y ), then X(e(t)) = Y (e(t)). Since X
and Y are left invariant vector fields X(g) = (lg )∗ X(e(t)) = (lg )∗ Y (e(t)) = Y (g) for all
g ∈ T then consequently X = Y . Let X(e(t)) ∈ Te(t) (T ). If there exists a left invariant
vector field Y ∈ τ such that α(Y ) = X(e(t)), then Y (e(t)) = (le(t) )∗ Y (e(t)) = X(e(t)),
and consequently X(e(t)) ∈ img((le(t) )∗ ). Conversely, if X(e(t)) ∈ img((le(t) )∗ ),
then there exists Y (e(t)) ∈ Te(t) (T ) such that (le(t) )∗ Y (e(t)) = X(e(t)). Hence
(le(t) )∗ X(e(t)) = X(e(t)).
Now let X be the left invariant vector field which is determined by X(e(t)). Then
α(X) = X(e(t)). It is trivial to check that α is linear and preserves the bracket
operation. Hence α : τ → img((le(t) )∗ is an isomorphism and dim(τ ) = rank(le(t) ),
which concludes the proof. ¤

The following lemmas give a characterization of right top spaces.


40 N. Ebrahimi

Lemma 2.4. Let T be a right top space. Then e(T ) is embedded in T .

Proof. If t, g ∈ e(T ), then (lt |gT )−1 (t) = g. Since T = ∪g∈e(T ) gT , we have lt−1 (t) =
∪g∈e(T ) (lt |gT )−1 (t) = e(T ). Moreover, by theorem 2.2 rank(lt ) is constant and con-
sequently e(T ) is embedded in T . ¤

Lemma 2.5. The function e : T → T is a smooth map and has constant rank.

Proof. Since e = m2 ◦ (i × m1 ), then e is a smooth map. T is a right top space, and


hence e(p) = e(p)e(k) = e(pk) = e ◦ rk (p), for every p, k ∈ T and e∗ (p) = e∗ (pk) ◦
(rk )∗ (p). Since rk is a diffeomorphism, rank(e)(p) = rank(e)(pk) and consequently
rank(e) is constant on e−1 (e(p)) = pT . Lemma 2.4 implies that e : T → e(T ) is a
smooth map. Hence rank(e)(p) ≤ dim(e(T )), for all p ∈ T . In addition, e : e(T ) →
e(T ) is the identity map and consequently rank(e)(e(p)) = dim(e(T )), for all p ∈ T .
Hence e has constant rank on T . ¤

Lemma 2.6. Let T be a right top space. Then (tT, i) is embedded in T , for t ∈ T .
Moreover, tT is a Lie group.

Proof. Since tT = e−1 (e(t)) and the function e has constant rank, it is an embedded
submanifold of T . Therefore the maps m2 ◦ (i × i) : tT × tT → tT and m1 ◦ i : tT → tT
are smooth and tT is a Lie group. ¤

Theorem 2.7. Let T be a right top space. Then T is isomorphic with a right Rees
matrix.

Proof. Let t ∈ e(T ) and let the map p : e(T ) → tT be defined by p(s) = t, for every
s ∈ e(T ). We prove that the right Rees matrix M (tT, e(T ), p) is isomorphic with T .
Let α : T → e(T ) × tT be the map defined by α(g) = (e(g), tg), for every g ∈ T . α is
injective and surjective and α−1 : e(T ) × tT → T is given by α−1 (s, tg) = stg. α and
α−1 are smooth. In addition α(gg 0 ) = α(g)α(g 0 ), hence α is an isomorphism of top
spaces. ¤

3 One parameter subgroups of a right top space


We need to first introduce the definition of top space covering projection:

Definition 3.1. [2] Let T be a top space and let G be a topological group. Then a
covering projection P : T → G is called a top space covering projection, if P satisfies
the following conditions:

• P (t) = e, for all t ∈ e(T ), where e is identity element;


• P (t1 t2 ) = P (t1 )P (t2 ), for all t1 , t2 ∈ T .

Theorem 3.1. [3] If T is a top space with a finite number of identities, then there
exists a topological group G and a top space covering P : T → G.

Let T be a top space with finite number of identities. Since e−1 (e(t)), for every
t ∈ T , it is open and it is a Lie group. Theorem 2.3 of [3] implies that these Lie
groups are diffeomorphic. In addition, the proof of theorem 3.1 implies that P : T →
Left invariant vector fields of a class of top spaces 41

e−1 (e(t0 )), P (t) = e(t0 )te(t0 ) is a top space covering, for every t ∈ T . Hence the
following theorem shows that the Lie algebra of a top space T with a finite number
of identities and the Lie algebra of the Lie group e−1 (e(t0 )) are isomorphic.
Theorem 3.2. [2] If T is a top space with card(e(T )) < ∞, G is a Lie group and P :
T → G a top space covering projection, then there exists a one-to-one correspondence
between left invariant vector fields of G and left invariant vector fields of T . Moreover
the Lie algebra created by the Left invariant vector fields of T is isomorphic to the Lie
algebra of G.
In the remainder of this section we show that the Lie algebra of a right top space
T and tT = e−1 (e(t)) are isomorphic as well.
Definition 3.2. [2] Suppose that T is a top space. A curve ϕ : R :→ T is called a
one parameter subgroup of T if it satisfies the condition ϕ(t1 + t2 ) = ϕ(t1 )ϕ(t2 ), for
all t1 , t2 ∈ R.
Theorem 3.3. Suppose that T is a right top space then there is a correspondence
between one parameter subgroups of T and its left invariant vector fields.
Proof. Let ϕ : R → T be a one parameter subgroup. We have ϕ(s) = ϕ(0 + s) =
ϕ(0)ϕ(s) = ϕ(s)ϕ(0). Hence e(ϕ(s)) = ϕ(0), for all s ∈ R. Consequently, ϕ(R) ⊆
ϕ(0)T and ϕ is a one parameter subgroup of the Lie group ϕ(0)T . Hence there exists
a left invariant vector field corresponding to ϕ.
Conversely, suppose that X is a left invariant vector field on T ; then X defines
a local one parameter group action σ : W ⊆ R × T → T , such that σ(0, g) = g and
d
(σg )∗ ( dt |0 ) = X(g). We define ϕ : (−δ, δ) → T by ϕ(t) = σ(t, ϕ(0)), where ϕ(0) ∈
e(T ), and (−δ, δ) is such that (−δ, δ) × ϕ(0) ⊆ W . We show that if t, s, t + s ∈ (−δ, δ).
Then ϕ(t + s) = ϕ(t)ϕ(s). If the parameter s is fixed and σ(t, ϕ(s)) = ϕ(s)ϕ(t),
then we have σ(0, ϕ(s)) = ϕ(s)ϕ(0) = ϕ(s), since ϕ(0) ∈ e(T ) and T is a right top
space. In addition, σ satisfies the same differential equation for σ:
d d d
dt (σ(t, ϕ(s))) = dt (ϕ(s)ϕ(t)) = lϕ(s)∗ ϕ∗ ( dt |t ) = lϕ(s)∗ (X(ϕ(t)))
= X(ϕ(s)ϕ(t)) = X(σ(t, ϕ(s)).
By the uniqueness theorem of ordinary differential equation, we conclude that:
ϕ(t + s) = σ(t + s, ϕ(0)) = σ(t, σ(s, ϕ(0))) = σ(t, ϕ(s)) = ϕ(s)ϕ(t).
This implies that ϕ((−δ, δ)) ⊆ ϕ(0)T . Now it suffices to prove that (−δ, δ) = R. But
ϕ : (−δ, δ) → ϕ(0)T is smooth, since ϕ(0)T is imbedded in T . Hence X(ϕ(s)) ∈
Tϕ(s) ϕ(0)T . Consequently, X|ϕ(0)T is a smooth left invariant vector field on the Lie
group ϕ(0)T and we have (−δ, δ) = R. ¤
Theorem 3.4. Let T be a right top space. Then there exists a correspondence between
one parameter subgroups of tT , for every t ∈ e(T ) and one parameter subgroups of T .
Proof. Let t ∈ e(T ). Lemma 2.6 implies that tT is Lie group and lt : T → tT is a
smooth map. Then lt (g) = t, for g ∈ e(T ) and lt (t1 t2 ) = tt1 t2 = tt1 tt2 = lt (t1 )lt (t2 ).
Hence if α is a one parameter subgroup of T , then lt ◦ α is a one parameter S subgroup
of tT . In addition if α is a one parameter subgroup of tT then lt−1 (α) = g∈e(T ) gα.
For every g ∈ e(T ), gα, is a one parameter subgroup of T . ¤
42 N. Ebrahimi

Theorem 3.5. Let T be a right top space. Then there is a one to one correspondence
between left invariant vector fields of T and left invariant vector fields of tT , for
t ∈ e(T ). Moreover, the Lie algebra created by the left invariant vector fields of T is
isomorphic to the Lie algebra of tT .
Proof. If X is a left invariant vector field of T then by theorem 3.3 there is a one
parameter subgroup of T correspondence to X that ϕ(0) = t. Theorem 3.4 implies
that tϕ is a one parameter subgroup of tT . Since tT is a Lie group, then there exists
exactly one left invariant vector field in correspondence to tϕ. Conversely, if X is a
left invariant vector field on tT , then its one parameter group is contained in T and
by theorem 3.3 there exists a left invariant vector field correspondence to this one
parameter subgroup. ¤

4 Quotient space of right top spaces


We begin this section with the definition of a sub-top space.
Definition 4.1. A couple (N, ϕ) is a sub - top space of the top space T if:
• N is a top space;
• (N, ϕ) is a submanifold of T ;
• ϕ : N → T is a homomorphism.
For a sub - top space N of the top space T , we set Na = N ∩ e−1 (e(a)) and ΓN =
{a ∈ T |Na 6= ¡f }. Note that a sub - top space N of a right top space T is a right
top space too.
Lemma 4.1. Let (N, ϕ) be a sub - top space of the right top space T . Then ΓN is a
sub - top space of T .
Proof. e(N ) is an embedded submanifold of N by lemma 2.4. Since T is a right top
space we have T ' M (tT, e(T ), p) (see the proof of theorem 2.7 for details). Under this
isomorphism ΓN and the top space M (tT, e(N ), p) are in one to one correspondence.
(M (tT, e(N ), p), (ϕ ◦ i) × i) is a submanifold of M (tT, e(T ), p) and (ϕ ◦ i) × i is a
homomorphism. Hence (M (tT, e(N ), p), (ϕ◦i)×i) is a sub - top space of M (tT, e(T ), p)
and consequently ΓN is a sub - top space of T . ¤
Remark 4.2. We recall that T /N = ∪x∈Γ(N ) xNx [4]. Let T be a right top space
then xNx = xN , for if n ∈ N and x ∈ ΓN , xn = xe(x)n. Since T is a right top space
e(x)n ∈ e−1 (e(x)). In addition, e(x)n ∈ N , since x ∈ ΓN . Hence xn = xe(x)N ∈
xNx . The converse is trivial.
Theorem 4.2. Let (N, ϕ) be a closed sub - top space of the right top space T . Then
T /N has a manifold structure such that:
• π is smooth.
• There exist local smooth sections of T /N in ΓN , that is, if tN ∈ T /N then
there are a neighborhood W of tN and a smooth map τ : W → ΓN such that
π ◦ τ = id.
Left invariant vector fields of a class of top spaces 43

Proof. Theorem 2.7 implies that T 'α M (nT, e(T ), p) and N ' M (nN, e(N ), p), for
some n ∈ e(N ). In addition by using Lemma 4.1, α|ΓN : ΓN → M (nT, e(N ), p)
is an isomorphism. Note that nN = Nn and nT = Tn . Nn is a closed sub-
group of the Lie group Tn , since N is closed by assumption. Hence by theorem
3.58 of [5], Tn /Nn has a manifold structure such that π0 : Tn → Tn /Nn is smooth
and for every gNn ∈ Tn /Nn there exists a local section i.e, there are a neighbor-
hood W0 of gNn and a map τ0 : W0 → Tn such that π0 ◦ τ0 = id. A coset of
M (Tn , e(T ), p)/M (Tn , e(N ), p) is of form (m, gNn ), where m ∈ e(N ) and g ∈ Tn .
Hence M (Tn , e(T ), p)/M (Nn , e(N ), p) = e(N ) × Tn /Nn and consequently it has a
manifold structure. Under this manifold structure π1 = id × π0 is smooth. In ad-
dition if (m, gNn ) ∈ M (Tn , e(T ), p)/M (Nn , e(N ), p) then we define τ1 = (id, τ0 ) on
W1 = e(N ) × W0 . Now it is clear that τ1 ◦ π1 = id.
Let β : T /N → M (Tn , e(T ), p)/M (Nn , e(N ), p) be the map defined by β(xNx ) =
(e(x), nxNn ). We prove that β is a one to one correspondence. It is well defined, for if
xNx = yNy then e(x) = e(y). Remark 4.2 implies that xN = yN hence nxN = nyN
and consequently β(xNx ) = β(yNy ). It is one to one, since if β(xNx ) = β(yNy )
then e(x) = e(y) and nxN = nyN . Consequently xN = e(x)nxN = e(x)nyN =
yN . In addition β is on to, sine if (m, gNn ) ∈ M (Tn , e(T ), p)/M (Nn , e(N ), p) then
β(mgN ) = (m, ngNn ). Now β induces a manifold structure on T /N . Note that
π1 ◦α = β ◦π. Hence π is a smooth map. In addition if one define τ : β −1 (W1 ) → T /N
by τ = α−1 ◦ τ1 ◦ β. Then π ◦ τ = id and the proof is complete. ¤
Definition 4.3. A generalized left action of a top space T on a manifold M is a
smooth map λ : T × M → M such that:
• for each t1 and t2 ∈ T , λ(t1 , λ(t2 , m)) = λ(t1 t2 , m);
• for each m ∈ M and t ∈ T , λ(e(t), m) = m.
Definition 4.4. Let λ be an action on the top space T . Then H(m) = {t ∈ T :
λ(t, m) = m} is called the stabilizer of λ.
Remark 4.5. Let λ be a generalized left action of the top space T on the manifold
M . One can define for each m ∈ M and t ∈ T two maps which are related to λ:
• λm : T → M, λm (s) = λ(s, m) for every s ∈ T ;
• λt : M → M , λt (n) = λ(t, n) for every n ∈ M .
−1 −1
Note that λt ◦ λt = λt ◦ λt = id, and consequently λt is a diffeomorphism for
every t ∈ T . Moreover, H(m) = λ−1m (m). A generalized action λ is transitive if for
every n, m ∈ M there is t ∈ T such that λ(t, n) = m.
Theorem 4.3. Let T be a right top space and λ be a left action of T on the manifold
M . Then H(m) is a sub - top space of T .
Proof. Since T is a right top space, se(t) = s, for every s, t ∈ T . Hence λ(e(s), λ(s, m)) =
λ(s, λ(e(t), m)) and we have λe(s) ◦λm (s) = λs ◦λm (e(t)). Consequently (λe(s) )∗ (λm (s))◦
(λm )∗ (s) = (λs )∗ (λm (e(t)) ◦ (λm )∗ (e(t)). Since λe(s) and λs are diffeomorphisms
rank(λm ) in e(t) and s is equal. Hence rank(λm ) is constant and consequently
H(m) = λ−1 m (m) is an embedded submanifold. In addition it is a generalized group
and consequently it is a sub - top space. ¤
44 N. Ebrahimi

Theorem 4.4. [5] Let η : G × M → M be a transitive action of the Lie group G on


the manifold M on the left. Let m0 ∈ M , and let H be the stabilizer of m0 . Define a
mapping β : G/H → M by β(gH) = η(g, m0 ). Then β is a diffeomorphism.
Theorem 4.5. Let T be a right top space and θ : T × M → M be a transitive left
action. If H is the stabilizer of m0 , then there exists a diffeomorphism between T /H
and e(H) × M .
Proof. Since H is closed, theorem 4.2 implies that T /H is diffeomorphic with e(H) ×
Tn /Hh , for h ∈ e(H). We define θ0 : Th × M → M , θ0 (g, m) = θ(g, m), for every
g ∈ Th and m ∈ M . θ0 is a transitive left action, for if m, m0 ∈ M there is t ∈ T that
θ(t, m) = m0 . But the second condition of definition 4.2 implies that θ(ht, m) = m0 .
Hence θ0 (ht, m) = θ(ht, m) = m0 . Hh is the stabilizer of m0 for the action θ0 . Now
theorem 4.4 implies that β(e(h), gHh ) = (e(h), θ0 (g, m0 )) is a diffeomorphism. ¤
Acknowledgement. The author is grateful to Professor Mohammad Reza Molaei
for his productive comments. This research has been supported by Mahani Mathe-
matical Research Center.

References
[1] M. R. Molaei, Top spaces, J. Interdiscip. Math. 7, 2 (2004), 173-181.
[2] M. R. Molaei and M. R. Farhangdoost, Lie algebras of a class of top spaces,
Balkan J. Geom. Appl. 14, 1 (2009), 46-51.
[3] M. R. Molaei and M. R. Farhangdoost, Characterization of top spaces by diffeo-
morphic Lie groups, Differ. Geom. Dyn. Syst. 11 (2009), 130-134.
[4] M. R. Molaei, G. S. Khadekar and M. R. Farhangdoost, On Top spaces, Balkan
J. Geom. Appl. 11, 1 (2006), 101-106.
[5] F. Warner, Foundations of Differentiable manifolds and Lie groups, Springer,
1971.

Author’s address:
Neda Ebrahimi
Department of Mathematics,
Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman.
E-mail: n ebrahimi@mail.uk.ac.ir

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy