The rubric evaluates feasibility studies on content, clarity and organization of material, quality of presentation, and description of activities, actions, and resources. An excellent score of 5 requires an in-depth understanding evident from a presentation that goes beyond what is required, with clearly emphasized main points and examples. A score of 4 requires a very good understanding with clear information presentation and well-organized material. A score of 3 requires a good understanding with thorough and detailed knowledge presented in a somewhat clear and organized manner.
The rubric evaluates feasibility studies on content, clarity and organization of material, quality of presentation, and description of activities, actions, and resources. An excellent score of 5 requires an in-depth understanding evident from a presentation that goes beyond what is required, with clearly emphasized main points and examples. A score of 4 requires a very good understanding with clear information presentation and well-organized material. A score of 3 requires a good understanding with thorough and detailed knowledge presented in a somewhat clear and organized manner.
The rubric evaluates feasibility studies on content, clarity and organization of material, quality of presentation, and description of activities, actions, and resources. An excellent score of 5 requires an in-depth understanding evident from a presentation that goes beyond what is required, with clearly emphasized main points and examples. A score of 4 requires a very good understanding with clear information presentation and well-organized material. A score of 3 requires a good understanding with thorough and detailed knowledge presented in a somewhat clear and organized manner.
The rubric evaluates feasibility studies on content, clarity and organization of material, quality of presentation, and description of activities, actions, and resources. An excellent score of 5 requires an in-depth understanding evident from a presentation that goes beyond what is required, with clearly emphasized main points and examples. A score of 4 requires a very good understanding with clear information presentation and well-organized material. A score of 3 requires a good understanding with thorough and detailed knowledge presented in a somewhat clear and organized manner.
Organization Presentation of Activities’ of Material Actions and Resources Excellent dept of All information The explanations Identified all the understanding is was relevant and of choices made actions and evident clearly presented reveal a deep resources Presentation of The presentation awareness of needed to run the 5 materials was was extremely problem project. The further than whan well organized interpretation and articulation is was required. Main points were solving always detailed emphasized and processes and accurate. reinforced with appropriate examples Very Good The information Able to clearly Identified all the understanding of was clearly explain the actions and the topic. presented choices made in resources The presentation activities, needed to run the 4 was well resources and project. The organized timing articulation is always detailed and accurate
Good The information Able to Identified all the
understanding of was somewhat somewhat clearly actions and the topic clearly presented explain the resources Knowledge is The presentation choices made in needed to run the 3 thorough and was organized activities, project. The detailed resources and articulation is timing almost always detailed and accurate Basic The information Able to explain Identified the understanding of was somewhat only to a limited actions and the topic was vague extent the resources evident There was some choices made in needed to run the 2 organization activities, project, but their resources and articulation is not timing always detailed and accurate No The information Unable to explain Did not identify understanding of presented was The choices all the actions 1 the topic confusing made ina and resources ctivities, needed to run the resources and project timing