This document contains a rating scale for student teachers with categories for personality, lesson planning, content knowledge, teaching methods, classroom management, and questioning skills. Each category contains criteria that are rated on a scale of 1 to 3. The rating scale is used by a cooperating teacher to evaluate a student teacher's performance and provide an overall general average. Strengths and recommendations for improvement are also noted.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
373 views2 pages
Rating Scale
This document contains a rating scale for student teachers with categories for personality, lesson planning, content knowledge, teaching methods, classroom management, and questioning skills. Each category contains criteria that are rated on a scale of 1 to 3. The rating scale is used by a cooperating teacher to evaluate a student teacher's performance and provide an overall general average. Strengths and recommendations for improvement are also noted.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Republic of the Philippines
NUEVA VIZCAYA STATE UNIVERSITY
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION
RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT-TEACHERS
NAME OF STUDENT TEACHER: DATE: _____ SUBJECT MATTER: SUBJECT: NAME OF COOPERATING TEACHER: POSITION: NAME OF COOPERATING SCHOOL: ADDRESS:
EXPECTED TEACHER’S COMPETENCIES
1.0 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.0 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.0 I. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed B. The teacher is free from mannerisms that tend to disturb the student’s attention. C. The teacher’s personality is strong enough to command respect and attention D. The teacher shows dynamism and enthusiasm in teaching. E. The teacher has well-modulated voice. II. LESSON PLAN A. Lesson plan is well-prepared B. There is congruence between 1. Object and subject matter 2. Object and teaching procedure 3. Object and formative assessment 4. Object and assignment III. CONTENT A. The teacher demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the subject matter. B. She/he is able to relate lessons to actual life situation. C. Gives concrete and sufficient examples to create meaningful learning experiences. IV. TEACHING METHOD A. Methods used were suited to the needs and capabilities of the student. B. The teacher is creative enough to adopt his/her methods to the student’s capabilities. C. Instructional materials were used adequately to illustrate the lesson. D. The teacher made effective use of ATM (Available Test Measure) after teaching. V. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT A. The teacher had a systematic way of checking: 1. Attendance 2. Assignment 3. Practice exercises 4. Group works 5. Passing in and out of the room 6. Correcting, distributing, and collecting papers B. Order and discipline were present in the classroom. C. Appreciation/Recognition of good work and behavior was employed. D. Visual aids were within easy reach of the teacher during his/her teaching. VI. QUESTIONING SKILLS The teacher’s questioning skill stimulate discussion in different way such as: 1. Probing for learners understanding 2. Helping student articulate their ideas and thinking process 3. Promote risk-taking and problem solving 4. Facilitating factual recall 5. Encouraging convergent and divergent thinking 6. Stimulating curiosity 7. Helping students to ask question